The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07-10-1996 MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION < '" JULY 10, 1996 7:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes:June 05, 1996 (Received in Previous Packet) Review of Minutes: June 19, 1996 (Enclosed) 4. Citizens Requests and Comments from the Floor: CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES. 5. Public Hearing at 7:05 p.m. for Consideration of a Resolution No. 457-96, variance request to encroach two feet into the required thirty foot setback for a corner lot to build a family room addition, Gerald &Jane Wall, 7441 Park View'Terrace,Planning Case No. 444-96 • 6. Public Hearing at 7:10 p.m. for Consideration of Resolution No. 460-96, variance request to construct a six foot high privacy fence on a corner property lot, Thomas A. Pick, 2725 Sherwood, Planning Case No. 446-96. 7. Consideration of Resolution No. 458-96, variance extension request to allow the construction of an addition to their existing facility at a five foot side yard setback where a twenty foot setback is required by Municipal Code,Herbst&Sons Construction Company Inc., 2299 County Road H, Planning Case No. 445-96; and Consideration of Resolution No. 459-96, development review request to construct a 6,400 square foot addition,Herbst& Sons Construction Company Inc., 2299 County Road H, Planning Case No. 445-96. 8. Consideration of Resolution No. 460-96, conditional use permit request to construct an oversized garage, Jerome Espeseth, 8005 Woodlawn Drive, Planning Case No. 448-96. 9. Consideration of Resolution No. 461-96, conditional use permit request to construct an addition to an existing Church, Cross of Glory Evangelical Lutheran Church, 5472 Adams Street, Planning Case No. 449-96; and Consideration of Resolution No. 462-96, development review request to construct a 6,166 square foot addition, Cross of Glory Evangelical Lutheran Church, 5472 Adams Street, Planning Case No. 449-96 10. Consideration of Resolution No. 463-96. variance request to allow a garage on site, Church Upon the Rock, 7901 Red Oak Drive, Planning Case No. 451-96. JULY 10, 1996 AGENDA PAGE TWO OF TWO • Consideration of Resolution No. 464-96, conditional use permit request to construct an oversized garage, Church Upon the Rock, 7901 Red Oak Drive, Planning Case No. 451-96. 11. Consideration of Resolution No. 465-96,recommending an ordinance amendment to the Mounds View Municipal Code, Chapter 1008, by adding a new Section I entitled"R-5 Mobile Home District." 11. Consideration of Resolution No. 466-96, recommending establishment of 180 day moratorium on new use, development or construction of commercial wireless telecommunication towers and antennas within the City of Mounds View. 12. Staff Report 13. Chairman's Report 13. Adjournment • • • 4/".4t.pio-cektde PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION • CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting June 19, 1996 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 The Mounds View Planning Commission was 1. Call to Order called to order by Acting Chair Miller at 7:06 p.m. on June 19, 1996. MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners 2. Roll Call Brooks, Obert, Brasaemle and Miller. Commissioners Stevenson, Marshall and Chair Peterson had excused absences. ALSO PRESENT: Acting Community • Development Director Pruitt. Acting Director Pruitt reviewed the request 3. Discussion of • noting that Ryan Construction Company of Development Review Minnesota, the Design Builder for Sysco, is Request by Ryan requesting a development review to construct a Construction, on 868'x80' (5,440 square feet) expansion to their behalf of Sysco, 2400 existing truck facility at 2400 County Road J. County Road J, Planning Case No. Acting Director Pruitt explained that since Ryan 447-96 Construction has already ordered the materials and since the 68'x80' expansion is so similar to the phased development which was approved in 1988, the applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission call to order on this item and make a formal recommendation to the City Council. Acting Community Development Director Pruitt informed the Commission that the applicant had • called earlier to explain he could not attend the meeting due to prior committments. Mounds View Planning Commission June 19, 1996 Special Meeting Page 2 • Staff requested that if the Planning Commission approves Resolution No. 445-96 recommending approval of the development review, the following contingencies be added: 1. All necessary permits be obtained from Rice Creek Watershed District. 2. Ryan Construction, on behalf of Sysco, enter into a development agreement with the City of Mounds View. The Planning Commission clarified that the proposal is for two new bays, conversion of an existing wash bay to a new wash bay, and a two wheeler storage area. The Planning Commission inquired whether there was adequate environmental protection for a new wash bay. Acting Director Pruitt explained the wash bay proposed is to be , environmentally sound. The Planning Commission clarified that a canopy exists on the west side of the building. Motion/Second: Brasaemle/Brooks to approve Resolution No. 445-96 with the two contingencies. Commissioner Miller noted a change to the resolution where it stated, the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the development review request "with the following conditions" to be replaced with "contingent upon." 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Acting Community Development Director Pruitt 4. Discussion of introduced this item stating that the applicant, Variance Request by • Mounds View Planning Commission June 19, 1996 • Special Meeting Page 3 Bioclean Mobile Wash, Inc., is requesting an Bioclean Mobile extension on a variance granted on July 5, Wash, 2151 Mustang 1995. She added that the variance was to Drive, Planning Case allow construction of an addition to their No. 450-96 existing facility at a thirty-foot rear yard setback where a forty-foot setback is required by Municipal Code. Acting Director Pruitt went on to explain that if Resolution No. 456-96 is approved, she would recommend placing a contingency in the resolution that if the work is not completed within one year the variance would be null and void unless an extension is granted by the Board of Variances and Appeals. Mr. Greg Kelly, a representative for Bioclean, explained that no cleaning occurs on site and the operation is mobile in nature. • Commission Brasaemle suggested that • Resolution No. 456-96 state, "WHEREAS, on July 5, 1995, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 420-95 granting the variance." Director Pruitt explained that if the variance was approved by the Planning Commission it would be a completed process and would not be forwarded to the City Council. The Planning Commission discussed with the represenative that the industry has until August 15 to ensure that wash water does not enter into the storm sewer. The applicant notified the Planning Commission that they are the only mobile wash company which uses a vacuum system which prohibits water from going down the sewer system for customers who request it. The applciant then explained they are now required by federal law to prevent wash water from entering into the storm sewer. Mounds View Planning Commission June 19, 1996 Special Meeting Page 4 Motion/Second:Brasaemle/Obert to approve Resolution No. 456-96 approving an extension of the variance request by Bioclean Mobile Wash, 2151 Mustang Drive, and to include in the resolution that the first whereas refer back to the previously approved Resolution No. 420-95 and also include the contingency that if the work is not completed within one year of the date of variance approval, the variance will become null and void unless an extension is Motion Carried granted by the Board of Variances and Appeals. 5. Adjournment 4 ayes 0 nays There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Acting Chair Miller adjourned the meeting at 7:25 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Joyce Pruitt Acting Community Development Director T - _•-.._ I.—— .•• a -.• — • • REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Meeting Date: July 10, 1996 Staff Report by: Joyce Pruitt, Acting Community Development Director Planning Case 444-96 File No.: Request: The applicants are requesting a variance to encroach two feet into the required thirty foot setback for a corner lot in order to build an approximate 352 square foot family room addition off the southern side of the home. Petitioner: Gerald and Jane Wall Location: 7441 Park View Terrace PIN No. 05-30-23-32-0034 Zoning Land Use: The property is currently zoned R-2, Single and Two Family Residential. • Applicable Regulations: Section 1104.01, Subd. 3c requires a minimum thirty foot front yard setback from all lot lines for properties on a corner. Attachments: Zoning Map Site Plans A hardship statement from the applicants Application Background: The property is located at 7441 Park View Terrace; a corner lot property. The request is for a variance to encroach two feet into the required thirty foot front yard setback along Park View Terrace. The variance is required to build a family room addition, approximately 352 square feet, which would extend from the southern side of the house. The applicants have provided the following hardship statement: "We'd like to build a family room addition onto our one level home. We live on the corner of a cul-de-sac and are limited to only one direction in which we can build. We feel the two extra feet will enable us to create a functional living space." PLANNING CASE NO. 444-96 • JULY 10, 1996 . PAGE TWO OF TWO The proposed addition is in conformance with all other applicable zoning regulations, other than meeting the required 30' front yard setback. The applicants have been made aware that the addition will need to be designed and maintained to provide a uniform building appearance with the original dwelling unit. Recommendation/ Analysis: Based on the discussion at the June 19, 1996 Planning Commission Agenda meeting, Resolution No. 457-96 for approval of the variance request has been drafted for your review and consideration. The following contingency: "Whenever, within one year after granting a variance or appeal, the work as permitted by the variance or appeal shall not have been completed, then such variance or appeal shall become null • and void unless a petition for extension of time in which to complete the work has been granted by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals," has been added to Resolution No. 457-96. • • MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 457-96 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING A FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FOR GERALD AND JANE WALL, 7441 PARK VIEW TERRACE, PLANNING CASE NO. 444-96 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request of Gerald and Jane Wall for a variance to allow a 352 square foot addition to the southern side of their home to encroach two feet into the required thirty foot setback for a corner lot, which is less than that allowed by Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the applicants' property is subject to the requirements set forth in Title 1100 of the Mounds View Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the criteria used to evaluate all variance requests; and WHEREAS, the special conditions of the property, namely, the irregularly shaped lot with the three sides of street frontage, does not result from the actions of the applicant; and WHEREAS, granting the variance would not confer special privileges on the applicants • that are not enjoyed by other property owners in the same district; and WHEREAS, the variance requested is the minimum necessary to alleviate the hardship. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission approves the request of Gerald and Jane Wall for a variance to encroach two feet into the required thirty foot setback for a corner lot to build a 352 square foot family room addition off the southern side of the home, contingent upon the following: 1) Whenever, within one year after granting the variance the work as permitted by this variance shall not have been completed, then this variance shall become null and void, unless a petition for extension of time in which to complete the work has been granted by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Adopted this 10th day of July, 1996. ATTEST: Chair Peterson (SEAL) • Acting Community Development Director Joyce Pruitt I 7564 7565 O 7565 1 75841g, X505 l7efcllU drl❑ Jarle VVa11 7555J • 755:0 R-2 7555 3 7555 1 7572 3 7555 7441 Park View Terrace I ' 7545 7546 545 illerZ 7545 7560 :agirsupri N PF Variance Request 7525 7538 Y Y 7515 rn 7540 ,I - • - - ► - I 5 �, "1 O o 7501 cav cav 7500 79v 1 mN I N r I N o N b,, ( ' BRONSON DRIVE n 10 • ^ '�Y yr ,I0N 3 7489 ry N ' 7490 7485, N Cr,0. 0 750 co N -'N +�° ,_,.o .. O O .7474lal N N N N N `N -)( 1.0 fo 7465 7474 7471 BRONSON �. ®W ® 454 71 74511 7456 N 1 0 7444 o 7445 R-Y 7452 . n r 1� f c ^,^ ,431 . :c ® I 7442 , �' t ^ 7434 7415 . "ii OR0 PF 7430 7435 1 -•-• E- r ".Cci- 7425 7409 CC 7440 Y 740. . ••o4o,44,c4. 7405 0 7408 73••% �g �� 7412 k. 4 g ,., TX: .740eti 7405 .. ,as;.. _. .�� -a. 90 738• = a r•40 a I I 7375 7350 N 7365 7350 7375 378 01. itt ^ t }- It 7365 7350 737 .. n 101 n rulco: Pt��+� 211 I 7340 313 7347 7373 737 7344 ?313 I 132q 3271 Y el 736. wI _ 7325 ry N 7338 6ti 111 r a n ,, I ^ a `33 n ,n I n a 7317i.�, �nn '1� h •n N1 I O OnN I O I 7 r< nn m 7 1 h _11OO O I OO. O 1 a a 1 to I N cav 7315 m to mt0 n, N 3 0n 1l n n n , n I n i n I N N 111 N r^�� I,cl. R I] R�2 I —J .. { , N I O I I ' Y I n t N O I C 1 m m i i g i 7295 ^I N I n 52781 5279 5278 Nary: M h I I N I N 1 N 01 N N! N CO N N I N N 1/200 B-1 W_l, �:' I 1 I i I •1 , 5272 5273 5272 cn i ,n1 ..'^I n J i I 1 1 518,..... a a ♦1 1t:131 n i �� El I ! ! I I I 1 I 28d ' ' 5266 5267 526 ccsi i N I N I j N 1 0. 11 {:. 1 1 1 I j 5260 5261 LOUISA 1 I I 1 I CC5171517 , I0I + I nI r>I �: 0 5254 52550 N •i N'N N N NI Cu. 7234 7237 7250 a�y: 1 Dt 51 781517 j 52481 5249 1 e < ...IN! „1. L1. I i ! 7226 7225 '2 / 1 5243 '°3 1 N N N ,.,!%1 N i " I 7200 7215 719 51751-14i 524211wI -- ' 5236{5237 ` nII7188 ?t9t R-4 \ MEI5231 •23• ;11".4:71-EARVII ItD� INOi (72'1- IL-1- 7 7180 s230 I iI { I I I 1 172 7151! 00517.516• 5224 5225 221 N 1 N 1 N ' ,150 1 5221 5218 t I I I O 1 0 1 n 1 :-I\ p 1 1 7 I n l m 1 m I m 1 400 Z= 521 J i La-g--- I ul o t n i i rn , 0, \°i 7. m ! N{ N I N N N \21 5212 52121 5213 n 521 ^ 1 n j ~' I WOODALE DR W ��, 521 t Z 5206 520 0 5206 520615207 I' I I ao 1 c l N I . ' i N e i u 5205 �" I n I 0 • 1 + I 1 N I71p0 n N ' o f 51625151 520015201 5200 520 I p 1 o N a , N I N �- 70951 N a3 'N N N 7090 5200 5201 a O I n n i I j•094 p ( WOO DALE DR 51,48 5148 15149 51481514 �• 0 70929,1 ....74 ; j I , 2 O 7089 1 7070 5143 Stag r--- 51401 !=_ 1 • 7090 3 I I StaO 5140;5141 Sts . 7082 095 ; J 7071 I 4, �_ �_ {- \17074 01---- 1 O6d 139 5132,°133 51321 5133 5132 F�- L '072 7069 ! 1 i Y 70631 j i I a I / R-26--5 t 33 I r _ 5125 5 t 24!5! r f706G n j n j ^ I 5124-51-25 21.1 1 7054 7057 c 1 7035! °N°1 N 1 `r L',...... 1.- �•IW� cREsT 9290` 5„6115;<7} 5at61�51_7 5!16151. ` �� '044 Z 'o_=. 704 ! w00DCREST /� >v PARK O 5,08!51C9 g, 5108i 5109 51081 51: j _ 7n28 ,o : c ! N _ .0 , N ,3 w - --r-- _ 7026 > 702 f1 ' e m m 1 m I m a N1 PF H 5tp71z 5'0015101 5:00'5101 5100 51. 1 1 • OOO N I N N N I N 1 0...� 7006 "pt , 1 N 1, N ' I I m ]p 2 W O�DCRESr .'/ I 5092 509 50921 5091 5092 SC a'; 50921 5091 tr 5092' �, 5°9 I 6986 69.� • 2940 7. i T _ 50856 5 5086 508 5086 5085 50861 5C a, I N j96• 50861 50861 508 I- 6970 Z 697 2932 .IC;nS!Y:1� 6960 50801 5079 50801 5079 5080 508 50801 5079 O .: 1 50 1n 1 I j 4”' a 5 �u I 507 5071 50' 5071 5072 5072 5071 0 507 1 `--C_ 6952 6953 I rn 1 a1 69 0 595; I 1 I 3 506 = L J 1 a N 1 N, —59:T. _._I 1 1 1 6940 50661 5065 W 50661 5065 506 5066 5065 0 50661 50 1 6946 I I �> 506' C • 6942 a 6939 I \ �� I 1 11--1__- 50601 50590 50601 5059 50 505, 50601 5059 03 506Q'`.'t 6928 6929 1 'n' , 1 x '6925 a1 - I „" 1 ,fl 1 ^ I a 1 5054150530 50541505 5054 505 505415053 50545C ,�I — ' 0 ,-,7 v, v ' ,^ N 1 ... 1 0 1 3 —1 I 504, i -� 1 0 1 0 "i ,°1.,1 cavi y a! m ! g I m : m 1 N 1 `D 5046 15045 50461 5045 50 504 504615045 504615- L0 16900 —, — __ — Ste__—.�1.L. 1� \ E W • 100`2-Nin Lund 5urvsyor Civil Enpin..r PHONE NO. 866-2523 Sur6Praid. ve yr ��eeer�� —as--G7 • /0 ..-79 ':, JOB NO. SURVEY FOR: MTRVIN H. ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION CO. DESCRIBED AS: Lot 1, Block 1, SILVER LIKE WCODS, City of Mounds View, Ramsey County, Minnesota reserving the drainage and utility easements as shown on the record plat thereof. k I I o I I ),,l'it, kr 11, I, i/ v -, gv9,z gw•) Q( k, \) ,60, .• . till i, 1 14 '.mo - V \ i� 9 s (om") �. ,k �l • v sed \k , ft,. \ --N \ •1 -- ":7' ,', \ \ . 41'.,\ 10 k.,;.., '''• •'s•`. - 114,-.\:14 1•1 ei-741-ii'''. IN-N ‘.1, \ ' � - ,;,' L Yr I /rro 1,' . ,a 17 `IIII :f; I " —• -.4 ,; r // 7,,i'"'', }I ', C ccerrr 6k-ezi — II � s -__-___-_-- -__--_--___�-_--_________--____-__-__----__-_-'_--_----___ _'____--_'_-- -- . _--_ -� _ -__--_-__ -'-_-'__-_-_-_.--__- -- __-_-___-_-'-___-___-_____ - -_- - ~. �-� ______'_-__-_ ___-__-'--_'-__-_ �-___---_- ` / --------------- ----�------------ ---'----- ---------------- -.-----) '` 1 . L.____.________.__________ _ _ _ ___ _ __ _ \ ___ ______ _ _ ____ if, - ______. .. . ._ _ _ _ _ _ .., \.... „....,..... _ i . 1... .._. ... , .., ,, T..., _________ _ _ __ .. _ _ ..7.),,, _44 .. . _ _ _ _ . _____ .1.4 ,,,..i ; 1 „:„. Ns...,_, ___ _ _ _ _ . _ -------, . _. _ . . . . . . . . . . — ' ' _ . _ — — _— . . - - � �� - - - -' -' -- - -- -- -' - ��K — —_ —_ --_ —' —� _� -- —_-- — _— _' — -_ — _ -- ��- . - - - _ - _-_'__ ___- __ ' _ _ .. ' - — — �� -- — — —_ . . . . . .. .. ._ . . . _ • CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW S' PLANNING APPLICATION �r�- ted- APPUCANT: �� W -'I 1 Phone '713-9- 6 7 ADDRESS: 7c4sz- r/ v LP��. 7 c 9c S 37/2_ Street Address, City, State, andZ.lp Cade Interest in Property check appropriate box): Owner of Property ❑ Contract for Deed Owner ❑ Lessee, Operator, Manager ❑ Agreement to Purchase • ❑ Other (explain) Documentary evidence of applicant's interest In the property may be required before final City aeon of this request. PROPERTY INVOLVED: Address/General Location -.`7 4L ' Legal Description or Property Identification Number (-57 Rb a 13Co:0 Legal Owner: Name/Address -et-42-rd a.rt_iiJ a- rte (Ala.-1 Present Usecheck appropriate ppropriate box)' - -. ❑ • UndevelopedNacant Single Family Dwelling 0 Duplex/Two Family Dwelling ❑ Multi-Family (No. of Units ❑ Business/Commercial Establishment ❑ Industrial Establishment ❑ Other (explain) Property Classification: 0 Abstract Torrens . REQUEST: 4-or &- &4(4.t-h cJ 2 feel h !�v!c✓ a -�avx ly roor►� W�(C w0vld .c*e - -ern AA �l�L Sam G -n. SJR o -F' uS.2. . *Please note: Applicant may be responsible for additional fees associated with thereview of this req est v.0 I HEREBY DECLARE THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENT ARE TRUE .,e.�%t��///d.., % 91-44e Signature th9 3200/acre.minimum 3200.maximum m$1,000 -Park Fund Dedication Fee °nCe R-1 to R-2-375.ail others$200 ' Oate Paid Gandi Use Permit R-1 to R-2-$75.all others=00 Receipt Number Cods Appel $75 Oeveioo.jSite Plan Review 3100/acre.minimum 100.mammum $500 Total Fees Paid 7S Minor Subdivision $150 Date Paid G&–/O-q C p Major Subaivision $250 plus 3250 deposit Receipt Number c I -7(e' 3 •Camp. Plan Amendment $200 Wetiano Alteration Permit S50 plus deoosjt determined by Staff Additional Fee Paid Wedartd Surfer Permit S10 Date Paid Planning Sign S50 Receipt Number PUO S350 PUO Amendment ,$150 Date of final action APPROVED ❑ DENIED D TA�817 Date 1 ' /—' Planning Case No. I'M y— 'r,J ,admin.Account No. ii ) �y'l ww, . 4 Wi, if a o - I ii/y S ro©rk (d 1(l7 Ort 7'ra a7-cy- o'7e /eve../ /Lime • tee /(1-; OfrL. -gac, ekt ct D-rte l/r►4itect 7b Of)( 6.1 reVe L /n. o, %/ 6-74a6/ rezzfz c - r c' // t);, .. err G< / • d &tail • 111 REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Meeting Date: July 10, 1996 Staff Report by: Joyce Pruitt, Acting Community Development Director Planning Case 446-96 File No.: Request: The applicant is requesting a variance to construct a six foot high privacy fence around a corner yard property at 2725 Sherwood Road. The request is for a two foot variance from the 48" in height allowance for a fence height. Petitioner: Thomas A. Pick Location: 2725 Sherwood Road PIN No. 06-30-22-13-0059 Zoning Land Use: The property is currently zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. 4, Applicable Regulations: Section 1103.08, Subd. 2, allows for fences not exceeding 48" in height from the grade level lot line for fences located on a corner property lot. Section 1103.08, Subd. 3b, allows for a fence to be installed on the applicants property, but not installed directly over the property line. Section 1103.08, Subd. 5, requires all surfaces of the fence facing adjoining properties or public rights of way to be of finished construction. Attachments: Zoning Map Site Plan Hardship Letter to Planning Commission from Applicant Planning Application Background: The applicant's property is on the corner of Red Oak Drive and Sherwood Road. Thus, since it is a corner property, the fence is not to exceed four feet along the front yard setback (shown in a dotted line on the site plan). PLANNING CASE NO. 446-96 JULY 10, 1996 PAGE TWO OF THREE • The applicant is requesting the two foot variance for reasons of safety. Namely, the safety of his child, any other children who may be visiting, pets and automobile traffic along Red Oak Drive. The applicant attributes these safety concerns to a large mound on the western edge of his property along Red Oak Drive, which is approximately four feet in height at the center. With a fence of only four feet in height, as the Code permits, the applicant feels the situation could create a hazard for children and pets. The six foot fence would, according to the applicant, provide adequate protection to prevent children from falling over the fence, pets from jumping the fence, or other potential mishaps. The applicant has also reviewed the variance criteria and addressed each issue in his letter dated June 03, 1996. As requested by the Planning Commission at the June 19, 1996 Agenda meeting, the applicant has notified Staff that the fence will be 78' back from Sherwood Road. The proposed fence will be French Gothic treated wood. The site plan shows the fence following the perimeter of the property line, but not directly on it. Since the Public Hearing Notices have gone out, Staff has received several inquiries from residents within 350' from this property. All but one call have been in support of the fence. The only call opposed to the fence was from Mrs. Vogt on Red Oak Drive who will be unable to attend the meeting, as she has a broken hip. She is concerned that a fence only a few feet back from the property will create a visual hazard and will create a problem with snow removal blocking the street. Staff did explain to Mrs. Vogt that the fence would be located behind the house and that the Code allows a 4' fence is the same area. Mrs. Vogt still wanted her concerns entered into the record. Recommendation/ Analysis: Based on discussion at the June 19, 1996 Planning Commission Agenda Meeting, Resolution No. 460-96 • • PLANNING CASE NO. 446-96 JULY 10, 1996 PAGE THREE OF THREE approving the variance request has been drafted for your review and recommendation with the following contingency: Whenever, within one year after granting the variance the work as permitted by this variance shall not have been completed, then this variance shall become null and void, unless a petition for extension of time in which to complete the work has been granted by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. S MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 460-96 • CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING A HEIGHT VARIANCE FOR A FENCE, THOMAS A. PICK, 2725 SHERWOOD ROAD, PLANNING CASE NO. 446-96 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request of Thomas A. Pick for a variance to allow a six foot high fence into the required thirty foot setback for a corner lot, which is a fence two feet higher than that allowed by Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the applicants' property is subject to the requirements set forth in Title 1100 of the Mounds View Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the criteria used to evaluate all variance requests; and WHEREAS, the large mound present on the property represents an extraordinary circumstance which does not generally apply to other properties in the area and did not result from the action so of the applicant; and WHEREAS, the literal interpretation of the applicable provision of a four foot high fence would deprive the applicant from adequate safety for children and animals on the property; and WHEREAS, granting the variance would not confer special privileges on the applicants that are not enjoyed by other property owners in the same district; and WHEREAS, the variance is the minimum required to provide adequate safety to children playing behind the home; and WHEREAS, the variance would have no material effect on other properties in the same zoning district; and WHEREAS, the variance will have no effect on traffic flow or on visibility at the corner of Red Oak Drive and Sherwood Road, as the fence will be placed approximately 50' back from the corner. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission approves the request of Thomas A Pick for a variance to allow placement of six foot high fence within he required thirty foot setback, contingent upon the following: 1) Whenever, within one year after granting the variance the work as RESOLUTION NO. 460-96 PLANNING CASE NO. 446-96 PAGE TWO OF TWO permitted by this variance shall not have been completed, then this variance shall become null and void, unless a petition for extension of time in which to complete the work has been granted by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Adopted this 10th day of July, 1996. ATTEST: Chair Peterson (SEAL) Acting Community Development Director Joyce Pruitt 486 88441 w X11 - ::8 842 •84 �tMiattei . 8441 _ ° �® --17= -.,_:-uf k- MEMO=841 0�. ` :: . 839z 840E 1121 841s atainum d400I!:� � ® ' 88.390 388 � �3aft 8420 8408 8420 MUM= �� m • 8409 8401 8406 �: 6380 trz 8380 4(4 �_ em. 8'r0, _ 03141 8400 8 8404 cm ,MAIM fgair"wo afalft 7 Mg 44,P MUNIM21 `461111WE MI 0 > 8370R atifgl .'_ ' 1 12:int - Mill 360 CMII 8390 8408Eil. r06 aft 8360 Q _: 8350 J8360 aft ® 8360 8366 �� r� �� ®� � � �� 8350 8350 833p we .in wt. _�� 1231 8340 min 833 8340 _. 3,720 ill: � 8330 3 � �� 'r� 8330 � 833Q83411R1 _:_ 10ari ® ®O�r �� ®8,o0 wo,® 8320annamta maw 8320 .. ? 8305 111:11 ® 8308 Y ' can® 8305 8310 k`� ': 8290 8305 83109 8300 - ! 8290 8295 4 III ' 8290 8289 8301 8260finin � � 8290!✓ �.=a,_.r 8280ANO z 8270 8280 G3 8265 8280;l. 8270 ® 8250 �' PARI( *. 8260 ipppimm,® 8270 8271 8270�' r �� 41 PF o 8255 8260 ma ab N n •az) 8250 82 ,. ' ,,8145 o O ARDµ n e :► 8250 '__ ® O n n ,„„:. ,y N .•,•��• N N `�' 8230 _EMI _:8240 no , . :~ -4 8206 l-• N.N t ai 'n° ( •JQ A N N N s 8201 = 920 8227 N 8210NIAll 2at 8211 (-) 8200 8198 8205 '0 ,."' 92.1 �� ?';r i is 2. 818p 8192MUM . N N!N'N 8205 LIP,: .1111111111012 122/111 . t •811• WI OR 9117 8760 ‘8111111111ft 9180 EN '. k1, y �� «PORT •• i �� 91>5 • $1so : • ,r �"wiiro,„„1 1�•i� •,, .+ �� ( °� �.d 8160 - i' ,\ - -... -. _ .,► !� iiia© fi� °Mr 8150 --‘:namt is., ,5„, an,,, w N N \\ N t iota:,„ nonOO � h aiZ . ani am' .\\ , N l" i n �e' D N N i N N '-' A) \ 80 ;7Z9 ! $08p ^� a S' N :::tr..;.- 1 +,\ 8065 a N 8081 N N 8088 8075 .Oi •O Jzzi . . to \ �• © 8075 70 8(171 N N 8099 `7 \\y R fl :. . 8045 8046:8045 808 r 8059 , 8080 56 9071 8068 8071 " N ' ''� i^' i j 1 \ . 8036 804p 8055 Soso 8072 `: y '-,,.....,.7, \ • • :25 8026 8025 8039 8042 8045 8065 67 ,_.:,..7' � \ 8016 8015 802: 8032 8052 8051 8040 valk " • 8000:8005 80t. 8028 9018 8033 8040 8035 j 8032 ' z�T�� 9009 8011iree �� 803 r a ,` �/ ,..-i-, 798. a 8004 �� 8021 8022Cr;-:. 7970 O 7981 8000 c'44;;---v-,- -- . 1 7979 7�Q 7 7990 a IMI '959 969 79$0 797®�4:M7-73 s, ti ��EZIMIMEM 7970 7865 7980�f�ti® } '~ 7950 7940 7966 • • "' xs'.�a 7930 ® '946 7927 79$0 .: • t �. `� * . 7930 l. �} �,•�*.� 4' 7930 ® EXIII 7940 ,, r+ Thomas Pick ` �� " 2725 Sherwood Road �,: � : Roan _ Variance Request _ : $ '89alnlizt 5; _ 1 Z N N IEP1. if �� 'e� 7863 / 7842 7 - s f -* P0-4. 4 0\A 785 t 7830 O 1 O ' `r >� 4} L ' 782. 781 ., .---:,17.--.'.:L 41)11'. 8_2 7800 7 d 0: 7801 9. b5 - _ 'tet 7418 7 • 7 ' 4- N ( ( 1 , , 1 I I I I I I I f I f f I I I \2. c. v . ,....,,, -e_.. ", (e-,os t--1-:0- , : I I t I I I i I I I I I 1 '', , I '......___ _ ____/ ' I SS1 I • I 1 I I t I 1 I_ I t I I 1 I I 1 I I Proposed fence line/ 1 0 i i 1 / t t t 1 I I I 1 I I I I , I .... . I t I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I House . , , f I I a), I / E , / I 1 I f I t 8 , 1 I Front of house , , • a Properly line , 1 f I I I 1 1 I 1 t 1 f I Sherwood Road I I 2725 Sherwood Road Mounds View,MN 55112 June 3, 1996 Planning Commission City of Mounds View This letter is in regards to my request for a variance to permit installation of a 6'-high fence in the rear yard of 2725 Sherwood Road, a portion of which would run along Red Oak Drive. The primary reason I am requesting this variance is for safety:the safety of my child,any other children who may be visiting us,pets,and automobile traffic on Red Oak Drive.These safety concerns are due to the fact that the property has a large mound on the western edge adjoining Red Oak Drive,which is approximately 4' in height at the center.With a fence of only 4' in height,as the current city code permits,this situation could create a hazard for children and pets.A 6' fence,as I am requesting,would provide adequate protection to prevent children from falling over the fence,pets from jumping the fence,or other potential mishaps. Please consider the following points when reviewing this request for a variance: • The large mound represents an extraordinary circumstance which does not generally apply to other properties in the area.The mound has been on this property since the home was built.From what I have been told,the mound is the result of the removal several years ago of a large elm tree.While a portion of the western edge of the mound will be dug away to provide the necessary easement for the fence,moving or flattening the entire mound would be impractical and prohibitively expensive due the remaining buried stump and roots. ilk • The literal interpretation of the applicable provision(a 4' fence)would deprive us of adequate safety for our daughter in these circumstances.This concern would not be present in a"flatter"yard. • The presence of the mound in no way resulted from my actions;it has been in existence since the home was built in 1988.I purchased the home in July of 1995. • The granting of this variance will not confer any special privilege not available to other owners in the area. Several variances of this nature have been granted in the area previously, including the properties at 7880 Eastwood Road,7900 Eastwood Road,and 8230 Red Oak Drive. • isvarianceis eminimum r •I -• • • •• •- -•-•■ - - - • • 9:•••9 •999- • The variance would have no material effect on other properties in the same zone. • The variance will no effect on traffic flow or on visibility at the corner of Red Oak Drive and Sherwood Road,as the fence will be placed approximately 50' back from the corner.Far from diminishing the value of surrounding properties,the attractive French Gothic-style treated wood fence should enhance the value of the three adjacent properties by providing an added measure of privacy. Thank you, and I look forward to your decision regarding the granting of this variance. Sincerely, _ Tom Pick • • CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING APPLICATION APPLICANT: ow c c A. Pt`c k Phone 717 Z2 ADDRESS: Z72 S. 51,.e�woo t (Zo�a( Moo r.-dc /AN/ x 5112 Street Address, City, State, and Zip Code Interest in Property (check appropriate box): • Owner of Property ❑ Contract for Deed Owner Q Lessee, Operator, Manager ❑ Agreement to Purchase • • Q Other (explain) Documentary evidence of applicant's interest in the property may be required before final City acton of this request PROPERTY INVOLVED: Address/General Location Z.7 2 (fid E car off' R / o k rJ��ve u Sl.�r�o�c CZ��d) Legal Description or Property Identification Number L4 z 5(k 1 Qv_d k Park 0G 36 o Legal Owner: Name/Address 'i C. s A , Peck 2-72 S 5(.�� d �/, 1U ds �/;e�•• MN SS. 2... Present Use (check appropriate box): ❑ Undeveloped/Vacant • rir Single Family Dwelling 0 Duplex/Two Family Dwelling " ❑ Multi-Family (No. of Units ) ❑ Business/Commercial Establishment Q Industrial Establishment O Other (explain) Property Classfication: �j Abstract 0 Torrens • REQUEST: 7 er t v^�� -f aro.. � ct.< 7 .rot Lc.k comer e-P 4.)%.e. oma-{— i.e. RSL. v6.lc Dr;'e, 0 L R i oa.IC:.; ( C.-Cle. co r t- err vz.�¢ L 1\f rrrh.:e I {a ra.L.ce not Se. -f^ro 124.C.oak (,bv57 c.-,d c2 S t .•.d. b�ic Gerd. Fe},ci a tc�c* -R t, 4L C -}r ,f i { riwu vc F rea�c a c u,oco r.�Gora fol 'Please note: Applicant may be responsible for additional fees associated with the review of this request .. k"r L 0d• I HEREBY DECLARE THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENT ARE TRU Signature wore.. itiehlritiririevroririelneiritirine _ $200/acre.minimum$200.maximum Si,000 Park Fund Dedication Fee "(titan= R-1 to R-2-$75.ail others$200 Date Paid .r.anal Use Permit R•1 to R-2-$75.ail others$200 Receipt Number Code Appeal $75 Deveicp./Site Plan Review 5100/acre.minimum 100.maximum $500 Total Fees Paid S S) 7 GIS Minor Subdivision 5150 Oats Paid Major Subdivision $250 plus$250 deposit Receipt Number Comp. Plan Amendment $200 1110 Wetland Alteration Permit $50 plus deposit determined by Staff Additional Fee Paid Wetland 6utfer Permit $10 Date Paid Planning Sign $50 Receipt Number PUD $350 PUD Amendment $150 Date of anal actan APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 maim Q Gate —) 6 _q Cp Planning Case Na. 7 y q CO Admin.Account No. 1 1n ` V REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Meeting Date: July 10, 1996 Staff Report by: Joyce Pruitt, Acting Community Development Director • Planning Case File No.: 445-96 Request: The applicant is requesting an extension on a variance to allow the construction of an addition to an existing facility at a five foot side yard setback where a twenty foot setback is required by Municipal Code. If the variance is granted, a development review to construct an 80' x 80' addition (6,400 square feet) to the north of their existing building must be acted upon next. Petitioner: Herbst & Sons Construction Company Inc. Location: 2299 County Road H PIN No. 08-30-23-43-0012 Zoning Land Use: The property is currently zoned I-1, Industrial. Applicable Regulations: Chapter 1116 regulates I-1 Zoning Districts. Section 1104.01, Subd. 3, requires a 40' front yard setback, a 20' side yard setback, and a 40' rear yard setback. Attachments: Zoning Map Site Plan Application Planning Commission Resolution No. 458-96 Planning Commissin Resolution No. 459-96 Background: The property is located at 2299 County Road H. The request is for a variance extension and a development review to construct a 64,000 square foot addition to the south side of the existing building. In March 1992 Herbst and Sons was granted a variance to allow the construction of an addition to their existing facility 1111 at a five foot side yard setback where a twenty foot setback PLANNING CASE NO. 445-96 JULY 10, 1996 S PAGE TWO OF THREE is required by Municipal Code. The variance expired one year from the date of issuance, or March 18, 1993. To consider this request, the Planning Commission would first need to consider whether to grant an extension to the variance request issued in March 1992. Then, if the variance is granted, then a development review process would be appropriate. The City Engineering Consultant, SEH, has reviwed this site plan and found that the site expansion should have no negative impacts on the drainage system. Although it will slightly increase the runoff rate, the area was assumed to be all developed in the LWMP. This proposal does not require Rice Creek Watershed District approval, as the site is only 1.68 acres in size. Based on the discussion at the June 19, 1996 agenda meeting, the parking provided appears to be adequate for the site. Recommendation/ Analysis: Based on the discussion generated at the June 19, 1996 Agenda meeting, Resolution No. 458-96, for approval of the variance extension, has been prepared for your review and consideration with the following contingency: 1. Whenever, within one year after granting a variance or appeal, the work as permitted by the variance or appeal shall not have been completed, then such variance or appeal shall not become null and void unless a petition for extension of time in which to complete the work has been granted by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Resolution No. 459-96, recommending approval of the development review request has also been prepared for your review and consideration, with the following contingency: 1) Herbst and Sons enter into a development agreement 11111 Ask PLANNING CASE NO. 445-96 111, JULY 10, 1996 PAGE THREE OF THREE with the City of Mounds View. • S MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 458-96 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEy STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING SETBACK VARIANCE REQUEST BY HERBST AND SONS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. 2299 COUNTY ROAD H, PLANNING CASE NO. 445-96 WHEREAS, The Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request of Herbst and Sons Construction Co., Inc. for an extension to a previously granted variance to allow the construction of an addition to their existing facility at a five foot (5') side yard setback where a twenty (20') setback is required by Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the criteria used to evaluate all variance requests, and supports earlier findings approving the variance request in March 1992; and WHEREAS, the applicant presented a hardship statement to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the literal interpretation of the provisions of the Municipal Code would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the special conditions of the property do not result from the action of the applicant; and • WHEREAS, granting the variance would not confer special privileges on the applicant that are not enjoyed by other property owners in the same district; and WHEREAS, the variance requested is the minimum necessary to alleviate the hardship. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mound View Planing Commission approves the variance extension request of Herbst and Sons Construction Co., Inc. for a fifteen foot (15') variance into the side yard setback. Adopted this 10th day of July, 1996. ATTEST: Chair Peterson (SEAL) • Acting Community Development Director Joyce Pruitt MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 459-96 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT REQUEST OF HERBST AND SONS CONSTRUCTION CO.,INC.,PLANNING CASE NO.445-96 WHEREAS,Herbst and Sons Construction Company,Inc.,has requested City approval to construct a 6,400 square foot addition to the north of the existing facility at 2299 County Road H; and • WHEREAS, Chapter 1006 of the Mounds View Municipal Code requires that a development review be conducted for this and similar proposals; and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this development proposal: 1. Planning Application dated June 06, 1996 2. Site Plan dated June 19, 1996 WHEREAS,the Planning Commission has determined that the proposal is in conformance with all applicable requirements of Chapters 1100 and 1120. 411, NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the development review request,contingent upon the following: • 1. Herbst and Sons Construction Company,Inc. enter into a development agreement with the City of Mounds View. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 10th day of July, 1996. ATTEST: Chairperson Peterson (SEAL) • Acting Community Development Director,Joyce Pruitt CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW_ PLANNING APPLICATION APPLICANT: hien 8S ± 4 SO ALS C6 Al St- C9, ' N C- Phone 7? ''' �Sd ADDRESS: ),24-9? CO, efi .I-/ /he I J J/ S V i tf Id SS /Ilk Street Address, City, State, and Zip Code• \ _ - Interest in Property (check appropriate box): I ‘47-441".4..., 4.., Owner of Property • IS— 0 Contract for Deed Owner 0 Lessee, Operator, Manager I 011440 — 0 Agreement to Purchase • 0 Other (explain) Documentary evidence of applicant's interest in the property may be required before final City action of this request • PROPERTY INVOLVED: Address/General Locations?' CO, ed Legal Description or Property Identification Number 0g.. o - ,?3,9- 3 -oola Legal Owner: Name/Address---t CMS S6 Ai_S ea/US-3--. Co. T. /U '---�c't Ca . ea I-i PC)611M1D_ _ 111 Et() )9'1 /U„ ,S-S / 1 ) Present Use (check appropriate box): • ❑ UndevelopedNacant ❑ Single Family Dwelling ❑ Duplex/Two Family Dwelling _,r-: .-:__- 11,- 0 Multi-Family (No. of Units ) ❑ Business/Commercial Establishment Industrial Establishment • -0 Other (explain) • Property Classification: `�Abstract ❑ Torrens . I r REQUEST: I 1 :e i _ A 11 i A) a 8-G i / l' t lla 6k) 6 r- c Cf- 1 cp _ , 1,9 m-F- -t ,p s -r e u t t-Lx *Please note: Applicant may be responsible for accitionai fees associated " 'the review of this r uest I HEREBY DECLARE THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENT ARE TRUE/ //tiyf� �//I iik-/ Signature Rezoning $200/acre,minimum$200.maximum 51.000 Park Fund Dedication Fee Variance R-1 to R-2.$75.ail others$200 Date Paid Conditional Use Permit R-1 to R-2-$75.ail others$200 Receipt Number Cod= c.•_-- $75 Deveiop./Site Plan Review 5100/acre,minimum 100.maximum $500 Total Fees Paid /& W�r - • • • S150 Dare Paid Ce —/n^-C7(p Maar Subdivision $250 pius$250 deposit Receipt Number ‘.5/7 (04-t. Comp. Plan Amendment $200 Wetland Alteration Permit S50 plus deposit determined by Staff Additional Fee Paid Wetland Suffer Permit $10 Date Paid / Planning Sign S50 Receipt Number PUO $350 . PUD Amendment $150 Data of final acsson r^ APPROVED Q DENIED TABLEDTABD Date — 6 7 1, , Planning Case No. t{ yS S.-a(P Admin.Account No. y-N ) 1 • 5300 529• 5300�--� k De • p 5295529 Z r y s r'. 33 H i N cv N CV h NI CV n N n n N Ch®®IIMM 5294Irgr EOM 529 � as �' W U 5287 H N N N N N N N N N N N- P B— 2 �. : N N N N N CV 52881T17 �� 1'r�1� I w A ,^� 3 N N 5275 I 5267-s E tiI 5263 Zi 53G 11M1 �O 7 W :299 Itg14r21u�, ti PUD 5251 I 28• :• N 727 � 5230 F • ?59'rr�=! 14bl280 I • /FF17��.77jJ�1'' i , WOODALE FFFD724• nnor =��Mr or : ry 5200.713 ~ ii� M � � � 5201 5229ccamm R�.nggE MEt Z ( /� 521 ■�+�w1:IlL'i� eq. 0 l! J ma bo . ¢Mr I 'I 520 5200 1 ^5200 5209Ong 11' 11" 5150 J 00,N N N N N til' I EDGEWOOD ti.� 8-3 JR. HIGH ti�ti�3 iv, — SCHOOL N 1 = r PUD titin •1 \ \ B-3 1:19c) o r-4 p U210.4 I z 7 I s RICE CREW 3 I W 0 . IPN ! NI � i I . W : o N N N — CO RD �` F- ;44 mmiii W 1- Z I 7111119111411111tik fah Ijaiirei:i aummillitik lhallik I,miry .....141 Miminibm" q I i t 140KIAINWEI MINNIIMMIiiiit I • r R-s • TOWNS EDGE TERRACE = 3i MOBILE HOME PARK ;, :` I i . uaaamoraar nnimommennemnips a • • 4 ,y , ... .... . . . 1-" • \ . ," i • 1 ; /' -. i.•1 ... .. 0 , 1 . c.c.) ... . . .. .... ......,.. . . .. . .. \ -,1 .. . ...\ ll). _61 c i • .. . irTI *‘,.,.., •. at - ••?4,,,,...... . . '124 874-- " ':'s ____ ( , _ ___:...._:_l________..___ _ _C. _ '-'i 155.57 Z 2:3 . . _•to' 10'1•<;''' `,....•-•=s-="'""'"-- '....--'\ . . . ' . . . ,.. o 'COIN] ( . --- t I 7:\ • . 1 . F..--1\- I •••,...._r.„ ...., \- G_ \ .. \'•--.., . ,, ) i 6 1 't ..c_0 4,-- ,-..-„..i....— , .. IN.1 1 ' . , " m --4 CO t ; X-',/, ' ' /// •' i 7 .,. i m - \\ 1." 'r.„ 1/;,///1-1 $ ///,A i `,/- Y/-// / !`) •-- 1 Y . fli ,- ; \ -1 ,:::1F., • -"::.;'../ //1/2 ' ,', ../A Li. en I ,! -•I • ----- LP • --..- j, -I • 7 -,-'I I 0 -•."LO I . . ,... _ . • 1 . / , i . • , ,.... / / Y ,/,/,,,,,./. / . ;••,. ; - 0 // I • .011 -- - ....._•- I9.. APC.,-'' 2! .. -- ` 2._" C.:. \QTE.Rr4,=6;.: . --,,, ,-":-• --L:2?....;_._nu .____._ •-, :,•_•=F-i-•—=----=-"-"-- —— -.-=----V-T^',="---,..;.-e _ _____ .-...- -,- ------- ----.-_--, •• <-1-, __________ .1-4-- • ____ z,---, ,L,,== =-7. t...1 C. .-.3'7. I __._.=_ _.__--.___-_ --,- •---. --- - — - - .-..1..=u7,.1., hm,_ - - z,•-*--• --; y -4 . 'II N\ \ .. IP ) n 1 , b. , . : II' • 1 110 REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Meeting Date: July 10, 1996 Staff Report by: Joyce Pruitt, Acting Community Development Director Planning Case 448-96 File No.: Request: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to construct an oversized garage at 8005 Woodlawn Drive. Petitioner: Jerome Espeseth Location: 8005 Woodlawn Drive PIN No. 05-30-23-32-0034 Zoning Land Use: The property is currently zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. Applicable Regulations: Section 1106.04, Subd. 6, requires a conditional use permit for garages exceeding 864 square feet. Section 1106.04, Subd. 6b, limits the combined square footage of all accessory buildings on one lot to 1,264 • square feet. Section 1104.01 requires a 30' front yard setback, 10' side yard setback and 30' rear yard setback for R-1 zoned properties. Section 1106.03, Subd1 c, provides for accessory buildings not to exceed fifteen feet in height, and shall be five feet or more from all lot lines of adjoining lots and shall be six feet or more from any other building or structure on the same lot. Section 1106.04, Subd. 6d, requires "the buildingshall be q designed and maintained to provide a uniform appearance with the dwelling unit." Section 1106.04, Subd. 6e, limits the width of the garage to 35 feet and provides for no more than three vehicle accesses. Attachments: ZoningMap P PLANNING CASE NO. 448-96 JULY 10, 1996 PAGE TWO OF THREEEll Site Plans Application Background: The property is located at 8005 Woodlawn. The request is for a conditional use permit to build a 1,260 square foot garage. The applicant has provided a statement that "The current two car garage on this property is not sufficient size to store our business vehicle, pleasure vehicle; family car, boat and trailer, antique collector car and snowmobile trailer, under roof and out of sight of the community members. We wish to erect this structure in hopes to clean the yard and driveway of unsightly items." Any existing garage and shed is located on the property (shown on Site Plan A). The applicant is aware these structures will need to be removed, and that no other accessory structures may be constructed, if the CUP request for an oversized garage is approved. Aim The proposed garage is in conformance with all applicable zoning regulations. Recommendation/ Analysis: Based on discussion at the June 19, 1996 Agenda Meeting, Resolution No. 461-96 recommending approval to construct an oversized garage at 8005 Woodlawn has been rpepared for your review and consideration with the following cuntingencies: 1. The conditional use permit be recorded with Ramsey County within 60 days of City Council approval, and a receipt of such recording shall be provided to the City of Mounds View. 2. The building be designed and maintained to provide a uniform building appearance with the dwelling unit. 3. The existing garage and shed be removed from the S AiPLANNING CASE NO. 448-96 JULY 10, 1996 PAGE THREE OF THREE property, prior to construction of the garage. 4. Whenever, within one year after granting a conditional use permit, the work permitted by the permit shall not have been completed, then such permit shall become null and void unless a petition for extension of time in which to complete the work has been granted by the City Council. i MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.460-96 • CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW AN OVERSIZED GARAGE FOR JEROME ESPESETH, 8005 WOODLAWN DRIVE,MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE NO.448-96 WHEREAS,the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request of Jerome Espeseth for additional accessory square footage;and WHEREAS,the Mounds View Zoning Ordinance allows by conditional use permit up to 1,264 square feet of accessory building square footage on one lot;and WHEREAS,the proposed total accessory building square footage on the lot is 1,260 square feet,which is below the maximum allowed;and WHEREAS,the proposed building meets all applicable setback requirements. NOW,THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the requested conditional use permit for additional accessory building square footage by Jerome Espeseth, 8005 Woodlawn Drive,contingent upon the following: 1. The conditional use permit be recorded with Ramsey County within 60 days of City Council approval and proof of such recording be presented to the City of Mounds View. 2. The building be designed and maintained to provide a uniform appearance with the dwelling unit. 3. The existing garage and shed be removed from the property prior to construction of the garage. 4. Should the use change for what the permit was granted for,the permit shall become null and void. 5. Whenever,within one year after granting this conditional use permit,the work permitted by this permit shall not have been completed,then such permit shall become null and void unless a petition for extension of time in which to complete the work has been granted by the City Council. 6. Jerome Espeseth enter into a development agreement with the City of Mounds View. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. ATTEST: Chairperson,Jerry Peterson (SEAL) Acting Community Development Director, Joyce Pruitt r °":'''C.--- ',10 2 6661 y4 8044 ' 8045 8046 8041 8046 8051 8044 ENF1E��' rummy 7945 7944 l : • a: ,.*00,i08035F "..--45..80328031 8038 8035 8024 ----;--4-- 8030 8027 8016 7941 7940 " = j ` ' 8021 8� 8009 8o 10 8011 1 8000 �00 /, 8013 7933 7937 7936 f 7993 7990 7932 �•`7 t.3 �.) ' 7990& 7981 r:%7990 C 7989 7996 7977Mtn 'g n 7984 7989 7988 7929 7928 Insi 7980 „ 7969 , ' 7980 7979 7980 7985 7970 F f 7925 7924-. 7960 7961 7964 7975 7980 7971 x:.7970 7965 7966 7969 7954 7968 7921 7920 El .! .itic 7954 7959 7950 7951 7917 7955 7944 7953 79,4 FE ty K_ 7927 7948 Ir 7940 7945 7946 7940 H I LLVI EW 7913 7910 n + 'x,7930 7935 7930 7917 _ PARK 7945 7934 7931 7909 Ce 'fl 47h 7901 _ rs al 7930 7gpd �' , •>;' u - 7900 7901 N I N 7900 PF -901 n iA :'u�i 7900 v I V. 7+! n 7905 7 "1 3i r.�.7900 N N N • ��w` may/ ROAD ^ I N N N N N N N N 7901 . SFT76.6�Gn I7wVJ s ' "' W :•,,:r47 A 7880 7895, g `i 7890 7885 h n j7864 =74.1 n R N G 7891 N N N I N N 7889 7888 +' 7� PF • 00r :uuuu; N N N > ill= 7885 7866 7867 7870 7869 7858 �'j`4 Z 7854 7851 7860 7865 7852 11 W 7853III= 7875 7868 7869 7860 7855 • •�-' 7870 Cr) 7877 7861 7854 p 7857 785C 1"...„'+'''';'-'7_,- + >z 7863 7842 7850 7855 7846 1131111111:': Z -0lr rt 7 -B 7841 ®■' aln 7845 3 .'`- '0 7851 7830 C1 7840 7835 7840 7847 7840 7840 784 7817 '. •D 7837 783(7 ' 4:-3 � 7820 O 7815 7790 7815 7800 7809 0 7833 7832 7820 - ry^ 444111111. 761C 7805 7780 7801 3 7815 7814 7827 ab C 4 7809 7770 7801 7760' 77977817 :+ 7eoo 37800 7801 7800 ' 9-2 �V' 7801 W 7751 7750 7787 7778 7749 7807 775v _ R �tbO�6y1 ri, 7767 7760 7741 7740 7777 7768 7739 7740 775 a a. N N �` 7761 7750 7731 7730 7753 7741 ry ME 772917730) ' '1N OOD CIR '1~ 7755 7730 7721 7720 a o 1 "' Imig 7728 7719 7720� 7731� N n' n ,R. � J`T6 ry�ryh 7745 7710 77117710 7709 771 C 0 7721 772• 7715 N N N H 7715 <p o 'm m - .. tp lDl mil r m n Of D m v�n 7700 77pt 17700 770 In n n N ,•.:::::• N arYN IIY�� • 7701 N N N N i n n �i r n OP h \ n.tT r N N p 'D CO O I C I • O m !"�-a+..- PUD - :- 'D a !�r t0 tD to�o n In 2553 N to In h 1 + n N o . n t.;:-:, ... t4 ,0 NNNN NNNNN 2551 0 N NI N N N N 'N ryIN rry .— J� N R N 2549 \ : 766C 6 2547 R-4 R-4�' R-4 401/11I1- - �'66• 7643 7658 2545 '561 8-3 " 8-4 2541 66 7641 7656 ;;, 2539 2537 766' 7635 ' 7639 76 7651 o � 7:I 7655 �.• • : 763 7630 ryy -4—� 7645ilia.Q 7625 7628 7641 7:r. VIEWr. 4 • ai. � ::1. �1 7 111:111111111 � ,.,,Pt •-Z / I. i ► CJp 'fit i61C 7631 o r, N 4� 8-Z ; •/ ..n 1 �Ir° `O I ,...Low' 783 . .61.W 95 7594 N N° n x758117580 7531 .0 ''u'° o co 8-3 + lc - 0 'c 7565,7564 G CO i(1 "� I N N '��i • n41 -4,4 J7 N L. L, o N 0.4 lap a _ 'l .,h" N N N n 551 7550 �52t ` :71 N Nnn0N �°Z 7535I75344d 75tt N o f...'\+;,-, :le n. _N 752 cc. ..752C • ,.4 N N N if N .. 0,7,-N;....N � o o� �I a 7541 ti - \ c' N N SOSI704 li��''+�'l.0. .0 o h 3 N 'ti PF + on N 'N 2co N m ' I n to _- N"N 0 R- CITY HALL N J N I N N _ _ ry�N ryy� X394 C; • N N 1-- /it It 8-3 `OR 733, PF r74�' 333Z. Ar �_ 9-1 - ( / . , _ -.,.... ,..._7,, k.s.,2;"..1....44V'6 ti , „.„,.. ri to m 0J 0 Ik ,,,,, ,,..;.. 0 '''..(..,3 n4 40 +ems .611r Si Oil ANIl --,s S s.Fl -3 N N N n 0 R -4 - ?9 H2 NOm 00 R— O• I NI to 5278152'g Si'91 nnNnnn� n1 EU ' a,I�I °� ^'�I + NNNNNN_NI N N Y r4 a f F.---- . 7 `4.7 NININI 52 2152' '27Jm, to, _, r n1 a,1 - =r n10+' In1 r''aU � I529'• R O PIr7 n' ,NjNl N I 10 0 ]� �5�2 I1'F �_- --. IDDIpI .p .OIp �DiOI .pI D11 1pI "j' 1a5186152 52561 .ti . . v. N( N 1 :v N! NI ! N �� I I I 528' -3 R7 I +°j I . .a.. _ �26' ti^ ,olee . — 10- zel ir . 'f 1 ...1 i (-1 C) m= -: o au' 1 •.<:..1 ,...., (\ oli - N1 --,-, --. ' --, . -.1 (.:.,.. < I i \—b , 1 t_ Vi -.--1-. \ '-•• <7.) :.,....‘3 i ---„, if) -1‘1 -.I • --!..) Ai it-.41 ,': •c..) ‘1.) . I -"•-• -1 ..,, I,:::`• , C.1 Q ,,; tN4 !--=%4,.) <) ....1\..... — . sr\ 1 IQ.. ,j1 ji rilliL _ _I AW i! • \ I, • 7:3 ,, \ ,,,, ci . • . - 1 1, 1 1 /1 i i\ / ....9 \ / I • I I 1 ( I ...4...... i . t . 1 N _.1..._ cr. ,s, 4,t,- -- 1 iN 1 "-... --- I .,,Z 1 i 1 :!:'kk; - ',:- - r•••••>1 1 . •--', X 1 I ,...1... I LC:1 1 I 1 • I i -. -,,,... i ‘11.....•••••••1 sorme.•••-dm 1 04... .. . - . .. • .• -- . •- ••.-- . . , 1 10 4' , 714— I' •I I . * I ;..._,, i C1 .1 1 s' 1 • I / -, , =.:: 1 0 i () i c\i . ,QJ • I -... 1 772 11 ....„ -I I --- i, 1 . 17---- .C.;,,1-,i ____1 c\1 i . v., ...., , _ I , I -- . r_ ......, ! 1 1 • ..... • , r) _.1 I , ‹ 'N i' I /:.:Zi li I I v<11 e.•C.-- `--i N 1 ‘44 c''' 1 1 N--- -- > .4qr ' s-1 •!, ; i I J J , c.• eC „,j (.-'... ---, ...4 QJ '`...C1 C-t lei\-11 \I e'i II 1, I • -f I I i ,,,___ _ ___ _... _ _..1 • ,, I D ,..,.. II Tit if1T,... zz -i=_ ___ / i , • . 1 1 I 1 ., I \ , • ! -- --- 0 c 1 I 1 . . • . , s•-•-•H \ .. ` \ (%I 4.1 • 1—4 'Z 1 of./. ••• ,n —.4 .-..-,. ‘..I.. 1...3 . 1 1 1 „.......4....„....—_____.........—........................—........ —___N_____,4 , 1.! • /1 . 4 nI AIH : ! .--,--111 IIIIIIII ....11 / , ' : ! . : 1 HI II / , 1 : 1 , ! ! ! ,---7-, , , , , • , ! I : 1 (-1, , I ' ; . 4 / iii ' , ! ! , ->II / , , 1 , — • 1 , ! : i • , . I, \ ii / /H i ' 11 .'11 /-- 17 11 . , . , , . . , : 1 1 , , 11 l ' I ! ! , , i , I ! r-• II iii • i 1' , , 1 , 1 i , I vl 1 ; 1 l ! ; ; 1. t : , : i • ! IhH , 1 til: s f , \.',, iih 1 . 11 , 11r7i , , . 1 , . . 1 ,' , • , ] . 111 , 1 , ; , ! 7 . . , . I ! , . i, , I'll i < , , , •• , , S . . , , • . ! , . ! , I , . . . • , \ \ . , . \ , 1 • . \ \ , . \\\ \ , . \ •H1 1 . \ \ I \1 • • I S ..., Ni 1, - I - I —; •-- --;; 1 , I ; •-• • 1 I 1-7 1 ; ..-; i ' I •-.....I \..4.1 . _ ..... ••• j *k I -a- \....i 1 i L ; . — I ri s;\.. 1 1 • 71 ... 1 . •••,,, Li 'N I I . I ; 1 j.... . . . I ! j i.-. -4 :- • !.." 1 . j 1 : . I ,..________,1 • ,,\ , -‘. • 1 I , , . • , , • ! 1 , . 1 • ! I - I 1111 . . . n I i Hill . •' 12 To AN-r Ey_rs-fee.IL 4-louse � X10 ASP4kAL l Z5 ''1 �� SI- !NL-ILG - n ',AA-rem -t j N k F�.LT W . . 2 GN eJt t-- N., NN � _K ALUP laltiM D>;!P LAJ '� l�1LLlA,1.1`t U Ax -"...#1C J IR -rip- ��\ -rr_YAEA.)STI t.,11 ALLft J Ur ScuFl4 i t4 i 0 MAI-C.0, ktok.a ir •k OQ r'3/4 x II 7/8 IV (o k2 ;TELE`) = iii fit 1 it � V bkri L L A I' _:,r!�1�.1 LIliiv,1 -TT) rnivrc,\3 House dill , �2 ; xgZ5/a ' i1 4 ' 11 i 1 1 Y--.. P\ti.iLtiO 10L'S 6' O.L. I Zy 1 .�— 2 X4 TRe.A1L1 II_NI , r -.4 -- 11-'' LI,t. L fat-reL Di K_ \ 4 R. /A1 CD/ZLG i� 204-i/ANL, O ` evsiI - r \ ~ j-1pAN— S (..,-rIL1J \_l1f_uJ • ) - _.===_ L __ • � - __ I, . �_ _ . / — "„$) . • • ! /.� /�.\ ~ -- -- � o ''� 0,. . . _ `` | - ' .||' |' / | | -- . ! _ ______� ____ . �___- _ \ / | | -- � |---- --�' | . | ---- --' -- � ! H.| � ' ' i | || | . ,�� / | li | • � - __-- __' -==--_-==- --.// | �__ . �� -_'_- ___ | � � �� ! / \| i '` / ' ! ' ' { . i ! | | 1 ) ||' J | �c- |N! ' i] ~ � / H__ _ ! |! / � __- ____��__- | | > � | / l ' i 1 ” [ I__- ' ' / --- -��- | --===-� =====--- ---~ 1/|i • !i!,---,| | -____ _- _- __-- ` / I I |u i 4 i 'c'. __� __ ilk ,.11'/ \ i | �. Ui' U | ; | /|U '| ' ��, ) It'i -;-- . ....-........ ....--.....--- it. . i f A 2 t 1 0._......._& , 0 ' ("a . • . . 1.- / I--, / I •i J 3,1 ....L.:. 6 ''..-''..........„...„ ."....,____________,...........4 0 .._,..... ---.........„...„ i I I/.; 1 • -1, -, I ! . I i , J ..:( ,, • . LI 1 . 1 i, I ,\ !..: . .1. -.,- . ,=..1 / !,. i ... ).. I // . , I. ' 0 1 . ....••,''., // • LI i 1 • i ' I i • :: !:- • • • !. I , 1 ;,• ! i i .... F ; • I i • ! 'fIf. ).1 i • . '.. ., • -. • ..1 \ , \ t. • , --------\ 1 I ',.... 1-• --... -I \...___. ._.-1....1 ! .: • . . : . ' \ --ii CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING APPLICATION APPUCANT: --/SROM L GS P65LT- t Phone l012 -785-7172- 0 78.x-9/7Z0 ADDRESS: 5005 IAlooc vJn1 Tztk/E, Ma,iNc V1£:4 M&) EE//-2_ Street Address, City, State, and Zip Code Interest in Property (check appropriate box): ® Owner of Property • ❑ Contract for Deed Owner ❑ Lessee, Operator, Manager ❑ Agreement to Purchase ❑ Other (explain) Documentary evidence of applicant's interest in the property may be required before final City action of this request PROPERTY INVOLVED: Address/General Location BOOS V\I oobtAv l,'l D,zive ,t4orr,/os J►1=.,,J ,Vi„J ss-11 L RAAA sirY CauAl- Legal Description or Property Identification Number LaT 2LE tJD LAW AI 1-E2RAC..e 053933 .2"" ate'.-` Legal Owner: Name/Address .fei26owc N. i PAAAtLA M. ;�`Pei LTH4 Present Use (check appropriate box): ❑ UndevelopedNacant El Single Family Dwelling O Duplex/Two Family Dwelling 111/ ❑ Multi-Family (No. of Units ) ❑ Business/Commercial Establishment ❑ Industrial Establishment ❑ Other (explain) Property Classification: 0 Abstract 0 Torrens REQUEST: LIND/ TID/JAL the Peg/oil-To 111IL,O 12.(..06D 2..caua2,E rr, 64rzptc, *Please note: Applicant may be responsible for additional fees associated withe review of this request I HEREBY DECLARE THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENT ARE TRUE. 't -- -1 -Xil l a ' ,�; Signature J • ******************,******************.,*******************************max=** Rezoning $200/acre.minimum$200,maximum$1,000 Park Fund Dedication Fee Variance R-1 to R-2-$75,all others$200 Date Paid Conditional Use Permit R-1 to R-4WD ail others$200 Receipt Number Code Appeal $75 Develop./Site Plan Review $100/acre,minimum 100,maximum$500 Total Fees Paid - '-)5. 00 Minor Subdivision $150 Date Paid (a— 7 —C1 ,_, Major Subdivision $250 plus$250 deposit Receipt Number 7 / Comp. Plan Amendment $200 Wetland Alteration Permit $50 plus deposit determined by Staff Additional Fee Paid 41, Wetland Buffer Permit $10 Date Paid / Planning Sign $50 Receipt Number PUD $380 PUD Amendment $150 Date of final action APPROVED 0 DENIED 0 TABLED 0 Date l.G` '7- in 4' Planning Case No. 4-1.01-- eg Admin.Account No. In June 6, 1996 RE: Request for Conditional Use Permit at 8005 Woodlawn Drive,Moundsview,MN • The current two car garage on this property is not sufficient size to store our business vehicle, pleasure vehicle, family car,boat and trailer, antique collector car and snowmobile trailer, under roof and out of sight of the community members. We wish to erect this structure in hopes to clean the yard and driveway of unsightly items. S 41 REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Meeting Date: July 10, 1996 Staff Report by: Joyce Pruitt, Acting Community Development Director Planning Case File No.: 449-96 Request: The applicant is requesting a development review/ conditional use permit to construct a 6,166 square feet addition to the Cross of Glory Evangelical Lutheran Church at 5472 Adams Street. Petitioner: Cross of Glory Evangelical Lutheran Church Location: 5472 Adams Street PIN No. 08-30-23-12-0086 (Acreage: 1.57 acres) Zoning Land Use: The property is currently zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. Applicable Regulations: Section 1106.04, Subd. 1, allows churches as a conditional use in an R-1 district with certain provisions. Section 1106.04, Subd. la, requires a minimum front yard depth of thirty-five feet. Section 1106.04. Subd. 1 b, requires a minimum side yard of thirty feet. Section 1106.04, Subd. 1 c, requires adequate screening from abutting residential uses and appropriate landscaping. Section 1106.04, Subd. 1d, requires adequate off-street parking. Section 1121.13 requires at least one parking space for each four seats, based on the design capacity of the main assembly hall. Facilities, as may be provided in conjunction with such buildings or uses, shall be subject to additional requirements which are imposed by Chapter 1121. 111 Section 1121.13 requires at least one parking space for PLANNING CASE NO. 449-96 JULY 10, 1996 PAGE TWO OF FIVE each classroom plus one additional space for each 50 student capacity for elementary schools. Section 1106.04, Subd. 1 e requires adequate off-street loading and service entrances to be provided. Attachments: Zoning Map Site Plan Proposed Floor Plan Application Letters from applicants Background: The property is located at 5472 Adams Street. The request is for a conditional use permit to construct a 6,166 square foot addition. On May 1, 1985, Resolution No. 130-85 was approved which granted a conditional use permit for sanctuary addition to the existing Church at 5472 Adams Street. According to municipal records, it appears the Church had been in place for quite sometime prior to the sanctuary addition. The way the Resolution was drafted reflected that the conditional use permit granted in 1985 was only applicable to the sanctuary addition on the site. Therefore, the proposed addition requires another conditional use permit. Since the addition is new construction, a development review is also required. The request before the Planning Commission now is a 6,166 addition which will be utilized primarily for meeting places for children between services. Staff contacted Attorney Long regarding the parking required for the addition. It was determined that a parking standard used for elementary schools would be appropriate for the classroom space since the use of the rooms will be primarily for children. Ten meeting rooms, one office, a work room, a room for the Pastor and a choir room are proposed in the expansion. A representative from the Church, Dave Olson, has submitted the attached letter requesting that the Planning Commission 111) Aft PLANNING CASE NO. 449-96 VI JULY 10, 1996 PAGE THREE OF FIVE not require any additional parking since the proposed expansion will not create any, additional parking needs which the existing parking area could not adequately provide. He states, the office space on the floor plan would be occupied by only three people; the church Pastor, secretary and Associate in Christian Children. The secretary and A.C.E. would only use the offices during the week. The Church provides grades K thru six, Youth and one Pre School all of which are held between the regular worship services. One meeting room will be designated as the nursery room. The nursery would be occupied during worship services. Section 1121.13 under"Church" states a parking computation for seating, and expressly provides, "Facilities as may be in conjunction with such buildings or uses, shall be subject to additional requirements which are imposed by the Title." An elementary classroom in the Code requires at least one parking space for each classroom plus one additional space for each 50 student capacity. Representatives from the Church have stated that they anticipate having less than 50 children in the expansion. The main worship area has 287.8 lineal feet of seating. The choir has 21 individual chairs. Thus, under the Municipal Code parking requirements, these two facilities would require 46 parking spaces, of which two spaces are required to be accessible spaces. Currently, 53 parking sites are available on the site with three of those spaces (one of which is proposed on the site plan) designated for accessible parking. This is in conformance with State requirements for accessible parking requirements. The site plan shows an additional fourteen parking spaces proposed to the North of the existing parking area. The Church is requesting that they may be allowed to phase in PLANNING CASE NO. 449-96IF JULY 10, 1996 PAGE FOUR OF FIVE this parking at a later date to economic constraints. Based on the discussion at the Agenda Meeting, it appears that the current parking in addition to the proposed fourteen parking spaces along the north of the existing parking area, will be adequate for the proposed expansion. It was also discussed at the meeting that these fourteen parking spaces be phased in later based on demand, rather than requiring a completion date for installation of the additional 14 spaces. The proposed addition meets the required setbacks. The property has two access points from Adams Street. These satisfy Municipal requirements. The site does not need to be reviewed by Rice Creek Watershed District due to its small size (less than 2.5 acres). SEH has provided comments on the expansion that the conversion of the lawn use is consistent with the local water management plan. However, localized drainage may be impacted due to the increase in runoff and changing the runoff flow path. SEH will need verification of the site drainage for final review to assure no negative impact to the surrounding area. With regards to lighting issues, the applicant has been advised that all lighting will need to be reflected away from adjoining properties, abutting residential uses and public rights-of-way. City Forester, Rick Wriskey, has requested three shade trees be planted along the south side of the property and six shade trees be planted in front of the Church on the boulevard along Adams Street (providing that a call to Gopher State One allows plantings in this location). Mr. Wriskey requests that when a landscaping plan is drawn up by the applicants that he review it for approval. Regarding the fire sprinkler system requirements, according 1110 PLANNING CASE NO. 449-96 JULY 10, 1996 PAGE FIVE OF FIVE to the Planning Commission direction at the June 19, 1996 Planning Commission Meeting, the condition of ensuring adequate sprinkler systems are in place for the existing building has been removed from the contingencies on the resolution. Staff has contacted Attorney Long to conduct additional research to ascertain whether it is legally appropriate to require fire sprinkling for the existing building. Recommendation/ Analysis: Based on the discussion at the June 19, 1996 Agenda Meeting, Resolution No. 461-96, recommending approval of the conditional use permit, and Resolution No. 462-96, recommending approval of the development review have been prepared for your review and consideration with the contingencies discussed at the Agenda Meeting. MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 461-96 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR AN EXPANSION TO THE EXISTING FACILITY, BY CROSS OF GLORY EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH, 5472 ADAMS STREET, PLANNING CASE NO.449-96 WHEREAS, the property is currently zoned R-1, Single Family Residential District; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View Municipal Code allows for churches in a zone district with the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the expansion proposal is in conformance with the requirements of the Title 1100 of the Municipal Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit with the following conditions: 1. The conditional use permit be recorded with Ramsey County within 60 days of City Council approval, and a receipt of such recording shall be provided to the City of Mounds View. 2. The building be designed and maintained to provide a uniform building appearance with the dwelling unit. 3. The proposed fourteen parking spaces along the north of the existing parking area be phased in as needed, based on demand. 4. Adequate fire suppression sprinkler system are in place for the new addition of the building. 5. Landscaping, as approved by the City Forester, be completed along the south side of the property and along Adams Street. 6. (Any surface water run off comments received by the Municipal Engineer by the July 10, 1996 Meeting.) 7. Whenever, within one year after granting the conditional use permit, the work permitted by this permit shall not have been completed, then such permit shall become null and void unless a petition for extension of time in which to complete the work has been granted by the City Council. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council-prior-to-app _ Adopted this 10th day of July, 1996. ATTEST: Chair Peterson (SEAL) Acting Community Development Director Joyce Pruitt I MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION IP RESOLUTION NO. 462-96 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT REQUEST OF CROSS OF GLORY EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH, 5472 ADAMS STREET, PLANNING CASE NO. 449-96 WHEREAS, Cross of Glory Evangelical Lutheran Church., has requested City approval to construct a 6,166 square foot addition to the existing Church at 5472 Adams Street; and WHEREAS, Chapter 1006 of the Mounds View Municipal Code requires that a development review be conducted for this and similar proposals; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this development proposal: 1. Planning Application dated June 11, 1996 2. Site Plan dated June 10, 1996 WHEREAS, the PlanningCommission has determined that the proposal is in conformance P p with all applicable requirements of Title 1100. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the development review request, contingent upon the following: 1. Cross of Glory Evangelical Lutheran Church enter into a development agreement with the City of Mounds View. 2. The proposed building be designed and maintained to provide urff . building appearance with the existing structure. 3. The proposed fourteen parking spaces along the north of the existing parking area be phased in as needed, based on demand. 4. Adequate fire suppression sprinkler system are in place for the new addition of the building. 5. Landscaping, as approved by the City Forester, be completed along the south side of the property and along Adams Street. 6. (Any surface water run off comments) MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION 40 RESOLUTION NO 462-96 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW JULY 10, 1996 BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 10th day of July, 1996. ATTEST: Chairperson Peterson (SEAL) Acting Community Development Director, Joyce Pruitt • S 111-• N • • N 794♦ 794q< 939 PF �c'��' at DR 2245 572r 7937 7936' 7935 ®®� N N N 224 N 5711." I 7933 7932 ��'j® StSN N N 223 NN7931 ��" + iNN 5701 .-f \-' -- \ `j► `- o3 7929 7928 7927f,� �� iliklif \rte, Ny N 1:1 2233 5891 7925 7924 0 7923 ND ''� °: R-537921 7920 W 7919. K �NNNNN (r °� 5681 �_ :1w. ..7� J9t4� 7 `,:r . �N N N N N N 5671♦ I 7 1.1 913 Ala* 0 c' --aC 9t0� 7909 . d+� c6,/ 5661 '��•. .; i 79Q9 7906° 790- �� , `' '— COLONIAL VILLAGE 7sos 7 ��,�� RO o 3 MOBILE HOME PARK 7901 Hp 0 1 n N •- n •N n w n n N 0 .- 0 04 c4 r4 N 0 0 0 PF 0� rA n N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ! 0 1 0 O O O i • F E � ' n l n M n n M O 10 O + 101 .. 0ILLVIEW O N ` ItJ NI flff N N N N (V I n Of m f' ao O h �► n��O O O) m !•31:21 N 10`m O N''o NA�N MN N N N N N OOAKWOOD N N N N N N N N N N N I�y/�� .�- ^O O 01 m !� y 7855 DR V) ^ OI n Iy N OAKWOOO, N N N NIN N N N N ry H N 5619 561615619Int n N 1^.1 N N14O1i N ^ PARK �- N N N I N N N N N N N ^ 01 n ,r) 5590 ^ 0 n N Ch 784 5613 5642561/ Elm N N N N N N <+ CO w PF o CO Of CO n •••• I El! O,yCyy00D N N N -•J_ 0 0 0 0 0 ' ^W N N N N N Ni--1)N ry N__N N N 1y 5607 5606 5607 ^ N N Y Cr • 5601 S60Q 560 tCZ UUUN N OVUMf N N I N N m n La,0 N ,[7 CO 03 h0f0 m1_O O T O + ,0 O N N N N In I Of m N.... I 5563 5562 558IME gamma, N N N N N N N N N N N N ry (4 N N I 5557 5556 5557 ��®�0 1 W N °' a n ^1a n I^ _ n U1 ^N 5551 U5550 555 tCill m N 'o m ••cgCr ^' N N '^ (' _ _ o a m ^ r.fNN • wNIN N N N n mC NIN N NNIN N�N la, N �N N N N`N NIN I 2.,"j-,5545 5544 55451;5 UU N N (.4®N N I(r + IO DR PINEWOOD CR ,r, 1.1 0) n In m N N N 0 0 + +I m CO N In T I o I N + ? 55391 5538 5539 CO m ^ ^ o h 1A ^ ' N N N a m c n A .,n n_ H I 1 0 l o+ o n' n os n' n �.1' ER N N N H NI N n CO N N N 8 N IIrN N N!N 1� .. -I-,�I. O o i o 10 N ^ N^ N 9 5533 5532 N N N1017# �- Z i N N N N N 1 N N (V N N N 7715 j 5533 PINEWOOD D r.4 m m n 5527 5526!5527MC ooi m o 1+! n m IC . o c, ®( m ^I m•vii uni n n m _I rt ^ _ N. _ 7701 ' n n) n (n IN IN 1N1ry 'n,�+ no lc, - I N4N _ ^1 01 011 01 1m ^ ^ N , N , N N •N15521 552 5521 5520 N ` N N N NIN N N NINNINZNiNjNIOVIN N!, 1NININ N NIN'N N N/Ir N RD I ' ca o : I o 0 0 N NI N I I 1 m •1 551 1 5512 5511 �1 N N N �I � ' re)n Ln ^ 5497 5503 5504 5505 fI 1 7641iii7.5• '6£1 N N n I ry :y 4 5493 5494 5499 PINEWOODL1 1 -iC I 5493 55�SCHOOL 3 ' \) ✓ 76 IV 7651 5480 ' 5479 `El 5486 5485 76251762 7641 ! ( 5474 5473 � 5478 5475 M .n y R-4IIIIRIP � Lill 1 '6 :;;; f U N 5475 5462 i 5463 ss 4s6 1 5459 j I ' 411\ M EIMEUMEI ae =Ill0� t;ij 5446 5447 O G4-- s'7, • 5447 N 1 1 1 - i I / 4' 7565 7564 I GO GO O 5440 I 5441‹ • A n I n m n i h! W MEE 521 I a I s \ 6' 5439 ^1 21,21 ..1 n n %� f-- I 2211111112 `' J� 5433 •r 1 N c41,71,4/7,/, ,/,,,,, ••, MEET 5x26 5725 SA �' ! BPIF LI•4 •;+ 51' F 2 i S4^<5 + 1 '5211 752. 5420 I 8421 St \' J I-- I j mn i ^ r N I N I N ,N: N O51?501 750 t ' 5401 Sat a 5415 5414 -I n 1,-,I o•1 -I 5413 r. ~ 1 I I 5406 "7 •-• nINl(I o' 4 ^1 `O �i�nl Y ' .'�, liv Y 5405 5406 :N1 NINl NINI N) 540 N1 NIN V1ry I N:N N =5395 5394 1 5395 a'9 m; N'A on;+ nv j N I fi o n 'rn, !m 5391 5392 5391 527 la 11113 Ii5394 538615385 538615385 53• • C5386 53870Z NNININNINN'NNIN NN N ' N N NjN 1 N53921 526:: M • 538C; 5381 Y ! y �_ _/--,-.......___L, 537 373-3 • I I I I i 538015379 538015370 .5361 W Iazir --,--,-H---- ` - _ B-3 / I I I 5.•.721 5377 5.3?21 X371 535 f 6 , 5367 X358 5359 5366 j I IST 536415363 536415363 534 o R-5 - f f 53.5- :335435 353 •�•o n i s i_, 1 53581 5357 5358 5357 534 2 / 5343 `3aa ! 535e i I '(''+ ' e 1 n 'N 1 N 1=i o I o I o 1;n 53521 5351 5352 5351 ;11! I:V IN! NIN!ry NINI N / 5 3 4 5 N:N' 'VIN I N I N 1 N I NI N'N i N I ' J_ .53 5336LAMBERT 534415371 534415343 53 35 5337 AVE i 533• cm • '� /' '�- `"�.53 / 533( 1 LAMBERT 12: -', .:;:c4 , N 1:27;p j 8 1 rn I m_lU 53381 5337 5338 5337 I 1 I^ 1 I I N Is,,.; 5330 532S 5330 5329 • _ - - - 531• • • • I - -- _ _ 1 I Ash_ 11/ 1 F1ri I XW 1010 — Isu1 r..:� 1 lGZas . v �- .L1 ' - -- \- \ I t I o I. 17---\Z' 1 : 1 I\� . . \ V1 NIW Q� -..iIIIIIIIIIIIILIIIIII I .\ Ir /1 Z Q f.— 1-7 I.v I \ I \ I \ I t / / / \\ 1 1 I l I � I ° z I r 1 IIf I i I P— f $'-e# i 1 I 1 � � ! I I , i I I I I �-___�_1___----'---_ —• ' _ ___ p— • 1 4/do d el"N-1- 00D rn W ce r- • UU < • -4 Q Q 71.:, E6 W W • Z N 0. Wot O gl >c< CO O =• N U • V aOe\irc (� ( Z'� Qi • ac • A .... _. • S 1.3 • \1;*' N Q o� f Z' • ROL 9 \ - -..k 1 • wlpIIIIPP- ` N • J S • Z 0 Z \ o •_ •G •'2 Y N kg f W• OC L ' f y za' • i K • .1,-.,11,7;;,...-- T :•:..,..1,.--;.. - . • \ _ ...,„-- 1:.,,,..--it::::::::''':::';7. ' • lL. / \ .. o r / Y , 0 • <Iv\ • I 1 I . .._ I )1----------;! , A PNI i 1I iM )I '' ,) I 1 c' i ;7 A gm ill Tm ...tirili ; !----- , i ill tt 1 . A --'—'- .7 -.1"1 17=__4n.___Ji : . . , 11 / , i! , , 777 • - • ,-, : . M a c= : a * 11 1 :- C ViEli -<. 1m ii i t. : - - A i I ' iii 11 A Iii /- '-. 111 1' i 1 ;@ "'FIL.,i-1 . i -,... . i lir ix i ii 1 . e.i 1 km i gl. 2,12 0 'S• I 1 I : 21; 1 , ..-_, S PLANNING APPLICATION Ldi e Ct+tiacr- APPUCANT: /to , .—_,I2 (A). s t"V'444LIC# Phone -.2-6" ADDRESS: -1—Y-7,1-4)4'15 S r211..) —_ Street Address, City, State, and Zip Code v,f M� �� Interest in Pro Qarty_(check appropriate box): Owner ofProperty •/ ❑ Contract for Deed Owner ❑ Lessee,Operator,Manager -❑ . Agreement to Purchase - - ❑ Other(explain) - • - Documentary evidence of applicant's interest in the property may be required before final City+=Son of this request - PROPERTY INVOLVW. -- Address/Genera! Location SSt7A- ana.,t 5 ff.; .4/0u...4s ✓if� Hr✓ 3Si'd Legal Description or Property Identification Number_/1.4ois ty coyt,-y c� f c 44-4, 5,14✓E 3: - 9 Legal Owner: Name/Addressfr H• . RI t�t.di>a 2o9f/Li �G-4-i3f�1 -10,1-5-7 �. 5�p' 20.9 wte.r_rFa✓5 riaj /lay.,/ /2404r2 A ai"y vif NnJs, Present Use(check appropriate box): -- ❑ UndevelopedNacarlt ❑ Single Family Dwelling Q Duplex/Two Family Dwelling ❑ Multi-Family(No.of Units ) - - 0 Business/CammerdalEstablishment ❑ Industrial Establishment - - Other(explain) �� Property Classification: f7 Abstract Torrens 1 • RECUEST: Fee ,ok/2n-,iSS.aa) TV 6a/4.....0 4,1-) e,�ar917,63 A•) 77o.t. ry 77 ''-'474 S 3, of PXrs`.t/ S,yL✓cTvn °please note: Applicant may be responsible for aaoitiorW fees associates with the review of this request I HERESY DECLARE THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENT ARE TRUEf iCtIL r-/ .......................... � Site-7 V aRezo� S200/aore.minimum 3200.maximum 51.000 Perk Fund Dedication rte ' ! R•1 to R.2-$75.al others$200 Dees Paid Conditional Use Nand R-1 is R-2-575.all others$200 Code Appeal 5.75 Receipt Number Deveop.iSite Plan Review it00/acre minimum 100�.jma m 5,500 Total Pees Paid Ij /Q,� Mince Sulpoivialort si ✓`-1.C✓T� ES Dme Paid Mao,Subdivisiott $250 plus 3230 deposit Coma Plan Amendment $200 Receipt Number i-� wetland Altrrton Permit $50 plus clamed determined by Staff Additional Fee Paid Wetland SurferPermit $10 DatePaid _________ Plannmq Sign • 550 Receipt Number PUD $33 PUO Amendment SIM Dau d find 77.4'APPROVED DENIED L' TASLD Ci D'm \)(Ar/e' Ill iqq& Planning case No. `'rt i '1 °tAdm -tal Admin.Account No. rl • From:DAVID OLSON HOME Fox;104.1011 Voice.7846111 To:JOYCE PRINTT hag 2 oft Wotlmsdry,how 12,1966 6:J1:10 PM MOUNDS VIEW CITY HALL 2401 HIGHWAY 10 MOUNDS VIEW,MN. RE: CROSS OF GLORY CHURCH ATT:JOYCE PRUITT: As per our phone conversation on the 12 th of June I am including the information you requested. - 1.The office space on the drawing would be occupied by only three people.The church Pastor,secretary and Associate in Christian Education.All but the Pastor are part time employees.The secretary and A.C.E.would only use the offices during the week. 2.We have grades K thru 6,Youth and one Pre School all of which are held between our regular worship services.We also will have one of the meeting rooms as a designated nursery room.The nursery would be occupied during worship services. 3. Main worship area has 287.8 lineal feet of seating.The choir has 21 individual chairs.This should help you in determining the parking requirements which are required by the city. /rJ-GrSor to-f7r 22" The rooms that are designated as meeting rooms may not always be used for Youth Education.This all depends on the number of children we have in our membership. If you need any additional information please fill free to call.Please call pager number 538-0515. Thank you. Sincerely, David F.Olson Const.Committee Chair ` er FAX COVER SHEET TO .')O'ff �� l�I _ FAX NUMBER 1,` 7S4 FROM 't l-A _ 1 PROJECT CROSS OF G.-0?—.1 PROJECT# 61%0• k DATE 6-7-.16. PAGES(INCLUDING COVER SHEET) cos2vD EIdT ,)1WCE?) I P PART e feEkeyxE5 1�t1i4 c 4U LESt6--, , DUET_ 1NmapY ET 1oN f L P IE ot- q=bem cote P 30s.( AF cd-t ) . 1PtcAT S - - -h 4-1002. P B seavtcs `tom- C 1-1EFT ttE5 PDT w- sTlTUT A -C 6,665D DR-51-1 The SE 1•-y c.peikt -r OF -n-is skPc1i `r. 2EViE !Th Ti-h; b N P C s DEF*--- rtbp a 1r tr copu)e-s ITtT4-} cop_ IPTErt eC 10-' X G TIM s is IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THE PAGES PLEASE CONTACT SENDER AT 612-224.4831 L RAFFERTY RAFFERTY TOLLEFSON ARCHITECTS 253 GST ATM STREET SAINT PAUL MINNESOTA 55101.1632 TEL 612 224.4831 FAX 612 228.0264 S 06/07/96 14:27 V612 228 0264 ART/INNOVATE QJ002 1994 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 305-3115_2.3 • • SECTION 305—REQUIREMENTS FOR GROUP E OCCUPANCIES 305.1 Group E Occupancies Defined.Group E Occupancies shall be; Division 1.Any building used for educational purposes through the 12th grade by 50 or more persons for more than 12 hours per week or four hours in any one day, Division 2.Any building used for educational pm-poses through the 12th grade by less than 50 prions for mon than 12 hours per week or four hours in any one day. Division 3.Any building or portion thereof used for day-ea a purposes for more than six persons.. For occupancy separations.see Table 3-B. 305.2 Construction,Height and Allowable Area 3051.1 General.Buildings or parts of buildings classed in Group E because of the use or charac- ter of the occupancy shall be limited to the types of conasuction set forth in Table 5-B and shall not exceed,in atm or height.the limits specified in Sections 504.505 and 506,except that the area may be increased by 50 percent when the maximum travel distance specified in Section 1003.4 is re- duced by 50 percent. -- - - 305.2.2 Atmospheric separation requirements. 305.2.2.1 Definitions.Forte purpose of this chapter and Section 1017,the following definitions are applicable: COMMON ATMOSPHERE.A common atmosphere exists between rooms,spaces or areas within a building which are not separated by an approved smoke-and draft-stop barrier. SEPARATE ATMOSPHERE.A separate atmosphere exists between rooms,spaces or areas that are separated by an approved smoke barrier. SMOKE BARRIER.A smoke barrier consists of walls,partitions,floors and openings therein as will prevent the transmission of smoke or gases through the construction.Sec Section 905. 305.2.2.2 General provisions.The provisions of this section apply when a separate exit system is required in accordance with Section 1017. Walls,partitions and floors forting all or part of an atmospheric separation shall be as required by Section 905.23.Glass lights of approved wired glass set in steel frames may be installed in such wails or partitions. All automadaclosing fire assemblies installed In the atmospheric separation shall be activated by approved smoke detectors. The specific requirements of this section are not intended to prevent the design or use of other systems.equipment or techniques which will effectively prevent the products of combustion from breaching the atmospheric separation. 305.23 Special provisions.Rooms in Divisions Iand 2Occupancies used for kindergarten.fast- or second-grade pupils,and Division 3 Occupancies shall not be located above or below the first story. • - EXCEPTIONS;1.Basements or stories having Itwr levels located within 4 feet(1219 mm).measured vertically,from djacent ground level at the point of exit.provided the basement or story he.exitsdirectly to the exterior at that IeveL 2.In buildings equipped with an automadeapdnklersysrem throughout too=UMW forkindergancn,fust- and second-grade children or forday-csre purposes may be located on the second story provided there am at last two exits directly to the axtetior for the exclusive use of such occupant,. 3.Division 3 Occupancies may be located above the fust story in buildings of Type I construction vas car ' Types II-F.R,tt One-lour and III Once-hese subjectconucnon,subjcno the limitation of Section 506 when: 3.1 Division 3 Occupancies with children under the op of seven or containing more than 12 children per story shah nes be located above rhe founts floor:and 1-31 • S Phone: (612)784-3055 111114°UND�� Fax: (612)784.3462 ogre's•ParmeK°s June 05,1996 Tim Sack James Steele Construction 1410 Sylvan Street St.Paul,MN 55117 RE: 5472 Adams Street,Mounds View,MN 55112 expansion proposal Dear Mr.Sack: • Upon review of City Codes and coitsultatien with the City Attorney,it has been determined that a building expansion • will need to go through a conditional use permit amendment process. The following are tentative dates of meetings at which your proposal may be discussed. Wednesday,June 19,1996-Planning Commission Agenda Session At this meeting thequest will be presented for discussion. All concerns(if any)will be addressed at his meeting. No formal action will be taken on the request at this meeting. Wednesdyy, Planning Regular his meeting,Planning Commission willtakef action on the request Meetingrecommending either approval or denial of the proposal. This recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council for their review. Monday,July 22,1996-City Council Regular Meeting At this meeting,a public hearing will be set for Monday,August 12,1996 to consider the conditional use permit amendment request. There will be no discussion at this meeting on the specific application. At this meti ,Monday,public c heast ring 1996-City be held onil the conditional lar use Permit amendment request hearing,the City Council will also take action on the request Following the Please be advised that these dates represent a"best case"scenario. The time frame for the process may be increased in the event that either the Planning Commission or City Council asks for additional information from the applicant or staff. If you wish to have the CUP amendment application discussed at the June 19,1996 Planning Commission Agenda meeting,you will need to submit application materials prior to Wednesday,June 12,1996 for staff review. Typically,we do not accept applications this late,but in the interest of expediting the process for you,the deadline of Wednesday,June 12,1996 has been provided. If you have any questions regarding this information,please contact me at 784-3055. Sincerely, CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW Joyce Pruitt Acting Community Development Director ��i�savituign 2401 Highway 10•Mounds View.MN 55112-1499 .41 Easel Opprorunsty Employer '�••'" wo. • REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Meeting Date: July 10,1996 Staff Report by: Joyce Pruitt,Acting Community Development Director 1110 Planning Case File No.: 451-96 Request: The applicant is requesting a variance to construct a garage on the property. If the variance is granted,a conditional use permit to construct an oversized garage(for 1,248 square feet)at 7901 Red Oak Drive Petitioner: Church Upon the Rock Location: 7901 Red Oak Drive PIN No. 06-30-23-42-0029 Zoning Land Use: The property is currently zoned R-1,Single-Family Residential. Applicable Regulations: Section 1106.04 requires a conditional use permit for accessory buildings other than a garage exceeding two hundred sixteen square feet. Section 1106.04,Subd.7c,prohibits an accessory building, with a conditional use permit,from exceeding four hundred square feet. Section 1106.04,Subd.7b,prohibits the combined square footage of all accessory buildings on one lot from exceeding 1,264 square feet. Section 1006.04,Subd.7d,requires the accessory building to be a permanent structure. Section 1106.04,Subd.7e,requires the building to be designed and maintained to provide a uniform appearance with the dwelling unit. Section 1106.04,Subd.6,requires a conditional use permit for a garage exceeding eight hundred sixty four feet. S PLANNING CASE NO.451-96 JULY 10, 1996 PAGE TWO OF FIVE Section 1106.04,Subd.6c,prohibits any other accessory storage buildings if the garage square footage is greater than one thousand square feet. Section 1106.04,Subd.6e,prohibits the width of a garage from exceeding thirty-five feet,and allows for no more than three vehicle accesses. Section 1006.03,Subd.1c,prohibits accessory buildings from exceeding fifteen feet in height and requires all accessory buildings to be five or more feet from all lot lines of adjoining lots and to be six feet or more from any other building or structure on the same lot. Attachments: Zoning Map Site Plan Application Background: The property is located at 7901 Red Oak Drive. The request is for a variance to allow a garage on the site and for a conditional use permit to construct a 24'x 52'(1,248 square feet)oversized garage for storage space. In March 1996,the Mounds View Planning Commission reviewed a request for an extension on Church Upon the Rock's conditional use permit request for temporary, accessory structures on the property. Discussion continued through several meetings regarding the need to remove the temporary structures,used as classrooms,since eight years had been already provided for the temporary structures. The Church was encouraged to investigate other storage options within the church for needed classroom space. Church representatives found that they could indeed use space inside the Church for classroom space if they were able to construct a storage facility for items currently in • storage. • PLANNING CASE NO.451-96 JULY 10, 1996 PAGE THREE OF FIVE At the April 3, 1996,Regular Meeting,Church Upon the Rock withdrew its application for an extension on its conditional use permit for temporary,accessory structures. Church Upon the Rock is now requesting an oversized garage to be used for storage space so that they may free up space,currently used for storage inside the church,for classrooms. The Municipal Code defines private garages as,"a detached accessory building or portion of the principal building, including a carport,which is used for storing vehicles." The garage proposed at the site will not be used for storage of vehicles. The Municipal Code allows for accessory structures exceeding two hundred square feet,but not more than four hundred square feet,by conditional use permit in R-1 zoning districts. It appears the Municipal Code does not recognize that churches,allowed by conditional use permit in R-1 zoning districts,may have all the demands for storage that single family dwellings may have. Staff suggests that the impact of an oversized garage on the site would not have any greater impact than a home with an oversized garage would have on the property. If the Planning Commission wishes to consider granting a • variance to allow a garage on the site,then the next issue to consider would be whether to grant a conditional use permit for an oversized garage on the property. Dick Whitney,a representative for Church Upon the Rock, has been made aware that no other structures may be • allowed on the premises. Discussion at the April 03, 1996 meeting by the Planning Commission suggested requiring some type of security to ensure the existing temporary, accessory structures would be removed from the property. A staff report dated April 04, 1988 revealed that the Church requires 98 parking spaces. At that time, it was shown that the site had inadequate parking on-site for its Sunday PLANNING CASE NO.451-96 JULY 10, 1996 PAGE FOUR OF FIVE demand and that on-street parking has prompted complaints from neighbors. At the June 13, 1996 Agenda Meeting,Mr.Whitney reported that he has not observed parking on the street and does not feel that previous parki concerns are an issue now,with the Church using Kinder Kare and Western Bank for overflow parking as needed on Sundays. A revised site plan has been submitted which shows 91 current parking spaces. Mr.Whitney has shown on his site plan(attached)four proposed parking sapces to the west of the property,two proposed spaces along the circle to the west of the property and a possible angle parking spot towards the east of the property. The site plan shows the propsed garage to be located along the east side of thee property. Mr.Whitney proposes to create five new parking spaces along the west side of the garage. Thus,if the angled parking space is included in the total number of parking spaces,the site plan shows 98 parking spaces. The site plan shows the propsed garage to be located where the refuse dumpster currently resides. It is unclear where the dumpster will be moved to on the site plan. Staff has left a message for Mr.Whitney to bring a site plan to the July 10, 1996 Planning Commision meeting showing where the dumpster enclosure will be located. The proposal before you shows the garage to be located on existing an impervious surface,so no additional impervious coverage will be created on the site with this request. Staff has reviewed this proposal and found that is consistent with Chapter 1106,regarding setbacks and requirements for oversized garages. Recommendation/ Analysis: Based on the discussion at the June 19, 1996 Agenda Meeting,Resolution No.463-96,approving a variance to construct an garage at 7901 Red Oak Drive and Resolution No.464-96 recommending approval to the City Council for a conditional use permit to construct an oversized garage with PLANNING CASE NO.451-96 JULY 10, 1996 PAGE FIVE OF FIVE • the appropriate contingencies. • • MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.463-96 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A GARAGE FOR CHURCH UPON TH ROCK,7901 RED OAK DRIVE,PLANNING CASE NO.451-96 WHEREAS,the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request of Church Upon the Rock for a variance to allow a private garage for supply storage at 7901 Red Oak Drive; and WHEREAS,the Municipal Code defines a garage as a"detached accessory building or portion of the principal building,including a carport,which is used for storing vehicles;"and WHEREAS,Church Upon the Rock has demonstrated that it may have all the demands a single-family dwelling has in an R-1 zoning district;and WHEREAS,the Municipal Code currently does not recognize that a Church in an R-1 zoned district may have the same storage needs as a single family home;and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission has reviewed the criteria used to evaluate all variance requests;and • WHEREAS,the inability of the Municipal Code to address Church storage needs does not result from the actions of the applicant;and WHEREAS,granting the variance would not confer special privileges on the applicant that are not enjoyed by other property owners in the same district;and WHEREAS,the impacts of a garage on the property would be no greater than a single family home on the property. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission approves the request of Church Upon the Rock to allow a garage on the property contingent upon the following: 1. Whenever,within one year after granting the variance the work as permitted by this variance shall not have been completed,then this variance shall become null and void,unless a petition for extension of time in which to complete the work has been granted by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Adopted this 10th day of July,1996. ATTEST: Chair Peterson • (SEAL) Acting Community Development Director MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.464-96 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW S COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA • RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW AN OVERSIZED GARAGE FOR CHURCH UPON THE ROCK,7901 RED OAK DRIVE, PLANNING CASE NO.451-96 WHEREAS,the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request of Church Upon the Rock for additional accessory square footage;and WHEREAS,the Mounds View Zoning Ordinance allows by conditional use permit up to 1,264 square feet of accessory building square footage on one lot;and WHEREAS,the proposed total accessory building square footage on the lot is 1,248 square feet,which is below the maximum allowed;and WHEREAS,the proposed building meets all applicable setback requirements. NOW,THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the requested conditional use permit for additional accessory building square footage by Church Upon the Rock,7901 Red Oak Drive,contingent upon the following: 1. The conditional use permit be recorded with Ramsey County within 60 days of City Council approval and proof of such recording be presented to the City of Mounds View. 2. The building be designed and maintained to provide a uniform appearance with the dwelling unit. 3. The existing temporary structure on the property be removed prior to construction of the garage. 4. Should the use change for what the permit was granted for,the permit shall become null and void. 5. Whenever,within one year after granting this conditional use permit,the work permitted by this permit shall not have been completed,then such permit shall become null and void unless a petition for extension of time in which to complete the work has been granted by the City Council. 6.' Church Upon the Rock enter into a development agreement with the City of Mounds View. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 10th day of July,1996. ATTEST: 1111111 Chairperson,Jerry Peterson (SEAL) Acting Community Development Director, Joyce Pruitt • ry Iry 007 ( IMI 8111 _ �4 ry w � �m �tv coli .�v w 1 8 ®N rv� 8068 .• =© 8: Etrz [ma 82528072 •� 1 m 6-3 R-0® 8 Soso CM 603o 8 lEma co b urni111: 8042 6032 6051 8045 \\ mWNW= 80®� "®' 8132018 8033 BOW 6035 8032 8031 8038 �8 &` 8000' 6009 I soca 121 8022 ., 8C �••.!7983 6000Wall 7980 J9B®® ® 800, I &110 00 7990 C T 7968 n yO ��'' ® 9960 2� 9'+799 7980 1 ��6E2,�7�}z 79 e ry CM�W� ��M=79}70 �j 7951f54 D: i 7930 M �'•� 7931 7934 R 4,, (�{ ®� VW, �� • Hlt l VIE'N 795: n al , DMIE! le �m im7901 PARK 790 Et PI r8ILLVIEW Pp: o1� 78951 n r 7690 760, I vryr'i 7884 883 9-2NE:41:111= 112 _ 7887 7870 7869 Er y' KW EZI® �N 7851 7860 7865 7852 7:3 D Op n 7850 W 7841 4 0U��7''� :-.13111111' 7630 CI�, 7835 7829! G77691778. . ®® �� 7813 I 7800 7817 LIM7775 781.u1 O 7803 7780 7809 7759 7770 0 � 1a 7809 77701 7801 1 77.. 7807 ••,777 7737 708 • /: 780, = 7750 7787 765 773. �Lig�� Qin,,� 767 769�74® 777 ��6" 8`..:O� p o I 7730 767 ""ai /lty�:-�(�y �� ` � 7750.773, 7730 7�jS3 cI ... _m.".2 7ss Tao 7721 I 7zo 710 . 7710 745 7710 L 7686NM! 7892 R,M= EMU .R-Z ., (t_ 768p N7690 PUO- n n. El 7669 / 7670Ellie ire, �` N 25537670 7683 786C Y n a n w :_: i 7886 � w CIO 2543 2541 7820 7825 7620 2339 760C 7819 7600 , 2537 75:. 758 7594 InalliEn 7�5 • SILVER VIEW - Jssp 7565 5 22 7365 7580 PARK :,,,iii,:ois, dliP o�0 . ti�., 7333 FIEB _= rn1,^. R- mu PF 7090 O ^in VgAIIVAP 4.A ^"Pk. T jam':. 7474 IIEREgal a9!n I 750- _-.. ,454 6RONSON "� I 745/1.--'-1 i m 7- U / 7452 m l 10 1 7444 i n a- 7434 j 7415 I I 7442 .illt- 7412 C 7306 1 6s�744.,00 ,AEW ,R PF - IC 7405 FYI 73 3 v''i'�j'1,730 7382 7393 7000 ;*8� -7sn -9 1390 7�0 '�7 2 .� _ 0 1 i ,‘YeFe. 1 .. .... "-; ' • . . 'A- ... . . . t...4 •. . . — -.3.- ' I — 1 ‘\ 9 , ., . . . . 4• '1 , •,-- 1 c- Z- . --%• .,„ --- - Y- — • • • _ ' I . . !. , i r .. --• ''.4 - '• e-r-N . • .. :-•`", - :C. c- • ,71 • ' Y ; — ...i• 0 •,.; ' i .11.Vvl 111 , . . i ._, V z- . ..,, • .L. ._____ I I : ,..1/4, 2,-,:-.7 • .i.,1 i's — ,..9 . •. 't. .1 • :' ' : 1 • . •i J' \ i •11N:-`1-.., -- 1 . . .• . . • . , , 1 • -;"--- - --• .. .., 'i- -5..\ . r _ 6 I • . eil V\ . Li I i ;-.4 1..• r : , r. i ,... si. „. .. -5L ,be. iL 1 11 it. .1. , 1, --=t ' .--.. — '---r— i -7- .=T---: ! i -7---I , NA. • - .--,4: • ,I. Hi, 1 . ,:;`-• !'.;',--,-..- 1 3--"z .• ',4 \A .. ; . 1 I 1 I- ,1? . 1 .9 a'I--] I . ' • Li 51. f;,i. ‘01 rAi it •.i )i .,..2. 1r Az 1.11,1 -.-^17 - `...T. ' ..,\3s •S•,. -. ',1-:‘,..'.4-c. . \. . ' • ••. I , I 1--. • . : 1 I--.---r---r- ‘ • i i -I" i 1 •4 1 I 4. \L/ L__, _-a ---- •• I •.. 9 I t." 's c•., --11-1. 1 :.-1::::..5(P) 94:SL:11 --'14.1. - ,..1 I :1 i :ri • • . . 1 . . _ , .....- 1 ' • rl 3 . ,.3 -1- i \.i., -- . Cl3 ;1•'.4 ,t•-• . I _- . . 1 •1-0 ._ , . - vs 1 ,g --__ • -1 . c, _ . r. .4% . A . - f 1 1 't/?, .. ,yx}-11 1.9tinfisvc71' ' ..., 1 . s.:::•., , . 1 ''''''''..,..4..,. .,1....) t-t; • . vt, • ‘,...,‘,A '',\., • • \ .. . . •,,,,,':". ...k.,.v..1 ‘,"-. • . i ITN '.,.7 ‘' ',,,\, • C., . . • .... .,, , N \ . ,....- 4 a 4: • _ .... /. ,.., ,..„.. _. M H! . ... •- . • a I ' .cl . 1—r• , ,,,, •- CC1 . ,...,. i..i kii 3.• • -3. ,3- 1- •:,1 , • 4 1 --- 'I1 —1 .. 1-, 1 . -.,•-•--2r,- ----------------------/, ----,- ---. c.,..pz 1\---1 . i .._. ... .. (1.kicni m. 1'/\1-111-1 _ • 06-14-1996 12:26PM FROM 612 643 2736 TO 97843462 P.01 • June 14, 199.. I 1 S Church Upon the Rock / Northside Christian School 790.1 Red Oak Dr Mounds View, MN 786-9555 City of Mounds View Planning Commision, I am requesting a variance for a garage use on the church property. Our neer. for the structure is the same as a single family housing unit. The impact of the garag • should not affect the surrounding area for its outside appearance will fit in with the church building facade. The church has also had an existing garage on the property for over 30 years. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely Richard M. Whitney ginIP _ fir: .. vs wavvrLar1L' w . PLANNING APPLICATION APPUCANT: C K,G Lr t/1 O,o ii+. Ao c_lc Phone 7S 6 - `?3-37-f--- ADDRESS: 7 7 0( f-.ci Dc,t 4.' II Street Address, City, State, and Zp Code kt cic. wk`s Interest in Property (check appropriate box): ❑ Owner of Property 041A-- V‘o, 2,- 0 Contract for Deed Owner ❑ Lessee, Operator, Manager ❑ Agreement to Purchase A • is Other (explain) C It.k-,.4 K5 G,4— i ✓14. .sr h .., Documentary evidence of applicant's interest In the property may be required before final City action of this request. PROPERTY INVOLVED: Address/General Location 7 l o( /2.{) o. I. ,- Legal Description or Property Identification Number ,�/„p �� Li- Legal Owner: Name/Address C.G K,c., /J G f.( ,(/n �� i Present Use (check appropriate box): -. ❑ UndevelopedNacant Q Single Family Dwelling Q :__ -DuplexiTwo Family Dwelling =.. i- Q Multi-Family (Na, of Units ) . ❑ Business/Commercial Establishment Q Industrial Establishment Other (explain) C4 -c-.4 A Sc_4 aoI (r.i l< <, Sf Property Classification: Q Abstract 0 Torrens REQUEST: Co-.J. I----.1 Us-� i,„,:i . / Z``,95 7, 1,f S�_� *Please nota—Applicant may be responsible for aaditionai fees associated with the review of this requ / � c I HERESY DECLARE THAT THE ABOVE STATENIENT ARE TRUE. lit. Signature veleirlivrifeirfrieiranirintronirieleiritironevnirtirtrintititirte Rezoning 3200/acre.minimum$200.maximum S1,000 Park Fund Dedication Fee Variance R-1 to R-2-$75.ail others$200 Date Paid .r.. R•1 to R-2-S75,dl others 5200 Receipt Number $75SL Oeveiop./Site Plan Review S100/acre.minimum 100.maximum$500 Total Fees Paid f Minor Subdivision $150 Oats Paid 1 MI�aior Subdivision $250 plus 3250 deposit Receipt Number V Cama Plan Amendment S200 Wetland Alteration Permit $50 plus deposit determined by Staff Additional Fee Paid Wetland Buffer Permit S10 Date Paid • Planning Sign $50 Receipt Number PtJ0 $350 PUO Amendment $150 Date of find action p, APPROVED ❑ DENIED ❑ TABL 0 Oats CO – I / – 9 Go Planning Case No. -s f' L (P Admin.Account No. Y\ \ P1 • MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 465-96 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING AMENDING THE MOUNDS VIEW MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW SECTION 1008.11,ENTITLED "VARIANCES," RELATING TO SIGN VARIANCES WHEREAS, Title 1008, entitled"Signs and Billboards," currently does not provide a maximum signage allowance for"R-5 Mobile Home Park"Districts; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 585 provides for a variance provision to Title 1008; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends modification to Title 1008, to provide a maximum signage allowance of up to one hundred square feet; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Mounds View recommends approval of Ordinance No. 585, an ordinance relating to sign variances and amending the Mounds View Municipal Code by adding a new Section 1008.11 • entitled"Variances" and a new Section 1, entitled "R-5 Mobile Home Districts." BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this Resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 10th day of July, 1996 ATTEST: Chairperson Peterson (SEAL) Acting Community Development Director Joyce Pruitt • ORDINANCE NO. 585 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW . COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO SIGN VARIANCES AND AMENDING THE MOUNDS VIEW MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW SECTION 1008.11, ENTITLED "VARIANCES"AND A NEW SECTION 1, ENTITLED "R-5 MOBILE HOME DISTRICT" THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ORDAINS: SECTION 1. TITLE 1008, ENTITLED "SIGNS AND BILLBOARDS" shall be amended to add a new Section 1008.11 of the Mounds View Municipal Code to read: Subd. 1 Criteria for granting variances: A variance to this provision of the Section 1008 may be issued by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals to provide relief to the landowner in those cases where the Code imposes undue hardship or practical difficulties to the property owner. A variance may be granted in the event the following circumstances exist: . a. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to the property which do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since the effective date hereof had no control. b. The literal interpretation of the provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Title. c. That the special conditions or circumstances do not result form the actions of the applicant. d. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Title to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. e. That the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. • ORDINANCE NO. 585 1996 PAGE TWO OF THREE f. The variance would not be materially detrimental to the purpose of this Title or to other property in the same zone. g_ The Board of Adjustments and Appeals may consider other circumstances under which the literal interpretation of the provisions of this Title create an undue hardship on the applicant. Economic hardship may be a circumstance for issuance of a variance. Subd.2 Variance requests, fees. All requests shall be made in writing on the form provided by the city and the request shall include the fee specified in the City's Fee Charges. All information required when applying for a sign permit, as outlined in Section 1008.03 shall be required before the request for a variance is considered. SECTION 2. TITLE 1008, ENTITLED "SIGNS AND BILLBOARDS" shall be amended to add a new Section 1008.08, Subd. 21 of the Mounds View Municipal Code to read: • g. B-2 Limited Business District: (1) Signs not exceeding one hundred (100) square feet per business occupant. This includes all types of permanent signs, as defined in Section 1008.01 of this Chapter. (2) Temporary signs as allowed in subdivision 9e of this section. h. B-3 Highway Business District: Signs as allowed in subdivision 2g hereof. i. B-4 Regional business District: Signs as allowed in subdivision 2ereo j. I-1 Light Industrial District: Signs as allowed in subdivision 2g hereof. k. Other Signs As Allowed in Certain Districts: B-3 Highway Business District, B-4 Regional Business District and I-1 Light Industrial District may have, besides the one hundred (100) square feet signage per business occupant, one general pedestal sign not exceeding three hundred forty (340) square feet. Only one pedestal sign is allowed per property. L R-5 Mobile Home District: Signs as allowed in subdivision 2g hereof. • Sec. 3 This ordinance is effective thirty (30) days after publication. ORDINANCE NO. 585 1996 PAGE THREE OF THREE Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this da, of 1996. Read and passed by the City Council of Mounds View this day of , 1996. (SEAL) Jerry Linke Mayor ATTEST: Chuck Whiting • City Clerk-Administrator • MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.466-96 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING AMENDING THE MOUNDS VIEW ZONING CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 1126 ESTABLISHING A 180 DAY MORATORIUM ON NEW USE, DEVELOPMENT OR CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC COMMERCIAL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES WITHIN THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW WHEREAS,Title 1100,entitled"Zoning Code,"currently does not regulate wireless transmission and reception facilities through its Zoning Code;and WHEREAS,the Mounds View Planning Commission is in the process of reviewing the appropriate zoning for the establishment of new use,development or construction of commercial wireless telecommunication towers and antennas;and WHEREAS,market demand,rapid advances in technology and expanding federal licensure of radio frequencies has resulted in increased requests to locate telecommunication Towers and Antennas within the City; and WHEREAS,the City of Mounds View's regulation of telecommunication Towers and Antennas predates the various types of facilities requiring Towers and Antennas;and WHEREAS,the City Council is concerned that its zoning controls relating to telecommunication Towers and Antennas may not adequately address issues to these Towers and Antennas and the conditions under • which they may be allowed within the City,including structural and construction requirements,co-location, setbacks,and height limitations. WHEREAS,the City of Mounds View finds it necessary to conduct studies to determine if there is a need to amend the City's Zoning Code to its comprehensive plan relating to Towers and Antennas,and if so, adopt the appropriate amendments. WHEREAS,Ordinance No. 587 provides for a 180 day moratorium on the new use,development,or construction of telecommunication Towers and Antennas within the City. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Mounds View recommends approval of Ordinance No. 587, an ordinance amending the mounds view zoning code by adding a new chapter 1126 establishing a 180 day moratorium on new use,development,or construction of public commercial wireless telecommunication services within the City of Mounds View. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this Resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 10th day of July, 1996 A1ThST: Chairperson Peterson (SEAL) • Acting Community Development Director Joyce Pruitt ORDINANCE NO. 587 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 111 COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 1100 OF THE MOUNDS VIEW ZONING CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 1126 ESTABLISHING A 180 DAY MORATORIUM ON NEW USE,DEVELOPMENT OR CONSTRUCTION OF COMMERCIAL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES WITHIN THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Title 1100 of this Mounds View Zoning Code is amended by adding a new Chapter 1126 to read: Subd. 1. AUTHORITY. This Section is adopted pursuant to the authority granted to the City in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.335, Subdivision 4, entitled "Interim Ordinance." Subd. 2. P SE O . The City of Mounds View("City") currently does not regulate • wireless transmission and reception facilities through its Zoning Code. The Mounds View Planning • Commission is in the process of reviewing the appropriate zoning for the establishment of new use, development or construction of commercial wireless telecommunications services (hereinafter "Towers and Antennas"), including Towers and Antennas for cellular, personal communication seivices4:PCS_Vspecialized mobilized radio (SMR), enhanced specialized mobilized radio (ESMR), paging, and similar services marketed to the public within the City. Market demand, rapid advances in technology and expanding federal licensure of radio frequencies has resulted in the increased requests to locate Tower and Antennas within the City; and that trend can be expected to accelerate in the reasonably foreseeable future. The City's regulation of Towers and Antennas predates the various types of facilities requiring Tower and Antennas. The City Council is concerned that its • 1 • zoning controls relating to Towers and Antennas may not adequately address issues related to these Towers and Antennas, such as the appropriate locations for the Towers and Antennas and the conditions under which they may be allowed within the City, including structural and construction requirements, co-location, setbacks, and height limitations. The City has received inquiries from companies desiring to construct Towers and Antennas and other facilities in the City. The City Council finds that it is necessary to conduct studies to determine if there is a need to amend the City's Zoning Code or its comprehensive plan relating to Towers and Antennas, and if so, to adopt the appropriate amendments. The City Council finds that there is a need to adopt interim measures for the purpose of establishing an orderly planning process and protecting the health, safety and welfare of its citizens regarding such matters. Subd. 3. MORATORIUM. A moratorium on the new use, development, or • construction of Towers and Antennas within the City is established. During the term of moratorium no application for final site and building plan approval, building permits, and other permits and approvals related to such towers shall be accepted by the City. Neither the Planning Commission nor the City Council shall consider or grant approval of any application of such work. No building permits for such work shall be issued for the development or construction of Towers and Antennas within the City. For—the-purposes of the-moratorium, the term Towers and Antennas shall include any pole, spire, structure, or combination thereof, including supporting lines, cables, wires, braces, and masts, intended primarily for the purpose of mounting Towers and Antennas or similar apparatus above grade, for the purpose of providing commercial wireless telecommunication services to the public. The moratorium shall not apply to (a) the use of existing water towers in the city, or (b) Towers and Antennas work that has received all necessary permits and approval from the City prior • to the effective date of this ordinance. 2 Subd. 4. EXPIRATION. Unless earlier repealed or modified by the City Council, this ordinance shall remain in effect for one hundred eighty(180) days from the date of its effective date. • SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance is effective 30 days after its publication. • Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View on 1996. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this day of 1996. ATTEST: Mayor Linke • (SEAL) • City Clerk-Administrator, Chuck Whiting APPROVED TO AS FORM: City Attorney 1111 3