The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10-01-1997 • MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION October 1, 1997 7:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETING AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: a. August 21, 1997 (Special) b. September 3, 1997 (Regular) 4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING,PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM, . AND GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE M[ ITTES 5. Staff Reports/Information Items 6. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports 7. Adjournment to agenda session * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * APPLICANTS: YOUR ATTENDANCE AT THIS MEETING IS REQUESTED. PLEASE NOTIFY CITY HALL AT 784-3055 IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND. THANK YOU. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NADATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\PLANCOMMTCAGENDAIAGENDA10.1 i MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION • October 1, 1997 7:00 P.M. AGENDA MEETING AGENDA 1 Planning Case No. 505-97 5cooc Program Avenue Major Subdivision request to join four separate parcels into one developable, 6.89 acre lot, onto which a 102,950 square foot, two story building is proposed to be constructed. Applicant: Everest Development, Ltd. S . 110 . REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Meeting Date: October 1, 1997 Staff Report by: James Ericson, Planning Associate Planning Case No.: 505-97 Request: Major Subdivision Petitioner: Everest Development, LTD. Location: 5xxx Program Avenue PIN Nos. 08-30-23-44-0002, 08-30-23-44-0012, 08-30-23-41-0012, 08-30-23-44-0016 Zoning/Land Use: PUD/Vacant Land Applicable Regulations: Chapter 1201 -- General Subdivision Regulations Chapter 1202 -- Subdivision Plats and Procedures Section 1204.02 --Park Dedication Requirements • Attachments: Planning Application Zoning Map Letter from Cathy Bennett to Applicant, dated 9/3/97 Letter from Applicant, dated 9/18/97 Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes, from 9/25/97 Plat Reduction Full-size Plat dated 9/8/97 (separate attachment) Background: This plat for the Mounds View Business Park East Second Addition, otherwise know as the Building N site, was originally approved by the City Council on October 24, 1994. Because the plat was not filed with Ramsey County within the time frame allowed, it needs to be reviewed again by the Planning Commission and reapproved by the City Council. Summary: The Building N project site consists of approximately 6.89 acres of vacant land with approximately 1,100 feet of frontage on Program Avenue. The site is bordered by the Clinch-On Products building to the north, Program Avenue and Interstate 35W to the east, R. J. Riches Restaurant and a car wash to the south, and McDonalds Restaurant, Mounds View Inn and the C. G. Hill building to the west. The Building N site consists of four separate legal parcels which are proposed to be joined together to form one new parcel. The parcels are all zoned PUD as a result of a 1994 rezoning adopted for this development. The size of the proposed two-story building to be constructed on this site is planned to be 102,950 square feet. From the 1994 project summary, 168 parking spaces are to be provided, at a ratio of 1 space per 612 square feet of floor area. Planning Case No. 505-97 Mounds View Business Park East Second Add'n Plat October 1, 1997 • Page 2 Analysis: According to Section 1202.01, Subdivision 1 of the City Code, full platting is required for all major subdivision requests. The applicant, Everest Development,LTD., is requesting approval of a preliminary plat for the proposed Mounds View Business Park East 2nd Addition. Review of this plat is required by the City Engineer, the Director of Public Works, the City Attorney, Rice Creek Watershed District, and Ramsey County. At the time this report was written, no comments had been received back. The plat, dated 9/8/97, bears the necessary data for both preliminary and final plats, as specified in the City Code. As with any subdivision of land within Mounds View, two issues need to be addressed. The first is easements. As a result of previous plattings, easements have already been dedicated to the City which will need to be vacated as a condition of this plat's approval. Vacations are done by ordinance, and staff has requested the City Attorney to draft the necessary language to accomplish this. The areas to be vacated are highlighted on the 81/2 by 11 plat reduction attached to this report. The applicant will need to provide the appropriate legal descriptions of the easement areas to be vacated. From discussions with Jim Hess, the City's Engineering Technician, it may be the case that additional right of way may need to be dedicated along Program Avenue to allow for an 80- foot continuous right of way where there is currently only 60 feet. Before the new drainage and utility easements can be shown on the plat, the Director of Public Works will make a determination • regarding the specific right of way dimensions. This will be done prior to your next meeting scheduled for October 15, 1997. The other issue addressed with every subdivision of land is the park dedication requirements. According to Section 1204.02 of the City Code, all subdividers of land are required to dedicate to the City for public purposes a portion of land, or, at the City's sole discretion, an equivalent amount in cash based upon the fair market value of the undeveloped land. It has been and continues to be the City policy of requiring a cash dedication in lieu of land. For commercial and industrial lands, the appropriate figure is ten percent. Because this proposal replats land for which park dedication fees have already been paid, Subd. 6 of Section 1204.02 relating to dedications for re-subdivision applies. Attached to this report is a letter dated 9/3/97 to the applicant indicating the exact park dedication fee that will be required for this re-subdivision. Also attached is a response from the applicant dated 9/18/97 which disputes the City's interpretation of the park dedication requirements. Staff maintains that the appropriate park dedication fee for this re-subdivision is $56,771, which amounts to ten percent of the land's fair market value less prior park dedication payments made for these properties. The Mounds View Parks and Recreation Commission, at its meeting on September 25, 1997, voted to recommend to the City Council an approximate park dedication fee of$60,000 as outlined by staff in the letter dated 9/3/97. The Planing Commission, before it acts on this request at its next meeting, will need to receive either written or verbal assurance from the applicant that the appropriate park dedication fee will be paid. • Recommendation: Planning Case No. 505-97 • Mounds View Business Park East Second Add'n Plat October 1, 1997 • Page 3 Direct staff to prepare a resolution recommending approval of the major subdivision request of Everest Development, LTD. for the Mounds View Business Park East 2nd Addition plat, contingent upon(but not limited to)the following items: 1. Satisfactory resolution of right of way question and dedication of appropriate easements to the City. 2. Appropriate payment of park dedication fees as stated herein. 3. Re-approval of the development review pertaining to the Building N project. 4. Satisfactory review of the plat by the Director of Public Works, the City Engineer, the City Attorney, Rice Creek Watershed Board, and Ramsey County. N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\505-97\EVEREST.SUB • • _ - , _ i CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW . - ,PLANNING APPLICATION Everest Development, Ltd. Phone 636-5500 ADDRESS: 2665 Long Lake Road, Roseville, MN 55113 Street Address, City, State, and Zp Code , Interest in Property (check appropriate box): Q Owner of Property -.. Q Contract for Deed Owner Q Lessee, Operator, Manager • • Q Agreement to Purchase Q Other :._(explain) - , Documentary evidence of applicant's interest in the property may be required before find City acxn •of this request PROPERTY INVOLVED -?---,,-"---:--,-':1'.','..,712'''' Address/General Location .` 5XX%X Program Aven+,e '' Legal Description or Property Identification Number 08-30-X23-44-0002 8, 08-30-23-44-0012 5, 08-30-23-41-0012 4, and `08-30-23-44-0016 7 Legal Owner Name/Address Michael Investments, 2665 Long Lake RoadRoseville, MN 55II3 ;. Present Use (check appropriate box _ .Q tlndevelopedNacacrt < 3 ' Q Single Family Dwel{irtg_ - x A -.1.-'-',--,:-';,-,:'\;-..--sr.i #i - s rs. a-;4. 'i 's`�. .,.3i.. .1 3C s - o , m « ai Duplex/Twc Family Dwelling Y .:< - �� -T 41, -':-.N---±.4;4.-.:=1,-T-..,71,1` --.tS .€,..z}ytik'RA-;,/+,'•_.r...,.....'' r-r a-;;1 -‘,.-_-_,..-„,'•?..;-',. -77 "w -§ a . Q y°(Noof Units- � , F,,�-;. �,.;, 'y : ,� N ' ;. x Business/ mmeic':ii Establ ) S' `; 'l' 4 �, k R i• Q; Industrial Establishment I 1 ' 12` -s��° • 1- °' ,,, 'i cR' ; #:,Y rtes ♦� t 4 a�a�' ,y, € VSs.. a i-. �.r i'c '' 1 % �+u'2` -r{'� Q x Other-. e--A ii. µ;" Y r%r •�;,. ,•-- ,r 7' x fr ' ``ZI -'=ti d r'a•, r t2%. %,t 'a" y?.` e � i �y a, .^.(e'Y )..1-3,--;“'i...,,,,•;,-,--.4.,,,,,,,,,, r •fes. �i:'r '� .,, -..n m�#. ...r: sds 1 ty Ctass'r n ''S+ x n€ V T; ' v_ ia s 3 4 Prope • c alio Q Abstract :Torrents fh' 47 ' r _ REQUEST: Subdivision "replat four (4) existing legal parcels into one as Mounds View Business Park East 2nd Addition (for creation of Building "N" site) *Please note: Applicant may be responsible for aaaitional fees associated w' the review of this r=•uesc ; 1 _ • I HEREBY DECLARE THAT THE ABOVE STATE�AENT ARE TRUE. /,(�(L LA_ . jqjp - ., .,. ,.�.,. Signa /z 9-8-97 Venom Sw,acre.minimum$200,maaamum S1 000 r= Park Fund Deciicatior Fee to R•2-$75.all others$200 ' Oats Paid Conditioned Use Permit R-1 to R•2-$75.ail others$200 . Receipt Number Code Appeal $75 ...' . _ Deveiop.lSite Pian Review $100/acre.minimum.100.maximum m 5500 Total Fees Paid .S"00.00 Minor Subdivision 5150 OPaid _ ats Mar Subdivision • plus S250 deoos� Como. Plan Amendment w re " „ Receipt Number Pi r7 /II Wetland Alteration Permit $50 pias deposit determined by Start :. . .- Additional Fee Paid Wetland Buffer Permit ... . . 510. .' :. -: Planning Sign $50 Oats Paid 5350 Receipt Number .. : . PUO Amendment $150 s_. P Oats at find actxrt s M ..4.•,S......'`. APPROVED Ct DENIE7 T Date 7 - Q —.q NO.r+ £ a x e jxa€z Sb 9< -,.'.._4•,,,r.,- TM` Planning Cass A. Admin.Account No q g 5 �9y P1 N `. 1� I N N 5275 5267 ti� . • 5263 CA PUD 5251 > a `1.• n 5230 N ,� 260 w000ALE tib:;?:.:-1 1 � DR 259 SME 5240 ial N c N 5200 5205 N N N MS Z 5201 '' r n itooLpl:''' ,:::.:ff::::...- rm tgl ../4 5 'L°itEr ESE ° 1.• 5150 I ... 010,7 MI -w N oovo N N N Z4. y.A 8-3 1. PUD 04,111110 1 I i k --titi°1 �t(5-,, � P �� y°� �Z'°61� I Z 8-3 1:1 Oc•°" P OS 1 ti• RICE CREW � I W N . Cti NZ I ..iiiiii0,3 IIIIMIE PI --RD -3 .: Mos Ce wit iiir CRP w • H • Q - ( ip .ri .iuma,. ,aiiiiii..„_ IT Alli R-5 z .utw.�t.tee_evr.r_�,t �� kB-3 TOWNS EDGE TERRACEN. MOBILE HOME PARK o v a 4825(C-5.0 4860 I 4821 a 4 x6 z 1• r I Zoning Map Planning Case 505-97 Applicant: Everest Development, Ltd. N4 Location: 5xxx Program Avenue venue VYY Y 'W Phone: (612)784-3055 11110e9HOS Fax: (612) 784-3462 Afro ce% partnesS��S September 3, 1997 Mr. Timothy Nelson The Everest Group, LTD 2665 Long Lake Road, Suite 330 Roseville,MN 55113 . Dear Tim: • Jim Ericson and I have reviewed the Mounds View City Code, information you presented and previous plat maps and documentation relating to the park dedication fees in the Mounds View Business Park. We have come to a conclusion for an amount due for park dedication in the platting of the parcels associated with Building N taking into consideration the following information. • Building N includes the following parcels and was appraised for$615,000 or$2.05 per sq. ft. 08-30-23-44-0002(93,220 sq.ft.)-Program Land Addition . 08-30-23-44-0012(101,886 sq.ft.)-Program Land Addition • 08-30-23-44-0016(5,781 sq.ft.)-Outlot A,MV Business Park East(portion of total) 08-30-23-41-0012(99,241 sq.ft.)-Pinecrest Addition(portion of total) • The Mounds View City Code, Section 1204.02. Subdivision 6 Dedication for Re-Subdivisions, states that"For any subdivision of a parcel on which a cash dedication for parks has previously been made but on which an additional cash dedication is required due to re-subdivision,the amount of cash dedication required on the re-subdivided parcel(s)shall be based on the new gross density less any applicable credit for the prior cash dedication. • In 1974, $8,500 was paid on the Program Land 1st • • :• -• - •- - .;-. . • •.•• • parcels, 08-30-23-44-0002, 00I2,0011, 0004, 0007, 0008, 0009, and amounts to 433,169 sq. ft. of land for an estimated.02 cents per sq.ft. paid or an assumed market value of.20 cents per sq.ft. • In 1994 as part of the C.G. Hill Development, $14,172.73 was paid which included parcel 08-30- 23-44-0016 or Outlot A. This was based on a market value of$1.43 per sq. ft. Out!o• estimated to be 9,289 sq. ft. of land of which 5,781 sq.ft. is included in building `" • 2401 Highway 10•Mounds View, MN 55112-1499 SOY INK1,,. Or 1110,00:1 NOW Equal Opportunity Employer The Everest Group Page Two . 9-3-97 Based on these assumptions which have been sufficiently documented by Everest and verified by City Staff, the following is the calculation for park dedication due for Building N. Total Gross Area Building N: 300,128 sq.ft.x$2.05=615,000 x 10%=$61,500 Minus credit for prior cash dedication for area included in plat: 93,220 sq.ft.+ 101,886 sq.ft. = 195,106 x$0.20=39,020 x 10%=$3,902 (Program Land Add) 5,781 sq.ft.x$1.43 =3,267 x 10%=$827(MV Business Park East Outlot A) Total Due for Park Dedication: $61,500-($3,902+$827)=$56,771 Upon written confirmation that payment wilt be made to the City of Mounds View in the amount of $56,771 for park dedication fees in relation to the plat for building N, I will schedule consideration of the Development Assistance Agreement for EDA action at the next possible regular meeting. If you have any questions feel free to contact me at my direct number 717-4002. Sincerely, di (ill/ hy Be ett EDA Executive Director cc:. EDA Board Members Chuck Whiting, City Administrator Tim O'Meara, Briggs & Morgan Jim Ericson, Planning Associate Bob Long, City Attorney • THE EVEREST GROUP LTD • September 18, 1997 Via Facsimile 784-3462 and Regular Mail Ms. Cathy Bennett EDA Executive Director CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112-1499 Re: Mounds View Business Park East 2nd Addition Plat Application and Park Dedication Fee (Building N Project) Dear Cathy: As you know, we disagree with your proposed interpretation and application of the • Mounds View subdivision/park dedication ordinance to the noted project, as set forth in your September 3, 1997 letter. Upon receipt of your September 3 letter, I called you and informed you of our disagreement. You referred me to City Attorney Bob Long, with whom I had a lengthy telephone conversation. In that conversation, I detailed how your proposed application of the park dedication requirement to this project is contrary to the language and intent of the Mounds View subdivision ordinance and represents a radical departure from how the City has applied the same ordinance to similar re-subdivision applications in the past. Several different City administrations over an extended period of time have consistently applied the ordinance so as not to require additional park dedication fees on the re-subdivision of commercial land for which park dedication fees have previously been paid on a prior subdivision. Mr. Long acknowledged that he anticipated our disagreement with your proposed application of the park dedication requirement, and that the language of the current ordinance does not clearly support your interpretation. On September 8, 1997, we submitted a Planning Application for the Building N replat (Mounds View Business Park East 2nd Addition). The identical replat of the Building N site was originally approved by the City in 1994 under the current subdivision/park dedication ordinance. We request that the Building N plat application be scheduled for review and consideration at the first available City Council meeting. Since the application involves reapproval of the same plat previously approved, we do not believe Planning Commission review • is necessary. We look forward to the opportunity to discuss the plat application and park dedication matter with the Council in the near future. 2665 Long Lake Road Roseville,MN 55113 (612) 636-5500 Fax: (612) 636-0183 Page Two September 18, 1997 Ms. Cathy Bennett CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW Since the park dedication issue must be resolved before the plat can be finalized, we also see no reason why EDA action on the Building N Development Assistance Agreement need be delayed any longer. Accordingly, we request that the Development Assistance Agreement be scheduled for consideration at the next available EDA meeting. Thank you for your consideration. Please advise us of your intentions in the scheduling of these matters. Sincerely, THE EVEREST GROUP, LTD .2i1/1;_t_rN. imothy J. Nelson TJN:lc cc: EDA Board Members Chuck Whiting, City Administrator Jim O'Meara, Briggs & Morgan Jim Erickson, Planning Associate Bob Long, City Attorney MvL.t918 WinIoata/Letbsr MINUTES OF THE . MOUNDS VIEW PARKS AND RECREATION COMIMISSION Thursday, September 25, 1997 6:30 p.m. City Hall CALL TO ORDER: In the absence of an elected Chairperson, Director Saarion began the meeting. ROLL CALL: Members present included Frank Silvis, Scott Dentz, Pam Starr and Gary Stevenson. Staff included Director Saarion. CHAIR NOMINATIONS: Motion was made by Commissioner Long and seconded by Commissioner Stevenson to nominate Frank Silvis as Chair. No other nominations were presented. Motion passed unanimously. Motion was made by Commissioner Stevenson and seconded by • Commissioner Dentz to nominate Dave Long as Vice Chair. No other nominations were presented. Motion passed unanimously. Motion was made by Commissioner Stevenson and seconded by Commissioner Starr to appoint Director Saarion as Secretary, in charge of writing the minutes of each meeting. Motion passed unanimously. PARK DED. FEE PROPOSAL: This is an addition to the agenda. Acting Community Development Director Ericson had presented Director Saarion with a memo requesting the Parks and Recreation Commission to review and provide recommendation for the Park Dedication Fees for the Everest Development N project. The Park Dedication amount is estimated to be $60,000. Motion was made by Commissioner Long and seconded by Commissioner Starr to approve the Park Dedication Fee to the City of Mounds View at appoximately$60,000 as a part of the Everest Development N expansion. Motion passed unanimously. In addition, the Commission reviewed a memo presented by Acting Director Ericson regarding the need to revise the Park Dedication Ordinance. The Commissioners requested additional information regarding • the anticipated changes. They also wanted to have input on any changes that may be made. It was anticipated that the ordinance will be written • more specifically to better define by what means land value is estimated. Director Saarion assured the Commission that they would be kept abreast of this revision. NOTE: It was at this time that two Commissioners, Starr and Dentz left the meeting in order to attend the Edgewood Middle School Open House. COMMISSION VACANCY: Director Saarion informed the Commission that no applications had been received to date. Members were asked to advertise the vacancy by word of mouth. FALL PROGRAM REVIEW: Director Saarion informed the Commission that because City Newsletters were late, many programs required postponement -which is a lot of work, and reduces the number of registrations because people think that they are too late to register. Hopefully stricter newsletter deadlines will remedy this problem. ATHLETIC FACILITY io ANALYSIS: The Athletic Facility Analysis should be completed and distributed within two weeks. This information has been a compilation of athletic facilities within the school district and cities that lie therein. Facility demands, future trends, and recommendations for future development will be included in the document. This information will be presented to the Mayors and Managers of the four cities within the School District, tentatively scheduled for Tuesday, October 21. Director Saarion assured the Commission that she would send a copy as soon as it was received - for review and comment. OLD BUSINESS: Director Saarion reported that all city departments prepared a list of budget cuts to be considered for 1998 budget. Director Saarion reported expamples of the 25% cuts that were submitted for the Parks, Recreation & Forestry Department. Director Saarion informed the Commission that the City Council would be considering budget cuts from all departments within the City at the Monday, September 29 meeting. ADJOURNMENT: Meeting was adjourned. • I— N I T ki i I F1. _ � W� n 1 II 1 I g2 —;J 1 !eft dil 0L 'i___J fibis . N 6,1 1 2 44444 to 6•••1 'C''ASF t ix it sol 174 t r4 \Q- O°d'o \ `'.it,' W Z IQ 18 6.1,1 F. [ i, \ !ter / N^ k.3 0 "w Ni ,.1.ivy, * iNisii 2 cri° * • Cf) M. iurw - �� \ QQ G/ onm.'. 03,bi a. *4.0 10.1141 \ W I I 20- \\ire.or••c`''ci r 1 W Iii IF sd'v' r'.9Cr_7 \ M IgI42, \ "��11J. is I 1 O� \ 411 Cr) Z rG 132_132_t,:•11-1dal 'oe ti, Cl)C ) N '0 ' d� Cl) te ti �SSvo., . '1111—`=� V wam.,o.,sr,o..m.)1.0701.070 A 6 \ {�) ° d 9g \ a 1:3 ,��Pr ` a R . \ _ ;'�� 1a 01 .'-�.a.'an lad aaa.women Arun o.aiw.�.a r 1\q` s Oa \ i 1 as WL KK.a.00S s \ \ 421 a o = e °�b4% \ 9S\ GI.4-1 O = = I ;.a q.,',,,,,:,,i, 0. \� \ o) v ° \b �0 ` \ ; 1 a ar+mVIr u w a+n nw • '�I1.., _ 21Z ln 1:77 1 WZ 8 \ (0311410031/)Ltxoc A41400.aow-___ i{ )( 7 § (owa.,Oman OM1 ammo:Ow Lavas) ``\ O s , 5 rr or $i's 1 *oQ b • °S e 1 I •Lit • PLANNING COMMISSION MEMO To: Mounds View Planning Commission From: James Ericson, Planning Associate Subject: Code Interpretation: Section 1121.10, Subd 6. Date: Meeting of October 1, 1997 Background: The property owner of 2109 Hillview Road, Don Leshovsky, has approached the City with a desire to install temporary parking spaces adjacent to the existing improved parking area. This has come about as a result of vehicles being parked on the grass at this four-plex. Installation of temporary spaces consisting of class 5 gravel would alleviate the parking problems being experienced. Analysis: 4111 On the surface, this request seems simple enough. However, it was pointed out by the Rick "arson, the City's building inspector, that gravel parking surfaces are not allowed in this particular zoning district. (The four-plex is located in an R-3 District.) I could not find reference to this disallowance in the Code until I found Section 1121.09, Subd. 6, which pertains to "Grade Elevations." I have included a copy of this for your reference. The Code does state that except for R-1 and R-2 districts, all driveways and parking areas shall be bituminous. (Concrete is not even listed as an option.) However, further down in the same paragraph, temporary surfaces are addressed, whereby gravel surfaces are allowed. I think the two references conflict with each other making the intent of the subdivision unclear. In its travels through the City, Staff has observed a number of temporary and unimproved parking areas/driveways in the R-3 District. Recommendation: The Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals, needs to interpret the Code with regard to gravel parking surfaces in districts other that R-1 and R-2 to determine whether a temporary surfaces would be allowed at 2109 Hillview Road, until such time that the Code can be rewritten to clarify this reference. S • O > • O O Ucif) '.- cn 4, V 03 o N L* ' 3 y U •— .... co to O - o o „0 ._. C) U = g a) O C .� II, co .O a) C) i., .h. '= uo .". �" w-, > w cts �., O a)›, a = = MO o C) az cts a) vz, 6.Oo ^ = ..G C) - 5.s.: " 75 C ori cn too r.' U --• cc v 2 .c Cced � C '� v t; = p t a) a) y 34 ., � a) a) cn o D > = >> CI) U 3 .pCSc ° 5C > ao-• " e - % • "11 .,V, (4-4 % r 1.. ° . U > cu t 3 ao rn ° .= 'cn cam. ., o O f- .� ....� O s.. w - Nv • Z .0 c�.= a) r. ", •-•-w c'"' " N O .- a) ^ "a a) U to o U > C. aS ..O U "o > a) v, = O\ N M U O "C3 8 0 a) L. tab O ,C N 4. +-" •••-, U .� t0 C 4 O N "G [� 0 U tib = Uw "_, •> N 'Tr O 0 c03 03 V) V .0 C)) = 'n N H "0 o O k — ° 'b -xa a .." oN -� 0 c.) W - = o o wl 0 CN rn ..�, ?, , a) ... . . c � ° � ^, � n, C3o � c:, •� • ;Izto CO �, 4, g . 0 3 .� 3 a) • .En a c. r au -. o o „ o czt . o - ccs aro oCD v .� o "a 14 cc ---u, o > '� v- cs U C) . : c 4444 t� C. N1110 /.. V MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION October 15, 1997 7:00 P.M. SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: a. August 20, 1997 b. September 3, 1997 4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda CITIZENS:BEFORE SPEAKING,PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM,AND GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES 5. Planning Case No. 505-97 xxxx Program Avenue • Consideration of Resolution No. 531-97 Regarding a Major Subdivision Combining Four Parcels into One for the Proposed Building N Development, Mounds View Business Park East Second Addition Applicant: Everest Group, Ltd. 6. Staff Reports/Information Items 7. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports 8. Adjournment to Agenda Session * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * APPLICANTS: YOUR ATTENDANCE AT THIS MEETING IS REQUESTED. PLEASE NOTIFY CITY HALL AT 717-4000 IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND. THANK YOU. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * ** * * * * * *** * * * * * * * * • MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION • AGENDA MEETING AGENDA October 15, 1997 (Immediately Following Regular Meeting) 1. Review of Minutes: a. September 17, 1997 b. October 1, 1997 2. Meeting Adjournment • • • REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Meeting Date: October 15, 1997 Staff Report by: James Ericson, Planning Associate Planning Case No.: 505-97 Request: Major Subdivision Petitioner: Everest Group, Ltd. Location: 5xxx Program Avenue PIN Nos. 08-30-23-44-0002, 08-30-23-44-0012, 08-30-23-41-0012, 08-30-23-44-0016 Zoning/Land Use: PUD/Vacant Land Applicable Regulations: Charter Section 12.06 -- Vacations Chapter 1201 -- General Subdivision Regulations Chapter 1202 -- Subdivision Plats and Procedures Section 1204.02 --Park Dedication Requirements • Attachments: Planning Application lication Zoning Map Plat Reduction Planning Commission Resolution No. 531-97 Background: At your last meeting on October 1, 1997, the plat for the Mounds View Business Park East Second Addition, otherwise known as the Building N site, was discussed. While this was originally approved by the City Council on October 24, 1994, the plat was not filed with Ramsey County within the time frame allowed, so it needs to be reviewed again by the Planning Commission and reapproved by the City Council. Summary: The Building N project site consists of approximately 6.89 acres of vacant land with approximately 1,100 feet of frontage on Program Avenue. The site is bordered by the Clinch-On Products building to the north, Program Avenue and Interstate 35W to the east, R. J. Riches Restaurant and a car wash to the south, and McDonald's Restaurant, Mounds View Inn and the C. G. Ill building to the west. The Building N site consists of four separate legal parcels which are proposed to be joined together to form one new parcel. The parcels are all zoned PUD as a result of a 1994 rezoning adopted for this development. The footprint of the proposed two-story building to be • constructed on this site is planned to be 102,950 square feet. From the 1994 project summary, 168 parking spaces were to be provided. The plans submitted by the applicant on October 7, 1997 show only 162 spaces. Planning Case No. 505-97 Mounds View Business Park East Second Add'n Plat October 15, 1997 • Page 2 Analysis: The discussion at the October 1, 1997 meeting regarding this development focussed primarily on easements to be vacated, easements to be dedicated, the possibility that additional right of way would be needed, the park dedication fee, and the possibility that the project would need to go through the development review process again. On this last point, reviewing the site plan again was thought to be a good idea, but doing so should not be tied to approval of the subdivision request. Easements As was indicated at this meeting, Ordinance No. 554 was adopted by the City Council on February 27, 1995 that vacated the easement areas highlighted on the 81/2 by 11 plat reduction attached to this report. While this ordinance was never recorded with Ramsey County, staff verified that it can still be done at this time to validate the vacation. In return, the City will require that the outermost or exterior 10 feet of the to-be-created parcel be dedicated to the City as a permanent drainage and utility easement. Additional right of wary From discussions with Jim Hess, the City's Engineering Technician, it was possible that additional right of way could have been needed along Program Avenue to allow for an 80-foot continuous right of way where there is currently only 60 feet. Staff brought this to the attention of the Director of Public Works, who indicated that the right of way as dedicated • currently would be sufficient. Park dedication fee According to Section 1204.02 of the City Code, all subdividers of land (and resubdividers) are required to dedicate to the City for public purposes a portion of land, or, at the City's sole discretion, an equivalent amount in cash based upon the fair market value of the undeveloped land. It has been and continues to be the City policy of requiring a cash dedication in lieu of land. For commercial and industrial lands, the appropriate figure is ten percent. Because this proposal replats land for which park dedication fees have already been paid, Subd. 6 of Section 1204.02 relating to dedications for re-subdivision applies. Staff calculates that the appropriate park dedication fee for this re-subdivision is $56,771, which amounts to ten percent of the land's fair market value less prior park dedication payments made for these properties. The applicant has indicated a willingness to pay this amount. Reapproval of the Development Review The original development review, along with the rezoning and major subdivision, was approved by the Council October 24, 1994. There is no documentation in the file, staff reports, or minutes which give any detailed analysis of the site plan and its compliance with the applicable City Codes. Staff has reviewed plans for the Building N development submitted by the applicant on October 7, 1997. It appears that, with the exception of the number of parking spaces provided and the setback of the parking lot, the development meets the code requirements using the criteria found in the I-1 zoning district. However, because these parcels are zoned PUD, the code requirements can be deviated from, as stated in Section 1120.01, • Subd. 10: "To allow variation from the provisions of[the Zoning Code]including setbacks, height, lot area, width and depth,yards, etc." In staff's review, it was found that the parking lot, Planning Case No. 505-97 Mounds View Business Park East Second Add'n Plat October 15, 1997 • Page 3 which is located in front of the building facing Program Avenue, is at one point is inches away from the property line. Because Code requirements can be varied from in a PUD district, the fact that the parking lot is so close may not be an issue. The parking being provided, however, is an issue. The site plan provided by the applicant shows 162 spaces, six of which are handicapped spots. The site plan that was approved in 1994 indicated 168 spaces. It is staff's concern that there may not be enough room for parking on the site for the size of the building. For this reason, staff recommends that the site plans be reviewed again by the Planning Commission and reapproved by the City Council. Recommendation: Approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 531-97 recommending approval of the major subdivision request of Everest Group, Ltd. for the Mounds View Business Park East 2nd Addition plat, with stipulations. N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES1505-97\BLDG-N.RPT • • r • crrr OF MOUNDS I IEtiy( PLANNING APPLICATION -' a+t-OLCANT; Everest Development, Ltd. Phone 636-5500 ---___ 0 ACCFEjj; 2665 Long Lake Road, Roseville55113 MN Street Address, Ci y, State, and Zip Code - Interest in Property (c.'7ecic appropriate 5 a2 • owner N.. of Property - - Q Contras for Deed Owner Q Lessee, Operator, Manager Q Agreement to Purhase . Q -Other (explain) O°wmo^mnidarres of ' --- _- w_ : .r . __ applicant's interest in tuts prvaarty may'be rsqu+red bai• cra anal _.. . . FCO • .. ----,".11.-.7,-• Y et this request PERTY INVCLV�. , ' „= _ �s • _ Address/Gen rat -- .R _. :: _ _ 7 . ._� t __e Locattort 5 , -�:: ;YK X KA .1.. s .-LI!:..7-___:.:::.:,,,,..:..-:;:,--;,-,Z.__. rYe...-"y}+:tie.l za. _ ._w. .n w."...-4.,,-.:...•,., _ L-.gat Cess.-iption or Property identification Number . oe-3o-23-44- 08-30-23-41-0012 4 0002 8, 08-30-23-44-00125, and 08-30-23-44-0016 7 L.xai Owner: Name/Address Michael Investments 2665 Lon 55113 Lake Road Roseville, MN_ Present Use (check aaoroonate box). . .. • _. - —. o�_.111 _.Undevelooed/Vacant _ _ - E " :Q' ...... =Y .pingere'Famitii Dweigh, r,•i s �1ar- .S _ z....�- DuQlexlTwa xFari7it DwetGng -=;:�, � • �, -`F-:7•,•!-.-'77:.•....w. ..I`2" „ieY ,y .,/ �494T �Zy-�/� � m � ' .rr��.y�y..0 �, 7 ';•'�. .....-........r_n... - : •_ 'G_ :' , j :. . ,.y"� PAili — -we" tlri = :.�.. ',-^i7I_ ]t. +w1'x 47-' ^ ':.'., aro-..- f. �a-•� -:i_ yrs" m-ir - +4 L17,y.��-bausinessicomm�rcr,,,w,,�r�L � .. tr-57: -i- 1"4:—..t 7+r. . c� �, " : •,..-.4rr ',...-1-,";A::: n ,i�'-y_ s Indtrstriat - .- meat: u -.....a-e�•r.t. ,i..ka %. �Y{' . n`.. .... ---',--Kt**";;_*;-. _•• y._ t-T y Establish _'j., %t: .}.'`.,,.tt� ''' .- -*.j.-, " r".2r.-747.:7,... ....„,- 71-7. -+; ..-..i ..w.,.. . s.`n'.R,iL•- hc'•r+..+ y..:.., i .a..:] .Q ,,,.� 'w]..J.,.,�i:..a w t+.4-4•r w yJ,. " i# .i..+.•. 'f.,,•i,.. • (� a �(e�mlaini-i' ., .4 .1.'.:...t `; �. - i.-w:...a-.. t< _ .:tom.. ; i,M•-- ,•r'M2.,..'3=t r!'�?.z �r c1• ' /y..�.,y�.'•i;-,--...-"'-'*:.----- i.'' 'V---- ::Tra. •c: t.Yf rte.,•'3T_l +L`:••-P-ods-_fir_i i1a:+C:.:Jre.._ Y.VI`w►'KJ.'we,vw...e .�....-__ P�! -I -.�.o++.i.t/ � c'"�� .. f.c:�'-�. ,rr- :t1'.-7 :1Y '�• .w^'s w..— wf+-•t+[.^�°► .4iY«..L .�..ey�"y-x:, -..,-0.••:=..........•:-..,-- -..` +• :w:.y 14... _. . .. . AbsC-_v.. 4 .;. - .: . =_. • • � . �' _—.,..�"�Tos7gr7s,+ 3fdV.':,,,. .�r'..:.].:.4y:,:_ +:7�_. _''....;-.T..--:__t _ • FG_vUGJ � . Subdzvlslon - -..' _ � - - " • - y �:_.. • - �_ - - - - View Business Park East n. A. four (4) existing legal parcels into one as Mounds A• •ltj or creation o Bu •ing i' site) • '°'ease note: Appijcanc may be resrronsibie for acaitianal fees associated _ ' r . the review at this r. est I h�E==Y CE:. F,E TrfAT T AECVE STS,►c4E4T ARE TRUE. / :::::-.:4••••••":;74.-!-%7•»•,--:--- '- -7;7.'7. Sig - • f.:9-8-97-.. .�. ..::;:-...z,4;;„ - - ' . . MYz/ / acre.muur.orr maximum St.000 Pan Puilld cao►emix Fv� ,, -_•a. .•�_ ^ice Variance . ... }Z R. Cad 11s.P'rmjt rZ,i ta A-2-S'S,al ars Qata!=std _— Q a1 CoosA .Seta Plan Review ppeal S73 altars=CC -•_ r�CalOt NUtll�af -. ..r..--''' - . S7 00/ aaca. maximum=0.3 Itaf Fast P d Minor Sueajvisjon S=� ,OP triaor Subdivision ... e..... =0 deocsjt) _ 'Lata Paid Coma Parr Amendment ._ Rseaiot Number7 • Wetland Alter> r e - _. _�_Q Pxm t SW pais aeocsrt demrminac yy Start - Wadano Surfer Permit SIG . . . . .. . • Aaaiticrrai a-s.Paid Panning Z9n WO Cane raid ' P"JC - =SO Reeajai iVuma.r = P+JC Amendment SI Sul _ • .. `. - . ---n•-: A RCVQ Q oevio . �� 4- ? -Q 7 "� armrnq Case.Vo. SSS_4 7 . . •1'==: -.C: .io"L7 0.."-:.,,,s1::.-:::-:,.:7-.:',;..' . . .-. co act H 2 • 1 n7 I ;',1 N 13-3 N 5275 I 3287 5263 • • 0 PUD 3251 1.4> I I. c 5220 :•:.. N •::::4.:::. cv 260 WL 000A .-: OR . 259 5250 'L7 N a 5244 _ N 5200 524' S24 •::•:-.1; 5205 N N N +.: 323 52201Z 3201 ..7.-Qy I / 5 • 522C4 by / a ?: ...7) ]+521• 321• ti) tit w a I -1]15209 5200 ^.�' '4' 5150 NNNNN I \�� N N N N N /7/---.--- 74 Ar ----_, kill,. Air I PUD l Ltb"'N ,, ` ` = al I J-OA s, I v 1 1 ' RICE ..CR€ 4in in I Lii T 0 A M N m Rd -- 8-3 I if-C 0: W CRP `I ? AMiligt• it• h f as d •L I R-5 eta....3 .. -1411EiNfelV4.nlitiOt 1130 TOWNS EDGE TERRACE I M081LE HOME PARK ...._ ... :...... M .0,41 rANI. ` . 0 I PF \ \ I U 6860 6825 I 6821 I 0 Zoning Map Planning Case 505-97 Applicant: Everest Development, Ltd. n Location: 5xxc Program Avenue ..r • c4 i I TI i� Y € E E W. W 1 TI"' it N P H——4- ——-I • 1.- 1'1 r Re, „ _.,_, , ,,.. . , ,„, , , 1 l §.rk 44 . N 1 11 ilet 4 1 LT, ,T\ o� 18 ��W C••••) oi \ , hbd Jp�a �\ `��y��b� 'Q� Q W Z01 V � i2 i2 p g SI SI IN q 1 rr \ `r`/ \\ ,e"/ 3 taJP „� h • og § / i,z..qb $g ; E 6.1 i ,.�� A• sa, N. rn p l al--_.+fid;r rO'�4 `„,.�.,,I y \ "'� 1 I I \ �'9,:t'.,°,44.',.:1 ,,90 ` .1 I tips/ °rc yr•ell..0' \ g 'alit ppb rr•rrr r.°yep°rr. ` �,Ipl ly \ • or° ag [� \ '�1yy p l'§ISI < ✓b! .` . lI ,moi � p�'y CO I I C dJ \‘ rr,^� 2 I I '',,,its. pa• rvl, ti .• I�1 "V 40 .• 1o4 \ 1 6 P,• �'�WO b.111387.women.ww O.X.04.4l'� A `' \ 1 §� � 0 \` i F 1 �' \ r-z~ �o :t I ;J pw 0 , \\'\ \ V-•IP AL I `�ro)9 �ry�J pS \�`\ ; COQ W (� `�1 a Y I; �/ \ ~\ R. cn Ka 1 o�1� \\p\.;i e�Yi !� �l�`1 I r1^ q z \./c--.-. ti; _ �., Nill va ` CD i $ ` (NYI7SVJI1)Lt'COC MyLAa,0011---• • 3 ill f Oscabacrt 013X13OW mw 3G OV Odd liras) W m S y a T1 a oN ptib § z oi. .0 1 ii dr,0S 13 it 1 j< 1 I dC • 11 . I ag r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 531-97 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT FOR MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK EAST 2ND ADDITION; PLANNING CASE 505-97 WHEREAS, Everest Group, Ltd. has requested approval of a major subdivision for the property legally known as: That part of the South S acres of Lot 2 lying West of the Easterly 80 Feet of said Lot 2, Block 2, PINECREST ADDITION, lying East of MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK EAST ADDITION, according to the recorded plats thereof and situate in Ramsey County,Minnesota; Lot 3, Block 3, PROGRAMIVIED LAND FIRST ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof and situate in Ramsey County,Minnesota; Lot 2, Block 1, PROGRAMMED LAND SECOND ADDITION according to • the recorded plat thereof and situate in Ramsey County,Minnesota; That part of Outlot A,MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK lying east of a line beginning at a point on the south line of said Outlot A, said point being south 89 degrees, 19 minutes 21 seconds East, assumed bearing, 409.00 feet from the southwest corner of said Outlot A, thence North 31 degrees, 43 minutes 48 seconds East 19.26 feet to the north line of said Outlot A and said line there terminating. WHEREAS, the above-described properties are zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development; and, WHEREAS, a plat date-stamped 9/8/97 titled MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK EAST 2ND ADDITION has been submitted by the applicant; and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has reviewed the proposed plat and finds it consistent with the City's street plan in that no additional right of way will be required as a result of this plat and that the proposed easements shown on the plat will be sufficient for the City's utility needs; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the applicant's request for a major subdivision reorganizing the four lots into one 6.89-acre parcel and found that it is in conformance with all applicable sections of the Mounds View Municipal Code. Planning Commission Resolution 531-97 Mounds View Business Park East 2nd Addition Plat October 15, 1997 • Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the major subdivision request by Everest Group, Ltd., contingent upon the following: 1. Before the Mayor and City Clerk/Administrator sign off on the Plat, the applicant shall accomplish the following: a. Payment of the park dedication fee in the amount of$56,771.00 as required in Section 1204.02 of the Municipal Code related to dedication of lands. b. Dedicate to the City via a separate document those easement areas so noted on the Plat for drainage and utility purposes covering the outermost ten feet of proposed Lot 1, Block 1, Mounds View Business Park East 2nd Addition, and provide proof of such recordation to the City. 2. Approval of this Plat shall be obtained from Ramsey County and recorded with the County within 120 days of final approval of the City Council. Within ten days of said recording, the applicant shall furnish the City with a reproducible copy of the final plat showing evidence of the recording, otherwise the approval of the final 110 plat shall be void. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 15'day of October, 1997. Jerry Peterson, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Jopke, Community Development Director N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\505-97\BLDG-N.RES • S PROCEEDINGS OF'1'11E PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Special Meeting September 17, 1997 Mounds View City Hall 2410 Highway 10, 1VOunds:.......rnew, MN 55112 :AMMO* 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair Peterse* 7:Qqym. 2. Roll Call Members present: Chair Peterson; Commissionifs Bragleffl0110102ks, Miller, Obert, and Stevenson. ..1610v Members absent: Commissioner Johnston had an excused ab4fite. Also present: Planning Associat*tricson;„gity CoiNtigigison Koopmeiners; and Recorder Dave Hix. 3. Approval of Minutes Aff ..ONE•12.:Mar .416:air 1997.4giglina 1040 40V97 c June 1 1997 .1.1111116, July 16, e. AugWtkinniax.. • - • 4. b • . •• • - . •eve is es minu es as suemre• mown carried: 6 ayes,.4ilaYs. 4/111 Citizen Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda Inge.E.Willwere no citizen's requests or comments from the floor. Index to Minutes Page Planning Case No. 503-97, variance to allow for a 33-foot wide curb cut, 2 5 which is 11 feet beyond what is allowed by City Code, 8419 Spring Lake Road. Mounds View Planning Commission September 17, 1997 • Special Meeting Page 2 Planning Case No. 504-97, minor subdivision request for Silver Lake 4 Commons to combine two (2) vacant lots into one (1) onto which ten (10) townhouse-styled dwellings would be constructed, 2637-2645 Highway 10. .iiiik. Air 5. :ti «. i}:.:�ii}Lti4 PlanningCase No. 503-97 v= 'ry «» 8419 SprinLake Road .> Applicant:cant• Stev e and Laura Lattrez .:j, Variance to Allow 33-foot Curb CutMOk The applicant, Laura Lattrez, was Present. <»>r '< `< :, PlanningAssociate Ericson brieflyreviewed `�±'t1 e.Commissioners the background of the variance request. He stated that: :>littnryYl:Cv;: "`'` q 1 ��pplia,te a d4y'care out of their home which is located at the above addre ' Aspha '] t # . pany was hired by the applicants to widen their driveway'' AsphaltDrivev ' pany completed the work without applying to the City r t e required permits;'Associate Ericson went on to list • the seven requirements thaAmost be met to approved a variance. { While,two of the critiiria!gin be meta gto the City Code, all seven of the standards s must be: a.variance to gfanted. difinal„.: 1108:11k. Asse son state t . t<St ff is recommendingapproval of Planning Commission Pp g Resolut€ 7, a res . ying the variance request of Steve and Laura Lattrez to allow f ;r' f :t wide.c 'cut, 11 feet more than the maximum allowed byCode. .. :Laura Lattrez sat > at�a contractor was hired to do the job. At that time the :: "contractor made ono me tion of a permit and proceeded to do the work. She added that €' the project was c ;npleted in June. <<;. Commissionr`Miller asked the applicant how far from the property line the driveway iniiiligilivas. Bate Ericson answered by saying one foot, and this would be okay as long as the neighbor was willing to sign an agreement saying that the one-foot distance was no problem. Ms. Lattrez stated that the contractor is prepared to remove the work if the variance is • not granted. • Mounds View Planning Commission September 17, 1997 Special Meeting Page 3 It was stated as a unanimous feeling by the Commission that the contractor, having done business in the City of Mounds View in the past, knew that a permit was required. Commissioner Brasaemle stated his concern with setting a precedent by allowing an 11- foot variance over the allowable 22 feet. `' < < Motion/second: Brasaemle/Obert to approve Planning Ccnunission Res ' :.-97, "A resolution denying the variance request of Steve and Lau 'Lattrez to< 1low}f ' »mot wide:'' curb cut, 11 feet more than the maximum allowed by C4` VoiagammEi:v Ms. Lattrez asked how much time the contracto`.",.baiarepove the section of driveway in question. Associate Ericson stated that the City would:n fy the con for m writing that the variance request was denied and that they>Elriveway Company] are responsible for removingthe work bythe sti ulat. date�< <l€1` `'.:> P .. Chair Peterson asked for a vote n the m.ption. Motion carried: 5 ayes, 1 nay (Stntn) > '' Commissioner Stey4a.miiit"stated tttaaVotatagainst the resolution on the grounds that it i re work fectioggity to undo undoiiimglim—g that has been done. ChAttaggersAp toldMa.magagg,that she had the right of appeal to the CityCouncil if she g pp so desi ' Nair • 6. INEEMMO Planng Case No. 504 € `<'' 2672645 Highway 10:>> ' lcant: MSP Real estate z .Subdivision request for Silver Lake Commons to combine two vacant lots into one onto #:'t „towrh =styled dwellings would be constructed. The applicant, MSP Real Estate, was present. Associate Ericson briefly reviewed for the Commission the background on the above • request. He stated that the minor subdivision process, as defined in Section 1201.03 and described in Chapter 1202 of the City Code is required in this situation to combine the Mounds View Planning Commission September 17, 1997 . Special Meeting Page 4 vacant parcels south of the existing apartments into one parcel for tax purposes and to eliminate the interior lot line. A Certificate of Survey drafted by a registered land surveyor will be required. Associate Ericson stated that a Park Dedication Fee, as required requireamfvfrCode and based on 10 percent of the purchase price of the propertywpOld be r efore any building permits would be issued. The fee amount is $7509a`" Atr Associate Ericson also reviewed easements andillikiges.,oilie survey that thaEmottgod to be completed before any City Council action could ke `ace. NEW' Associate Ericson stated that it is Staffs recomr **0 the Planning Commission approve Resolution 529-97, a resolution recommending recomotendingtikakof a minor subdivision request of MSP Real Estate to combine theovacant paraof the apartments into one lot, subject to stipulations. Chair Peterson recommended enttrifig the gievmkgitkgfeirmal resolution language. NEMEWiY Associate Ericson complied `': ` i AISW „Ay Commissioner Miller susted soninor graMmatical additions that would make the resolution read bette, `. i ii;\ AMR. vii ilii\v:�:tit Yti?ori?titiik:++v, : _Ericson o €. :: . Motion/second.::;..Mill /Stevenso a ove resolution 529-97, "A resolution recommending approval of a:r ;~ cion rectog of MSP Real Estate to combine the two vacant parcels south of the`apartmen nt a lot" (subject to conditions and as amended. ::::::`Chair Peterson i kid 'or a vote on the motion. l €ton carried: 6 ayes 3 nays. ii::LCSii ii::i�iit i?ii}::?4:::ii::i:`i:i:i+v>~•: ' > 1 3 > orts/Information Items molignior No reports/information items were considered. 8. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners' Reports 110 Commissioner Brooks inquired about the status of the Highway 10 Corridor Design 9 Mounds View Planning Commission September 17, 1997 Special Meeting Page 5 Theme. Council Liaison Koopmeiners told the Commissioners that the design is hold until Anthony Properties decides what is going to happen on the O'Ne, Prope `across the street from the City Hall. Commissioner Obert suggested that Associate l € ;on be giveottification fold" the good job that he has been doing as acting Community Dev 'opmen ' :` pr. Motion/second: Obert/Brasaemle to give Associate Eri al recognition fo ' „ ood work that he is doing as the acting CommunityDeveloprri ? " " pr. Motions.assed: 6 ayes, 0 nays. P Y Y 9 Adjournment to A g enda Session k Chair Peterson adjourned the S eci Meetingat' 3 >` � t �> >p • ..,......................... (The agenda session was heli>i ediately followin ` adjournment of the Special Session.) Respectfully submitted, `' ::» James E4 Acting Co. ty nevelop i ~ 2__ or • • • PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting (*ober 1, 1997 ApungtfAriew City Hall 2410 Hightvay 10,iliktdOiew, MN 55112 1. Call to Order gtik „4,0 The meeting was called to order by Chairpersont4f*Att'at 7:00 p.m., October 1,r1997. 2. Roll Call „or VIMEN„, Members Present: Chairperson Peterson; Commissioners *Mak:Brooks, Johnston, Miller, Obert, and Stevenson. moigoi." Members Absent: Council LiaisoNi5opmeiOROSSINgge Also Present; Planning Associate Ericsmili' ecorde*FiVe Hix. AIND dg." .4" 3. Approval of Minutes: Air ARK a.7,##.1#.1 21, 1941( 1.01a1) b0*ig*her 3,1992jaeular) Motion/secondikppitp:,file/Pet.66...:0"311#pprove the August 21, 1997 (Special) and September 3, 1997 (Regulaaftitoglignutes aeffibOitted. A a ays - 0 Mi carried. "•••• Comtnissioner Ober1§4s absent at the time the vote to approve the minutes was taken. He amsred at the meeting at approximately 7:10 p.m. 4.•NtECitizen Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda No citizen requests or comments on items not on the agenda were considered. 5. Staff Reports/Information Items 1