The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About03-05-1997�O � �/ P� � �O �SI0�1 I1��C� S, 1997 7000 Pol6�o ,� �i,, ( . �: ��i a. Call to Order b. Roll CaII c. Approvai of Minutes m �ebruary 5,1.997 2o Citizens �equesYs aod Comments on Items Not o� the Age�.da CITI�BN5: BEFORE SPEAKING, PLEASE COME TO iHE PODIUM, AN17 GI`IE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTE� 3. Pla�neng Case No. 473-97 2185 Pinewood Drive; conditional use pemv.i for oversized �aragc Applicar�t: Tammy Bellamy 4. P��n�ing Case I�Io. 494-97 8344 Geoveland Itoad; minor su�division (iat spiit) Applicant: Carol Hoopingarner 5. Pl�nning Case No. 475-97 8490 Corat Sea Sireet; development review �d varianc� for of�ce/warehouse b�lding Applicacrt: Benson-Orth Associates (on behaif of ZEP �acaufacturing) 6. Planni�g Case I�To. 476-97 2D75 Rustad Lane; review of conditional use pemut for on-site mobile home sales Apgiicant; Colanial Village Park 7. l'lanning Commission Bylaws 8. Siaff Report/Infomnation Items a. Status Report on Highway IO Study b. March 17 City Council Wark Session c, Open Meeting Laws 9. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports 10. Adjoua�nment , . � �� ;1 � i. �� , � � � 1� •� � :1' ", ��a��x�*�*�x��x#��*�� Al'Pi,iCANTS: YOUR ATTENI�ANCE AT THIS MEETII�iG IS REQCJESTED. PLEASE NOTIFY CITY HA�L AT 7��3455 , IF YOU ARE UNABLE TQ ATTEND. THANK YOU. $�� Contanued on Reverse Side Planning Commission Ag�nda March 5, 1997 Page 2 �� '. " ` � 'l� `�_ :#: �.,. � �.,.., ;�� . ��. ;� . :�: ;, �-. ;�, �<. � . .r � �; .. � : - .l 1� ,r, , AGE�� S�Q� AGE1�D�i 1'Ianning Case No. 4i2-97 2975 Highway 10; conditionat use pemui for auto xepair Applicant: Spots Quick Lube 2. P4ann►ng Cas� 1�T�. �Pm012-97 Qrdinance No. 594: Allowing wetland and native vegetatio�s to be exempteci from thc requirement fo�r mowing grasses over S" ir� height Referred back by City Councii for fiarther review. Plannin� ��se Ivo. ��'-01�-97 Qrdinance No. 595: Adding day care and group nurseries to business and industial zo�ing districts Referred back by City Council for fiarther review. N:\DATAIUSERSIPAMS4SHAREIPLANCOMMIPCAG�NDAIAGENDA3.5 i ITEM 4�3 ii, . ,` :i -- �t . �' '��.. � ; :t; �� '.. i.��`v , e '�S . � � :�� . �4,> "�.. ':. , #f' ��. ��tli]� �$��: S�a#� Repm�°i �y: I�iiarch 5, 1997 James Ericson, Planning �ssociate Plaa�na�� Case No.o 473-97 Reques�o Conditional Use Pernut for ari Oversized Garage Pei�tionera I.ocaiion: PIN l�o. Zonp�g/I.a�d TJs�o Tammy Bellamy 2185 Pinewood Drive OS-30-23-43-0032 IZ-1, �ingle Fa.mfiy Residential Ap�licable I2e�u�atio�ase 1104.01, Subd. 4: Accessory buitdings detached fro�n principal build�ng shall have a side setback of 5 fee�. Rear setback shall be S feet. Accessory buildings shall not be allowed in the froni setback. 1106.03. Subd. I d: No garage shall exce�d 8b4 sqiaare feei except by CUP. 110b.03. Subd. Ih: Th� combined square footage �or all accessory buildings on a loi shaLl not occupy more than 25% of the rear yard. 1106.04, Subd.6: 'The combined square footage of all accessory buildings on one Ioi cannot exceed 1,264 square #°eet; if the garage square footage is greater thaal l,OQO square feet, r�o oiher accessory building shall be allowed, the garage width cannot exceed 35 feet nor allow for more than three vehicle access. /�R, r iri; Plarming Applzcation Zoning 1VIap Sit� Piar�s Resolution 495-97 �ack�roa��d. Wlaile no� significantly larger than the surro�nding properties, 2185 Pinewood is one of the la.rgest parceis in ihis section of the City. (Refer to the zoning map attached.} Presently ihere is a small, one-story residence and a deiached single-car garage on the corner lot. The garage would need to be removed %r ihe 1,260 sq�aare-fooi garage to be canstructed. �/;vj' , t)•.;'i! .. , �?; t/t E;�....... r� �v / �:� `.�} :"ti i.•,� i �i j ' j " •} _, I'.?/i V.,_, f.V�� } �. 4.i �� i ._��. Planning Commission 473-97: 2185 Pinewood; Oversized Garage �ebruary 28, 1997 Page 2 Di�ea�sion�l ��qaeirex��ntso Garage Setbacks* (Front) (Side) (Itear) Percent of Rear Yard* Garage Wiaiih Re uq ired 70 feei 5 feei 5 feet < 25% s 35 feet Provided �0 feei 11 feet 49 feet 2I% 8 fe�i Area of all Accessory Buildings: s 1,264 Sq. ft. 1,264 Sq. ft. � The City Councii may increase these requirements as a condition of approval. A.�alysis: IvIetJlVot IV1et Met Met Met Met Met NTet At the Planning Com�ussion's last mee�ing on February 19, 1997, the relationship beiween the house and the proposed garage was discussed. Specifically, it was discussed that the proposed garage may be ioo large for ihe site and the kome. To baiance this concern, the Planning Commissian looked at the advantag�s of such a garage, such as creaiing adequate storage space for the resident's vehicies and yard appliances. It was nofied thai zfi is desirable from a cornmunity perspective �0 4�ave property owners improve fheir properties wifh garages since the proper�ies are tkzen usually kept in better order. The full effect of the garage would be shielded from ei#her street view. In this instance, �he benefits of such a garage outweigh any disadvantages. The applicant is noi intending to alter the driveway's configuration in conjunction with the garage constructian, but ,plans io do so in the near future. As presented, th� proposai meets all of the criteria imposed by ihe Code, as addressed in the dimension�t requirements above. laecomrnea�da�ion:. Approve Resoluiion 495-97 recommending approval of a conditional use penmit for an aversized garage at 2185 Pinewood Drive. cc: Tammy Bellamy, 2185 Pinewood Drive, Mounds View 55112 N:�DATA\USERS�YAMS4SHAREIDEVCASES1473-9?12185PINE.PC2 ; `; • - � �: *. ' - _k •' ��_; . • .. : � ,,�� _ � , � : � � • �_ _ _ ' '.��"F . r .K^- 1fS$�feS$ !f1 �fO��i�/ � ❑ � � +� � . '� •. . . �_ �� j� (cf�ec� apprapriai� bax)a awner of Property Cantraci fo� Dee� �va�re� Less��, Operator, lbfanag�� ' Agreemerst �o �ueehase �th�r (�xplair�) . Oezumeci�o edidersc� 04 applicarrC� irrt�r�sE irs �t� prooerty m�y t� r�uired b�etor� f�l G �y ' afi �i� r�qu� .•�. � � � � `��"' � �- � • ..ir _ ' ' � ! ` ��+ *" _ a_. �- ri.�_ � � a�- �.. . .- __ _ LegalOvvner: Narr�e%4d�ress �l �resent Us� (che��C appropriate �ax): Q Unded�feoe�i/�/acarti � 5�ngle FamiJ� Dwe!ling ❑ Dupiex/Two �amiiy Dw�6ling . _ . - . _ - - - -- - -_ - - r, . - - - , - � Multt-�amiiy (No. ot Un� ) _ ❑ Business�Cammercal �sfa�lisiimerst Q {ndusiria! �staalishment ❑ Other {explain) Property C�assmcafaot�. RE��U�jl°: �C ['j Abs�`act � iarr�rts 0 ___ _` � � — ` -�a � �- L°�..tZ e� Cc�..`.s� '°3�se Rete. App►ic.�nt may be rPS�nsicle far aac;�ionai ;ees associace� �rvith the r�eie�a ar tflis r�uest f HE�E3Y (a�CL.4RE iHAT T�°eE ,4BOVE STi�,�°�c.AEVT �AE TTnUE � Aeaoniex� Verraaxm Garsaf��i U� r eamrt C�� .3pp� Oe�veiaoJSet� Pi� �ri� Minor Su�ivisimn �4eior Suaaivislan , Camo. rlart Am�tdmertt ' 'Ne�lan� ,�It�ffiian F�mi¢ Wadaa7� 6urfee° �ermit Pfenrnng Sign A°JO �UO Rrtj�ndrnett4 SZOQl�. rninimum �DA. n�munr 51.000 i�i � r�2 - Ss`5. aii cth�°s .5�00 R-t � �-z - rs. ffia �r,� �c� S75 Stafl/asrr�. �inimurrr t�Q, ;rraadrr�um �ud 5f5L� 525� plus Sc°0 deoasit 5200 55A olua de�e��f daceeminea ",v St�af S9 0 � S�a �350 �B � P�r}c Fund D�ic.�ion Fe� Oesa F9ad ��aot tvur�,be� iav�6 P�d Oa� Paed r'�ei�t Num�r ,�dditicn�ll i-e� ?sid �ar� P� 'oc lVurrrber �'l..JC° �U t �• -7 l det� cF nn�d a�^:,,�n ,�PP�iC�V�� F„N1E� ;°i T�6L� �, � [7ar,� 1—/`i ° Q i r°'�anriing Ca� �`dra. ^--- ,admirr. dr.:�,��.w va, Zoni�� Ivlap Case I�o. 473-9� 21�5 Pia��wood Driv� A.ppli�a.n�: T�y ��llainy �� ; ' • � I ;� t SiY� Plan �e�sti.ng) PI '� Cas� No. 473�97 21�5 P�ewood Ia�iv� Appi�ca�.i. T° y �ella�y �►». �- 'i' �� , �►= - . - ., ,.,, ., . i1�: �+ , , .. - : , � � +° ••� l - � l f � .. 1 �'' .; �1�1 1? � % ' .. 'il: �� ►. � ,:. .i r r �: �� ► �� . r � �, �� ; :_ : r� : � ��. °r .r � _. ��, ._ �� ; - :� � , �.r; ��,. ,:��; ., , . �,: �. r�� ; � �� , � i � � � � � �:I � � i°� � : �SO�,u�o�r �� ING ��ow�� o� � co�rrio��, us� �� 1'�Li.�VV tai\ ��'L' l�s�ao,�� 4Y1`�.6�ti63Y'a �Y.fid � YD�L g 2fl�5 I'I��/OOD D ; id10 S�W P G CASE N�. 473-97 �„E ti� f F CJ,�`4�� `� y�""4 t ` �REAS, �'ammy �ellatny has applied for a canditiQnal use permit gfl �onstruct a 1,�6� square foot �n her property located at 2I85 Pinewood Drive, zoned R 1, Single Farnily Residential, legally described as followed: ��.i� � �� l t; I: ° ;`/ ►; 'f r'/fI' ••. ,. iN�TEREAS, The 1Vlounds View Zoning Code allows, with � conditional �ase pernut, up fc� 1,264 square feet of garage/accessory building on one lot; and VVHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: a. Pianning Appiication b. Zoning Map c. Site PIans WHEREAS, the Pla.nning Comrnisszon rnakes the %llowing findings that the dimezasional requirements in the Zoning Code have been met: Gaxage �etback�* ` (Fron�} (Side} ;. (Rear) Percent of Rear Yard*;' Garage Width Area of all Accessory Buildings: ' Required 70 feet 5 feet 5 feet < ZS% s 35 feet s 1,254 Sq. ft. Provided 80 feet 11 feet 49 feet zl% 8 feet 1,260 5q. ft_ ' � Tlie City Council may increase these requirements as a conditio�t of approv�. ' Met/Not �iet Met Met Met Met Met Me� �II-�EREAS, th� Pla.i�ing Coxrzmission makes the %llowing find�ngs thai possible adverse i effects have been considered in its recommendaiion, as required by �eciio� 1125.01 Subd. I.e.: Planning Commission Resolution 495�97 2185 Pinewood Drive IV�arch 5, 1997 Page 2 r�, �� 1. Relationsl�ip ivith the Comprehensive P(an. f�y'`'�-`-� ,` The Comprehensive Plan encourages fihe development and maintenance of r�s,�.dential areas sa as to unprove the quality, appearance and attractiveness oihousing unit�ar� resicfential property in general. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property, 21��'Pinewood Drive, low-density residentiai. This propasat does noi conflict with th� Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Geographical Area Involved. 4. The Character af the Surrounding Area The Iots u� this area are either the same size as the subjeci lot or are smaller. The homes in this area are ot' a similar styie and consiruction, wiih detached or a�tached garages. Since 2185 Pinewood is a corner lot and also fronts County Road I, iti has more visibility than tke ather homes zn this area. Although the proposed garage is larger than is iypical for the area, the placement o#'the garage hides the bulk of it from view from adjacent streets. 3. Whether such use will tend io or actually depreciafie the area in which it is proposed. 'i Removing the existing, one car garage and replacing it with a new, targer garage would be � a benefit to the area in the sense that it is an upgrade to an existing buiiding, and an improvement ta the property. The Demonstrated Need for Sucb a Use. The applicant has stated that this garage is needed to store vehicles used fbr racing, a hobby the residents partake in. Previously, the applicani was asked 6y the City to remove a large car carrier from their rear yard. Currently, the car carrier is in the front driveway because the existing garage is too small. A new, larger garage would enable the applicant to keep ihe car cazrier and race cars inside, as well as other yard appliances. Keeping these items within the garage as opposed fio outside will reduce the appearance of ciut#er on the property. WHEREAS, the Pianning Commission makes the fotIowing findings regarding the criteria �or approval of a conditional use permit, as required by Section 1 I25.01 Subd. 3.b.: (1) The use will not create a� excessive burden on e�sting parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities w3aich serve or are proposed to serve the area. {7) The use will not cause tzaffic hazards or congestion. (8) Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and necessary faciii�ies have beetx or will be provided. The construction of an oversized garage to replace an existing garag� will not create a PIanning Commission Resolution 495-97 2185 Pinewood Drive Marcb� 5, 1997 Page 3 greaier irr�pact on existing public facilities or services, on utilities or access roads, nor will it create an appreciable increase in traffic on adjacent streets.. The increase in runo�'�rom the Iarger structure is not signif can� and will noi a$`ect the drainage system. � (2) The use will be sufficiently co�patible or separated by dzstance or screening from adjacent residentiaily zoned or used land so that exisiing homes will not be depreciated in value and there will be no detexrence to develop�eni of vacant land. (3} The struct�.u°e and site shall have an appearance ti�at will not laave an �dverse �ffect upon adjacent residen�ial properties. The placement of the garage so that the buik of the struciure is hiddea from street view wiU provide adequate screening, and will preserve the residential character of the neighborhood. The adjacent neighbors have no objeciion to the proposal. {4) The use, in the opinio�x of the City Council, is reasonably related to the overall needs of the City aa�d to the e�sting land use. {5) The use is cousistent with the purposes of the Zoniug Cade and the purposes of the zoning district irx which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. (6) The use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. of the City. Garages are typical uses in residential areas, and allow for storage of v�hicles and ather equipmeni. Having this garage will allow for the properiy to be kept izx better order and for storage of larger-than-typical equipment. Improving neighborhoods by enclosing stored items is beneficial to the community and consistenfi with commuzu�y goals. � NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds V'iew Planning Commissian recommends approval of the conditional use pern�it with the following stipulaiions: The conditiona.i use pemut be recorded with Ramsey County witivn 64 days of City Council approval, and a receipt of such recording shall be provided to the City of Mounds View. 2. The garage shall be desi�ned arad maintained to provide a uniform building appearance with the dwelling unit. The garage shali not be used far living space or other, uses noi allowed by the district in which it is located or by the Zoning Cod� �Should the use c�ange for which the permit was granted, th� canditzomal i�se permit shall become null and vaid. 4. Th� garage shall be situated parallei to the home such ihat it mainiain� a consisteni distance from the sid� of the home closest to �he garage and not be set at an angle. 1'Ianning Commission Resolution 495-97 2185 Pinewood Drive March 5, 199� Page 4 S. No other accessory buildings shall be allowed on fihis Iot. BE IT �'INALLY RESOLVED �ha� ihe Planning Commission directs sta�to focward tkus resolution �o �he City Caunc�l prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this Sth day of I�arch, 1997. 7erry Peterson, Chairperson AT'I`EST: Pamela Sheldon, Community Development Director (SEAL) N:�DATAIUSERSIPAMS�SHAREIDEVCASES1473-971473-97PC,RES ITEM �f4 �: < �, : ; � • ;•; �; ' :;� ;; :` -�: °•,. I�Ie�tan� I�aieo ��af�° �epo� b�: P�annirng Cas� l��o l�eq�aest: A.pple��nt: A.d�re�s: PIN #a ��ning/I,attd �7s�e I.ot Sezea .Appl�cabie ��ulatios�sa �iarch 5, 1997 James Ericson, Planning Associai� 474-97 Minor Subdivision {Lat Split) CaroI Hoopingarner 8344 Groveland Road 06-30-23-21-0104 Rml, �ingle Family Resider�tial 1.11 acres � �ue�,e�or9s C�r�iAficateo Section 1202.01, Subd. 3b requires that ihe applicant provide a certificate of survey prepared by a Minnesota regisiered land surv�yor. � Ma�imu�ra Loi Saze an� �7A�lihs: Section 1104.02; �ubd. 2b, as amended by 4rdinance 1 590, sets the mznimum interior lot size at 11,000 square feei. The minimum width for interior Iots is i5 feet. � Provision o#°�+ �sements: Section 1203,04 requires �hat drainage and utility easements be provided in the event of properiy subdivisions. � Pariz Iied�cataor► F�e: Section 12Q4.02 requires thai a gark dedication fee be paid in the amount of $100. A�ta�br�eni�: Resolution No. 494�97 Pianning Application Zoning Map Certificate and Plat of Survey (Separate Attachment) Letter from A.pplicani Existing and Requested Ease�nents �ackg�°ou�d: The applicant, Caral Hoopingarner, is requesting approval of a minor subdivision to create two tots from her property locai�d at 8344 Groveiand Road. The Ciiy's subdivision regulations a11ow for approval of a surveyor's ceriificate in these situations. A copy of the surveyor's certificate showing the proposed lot split is attached. This property is a through Iot that fronts both I�nollwood I�rive and Groveland Road. The applicant's home sits an the porCion of the lat froniing Groveland. The lot is irregularly shaped, in that fihere is an additional3Q feet of larid j Planning Commission 474-9i: 8344 Groveland Road February 19, 1997 Page 2 aitached to the southeast 211 feet of the lot. The applicant proposes to split the lot at a point approximately 3 0 feet o�F center to the east. I�sues: At the last Planning Commission meeting on February 19, 1997, the issue was raised as Yo whether or not the requested easements were excessive. The area in question is the land lying between the existing N�P easement and the proposed rear property line of the lot fronting Crroveland Road (PaYCei A}. A thirty-foot �vide drainage easement is present just south of th� property, but does not e�tend through. Sta�requested the Ia,rid between the NSP easement and the proposed rear property line be set aside for a drainage easement. The �esult is a wider than normal easernent area of approximaiely 35 feei along the rear properiy Iine for Parcel A. PIanning Comrzussion requested staffto meet with the appiicant to detemvne the best course of action from �tlze applicant's perspective. They pcefer having the easement as propased. Staffatso feels t�at it will cause Iess confusion in the field to have the entire area beiween the NSP easement and the rear properiy line ir� easement. The easement doct�ments being prepared by the applicant would create the 35-f00% v✓ide easement area. �tec o�ra Hn en d a ti o�e e Approve Resotution 494-97 recomrnending to the City Council approval o�#his minor subdivision `� subject to contingencies. ' cc: Carol Hoopingarner, 8344 Groveland Road, Mounds Vi�w 55112 N:IDATA\U3ERSIPAMSISHAREIDEVCASES14749718344GROV.PC 1 . _. , ' -- --;; .. . . .. . . .... . . _ . .. -.. ....._ _. .-. .. .- . ,. .�. - ... . _ '.4 _ _ . _ .. . ... .. . ..::. ...... . � .... . _. ... _. . .......w w .._.ti �• . I,. ..: • • _ � _ . _ . . , _ �� . �_ '" • __ ,__� .,.__ __ _ ......� :._. • I: - . _ . - � _ D� � ~� -- _ - - � � �� IbI�A3'IO� . . � �- - - - APPLiCAAd�°: G �c R,o _ . I _.. _ _ �. � � � _ � � � � . � • �� , r� 5 l�t�� . ° ! � � Phor�e � 8 � - � � � 1 ' ADt�RESS: �' 3 - . .. , .- _ . - -. . .. °yt C�R�u� Q,� G na�{ -- �. - --- -- ----v -- .�___ � t - - C� � _ ; .: . o v � S�re�i Addre� C�#y, S�a.ie, artd �� Cnd� - :� ._-_. - _: _. :._. '. � ``; .:..:� 1 _ . _ �.= ,_ , _ .�.. _.. _ .__ ,.. .. . . Enferest irt Propatty (cf�eelc �pprapr�afa bcxj: _ _ _, _: _ � �--_-�= Ow�ner a� Prape - : - , ... . _ . j S 11 �.-._ , _ - -- - . . _ , ,.. .. . �y �. . . _'. . � _ - � . _ . . . - �- _ ;: J ; - -- C� Cordaa� for �ee� Owrrer - .. . '� � .. � ,. ._ -: .: .- - - - � _ ' � Less�e, Operat�r, Martager ....:- _ . . : _ . . � �. _;:� :-. , . . . _ `, . _ , _ . .._ . � _. Agreem��t Yo Purc.'�ase _ _ . . : . . . . _ . . _. � . ._ . ._ _.. , . .,.. . ; � _ - _ ._ � QYher (expiain) • _� . : . . .. ."'... ; . _ _ . ._ � .. . . _, - - - - ; 1. , p��.�a}, awd�rx� of e�apl�rvt's usterest tn tt�� " __ . _. -- , � (�' ��.�(�� - �- p��Y m8Y � uu�d 6� iinag d _ � � -' f 1 l�f J �.,.. ) s � _ _�`� ��Eil01 � �� 1 _ ` _ --- �i`Y�1N�l�LVED : _� :�� _ _ � - -_ ' Address/�ene�1 L�catiort� .. g 3 � 6/ - �' ` ,: - .. - .. _. : , � , - �Av a C2o U� kh�� R�( -fo � /va� . ., _ : �Q � �s U,'�v ...... � - -._ . ._ - -� . _ _ . �. _ .. ., . g Oes��p�ion ar Propercy Idet�tincati�n Num�er o ': � _ . .-_. _ _ . ._. . - . . _�.r _ _._ . _ . . . � � o i o L°gal Ov�ner: i� e _ _:... ... .. � ame/Address � , ; . � , _ � _ _ � - _ ... � fl � , �z..hr ... a � � S �� a _ F?reset�t Usa (cttec:c apprapriate bax): - _ . , , - . ._ .._ .. -.:.-5511}-. ... ; ❑ :: Unc�eve - � I��clNacant . . , �. . �. .: ' Singfe �amily Dwedting �_.' � � . u � � ;;,' _. � - � _ _- Du�ie�lTw� Family Dweiiir� � - _ - r - r _ . . � � M u!� g.. � _ -;� � --r - _. . -�aretily (No. of Units �� - '° -< '"F`. �Qy BusinessJCamm�rc:a# �siaclishrrierit - � - � � _ _ � . ♦ i�d �.s.�„C_I'e �� 1�� w 1dU�kld �s 1 �Gi ♦6 . � . S A .at X i' i� 'i- • ,�'"� " - 1 , � .. � 1 I . . .. . . . �� i ' � :';' . oY��i . ... . -- _ � � � Z� s'�Le Li `.M .�. . y - T {exFtain _ - , . ��. . . _. � .. ._. . . .. . ,�. � . ... .w _ _ � . . _ . _ ,� - i � _ . .. . . ..._. _. t _.. ,. _. ;c . --,- . . . _ �YOgef$Y Gi3SSrF1G�$1QR � i . . " _ .. . . .. . ' _ _ ., .. . - , , _ C Abstra� . _ .. . I' . . � iarrer�s _ . . . � °°!eas� n�te: Ap{�iicarrz may be rescansibt� for aaar�anal fees as.sxated ��itt� the review ';his r�uesz 1 H�E�Y DECL.viE THAi �iE M80V� SiAT�r4E�t i ARE TAUE J J . , �,. �� Sigr9a#ur►a Rs�onir�g �pU/�. �inimurrr 5�2�. �r Vasiersc� �rr 37,000 Fsr� �,a� p�' F� }�-1 to r�-2 - $74. �{ �tt� �CtI Q� P� C3naetie�ml U� �� F{-i � r%2 - SeS. �1 e�� D Code r1�3oe�1 �� oi �� Oe��ao.iSSit� P9an A�ei� S10Q/acr�. ninirr3um 1a0. ��,rornua�v ��70 U ��l4inor Suoaivi�n �ic� �� sa� �SD• � �9a�r Suafinaiss�n C 0� �aic,f _� _ 5250 pius Ss_a deoa�it ��imt Nuan�r C,�no. �9ert .am�dm�e�t 520� _ 5 `'�Y X ` YdeUan� ,�Itar�oa� P�amiQ SS4 aie� dsaec��k deearrrsin�a vv Staf J � `!1lettana Burfe� r��g SYO ��ifaar� F� ps� r'�Panning Sign �r� C� A� }�JC! �� Re�adoe Nurrt� r�tl� .arrter�dmartt �� n �� ir�i/- � 7 t�r� a� 5rt� �..� A1,P��V�� [� C��VlF�' r" TiaBl.� b„i - P!�nrtietg C� ��a. �%'°7' � Q�% 9.:.<..:w , ��a �4_�0 C�� C ° ° ° ° _ � a4s� � N 4s a��s 848 8485 �484� 8489 84�77 ��0 8479 8462 �4808�61 8488 �47 Q 8469 8469 345 �45 � 8454 � 8461 847 8453 845� V NE 8480 8455 B45 8��g 84-� 84-41 84-42 8449 �440 8445 8`�34 �43] 84�& � 84�9 6422 8421 8430 8425 8430 > � 8429 8412 841i &421 � 8423 fl4tJ2 � 8401 8418 8419 8419 �392 8391 �s �40i 841 8415 8�9Q �389 8394 8$03 8408 84-09 838s 8391 8�a6 8� 83�7 B38Q 8387 838 391 8380 8385 8381 � ��7`� 8383 8 2 8371 8370 j. 8371 g3fi 837i 368 835T 836� 836� � 8358 360 \� �350 � 8347 8355 834 35 834i 8335 �� 8345 � 4 0 8339 $3�Q 8335 S��S 8325 g33 � 8333 832a 8�25 $3�� 8315 &322 p �310 �315 8311 S;QB Y 831 830Q 8�05 8312 8297 8298 83Q1 �284 8285 8290 �289 82�� 285 :28Q 8275 5281 ��5a 82fi3 � Z 827Q ��65 823a 8241 � 270 Q &265 � Z6Q � $2�JJ� a�� o � � a ZSO � 8245 cv c� N 2� PLE.� 8233 �228 c�n 8245 ,� 823 � 5213 8217 8Z1� �s 819 < 8201 � -�- - J �� - � - � . . � . . ..� . . ..�NORTH CC � I N 8490 � �491 N � 849 8480 848i 8484 8�470 • 84i1 8474 84&5 84i0 8460 846 84fi0 8456 �461 8460 845 - 8456 � 8450 8455 8440 �441 � 8444- �� 8431 8432 � 8431 e�� 8432 8�'2� 84ZS 8434 $419 8426 8400 8415 �� 8420 8409 8392 8494 �1 �`w� 8406 � � Q, 8384 �408 39 � � 83i8 8�89 840a 8398 R 1APd '�� 37 8379 8380 8 8372 � 8378 3� r�• � 8365 � 836 8368 �$ 9� � g360 83�� 83fi8 � s3 a� a�54 a�4s s�sa. \\� 83 8346 834-0 ` \� 8335 83 H342 $��5 8312 8334 3S 8332 8315 830Q 833� 8333 8322 8�05 $Zga g�2� 8300 fl 8285 8280 � 8275 6270 � GROVEC�4ND Q 82fi� s2so � PARK g255 8250 PF � 8240 � � � � � � �- N `�° � t� n r � MR�� N N N N 8230 � O� •� � � � N : c„ N � 82 ' 82a6 �ZO� �9 98 ��:`(:� � � �� , _�� , ,. �. i. �; i'.. I l �� r ' #� _ l- �. �!_ !�_M 1�.��„� ^.� `'± January 21, 1997 M�~. .1im Et~ickscart City �� Mo�nds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds Vi ew, MP! 551 1 2 Dear Mr. Erickson: � S�;y 199i �� :�S�t� C'�Y °�`'te,� �oun�s A� �his �ime I am �resen�ing you with t�e required pa�er°s aiong with my req�aest �o �he Mounds View City Courtci 1 for� permissio�t for a.:minor subdi.vision. This wi77 divide a section of my io� which now runs from Groveland Road ta Knollwood into 2 lots. The 1ot facing Grove7and will can�ain �he present building house and garag� and th� 10� �c4 b� crea�ed will b� an undeveloped 7p�c facing Knollwoode If furtf�er ��ormation is needed9 please contact me �� i�her° my off7ce 786-��81 or- at my home 784-6003. Sincere7y, C� �i`ti` , / '�°'°-" ;� � Carai M. (Z�eiinsi�i ) Hao�in�a�°rter° 83�4 Groveland Road Mounds View, MN 55112 i: �. - ,�, �� r. ��: _ r : ��. � ; ��_ � r�� t� �i -� �; ��- , �r t�, , , � <�; . ,� ;�. � r t; �� . �� ; � �� .0 � �, ;� � � �� :� r�� °�� . � : ��. � �r : �� r �� : . ,. , ., �, , � : ; �; •, � � ; �: . . _ :� i .� ,�, .,. �� : �� : �� r�� : . . � . ; �� , : �� ;� � �, :_ -�, f � � � ��: � ,- WHETtEAS, IVIs. Carol Hoopingarner has requested approval %r a minor subdivision dividing her property at 8344 Groveland Road, properiy zoned R-1, Single �amily �Zesidential, legally descrihed as follo�vs: � 1'� �� . � - � i / I � � /� , � � �l ''� . � � I l I ; � . .I ` � , .. ; � � { , __ ; � : / :/ � , . ; : � ;, , : .I .; � �. . .: � � !' ; !. /: /i :'f ; ' .;.; -:/'I:.,II /" ` ;; �: `, � , , j WHEREAS, the two lots created by this minor subdivision, Lot A(fronting Groveland Road} and Lot B(fronting Knollwood Drive) can be legally described as follows: . :� � � :' �" . �� . � � � 1� � .� .- � . : . :� , �:�- �, :' 1 � '. . �: '._, �:, ; �.. � � �' � � , �, .� • � y,,: .� . I ,... , ' � :I '. � � , ' I� � � ': :I ."I i� � . ... : j� . .. I�� / ' � .� -�� .� :�, -�. :f: �" - ` � �� { � .... � . .,�. � �� .'. � � ...� . � � � �.. .. �.': I .'�. ,� I :�.� �, ..�. . ; :1 � . ' . .�- .. �' . � � �� '- � � � ��, . . j - ,' .. _. , � . � �'� .'�.... .I ; . ;° � •; , i � • r,;� WHEREAS, the Planning Comrnission has reviewed the applicaant's reques� for a minor subdivisian and has deternrnzinned that it is in con�formance with Chapters 1201, 1202, 1104 and 1204 of the Municipal Code; and WI�REf1S, th� appficant has submitted a Certificate and Plat of Survey for the abov� described property. Planning Coinmission Resolution No. 494-9i March 5, I997 - Page 2 NOW, T�IEREFORE, BE IT �SOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the minor subdivision request made by Carol Hoopingamer, 8344 Groveiand Road, cqntingent upon the foiiowing: 1. Prior to City Councii action on this request, ti�e applicant shall provide the £ollowing: a. A revised Certificate and Plai of Survey adding a note stafiing "Ufility cmd drainage easetrtenis have been dedicatecl by a separate recorded doc2ament dateci , 1997 and recorded with Rc�nsey County on . 4�/`'/. ]D I� b. A documeni dedicating the uiility a.nd drainage easements to the City, which is acceptable to the City Attorney as to form, and has been executed by the applican�. c. Payment of a park dedicafiian fee u�a the amount of $100 per Code requiremenfs in Section 1204.02. 2. Prior to the signature of the Mayor an the Certificate and Plat of Survey, the applicant shall arrange to have iron monuments huried at the proposed interior lot comers. The applicant shail record the City Council resolution of agprova.i, the Certificate and Piat of Survey and the drainage and atility easemen� document with Ramsey County within si�cty (60) days of final adoption, and present proof of such recarding to the City of Mounds 'View, or this approval shall be null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopied this Sth day of Marcli, 1997 Jerry Peterson, Chairp�rson AT'�E�T: Pamela �heldon, Community Developmeat Director (SE�L,) N:IDATAIUSERS\PAMSISHARE�➢EVCASES1474-9'7�8344-PC.RES : >'� ITEM ��5 � : ,:� ; � , , ; ,, �; " �' •; ;` �, .., IVI�e��n� I}at�a Stati' Repo� bya Plaa�n�rag Ca�� I��.� Request: T'et�tionea°e I.mc�t�oaa: � 1`; °:: , Zo�s��and �T§eo Applicab�e R��u1��o�so Nlarch 5, 1997' James Ericson, Planning l�ssociaie 475-9'i - � Development Review and Variance for Parking Ratios for Oi�ce/V�arehouse Building Benson-Orth Associaies �490 Cora� �ea Streei OS-30-23-21 pQ002 I-1, Industrial District / Vacant Land � �eve�opffi��t It�vicwo Sectian 1006.06 requires fhat all commercial �d industrial d�velopmer�t within the City be subjeci to review by fhe Planning Comtnission and approval by the City Council. • �ett�ac�o Section 1104.Oi, as amended by Ordinance No. 590, establishes the principal building and parking lot setbacks. These will be addressed in the analysis section of this report. 0 0 0 1VV�anianu�t Lot Siz�: Section I 104.fl2, Subd. 2 establishes the minimum lot size in an�he Industrial Zane as one acr� (43,560 square feet.) Parl�ing Reqa�irements: Section 1121.13 requires that 84 parking spaces be grovided for a use with I9,325 square feet of warehouse and 5,954 square feei of office. P�a°i�ng �a�anceo Seciion 1125.02 establishes the process acid criteria for the grantin� of a variance. A.d$acl�m�nts; IZesolution No. 496-97 (Development Reviewj �Zesolution No. 499-97 (Parking Raiio Variance) Planning ?,pglication Zoning Map Letter from Applican� �ite Plar� (Separate Attachment) l�rainage, U�ility and Erosion Control Plans (Separate �i.ttachment} Planning Commission 475-97: 8490 Coral Sea Street; ZEF Manufact�u-img March 5, 1997 Pag� 2 . ..r ��!i�r�'. The �pplicant proposes to construcfi a one-story branch sales office and warehouse with a 22,3�0 square-foot foundation for ZEP Manufacha�ing, a national company specializing in the rrianufactur� and sale of specialty janitorial, sanitation and maintenance chemicals. This facility would serve as a sales support and disiribution warehouse. No manufaciuring or packaging would be done here. The building would consist of 5,950 square feet of offtce space (which includes 2,500 square feet of mezzanine space} and 19,320 square feet of warehouse space. ZEP IVlanufaciuring cunentty has a faciiity operating in Roseville, with ihirteen on site emplayees supporting approximaiely 50 sates reps u� the Twin Cities and surrounding areas. Staff has spoken wiih a representative of the Roseville Cammunity }�evelopment Department vvho was unaware of any probiems associated with the business. I�escr��sion: Dime�sionat Requirements: Lot Area: Building Height: Building Seibacks • Front (Cora1 Sea St.): e Side (Co. Rd. 3): � Side (interior): • Reax: Parking Lat Setbacks � Front (Coral Sea �t.): • Side (Co. Rd. 3�: e Side (interior): Required 1 acre 5 45 feet 40 feet 30 feei 20 feet 40 feet 40 %et ' S feet 5 feet Provided 3.94 acres 32 %et 120 %et 40 feet 150 feet 2I0+ feet 40 fest 60 Feet 40 feet There are three issues that need to be addressed in relation to this project. N1et� Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes FYOnt Setbcack: The first is fihat the site plan daie�stamged 2/28/97 shows the front parking iot setback iricreased from 1S feei to 40 feet, the rninimum requir�d by the Zoning Code. Weticnrd anc� d�etland Altercatiorr P�rmit: Since your me�ting, itocky Keel�n {of SEH Inc.} who serves as the City Engineer on developrnent projecfis, discover�d a very small wetland area in the northeast corn�r of the property in an area shown for parking. This was confirmed by Rice Creek �la#ershed Disirict. Representatives from botl� Itice Creek and �E�i will be meeting on the sit� to determine the exteni of the wetland. Depenalirig upon whai Rice Cz�eek determznes, the we�land :� i Planning Commission 475�97: 8490 Coral Sea Street; �EP Mariufacturin� Niarch 5, I997 Page 3 may be able to b� f�lied as iong as mitigation is provided. Possible wa,ys to miiigat� th� filling of th� wetland wauld include adding to the detention pond being built in the southwest corner o�° the site, or add°u�g to the eacistin� and much larger wetland along the west side of the site. At the time that t%us report was r�vr%tten, staff had not learned of Rice Creek's deterrnination. V+Ie will have this informaiion for your meetin� on IVlarch 5, 1997. The conditions af approval may need to be adjusted at that time, ta reflect wha� we learn from Rice Creek and the City Er�gineer. This project will require approval af a wetland alteration pemut because grading is being don� in the buffer area for the detention pond and a portion of the parking lot is in the �uffer area �s well. The �irst �tem can be handled as an admix�istrative approval by staff; tlne second requires City Councii approvai. These requiretnents are reflected in the conditions of approval recommended by Resolution No. 496-97 Parking: The last issue of significance with Yt�is project is the parking situation, which was discussed at your last meeting. The parking ratios in the Zoning Code would require 87 spaces far this faciliiy. VVarehouse: 19,325 sq.ft. divided by 500 + 8 spaces = 38.65 + 8= 47 spaces* Qffice: 5,954 sq.it. divided by 175 + 3 spaces = 37 spaces � Total: 84 spaces � Each fraction of 1/2 or more shall coastitute another space (Section 1121.08. Subd. 1) �taff has prepared a resolution approving a variance request in the pazking ratios which will apply fio ttus property. Tkte revised ratios would result in a requiremeni for 43 spaces (19 spaces for warehouse; 24 spaces for office). The site pian shows 42 spaces. Staff is suggesting tha� �.vo more spaces be shown at the end of the parking bay across the front of the properiy, so the total provided is 44 spaces. The resolution includes a condition to ti�is effeci, and a requirement thaic ttte applicant is obligated to build up to 40 additional parking spaces if it is deemed necessary by the City. The site plan shows sufficient area is available to build an additiona143 parking spaces. Recar�amenda�ion: Approve Resolution 496-97 recommending appcoval of the development review for ZEP Aiianufacturing with stipula�ions, and Itesolutiora 499-97 approving a parking lot variance for ZEF' Man�aiacfuring. cc: Ivlike Munson, �enson�Orth Assaciates, 14001 Ridgedale Drive, Suite 3�0, �Iinnetonka, IViN 55305 iV:U7ATA\USERS�PAMSIS EIAREIDEVCASES1475-971ZEP-PC2.RPT �� -: . , , .. � �PP[��q�°�: BENSON�QRTH ASSOCiATES, INC. � 545-8826 Phor�e ,qpp��. 14001 RIDGEpALE DRIVE, SUITE 320, MI3VNETONKA, MN 55305 �tre�t Address, �ity, �t.�ie, and �`ip C�de lrrter�t irr �rop��ty� � � ❑ � � (ci��cic a�apr��iate baxj: O�er �f Propetty Carrtra� P�r De�� Ovv�er Lesse�, Operatar, Mana,ger Agreemeni to Pu�rhasa Other (e�fain) � Docume�tary eaid of applicarvY� iet4er�t in tli� prooerty may � t�qufr�d 6efere fu�ad CGfy a�rr of U�ia r�qs� P��N ��.�E�` Addr�ss/Gener� L�catian SOUTN OF COUNTY ROAD J AND WESi OF CORAL SEA STREET L°ga! Descr�piian e�r Prop�' ldenti�c2tiart NumberLOT 2, BLOCK 1, NORTHSTAR INDUSTRTAL�ARK 2ND ADDITION L°gai Ot�n�r: Name/Address �ATSQN IN , •, EXCELSIOR BLUD. SUITE 420, MI , _ Pre�ertt Us� {c �eci� a�a}aropriat� h�x): . Undeaelaaed/1lacacrt ❑ Singie �amiiy �welfing _ __ _ - - r:. _.... � _-- �]uPlex/Two..F.'ami�y Dwe�ling _ _-...�=- =-,�. �-.�_.�-_-,.�.�.P�,� - _ _�a�,.� =:�.�_.,�..�.�-,�.,- ❑ Mviti-�amiiy {Na. of Units ^ ) ❑ 6usiness/C�mmercal Estabiishment it�dustriaa Estataiishrrrent Q Other (ex�iain) � �}� ..: . .� � i• �..t f.M. * � ...._... R�.,��U��-; APPROVAL TO BUILD� A COMMERCiAL DISTRIBUTION FACILITY °P'a3se note: Applicarre may be rescansib�e far acditiorrai fees �s,�ciat� with the reviesa� cf �his r ues� 1 NE:�E�Y �ECLAAE THA7' 3�'E ASOVE STAT�riEVi ,4AE TRUE - i�%v � p .��..�f...------- ' Sigr�aivre F%rsirtq � Veararxse ? C.candiii�u�al Lls� PermiQ C.�� .�npead -� o��ao.rsa� p��, �,;� Mina Suis�ie+isiow M�qr Su�ivisiort C.jrno. Plan rarrt�dm�ett Weclan� ,�J4�r�os� A�rY Weefand Burf�r P�mrt Plenning Sign P'JQ F'U[7 Amendmee�t SZOQJ�. minira9uarr 5206. m�amum St.Q00 �1 90 �-2 - Si"5. sai aati� 52(� R-i � R-2 - �'75. �JI arthacs �U� �'T5 Si OQlecre. minimuert 100. ma�dmum �0� S9 �0 Si,� plus 52�� dean�rt 520Q S50 0l� deo�ii de�m�ine�d by Stffif 510 5.5� 535� SZ Sfl . , , . � � , .�,.,,, � : :�. . .,;_: - , .,, Tatn! � �� Pec�int P3usnia�r ,�ddi�an� � Rsi� Oat� P� f�e�at Nauna�r 2so ��. _ /-.?'7-9% 5�a53 �� crf fi�l �,�n APP�C7V�� [j O�J�dI�� [ i.±81� L% 0� % °.�, "7 ° Ol � �� P�aaining � t�o. �'7 7 S ` � % ��r�i�. .�s�taat4 Pla, "°� i. i� �' ; . � � .� .� � COi1NTY �1�0� J `° � � � � � m �° :� � � �- °- �- \\ �\\ � \ \ � �� : �\\ � �8�9Q\ , \ \\\ � � t,�t I �� • -- 845Q [ _ � ' -- � - z�wE��° tV � _ - �,� � ��oo � I � - � = -- - I _ � � PF �! � � _ _ � U�' - � � �z90 � _ �'��S �2ND �,P1E NE DRIVIPIG RANGE � � a � � N ( - � -= - � -- --- _ _ � ........ _..-•-----•-•---------- . . i . . _._., ��a��S ::: G4LF COURSE � �t �;� � .� �, _� ��., �._ `v� •1 •. �_. ".. � " k. � �# � � :. 1 ��i -"� � �: ! { . :� i � � e� - 'f' .: �� ` ,� � ll8 - -, �i �� FROM �ZEP ENG/MRINI- � 404 605 972� �J } �EP �A�UFA�TU�Ihl� ��P�P�� R3i0 5eabaard Indus4rial Boulevard. N.W. Post O�ice Bax 20q5 ' Atlanta. GAO! 14 30301 (494) 3b2-169� Mg o Patilel.a 5��1(�.OIl Community Dev�lopmen� Da.rec�or City �f Mcsunds view 2401 Highway �.0 Mounds V i ew � i�V' S 51.12 De�.r Ms . Sheldoxa, 1S�?.�1-24 11:48 �038 P,02/fl3 Januazy 23, 1997 l�i.ke Monson of �ensan-Or�h and I th�n}c you for �.he �ppo�°�unity �o meet with you yes�erday �ti dis�uss �ur plans to de�relop a branch sales of�ic� and warehouse in �he Nor�h S�ax° indua�ria�. Paxk_ i�ou wex�� v�xy h�lpful a.n e�plaining �he ��velopment R�view and Appraval, pxocess . � wauld 1ik� �o �.ntrc�duce �ep �o you and explain �he a��ivi�i�� that will t�l�e pl.ace in our n�w �acilzty. Z�p Manuzacturing is a six�y yeax old company headq�.artered �n ,�tlanfi��, Geoxgia. �1e a�'e a di�rision of Na�iana7. S�rvicQ Tndustx°ies, ��wo billinn do].l.ar cdmpany lieted on the New Yark Stock Exchange. Zep ha� �ver fif�y branch and fiv� manufactura.ng 'oca�ions thraughou� th� U.S. az�d Canada, �mplaying over 2,000 sales and support personnel. Our busir�esa is �he manu�ac�ure and sal� vf epecialty janitorial., sana.tation, and main�enance chemicals f or our hospitality, ins�itta�ional, and. manufactux�ng customera . We a.lso se11 a comple�e 3.ine �� cl.eaning arzd maintenarace. equipment . Our chemical praducts axe available aa powder�, liquids, and aer�sols. They ar� package�. in �a�es of aexosols, quart and gallan bot�les, sev�n ga�l.on pails, 55 gallon dx�ume, ancl 2�0 ga�.lon r�usable to�e tanks. Most of �he �iqus.d'praducts are wa��r ba9ed soaps and sanitizers, but we �lso provide many so�.ven.t ba�ed �.egreaser� and cl.eaners . �ur products are desic�.ed to be strang �nd e�fec�ive. Some are flammable and some are corx°o�ive . We recogna.z� �he �.mpor�ance of operating oux' business corzectly arld re�pa�.��bly. Our mairi pJ.ant iri AtlarY�a makes approxima�el.y $0� of otxr px°oduction in 700,000 �qua�e fe�� o� manufacturing and warehc�us�ng ��cil��ie.s. This �acilz�,y is i50 90�1 ce��ified and has won the Sta�.e o� Geargia Env�ronmen�al �lward for the last four years _ T�i� o�he� manu�acturing fa�a.lities w�.11 become ISO ce�tifieei �hie Spr�ing. We c�cark a.x� � partx�ering xel.ati�on�hig with our �nsur�nGe and �.ass p�ev-entic�n co�sultarat, Alexander &�lexax�dez , anci our ��.surar�ce cax�x�er, �R;L f�o continua�.ly ev°alua�e a�d impiement �he latesti � tect�on me�hods and ' e axzd lo9s ro i x° a ar�d mos� effective £ p �qu.�.pmen� at �11 0� oux fac�li�ies . we �r�sure �ha� all new �tr�r ��, Mainten�nce Prodv�4s nn,rr,nni n� nrernln;ai c�ci�rre f+��ternr�c tnir" i-! �'F20M : ZEF� ENG/Mi� 9 i�tT 404 605 5729 ,: , : 4597.01-24 13:4Q q0�8 P.03/@3 �acila,ties, such as �his one, wi11, b� in fu11 compliar�c� with a11 �'�"�A and iVEC �od� x°e�uirement� . We a�ss make cex-�a�.n that we �ully pro��ct the environment. We have had a branch i�. the Twin Ci�ies since 1970 and hav� been at 2031 pakcrest Ave. �n Ras�ville sir�ce 19$Q. The current facilzty ha� i�.,soo square f�etYo� ware�ou�e and �,a�o of offices. There axe ee�r�n adminas�ra�ive �nd six warehouse emplo�ree� suppar�ing approximately �hix°ty sales reps in �he Tw�r� Cities area arad an addita.oxaal tw�nty r�ps in, �he �urrounding ax�as. This new �aciiity w�,11 ha,ve approximatel�r 18,�00 sq�,are ��e�. of warehause and 5,aoa o� of�ice� and sales �rainirag areas. The z�ew �ac�.lity we a�e prop�sYng will be s�1.�I.y a�al�s auppor� and die��ibu�ion warehou�e �or our custome�s in Minnes�ta and the Dako�as. '�her� wil�. be no manu�ac�ux'ing �r packaging dane at this �acili�y�. AJ.� environmental, and �i�e p:rat�ction codes wi11 be fu1.1y met . We ha�re desig-xied aeparate cut�ff rooms for the sa�e stoxage of �he �eroaols and combustible/�],ammable liquids. I hope thi6 gzves you � help�ul understar�d�.ng of our plans_ �� yau have any ques�ions, p].ea�e giv� rne a ca1.1 a� 4o4-60S-gg42, We 1.aok �orward to working clo�ely with you, th� Fire Marahall, and others �o�ensure that �.hi� project mee�s eve�yone's expecta�ions. Sincerely yours, Stev� Avary Dix�ector o� Engineexing � ` '; , �� ; ��_ ..., °�_ 1; ��,'�,, � � :; `, �,� -_ :: 1�; �� .1 :1; ,� ` ��' '` , � � �, i,: �ij �' `c�- �; . : ;� I> I,. ;, ;.r ,F 'J` ` � �� : � �`� �E I ��. �' '; � �'�. '� � �i . �: > > > �. ,��. � �� . : � _ ,- , . .� � � -., �„ ; f . �` f', �: --_ i . 1- _ �; :1,, ' ' "�, ," 1, `1= i, � ' I � ' _ � :7 , � ;� ', t',' �_. _ ,,,.. i7tTI�ER]Efi.S, Benson-Orth Associates, representing ZEP Manufacturing, has app�ied for a varian�e of parkin� ratios associated with the development of a 22,300 square foot warehouse/office building on ihe parcei locaied at 8450 Coral Sea Sireet, property zaned I-1, Light Iridustrial Disirict,legaily described as fpllows: '/ ; :` / � ' ;/ ' � ' / 1: . r , : . ., ► - I -: ,I I . : :' /' ` �76�HEREAS, Chapter 1121 o�the Mounds View Zoning Code establishes the parking ratios by specific use; vahich, as they relaie to Yhis project, are as follows: �arehouse: 8 spaces plus 1 space for every 500 square �eet of warehouse floor area Office: 3 spaces plus 1 space for each 175 square %et of office floor area WHEREA�, according to the Zoning Code, the number of parking spaces that wouid be required using the squaremfootages provided by the applicant are as foIlows: Warehouse: (19,325 square feet) Qffice: (5,950 square feet} Total: (25,275 squace feet} Required spaces = 4'i (S spaces plus 39) Required spa�es = 37 {3 spaces pius 34) Required spaces = 84 WHEREAS, Staff has reviewed parking ratios used by other municipalities and parking guidelines as developed by the A.merican Planning Association and recommended the following ratios: V�arehouse: 1 space per 1,000 square feet warehouse floor at°ea Office: 1 space per 254 square feet of offce area WHEREAS, t�tilizang th� adjusted paricin� ratios, the number of parking spaces requ�°ed _ for this development would b��4;�paces; and, „___ � ' a,t �� ..�..._ ._.�._... . .. ,� � VV�REA�, there is sufficient raom on the property to provide the 84 spaces required by the Zoning Code; and, Planning Commission Resolution Na. 499-9i March 5, 1997 Page 2 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this requesi for a variance in parking ratzos: 1. Plarming Application 2. Zoning 1VIap 3. Revised Site Pian, dated 2128/97 4. Utiliity, �'rradirtg, Drainag� and Erosion Control Plans, dated 2/7197 5. Let�er from the Applicant '4�lHEREAS, the Pianning Cornmission does her-eby make the following findings of fac� regarding the requirements for granting variances as set forth in Section 1125.02, 5ubd. � of the Mounds �liew �oning Code: a. ExceptionaI or extraordinary circumsEances apply to the property which do nat apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity and resnit from lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over whici� the owners of the properiy since the effectiv� date hereof have %ad no control. ' c. That the special conditions or circwmstances do not result from the actions of the applicant This site is heavily wooded, a portion of which lies in wetland. While #here is ample room to pravide the full amount of parking required by ibe Zoning Code, the applicant would prefer to retain muc� of the tree caver and keep the site as natural as possible. Research has shown that the Mounds View paricing requirements are muc� higher in comparison to neighboring communities and communities across the counfiry. The applicani is not respor�sible for the City'"s parking requirements. It is advantageous io retain natural areas as opposed to paving them for parking lots, if the parking provided will be adequate for the use proposed. b. The literal intezpretation of the provisions of tIus Title would deprive the applicant of righis comm,only enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the texms of t�is titte. d. Th�at granting the varianee requested will not confer on the applieant any speciai privilege that is denied by this title to owners of other lands, slrucEures or buildings in the same district. The higher-than-norrnal parking requirements for offce and warehouse square footage creates an undue burd�n on the applicant, and similar considerafi�on would be given to other requests from developers who are proposing to build similar facilities. The developnnent to ihe south, the Bridges Technotogy Center, was granted a similar parking variance in 1995. i::; Planning Commissior� Resolution No. 494-97 March 5, 1497 Page 3 e. Thai: the variance requested is the minimiun variance which would alleviate th� hardship. Economic canditions alone shaIl not be consideced a hardship. The raiios proposed far the project are as follows: one space per 1000 square fe�t of warehouse area (19 spaces) and one space per 250 square feei of office space {24 spaces). These ratios are cot�sistent with surveys of other jurisdictions and informa�ion from the American Planning Associa o�, and represent a suitabie adjustment. The conditions on this resalution require tha�44�,�paces be provided on ihe site pian. � ; .._- `-__-__ _ - � -� . � f. The variance would not be materially detrinaental to tlae purposes of this title or to other proper�.y it; the same zone. 'I'he granting of this variance wiil not conflict with the purpose oithis Title in that parkin� wiil be provided using accepted parking ratios for o�ice and warehouse uses. Sufficient room is available to build the additional parking required by the ratios in the City Code, if it becomes evident that pariting is need�d in the fiature or if a different use locates in this i�acility. The 12,025 square-foot reduction of impervious surFace is{a, enviranmental and aesthetic benefit. � 1~ a � GF�4��.. g. The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of Iight and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or inerease i:h� � danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially d'vninish or impair property values within the neighborhood. The granting of ihis variance will be a beneft to neighboring groperties by preserving an e�ensive growth oitrees. These trees serve as an additional buffer between the proposed building and a.djacent parcels. There are plans in the future to create nature irails and hikin� paths in the open area behind the site. Retention of ihis wooded area will a.11ow for a more opaque screen while retaining the natural cha.racter of the sii�. Traffic wiIl not increase on the adjacent streets as a result of this variance. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission does hereby find that Yhe criteria for granting a variance in this case have been met. NOW, 'T�REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the �Iounds View Planning Commission does hereby approve a variance in ihe parking ratios applicable to the proposed ZEI' 1blanufacturin� project wiih �the followring stipulations: 1, The ratios applic�bte to ihis property shall be as follows: �arehouse: 1 space per 1,000 sq�aare feet of warehouse fioor area O�c�: I spac� per 250 square feet of office floor area Planning Corr�mission Resolution No. 499-97 March 5, 1997 Page 4 2. Prior to action by ihe City Council on the development review for filus project, and in order for this variance to remain in effect, the applicant shalt: a. Revise the parking layout to show �e additiona.l parking spac� so that cou�t provided is 43 spaces, wit� lf�spaces shown in parking areas wbich could be added if deemed necessa� by the City.� b. Add a note to the site plan which states: T *;�� "A va�°iance in requfreci par�ki�ag �atios was approved foY ihis proper�y by Planning Cor�rrmission Resolution I�To. 499-97. The parking ratios appYOVed for° this pYOper°ty crre as follolvs: 1 space per 1 D00 square feet of warehouse sperce 1 space per 250 square feet of office sperce ;_� � ,,.,._,.,, �r'��.-,v�._ - The prope�ty owner is obligcaterl to build up to an addiiional �33 �arking spaces, which would meet the parking raiios requir�ed by the Zoning Coc%, if deemed �recessary by the City based o�t future parking patterns, trse of the building, anci evrdence that parking needs ccannot be scrtisfaed on site. T�ie property owner shall be notifrerl in wniirrg that addiiional parking �rrr�st be built, cand upon such rrotice, shall construct the additional prrrking within 3 months, with consaderation for weather conditians " 3. Approval of this variance shall be null and vaid i#° any one of the following approvals axe not obtained for this project: a. Weiland alteration permit approval by the City Council b. Rice Creek Watershed District perniit approval c. Development Review approval by the City Council Adopted this Sth day of March, 1997. 3erry Peterson, Planning Comrnission Chairperson ATTEST Pamela �h�ldon, Community Dev�topment Director (SEAI,) N:IDATAITISERSIPAMSISHAREIDEVCASES1475-971ZEP-PC2.RES E �; ; 1 ,.:. �, �� ,�� - � ��. : _ : �° �; 1 ;�, >.-, � �;<� �� ; �: , _,; �— 1� � i� ��% , � <�:- . `� �f � l; `� �� `�: �, �, �: . � 1_ �11'-"�:� 1��_ .- �, ; � �, ;� �. �.' �. .1� 11� 1'� � . �� ° �:_ 1 � •`. : �" : � 1� `�_ �` ' ' .1; , . �: ; _ ;f: �-,°� �: . ,, .- ,� , � . ,�. ,� � ,1,� ,, . ' ��, � ;� �" '' ' - ,, �., . ��, � �. , "' . . .- "_ �" ( ; .. � _; �� .�� ,: �,; :f }��EREAS, B�Y150%t-OTtII ASSOCI3$�S, representing ZEl' Manufacturing, has applied for a development r�view to construct a 22,300 square foot warehouse/office bu�ldin� on th� parcel located ai 8450 Cora1 Sea �treet, which property is zoned i-1, Laght Industrial pistrict and is Iegaily described a.s follows: /; . ;; , � ;, f . , : , : , �: ,� ; , � . , ,; •. ; . ' l �' l :f / WHEREAS, Chapier 1006 of the Niounds View IVlunicipal Code requires that a develapment review be conducied for this and similar projecis; and, VVI�E�tEAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed ihe following documents cegarding ihis developrnent review request: 1. Planning Application 2. Zoning I�ap 3. Revised Siie Pian, dated 2/28/97 4, Letter from the Applicant WHEREA.S, the Pla.nning Com�ussion has made findings that the application from Benson-Orth Associates meets the dimensional requirements as stated below: Lot Area: Building Height: Building Setbacks Front (Coral Sea St.): Side (Co. Rd_ �: Side (interior) Rear: �arking Lot Setbacks Front (Coral Sea St.}: 5ide (Co. It.d. �: �id� (interior): Parking Required 1 acre s 4S �eet 40 feei 30 Feet 20 Feet 40 feei 40 reet 5 %et S Feet �7 spaces ��o�a�a 3.94 acres 32 feei 120 F'eet 40 Feet 150 Feei 210+ Feet 40 feet 60 Feet 40 Fee� 43 spa��s MetJNot Met Met Met Met Idlet �iei Niet Met M�t �ie� (1) Planning Commission Resoiution No. 496�-9�' March S, 1997 Page 2 (1) A variance in parking ratios to a11ow � reduciion to 43 spaces was �'anted by the Planning Commission in Resolution No. 499-97, Approval of this development review is contingent upon apQroval of ttus varianr,e. WHEREAS, the Planning Commissian does hereby find ihat the Iandscape plan as proposed saiisfies the requirements of the Code as stated below: The landscaping propased for this site has been rev�ewed by the City Forester, who has recommended chan�ing one of the tre� types {Haneylocust Sunburst) for a more climate0 appropriat� specie§ (Honeylocust Shademaster). 'I'he other landscapu;� is acceptable. Nluch of the existing tree cover wili be retained to provide a full screen from batl� County Road J and Coral �ea Sireet. MosY af fihe rear elevation will a.lso be screened from any fiati..�re park dev�fopments on adjacent land. VVFiIEREAS, the City Engineer has reviewed the drainage plan for this site and l�as found ii acceptable and consistent with the Master Dra.inage Plan previously approved by the Ciiy Council and Rice Creek Watershed District. WHEREAS, ihe City Fire Maxshal has reviewed ihe siie plans a.txd f nds the layout rneets Fire Department requirements for emergency vehicle access; and, J W��1�.EAS, the approximately 40 square feet of signage u�dicated on the site plans is within the 1 q0 square feet allowed by the IV�[unicipal Code. NQW, THEREFQRE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mounds View Flanning Commission does hereby recornmend to ihe City Council tIaat the development review for ihe ZEP Nlanufacturing proposal at 849� Coral Sea Street as presented by Benson-Orth Associates be approved su�ject to ihe following contingencies: The granting of #his developrnent review is contingent upon the granting of a wetland atieration perniit from the City and a pemut from Rice Creek V4�atershed District and shall be null and void if these approvals are not received within i20 days from the date on which the City Council acis to grant ihis development review. In no event shall any building pernuts be issued until such time as the wetland alteration pemut from the City of Mounds View and the permit from Rice Creek Watershed I)isirict have been obtained. 2. Prior to action by the City Council on this devetopment review, ihe applicant shaI1: a. Revise the landscape plan to show Honeylocust ShademasYer irees in place o�'the Honeylocust Sunbursti trees. - Planni.ng Coxnmission Resolution No. 49b-97 March 5, 1997 Page 3 b. Rev�ise the par�ing Iayout to sho yo�e addiiional parkin� space so thai counfi provided is 43 spaces, r�vit�31 spaces shown in parking areas whic� could be added if deemed necess��y`Y�i�"�ityx: � ± c. Add a nate ta th� site plan whick� staies: E-� � � "A varicance in �equired parking rataos was appr�oveci for this property by Planning Commissiorr Resolution I+lo. 499-97. The par'king ratios app�°oved for this property are as follows: 1 space per 1000 square feet of wcn°ehouse spa�e 1 space per 250 squaYe feet of office sperce ;� �-° `'� ' � The propeYty owrre� is oblagated to builcl up to an additio �Z �3�,3,��ar�king spaces, wlrich would meei the parking rcatios reqzsired by the Zorrin�t Code, if deerr�red necessary by the City basecl on fr�ture pcarking paiterns, use of the building, and evic�ence thai parking rreeds ccrnrroi be satisfied on srte. The prope�ty owner sh�rll be r�otified in wr°iting that adc�itional parking tnust be bualt, and z�porr such notrce, _� shcrll constr°t�ci the addational parki�ag tivithin 3 r�roaaths, with consideration for - wecathe�° conditions. " d. Resolv� the situation regarding the minor w�filand area in the northeast comer ofthe site. Ii�he wetland area catinot be moved andlor mitigated, and as a result, major redesign of the parking area and buil.ding tocation is necessary, the site pian shall be resubmitted to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation, prior ta forwarding the development review to Ciiy Councii far action. 3. Prior io obtaining any building pernuts or grading permiis, the appiicant shal! install snow f�nces or another type oi demarcation de�vice around thase areas where trees are to be retained. The area shall be of su�icient width so as to protect the trees' root systems. The use of heavy equipment shall be prohibited in these areas, and the property owner/developer shali be responsible for monitoring constnaction activities �a make certain these restrictions ar� e�forced. I P1a�ing Commission Resolution No. 49b-97 March 5, 1997 Page 4 BE IT FURTI�R RESOLtIED that the 1'lanning Commission du-ects Staffio fozward ihis resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this Sth day oflv�arch, 1997. 3erry Pe�erson9 Chairperson AT'I'EST: Pamela Sheldori, Community Deveiopment Director (SE�.L) N:IDATAIUSER5IPAMS�.SHAREIDE VCASES\475-971ZEP-PC.RES 1 ITEM �� 6 '. . "�' : ! '', ' : � i'`, ` . : ,�; ,1- ` f ' ,� ` �: `,: I�eeien� 1➢at�o �tafi ltepoe-� %y: I'la�e�ing Cas� I�o.: Rec��tesi: ��iiti�ner: Lo�aiione � :�., ,..: ��nyn�/i�a�d �Tse: f1.pplacabi� �ega�lati�nso A,tta�i��e�atso �ackgrorand: March 5, 1997 James Ericso� Planning Associate �i76997 l�eview of ConditionaI Use Pernut for On-site Mobile I3ome Sales Coior�al Vil�age Park 2075 Rustad Lane OS-3 �-23-41 �002 i 05�30-23-41-0022 R�S, �Iobile Home District Coionial Village �iTobile Home Park �eciion 1110.04, Subd. 5, wluch aiJows the display and sales of model homes within the R�5 zoziin.g district as a conditiona.i use. Resotution No. 49'i-97 Qriginal Planning Application Zoning I�ap Site Plan (da�ed 6/29/94) City Council Minutes (dated 2/27/95) City Council StaffReport (dated 2/2i/95) Resolution 4719 In July of 1994, VVilliam Liggett, representing Colonia� Village Park, made application to amend the Zoning Code reiating to the R-5 (Mobile Home District) to allow the display and sales of model mobile homes. The Planning Com�nission approved the Code amendment on November 2, �994, sendir�g the amendment on the City Council. Befare reaching the Council, however, Paul Harrington and Jim Thompson (the City's respective community development coordinator and attorney at that time) �ogether reinie�preted the Code and decided that the use was a permitted condi�ional use. On January 4, 1995, the Planning Commissian approved the CUP applicatian, sending iti on the City Council. Th� Council approved the CUP on February 27, 1995. Anai�syso At your last rne�iing on February 19, 1997, sta:�noted ihat five oithe six contingencies attached to this CUP were satisfied, with the exceptio� of continger�cy #3 which requires that the model hames Planaing Commission 476-97: 2075 Rustad Lane March 5, I997 Page 2 be installed in compliance with aII City and State regulations. At the time of your last meeting, it was sta.�s understanding ihat th� oniy Code violation on the rnodei homes was that they were missin� the s�condary sta.ircases. This has since been resolved. We ar� now aware, however, ihai the staircases and entrance platforms at the primary enirance are no� in compleie compliance with the Code in terins of the handrails and ihe height and width of the steps. This has been an ongoing problem with no� only the model homes but other homes in the park, In the past, there has been somewhat sporadic enforcement on this item due to workload. We have started enforcing ihis provision, but consider ii to be larg�r issue than just the model homes. It is staff's pre%rence to address the existing staircases through an overall approach to enforc�ment in Colonial �Iillage, or to provide a iune frame for the model homes to be broughi i�to compiiance. The con�ingencies on the orig�nal CUP have been meti as %llows; Th� f rst required that ih� CUI' be recorded with Ramsey Couniry, �which has been verified. �'he second contingency required that the number of units available nat exceed six percent of licensed lots. There are currently 194 lots within Colonial �Iillage, of which only three are model homes (refer to the site plan.) Tlus represents a percen�age of less than two perceni. The third eontingency required that the mod�I homes be insta.11ed in complianc� with all City and State regulations. An inspection by �iick Jarson on Febnaary 28, 1997 verified that ihe secondary sta.ircases have been added as reques�ed. (Another code compliarice issue is noted earlier in this report.) The fourth requirement states that the Ciiy be seni a list of homes offered for sa1e, updated every month. 'The City has these notices on file, indicating that this requirement has been met. The fifth requirement puts limits on the hours of walk�throughs. Carol Mueller, ihe pa.ric manager, responds ihat they adhere to tkese hours. Staff has not received any complaints stating o#herwise. The last requirement specifies that the CUP be reviewed after one year. Stiaff' is unaware of any problems associated with the CUP and does not have any documented complaints regarding Coionial V'illage or its display and saies of znodel homes on file. Staffhas notified the park residents as well as tihe residents within 350 feet of Colonial Villa�e regarding the review of tlus CUP in order to solicii any commenis or concerns they may have. Iteco��endag�on: Approve Resolution No. 497-97 recommending to the City Councii approval of tlus conditional use pern�it remaini�ng in e$'ect with amended contingencies. cc: Carol Mueller N:�DA'FAIUSERS�PAMS4SHAREIDEVCASES147d-9'71COLVII..G.FC i �; I". : " ,t,` ; ' "�' : �;�; . , . , .._ . .y; T �; .� � : f;: ,� • 1 �:�°.� i�< f= � = r. 1. �� ;: �. �_ �_.. :� - �. -_; �� ,, :� ' 1 �. �, �, ,! ,[ ,.�: . :.1': � ; i� ; ��, _ _�� , ,. . .�:. . ��, .: � < .�1� ! '�� ;1 � �.. .. � � � "� � �� '� ��- �� .`, :I"� � ; ` :1: �:1'-� ,�. , ,, ,��, ., ,, ..: �. __ ' '� 1 - ; : � `I: :1:1 ' `� ' � ti : •� ;• . i ; � 'li � .. ., . � � 1 ,. i�IHEREA�, the conditional use permit allowing far the display and sates of model homes within the Colonial iiil�a�e I�anufaciured Hom� Park is due For review; ar�c� WI�REAS, Colonial `Iillage Ii�anufaciured I-iome Paxk is on property zoned IZ-5, I�obile Horne District, legally described as follows: . , , ; ;�; j : �. �; j: . ,; . ,: � , �; . �. : � /' �` / I '` `: ; ;I" /` ! I` : l " ;I / f ►, �. . ., i ; � ; :� � ;� ► . . � . . and ,: + I '` ;I r I J ;' � l ` �> " 1 . ' l I f 1' f : _ ; : .. �, ; � , � � � ,� . � . �, . , �; �, � : /'' l'J ' I. l:l' l' ,; 4I /; F- I / I ; , # . . .� < �: I I : ,; � � j • � , �; ; 1` /; � -�. . I •' .I : I : 1 / : / 'l I , /' � / ;' /' /: ' ' J ' �, VUHEREAS, the Mound View Zon.ing Code aiiows for the display and saies of model homes wi�ixin the R 5, Mobile Hom� District with t�Ze approval o£ a conditional use permit; and WHEREAS, the Planaiing Cammi.ssior� has reviewed the following documenis regarding this proposai: a) Original Pianrung Application b) Zoning �Iap c) Site Plan d) City Council Ia/linuies (dated 6/29/94} e) City Councii Staff Report (dated 2/2i/95) i} Resal�ation 4719 (daied 2/2i/95) ��AS, the li/iounds `Iiew Plarining Comr�ission ma.i��s the follor�ring findings thai possibl� adverse effects have been considered in its recommendation, as required by �ection - 1125.01. "�ubd. 1.�. of ih� Murucipal Code: Planni�g Co�mission Resoluiion No. 497-97 March 5, 1997 Page 2 Rela�ionship io Municipal Compreherisive Plan. The Mounds View Cornprehensive Plan designates this area to be used as a trailer park. The CUP does not conflict wi#h the Compreh�nsive Plan. 2. The geographi�aI area involved. 4. The chazacter of the surrvunding area. This area is trailer park tocated in the narth-easterr�osi section of the City, surrounded by four-plexes and dupiexes on th� south and west sides ana Interstate 35W and I�ighway 118 to the east and north. Given thai the trailer park is existing, there are no adverse e�ects to th� area expected from continued sale of model hom�s. ihe sut°rounding area is 5hOW1IIg SOYT16 Si�i15 Of ��1$Il�; some of �he four9plexes in the area are in a state of disrepair. Improving the quality of hausing in fihis area� is a benefit io everyone, and may serve to motivate neighboring property owners to iake better care of'their homes, buildings and properties. Wbefrher such use will tend to or actuaiiy depreciate the area in whicix it is proposeci. The CUP allows for the display a.nd sales of model homes. The intent is to improve the level of housing quality gresent in the park. The area should not depreciate as � r�sult of bringing in nev�ver, higher quaiity homes. The demonstrated need for such use. Having the CUP to display and sell model homes has allowed Colonial Vill�ge to improve the overall condition of ihe park. WF�EREl�S, the Pianning Commission makes the following fndings regardin� the criteria for approva� of a conditional use permit, as required by Section 1125.01 Subd. 3.b. af the Municipal Code: (1) 'l�e use will not create an excessive burden on e�cisti�g parks, schools, streeis and other pubiic facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. {7) Tlie use will not cause traffic hazards or congestio�. {8) Adeqnate utilities, access roads, drainage and necessary facilities have been oc will he provided. The model homes will be located on existing lots whicix are served by existin� parks, schools, streets and other public facilities. No additional demands on serv�ces, utiliYies, access roads and drainage are aniicipated. The level of tra�f°ic to the model hom�s has n.ot caused tra.ff°ic hazaxds or con�estion. Planning Commussion Resolution No. 497-97 March 5, 1997 Page 3 (2} The use wiII be sufficiently compatihle or separated by distance or screening from adjac,�nt residentiatly zoned or used la�d so that e�sti.ng �iomes will not be depreciated in value and ti�eze will be no deten-ence to development of vacant land. (3) The structure and site sha31 have an appearance that will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent reszdential properties. The use involves the placement of higher-qua.lity models of mobile homes onto existing lots, wh�ch will remain in place when sold. This use is expected ta have a pasitive eff°eci on the quality of housing in fihe park, and wiii cause possible appreciation rather than deprecia�ion of adjacent propert�es. (4) The use, in th� opinion of the City Council, is reasonably related to the overail needs of irhe CiCy and to the existing land use. (S} Tb.e use is consistez�t with the purposes of the Zoning Code azzd the purposes of the zonin� district in which the applicani intends to locate the proposed use. {6) The use is not iu coe�flict with th� Comprehensive Plan of the City. The C�ty has identified the need for upgrading the qua.lity ef� housing in M[aunds �1iew. both in the Comprehensive Plan and in the Mounds View Focus 2000 projeci. The Focus ''; 2004 report stated as an actzon step: "increase support to owners ofmanufactured horrze parks to encoucage upgrades and improvements." The sale of higher-quality mobile homes in Colanial Village, wk�ich will remain in pl�ce when sold, is consistent �,vith this direction. Both the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Code identify ihis area for development and operation of a mobile home park. Dispiaying models of mobile homes for sale in Coloniai Village is very s�zitable, and will heip iti achieving the overall need to � improving this mobile home park. IV�W, THEREFQRE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Flanning Comm�ssion recommends approval of the conditional use permit with the following stipulations: The number of units availabie for saie at any one time shall not exceed six percenfi of the licensed lots. 2. The modeis offered for sale sha11 be instailed in compliance with all applicable City and Stat� regulations goveming manufa�red homes. The stairways and entrance platfarms for the primary entrances sha(1 be broughi into cornpliance wiih the Buildin� Code by June l, i997. 3. A current Iist of properties, updated monthly, upvn which model homes are offered for sa1e, shall b� provided by the applicant and kept on fiIe at City Hall. I' ::... . '.:: ' ' �' �:: � ", ,,:: -: I ... Pla�ining Com�mission Resalution No. 497-97 March S, 1997 Page 4 � 4. �Iarketing of the model homes, including walkWihroughs and open houses, shall be limited to ihe hours 8 a.m. 40 9 p.m. Monday ttzz�ough Friday, � a.�r. to 6 p.m. on �aiurdays and 11 a.m. to 6 p.m, on Sundays. 5, This conditionat use pernut sha.11 be subjeci fo review one year from the date of ac�option by the City Council or sooner if a problem develops. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED thai the Plan�ng Comrnission directs sta.�Fto fonvard t�us resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the mir�utes. Adopied this 5th day of Ii�larch, 1997. Jerry Peterson, Cha.irperson Aitest: Pamela Sheldon, Community Development Direcior {Seal) N:IDATAIUSERSIPAMSVS�-TAItE1DEVCASESk176-97\COLVLGPC.RES � _ :;_ .. - - -- ��' - �. M ... _ ... . ... . .. . . . . . . u �...� ..-.n. •�-. ; l �� d_ �.� J , .. •. - _ ,. ,__- ` .. ��T ..��' ��e�'��'� r� �Z �% . ' � -: � _ „ -.__ P N�d�� A��L�CA�°I�Fd „ -_ ." .. � . . - . �' .. . _. _ _ , : __ _ ,_.- .. _. __. . .. . . . , .. -, _..:�,�_' . _ . - -- ;- _ . aPP��c��r: --: � �' I ! i � � - � . L I� G � � �� P �t,��r-- Phone� �3��s6� ._ _ - � Co[.��v.�` 1/�Lc�� p�K �� MN GE�vf-,e�C 134�TN�e�S/�`/� :�: :._._��,..ADDRESS:- - 14�1� �17:7'C2��F_ .-=�JK/N��iOnl�'�4.� I�N :_::553�5�...�.__:�.. : : ` : Street Address C�iy, Stat�, and .�ip_ C�de - = , , — . __. � - " --- - — — . _ _ „.:�. : c .: �.,._i: _ .. _. :...- �_.:.-r.r�, ."'- r "_: ,-:.._:� �.._:,...i- r - _ - _ t - lnYeresi irt Property`(checic apprnpriate b�x) s - � . � .�" Otirner'of �'raper#}i' . - � . y � ` � � �'= �t � .. _ . _ . ._. C7 _ .. .o..., Conteact fdr Deed Owner. _ ,:__. _, : ,. _ < ;. . ;`. . ,... . _ - _ _:. -Q- _'_-.1�; Operator, .r �rop�w�:�. �� -. . _ ,. �_ ._ . . . . . . : ; ❑ : . : Agreement to Purchase _ . C�- Uther (explain) eoN�� 8,�. v�� uRcN�S�,2 - . � : 1� � u � � , . � . ' � .. .. ..:� -,.,.:. .;..� . .. '.- �.... -�= n��..; ,.., . _ , ,.: _ ... � � . �.. - w� �.0 .L- �' � r C .. t. �oeumentary evicfence af apphcant's in4eresY in the�praperty may be requieed betore frna! City actian of this request ' " f r ?� *ro _ i� a35 . i,. L.� �r. . � - �, ny'�,�-ac - eaL v - -� rY . rt. � - . . ,.. �.wat- ;� te -, --+-1 y��v fs'yti .�°'"�F tu+� �y-e°"t� J -�r:+� _ R.. :w -. �r x�^- � i ev`� -. 9 L frw� L� �- .a. � � � -, d.. .o, - " s-d �. Y_..r - b i.+ s,F... a ' � �-� .�. .. .. PF�UPERiY�IfVVaLVED° °��"°"° �- _ --r. ' � - G�fl@f�l -� � v �Si�- ; w�� r M� � ` s - �'Address/ Laca�iart ��cie� -�� '��2o�s- R � _°� �v:,-i�'�uti ��1��v, �,�~• �s�e� . _ .. . .. .. _. . .. ... ,_ . . . . > . . - . , , ..-r - _ . - - � - • • . _ .. � .. - , . �-n. _ . . . _ . � . . _ . ..-. - . . :: Legal Description or Praperty lder��ificatior� Number os. 3 0-� �� e�.� . - � r °r � ...,. , . . _ ��S-3a-�,3 -�i�-��o .� �.= o•� _ -.: . _ ... . .. . - __ _ _. . . __... - -. Legal Owner: Narrte/Address c o �,bN � � �- . v� �` •�� - �,� R iL i� � ni G, � �v�r�;a ` . . - . F,�R't-A/cG �S �f �� . 1 � D r S a-v T, T�,� , � n,t r �i N �'i �W �' A-, � n�e N S'S 3 4�.,�" . . . . .. _ ="� � . ,- .: , .. _ . � _::: . . . _ _ . . - . .. . , . F'resent Use (checic appi`opriate box) < , _ _ .. - -� . _.. .. - - - ; � � ❑ ::_Uncieve(oped/Vacant : _ _ � - F ' � �;�, �, ❑ 4�,.-SingEe FamiiyJDwell�ng � f � _' � r '. . . . , . . . . �N l,". - .- "�- 4 - j . � � � �� -��Dup(ex/7°wo Family Dweiling � ' �' -�- - - � - ` �� -� � [�- :`Multi-Family�(No, of Ur,its = r � � j � � ° �` __ �' �, . ._.._. ,� , � . [� }� p;,�usiness%Commerciaf Estabiishment r � '� z = 4 4f� `:: LL ❑ � � �,lndustrial �sta hm "" ,,`; V _ k;�, � bfis ent � ` � � � T � , ,..-- v;�., `' - ;:.x,.�:�. `z � Cj ' �nOther (expla�r�) " .v_r`,:.�.��, ._.� , ;`,.. ;u; � �.•m --_ . „ .. � . . . _. . f =- . . :5. � ��-_ �, r' " _ _. . i `� r . ..�, .. _ - . -_ , .. ., . -.. ...-.. , _.. _ r_,..� ..� �:i.•: . .,:. .. � .. . .. ,_ . .: _ .,_-.... .. . . � , . -'� - - : � - _ Property CSassficatian: � [� Abstract �_ ❑ Torrens - - -- REQUEST: s�� -�-�Gtie�" _ . _ _ . - . . , . *P!ease rtate: Applicant may be responsibie for aaditional fees associated with �he review of this request i H�REBY �ECLAR� 7HAT THE ABOV� S7ATEM�NT AR� iRUE. �%- i4i�-J - F. ,�. �� - . - . . SsgnaCure �']E�':f�'$�ti'Y[7a�Y'RR�'SI'yf�l�Clkl�i�YC*'iP�i�t$$�CT'�7i'/Pk]k'if�f1�R�AiNRiCYeyl�f�lCyCY"R'jC�1'l1l*ihlk]pYPiPY7[Y�(♦P�'t�fi'�B�C�[�f'fk9i.'�:Yie�f[$7C]'[id�'�*]4']lNl�� - Rezanirtg Variance . _ C nditio I Use Rercrrit ode r1 e • �evelap./Site F'lan Fieview Minor Sui�divisian °- Major Subdivision Corrzp. Ptan Amendment Wetland Alferatian Rermit Wetland Burfer Permi� Pfanning Sigr� PUD � PUD Amendmen4 SZ00/acre, minimum 5200, maximurrt wt,000 R-1 to fi-2 - 575. ap o4hers S2D0 R-1 ro Fi-2 - 5i°a, zJl others 5200 , �75 - - . $1od/acee, minimucn 100, maximum $50d $15Q _' � • . . . .... SZ5o plus 5250 depasit - � _. __. $200 � 550 pfus deposi# de4ermined by Staff S10 i50 . �350 - $15� Park Fund Dedieation Fee � Date Faid Recaiot Numt�er Total Fees Paid Oate Pasd �leceipt Number Add'stianai Fee Paid �ate Paid Receipi Numbee � � � � -,.� �.-_ _ s= � _ . Date of final aetinn APT�!�OVE� ❑ DE�!(ED 0 TABL�D p Oate {..� ` � � � Planning Case fVa. ,� � / � � � Admin. Accatant No, � � a - -_ _ _ ' � -'' --.... ' E ► B L A I N E . ..��..___..._.._..�.. rye —��—..`..�.. ... �,�io��s - . _. _ _. _.... c0 � �--- --- - ... _ CF._: _ _ _ _ . ... . .... �---- . .. - . ... - -- - .. . ... _ _ _ _ . ... _--. -, . .. . ... -. . ... .. . , . .. ... . . _ ::.� . .:. .__ ... .__. --:��_ :.:_: ----- -- _ - sE _ ,. --. . . �; -_ _ . °�R - ---- �ic,�. _r —. _ _ ._. . -- � �- _....: =�. .. _. -- ... . .::. �N _'-..._. . ..O^�::.��._ ��-...__...�..-_:"_' _ .._.... . ..., N n .... � � . . �f� . ._ "' .' " -. � CI N Ci O � .' __ _� -- _._ __ �a�g Map Plantung Case No. 476-97 C�Ionial Village Man�.fa�iur�d Home Park 2075 Rusiad Lan� � ;� I � I � f �� I . � � j , � , i i � � I o � > A 7 L% � J e T i � E; � Q J J i� d 0 U . w � B °a a � N 4 N J 4 6 0 0 � n � r , p w 6 RP � a a v n � a n � 0 � o n � a � h „ a o � d a saurRE �� a h o r � J �n r a A P °n a �i � A M � J n w h � � � • n � ° x � ; � � a o h v ^ F e � PtAY � z c�oun$i K � 7 � RLrS;AD i.AN� QUAKER �.4NE CFFKE Z Q J � � � !� ' . X, ��%�; Locations oiModei I3omes i ^ i f'/y S�� Plan P1a�ing Cas� Na. 476997 Calo�.al �illa�e Manufa�ttu�ed I�offie Park 20°75 IZustad L,ar�� _.�.,.�1 j;;;. � Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting �ag� 3 February 27, 1995 �hrough the FoCUS 2000 programo i� �aas propvsed that tax incre t finances wauld be used to rehabilitate some of the existing mes and businessese Senator Novak remarked �hat the bill had been introduc but wauld probably nat bec:ome Iaw during this Session. An iss tha�k waul.d adversely affect Mounds View would be �he Governor' budget which curren�Iy called for a signi�icant �ut in State overnment Loca� Aid. Linke advzsed that he would like to have freeing up the aptians of ci.ties �o use th improv�.ng city st�eets. / isiclerati,on given to gas tax mQney �oward The Cauncilmerabers joined Maya� nke in expressi.ng th�i�� appreciati.on to Senator Novak f�r o ering his updat�. CONSENT AGENDA Samantha. Orduno, City Admini rator, read the Cansent Agenda as �ollows: r�! Q Adopt Resalution Na Against City Funds Licenses for n�H�. -° �;x zr 6 30 Del-Ai.i, Ir� . - Ne*�r � 4716 Approving Just and Correct Claims li�l�L�LV �v1vo= Quick/Hankner to Adopt the Consent Agenda as Presen d 5 ayes � 0 nays Mation Car�ied May Linke explained that �his portion of the meeting was de ignated for anyane who wished t� speak to the Council on it2ms t at were not on the Agenda. There were no c�mmen�s or �Q�ues�.s ram th� flaor< b PTJBLTC HEARINGS ° Cons�deration of Resolution No. 4719 Re est for Conclit�onal Use P°�`mit for Wiiliam Li ett to Allow Disz�ia and Sale of Model Hcmes a� Colonial Vill.a e Manufactur'd �iome Par!� �Iayar L,inke opened the publ�,c hea�zng a�, 7 0 2 2 p a m. =, Mounds View City Cauncil Page 4 Regular Meet�ng �ebruar� 27, 1995 �aul Ha�rington, Cotnmunity Development Coordinator, �eported that willia�n Liggett woexld like �o be al.lowed to sell m�del homes within his manufac�ured home park. Municipal Cade allows for this type of ac�ivity with the issuanca of a Conditional. Use Permit, which would guaran�.ee tha� certain conditions wauld be adhered to, such as �raffic and parking pa�terns wi�hin �he manufactured home park, �he number of homes that could be displayed, and the hours tha� hdmes can be displayedo �he purpose ot this applica�ion was �o systema�ically upgrade this park as lots bec�me available, �hereby bringing up the overall quality of �he manu�actured home parlco Ti�is i,tem was reviewed by the P�anning C�mmission and they recommend appraval of' the Conditiana� Use Permit. This item was aisa di.scussed at a Gouncil Wor]c Session ear3ier in the manth. Mayor Lin]ce offered a clarification �f the type of homes that would be sold from Colonial ViJ.�ag� Manufactuged Home Park. rn reality, they are nat mode� hames that wauld be sold, but rather spec homes o Harrington a�firmed �hat �he homes wauld be fu�1y connected to water anci sewer and would be ready �o live ix�. `� Councilmember Trude remarked �ha� �his Conditiortal Use Permit wauld encou�age updating the stock within the CoLonial Village Manufactured H�me Pazk. Mayor Linke cJ.ased the public hearing at 7:26 p.m. MOTION SECOND: Quick/Trude to Adopt Resolution No. 47I.9 App�oving Conditianal Use Pernit for Williazn Liggett to Allow Disp�ay and Sale of Madel Hames at Colonial, ViiZage Manufactured Home Par:� Counciime�n.ber Quick s�ated t:�a� he vier�ed this action as a stet� toward impraving the overall. a�pearance of the�nanu�aczured housing park. voTE: 5 ayes 0 "Ntxisances'P o nays Intraduction = l+'�aunds V, eT�r �ti e 0a F3v F.�t`ah1 Motion Carried nance No. 535 Renealinea :ode En�it�.ed . 1tNuisanc�s'° de*a Cha�ter 607, Enri�led. Mayor Linke opened the pu�ic hearinc� at "1 a 2 5 p. m. I�aul Ha�°�ing�on, Ca ity I�e�re Ament Coardinator, adv�,sed that a.n �he. stammer o� 1993 tiae Czty held c�mmuni�y-��rade visiar� process refe�red to as TJS 20Q0, a� which '�ne i� allowe� the ci�izens of Maunds Vie4� �ppo�t�ani�y �o me�t wi�� eTected offi.cials and Cz�y ,; ,: R�I �1��?� � �� . � � �; �. �, t, � ,� -. ��:� �� :.., , �_�� .' �' � ' .. � ° ; ' � - .. � � R' . . �. �:... ; CI`$`� G�TJI�ICTF„ �� ,� F°ebruar3r 27, I995 Agenda Section: � Report I�lumber: 95-123bC Repor� Date_ .� � Council A,c�ion_ a Sp�cial arderafBusiness � Public Hearings d Consent Agenda C7 Council Business Iter� DescripEion: Cansiderat�oa of Resolutipn Noo 4719 IZac{uest for Cnnditianal Use pe�� or _ W�-��im �zgget�9 Coionial. VilZage Manufactured Eiome Park A�II11t119LT8tOP 9 Review/�$ecomrnendation: . � - No comments tci supgiemen� Chi� repart � � Corraments attsched. � ( � � ExplanatianlSuz�ary (aitach suppleme�t sheets as aeces�ary.? �� 1�A F2,�^ t Bil� Ligget�, �wne� ag �oloniaZ �lzlZage Manufactured H��e Park, ha� made applicatiorx far a Condi�i.onaZ LTse permi� ta allow the display and sale of model. homes within Colonial Village Parko Chapter z110.�� Subdivision 5 of �he Nlounds Vie�a Mta.nicipai Code allaws madel hoffies r,rithin a manu�ac�ured home park (R-5 �ona.ng distx ict) uri�h �he is�uance of a Condztianal tTse Pe�mit. I�ira Lzggett's requ�st, �� app�c�ved, would allow the display and sal� �f up to seven (i) hoffiesa The applacant's request is a resu�� df h�.s desire to u stock witl��.n the manufactured home Pgrade tfie hous�ng �, vacancies ), �� ap p�iCant wo u l d Iacape new h mesp on th se� vacargcies `and � a�arket them to the generai pubii�. A31 madels would i�e fu13y set �xp i includiazg all. appropra�ate utility corineetians laeing madea �t is the � applicants hope that t�iis approach �aili lead ta the 4vera1l improvez�ent af � �he housing s�ock e�r.ithin Coi.onia� Vi1.Iage. � T�her� revie�ring the requ�st, tl�� tqat�� V�ew �Zanning Cc�a�rnission considered, among others, the fallowing i,ssues: Z� ��Pa�� of graratinq �he C�t�ditionai TJse Permi� on �raffic and parking patterns within �Yae rianufactured Hame Pa�ko z) �s �he reque,sted nuu�bes o� mode�• homes (7) appropriate in �elatic�n tc� the averal.l size af the Park? 3) ►�at assux°anc�s doe� the City kaave' �ha� the madels wii� �u�n o�rer on a �egular basi�? - �� . !� � l gaui Harrington, C w _� ��t�I�,�_ �. �- � � ► �. � s- . ..�+t _ .. . . - �dapt �e�alu�iar� I��e 4�29 a�p�nving a Ce,z�ei��iorzal U�� e�i� �ear �ill�a;� Lige�e��, ��1�ox��.�.� `iiliage �i�xz��a��ur�d �I��e �a��ta .J�Ci1' i dC.f:e�OlY.6 ,-.;��tY�re 1 YV� .- F'EBRUAR�' 2%I �9�5 � j Will 10trad�-�ins'Q be re�oved �r�� i�..e Par}� or, r�il� �h�y iae mar]c�ted or�-site? Fallae,��.r�q discussion �f these and o�her issues with �he app j.��t, the Planning Co�ission was satisfied wzth the con�apt of made� hc�m� sa��s an get��r�la At th�zr J�nua�r 4, i77.5 m�et�ng°y td�e Plann�ng Comr�ission adopted Reso�.ution I3a. 410-�95 (capy attached) recoffimending approv�l of �he Condi��,onal Use Perm�t. P�ease not� the �anciitzons �ahicix wer� placed on the recom�endati�n o Fc�l]�owing dzscu�siQa� �.t the Feb�a�r�s �I�rk S�ssion, and a� directed by �lze Council, 5taf� has �afteci the attacheci Resalutzon for conside�°�t�,on, �1ea�e r�c�te �hat the ��svl�tion in�ludes the c�zaditaarxs of approva�. as recomm�nded by the Planning Ca�.r,aission. '.,, d r:,-.,,,<„;�'i � `' "; � ��soLUTroN �o0 4719 c�T� oF r�ourrD� vz�w cov�'�Y o� �s�Y �TA�� oF ��r�aESO�� soLUTxor� A�PRO�rzrrG � corrDr�ror�A�, �rs� PE�zx� To �x�LOw D�spr�Y �,rr� sAr� oF �o�� xor�s ��r eox,orrz�L v�Lr.�cE r�xuF�c�D xoM� P�xx, � pr��rrG c�s� rro 0 3� i-s4 TrIHEREAS, Colonial Village Manufactured Home Park has made application ta allow the disp�ay� and sale o� model homes within the Park; and WHER�AS, the app�.icant has submitted the f�liowzng items a� pa�t of the applicationo Io Planning Applicatian dated June 29, �g94 2o Letter outlining prapasa� dated December 6, 1gg4 3a Site Plan dated ��cemi�ex° 6, �gg4 WHL'REpss y 2'zt�e 11Q0 Of tfle MOIIl`iCiS Z%iE?wd MililiCl�J$1 C4C10 allows the display and sale of model h�mes wi�hin a manufactuxed home park with the issuance o� a Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the rYounds View Czty Council. has reviewed tY�e request against the criteria listed in Tit1e 1i00 govarning issuance of Condi�ional Use permi�ts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESQLVED that the Mounds V�.ew City Council appro�res the x-equested conditiana� �ase pex�nit for the display and sale af madel homes at CoZonial Village A'Ianu�actured Hame Park, �ontingent upon the follatrr�.ngo 1) A copy of this Conditiona� use permit sha11 be recorded with Ramsey County. 2) Number af uni'c� avaa.Iable fo� sale at any one t�.me sha11 not exceed 6% o� licensed lots. 3) Uni�.s of�ered for sale siiall be insta].led in compliance with aIl applicable Ci�y and State regul.ati�ns governing Manufactured Horaesm �) A c�ax°rent list d� propsrties, upd��ed montk�ly, upc�n which madel h�mes are a��ered for sal� shall lae prov�.ded by the app�icar�t and kept on fil� �t �i�y Ha�1, m 5) Marketing af the madel homes including walk-�hroughs and �pen houses sizall be liani�ed ta th� hau�s �f 8 ammo to 9 p.m, Monday through Friday; 8 aom. t� 6 pea�o � �� ReSO�.L1�1Q21 �TO m 4%,.g � p3CJ8 `L'WU Sat�.rday and; 1]. a.me to 6 pmm. Sundaye 6) This Conditional Use Permi� is subject to r��aaeea a��er one yea� by �.he City. .Adopted this 27th day o� February, 1995 P.i'TES�' ; May -� (SEr?L) , '--��Y+''�G„�r/-�! �.i /��y;� i' Clerk-�Ad inis ato� � � � 1 i:' i.;, Item ��7 � � , � � To: F�°om; ��bject: li�tee �. IViounds `Iiew Planninp Commission � Pamela �heldon, Community Developmeni Director �O'� Planning Commission Bylaw� 1 February 28, 1997 1Vle�ting on ivlarch 5, 1997 At your meeting on February 19, the Pianning Comanission reviewed proposed revisions to your bylaws and requested some further changes. A copy of the bylaws with these changes is attached. The changes have been highlighted by "rediiriing" to speed your review. A resoluiio� has been prepared far the Pianning Cornmissian to u.se in adopting the revised byla.ws. �eco��end�tion: Adopt Resolution No. 498-97 approving revised 6ylaws %r th� Plaa�ning and Zoning Commission, azzd direct stafi to forward these bylaws to the City Council for accep�ance. N:�llATA1USERS�PA��iS1SHARE�LANCOMMI9YLAW2.MEM -�> ; �;�� , - � ; ,fi�,, ; ��, : �,, ,��, . �;, � ,� � , .�, , ;�_ , � � �:._ � !�; ` : # � 1� `. '1: `�-.'�-� � f • �, J� : � �-. .1't" � � � � � �f �_ � �=, .: : � : f,� �� .� �_� �;�; •� : 1�,� : ` 1' �'� �p`! ��'' ; .t- . ;1. �; �� '��.. ; f- �., 1` '1. = � : ��T '�, �3EREAS, Sectian 401.05, Subd. 7 of the Mounds View Ih[unicipal Code requires ihe Planning and Zoning Comrnission to adopt bylaws for its governance and for the transaciion of iis business, and for the annuai review of these bylaws; and, i�THEREAS, th� �lannin� and Zoning Commission has conducted its 299i review of its byiaws and has determiized that revisions are needed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE�OL'VED ihat tche bylaws for the Planning and Zoning Commissian shall be revised as shown in "Exhibit A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and that the bylaws as shown in "Exhibit A" supercede previous adopted versions of the bylaws. BE IT FURTI3ER RE�OLVED that these revised bylaws shall be kepi on file with the ::; City Clerk-Administrator and th� Department of Community Developmeni, and shall be forwatded to the City Counc�I for acceptance. Adopted this Sth day of March, 1997 Jerry Peterson, Chairman ATTEST: Pamela �heldon, Community Development Director (SEAL) N:IDATAIUSERS�PAMSISHAREIPLANCOMMIBYLAW,RES - CTTY OF MOLTND� VIE� PLANNING AN� ZONII�IG CO�VIMISSIO�i �YLAV�S {Revised as of Niarch 5, 1997} AUT'H4RITY: Thes� Bylaws of the Mounds View Plaruun and Zonin Commission (Bylaws} are established in accordance with ihe Maunds View IvYunici�al Code 5ection 401.06. Subd. 7 ., ,"The Commission shall adopt bylaws for i�,s � govemance and for the transaction of its business." Where there is a corxflict between the rovisions of e Bylaws �d �� rovisions of the Ciiy Cha�°ter and the Ivlranicipal Code, th��rovisions of fit�e Ciiy Charter.artd.ih� P_,,. _ . _.. .... ... �.. , . ..�.::.:.:::,,.:.H,�:. ,: =;�:_. � , �•� � ,• :, . � � . � �, � �� A. Administrator and th� iommunitv Development lle arnnent. � copv at tne nviaws snail be forwarded to the Ci Council for iis information. An amendments to the B laws sha11 be adopted b�IZesoiu�ion in ihe same manner as the ori�inal Bvlaws. B. ANNCJAL I�EVI�W: The Bvlaws shail be reviewed on an annuai basis at the �irst re�ar � meetin of the Commission in Febru :�. ga « . : �� N. OFFICERS A. OFFICERS NAMED• The afficers of the Ptannin� Commission shall consist of a chairperson and vice-chairperson The Commission mav create and fiII such other offices frorri its members as it znav determine to transact Commission business. In addition. the Director of Communi Develo ment shall act as the recordin secre for the Commission fo�ur�ose of .�reparin� meetin� minutes or shall a�t�oint a staff member io perform this dut� B. ELECTiOIVS• TEf�]VIS 1. Chair�erson: Based unon the recommendation of the Planriin� Commission, the Nla�ar, with th� approval of the Citv Council sha11 a�voirxt the chairperson o�the Commission each ear At the first meeiin� in December the Commission shall conduci � e�ection in order to make ifis recommendation for the chai erso fatlowin�procedure in City of Mounds View March 5, 1997 PIanning and Zoning Commission -�ylavvs Page 2 III.B.3. The name oithe person recoznmended %r cha.iiperson shall be forwarded to fhe Citv Council for action at its first meetin in Januarv. 2. Vice-Chairperson: The Plaau�in� Commission shall elect a vice�cha.irperson each vear at its first meetins in January, followin�the procedure in III B 3 3, Eleciion Procedure: For each office, the cha.ir�erson shall invi�e nominations from Plannin Commission members. After nozninahons have been receive the chairperson shall entertain a motion to close nominations If such motion is made and passed. and more than_one nomination has been made the chairperson shall distribufie ballots ta the Commission members and each member shall write his or her selection on the ballot. The record.in� secretary shall iativ the ballots and announce ihe nominee recezvzn the mosi votes. Irx the event of a tie iiie recordin secret shall anriounce the z�ominees tied in the voti�g and balloting shall be re�eated untii an election occurs. If anl one nominai�on has been receive the ch � erson ma conduct -�he votin b voice vote. If a maioritv of the members present vote in ihe affirmative for the nominee, the nonYinee sha11 be elected 4. Assumption oiDuiies: The Chairperson and Vice Chairperson shall assume office at the frst meetin in Febru of each ear. 5. Term oi Off ce: The chaizperson and vice chair�ersan shall serve one vear terms and mav be re-elected to additional terms in accordance with this Section III B C. D�S OF OFFICERS: T'�e chairpecson shall preside over the meetines of the Plannin� Commissian. and shall haue the authoritv to add or cancel a.�enda review meetin s�or re ar meetin s and to call special meetings asprovided in Section V The vice chairperson shall assume the duties oftha chairperson in the absence oithe chairperson V. LIAI�ON TO COLTNCIL: The Citv Canncil shall apgoin# from among its members a Liaison to the Commission on an annual basis It is eYpected that the Council Liaison will attend the Commission meetin�s on a re�uiar basis In the event of the ahsence of the - Council Liaison at a Comznission meetin� a Commission member may be appointed by the chairperson to represent the Planning Commission at the next regvlar City Council meeting or at the meeiin where tha Ci Council will be considerin the lannin cases acted u on b the Plannin� Commission in the absence of the Council Liaison I�/�TI- ��e� A. TYPE3 QF 1VIEETINGS; SCHEDUi,E: Th� r��° meetings of the Commission shall be held on the first an.d t�iird Wednesday of each manth a with th� annual schedule of ineetin�s for �he followin� veax ta be ada ted b Itesolution af ths first meetin in December. - 1. I�egular M�etings: The first Wednesday of the month shall be a reguiar business meeting for ihe purpose af convenine public hearings malang recammenda�ions to the City of Mounds View March 5, 1997 planning and Zoning Commission - Bylaws Pa�e 3 City Council, , and conductin�business which repuires a vote of the Commission, convening as the Board of Adjust�nent and Appea.is, and ather offcial busirxess. �.genda Review I�eetings: The third Wednesday of the month shall be .y � � an agenda review meeting for an informational review of �lanning a�pticatians pro�osed for action at the regular business meetin�_the followinp month. �onducting site plan reviews. exa�i�i��prot�osed ordinance amendme�ts. discussin� lon� ran�e plannin� issues and studies and other matters not re uirin a vote of the Commission. The Commission ma ca.11 to order ai enda review meetings to iake action if noiiced on th�enda for the a enda review meetin� 3. SpeczalIVieetings: � � .�pecia.l meetin�s mav be called bv the chairperson ,� Cleck-Administrator who shall then ost and maii a natice of the meetin in accardance with State Staiutes Plannin Commission members shall be notified b� tele�hone and in writin at �east seven da��s vrior �o a special meeiin�. � 4. Cancellation of Nleetings: Reguiar or agenda review meetings may be canceled by the chairperson far good and su�cient reasons, or in �e event there are no items of business re uirin the attention of the Cammission or there is lack a� a uo b the Communi I3evelo ment Director. Members of the Commission shall be natified b tei�hone of anv meetin�cancellation b th� e Friday preeeding the meeting A notice of the meetingzcancellation shail b�osted as required bv State Statutes. �. QUOI�LTM: A majority of the number of voting members appointed to the Cammission shati constiiute a quorum. COI�TDUCT OF I�IEETINGS; ADJO�:1��]NMENT 1. IVleeting Chairoerson: If neither the chairperson nor the vice chairperson is present to conduct a meetin� of the Planning Commission. the Planning Commission may elect a meetin chair from amon those members resent rior to the comrnez�cement of eleciaion, 2. �pen A�leeting I.aw: Meetings shall be condu�ted ixa accordance wiYh the State of Nfinnesota. en I+�eetin I,aw . . ':::�5�ia:��<�'��`;:':��;�. - ........ .,. � � �; .:.>.:�:.; .................. g �� :.... .. ........ . 3. Adjaurnnzenf: Meetings shall adjouzn::� or before l 1;00 p.m. unless a two-thirds majority of ihe rnembers present a.�ree to exter�d ihe �ime of adjouxnnzeni. `:� Ciry of Mounds View March S, 1997 Planain� and Zoning Comznission - Bylaws Pa�e 4 l3. Iv�LJ7'�5: Nlinuies shall be prepared for reeular meetin�,s and each Gommission member shall receive a copy of the unapproved minutes %r review and approvai at a succeeding meeting. Ivlinutes shall be approved bv motion, Approved minutes shatl be tiie official record of the business conducted and actions taken bv the Planning Commission. £*�c�r . �;Orill'T1fSSiOh members mav request copies of a�proved minutes after thev have been corrected, if necess_aiv,_and signed as apprOVed. �� t�ithe appraved minutes shall be filed with �re � Clerk-tldministrator and in the Community I3evetopment I)e�artment. �iiinu�es shall be ciearl� maaiced "UNAP�'ROVEB" or "APPROVED". The mir�utes shall state tixe folIo�in�: 1, type af ineeting, whether a.�enda review. regular , or special 2. date, time and place of �tie zneetin� 3, time meeiin� caited to order 4. roll call of inembezs present, and whether abseni members are excused or une�cuse� 5. corrections to and approval of any previous minutes and �he vofe talcen, excep� that minor arnmaticai and o hicai corrections need not be noted 6, for each plannin� case on the agenda: � case number, project name and address, brief description of the request, and name and address of the applicant b. summary of the reques# c. sununary of any previous action d. summar}� of the stai� review e. sumcnary of s�atements made by the a�pticant, particularly concessians or agreements made by the applicant f summarv of commen#s made bv each nerson testifvin�_ wiih fhe name and address 7. for any motions made: a accurate as possible stateme�t of motion b. name of Commission members matang and seconcling motion c. vote or� each motion as to nu�zber af ayes, nays and abstentions d. reasons for each nay vote or abstention e. whether mation carried or fa.iled 8_ specific concerns addressed to the cha�rperson for inciusion in the minutes 9. reports by sta,ff 10. reporYs by Commissian chairpecsan and members 11. if the minutes are for a re_�uiar meeting, date, time, place and attendance at the preceding agenda review meetin� 12. time of adjout�nent . 13. signatuu-e of chairpersor� and recordir��; secretar�v i` - City of Mounds View iVlarch S, 1997 I'lanning and Zoning Cornmission � Bylaws p�� VI. INFORI�IAT`IOI�iAL PACKE�'S: Each Commissioner shall receiv a staff report, plans and addi�ionai information, as approp�iate, , ag�e, �g for each item placed on the agenda at both the a,�enda review meetin� and fhe re�uular meetin�The Commissio� packet shail be delivered at least four davs nrior to the meetin�. Each Commissioner is responsible for reviewing the material within the packet prioc � the meetin�. �. PRO�S�IONl�L, CONSULTAATTS: Advice from, consult�tion with, and/or requests for r�view by the City Atto�ney, City Engineer, Ciiy Piagvvng Agenc�y, or other paid consuttan�s s�a� be in acco�dance wi�h the IV.iunicipal Code, Seciion 401.07. �Iffi. SUPPLEIviENTARY 1'LJBLICATiOIVS: AII Com.missiorr members shall receive a copy oiFthe , , I�ounds View Municipal Code and a copy of the lYluxucipal Comprehensive Pla� as weli as other materiais as provided by the City Council or Ci�y Staff. These materials shall be retained by each cornmission member and relumed ta the Communiiy I7evelopment Director upon th� member's resignation or temiination of appointment. A � ►1� • ui ul:iial:7� � A. ATTENDANCE: Commission mernbers shall advise the designated Staff rnember or the Comtnission chaiarperson of an anticipated absence from any regularly scheduled Planniaa� Commission meeting. Any member attendizig Iess than 20 meetings per year without #h� cansent of the Commission shall be deemed to have vacated the offiee, and such vacancy� shall be filled by the City Council pursuani to . Section 401.03, Suhd. 1. A ieav� of absence may be granted by the consent of the Comrnission. B. CONFLICT O�' INTSREST: 1. General Standard: No Commissior�er shall be appointed with private or persanal interests iikely io conflict with the general public interest. If any persan appointed to the Cornmission shall iind that their private or personal interests are involved in any matter coming before the Commission, they sha11 disqualify themselves from taking part in anv discussion or actien on the matter; alternatively, they may be disqualified by a, two�thirds (2/3) majority �vote of the Camxnissioners in attendance. 2. Conflict I�ue to Economic Interests• A Cominissioner has a conflict of interesi i£ in his or her discharge of officiai duti�s wouid be required to take an action or make a decision that would substantiall�affect the Commissioner's finazzcial inierests or those of an associated business ur�iess the effect on the Com�r�issioner is no �reater than on oeher �ernbers of the Commissioe�er's business classi�cation. ro%ssion. or occu ation. In fr�e eveni a�onflict of interest exists with res ec� �o a articula� matter befare the Comrnissian, the Commissioner sha[1 disqualifv �hemseives fram takin�_pa.rt in an discussion or actioe� on the matter. Ciiy o£ Mounds View March 5, 1997 Plaiv►i.ag and .Zoning Commission - Bylaws Page 6 C. EX PAItTE CONTACT�: Ex parYe contacts are contia�is between individuals seekin�to influence the decisians of the Plannin�Corninission and individual Commissior� members outside the meeii.nQ forum. Such contacts include rneeiings with project proponen�.s, residents propertv owners, and cifizens separate from Commission meetin_gs, carnmunucation between Commission members outside the meetin f� orum, telepho�e calls or letters which attemut to influence a Commissioner's opinion on a znattec which will be sub�ect to the Comrr�issioner's vote. When fhe Plannin�,_,Commission is ir�volved in con�acts and should avoid expressing any opinior� as to ihe merits o£the case. �en ex �arte contacts occur. th� Piannin� Commissioner is respansible for notif�rin� the Communitv Development Director, and for conve�n� the substance of the communicatior� at the next comrnission mee�ingat which the matter discussed is under considerarion. Approved by the Planning Commission by Resolution No. 498-9i Dafie: IV1azch 5, 1997 Jerry Peterson, Chairperson ATTEST: Pamela Sheldon, Cammunity l�eveloprr�eni Director N:IDATA\USERSIPAMSVSHARE�PLANCOMMIPCBYLAWS.97 acE�Da s�ssza� Item #1 ;� �; , �, ;._ ► ; :.. ;� ...: . <�; � :� i, :, .: 1: , NI�� I➢ai�o S�at`��teport byo Pla�ni�� Case No.o 12es�u�sia Peiatio�►e�°o i.�c�tiona J;'f`. �'� ,�: Zon��/I.and t3seo A.ppl�cabT� Reg�l��ionsa lVfarch 5, 1997 James Ericson, �lanning Associate 472-97 Conditianal LTse Permit, �or Auto Repa.ir �usiness Spots Quick Lube, Inc. 2975 Highway 10 06a34-23-23-0005 Ba3, Highway Business Districi / Vacant Auto Central Bu�tding � Section I 104.01, as amended by Ordinance No. 590, establishes the principal building ar�d pazking !ot setbacks. These will be addressed in the analysis section of this report. � �ection 1 i 14.04, Subd. 3 estahlishes the requirements for auto repa.ir businesses, since they are allowed as conditional rather than pernutted uses. • Section 1125.01, Subd. 3b(2): The use will be sufficiently compatible or separated by distance nr screening from adjacent residentia.l.ly zoned or used land so tha� e�asting homes will not be depreciated in va,lue and there will be no deterrence to development of vacant land. � Attach�a��tse 1. 2. 3. 4. S. b. 7. Section 1125.01, Subd. 3b(3): The strueture and site shall have an appearance that will not have an adverse e�eci upon adjacent residentia.l properties. Planning Application Zaning Map Siie and drainage plan, dated 2/I2/97 Ci�y Engine�r Commenis Hydrologic Review (prepared by SEH Inc.) Letter from Applicant Letter from property Owner (Norwest Banks) ��roa�atd: The Auto Centra.l ioi, w�ich operated previously as Ivlid Arnerica.n Auto in the 1970s and 1980s, has been vacant since 1995. The site is currently owned by Norvaest Baeilcs. In Tan�aary of 1996, the �ity Council approved Ordinance No. 580, which amon� other things, established a rtiinimum lot size for new and usedl automotive sales lots of iwo acres. At two-thirds of an acre, the A�ato Planning Commission Planning Case No. 472-97: Spots Quick Lube, Inc. February 19, 1997 Page 2 Ceniral siie can no longer accammoda�e automoiiv� sales. The site is in a s�ate of disrepair a.eid is in need of e�rtexasive work. In �eptefnber of 1996, I�on Ostrander and Bruce MacDonald applied for a condiiional use permifi to allow for an auto repair business at this site {Planning Case No. 460-96). Th� Planning Commission heard this appiication on October 9, i 996 after which the applicanis withdrew th�ir request. The Pianning Commission's comments as �vell as the staffreport on this earIier case were given to the present applicants to guide them in the development of their plan. On January 9, 1997, I�en C1ark, represeniing $pots Quick Lube, Inc., submi�ted an application far a conditional use permit to allow for minor auto repair at the Auto Central site. There are no plans to structurally aiter the present building. A�al�sise Dimensional Requirements: Mi„imum Lot Size: Minimum Lot Dimensions: Buildin� 5etbacks o Front (facing Highway 10): a Front (facing Spring Lk. Rd.) ° Rear (facing north): � Rear (facing west): Parking Lot Setbacks � Front (facing Highway 10): • Front (facing �pring Lk. Rd.): • �t�ar (facing north}: ' • Rear (facing west}: Required �,z,sao 5�.ft. 150 x 130 30 feet 34 fe�i 40 feet 40 feet 30 feet 3 0 feet 2a feet 20 feet Frovided 27.00O sq.ft. 166 x 244 5 i feet 34 feet b1.9 feet 74.2 feet S feet 30 feet 90 feet 28 feet Met� Yes �'es Yes Y�5 i�es Yes No Yes Yes Yes WiYh the exception of the setback of the parking lot from Highway I0, all of the dimensional requirem�nts have been met. Given the size of this irregularly shaped parceI and the placement of the existing building upon it, meetin� all of the paridng lot setbacks may not be possible. I�owever, f the Commission were to consider fhe side of the property facing Highway 10 as a "side" rather than a"front", the req�aired setback would be only S feet and the site would then meet all of the required setbacks. ' Parking Rec�uirements' 1�ccord°u�� to the Zoning Cade, the required rzumber of parki�g spa�es for an automotive repair facility is � plus 1 space for each �00 squar� feet af flooc area over 1,000 square feei. Given ih� �l �;; � Planning Coenmission Plannirng Case No. 472-97: 5pots Quick Lub�, Inc. February 19, 1997 Page 3 squar� foofag� oithe building, 9 spaces woutd be required (8 plus 1 because the building is approximately 1,500 square feei.) The Site plan date starnped 2/12/97 indicates 8 spaces provided. On� more space will need to be added to meet ihe parlting requir�ments as set ic� the Zoning Code. In additxon, there are no spaces designated as handicapped accessible. State guidetines require #hati one of ihe provided spaces be posted as handicapp�d accessible wiih the proper ciearances. Access: 'The site plan ind�cates iwo 16-foot wide access points onto Spring I.ake Itoad and none onto Highway 10. The two existing entry points from Highway 10 are proposed to be �losed offwith the driveways and culverts removed. Staff believes that the two access onto �pring Lake Road pose nuyneraus problems and requires that ihe site pIan be revised to irzdicate one 309foot wide aceess point onto Spring I.ake Road in the general iocation of the northernmost access point. Draina�e; The applicani will be installing three catch basins on the site to help route water to the Higl�way 10 drainage ditch as it will no longer be able to flow freely to the ditch with the addition of curbing. The amount of drainage runoff will decrease since, under the applicant's plan, impervious surFace will be removed and tanciscaped areas wiil be added. The apglicant will need to ob#a.�n a pernut from NInDOT before doir�g any work in their right-of-way. Staff has sent a copy of ihe preliminary site and drainage plans to Iv1nDOT for their review. Sprin� Lake ltoad i�econstraction: Spring Lake Road is scheduled for reconstruction and wideninrg in 1998. The applicant wiil need to dedicate to the City a permanent 1 � foot roadway easement atong the east property line. Before the City Council acts upon this conditional use permit, a dacument conveying such an easement will need ta be prep�.red and executed by the applican�. General Site Considerations: Currently, th� majority of the site fronting k�tghway 10 and Spring Lake Road is paved. There are no defined access points onto Spring Lake Road; a wide swath of pavemeni connects the parking Iot to the street. The applican� proposes to eliminate all of the extraneous pavert�ent as part of the redevelopment. ihe e�sting fence se�ions are in a state o�' disrepair and should be removed and replaced with , new screening fences. The ��nce alon� Spring Lake Road will need to be moved back approximately t�n fe�i to make room for ihe proposed roadway easerr�ent. planning Commission PIanning Case No. 472-9i: Spots Quick Lube, Inc. �ebruacy 19, I99�' �'age 4 A garbage dumpster is indicated on the site plan. This wiil need to b� totally screened wiihin ari enclosure that has a Iatch;ng access gate. The site plan should be revised to show the enclosure. � I�Io lighting, signage or landscaping is indicated on the site pian. This information wili need to be provided before the next Planning Commission meeting. Because this site at one time was a gas station, there is an environrnental concem as io wheih�r the tanks wera properly removed. The applicant will need to provide documentation verif�ring the proper removai of the ianks and any test r�suits of the soil. Adverse Effecis In its recommendaiion to the City CounciI, The PIanning Commission will need to consider possible adverse effects of this use. Its judgement sha.il be based in part on ihe following: � RelaPzon�hip to fhe Comprehensive Plan This property is designaied as low density res2dential in the Comprehensive Plari. This site has been used commercially for the past 30 pius years, although it l�as been vacant the last two years. Approving this CLTP will continue the inconsistency with the plan. The suitability oi the site for low density residentia! is somewhat questionnable given its Iocation adjacen� to Highway 10. • The character of ihe geog�aphiccal at�ea involved This area has a rnix of older housing and recent new home construction. This commercial sife, however, is somewhat out of place amidst the neighboring residential uses. In its present state the"siie is undoub�edly a detriment. The applicant seeks to redevelop the site, improving its aesthetic and economic potential. � Wliether sasch use �vall tend to or actucally depYeciate the crrea in which the use rs proposed. Considering the fact that this site has remained vacant for the past two years, persisting as a negative presence to the area. and t�e Highway 10 corridor, the proposed use should serve as a ben�fit to the community, The applicant has indicated their intent to d�velop the grop�rty so it will projec� a very pteasin� image and will give landscaping the site a high priority. , PL2rilllrig COmiI11SSfOI1 Planning Case No. 472-97: Spots Quick Lube, Inc. February 19, I997 Page 5 � The demonstrated need for srech a use. Y According to ihe recently compieted Feasibility/Highest and Best Use Analysis af the �iighway 10 Corridor, an automotive repaiz° or quick lube facility is not listed as one of tl�� uses "not present" in the corridor. However, only two businesses in Mounds View perform oil changes and other like services, one of which is the �aturn Dealership. �ecause of this, the case can be made that their is a demonstrated need far tivs business. Con�l�s�oa�: Staffis favorable toward the gran�in� o�a conditional use permit io Spots Quick Lube, Inc. for the operation of a minor auto repair business with conditions, sorrxe of which are as follows: 1. Hours o� operation shall nofi exceed � a.m. to 9 p.m. l�onday through Friday, 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. on Saiurdays, and 10 a.m. to 8 p.m.. on �ui�days. 2. No work shaii be performed outside of the building. 3. No ouiside storage oz° sa.les shall be allowed without the prioe approval of conditional use permit. 4. The applicant shall obtain a permit �om MnDOT before doing any work in the IVInD�T right-of-way. 5. The applicant shall follow all approved oil disposal guidelines and procedures, 6. The applicant shall pravide the following items prior to the �ext Planning Commission meeting: a. A landscape plan showing a.il species oi shrubs, bushes, trees and other effecis to be added to the si�e and the areas to be sodded or seeded. b. A revised site plan showing the dumpster enclosure, ihe singte access onto Spring Lake Road, the proposed easement area, the lighiing and signag�, the additional parking space and ihe markizxg of one space as handicapped accessible. I , --_. ------_ ._. _:... ........ - ;; i Planning Com�ission Pianning Case No. 472�97: Spots Quick Lube, Inc. February 19, i 997 ' Page 6 7. The applicarit shall submit the folIov�ring before the City Co�tncil acts upon this conditional use permii: a. An executed documen� conveying the east ten feet of 2975 Highway 10 io th� Ciiy as a permanent road easement. b. Documentation verifying that any underground tanks have be�n properiy removed and a.ny results of any associa#ed so�l tests. 8. The applicant shatl r�cord the conditional use pemut and easemen� documeni with Ramsey County within 60 days of Ci�y Council approvai or this permii shall becorne null and void. Staffwill draft a resaluiion for the Planning Commission's next regular meeting on Apri12, I997. N:\DATAIUSERSIPAMSISHARE�DEVCASE 51472-9i1SPpTS-PC. RPT � �iF,��Cr1Nr: '. , qDCREj.�; . • . ' :� � -.. . .R,y , '" - : + • � Spots Quick Lube Inc. PhGr1e 612-934-2837 6300 Carlson Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Str�et Addres�, Gity, St�a, �nd ?p Gade lnterest in Property (c�eeSc apprapriaie �ox): � Ov`mer oT �roperty L� Cantra�t far Desd Owner ' Q L�sseeT O�erator, Mar�ager . � ,4greer�er�t to Purc.nasa ❑ Other (expiairr}____ - Qoeerme,r�y avidenc� aP aPp�fesrre's irrt�esY in �e preparcy may bm r�uired berare finad C:y ��on afi �ris r��. pqo��iY INVOL�/ED° fi��r�sa/�enerQ; Loca ian 2975 i�i hwa 10 L'g�i C�esc:ipticn or Prcperiy I�eniinc�ticn Num�er Pin � 05-30-23-23-0005 �°�� wner __ Wil_ Name/Addr�s: be: Spots 0 Currently vorwest Banks Inc. uick Lube Inc. rres�nt Use (c'rtec:t aopropriate �ax): I? Undevelooed/Vacc�nt � Str�gfe r°ami'ry �we�ling t-! DuolexlTvHa �ami'ry Cwe�Iing C Multi-=amily {N�, cf Unrts } � 8usiness/C�rnmerc:a� �.-raclisnment ❑ Industria! Estabfishmenr [C Other (expiainj Properey C:assincation. C Absi�ac; , C i arr�ns FE•�uE� i: Required Permi+�s to o��rata a Quick Lube. "c!ease nore: Ac�iicant rnay be rescons�oie 'ar �cc;:;or� `e�.s ass:.c;at� •,virh ;,'�e revi w cr ,his racuesL I W�7EvY ��•;,�E T°'r�`AT i�-iE A�CV� 5 i d; c:dlE�d ►.��;� � nU�. � 1 xRa'e'W7tlY$�'W4Yt��A'eaY*yPa1vRR��aRw"X�F��rYaR'H9vax9��'�eR'NVaYi°R4�s'W'R9WYwssYS 7Ap�'sas'C � aY+�AFR�9m'xev�aav'WY9�'t�v'W42t �axaninq S6CAlac:�. minirrsum SZQQ. „�a�mum SS.� r�srk �.:nd ��ic�ion � ee �leaitanc� F}-t � r�-2 • 5�5.'al ot�ers S2CA ��iticn�l Us� r �r� � 0a� r°aa 7-� � �-2 - 57.,. .�il ameas �rci �=secaaot lVumbee C.�e aoo�! S'i 5 �7ev�ico.,Sita r��arr r�vreaae SiOa/acra. ,�inimum �CQ. -'�musr°� �iA ,4lincTt Sur.aivislan Si59 °aYP1 =�� -i� _ - - Wa�or Suoaivisson c � �� ?qid _ ,; . - S2..d oieas SL..O Geacsrt �-'mo. °'an �tmendm�m S�CU ' .0C9�OZ �Ui7YGeP - `.'Neclana �:ltar�on r��rmtY SSO arus deocsrt Ceterertinec dv a"t�si "Nettana 3urier rsrmst SIO �ddit9cna� �se ?Wid ��enntnq 3ign -y+c� �rara ?_id r".1� �� •�aOY �duRto�r +'UD ,irrrenamont Si St� :a� c�r irlai �°°.:on 1�a.�'iCv�� " u�V{E� � �� / ' `� - `% '%' P�snning C.ls� �Vg. ' -'f � . 6✓ �1 � .� �Q"�`tis� lr-� �... a�, ., � �t. T�S� °`" i': �: ,; t_: � � � � � 1 0 � _ _ 8381 8378 '' � � � 836 �j 8374 83g3 8372 8379 8368 � 8368 � 8360 8 8370 j 8371 836 . 8371 �368 835i 83 8365 6354 8 8360 . 8360 � 83�9 8360 8351 8346 8344 8� � 8347 $3�8 g3�1 8343 8342 �, 8350 835� 834 • 8340 8335 8334 ��33g 8334 g335 8332 8; �8345 fl330 8336 8325 �330 � 8333 g330 8333 8322 8: 8335 8�20 8�2g 8315 8322 p 8321 8325 8300 Q e: 8318 — 8315 8311 8308 Y 831 8: s3� a ��at GROVFLAND 8312 8297 8298 Q 8� • 83d0 $�05 8289 8280 8285 PARK 8: 8284 � 8285 8290 pF' ,n 825d 82fi1 ,.. � ,n SLSO 82%5 SL7O SZBt 8230 8241 N N N N ' k t— 8265 ARDA{�6 �—� 8270 Q 8265 8260 � 8255 8248 � a�i m rn oas :: : � � � �24 ro � °D � g � � J N N CV tV :. ' N CV CV N N N C`7 CV CV 8250 a. 8245 ' 8240 PLF�� 8233 8Z28 � 8245 8206 8227 8202 h � 82 B23 � 8213 8210 8217 8198 8205 n 2 819 < 82at 819i 8192 � g203 � P H2O8 � � : 22 1 fl377 �� 8200 r 8160 � °° cv cv �` � 2 —ni 8180 8148 p LAPORT R�� 12 ei�� aiso 8zsz ��.. c�a � m� N�. ai�8 �i ", oo� 1 a H RW � N::.: 2863 8� 32 s127 i � D Fl.AC� o� �� 1 � �, 814 � c°v o ?8s8 81 1 M� i` o o�: ? I ` d 813� � N N N N� 8�46 ry N � N � N � � p� \� 81t1 ! N 'p 8100 � ` • tD � � � �; �� 8aS N� m N m � � N N 8060 8065 8084 S( � �� "1 8040 8046 8' � � �� . �, ��3 R—Q 8030 ao4s so3s � ` � � � \ �J 8�26 8 � 802C1 8025 801 b e \ ' � I � ! \ � 798Q �005 8000 � �' ( � 7sso % � �, � � � � 798 � ^ �� 7960 • � N ° � � o c�.a m o � tt � o � � �79: �� c� � � � E �i � � j —��,.�.�d 7RR7 Zo�g Map Case No. 472-97 2975 �Ii�hway 10 Auto C�ntr�.11 Siie Applicant: Spats (�uick Lub�y Inc. N p� "� 7s5 m N 7934 7932 o ,o � � _-� � _ � �� :i ❑ ST. PAUL. MN D MINNEAPOLlS, MN u ST. CLOUD, MN ❑ CHlPPEWA FALLS, W! ❑ MADISON, WI TO: Jim Ericson, City of Nlounds View FROM: Rocky J. Keehn DA'TE: February 27, 1997 RE: 1�evier�v o� Spo�s Q��i�k L.ube-�asP 472-97 'I'he site was previotasly a gas staSior�. The environment�l. concem is whether ar not the tanks were properly removed. Although the City is not buyzng the progerty, they may wani tv assurance that no contaminates will show up ixr any private wells in the future. "I°he drainage w�ll flow to MnDOT right-af-way so the applicant will need a Mn]70T pernut to work in their right-of-way. Rice Creek Watershed DistricC shoiald alsa be no�fied to verify that they do not have any concems on this project. The Maunds View Hfydrologic Review data sheet is attached for your records. Runoff calculations were not ir�cluded as part of the submittal. Since the Iand use is not changing a. >'' irnpervious surfaces are not being increased, deCailed calcttlations are rcot required. However, a�ading plan that shows the existing drainage and one with the proposed draiztage plans should be provided for reference. Since the storm sewer system will rep�ace the existing dra�inage system which currently flows directly tio the MnDOT di.tch, there are small drainage changes which should be noted by the applicant. The proposed entrance wiU need a more detailed review in regards to traffic. I showed the site plan to our trafftc engineer and he indicated a concem an the tocation of the entrance to the site. If cars are stacked to get into the site, it could cause a problezn to vehicles tucning anto Spring Lake Road from Highway IQ. A better atternative �ay be to make the north entrance a one-way in and the south entrance a�one-way out. Before the site is presented to Council, the applicane should lzave a traffic e�gi�eer provide input an the location of the drives. If the city desires, we are availahle to do a rnore detailed review of the site to deterriune actual site distances and entrance Ia�caiions. Fees for a more complete review af the site will need reimbursad. - The last consideration is the actual connection of the drives io �pring Lak� Raad. Sprin� Lake Road is scheduled to be reconstructed in I998. If the drives are incorrectiy insCalled, they would need to be reconstructed as part of the roadway improvement project. A 1zt�file foresight shovid prevent this. Also, the road will be reconstruc�ed ta State Aid standards which may put a restricrion on the iocation of their driveways. Prior to approval, the applicant should check with State Aid standards to verify that the locatian of the drives will not i�e in violation of future requirements. Tf you have any questions or if I may be of fiather service please catl me at 490-2Q26. . . . , .�,. A�focrnd� Vlew fl�de°ola�ic R��i��r �fo ��ots Quick Lube 29i5 �ligh�ray 10 '' APplication Date: February 1�, 1997 ; P�ojecfi No. �nnourv�s7oi.oa File: 80.09 Planning Case Number:472-9� Date 02/27/97 Reviewed b' RJK Does �ny of the �I��d ��ea �ho� up on the �IWI m�p? a Y�S � NO , i Is any o# the �rea impa��d b the citie� w�i6and overl�ys ��ea�? � YE5 [� NO Are #h�r� �n hydric soil� �►rithin �he pl�tted ar�a? � YES �] NO �lhai L,ViJM� dr��n�ge ar�a is the P4�t in? � SL-1 1 a i�_ : �;� r - �. - - r:' . - ' � � Ifi Y�S rr�hat are �he land use changes: � � r: . �� s • v� � . .: � - '. � � :• if so whafi are they: �� - - ,.. .;�..- - � . .� - �,. .,- - - .. , . . � � `� If so what are they: _ Ar� 4her� �n revious dr�ina e��udies fc�r �h� are� besicte� �h� L0�!€UiP? � YES � NO I� so what are they: ��.� �� .. �_- . i' s �� . L � � � � � Tlze Honorable Duane McCarty Mayor, City of Mo�ds View City Hall 2401 H�g}�way 10 Mounds �iew, MN SS I 12 Re: 2975 Highway 10 Nro,�as v��W, Mrr Dear Nlayor McCa.riy: January 27, I997 Y .�. �°-'�'��;,::; �,,. s` -.�. '..su��:i��5 J`� �' �� `L{S n�S `��v� I have submitted an applicatian to the Ciiy of Mounds View for a Conditional Use Permit to operate an automobile lubrication �°e�ail facility at the above-referenced tocation. The name of the business a� this location will be Spot's Quzck Lube, Inc., �� 1� � sister company of BiII Clark Oil. BiII Clark Oii has been involved in the wholesale of lubricants for 34 years and is a substantial corporate citizen in Eden Praarie. I anticipate that this business will employ 5 full-tizne and several part_tirr�e �rri�l�y��s. In addition, I anticipafe �hat while the success of the business will be enharzced t�y #he weII-traff cked Highway 10, we wiil alsa attract business to the streei that will b�n��g other businesses. I look forward to working with the city Planning Departznent to develop site plans that will ensure the addition of an atlractive business on the street and maximize on curb cuts and other amenities that will work with traffic flow pzessures. These site pians will include modifications to the site t�at wiil screen and proteci the nearby residential district such as fence repair and/or replacement, and any nec��sary fence extensions, upgrading the Iighting to m�et the Pianning Commissions lighting standards and the enclosure of outdoor storage, including garbage, vehicies and equipment. Moreover, I intend to enhance the visual appearance flf tiZe site by m�king necessary repairs to the buildzng and par�cirtg lot, as welI as by peY°fom�ing laaids�ap�ng that will both meet fihe requirements of the piannzn; Commission and wiil bolster the overali appearance of the site. A site pta.ri will be submitt�d shortly and wiil include the landscaping details. My attorney and I are woricing closely with Mr. Jarnes Ericson o�your Planning Departrr�ent. Mr. Ericson has been e;c�er��ly h��j �e jook forward to continued c�operation with the City. Should you or any council membe� have a.i�y questians or concems about our business plans, please let me know. I will appreciate your support of my application for a Conditionai Use Permit. Sincerely, SPQT'S QUICIC LUBE, INC. Ken Clark, President j`'; ��;�:�.�� BANKS �� ,�'��,'� Jan�ary 16, 199i James Exicson Planniz�� l�ssociate City of Mounds Vie�ev 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, IvI�' S5112 RE: 2975 I�i hwa 10 Mounds View �linnesota Dear 11/Ir. Ericsan: Nonvest Bank Minnesota, N.A. NorwesP Center Sixth and Marquette - Minneapolis, MinnesoPa 55479-0001 6l2/667-1234 ' �� ,��e,��`� . ��° G� �� '� �°vr Donna Stnasinski, attarney for Spots Quick Lube, Inc., rec}uested that I send you �his Ietter confuming that Spats Quick Lube, Inc. and Norwesi Bank Mi.nnesota, 1Vationai Association have entered into a F'urchase Agxeement foz° sale of the above-referenced property by Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association to Spots Quicic Lube, Inc. Tt is my understanding that yau wanted confirma�ion of this Purc�ase Agreement in order to work with Spots Quick Labe, Inc. regarding a use pernlit for the proper�yy. Shonld you have any ques�ions regarding this matter please contact �/Is. Strusinski or myself ai b67-2407. . cc: Danna Stnasinski Clenn IdlcCabe cxts2i�t Vexy t lY Yours, I � / �l� , G�y . x��s�n�r Sez�ior Counsel i. AGENDA SESSION Ttem ��2 � ' ♦ . ,, ,` � 'I'om �Iounds View Pla.rnxing Commission �-, Fra�o Pamela Sheldon, CommuniYy Development Director �� f .�i1fl�J��e .�p—��.Z�g% Ordiriance I�to. 594: Aiiowing wetland and naiive ve��iation to be exempted from �he requirement for rnowing grasses aver �" in heighfi I�at�o February 28, 1997 IVieetirrg of �iiarch 5, 1997 At the meeting on Febr�aary 24, 1997, City Cou�c� tabled first readiri� of Ord°ulance IVo. 594 and requested fiarther revisions. This ord°uzance would provide five exempf�ons #o the usuaI requirement to mow "tall grasses" in excess of eight inches. The ex�mptions would include fihe following situations: i. Native wetland vegetation fouzrd ir� floodpla.�ns, drainage ponds or ditches which s�ore and convey stormwater 2. Aiative vegetation found an naiurai areas wiuch are part of public open space, parks and nature centers. Natural plantings, weiland and meadow vegetation indigenous to 1Viuuiesota, grown on any occupied Iot or parcel of land and maintained as part of a la.ridscape treaiment or garden area approved by the Direcior of Communi�y Deveiopment. 4. An ar�a where the land and vegetation appear not to have been �raded, landscaped, mowed or otherwise disturbed by human or mechanical means at any time. Prairie land restoration by an educational institution or public agency, in areas of ai least f ve acres A concern was expressed at the Council meeting about #3 above, in that areas lefi nat�ral on individual Iots in developed residential neighborhoods may become an annoyance io th� neighbors and that we wer� openirgg the door to a coniinuing problem. There w�s concem expressed about naiive vegetation spreading into neighbors' yards. I�ounds �Iiew Planr�ing Commission Ordinance 594: Tall C'srass Page 2 Febnaary 2�, 1997 Op�ions: 1. Remove #3 from the l�st. 2. Change #3 to define a much narrower set of circ�amstances whe� we#land vegetation may be iefi. The wording could he as foIlows: Ar�as or� any occupred loi or parcel of Iand having wetland-type veg�tation becaus� of neighborhood cirainage pattems, where the dr�irtage pattem is evident on contaur maps atid from field observation, and the vegetation is confir�ed to a sirzgle lot, separated from adjacent lots, and managed so a.s not �o be a nuisanc�. Option #2 wa�ald Iin�ii the type of vegetation to wetland.-type grasses on�y rather than also allowin� naturai plantings and meador�v vegetation. Staff is checking with Riek Wriskey as to whether wetiand grasses are unlikely to spread inio adjacent ya.rds because they require wei conditions to flourish. I2��ain�eaeci��i�n: Option #2. N:IDATAIUSERSIPAMSVSIiATtE4SP�CPR0J15P012.971GRASS-PC.ItP2 AGENDA SESSION Item ��3 � ` �; � � . , =, T�o �ro�: Sub�ecte �� Iviounds "View�lanning Corrunission Pameta Sheldon, Community T�evelopment Direcfior SP-013-97 4rdinance No. 595: Adding day car� and �roup nurseri�s io business �d ir�dusir�ai zoning districts February 2�, 1997 Meeiing of Marcl� S, 1997 Ai the meeting on February 24, 1997, City Council tabled first reading of 4rdinance No. 59S and requested further revisions. This ordinanc� would allow day care centers and group nurseries as a conciitional use in fihe B- I, �-2, B-3, �-4 and I-1 districts. The criteria for review of ihe cQnditional use perrnit were proposed to nnirror the criteria wiuch are now applied in the residential districts. These cri�eria are: a. No overni�ht faciliiies are provided for the children served. Children are delivered and removed daily. b. The front yard depth shall be a minimum af t%irty five feet (35'}. c. Not less than forty (40) squa.re feet o� outside play space per child be provided and �hat such space be suitably fences ancUor screened in accordance with conditions as specified by the City Council. d. Adequatie off-street parking and access is provided, in compliance with Chapier 1121 af tlus Titie. e. Adequate off-sireet Ioadin� and service entranees are provided in compliance with Chapter 1122 oithis Title. f. The site and related parking and service entrances shall be served by an arterial or collector sireet af sufficieni capacity to accommodafe the tra.ffic which will b� generated. g. All signing and informational or visual communicaiion devices shall be in compliance wiih the Mounds View Sign Code. Two issues were of concem to Ciiy Council: If day care ceniers are placed in business and industrial disiricts, it is possible that they wili be lacated z�e� to streets which catry higher voiur�es of traffic, and children wilk be subjecied to higiier levels of exhaust fumes. The question was asked whether a crit�r�a should be added which would address this possibility. Mounds View Planning Commission I'age 2 February 2�, 1997 The question was asked whether Yhere should be a distance requirement between day �� centers and group nurseri�s and businesses serving liquor, liquor stiores a.nd adult establishmen�s. City Councii suggested that the Planning Commission discuss these issues further and provide recommendations, if you so desire. Fumes: Fumes are re�ated io traffic volurries on adjacent streets. The current Griteria for day care centers and graup nurseries state ihat these sites shall be served by arterial or collector streeis. These ar� the streets ca.irying ihe higher traffc valumes. So a balancin� act is required between kee�ing da.� care centers on higher volume streets so they do not add traffic to neighborhoods, and protect�� the chiIdren from iumes. StaflFdoes not have e�ertise in ttus area., but we would guess that the only wa� to protect an outdoor play a.rea firom futnes is distance. Staff feels the most pracicica! way to address this issue is to direct attention to Highway 10, �vhich carries a very hi�h volur�a� c�� traffic and is uruque in ihe community, and decide whether or not a distance requirement from Highw�y 10 is needed. If arterial and callector streets are included in general, e�sting etement� schools and day aare centers will become non-conforniing {examples: Pix�ewood Elementary, Sunnyside Christian I]ay Care). Even if our atiention is confineci to Highway 10, any distance requirement wiih make Kinder Care a non-cor�forming use. As a starting point for discussion, staffwouId suggest a distance requiremeni of 250 feet. Sta� has called the Minnesota Department of Human Services to learn whether air pollution teveis are considered in issuing licenses for day care centers, and they responded that this item is not regulated. We are checking with thE Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Dis#ance Requirement from Certain Businesses: The City Code requires that premises holding a intoxicating liquor license be 500 feet from any schaol or church except th�t the 500 foot requiremeni shati not apply to �ny premise that receiv�s afi least sixty perceni of its annual gross sales revenue form the sale of food (Section 502.05, Subd. 2}. Day care centers are noi mentioned as one of the uses triggering the 500 %ot distance requirement. Iiit is the City's desire to have new day care centers located at Ieast 500 fee� from liquor establishments, then a cri#erion to this e�ect needs to be added to the conditional use pe�nit requirements for d�y care ceniers. Adding tfus criterion will not prevent new liquor establishmer�ts fro� locatin� within 500 f�et of an existirag day care center. The liquor cod� would need to be amended to a,ddress this issue. Mounds View Planning Commission ' Page 3 F�brua.ry 28, i 997 The City Code requires a ticense for adult establishments w�iich i�clude: adult body painting studios, aduli bookstores, adult cabareis, companionstup esiablishments, conversation/rap parlo�s, aduit health/sport club, adult hoteVmotel, adult massag� parlor, adult mini-motion picture th�ater, adult modeling siudio, adultmotion pict�are arcade, adult mation picture theafer, aduli novelty business, adult sauna, adult steam room/bathhouse facility. �uch establishments shall not be Iocated within S00 feei of a residential zorung district, public facilities zoning district, school, church, library or commercial day care center. These regulations wili prevent new adult establishments from locating withiri 500 feet of existin� day care centers, but will not prevent a�etiv day care eenter from locating withirf 500 feet o� a.n existing adult business. To address t4us situation, a distance requirement needs to be added to the criteria appticable to day care cenYers. Options: 1. Recommend ti�at the following distance requirements be added io the criteria for app�o��d of conditional use permits for day care centers and group nurseries in busaness and in�aCStyz°a�l districts: a. 250 feet from Highway 10 right-of-way Iine b. 500 feet fram any establishment holding either a.n on-sal� or off-sale intoxicatin� liquor license, except that the 500 foot requirernent shall not apply to any establishment receiving at least si�cty percent of its annual gross saies revenue fr�� the sate of food c. 500 feet from any adult establishment 2. Recommend Option 1 plus adding the distance requirements to #he r�si�erat�al districts (recognizing that Option #2 �vvill make Kind�r Care a non-con�forming use but will treat a�ll day care uses the same relative to Highway 10) 3, Recommend that Ordinance No. 595 be adopted as ari�inally praposed. St�ff Iteco��emdaixon: Option 2 with ari allowance thai exisiing day care centers which would be made nan-conforn�ing by these regulations would be allowed to modify or expand. N:IDATAIU5ERS1PAM51SHAREISPECPRO.T1SP013.9'7�DAYCAitE.PC3