The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About05-04-1994 MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION • MAY 4, 1994 7:30 P.M. AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Review and Approval of Minutes: April 6, 1994 (Received in Previous Packet) 4. Citizens Requests and Comments from the Floor: CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINU 1'bS 5. Consideration of Resolution No. 379-94 Regarding Rezoning/Development Review/Major Subdivision Request of C.G. Hill, Mounds View Business Park East, Planning Case No. 380-94 • 6. Consideration of Resolution No. 381-94 Regarding Conditional Use Permit/Variance Request of Michael Hegland, 7604 Spring Lake Road, Planning Case No. 374-94 • 7. Consideration of Resolution No. 382-94 Regarding Rezoning/Development Review Request of Westminster Corporation, 2701 County Road I, Planning Case No. 375- 94 8. Staff Report 9. Chairman's Report 10. Adjournment APPLICANTS: YOUR ATTENDANCE AT THIS MEETING IS REQUESTED. PLEASE NOTIFY CITY HALL AT 784-3055 IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO A I"PEND. THANK YOU. MEMORANDUM 110 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION A FROM: PAUL HARRINGTON, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR\ DATE: May 2 , 1994. SUBJECT: REZONING/DEVELOPMENT REVIEW/MAJOR SUBDIVISION C.G. HILL, PLANNING CASE NO. 376-94 Following discussion at the April 20, 1994 Planning Commission meeting, Staff has drafted the attached resolution for consideration by the Commission. Please note that reference to parking stalls with a minimum 20 foot depth is made in the resolution. As you will recall, the site plan submitted by the applicant showed stalls with 18 foot depths. I have also included a standard provision in the resolution which requires Park Dedication Fees to be paid. All other provisions of the Municipal have been met by the applicant. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. • • MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 379-94 • CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE REZONING/DEVELOPMENT REVIEW/MAJOR SUBDIVISION REQUEST OF C.G. HILL, MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK EAST, PLANNING CASE NO. 380-94 WHEREAS, C. G. Hill has requested City approval for a Rezoning, Development Review and Major Subdivision for their development on the Mounds View Business Park East site; and WHEREAS, the proposal is subject to the requirements contained in Titles 1000, 1100 and 1200 of the Mounds View Municipal Code.; and . WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this development proposal: 1. Planning Application dated April 14 , 1994 2 . Site Plan dated April 1, 1994 3 . Landscape Plan dated April 1, 1994 4 . Building Elevations dated April 1, 1994 5. Grading, Drainage, Utility and Erosion Control Plan dated March 23 , 1994 6. Preliminary Plat of Mounds View Business Park East. • Building M Addition, dated March 30, 1994 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the proposal is in conformance with all applicable requirements of the Mounds View Municipal Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the Rezoning, Development Review and Major Subdivision request of C.G. Hill contingent upon the following: 1) Park Dedica _ - - -_ _ U - ' • •• - - paid per Title 1200 of the Mounds View Municipal Code. 2) Parking stalls on the site shall be a minimum of 20 feet in depth per Municipal Code. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. • Resolution No. 379-94 Page two • Adopted this 4th day of May, 1994 . ATTEST: Chairman (SEAL) Community Development Coordinator • • MEMORANDUM •• TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PAUL HARRINGTON, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR DATE: May 2 , 1994 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE MICHAEL HEGLAND, PLANNING CASE NO. 374-94 Based on the discussions held at the April 20, 1994 Planning Commission Meeting, Staff has prepared the attached resolutions for consideration by the Commission. The resolutions - one approving the request, the other denying it - include the language contained in the Municipal Code regarding Variance and Conditional Use Permit requests. The Commission may want to modify the language contained in the Resolutions, however, they do provide a good starting point for discussion. If you have any questions, please give me a call. • • MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION • RESOLUTION NO. 381-94 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW FOR AN OVERSIZE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AT 7604 SPRING LAKE ROAD PLANNING CASE NO. 374-94 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request of Michael Hegland for a variance to allow an accessory structure in excess of the square footage allowed for with the issuance of a Conditional Use permit; and WHEREAS, the applicants property is requirements setforth in Title 1100 of the Mounds View Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the criteria used to evaluate all variance requests; and WHEREAS, the applicant has presented a hardship statement to the Planning Commission; and • WHEREAS, the literal interpretation of the provisions of this code would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Code; and WHEREAS, the special conditions of the property do not result from the actions of the applicant; and WHEREAS, granting the variance would not confer special privileges on the applicant that are not enjoyed by other property owners in the same district; and WHEREAS, the variance requested is the minimum necessary to alleviate the hardship. •• Resolution No. 381-94 • Page two NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission approves the request of Michael Hegland for a 484 square foot accessory building contingent upon the following: 1) 2) 3) 4) Adopted this 4th day of May, 1994 . ATTEST: Chairman (SEAL) Community Development Coordinator • • MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 381-94 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW FOR AN OVERSIZE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AT 7604 SPRING LAKE ROAD PLANNING CASE NO. 374-94 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request of Michael Hegland for a variance to allow an accessory structure in excess of the square footage allowed for with the issuance of a Conditional Use permit; and WHEREAS, the applicants property is requirements setforth in Title 1100 of the Mounds View Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the criteria used to evaluate all variance requests; and ' WHEREAS, the applicant has presented a hardship statement to the Planning Commission; and • WHEREAS, the literal interpretation of the provisions of this code would not deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Code; and WHEREAS, the special conditions of the property do result from the actions of the applicant; and WHEREAS, granting the variance would confer special privileges on the applicant that are not enjoyed by other property owners in the same district; and WHEREAS, the variance requested is not the minimum necessary to alleviate the hardship. • • Resolution No. 381-94 • Page two NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission denies the request of Michael Hegland for a 484 square foot accessory building based upon the following: 1) 2) 3) 4) Adopted this 4th day of May, 1994 . ATTEST: Chairman (SEAL) Community Development Coordinator • • • MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PAUL HARRINGTON, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR DATE: May 2 , 1994 SUBJECT: REZONING/ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW WESTMINSTER CORPORATION, PLANNING CASE NO. 375-94 At the April 4, 1994 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission agreed, in principal, to the request by the Westminster Corporation for an 82 unit Senior Housing Project to be located on County Road I between• Highway 10 and Silver Lake Road. At that time, the Commission directed Staff to draft a resolution of approval for the project with the understanding that the final issue to be resolved - available parking on the site - would be discussed at the time of formal action. A second requirement of the Commission was that the applicant receive any necessary approvals from the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) . Following discussions with the RCWD, the applicant has completed a redelineation of the wetland surrounding the project site and found that there is a slight . impact to what RCWD considers wetland area. Because of this, the applicant has made some minor modifications to the overall site plan. A copy of the modified site plan will be provided Wednesday Evening. Also, Staff will be drafting a resolution for consideration which will provide a starting point for discussion on the modified site plan. If you have any additional questions, please give me a call. •