HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-06-1993 etift/c. ZNINt.
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
• OCTOBER 6, 1993
7:30 P.M.
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Review and Approval of Minutes: September 1, 1993 (copy enclosed)
• 4. Citizens Requests and Comments from the Floor:
CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME
AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES
6. Staff Report
7. Chairman's Report
8. Adjournment
•
****************************************************************
APPLICANTS: YOUR ATTENDANCE AT THIS MEETING IS
REQUESTED. PLEASE NOTIFY CITY HALL AT 784-3055
IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND. THANK YOU.
****************************************************************
•
UNAPPROVED
• PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
September 1, 1993
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
The Mounds View Planning Commission was 1. Call To Order
called to order by Chair Mountin at 7 : 32
p.m. on September 1, 1993 .
MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Nelson, 2 . Roll Call
Peterson, Miller, and Chair Mountin.
Commissioners Ruggles and Stevenson had
excused absences.
ALSO PRESENT: Planner Harrington and
Recording Secretary Asleson.
Motion/Second: Miller/Peterson to 3 . Approval of
approve the minutes of August 4, 1993 as Minutes:
corrected. August 4, 1993
• 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
There were no resident requests or 4 . Resident
comments from the floor. Requests and
Comments
Planner Harrington reviewed this case, 5. Consideration
as it had not been discussed at an of Resolution
agenda session. The applicant wishes to No. 366-93 .
build a 400 square foot shed to store a Regarding
collector car and lawn equipment. Conditional Use
Permit Request
Commissioner Colleen arrived at 7: 36 for Oversize
p.m. Accessory
Building at
Donald Pederson, the applicant, was 8368 Spring
present and received a copy of the Lake Road,
proposed resolution. Planner Harrington Planning Case
also read. the proposed resolution out No. 368-93
loud and in full.
Commissioner Miller requested that the
recommendation include a prohibition on
placing an improved driveway to the
shed.
• Commissioner Nelson asked if this type
of Conditional Use Permit would be
R.
APPROVED
Mounds View Planning Commission September 1, 1993
•eu1ar Meeting Page 2
subject to a one year review. Planner
Harrington replied that the one year
review provision is usually reserved for
commercial uses, but that revocation of
the permit would occur if violations
were noted.
Motion/Second: Nelson/Colleen to
approve Resolution No. 366-93 ,
recommending approval of a Conditional
Use Permit for an oversized accessory
building at 8368 Spring Lake Road.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Tom Boulay of Husky, Inc. , gave the 6 . Consideration
presentation of this case. After the of Resolution
Planning Commission denied a variance No. 367-93 ,
for this car wash, this alternative plan Regarding
was designed. It meets all applicable Conditional Use
setback rules - now a Conditional Use Permit Request
Permit is needed. for a
• Chair Mountin requested that Planner PrefabricatedCar Wash at
Harrington read Chapter 40. 25 subd. C on 2390 Highway
the requirements for a Conditional Use 10, Planning
Permit. Case No. 362-93
Commissioner Miller asked how cars would
exit the property from the car wash.
Keith Carlson, of Gateway Foods,
answered that the cars would have the
option of exiting onto Highway 10,
Greenfield Avenue, or County Road H2 .
Commissioner Colleen asked about how the
stacking would be handled - would the
entrance to Highway 10 be blocked?
Planner Harrington stated that staff had
the applicant plan for about 1/2 hour
worth of washes, or about six cars.
These may block the Highway 10 entrance,
although this can be alleviated somewhat
by striping (such as Phillips 66 has
done) .
Chair Mountin asked about how the water
• drainage would be addressed - would an
additional water pump be needed?
UNAPPROVED
Mounds View Planning Commission September 1, 1993
"regular Meeting Page 3
Mr. Boulay answered that the blower will
rid cars of most of the water and that
there would be a heated apron at the car
wash exit.
Commissioner Miller inquired about the
adequacy of parking on the site.
Planner Harrington replied that no
additional off-street parking is
required for a car wash facility.
Commissioner Nelson asked Mr. Boulay if
the car wash had any space for outdoor
merchandising of accessories. Mr.
Boulay replied that there was no space
for this, although there will be pay-
per-use vacuums outside of the car wash.
These vacuums will not be attached to
the car wash nor will they be in the
stacking area. Chair Mountin asked that
the vacuum's placement be shown on the
final plans.
There was some discussion among the
Commissioners regarding the compati-
bility of the primary and secondary
uses, in this case being a convenience
store and .a car wash. The Commission
wished to avoid a scenario in the future
where the car wash would be an accessory
use to a fast food store, for example.
A condition was placed in the resolution
that nullifies the car wash permit if
the primary use of the property changes.
Motion/Second: , Nelson/Peterson to
approve Resolution No. 368-93 ,
recommending approval of a Conditional
Use Permit for a prefabricated car wash
at 2390 Highway 10.
Commissioner Miller questioned the
requirement that a blower be used in the
winter months - would this be an
additional charge? Planner Harrington
stated that the operators of car washes
often work the cost of the dry into the
basic cost of a car wash.
4 ayes 1 nay Motion Carried
LINAPPROVED
Mounds View Planning Commission September 1, 1993
•egular Meeting Page 4
Chair Mountin voted against approval of
the resolution - not because she has
objections to the plan as presented, but
rather that she objects to the principle
of allowing accessory buildings in comm-
ercial districts. The language of the
code is fairly vague - in the past, it
has been interpreted as allowing acces-
sory buildings, but Chair Mountin feels
that this interpretation sets a bad.
precedent. Also, while accessory uses
are allowed in the code, Chair Mountin
does not feel that this use is "reason-
able and incidental" to the principal
use of the property. She stated that
the applicant has done a good job
working within the constraints of the
site, but she cannot vote in favor of
this proposal given the above concerns.
Planner Harrington reported that Everest 7 . Staff Report
Development had withdrawn its requests
regarding the proposed expansion of
Multi-Tech. Everest has asked for a
refund of its planning fees, which staff
feels is reasonable given that minimal
staff time was spent on the proposal.
Motion/Second: Miller/Nelson to
recommend to the City Council that all
planning fees regarding the Multi-Tech
expansion be refunded to Everest
Development.
- -.
Chair Mountin stated that she was 8 . Reports of
pleased to see that the Park-and-Ride at Chair and
County Road H was being expanded, but Commissioners
wondered why there had been no Planning
Commission review of the proposal.
Planner Harrington answered that the
area is technically out of the
jurisdiction of the City, as it is
completely highway right-of-way.
Commissioner Peterson announced that the
next meeting of the Golf Course Task
Force would be September 9th at 6: 00
p.m. The anticipated topic is the
UNAPPR
OVED
Mounds View Planning Commission September 1, 1993
Regular Meeting Page 5
results of the land negotiations and
bond sale.
Chair Mountin announced formally that
she would be resigning from the
Commission as of September 30th so that
she may attend graduate school in the
evening.
Commissioner Nelson thanked Chair
Mountin for her assistance and
mentoring. The rest of the
Commissioners concurred.
There being no further business before 9 . Adjournment
the Commission, Chair Mountin adjourned
the meeting at 8: 53 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Paul Harrington
City Planner
•
• •
MEMORANDUM
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION I�
FROM: PAUL HARRINGTON, CITY PLANNER 17,r' .
DATE: October 1, 1993
SUBJECT: NOMINATION OF CHAIR
With the resignation of Chair Peg Mountin, the Planning Commission
will need to nominate a new member for the chair position. I would
like to bring a recommendation forward to the City Council in Mid-
October. I will cover this item under my Staff Report.