Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-01-1998 MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 1, 1998 7:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETING AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM, AND GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES 4. Approval of Minutes: March 4, 1998 (Regular) 5. Planning Case No. 507-97 Property Involved: 2625 Highway 10, 7715 - 7761 Eastwood Road Discussion Regarding Walgreens Development Request Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning . Applicant: Told Development Company 6. Planning Case No. 514-98 Property Involved: 8400 Coral Sea Street Discussion Regarding Development Review for Completion of the 2nd Phase of Bridges Technology Building Project Applicant: Bridges Leasing Company, LLC 7. Planning Case No. 517-98 Property Involved: 2430 Highway 10 (O'Neil Property) Discussion Regarding the Development Review Stage of the PUD, Preliminary Plat and a Wetland Buffer Permit _ . . • . 1 • * ki • .. • •--• - - 8. Staff Reports/Information Items 9. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports 10. Adjournment to Agenda Meeting * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * APPLICANTS: YOUR ATTENDANCE AT THIS MEETING IS REQUESTED. PLEASE NOTIFY CITY HALL AT 717-4000 IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND. THANK YOU. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION April 1, 1998 • (Immediately Following Regular Meeting) AGENDA MEETING AGENDA 1. Review of Minutes: a. March 18, 1998 (special) 2. Meeting Adjournment • • • Planning Commission Memo TO: Planning Commissioners FROM: Jim Ericson, Planning Associate SUBJECT: Walgreens Development Proposal DATE: April 1, 1998 Introduction: TOLD Development Company has requested that the City approve a comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning of residential properties to allow for the construction of a Walgreens store at the northeast corner of Highway 10 and County Road I. This case has been discussed at four previous Planning Commission meetings. The only new information that will be presented to • the Commission is an update regarding the research done by the American Planning Association, the results of a meeting attended by representatives of Ramsey County,MnDOT, the applicant and City Staff, and an update concerning the possible installation of traffic calming devices on Greenwood Drive. The applicant has provided a reduced-copy site plan showing the proposed right turn lane from County Road I onto Highway 10, which is attached to this report. • Background: APA Research. Staff recently received the research performed by the American Planning Association concerning the impact of a new commercial use into a residential area. Unfortunately, the materials we received did not contain anything related to the specific question that was asked. Because of this, I did not attach the research to this report, but it will be made available at the meeting if anyone has an interest in it. Discussion with the City Attorney: At the last Planning Commission meeting, questions were raised which needed to be addressed by the City Attorney concerning property values and responsibility in the event a mistake or miscalculation is made during the project review or construction. Regarding property devaluation, neither the City nor the developer can be held liable for any real or perceived reduction in property value. For properties abutting vacant land or in close proximity to major transportation arteries or major commercial centers, there is a certain degree of risk that neighboring land uses might change. If done in compliance with the municipal code and State statutes, the act of rezoning a tract of land shall not necessitate compensatory settlements with adjoining property owners. Regarding the issue of liability in the event a mistake Planning Commission Report#5 Walgreens Proposal • March 26, 1998 Page 2 or oversight is made during the project review or construction, according to Minnesota Statutes, a city, its staff and paid consultants cannot be held liable for any damages. Discussion with the City Engineer: One of the questions asked at the last Planning Commission meeting was how might the water table be impacted with the construction of the Walgreens store. Staff directed this query to the City Engineer for his comment. Rocky Keehn of SEH, who is a certified hydrological engineer specializing in stormwater and wetland management, explained that there should be no impact to the water table directly attributable to this project. If anything, because of the impervious surface area proposed, there might be less recharge into the water table. Recharge is the means by which a water table or aquifer replenishes itself by absorbed water through the ground. The recharge of a water table in a particular area is decreased as more impervious surface is added. The regrading of the subject parcels to prevent stormwater runoff onto adjoining properties should also lessen some of the existing problems experienced by the adjacent owners. MnDOT Meeting. On March 26, 1998, a meeting was held with MnDOT attended by myself, Robert Cunningham of TOLD Development, Dan Soler, Ramsey County Traffic Engineer; Scott Peters, MnDOT Local Government Liaison, Michael Christenson, Assistant Division Engineer for MnDOT, Michael Chen and Jim Benshoof of Benshoof&Associates; and other MnDOT staff. • The focus of the discussion concerned the right-in right-out access proposed on Highway 10. In a letter dated March 2, 1998, Scott Peters denied the proposed access due to safety considerations. Specifically, there was not enough spacing between the intersection and the access point to allow for safe deceleration. This letter was followed by another letter dated March 17, 1998, from Mike Christenson, who reiterated Mr. Peter's denial, stating that it would be irresponsible of MnDOT to allow such an access. (This letter has been attached for your reference.) In addition to this, however, he pointed out that MnDOT does not"own" the access rights for this location and as such cannot prevent the access being granted if the City so desires. The meeting expanded on this theme in that MnDOT could not actually deny the request since the approval was not theirs to give. The applicant and his traffic experts pointed out that the addition of the right turn lane on County - - the intersection, to which MnDOT and Dan Soler agreed, yet they did not feel the benefits exceeded the possible dangers associated with the proposed Highway 10 access. The meeting adjourned without MnDOT changing its position. Traffic Calming: The City Engineer was sent two diagrams showing possible traffic calming plans for Greenwood Drive. Of the two options presented, both of which are attached and labeled Option 1 and Option 2, both the City Engineer and Mike Ulrich, Director of Public Works, indicated that Option 1 would be more of a deterrent to fast speeds due to the abruptness of the lane shift, whereas Option 2 is less abrupt and more smooth-flowing. The cost associated with either option are minimal, although Option 1 would be significantly less as no additional pavement would be required. Mike Ulrich explained that this might be a good test case which if proved • successful, could be incorporated into future street reconstructions and as a tool to reduce speeds on some streets with long, uninterupted blocks. r , Planning Commission Report #5 Walgreens Proposal March 26, 1998 Page 3 Analysis: One of the primary issues that has not been resolved is the effect of Walgreens development on the abutting property owners. While staff has not yet learned of any previous studies or comparable situations, we will continue to search. Given the information provided by the two real estate appraisers contacted, property values may be negatively impacted by the addition of the Walgreens. The extent of the impact, if any, would be mitigated by the type of use, the neighborhood in which it is located, the amount of buffering provided, and other factors. It is staff's contention that any decrease in value would be negligible if at all. The developer has offered to compensate the adjacent property owners with additional land(as much as 4,000 square feet per property) or by means of a cash settlement. Staff is not aware of whether or not the settlement offers have been accepted. There are other impacts to the surrounding property owners and the neighborhood beyond property values. The issue regarding additional pass-through traffic on Greenwood Drive is as much of a concern to the City as it is the residents living on Greenwood Drive. The traffic experts claim that the additional vehicle trips will be negligible and would not be noticed given the Snumbers of vehicles already using the street. While this may be true from a theoretical perspective, from the perspective of a resident that already considers traffic to be excessive, more traffic would only add to the problem. For this reason the applicant would consider installing some type of traffic calming device, perhaps similar to the options presented herein, or in some . other form. The result of which would be that the additional traffic that would have used Greenwood Drive and perhaps some existing traffic would be diverted to Long Lake Road or some other street. The speed of the remaining traffic would be reduced in addition. With regard to the access onto Highway 10, it has been learned that the City, not MnDOT, holds the right of approval in this location. That being the case, the City could approve the site plan at development review with the access onto Highway 10 indicated on the plans. And while ample justification might exist for doing so by looking at other properties having similar"difficult" access points (SuperAmerica, proposed Holiday store, the Oasis Mart at H2 and 10, to name a few), MnDOT stresses that the mistakes of the past should not be the basis for approving future problem access points. The other consideration regarding the access is if the City does approve the site plan with the Highway 10 access, how might that impact future City/MnDOT negotiations? The Highway 10 design theme implementation could be compromised if the City contradicts MnDOT's position. Mr. Cunningham has stated that the project is dependent upon the Highway 10 access without which there would be no project. It would be staff's recommendation to approve the requests before the Commission and deal with the Highway 10 access at the development review stage of this project. Even though the City could approve the access point outright, the applicant should be directed to continue to negotiate with MnDOT to • resolve this issue without City intervention. Planning Commission Report#5 Walgreens Proposal March 26, 1998 Page 4 From input gathered at the two previous community forums held to discuss the comprehensive plan and future development in the Highway 10 corridor, there is a general agreement that commercial development should be restricted to those properties having Highway 10 frontage. The fact that this assembly of parcels has its predominant frontage upon County Road I should not"disqualify" it for commercial development, regardless of which way the proposed building would face. This use, at the corner of the busiest intersection within the City, an intersection at which three of the four corners are already developed with high-intensity commercial uses, would not be an intensive use and would act as a good transition into the adjoining neighborhood. Because the City will be presented with similar redevelopment proposals at other locations within the corridor, a policy should be drafted which would address commercial encroachment into residential areas. This policy would be incorporated into the City's comprehensive plan update, which will be completed this year. Recommendation: 1. Staff recommends approving Planning Commission Resolution 536-98, a resolution recommending that the City Council approve a comprehensive plan amendment to change the designations of the properties located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-7761 Eastwood Road to NC,Neighborhood Commercial, to allow for the construction of a Walgreens Drug Store. 2. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Resolution 538-98, a resolution recommending approval of Ordinance No. 614, an ordinance amending the City's official zoning map by rezoning the properties located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-7761 Eastwood Road to a B-2, Limited Business District classification. Attachments: 1. Letter from Mike Christenson of MnDOT, dated 3/17/98 2. Memo from Tom Sohrweide, SEH, dated 3/26/98 3. Traffic Calming Options 1 & 2 4. Revised Site Plan, Reduced 5. Ordinance No. 614 6. Planning Commission Resolution 538-98 7. Planning Commission Resolution 536-98 N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DE VCASES\507-971507-97.PC5 4014E30,4 la Minnesota Department of Transportation / Metropolitan Division Waters Edge • 1500 West County Road B2 Roseville, MN 55113 March 17, 1998 Jim Ericson City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 Dear Jim Ericson: SUBJECT: TOLD Development Company Site Plan Review S98-015 Northeast Quadrant of Trunk Highway(TH) 10 and County Road I Mounds View, Ramsey County C.S. 6204 The Minnesota Department of Transportation(Mn/DOT) includes the following concerns in •addition to our letter of March 2, 1997 regarding this subject. • Allowing the proposed access on TH 10 would be irresponsible of us and may jeopardize the safety and operation of TH 10. When access points increase along a highway, accident problems and congestion problems are likely to follow. Control and reduction of access is critical in minimizing highway congestion, and are important factors in reducing accidents on highways. An access this close to an intersection brings a very high probability of serious accidents. The local street network most safely accommodates local circulation and property access A.: :. - . :: . - - ... ' . . . - - . • . +.a region. :'• .way sys em. Regional highways cannot substitute for the local street network: The platting and development of property must create, extend and utilize such a network. • Mn/DOT does not own the right to restrict access to the highway at this location. TH 10 is a minor arterial and thus,has a lower priority for use of Mn/DOT resources when compared with other regional highways. However, we strongly recommend that the City of Mounds View recognize the consequences of allowing trunk highway access this close to an intersection. The city has the power and authority to act accordingly in limiting site access to the local • street network that currently provides access to TH 10. If Mn/DOT is asked to purchase the right to restrict TH 10 access on this parcel, it could cost several hundred thousand dollars. An equal opportunity employer Jim Ericson 111 March 17, 1998 page two It is increasingly important that local governments cooperate with Mn/DOT in effectively managing the region's highways. Safety and congestion problems are many, and solutions are more difficult and very costly to implement. The likelihood of problems caused by the proposed access will increase as this corridor continues to develop and traffic in the area grows. We cannot replace the regional highway system. The system is a regional resource and we must manage it for the benefit of the region as a whole. Mn/DOT's ability to promote safe and efficient traffic flow on the highway is compromised without the cooperation of property owners and local governments in the land development process. It is our desire to work in partnership with the City of Mounds View to manage the regional highway system effectively. We strongly recommend that the city act accordingly to ensure that site access is limited to the local streets that currently provide access to TH 10. • Regional policy developed by the Metropolitan Council disapproves direct access to minor arterials from individual properties. The emphasis of TH 10 is to serve mobility as opposed to direct land access. Access to County Road I is more appropriate. • Regional policy also advocates land access management and control as tools in ensuring that minor arterials continue to operate efficiently and effectively. As one goal of the City's Focus 2000, initial highway corridor improvements have focused on a bike/pedestrian trail adjacent to TH 10. The City must strongly evaluate the future trail and safety of its users when considering development plans with direct property access to TH 10. Please contact me at 582-1000 with any questions. cer ly, Ida AO • ' ' ensen Assistant Division Engineer, Transportation Planning c: Dan Soler, Ramsey County Traffic Engineer Ann Braden,Metropolitan Council Transportation • ,.03/26/98 THU 15:44 FAX 612 490 2150 SEH 0 002 • 4...rirefi• A ►� MEMORANDUM ■ST.PAUL,MN O MINNEAPOLIS, MN o ST.CLOUD, MN O CI•IIPPEWA FAU,S,WI O MADISON,WI CI LAKE COUNTY,IN TO: Jim Erickson,City of Mounds View FROM: Tom SohrweidelliV7 DATE: March 26, 1998 RE: Greenwood Drive Traffic Diversion SEH No.A-MOUND9805.00 Steve Campbell has forwarded your FAX to me regarding the traffic diversions on Greenwood Drive. As Chair of the North Central Institute of Transportation Engineer's(NCITE)Neighborhood Traffic Control Committee, I have kept aware of various traffic calming techniques and have the following observations. • Generally,creating a curvilinear alignment reduces traffic speeds. However,if it isn't done abruptly enough,drivers can straighten out the curves,thereby minimizing the effect on their speed. Another concern which rue seen in many situations, is that while physical features, such as curves may slow vehicle speeds,complaints and problems can continue as vehicles are driving too fast for conditions. While they may have been driving 35 mph previously, a reconstructed alignment desires to slow speeds to 20 mph, while they actually drive it at 25 mph. This can result in vehicles crossing the centerline or losing control. Of the two options, Option 1 combines two features. Roadway narrowing and curvilinear alignment. The closer the protrusions are together,the more potential to impact speed. Caution needs to be taken _ - -ira,i i- ,r.rne.- a I - , r •- ,lLar access. Option 2 uses curvilinear alignment only. Although this can work, it creates greater opportunity for drivers to try and smooth out the curves and/or drive too fast for the new condition. • A recent MnDOT survey of metro area traffic calming activity categories which included street narrowing and horizontal realignment generally were reported to result in improved street safety. If you have any questions relative to the above or desire additional information,please call me at 490- 2072. • is c: Steve Campbell, SEH sATRANSNQUNP RWD,WPD An AJjvmetiveAdiout, E4ral OPPoMwity EePleyer o o i ' m th o z A /a mo CO 03 V » CA A CO M -1 - e = O o 2' m Z _ z Z 0 m � � \ -c 0 0 F � m § m M z c t E a § ?1, c m m -0 E r ■ & o O § A 9. $ 2 - GI 0 § g 2 0 § > ° a 0 § _ 0 • - > 1— z c ¥ £ § k i i B }. k 2 k ) § § CO k z a.co cr) XI• 2 k \ z cc, 22 / k § \ Z in 0 P. Q m ■ k 5 k 2c• 2 z k k k a 2 0 -n m a. § § - > 2, > 2 1 § § CO 13 71 2 \ m i e . w 2 E E C s } k k / m -1 rn + co + rn m 8e LI BR Co r r Q w w w p r- CO r z > m % 0 > W@@ 12 2 2 a i< i< P § 0 3 $ r" § 0 _ _ , k _ z 2 12 -0 c 9 GI FA 2 $ $ § Iira~ A ® ■ a a 8 Q q P � @ a 0 cn 2 8888888888888 k 0 o \ % 4rirl • a _ _ V -.Ia & — a 0 z 8 - # _ f # # 4 a $ k P / - & $ § k 2 2 ■ 8 d $ $ 8 / 8 0 , 0 0 g B@ / 4 § q -, -, CA 2 & & S J. 0 0 z - - 0 A \ / k $ 8 7 \ $ \ \ / \ ? / g B § b ) G @ § 8 § § @@ 8 8 8 8 8 S , • ,nn a TT,r, ",,. S"� .,•. _,. ...../ST ? t, OPTION 1 • t I t5,4' ease a _ a •* )4 /o AO • • j ri>-)'\ • ° Mid-Block Slow Point, Chicane Serpentine curb protrusions offset from each other in mid-block locations that narrow the width of the roadway and help reduce traffic • speeds and improve safety. OPTION 2 • I I Existing pavement 1 to be removed I : L_______._ Pavement to be added I + G tie I/Pt 0 I 4 I ; Cr f Ito 1 1 OQ krAl 4Q 1 40 I O 1 \ ', I • ____)/ 7 \ II • Pavement to I iI be added I Existing pavement to be removed 1 I I e I Mid-Block Slow Point, S-Curve Serpentine curb protrusions with corresponding curb intrusions in mid block location to form a slight S-curve that does not narrow the width of the roadway yet does •help to reduce traffic speed and improve safety. • I i der I % • 40 S /„' • ' l ``... 11147 i / lQf is r li �ili . _ .;-,1,- fi �.(. \,i i I v . .. li_ a � : i:;. 4 ...-,-....1.. e. ///: 1111111111H. I i'• i,= ZY i 4, t � Efrj .i s 11111111111111111i1 ° • _ — ---- ~ --- _c1 111111111111 1.,n�o tr� (4 ---. if dr--- , pi a 1 .0 f p•_2. . lam_ ; I; ,- ice_ „.( ice_ 1. ? ' `" 'moi/{� `` %.'�ti �i 1%'„.. \ -.v .-.F 71-1 P,. - Pif ja 1 I . . • 2 , 1 ' li .1 1 . s 1 ORDINANCE NO. 614 • CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A REZONING OF FIVE PARCELS ABUTTING EASTWOOD ROAD FROM R-1 AND R-3 TO B-2 FOR A NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL USE TO BE LOCATED NORTH OF COUNTY ROAD I AND EAST OF HIGHWAY 10 AND AMENDING THE CITY'S OFFICIAL ZONING MAP THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Appendix A of the Mounds View Municipal Code entitled"Specific Rezonings", the City's Official Zoning Map and zoning district classification are hereby amended as follows: 1. The zoning district classification of the following described real properties are • amended from R-1, Single Family Residential to B-2, Limited Business: S '/2 Lot 51, Spring Lake Park Hillview (PIN#06-30-23-44-0032) N 'h Lot 50, Spring Lake Park Hillview (PIN#06-30-23-44-0031) S '/2 Lot 50, Spring Lake Park Hillview (PIN#06-30-23-44-0030) Lot 49, Spring Lake Park Hillview (PIN#06-30-23-44-0029) 2. The zoning district classification of the following described real property is amended from R-3, Medium Density Residential to B-2, Limited Business: Lot 78, Spring Lake Park Hillview (PIN#06-30-23-44-0051) SECTION 2. This Ordinance is effective thirty days after its publication. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 13th day of April, 1998. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 27th day of April, 1998. • • Ordinance 614 Page 2 Duane McCarty, Mayor ATTEST: Charles Whiting, City Clerk-Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: Robert Long, City Attorney N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\507-97\TOLD2.ORD • • MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMIVIISSION . RESOLUTION NO. 538-98 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 614, AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE REZONING OF PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 2625 HIGHWAY 10 AND 7715-7761 EASTWOOD ROAD FROM R-3, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, AND R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, TO B-2, LIMITED BUSINESS DISTRICT; PLANNING CASE NO. 507-97. WHEREAS, TOLD Development Company has applied for a rezoning of the properties located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-7761 Eastwood Road from residential to commercial; and, WHEREAS, the subject properties are described as follows: The South '/ of Lot 51,All of Lot 50,Lot 49 and Lot 78, Spring Lake Park Hillview, Ramsey County, Minnesota WHEREAS, this rezoning request is to be acted on in tandem with a comprehensive plan • amendment requested by the applicant which changes the land use designations from Low and High Density Residential (LD & HD) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC); and, • WHEREAS, the rezoning request would be consistent with the comprehensive plan if the comprehensive plan amendment request is approved by the Mounds View City Council; and, WHEREAS, the subject properties form a contiguous tract of land at the northeast corner of the Highway 10 and County Road I, an intersection having the highest traffic counts of any intersection within the City; and, WHEREAS, the other three corners of this above-cited intersection have already developed with high intensity commercial uses; and, WHEREAS, allowed uses in a limited business distrcit would be low-intensity commercial, which would serve as a transition into the established residential neighborhood; and, WHEREAS, a use of this type should serve as a benefit to the immediate area; and, WHEREAS, the developer has indicated that the proposed use would fill a need for a growing demographic group within the immediate area; and, • Planning Commission Resolution No. 538-98 March 18, 1998 Page 2 WHEREAS, there has been much community sentiment regarding the inappropriateness of future residential development fronting Highway 10; and, WHEREAS, in a study completed by SRF Consulting in April, 1997, the property at 2625 Highway 10 was deemed to be too restrictive for stand-alone development due to access limitations and size constraints; and, WHEREAS, the SRF study indicated that development potential of the property located at 2625 Highway 10 would be enhanced if combined with adjacent properties; and; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council adopt Ordinance 614, and ordinance approving the rezoning of properties located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-61 Fa stwood Road to B-2, Limited Business District. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this Resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. S Adopted this 1st day of April, 1998. Jerry Peterson, Chairperson ATTEST: Rick Jopke, Community Development Director (SEAL) 110 N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\507-97\538-98PC.RES MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMIVIISSION • RESOLUTION NO. 536-98 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FROM LOW DENSITY AND HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 2625 HIGHWAY 10 AND 7715-7761 EASTWOOD ROAD; PLANNING CASE NO. 507-97. WHEREAS, TOLD Development Company has applied for a comprehensive plan amendment which would change the designation of the properties located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-7761 Eastwood Road from high and low density residential to neighborhood commercial; and, WHEREAS, the subject properties are described as follows: The South 1/ of Lot 51,All of Lot S0,Lot 49 and Lot 78, Spring Lake Park Hillview, Ramsey County, Minnesota • WHEREAS, Section 401.09 of the Mounds View Municipal Code states that the City has adopted the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Mounds View, dated 1979, as its plan for future development and growth within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mounds View adopted the 1979 Comprehensive Plan in 1982 by Resolution No. 1467; and, WHEREAS, the 1979 Comprehensive Plan places the subject properties in District 6 and designates these properties for both high and low density residential development as indicated by Exhibit 1, attached herewith; and, WHEREAS, both the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning map designate these properties for residential development; and, WHEREAS, there has been much community sentiment regarding the inappropriateness of future residential development fronting Highway 10; and, WHEREAS, in a study completed by SRF Consulting in April, 1997, the property at 2625 Highway 10 was deemed to be too restrictive for stand-alone development due to access limitations and size constraints; and, Planning Commission Resolution No. 536-98 • April 1, 1998 Page 2 WHEREAS, the SRF study indicated that development potential of the property located at 2625 Highway 10 would be enhanced if combined with adjacent properties; and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission makes the following findings that the proposed amendment is consistent with the general land use goals and policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan as follows: Goal 1. Develop a cohesive land use pattern which ensures compatibility and functional relationships among activities and uses. The change from high density and low density residential to neighborhood commercial will allow for the commercial development of the northeast corner of the Highway 10 and County Road I intersection, an intersection that already supports three corners of higher intensity commercial uses--a Hardees Restaurant and the Moundsview Square Shopping Center, a SuperAmerica gas station and convenience store, and a Burger King Restaurant. Given the high traffic counts at this intersection, it would seem more appropriate to use the land for commercial rather than residential development. The proposed amendment is in keeping with the community goal of limiting commercial development to the Highway 10 corridor. The neighborhood commercial designation is the least common designation • used in the comprehensive plan, representing less than one-quarter of one percent of the properties in the City. The proposed use would be set back approximately 130 feet from neighboring residential properties and separated by a minimum 70 feet of greenspace and other physical buffering. The neighborhood commercial designation, as opposed to the more intensive highway commercial designation, would in itself be a buffer to the adjoining residential properties. Goal 2. Maintain and, where necessary, upgrade land uses and environmental quality. The policy under this goal directs attention to protecting integrated use districts (residential neighborhoods, commercial centers, industrial parks) from penetration by through traffic. By virtue of its proximity to Highway 10 and County Road I, the residential district already experiences a penetration of through traffic. Redeveloping the subject properties for a commercial use will add to the existing traffic in this residential district. The tradeoff, however, is that Eastwood Road would no longer feed into the Highway 10 / County Road I intersection thus eliminating a notable point of conflict and with the addition of a right turn lane onto Highway 10 from westbound County Road I, the overall functioning of the intersection will be significantly improved. • Goal 3. Preserve and protect property values. Planning Commission Resolution No. 536-98 April 1, 1998 • Page 3 It is hoped that in the long run, property values will increase with the introduction of a lower-intensity neighborhood commercial use at the corner of the most traveled intersection of the City. The positive impact to the City's tax base will serve to lessen the tax burden to residential properties across the City. Goal 4. Ensure community development is compatible with features of the natural environment and is accommodated without destroying desirable environmental features and natural amenities. Other than a few mature trees present on the subject properties, there are no natural environmental features or amenities that will be threatened or degraded as a result of the proposed development. The plans for development will include a system for capturing stormwater run-off for the subject properties which should improve conditions for properties immediately adjacent to the development. In so doing, the quality of the stormwater that now runs untreated into the City's sewer system will be significantly improved. Goal 5. Prevent development which is not accompanied by a sufficient level of supportive services and facilities (utilities, parking, access, etc.) • The properties are located on Highway 10, a principal arterial and the major thoroughfare in Mounds View, and County Road I, a minor arterial street. While adequate opportunity for access to the development is available to County Road I, access may not be possible onto Highway 10 because of the limited highway frontage. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) will need to review and approve any requests for access onto Highway 10. Water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, gas and electric lines are available. Comments from the Blaine/Spring Lake Park/Mounds View Fire Department regarding access to the subject properties as well as to the properties on a dead-end Eastwood Road indicate that as long as there is a sufficient turning radius at the end of the cul-de-sac, no reduction in the level of service or response time would be expected. The parking requirements would be examined during the development review. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission makes the following additional findings that the proposed amendment is consistent with the commercial goals and policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan as follows: Goal 1. Commercial development shall be considered in order to provide a broad tax and expanded employment base within Mounds View. Redesignating the subject properties to allow for the development of a specific neighborhood • commercial use will increase the City's tax base ten-fold and create 35 positions, more than Planning Commission Resolution No. 536-98 • April 1, 1998 Page 4 half of which would be full-time positions. Many of the jobs created would be filled by Mounds View residents. Goal 2. Provide safe, convenient, attractive, and accessible commercial development within Mounds View. The development proposed at the northeast corner of Highway 10 and County Road I would be put through an intensive review process by which all aspects of the building design and site layout would be examined. The proposed use would be buffered from the adjacent residential areas by an expanse of greenspace, plantings and a fence. In terms of convenience, a neighborhood commercial use at this location would give those residents living north of County Road I and east of Highway 10 the ability to walk for certain goods and services without having to cross either thoroughfare, which are viewed as major bathers to pedestrian and other non-vehicular traffic. To encourage pedestrian use, the City would require that a sidewalk be extended to the site from Greenwood Drive on the north side of County Road I and there would be a pedestrian access from Eastwood Road to the north. • Goal 3. Major retail sales and services will be developed in planned and concentrated centers. Now that the majority of the available vacant land within the City is either developed or is slated for development, this goal may not be as applicable as infill development becomes more prevalent. However, if one considers that by locating on the fourth corner of an intersection already populated with higher intensity commercial uses, then this goal is met. The development will provide for its own stormwater retention and treatment system. Goal 4. The development of small, neighborhood convenience stores will be limited to locations which best serve residential areas without impairing residential development. Any development proposed for this site will be put through an intensive review process through which compatibility with the character of the surrounding neighborhood will be strongly encouraged. The access to the proposed use will be convenient for the surrounding community and non-vehicular traffic will be encouraged through the installation of pathways and sidewalks. WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan land use map designation for District 6 is proposed • to be amended as shown on Exhibit 2, attached herewith. Planning Commission Resolution No. 536-98 April 1, 1998 • Page 5 NOW, THEREFORE, the Mounds View Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council approve an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to redesignate the south l of Lot 51 and all of Lots 50, 49 and 78 to NC, Neighborhood Commercial. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this Resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 1st day of April, 1998. Jerry Peterson, Chairperson ATTEST: Rick Jopke, • Community Development Director (SEAL) N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEV CASES\507-97\536-98PC.RES • FILE No. 696 04/41 '98 10:30 ID:TOLD DEVELOPMENT 612 420 7574 PAGE 2 1+ RPR-01-1998 05:55 BENSHOOF & ASSOC. 612 S32 9564 P.02/05 ivBENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 7901 OHMS UNE,SURE 500/EDIN$,MN 5$4841(812)1132-8658/FAX(612)8324664 April 1, 199$ Refer to file: 9749 MEMORANDUM( TO: Robert Cunnin-1, ' TOLD Development Co. • . v FROM: ramps A. : -, ,.. .f R Michael H.Chen Si RE: Review of Access Issues along T.H. 10 Corridor In the City of Mounds View PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND As you requested on March 27, 1993,this memorandum summarizes our review of T.FL 10 access issues pertaining to the proposed Walgreens development. The review also 0 addresses positions taken by Mn/DOT staff that appear to be inconsistent with established MxvDOT policy. I REVIEW OF ACCESS ISSUES Our review addresses four issues relating to the right turn =eases along T.H. 10. The first issue concerns the Mn/DOT access approvals for the planned Holiday Station development at Silver Lake Drive and T.EL 10. The second issue concerns the existing operation of the Super America station at County Road L The third issue concerns MntDOT's established 'nes for minor arterial roads_ The fourth issue examines the accident history information on TR 10 with respect to right turn accesses. Koidav Static('at Silver Lake Drive&Tit i.0 This proposed development has access onto both T.H. 10 and Silver Lake Drive that is very similar to the proposed Walgreens location. The Holiday Station's access on T,H. 10 is located approximately 200 feet(edge of curb to edge of curb) south of Silver Lake Drive. The Silver Lake Drive access is spaced approximately 195 feet (edge of curb to edge of curb) west of T.H. 10. This spacing is similar to the proposed Walgreens IIdevelopment which has a spacing of 157 feet along TR 10 and 200 feet along C.R. L FILE No. 696 04/01 '98 10:30 ID:TOLD DEVELOPMENT 612 420 7574 PAGE 3 APR-01-1998 09:55 BENSlDDF & ASSOC. 612 832 9564 P.03/05 Mr.Robert Cunningham 2 April 1, 1995 Representatives of the developer and the City have stated that Mn/DOT has already given verbal and written approval for the Ration's right turn access on T.I . 10. Some of the design elements for this access are not yet complete so an access permit from Mn/DOT has not yet been issued. According to the developer, approval also has been obtained from Ramsey County for the access on Sever Lake Drive. Super America Stan=at County iloadX&T$. 10 Located in the southweet corner atm TA 10/CR.I intersection, this development has a right turn in only access on T.H. 10. This access is spaced approximately 230 feet south of CR.L(edge to edge) The Super America station shares this T.H. 10 access with a small commercial center to the south of the station. This access was granted in 1989. No right turn lane is provided; motorists use the shoulder area to turn from T.H. 10 into the site. Mn/DOTAccess Swing Guidelines Mn/DOT'a policies regarding spacing of direct zooms driveways are addressed in section 5-2.09.01 in the Road Design Manual. According to this policy,roads classified as minor • arterials such as T.H. 10, require acme spacing of 60 in (197 feet) of frontage. The proposed Walgreens access on TX 10 is&proximately 187 feet north of C.R. I and this is within 10 feet of meeting this policy. Accident Rarity on T.H. 10 at Bight Turn Accesses To address some of the safety =cams expressed by Mn/DOT staff regarding the proposed Walgreens right turn access on TIL 10, we conducted a review of the accident history along T.H. 10 from Silver Lake Drive south to Long Lake Road. This review examined the Impact,if any,that the existing seven right turn access locations had on the accident history during this period There are five right turn access points located northbound on TIL 10 in this section and two access points located southbound on TA 10. The accident information was provided by the City of Mounds View and includes a period of 22 months starting from January 1996 to November 1997. During this 22 month period, a total of 46 incidents were recorded on T.H. 10. None of the recorded accidents occurred at the seven existing right turn accesses along T.H. 10 or could be attributed to vehicles using these access points. The lack of accidents at these locations indicate that these right turn accesses operate safely, which is different from the safety concerns express by Mn/DOT stag • FILE No. 696 04/01 '98 10:30 ID:TOLD DEVELOPMENT 612 420 7574 PAGE 4 APR--01-1998 09:55 BENSHOOF 8. ASSOC. 612 832 9564 P.04/05 Mr.Robert Cunningham 3 April 1, 1998 • CONCLUSIONS The characteristics of the T.H. 10 right turn access for the proposed Walgreens development are very similar to the spacing characteristics of the approved access on T.H. 10 for the new Holiday gas station development at Silver Lake Drive and T.K 10. Considering the similarity of these access locations and considering that the Walgreens driveway would have less traffic use than the Holiday driveway,we are confident that the impacts of the Walgreens driveway would be less than the Holiday driveway. Thus, s;stca Mn/DOT approved the Holiday access, they also ought to approve the Walgreens driveway. Mn/DOT policy guidelines indicate that accesses located on minor arterial roads can have an access spacing in the range of 60 m or 197 feet. The spacing of the Walgreens access is within 10 feet(five percent)of this guideline. No accidents were reported from January 1996 to November 1997 that involved the seven right turn access points on T.H. 10 between Silver Lake Drive and Long Lake Road. Contrary to the safety concerns expressed by Mn/DOT staff thio record clearly indicates that the existing right turn access points function with a high level of safety. Further. this experience is a strong indicator that the proposed Walgreens driveway also would Stadion safely. • The information presented in this memorandum indicates that the current position of Mn/DOT staff not to allow the proposed Walgreens access on T.H. 10 is not consistent with their past actions, with their established policy or with the high level of safety provided by existing right turn access points. Thus, we would encourage you to flusher pursue access approval through discissions with representatives of the City and Mn/DOT. Fadeout: Mn/DOT Policy on direct access driveways from the Road Design Manual . FILE No. 696 04/01 '98 10:31 ID:TOLD DEVELOPMENT 612 420 7574 PAGE 5 APR--01-1998 09:56 PENSHOOF & ASSOC. 612 832 9564 P.05,05 . DECEMBER 24, 1996 ROAD DESIGN MANUAL 5-2 (3 0) It2.09 Driveways and intersecting roadways to the extent practicable within the Driveways should be neared Bs low volume intersections is existing tight-of-way. Where no grading is involved, the their design, Nationally, driveway accidents account for existing °a�D slopes may be cess in place, provided between S and 11 peroses of all urban accidents. It is accident history or other criteria do not indicate corrective therefore warranted to closely owning their design and outs/ is needed. Goading is donned as say work done lacatioa. otttsid+e the shoulder m correct aidrsl and ditches. Driveways that serve major traffic Seeerators such as shopping centers. industrial complexes, large apartment 5.2.09.02 Geometric Design Elements complexes, office parks, eco, require special design considermionr.. The design for these types of developments The eriusia presented are predicated on allowing a cera be complex. The OHfce• of Technical Support. P vebicla in eater or exit a driveway at a minimum of Geometries Unit. and the Office of Traffic Engineering 15 kmlh, Sallies lyres iaditatesd that this yields as acceptable should review the proposed designs. These driveways should amount of vehicle delay on aha main highway+ and eiamMorarbi be treated as street intersections and in some ousts major the =few hazard compared m lower street intersections. entrance For urban design, Standard Plate M7035 shortuld be used 1. Turning Radii-See Table 5-2.09A and standard plates for private driveways that service lav traffic generators, i.e., M9035 and M9000. Ovate homes. duel x ee, small apartment complexes, small 2. Sight Distance-The criteria for intersections also apply business establishments, etc. Tits means that the gatua to driveways(Section 5-2,02). should be continued across these entrances Desissets should use their discretion as to whether the flared entrants 3. 'W Lam • A turn lane may be waimntad at high design or a radius design should be used on a pr jeer. In volume generators. Its design would be as described some lnsrances,a municipality may have a preference. Rohr earlier(Section 5.2.06). Tab5-2.09A and Figure 5.2.09A for driveway radii, 4. Skews - For 2-way ppessudoa, the angle should not 4lc cting standards 'Si entrance design the da the statete by more than 20 deg. {roma right angle. For a municipality should be resolved with the d+miSzKr and 1-way operation where Daly right turns will be made, the municipality. For rural design see Standard ?plate M9000, an angled driveway may be preferable to a perpendicular intersection since it will permit a higher entrance or exit speed. However, this is undesirable 5409.01 Polley When pedestrian or bicycle traffic is appreciable. 5. Width •Excessive or itsaictive driveway widths can li(innssota Rules. Thai; Highway System, Chapters detrimentally affect operations and safety. If the proper 8810.4100 through 8810.9921, describes the general roles curb ream is provided for the design vehicle (Table and regulations governing the design and leeadon of . 5-2.09A),thea a lane width of 3.6 m(I-way)or 7.2 m driveways. This section provides further guidance and design (2-way)will theoretically work without encroachment. detailr which should be used for driveway where , , .. _ . . ., .. 8 °.4 00 through 8810.9921 do not provide this m should be used. If the desirable radii are impractical guidance. To reduce the risk of accident potential. it is to provide, an individual mews=of each driveway imperative that driveway awes be limited to a reasonable must be conducted. member. Therefore, the guidance shown below should be used to determine the frequency of direct-mass driveways: For 1-way operation. the vehicle cannot be allowed to encroach beyond the far edge of pavement or curb.For Principal Arterials-Individual Analysis 2-way moo. the designer must select the tolerable Minor Arterials-One per 60 m of frontage encroachment based on the!Manhood that an entering and exiting vehicle will appear at the same time.These Collector-One per 23 m of frontage , considerations will yield the desirable width for a given Local-No micro! set 6. For new eanstructiodrecansuucsion 6. Corner clesrn ee •Driveways should not be located so or For should eon bedes, 1:6 inslopes close to interscnions or other driveways that they Ipl intersecting road provided on all driveways,field entrances, interfere with the safety and operation of the S Ys General guidelines are presented in eta Rules. For preservation erects, when grading is involved, 1:6 Trunk Highway System. Chapter 8810. It should be iadopes should be considered an driveways, field entrances, noted that dimensions can mood the minimum requirements, but should not exceed the re9ulr d TOTAL P.25 MAR-18-1998 09:46 BENSHOOF & ASSOC. 612 832 9564 P.02/83 W BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 7301 OHMS LANE,SUITE 500/EDINA,MN 55439/(812)832.9858/FAX(612)832-0564 March 18, 1998 97-89 Mr.Robert Cunningham TOLD Development Co. Wedgwood Commerce Centre 6900 Wedgwood Road, Suite 100 Maple Grove,MN 55311 RE: Summary of Conversations with Mn/DOT Staff Regarding T.H. 10 Walgreens Access Dear Bob: Please refer to our phone discussion on March 17, 1998. Here is a brief summary of the • discussions that I have had with various staff members at Mn/DOT from January to March 1998, regarding the Walgreens right turn access onto T.IL 10 in Mounds View. Please keep in mind that the items discussed here do not necessarily represent official Mn/DOT policy. This is merely a record of the conversations that I had with Mn/DOT staff In early January 1998, I spoke with Bill Warden at Mn/DOT regarding the suitability of this proposed access, given its location and proximity to the C.R. I intersection. Bill Warden said that this access was acceptable since the expected usage(14 in, 14 out in the p.m. peak hour) would not cause congestion on T H. 10 and the access spacing was consistent with other access locations on T.H. 10. Mr. Warden did not expect any difficulties to arise for this T.H. 10 access unless there was, for example, a drainage problem on the site that could not be satisfactorily addressed. He further suggested that the originally proposed right turn deceleration lane on T.H. 10 into the site was not necessary for this type of access. In early March 1998, I spoke with Scott Peters at Mn/DOT following a review that he had completed with regard to the T.H. 10 access. This Mn/DOT review was completed based on information provided by the City of Mounds View. The Walgreens Traffic Impact Report that we had completed for TOLD Development Company was not examined as part of the Mn/DOT review. Scott's reasons for recommending against the access were based upon safety concerns caused by vehicles entering the Walgreens site from T.H. 10. He felt that the access spacing of 150 feet (curb to curb) to the C.R. I intersection did not provide for an adequate deceleration lane into the site and could possibly lead to rear end accidents. Scott mentioned that he could reconsider the access request if the Walgreens T.H. 10 access was • restricted to only outbound right turns. The precedence of existing access spacing on T.H. 10 1rr • • • MAR-18-1998 09:4? BENSHOOF & ASSOC. 612 832 9564 P.03/03 Mr.Robert Cunningham -2- March 18, 1998 • was not a sufficient reason to justify this access. Scott said that there was now an effort at Mn/DOT to "correct the mistakes of the past" whenever the opportunity arose. This means that although all the other access locations on T.H. 10 in the vicinity of the Walgreens development do not meet Mn/DOT spacing requirements, Mn/DOT now requires all future access locations to strictly adhere to Mn/DOT guidelines. I asked Scott Peters to discuss the T.H. 10 access situation with Bill Warden in order to reconcile the conflicting messages that we had received from Mn/DOT. Following Scott's discussion with Bill Warden, Scott advised me to contact Michael Christiansen as Scott felt that he was not in a position to grant the T.H. 10 access. (According to Scott,Bill Warden has not changed his original response to the access issue.) I contacted Michael Christiansen on March 10. Mr. Christiansen stated that he agreed with Scott Peters' review of the T.H. 10 access and felt that the access should not be permitted due to the safety concerns addressed in the report. He further mentioned to me that while Mn/DOT has the right to grant or refuse access on T.H. 10,the City of Mounds View has the right to make the final decision to either accept or reject the Mn/DOT recommendation. According to.Michael Christiansen, the City of Mounds View has,the right to grant the Walgreens development access to T.H. 10 over the objections of Mn/DOT staff If the City were to disregard the Mn/DOT recommendation, it would be up to Mn/DOT staff to object to this decision. The level of the Mn/DOT objection would be dependent upon the relative impact that the Walgreens access would have on T.H. 10 io operation. This is a decision that Mn/DOT staff must make. If Mn/DOT staff have serious concerns about this Walgreens access,then the level of their objection could be significant. If their concerns are minor, Mn/DOT staff could allow the proposed access to proceed by not objecting too loudly. This completes the summary of the discussions that I had with Mn/DOT staff from January to March 1998. Let us know if you have any questions or comments about the points addressed in this letter. Sincerely, BENSHOOF&ASSOCIATES,INC. Michael H. Chen I TOTAL P.03 • MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMIVIISSION RESOLUTION NO. 536-98 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FROM LOW DENSITY AND HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 2625 HIGHWAY 10 AND 7715-7761 EASTWOOD ROAD; PLANNING CASE NO. 507-97. WHEREAS, TOLD Development Company has applied for a comprehensive plan amendment which would change the designation of the properties located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-7761 Eastwood Road from high and low density residential to neighborhood commercial; and, WHEREAS, the subject properties are described as follows: The South % of Lot 51,All of Lot 50,Lot 49 and Lot 78, • Spring Lake Park Hillview, Ramsey County, Minnesota WHEREAS, Section 401.09 of the Mounds View Municipal Code states that the City has adopted the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Mounds View, dated 1979, as its plan for future development and growth within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mounds View adopted the 1979 Comprehensive Plan in 1982 by Resolution No. 1467; and, WHEREAS, the 1979 Comprehensive Plan places the subject properties in District 6 and designates these properties for both high and low density residential development as indicated by Exhibit 1, attached herewith; and, WHEREAS, both the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning map designate these properties for residential development; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission makes the following findings that the proposed amendment is not consistent with the general land use goals and policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan as follows: Goal 1. Develop a cohesive land use pattern which ensures compatibility and functional relationships among activities and uses. 1 I • • • Planning Commission Resolution No. 536-98 April 1, 1998 Page 2 The change from high density and low density residential to neighborhood commercial would allow for commercial development of the northeast corner of the Highway 10 and County Road I intersection, which would be in direct conflict with the existing uses on this site and those adjacent to this site. Goal 2. Maintain and, where necessary, upgrade land uses and environmental quality. The policy under this goal directs attention to protecting integrated use districts (residential neighborhoods, commercial centers, industrial parks) from penetration by through traffic. Commercial Development at this location would cause an unacceptable increase of traffic through the adjacent residential neighborhood. Goal 3. Preserve and protect property values. Through discussions with certified real estate appraisers, it is evident that there would be some reduction of property values as a direct result of developing this assembly of parcels • into a commercial use. Goal 4. Ensure community development is compatible with features of the natural environment and is accommodated without destroying desirable environmental features and natural amenities. Development of these properties would alter the existing and natural drainage patterns on the site and would also involve the removal of a significant number of mature trees and natural vegetation. Goal 5. Prevent development which is not accompanied by a sufficient level of supportive services and facilities (utilities, parking, access, etc.) The properties are located on Highway 10, a principal arterial and the major thoroughfare in Mounds View, and County Road I, a minor arterial street. While adequate opportunity for access to the development is available from County Road I, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has stated that they will oppose and possible take action to prevent access onto Highway 10, due to safety considerations. Without access to Highway 10, the additional vehicles on County Road I would cause numerous traffic conflicts. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission makes the following additional findings that the • proposed amendment is not consistent with the commercial goals and policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan as follows: F • • • • Planning Commission Resolution No. 536-98 April 1, 1998 Page 3 Goal 1. Commercial development shall be considered in order to provide a broad tax and expanded employment base within Mounds View. Commercial development at this corner would increase the City's tax base and create additional employment opportunities, but it may also force the closure of related businesses in City which might result in a net loss of jobs. Goal 2. Provide safe, convenient,attractive, and accessible commercial development within Mounds View. Commercial development at the northeast corner of Highway 10 and County Road I would cause safety concerns with the additional traffic generated and the introduction of points of vehicular conflict. Pedestrian access to this site would be cut off from this site with the exception of the area north of County Road I and east of Highway 10. The safety of pedestrians attempting to cross either thoroughfare would be compromised significantly. • Goal 3. Major retail sales and services will be developed in planned and concentrated centers. This location is not adjacent to any other retail development and would be a stand-alone retail use amidst residential development. Goal 4. The development of small, neighborhood convenience stores will be limited to locations which best serve residential areas without impairing residential development. Commercial development in this location would impair residential development in that four single family homes would be removed to accommodate such development. NOW, THEREFORE, the Mounds View Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council deny an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to redesignate the south 1/2 of Lot 51 and all of Lots 50, 49 and 78 to NC, Neighborhood Commercial. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this Resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 1st day of April, 1998. 110 • Planning Commission Resolution No. 536-98 April 1, 1998 Page 4 Jerry Peterson, Chairperson ATTEST: Rick Jopke, Community Development Director (SEAL) N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES'507-97\536-98NO.RES • • 411 REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Meeting Date: April 1, 1998 Staff Report by: James Ericson, Planning Associate Planning Case No.: 514-97 Request: Development Review Petitioner: Bridges Leasing Company, LC Location: 8400 Coral Sea Street PIN Nos.: 05-30-23-21-0003 Legal Description: Lot 2, Block 1, North Star Industrial 2nd Addition Zoning/Land Use: I-1, Light Industrial District/undeveloped lot Applicable Regulations: • • Development Review: Section 1006.06 requires that all commercial and industrial development within the City be subject to review by the Planning Commission and approval by the City Council. • Setbacks: Section 1104.01 establishes the principal building and parking lot setbacks. These will be addressed in the analysis section of this report. • Minimum Lot Size: Section 1104.02, Subd. 2 establishes the minimum lot size in an the Industrial Zone as one acre (43,560 square feet.) • Parking Requirements: Section 1121.13 sets the requirements for parking ratios. Summary: The applicant, Bridges Technology Park, has applied for a development review to expand their existing building located at 8400 Coral Sea Street. The new addition will be 35,188 square feet for a total build-out of 64,376 square feet. The building will be 10,188 square feet of office space and 25,000 square feet of warehouse space. The site is currently zoned I-1, Industrial District, which allows this use. This parcel is undeveloped with the western edge of the property in wetland, and the remaining area covered by dense tree cover. The proposed expansion will match • the design and style of the existing building. Planning Commission Report Bridges Technology Park Phase II Planning Case 514-98 • March 27, 1998 Page 2 Discussion: Dimensional Requirements: Required Provided Met? Lot Area: 1 acre 2.59 acres Yes Building Height: S 45 feet 18 feet Yes Building Elevation: z 901.6 feet 908.5 feet Yes Building Setbacks • Front (Coral Sea St.): 40 feet 40 feet Yes • Side 20 feet 70 feet Yes • Rear: 40 feet 160+feet Yes Parking Lot Setbacks • Front (Coral Sea St.): 40 feet 40 feet Yes • Side: 5 feet 5 feet Yes Drainage. Wetland Considerations and Wetland Alteration Permit: This lot was platted as part of the Northstar Industrial Park 2nd Addition. At the time of platting, • a comprehensive drainage plan was prepared which identified the ponding requirements for Lots 1, 2 and 3. The major wetland along the western boundary of these lots was also delineated at that time. The applicant is proposing a drainage system which coordinates with the earlier plan. There will be a storm drain at the rear of the building to capture the building a parking lot runoff, directing it to the existing stormwater retention/detention pond behind the existing building. The runoff in the front of the building will drain into a catch basin which is then directed to the City of Blaine's storm sewer under Coral Sea Street. Because work is being done within 100 feet of the wetland, the applicant will need to have a wetland buffer permit approved by the City. From the site plans, the new parking area will be eight feet from the delineated edge of the wetland, but will not encroach into the wetland. The existing building and parking lot come within 18 feet of the wetland, but no closer. The applicant will have prepared a revision to the site plan prior to the meeting of thee Planning Commission which shows where the 100-foot wetland buffer is, indicating the amount of impervious surface within the buffer. Rice Creek Watershed District has reviewed the applicant's drainage plans and has approved them pending payment of a cash surety and dedication of an easement area over the existing wetlands on site. Parking: The parking ratios as required in the City Code for office and warehouse uses are as follows: Office: 3 spaces plus 1 per 175 square feet of floor area • Warehouse: 8 spaces plus 1 per 500 square feet of floor area Planning Commission Report Bridges Technology Park Phase II Planning Case 514-98 • March 27, 1998 Page 3 Using these ratios and the breakdown of floor area presented above, the expanded building area would require a total of 119 spaces, of which 61 would be for the office floor area and 58 for the warehouse space. Five handicap stalls will need to be shown on the plans, at least one of which will need to be van accessible. Only four handicap stalls are shown all of which are van accessible. To be in compliance with the parking requirements, an additional 27 stall s would need to be added, unless the applicant can show that the existing building is currently overpacked. Easement Vacation: By way of the platting of the North Star Industrial 2nd Addition, perimeter drainage and utility easements were dedicated to the City. The proposed building expansion and development will cross over the set of easements between Lots 2 and 3 of that plat. These easements will need to be vacated before any construction activity can begin. The legal description for the easement area to be vacated has been forwarded to the City Attorney, who is drafting an Ordinance to accomplish the vacation. This Ordinance will be presented to the City Council after or in conjunction with the Council approval of this development review. Other Issues: • • Landscaping: The City Forester, Rick Wriskey, has reviewed the landscape plans and finds them to be acceptable. • Public Safety: The Fire Marshal for the City of Mounds View,Mark Bishop, has reviewed the plans as submitted by the applicant and finds the access and drive aisles to be in conformance with Fire Department requirements and standards. • Utilities: The building expansion will take all its utilities from the existing building. Water and sewer are accessed through the City of Blaine, as is sanitary sewer. drainage and utility easement over that area within the delineated wetland plus a minimum five-foot buffer beyond the wetland. Recommendation: The Planning Commission shall direct the applicant to revise the site plans as it deems necessary and shall direct staff to prepare a resolution recommending approval of the development review to be acted on at the April 15, 1998 Planning Commission meeting. James Ericson, Planning Associate Planning Commission Report Bridges Technology Park Phase II Planning Case 514-98 • March 27, 1998 Page 4 Attachments: Planning Application Zoning Map Site Plans, dated 3/6/98 N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\514-98\514-97.PC1 • • 03/03/9 08:58 FAX 612 784 3462 CITY OF MV- _ Q1002/005 CU R4-11n-Z COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 1.-°' ._ DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION ' lin' 2401 Highway 10,, Mounds View MN 55112 612-717-4020 612-784-3462 -FAX Please Type or Print Information-Complete Both Sides of This Parra Applicant Information Name of Applicant P.ririggz .easing Company,LLC Address Telephone (h l2) 7 R 0-15 0 0 --84.0.1)._C 1 a St Suite 100 Fax______(1212171E111...2 Rhine MN 55449 Interest in Property(check appropriate box) )¢ Owner of Property t7 Contract for Deed Owner a Lessee Operator.Manager 0 Agreement to Purchase a Other(explain) Applicants must provide evidence of interest in property at the time of application,and if you are not the owner of the property,you must provide a letter of permission from the owner giving consent to the filing of this application. The property owner roust sign this application for it to be accepted. Property Description/Proposal _ or General Location P4n(l Coral Sea St . , Suite 100, Blaine , MN 55449 Description Tiin - 2 Block 1 North Star Industrial Park 2nd Addition Property Idetuitieatioa#(P1N#) 0 5102 12 10003 Rdib ey Co . , MN #of Acres 2 . 59 Ares Current Zoning CommPrrial / Industrial Type of Application a Comprehensive Plan Amendment $250 a Rezoning o Major Subdivision 5250/acs= rain$250 max 31500 n Minor Subdivision 5250+SZ50 deposit* a Planned Unit Development(PUD) Refer a PUD Amendmrnt Rfer to rezoning fees S50 C Conditional Use Permit R-1, R-2 375;all others$2S0 o Variance R.I. R-2 3I00 all whets 5250 a Code Appeal $100 • X Develop Review/Site Plan 5125/elate;min 5125 moat 5750 —�5-tz,od a Wetland Alteration Permit R-1,R-2 3I50;all others$200 o Wetland Buffer Permit R 1.R 2 325;all others SI00 tI Floodplain Permit S200 a Other "Deposits shall be paid to cover all costs of public notices,materials and staff or consultant time spent in the review, or preparation of materials associated with this application. The applicant shall be responsible for all reahaoaable costs in=cess of the initial deposit amount. Any portion ache deposit not spent or encumbered shall be rctuadcd to a applicant within thirty(JO)days atter consideration of the application is completed. c Please complete the reverse side of this application. v,,i u4l uo VU:,a rAA OIL /84 J4KL CITY OF MY 003/005 City of Mounds View,MN Develo•ment A• •lication Pa-e2 Present Use of Property II IF Undeveloped/Vacant Single Family Dwelling o Duplex/Two Family Dwelling Q ❑ Business/Commercial EstablishmentMultitral Ey Dweiag a a Other(explain) Industrial Property Classification Xi Abstract Q Torrens Description of Proposal .,, . - ion of 2nd phase building project as shown - - • - • .t 2 bloc "or .. - • ��� - . •ustria 'ar ' .. BY MY(OUR)SIGNATURE ON TiFS APPLIC•f ON,I HEREBY DECLARE THAT.TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.THE INFORMATION PROVED o IS TRUE AND • CCo • TE. Signature of Applicant if .1 n► -.• • "lq„, . Name of Applicant(typed/printed) , - is dent .C. •Y & �ci. .115,0" ;-1, nc . I ' - ' : 8201 Sigisao re of Property Owner //��,Di/ ... IIName of Property Owner(typed/printed) I wilim ...." ..0e.z.e...... '''' •'"" 4 Address of Owner : es Coral Sea 'Suite 100 • • • Rlaine. MN 55449 Phone Number of Owga- 780-1500 .........a r........,.,. Date of Submitral FOR OFFICE USE ONLY S ^ Gj Dare ofAcceptance �� ry • Planning Case No. S / L - I 60 Assigned te: �, — 1 — v Limit S-'s-1$ I20-day limit . Fe4 Paid: Account# Application: Cheoic# Par1c Dedication: 3 7G�� /O 0 1 _Sg/ s— Depasits: Other. Tota(: w.mmem •_,_______,__ NI MATAIC RO UP S1CO MD EM FO RMS1D E VAP P.FO R L9E - .. -401.11111111ft.. — • • - • • - • • i./yMpr . I il I I I I 1 I I ly r • . 8490 . ,--110 I ,..-./ :. • t.L.i \\I it- 1450 • • i;roposed.\ \ \ --li 4 ..:. k E x i s.t i n g 8400 6 1-1 0 ..:.:.:::::.e.:::;::.:.:.:::;;.::::::::.:..f..:-F •,::.::::.::. , -.......:::::•-t:,:;::::::.t.::::, i.r0111144* ...:::-::;:y , . ............ ...... -J ..._.. . ....... g .110 0 --7..1,•:•:-F.:. - ., • \I'111111111111111\hit- ......::.: A111111111\tt. 8290 1—— 82ND LANE ITL ...... -......... ::::* ...... .. . . .. ... .•.•.. ••• THp. ...:: i.... ...., ::: . .. _..„. .. .. ....... ..... ....... ,..ouR .... _ . .. .......... ....... se •• .. .,... __.. - '`ok..... ....... • • ...,. . .. ..... •• IV' ••:•:. Hwy, . .. 8237 •:. •-• ; , in fel -. I .... pl ..:: .- 0 to N co ..r. .t. c.., ••.*: 1. •PP re, 01 to') re, PI in 62 .••. ....... N N N N N N N .7 • LAPORT DR ...•'X .7.-.7."..*.7.7.7::.7.7.7 1: • tQl CO- 0 N •.s- 0 c.,1 04 04 N co s•••, . 7:. • *– 0 cm N tin in .4' PI c4 P- 0 ° i.- ...... 8140 .4- i• .4. In rn PI pri pej in In en In ,,,., • •::., .' N N e.,i csi N N cy e4 c‘i 01 (4...-el..-. -, . C:1 81338130• 0 8141 813' :. ... .- 0 812C '. 2. 8123 8120 8121 CRP 0 — cn to, to N N CO ..- PI in N 04—trr- A Ce in in .r 0 8110 1 o o N co in •• ..r Po) N .-":" 0 . ca '4' •• .• w a,-..•-,'n. 7ct, ',2 r."2 in. '1 1 In In r. 0) r•., cv tv • Zoning Map Planning Case 514-98 Applicant: Bridges Technology Park (Phase II) Location: 8400 Coral Sea Street Item No. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT • Meeting Date: April 1,1998 Staff Report by: Rick Jopke, Community Development Director Planning Case No.: 471-97/517-98 Request: Development Stage Review, Wetland Buffer Permit, and Preliminary Plat for the Anthony Properties Management/O'Neil PUD Petitioner: Anthony Properties Management/Louise O'Neil PIN Nos. 08-30-23-23-0003 Zoning/Land Use: PUD, Planned Unit Development/Vacant Land Applicable Regulations: 1. Section 1120.04, Subd. 3 and Section 1120.05, Subd. 2 of the Municipal Code provide requirements for PUD development reviews. • 2. Title 1200 of the Municipal Code provides procedures and design requirements applicable to the subdivision of land within the City of Mounds View. 3. Title 1010 of the Municipal Code provides requirements and procedures for the issuance • of wetland buffer permits. Attachments: Planning Application Zoning Map Resolution No. 5104 Resolution No. 5119 Ordinance No. 598 Approved General Concept Site Plan Site Plan, Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control, Landscape and Utility Plans Dated 3/6/98 Theater Elevation Drawings Office Elevation Drawings Illustrative Sign Drawings Letter from Julie Ann Olsen Dated 3/23/98 • 1 Background: Introduction: • This item is intended for informational purposes only. No action is necessary by the planning commission on April 1. The proposed plans are still in the process of being reviewed by city staff and other agencies. It is anticipated that the review will be complete in order for the planning commission to take formal action at the April 15, 1998 meeting. No formal public notice has been provided for the April 1,1998 meeting. Full public notice will be provided for the April 15, 1998 meeting. Project Summary: The site in question is located at 2430 Highway 10. The 26.03 acre site is triangular in shape and is bounded by Highway 10, Long Lake Road, and County Road H2. The property is owned by the O'Neil family and is under contract for purchase and development by Anthony Properties Management. Anthony Properties Management is proposing to develop a 63,000 square foot 15- screen 2188-seat movie theater, three 11,000 square foot one-story office buildings, a 5000 square foot restaurant, and a 6400 square foot retail building. The movie theater would be operated by Carmike Theaters. An 8.25 acre wetland would remain undeveloped on the site. Total greenspace on the site after development would be 16.73 acres which is 64.3 % of the total site area. Impervious area including parking areas and buildings would comprise 9.3 acres or 35.7 % of the total site area. • Parking for a total of 776 cars is provided on the site. 82 parking stalls are shown for the restaurant site, 49 parking stalls are provided for the retail site, 548 parking stalls are provided for • the theater, and 97 parking stalls are provided for the office buildings. Joint use of the theater and office parking is indicated because offsetting hours. At the time of the writing of this report, staff had not received a copy of the preliminary plat or a site lighting plan. The applicant has indicated that these plans are being worked on and will be. submitted in the near future. The property will be subdivided into 6 lots, one lot for each of the •ings. ewe an. area •- inc u•e. in e sea - • . Previous Approvals: On May 12, 1997 the City Council approved Resolution No. 5104 which changed the comprehensive plan designation of the subject site from Medium Density Residential to Mixed Use PUD (Commercial and Residential Uses). The City Council on the same night gave first reading to Ordinance No. 598 which rezoned the site from B-1 Neighborhood Business and R-2 Single and Two Family Residential to PUD for commercial uses. Resolution No. 5119 was also approved on May 12, 1997 which approved a General Concept PUD Plan for the site. Second reading and passage of Ordinance No. 598 occurred on May 27, 1997. Copies of the approved resolutions and ordinance are attached for your information. • 2 PUD Approval: There are three steps to approval of a PUD. These include general concept plan, development stage plan, and final plan. As indicated above, the city has previously approved a general concept plan. The applicant has now submitted a development stage plan for city approval. 1120.04 Subdivision 3 of the Municipal Code outlines the procedure for development stage plan approval. The code states that the Planning Commission shall review the plan and submit a written report and recommendations to the City Council with respect to the conformity of the development stage plan to the general concept plan, with respect to the merit or lack of merit of any departure of the development stage plan from substantial conformity with the concept plan, and with respect to the compliance of the development stage plan with the provisions of this Title and other applicable Federal, State and local codes and ordinances. No public hearing before the Planning Commission is required by the City Code. 1120.04 Subdivision 3f. outlines the following review and evaluation criteria for development stage plans: 1. Adequate property control is provided to protect the individual owner's rights and property values and the public responsibility for own maintenance and upkeep. 2. The interior circulation plan plus access from and onto public rights of way does not • create congestion or dangers and is adequate for the safety of the project residents and the general public. 3. A sufficient amount of usable open space is provided. 4. The arrangement of buildings, structures, and accessory uses does not unreasonably disturb the privacy or property values of the surrounding residential uses. 5. The architectural design of the project is compatible with the surrounding area. 6. The drainage and utility system plans are submitted to and subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 7. The development schedule insures a logical development of the site which will protect the public interest and conserve land. 8. The development is in compliance with the requirements of Chapter 1010 and Titles 1200 and 1300 of this code. 9. Dwelling unit and accessory use requirements are in compliance with the district provisions in which the development is planned. Plan Changes: The following differences exist between the proposed development stage plan and the approved general concept plan as outlined in Resolution No. 5119: 1. Parcel B is designated as a retail site instead of a restaurant site. 2. The movie theater seating has been reduced from 2648 seats to 2188 seats. The number • of screens has been reduced from 16 to 15. 3 3. The site area has increased from 23.99 acres to 26.03 acres. 4. Impervious site area has decreased from 36.9 % of the site area to 35.7 %. Pervious area has increased from 63.1 % of the site area to 64.3 %. • 5. The northernmost and southernmost driveways on Highway 10 remain on the plan. 6. Sidewalks are shown along Highway 10 and along the northern edge of the wetland. 7. Trash enclosures are shown for each of the buildings. 8. The two NURP stormwater ponds have been replaced with one large pond. This is due to the fact that city stormwater from north and east of the site will be piped to the new pond to help alleviate existing stormwater problems in the area. 9. Snow storage areas are shown on the plan. 10. No access is shown to Long Lake Road as was encouraged as part of the general concept plan approval. 11. Deceleration lanes are shown on the plan. A detailed staff review of the plans and of the changes will be provided to the Planning Commission once all the comments have been received from the other agencies. Recommendation: As previously mentioned no action is required. Staff and the applicant will be present to discuss the project with the Planning Commission. Any questions and/or additional information needed should be identified. • N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\471-97\517-98.PC 1 • 4 Feb 11 98 02: 43p Wendell R. Smith 612-484-0899 p. l • li '�'' ` COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION N... 2401I2 Highway 10, Mounds View MN 551 " -4.-pxrtri�rsti��t 612-717-4020 612-784-3462 -FAX Please Type or Print Information-Complete Both Sides of This Form Applicant Information Name of Applicant AP MOUNDS VIEW LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Telephone 972-991-4484 Address 12770 COIT ROAD Fax 972-991-4494 SUITE 1170 DALLAS TX 75251 Interest in Property(check appropriate box) 0 Owner of Property � Lessee,Operator,Manager o Contract for Deed Owner a Other(explain) o Agreement to Purchase Applicants must provide evidence of interest in property at the time of application,and if you are not the owner of the property,you must provide a Ietter of permission from the owner giving consent to the filing of this application. The property owner must sign this application for it to be accepted. •roperty Description/Proposal Address or General Location 2430 HIGHWAY 10/LONG LAKE ROAD & COUNTY ROAD H-2 Legal Description SEE ATTACHED Property Identification#(PIN#) 083023230003 #of Acres 23.979 Current Zoning B-1/B-2 L fCJ,J Type of Application a Comprehensive Plan Amendment $250 o Rezoning $250/acre; min$250 max S 1 500 at Major Subdivision $250+$250 deposit* a Minor Subdivision $200 o Planned Unit Development(PUD) Refer to rezoning tees Q PUD Amendment $350 o Conditional Use Permit R-1, R-2$75;all others$250 oVariance R-1, R-2$75;all others$250 o Code Appeal $100 0 Develop Review/Site Plan $l25/acre;min$125 max$750 a Wetland Alteration Permit R-I,R-2 S150;all others$200 t$ Wetland Buffer Permit R-1,R-2$25;all others£100 o Floodplain Permit $200 o Other posits shall be paid to cover all costs of public notices,materials and atatfor consultant time spent in the review, �e research or preparation of materials associated with this application. The applicant shall be responsible for all reasonable incurred costs in excess of the initial deposit amount. Any portion of the deposit not spent or encumbered shall be refunded to the applicant within thirty(30)days atter consideration of the application is completed. Please complete the reverse side of this application. Feb I1 98 02: 43p We, .ae11 R. Smith 61� t84-0699 p. 2 city of Mounds View, MN • Dcvelo•meet A, •lication Present Use of Property _ P$ e 2 .11 Undeveloped/Vacaat ,-/ o Duplexr rwo Family Dwelling t? Su iFamDwelling G Business/Commercial Establishment Multi-familyyy DwelIBusiness/Commercial Q Other(explain) wirisi Industrial-Establishment Property Classification X Abstract 0 Tornens Description of Proposal BY MY(OUR)SIGNATURE ON THIS APPLICATION,Ie I IOWLEDGE,1�INFORMATION PROVIDED IS I R...3Y DECLARE THAT,TO BEST OF MY L'E A.NU TE- Signature ofApplicaat ........ 1 Name of Applicant(typed/printea) R. JAY , Ar • Signature of Property Owner f Name.afpr r .i ...� � T) r �� ,�, operty Ownor(tvpespanted) LOUISE O'NEIL �� Address of Owner t o L �^ Phone Number of Owner • — a ti ******, *3***s********if*******M*********41,0******taxa:4x41-4414.# ******VW*************.*********sss Date of Submittal FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date of Acceptance Planning Case No. 60assigned to: ,day Lirt,�t 120-day limit__________ Fees Paid; Account . Application: Chick# Receipt Park Dedication: • Deposits: Other: Total: :TIATAIGROUPSNCOMDE41F AlidSIDEu,wo rno fi00%COO Q, .I.L2I3dOZtd :MUNE' fi6fifiT66Z16�Qi t Z fiT 98/t T:Z0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION • The southwest 1/4 of the northwest 1/4 of Section 8, Township 30, Range 23, lying southwesterly of State Trunk Highway No. 10-62, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Ramsey County, Minnesota. And All that part of the northwest 1/4 of the northwest 1/4 of Section 8, Township 30, Range 23, lying southwesterly of State Trunk Highway No. 10, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Ramsey County, Minnesota. Containing 1,133,997 square feet or 26.979 acres. • • )SEPH G. BEATON, JR., LTT ATTORNEYS AT LAW VOICE DIAIL: 871-6604 3109 HENNEPIN AVENUE SOUTH PAGER (612) 640-6087 JOE BEaTON anulTTEn MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55408 DIOBILE(612) 791-2182 IN ALASKA 4,0113 MINNESOTAE_DIAIL:beato001®tc.umn.edu FAX (612)871-3694 February 19, 1998 Chuck Whiting City Administrator City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Moundsview, Minnesota 55112 Re: O'Neil Property Dear Mr. Whiting: This letter will confirm that the property owned by Louise O'Neil on Highway 10 across from City Hall is now under a ground lease to Anthony Properties d/b/a AP Mounds View Limited Partnership. 0 Anthony Properties Management, Inc. is the general partner of the partnership. R. Jay Anthony, as President, is authorized on behalf of Louise H. O'Neil to proceed on behalf of Louise H. O'Neil with the subdivision of this property. We appreciate your efforts and those of the city staff, Planning Commission and City Council to make this a good development for your City. We look forward to working with you in the future. Let us know what we can do to help. If nothing, please rely on Mr. Anthony for our input. Very truly yo rs, J►SE A.,.}3�:TO ., LTD. 0, B, . Joe B- .ton r II 110 I grant the authority stated in this letter to AP Mounds View Limited Partnership, Anthony Property Management, Inc. and its President and general partner, R. Jay Anthony. ' J (4) ' L Dated: r U 91 Louise H. O'Neil cc: R. Jay Anthony, Anthony Properties Via Facsimile (972) 991-4494 • II A w x •z \'):' •tcrZ 94= fjjr {riL cra i ir® �A •©..o _ .�.. n - A • ri-� ra _:.._ WIZ SS= WIZ Oat a. A : ilcrg . 01 A 211 ,. . . 1211 ` id • ' orifi Y az 7t1(rZ m . 2 7. i MIMI i -i .n.i .nx .11.1 ..1 x AA i "' NOSWIT iY • n T py y Z A + 11el 01 .:-7. Ni1.11.-11/4gbroitAl Sar 4Tittitan 040 ' wiiiiiiiii ariCAtilltill ' Q 4 4,,,...~--mmlie!cf E ef Ci 2 2 Z 2 2 2 I 2 2 4 40:00 AEW4.E111Eli =c2 CI IX Ul LIJ -2 • lij t 3EtE 3141 ERE z Illiks 11101 at►� Kai ..0 , ITEM =Ma =:311,_,� = �1 RIR 1 iiiIli �m I - a a 2 a 2 a w n aE1MEEEE i $ i i u. Q E Ejtik11F,Ht.7-triz......_ rim 4,,:i4. :. _i1.. .r1.,/ o`:':Ileti;li gjSi{t��'.�k?t � Sr ,IF � 4�.'i'iCd} ilLi .;:�'ss�'dt1:::i�iii i,i.s.. � la: S AFr •�iii_. ..,..,.- - En ::3FIEH- ww ' �prij'i : 1 R 11112111:12 ww116, rial 7.__ p-•pt � _ AA�AI AI A� LIR Nf �R :.: °.� '°� •• E °SOIi1il§IR I MC r� MI ��LC4rA . wK s 4oK1 ow N!Tn warriarci©� ! 7G II 1r L. a-;�r��� 1 .s � • t1lf �liiri •1K Ct tins, 't' GOOAVSI13 glitiIT -`C ( •• - ' ' tris =ultra• N - '• ♦ A w1 - ' , iii �"� �'�= 1' . 0. ms LII . . _~� A A A A -1 Al YII 1. MOM ^ 1.iK •� Al A me �lX Kligi ... rose �—.r Dlsr eiK' d � � di_ '1„t -`� m J I wI �I�I it gj' Q 1� -•+1 pd/8r �w._1,.��•••...iiit • oar • G. me A A A A A O I A!A I n f l i l R RI i!$t me , -- . 111!1is16!_i:Ia 8 11144..w. L1K t/K i tow A•_ A 4 A n ntA 0 .s on �. IS 1 .r Fru „„„,,,,„,,,,,iA! O 2 • ♦ A_12 Ale,A I lRlp.f R' �K 9 a A!+!Ml.. A 4A • RESOLUTION NO. 5104 • CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA • RESOLUTION ADOPTING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO MIXED USE PUD FOR COMMERCIAL USES ON THE O'NEIL PROPERTY,2430 HIGHWAY 10; AND INCLUDING REVISIONS TO THE MAP AND TEXT FOR DISTRICT 1; PLANNING CASE NO. 471-97. WHEREAS, Anthony Properties Management has applied for a comprehensive plan amendment which would change the designation on the O'Neil Property from medium density residential (3-6 units per acre)to mixed use commercial; and, WHEREAS, the O'Neil property is described as follows: Part Iying southwesterly of centerline of STH No. 10 of southwest 1/4 of northwest 1/4 (subject to roads, highway and easements) in Section 08, Township 30, Range 23. WHEREAS, Section 401.09 of the Mounds View Municipal Code states that the City has 411 . adopted the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Mounds View, dated 1979, as its plan for future development and growth within the City and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mounds View adopted the 1979 Comprehensive Plan in 1982 by Resolution No. 1467; and, WHEREAS, the 1979 Comprehensive Plan places the O'Neil Property in District 1 and designates this property,for medium density residential development; and, WHEREAS,there have been four efforts to amend the City's Comprehensive Plan since 1979, and theHr!! :r. : :..a •- - --e' . . �,. it r -i ounc m .. . and, WHEREAS, as part of these efforts, consideration has been given to various land uses for the O'Neil property, including: highway commercial, mixed use Iow and medium density residential, office park/ corporate headquarters office, or townhomes; and, WHEREAS, the existing Comprehensive Plan designation is 18 years old; and, WHEREAS, District 1 is referred to as City (Village) Center, and the description in the Comprehensive Plan for this district states that this area offers the community a valuable opportunity of creating a strong, vital, identifying community focal point. It also states that commercial and medium density residential development should be located in proximity to Highway 10, with a decrease in intensity of use occurring outward from the highway toward the lower density residential neighborhoods to the south and west; and, . City Council Resolution No. 5104 May 12, 1997 Page 2 WHEREAS, both the Comprehensive Plan and the current zoning on this property indicate a need to provide buffering between land uses on the O'Neil property and the adjacent single family residential neighborhood; and, WHEREAS, the current zoning envisions approximately seven acres in duplex residential use (R-2)in a strip along the southern edge of this property, and seventeen acres of commercial uses (B- 1) bordering Highway 10; and, WHEREAS, Minnesota State Law gives precedence to zoning where there is a conflict between a zoning designation and a comprehensive plan designation; and, WHEREAS,the O'Neil property is one of the most significant parcels remaining available for development in the Highway 10 corridor and in Mounds View, and presents the possibility of adding to the City's tax base; and, WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following findings that the proposed amendment is consistent with the general land use goals and policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan as follows: 11111 Goal 1. Develop a cohesive Iand use pattern which ensures compatibility and functional relationships among activities and uses. The change from medium density residential to mixed use PUD, allowing both commercial • and residential uses, will allow for flexibility in the City (Village) Center area. The accompanying description of the types of land uses to be allowed requires that commercial be included in the mixture and directs development toward destination-oriented commercial, rather than local convenience commercial. This mixture will create a lively, vital activity center at the heart of the community and brings a new, beneficial element to the land use mix in Mounds View. The proposed amendment places this ummercial activity center on Highway 10, which is the major travel corridor through Mounds View, and across the street from City Hall and the Mounds View Community Center, which will reinforce the City (Village) Center idea. The land use description requires adequate buffering between this property and the residential neighborhood to the south be provided by limiting the intensity of uses in the area 150 feet from County Road H2, and by requiring a 50 foot buffer of landscaping or tree cover if this area is used for commercial uses. Goal 2. Maintain and,where necessary,upgrade land uses and environmental quality. The policy under this goal directs attention to protecting integrated use districts (residential • neighborhoods, commercial centers, industrial parks) from penetration by through traffic. • The revisions to the text for District 1 indicate that, if commercial uses are developed in the area within 150 feet of County Road H2, that access to County Road H.2 be restricted to protect the neighborhood south of County Road H2 from through traffic. The substantial City Council Resolution No. 5104 • May 12, 1997 Page 3 wetland on this property shall be preserved. The change from medium density residential to mixed use PUD allowing both commercial and residential uses creates more possibilities for reinforcing the idea of creating a vibrant City(Village) Center. Goal 3. Preserve and protect property values. The requirement that uses within 150 feet of County Road H2 be limited to lower intensity uses, that a 50-foot buffer be provided if commercial uses are developed in this area, and that the wetland be preserved will help preserve and protect the property values of surrounding residential neighborhoods. Goal 4. Ensure community development is compatible with features of the natural environment and is accommodated without destroying desirable environmental features and natural amenities. This comprehensive plan amendment includes a requirement that the substantial wetland on the property be preserved from development, and that consideration shall be given to • preserving the tree cover on this parcel outside of development areas wherever possible. 410) Goal 5. Prevent development which is not accompanied by a sufficient level of supportive services and facilities(utilities,parking,access,etc.) The property is located on Highway 10,the major thoroughfare in Mounds View, and is also bordered by Long Lake Road and County Road H2, both of which are collector streets. Adequate opportunities for access are available. Water, sewer, storm sewer, gas and electric lines are in place in the surrounding streets. Comments from the Mounds View Police Department and the Blaine/Spring Lake Park/Mounds View Fire Department regarding need for service would depend on specific land uses proposed and would be obtained at the time of development review. Parking requirements also depend on the specific land uses proposed and would be checked during development review. WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that the comprehensive plan amendment will remove an inconsistency between the comprehensive plan designation and the zoning designation on this property. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council does hereby approve an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to designate the O'Neil property as Mixed Use PUD (Commercial and Residential Uses) with a requirement that development be limited to lower intensity uses in the area within 150 feet of County Road H2 as noted in Exhibit 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Revisions to the text describing District 1 shall be made as shown in Exhibit 2, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Uses suitable in the • lower intensity area are offices, single family detached homes, patio homes or duplex residential units -- not exceeding 6 units to the acre, and parking and landscaping. Development in this area shall be designed to provide a buffer of at least 50 feet in landscaping or tree coverage, and to restrict access City Council Resolution No. 5104 May 12, 1997 • Page 4 to County Road H2, if this area is used for commercial development to protect the single family residential neighborhood south of County Road H2. Development on the O'Neil property shall include commercial uses, and these uses shall be destination oriented, rather than local convenience commercial uses since an adequate supply of such commercial uses have been developed in Mounds View. The substantial wetland on this property shall be preserved from development, and consideration shall be given to preserving the tree cover on this parcel outside of development areas wherever possible. Adopted this 12th day of May, 1997 1 / Duane McCarty, Mayor ATTEST: • COIX6-12t --• Charles S. Whiting S City CIerk-Administrator (SEAL) NADATAZROUPSCOMDEVIDEVCASES 471-9TCCRES.CPA i City Council Resolution No. 5104 - May 12, 1997 Page 5 • EXHIBIT 1 DISTRICT 1 NI 11 .,„„.1 U U iL._ _J L_ LJ' - n o ... ,..IF 1 1 1 c • =.: /\‘ 1 11 1- 2 Cf '' _____. ,' . . -: i _ . t _ ,..... 0 .! 1 .---=:, � _ Inc r C , Hl�, a �.;r , - II -»-t — r Ml-4 : _ iDS1 ;; r r lir"' III gN\ jlSilf x PROPOSED LAND USE LD Low Density Residential MD Medium Density Residential MD/MHP Medium Density-Manufactured Home Park HD High Density Residential NC Neighborhood Commercial HC Highway Commercial IND Industrial - MU-PUD Mixed Use PUD (Planned Unit Development) MU-PUD (U) • Mixed Use PUD(Lower Intensity) MU-PUD(HI) Mixed Use PUD (Higher Intensity) S School C Church P Park/public facility NATURAL FEATURES` O Fioodplain/DesignatedWetland •O Steep Slopes O Tree Massing 'Approximate locations-subject to detailed review at time of proposed development. City Council Resolution No. 5104 May 12, 1997 • Page 6 EXHIBIT 2 District 1 is intended to become the Village Center, or focal point for the community. It is envisioned to be a strong, vital activity center in the heart of the community, where a complimentary, coordinated mixture of uses will create a feeling of identity and enjoyment for residents and visitors. It will provide places to live,work, shop and enjoy leisure-time pursuits. The creation of the Village Center will build on existing uses which include the Mounds View City Hall and Community Center, two community shopping centers, Mounds View Square and Silver View Plaza, the Silver Lake Pointe and Wildwood Manor senior apartment developments, the single family homes and townhomes in Silver Lake Woods, several large apartment developments including Scotland Green, Woodlawn Terrace, Timberland Ridge, Greenfield Estates, Landmark Estates, The Sands, and Mounds View Estates, individual retail businesses and restaurants along Highway 10, and neighborhood businesses like the Tom Thumb market. This district includes some significant natural resources and open space areas. Silver View Park, on of the City's largest parks, is within walking distance from many areas of this district. It includes an • attractive lake with walking paths, athletic fields,and picnic and playground facilities. There are three large wetlands, one located southeast of Silver View Road and Highway 10, one south of Highway 10 between Long Lake Road and County Road H2, and one next to the Mounds View Community • Center. Two of these are State-protected, and all three are protected by local regulations.ulations. They will remain important assets in the environmental quality of this district, and an appropriate setting around each wetland needs to be preserved. The undeveloped land in this district is often wooded with mature trees, and effort needs to be given to preserving as much of the forested character and natural • feel of these areas as is possible by how development is designed on these parcels. Highway 10 presents a challenge to the creation of the Village Center, in that it cuts diagonally across this district and the remainder of the community, and is used as a major route to move traffic through the region. It carries a high volume of traffic during commute times, and the timing of the traffic • tt r. •t. 1 t.• n.v. r. intersections. The Village Center offers the possibility of creating a meeting ground between the two halves of the community, which will overcome the division created by the highway. It is the desire of the community that Highway 10 become a boulevard that is rooted in Mounds View, and makes the community visible rather ignoring or being oblivious to the community. Vehicular circulation should be developed according to a ring road concept to keep major traffic flow on the periphery of the Village Center. Access to Highway 10 should be limited and concentrated. Relative to general use patterns, commercial and medium density residential development should be located in proximity to Highway 10, with a decrease in intensity of use occurring outward from the highway toward the lower density residential neighborhoods to the south and west. Development should also include provisions for dedication of land to a pedestrian/bicycle trail system which can . tie the various elements of the Center together and provide connection to a community-wide system of trails. City Council Resolution No. 5104 • May 12, 1997 Page 7 There are opportunities to enhance and further reinforce the opportunity.to create a Village Center in Mounds View through how vacant land in this district is developed, and through incorporating design elements along Highway 10. There are two significant vacant areas which deserve mention. Both of them are on Highway 10 and offer an opportunity to strengthen the City's economic base by taking advantage of the strong desire in the business marketplace to located on a major thoroughfare. • The first is bordered by Highway 10, Long Lake Road and County Road H2. This parcel needs to be developed in a manner which maintains an open face to the Highway 10, and creates a destination activity and meeting ground across from the Civic Center, so there is a concentration of activity on both sides of the highway. Possibilities include entertainment uses, restaurants, and unique shops. These uses could be combined with offices or higher density residential to create a"village center" feeling. This parcel also presents a challenge since it abuts a single family residential neighborhood on the south side. Care must be exercised in providing an adequate buffer between the active uses located on this parcel and this neighborhood, so the quality of life and peaceful enjoyment of their homes is not disrupted. How the development is oriented,the location of access points, and the circulation • system to serve this parcel are critical to achieving this goal. The district map shows two designations for this area. Both of them are for mixed use PUD allowing a combination of residential and commercial uses, with the area approximately 150 feet deep along County Road H2 restricted to lower intensity uses. Lower intensity uses would include single-family housing(up to three units per acre), and office uses. If the lower intensity area is developed for non-residential uses, access to County Road H2 shall be restricted and a buffer area of at least 50 feet shall be created which shall be in landscaping or native tree cover. • The second parcel is bounded by Highway 10, Silver Lake Road, the St. Paul Waterworks ROW and existing businesses. A Iand use study and market analysis for this area has been completed, and they included suggestions on the types of land uses which would be suitable for these parcels. These uses included senior citizen housing, offices, restaurants, and high impulse, convenience-type businesses. Attention needs to be given to how to create an integrated, coordinated development which related to surrounding uses, makes connections to the trail systems in Silver View Park and along Mounds View Drive, and uses the wetland • as an asset. It is important to avoid development which creates a row of independent highway-oriented businesses along Highway 10 oblivious of their surroundings. This parcel is at the point where the commercial development widens along Highway 10, as one enters the City from the north. It needs to be treated as a gateway area. To help ensure that future development is consistent with community goals, the remaining 04ndeveloped land should be developed on a staged, planned unit basis. The current state of the illage Center is somewhat fragmented. It is most important that this area become a more coordinated, cohesive focal point for the community through the types of land uses developed, how developments are designed, and the implementation of design features which will establish an overall City Council Resolution No. 5104 May 12, 1997 • Page 8 character. The community's goal for this area is that it will be a destination and significant place, which draws people and brings them enjoyment. Land uses need to be coordinated and interconnected, tied together by a landscaping and design theme along Highway 10 and system of walkways and trails. The types of land uses must create activity that is an asset to those living and working in the community, to visitors, and to the residents in the immediate neighborhoods within this District 1. N:IDATAIGROUPS9COMDEVIDEVCASES4471-771CCRES.CPA • RESOLUTION NO. 5119 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION APPROVING A GENERAL CONCEPT PLAN FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON THE O'NEIL PROPERTY,2430 HIGHWAY 10; PLANNING CASE NO. 471-97. WHEREAS, Anthony Properties Management, Inc. and Louise O'Neil have applied for approval of a general concept plan for the development of a 16-screen movie theater, three 11,000 square foot office buildings, and two restaurant sites on property bounded by Highway 10, Long Lake Road, and County Road H2, and described as follows: Part lying southwesterly of centerline of STH No. 10 of southwest 1/4 of northwest 1/4 (subject to roads, highway and easements) in Section 08, Township 30, Range 23. WHEREAS, the applicants have submitted a general concept plan prepared by HLM Architects and dated 2/7/97 which shows the general location of uses and buildings, walkways, _,) parking areas, access points, access drives, buffer areas, and open space areas to be left undeveloped; and, WHEREAS, the PUD stipulations attached to the general concept plan specify the maximum densities, minimum setbacks and maximum building heights to be allowed, and special criteria applicable to the development to this PUD; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: 1. Planning Application 2. Zoning Map 3. PUD Concept Plan,dated 2/7/97 4. Traffic Study prepared by SRF Consulting;dated 4/17/97 5. Traffic Study(for Restaurant Sites)prepared by SRF Consulting,dated 5/2/97 6. Preliminary Drainage Calculations 7. Available Utility Connections for Water, Sewer and Storm Sewer 8. Market Summary 9. Summaries of Neighborhood Meetings(12/12/96, 1/15/97) WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has received a recommendation of approval from the Mounds View Planning Commission as stated in Planning Commission Resolution No. • 503-97. and, City Council Resolution No. 5119 May 12, 1997 • Page 2 WHEREAS, the proposed general concept plan is consistent with the Mounds View Comprehensive Plan and the requirements of the Mounds View PUD Zoning District; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council does hereby approve the general concept plan for the O'Neil Property prepared by HLM Architects and dated 2/7/97, subject to the stipulations contained in Exhibit 1, to the requirement that approval be obtained for a development stage plan and final plan as provided in Section 1120.04 Subd. 3 and Subd. 4 of the Mounds View Municipal Code, and to the requirement that the following changes be made to the drawing of the general concept plan: 1. Parcels A and B shall be marked as restaurant sites. 2. The northernmost and southernmost driveways on Highway 10 shall be removed. 3. The driveway on Highway 10 at the center of the site shall be marked"right-in, right-out" with a notation that a full movement intersection shall be allowed if approved by MnDOT. 4. The reference to the pedestrian bridge shall be removed. ADOPTED this 12th day of May, 1997. Ci6O4X-i-)11& Va / • Duane McCarty, Mayor AIt'hST: Charles S. Whiting, City Clerk-Administrator (SEAL) N:IDATA\GROUPS\COMI)EV\DEVCASES1471-97\CCRES.00P ID V= a)Z o _ v _ V y 0 o c (] N 030000 -- zz > • 0 U) aci .) aWi � `� "� EE-- Z ,..... t) ..-"i i clioEco .n. c 13o Er; U zz r4 0 0 O O " " U U U U U V U V Q O co O a y y _ _ CO CO CO 0 a7 CO CO ca «.a L) > No e m �,a. co oc0c� ccrnmco � 3t-,1 " � 0 pp O .N...Ni = d � h 0 O et COON 1` to co ,,-, 0 � c0 Qm y = � Om y W t` � r � nje- CpCV � � U D x LIu •O mo " .t° a) 3h 4.) c EE as � 2j)41. " EeL � il c " c3 +� oa) = O A a 0 00 (.., m � y � to 2 0le caV m � p � -2 zI; co .`.. 0 W E a) .o m ca q ? ` c ! G9z =03 E. U A E o c.... h r.„ U W }' Z = cmi .. .. .L , c $ ti $ 42a ,5 a) o °a 0) a� cv c C tcoo " .h .ht � as a el w a• E o 0 N C 0 5 p= v a) ap CO .a: D N t'� a m C O J" 0 : a) (5ca , tim � a) pOp -' 0a) 0G) a) co _ c4 W N < c - 15 d d w ft o t,ay e a) N . w w ' CO C 0 o a � > N CM M0aaa ._ co ` o o e e :cG 1- 000aa5F- --a. . Q Ow .ti .. .B.+�- chi'4 4'2, r^ ) i►+' . /:1....ril f'\. t ZS ""' 1 1:4/ ti'��r��� t r i N 0 • a .-.1 r tsert,.,:: ''4 � ••/ y ' , • Sbis .09 ! ! - ' CoC pr 01J1/N»;� •I o / `� C I w �' J' 4. -mow+-F.wr N 0 t! 7r.,:. ,Y t .• '•.�..+ •+�-1. :1) Wr•? M.r•••}4.4y¢ .p f.4. 7-•--7-",. ! ST ._j O E 0 en :j1Ys3iq)k'f R .." s\.t'ir�e�=� / / IA ST 0 t. , t .I / '. \ \\\ __ Z C j:. - et' Ali a i ; /1/4,\ \\`\ \�\\ • - i- " 1..1.,:' `.. \,�• \•- \`\',,\\ '\\•` 1• 1 • •_ F 'F`i 0 .0en 6 117.1. xe -4,/,—÷,c).\\\,. t j ` `�.. t 4 r '_tea;'' .— c -c a. f+ - , \\ \\ \,\ `\'IZ ,,` •\ \ 11• ,—•S. VI Y' .0 s a) 0 ,v ! •• , \. .s•\ i.'i ie.-4-4,9-y.i-.e,t- cQ r-a • .. / \\1,`,..\\ '\ -\�\ O C, • \ '' ;*,",�. , M- _ N 0 • . • ' I 55('' j\ i • i k- `K f•l' co 7 d Q E • ,•C : t Cj� �. •J��J�'=. I .7 CO ' 0 w �y - - :. ; A. if 7A \ `Fi i. `,LI_ a o o 0 N a¢. •v. _ O N. O, N. ON �+ y O O j a "" 0., O, NCD Z O,G O, y O cow a) ett tt .c •D •G _ al r.fir _ e Q � U N a w C a) L , reeE C. 0.Z' ft d y O z = 0) �, C O w a a) :O ti .., v) h p i m .O h a) t o a W qp Q, O ). •a O .C1c) E i O C O O O� = .Q k- O h . m da O to N` , E V •; V O C m E " , c v., to ..0 Q b. _ O CO p ._ Vj y N h vJ v O m = d m � •� a � 6 w 0 m h O .. L. i co ..0-01 c O .Oci, L a. yc 0 v, •.2 G ilU O N O q X - _ ... 01 h al 7 y d = O = CO ' O O O Z O ' O tq Ol m m '�' •� zz Lri Nti ' X coZ ° 0 co 0. m to (.3 o 8 co c y a 5 E1E ¢ 00 213 m 'a Z a, LL h E '5 I1llUi 0 .gN $ O .c 0 CD o VO ,= `' O.•.. .., h 0, Om ._ _ _ e 0,co N " .►.* U '_ m = c woe `° h E mei _ $ _� � ,L °' o, E a' h A W � � o ti � N0 E E. Ea m o o - V - 1,42 O a) a .e 8 ay O A 0, -c .o Ht L. 5- 1- m o "a ft f m CO Co ° c a 1 z 4) -. mora '- nes m o = 5,.m O '° e m ' H a 0. N , '= = f .0 00 i ` aan � ct o y .0 as to 8 0 m € 'c °' coa ,E- .8 ca -8.) hmmm > *pcv, a, 0.'t a1E " Ln.= ;' o,` m O CD� a 47 0. .> C CO CO CO t m ° rte O Z .y O V C �° � ` '= O .� = a) aaa� � � h v,O E �CO 0 c, o ocftt, c .E Ih9lflh F� Omm > ,U) m61. It �a) CL 0 E ,E A . p m 3 Q) V O m d ... �, O O O O W a0 rt t g. el Z E" ,.a thuD III.. w � aI--- OCL �to o 01 ,o �.a N m COR CO h °v ti 0 A . w Q 0 o a m -0 4 o a cci a' o -0 o, E. 0) .- m 0 as CCoo E •a B m 3 N O m 3 CA tq t/) N H N N E C C E m E m m en m d d •C C '- C C •� y QJ C.) C.) � 0 0 E � E � c m m m as ca CC CO CO �E E �E E = c 1n CO O .- CO e' 0) ... .. m m ,C �, as OODtDtn e. CO Ce) mm mmma11) te, coen $ 1ChtiC oo � w0 sw 0 C, = IS.. CCe- pop Otis 000 0000 g � E-1 h C�) U) , u) �- p_ 03 .co = 8 G co Q O d O Q C = v, o U 0 = = = W E m U0. EEE w cQ m ` . i co U YC �X X o R tQ CG A a N � J �Q � Q) € �� EEE F CO C O� o m " 3 ,as c Q• O �c e"2"j w 0 a O O `i `-cc CD O A 2 e (13 U) C m �Jams c I FNM W J" Q M e U 0 m t C O,». J .- if, y 0 .O, p CV y "al C h 0 0 O O O CY) t pCj .m. cb = C -a = Ix. I- 0) � � , 'Q m � = (.) JW r 1 -� 'p m m 4 CO co 0. C7O � to .C � o m m A h o c a) .` - c7i 'E W '3 m o ;° W o o E O a) 2 m .a m -.. O O' -.W •j t ic 0 Z en et C7 � o.. F- OH n. > oi id cL . a co Cd `a E �N.. k cat— OCC 0 N a.. 0 C a% L. W m es. 0\ CD O • m = mcd ~�p L c ... mewy0) � � Lm cca P.. m E O)•O '- (� m > m o N w m C ` O v1 N C 1- N C to �_ ca ° m > a) — .04) 035. a m C ... m .-. m EL "+ a .. C� 0 E P.- TS 09. ;='• N a 0 = = a) =' ZZ '"- • E E = a C p = a— c NC ` .0 z Poco cm a'- �o coo -- c� � e� NmoCi].... E E "1 oL m m 'LL LN � y .N m .= WE ` .- U W U a O N L• O d X O N = N > x U 0 L 7 0 a ° W ¢ rZ m a m 0 C) • .•. m ,C N Q ,= m 0 ° a W D W 0 C C 'p m .�Wp 0. la a 0 '� aNj ` U «.] O enn 3 C > C _ v L W .mC ..r H N .� O C w O 0 w O U oasmoo . am a... m W .� ooc c � 52 c .� ti � � 5 m >. Z6 � cof 'nco ° C ao ff v) .cN al ° a, ... coma ».. .c Z.= ° m V W vi C PT-I 22 . o C '0 mr N N ° � -o ac m " V >.- Qu.' O 2 ay W m Lo co_ m 0 co C. C. 0 > _ •° 0 a) cu y m ° 0co II-. a O U cc .mcN COc pa .0 > a) 0 = 00 0- ..- E - co ° E- m N m •� o ca .... ... L co " 0 O m >. � en 3 � H oc.= ..! o. c .r >.°D o C 1. aft m m � � ° am W CO V W C 0 > o ca € C'CC N 0 C) 'C c al m = > _ W O •C m m E U �t o � _ � -o a L w o m a' m m W ,a m > m � c a am o ma. > 0 m — m W 0 m o'° p, E E 0L ° to :61 13 s `r' w _ W - `n. o- e � mm ° � � >pNe4C = cN . 3C � o .oy0ca0 rn 0 0 o CO O .1.s=o O L o"i,Te 0 > C...) .0 W m L O _C 0)L = m ° W "' d N N to C v) 6. _om — ,., m Co) o= o Cr) = N 0` m � mr F o N !n �. o O� m U W _ cp 'o c 0 C o mo ' ° ° mCV e ^- to we - on a ° '.0 = c > p , 00) 0Nm0a2mo °.§ Wcs. ° V � 2m 'o ° Ecaa 'C _ � E aL aN `.a 0 s > 0 c . . ow a• WN C. 0 V ° c0 °-0 r.. - 0 cI a = 0 . L co = o C12E� y o d t �w 0c as m x — N a c a . >. o • g ~- W >+ Omm• 03 mL m 0 C .0ONm m O 0° W a, : C m C N m 0 ral U o I m 15- m m a COo W o aa 8 C 2 0) Lo an 2 E � caaa0ng IDM0O U - NycL i aWoo 't -0mm1- vm .I- aacoEE0 04 a en oL > 6 NV VCf.-. ca0Cm0C•- UVi -. m m = co ° — .W ° t ° c !1WN WW •- ° om00 ° C 0 m a.? C3Uo .ccoa ,_ to: Zmoa oo - 3 ealloalaaEoy F- '0 _ o2 Q IV, L C -E W L m 'C L C C — O W o C N W N UL O — W 0 co O p) c W c� "' m � '' � L ai EL Q y o ti C ca 00 II .a m m .' O �II N V p;.. 4-1 > • NN m = ` o .° H cEc co cco m N RI ami m e cL c c c - c L.W mw � CO mor€ aO °>' W m ° -o > vi O E � as 03 W W o In yr o ° ac '0 a co t m w. O O L C a1 _ C as — c m ° CD I— = Ls c, m .: v m coo n o ° aO o c m cZ o = c € coca mo � a, 20eaa � oL o 'Q = 0L -5 (IT ' a WN a0 m m o a) Fp C V3 WH- re E � ,C � au y Eti c y �� C, W m c o c ° ° � .c aciO c c ° o ... c = E 'o a W c s C O N 'v t 0 N d ca O 0 0 a a C W 0 L 0 .4- o O N •� N CO N 0 2 c o C co a ° L co co m a 2c.) 1� oDa.. "i 6- 0 C •C co pay ° y m m cv �` 'C z E ° � Q ; o` m acid m � °>. E °' c > m Eo > r ° ° c m as _ o t ay W 0O. oha= o -- -0 .m =- w n O = n� mZ co" E EL22 — o E 0) a) co 612 ° 2 a.c m co ..g 2 0 m N = c a•- O m c L 'o 0- 0. 0 ` a•- :C":1 a > Z m = N w c 'fl 0 0 3 a, m O - c � -- c � Q > m W > m V O C cca � 0 .mc -�o oO CL .0 •C) a>i c .0 c c 03t- .a ° c 0 ai •m0 ccw °' °`aw to w 0 aoLm6' � c C) cwCO 'IImC,� .c � Cda � Oea vm, d0 -0y ° W 2 °- ate, '- 1:3 aajr C IS p `° H c aS C '- cC � U Ewt c >.� 0 OO 0 m c o ca ° o � �, o o > • o G. cn m a0 � .c i Z 0 o cco 0c = o- ca c � a; �a Wftp W cmi a0 co 0 'O o'o 0 � CL t. C •- ,_ m > C ,_ oCO UaccOm E o N ° -UC — im c o •N c o m m 0 ` ° c o 0 9 'Q o ea aL a6= '0 a0 m a= — 0 W c a, W o m c`�o U c W 0 ca H W 0 C m .E t) c m C 0 ° N W C a 3 W -0 a N .. > •C > '0 co .. c �.. = Q c •� C co r ° +� > O O .0-_ m - cc a . w p O C C - >, ° 3 C O� 00 , — .ow •c m m C p o ... c o W C m ° L. O o 3 C .0 a) c o Lz m m m L m U c to > 0 > o d 0 0• E 0 O 0 >. 0 a W c u- "' o Way N 0 0 0 as E p„ 0 O m o m a= W o -- 2 m `� m •c ° cca C 'c •II 2 2 = �.0 o •C o a — m x morn al CL N m a c ... .,. m � w co N w a d O r C a C d L m d °3 •0 0 C d 2 p C C N V C °-'N Z C7 co ■ Q rn o cn ca 0 ■ a � N � > •e = •c w ■ a g o co 2 co o o..N E a 0 .0 O c-.1 a ». • "o m0c ° c = cc —>, -E c mm ,_ v°, a O 0 m c m W : L m ° E to h v, a E ._ Wm a mo 3 c .0 >. c o .0 CL o pci y0 L '= 0 m d ca.— C .... L C m 3 o N 15 d C cC ° ° 6 Z •-• �+ m L 0. . .2 0 C O C 0 .. 3 = E .. o m a 'mQ ° _ ~ W m C E d0, 3 O a C, c c co O- C flh O o Saar CD m '-• 0, `o C aam2' m cr m 2ao .0 o o c UJzO N T) N y � E = S. 7-1 m — = = 0-0 a) t cr- .0im 'v aca ° m vO 1 0 > > ° Cam m E ` L Omm ? >, oCE c4 c.) o cca is y 0 = ED) = ' ° o ao O` .a 0 c QN ° - 0 .- a zzt� .� > �p Z E C m aG p d m 0 t6n Oro cn c CSL "g C -p oc m �, •cc.) ct1C! ° fs. 'c 0 m = ..• .. ca mZ o .. o m mv;� mm � cc0:71 a cu Is,,c� cm aa, mc mo, ° oca : o- o > QOO d ° c°) EcaCc _ _ ma% v _ 0 c as °'. s m- >, c w C ar v, o W e •°` « E o m i.v' aE C C 0S m -aac v, ° °' m 3F" E.. CD v, ao 0 o ODo > O c -0 viV 0 m w ° ems- C y 2, -..C, ; co V � c � — ° 'c �a >, o e• c C q `o E m m ° o c m — # o oU oC ,_ '° ° y 3 ' m 3a .c as a0 o) a) m >, > � m c - -o L •�' rn — a: m m 01°° W 00C � o ° ° 'DimE -- 00 ° °' mm Qmm � ° •- mcWrr > r .c .Q ... — c; L. L ea •- m L m U a E .c m ` a E m i � •- m f- N c •> o � ', m _2) 0WmcwmEaDccic3 aao ° � L 'c w (i .0O 0 3 ca 0 °' •3 W = ELmz .c � = c mat a ?. _ v, c .0 •0 g _ a) ,aZ .c 0. c1-15 3 0° m m — 3 00� m act co .6. m v cI -- N m � p, m a 0"-c m c E O —mw .c .- cQ 'c -0Zw 'DC C ' 015 .,_, m O = of 8 �' 2 mac a,aa - - _ m o = -� N = _- �, W O , w o Lm1a •p Em O1 ° ° 0 w � co � ▪ c gCv, = E Q� .m > n03 : 13 ° = 01- r co aLm, •v ; 3 s at �a u' E � 0 °' L ° 'cf- •- E � v, c c ? mWc = .. o � tlL, E-■ L C m m p •._ m .c '0 -o E o ffm q — .0 as m ci ca al > _ Cw '0cO O- O v0, C m > w .a c° 'O ° ° w . W 8 W - m c o m � "' w. m m E m - v, ca 3 c 'V -- c Er C c m C 6 C5m m m mc .mc ` c o C 15 C Z.— o Ec _ .0 c E ,� o ac17) c O p C � m W a _c c .- EE- ami °•ate > ° ca o, 0 vm, " � " 0.ia 0) a �, E m c e 0 o W C ° > E-" 0 � ccu) a) a) 2' mcmic € C)_ CC) a) . ma mta wm` 'yp3o t� - a. -9 > .0 .- < . ..° o co co 15i- W 0 C .° 0. o0o E E `" L m € mZ o aD 0 0 E Q � E- O a•c o U c, ao - ) A • �-'aH czl 0) c ° z p m C ° ` y m Oill z � m morn -- gym ° O m ;� > CDa) 0 ° al ea 0 co) O m o c ° d Q Zw c`a E E co_ 02 0 o •O m °' cco � Z 0I a�, m p-., d ° .c 'II 'WQ c 0 C t 0) e4 O t0 ., 'II a .X cb 0 '0 w m o ca m •- ca L vJ w ` O a... O Cai Z c y c W C m m c L. 0 C f- ° O 0 m a, y. C V o m ` L m m 'fl c 7 m L .c — LCC m C m O C a•Q N .N. m a L•, dl N E W m V E — E- -0 a >..c a) L o m 2 •- o o m c Li.) C a— m 0 .. •v ..- I•1- � m C o 7) '0 C Q, -� C a� > -) '000 .,c•- = � 0 3 0 y C H � c > 0 'accca > aco m ° 0Em ° Ed ° > Lpmm ° V • s E d -0 ° 0c, y13 ` .0oa.0QmcmmO. a.0U f m t m 0c -6 ;50000 =• � 6- Ccs 0 o - • - = 0 ° ° �.; 'co .:. >. m -0 .c3W ,= C ` -C 0 ° C m ° m N �.'a .° .. •L E .c cc m Cm L ca m _ -oc C o -o W � Oo -oWco D0 - 0mm .vwmaa) .00 mai `m � � m ° a °' •�� - ,. o •am � Cm � ymmc0- W »� F" F lamm c2vi we 8Jr. CO ° L ° o01:12.00.5 LC 6 0 .c-_ o a°i ~v2i 'o aj 0 c H ° m o °frf C.0 C C "' 0 m am u) a) H . caa. ` •cac°, ° Lu0- - Q `° c > 0aa° m .- _ o `4 ; 215 . a.0 cc o 0..H 0 E ~ d'= a vm, LL OL m h va! ° G C r. _ cq = SD C .- O W No p00EL . O c0 a'000 oN. rn % 0) m ° 0 ._. 5m > m co acs m ° U aa•ct °f a-- to m 3 > € 2 L o -C oa co . w .V pCD ri) ` O m 0 o Q, CD O w . c0 m C _ L Q, m 0 `- 0 N o N C w ca c u) -c) m 'E - N .-. ...in o w f- 0 W w 00 %- :" ,o°p 7 . « .._ •D 'II ° C ca C V = Q at 0 .W A .0 m >. W ca O O C_ O to .o ••••• ° O m m •- — m cII E O " p W O Co-' 00c -0 N H 'W .E V C N >.w L. j — L N O W V •" 0 p 0a O a _C a ` 0 _ p- N w ° C o ld ° ° — O 0 t O' c .."' W ,.,6- m p O fq C 'L m m 0 > E E C ° ea 0 m w C N m 0 .c R to Q, m -c 0,b= m C 1 LzLI 1p m .0 2 ° .o .c .0 0 m0 ° E E -- ° ° � � r CO) m C - m o 0 o 0 - 0 3 �n m o ` m a a C y m ° C al m ° ._ O p m m C. CT O O C — o 0 a0,- 0 ... Q d W O — Cw acQ � .. UL +•, W L .. (am 02m (1, ccac ;nr. c m =. ° m . 01.. c ca NW a R. Si 0) _ cu N Ca V c ca m ca m H2 c o m m7Q o .... m L C_ �UQQa c9 :II > C y O •C ° lII c CL (� O E N m •c a_ _ Ooz-) 0.. U a 'C _ 3 0 0 0 1 0 N ¢ c - L cQ 1 x 14 H m > 'c 15 E m y c° ac z m •a — c c € °co 0) E c nm mo ° Co mL ZM � O �' o E] In '6 O m 0 o of Q .0 0 . a W d c I- . 0- c`a N a u 1-- > O N a CA ID n " " o c w c m c m �' as °` c >. a) mL 0L ^- t0 0)0 d m 15' H N — Oc5 esr a) N -Q cn 0 W o oID r_ v, � � = H ca m - 01 � c a) L a•c a� c vi ca o- 0 � _ � ate) a>) sc � comc >, mmm o. yc0 = .natio 'crn � X L) U. 'IIv .c m m y °'en > m m CA .mc En `o o m m E O, aa°) 1D 2 •C � — .. " w C CD O L o m y .0 y " — 0 CO o CD C -- y L Lv; - - O � °i ° _n E .c > c ° ° yc13313 cu k ,c0E2 E -- „.; v, C.) C O y C C V J .0 C 'C.itz 'O Zg o ” C y H C O t *8- 2E "m < 00 CO C 0 m y .0 R U O t -1 0 L m 'C CC L „6 m m . m Cl" Q. aN�� in � -O � 0Va 3 ~ w � .� m o P. o —a°� 3 � F E o) tIImmomc0 0y 0 ..: o "t 145 a, 2a > w - v o -,c C N c 0 ° v0! o V O a) m a•3 m vm, m e E °n m 0 u •a _c'o,--cc. v 1. c ._ a) _ a3 ~ r a3 -a c) y - W m U — a Aww C 1II o f = '" ai 0 C o oc a5 .0 y —a°� L •� aav, � c 3JD N o n cz o) > v a. .5 0 0 -e y 0 L o �. Cl. p a f- m cr a) n.c O = G ! ..0 C c o :... L .' — rn - 3 0 -Cn c c� ai E 03 A- v) v) NLO m as n me m - 0asn ..,c y O m " n Cw y m V y O 'no y O 0 d V m �� C .0 0 2 c � = = mcaoo3Ec MO - 0 mo ..... o' � yr asa co > w > c ` �' c m c m o3 ° o � E acs c E n°, c C o cn m 3 > L .1°a f- m •Crft a, c.0 m .0 .O O° m J O >5m E a C m o m as -. C ! C 0 0. c0 W -0 c`0 n s. o r- m 13)__>.41 .0 C n m c .� > E L m »- >. O ` pp t ani .- ao) 3 � o,'= as do v c m 0.0 s c cnc mr 20 a) . a m t.c .o G1 "' asal > Ts _ � ~ � � m c m > t � -o o� m n0C a0i Q -•i 'm '- a L cc)•`- m = c. n . -C I"' 'fl CO2 L °O > a► 5 ° U ° o " Ce O W Co) •C CS .� {0 'aa)i o d x 4 .0 d 0 1!! .0 d 0 c m ECO 7 cD L C c n a A. w > •- H nm ast .casmas � F- 'vy � H ° avas � � rn-Q .- F- Wvn r rjj Q . .- 0) C " Q m r0 co) 4 0 O as w o y 0) t0 C O l0 L O c = m o a'm � m ad ` a ate) m r tw M •. Q 01 ••-•,_ € as am Wr y a= � >. c v y Z 3 ami o 0 O. .O Z V '0 ..' Q. O C- 0000 Oc 0. 0 LZ m '60- c-1 C a " E rn .a m C a > � � 0X 0 -c eh Q - > aa)) w � ..-- c0 w .C >. ac) !Q W 2 as O — m ° 0 oL 5 vi c EZ � o = a� nye -- y � • °� t € E n .6 n ` � m C " -� •a" �, ca) mica _ m '� E ° am ' o cas10as cmcE0.. . od 00 y as c E a. ac, o 5 3 o m > � E .N a, 0) m OC € o. c.) E cmas .� ca'C — yCC -0mmny � c -Cy •3 m � l� mC o co 0 OD 03 O m 0 0) m r- p•� O m >.V E- -- .0 n . C — V Lam. m c O C m E W O Q > C y _ c V = co !2 >, C ' r C o m 0J N C mLL mm '" E Ti V W Qh as 0 al 0 > ° 0 n.0 m co M (5 V ` as O > $ O o m o m 0.2 Q 0 � >. d y S m Q• ° ._C m ct � 0 CO c Q O L CD 0 m d C C :Q (/1 mV IV o• OL '0Q .0iAC mm0 :•-• 5� = 00 L O m ° t0 � mm � 0mo y " ymo � c � lesco = y .co c .. .coymQ3m a) .c m ms � � aQ m '�, o -i � W �N o 'c � •a; c E ui > c c C > o o ».. y m re -. o, n, :. o ,a 2 m Ect o E m E W 0 c c a -o E m � >. yL o = V Z n" = .0 •cu .� as no aa) co o 0w H CV O s- « l0 C co) " J .0 mL >. m C >. = QS m d+�' A U) a7 C " •O C 0 " C C .O V ..p .O.' m 'o cc N " w .2 CO 0 as ` ca V yw y m c € o aCEcv3 'v °' ° E0 .a ° yCm � o .° a? = E " cE I- CC 1- aL y c ca 2 m rn 0 W °; L — o) a) " 0 m m CO ° .:" ' .� � a) O .noDr a) E N N $ 3 v>) t o � C C L = � '� O m ` y � n H (� O D o ti.). m O 'On' L � m m U) CD C 0 0_O. 5I y c y C TO-> E m C �. o C w >" • 'C .. Q3 Of as N) C y m w m o a7 O ai C a — a. o CO .0 C 0 " C a) i Q as > •C C C ) L nEID — = m 0 0 CL CA 0 m ' Q O� ac4 as E ° f- o 0)� " —0 ac m E .c m am c a CO 3 ...axw o -0 ,i; •5a CCym ° -0 - 1- € Q, ecca1M0C ••• 0 COCW1OCC (g0 a00 nc3 0cc0) c -avcoc 3in ° ca3ym 'aoa ° '` ash c0 a) C — O y C 0 V •O m ` o 1. m W w .0 mL NL TO -eL o m y .c m 'co > O m 0 — 0 C O ° y 3 z M t- 3 " •- I- vDt- o . I- O -c •v 2 o.-c N - o neo ■ ■ ■ ONa m C 0 m ° C ., ON .c o` o o - .O •°v c m m ° a> � '� °` C ).- . L v°i m O at CD - 0 C O C - H v1 ... ort e•Nr 0 C O C 0 0 0 m V �' Lv, c ° -c O p tC a m 0 5 !SI 0 vJ • ° • Cf C .0 20C ° 0 •C >. of :tic!: w 0 0 z . 2 e) . m � 2 . o0vm, c CO a) 3 ° � ° `o a) c N > m N •C I. m V O C O E _ •- N 'v , " .0 Cl.r. [/] 8 .c ; o` 0 W .c o .0• .0 3Z o O m 'o .� E ow 3 -�°� �� v 0 L...To m E m ° m = � c cQ C •0 0.15 a>� c •��0 .- d ° vOO p r d N c w L C ..: off CCD "0 m m 'c CU 0 m • E W as un U U, ° - t °c .- v°, O v, 3 > as 0) a 1II � 0' ° E v E _,..._°":` , m` zza m c W as 3 - ca m cxi a) E asa, o m -x ° 'C - o zw � E �,0 c c E .r= = m E m � a) o 0 o H CL./ CU c 0 d00 A- ai ° ° oiE � v) 15a .c � mcc ya•- moo ° o p',, .� v a o 'Q ami m ° m m = = w o = W 'g m 3 aH0 h-1 ° = ° F~ �" a.. 02 .0 mHmECH , 0 .., m ' to • = a• aa) 0.w us . ,_ ... •- C Q m .c L 7 •- L 04 O O ... ►.� .-+ U O 0 m„.„,0200 - _ 0 c cw) t C 0=E. 0 OD.a ca 'o mo C >._ of 0 W aG > 53 Z0mo -a cas m > O rip W L c a c :c=a � ~ 0 0 m 15 ea .0.. 46.- E. 3 as c m m m c. Oz w > o O c• .0 o O C ;flla _ ,._ •- •C C) C m .0 asw 0 0 3 2 arno '`O = 'E N m � � - m ` 0).0 ° .nw °' = 0:14:3 : 4n = aai2 �>. m a) o` E m 0 0 •0 0 'fl Ta' '5.z c L .OG ai 'v m C L - i. a:c O ° C L O U eo � a1 h N �• � s m o2 o4 O m c .. w H = i c E o E 02 E o O a C .- cQ .0 m -0 y m dJ .- ` O O O vJ aac .0 O >. � c mw " w 092 = == t m :,). C •II = O C E . v, = - " c Y v, m ° � o € mP ai cal m tat '0° c as n•2 as w m -p �[r- -• m o = co.c Era C 7 -0 O m n• C aas > C ., = ` . C.). W M � -- as m cc m ca M c � •a = m a E c E. CD CU a) m •cLL a t- W O .Z'= m Ory W dm c m m To 0 Q Q11- at m ° L •m C ` ~m = 0 = 0- 00003 c V cc ~ C a 0 I- o = -. 22 • 0) c O 0 a •.c- •°c 0 L X r > 16 01 0 'C o O ... Y W • 4 211o. W ,�. CL L a) a: C C C `C "'.' E 1p C m ,0 N m 3 `�- al c •a C1 a c J = Q c ca • 0 1-. . 3 me � � :° 00 mE � m > `o ma� rnwo Q � � rn 0t x W > • t- 5 .0 •n 3 ca • i- o! C) •o° • -- •c -2 c°.) a °-) IL- •c-1 a� a c.0 Q Ow A 0 Lzi vi m a) as" m N 0W cV v5 C -12 m Xi C c L ` � � O c aJ _ _ O G.0 __ > 3 O o CU OD C L •,,,- _c> c "' Q >, ° c m ° cn H L mm q O L .y ° a7 '0 0 a = c m � a3 c v, •v v-, c 3 m 0 c - ;a m � c aci m cis? - °° > •Tu. .a) - _ �' a�>i �' c) ca -� LNas0 m CLvlO � m E is E- w ... c 0 - c mW �ao` ar ° E ° = E07, 13 � � aam 3 ,c ..- m ... o c M c� � v, a cn8 V 0 0 ~ ~ y .2 0 ca m C OE C1 C '0-) ) 0 m a1 ca.0wcp) rn a •N ° Oo •- L0 (13 a, 0 12 € ° c vcci rny ;i .6 - °)� o ° .0 UL 0 ` N p 0 Ycc ( CD0. E.0 .:QCm '" yr .- cm am - ic .0 oc~ a1 1, 14 v°ic � 'XoEm ,� c 0E L ` c Q c N 7) -Tu- m a - m o U L .. 0 a1 m ao ° o m al c o -' a E v, .o c � .r m rn c c- F� 'L � m 9. E m .a •- c 0. g y a 0 o cm .0 ;0 15 > .,- a1 w 0 03 or as O > az m E ° EUS 0.75 .c as m E c c 5 E L a m m •- c m > -' > n a E cc 1."6 § -073c > o m 0 mcw ). o> ao).c cmi am) o a 0 WW �'CD E E cad a ; � m d m •a .= .II II v°, ,.. E ? W 0 m .ccc•0 °c �' 0 cr -0 „ � 3 . 0asalc L .o° mrn I� Vo ,_ v, ' c 0 -- C H 0 L a ea -C C F" ° C) G •� of coN :, C "- as 0 V _ C ) •� co L H = ZL ccp C m •as � E � a) O al cu.- -c a) o o cQ v L l~4 � - C O d c0L a)• Z` o)-In " m y o 0 o) ow y E a; m a a po off' o > a c .o az a: yL am c N E m c E ° w � al 0 v) i_ mo •L� ° m a m .�'i_ ca! °) CD E a aid' o Ern 0 Ecai 0u) 0? ad Vy c W0 ° E >.,.- mUu) v; o wC3 •C Q w cQ c0 > o ii L O m vJ � c = a a7 � at 0 W •ani m 0 0 .0 ° = •E •v) c mo E E •0 -. y c E >. "_ 6. h m a00 o � co :51, ..' - E °2aic 3v) i� a � Emoc � coa, � Q` o` � .a s-.. X ° cacv0 m � oE m •- oy mrnrn30 •- com 0 = L cz] o m m a•- L c •C o 1.. •C m C m tiL o ° ° E ca ° a > co- ° z c°o z `'' 0 Ev) Q I- cc0..; o3E CO -a .- I- aaisca .aa. a.� o r- Qu) m 0r. a •0 .c N VNl ` h O, !� ... d O+ .r pp, � mm O c a) ;7N23 mC ^' ~ — E c al; C ° O C •W ° m m .0 0. h ^. O N C m N O am m C .c f- >` CT)%-0 m ... "� > 0 1.LC ` m N m as -Q L 14 m p N 0" E Z Z 0 CD .0 ::8- .. 0C w .0 " a y L w m m w m Cr) r: � E C C Z' C ° N • [w/l � � O C C > a m N a5 0 m m ..-• �-. CONwOmc >.= I-. vC ;� .� = � c � 'IIcaU c¢j � o N a1 0 N N a..- as E •.0 N •O..0 N ..... w ,°p ,II L w �^i O] V In, t E C cU �tn 1T5 ° .o .00 `l ° O` 0 V � > E.m m .a: � ,p P4 •�' ° m c, o ,�� E a m a�i � � 'nc '� �' � � � - 0 .., c o. c.w c aa) 3 � � p0 = E 'v o m fr cc CD :a .c m a a,.-. a = r2 axi ° .0 a 6., U 'Na °-•>- � w 'E m o "0 3 c � a EU •c = 0 o V � "0 >:.c ami E' H Li L 0 O O C aa)i 0 C. > ° 0.w .a O w ...... C G) L .o t .c c 0. 0 rw, '►��`"� c./ .«. r. m m p m C O m m 0 C ° �7C _ 1- 2 N > .° 0 V m7 en 0 NInc - .2 -0c -0w m .a c w a= Tx) m .o •,— C N a) N ... m — c m a.C -p a, . < m N > en m 0 m 0 0 m C Y C C v0, = > N E N m c >.1L- c m � � L = � � .� o asN "" Nm ° oo � mo w .o � c°.0 a �Or L� In O � C N ~ asp" 0 m d c _c e)e .. a� 6. E ° C aca ) C 2 = > cw N p L = m 'pw m ` m rc � m -� ° o 0 -- m om= � c a) -- c TO. L re N —To —�.lr n � O E mtQ >.N31, = 0O ° mm � c gNLmmC L0Z.II� _ 2 m > 'C 52... O 0 'p m N a m a -.S. m �a „,a) N Z 0 -aEm 'oa� mo CD0xaa' — N � 3 � ta � mm c x Cu C a0. E C . 0 3 m m c� m c ct 11.10 .„ .0 € mL eS cli o) W a � c°i '� -L »>r ° ° v � ' E Q 3 m -- • c X32 0 "- �'" C .� — ° CO m >. m CV ai 0 O E >. a7 0 m O ,O O 1-4 a) ° L m as N C a.E t ... ° 0).0 0 N _2+ N a x c •�'�,.. 'fl N O m m a. E = � N � a2 E 0 E aO C -Q V a aa' c as co p 0.0 1° •c > al C > o a mm•° = 0mm0 i... 0) oacaNm aEcca2 E . 0 1-, ._ L ` pN 'l7L �" z � c '_vNo m -6 -0cmio m . 0 ,._ 0c0 aa". :4 � a • < o.. ao.r = 20-0aa)).2 ■ 1L- o. CCDQ ■ i' . CO 0 0 �° Eaa)i .1Q ! `a a w - Y F w COc o C -0 a) m m ° C Y -_C 'II N O w m N 'C m C C) > ..- L Y m 0 3 m 0 Op C N .� E • O N N N O O 'C — N m ... 0 c 3 U w ; C dam; 0 = oC € 00Ec 'a .o6= .) :II •Ve € comm •- co a Sac) a) .cNc mm -- oaa)) occr.vcoami4) a? � 'ac0 U w -0 .0 0 0 IXas y — O C — N VD' -1 O .c >. m .IC N L m C "Cl C N O L m 'II C,0 ° p m E z � CTSooa) � .c° c� � m �� � ° o � �ca°'iE ... m m C m — �a N m a. w m C c O C ' O J C C as m O 0 •y E p L C N m r m •= 2 p c m ..r C E r m w c Q E m oc o o m m ,° 0 -a Y 0 c•c > me U Q >. o2 � c L = c L C jQ 0 N p 'C as C O. m .c 3 u) = as ° — a 1310 = 0 ..... NzNQm mCaC.) C E _. CL ° cm •~°vja ` oCP. x w .3 cu m c -0 2Cussca, as -§ a = mLO ); ~ ca) Y E"OEma ° E >' o ri ao m a) c2ccmrcm o ° m Zcc o . o m aYocas > > °a -c cocam ° c aN O ° c oN c — as ° es .0 ° cR — > =- LP .0m a1 E a ` ° Qfro > -n co :II .cm. ° WO L °� WLada, a C Nc e � 2m 0 ` vO O p p a... C � 0 C000 � CN - n Wo > a) w as a) Z' u) (a3 d .v >, C a) am o w a /:13 mJ 0 o,Co aE c rnco >ma a0 a) a o)c ° rn3Cm •_ co a, amm - 0001LaO .-E. >, pm N Ls ` A Y > c N t t E a) 0,- rnm > = pm4_ 0 1.,° of mgr Eom c • r. - .0o o � ° aa � � om � �'6- mI) acZrnEa) .>. y ca .c al EaQ OOCa) � O > O mCmpi _ ° Hya � p,c . a € O Q 0O �) 0mac � O > Al• m >. cs > � � , E a m0w c d C L a3 �0 m teom - a)NCme • C rn o - c °•� m at � � -o d msv ° � °a) aa) - :5 4.o «° W ° � L - fl- lII m vEl! 0. ` p ti L a0.., 7 OQm ° C eom 0 ° v �� m ` 0. m c Hci, oc- . cN ac Q a° 2 ) c)• > _ a_ m It ow m ' a) . 0 m0- E ° m ° -cc °� •vaw2 No C O NwWw Q1- O 1- O C O 1- ( E 0 1- -o 2 CO0 COC 0 f) F- w c U O N O. �'� O. ;m O C Z N I ,� - m II 0) NN tL CO o •..•' U UC ' O z - 65 -t11% m m � dy ' O C COa1 M QC �. 2 0 - ZN nmL y 41370i a. v mZ � wQCf0 �c o `0 O � o CV ` _ m • 5L mO Lay 00 NmE V ..a O 0D zzO2c •y oW a� S 00 .10 = wm 0 — c U O c ) V>. J O UC m - C L 'C OC ZOL asp m ° a -.L 0 z •-• ca aEr ,- L m 'C ¢ OO •C m m U «a Um c p I- 0 3 2 �. m rn C0 •y a) y m .: - d m ~ 1-- ' r- m 3 ... m mOOCc Z > orf � N � CN 'W .� WmF o ai c •c 'a c0 < W o U cw � ° Z - m pw . . y oasID � 0 z > COaJ U. N U_ ... aJ m• U d m a.='• o ani W o 0 = °-' •a = ° N m 0 A ca c ay as I .076 m E co' m U O w J 0 O y '• O •o y - 2 0-o-13 < a) = c.) a)m ..._ 2 U 0 cr a) 0- .JL o m C c a.Q) > m30 H t Wp ° .2 - -el tl' a •° J 2 oat mcg Q.c .c >-ID O I- 2 p y c w o E o cm-- m c Z Q 0 0 ..- as + L = am > E m o .a U) w m Jm aacs � Din 2 4-, f-' ca m y � m > = ,cam E �' E L L s2 _ - o . Z y aooy0c ca. F- " ca ,� CO W .'.v E " a�0 .- .2 � o < ea o 0 42) y m A m C CL a 0 of E 16 -' y y Q m L y II) W > c m U) 0 >" O a2 CO CD' _ Cad U) > mo m0 a1ate'122 E C cO •a0' � •-a mm yOmas .0 O o2 > _ mm .3m a - � � -c-. -c. NQ •c r- oW N Z ao ID C`.E. 0 ZC. . .c d iA 0 • j I- m 0 m w C >. c � m o w m an c 0 .c 01 as m as aa) , as c p •_ CEa = E•3 c3 ' I � cac TA 0 .c .0 covmicc m o a cam= E m as ? `'_ "> v ° co ° .° m n> .(7) c. � �� Q •�O N a) to as (D>. ci- c � .ma = ami a ani > aoic Q) ,.. .- .... =o - •- ° coo m E c m •a0 a 13 = ^ ..., w y o > 0 0.15 c o o `- � = c ao � 'c m0 as2 c � i, m y o m C C 3 U C O ° ° > -a C C of >..c EDE = ' 0 'a o m U_ as 3 3 .. ... 4.- •E +- m >. m.0 t 133 c c 0)12 3 10 o- atcc � • EmLrnm a �° " 2o �_ m �cmo > � o, s amo c = = E E2aLy c -0 49 8o �+ ' al al c S malum, o •.c-. EEo _ ooi41) d :� c fa � cm01caas a1.. .c .� asas - LNomm om -.) a'0in ca' >. 0 > ao .0 o .2 ' E E-y p y m O Gf as y 7 C .Q E SD m W O. c m w = c m E t6 U CCD MI > o cas � cV.yami' `o ,_ cal mcaioco to 6o , L>.Qy cEmo 0 ca E a) OL as � w .,c �� o m In COof Ls as vi c m c a a c0. - U)H0) . - m ' a~ m'- m •cEmc € a O u) oC . c0af case € .8... u) m = o -- a• afo W a•a ° '—.0 E - u) *c .2' a .a ) C wc ' IF. a) OI- .a •n. A Emm >.'vf3OO of € Lm • mc Cc O ;= CrnCCC 0 E•- p .c 5 72 3 C,rn w ` m c U �, 0.o .... . co c •'rC 0 u) E a v; L c '..� ,, O 2L c = m1L 0 cam ay O C O � •C y C o m y E y O = �aa= °' o` Ecc�a � smmmin .cE =' o 00 — _,_' ya3 w � > .� d 'as m "' L > L U as .0 C 0 = C «. of C >.— m E o m y m . .. E ».. .- = ol- U am me � _ .� :° .�-- 00 "; zzQ h aa6. Ly cEaovm, csacas aai alas � ° °' cH ° � mcm ¢ AD a y �` m rn as w ns �. o as m ». o a, co mm as a C c .� W o o uf � ..Y a0i E >• C 'N m E di'm Q' U' V y o m = Ea o. o E ca av0 •C a) L •C ` C y c O H y ... o0 ° of � '� ° y y o W m � ea a �� � c � •m y �� m —°y m U m wow ■ ao .°�fu) vma -ca. NIL- .cm a) acf � Ho NQ � a3Q'ma 0 € U' U)i ON m mt. O, t-- , • ten .... a or. m• 0 > 0 Oz ›. . zzQ mmmo-= Q � z 2 U o2co o.a BOO do oo r� , 015o < p0 1: ._ a U , co .0Q ° maa � ° 15 .-� - U C °) > P3 Oi 'U c z W co m ,v d 3 � -� co 2 Q O w a)E 03 ca al Z° O " Xow2 WW xZ g c 2 > Z m m f., z u. 0 c W /- Z w ° . 0 WE-' /.1 Q = a) (0) a. >. W 00 I-- oCU cr Q y 41 1" 0 --4. E" 1C3. z 0 ca6_ �° 0 'U C I ` O Q ° O o cal m °i o E a v- W it Q L =d W CO m m .a0 m Q ID U m P. w m . L- ` A m4 m .wy >. U O) O ... 1, m cac as wmai J � �- :° c E-.C IT � 0. uv° 'n r . 1 v ° c2 U a o rn , ... y ,- n 0 o c o ti 2 vi ao co rmo, m � m ami > �. � c .. a c -C W Q C ° p d y 7 L 0 O W m ZE NEm O U F-/ 0 0 2 tc � ° .. 2 2 � c � Z v g .s 1*I00) > � O rn m c 0 ."" Li-u_ 0 0 'o >.U Z c = ccs Qa 0a H .0 m m c 1.. .0m07 Z o 0 0 aaCOCj .c co LU ,.../ ' 0N .c m ° vcn1- .. -° cotm ) r Zto U t- o _ 4.- Daw0C Q en Oita. • ORDINANCE NO. 598 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A REZONING FROM B-1 AND R-2 TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PUD) FOR COMMERCIAL USES ON THE O'NEIL PROPERTY,2430 HIGHWAY 10,AND AMENDING THE CITY'S OFFICIAL ZONING MAP. • THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Appendix A of the Mounds View Municipal Code entitled"Specific Rezonings", the City's Official Zoning Map and the zoning district classification of the following described land are hereby amended as follows: Part lying southwesterly of centerline of STH No. 10 of southwest 1/4 of northwest 1/4(subject to roads, highway and easements) in Section 08, Township 30, Range 23. • Present classification:B-1 and R-2 New classification: Planned Unit Development(PUD) for commercial uses. • SECTION 2. This rezoning approval is subject to the requirements for approval of a general concept plan, development stage plan and final plan as stated in Section 1120 of the Mounds View Municipal Code, and execution of the PUD stipulations by the property owner(s)and recordation of the PUD stipulations with the Ramsey County Recorder. SECTION 3. This ordinance is effective thirty days after its publication. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 12th day of May, 1997. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 27th day of May, 1997. 1 • Duane McCarty, Mayor Ordinance No. 598 Page 2 • ATTEST: (321C Charles S. Whiting, City Clerk-Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: . Robert Long, City Attorney N:\DATA\USERS\PAMS\SHARE\DEVCAS 71-97\ONEILOR2 • 1110 I Ac)(10VED 6ENtlzoott__ oNcE/97-- l'i-E RAC i\ N 51 DENALK TO PROPOSED I PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE • • • • • I • PARCEL A \\ / 1/ .. . .\ \ •\ ••••• .• . . •' • \ : / .. / • 67 ;-I - ,• , N./ \ % I ,I - , • , - -/ c/ -\ ' -1)". I \ • .• A \• , "FULL SERVICE' ACCESS I.L. .. ,. ,, . ,. • '- 4-7-""\ . r - • :// /--'''''I 1 iiRdEL i; .. . • < „ 0 I... \ \• ..; ..1 r . 1416i4 P A. < ' •IM --r- ',106.,: _.1 'I - AYSOTTOM - '• — .: . 299, . fT1 •. 's••,. 1- — — - - — — - +1 - - ,. . --- .. ... N . L. - .. - . - -. 4,41M.0...) . i,,,,,von;:-..k...44,' ''' .., Th 0,„...,.„:?,.: ,..,, ,, 4 J I .' ,e..,- e .-*1 4.„ U— ..... ,V.IFIPAC.0 ' % 1 - • . ..• ":,...f,•••tik 1 N ,,A . " "" .. " .. W:VM 1 • ‘• "RIGHT IN ..., i fr77,,,q '1' • '..1 ., ..::---, ..,, ,,.. l RIGHT our ,. ... /\..,.,.,,,.,.,.,,.„:,....,...,)•...•.-i"."FieM •-,, tre , -- - - m 1 X" al _ Access . \ I f- - - •• - • ' : •.-Z- . :=3 •:=I 4= 1..1 404 • II Ti IT I I I f 47 1 1.- •• : *OZ. 0q91Gt OW& OFFIC.0 Efl-Der. orpice et.ve...:.... I 1 Y.1470 • .000 se .- 1 . O . '''":,71',000-61.- .n a ii40.0-5,. .B, a .1 ... 1 .... •• MAP POND*2 \ • . ‘11 FA il I k.1 I P ,i.. XVI I I L.Ird r '. NVAI I I 1 I LW, I .104 -' - --'' ;."'IC7 AIGILWAIL • ' .drAbo.‘1111rAW ' - 'IliiiirAltit,, I ....i . * ‘ .. .•.4111141111401110"Wiliii 1101111Kar.Gar ' :Ac • 110/4141111.41111// I' N. c COUNTY ROAD H-2 ,' SITE FLAN i,l, i! SCALE: I" = 200' CARMIKE 16 MOUNDS VIEIAI, M1•1 ANTHONY PROPERTIES Real Estate Drueia!meent E hmesiment I-ILM ARCHITECTS, INC. 12770 Coit Road.Suite 1170 JOB NO. 56047 Dallas.Texas 75251 02-05-c7 (972)991-4484• Fax(972)991-4494 • clik c-,r V10S3NNIW M3IA SONIIOW ��•. . \- T . k°tIl' 3!l1V3H1 N33113S SL — " g -...11,10.0 WINK' ` �1' asl SNI 'St/W3NI3 3)iIW!lb�3 L esa61 r - It ,'E _l'i 9-!I t I t ,fi R {l `t1 t f g �€ /lif i I: il il =II! !! ! 1 i ., {it jet 3 ir $31 �I jtf 1{ i LII €# Lfl a�tljft]I ta 3 g: I1:I1`] 4• jI I1 ji I iii III Tt If I i i Fir I AIm I1 III 1!If fit ; Pi 1 b f` 1 / // l� R IOC Im / / R 3Attl0 OOOM3003 -- -------_ / :i � -,\ /// vl�ocR� 111 ,, ., , 0 as r i 71 / " )'1 ' ;Ildil , ti / \// , ... • ..--.1 ,,' • /**Xi,7\ ,,,•''' ,''i ; 1i = I/ ' � del , / r4It q �„ • • gggggd ,o . Q q.'. .7 7 ...... ..... T. : `g OP 4,..P. .v -i ? 4a p 1 =I p 1 i- a la i , . • 4,/,-. -:-'-:-:. .1-! :: a t POLYPI avow 3)ivi ONOI 3.00d.00 S L J • Ida c lk .r•--s•, VJ_OS3NNIIN •• M3IA SONi1O W r 'm •^' —..--..-1 9 1: A -cS43i� �,��� 1♦ ®® 3il1V3Hl N33H3S SI �.. — f .`. ..,'<Irmo o04aaw ®® -21311a1=01183°v®s� SNI 'SHW3N1� 3�IIWat1� •..,.___- iiiel 11 Lr J r r } ;F• t fie, 1illft 1 it i`i S rt (stta i t !i;t!t I s {t !i! iIi ,,, {=ii1 1[ t i,! hilt(f it.i f 1 ivii h,, 1t t Lb �1oittc ! Jt t e•1 t' 1"! i II. 1 t'I'li E ( t iiSi , l t ! 1 ,+ i•3 � t . li it( . w.` 1, .,l e ! 1, t i1•t_ li ( 16 1 is �1 iii .11if ti ii 1 it i�l t $• t 111 itit ulli1 11 l 1111 iii lilt :1 i ii liWil# I'l 1 h;i•li li :If li #t 11 ,iii:i•Yti1t tlSt'E S 7S t itSi�(i 1S t#f �t ii t ' tte" i.' t11 ill' 1 ill 'i{t i1#1 MIN.'# II. I j 11111q t ! 3i fr i tai. #�# i° iiia � O� r,i It1i=1 fat �i(�t' it iii ii n!liM 'i,ll!Il ii.: ,}"ij,1',1 Itiig;;I'Hi 41 �i•'+t.` S1�i'tll'' `t 11 jt il.iP ai , ill MN ii1:i#ti W• ild i,11�'WA hi n(# i WA ii_tt;ltt iltb ii 1:idiligiiiii ii; IE it it;ll'Iii lllilid!!'!I,!II!,„1 I el 1 g. ' , iir i,4, , i , •,., ,, ; J —_ _—__—__—__—__ __ _I[.WitI _ .�•:-Qjiw! _ t 3AItl0 000M3003 }73 g�g,SJ���� \\ , Ae, d X444'/ I , t ���'.,-- , /' iT#/4/r2' 4 nil a� g • 01 -`, ,'' / \\\\\ / , ,•/;•,,,,,A At i ,.. 1.1. , . / \I / . /A.,,,,4111 xt 4 l. I . , ". - „ ' r:ailif \ 4 7 -_____ .. isAt ,,• • t ill i fifr— eisse t1 1111!ili ,� e����"r ���t / •'La V/ •I 1.p`4 Y tai $ 8 1 i a ,// ! /. 411. `j •► '+Nos .-jl_ ._._ ar L! . II= •" ,/ 1. 'Ili!' t 1- ',lint' atir ese _! �P / t.. �_v SCI av 'i� ;e .�A ► �► � ' !Sc • ,,,,A1:1 - . 1 0 tO 1 pffl i' ,^ `G@• �i� / I-' ,`7 e.r is `II 'I r x / r' `ill Ike _-� 4ri t; Ail - P • ,,, 's 1/ //1"-,,,,...--..-- ._-_-- —• ---..gmel+flprri,-1 Fkirrii11/1111111 y ail_ ./ , iii i !lig N iii 8 ���5 r\ _ .\_ , !t ti F P D 01 Iggii;!43 i' e .`�l �lp 'I u`- \ _. d� eicv.:40',. g ),iC I t i i!{ .e .t tj 43® 1�.���, I,� 0, e9I Hi I I Se�'L a• C , ,til ,_'\IPV I il 1,s1,i i, ��ic ,ill Ej, ;qis{ Egli=,..i !#gyp lgl I f '� Itllii t , iti t9 illilil, loo ° 't ilii It- iii!{t 1 I tr^ I` ' u? i oj-, , i \ 1¢ #•.QitOrlij1if-i#i; 1 ( . Sill¢` Fta� II.. I, i` --,!.. • ^ g��� i� ., ` til f0 li�ltiitli l;lli,li i '11 i +if�i t#E It 1� r�I.' is • ,� pit eiglit\..:__ ,....4-1-. ---1_ 1 _.----,----7-,------.,----I . =. ��/ _ ..`i�,_, L J • c nrs.t V1OS3NNIW • M3IA SONflOW r " •� �`'°, t l,—.., �e.0.3 p t'1 eu.u+.�.0 ��_ ® 7 .wows. - r iS - fn i ,- •„p� \• 3Fi1V3H1 N33UOS SL ••.- -� •wools y�uc'• ®® �t x�s� 3N1 -SVIN3NI3 3)IIWHHV3 -_._.=--.n•:' 41,g1 Lr J r • _{ t • i i Ii 3 iel ast if" €t' 9 .!1:01091,11 i = i iI i 1 1$ 3 1S 1 ! $ I, JI1I i11! JJ; ii/ 511111111 E`iIi fr I}t3E jflhIii!i)h i3g. cf3 !• F, i ri1lL 1. # ;JJ f! i ii Ii1' til .i.. _.h1 , I.t gF 1't fly y ,,i1 l if,at if II. 1fi iltli i#'E f #s!It 1°1 11!fill 1ii;i 11 1111 11611,112 ii 11 Is ff{#tit 111;11111 f 51 f Iff 11111 y y i V , /' K I I / • O /.2 • o' I / J ---- / 3AItl0 000M3003 \ \ / � .11( 61Iet' -_.•rami ,,, / t_.,_, / 'wl 1IPA a • ii _TP • ti u , „. . %J �'� i I i �� • ,,,, .: .. , r n 1 {i .,.. ..._. .. • :. , • , .. .., ., ./ ....., ..,...;„ sl 1 1 -S;'/ ,,..r,k - /.,". - .... iii �/� j Pig i :,., ,..— ."c 1 ". ,_ .,..•e/ I� `� ,, i¢' 014 t., ..1.._, I., ._ .. ., .:.4 ;; ;. ,,,..‘! {{ G 6 i ,-, i , 4 i sip ,/ ,.. .,N, ,, - ,,, ., 1 li ,., ,0. , itm i? o® a r�,r0•; r rII' I `� ..-. ,: 1E, i. R Ii 11PiF/i ':! , i :4. •`l� - • Ii i I. 1 _1, I / a ,h14 � -..1__,—i.-!_i ;: mac [ �,,c , GI •g u,'. X IV -- i :c.: 4' • tri •9iI [' Ii. I 1 I • ./...._,4-1—'-' !•. � CA i{ tot A i i i 1 Ca - of 4 1. gga. I z " / 'I,�1.�1rr lig''., i, 1 I t tt • I iii M11� k _:3r. _ -..-,��,-_.---- -.- •t.�,, sTi... ? ,. t , a • rcn. �J<BYON aril,ONOLi--.,,,a•s '1 ti � — L— - it • . MY VIOS3NNIW " M31N SONf1OW r '•" ••^' -w ..1......1 1 IT I 3H1V3H1 N33H3S SL = _ "".'&0,aus�o,ww fe '°'' »°a�'°°.s .3NI .SVW3N13 3NIWEIV3 -..�."_�..--J a is€ C r !1 I 1 1 B e °1.Bis Y61i 1I6i 1l 81xli Z_ c is i4�Q�{z `-v � 4 {,gY`3 �/2 12144 D s syyg p baa _ '..... ' 116$±8 516CiI Y51f3YYpis ' � C Gni-.: w YYYb11b1 ii `�y;�iU cii.c cd \e-: V ,Y b 4 4 Y b l b i. = t[gTNI W c✓G , I.�it ll -,-',°,G6: Y :.F.' i a i sig Off 1 $ •; g . 1 1 1 pa ill `ygy 1 EsGl s a iti di! 1Y II 668€i y 1,-.1 • v I11// ` W INrY�. !1�11 4 6y° 1 1 jI! 6 4 i 6 ! , ;. oot 000 k k 9a F �_ opo 1 1. g II1 i �: -,.....,000.0„...s,, c ar .. I I �0:«1 I.�,1. o �, 4444, i '4::,I1=' R' 1 I N ri S I I tootttt� ,rfro:.::;::::§. GCt OO OOilI, �I i �� I !C J 9i Y ` ' ° f jai 2/ ' I '. (.1f,`A .1 . 1 IIIIM d! i'fi �ii Iif ill/ t I "$ ii1 llJ1 lit ti! : :l li i ii p1� 1 Ili, fill 'If Li{ II 1q1 ,I4I ti I1 i=zi 1 k .j i I1 i lith.„111 i1 p, El i t 'i h ! 411 !Iii :Oil 1, iii. f Mil'''l Pi' I 1. iil 4 $ el is 1si`1 i.1 Ih F a 11. :111 I1 I fill t:'l� Ia ;fit: {i i it 'fI i `ii.1c. 1 I.i i 11!I ill;1;,,i gii; 1 1111;,1 �Ii 1i11;i it tilt 1Fi i 11 11'I 4I! 1I1w .fit a ' 'pi pill ji ! 1 � 11 � �.�� 1..4,.� �� {' 4 I i lI z ¢, ifthil it ,a1! iri 1 €_ii 1x ii{i Fiilt ilii i'I j.F}: i ; hii' i ; f ,,,1411{r 41,;111 . I i i= `till E;IIk i1 z 11111 `Ili Ii•;1I iliat li i i!! y f1E ihp Ili fi:1 1iii#st ii IFiIF F1I1= :Ii INF}'i =; i IT` i'Y i{3a teid1I{ i{�i ii, s ii• { iiiiIi = 13a€ el i 1 1a flip 14I4iFI alI:it1Elit'li 11.41$i`}i11l!Iilf I:1R! i,;01.11114 �INI pF11 ia;{ € fil;1 'z' 11hi Ilft1 { i I11 i. IIti ill Ili; i3{1 z ii 111161;iihs!hills i}i Ili Dtag i i1 Ifs• ; l•g;!Ai IL"piL!Ili!!Iii i1 IFi lit It 3iil E L Jl ..ion,mn mimmerl . ..�.,.. - . b'lOS3NNIW ' M31/� SONf10W m���r, 7""r.._____•"—"—""71 —mommar ----1a .....1.1sormommoomn •gum! 3ald3Hl N33a3S S 1.MIIMM11...="=2.... .,..,,. —., •:- 'ONI `SVW3NI0 2yIIW?db •�-.–..�.r.... igi wKeq�p�p4y r 7 • 81 I I II I I1 I{ t R AI. 0 111 1 ,/ : • �� = i - I!"!! .1! 2. // / ... / ,, ilibrA 1 EL.--€E€ MEC i / 1.14• f4°?*/'- ' • d55 � / ^�i'�rcl jr� l1 Al - 1!li * 1.`e ' r i -_�. 1r I' IIII % .'2 J' . / "�i/1 .. 049 7. t '. ./ / ,,,,// • e1 I III . ki I , „ .." .,,;.7N 4!J. .: .1 Ii I il, . ••• , , „ _, � •/°i,1,,,,,",/ ) Mi:L0r1P k • j/ 0°;(;;A4 '-‘g : \1 ‘. iiiiir ‘,:' r i II .,,,,,. ,, =E yC tt:Ccl p 1 / • i I : .EEELE :ESE � I Irl'''' . E , ER. " �;•_ L:14 CI'm l . o / ri Art, JE ='" 1- - =ik,F=e=t 0#1 ��` �1,'i `amu _�►..., / / 011 t\ v�`� .1U� 1�\..J/ o e_u) V, / , iitiallitti ,�'o i 11-` �r.��� ... cis 11C. AL. / 4..,ilii t�y7 : �..,;, — 11.411th 4.1. j /��/ r 'o I; '.?:psi ,G' II_' `R �fi i �_.'!. �'t17 q 1 p /'�//. <N �I,� IIS' r, col .ilniz :fr,Ar, r / / ./. /s `•*... ' i. / -rer//xer-/- , ,\�+�g I IAC '�� =i'1-�11 ° 11 / ill` _ T.-7. r.: •(�71°Orpik INo I- 1j — _ ' . •':1111 11 111 1 / 1/../0: I r: �R -- —_ 01 / • i /,),.41/41 il s 1 \ ,-;-.,.,. ;"---.. "1 =1-=-.1 . 8 ,,,,i'lw),01-;. • *))1, 1 .0 :,11141N1\k t\ L , ,I, 0 7.2 \,'‘\ \ 6, ,11 r 1 1 1Q , 'I j1 ��,„.. ,,,„.. /**1 '!I11I* . .,,:'..ii I r%� =ivt 11 1 1 $ 1 ,r 1 %l �! �I„! 111 ( ..,:l.', I.4'o? r ^ G l I 1: 1 1 I 1 l ,� / IIIo. .r, L 1 7\ ,1\ 6 1., \ et ►� f�„�, Q�fr� iijb .:�,5%p!'1c► '•l�; - a=te.....- .. e.-- I L. L J • _ a AW c 4._t =u s R..1- 4.t.1-111.1A11.114. x= A.1.1 .............................................__ r 3 -gliMi--='r.——i. • -• _ _-•._ _— - .• •_._.. ...._..._.�_— to .aaaMs+ormsan.*.Isamr.esa,a ,IIrV. mcs. x -.t --. c x .-xus,:sifs..2s, n x ,...aup o ,� i 4i rte. ., ,� �: ' - I I - :.:i _� _ : ,,;:, :i I� ..• > >EE $ 3;!$ t t.t.' -sstt,c c�q = �1x 1.e=s x1{, ‘ccx a r,,t- :-:-.7------7.- - �' - ': _cccx ' -,'-'..11:4-1,1-casc'Ts'�s eat°su_u�'c c't�-"�•"�: --- _.w . T Viii Iii /i:'i r ;11(1:4, ,, -1...'s_ �.__ i•++1. p -w''= �.,e_.._a:...e _- �%m y[ -4 Ii+ a.aI$rali aax axla 1_ :z _ ..-1,1,1...`",41, a;. +M3m?3IA d 111EfiE 3737 -.._ N C1 f 1is'.'`_ ' ,y=rf am {!cr - "•f�1zriz:m's -5'- Q m 1�' '€ tz r,rcm ex zxss�tgsa l .z -----..ter• .------•------•-----,._.,_'--•--.._ •'...4-;..-:.--:::.:=-.7..--------...__.__•. o /' / / •S. -':`,, -7---N... �1,8C --------------'---------------- i' -—-- / jam_ r..--.-..,,.,:,,---1,-- �_?N - { V // ,..Si • \ t o I /' r / vi I / / 1 •`t r4/ r(i I.1 I, VAI z i lila! // pec / ,+ 1 -M:.1�. 'Wc 1+. i-1• + S • ._i •I o ��i1Fi� // ��F I. /� �Ii� 11.E + a?: 1, 1. 1.Y�VJjiV I\ ', • � W1 , / 1 ,-••'• 1 1 . 1 • y I. 1l1-;1 V i // / T i I '1 1 I. Yr 1 + s, 3 f • V o /// 4:-P'/• �/J 1S+ 1•,,i yn 11 • -„ J.1 1r ,I Yat ilr ; N; 4, L, .t r' 1 Ii; �. /// ~`JC / c,,,,,,,4.1/‘ M Iii.i 0:11,-1..:. ) .1-+ \ 1 I I'1 11 ( • ;,Y ,�', Jo" // ypt / ./ i+.. ,, 11+•.1. 1,; i, 1 (1.1 1?'1 +: 1, �1. 1 •s. , io'� I'�` ccz + 11\ ' ,i t j 1Ir•Y1� 1/ �1+ t 1p / �; /•/ 1- `\I�. /I 1 1 1 .I .1, 1�.,. \.��,111111���1.I . 1 i c ' 1,>.,.: :: / 1 1, •'1 1, ri , '4 , 1/. 1,.i.., 1, Au 1 �. 1 1 \1 r,. i 1. Ai. 7i 1 A 1 1•+' // /" -/• \Ni 1 1.1 \a 1..-1 .�.1• 1.• Yl1Lfe 1 Y 1, 0t„��1_,,,�or2t_ '`` / / / ;/\ I i .., Y'it ' + I' ' I.1 1 1 1'i 1 1 I 1 t. •;ye'7W1rc0ai / :-I II't-'a 1' I.1 l' 1 i) 11 f -- / / r ,h. \ 1 1 1, 1 1 I / 1 —A•'o11' /N 1 ,;* / //i \I .•.I,,, 1• .11• ,,y,hl 1 1 ° /I II;t••I! v; / � 1\I 1 t. 1 ..1 1;1 1 O. 1 1. � - I-- - + a o // / %I/j V _- ,w 4l 1)t_1`r1-+. , ,II i • 1 1 i' : I ,'y, OI.W `T / // '47/ - '\" ! - -" t JI•_7 1 1-_7 I • F 1.•\ • i' f/• / / 1., :,./.„Av;\\11?:....1,:s 4 i 1 Iii e • ' 1 . , l• aieac / /. f Z, '.''1 i 1 , 1•: +. it! \, 1;1-r , VEINS 1t. ll 1 / //ell:\ 4' . if i i j I .1I 1 1I 1 l i jl i. Z/ n' • 1 i I• \�p I Y! h. In { 'i • a f--"� 1' I iI .0 **if,. / //,';1:4 t11 11•i/ I ' 1 r,11 i 4L• 1 s / I r I 1 ( 11 V! 1 11�'. A 1 1 t1 ! h 1 I i• 7 I' /' t •I •{+ i I f i I 1 , 1 1• �.'x.1.I 1 I ° / II ', V \ IU 1, Y y 'YI '••7�i Ii.t. 1 II / t' xl. , ./1/1 1/r11 \ \. I 1 'i t ' 1% S• I. t. 1 1 1 ' t !err r :. ,/I(i t •or!'i•l• �\,1 1. • 1,I 1 I • 11 , 1//1i 1, \f-if -S /4t,i.t c t"ia,� s- =— •'- r..--, .- e�v , - worn _;� pooa .,ala-y_bug{x<.m _ z p ^ a 1 S p {1 611j g' 'Ili ill!rYfYYisi 112., !° . !! $(Ill /hill!, 13:/Yiit iib Ill 1,,• 1 R eoeoeeg a.1. cel} Illi : ,'.�C;-' Y! t1 I J E Sti 11i i; p 1111111 . r{ i ••,se . .'OSWCa.cc.c , sscoo¢ac i!I 7i .. `J - "li r01114�0 i'• x1 ,'M t,,r'wl A' I I t' r;illti{ tty1I Itis 111;,",1,101/2%,.;d' II IUlll illl�;Ell. S ' t1''''i't'4 llt I '{ I � 11'11 'i'' llltlii i�ir,!,i i x a'�'5����;�`f�•s�i4'S'"a�;)�� 7 !111111!f .,xih - II I0IYIW *��f1 _: ' n � II III 0 I ' ZZ jiljlll i1l l ,,`x ' P 1i 1 1+i h Y' C:.IIM v ?! —:t•i# il`ii Ili'l i jfl{ li "':,,V101101 u+E'I j t1lt t (I 5s r' 1lliihi ljtii.`.ie",,' 1111111111'111,i1i'j�j.li� jt ! m 41 r • lily;llli;• I soll , ! CI 1.. I InJjI gm.;; f !I1 I , I• ! I . 1j 1 I, 1 •� g II Lu:.'.L+' O mI .lz lair' II, al I IIM i 1 - I. 11111111111. IS II'''1' • 0.11.111.,1::...... , 1 1 7 I I i I';•'.""i.I\ IN/ Imo 7-1 I• I li��!7I I I I 1 Ll i bi,1 MN Mi I: I 1 1 am II llINII IBM g :1. • «.nalIm / irml Ie <� 1 I i t I I� a ov 1-1-I 11 !I i �Im.?, C Xi 1,t, tr... z, I./I •/1::„,,,,,,,, , �I I �_I I fey 1 § ll Vil II li lii mi' 1 El MOP 11 flIifli'"Mill � 1 I ) 11111•111 i • III ' . MN : !aL il, 1 . III R' : Mar 17 98 04: 47p Wendell R. Smith 612-484-0699 p. 3 tik j �'I Z� . t11 _ sct ad!' • • -1 = \ ..1: . . S... . \ 11% Nt ma 7 1 ' ''l1Ri1111.:J11111111111r11MlNIi - - wa y iig • • 1 • ; ` 01 ,.,::, ..• 1 •,:::fi ii; )P.1 1 1 . 'J . 1:•!• • ;•'' ,I./ .- , . . • :, "if. .. .4,_41 , ,., . „, il 1 ; . , , :. .,,,..!..1,11. li 11 .,'I ' ('• . I:: ` : .. . , _ii:14 iii•.. El i ' 1-. . ii ,t . : • !;•: , rii .:. ... ii . . , . . .i6:.. IT • .. • 1 ... g. . % • 70 g- 1 i • '' • ... P - • 1 --..,.. • zg ? i '. . 'a. S - 4-f • -st • to-e 0-2 3-8 R. .• .. ..,.. , I e .. .el a. .10 . } 1 • . l'" . ;., .. . .......t..-6:51-, - - ,. (It g x Tsi • • . . ::V :.i Wit,', ,. Mar 17 98 04: 46p Wendell R. Smith 612-484-0699 p. 2 4111 • ''IY •• t 35'-0" N r-0" N fv 'ail ‘' i. 1_ m if_- t'iii►{ 1 • 0CFI . 44.1. . i ..-- .•1: a c1 CI I 1 -1:: ti41 1• a.'FQr id • DG]itD ZZv2 mz9> m n yz_=100 R Q:.�Opf�1p.la 0`m �O1,O -. ty7 D r Q z C7 C CU Ol l°'1r1i C fY v z•PI O IC;cn�.H vu i P.. N ',. G1Y v sy m 7 z v�O m,_ 7c O ZS la C'_N ar zDulwn�-�" r. i n 55 p) Tpm n •m� m rn �� nm r• Z.II f1{ T 7 �viD•r 0 m�C�1mm t rm ZO ZF� m m00i: 0 G?O?M?QrCm ... Sy 0 O9m.-cox 'o. Ze0 12rr Nm I K ne • ij 01 n n r Q 0 m Z r m a. E Z m i w.� 1, m O . 2 1 r • VHM1S aaWwwoo leIOads uewJleyo-o3 uas10 uuy alun- `RlaiaouiS XVd OZ69-£9L(MO aouaplsab 99£6-£9L(ZI,9) Z1I•SS NW MGIA spunow alOjta pno0 a�le-i £99Z uasIO uuV aline •anus MaIA spunoW;o ypou peon awl 6uo-1 uo puels1 ue y}lM swam;no;Op ul;y6u a o;;no clam yons pp;saj Rlgejapue uofOasja;u!antra MaIA spunoW;o yajou eaje ue o;aV Iii;no„ pesodoid ay;woij peon awl 6uoi o;;no gjno ay;6u! u;saj;noypM uone. slulwpe Apo ay; Jo Apoq pue Aq lenojdde and JO ueid;uawdolanap Aue ass o;;ueM;ou op GM '£ quawdolanap ay;ul honed jay;o Rue o;V • Pond paquosap anoge ay; w0.4 oJJe4 Jein3lyan Rue uolsnioxa*woods foyf+►uol;ej;slulwpe Ria ay;jo Apoq Rue Aq Ienojdde and io ueld;uawdolanap Aue eas o;;ueM;ou op GM 'Z • •„peoll Bunt!.ay;se paquosap Risnolnajd se yons;sans ajn;n;jo;uesajd 'Iel;ue;od pue apnioul mom uol;Iglgoid SRL •a;ls;uejnelsaj e se pe;eublsep pue peon awl 6uo-1 pue 01,ReMy6!H Jo JGUJOO ay;uo sl LOl4M 'V pond ze pa}eubisep eaje ay;wojl uey;jay;o peotl axe1 6uo-I o;ssaooe OWej;Aue;swarm uol}lglyojd ssajdxe ue;noy4M uol;ealslulwpe R;lo ay;jo Apoq Aue Aq lenojdde and ay;JO sueld;uawdolanea ay;jay;la Gas o;;ueM;OU op GAA I. •JueM;,uop„OM;gym se pessajdxe eq MOU IIIM SUJG3u00 jno `pa;sanbaj sV •ueld;uawdolanap ay;Jo ssaooid ienojdde ay;!gun pesseappe eq;ou pinoM swaouoo ino zeta s;senbei snolnaid jno uo peseq bulpue;siepun jno s!;! •anoge 044 uey;Jew s;UGWaaj6e pasodojd JO uogeowoads uafUM Rue anlaoaj;ou pip aM Awuns aa4 96/062 einpayos 6uqueld-g6 qor S$IBIGP-P0 Alll3n-£O 6ulpej6-Z3 ueld ams-i3 •peodl awl buo-i Jo Sea`06 ReMy6ly 6ululofpe pond Jamey;UGOJOS 91 eta JOJ 4uawdoienep pesodoid ay;Jo;sueid 6uIMollo;044 pOMalnaj aM 96/L6/£0 110 966E `£Z 43JeW :31Va L6-1Lb ON eseQ 6uluueld 06 ReM146!H 0£qZ RJedojd 119N%0 :103rgnS UOSIO a11nr uewj1e43-03 WIIONVZIOW3W aanlwWOOle1edS VHM1S :WO21d • eMdor Mala `6u1;14M 'Me4S AID 'i!Ounoa R;1a'g joIeW `uolsslwwoa 6uluueld :01 T • PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY,MINNESOTA Special Meeting ►„)>: ch 18, 1998 oun 30;.' iew City Hall 2410 Hi way 10 {bun 3 iew,MN 55112 r '. K s .?Fk =�‘!..1;?`16 1. Call to Order jknAL • /2 : 2-5 j. CZ 5 f '<u The meeting was called to order by Chairperson ' --. '-t 7:00 p.m.,Marc¢`i v,' •98. s s . ,r s 2. Roll Call ,F r y • ' Members present: Chairperson Peterson, Commissioners ' i :rooks (departed at 9:00 p.m.), Obert,and Stevenson. ',.<,:„',,,„,,,, Nf. syr Members absent: Commissioner Jaw"ston (e . �_/� n , tAlso present: Planning Assocta'"`Ericso ousing e pector Dorgan, Council Liaison . • Koopmeiners (arrived 7:45 ._>°,and o order D..9t Hix. 3. Citizens' Requests ad :' ,mmen 6 ii. iA4't on the Agenda. '= 6:-y .P.:.. pyx li .iii no ci 'r e is and co i ents. Index to Minut ; 3 x Page N ,',,h ?k!Ys^ ) �k Planni ,-,:rase No. 513 • pring Lake Road, Consideration of Resolution 2 No. °'-98, Approving <, oot Variance to the Required 30-foot Front Yat$ etback,Preferred '3 ii.ers,Inc. • Oaring Case No. 5!< •7,2625 Highway 10,7715-7761 Eastwood Road, 0 , .tion of' - 'lution No. 536-98 Regarding the Comprehensive Plan " i.f s m, 'ezoning Request for Walgreen's Development t,TOLD Development. r Planning Case No. 515-98, 5394 Edgewood Drive,Discussion Regarding Development 9 for the Mounds View Community Center(formerly Bel-Rae Ballroom), City of Mounds View. • . t Mounds View Planning Commission March 18, 1998 Regular Meeting Page 2 410 4. Approval of Minutes A. February 4, 1998 (Regular) B. February 18, 1998 (Special) f Motion/Second: Stevenson/Brooks to approve the Feb . 98 b _ • February18, 1998 (Special) meeting minutes as corrected. „,s-- •-4, . • Ayes - 5 Nays 0 %' •xG %, �' ,%�� . PlanningCase No. 513-98 'f 8265 Spring Lake Road ,'` ;�'� Applicant: Preferred Builders, Inc. ��%A, • sh Consideration of Resolution No. 532-98, App A. 't .. ur -st Van . 'Ce to the Required 30-foot Front Yard Setback. The applicant, Preferred B ,Inc..Lresen tH • Inspector Dorgan relie , ,. the Plano;a.....-<_,-er a fission Memo dated March 18, 1998. At theyh 4, 1998 ,k ., Commrsst , ;ar meeting the Commission tabled the first s eraa- :a,„'lanniri, s, ,-98,a vary. `ce request to deny a seven-foot variance to the Req”'.w -a .of fron a , !•ack. City staff had indicated the need for the additional time t.r' 'ance ,° • the builder's compromise to allow for a four-foot varianc . a a a ed 30' ' ont yard setback. ,41/nal action w,9€ :.;r: -d on the variance request so the City would be in compliance ; ; s• 'th Minnesota S►aaa':Saes that specify formal action within a 60-day time period. u J Chairperson P rson turned the floor over to the applicant for his comments. i , -,r),:‘,:.< i arryl Wes. erlund, representative for Preferred Builders,Inc., introduced the ::. o ss do to Bruce Fulcan, the independent home designer that Preferred Builders uses % a align their house plans. Mr. Westerlund said much time and effort had been expended trying to come up with a workable house plan or rework the proposed plan for the property in question. To date, the designer has had no luck in this process. Mr. Westerlund told the Commission Preferred Builders would be willing to build a • smaller home on the lot, but this would take an amendment to the purchase agreement as it now is written. Mounds View Planning Commission March 18, 1998 Regular Meeting Page 3 Chair Peterson returned the floor to the Commission for questions and comments. Commissioner Miller asked what the encroachment had been of the home ; previously occupied the lot. • Inspector Dorgan told the Commission the previous a o, e ha.;® , feet from the property line. ` Commissioner Brasaemle thanked Preferred Buz -rs for 0 time and - ME put in to researching, at his request, other home pl• ite. •Commissioner Obert suggested building an ove g :arage,to comply with the building foot print requirements, as opposed toWuunnde '°::'y<V ; - car garage. Mr.Westerlund answered by saying an averssem* o car garac be very close in size to an undersized three car garage s yws .h Commissioner Brasaemle state• • 44'wi.=4 ouse' I'$ car garage still has a problem because the house i i`-'1 as to b '0'from side property line,the garage only has to be 5'from the side p 8, , line "o the pro$€ is not the garage,the problem is the width of the house. T, ouse 12,,J o gara�� all would still require a four foot van• ce. • 'oxnmxsstoner �=enst . ~ted he "inclined to vote in favor of the variance because the x the lot' 4 ...�.ized when they bought it. It was also known that a varian" Q' o"_ $e requires• • - the property workable within the EDA requirement that a 1 9014 uar . •of hom y ilt on the property. .. `.�.s • • � •n•' • w'aae (� :• . • • • - • - - w • • • Com• 1061 ► • -•: l • • • *1ga Four: :�'0t Variance to the e • red 30-foot Front Yard Setback. :CdlS Commission Ort stated his agreement with Commissioners Brasaemle and Stevenson, except for one s'•int; that point being this particular development does not fall under the• • ity's Ho ff' Replacement Projects. 'eterson suggested as part of the Whereas statements, on Page 2, language should be added to the second Whereas that says, "No new corner lots would be platted with this substandard size." The only situations that would not apply would be already existing properties that are substandard and the home on the property was going to be totally • replaced. The Commissioners agreed. . • March 18, 1998 Mounds View Planning Commission page 4 • Regular Meeting Chair Peterson asked for a vote on the motion on the floor. Ayes 4 Nays-2 (Brasaemle, Obert) K£, The motion carried. ::', f '' ,��x =: A put the ent as Commissioner Brasaemle made his oppositions fol • jg builder in the unfortunate position of having to d•3. e dirty w41::,'" of a s $ . _ that the ED "4.eW ubstandar•" ' controversial variance on a property % � � The EDA, in a �„ ,� rced the builder would have a problem getting the vanan«:;y q;;.Fi. would not normally approve. Planning Commission to grant a variance on a prof-'1','- � , F � e first opportunity the opposition stat . ent �x#.,A Commissioner Obert made his ' �; �,� i they decided to go City had to do something right with the Hous',!,.. eplaceu around the rules. Obert said he disagre� _ .. .proach t' o em solving. Hwy- r t3aaS ,, ��tis-x �,.; ' Kx. • yN u7� '�'• �� bas Rs�� 6. f - .Planning Case No. 507-97 .; ,�9�.�;Roa• 2625 Highway 10, 7715-7761 Eas'.•. Applicant TOLD Developmentmpany . do of Resolutio ,,o 6-98 R to . ` omprehensive Plan Amendment and Considera °� Rezoning ° $est for Wal:>..7"-='";,II evelopiu ..-„,,,-•;.,..:-..., -, ' Company, was present. �y s n,���LD D tt s rzt- = P Y. The app ,'1,z;5:44,',;.,.'....,.Q 4 �:, 1998 Assocra e irks, , .Sewed t 'e Planning Commission Memo dated March 18, �.«. -,7',',(red . ,, . - ••8 Plannin� Commission chgavebac • `i:► .rma i• - . .. 10 x meeting where a : • r $•ata for County Road I betweenaccident data for the intersection of ' was discussed. .: o.iscussed at this meeting was , Highway 10 an r ounty Road I. Q ,, • pact to,,,r, `es of adjacent properties was discussed. iscus a ana mat on was requested that � can Planning : f 'x- 5 4 a: Y �.��• •tt s(APA)research division was contacted a'- t9 help shed some light on how the Walgreen's not v n recent would d uldt ime tpacme of the the surrounding neighborhood. The information had March 18, 1998 meeting. As soon as the information becomes available the Commission and public will be brought up to date on this issue. is still involved in negotiations with the neighboring property owners • TOLD Development e delvaluation issues. on how best to resolve the water drainage and prop rtY t ' Mounds View Planning Commission March 18, 1998 ipRegular Meeting Page 5 New information brought to the Commission and public's attention was presented as follows: Ramsey County will require that the developer improve the intersection of County Road I and Highway 10 by constructing a right-turn lane on westbokCounty Road I onto Highway 10. This construction,it is believed will pr-;° -nt s 'ing of vehicles beyond the proposed Walgeen's access on County Road I. fy; MnDOT has stated it will not permit the currently;$ :.•posed righ 'fit,415,-rw,, access ont• Highway 10 due to the following: ' • £F k 1. Its close proximity to the intersection of : • 'a ..y and county ro•'. •• — 2. The property has an alternative means of aar..esst .;,the property via County Road I. Staff has enlisted the advise of Mounds View Pu is 4 •r,Mike Ulrich, to assess the possibility of adding some type of traffic calmin •• o Greenwood Drive. This step could possibly reduce or slow 4,,44:77,8; passing •}• a the neighborhood. /b J?ti'�ffiR ', Associate Ericson told the Comms the •'• • .dvised staff that Comprehensive Plan amendmen quire a.::ublic :',_ fixi be held not only with the • City Council but also with thy' arming Cnnunissio,w erefore, no action can be taken on Resolution 536-98 unti .:. : � 'he Puli i'c Hearin t24 at is scheduled for April 1, 1998, 7:00 p.m., at the City Hal G - J Chap 'eterson floor ov 0 b' Development for its presentation. Be;7( ymut am, r •res-• k e for TOLD Development, addressed the Commission as • folio ` - t-turn m+ . a : 'oad I,as proposed by MnDOT, is acceptable with the develo• s ,• - will funs .1.>'construction. 0 D is of the�o tmon th t the issue of the right-in right-out access is being passed • v round from pers'o .erson at MnDOT. At first MnDOT indicated that the right-in right-out access s naiio would be acceptable. At a later date, with a different person from MnDOT reviewing the plan, it was decided the access scenario would not be acceptable. <.< > x Currently the •N is in the hands of Michael Christiansen, who has indicated the City of ounds V : as the right to grant the development access to Highway 10 over the MnDOT staff. If the City disregards MnDOT's recommendations, it is up to • s staff to object to this decision. This is important for two reasons: 1. Access to the Walgreen store. 2. To keep as much traffic off of County Road I as possible. • Mounds View Planning Commission March 18, 1998 Regular Meeting Page 6 . TOLD is recommending that funds be set aside in an escrow account to construct the traffic calming devices. Input from the Greenwood neighborhood residents will be encouraged. N,r /y. Associate Ericson requested that the Commission review the or. ::.' def it was drafted and review Resolution 536-98. Staff is looking for fw='• ck i '` `x� needed changes and also, if it is possible for the Commission to in•ta =�m ed if the a F �- a oward approving or denying the Comprehensive Plan Am:-- dment au ezo -�t H/" Commissioner Miller suggested several gramrnatg ges, which Eri e would correct. She also questioned the reference < a 's review of the process. It was suggested that MnDOT has not given a definit :' .awe € the intersection construction that would be part of this project. %ma45 mss. xsem,�.; Chair Peterson made reference to text thn, a� o a side' � ; he City would require that a sidewalk would extend t,•.� st,5. .3:a�;. •,`: 'ng Lak f oad", he suggested this ` n section of the Resolution would be =►�`place � $ •- 's earlier comments regards to where a sidewalk will •; •uilt ani • ho i• ,•?f a • cover the cost of the • sidewalk. r v• t 11111 Commissioner Stevenso= ;xed if th =were planfor a designated crosswalk from the Walgreen property t. a o``ry ds Vie :: `a i• l4kQ •^)i.4Y^ ....b' Sy ,ki)3. <. annissioner B . aem s .id he watt • •e very concerned about having a crosswalk mi• • o said, 'lla'-='-"V,t11,e street isn't going to cut it", referring to cars that are curren s ped-. '• 8 • ;zones. Commisstone• rte• venson stated that people go around the corner very fast at the e�rsection and County Road I, making a crosswalk located there very•angerous. • Chair Peterso :pened the floor to the public for questions and comments. l,„ y F ;� arol AT 50 Greenwood Drive,said she would not send her children down a sidewalk r 8$ es on County Road Ito get to a Walgreen's store. She said, "A crosswalk is not ss• make cars stop." Her opinion was stated in favor of having a sidewalk all the way to Long Lake Road. Gayla Keyes, 7730 Greenwood Drive, asked if the City had contacted an assessor to have an official evaluation of the impact that the Walgreen's Development would have on the • adjacent neighborhood. Mounds View Planning Commission March 18, 1998 Regular Meeting Page 7 Associate Ericson told Ms. Keyes the City has contracted with the American Planning Association who is doing research into what other studies have been done specific to the issue of how developments can affect the surrounding neighborhoods. The ':'":'ormation is forthcoming. s� Ms.Keyes told the Commission she had been in to 'th th sNGeneral's Office. .may'. :: They have indicated the City of Mounds View wok 4�" timately„ . ::. responsibR 4 for any negative impact that the development wo '_ have on t djawa ner $ •orho• r 5 ; a'FrF. property values. • Commissioner Brasaemle told Ms. Keyes that th � •rney would be the appropriate person to respond to her statement Chair Peterson opened the floor for discussioe- the Comr t a0 rh-:'ossible leanings on 4 the Walgreen's Development Commissioner Obert stated the peop e he h e i ';.. • eedback he has gotten from the community forums, indicates citize.•.-of the y$'m ity want any commercial • development that takes place $"in the to be r cted to the Highway 10 corridor. Commissioner Brasaem ' 'served•;‘, the W• = een's Development isn't strictly limited to Hi•hway 10, and tis e dile ,,4,„()evelopment • ked t r- _ _ ion tow . extent the City was going to allow commercial devti • •m o encro lYSieSi,dentially zoned areas. Commsst e. aemle: ,:.-_ . Arel to keep in mind the fact that commercial deve opine" _ Y e for the City's tax revenues. Commercial taxes subsidize the � Yf;:: r-� dential use o F s ces. Chair Peterson e• that access to the commercial areas is the one element that will keep ac the commercial. 'velopments centralized to the Highway 10 corridor and out of the neighborhoo•tesidential areas. It is not convenient to get off of a major road to access - ommerci siness. F� eyes made the observation that quite a lot of the commercial development that is going on in the City is TIF funded. She stated that these TIF funded projects don't add anything to the immediate tax base. • Commissioner Brasaemle responded by saying the Walgreen Development is not a TIF assisted project. Mounds View Planning Commission March 18, 1998 Regular Meeting Page 8 • Ms.Arel told the Commission that they would be setting a precedent by rezoning the residential areas to commercial for the Walgreen development. Commissioner Brasaemle told Ms. Arel that the this Planning Ca missi: j was very sensitive to the issue of rezoning residential property i.to commerce. t - .perry. He added that this Commission is not interested in encourage 2:41(ajor :' � o . a wide swath of property through Mounds View turned into comma.,iii prope ,, $ ies that h. ,4,- frontage frontage on, and adjacent to Highway 10, are the - :eas that ar-,••eing' • --• for • commercial development. �s'< ,--z-`,;:0-,-• -.- commercial \ ,;f H Commissioner Brasaemle said he is still undeci. . s m: � ;Walgreen's Development issue and asked the staff to develop resolutions to coy- -.g37`•e._, : ... oval and denial of the project. ", �'�"•:.:; `-2.,":.r,,, Commissioner Miller stated she, too, is,sti °un.-•ded abou ir .ject. yx '',3%,4?,; ",''%', e Commissioner Obert stated he isv`ing trou. enab`.. lion whether to support or to deny the project_ The City do `` need to.. e advan :,- its commercial development potential in order to keep the,._ 'f'' s servic+ at a read.: a• e level for the residents of the • City. =s" .• Chair Peterson stat • c.<ur ercial $ • .,A. , worth more than residential properties, th sr.ducing m• ;venue ` _ ...m a financial point of view the Waigreen's • 4 o$ �= nt •is v •'• . the Ci" ' fMounds View. The role of the Planning Co • g- , to try'. • = •ut which course is best for the City's businesses and the City's real• a. ..-..jThe two�ut-. .. e to be balanced against each other. He added, he,too, is undecidbu -• ing to = approval of the project. . _C Keyes and .t.:-:Cam€mission had an extensive discussion in regards to how the algreen's Deve 0 might effect the adjacent properties'ability to handle water runoff. ' T:::;', , M Commission_ tevenson reminded Ms. Keyes that TOLD Development has offered to . . •de the de ;elopment site in an effort to alleviate water problems occuring in the adjacent >�c . . - his work could be made as a condition of the development agreement. sociate Ericson informed the Commission that this item would be on the April 1 agenda at which time Staff would provide a report which addresses these issues. • Mounds View Planning Commission March 18, 1998 Regular Meeting Page 9 7. Planning Case No. 515-98 5394 Edgewood Drive Applicant: The City of Mounds View '" Discussion Regarding Development Request for the Mounds iew Comm uni. enter(formerly Bel-Rae Ballroom) •� _Y 2; Sh/l� The applicant, The City of Mounds View,was pr.-',4 nt x� h f Associate Ericson told the Commission the staff project is still not ready for presentation. In light of this development,staff is ecomm 's:n. that Planning Case No. 515-98 be tabled to a future meeting when mor <nforma; s;n ' a :_'labie. Issues that will need to be addressed wh- - •oes corn • ore the Commission will be : • 1. A possible code amendmen • 2. Possible rezoning to 40,47 a parti.,,s ar use i e area. 3. Development revie 4. Wetland alteratio• , 5. A public hea s a he Couu -�� • g i• _ •een 1 . n •• • •'ect, bu 4 ". approval has been obtained from the appropriate Cot ( andC • Commissio l e" S Benson ' ' ended pursuing a code amendment route to resolve the use _ - se Commissioners agreed saying the property should be left B-3. ; hair Peterson co rm with Associate Ericson that this item would be on the agenda for discussion at theuext< 'lanning Commission meeting. S' = r 'ORTS/INFORMATION ITEMS • Recap of March 11. 1998. Community Forum Meeting(second of three forums- verbal report) • Associate Ericson told the Commission that no summaries had been drafted of the March 11, 1998, Community Forum Meeting. The Commissioners, in a discussion Mounds View Planning Commission March 18, 1998 Regular Meeting Page 10 • earlier in the evening's meeting, gave some feedback from the meetings they had attended. M% Commissioner Brasaemle stated the following points of interest,;'••m th.-,Meetings he had Y attended: `. \ �f �-v,.-5,,,:,,,,,, ids 1. Commercial development along the High. i corrido ;5 - west regio 2. Future development of the Anoka County4i rport. -_; -- 3. Transit issues. �' �f ,, : 4. Trails along Highway 10. , ,, r 5. The Highway 10 Corridor Design Theme 3 y r9yr Chair Peterson agreed with Brasaemle's obse >ons -7:i:e`s."';'the following: 1. Residential developmentwithin 9 �r 'm 2. Infrastructure development. -ti f.i"' /'''''' -` � 3. Developing a downtown f -� 1 thin tl k3„• k, , g- View, meeting local needs locally. '” . • r z 9. CHAIRPERSON AND P ,. 1 G ckilVIIVILSS ONERS REPORTS No resorts were cons •er"a 10. t f, f, yr�F'A,rtier.,r There• s • $ 4 rther . b:. �,., ore the Special meeting of the Planning Commission - Chairpe Q.: ..a �a,l adjoum e- e meeting at 9:06 p.m. s. "�- Y 35H --,. '' �µi\r : { Re` ctfully submitted, . sk,'It<. t . `mac. • Community Development Director III