The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About03-16-1994 } Y - , • MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 16, 1994 7:30 P.M. AGENDA SESSION 1. Review Minutes: No minutes for review 2. Discussion of Request for Conditional Use Permit/Variance by Michael Hegeland, 7604 Spring Lake Road, Planning Case No. 374-94 3. Discussion of Request for Variance by Townsedge Terrace, 5001 Old Highway 8, Planning Case No. 376-94 4. Discussion of Request for Development Review by Multi-Tech, 2205 Woodale Drive, Planning Case No. 377-94 • 5. Discussion of Request for Development Review by Sysco, 2400 County Road J, Planning Case No. 378-94 6. Continued Discussion of Request for Rezoning/PUD/Development Review by Westminster Corporation, Planning Case No. 375-94 7. Review of Planning Commission Bylaws ***********4-4-4-I,************************************************* APPLICANTS: YOUR ATTENDANCE AT THIS MEETING IS REQUESTED. PLEASE NOTIFY CITY HALL AT 784-3055 IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND. THANK YOU. **************************************************************** • Pwt MEMORANDUM 411 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PAUL HARRINGTON, PLANNER�'�' DATE: March 14, 1994 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE REQUEST MICHAEL HEGLAND, 7604 SPRING LAKE ROAD Michael Hegland, 7604 Spring Lake Road, has made application for a Conditional Use Permit/Variance to allow the utilization of an existing 528 square foot building located on his property as an accessory building following the construction of a new, attached garage. The existing building is currently utilized as the principal garage on the site. The Mounds View Municipal Code allows for accessory buildings (in addition to garages) up to 400 square feet on residential properties with the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. The applicants request exceeds that number and, therefore, requires the • issuance of a variance for approval. In addition to the existing 528 square foot building on the site, a smaller, 90 square foot building is proposed to be removed if the Commission is willing to grant the variance. I have included a copy of all materials received as a part of this application. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. • 411 / CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING APPLICATION s7y.5000 ekr-C--- APPLICANT: �APPLICANT: /1//C!f 4f L iti6r6G4rup Phone 78(. "tar • ADDRESS: 74 o y SPQ/ i Co Wit OD m/riAS Vino NA) ss-ll 1.- Street Address, City, State, and Zip Code Interest in Property (check appropriate box): 2" Owner of Property ❑ Contract for Deed Owner ❑ Lessee, Operator, Manager ❑ Agreement to Purchase ❑ Other (explain) Documentary evidence of applicant's interest in the property may be required before final City action of this request. PROPERTY INVOLVED: Address/General Location 7(0 4 SPR/u6 LAOS' Rb* r77 -3o -0).3-- Aa -ooh 6LP k, e5 ) S yo' L 50 1--max 5 - 10'1 C o-71- - Legal Description or Property Identification Number tar 49 kcccPr see rj So ccfr rHFR(t Souvi qa VO Firrof tar t0 /N SPemm& wit PArIK KCLS ADD,T104�` 106161Y ecQuT7 J OlikkE: Legal Owner: Name/Address m,cw4a . r dVE6 4,4A,p ( SIM,LIAM? A 11664A Present Use (check appropriate box): ❑ UndevelopedNacant SDSingle Family Dwelling Duplex/Two Family Dwelling ❑ Multi-Family (No. of Units ) ❑ Business/Commercial Establishment • 0 Industrial Establishment O Other (explain) Property Classification: • Abstract 0 Torrens REQUEST: Z. woutb L.IXF ro ItELOC4r' ifA o use inf Exis7'N6 £2.5 so p; co Aeaftese AS A Sra2Amf ROtt.D 106 AtT rI?e AD /A.14: &ea.) it S O FT A-rrACh'e b GAeAroE - !N No• _ ► -1tl1u *Please note: Applicant may be responsible for additional fees associated with the review of this request. I HEREBY DECLARE THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENT ARE TRUE. rI/ Signature Rezoning $200/acre, minimum $200, maximum $1,000 Park Fund Dedication Fee Variance R-1 to R-2-$75.ail others $200 Date Paid Conditional Use Permit R-1 to R-2-$75,all others $200 Receipt Number Code Appeal $75 Develop./Site Plan Review $100/acre, minimum 100, maximum $500 Total Fees Paid , '7 5•co Minor Subdivision $150 Date Paid a-q- q Major Subdivision $250 plus $250 deposit Receipt Number !1174/ i). Comp. Plan Amendment $200 Wetland Alteration Permit $50 plus deposit determined by Staff Additional Fee Paid 0 Wetland Buffer Permit $10 Date Paid Planning Sign $50 Receipt Number PUD $350 PUD Amendment $150 Date of final action APPROVED ❑ DENIED ❑ TABLED Date P{ - 9 '-'6t Ll Planning Case No. =h 7 4-- `z 4" Admin.Account No. /ir , ., ,_- _ I •,c1/4 •<'3,, .‘;',A • ', 7.",",.; ",,,Z...-,-;',•1', 04 4,,,,,/,/,:;,?;;;;;•4;."/.<,c,,, P I f 43'1 '16,5 42 /' '',,,"• / •"P7,,ft AI /4/i'4.' -.cf - ,; ,„;•,;/,<. y NftO <4_,. •A, .4,..,,,,..4,,,,, ,,,,,„•,,,,,, •>. < ./...-„,,,, ',.;‘,. 1 ,,,,,,14,4,,,i,/,•.,47;,i7,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,w4 ,,,,,, ,,,,,,,•, , • <•<,/,..< •,;:70;.,,,, \ 4 4 1110''' • ,i.X.'.'i'',.'';'.-'' '',,(/.;."7",/,...",. //, ,' , %',"','''''' •W" '', '' ' /,''"' ',;'%-,s,'---4/.4.4, ‘A , ' '2;" ..)‹ // .;›,3.,./ '". ", "../.5%,,,,,' „,,,a.•Sx/ , y /./ / / / • / / / ' • 4 / '.4/'"'''fi ' • 4, , • < • v.I.42,45.v.,../. tkal fi ,.., ' .. 24 e -',,,i4 .4 '. , /4 ''''",.45' .'•'. 4.,y/ ,,,,,• e.....,, Y • ', /% / '%4;4 ,4 4 q,,^. ,.,',. , //// //4,-/,‘, .' t , •:, f... ifr .,, •-,-,,P.:',/;.%'-''.'.e.,;!,"',' -w.n., - `.,',„',,,,• ,,..- /./,`,::-V ,” 4.,-e , ;/ / 4/7/•/,'';; ; 4.;".?:"A <' P' '"":"1"/'•'"'",/'/4' 4, 74...„4"/"'4,/ 424 f. /.. ' A '' •-',/, -,e,""-a-4,a ' It:ta • ...e e;" ,,,,,,• ,a.•ax,, ,,4 •,/,,'47%'',,,-••%,"74"''''''a:a',a,/,',A,",4;4(," "a, /... :•,..:' '' '''' ' — a',r. •,!<. ?l•/ . P, ... , ' '' / • ; *gia ', '','. • sa',4*. z -a"za,/ / / • •, 4' a''.,a4••'• "'",440.,,k,' 5,'•Ia • ' - , i;;',....,,,a•-•: ',;,,:a/,‘// .. 1:1:: ;/ • ' ' / e k.,,, V,"4`'-',"",fr% a' Crl , ,•,-.`'/// 'a •'/ „I a, 'a/§.A.Vir-A. ..'ee//al• • .-'•'-''•%" // a'%. at'.9"R'' '..' (754'''s *-I -,-",,',. '," •- , . o ,,, r— LT* : ;',‘,, -,,, ' -, „/„ „ ',7.,'.,- ... ) ***‘', •<,<.<,.,,, —..< —• , ,1,, —.<- <<,-, a,u.4•4 ,, a : a .''1. /4 4.1 /4 4"' ' '5/ ,, „,:,” ,- '.<1..,,/ • •-,,',/." ' ,,...,,/,'', , ,,,....,,A/„.' P .i.,,,- .,, ,, ' • ..,-• , ' , • -2'., ] p. 41•''. '''''.,''.''' %'''''% :' / ,','.44 4 P,,//,///5 ' 2'4,•••("er .. '..,.;''://•/.."''4,' /• /•,/ ".4/5".l'"",'" ,,/•/./ ".,/,', ^ ••"" ' ../' ".".'/'',...."A'"" • '72,'''...' ','s.,,',.`, ' 1,2 PI i'-g' ,,,,,,,,,, , • /... ,,,:,, ,,, ,,,,,,„ ,, , .,,,,,.,„„ , -.4,,, , •,<,,,, ,4; ,.,,,,-,. *:' -,,,,,i,:-,,,,,; ,...,,,,,,-,z,,,,;,,,,,,,,,;;:;„•,;;;;„,,,,,,;:„,„'„y , E. ,- ...,w",„,7- %,:ias'%;';<e=7--,;,' ,tiv,yr •;<, ;;-,-,15,6',47 ,,,‘%-.:11 \ O 1 ...,. ,Az..0 .....--..., ,...,,,,,,, arizo, ..,, tvf-ttt:',:' • .;7/%''',1:'',,/':,Ia.,';' 4) ,ri OW:,ei,..-,'. )1,-//-,5,-;T,3'',/m<<„, ..•.".f, , 4i,l,4tl,<,.,-,,t•<;.;,;..:.7,P::1.4-1.--,.9-,<,..:<7440.,-,0,,1,4,-ex,-„4,,-A,,,,,,,,,,,c,Ri•;e,,,z:,,-,-73';0,',<,,,.,r:<4--,,;„,<.,'' *.,.-,.t.,,..4...1 ,4Y,,:w-,'/ f V , 7r • 144 ZCaE6 i4.. It" NJ „'7 ,k, 0,,,, — •• • 9.< • /, < ...5 ir-4 V itj , t ,,:3,. ;,...,;w t;•"<" Arf,'4°.•;',,i'it,V(•<9=•PA,ilt4.-f,<,f'eIrl'i, , til „,."4:,--i%/,,%„,..,*4;:x•.,,,--?Pa /<,z,/.,,;,,,,.f(i' y N. .., i ;s,., ,-,• 0,,,,,,,,,,:i4p;..,,.....,,,r, >4..,,,,„,,,,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,;,... 4 0 t-- ,:a1,,,,,,.41.<'d,',,,,,4:'";:,7•5,<';;,p,'%7),,;''-''''if.' J 0 //•., 4 ' '4%.;%e4e/i/';,''<,"'4;..•4•A,5..•,/ •44//•// -4 z IL tu A 0 '44' • •,/,./A.,c4. /"..`"'•..•%•.,) ',i'"'"',""0,''49. ".",g. ',.'''"/"'<4.',,,,•,'"''' <2',.. '' .,*" '''/';,/,,, , .ri .,.. J A 1 e2e.4"6(1 '4''''''S'''t.•4.1.774,4, 00 t3i, 45 Ilit ,,-1 .,' YAC'w,e,4.'-§,•--:<>:0,-A5.' J..% ; ; — I.,-,,,, 44,;,--,..,,,:,;e4 L .A1 ts. rt ,. .. „.• 4,0?:,.f14,5<-5.4.47 ,..._16 a _g•1 e , ' ,A. 1 NI.% V/ ' ../ i ; 0 r A a J 1 PA i 1. - A! i igyo ham,-4, 0 40% ... • x x : xxxca >. xxxQ. pn 41 4 a Y% ti Y j: 3 4 %l 4 7 4 t 4 ct 44 : . —N Z N I y v,/g, f ,/,/,4 ,i f / Fes/r'sr'�Y 0 ^ r <4,, A3/ff/�s�z" /',/� " is �� //P2 Fly// {, c. o/f,0Ly y J.,..o,J $3 i;./4;�' if/ / . �i // / fe i v ,w ,.0 r n//-k/,/,f t 6Gl/ 3tre'r 'j£-3,..-4.,...3,--3., b�ru /bi /y/ifn.m0 at • „ _... . ::.. • 13 i" /i*Rf6.P:. d //S ' t" yi ar "/ 3y'`x '✓, ' , , F' �3/, / Y Yr ' /E� ¢¢ yma. 7,41t• g R - Fy ///��/��,�/ /shy /'3� _�� t/ CI ar/'7i/i�/%'.'V';',:4".....-4,, ":-:, r./x/''sx b n ,i/ �, //ifi y s r % yi/ P ri ,ist/i,," /� ,j'�N/ srhy �i/°` 1..n' i p� /5 /� (l yt i jij � v .= E. , ` y z .2'4si Ywi y /r ' b / 1 Lx. � � / .. . . ,„,..„,,,,,,:(5,,,,,,„„/ ,/ j, ; i r. a // i J�uw 3- �,ox f' u/' l \ " ''..*.,3 im' „ , 1 ,01 4 a �f r�, .eyB3Au spa, f b 4 " F .1rJ ' ''' f r„ t. q It ...,,,,-;?... \ ■ QQ y •1 ` Y 1 4 'o i'• 4nN—Lc)• ,..,,a,,,.. - 0400% ii ^«; X x K x><>< •) •zs .... x x x¢ xi": y.% Y 4 m , , ," f N g E iii: 0 I r r.,,,....,,,,,,,,,..; f zwo f, j% J.) ,y t/'s. p s n Y r0 jj: / n. F 1 jA f�ai /h/ ....,,»...,.».......,».»,»...............................».»........».....»,.»......»..»......»..........,.-ryr .....,«r »,.»....»»..».» i� ..........»�.»»»._ri »........w^»r»i2....«mvnvncro-�m�..........e,......r ..».....+m,.-»...,.,....,,»,.»,.....,.,»..«......»..........»............. r7'e ,P 3 MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PAUL HARRINGTON, PLANNER \ DATE: March 14, 1994 SUBJECT: VARIANCE REQUEST, TOWNS EDGE TERRACE 5001 OLD HIGHWAY 8 Townsedge Terrace Manufactured Home Park has made application for the construction of a 2000 square variance to allow for foot storm shelter on their property at 5001 Old Highway 8 . The building is proposed to be constructed at an 11 foot setback instead of the 30 feet which is required by Municipal Code. The Planning Commission may want to consider the hardship which is currently being endured by the residents of the Park. As stated in the applicants letter of request, the residents of the Park currently have to leave the site in order to seek shelter from inclement weather. The granting of the variance would alleviate • that problem and provide for the health, safety and welfare of the residents. I have included a copy of both the letter of request and site plan 'for your review. If you have any questions, please call. CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW = PLANNING APPLICATION APPLICANT: • Townsedge Terrace Vern Larsen Phone 786-6905 ADDRESS: 5001 Old Hwy. 8, Moundsview, Mn. 55112 Street Address, City, State, and Zip Code Interest in Property (check appropriate box): - ❑ • Owner of Property ❑ Contract for Deed Owner El Lessee, Operator, Manager ❑ Agreement to Purchase ❑ Other (explain) Documentary evidence of applicant's interest In the property may be required before final City action of this request. • PROPERTY INVOLVED- Address/General Location 5001 Old Hwy. 8 , •Moundsview, Mn. 55112 Legal Description or Property Identification Number 17-30-23-12-0002-9 Legal Owner: Name/Address William Toberman/Barbara Toberman 9909 South Shore DR. Suite C. Plymouth, Mn. 55441 . I Present Use (check appropriate box): I SECTION 17 TOWN 30 RANGE 23 ❑ UndevelopedNacant • 0 Single Family Dwelling ? PT SE OF CREEK CL & S OF A 0 Duplex/Two Family Dwelling O 'Multi-Family (No. of Units ) i LINE BEG ON W LINE & 440 . 29 O Business/Commercial Establishment FT S OF NW COR TH S 80 DEG ❑ Industrial Establishment ; 35MIN E 53 . 81FT TH S 58 DEC ® Other (explain) Manufactured Hoz 39MIN 42SEC E 213FT TH N 82 Property Classification: Abstract 0 Torrens REQUEST: Varience for rear lot line setback-see attached letter *Please note: Applicant may be responsible for additional fees associated with the review of this request I HEREBY DECLARE THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENT ARE TRUE. (/_,,/),..41 Signature on' $200/acre,minimum $200,maximum $1,000 Park Fund Dedication Fee R-1 to R-2-$75,all others$200 Date Paid • •Tonal Use Permit R-1 to R-2-$75,all others$200 Receipt Number Code Appeal $75 Develop./Site Plan Review $100/acre,minimum 100,maximum $500 Total Fees Paid ,,;1, - 00 Minor Subdivision $150 Date Paid ��++ Major Subdivision $250 plus $250 deposit Receipt Number '14'Q c y Comp. Plan Amendment $200 S Wetland Alteration Permit $50 plus deposit determined by Staff Additional Fee Paid Wetland Buffer Permit $10 Date Paid Planning Sign $50 Receipt Number PUD $350 PUD Amendment $150 Date of final action � - '`CAAPPROVED ❑ DENIED ❑ TABLED 0 Date " .Z 3 -9 c` Planning Case No. 3 [� - 9 Admin.Account No. /i/I-- MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION , FROM: PAUL HARRINGTON, PLANNER DATE: March 14 , 1994 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW MULTI-TECH, 2205 WOODALE DRIVE Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. has made application for a development review of their proposed building addition at 2205 Woodale Drive. The request is for a 32, 080 square foot, two-story addition to the West side of the existing Multi-Tech facility at 2205 Woodale Drive. Staff has reviewed the submitted application and narrative provided by the applicant and found the request meets the intent of the Municipal Code as it applies to this request including, land use, setbacks, parking, etc. There will be no additional need for utilities on the site and those currently in place will not need to be relocated. A review of the provisions for storm water control . on the site is currently underway. Staff anticipates no problems with storm water control on the site as the ponding area constructed as part of the existing Business Park was sized to handle the development of this property. I have included a very comprehensive application submittal provided by the applicant for your review. Representatives of Multi-Tech will be present on Wednesday Evening to give a complete presentation of the proposal. CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ' PLANNING APPLICATION APPLICANT: Multi—Tech Systems, Inc. Phone 785-3500 • ADDRESS: 2205 Woodale Drive, Mounds View, MN 55112 Street Address, City, State, and Zip Code Interest in Property (check appropriate box): ® Owner of Property ❑ Contract for Deed Owner ❑ Lessee, Operator, Manager ❑ Agreement to Purchase ❑ Other (explain) Documentary evidence of applicant's interest in the property may be required before final City action of this request. PROPERTY INVOLVED: Address/General Location 2205 Woodale Drive Legal, DlesRriptcan fs P2rgpT5y d512tification Number Legal Owner: Name/Address Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. Present Use (check appropriate box): ❑ UndevelopedNacant ❑ Single Family Dwelling 41) 0 ,. Duplex/Two Family-Dwelling ❑ Multi-Family (No. of Units ) _ ❑ Business/Commercial Establishment El Industrial Establishment ❑ Other (explain) Property Classification: 0 Abstract El Torrens REQUEST: Site Plan approval for a 32,080 square foot addition to existing building *Please note: Applicant may be responsible for additional fees associated with the review oft is request. I HEREBY DECLARE THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENT ARE TRUE. ��jj u ......_2 Sigtfature Rezoning $200/acre,minimum $200,maximum $1,000 Park Fund Dedication Fee Variance R-1 to R-2-$75,all others$200 Date Paid Conditional Use Permit R-1 to R-2-$75,all others$200 ; Receipt Number Code Appeal $75 Develop./Site Plan Review $100/acre,minimum 100,maximum $500 Total Fees Paid (P.5.040 .04:5 Minor Subdivision $150 Date Paid J I-�� Major Subdivision $250 plus $250 deposit Receipt Number i'444•9/ Comp. Plan Amendment $200 Wetland Alteration Permit $50 plus deposit determined by Staff Additional Fee Paid ill Wetland Buffer Permit • $10 Date Paid Planning Sign $50 Receipt Number PUD $350 PUD Amendment $150 Date of final action APPROVED ❑ DENIED 0 TABLED 0 Date - A-5- Planning Case No. 37-2-4 Q/ Admin.Account No. rY • Land Allocation and Coverage Calculations Multi-Tech Existing Site: Approximate Site Area 247,518 Building Footprint Area 52 , 156 Building to Land Coverage 21% Parking and Drive Area 114 , 016 (46%) Surfaced Area of Site 166 , 172 ( 67%) Open Space and Green Area 81, 346 (33%) Multi-Tech Site with Addition: 411 Site Area ( same) 247 ,518 Building Footprint Area Addition Footprint 17,480 Total Building Footprint 69,436 Building to Land Coverage 28% Parking and Drive Areas Added 17 , 650 Total Parking and Drive Area 114 , 186 (46%) Surfaced Area of Site 183, 622 ( 74%) Open Space and Green Area 63 , 846 (26%) Phasing Schedule The Multi-Tech Systems expansion project is proposed for construction commencing spring, 1994 , as soon as necessary project approvals can be obtained, with completion by fall, 1994 . dikiit i N lir . t n, n, m, ' : v i „ ,n� �. iii �, !n) c) ••'1:`. .:.1 1.1,:11 .Clr.- -' ,Ltl _.«i.l-i=f-..tu.. .- j r - w••.,.- j.1-:•. 4::.2. -".1 .La� .. . .:-: • _1..'i rI'4.4 T _ :r • ' O ' -x Z �,./ oj: I - `� FI' �..� r ;I/ " �I 1.9 I -•, Ari :I I 'ei ` :ki� II i�,I'� Z 1' q I Ii 441 I o ! 1 1: ° m i ; ; j ice 1_ i • - • i^'.-rt, st'...''` .�_,_},s._—_, ' 'r0i i� L-=1-1:7 g k • t r k ---_ ^Rl n) oik, 7, i 3' ' IIF'''''l a. , i'•� a ha l �'' ; Z, . a 44,444 a j I.441 i Ii 1 i • --- 11 1 .� i^ — _!a j xxl y I j 1 j HLi I u I, --j •: - i „ 1, 3 43 j L _. . p'1 ' - LII u (e...)'1 - [- - i i .u. MI F gg I i i y 1 41) i ( J ( �; a (i 19' y j 1A C C - LZ' j-.3 i- r '- - m r , I:i [ �� , i I 1, Z i i ' t R ' , 4 to li ( � ; I j M I p f lyr , -I I Q r i 1 171 .1 1 i I Gl I. q1 �*-i i — 01 ii E 1 L IaJI hi _ i1 , i —. � ; - 1 , s' z Ye 7: "—I®,:__.,1 �^ e i i � 1 :ei— •'tai; i { , i I i i i.4. ' I. i5 ' t I a Ig I —{ 1, t e •_i II I _ 1.,,:� !- e. it 19 ii I s;, !1�"! l ' '111 '1 h' • �• � a 7C 1 {I AI LH I..j j;11 , j . 4--a; ! J I 1 1 �, ' '�', 10\ I-, - 1, n, l' ia', �P+• • 3 11 ' �wr�r -'`' 1 43 MULTI-TECH SYSTEMS I;t -- --. :ig i Za_$ ' D k 1 . 205••Wnotidele Drive Mountie View, Minneeote `k; =- ��-•� ;{� n 2 r' x FLOOR PLANS n d.. „_„_._ Ii MZ .„ 611‘1.74u4n#1 mtc MEMORANDUM • TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PAUL HARRINGTON, PLANNER V DATE: March 14 , 1994 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SYSCO, 2400 COUNTY ROAD J Ryan Construction, representing Sysco, Inc. , has made application for a development review of a proposed building and parking expansion of the Sysco facility at 2400 County J. In 1988, the Mounds View Planning Commission and City Council approved a site plan for Sysco which included a phased development for their site at 2400 County Road J. At this time, Sysco still anticipates developing according to that plan. However, their more immediate needs are for additional employee parking and an expansion of an existing truck garage and associated maneuvering area. The representatives of the applicant will be providing plans 411 of the proposal on Wednesday Evening for review by the Commission. I have included a letter received as part of the application for your review. Staff has reviewed the proposal and found that it is consistent with the intent of the Municipal Code as it relates to zoning, parking, setbacks, etc. The storm water controls on the site were provided at the time the original development plan was approved and are sized adequately to handle the currently proposed addition. If you have any questions prior to Wednesday Evening, please do not hesitate to give me a call. • Ryan Companies -(P) 1111,rnat anal(:'ntrr JI1O Srcuncl.\%emit•Sunil= Slinnc•ahcdis, \l\.=-4112,-.1ati- - Buildings lasting Relationship, (il2'33(i-12011 phone .41101,12.:337-5552 1.1x .. t February22, 1994 ! .= I �c . ` opt �y�L � • Mr. Paul Harrington CITY OF MOUNDSVIEW \`: 2401 NE Hwy 10 Moundsview, MN 55112 RE: SYSCO/MINNESOTA EXPANSION Dear Mr. Harrington: Sysco is a large national food distribution company. In 1988 Sysco/Minnesota began construction on a new warehouse facility in Moundsview. Their site plans_at that time indicated several areas designated for future expansion. Final site drainage plans, utilities, and landscaping were sized to accommodate the future development. Based on these assumptions, the Moundsview City Council approved the overall site concept. Sysco has now grown in their trucking needs, and through various office remodels, have a greater office staff. The immediate company needs dictate that they expand into some of the previously approved areas. • The proposed scope of work now, is to provide additional parking and an expanded truck garage and truck maneuvering area. The print included here identifies an employee parking area of 93 stalls on asphalt, with striping, on the property's NE corner, a truck building expansion and truck maneuvering area at the building's SW corner. Because Sysco may soon add to the building on the west side, the truck maneuvering area will be asphalt except for a 45' by 288' area which will consist of 8" of Class Five rock. The Class 5 area is located at the future loading dock area of the future building expansion and facilitates that construction without having to remove excess concrete dolly pad for footing and loading dock structure. Paul, please let us know what can be further accomplished to expedite any of these issues. We will be glad to participate in any way necessary. I apologize for not being able to meet with you personally last Wednesday, but I have byeen-hon=e-ill-r Lwill-contact you in the near fiitnre to discuss this further Sincerely, RYAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY OF MINNESOTA, INC. Norm Mead Project Coordinator cc: Dan Knutson - • Larry Farr . I- .ih, • I'. :n \l_ _ - nt • c.I .0 iii .. _ • E MEMORANDUM • TO: PLANNING COMMISSION • FROM: PAUL HARRINGTON, CITY PLANNER \' DATE: March 14 , 1994 SUBJECT: REZONING/PUD/DEVELOPMENT REVIEW WESTMINSTER CORPORATION, PLANNING CASE NO. 375-93 Jeff Huggett, representing the Westminster Corporation, has informed Staff that he would like his request to be on the March 16, 1994 Agenda for further review. A site plan and storm water control plan will be provided at that time. The parking survey, which was requested by the Commission following the February agenda session, is still in the process of being completed; However, an update will be provided Wednesday Evening. If you have any questions, please call. • MEMORANDUM • MEMO TO: Planning Commission FROM: Carla Asleson DATE: February 24 , 1994 SUBJECT: Planning Commission Bylaws Attached for your review are the Planning Commission bylaws. The Commission is required to review the bylaws once per year. Please review them and bring to the meeting any recommendations for changes, additions, or deletions. Of particular interest this year is the elimination of conflicts between the bylaws and the proposed changes to Chapter 401 of the Municipal Code. If you have any questions on this matter, please call . • • B. The third Wednesday of the month shall be a regular agenda • meeting for the purpose of informational review of applications for planning consideration, drafting of reports, and for other discussion not requiring action (i.e., vote) by the Commission. C. Meetings shall be conducted in accordance with State Open Meet- ing Laws. III. INFORMATIONAL PACKETS. Each commissioner shall receive an informational planning report for the items to be placed on the follow- ing month's regular business meeting agenda no later than the Friday preceding the agenda meeting. Each commissioner is responsible for reviewing the material within the packet prior to the regular agenda meeting. • IV. A 1"l ENDANCE. Commission members shall advise the designated Staff member or chairperson of an anticipated absence from any regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting. Any member attending less than 20 meetings per year without consent of the commission shall be deemed to have vacated the office, and such vacancy shall be filled by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 32.09 of the Municipal Code. A leave of absence may be granted by the consent of the commission. • Rev. ")/93 V • c) Summary of staff review. • d) Summary of statements made by the applicant, particularly concessions or agreements by the applicant. 5. Motion/Second a) The motion shall be quoted as accurately as possi- ble. b) The motion shall be prefaced with supportive statement; i.e., "whereas". 6. The vote on each motion (ayes, nays, and abstentions), a statement of reasons for nay votes or abstentions, and whether motion carries or fails. • 7. Specific concerns addressed to the chairperson for inclu- sion in the minutes. 8. Reports by members. 9. Date, time, place, and attendance at the preceding regu- lar agenda meetings. 10. Motion for adjournment, second, vote, and time. 11. Signature of the Staff designated member. B. All minutes shall be clearly marked to indicate either "APPROVED" or "UNAPPROVED". Each commissioner shall receive a copy of the previous regular business meeting minutes Rev. 2/93 • 4