Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
04-15-1998
• MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION April 15, 1998 7:00 P.M. SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING,PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM, AND GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES 4. Approval of Minutes: No Minutes for Consideration 5. Planning Case No. 522-98 Property Involved: 2535-2585 Highway 10 (Moundsview Square) Consideration of Resolution No. 543-98 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Temporary Produce Sales Applicant: Craig Gilb (Merryville Farm Market) • 6. Planning Case No. 520-98 Property Involved: 2824 Woodale Drive Consideration of Resolution No. 540-98 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for an Oversized Accessory Building Applicant: Ronald P. Overton 7. Planning Case No. 518-98 Property Involved: 7581 Spring Lake Road Consideration of Resolution No. 539-98 Approving a Minor Subdivision Applicant: Charles Schultz 8. Planning Case No. 516-98 Property Involved: 7858 Long Lake Road Consideration of Resolution No. 541-98 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for an Oversized Garage Applicant: Thomas Lammi 9. Planning Case No. 507-97 Property Involved: 2625 Highway 10, 7715 - 7761 Eastwood Road Consideration of Resolution Nos. 536-98 and 538-98 Denying the Walgreens Development Request, Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning Requests Applicant: TOLD Development Company • Planning Commission Agenda11110 April 15, 1998 Page Two 10. Planning Case No. 514-98 Property Involved: 8400 Coral Sea Street Consideration of Resolution No. 542-98 Approving the Development Review for Completion of the 2nd Phase of Bridges Technology Building Project Applicant: Bridges Leasing Company, LLC 11. Planning Case No. 517-98 Property Involved: 2430 Highway 10 (O'Neil Property) Consideration of Resolution No. 544-98 Approving the Development Review Stage of the PUD, Preliminary Plat and a Wetland Buffer Permit Applicant: AP Mounds View Limited Partnership (Anthony Properties) 12. Staff Reports/Information Items 13. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports 14. Adjournment to Agenda Meeting * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • APPLICANTS: YOUR ATTENDANCE AT THIS MEETING IS REQUESTED. PLEASE NOTIFY CITY HALL AT 717-4000 IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND. THANK YOU. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * (Immediately Following Regular Meeting) AGENDA MEETING AGENDA 1. Review of Minutes: a. March 18, 1998 (Special) b. April 1, 1998 (Regular) 2. Meeting Adjournment 411, • REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Meeting Date: April 15, 1998 Staff Report by: James Ericson, Planning Associate Planning Case No.: 522-98 Request: The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to operate outdoor sales of produce at Moundsview Square. Applicant: Craig Gilb, representing Merryville Farm Market Location: Moundsview Square Shopping Center parking lot PIN No. 07-30-23-11- 0079 Zoning/Land Use: R-4, Regional Business District;Moundsview Square Shopping Center Applicable Regulations: • Section 1115.04. Subd. 2, which allows for open or outdoor service, sales and rental as an accessory use with a conditional use permit. • • Section 1125.01, Subd. 1 e, which states that the Planning Commission shall consider possible adverse effects of proposed conditional uses. • Section 1125.01. Subd. lg, which states that the Planning Commission shall make findings of fact and recommend such actions or conditions relating to the request as it deems necessary to carry out the intent and purpose of the Zoning Code and forward such findings to the City Council. Attachments: Planning Application, dated 3/25/98 Zoning Map Site Plan Letter from Paster Enterprises, 2/10/98 Letter from City Attorney,dated 4/8/98 Resolution 543-98 Background: Craig Gilb, representing Merryville Farm Market, is requesting a conditional use permit to operate an outdoor produce stand in the parking lot of Moundsview Square Shopping Center from July 1, 1998 to September 30, 1998. The produce stand would be open seven days a week from 10:00 am to 7:00 pm. and would be selling produce home-grown from its farm in Waverly. The stand • is a five-sided gazebo-like structure with a canvas roof, and is 14 feet wide at its widest point and 9 feet high at the peak. The stand requires no utility hook-ups. The produce stand was granted a CUP the last two years at this same location. Staff is not aware of any problems associated with this operation. Analysis: Merryville Farm Market CUP Planning Case No. 522-98 April 15, 19984) Page 2 Mr. Gilb has stated that this will be the same operation that was approved last year for this location. No changes have been proposed. The dates of operation for the farm market, if approved as requested, would overlap by 15 days with Linder's Greenhouses, which was granted an outdoor sales CUP until July 15, 1998. Linder's will be dismantling its greenhouse sometime in between June 30 and July 15, so the overlap of operations could be less than the possible 15 days. In the occurrence of an overlap of uses, there should be little impact to parking, as the produce stand would occupy only 110 square feet of the parking lot. Signage for the produce stand will be accomplished with small banners affixed to the gazebo base and lettering on the canvas roof. There has been some question regarding the legality of requiring the applicant to go through the CUP process because of its status of a seller of homegrown produce. According to the City Attorney, whose letter is attached for reference, the City cannot impose any licensing requirements upon the applicant. The City can, however, control the time, place and manner of the operation through a conditional use permit, so long as the requirements do not in effect prohibit the use or impose undue hardship. Staff has discussed revising the Code to allow such temporary sales (such as Merryville or Linders) as an accessory use. The City Attorney is drafting an amendment to the Code that will accomplish this. The amendment will be brought before the Planning Commission for comment and review upon its completion. CUP Requirements: • The criteria for approval of a conditional use permit appear in Section 1115.04, Subd. 2 of the Mounds View Municipal Code. They are as follows: a. Outdoor service,sales and equipment rental connected with the principal use is limited to thirty percent(30%)of the gross floor area of the principal use. The shopping center contains 102,035 square feet of building area. The applicant proposes to occupy 110 square feet of the parking lot, which is less than 1% of the building square footage on the site. This criterion has been met b. Outside sales areas are fenced or screened from view of neighboring residential uses or an abutting residential district in compliance with Subdivisions 1103.08(1)through(5)of this Title. The parking lot fronting Highway 10 does not abut any residential properties. The nearest residential property is Wildwood Manor, an apartment building for senior citizens, which would be well screened from the proposed use by a stand of trees., c. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source shall not be visible from the public right of way or from neighboring residences and shall be in compliance with Section 1103.09 of the Code. The applicant will not have any lighting associated with the produce stand as it will be Merryville Farm Market CUP Planning Case No. 522-98 • April 15, 1998 Page 3 operating during daylight hours. d. Sales area is grassed or surfaced to control dust. The applicant is proposing to use an existing parking lot which is surfaced with asphalt. This criterion is met. Staff believes the criteria for granting a CUP have been met. The Planning Commission shall also consider any possible adverse effects of the proposed use as required by Section 1125.01(1)e of the Municipal Code, which are as follows: (1) Relationship to Municipal Comprehensive Plan. (2) The geographical area involved. (3) Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. (4) The character of the surrounding area. (5) The demonstrated need for such use. The proposal is for a temporary produce stand in the parking lot of an existing shopping center. The Comprehensive Plan designates this site as HC--Highway Commercial. The produce stand is an appropriate use within this designation. The shopping center is surrounded by roadways and the • area where the use is to be located is 1,000 feet from the nearest residential property. The sale of produce is a typical seasonal business in a community such as Mounds View and it serves a community need. The short duration of the use will result in little, if any, adverse effect upon the surrounding area. Recommendation: Approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 543-98 recommending to the City Council approval of a conditional use permit for Merryville Farm Market to operate an outdoor produce stand at Moundsview Square Shopping Center from July 1, 1998 to September 30, 1998, with stipulations. James Ericson, Planning Associate N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\522-98\MERRY-PC.RPT , 1111 algitigin COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION• 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View MN 55112 S '?'4.11-P�.c�et''" 612-717-40`;0 • 612-784-3462 -FAX Please Type or Print Information-Complete Both Sides of This Form ==ationJ C /�Li_/ Gj ,T cj i /b Telephone 1-- 12.— 5—q" Y47 L. Address "7 Sn. / '2,c 5'4 S 1e. Fax I- en. - 6 SY - `--('34 7 W fr v�-(t, , Af n1 - . 5-57ga Interest in Property(check appropriate box) -- - ❑ Owner of Property ❑ Contract for Deed Owner I< Lessee, Operator,Manager ❑ Agreement to Purchase ❑ Other(explain) Applicants must provide evidence of interest in property at the time of application,and if you are not the owner of the property,you must provide a letter of permission from the owner giving consent to the filing of this application. The property owner must sign this application for it to be accepted. • Property Description/Proposal Address or General Location /t'trl/it Ail c U t.e t✓ Cd uAke. c 1.°fir i.hc} c en f1- III _ Legal Description AS3 S'Ari'$5 Al i cj 'IC Property Identification#(PIN#) 07 ;-..34 - -3-l I -CO-7g #of Acres Current Zoning /3— I Type of Application - ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment $250 C Rezoning 5250/acre, min$250 max$1500 ❑ Major Subdivision $250+$20 deposit* O Minor Subdivision $200 ❑ Planned Unit Development(PUD) Refer to rezoning fees ❑ PUD Amendment $350 - Conditional Use Permit R-1, R-2$75;all others$250 ❑ Variance R-1, R-2$75;all others$250 ❑ Code Appeal $100 • ❑ Develop Review/Site Plan. $125/acre;min$125 max$750 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit • R-1,R-2$150;all others$200 e Wetland Buffer Permit R-1,R-2$25;all others$100 Floodplain Permit $200 O Other *Deposits shall be paid to cover all costs of public notices,materials and staff or consultant time spent in the review, • research or preparation of materials associated with this application. The applicant shall be responsible for all reasonable- incurred costs in excess of the initial deposit amount. Any portion of the deposit not spent or encumbered shall be refunded to the applicant within thirty(30)days atter consideration of the application is completed. Please complete the reverse side of this application. •City of Mounds View,MN Development Application Page 2 Present Use of Property • • ❑ Undeveloped/Vacant ;r ❑ Single Family Dwelling 0 Duplex/Two Family Dwelling 0 Multi-family Dwelling Business/Commercial Establishment ❑ Industrial Establishment Other(explain) Property Classification ❑ Abstract 0 Torrens Description of Proposal '' 1 Lut �J . � �r�rlV• .• �� �_ W 11� � ' fi BY MY(OUR)SIGNATURE ON THIS APPLICATION,I HEREBY DECLARE THAT,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. Signature of Applicant C !1-z> 42't( Name of Applicant(typed/printed) • Gl t C21a1 e Fy G t l 6 ak Signature of Property Owner / • / Name of Property Owner(typed/printed) : !� � h'f'I . p ►'S e S cin 5+€Øn n i e kG Address of Owner _ - 22 Z 7 uh e'V t. C(+7 A✓e , S4: PAkL , _AN 5- 51y Phone Number of Owner C6 12.) 6 ,-16 — 7q0 I ************************************************************************************************ FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date of Submittal ;Pj-—J`6 Date of Acceptance Assigned to: Planning Case No. —3:g";7-(6 `1' 60-day Limit 120-day limit • Fees Paid: Account;# Check 4 • Receipt 4 Application: Park Dedication: Deposits: ether. Total: N:1DATA\GROUPS1CO,NIDEVIFORNISTE VAPP.FOR 1/98 . uv . 8028 Ju.,o Gd U24 dUL/ U1 _ O 8025 8018 8011 8000 8022 8019 8030` 8021 8016 8009 8006 8000 8001 8010 8011 8000 8005 801 8004 7981 7990 ix 7981 7990 7989 7996.CXce 7993 7990 7877 7984 7989 798 7970 7979 7980 7969 7980 7979 7980 7985 7970 7960 7959 7970 7965 7960 7961 7964 7975 7980 7971 7968 w 7949 7954 7959 7966 7969 7950 7951 7954 7956 7955 7944 7953 7948 7940 7945 7946 7927 f HILLVIEW 7950 7930 7935 7930 7917 7940 PARK 7945 7934 7931 7930 o -a 'rn N n 7901 [ n , 7900 L.N' N N 7900 7901 N N 7900 P► '901I a {• n 7900 v N I N n { I N 17980 7901 ) N I N N N HILLVIEW ROAD N ���caN� N 7891 N N 7880 O N i.: 7890 7885 N N ® 7889 v I v I v ®® '•UU; 7889 N N N 7876 Z 7885 7866 7867 7870 7869 7858 =� 7853 7875 7868 7869 7860 8-2 7870 N 7877 7854 7851 7860 7865 7852 w 7870 7857 785C 'V 7863�� 7863 7842 7841 7850 7855 7846 t 13...:.:'-EE 3 7881 7854 7845 784C :.'�0 7830 7840 7835 7840 �■:: g 7847 7840 IX + _3 7851 0 7820 7815 7800 7817 'p 7833 7832 7_---.--- x‘ 83C 7 �o 7815 7790 78097827 782C q1 1ryP ti 7810 8 0 7805 7780 7801 7 3 7815 781a 7817 4' 7800 7809 7770 3 7801 7760 7797 7800 7801 780C 4 .fr 8-2 7801 w 7751 7750 7787 7778 7749 7750 7807 R-4 w 7777 .ita, tib �,�^ 7767 7760 7741 7740 7767 7768 7739 7740 775 les,"..... gp �� 7761 7750 7731 77J0 7753 -= 7741 7740" nzs Ina B-2 7755 7730 7721 7720 7728 7719 7720< 7731773C �6., 7745 �� MN 7710 7709 771Cp 7721772C . �' llkii t c mum��,� -, ��, :............................. 7700 i:1f.+fr. 7701 7700 77003 4 Rs i.n PVA • _ _ jj. ! ) r..• 2Ip:' MB-3411 in In• 5 R-4 P1221,1. �' B-4 2x41 o 8-3 1`3 2539 rN � 2537 '"`++i 76� 7655 . ,7645 SILVER VIEW .i i n • ,Q: ,� ,tu.�.ir.1;v i AV iiitlillitliZi 1.+0•N v• OS0 i t r 1 ILN PARK N N 0 N ~-41' •_ oi N !7 i(orN /�� —��? N 2 N N O0N 0' m gI I. N N N N n N N 10 2 to ^ �' PF N N N N N • r1 0 u3.-cy N /► _ i N 0 N T N '7•4,4,44.4.0;00'7•4,4,44.4.0;00O h o N .L. PF N an N R-4 CITY HALL �r/O V N N 10 NrN i N N N ,0 N N rN NON ,,, IJ —" m O ON 2• of V mr 10 0 a 740 - N N 'T� r 742 Z VIEW OR 733 ::? PF r ::•.:.. .... .:i::':-:ir::..:..:. 0 0 740 ,1t.i 1 —• Zoning Map Case No. 522-98 Highway 10 -- Moundsview Square N4 Applicant: Merryville Farms • — — 6111��NZadoa3�V NO1 — — — ' 1— NESTAONM1f - • •o L�. _ -aI Irl-- • / i i— I C ap — — jj, / / / I 1— iS1N0L m — /:% / — //illi /��� L1507 . I '` %//% 8 tNNW1YlS3tl //// / M -i ve.+ai1 Wee= PEa yertiSiflg February 10, 1998 MERRYVILLE FARMS are entitled to run their produce market from July 1, 1997- September 30, 1998. Permission is granted by Paster Enterprises, owners of Moundsview Square Shopping Center and the merchants of Moundsview Square. MERRYVILLE FARMS will place their market/stand in the area highlighted on the enclosed site plan. Sinc- /el; / •- • Step anie A. Kirchmaier Director of Marketing Paster Enterprises 2227 University Avenue St. Paul, MN 55114-1677 612-646-7901 FAX 612-646-1389 470 Pillsbury Center `' > > 200 South Sixth Street !\f.i� 1E V Minneapolis MN 55402 -; (612)337-9300 telephone (Traven (612)337-9310 Fax t+ AR TERED c-mail:artysekenncdy-gta•en.cotn SCOTT 3.RIGGS Attorney it lav Dited Diel(612)337.9260 e-mail:srikennesly-gritveamm April 8, 1998 VIA FACSIMILE AND REGULAR MAIL Mr. Jim Ericson Planning Associate City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds view, MN 55112-1499 RE: PUD. Requirements for Produce Sales--Merryville Farm Market • bear Iim: Per your request, I have reviewed the Municipal Code requirements as to temporary sales of produce within the City. As you are aware, the Municipal Code requires such produce vendors to obtain a CUP from the City. The question you had raised was whether such a CUP requirement can be imposed against vendors of solely "home-grown" produce. The Minnesota Attorney General opinions I have reviewed involving this issue note that such "home-grown" sellers cannot be licensed.1 however, these opinions also provide that a city may impose reasonable police power regulations on the sellers. such as reasonable time, place and manner restrictions of such sales of produce and other farm goods. The Attorney General's opinions note that whether or not a restriction is reasonable is a fact question. Keeping the above discussion in mind, it appears that the City's CUP requirement would be, at least on its face, a valid regulation/restriction rather than an invalid licensing scheme since the CUP requirement imposes reasonable time,place,and manner restrictions on the sales of produce 'See Minn. Const. art. 13. § 7 (a "person may sell or peddle the products of the farm or garden occupied and cultivated by him without obtaining a license therefor"): Minn. Stat § • 329.08 ("persons who may sell or peddle the products of the farm or garden occupied and cultivated by themselves" while being exempt from the licensing scheme set up for other hawkers and peddlers). a.7F14t230 ttU125-47 1Z9—d £O/ZO'd 890-1 Ot£81££+ N3AY.9 9 d03NN3N—W01d Wd£1:Z8 88-eo-Jdy • end other farm goods. As has been discussed before, removing such temporary produce stand sales from the City's CUP requirements, and instead changing such uses to "permitted uses" in • districts the City deems appropriate, will simplify the City's dealings with such entities. I will forward by separate letter a draft ordinance revision which removes the se temporary feel produce stand sales from the City's CUP requirements. In the meantime, please free to contact me with any further questions or comments you may have regarding this matter. Sincerely. •'/ / / / Scott Ri SJR:s cc: Mr. Robert C. Long, City Attorney Mr. Chuck Whiting. City Administrator • • S3R141230 Ht1125-47 2Z9-d EO/EO'd 690-1 OlE82EE+ N3AVa9 7 A03NN3)I—word wdgl:ZO 88-80-Ay • MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 543-98 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OUTDOOR SALES AT MOUNDSVIEW SQUARE, REQUESTED BY MERRYVILLE FARM MARKET; PLANNING CASE NO. 483-97 WHEREAS, Craig Gilb, representing Merryville Farm Market, has applied for a conditional use permit to conduct open and outdoor sales at Moundsview Square Shopping Center; property zoned B-4, legally described as follows: That Part Lying Northeasterly of the Centerline of State Trunk Highway 10 ofNE'/. of NE 1/ (Subject to Roads and Highways) in Section 7, Township 30, Range 23 WHEREAS, the Mound View Zoning Code allows open and outdoor sales in the BA Regional Business District with the approval of a conditional use permit; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: a. Planning Application b. Zoning Map c. Site Plan d. Letter from Property Owner e. Letter from City Attorney WHEREAS, The Mounds View Planning Commission makes the following findings that the criteria for approval in Section 1115.04, Subd. 2 have been met: a. Outdoor service,sales and equipment rental connected with the principal use is limited to thirty percent(30%)of the gross floor area of the principal use. The shopping center contains 102,035 square feet of building area. The applicant proposes to occupy 110 square feet of the parking lot, which is less than 1% of the building square footage on the site. This criterion has been met. b. Outside sales areas are fenced or screened from view of neighboring residential uses or an abutting residential district in compliance with Subdivisions 1103.08(1)through(5)of this Title. • The parking lot fronting Highway 10 does not abut any residential properties. The nearest residential property is Wildwood Manor, an apartment building for senior citizens, which would be well screened from the proposed use by a stand of trees. Merryville Farm Market Planning Commission Resolution 543-98 April 15, 1998 • Page 2 c. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source shall not be visible from the public right of way or from neighboring residences and shall be in compliance with Section 1103.09 of the Code. The applicant will not have any lighting associated with the produce stand as it will be operating during daylight hours. d. Sales area is grassed or surfaced to control dust. The applicant is proposing to use an existing parking lot which is surfaced with asphalt. This criterion is met. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered the provisions from Section 1125.01(1)e of the Zoning Code regarding possible adverse effects of the proposed use and makes the following findings: (1) Relationship to Municipal Comprehensive Plan. (2) The geographical area involved. (3) Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. (4) The character of the surrounding area. (5) The demonstrated need for such use. The proposal is for a temporary produce stand in the parking lot of an existing shopping center. The Comprehensive Plan designates this site as HC--Highway Commercial. The produce stand is an appropriate use within this designation. The shopping center is surrounded by roadways and the area where the use is to be located is 1,000 feet from the nearest residential property. The sale of produce is a typical seasonal business in a community such as Mounds View and it serves a community need. The short duration of the use will result in little, if any, adverse effect upon the surrounding area. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the conditional use permit with the following stipulations: 1. The facility shall be allowed to operate from July 1, 1998, to September 30, 1998. 2. The hours of operation of the facility shall not exceed 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. 3. Signage shall be allowed only as affixed to the gazebo base and/or canvas roof. 4. Lighting for the use shall be supplied by existing parking lot standards. • Merryville Farm Market Planning Commission Resolution 543-98 • April 15, 1998 Page 3 BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 15th day of April, 1998. Jerry Peterson, Chairperson Attest: Rick Jopke, Community Development Director (Seal) N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES1522-98\543-98PC.RES • i • REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Meeting Date: April 15, 1998 Staff Report by: James Ericson, Planning Associate Planning Case No.: 520-98 Request: Conditional Use Permit to allow for an oversized shed Petitioner: Ronald Overton Location: 2824 Woodale Drive PIN No. 07-30-23-31-0042 Zoning/Land Use: R-1 /Single Family Residential Applicable Regulations: 1106.03. Subd. lg: No accessory building other than a garage shall exceed 216 square feet except by CUP. • 1106.03. Subd. lh: The combined square footage for all accessory buildings on a lot shall not occupy more than 25% of the rear yard. 1106.04, Subd.6: The combined square footage of all accessory buildings on one lot cannot exceed 1,264 square feet; if the garage square footage is greater than 1,000 square feet, no other accessory building shall be allowed. Attachments: Planning Application Zoning Map Site Plan Resolution 540-98 Background: The applicant, Ronald Overton, has applied for a conditional use permit to convert an existing, single-car garage to an accessory building, moving it 100 feet back toward the rear of his property located at 2824 Woodale Drive. The dimensions of the existing garage are 14 feet by 22 feet for an area of 308 square In its place, the applicant would be constructing a detached two-car garage. The area of the parcel on which the house and attached garage are situated is 36,595 square feet, or 0.84 acres. The backyard area comprises a majority of the lot at 24,607 square feet, which amounts to over half an acre. The applicant has not yet submitted plans for the two-car garage, but he has been advised about the 1,264 square-foot limit on accessory buildings. The garage to- be-built cannot exceed 956 square feet (1,264 sf less 308 sf). If the garage is to exceed 864 square feet, this CUP will need to be amended. Planning Case No. 520-98 Oversized Shed Conditional Use Permit Ronald Overton--2824 Woodale Drive April 15, 1998 • Page 2 Analysis: Dimensional Requirements: Required Proposed Met? Shed Setbacks (Front) 30 feet 175 feet Met (Side) 5 feet 8 feet Met (Rear) 5 feet 73 feet Met Percent of Rear Yard <25% 1.3% Met Area of all Accessory Buildings: s 1,264 sf. 308 sf. Met CUP requirements: Section 1106.04 of the Zoning Code states that no accessory building other than a garage shall exceed 216 square feet except by conditional use permit. With a CUP, the maximum area for all accessory buildings is 1,264 square feet. Section 1125.01 gives a list of criteria that must be satisfied in order for conditional use permits to be approved. These criteria are as follows: 1. Relationship with the Comprehensive Plan. 111 The Comprehensive Plan encourages the development and maintenance of residential areas so as to improve the quality, appearance and attractiveness of housing units and residential property in general. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property, 2824 Woodale Drive, low-density residential. This proposal does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Geographical Area Involved. 4. The Character of the Surrounding Area The majority of the lots in this area are larger than what is typical for Mounds View. The subject property along with those immediately adjacent to it are %of an acre or larger,some of which are heavily wooded. While the proposed shed is larger than what is might be standard for this area,the placement of the building 100 feet behind home hides it street view. The shed would be visible only to the two neighboring properties. The home behind the subject property is screened by the rolling typography and extensive tree cover. 3. Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. The conversion and relocation of the existing garage will serve to increase the subject property's value without negatively impacting the values of the neighboring properties. However,because the garage's stucco exterior matches the exterior of the home,staff would stipulate that the shed • maintain a consistent and uniform appearance with the house until such time that the shed is removed from the property. Planning Case No. 520-98 Oversized Shed Conditional Use Permit Ronald Overton--2824 Woodale Drive . April 15, 1998 Page 3 5. The demonstrated need for such a use. The existing garage is small,even for a single car garage. The applicant would like to park more than one vehicle inside at a time. The structure,however,is in solid repair,and could be retained as a storage shed,which the applicant currently does not have. The applicant currently stores yard and garden equipment outside,under their deck and in the back yard in the open. This proposal satisfies the conditional use permit criteria. Also in Section 1125.01, the Planning Commission is to examine the possible adverse affects of the oversized shed, which are as follows: (1) The use will not create an excessive burden on existing parks,schools,streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. (7) The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion. (8) Adequate utilities,access roads,drainage and necessary facilities have been or will be provided. The conversion of the garage to a storage shed will not create a greater impact on existing public facilities or services,on utilities or access roads,nor will it create an increase in traffic on adjacent streets. The increase in runoff from the larger structure is not significant and will not affect the • drainage system. (2) The use will be sufficiently compatible or separated by distance or screening from adjacent residentially zoned or used land so that existing homes will not be depreciated in value and there will be no deterrence to development of vacant land. (3) The structure and site shall have an appearance that will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent residential properties. The placement of the shed 100 feet behind the home will hide it from street view. The shed will, however,will be in full view of the two adjoining properties. Through the CUP,it will be required that the shed maintain the same exterior appearance of the house. (4) The use,in the opinion of the City Council,is reasonably related to the overall needs of the City and to the existing land use. (5) The use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. (6) The use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan of the City. Sheds and out-buildings are typical uses in residential areas, and allow for the storage of yard and garden equipment. Having this shed will allow for the property owner to store items currently left outside within a secure and protected structure. Staff believes that the adverse affects of this development proposal are minimal and are far out- weighed by the overall benefits. Planning Case No. 520-98 Oversized Shed Conditional Use Permit Ronald Overton--2824 Woodale Drive April 15, 1998 • Page 4 Recommendation: Approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 540-98, recommending to the City Council approval of a conditional use permit for Ronald Overton, allowing a 308 square-foot oversized shed at 2824 Woodale Drive, with stipulations. Elivirolm4fto James Ericson, Planning Associate A:\O VERTON.PC 1 trr 111 ©LIMO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION • k2401 Highway 10, Mounds View MN 55112 eg'trr-Partners 9.' 612-717-4020 612-784-3462 -FAX Please Type or Print Information-Complete Both Sides of This Form Applicant Information L. Name of Applicant RO42. /1 J',' C!'e i- / �,,., Telephone 786—6 9A Address Z6> ' woo-d ,4 pc Fax • 04504fJ i), /eIJ In)rest in Property(check appropriate box) Owner of Property ❑ Contract for Deed Owner ❑ Lessee, Operator,Manager ❑ Agreement to Purchase ❑ Other(explain) Applicants must provide evidence of interest in property at the time of application,and if you are not the owner of the property,you must provide a letter of permission from the owner giving consent to the filing of this application. The property owner must sign this application for it to be accepted. Property Description/Proposal • Address or General Location Sc.2 Z Y WOo dcz//e Vt Legal Description ,o/tw u a d Pa,•- Z.07z: ?,J Property Identification#(PIN#) O 2 30).3 3/O o y #of Acres ®, Py Current Zoning Type of Application ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment $250 ❑ Rezoning $250/acre; min$250 max$1500 ❑ Major Subdivision $250+$250 deposit* ❑ Minor Subdivision $200 ❑ Planned Unit Development(PUD) Refer to rezoning fees ❑ PUD Amendment $350 .N Conditional Use Permit • R-I, R-2,$752 all others$250 0 Variance R-l; R-2$100 all others$250 ❑ Code Appeal $100 0 Develop Review/Site Plan SI25/acre;min 5125 max$750 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit R-1,R-2$150;all others 5200• 0 Wetland Buffer Permit R-I,R-2$25;all others$100 ❑ Floodplain Permit $200 0 Other • • *Deposits shall be paid to cover all costs of public notices,materials and staff or consultant time spent in the review, research or preparation of materials associated with this application. The applicant shall be responsible for all reasonable incurred costs in excess of the initial deposit amount. Any portion of the deposit not spent or encumbered shall be refunded to the applicant within thirty(30)days atter consideration of the application is completed. Please complete the reverse side of this application. City of Mounds View,MN Development Application Page 2 Present Use of Property / • ❑ Undeveloped/Vacant ta' Single Family Dwelling 0 Duplex/Two Family Dwelling ❑ Multi-family Dwelling ❑ Business/Commercial Establislunent ❑ Industrial Establishment ❑ Other(explain) Property Classification 0 Abstract 0 Torrens / Description of Proposal �nVp eW[1 4 /9sX 72/'7 /00 / .5-001/-42.rt d us 2_ as s 7/-o e euJ /:44 , 1 BY MY(OUR) SIGNATURE ON THIS APPLICATION,I HEREBY DECLARE THAT,TO THE BEST OF MY IC'IOWLEDGE,THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. Signature of Applicant O Name of Applicant(typed/printed) F,VAa a QV e,,.74 iv Signature of Property Owner j a wt.e • Name of Property Owner(typed/printed) 71 Address of Owner S2Zi L000 fiZle U r /Pio f1HA) 3-57/2-- Phone Number of Owner 786 ` 6 860 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date of Submittal - U - 9 Date of Acceptance Assigned to: Planning Case No. 5'6- Llg 60-day Limit 120-day limit Fees Paid: Account# Check# Receipt Application: 1 S /OC-50/o -i 9 to 1S 8a.'v Park Dedication: Deposits: Other. • Total: • NMATA\GROUPS\COMDEVTORMS\DEVAPP.FOR 1/98 Site Plan for 2824 Woodale D*-'-7e • ( t Lot size 126.19 ' X 290 ' I ' 1 I73 o street 1 Existing garage set-back to side property line 6' 6" Existing /s ! Location 440 I 1 i• I ' loo ' t I I ' t I • I I Proposed location • I ' Set-back to side property line at proposed location 8 ' i I 73 ' • � It I ( I- - - - - - - - - - - - - - J il ..., Y _ (m ^ 7540 �y M▪ n n ' M 750' N I N 75001 I N N N N 7532 m A BRONSON DRIVE ® N.C.N`C • O 0 0 2 0 7474 7489 co N l 7490 7485 N 14 • 1 n n n n n : L'LI 17457 7465 7474 7471 747 15 ''462 74544 BRONSON 7456 a m 74477451 N o1781:, :::::„.,....... '',''.'' - II 7448 7445 -1 7452 N N 744 ..... 7425 7430 7435 7434 > 7415 7442 N ��� �� 0 7409 7440 I. vtEw 7415 7406 7405 7412 7405 7408 El n n IO •• CSI, 7385 7380• Z 7381 7382 7413 goo io v 7329 Ic• 7395 7390 N ti� N N •'�l 7375 7350 rn 7365 7360 7375 7378 H H.h N li 7365 1$1111# �Z 17340 7:50 737 3� :732° 7347 732C 3273111 73440• %11�$® {; :i? " . W Ia a n na 733: n u• n Ca 7325 7338 yb� q� �• .; - II + npoN oonN Oo 317 <� nn . 1 h ,n 30 n M M ON h n h N N N N N 731 co ',Ego, N N 7310 ^� n n to i . oy - R-2 m N v CO 0 co o N . ,o m i o m + o m 7295 "'^. `D V' n 213 O a r n N O O •c- co N o n N O O O O O O O+ O O W N N N N 2fl. B-i N N 5278 5279 5: • n n n n n N N N N N N N - – Q • .1 518 5272 5273 5 •18. 5266 5267 5 28 _ k ' 5260 5261 f: 0 7234 7237 725•• p p 5 t 78 5177 5254 5255 O 7226 7225 # 72:• 5176 5175 Z 5248 52450: ir 7200 7215 7190 5174 517:0 5242 5243 • 7188 5236 5237 - _ R-4 5172 st71 6231 i' 7172 718• 5230 - • _ 5 52 • 5170 5169 5224 522 • rn• 7150 N n G�5168 5167 5218,5221 es p oI O o n O1 Of co co co co nib O 5166 5165 5217 5 n - _ 5212 O n W000ALE 51645163Y 5206 5211 5 .. • o n N n fO 055116624551166! O 5205 • O N °" N N 7095 N N N Iii! 5162 5161 5200 5. m N .o ,.4 5 ••DALE DR 5148 5201 5 n 7092 ,4, n 7. 0 3 7085 070 5143 — 5149 • n 7082 G 7095 _I 7075 5140 5141 5 ] 7077063 O 0.4 5139 5132 51331 5 I 70727069 _ 7054 7057 X060 70 Pn m m m R-2 5133 5124 5125 p 5 7044 �R ' 0C.CREST 12_ 5116 5117) 5 . 7034 7040444144\ WOODCRFST05119 Z7026 5 7028 o N o A PARK N5113 W5108 5109 5 702' ee p��pp IH N N N NNPFN5107 5100 5101IX 2 5 7006 701 '® k .kq_\ �— 6986 69'Van 294.0 �`1�•� 5092 5091,8 5092 N 5092 09 5. t- Utik `�`"��r 5086 5085 O 5086 5085 5086 508 51 6970 Z 697 2932 . iii69� 5080 5079 5080 5079 5080 508 sc a to • 6952 6f 6953 N a •• 6951 5072 5071 5072 5071 507 507 51 I6942 0 6939VII N N lid 6945 6940 5066 5065 Gi 5066 5065 506 506 506 5 6928 5060 5059 5060 5059 506 505 Si —is 6929 9 111M, N .- o ® z N n f� 5054 5053 O 5054 5053 505 504 5( rn rn �0 6900 0— ! r N N N CO CO N 5046 5045 5046 5045 504 44 51 • Zoning Map Planning Case 520-98 Applicant: Ronald Overton N4 Location: 2824 Woodale Drive • MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 540-98 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR AN OVERSIZED STORAGE SHED FOR RONALD OVERTON, 2824 WOODALE DRIVE; MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE NO. 520-98 WHEREAS, Ronald Overton has applied for a conditional use permit to convert an existing 308 square-foot garage into a back yard storage shed on property located at 2824 Woodale Drive, zoned R-1, Single Family Residential, legally described as followed: LOT 93 KNOLLWOOD PARK ADDITION, RAMSEY COUNTY,MINNESOTA WHEREAS, The Mounds View Zoning Code allows, with a conditional use permit, up to 1,264 square feet of garage/accessory building on one lot; and • WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: a. Planning Application b. Zoning Map c. Site Plan WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the dimensional requirements in Chapter 1104 the Zoning Code for this proposal have been met; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission makes the following findings that possible adverse effects have been considered in its recommendation, as required by Section 1125.01 Subd. 1.e.: 1. Relationship with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan encourages the development and maintenance of residential areas so as to improve the quality,appearance and attractiveness of housing units and residential property in general. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property,2824 Woodale Drive,low-density residential. This proposal does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Geographical Area Involved. • 4. The Character of the Surrounding Area The majority of the lots in this area are larger than what is typical for Mounds View. The subject Planning Commission Resolution 540-98 April 15, 1998 Page 2 • property along with those immediately adjacent to it are %of an acre or larger,some of which are heavily wooded. While the proposed shed is larger than what is might be standard for this area,the placement of the building 100 feet behind home hides it street view. The shed would be visible only to the two neighboring properties. The home behind the subject property is screened by the rolling typography and extensive tree cover. 3. Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. The conversion and relocation of the existing garage will serve to increase the subject property's value without negatively impacting the values of the neighboring properties. However,because the garage's stucco exterior matches the exterior of the home,staff would stipulate that the shed maintain a consistent and uniform appearance with the house until such time that the shed is removed from the property. 5. The demonstrated need for such a use. The existing garage is small,even for a single car garage. The applicant would like to park more than one vehicle inside at a time. The structure,however,is in solid repair,and could be retained as a storage shed,which the applicant currently does not have. The applicant currently stores yard and garden equipment outside,under their deck and in the back yard in the open. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission makes the following findings regarding the criteria for approval of a conditional use permit, as required by Section 1125.01 Subd. 3.b.: (1) The use will not create an excessive burden on existing parks,schools,streets and other public • facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. (7) The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion. (8) Adequate utilities, access roads,drainage and necessary facilities have been or will be provided. The conversion of the garage to a storage shed will not create a greater impact on existing public facilities or services,on utilities or access roads,nor will it create an increase in traffic on adjacent streets. The increase in runoff from the larger structure is not significant and will not affect the drainage system. (2) The use will be sufficiently compatible or separated by distance or screening from adjacent residentially zoned or used land so that existing homes will not be depreciated in value and there will be no deterrence to development of vacant land. (3) The structure and site shall have an appearance that will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent residential properties. The placement of the shed 100 feet behind the home will hide it from street view. The shed will, however,will be in full view of the two adjoining properties. Through the CUP,it will be required that the shed maintain the same exterior appearance of the house. (4) The use,in the opinion of the City Council,is reasonably related to the overall needs of the City and to the existing land use. • (5) The use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. (6) The use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan of the City. Planning Commission Resolution 540-98 April 15, 1998 Page 3 Sheds and out-buildings are typical uses in residential areas,and allow for the storage of yard and garden equipment. Having this shed will allow for the property owner to store items currently left outside within a secure and protected structure. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the conditional use permit with the following stipulations: 1. The conditional use permit shall be recorded with Ramsey County within 60 days of City Council approval, and a receipt of such recording shall be provided to the City of Mounds View. 2. The shed shall be maintained into the future so as to provide a uniform and consistent building appearance with the existing house. 3. The shed shall not be used for living space or other uses not allowed by the district in which it is located or by the Zoning Code. Should the use change for which the permit was granted, the conditional use permit shall become null and void. 4. No other sheds or accessory buildings, other than the proposed garage, shall be allowed on this lot. • 5. There shall be no vehicle access to this shed, nor shall any vehicle be stored within said structure. 6. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City to ensure a high quality of workmanship and timely completion of the relocation. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 15th day of April, 1998. Jerry Peterson, Chairperson ATTEST: Rick Jopke, Community Development Director (SEAL) N:\DATA\GROUPS\CO MDE V\DE VCASES\520-98\540-98 PC.RES 1110 • REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION • WMeeting Date: April 15, 1998 Staff Report by: James Ericson,Planning Associate Planning Case No. 518-98 Request: Minor Subdivision(Lot Split) Applicant: Charles and Shirle Schultz Address: 7581 Spring Lake Road PIN#: 07-30-23-22-0006 Zoning/Land Use: R-1, Single Family Residential Lot Size: 37,669 sf (.84 acres) Applicable Regulations: • Surveyor's Certificate: Section 1202.01, Subd. 3b requires that the applicant provide a certificate of survey prepared by a Minnesota registered land surveyor. • Minimum Lot Size and Widths: Section 1104.02, Subd. 2b, as amended by Ordinance • 590, sets the minimum interior lot size at 11,000 square feet. The minimum width for interior lots is 75 feet. 6 • Provision of Easements: Section 1203.04 requires that drainage and utility easements be provided in the event of property subdivisions. • Park Dedication Fee: Section 1204.02 requires that a park dedication fee be paid in an amount equivalent to five percent(5%) of the land value of the property to be subdivided. Attachments: Planning Application Zoning Map Drainage and Utility Easement Document Certificate and Plat of Survey(Separate Attachment) Resolution No. 539-98 Background: The applicant, Charles and Shirle Schultz, is requesting approval of a minor subdivision to create two lots from their property located at 7581 Spring Lake Road. The City's subdivision regulations allow for approval of a surveyor's certificate in these situations. A copy of the surveyor's certificate showing the proposed lot split is attached. This property is a double-wide • 40 lot that fronts the east side of Spring Lake Road,just south of Spring Lake. The applicant's home sits on the southern portion of the lot. The applicant proposes to split off 85 feet, leaving 80 feet for the existing home. All applicable setbacks would be maintained under this configuration. Schultz Minor Subdivision S 7581 Spring Lake Road Planning Case No. 518-98 April 15, 1998 Page 2 Issues: The proposed legal descriptions and certificate of survey have been reviewed by the City's Engineering Technician, who finds them in compliance with City standards in the proper form for recording. Staff has sent a copy of the certificate of survey to the City Attorney for his comments and to arrange for the drafting of an easement document to convey the drainage and utility easements shown on the survey. The only other issue that exists with regard to this request is the park dedication requirement as stated in Section 1204.02 of the Municipal Code. It states that for all subdivisions of less than one acre, a five percent (5%) park dedication fee is required to be paid before the subdivision can be approved. According to the Ramsey County assessor's records, this property is valued at $39,700. Five percent of that would amount to $1,985. Subdivision 3 of this Section, however, allows for the exclusion of the land under the existing home remaining after the subdivision. With this exclusion, the dedication requirement would be reduced to $1,032. This item was to be heard by the Mounds View Parks and Recreation Commission at their last I) meeting on March 26, 1998, but the meeting was canceled due to a lack of quorum. While the Commission is on record as requiring the full amount of any park dedication fee, since this is the first minor subdivision under the new fee requirements, staff felt that a recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Commission would be appropriate. Their next meeting will be April 23, 1998, at which time they will make a recommendation regarding this request. Recommendation: Approve Resolution 539-98, a resolution recommending to the City Council approval of this minor subdivision subject to stipulations. d—rA-A/V-9-4 F..424. ---..--.. James Ericson, Planning Associate NADATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DE VCASES1518-98\SCHULTZ.PC 1 L_ _J 7897 a 79 i v ' I -• I -• I -" , I L HILL illIfiry. .:0 0 7830 7835 7890 7887 =5 a a! M lifFil : 7661 N i� 7820 . 7825 7880 7879 7860 7835 'j ao 8 F 781 J 7815 0 7865 a m r' co B-2 •a O 805 7860 851 0 7850 7821 B IT 7850 07~7841 N N 780• 7901 , w Y 9 "COMP' . 7791_ 3 R-4 g. 7830 7821 11 m 776• ►�: 7781 7750 ti^ 1::: 776= 7775 O' 775a 7770 .::':::::: 7766 p c::::::;:•:�:�;:•ii::�: :•::::•'t::•::ri� ri .;: : : :=: �. 7765 7748 7749 7767 �... 7738 a 773• 7729 • R-3 Q ` O 7801 .:v.rrr.'t.::C:•::......�:: lr:'�"� �'•�'�i.i":r.-cri.:•.•:.:it .._`[ `:..."......::`.:.,:..:::'}::;_: ::• 7755 772x 0 7729 772' 7723 R-2 0: :.4::::::;:' -:•. :•: •::•.:-:.: 773, B-2 • :: 7718=1. 7719 771• 7715 • 772. r " - 1: :• .::::.:.:.•_,.:.....::.::::.:....'f" rn Z m 7711 .. :: i--ri::••--— N 7710 Y 7709 7710 7711 N:77O E ::cam: ......... .. / .. v 7 7692 R1 m 7686 76851 N 7692 685 N 7690 P� .r - CC 7682 • 0 N 7680 0 7669 7670 7663 7680 Y II a m m ..t 76 _ 7670 7665 7660 M M 7• 7644 7653 7655 7647 - . 7630 7633 7664 7629 7634 7635 0 I7624 7629 7620 7625 7620 7614 7627 7600 .19 7600 7601 Li 7611 7604 $ SILVER VIEW X85 7594 7575 0 7581 7584 ill 7580 , .79 7588 if PAR K 11 7555 7564 7565 O 65 758 O 7565 ' 7555 7556 3 555 7572 Z� R-2 w 1 • 7545 7546 w 7555 I 7552 1 ' 7545 755• . 7545 7560 p � 7550 N I I 7525 : w - .81C 7515 Gam? 7545 7542+ PF 7540 O O M o 750 N N 7500 m N N N 752 7532 7530 BRONSON DRIVE 7522' I .c. -9 .4 tOown 7490 7485 m 7501 N. 7 2pp O o 7474 N o O 1 n M r�i r, ", • 7495 N m m 750 74651111.:1 7471 7474N a Ii 7457 ,4s2 BRONSON 74 15 7456 a m ( I 7447 7451 a o 17444 gilt. .. . 7448 � P N N 7442111C4 N 6� I . 7425 7430 7435 7434 w 7415 �—N 42 n pR 17409 7440 VIEYI� II 7415 740 17405 7412 7405 7408 _ ^ n 740 9 Zoning Map Planning Case 518-98 Applicant: Charles Schultz lv- Location: 7581 Spring Lake Road • 111 PERMANENT DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT GRANT THIS EASEMENT GRANT IS MADE THIS day of 1998, between CHARLES G. SCHULTZ AND SHIRLEY SCHULTZ, husband and wife, of 7581 Spring Lake Road, Mounds View, Minnesota 55112, Grantor (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor" ) , and CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, Grantee, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, having its principal office located at 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota 55112 (hereinafter referred to as "City" ) . 1 . Consideration and Description. In consideration of the sum of $1 . 00 and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged, Grantor hereby grants, sells, and conveys to City, its successors and assigns, a permanent drainage and utility easement for the purpose of constructing, laying, operating, inspecting, maintaining, altering, replacing, repairing and putting into operation all necessary public utilities, including but not limited to water and sewer, storm sewer and drainage, pipes, lines and facilities and appurtenances of said City, in, upon, over and across the following described real estate owned by the Grantor situated in the County of Ramsey which is described herein as the 11) Easement Tract . The Easement Tract is legally described on Exhibit A which is attached hereto and incorporated herein. 2 . Term of Easement. The easement rights granted herein shall be possessed and enjoyed by the City, its successors and assigns, in perpetuity. 3 . Ingress, Egress, and Maintenance. The City, its employees, contractors, and representatives shall have the right of ingress and egress to and from the Easement Tract for the purpose of constructing, laying, operating, inspecting, mocintdining, altering, replacing, repairing and putting into operation all necessary public utilities, including but not limited to water and sewer, storm sewer and drainage, pipes, lines and facilities and appurtenances of said City. Such ingress and egress shall be limited to the Easement and to existing public roads, if any, on the premises. 4 . Rights and Restrictions of Grantor. Grantor shall have the right to full use and enjoyment of the Easement Tract except for such use as may interfere with the exercise by the City of the rights granted herein. Grantor shall not construct or permit to be constructed any house, structure, or obstruction on or over or 4110 interfering with the construction, maintenance, repair, or other operation of any utility lines, drainage, facilities or appurtenances constructed or permitted pursuant to this instrument . Grantor further agrees that it will not materially change the SJR141166 MU210-5 1 ground elevation above such utility lines, facilities or appurtenances, or impede the drainage over or across the Easement Tract, without the prior written consent of the City. 5 . Covenant of Ownership. Grantor covenants that it is the owner of the Easement Tract and has the right, title, and capacity to grant the Easements granted herein. 6 . Effect Upon Subsequent Parties. This Easement Grant shall be binding upon and accrue to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto. [The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank. ] 401 SJR141166 MU210-5 2 S IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused this Easement Grant to be duly executed in its name and behalf as of the day and year first above written. CHARLES G. SCHULTZ SHIRLEY SCHULTZ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss COUNTY OF RAMSEY The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1998 , by CHARLES G. SCHULTZ and SHIRLEY SCHULTZ, husband and wife, respectively. 111 Notary Public This instrument was drafted by: KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED (SJR) 470 Pillsbury Center Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 SJR141166 MUz10-5 3 • EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Easement [Easement Tract] The South 80 . 00 feet of Lot 41, SPRING LAKE PARK KNOLLS, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Reserving and subject to easements for drainage and utility purposes being 10 . 00 feet in width and adjacent to the east and west - lines thereof . And reserving and subject to easements for drainage and utility purposes being 5 . 00 feet in width and adjacent to the north and south lines thereof. S SJR141166 4 MU210-5 • MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION 111 RESOLUTION NO. 539-98 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR CHARLES AND SHIRLE SCHULTZ, 7581 SPRING LAKE ROAD; MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE NO. 518-98 WHEREAS, Charles and Shine Schultz have requested approval for a minor subdivision dividing their property located at 7581 Spring Lake Road, property zoned R-1, Single Family Residential, legally described as follows: Lot 41, Spring Lake Park Knolls, Ramsey County WHEREAS, the two lots created by this minor subdivision, Lot A(the southern half with the existing home) and Lot B (the northern half) would be legally described as follows: Lot A: The South 80.00 Feet of Lot 41, Spring Lake Park Knolls, Ramsey 111) County of Lot 41 Spring Lake Park Knolls, RamseyCounty,Lying Lot B: That Part p g ty North of the South 80.00 Feet Thereof WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the applicant's request for a minor subdivision and has determined that it is in conformance with Chapters 1201, 1202, 1104 and 1204 of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a Certificate and Plat of Survey for the above described property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the minor subdivision request made by Charles and Shirle Schultz, 7581 Spring Lake Road, contingent upon the following: 1. The applicant shall make payment of a park dedication fee in an amount specified by the City Council according to the requirements in Section 1204.02. 2. The applicant shall record the City Council resolution of approval, the Certificate of Survey and the drainage and utility easement document with Ramsey County within sixty(60) days of final adoption, and present proof of such recording to the City of Mounds View, or this approval shall be null and void. 7581 Spring Lake Road Minor Subdivision Resolution No. 539-98 April 15, 1998 Page 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 15th day of April, 1998 Jerry Peterson, Chairperson ATTEST: Rick Jopke, Community Development Director (SEAL) N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES1518-98\539-98PC.RES • O a 7581 Spring Lake Road Minor Subdivision S Resolution No. 539-98 April 15, 1998 Page 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 15th day of April, 1998 Jerry Peterson, Chairperson ATTEST: Rick Jopke, Community Development Director (SEAL) IIN:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\518-981539-98PC.RES lb REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Meeting Date: April 15, 1998 Staff Report by: James Ericson,Planning Associate Planning Case No.: 516-98 Request: Conditional Use Permit to allow for a 1,246 square-foot garage Petitioner: Thomas Lammi Location: 7858 Long Lake Road PIN No. 06-30-23-44-0065 Zoning/Land Use: R-1 /Single Family Residential Applicable Regulations: 1106.03. Subd. 1 d: No garage shall exceed 864 square feet except by CUP. 1106.03. Subd. lh: The combined square footage for all accessory buildings on a lot shall not • occupy more than 25% of the rear yard. 1106.04. Subd.6: The combined square footage of all accessory buildings on one lot cannot exceed 1,264 square feet; if the garage square footage is greater than 1,000 square feet, no other accessory building shall be allowed, the garage width cannot exceed 35 feet nor allow for more than three vehicle access. Attachments: Planning Application Zoning Map Site Plan Resolution 541-98 Background: The applicant, Thomas Lammi, has applied for a conditional use permit to construct a 616 square- foot garage addition to his house located at 7858 Long Lake Road. The dimensions of the existing garage are 21 feet by 30 feet(630 square feet)with access for two vehicles. The proposed garage addition of 616 square feet would attach seamlessly to the rear of the garage and house, tying into the existing roof line, siding, and soffits. The area of the parcel on which the house and attached garage are situated is 12,780 square feet, or 0.29 acres. The backyard area comprises 4,500 square feet, which amounts to 35% of the lot. Because backyard accessory buildings cannot exceed 25 percent of a backyard's area, the garage addition cannot exceed 1,125 • square feet. The proposed addition would take up 12.7 percent of the backyard. Planning Case No. 516-98 Oversized Garage Conditional Use Permit Thomas Lammi--7858 Long Lake Road April 15, 1998 • Page 2 Analysis: Dimensional Requirements: Required Proposed Met/Not Met Garage Setbacks (Front) 30 feet 30 feet Met (Side) 10 feet 10 feet Met (Rear) 10 feet 22 feet Met Percent of Rear Yard <25% 12.7% Met Garage Width s 35 feet 22 feet Met Area of all Accessory Buildings: s 1,264 Sq. ft. 1,246 Sq. ft. Met CUP requirements: Section 1106.04 of the Zoning Code states that no garage shall exceed 864 square feet except by conditional use permit. With a CUP, the maximum area for a garage is 1,264 square feet. The garage area proposed by the applicant, at 1,246 square feet, meets this requirement. Section 1125.01 gives a list of criteria that must be satisfied in order for conditional use permits to be • approved. These criteria are as follows: 1. Relationship with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan encourages the development and maintenance of residential areas so as to improve the quality, appearance and attractiveness of housing units and residential property in general. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property, 7858 Long Lake Road, low-density residential. This proposal does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Geographical Area Involved. 4. The Character of the Surrounding Area The majority of the lots in this area are larger than the subject property although many of the lots across Long Lake Road are smaller parcels. While the proposed garage is larger than what is typical for this area,the placement of the garage addition behind the home hides it from Long Lake Road. The garage would be visible only to the three adjoining properties. Staff has spoken to two of the three neighboring property owners,who do not foresee a problem with the addition. 3. Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. This addition will serve to increase the subject property's value without negatively impacting the values of the neighboring properties. • Planning Case No. 516-98 Oversized Garage Conditional Use Permit Thomas Lammi--7858 Long Lake Road • April 15, 1998 Page 3 5. The demonstrated need for such a use. The applicant has indicated that they own antique and classic vehicles that are currently parked in different locations across the metro area. With the applicant's everyday-use vehicles there is no room in the garage or driveway for the other vehicles owned by the applicant. The size requested is the minimum needed to satisfy the applicant's needs. This proposal satisfies the conditional use permit criteria. Also in Section 1125.01, the Planning Commission is to examine the possible adverse affects of the oversized garage, which are as follows: (1) The use will not create an excessive burden on existing parks,schools,streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. (7) The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion. (8) Adequate utilities,access roads,drainage and necessary facilities have been or will be provided. The construction of an oversized garage will not create a greater impact on existing public facilities or services,on utilities or access roads,nor will it create an increase in traffic on adjacent streets. The increase in runoff from the larger structure is not significant and will not affect the drainage system. • (2) The use will be sufficiently compatible or separated by distance or screening from adjacent residentially zoned or used land so that existing homes will not be depreciated in value and there will be no deterrence to development of vacant land. (3) The structure and site shall have an appearance that will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent residential properties. The placement of the garage addition so that the structure is hidden from street view will provide adequate screening,and will preserve the residential character of the neighborhood. The garage addition,will however,be in full view of the three adjoining properties. (4) The use,in the opinion of the City Council,is reasonably related to the overall needs of the City and to the existing land use. (5) The use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. (6) The use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan of the City. Garages are typical uses in residential areas,and allow for storage of vehicles and other equipment. Having this garage will allow for the property owner to store his collectable vehicles upon his own property. Staff believes that the adverse affects of this development proposal are minimal and are far out- weighed by the overall benefits. • Planning Case No. 516-98 Oversized Garage Conditional Use Permit Thomas Lamrni--7858 Long Lake Road April 15, 1998 • Page 4 Recommendation: Approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 541-98, recommending to the City Council approval of a conditional use permit for Thomas Lammi, allowing a 1,246 square-foot oversized garage at 7858 Long Lake Road, with stipulations. J' .. Ziollobl"."""mh James Ericson, Planning Associate N:\DATA\GROUPS\C OMDEV\DEVCASES\516-98\LAMMICUP.PC 1 • • 7X1 �'' .D' coivaruNrry DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Ill ...1: 9' i ':,N! 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View MN 55112 ••A o'I's-Parme4s11 612-717-4020 612-784-3462 -FAX Please Type or Print Information-Complete Both Sides of This Form Applicant Information ) Name of Applicant 4 Mos /4 yyl 1H) Telephone 716 .3 i 3 y Address Tr 58 ,/.,gw9, ,g 62 aQ Fax ,1,l ,i, "s l/1•Q .) J"9 Ili 5 r1/ Z.i Interest in Property(check appropriate box) X Owner of Property 0 Contract for Deed Owner 0 Lessee,Operator,Manager 0 Agreement to Purchase 0 Other(explain) Applicants must provide evidence of interest in property at the time of application,and if you are not the owner of the property,you must provide a letter of permission from the owner giving consent to the filing of this application. The property owner must sign this application for it to be accepted. Property Description/Proposal Address or General Location 7SSg , L xv .8 E? • Legal Description -7-.'V ear,s 1~ KG 2 OA <3 `'.-431k 1 - - Property Identification#(PIN#) (p—36-Ai -G/-V-o065 #of Acres Current Zoning . .. 4.,C,r•„/ Type of Application - -. .. __-__ .. 0 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 5250 O Rezoning 5250/acre; min$250 max$1500 O Major Subdivision $250+$250 deposit* O Minor Subdivision 5200 O Planned Unit Development(PUD) Refer to rezoning fees O PUD Amendment $350 • �- Conditional Use Permit R-1, : others$250 1}D Variance R-I, R- 141-0 others$250 O Code Appy $100 O Develop Review/Site PIan $125/acre;min$125 max$750 • O Wetland Alteration Permit R-1,R-2$150;all others$200 O Wetland Buffer Permit R-1,R-2$25;all others$100 O Floodplain Permit $200 O Other • *Deposits shall be paid to cover all costs of public notices,materials and staff or consultant time spent in the review, • research or preparation of materials associated with this application. The applicant shall be responsible for all reasonable incurred costs in excess of the initial deposit amount. Any portion of the deposit not spent or encumbered shall be refunded to the applicant within thirty(30)days alter consideration of the application is completed. Please complete the reverse side of this application. � � -i -- • City of Mounds View,MN , Development Application Page 2 Present Use of Property III ❑ Undeveloped/Vacant IA Single Family Dwelling ❑ Duplex/Two Family Dwelling a Multi-family Dwelling ❑ Business/Commercial Establishment 0 Industrial Establishment 0 Other(explain) Property Classification 0 AbstractilacTorrens Description of Proposal Aid,/" /91494411,00'/ 9xi440 r ,heict..47Ac yy471,- G'btfELS a t gt" fc2,20p b y Ag IJ roe BY MY(OUR)SIGNATURE ON THIS APPLICATION,I tit,:y DEC • ' THAT,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IS ,Lo ' AND ACAS •TE. Signature of Applicant - 1' , ell • Name of Applicant(typed/printed) o/v,1zt • ,4 iv)i 1' IIISignature of Property Owner r m ,�. Name of Property Owner(typed/printed) fj o r„104 t Address of Owner ._. .....___ :`7gsg - a„f:, 0.� . .. ... �1!//11•✓ ist1 if). Phone Number of Owner 1.0 . ************************************************************************************************ FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date of Submittal c1-17 - 9 g Date of Acceptance Assigned to: Planning Case No. 60-day Limit 120-dav limit Fees Paid: • Account# Check# R ei t Application: l Ts.e, o /2+' tO Paris Dedication: Deposits: Other. . Total: N:IDATA\GROUPS\COMDEVWORMS.DEVAPP.FOR 1198 nus.s atP+u J auoo •- ...,.•• ".•.••• 8035 - • 8022 8019 8030 8011 8000 8024 8027 801E 8021 8011 . 7 8000 8001 8010 8000 8005 8012 7981 7990 0 7989 7996 ix 7993 7990 7977 7989 7988 7 969 7980 7979 7980a 7985 7970 7984 _ 7 79651117 7960 7961 7964 7975 7980 7971 7968 7966 7969 7954 7959 7950 7951 7 7955 7944 7953 7948 — 7945 7946 7927 G H I LLV I EW 7935 7930 7917 7s4o PAR s 7945 7934 7931 ,n ,n ,41 ug N 7901 r. ` f 7930 - CO CO 7900 7901 m v, 7900 1 • �n Lo 7900 41 v I v v4• 1 "� N N N N N f N I N V•I N N ` N N N N - ROAD . S. N W p c0 . 7891iri 7895' o `O 7890 78 ® 7869 .n<: „�7886 7889 7888 N I N I CT' PF N N N •' N N.v N N I 7885 7866 7867 7870 7; 9 7853 7878 7875 7868 7869 7860 7 7877 7854 7851 7860 78 7852 w 7870 7857 7850 — 7841 .Z 7861 7854 et 7863 a 7841 7850 78 7646 � 7836 3 7845 7840 7 7830 Ca7840 7835 7840 78 g 7847 7840 7620 7837 7830 t,� 7 7815 817 p 7833 7832 > 9111 7820 78157790 0 ��� 7809781437815 7827 7820 7805 7780 7801 7806 7814 7817 �� 7800 7809 7770 3 7801 7760 7797 7800 7801 7804 e R-4 7801 `w 7751 7750 n777 87 7n8 7749 7750 7807 (1. 1 7767 7760 7741 7740 77767 7768 7739 7740 7751 `ti440p 7761 7750 7731 7730 7753 J 7748 7741 774 f 7729 77301 7755 7730 7721 7720 7728 7719 7720 Q 7731 7730 l 7745 7710 7711 7710 7709 7710 p 77217720 rz\ O _ - f 0 00 m _ ►- 7715 N N us!:t�F:�l 7700 N in in in in 7701 7700 770 •v' I - N' R-2 -R-2 CO _ cv _ 4- ,. r.N o 'o<c u7 in u7 2553 in in .. v - v . v • M In in u7 to in�n u7 in u7 7695 N N N N N N N lDtp �nB-3- NNNN M NNNNN 551 N N N in N 547 7687 766 WIMPA5 ' I R— R-4 2545 oJ► B-3 ti6°� B-4 2541 _ 66 -2539MI - 537 7661 _ 7635 t, ,.a _4 7 765 - ` -; 7645 mpg& - of o i' y� g5� —Z v r�: p - u7N. N;ItL, SI"' '4114011811117/e. i wig w • o. • Z 2 M lsl �• o�n B-3 -1- If <n a ctOv _ M d CO( !I �`� '` ul ..�L�ry N co N N NC 2 CO COiO 40 N N 0(G .�NyC4 ^� N p». � iOI C4 N Nr _ rN NN111 � N T1\ _ N Y,'4 N l,1, co O F 2 N Is • _ PF I' Zoning Map Planning Case 516-98 Applicant: Thomas Lammi Location: 7858 Long Lake Road Ni) HILLVIEW ROAD . II --- 232.00 -- - _ 90 0 f I 142.0 33 I °° (31 ko -I0'� 0 I •-I zI W 1 W ^ I Qi _ I (L/) 0� O IJ I z I ,'♦ I W W N W IW Z .71 1 °�� 142 025 _ . CC I ' I "i' PR ON TO SCA Le -- - ' Im 1 w IW 'Cr r Q I 7,5s J ° I ¢ 0 L.O 3 CA �0A:D z I I � _ _ _ _ _ I0' lIibr::: AJ�. OQ4:NAGE —13----- UTILITY EASEMENT_ 7 90 0 142.04 i DRAINAG 8 UTILITY EASEMENT b -- - - - - - - — - - - - - - _l_ -- -- I '� I i 1 I I ‘-/ ARIA Or 2•2 Zg 411 61At)6( A 00 rtcm! 0 rn 1 I 1 • MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 541-98 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW AN OVERSIZED GARAGE FOR THOMAS LAMMI, 7858 LONG LAKE ROAD; MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE NO. 516-98 WHEREAS, Thomas Lammi has applied for a conditional use permit to construct a 616 square foot addition to his garage 630 square-foot garage on property located at 7858 Long Lake Road, zoned R-1, Single Family Residential, legally described as followed: LOT 3 BLOCK 1, T.V. CONSTRUCTION, INC ADDN, RAMSEY COUNTY,MINNESOTA WHEREAS, The Mounds View Zoning Code allows, with a conditional use permit, up to 1,264 square feet of garage/accessory building on one lot; and • WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: a. Planning Application b. Zoning Map c. Site Plan WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the dimensional requirements in Chapter 1104 the Zoning Code for this proposal have been met; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission makes the following findings that possible adverse effects have been considered in its recommendation, as required by Section 1125.01 Subd. 1.e.: 1. Relationship with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan encourages the development and maintenance of residential areas so as to improve the quality,appearance and attractiveness of housing units and residential property in general. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property,7858 Long Lake Road,low-density residential. This proposal does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Geographical Area Involved. • 4. The Character of the Surrounding Area The majority of the lots in this area are larger than the subject property although many of the lots Planning Commission Resolution 541-98 April 15, 1998 Page 2 across Long Lake Road are smaller parcels. While the proposed garage is larger than what is typical for this area,the placement of the garage addition behind the home hides it from Long Lake Road. The garage would be visible only to the three adjoining properties. Staff has spoken to two of the three neighboring property owners,who do not foresee a problem with the addition. 3. Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed This addition will serve to increase the subject property's value without negatively impacting the values of the neighboring properties. 5. The demonstrated need for such a use. The applicant has indicated that they own antique and classic vehicles that are currently parked in different locations across the metro area. With the applicant's everyday-use vehicles there is no room in the garage or driveway for the other vehicles owned by the applicant. The size requested is the minimum needed to satisfy the applicant's needs. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission makes the following findings regarding the criteria for approval of a conditional use permit, as required by Section 1125.01 Subd. 3.b.: (1) The use will not create an excessive burden on existing parks,schools,streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. • (7) The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion. (8) Adequate utilities,access roads,drainage and necessary facilities have been or will be provided. The construction of an oversized garage will not create a greater impact on existing public facilities or services,on utilities or access roads,nor will it create an increase in traffic on adjacent streets. The increase in runoff from the larger structure is not significant and will not affect the drainage system. (2) The use will be sufficiently compatible or separated by distance or screening from adjacent residentially zoned or used land so that existing homes will not be depreciated in value and there will be no deterrence to development of vacant land. (3) The structure and site shall have an appearance that will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent residential properties. The placement of the garage addition so that the structure is hidden from street view will provide adequate screening,and will preserve the residential character of the neighborhood. The garage addition,will however,be in full view of the three adjoining properties. (4) The use,in the opinion of the City Council,is reasonably related to the overall needs of the City and to the existing land use. (5) The use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. (6) The use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan of the City. i Garages are typical uses in residential areas,and allow for storage of vehicles and other equipment. Planning Commission Resolution 541-98 April 15, 1998 • Page 3 Having this garage will allow for the property owner to store his collectable vehicles upon his own property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the conditional use permit with the following stipulations: 1. The conditional use permit shall be recorded with Ramsey County within 60 days of City Council approval, and a receipt of such recording shall be provided to the City of Mounds View. 2. The garage shall be designed and maintained to provide a seamless and uniform building appearance with the existing garage and house. 3. The garage shall not be used for living space or other uses not allowed by the district in which it is located or by the Zoning Code. Should the use change for which the permit was granted, the conditional use permit shall become null and void. 4. No other sheds or accessory buildings shall be allowed on this lot. 5. There shall be no vehicle access door on the west elevation of the addition. Vehicle ingress/egress shall only be possible through the existing garage. • 6. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City to ensure a high quality of workmanship and timely completion of the development. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 15th day of April, 1998. Jerry Peterson, Chairperson ATTEST: Rick Jopke, Community Development Director (SEAL) A:\541-98PC.RES • • Planning Commission Memo TO: Planning Commissioners • FROM: Jim Ericson, Planning Associate SUBJECT: Walgreens Development Proposal DATE: April 8, 1998 TOLD Development Company has requested that the City approve a comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning of residential properties to allow for the construction of a Walgreens store at the northeast corner of Highway 10 and County Road I. This case has been discussed at five previous Planning Commission meetings, the last of which a motion was made to approve a resolution denying the development. The vote was not taken, however, because the resolution for denial was not worded in accordance to the desires of the Planning Commission. • The date by which final action on this proposal would need to be taken is May 29, 1998. Attached to this report are Resolutions 536-98 and 538-98, resolutions recommending denial of the comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning ordinance, respectively. • . MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMIVIISSION RESOLUTION NO. 536-98 • CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FROM LOW DENSITY AND HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 2625 HIGHWAY 10 AND 7715-7761 EASTWOOD ROAD; PLANNING CASE NO. 507-97. WHEREAS, TOLD Development Company has applied for a comprehensive plan amendment which would change the designation of the properties located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-7761 Eastwood Road from high and low density residential to neighborhood commercial; and, WHEREAS, the subject properties are described as follows: The South '/ of Lot 51,All of Lot 50,Lot 49 and Lot 78, Spring Lake Park Hillview, Ramsey County, Minnesota • WHEREAS, Section 401.09 of the Mounds View Municipal Code states that the City has adopted the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Mounds View, dated 1979, as its plan for future development and growth within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mounds View adopted the 1979 Comprehensive Plan in 1982 by Resolution No. 1467; and, WHEREAS, both the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning map designate these properties for residential development; and, WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation has disapproved of an access from the subject properties onto Highway 10; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission makes the following finding that the proposed amendment is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan due to the extent of commercial encroachment into the residential district. NOW, THEREFORE, the Mounds View Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council deny an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to redesignate the south 14 of Lot 51 and all of Lots 50, 49 and 78 to NC, Neighborhood Commercial. • • Planning Commission Resolution No. 536-98 April 15, 1998 Page 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this Resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 15th day of April, 1998. Jerry Peterson, Chairperson ATTEST: Rick Jopke, Community Development Director (SEAL) • N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\507-97\536-98NO.RES . • MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION • RESOLUTION NO. 538-98 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF ORDINANCE 614, AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE REZONING OF PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 2625 HIGHWAY 10 AND 7715-7761 EASTWOOD ROAD FROM R-3, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, AND R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, TO B-2, LIMITED BUSINESS DISTRICT; PLANNING CASE NO. 507-97. WHEREAS, TOLD Development Company has applied for a rezoning of the properties located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-7761 Eastwood Road from residential to commercial; and, WHEREAS, the subject properties are described as follows: The South '/ of Lot 51,All of Lot 50,Lot 49 and Lot 78, Spring Lake Park Hillview, Ramsey County, Minnesota • WHEREAS, the subject properties form a contiguous tract of land at the northeast corner of the Highway 10 and County Road I, at the fringe of an established residential neighborhood; and, WHEREAS, the proposal would remove four existing single-family homes from the City's housing stock; and, WHEREAS, the rezoning request would not be consistent with the comprehensive plan, which designates the properties as low and high density residential. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council deny Ordinance 614, an ordinance approving the rezoning of properties located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-61 Eastwood Road to B-2, Limited Business District. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this Resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. • • Planning Commission Resolution No. 538-98 April 15, 1998 Page 2 Adopted this 15th day of April, 1998. Jerry Peterson, Chairperson ATTEST: Rick Jopke, Community Development Director (SEAL) • N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\507-971538-98NO.RES • Planning Commission Resolution No. 536-98 April 15, 1998 Page 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this Resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 15th day of April, 1998. Jerry Peterson, Chairperson ATTEST: Rick Jopke, Community Development Director (SEAL) • N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASEM507-97\536-98NO.RES • • MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 538-98 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF ORDINANCE 614, AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE REZONING OF PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 2625 HIGHWAY 10 AND 7715-7761 EASTWOOD ROAD FROM R-3, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, AND R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, TO B-2, LIMITED BUSINESS DISTRICT; PLANNING CASE NO. 507-97. WHEREAS, TOLD Development Company has applied for a rezoning of the properties located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-7761 Eastwood Road from residential to commercial; and, WHEREAS, the subject properties are described as follows: The South 1/2 of Lot 51,All of Lot 50,Lot 49 and Lot 78, • Spring Lake Park Hillview, Ramsey County, Minnesota WHEREAS, the subject properties form a contiguous tract of land at the northeast corner of the Highway 10 and County Road I, at the fringe of an established residential neighborhood; and, WHEREAS, the proposal would remove four existing single-family homes from the City's housing stock; and, WHEREAS, the rezoning request would not be consistent with the comprehensive plan, which designates i - • • - ■ . . . i s i :i s- 1 •L NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council deny Ordinance 614, an ordinance approving the rezoning of properties located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-61 Eastwood Road to B-2, Limited Business District. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this Resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Planning Commission Resolution No. 538-98 • April 15, 1998 Page 2 Adopted this 15th day of April, 1998. Jerry Peterson, Chairperson ATTEST: Rick Jopke, Community Development Director (SEAL) • N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEV CASES\507-97\538-98NO.RES • • Planning Commission Resolution No. 536-98 April 15, 1998 Page 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this Resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 15th day of April, 1998. Jerry Peterson, Chairperson ATTEST: Rick Jopke, Community Development Director • (SEAL) N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\507-97\536-98NO.RES I MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION • RESOLUTION NO. 538-98 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF ORDINANCE 614, AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE REZONING OF PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 2625 HIGHWAY 10 AND 7715-7761 EASTWOOD ROAD FROM R-3, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, AND R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, TO B-2, LIMITED BUSINESS DISTRICT; PLANNING CASE NO. 507-97. WHEREAS, TOLD Development Company has applied for a rezoning of the properties located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-7761 Eastwood Road from residential to commercial; and, WHEREAS, the subject properties are described as follows: The South '/ of Lot 51,All of Lot 50,Lot 49 and Lot 78, Spring Lake Park Hillview, Ramsey County, Minnesota • WHEREAS, the subject properties form a contiguous tract of land at the northeast corner of the Highway 10 and County Road I, at the fringe of an established residential neighborhood; and, WHEREAS, the proposal would remove four existing single-family homes from the City's housing stock; and, WHEREAS, the rezoning request would not be consistent with the comprehensive plan, which designates the properties as low and high density residential. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council deny Ordinance 614, an ordinance approving the rezoning of properties located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-61 Eastwood Road to B-2, Limited Business District. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this Resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. i Planning Commission Resolution No. 538-98 • April 15, 1998 Page 2 Adopted this 15th day of April, 1998. Jerry Peterson, Chairperson ATTEST: Rick Jopke, Community Development Director (SEAL) • N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\507-97\538-98NO.RES • A REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION • Meeting Date: April 15, 1998 Staff Report by: James Ericson, Planning Associate Planning Case No.: 514-97 Request: Development Review Petitioner: Bridges Leasing Company, LLC Location: 8400 Coral Sea Street PIN Nos.: 05-30-23-21-0003 Legal Description: Lot 2, Block 1,North Star Industrial 2nd Addition Zoning/Land Use: I-1, Light Industrial District/undeveloped lot Applicable Regulations: • • Development Review: Section 1006.06 requires that all commercial and industrial development within the City be subject to review by the Planning Commission and approval by the City Council. • Setbacks: Section 1104.01 establishes the principal building and parking lot setbacks. These will be addressed in the analysis section of this report. • Minimum Lot Size: Section 1104.02, Subd. 2 establishes the minimum lot size in an the Industrial Zone as one acre(43,560 square feet.) • Parking Requirements: Section 1121.13 sets the requirements for parking ratios. Summary: The applicant, Bridges Technology Park, has applied for a development review to expand their existing building located at 8400 Coral Sea Street. The new addition will be 35,188 square feet for a total build-out of 64,376 square feet. The building will be 10,188 square feet of office space and 25,000 square feet of warehouse space. The site is currently zoned I-i, Industrial District, which allows this use. This parcel is undeveloped with the western edge of the property in wetland, and the remaining area covered by dense tree cover. The proposed expansion will match • the design and style of the existing building. L i Planning Commission Report Bridges Technology Park Phase II Planning Case 514-98 March 27, 1998 Page 2 Discussion: Previously: This request was discussed at the Planning commission's last meeting on April 1, 1998. According to the site plan dated 3/6/98, all of the dimensional requirements for this development would be met with the exception of the parking requirements, which will be discussed further below. One of the primary issues that was raised at the last meeting concerned how close the paved area was to the delineated wetland. It was requested that the distance between the wetland and pavement be increased to a minimum of ten feet. The revised plan(date-stamped 4/8/98) submitted by the applicant shows a setback of ten feet while maintaining a minimum 26-foot drive-aisle behind the building, as recommended by the Fire Marshal. Drainage. Wetland Considerations and Wetland Alteration Permit: As discussed at the last meeting, because work is being done within 100 feet of the wetland, the applicant will need to have a wetland buffer permit approved by the City. From the revised site plans, the new parking area and drive-aisles will be a minimum of ten feet from the delineated edge of the wetland. The revised site plan shows the 100-foot wetland buffer, the edge of the easement area, and statistics regarding the area of the buffer and the percent of which is covered • in pervious and impervious surface. Parking: The applicant has provided a master site plan for both lots 2 and 3 showing the parking for the existing and proposed buildings. Altogether, a total of 200 spaces would be required for both buildings, with a total of only 162 stalls being provided. The remaining 38 stalls are indicated as "proof of parking" on the master site plan. The proof of parking can be allowed one of two ways. For the ncighboring ZEP manufacturing, the pro: - .•. - _ • • •. - • • • • - • - Sig and warehouse parking ratios on the condition that the spaces be constructed if needed in the future. The Code, in Section 1121.14, requires that a conditional use permit be obtained for any reduction in parking space requirements. Obviously, a variance to the parking ratios would be the more expedient solution, if that choice is still an option considering the what the Code requires. If a variance to the parking requirements were considered, the following amended ratios would closely match with the number of stalls being provided: Office: 3 spaces plus 1 per 200 square feet of floor area=3 + 84 = 87 Warehouse: 8 spaces plus 1 per 750 square feet of floor area= 8 + 65 = .160 • The difference between the number of stalls provided (162) and the number required (200)would need to be shown as future parking(38). Planning Commission Report Bridges Technology Park Phase II Planning Case 514-98 41) March 27, 1998 Page 3 The site plan shows seven handicapped-accessible stalls, which is one less than what would be required if all 200 parking stalls were built. Because only 162 stall are being built, the Americans With Disabilities (ADA) act requirements are met. Easement Vacation: The ordinance vacating the drainage and utility easements between Lots 2 and 3 has been drafted by the City Attorney and is attached for your reference. No action is required of the Planning Commission for this item. Easement Dedication: The legal description of the wetland on the subject lot has been forwarded to the City Attorney, who is preparing an easement document that will dedicate to the City a drainage and utility easement over that delineated wetland area. Recommendation: Approve Resolution 542-98, a resolution recommending approval to the City Council of a development review for the Bridges Technology Park Phase II expansion, with stipulations. • James Ericson, Planning Associate Attachments: 1. Ordinance 615 2. Resolution 4800, approved 8/28/95 3. Revised Site Plans, dated 4/8/98 (Separate Attachment) 4. Resolution 542-98 N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\514-98\51497.PC2 • RESOLUTION NO. 4800 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY 0111 STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND WETLAND ALTERATION PERMIT FOR MIDWEST I.V. , PLANNING CASE NO. 419-95 WHEREAS, Midwest I.V. has requested City approval to construct a 29, 168 square foot Office/Manufacturing facility at 8400 Coral Sea Street; and WHEREAS, Chapter 1006 of the Mounds View Municipal Code requires that a development review be conducted for all commercial and industrial developments within the City; and WHEREAS, Chapter 1010 of the Mounds View Municipal Code requires the issuance of a Wetland Alteration Permit for work conducted in the Wetland Buffer Zone; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the following documents regarding this development proposal: 1. Planning Application dated June 1, 1995 2. Site/Landscape/Drainage Plan dated July 21, 1995 and revised August 7, 1995 1 WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the 111 proposal is in conformance with all applicable requirements of Chapter 1116, Industrial Zone District, of the Mounds View Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Rice Creek Watershed District and the City of Mounds View Consulting Engineer have reviewed the proposed drainage plan for the project and recommend approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council approves the Development Review and Wetland Alteration Permit request for Midwest I.V. contingent upon the following: 1) The applicant shall provide landscaping as directed by the City Forester in his letter dated July 14 , 1995. 2) The applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement with the City of Mounds View. Adopted this 28th day of August, 1995. ATTEST: ' AO May. III (SEAL) ' lerk-A• finis rator MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 542-98 iCITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR THE EXPANSION OF'111E BRIDGES TECHNOLOGY PARK, 8400 CORAL SEA STREET; PLANNING CASE NO. 514-98 WHEREAS, Bridges Leasing Company,LLC, has requested City approval to expand its building at 8400 Coral Sea Street to include the property at 8450 Coral Sea Street; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council approved Resolution 4800 on 8/28/95 approving a development review and wetland alteration permit for Midwest IV to permit the construction of a 29,168 square foot office/warehouse building; and, WHEREAS, Chapter 1006 of the Mounds View Municipal Code requires that a development review be conducted for all commercial and industrial development within the City; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the following - documents regarding this proposal: • 1. Planning Application,dated 3/5/98 2. Zoning and Location Map 3. City Council Resolution No.4800,approved 8/28/95 4. Site Plans,dated 3/6/98 and revised 4/8/98 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission finds that the dimensional requirements as set forth in Chapter 1104 of the Municipal Code have been met; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission finds that the site plans dated 3/6/98 and revised site plans date: : ' : • • • • - -• •' - - • - . • - •, •us ri. Zoning District; and, WHEREAS, the Rice Creek Watershed District and the City Engineer have reviewed the proposed drainage plans and find them in conformance to watershed and local water management plan requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Forester has reviewed the proposed landscaping plan and finds it to be acceptable; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View/Spring Lake Park/Blaine Fire Marshal has reviewed the site plans concerning access and drive aisles and find them to conform to Fire Department • specifications. Planning Commission Resolution 542-98 Bridges Development Review April 15, 1998 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval to the City Council of a development review for Bridges Leasing Company, LLC, to expand the Bridges Technology Park as shown on site plans dated 3/6/98 and revised 4/8/98, subject to the following stipulations: 1. Prior to the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall accomplish the following: a. Obtain a Rice Creek Watershed District permit. b. Enter into a development agreement with the City. c. Coordinate with City staff to resolve the parking requirement inconsistency either by obtaining a variance or conditional use permit for the reduced parking ratios. d. Arrange to combine Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 of the North Star Industrial Park 2nd Addition with Ramsey County and provide proof of such application to the City. e. Arrange to have recorded with Ramsey County the drainage and utility easement document for the wetland area as indicated on the revised site plan dated 4/8/98 and provide proof of such recordation to the City. • 2. Approval of this development review shall be contingent upon the adoption of Ordinance 615, an ordinance vacating a portion of a drainage and utility easement over and across Lots 2 and 3. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 15th day of April, 1998 Jerry Peterson, Chairperson ATTEST: Rick Jopke, Community Development Director SEAL • N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\514-98\542-98PC.RES oORDINANCE NO. 615 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT OVER LOTS 2 AND 3, BLOCK 1, NORTH STAR INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION. THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ORDAINS: SECTION 1. The City of Mounds View Municipal Code Appendix D is hereby amended to include reference to the following Special Ordinance No. 615: Subdivision 1. All of the following described land is subject to an easement ("Drainage and Utility Easement") for public utility purposes, as show on the plat of NORTH STAR INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION, Ramsey County, Minnesota: Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, NORTH STAR INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND • ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof situated in Ramsey County, Minnesota. Subd. 2. The fee owner of the land subject to the Drainage and Utility Easement, Bridges Leasing Company, LLC, has requested the vacation of a portion of the Drainage and Utility Easement described as follows: To vacate a perpetual easement for utility and drainage purposes originally dedicated over that part of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, NORTH STAR 'USTRIAL PARK'_"NT)4 r1DITION,according to the recorded plat thereof situated in Ramsey County, Minnesota being a 10 foot strip of land lying 5 feet on each side of and adjacent to the south line of said Lot 2 and lying west of the east 10 feet of said Lots 2 and 3 and lying easterly of the westerly 10 feet of said Lots 2 and 3. Subd. 3. There are no public utilities or facilities located in the portion of the Drainage and Utility Easement area to be vacated described in Subd. 2 of this Ordinance. The proposed vacation of the portion of the Drainage and Utility Easement therefore will not adversely affect the ability of the City or other utility to maintain, repair, or replace public utilities. 4111 Subd. 4. The Council finds that there is no longer a public need for that portion of the Drainage and Utility Easement to be vacated, as described in Subd. 2 of this Ordinance. SJR140661 MU210-5 Subd. 5. The portion of the Drainage and Utility Easement, as described in Subd. 2 of this Ordinance, is hereby vacated. o SECTION 2. This ordinance takes effect 30 days after its publication. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this day of , 1998. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this day of , 1998. Duane McCarty, Mayor Charles S. Whiting, City Clerk-Admin. APPROVED AS TO FORM: • Robert Long, City Attorney • SJR140661 MU210-5 , • PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting April 1, 1998 Mounds� ° City Hall 2410 Highway 10, nd ::s,;''., '`ew, MN 55112 1. Call to Order ' The meeting was called to order by Chairperson § -rso :00 p.m.,'''' .m., ', Ps 2. Roll Call > ' Members present: Chairperson Peterson, Comi ussione ® ':-: , $ e, Johnson, Miller, Obert (arrived 7:15), and Stevenson. x .�i' r a Members absent: Commissioner Br.. ex i -: ' Also present: Community Deve 0' ment • =ctor Ji 14;4 aiming Associate Ericson, IP -::::• Council Liaison Koopmeinek• 'ved 7,),:a p.m., d;"• 9:36 p.m.), and Recorder Dave Ex. i 2"2 .::"C `, �., if s' ;yr 3. Citize s' Requests. .. i Emmen r0:,111 tollpiof on the Agenda T - R, o citi 4 s or comments on items not on the agenda. Index to Minn:: � ,.... Page ' ...• •. :,r. - ' = 17 v '., "• : - ••• • 1, 7715-7761 Eastwood Road, 2 DisF. ' ion Regarding W. `;',F-; Development Request, Comprehensive PI.£'" endment and R4':ning, TOLD Development Company. '' g Case No. 1' v. 8 5. 98, 8400 Coral Sea Street, Discussion Regarding 10 -7t.e4 0F.4.1int ' view for Completion of the 2nd Phase of Bridges ::1)1';'; .. ing Project, Bridges Leasing Company, LLC. Planning Case No. 517-98, 2430 Highway 10 (O'Neil Property), Discussion 11 Regarding the Development Review Stage of the PUD, Preliminary Plat and a Wetland Buffer Permit, AP Mounds View Limited Partnership (Anthony Properties). r Mounds View Planning Commission April 1, 1998 Ak Regular Meeting Page 2 lir 4. Approval of Minutes: March 4, 1998 (Regular) Motion/Second: Stevenson/Peterson to approve the March 4, 1998 regular meeting minutes as amended. Ayes - 5 Nays- 0 `� 5. '' , PlanningCase No. 507-97 • u 2625 Highway 10, 7715-7761 Eastwood Road y °" '_'`y' `>, Applicant: TOLD Development Company ``x Discussion Regarding Walgreen Development Request, . <' 3".::. i: - Plan Amendment, and Rezoning. ' Mh£ •3,; Ban' y :^: `ed b °aY s ert Cunningham, was The applicant, TOLD Development 9,. i y present.::>,_.,., > .,- Associate Ericson made his, entatio+.:":s follow-. ✓ice, .ii3ar' .. IP s>_ .a „,, 2, r3ZM „. TOLD Development, on $ alf of ,: ,4 een's requesting a Comprehensive Plan Ame,•..ment and rez 3 f reside . 4 , es to allow for the construction of a W. :` -3 store .> g east co ”',';‘,Alt-:.: way 10 and County Road I. The meeting 4:.: 1+ cusses .x' 0 '$ -vious P anning Commission meetings, public hearings and comm t ,.:.eetings i ,xr.t 7 .} •n with the Comprehensive Plan Update process. The new in v: ' o : at the ;t:>_.._ g-.° as made available as follows: 1.%." Ameri '. '$.;'. g Association (APA) information, which was not attached because' sio : ddress the issue of how the Walgreens , , property values. dk ,I ' : , adjacent pts , 2.ir Discuss; with the City Attorney regarding who is responsible for the decline in prop s=`;> values, if any, when a commercial development comes into a residential a �4 A. The City Attorney advised: Neither the City nor the developer, in general, can be held liable for any real or perceived reduction in property value. There is a certain degree of risk that goes with properties that abut vacant land, or that is in close proximity to major transportation arteries or major commercial centers. In the event a mistake or oversight is made during the fib project review or construction, according to Minnesota Statutes, a city, its • Mounds View Planning Commission April 1, 1998 Regular Meeting Page 3 staff and paid consultants, in general, cannot be held liable for any damages. 3. Discussion with the City Engineer. A. In regards to questions raised about th-�Walgree , . ;•ment effecting the water table in its immediate area `. ky K. . the City's Engineering consultant, has advise oE l City the : � �o impact t• > the water table directly attributabl T o this pr•' . Y the impervious surface area prop `" •, there ght be lesA 4 w- $. the :: em ; � water table. He has also advised 'b. . , % :' "at storm water might effect the development's adj. $erties would also be decreased because of the newly regraded par 4. MnDOT meeting Concerning right-i.s '_ -out acc.� 4 g project. A. MnDOT has denied tuet g` p• • ty da considerations. �� B. MnDOT does nown the ."fess n` s location and as such cannotprevoeri, 3 e gra ':;. d fthe City so desires. C. MnDOT . "d with D's tr.: : experts that the addition of a right a removal of the Eastwood Road Access waw ::.$ Y eve the .. ctioning of the intersection. .W+o>±tog. 5. '� g CalmiM z •tions were presented with their associated costs, which =r,. neer and Director of Public Works gave written $_q3„insX11�. the tra' •ng devises presented might be good test cases which, pry�$ � ��. sful, ould be incorporated into future street reconstructions and � ' as a tools = -`speeds on some streets with long, uninterrupted blocks." The impact that t :e aigreen Development would have on the adjacent property owners has not been re-.:'''ved. TOLD Development Company has offered to compensate the adjacent pro! owners with additional land or by means of a cash settlement. . 0 a $>. commended approving Planning Commission Resolution 536-98 a resolution .V. ending that the City Council approve a Comprehensive Plan amendment to change the designations of the properties located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-7761 Eastwood Road to NC, Neighborhood Commercial, to allow for the construction of a Walgreen Drug Store. • Staff recommended that the Planning Commission approve Resolution 5328-98, a Mounds View Planning Commission April 1, 1998 • Regular Meeting Page 4 resolution recommending approval of Ordinance No. 614, and ordinance amending the City's official zoning map by rezoning the properties located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-7761 Eastwood Road to a B-2, Limited Business District classification. Bob Cunningham, of TOLD Development Company, made a p"= enta '. t showing g changes that had been made to the site plan as a result.f citize$ i t a. nd City request. Shown was the inclusion of a sidewalk from the Ea .$d cul 4- a the proposed Walgreen Development. Also included was a dec-: d,.tion lane.,;e4 $ . for the right turn entry off of Highway 10. There was t% nclusion.•, e d=`#{" : t from the primary exit point of the property to th Mersec'` .. of Highw. ¢ u :$ , there was the addition of a sidewalk from Green ` ` =,Ir.ghway 10. Cunningham reviewed the pros and cons of the -‘, g $ •s follows: Pros: 1. 11 percent site coverage 2. substantial amounts of gre ` .$d buffenn; 3. ample landscaping � '.. sc,. 4. fencing to be part . e buff: a 5. 45-55 jobs to M. ds View`' econo •6. property tax ;4 ue - ; :• 7. street deve .AMC" is pa $, .y the de: oper 8. sale ofth^>:. .'y e5 ownrcel of 9. z : d Y ' cru park 5,-•i ion fees: Krr < ne _ „$ -•$g impact access":. r_ +way 10 .rte: T ;;tr.r waw:: ;: w o the Commission for questions and comments. Commissioner SO'"3 ssto asked the developer if he would be willing to move the `• ' Highway 10 acc ' point t closer to the property line. Mr. Cunnin a hm told the Commissioners the referenced entry point on the site plan was acc ... 17depicted. After giving the correct dimensions and layout he stated the entry $ $ .dequate. 6 Chairperson Peterson opened the public hearing. William Bakke, 7767 Eastwood Road, asked staff to reread the City Attorney's advisory on the liability of the City in regards to property devaluation of the properties adjacent to • the Walgreen Development. Staff reread the City Attorney's statement. • Mounds View Planning Commission April 1, 1998 Regular Meeting Page 5 Carol Arel, 7750 Greenwood Drive, told the Commission that by rezoning an R-1 property to a commercial use will establish a precedent that the City will regret. She added that the citizens' concerns about safety issues and property devaluation have not been satisfactorily addressed. Warren Johnson, 7710 Greenwood Drive, stated to c ange t ensive Plan, at the cost of tax payer's property, is not what he felt ..$' `$ be • _ '` omprehensive Plan was put into affect to protect the citizens ani .ry• eep that -!_-;61'1V41-, 1-, om happening. •4.=` ;: h . Chairperson Peterson reminded the citizens th. sf::.. t zp rehensive Plan �>� e process of being updated and revised. He encouri , rticipation of the entire community to ensure that their voices are heard a •' :: t •date process. Milo Pinkerton stated he was in favor oftt staying • - He added putting •' iii: .spoor commercial property up against single f.:�::::►:< ,.s poor p s ` :..._ Tim Behn, 7715 Eastwood, told v.P. Pinke k..:F"$:" } s ; orhood on Eastwood Road, is against the town home ,„,„: . ect th.._a '`e mon) is currently developing. John Wiens, 7760 Green � •rive .ted the •zens don't have an advocate to represent them on this prt t. ' ; A\" :.. �, ;�;x�„ � fir: Hilto', ` eenwoo s,..!; tated the residents on Greenwood Drive were p,> ., •` ' ed o '': ;, • •roject t uatywas going in on this particular site. She stated tha`11,11144,e resit- ,Y` .: s:; twood Drive are racist and that is the motivation for keepinAtAtiiisized h.' :: v •. of the area. She added, if the Walgreen Development is app •A; a _.. s to ine*iiiit feels she won't be able to sell her home because of its e• v. 0 ”"t`Chairperson Pete :; old Ms. Hilton the Planning Commission is charged with the very difficult responsgaity of making balanced decisions for the City and its citizens. Commissiorasaemle, in response to the word "racist", told Ms. Hilton he voted . .. + .inst g e.to n homes because they fronted on Highway 10; not because he was opposed ••1 p housing. Mr. Pinkerton asked if there are other proposals concerning this property that would maintain its residential character. Staff told Mr. Pinkerton no other proposals are currently on the table for the property. • Chairperson Peterson told Mr. Pinkerton that his reference to the property, the busiest Mounds View Planning Commission April 1, 1998 Regular Meeting Page 6 corner in the City, as having residential character, was absurd. Commissioner Obert asked Mr. Pinkerton if he would live and raise his family fronting a highway with daily traffic of 40,000 cars. Mr. Pinkerton told the Commission that there is a developer, :if.$ - i , � uld take the time to solicit that developer, who would be willing to,adevelop , rty on a residential basis. ' r"' `> Ms. Arel expressed her concern that nobody waiiiscussin_ �teffe`` - `�'-°"� • � asir,> would have on Greenwood Drive. q'n Cliff Ash, 2664 Lake Court Drive, expressed his .4 £ bout the traffic that the theater project and the Walgreen project would c ' ` ..• Mr. Johnson suggested that the City liste s 9 OT's at ` - $ .,-rning unsafe traffic conditions at the subject intersections. J Mr. Cunningham read from a B-; "hoof ankle: =f of the accident history along Highway 10 from Silver ,-,-e Road,..' th to � .:.a^ a Road: "The review Y i W • examined the impact that th-:Ming right tu�� ac-c>ess locations had on accident • - are history during the period. ' ��� : nght tu ccesspoints located north-bound on �. Highway 10, and two on th boun h° 'ghwa,;. . The accident information was prove ed by the Ci : unds Vi._'g` '`$ >•• •es a period of 22 months, from January .ugh N.as ' '<Owe D : 2-month period a total of 46 accidents were T.H. - - of the recoro ed accidents occurred at the site of existing right tu '`' ong a <;;.r could be attributed to vehicles using these access points: °<' <b <;.; s'' :. ar Co tevd on as'ed the applicant if they would be willing to consider nc in e ��"• °-kv A'_�:�11 o i way I access o o ou -soun. rigrns, as g °� gy suggested by Mn .CO * ' 4:11 Mr. Cunninghamytold the Commission that TOLD is having Benshoof and Associates discuss the in more detail with MNDOT. Based on the outcome of these discussions ri_ R,, : ssues should be left open. He was not willing to commit whether Walgreens ;Vining to continue with the project if the right turn off of Highway 10 was not ted. Commissioner Johnston expressed his concerns about the lack of an acceleration lane from the project. Ms. Arel stated that the lack of information regarding the right-turn lane issues was proof • • Mounds View Planning Commission April 1, 1998 Regular Meeting Page 7 that the citizens safety concerns had not been appropriately addressed. Chairperson Peterson closed the public hearing and returned the floor to the Commission for questions and comments. tiyz-. Commissioner Johnston, again, stated his concern f. the lac s,�. .4N - "elevation lane for the project. He said he would have a hard time ,.`1' s:__ for t... owing that MnDOT is not behind the designed access point. A •' •" Commissioners Stevenson, Brasaemle, and O-;'7,44 agreeith Johnst�$ ey would not be in favor of going against MnDOT : �; s ' °- ' " . :iGHz_ Commissioner Brasaemle told the Commission ,. PZA 'View is in need of tax- paying commercial developments. If the City's mmer ;; . is not expanded the residential tax rates will continue to increas µ;by, Mr. Johnson stated the message th. .e m. ��it . the: C'.¢. 'at the Comprehensive mss,." ... �:. Plan Update community forums w.:' = at Hii } ' ,: 'only location that commercial development is wel e. If a oject i. $' o$ 5'considered along Highway 10, • the R-1 property that abuts $ <$,roposes oject sh ld be- rezoned to R-2 or R-3 to ryS buffer the R-1 areas from er :oi develop„,SY-nt. Com t, issioner Ob 'rated the § `for an increase in their commercial tax b. , n ns •; z• ,sus � , �*F � fes;, Chat: ,, eterso ; : f i'$a Walgreen project was close enough to Highway 10 that it wou`o gt, $.t far o ; 0 , , 'on into the residential area abutting the proposed projec... .-" tV. ; $ - -i i i ner p .< a: ee• wi - i iz- . the R-1 area needs a bigger buffer Commi•ssi•oner.:; bert stated the City could run the risk of developing the reputation of bein unfrien.$ oto developers byrequiring thepurchase of buffer property togo alon g :. P q g P P Y g 'th a ;�4,project. 4 airperson Peterson stated the City needs to develop a "downtown feel." Currently, most services that the Mounds View citizens require are found outside of the City. He suggested it is time to bring those services into the immediate area and develop that "downtown feel." • He asked his fellow Commissioners to answer the following question: Is the use of Mounds View Planning Commission April 1, 1998 • Regular Meeting Page 8 adjacent properties, in regards to the Walgreen project, within the boundaries of what the Comprehensive Plan should look like in its update? Motion/Second: Obert/Peterson to approve Resolution 536-98, a resolution reco. .j ending that the City Council approve a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change desi•$ ions of the properties located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715-7761 Eastw,od Roan 'neighborhood Commercial, to allow for the construction of a Walgreen D ore. ' � ; t, te, : .a• The floor was opened for discussion of the moti•< y' < >> e, :"' Vis:s. �"' •:,.,.:; 3fE^,z::::a.:a,. ' Commissioner Johnston agreed with Commiss,i g. ,` ' enson's commen'a`4,411": °-3 zones areappropriate for the Hi Highway 10 corridor ro p ``�« g Y P P°��# �'A. Commissioner Stevenson reminded the Commission t `::: . �..;:€0: e five subject properties do not abut Highway 10, and ther-eff - should n•ry $ . o rdered for the NC designation. ,.o Cd ,. Chairperson Peterson stated they i perties •o ° P AA within the 100-yard threshold, whether they front on i ghway i`or no i of the Highway 10 corridor development plan. _ ,,,,,,, �� v ' III 4 , A vote was called on the;$ ion on g oor. .s '` Y r A « > 4 The motio ` '`' M• i• -c• s <e.;.. !'eterso approve resolution 536-98, a Resolution recommending denial of. .mpre ...6 ;- amendment from low density and high density residential to Road arming Case No7. . ''' Associate Ericson suggested adding a Whereas indicating that MnDOT has denied access , or indicated tai'=ir disapproval of an access at this location. kk=` , .3 .,, o .'....:.'.'.'.. •,, .,. ;$g._ >t,n * � 1,1 e motion was moved and seconded. WThe Commission reviewed alternate Resolution 536-98 and made changes in verbiage and the use of the stated goals. Mayor McCarty, who was in attendance, addressed the Commission by stating the • following: • Mounds View Planning Commission April 1, 1998 Regular Meeting Page 9 The defeated motion, denying the resolution of approval, leaves the Commission with a condition that hasn't changed, the zoning hasn't changed and there is no recommendation to the City Council for a change. By adopting the additional resolution, the motion currently on the floor, additional arguments and issues are set up that may_ to legal questions that need not be addressed. .v ;. s • '''*,,''r •d •tn •The Mayor suggested withdrawingthe motion an ,. ., Q ••S,F .,. Commissioner Brasaemle withdrew the motio <; gd asked • 8 sow :? a , als• needed to be acted on. -sx ' '-,-,:a€`;'=""- ` Mayor McCarty told the Commission Resolutio"> ould come before the Council if the applicant decides to appeal the Planning Cod `" a a. # ision to deny approval. Commissioner Obert asked the Mayor if thy: ,, prehens °' - =�_ es precedent over the Zoning Plan. " �„ Mayor McCarty told the Commi ;,,'1:'n the c ' - • that the Comprehensive Plan takes precedent over the Zoning Plan • .. ;,4 ..;,.:< ' Director Jopke read fro ,ter 11:5-Fof the C e: "The Planning Commission shall make a Finding of Fact a f; , ecomm 1 uch ac. •ns or conditions relating to the title nece ; ary to carry o ;" „ : ` tended..I< & '� e title. Such recommendation shall be in a kk ;�'s, fes' vH" 11 d acco p i &3 a repo ; s.$ •mmendation of City Staff 111 :-,e‘:114,'"4,11,''.71` ,3,. 3`: am St.t ! Id be willing to put a hold on the process to allow the Comm -'- W � -t the app a° .:.., .dvise it needs from the City Attorney. Motion/Se-0 . : tev Obert". to table action on the application to the Planning Commission g.. until A, ; 15, 1998. It Ags 5 Nays - 1 otion carried. •z: '• § : cCarty asked staff where the application process was at in regards to the 120- x ;t ; :'r` : e limit. Associate Ericson told the Commission and the Mayor the 120-day-time limit expires May 29, 1998. IIII Mounds View Planning Commission April 1, 1998 • Regular Meeting Page 10 6. Planning Case 514-98 8400 Coral Sea Street Applicant: Bridges Leasing Company, LLC . Discussion Regarding Development review for Completion o the„ 2nd ':&. Q` i ridges i y Technology Building Project. •• err _ �v rL .a sf <`> The applicant, Bridges Leasing Company, LLC,` .resa Associate Ericson gave a brief background on thy.-`.. - „follows: Bridges Technology Park has applied for a dev :•pmen • .dd a 35,188 sq. ft. expansion on their existing building locate. . , 00 Coral”n The proposed addition will match the design and style:v # ., buildin' "� The applicant is proposing a drains: syste '° •• •' -s with an earlier plan which was platted as part of the origin. orth S ndusi t rb ` ' 2nd Addition. Because the work is being done within Ii. ., t of tha'-:7✓ 'etetland applicant will need to have a wetland buffer permit appy ,•y th-tt ty. Rice eek Watershed district has reviewed the applicant's drainage • and ha •rove• < m pending payment of a cash surety and • dication of aent °� ' � tingwetlands on site. area '✓s?i. a:yr.D`a;n».>` $ .; - „• the net° , • not mee e City Code. Twenty-seven additional stalls wo '• be ad• ` '' ;' e applicant can show that the existing building is currenu= ,:' . ked. AA: . Th- •ttc .:. .:,:sg; :_.'ing an Ordinance to accomplish the needed easement vacation • . will be piese t F 4 :. Council when it coiisideis the development review. Landscaping, pub c safety, utilities, and easements issues are in accordance with City requirements. aff is... g the PlanningCommission to review the plans, make anyrevisions it deems ` L..4 g• -...:., : or the applicant and direct the staff to prepare a resolution recommending •' royal of the development review to be acted on at the April 15, 1998 Planning Commission meeting. Chairperson Peterson turned the floor over to the applicant for their presentation. Grady Kinghorn, on behalf of Bridges Leasing Company, LLC, told the commission the • • Mounds View Planning Commission April 1, 1998 Regular Meeting Page 11 proof of parking issue would not be a problem to conform to. The only issue that he felt needed to be addressed was the parking lot which is located within five feet of the wetland setback. As indicated the Rice Creek Watershed has given preliminary approval for the project. 2 ;Y The floor was returned to the Commission for questio es and ca $ $$ # Roger Anderson, civil engineer and representativ r the appl. Commissi. . there is a 35-foot distance from the closetparki all to th� tan o-•;,04,41)-0,z, o �{ surface drains through the NURP pond which h.:. • e •• installed t• • ' it that may drain in from the cars parking in the lo Commissioner Johnston suggested rounding op $ g` tea corners of the parking lot that are close to the wetland area. k, �, _ ' " '". ,kms Commissioner Miller asked the applic. < ;�'y'�.�.�: se the sno 4>.�`4' rage accommodations. Thea applicant complied. PP Commissioner Brasaemle ask- e appli y° t if t I W modify the drive lane, while • maintaining all safety issues,, $ 'der to ease th- .mount of space between the parking area and the wetland. Th- ; ant to the Co ;ssion that they would make an effort to do what Brasaemle haoistquested;LW� ,,fir• ; • No ," 1 awas to� $ - plan re 0:'07410, - applicant told the Commission that the angel ....':e., ' ade rea•y for consideration at the Planning Commission �: ed o, me= f,i, z. 1 f k 998. 7. ash : Plann'# ,'Case No. 51 ,a 243 i ‘ghway 10 (O'Ne` '' <• rty) Ap } ant: AP Mounds t view Limited Partnership (Anthony Properties) D4 ssion Regarding Te Development review Stage of the PUD, Preliminary Plat and a d Buffer Pe C. • sr :.2244~ ,, pplicant, AP Mounds View Limited Partnership (Anthony Properties), represented by Wendell Smith, was present. Director Jopke gave a brief background as follows: • The site in question is located at 2430 Highway 10. Anthony Properties Management is Mounds View Planning Commission April 1, 1998 Regular Meeting Page 12 proposing to develop a 63,000 sq. ft. movie theater complex, three 11,000 sq. ft. one- story office buildings, a 5000 sq.ft. restaurant, and a 6400 sq. ft. retail building. The movie theater will house 15 separate screens capable of seating 2,188 people. Of the 34 + acres of land available on the site, 8.25 acres will be wetland, 16.73 acres De developed green space, with the remaining 9.3 acres being dedic. to ctual building sites. There will be parking for 776 cars. a. � •j � � am' On May 12, 1997, the City Council approved a rf ion whice=: Comprehensive Plan designation of the O'Neil pr, ;. erty fro 4''diu °: ' to Mixed Use PUD (Commercial and Residenti. e) - olution app General Concept PUD was also passed that sam • • A general explanation of the PUD approval proce......Y .,-d for the public. There have been several changes to the ori_'s'. ::. .pprove s g • . .ncept plan. These changes were listed as follows: '�� r " 1. Parcel B is designat. as a retat .g . ra restaurant site. k1.RfG3}�iiy3�yy.:,`5%A:.K 2. The movie theat- '. eating .een :a.� : : � om 2648 seats to 2188 seats. The number eens h. .een reds -. from 16 to 15. 3. The site, le,,,v has' reased from 23.99 acres to 26.03 acres. 4. Impe' . ite are. .1 d from 36.9 percent of the site area to 35,..M . Pervici.T.41rf.4 increased from 63.1 percent of the site area• The n. � ,i and southernmost driveways on Highway 10 remain on alks a' ' along Highway 10 and along the northern edge of he 7. te:.& .sures ar- . . . - . - .. .' 8. T ::;: ;'� ' ' storm water ponds have been replaced with one large r.r.K pond.'` his is due to the fact that City storm water from north and east of ta site will be piped to the new pond to help alleviate existing storm water 40* .roblems in the area. 9 s." ' Snow storage areas are shown on the plan. 1, A` . #:: : No access is shown to Long Lake Road as was encouraged as part of the general concept plan approval. 11. Deceleration lanes are shown on the plan. No action was required by the Commission. The evenings meeting was for informational purposes only. • Mounds View Planning Commission April 1, 1998 Regular Meeting Page 13 The floor was returned to the Commission for questions and comments. Commissioner Johnston asked staff if the MnDOT approval of the associated traffic signal depends on the realignment of Edgewood Road and if so how close 461.ld the realignment come to City Hall. Director Jopke told the Commission the realignme dge e: is part of the project at this point in time. He gave no specific vr dimensio The floor w as turned over to the applicant for esent #�� '�r<� • j= ;N:< Wendell Smith showed the Commission an upda' a r: ' rendering of the proposed facilities. He told the Commission that the contr.. oject has been selected. WhpThe changes that have been made from the • 1 site, ana , $ted by Director Jopke, were reviewed. No access on to ,an > s d H2 or vg"g-- ake Road has been designed into the project. This desi:a - en' Y. . a ect re of working with the neighborhood that had made it kn:,r from eat a' ject that they did not want the theater to impact the traffic 4!.ng throe `.their , .rhood. The Fire Marshal's reques :4 aK dent cility en ' s will be accommodated. These plan changes will be made ay. $ e at th-:•$ Plan =1. Commission meeting. S• '; . f the C1,—*!9;' a.12,ner expr: ..‘111::1 °1-concern that the City has not been given allsiOtiiiiha.ce fro = $' s at the tra- c intersections involved with the project have bee fd for co " • #`. They requested that the applicant furnish an official notifica �g Crtaii ril 15, 1998 Planning Commission meeting. Theta` ent p f ; � a sidewalk coming from Long Lake Road to the facility entrance • om 6+ w, i : a ver o -'g way I a wou a connec . • ee s hat they ould prefer to elide the Long Lake Road to the facility entrance sidewalk and have a 41e- Ar bituminous path Instead. This change will be shown on all future drawings. •, :. A site-drainag overview was given by Brian Mundstock, of SEI, the consulting " ~ - a •inee a a> 6mpany for the project. o ti":•::<° d: Brasaemle/Stevenson to continue the Planning Commission regular meeting of April 1, 1998 beyond the 11:00 p.m. cutoff point. Ayes - 6 .Nays - 0 • The motion carried. Mounds View Planning Commission April 1, 1998 ii) Regular Meeting Page 14 Wendell Smith continued his presentation. Chairperson Peterson asked staff if they had any outstanding issues that the applicant would need to address before the April 15, 1998 Planning Commission meeting. Staff had no outstanding issues for the applicant to address. Several members of the Planning Commission, . . ..ske./ ,*.4!q,,13.31s en notification >,t from MnDOT in regards to their acceptance of th , ility's sou j e design. s Mr. Smith asked the Commission to hold a stra '" .le to,e�>•e the deve iyg ' .:: e •tion of the Planning Commission's leaning on the prof; "^"`` " "" Commissioner Obert indicated his full support '. t >. ki -d project. •Commissioner Johnston offered his suppo u,� M ">did exp`«. " 14 .ncern with the neighborhood committees request to not;a,":.•;e;an re curb •n`. '. Long Lake Road. . Commissioner Miller agreed wit• ohnston. t "•\' - . ; sue. She also told the applicant she is looking forward.t the pro t's co i ;i . •us. Chairperson Peterson sai €b'' as v 9;'enthusia-: about the project. He added it's good for the City and go. 'ior the r .. •'-nts; e ., •ody wins. Co.3:} {3 ioner Stye f f said he was-,- $ d the project and asked when the project was fs4 .w8 S'?:orcome a.Gieit,4`6 ',4:ke4gMla4 Mr. °en 4,, .' if the , . ?4.4"approve the project by the 17th of April, the theaters woul i ., h , �. ':y g :,.. �• hristma�- e" . . f 8 a . - ..1 ., • • .1 .. • - - . -ity Hall, part of the realignmen • •gewood Road, would be considered for approval by the City .4,4,,, Council at the sago time the theater project is considered for approval. r,. �: Commissione Brasaemle gave the project his full support. 8. ' 'to Reports/Information Items The next community forum will be held April 8, 1998, 7:00 p.m., at the Edgewood cafeteria. 9. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners' Reports • 9 s ` • Mounds View Planning Commission April 1, 1998 Regular Meeting Page 15 There were no Chairperson or Planning Commissioner reports. 10. Adjournment to Agenda Session it , There being no further business before the Regular meeting of th q'lanni o ommission Chairperson Peterson adjourned the meeting at 11:24 0.m. ra<x (The Regular Meeting adjourned to t e genda Se 8 rs.i i •I ��'' /F —55 s3•. y,a. Respectfully submitted, - 3 ' u Y t"; £or Rick Jopke '•.° ; w ' Item No. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 40 Meeting Date: April 15, 1998 Staff Report by: Rick Jopke, Community Development Director Planning Case No.: 517-98 Request: Development Stage Review, Wetland Buffer Permit, and Preliminary Plat for the Anthony Properties Management/O'Neil PUD Petitioner: Anthony Properties Management/Louise O'Neil PIN Nos. 08-30-23-23-0003 Zoning/Land Use: PUD, Planned Unit Development/Vacant Land Applicable Regulations: 1. Section 1120.04, Subd. 3 and Section 1120.05, Subd. 2 of the Municipal Code provide requirements for PUD development reviews. Attachments: P Draft ft Pl Appg.Commission Resolution No. 544-98 tion Zoning Map Resolution No. 5104 Resolution No. 5119 Ordinance No. 598 Approved General Concept Site Plan Site Plan, Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control, Landscape and Utility Plans Dated 3/6/98 Theater Elevation Drawings Illustrative Sign Drawings Letter from Julie Ann Olsen Dated 3/23/98 Comments from Mark Bishop, Fire Marshal Comments from Joseph Richter, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Comments from Rice Creek Watershed District outlining requirements Comments from Rick Wriskey, Forester Comments from City Engineer Comments from Army Corps of Engineers • 1 n Background: Introduction: 411 The Planning Commission reviewed this item on April 1, 1998. The Planning Commission is being asked to make a recommendation to the City Council on April 15, 1998 concerning development stage PUD plan approval. Full public notice has been provided for the April 15, 1998 meeting. The application was accepted on March 17, 1998. The 60 day approval period expires on May 17, 1998 unless extended. Project Summary: The site in question is located at 2430 Highway 10. The 26.03 acre site is triangular in shape and is bounded by Highway 10, Long Lake Road, and County Road H2. The property is owned by the O'Neil family and is under contract for purchase and development by Anthony Properties Management. Anthony Properties Management will have a ground lease for the development and will purchase the property upon the death'of Mrs. O'Neil. The developer is proposing to construct a 63,000 square foot 15-screen 2188-seat movie theater, three 11,000 square foot one- story office buildings, a 5000 square foot restaurant, and a 6400 square foot retail building. The movie theater would be operated by Carmike Theaters. An 8.25 acre wetland would remain undeveloped on the site. Total green space on the site after development would be 16.73 acres which is 64.3 %of the total site area. Impervious area including parking areas and buildings would comprise 9.3 acres or 35.7 % of the total site area. Parking for a total of 776 cars is provided on the site. 82 parking stalls are shown for the restaurant site, 49 parking stalls are provided for the retail site, 548 parking stalls are provided for the theater, and 97 parking stalls are provided for the office buildings. Joint use of the theater and office parking is indicated because offsetting hours. Previous Approvals: On May 12, 1997 the City Council approved Resolution No. 5104 which changed the come - - - a :--.g . .: : ,-- - ; . - " -a.-- !- . _ _ e ki. _e Use PUD (Commercial and Residential Uses). The City Council on the same night gave first reading to Ordinance No. 598 which rezoned the site from B-1 Neighborhood Business and R-2 Single and Two Family Residential to PUD for commercial uses. Resolution No. 5119 was also approved on May 12, 1997 which approved a General Concept PUD Plan for the site. Second reading and passage of Ordinance No. 598 occurred on May 27, 1997. Copies of the approved resolutions and ordinance are attached for your information. PUD Approval: There are three steps to approval of a PUD. These include general concept plan, development stage plan, and final plan. As indicated above,the city has previously approved a general concept 411112 plan. The applicant has now submitted a development stage plan for city approval. 1120.04 Subdivision 3 of the Municipal Code outlines the procedure for development stage plan 1111 approval. The code states that the Planning Commission shall review the plan and submit a written report and recommendations to the City Council with respect to the conformity of the development stage plan to the general concept plan, with respect to the merit or lack of merit of any departure of the development stage plan from substantial conformity with the concept plane and with respect to the compliance of the development stage plan with the provisions of this Title and other applicable Federal, State and local codes and ordinances.No public hearing before the Planning Commission is required by the City Code. 1120.04 Subdivision 3f. outlines the review and evaluation criteria for development stage plans. The following is a summary of staffs review and findings: 1. Adequate property control is provided to protect the individual owner's rights and property values and the public responsibility for own maintenance and upkeep. Both the developer and the property owner have signed the application. The developer will be leasing the property and will purchase the property upon the death of the owner. The PUD will provide adequate requirements for maintenance. Criteria Met 411 2. The interior circulation plan plus access from and onto public rights of way does not create congestion or dangers and is adequate for the safety of the project residents an the general public. The interior circulation plan and access are adequate. Some adjustment of the width of the accesses are necessary to meet the Fire Marshal's concerns. The addition of the signal and the provision of the right turn in and right turn out only access on Highway 10 are important for safe access to the site. The access to Highway 10 on the restaurant site is less important. All access onto Highway 10 is subject to approval of MnDOT. Criteria Met 3. A sufficient amount of usable open space is provided. The type and amount of open space provided is appropriate to the type of development proposed. The open space serves to provide buffers to adjacent residential uses and to protect the existing wetland on the site. 64.3 % of the site is green space which is adequate. Criteria Met • 3 4. The arrangement of buildings, structures, and accessory uses does not unreasonably disturb the privacy or property values of the surrounding residential uses. 4111 The location and arrangement of buildings on the site shown on the plan is consistent with the approved concept plan and will not unreasonably disturb the surrounding residential uses. Sufficient buffers will be provided. Criteria Met 5. The architectural design of the project is compatible with the surrounding area. The architectural design of the project is compatible with the surrounding area. The design of the office buildings is residential in character. The office structures are single story with gable and hipped roofs. The design of the theater,restaurant, and retail buildings are appropriate for buildings along Highway 10. Criteria Met 6. The drainage and utility system plans are submitted to and subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. The drainage and utility plans have been submitted to and approved by the Director of Public Works and the City Engineer subject to modifications outlined in the attached April 13, 1998 memo from Rocky Keehn. Criteria Met • 7. The development schedule insures a logical development of the site which will protect the public interest and conserve land. The Developer is proposing to complete grading at one time to facilitate development,minimize intrusion on the surrounding neighborhood and to minimize costs. Construction of the theater will begin immediately upon City approval, with the construction of the most easterly office building to follow. The construction ofthe r=" ..''': -!r_ ■__ -_ . .- . - _ - t• leases are signed. Construction of screen fencing and landscaping of buffer areas should occur in the first phase to minimize the impact on the adjacent residential area. Criteria Met 8. The development is in compliance with the requirements of Chapter 1010 and Titles 1200 and 1300 of this code. The developer is proposing to subdivide the property. In accordance with Title 1200, the subdivision will be considered a major subdivision. Therefore, City approval of a preliminary and final plat will be required prior to the issuance of • permits for more than one building on the site. The developer has applied for plat 4 approval and is in the process of completing the preliminary plat drawing. The plat will have to be approved separately from the PUD. The proposed development will encroach on the wetland buffer area required in Title 1300. The developer has applied for the necxessary wetland buffer permit as per ordinance requirements. Criteria Met Upon City Approval of the Plat and Wetland Buffer Permit 9. Dwelling unit and accessory use requirements are in compliance with the district provisions in which the development is planned. There are no dwelling units proposed as part of this development. Accessory uses include parking and trash enclosures and are in compliance with district provisions. Criteria Met Plan Changes: The following differences exist between the proposed development stage plan and the approved general concept plan as outlined in Resolution No. 5119: 1. Parcel B is designated as a retail site instead of a restaurant site. 2. The movie theater seating has been reduced from 2648 seats to 2188 seats. The number 40of screens has been reduced from 16 to 15. 3. The site area has increased from 23.99 acres to 26.03 acres. 4. Impervious site area has decreased from 36.9%of the site area to 35.7%. Pervious area has increased from 63.1 % of the site area to 64.3 %. 5. The northernmost and southernmost driveways on Highway 10 remain on the plan. 6. Sidewalks are shown along Highway 10 and along the northern edge of the wetland. 7. Trash enclosures are shown for each of the buildings. 8. The two NURP stormwater ponds on the south side of the site have been replaced with one large pond. This is due to the fact that city stormwater from north and east of the • - . - :erk to the n- _ - - area. An additional pond will be constructed north of the wetland for the restaurant site. 9. Snow storage areas are shown on the plan. 10.No access is shown to Long Lake Road as was encouraged as part of the general concept plan approval. 11. Deceleration lanes are shown on the plan. 12. Lighting Standards on the theater portion of the site are shown as 40 feet high instead of 24 feet tall. 13. Exterior Insulation Finish System (EIFS) is shown as an an exterior material on a portion of the theater buiding. The approved concept plan mentions only brick, split faced block, or stone. • 5 Analysis: Staff has reviewed the proposed development stage plan and has found that the development stage plan is generally consistent with the approved concept plan. Variations for the most part are improvements to the plan and will not adversely affect adjacent properties. The exception would be that the higher light standards may be more visible from the adjacent residential areas. The staff has also found that the proposed development stage plan meets the criteria for approval listed in 1120.04 Subdivision 3f. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Resolution No.544-98 recommending City Council approval of a PUD development stage plan with stipulations for the Anthony Properties/O'Neil development at 2430 Highway 10. Rick Jopke, Community Development Director N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\471-97\517-98.PC2 6 MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION 40 RESOLUTION NO. 544-98 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PUD DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN, FOR COMMERCIAL USES ON THE O'NEIL PROPERTY, 2430 HIGHWAY 10; PLANNING CASE NO. 517-98. WHEREAS, the O'Neil property is described as follows: Part lying southwesterly of centerline of STH No. 10 of southwest 1/4 of northwest 1/4 (subject to roads, highway and easements) in Section 08, Township 30,Range 23. WHEREAS, Anthony Properties Management, Inc. and Louise O'Neil have previously applied for and the City has approved an amendment of the comprehensive plan designation of the O'Neil property to a Mixed Use PUD; and, WHEREAS, Anthony Properties Management, Inc. and Louise O'Neil have previously . applied for and the city has approved a rezoning which changed the designation on the O'Neil Property from B-1 (neighborhood commercial) and R-2 (duplex residential) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the development of commercial uses and a PUD general concept plan; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with Chapter 1120 of the Mounds View Municipal Code, Anthony Properties Management, Inc. and Louise O'Neil have applied for approval of a PUD development stage plan approval; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents: * Site plan, grading, drainage, erosion control, landscape and utility plans by Sunde Engineering, dated 3-6-98 * Theater elevation drawings * Office elevation drawings * Memorandum from the City Engineer (Rocky Keehn), dated 4-13-98 * Memorandum from the SEH dated 3-31-98 * Fax from the Fire Marshal (Mark Bishop), dated 3-3-98 * Letter from U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, dated 4-7-98 * Letter from the Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources, dated 3-26-98 * Memorandum from City Forester (Rick Wriskey), dated 3-31-98 • Planning Commission Resolution No. 544-98 April 15, 1998 Page 2 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission fmds that this proposal meets the purpose and intent of Planned Unit Developments as stated in Section 1120.01 of the Mounds View Municipal Code in that the proposal has planned the overall development of this property and included an appropriate mix of uses which compliment each other, and will add to the vitality of the City Center. Requirements have been included to insure high quality architectural design and coordinated signage. The substantial wetland on the property will be preserved, and consideration will be given to preserving the tree cover on this parcel outside of development areas wherever possible. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission fords that this proposal meets the general requirements and standards for Planned Unit Developments (Section 1120.02) through the stipulations established in Exhibit 1 to this resolution. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission fmds that this proposal meets the special requirements and standards for commercial PUDs (Section 1120.03 Subd. 2) as follows: Required Provided Minimum Project Size 5 acres 26.03 acres Minimum Street Frontage 200 feet 1690 feetID Minimum Property Width 200 feet 1280 feet WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the proposed PUD development stage plan is generally consistent with the approved PUD general concept plan; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the proposed PUD development stage plan meets the review and evaluation criteria found in 1120.04, Subdivision 3f.of the Mounds View Municipal Code. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mounds View Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council approve a PUD development stage plan dated 3-6-98, for the O'Neil property, 2430 Highway 10, and as described in Exhibit 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and subject to the following stipulations: 1. That the landscape plan should be amended to incorporate the changes suggested by the City Forester in his 3-31-98 memorandum. A final landscape plan should be submitted for approval by the City Forester. 2. That the site plan be amended to incorporate the changes suggested by SEH in the memorandum dated 3-31-98 and the comments from the Fire Marshal. The site plan submitted for PUD final plan approval should include the changes. 3. The drainage/utilities plan should be amended to eliminate the City storm sewer system • on the property as per the memorandum from Rocky Keehn dated 4-13-98. The • Planning Commission Resolution No. 544-98 April 15, 1998 Page 3 drainage/utility plan submitted for PUD final plan approval should include the changes. 4. The light standards on the theater portion of the site should not exceed 24 feet in height. 5. Preliminary and final plats in accordance with Title 1200 of the Mounds View Municipal Code must be approved by the City prior to the issuance of permits for more than one building on the site. 6. City approval of a wetland buffer permit in accordance with Title 1300 of the Mounds View Municipal Code. 7. Approval of the required permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District. 8. Approval of the permits from MnDOT for the accesses onto Highway 10. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this Resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 15th day of April, 1998. Jerry Peterson, Chairperson ATTEST: Rick Jopke, Community Development Director (SEAL) N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\471-97\PCRES2.ZON • e Cb -0 w gc o, Ie , o aria Z .� E •a � o • c ° aa) c `^ H D aa)) O Fes w�' 5 Cb -0 0 O • O ° ap) p0E � o � G4 ch zO a) r X a) 7 as pc > .c u) to co co u) to cm (43 N N Q E co a° n - �— ;w .� a) a) a) a) a) a) E v w O �� O .� ctl '52)C .O C sn O D U C) 0 0 co ° C7 O a) ca p) O' h sq �O L N O N t0 CO f4 N as as Z > a) ,^ a) a) N,,p 0 a i O CO M LU C7) CO Un CO COpO v N �� p E i 2 0 O rT- O � N � ON a1 ,-". CI O NM m 0 vi c j N 0 a. kU .a X X 1.., 0 , C a) L. I., .0 O a W a) CUM COM j O w O N W c a. a. � � C � E � a) � N 7s. — N 6 m 'o E a'- �. R U p To- m � a) co aa)i � E �c a) W a) — E ,O .O i > .' X N p 73 E ° o 0 ca E t.-... 13 o� 0E-I M O C Of Oi N O 1— 0 4 ca 0 z 'p sq �.. z • O) a) O U) C O z i a3 h y a) j R = a) ... -a N. a) 0 v) O ° a) aL U) >, <4 0a)co c N Q — a = v) t....-. a) U . � Z a) E cac iivj � aca0 ° 4- 0 o0 M O O M o A Y O C G A ° z 0.-c v) L r 0 N, tca fl. Q C a) 4 � �" a C 13 .011 = '-r) o N U r v.N. ° „r .. a) a .0 a) 0 C r= O a U) o 0 0 0 v) c ° o x = � ti Z ..a LII Q O E 0 v0) 0 ` � C O � o.W E E `r W O aa) v°) �� m .ECL Q w •4 o c x CO 4aa) `a 0..c1- )< () Ed - v� N- N '- 0 C a) os --.T. - 00x 0000 to C , U 0 U (lc d M O 0 O 0a ._ca � cII ca cJ v) C7 O a � rQ ° m 0 E o � a a) o v-�i •• •c a� ,2 = 0U U 0 000 — ° 5w2 ... 30 .04 - Z a ° a cn L 0 0 oo a o cN N .00 c -›.5. c) 4t0 � ° .— ° max � ° cz. a) - acm ° coN oamiC 'c CO .2-4_7, .61) acac - 0E = )wa) a) coca a 0 ca v) ° a) O -c E .0c 0 ° •c a .- °L' N 0 — a C. . C. L o t) a) v) c ... a � ci) 0o a) Q:D .. Na ° a) con � L000 ° o `° o ° `o as a) � _ = 0. 0) -a U �, NrNe Er- aE �- � •, ,cva L m '4a 0 `° v C ca C M > � �. � ,� � o - a ° -a - - v) — a) a) m a) E ° a)� v°i 'oo cca .c , 0 0 ami a) c A U c `, Q fl. fl. N Q ° a) c 0 c O a � •Q ... Y i fl. U U L«=. a) co c°) cu o m a) a � .y � w i yo c) 4o cca 0 ) a)0 - C E >✓ ° c ca m al _c ca a) � v CO Q m o � Y CO ° 0 4 C c � 0) 7a 0 -C O 44 Z E v°) U)) 0)) cn z o � 4- a - ° (NI U E y 0 0 0 01- CD a 0_ a) � r- � � ° Q; ° .� o °�' Q oca) ° a) co . aso v) L a' 0 v) a) os, 0) 0) a) ,p 0 ca o ( a) (1) Z Lo C W ox EY as Q. CI 4. 0 2 � aa) ac) u0) m 0o00 E 0 ° - L - c ns E s c e ° '> a o C), 3 -2= 4= 00 0 - a) U) _ -0omo - E ,� ,� m ca 0, O � � � ° ) . E` V o t- a) •c-- Q 0 1" a) � � 0 U) c°n °) > a � aca �1L- O � 62 vain � `a1 E o �trz `,9 -8 e ,0 co ■ HccccNa › iiiA Q H ag > � o as a. b ; .z ,.. -,z, •Z 0 ai 0 ,c c 3 a ° .Qy ° d .-. a c Ute "' ° m a a" .„c! a a� � c c � o � v�ci 1`• M ca ) as ° p i ca C') m E mv' .- 0' N° aia°icE m ° '. 0 ° .L L. v� cnv) u) wrn c_ c .cc_ ° ° c <0 csi ;� � 0mo 22 000 EE E EEE ... c 0 L. � � 000 La ca as .. �. a) a) .. .ra) a c) 0 N ; 0a) QS 03 Qi Mt� O LocoM N av0- N E 0 co -_ p O 4• M N N- .«.. v- 0 0 "- 4- O o;�_ `' i� ,_' ca `�- Z cONO 40400 MLOo � N 00) � � 0 V 50 +a? E O 0 b) W c o •0 •E a cO a p., a U0Q' ° S o y Q a) c 4— Ti a) • c oQ o0o cm ° ,;a > 0 05 ,_ °mx � x � c " c A co o a) acoLa ° °a Np vQ EEE � � o0� aa ° a)o I 0 'COY 0 .0 -te a) a) a) -Z .a cca Ca ° — L.. c Mww y- 0 p CO Q'5 ca as y C "0caW 1 oma. .....z 0 - a 0 m Qy. •� _ -F....4.3 o o, 0 L._ y Qm 'y o0rn ° � cn C . ° ; ° ° a axw �. = o La ... c .c c 0... 00 O p 0 .. = U _i W . . -p aai mi N ..s.—= .01..... m° -- N C C +. L CIS X p +0. a) c°a •C)0 v �+ 0 Q.2 is > r.. ° ia G C ° a) .: L a) a) a) ,� C 0 .0 - a a) C a) cn L O 0) a) 3 C Z = c N a) a) cam m '- .c .,,, S • CCaa a) 10 '-• .0 = a) O mamma) = = 0o Ea(0O cm ' � z a) a - - — _Ccu' 3a 4CaE � cam ° taaccmial a) � z U 0 L fa a7 a) U 0 1 L — N N �O 0 ca LU, a __, O a a) ,c ~ c Q.° a) a0 0 ° s N O N a) .. c U Q- o2 (a C C C -Np a) (OQ ca 0 t +r in O u) r p m °'a U 2 = U O -.. O ° E V 1 O N to m 0 ca >' .c 0 7 m N LL V a) = O ) a C N .L Z O C to G. ° 0 °-) O C a CIL ca C U) c > O a O ca a p a W U) >4 0. - • 9- - fa a) -0 • a ° 3 0e1,_ claw (-*/ � a ate.. Om u) a) V ca L p O ° ca U) > = = m >, N m .- L •> C ' L U •- a) c U) N o a)2 '� 2 a) O 3 Ca N •V U o C7 O .0 > F' .) �'(0Y v - as a Ew c o ° -0_ mac) coo '- m a) � z � 'o c > °- c`a ani c > � ,o Qaa L "' ° ° o Q. � •- [ O ca ca a) a) a) ag a moW m � al Q. E — , . oa m m �? m c ••- = V o..:? 3 •� aU a m ca 7, r- L as> a) a L m U 3 L a a) 3 ° u, ° cc73 acn o m > °-. ate- s_ L p a°) Na _ a o C a. X au'i 16 .7.5 - ca22aLLu me~ aE) a- 2 -auu) 32o aa) Q. 0m .CLi �412 aa) WWOU al � `� amimcc°) c`a .� c�a � U) 0 a ° aiamiaEiu;� 0-.4- eq L- a) O LC .l y. a.- v) :..= cac° o .cnomm Lc ) ° U o) v1 > m ca so Q) � co) a) — . .. a c) vi ° p � cAU °' C Q C..-3 a) maim «' mmactsvimcm �a3r- mcmmL a) r. >, U � m 'c >, �- w p ,. is C = a as NY ..: N U Coa a)af ca a) .. �O Hw O w U) L "' a1 L L L - 24) .. —as -04)U : >� U) O O >' C O W a O -a 4_ m a , a 0 o. O C m . a U O OC j i- o C -0 u) 'ca aa)) oQ- n-• ca) '>7 u)u) c •° O -a To' 0 co 0.. uu)) ` 3u°) c m 'i_ m 'm °) > c � A E, -C2 co '+'r ° O c m ()) t moa 3 ° 0 .- a �o � mw .cL.. ,° � ta° o a`) o W m � � aai � o E �� � co as 4- 3 c mo o c Qma) O a maa ms m a) m •- m a) O acn ola •_ c`a � o c 2 o a m m cv a E ,.�m_. o a a) 4- z ,- > as 0 3t o um) mac = U) fa a) c ns aa)) e .or- c ffl aa) ° ocaov� ao a) U) -0 ama •�. op aau'ic � �' -cLai E" l aj U a os = 3 o a a a ca U ma .= ca 1- a _ U L o ... U 0 L 3 ... a U o L >' gcl a4 A • a > w a"1 g - U)) '� m c o �_ V . >. ° a) c a Z A ca a cam m 4- ° m c m E- � a comm" o o ai a c a) . C0 E � p m 0 � o d ° o °'m �,a ca o . 73 5 .: 0 '" -`aa 0 a) 0E _a— ca) c .-• 5ma� c -° UmcU � ° � o �am ,cm aaiY a � o � m m ca o � � m m -cs o � ° u) .c 3 U ca > u) ° c '•- CV 0 >, E .C '5 4- U0_ O ... pm Xa cca ca a � o ) ,-, o c a) �� c o a QE E ° w avoi o o - o 'U) a alai ca p m aoc) o m E � •- a m > '3 a) >, o u) � .� c > c m a NSM p C C � cm L � -0 a C OCU a) O O •a a) -0 aa) rn� cca a) m 3sM c 0 ca ui c m•o m m o L o a) a) `a O u) > -a L O U) c N L a a) ca a) N — �.0 a) ca „,>< V C E ca _ 'E u) c o >, C � ' ca as N L L ca 13 a .-+ a L Tel ' a ° 4- 't — C C C .0 U) — ca U) 0L a) ' Z U) ,C C C p CD E c .- a) a) 3 a O i.=. a 0 P y, c r.. = >, W c -a (13— a) a oocaao2ao � sa ° mCC °>> om U) C caa) o- 3 � a) la >,M .. maoa) c v*ov _ La Q. s- L .� a o-C moa c ca = m c cti m m E ° m m cam 0 c. ° O C a) a) t -0 m 'D c O C o U) -C L 'C N O O u) a — 'a m C ca o) aU N a ca a) L.- ° c >,o am o •, w L) .CQ 3xi c W E N U) . .0 _a -.A ° c o .a o a) -0 ,- a °- � >, N a) O — o W a) ca ca c ca ° �p ca U a p �_ c co O 0. ca U .°c p Q ca a) -a a to 00 C L -a °, C ° >, O C a) a N L E- 6-5 -� 6' C C f/) b- .c ..L- r ca 7) L a) - U ° :. a C u) O (n ca (a 'U) p) ° U U a a c ° a .tn. a) .. ca ° ca ° rn O c —aa) co04. aCCD CCUCUc°.) om0E _ �' a).0 >,•- 0a . o a) > o0U Ca) C L ° __ a= co = -0 > 'S . L .� E0 :. c .- cm � 3Nt' ;� a) maioa) , as .- 0 00 � ° W as ca •Lc caacaoomo ° U_ > a a 3L m � a JoO ›' o -a O a p m a.— MT)L- aoo ciao ) O : a a E 3 � ) N a �' >,Z Q a) a) z. U)E o ' ma . ° -C Z c cacCa) � a) ° Co ¢ 3 °\ + N o c ° V O c .c o O .- o a) u) u) _ oo ma, 2 c ai L c u) uta) U)) x w po.. =c > u_ 4-. m � E ; • 0 • (Do_ Q c� 0 o c, c�a ° No06 eco = ai = o E a o - `o ami •S -, c a) a E � c .cri me a) E O a' c •� c c L cn -.. c ?v = ►- Q� A cn ' w o c Z O c JAZ ,� N L • z a) 0 a .. �- es a ocu°�i L 3cn � "' our o .. �- � � N � � ° QCD c � � OOso. � No oQ > � n cwcl- Eo � � vn o .. Ecca ° 2LO) > cna.. :=. � 2ca2o D0lt - 3 O � mcaacio °- °� c sNinaYi -ate-�' 2 acin � rn� � Z0CLaW z -., .. c4- 13 a o ° o o w 0 TE > aoi , C5 >, ° Oo2 a� cac EcacC a>) � 2 •E � vp a) = > o > mc0 � m ° c °-U 0. . a�io•coo � a..... -0000CQa vo) U 0 -0 0- 3 -00200 •- L .. • o c�—a CA.. o N O L U U W Lao a) _c uiZmU � — ..,0 , > � o •cc Oc o3o C70 A ° c = 0 Lw 6 .) > ca = E 0 Loa) Ot -0 o o c > y•a a) •- a. = a) cc a. 11)- >� as3 ° -a -o - -- • E cs »_• ° a) � a z EUc a. -c 'c� =a o � -ao v_, cuooasL. � o > o 73c _ 0 Nyco, o L- c aoi 64.17. C = o � m � ��, � �.N 3t a'� aaa 0 - = 204.- -C4- 04- w N to V a) = L .. L .. c a) a ° .. Q' • U c0 .. ° ,� ca •- * CC 1.- S - •• 0 ) •- caL MCD f) mQ -a OoE6 o >,., p9a) ° cof0 •° 0U .«. o ov, E a .... o >. : 70- - 5 o o , L = 0 � 4 cn a) — . L) a) o a) O mow o -a W • �Oi�- Ec � � a �, � _coo N > � � -off `° "- moo w OU N o N as 0 ° i- c ° ° .- cm o c u) m o � _t r, e ai •> av E . a0 ° � ° .n C o •C ca73o ca c o c c -o o • 5Up o — a"') cca m — � ca -aco co � � "-' ° � • 'ao20 E a-- cost a) vi.. -ozct � cw .`—° c o aoa — 'N = ^ �' 3 2 aci c � `� ° w 3 s aO c c0 C0 om O O o a) C a .0 E .� -' o L 0 2 L a C 'a ca ° -0 .2 a) E •°' L •c ca a) E rr a) .... 1= 4,v , .. a) O .-.11 a) o ° o a`) Q- O �' 0)0) c aa)i O 0XI0 E Cn � LZ CUZ _cm -..... 0 ,-, u) N.0cc ,- .., ›3 - 'AS AS o c o o to - w ° a) .S o 46 ..a >,46 .6 N au, o fa �0 o m ° a CZ E. E0Lc .Qo c o a? 13 13 it- .0 c ca (7) c as 2oZ OTE N - W Q o � o n. ° o o a) -0 ami aci 0Ec v fl.� W � o c o1- o 0 o ,E O Cno O ca °) f oo Em .S Ems; 2a ac) > ° � ) ,. a � I- 092 ° p ." O o o .c a,> -3 3 m E oL o :� a) a°) 0 . o °- cca .0 ,E m ca ) o 0) Wx w 7 C E - m O - N e: cc L a) a) N O •_ O N O M a L c a) .5 -U N L m L O O C aw > m .. ._ o = a o L T- H � a-a00 U C3 a.. .� I- 3 E cart- -ate �..fl ca A A . W o u)1:lig o cc) to �� H ° 0 ° 5o Ncno o Ca ao)ca >, . CE azA o a O Co � N = vi ° . o ow m - caZ 0oaL7. Q Y o Oo c "' ' O = — � a -cm f° o a) L OO ' 0 o aN L ,- 0c o4, Lo tWcwa �Oao 'a .«.Q a c ° viaC -OcZ Oa) p -00 (0w C) 'aa ••a Zc � • CDr. jSLNa � o0_ mNE0mA00 a � 6oauO N c : a 1-1 a al as co =73 C a 13O E a) a) > s -o L_ O O ° "'r 2 w > -= (,) — ` m m a) a) ° °' 0 E m ~ a -aU 0 E a) cca E -oc c ` ° ccLao o 0 � N -13 0a- od •- oCn-Qaa) -a mcot° O > D•- ao .cc �>> •U)• Com- O _0 0 o 4.., O a) ° t a) E .0 0-4- b - >, 03 C) --' a) m 0 oc ca aci > �a amE Sao > •E m t aa)) o fl.-a s- CIS mo '� rn_o C aV o c.,13 W C m ac (010 '4'LOCI) a ah) >�,m c aoi m O E o '6 0) E .0 m ca Z o N O O 0 0 .O a) :II c o x ca O m - a o L 0 L L a) o w H o -- c � � o o •� � — oar N > o rn ° m c o 3 .c c a) a oO worn - 13011' 0) 0 O '3ca) 3 � rn.QjOcc O U m a=) > aa) 0-m 0. � mV 0. — 014- 'a ami O • 70 0o Qom > E03 W mm CA 2.LL 2 ) mc w 4-,.. > a) m `° to EO � .5 c`0 > c o ° .c ' OL m � -OC3 aa) L > 't- L C a-•- c .- L c c O 'O 80c4- 2 'O N ?� ca a a) !� cQ Q-� L a al = 4 '= oao) - �,I- OOa,icaoa) oo me .cac033a) -a >,. . Ecn H to O 00 "- - = c "r a L L U E E :a 2 CA a) E a)s � '� ca O O v_ Z C13 .5 i4uu . =- M 3m ca vi '=; (1) 04'7. =c ° ' = •cam ca °) c.c � cam ai z .. . c m o O ca N c — cL � a>) al a "� o me v = E ai = c m w � 0 o c .� N ' • °- co co o � ,� oo4 3v) c z >» • oY ` Ems, o o � ° CD ` o m m o o Ca C0 o o ff : ,n 0) ° mw ZQ Cc •� Q o t s c R) c 0 'a Q) ° 0 w -o .0 L ° V m 'c >o a) c c L c = a) o d 3 °� . La) cag — 000co o — ,no 0 - 0 00oo »� oc , ,-a = 1 c w To f0 a) c .0 ca cn c O. ca _ _c 'a 13 .,.. a) v• E 0 . c 0. u) a O E (a � c N ° � � ¢ :112 Egamio oca ,� � c '� 00 � coEma`a) 0 > � � o � � a) o J � cc0 > r- mo.Uo °-) = wo (D O o O O a) L L o 0 a) L t L L E O O O L a) O .c to •� z d o a) ci < .a o aca < as o aca cn a,0 I- . - Qaa.E � m .� H E2 O �, a .r .r a) its' _,- E m o C U I ° as o .j a) L —m aUO m -0 a) = O- 0.L ( 'O L ° L m C C C a) "" (� z 0 n a) E 0 m m c a) rn rna0 0 '� � > 0 0 0 rO40r ° N m C O ` -cE m a a) -c c C - O E a f0 O Y C ._ d t'� O .c 0 ) 0 � a) U) .. 0 � 0o c °) QaOi .c Ew c -o Op .rte 0 0 E co w ai I 0 � :° „as 0 00 0 3 ui MI Za c -5 0 = 0 cMaa � Ern9cc CcscaEm c ° cami0 w � — m 0 .. E me U m o c� mF' 0 E E m ° oa �, m 0 L am ° vj c O U ° E4 ,; 0 0 _ .0 c E 0 4 � U m � � � E L0 CD aCi o ° a0i o c ai 0 Uw v) .�-60 � � c 0 m c- 2 c os '4- E E ° c v`) rnma? I- � C70 > a0 0 (L,) D c ' c c0 cc al .N � 0 0 > o 2 m 0 CQ c m c O _ 3 7 7, io "_ 3 ,C Z F" .. '� a. �' cu U to O° Zo mom : to O L me a > E ° I- a0 a) 0 m � ) .c .- me L 0 . �' E '- ca�i � a? mo v osa) .c d U �c `°° as 3c � v3iccN-' 'c o` cn - � -acc0 � a' a) `°° N a T Q _ 0 0 ' w 3 +• m L c 0 00 •La3 W U 0 . , co 4- 0 .U+ L U L - a C O t_ 00 mc 0 3 0 E 0 9 ao ( 111 3 0 " 4- 04- 0 >+ o m .c m m ° p cc4 - U mL a � 1 N Ca-g -00003774 0 _ � L m a) c 0 c. m > 3 , o av, .. m - 0ox0. ., -0 ci0o . -0Ecco0 om v, ,� a ns a �'= -a •c6 a > cr c as N s C L a as �� cn 2 U cU = ° m Ca o -o c �m = = 0 0 rn-0 L- u) a N 8i�� a �° cin " Ci/ c) oc a) V (o ° vi O CU 0 O O Y 22 U ( ... ..- >455 >4 �- O M O O W = 00 N... c20 0 .. O U C (off c c • 0a)a) 2 E as > 0 E m -.10 >, m EE 0 ac) o f ci 'i c 2 °r o �, = 0 ccs g- o -c o A s c > E -C 0 •-' c 0 — s. m 0 0 > , `-' ai Z vow cmc ° .coECO 0 >N-C -10 OCL -0 2m .Cwwm .Ca) ap ,ci) Q- 0 p L ac a H 0 03 � = L -d E 0 0 aac ^ L a- O c0c LO . >, m > cn Om00 - _ 0mo , Umm /5 . - a 3 0 m -."- t --= L O O � LL O > m L U _ L c U1' co) p c , U a, aL ,3 I- 10 0 cic -0 O m a to a �, L5O F U) -a •c 0 m H o o ° vfc o a°) uic m - o c 0 E o m cot - o 3 cn o 0 -041) ,-,; F vU9- r- I- -ow . 1- Oaom � rn-0 r- F• � Uomnm I- moat Q • a � > w �� � rn a) • 0 0 a4 c "- >+ .= 0 a) (D 4- a ZA 0 — CC � L o U � C L ai C .C .o a O -) 0 0. C)~ c o .co ..-- t. -0 -015r- c -0 `� Qomm a p °' E C � Amo ..: t .l O W > E00 > 00)O O N U 0 V c�II C a ^ •N N a a) aC) m � L0 -50. 0 wE "c •,- 4- - o a) o0 _a > 0 0 0 = - s = E m .N 0 ° tom am- t c a , � � c mm m o -0 E 8Q m c a) u) - --- a)0 " a) c umi ° t .aY0 .�� 0 •� i 0 N cn Ca a..- LO a) N 0)_c rn.co '" c W C m C 0Z C o ° a Y � -D m .- 0 U ° . (o - cnv L N . - J 3 W = m 'c N 2 -8 ° 13 C m �, a) • N O — O N 01 to >+a a O C a)cocT3m -po 4.1 c ., 0) C >, a3 -0 c _C 0)-0 0 t N N O 2 .0 J E a) a) N m U '" II a) cn , C 0 < E4- 2 0 a) a= 0) ° c 03 F" 0 0 c .o 0 .cLo rn 0 cmg0 m v) ° " oa) wma? z C moo � � ° c -0ca? 0 _ 0ocorl3f1 a .mc •a> c • cco >i -° .. Ca? ° a a) cn c i a) t0 p)'cCTO U 0 m a) m L m O E :c >, 0 > • L C 2 f7 � E 0 > E _c rn - c =Eml) 0 0f. m C o �-a 15 0 cc 0 -00 (53 -0 - 4) -; . � •E o - ° ,o7 '- Ea3 0 " w 0) = W >, .�-076 (60. 0ca0 � '0 ,« 2Q... cm ,t_ .. 0) .ZaL (� -CU > w (o C L L a) .-0 - - -C L >,1 = m C .. C .t C C -p �O (o a W c m -pc -0 amigNo mo Em = Eai = (" ET):c -01-40 -0 ,.. = a0cmc LQ Els 0 E m C -0 -8 'p O m 0 a) Z 0 0 0 a m O . F' -0 0amC 0c - Ow a4_ (0y- oc EOa) _ m... CtS c .., �' E -c ° a) 0um) 0u°) 0E 0a) m � "= No) � "o > w' E O � � Oma- 0m > � C .� aEi0 oC (_ C0 N00 - .cornrn3 Ao N : E4 c 0 C 0 > a (P2. 0 .' 0011 C7 o N o C .c U w O " ° -0420_ 5)) = 0- c •� (u- 2> = 4) = 7,265 -62 -al C 3 L = N ° O-0) D) < 3 '2\ 0 O °- 3 C'C Cw mc ,E a a) m a � 50 � f- N 3 m — aocJ a) s axw �- a015 $- m - � (0 0 0 4- (n o•oWOz 3m mr E = 0)= 0 . 4 0 apo '~ m aZ0 (orn 0 - 0• m a c O a) .0 +. U N Jt p 0) f—CO C ,--, Z W c •c00 E .co �- a � '(o (Do i r > C,2wc a) m e 'c 3 ri - c 0s aCi o zv Q 3 I- Loa) Uooa-00 a0 ■ ■ ■ � Q ..., -0 .2 Ocva • «. N. — a o >, 00 0) N .0 = 0 CiN CD CD 3 ro .0 I- _C a) 0 u) , .. 4... .0 0)J - .. p � O 0 cc ° �' � 00) . ... a) E ,— a) cc , v) O Z c .0 C O a) L coO O‘ z � aEcs � a = a) ii 9- a) � z 0 0 0) (..) b � o as °� � E �o a aC 2 Y � O c 'S 0 EE. :Ca) Lo LO ` O � a) oCDµ- W0 M o � _c as >, ca as 0. a ,or. " .�.0 C C N 0 .- 0 > - d �,� cn 3 � Q ca 0.:? � �� v a) _C o V w0 C P. CSL O a co O .� N '3Q '� 00 .5 f04 C O p � � as a) ca 0 u' 0)c as �, 0) as 0) c 76 EZ a) G .. co C > w t— C.) W E � OLv) =CD � c � ascc •N >+-aL.. t� � Yo � cncA C70 73 L cn = u) = O O E a) O a a) 0) co O O 0 U i 'i �d 01- a3 -C ° 0 0) F- OL Cs Qas c N x N a) CJL2 U) O Q � L a) ca a) c aC U) G. `p a'c G. ) O` Q as J J 0) a) .. a 0) C •C 0'in p u) 'a 0 0 0 8 C O Q 3 v- a) O Oc •C c L. C W � : � -FD m C cg L a, N 0 —, C cC = a C .L u) a V C cB W O p •= — a) _ — a .;.. L .. 4a 0 a) c. v) p = a3 ..U) 04) O L. L - E .. 7 o O C fa O (..) a) >• 0 °O a)Cf) ' 0. 0 a) "-' Q' E o V] — a) _c ° a) ix .- > mo o = a31 -a c � ns NG a) U .. LG. ca •— V vm a) ac•� 0O � Y > V) L a) 04- as a .. G al as 0) c 0)L a c O a) 4. U a) C vim as ai E .0 al ` o >;•C •cn = � = a oL ocil 03 � � 0) cp) O - 0).00a) 'U) al cC .� .0 o � v) � 0 ` � � o c0 c -5 C 4-. 7 ( C � CO a° fl. a) c CZ aci o •V G'•- .-. "a c ca a) J 1 �" .., a p � E ca O '- C � 3oc ooL ,«.. ca � o Z U 3 To 'C rub' ` C U) 0 C C u) 0.C as � t - " .... c 0 a a) - o u3 � .ao (1) 0 .- 04a. U ~ c0i 07) 00 -C ~ o a) mw- 0 0 � a) O G. 0 E L c .- Cal 0 0. a O c. o ax) o a) cn a c T as mo v aa) u, ix 0 -c 0 -E 0 0 > o a a) E '.(a G d a) c o 0 . a) V Y o Oo a. G a) j U a) C O H a > ■ H 0 .a C U)) a0) ■ I- 0 < � g .0 °-) IL- as .� co a_ ,_ IL- � 3 IL- di A crl A , 1:-..1 g . . s_ t� a) c -as 0)'� .0 _ 0 .., t a as as c c3 00 cu) a. Ow w 42c "+ > � 510- c U ° vc-- 0 >'.� 0) d U) c C �? L E .rncnp 3a) � c � 0cc00a) � ,� a cn U) L N °�� .� •� � ca c " o :3 — E 5 -v a a) as C) in .. L > L as U) as -a 0 = -0 5 L m oL ,� 0) a) � •E0 � fl. c3 cuL ,� O .0 ~ a w ~ (1) .55 E 0 0U) a a) O N 0 .) a) >, cat cm c4- a) ac O O � p a 0 O V O . a) N cis Z' i 0) c O p a) ,� Y = 0) G. N 0-. > a) c) .4 0 = L V) c .0 .0 = - L L. O w, O a3 " a3 c`a c a) Va) a) -a L OL C > L o c 0 �? Q O C Y G. a) c c6 ala) 0 3 O N - 0 a) V E O "a -a 0) G.a. `p a) a) G- c"n c r u) CD -a •�' V o 7 c G. >, L V c cop E.. trot 'ate � � co �jEc c aso = o _, cccac-a .;c c 5 O p O .2V•. E _cmc u) a) . 0 a).. (, •5 _ 0 a) Z > (° mE c0) Eccrn °).oEa) o6D > aoa .ai � aCaa w 0) a) a) 0 L o EsCD In u) G.asj .0 > a) i_ 0) � ? � L- c a > c > � 3 c > a) .. G. tY " .4- a 0 C-5 c o -5 = V c o >•N flI5 0 L °) o - o 0 aoi2cpn COCw .. 0 3 2 > L O ( a 0 as 0 "Q 0 p L > 0) a) uJ • LQ m o c2a) cn � .0 V0a0i c0aoaN ct `c-a •c � � Q ccn > a) +r 1::$ 01- 12 (00) , - = o U) 0V 3 � a) . 'CI u) 0) iia .„ � . 2 a) 3 � C oG. o LcoU0 cL = L a: P0.4== CD- NG. u) .6., 0 .,y, V cam -au) aO00E )) LO., I 0 0 _ -aa) (� O La as O O U uJ O L a) a) r E 0 "a) ._. a' m "0 Y c w C 5- O 0 •c I- .0 O p 2 •- as cs ' N a 0 1- Ts E co L O c' 0 — C — a) Z � m G. >, - u, _ c ,C _ E .0L 05L. �. Lca oN 0 o -a c . — 'a >,m cIrsa ca E —0 a3as U a 0) -0 -aU) a) c c E � o, "= MI co = E ate) a ULu) vi o = o c s :? � W 0 ° ° _ axw c o CD a) o 0 E 3 o a 0) E > U 0 a '5 F- as _ --- 0 a) 0 cn E a00 o '- 0 c 0) 0 aso c 0 .5 as N = L o � � c m EL a) o ,-.1 L 3 0) inasN � � a c c L 22 Q 4.•. 0) a) 0 •- V W f4 3 a) c a � rnai o 0 0 � ccs 0 a. � 0 > 0L) a) c a) 13 C C 0 c z � � E � — L >, > ao cats L 'rn >, C0000 < o L U) 'a e- U) u) 0. as a) .0 0- G... o - < L a) ■ F-• O co as 0 0 4- .. O N al L C a) >, ca ° Ca ca >. ai ` cu O •0 ;� .0 O. O O c E O C =. a Q) a) - E c c .cwt 3 a) c� • (0a > a) t � ) a) w fa a) O a) 4- 'u) V 0 •�p) E o ° 0 c > I- ,o .. o,.... sv a) w -c ° 0 3 E2 = co � z N O. o ca 13 0 .0 ca ° a LO c ~ C a) ca Z a L cc) _ u) .. O ,c a..-ea' c) 0 •- c o o 0) to 0 o a) LO 110 ° aciQ' ° _� � > ca a) N .N E "- a) a)a) c `^ E� c u) a' L8 o u) c �. o n.-0 a) cP o ca ° ccao 0)I-- a) `i' U' ° L0 as .4Z. cca) c13 cam a) c0 U 0 ca ° o o 0.- o •S 0 BUY >'L � v, C70 0- c.. 0 O N -0 0. .c El a O '5 n00030.2 -0 Z -. Z .n '42 a EUs , - V U Tv -0 ao- _ Lo 3 � L u Z - aa) 0 0 -0 u) .c4- c N �° 0 0c c 0aa ° 0 � 2 ° n pqa L ca «. 0 to ,, O s �-- L 0 c a) L c v- U 0 C 0 0 W O a) x c a $ "' 0 1.... (1) .z.. .- O -0 >> o,0 0 -a R a ca t D) 0 a) a) a) C '" > co c E a) aL N = c a) a aE L a) .c a) a .� 0 3 •Qa) 0 .6 3 W 0 c •- . 0 Y � ° E ° •a •a = c >...c -0 c LL O E O 0 W U Ems- °�-) a � � � � o .,. ° arnc-VF• CL E = 2 � � a.o0 . y, 0 X 0.To' L o C acQ, 0 ccaa. °) .0 a) c C '• E L v) caa 0 0 - C - ,c 0) c" 0 - •?+ccs acn -C ca 0)-IC a) O A U 0U) 0. c 0 .0 = a' o a' cat >,e'pia- Ec c) u) NcaaEcn • La 06 u) cc) .c .ccLa0 0u) 2Z � 0Z L cca0 .00 •- W `° cam _aC aa) aa)) 30Q- aa)) wa) ca .C1.- '° a) c°a ) (13 (ni "j •" 0 c 0 C aCD a) E a 3 aci c 0 � s `- 0 c .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 v) OoLcaa QoE � a3L ca ° Lw- � ,� o E0 � a) -.. aa0. ,-: WE, E o c o 2 >. a) 2 O c >. 0 -0 u, 0 a) N „cA c E . a) 3 '� o •2 .. c o ami ca m0 = " ami : o cU c .: a 0 0 Q' Q-,.- Z a 0 O ca .5 c -a U 0. 0Y 8Q p ac -a > ca c W a c E 0 ° _ + a 0-- -Va) 0 oa, m oa) -� > oc0 om0 ,E0Q,.. O _i : 0 L i_. O-Y Q' NU O- N 0.0 N fl... L Q LL w ,.a a) .,, to a a) L "a O a) ca 0 u) +• 0. N .- u) a) O O.-°= L +' E-, > .c 4... ■ II- 0. oc. EL ■ II- ca a)) 3c° E a) ■ II- 2 ._ 30 ' ' o N OW •a E~ a -s Zate) c > .00 ,> 0 Cl) oc a 0 A c •c a)_r: o a - C 0 >4 0 .c a 00 , E00 .. c a 2.). ca 0 01= U d a) O 0 .0 a) t, O u) p C O p 0 ca c t ca 0 0 0 to m O O 10 � 0 O M CO CT00 a > 0 c = N N a A LO ca .5 -0 mcLu' - › coca 03 "0 " � •cn `� O � m � ca .0 co � caco � fl. a >+� oY > .• ° 0 L - E 0. 2 • M Cu ... O N 0. 7 C > fl. C c ca a) a) 0 0 o � c N O c1. a' '= 0 0 0 co V o a) a E O a) m u) 0 - Uv Y O ni 0 � � w a .. O ca o � � E cn u) o 3ca � c°) 0oo3 a) a) _c - _Cac) E E c v to �•F_)- . v -0 0 aJ 0 ca CU NFA- - H Cu >. _C 03 (a a) U N : O ccn tea) �Ti) L 9 w ai L n . , f- .-+ ca ° u) >, L c L 3 a) 4- 0 0 O 4 Ca • C ca o c �-' en C o a) 0 . -a >. 0 - co o c o W LO c a) .c c a) O EO c 0 ° „�, OO J O a) V O IX O U 0 ,«- 00 cp � c = ,amu) a' 71- u ac) 0rE0 ni cy-' -a �6 -as 1' a) a O Q- Q'� as a a O c .0 a>i 3 'a ca ~ •- o .D O ,U.Y a ca 0 o >� CI L a >. o r aa)) 0 a . � -0 c`a a) .� o �� c• > 20 a �, ca0) , cua. 3c -t '0n- a) Cl) a) ,> ti Oa) O Q .. -a o ca ct a 0 a6. 0) 3 " c rn3 � C C) Lo CO ca o •�' E 0 2' a) • 0 > -r.- `‘ >. (1) 0410 0 0 0 a) ...' 0 •a E-� w O. - a= fl. 0 ' a) -0 c -c 0 4-• v) > = E ca 0 O 5 U = C L u) .a 'o o .c c o > s cn 3 c . o� 0 0 > N ca C o •- c -0 0 -a � a A o L0ca ca) OO t ° 3 0.203 -CCD0 W to CO ac O W �' O. '-' •-, 0)V a c O) •rr O (a 0) .r O Y ad O1.N E O O Lw O N Q 0 c a -c cla = o .0 ci_ o m N 3 c O ate) C .2 ° Cl)a) 3a • is O ca O V u- .L. 'a .3 0 4i a) o ~ O c -a O O O C L a) 5 O Q ,.a = . c :. ... vi O fa .0 a Q ca >(N1.2 ca "a + a 0. L E .1-) O Q+ C7 0 L0o "aa) is a) a) LQ. ooLl" co2a °) '7n ca oa) oa) � a) ,..a = s c c _ c0 c c > 00 a0-°) 03 � 0 .c0 a 0.:12 h- c •E > 1Z4 •as a) .2 a) aE a) 0 � a) c0) p 0 = V 0 0 c0 'O O wo Z 0 .00 = -0 I- c06 ° '� Cu NI- o - Cu.0 O N ■ H 0 - a- .� 7 O c`r4 a. m. 6. L 4;4 I Cu .. 0 I a vZ as aa) ot � 0O V.. 1— 22 o a� Z °'00 Z • iref0D :c i z CO Y o H U a O ctan = ° a) ° E Z a a c. 1- `a)=2 'm `ww ZIca o P— rnm > - a) Z d _ 2 i � � - -a a) CDO cnLu a) c: ox a0ZE.O -� UU ct a) Cu C a � = > c `�_ Z - 5 I w a) ma . o Cu C) 3 O O p a ,acoaaiu) ( co _ - v+ } W `" 0M c '5 Cu r" o caON 3 cn �51 0 -0 .v. ...I ..... < 4a". E U o ° � � 0 Cua O W E w C7 m m Q ca c c u) co a • O c � J fn O O p a) t z < q CD ca a) c Z Zo ~ � N asi c •E) c'3 °� °) 0.) U ZCe ca Z W O 'o _a 0 a) . Z aai �jQp co a00 o O O >- a��i a _ 9 g > a 0) 2 Q m - H m O a > o = cn > 5t _1 CO 0 11-- o Z > 4.1 IIA I a) Q Z Q c •--> a a? ,_ 0.1 c o c o o aai a QW c Cu O c al 1-.1 3t .0 Q z O cu i (n O 4' >+ U >` q`_ � ° >, gc rn;� a`) ccaac a) n = a) -aaE a a) Y = a) -° a 3 > o ° a a) Z ca •° O -a _a = tea) N a) 0 2 Cu c 0 cce a? a_ 0. a. a — o .. a o > a) c._ � o 15 C «. O a) 76 - a) 5 L: ,I a) co c4 Cl) = No0 �O O' c a) O a -al L o •C .0 N c O O C C Cu - -a ›„-r... O "- crn � "' 0) a) o E ° aU .. o0 _ a� a� o �_ U Nc — O 'U) Cu -o - :., L aE - Lu- Ea icon oNo °) a`� .0 cavo co ° ,a? o 1- o � c � Cu = G •o a) C - CO mow m mIU a) C eii c > E" ca cE c`a > a:. a $ .. cnasC — •U) H Z �- c a) a) — � � a) O C U C C O o c 'c Z 3 co W -a 'c� E0 w' a X30 oa) ao .0 a) Woa ccaa m a >. O >,(n c E ° U) .E ) C � F- � � � " � a ,.. a) ca c.) yam .. ca4— N O .i • E y O "E' -c UQ W O O co L m a) a) L E O U a L co cp C O ca ' ^� r.a 0 a = - c cc — 1U a) +, ca 3 L d W a >+ a — 3moa •� Ta. 2.). _� 002.4- oN W o > C.a N V � s c _ o N a) a) -o > it a) VO Q O .r O �. — a) -ca) a) E c W CD >a) LL `~a) 13 0 C j O ) := a) 1— SI OL c rn a) 4.7. a) - = E-, — Qa U ca ': � C a) = Cc = 2 aviasc'„ catpa) a } N c6 N Cu c C V .X45 a) }, C .0 :? N cv a) E C O E 8. Z -a Q F. -c .0 Cu c >. = = .Stas_ a) a) C >oa > > E > a) 2 i W a) < • ocaaa)) ECD � ` ca -d3aEi �- c � cccaa c- > ° u) .- c a 3 � CFC a) o � rn� C a ° °) °) c4 c E ° Qac c .as N W x W a� c c ca a) E 3 E ca o c- aS o a) E C Q a ( O ai cii oc c CO c rn � aa) oN o °.� °? .- occ a) m > -C a °O 73 CU � ai M 'X • = ca ( E .° a) a) cn a) co coZ. U) m W /r5 a) ` 3 a) O a) a c c4 > L Z o) N .O a) a O Z CM .' _c >...— L cn M c c 0 0 >. a) 2 a) aa+ w d' C - O v) to Z 2 d• Q I— C > I— .N N Q = O U v- _a 0 (0 (0 (00 N Q 0. w a) Ca N Y O. 0 N rn F.: O 00z , z 0 � o zz ,-- ;11 2 U w O O ZHO W U a 6 a W0 W 0 A 0 6 W � 5 v, H A � o WW O W as rxQ • a �a o O Q o` as -o O a 1-o W d c c cli a 'p O u) caL L fl- N ai 2 O Q.a Q 5 O 3 °? ,° a) '5 -a •c P 13a)tes j Y E '�- c a) I O c)>2 CO f'. > 0 = c c) Cl) 10 -0 z cama) o 5; = ( 3 = °) W mop C jC ca) 0 > o a o 0 0 -cam 23 0 - oa) Cl) ca a) C = W a) Us � co .-.-. U) o o ti m a) cu u) c 3 �2 m W oo . = t Q c 20 o Ca tc) o.s Cl) Cl)W2 .c -- .c .- cox >, 5 mW W . oia) Q O U :a u) Z < .5 - .' W H .Z a) au) .coU _>40 < < 3 CrN 0 a) a) E m I- 0 mo v) > a) a � 0 � � o 'a w 1W- Z 0 Ila -° al W i� �. p Q N O W a -°a 0) ate) o I¢— O s � � ami z � Q _ N— "0 0 Q (!) 0 1- OU 2 .0 (t 0 N C1, ..,.�- "--, , IS ,pmt i.II O1C-`ft7`t-Ubij p. 1 i * • 1 I., COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION •p'c�u ti�vP 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View MN 55112 612-717-4020 612-784-3462 - FAX Please Type or Print Information-Complete Both Sides of This Form Applicant Information Name of Applicant AP MOUNDS VIEW LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Address Telephone 972-991-4484 12770 COLT ROAD Fax 972-991-4494 SUITE 1170 DALLAS 'TX 75251 Interest in Property(check appropriate box) a Owner of Property Lessee,Operator,Manager t7 Contract for Deed Owner a Other(explain) Agreement to Purchase Applicants must provide evidence of interest in property at the time of application,and if you are not the owner o property,you must provide a letter of permission from the owner giving consent to the filing of this application. The e property owner must sign this application for it to be accepted. *'roperty Description/Proposal dress or General Location 2430 HIGHWAY 10/LONG LAKE ROAD & COUNTY ROAD H-2 Legal Description SEE ATTACHED Property Identification#(PIN#) 083023230003 #of Acres 23.979 Current Zoning B-1/B-2 P''DJ Type of Application a Comprehensive Plan Amendment $250 EX a Rezoning $250/acre; min$250 max$1500 • Major Subdivision $250+$250 deposit* Minor Subdivision $200 Planned Unit Development(PUD) ® PUD Amendment Refer to rezoning fees ® 5350 Conditional Use Permit t3 Variance R-1, R-2 575:all others$250 Code Appeal R-I, R-2$75;all others$250 o Develop Review/Site Plan $100 o $125/acre;Wetland Alteration Permit min$125 max$750 R-1.R-2 5150;all others$200 et Wetland Buffer Permit Q FIoodplain Permit R-1,R-2$25;all others$100 0 Other $200 .111ksits shall be paid to cover all costs of public notices,materials and staff or consultant research or preparation of materials associated with this application. The applicant shall be responsible or alll reasonable incurred costs in excess of the initial deposit amount. Any portion of the deposit not spent or encumbered shall be refunded to the applicant within thirty(30)days atter consideration of the application is completed. Please complete the reverse side of this application. Feb li 98 02: 43p We.. 411 .�e11 R. Smith 61� r84-0699 p. 2 City of Mounds View, MN Deveto•meat A. •!leaden Present Use of Pmpv Pa.t Z Undeveloped/Vacant Duplex/ wo Family Dwelling Beagle Fly Dwelling l G Business/Commercial Establishment e ;dull-family Dwelling Other(explain) +istrisf Industrial-Establishment Property Classification 20 Abstract a l OtTL719 Description of Proposal BY MY(OUR)SIGNATURE ON MIS APPLICATION, HEREBY KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMA TION PRO VTDED ISIUE DECLARE THAT,TO THE BEST OF MY Signature of ApplicantITS (rypedlPrintcct) R. 'JAY ANTHO. Name of Applicant 1111 Signature of Propertyr Owner • Name.ofProperty Owner(trprci/Printed) LOU/SE 0 tIE_-L T Ow Address of Owner TT t {—I Phone Number of Owner 5r- .swss****asaes*as***********************as*****taxa:axassrr++ *****Innis******s************srssss )ate of Submittal :FO OFFICE USE ONLY )are of Acceptance 'honing Case No. Assigned to: 60'day t 120-day limit Fees Paid: Account • oplication: Checkrk Dedication: Receipt :posits: , ler' • )ATAIOROLPSICOMDEV\FAA ki ClEu,r#o ran r00-COOC2i TZ2I3d021d .I�OH?�F r6ffT66Z1.6S/ CZ:t'T 96/CT/Z0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION • The southwest 1/4 of the northwest 1/4 of Section 8, Township 30, Range 23, lying southwesterly of State Trunk Highway No. 10-62, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Ramsey County, Minnesota. And All that part of the northwest 1/4 of the northwest 1/4 of Section 8, Township 30,Range 23, lying southwesterly of State Trunk Highway No. 10, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Ramsey County, Minnesota. Containing 1,133,997 square feet or 26.979 acres. . 1SEPH G. BEATON, JR., ',Tr ATTORNEYS AT LAIC VOICE MAIL: 871-6604 ' JOE BEATON 3109 IIENNEPIN AVENUE SOUTHPAGER (612) 640-6087 AD/41MT= MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55408 MOBILE(612) 791-2182 IN ALASKA AND DIINNISOTA E-MAIL:beato0010tc.umn.edu PAX (612) 871-3694 • February 19, 1998 Chuck Whiting City Administrator City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Moundsview, Minnesota 55112 Re: O'Neil Pmperty Dear Mr. Whiting: This letter will confirm that the property owned by Louise O'Neil on Highway 10 across from City Hall is now under a ground lease to Anthony Properties d/b/a AP Mounds View Limited Partnership. Anthony Properties Management, Inc. is the general partner of the partnership. 1111 R. Jay Anthony, as President, is authorized on behalf of Louise H. O'Neil to proceed on behalf of Louise H. O'Neil with the subdivision of this property. We appreciate your efforts and those of the city staff, Planning Commission and City Council to make this a good development for your City. We look forward to working with you in the future. Let us know what we can-do to help. If nothing, please rely on Mr Anthony_fbr ourInput Very truly yo rs, J o SEP -at,_BTO • , LTD. . - B, . Joe B: .ton II • I grant the authority stated in this letter to AP Mounds View Limited Partnership, Anthony Property Management, Inc. and its President and general partner, R. Jay Anthony. ? e.. , .� Dated: vC — vG> Louise H. O'Neil cc: R. Jay Anthony, Anthony Properties Via Facsimile (972) 991-4494 • wI w ..1 Al." •ICZZ , 4110..MINminszj .t?: 111.1121=17.. - 10. '---:-4 .- ---L--- ... •- eic ... 41 444 .....1-Ezill , , • , o f mY • Za `sf 3 ly ilw i ^iNRww w � Carl 01132 a. NOSICTIT ItAl Sar ._ .... :._.. e.s.•.imr•'..••..eaMmemems ** 4/P*.44; 1 "ketirlEn iniel- 6 2 Eitft 4f-41111r dares-tEMS1 . �lp 42 Mr �U 46 0,,41 0 I,: i A , .-.......w!tterl � jj s • uIii -wwe " w w�wmer IREEILIEURE .1 r ..:tet _ e 8 M � r w e • t O .... d OW ` mum ��i�i 'ii n e e wl w eflit' XI�S�Sf 11: � qr r � ply :i R _ R R 1 c=namenzicl,== =mu .1EIMBIE IC ii i ,..m.ilwriat mli. cz iti .� of= •. �!} , -.``••''p.OAP ® S - 1� FiEwa fta Ili w w w w '. w w - E�.1��Ft� PEI • w - - ww.w :i ,e w O w O t .„,.........c.. .... Er, . . e n UM ifitilgEMMES tin g: -. -I X 1;r: 7 .... Merl ..?! — g apP- .,,- Viz �SfZ K 4•;x.,. IFLANE... IJ :�' iia + ant ...At inv,... 1==i, . _ - . t ct _' + =umZst 't000ftsra�= n wlwIfS '$ffSf x� + . It • A LL. i7 'sec =� 'f'-CMS .fi; w1w'wiw VPwIw O wO MAR 41 Aio :fSR wx ..,• ,:=7".j.; a. +�.�. .-1,1.. .i....:6-1.1.-i...] f7 3 . w w w •rri.iiri '�f rZ w i+M w e I i l w ��. Ig $ g to NW I Esq � g _f 2 :. _ � -11?:-' � • RESOLUTION NO. 5104 • CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION ADOPTING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDEN'TIAL TO MIXED USE PUD FOR COMMERCIAL USES ON THE O'NEIL PROPERTY,2430 HIGHWAY 10; AND INCLUDING REVISIONS TO THE MAP AND TEXT FOR DISTRICT 1; PLANNING CASE NO. 471-97. WHEREAS, Anthony Properties Management has applied for a comprehensive plan amendment which would change the designation on the O'Neil Property from medium density residential (3-6 units per acre)to mixed use commercial; and, WHEREAS, the O'Neil property is described as follows: Part lying southwesterly of centerline of STH No. 10 of southwest 1/4 of northwest 1/4 (subject to roads, highway and easements) in Section 08, Township 30, Range 23. WHEREAS, Section 401.09 of the Mounds View Municipal Code states that the City has )-0 adopted the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Mounds View, dated 1979, as its plan for future development and growth within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City ofMounds View adopted the 1979 Comprehensive Plan in 1982 by Resolution No. 1467; and, • WHEREAS, the 1979 Comprehensive Plan places the O'Neil Property in District 1 and designates this property,for medium density residential development; and, WHEREAS,there have been four efforts to amend the City's Comprehensive Plan since 1979, and the Highway 10 Redevelopm picpared and considered by the City Council in 1995; and, WHEREAS, as part of these efforts, consideration has been given to various land uses for the O'Neil property, including: highway commercial, mixed use low and medium density residential, o ce parks corporate headquarters office, or townhomes; and, WHEREAS, the existing Comprehensive Plan designation is 18 years old; and, WHEREAS, District I is referred to as City (Village) Center, and the description in the Comprehensive Plan for this district states that this area offers the community a valuable opportunity _ • of creating a strong, vital, identifying community focal point. It also states that commercial and medium density residential development should be located in proximity to Highway 10, with a decrease in intensity of use occurring outward from the highway toward the lower density residential neighborhoods to the south and west•, and, City Council Resolution No. 5104 May 12, 1997 Page 2 • WHEREAS, both the Comprehensive Plan and the current zoning on this property indicate a need to provide buffering between land uses on the O'Neil property and the adjacent single family residential neighborhood; and, WHEREAS,the current zoning envisions approximately seven acres in duplex residential use (R-2)in a strip along the southern edge of this property, and seventeen acres of commercial uses (B- 1) bordering Highway 10; and, WHEREAS, Minnesota State Law gives precedence to zoning where there is a conflict between a zoning designation and a comprehensive plan designation; and, WHEREAS, the O'Neil property is one of the most significant parcels remaining available for development in the Highway 10 corridor and in Mounds View, and presents the possibility of adding to the City's tax base; and, W.I-AREAS, the City Council makes the following findings that the proposed amendment is consistent with the general land use goals and policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan as • follows: 1111 Goal 1. Develop a cohesive land use pattern which ensures compatibility and functional relationships among activities and uses. • The change from medium density residential to mixed use PUD, allowing both commercial • and residential uses, will allow for flexibility in the City (Village) Center area. The accompanying description of the types of land uses to be allowed requires that commercial be included in the mixture and directs development toward destination-oriented commercial, rather than local convenience commercial. This mixture will create a lively, vital activity center at the heart of the comrrnu>ity and brings a new, beneficial element to the land use mix in Moun. »: . -.r i,* commercial activity center Highway 10, which is the major travel corridor through Mounds View, and across the street from City Hall and the Mounds View Community Center, which will reinforce the City (Village) Center idea. The land use description requires adequate buffering between this property and the residential neighborhood to the south be provided by limiting the intensity of uses in the area 150 feet from County Road H2, and by requiring a 50 foot buffer of landscaping or tree cover if this area is used for commercial uses. Goal 2. Maintain and,where necessary,upgrade land uses and environmental quality. The policy under this goal directs attention to protecting integrated use districts (residential neighborhoods, commercial centers, industrial parks) from penetration by through traffic. • The revisions to the text for District 1 indicate that, if commercial uses are developed in the • area within 150 feet of County Road H2, that access to County Road H2 be restricted to protect the neighborhood south of County Road H2 from through traffic. The substantial City Council Resolution No. 5104 May 12, 1997 Page wetland on this property shall be preserved. The change from medium density residential to mixed use PUD allowing both commercial and residential uses creates more possibilities for • reinforcing the idea of creating a vibrant City(Village) Center. Goal 3. Preserve and protect property values. The requirement that uses within 150 feet of County Road H2 be limited to lower intensity uses, that a 50-foot buffer be provided if commercial uses are developed in this area, and that the wetland be preserved will help preserve and protect the property values of surrounding residential neighborhoods. Goal 4. Ensure community development is compatible with features of the natural environment and is accommodated without destroying desirable environmental features and natural amenities. This comprehensive plan amendment includes a requirement that the substantial wetland on the property be preserved from development, and that consideration shall be given to • preserving the tree cover on this parcel outside of development areas wherever possible. Goal 5. Prevent development which is not accompanied by a sufficient level of supportive services and facilities(utilities,parking,access,etc.) The property is located on Highway 10,the major thoroughfare in Mounds View, and is also bordered by Long Lake Road and County Road H.2, both of which are collector streets. • Adequate opportunities for access are available. Water, sewer, storm sewer, gas and electric lines are in place in the surrounding streets. Comments from the Mounds View Police Department and the Blaine/Spring Lake Park/Mounds View Fire Department regarding need for service would depend on specific land uses proposed and would be obtained at the time of development review. Parking requirements also depend on the specific land uses proposed and would be checked durin WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that the comprehensive plan amendment will remove an inconsistency between the comprehensive plan designation and the zoning designation on this property. NOW, TIEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council does hereby approve an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to designate the O'Neil property as Mixed Use PUD (Commercial and Residential Uses) with a requirement that development be limited to lower intensity uses in the area within 150 feet of County Road H2 as noted in Exhibit 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Revisions to the text describing District I shall be made as shown in Exhibit 2, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Uses suitable in the • lower intensity area are offices, single family detached homes, patio homes or duplex residential units not exceeding 6 units to the acre, and parking and landscaping. Development in this area shall be designed to provide a buffer of at least 50 feet in landscaping or tree coverage, and to restrict access City Council Resolution No. 5104 May 12, 1997 Page 440 to County Road H2, if this area is used for commercial development to protect the single family residential neighborhood south of County Road H2. Development on the O'Neil property shall include commercial uses, and these uses shall be destination oriented, rather than local convenience commercial uses since an adequate supply of such commercial uses have been developed in Mounds View. The substantial wetland on this property shall be preserved from development, and consideration shall be given to preserving the tree cover on this parcel outside of development areas wherever possible. Adopted this 12th day of May, 1997 Duane McCarty, Mayor ATTEST: . . Charles S. Whiting City Clerk-Administrator 1111 (SEAL) NADATAMOUPs1COMDEVZEVCASES1471-97CCRES.CPA • • • City Council Resolution No. 5104 •May 12, 1997 Page 5 EXHIBIT 1 • DISTRICT 1 j ,., vU I ••us.r.I U L I 'Zice._1[—ALJ — i i I e Cf 4 --I\ MU-PUD - —' -- _ C 1 . ..,:-.-mar--....-L i .. _,,,, 0. 1 t _, .... et... , .,..„ _ ___, , w - - - -%- .. .. . _ : . .,, _ _ _ ___„. C . me , --- ' . ter.: x ii - 1„. ....,,I,: f ....... ..._: L _ ill (HD i ,-.• Mr • t •-•j� HD mal MU-PUD IL D1 ♦ ti _ . t�� 1 V e t� i i. �, ,t i 17N\ PROPOSED LAND USE LD Low Density Residential MD Medium Density Residential MD/MHP Medium Density-Manufactured Home Park HD igh D= -- - - NC Neighborhood Commercial HC Highway Commercial IND industrial • MU-PUD Mixed Use PUD (Planned Unit Developmant) MU-PUD(U) • Mixed Use PUD (Lower Intensity) MU-PUD(HI) Mixed Use PUD (Higher Intensity) S School C Church • P Park/public facility NATURAL FEATURES' 0 Floodplain/DesignatedWetiand 0 Steep Slopes 0 Tree Massing Approximate locations-subject to detailed review at time of proposed development. City Council Resolution No. 5104 May 12, 1997 Page 6 EXHIBIT 2 District 1 is intended to become the Village Center, or focal point for the community. It is envisioned to be a strong, vital activity center in the heart of the community, where a complimentary, coordinated mixture of uses will create a feeling of identity and enjoyment for residents and visitors. It will provide places to live,work, shop and enjoy leisure-time pursuits. The creation of the Villaoe Center will build on existing uses which include the Mounds View City Hall and Community Center, two community shopping centers, Mounds View Square and Silver View Plaza, the Silver Lake Pointe and Wildwood Manor senior apartment developments, the single family homes and townhomes in Silver Lake Woods, several large apartment developments including Scotland Green, Woodlawn Terrace, Timberland Ridge, Greenfield Estates, Landmark Estates, The Sands, and Mounds View Estates, individual retail businesses and restaurants along Highway 10, and neighborhood businesses like the Tom Thumb market. This district includes some significant natural resources and open space areas. Silver View Park, on of the City's largest parks, is within walking distance from many areas of this district. It includes an • attractive lake with walking paths, athletic fields,and picnic and playground facilities. There are three large wetlands, one located southeast of Silver View Road and Highway 10, one south of Highway 10 between Long Lake Road and County Road H2, and one next to the Mounds View Community Center. Two of these are State-protected, and all three are protected by local regulations. They will • remain important assets in the environmental quality of this district, and an appropriate setting around each wetland needs to be preserved. The undeveloped land in this district is often wooded with mature trees, and effort needs to be given to preserving as much of the forested character and natural feel of these areas as is possible by how development is designed on these parcels. Highway 10 presents a challenge to the creation of the Village Center, in that it cuts diagonally across this district and the remainder of the community, and is used as a major route to move traffic through the region. It carries a high volume of traffic during commute times, and the timing of the traffic -li• err, r.. ••w.' . . i. .6.. . .Z..iT . see. g o cross •e . • . •y at the intersections. The Village Center offers the possibility of creating a meeting ground between the two halves of the community, which will overcome the division created by the highway. It is the desire of the community that Highway 10 become a boulevard that is rooted in Mounds View, and makes the community visible rather ignoring or being oblivious to the community. Vehicular circulation should be developed according to a ring road concept to keep major traffic flow on the periphery of the Village Center. Access to Highway 10 should be limited and concentrated. Relative to general use patterns, commercial and medium density residential development should be located in proximity to Highway 10, with a decrease in intensity of use occurring outward from the highway toward the lower density residential neighborhoods to the south and west. Development should also include provisions for dedication of land to a pedestrian/bicycle trail system which can tie the various elements of the Center together and provide connection to a community-wide system of trails. City Council Resolution No. 5104 May12, 1997 •Pae7 There are opportunities to enhance and further reinforce the opportunity.to create a Village Center in Mounds View through how vacant land in this district is developed, and through incorporating design elements along Highway 10. There are two significant vacant areas which deserve mention. Both of them are on Highway 10 and offer an opportunity to strengthen the City's economic base by taking advantage of the strong desire in the business marketplace to located on a major thoroughfare. • The first is bordered by Highway 10, Long Lake Road and County Road H2. This parcel needs to be developed in a manner which maintains an open face to the Highway 10, and creates a destination activity and meeting ground across from the Civic Center, so there is a concentration of activity on both sides of the highway. Possibilities include entertainment uses, restaurants, and unique shops. These uses could be combined with offices or higher density residential to create a"village center" feeling. This parcel also presents a challenge since it abuts a single family residential neighborhood on the south side. Care must be exercised in providing an adequate buffer between the active uses located on this parcel and this neighborhood, so the quality of life and peaceful enjoyment of their homes is not disrupted How the development is oriented,the location of access points, and the circulation ° system to serve this parcel are critical to achieving this goal. The district map shows two designations for this area. Both of them are for mixed use PUD • allowing a combination of residential and commercial uses, with the area approximately 150 feet deep along County Road H2 restricted to lower intensity uses. Lower intensity uses would include single-family housing(up to three units per acre), and office uses. If the lower intensity area is developed for non-residential uses, access to County Road H2 shall be restricted and a buffer area of at least 50 feet shall be created which shall be in landscaping or native tree cover. The second parcel is bounded by Highway 10, Silver Lake Road, the St. Paul Waterworks ROW and existing businesses. A land use study and market analysis for this area has been • ---• • - • -• • _ :ons-on-the d uses which would be suitable for these parcels. These uses included senior citizen housing, offices, restaurants, and high impulse, convenience-type businesses. Attention needs to be given to how to create an integrated, coordinated development which related to surrounding uses, makes connections to the trail systems in Silver View Park and along Mounds View Drive, and uses the wetland as an asset. It is important to avoid development which creates a row of independent highway-oriented businesses along Highway 10 oblivious of their surroundings. This parcel is at the point where the commercial development widens along Highway 10, as one enters the City from the north. It needs to be treated as a gateway area. To help ensure that future development is consistent with community goals, the remaining developed land should be developed on a staged, planned unit basis. The current state of the 'Pillage Center is somewhat fragmented. It is most important that this area become a more coordinated, cohesive focal point for the community through the types of land uses developed, how developments are designed, and the implementation of design features which will establish an overall City Council Resolution No. 5104 May 12, 1997 Page 8 character. The community's goal for this area is that it will be a destination and significant place, which draws people and brings them enjoyment. Land uses need to be coordinated and interconnected, tied together by a landscaping and design theme along Highway 10 and system of walkways and trails. The types of land uses must create activity that is an asset to those living and working in the community, to visitors, and to the residents in the immediate neighborhoods within this District 1. N:IDATAIGROUPSICOMDEV1DEVCASES\471A71CCRES.CPA i • • 1' RESOLUTION NO. 5119 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION APPROVING A GENERAL CONCEPT PLAN FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON THE O'NEIL PROPERTY,2430 HIGHWAY 10; PLANNING CASE NO. 471-97. WHEREAS, Anthony Properties Management, Inc. and Louise O'Neil have applied for approval of a general concept plan for the development of a 16-screen movie theater, three 11,000 square foot office buildings, and two restaurant sites on property bounded by Highway 10, Long Lake Road, and County Road H2, and described as follows: Part lying southwesterly of centerline of STH No. 10 of southwest 1/4 of northwest 1/4 (subject to roads, highway and easements) in Section 08, Township 30, Range 23. WHEREAS, the applicants have submitted a general concept plan prepared by HLM Architects and dated 217/97 which shows the general location of uses and buildings, walkways, parking areas, access points, access drives, buffer areas, and open space areas to be left . undeveloped; and, WHEREAS, the PUD stipulations attached to the general concept plan specify the maximum densities, minimum setbacks and maximum building heights to be allowed, and special criteria applicable to the development to this PUD; and, • WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: 2. Zoning Map 3. PUD Concept Plan,dated 2/7/97 4. Traffic Study prepared by SRF Consulting;'dated 4/17/97 5. Traffic Study(for Restaurant Sites)prepared by SRF Consulting,dated 5/2/97 6. Preliminary Drainage Calculations 7. Available Utility Connections for Water, Sewer and Storm Sewer 8. Market Sununary 9. Summaries of Neighborhood Meetings (12/12/96, 1/15/97) WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has received a recommendation of approval from the Mounds View Planning Commission as stated in Planning Commission Resolution No. 503-97; and, City Council Resolution No.5119 May 12, 1997 Page 2 WHEREAS, the proposed general concept plan is consistent with the Mounds View Comprehensive Plan and the requirements of the Mounds View PUD Zoning District; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council does hereby approve the general concept plan for the O'Neil Property prepared by HLM Architects and dated 2/7/97, subject to the stipulations contained in Exhibit 1, to the requirement that approval be obtained for a development stage plan and final plan as provided in Section 1120.04 Subd. 3 and Subd. 4 of the Mounds View Municipal Code, and to the requirement that the following changes be made to the drawing of the general concept plan: 1. Parcels A and B shall be marked as restaurant sites. 2. The northernmost and southernmost driveways on Highway 10 shall be removed. 3. The driveway on Highway 10 at the center of the site shall be marked"right-in, right-out" with a notation that a full movement intersection shall be allowed if approved by MnDOT. 4. The reference to the pedestrian bridge shall be removed. ADOPTED this 12th day of May, 1997. • Duane McCarty, Mayor ATTEST: Charles S. Whiting, City Clerk-Administrator (SEAL) N:\DATA\GROUPSCO1v )EV1DEVCASES‘471-971CCREs.GCP I • ti ny m -0 0, o\ Ur ho (...• `" i p CU O Z } a L PZ�' � � = '° � OCC IT, — E • cn y + d a .. .0 = j N to N N U) N N cn c' .- Q m — v) a .000a) a) a) a) ,�� = D W E O a: - v = y C) U U V o U U u < p 4) m p. hyoL = o C 07 ca CO CO CCW CO ,� L in O ^^ e m tQ 0 . b i O CO f7 u) C) CD COO G., `- 0 cc) �.N.. _ UH my =Xx � cmi tm3= > es - cam a � & ° 0Le0 - OtztF c E E an. .a y EZ h `o CO C ` t '_ �.CDmccO r ' N Ctt= a O E.". 0 .gym am " 2 all a) E :E Qi `� xy p `: E 0 O m co _ 2, = E m .= f F o694am2E-E 0 h U E „ ter= h $ oa ` m = Ar• I 0 thU ,`gyp Op h o E E O 0 ''' r. N th Q m 'D -_ I” O t� m > > > p Q "''' o a) a) a) • Co O 0 0 0 U U ' as 04J N Q Cadet w,g �z = v v) gm s = == yW • c w � cq M 2Oarxrc ... co ` o az E Eft HOOOaa5E- a. < • ----ALI 1::: . • • •✓�s- • =—om. •• t ��, i . y • /... •• , r ) ccij EW tfA id cu in ,i t„sf r • i / : ? Ili � • sQ. d p ,tI! vkt_ JTPIrbtg. !f t / �* s ¢ wy ' r- � 1.,i. a tp� iA t • C ; �1,.�1r.1:t.\.i'A'1tj1 / : `i + +ws3f cS 1:1 `-x;y; I :•: / `� \ ii ';.r; . j. Z C i CU ' I ' /• I\�,i `,\` \ `moi - ~ fa � `. 1 \ � �'` F, .X f \ i y\ ..t • 1Tom...:• c 1•s ` • ' ' ! yr 1 C L 2 4 ' y \`..\\••` \tg :\ \,`•\ `. 1 ii. t 3'1 Y'lit d •0 O r // i I. `// 2/ ,..\,..\`\` \. N,.'1.5t,\.•'\ .\�\-( : • i,.M1'•\\,`��-�`�`re ft :►j.; } C 0) .66 C • to `' _ 1 ..0.4..8.5 i,` r2 i erg `0Ti" r- Q L-+ r SPR' O ) r to tit! O N CT • . i i sit i. • r ,- I •= s� ter'W D N al (Li) Baa L: • •" " >" � • o f ;� 1 = — C -c , � zCL V... • 00 0NO. = c., ..- t =O OpOH .., m Ch ..+ O, 8_ 'I �j j E E EbM 41:1Z a, a3 b m Ettem m h m & .a = = � , °� � � �ft D1 a m o M " Wt .Q4 o � _ dft E E `� O � t�' o, = ym .c ...c� �P. q = hm 4 � m2 � 'L` t' o" c h •oo Oz }, Uz m oEi aci a`) ac. cc, h E ay 0 0:1 W .t "- tr ft0 .-..'s E o, e o .a y .a MEG) . �z � � o m € = __ 4I O U) � b ,� �' = m.O d O = 000 ' m 0 = m ai O '_ y = h N a7 h h U We m = a' CD coo a me maw E a h o go Lob J h h Zgo ilU = nm= O O O o Cj E Z h O Di O E 'Sa E Ct: o� yh = d cczQ Paa °iyU ,b �� w " � •= c, , Elk < 00 o f o .o z w 0 h , O m O O c ` 000 4 O U •bm 0 Hull o �° •E .E O aid Ci "-1 ....' � Ee ke hI a).n `Q of m ie as 2 . j °' -= > = s h 0 — � .112 h m m h £ m m , m ,,, ,,, c — cols a� z Qw cm -0. d ` a= moo E " •� ` `o = c � t e.,n co .; � _ " h r>i� obi = o h vNrE �Q as V , O m d zm '= �ohr1 L mb Vh + lEm �'� d = 0 '� ' m e ah' v aaa1 a o � a = c,'E D E = m o o, a h > � a, a, � b ;CI V) z_ d m h .o m c0 m W3 0e �' _ bbb E ai .� y a, a, a, > b = h a, abb cl. e he i 4•= y D,` m 0 •c U 8 U a, .. O m b ...SO = EQQ " '- az c as a7 m = mt E ,. 6z h ,,, _ 0 m O '0 h i =D O h E N CAM = .0co co O, O ` h O Z W t_ amoEEmm n $, mF- E '=acaah Q m hbE mp ,ao, flifl O m co _ oZo• >� EO .OimV Ot = LGam . f O� a h .. a �Ya4 Es am aEhp = �171 € Et o = m = •EzIPOy m — mMi- ` ., ` � �CIohah. a0rc o = o . . Nm :°' = E j0 0m w . 0 o o w .a a1 b .� o 4.ct = C.) ti Is a b 'at E a 15. M o fc ,Q , m Emmai ami c '° b v " cc ,: e m CC CO as Of as as E E E E °i c Q7 Q, Iry m rry CO oMm vrnta a, m � m m mhas 3 mac, W 00 : : ...r o : :).- 41) ! _ • °i = 2icc , o6 6 6 to o = fii .CD _ e E b a Q o f oz a m h > V n z z c > EEE > E m a, E :§ 1,'� A, U .)7 .7( .( A D. = a) .J0,� L ) EEE F _ o > :� Z h t? ° .oc m � E a� da� y room •5 ca = m c^w :� m o O. a6 U. Ti a5 d E 0 = yvN cc') WWz ~ o o t° �-� a C W .s o z > 1 Q t7 EIS 0 ii m t C p,... ::-.) .� h h a) Q j N Q ;Q Q, C H +. h O �, i a, m E 3 0 0 " � co � a YIO ° W � � °i aa� Z C. a, � 0 C_ a) 0 03 a_ E 2 ..- c $ y E O b C .O.. is ...) .-. N �.,Las 5 •C C o •= W �' ai •� '` E of d cII Gad Gra m � .. cm oma i= �, ., a W � a3 cc• v, oo EdHOto— a5. Oto— Ici OLLW ) ^ a' o -. o j .C '- a, ON c : E � 3 4� Ho ONoE. 0 a) h. CD > n .O` op O 0mC , crs c cri E ' - .c 0 0 m > a) -. ..aao 0 �, cH � �.c CO '�* O • E E = aa, °- -- C = 0 ` acc = ma-CU ai NC moo ° = >- 00ca, .0 o3 c0v, m a, xYm -- N0cco Na- - tnDJ � i. � w � m Var C � m a) mx am > m c ❑ a3 = Is 0 .- 3 m ° .cam Q F- 4 � m m 0 o La C " W C .0 m � O - O.6.5 �m •Lo 0 , '- V O 0 ,cNC ? Tn - Lam ❑ coo Ecg s .. a2oa, as 0mm ` 0O in � - c > c d Os,°C m = t ! ami cn ? o° ciL. v .aI' so c mN C70J 0 � � � a= � mm . tea. -6 -.Eccs,= -weco C >, " 3 � U a L to 0 m C O .0 - ..0 ..... 0 a1 00aic OE rpc 'IIm -cm NmOi 'CaCm V >. wp � � WHt2co rn 00ac a, i'C- aa0 > - a0a, to v3, m0a�ir° a00 C C ,c m +' to 2 m �� 'o v, 0s o m � a3 .� E � C o ° F, ?� o =coa = + = c= ca Wma, QWsmm -c � z° am t3xiGgU .� -- a > O � N p eoz w W � � C e4 m = > . ea O -a m m m >- `" o ° 0 a W a 0 m "'.a Q3 m °' m � m > m .Q C a a0 3L c � t Ca o a ° �, m E E?.0 co, o` m a, m U � s v' L4m > .0 m La .. al m c H 'a ..to m m 0 z > .- 2 �' lamta � .0mo� > 0 _�� = • mC � N. .� m55 `0N en _� C 14 c aE it �'Nr 0 m8 m Us 0 mL C o0 .0 0 -0 ., m 0 0 O o O 0 V = O ea en > m 4 m • t • m O = m N m m O a C 3 �' - . " T3 o m 2 .... m Ta c O C W � � •EEVv, W .0Cvo � v, tom ... omtna.cV enmcm � _O t C O �'� > z a O in O DD m e4 v0i m m O O a = eoeor ° () 02 m0 ° E ca) mZ' C � .c en0 m 2 0a�, to E ' eQma a .atm oom0 > asc .� c -a _ smato ` E- F n es m C -a ..a , W �' L.• :. - V cW am ° = C eon o = to O C C >+ C m m O p C ea m x- en a C a7 cot >, U •- 0tZ O 'ECU CID a) we mmOCa7 .0Oc en .0 ZawU c (� C V eA .° C e�, en m s.-p -- .- '0 m m to .., m AEI 0 ° 2 o`� 3 W `o = m a' � c c m0 CD m - m m > 0 0 o ,a .a w > c C 2 .. 3 o c to E ' E ° m aW 0 a CD ° o m E . cn >O �-" � � .�cCcmcsic °' aeac°� "a°, € a � o .m�. c, mcvm, C1C•00. a � E �' 0 � � • c •- ° oma 0 c o m o co > m m as 0 > as m vm, = m a aa. 30 c .a co a2 e: Z m a o. eei c 3 ea c°5 a aaE ES 0 1L- :5 a m A Q WS Z C t C C al .25 0 c = Cm c ._ .� t� m �° eo O as m ° m O m .c Q oto c W 0 meb, 12 E m cr `o m ca e) c oCD _ in a+ ow 2 C> 6331 m N E 5 13 eel m V .0 C eo 0 0 v rn= W O m .g jy 'aa .0 000)� 'a1, m - � 0C m - a > a m �, O s '- C C C 1 '- "" 0 m > € H m m a0' oasm 0o` weo '0m -Nm 0 .mca' .0c .c `0m �0ID- ❑ a 0 � _ - m ~ a`, o,�° 0 ao .0 � c c 0 a0 oc= E _ o S, NI- ❑ L15 Cer C 000. ONn. 0_O ill 0 m °' .0CcCcWF�- � E d ca 5 a oz m- m am aeric 0) 0 0 .- m c 0 oN � o > > ena; Eta cm a 8ceo c � -Sm ' cCcV 2 � -a' C Ern 'QQ0' C5cea ° w c0 ''� 0 a eoa Qa C. a - 0N- a) aa' C) W 5 g •mc t a2 0 ° o c c, a0 .Cm, _am ami a2 � Q 3 � o` m aC, m m � g. E2 a2 C 0 >0 ai ETI > _ � ° 0 c a°ia '_, yZ =� E 0.E- E 0) 0 80 0. W a.c ° 2 a� 0 0 � Ir) _ a > Z m = w w c � 0 0 30 m 5 o C "C c .c aam ,_ a-- :0 -a E a. m _ ca >,-a m ca •- - m m C o C .Q eo -- Q c a� W 3 > m o 0 c � � s � 0V 0.. .0 m a>i c � c0 �� .n ° 0 m ai m �° � � a`, aw d w a .a m C 0 a 0 � m c2 c c, c 0 Wks � t „c .0 C.� n c o >,� emi, a) 0 . 0 o LZ) 2 a'0 s- '0 a m c :a eo > c 0. O ai to m m V ea eo V - 0 0 O O cca C Cd m U a: co t ca CVw eo V ° o 41) = U aIn CC a 0 0 ao-� co0 a E 0 en 2 = ° c .x m „co C c cr, o` ea c ami 0 0 E 0 C o2 .0 � !n Q N Et."- C a s m a=V to m C i eo c m _ C 0 V c 0 0 au .a cn ral C � r m c 0 o v, .0 a0 co a3 co a H - m Q ; z >• m .rz :- so• cw c 0t 0 0 6 to 0 0 am o, c c w > 0 3 '0 HL C . 3 m00a•ac0 m .Cm0 ° C' rucoW cm0a'� m003c0a) co ..) w m Ora Tri . 0 U E 0 - o -4 V 0 m n-a r E 0 a= > V U TY 0 -0 m V R. O a) oL.- a)a� a� ° 2omL V-cm ac ° 0cc -022 ._"m_ .00 -tc ..avc-, m a F2 ._ ._ c y N € m � � co H � w QaciO = ca -°ca°irmma, aci cm � EoCC Cc°) °o °-N ZIn co ■ QoVU) co ❑ ■ a N2 > -8 � . .° . Q.' ocmc°.9c°iah2aOa ONa o ft- o m .= m >, c m W c ami m E - 0 � h � mo) CD._ Q- m o 3 s >, • m co 03 t CD- >N of v "i Nm OU mE v, ,C op p L.m 3 O v, 0- M m O U v, � ms m m Qaco w= - W � — OW E pz � .v C Er � 0 7 o m c >, r c m m e OO ..;0 m zZ 00 E c.�vm ° c ~ CD .o .0 c m 4D 3 >, av, c 0 °ps -� •h m aci a tr '� � fa a= _ m ... - E .. m m - mtt Q, ` �; .. m m � Er a � z ca .at c m � o a ` 0) 0 C 20 >LC co ct m - E m N OO _E QE C a-5t C) ; .0 O 0IS = .� O .07 - 6 -- o Em = = c `o � a) m ; o0m CSO " O 'C01- 0mo 0 .... COOOa ° O morn . m — ° zz ma 0.oommm m -- mcc � mmmc -vo ° mm a03w - ° zw m � m � acCMCmm -Cmmc " mac mZco0 c = M o > � oO = 0 a m w = m cot 0 ..:= c 2 v > co c 6 m .4 .... j.) t- m ° = E m c ov m E y m "' 0 E m o RM Q1 >0 .0. 003 .020 a; o -0 .0.1 °" �, >- = a'Cm oaa � ... E >,-- Ec = c E m -v 3 E- amcotsc mEo - c, = co aJ a� c � a' 3 = m = weu ac ° ,. coo � . tmcnUmm .. ..m , comm co v .- -� -� U is am w c o - �.. > - - m . E > o o = m m , e4 .1:141;m m Sar ao o, m m ° > vm c t° c � . 0 c m � m` mm v' ajw 0 o17Ec m 3 �, ° v, m c = O m m mm Q m m dcc 17 .17) - , a) A .- t .S `o � o tt aJc mm mo aA � Era) �, aE -c m = c ml- m > a. m > ` � °' a �= 37 14E m Ea0 0 C 3 m E c o` c m � aiZ O G m o o a, - ) 3 = t .= t m = -- mac o m ad°, C mE -v m m o z .= aa0 -'? 3 � ' m ` . m - 3 Ow m mC C •m m m C ~ m m O � -o c .� m 0, 0) T ,-. 0 _= - _ 0 -m ° e as o m .mcm eo0 ° - m E o = 0c W 2 0 3 calm a. 000 _ 002a00ELS . o -c = ..- ca ° = m mo W � av a g a.c 'c 0 at ° m1t- m = 40 E • °D mL 3 3 = = a0 — =mvm, t~ m t o t C mo m 1vE ° c � cZ0w0 '. aam Z m : E -cQc o .4T0 E—•00 `o o n c m > a . cc .601562. : c ,. ,h tzi m mm § m m E m = T, mg = _ ... c CC c ea m e CO m � m _, m ... • Ccc �0t.. oE,= = CDo- cacocm -- m - ° o c ... w tl. c ca ohm aa:r m m o, U 0 " 0 .. aea m d 0 E me W 2 V m c E > Fo M -I cci' mco,m -Looma � ` mC2Ca me = '. € e�ca Nom .-. o0 0 40 3 d ' m ca -- m .:� cn = m o €c mac m a o r: ,= m € mZ 000 "/ a Q aa3 -v cn .- ca o c .� 0.. -v oo .0 E E ri- C a.o o U aao E Q IW ----c,., 40 G r a cf, c � c az w ' U) Em , vW m" ` = 0 ao � d a' a) dc00, 0 ma EECD� cc c = cmm c cZvN � 6Q Utcm ta aC Ca C5 V.-a O = -0 -0cc . o = X CD WTI mm ° te : -' m cmtc EID mm . am a m °Zctc —amc.0C - oc ~� mC - aEm m m .pcvamstQmCom � � 6- Q. c mt . o.m mCm "C7 CDOgm � ° � �L . c = E = 0 = co ~ �Ioa2 . v JIe ; o m cm ._ C .0mamE > mm > � OCm- cm >, o mm ,a mom/ mem0 : me .cUliE gam t X o cz E o 0 0 _. ` C C) - - C m « cep 0 'ca :�. v .p c o ca -- o m m m ° ° o am - o m ....., 1- am - v =' .0L. - o -0 ,.. = m I- m o3 > 2 --mmm _coo r � ° � � � mcLomcvm, ,a �a.mcoc al = m - Vem H V2 m b.. ° Om V m, C — d d, ^ m ... v, v m = O c ca .0 mt `' o W v C � > C ' ca o CL aL c m m , env mm o m aO N_ U m m 0 m m > aa, aW a'II om �otm m c025 CC-m- O ar- o >, 0-Emm a E m v; m o oc -- = v, - i v, W m m o ° m E = E c m a15 / m o m 3 c m m mom -- S m > '= m N ac .0 H 7O ac'C C c aas . -C = € c m y ° tv, ° d w a m W L t~a m O •= L C m O 0 m -- ~ t -. d .- c m L_ o o t V O Q U) 00) — m W o w t O = r- m v , c to c cioa7 ca p V 0 o — E Q c t Vi •- �t5 O 0 c .. = O „, 020 ... ... 2 -0 D O o a`' c a � 0 - = E � c N .. . )..... ...- 376 -0 , 0 . 0 ,.. 0 - c c o m w - ;a - co m AP. 3v, c ° � m 'mo > € � cm i� acimwcmmo �amasmmcm ,�v-- m > zW� c•°`a0 � 2ott .0O` m o m - E E -- O 0 = L- = y m c •O ` m m o),._= v 5 E t - s m 0 o ,_ m aao c - Q o W cc c .mc m 0 .0 ° o E = ca ° c c`o a m 0 .0 m m c m c:n ° c m o 0 . � 0)c a? L c m c c a tv, a JZr:. ° " - m v t a= coma coo coc 04400 E m E v' ot 04 .0 c 2 E W 2 c °' 3 '50 > 00174 'cQ ° '� m m � � mm tam 7o > = 9,...(2 : 4 -7,-. .. m2 .5 m c � H me € m E , E m ° m cd m - il = ts� 0 „To = iii - ..2 = ,... m . ,EoEoc, aiU ° ° •ca' tmmam �' m " = w = .0 zvME Qm v �. a co co a ea W a v, i- 3 O c" c. M m Ca _ � C` P O c C c M c m m a1 0` " C. t '� _ >. a) W . c .c v Iii a)Cmm � o v) M = cO m in 'V vn 0) d m � t c >` t. Q.= M m - -% >+ c C p. nz M `a 3 �= tco en m N m M o � .� m = t a3 Oz , .� ccv o � L � — Q. c -012 ` — Mao` ° tc m a; ZZ4 8 0 o M "0 m as N ° � m s m W co c m .� II) II Q. s cz1 C o 010 a) o • r = U ° a),.. =C >, m▪ m m 0- N 'C U E it 0 .a m 2 *c O c Q. o U • m � x M � r E a) am -a = > = m m s t W �) o aim c o C � o ° "0 0s E cacti c c c c � U) Z O °>' c �, ° t m m "' N s N m— V a7 O L z L 3 .c v; _— •° = � U Q. Es > c co o M c � UM E U E � M z �. V .r a1 _c U •J m C C ai U M �' m �• a) c CI) < c 7- D...... c -a M eQ -c mp cmi m m eo � •_ c C � E E ` -aCL- a � �Y41ens0a1 , UVd ° Htma1 . y, ::: m .—ma > o 3F- v E N ` M -- M 3 •-v cc ° cE � o � c m � .� tc � E mmr � ocE > t); ; mL C is � � �cv CDm mat Eeacm -ccN . c mora, CU.) 6= M CDC)-�c Ma= c = a) 1:1 C. 3 � a7 0. 3 .0 --' _; U CO "'• m = L O Z = a) a) aD— -- Eme cm ° C) o) -) 0c wa) L 0. CO i4 `0 E - - c a) c CD .cct) m _ 3 .Q m o v. C Q.� •0 o . rnmM � = c >. 0-..463 co m ~ m a X am .II c � � � 2 -, o• m .0 U) ° = In co C13 = Em 2 ca amtM6- lc •q v • av°) we • gmEU) o ai0 13 oi.`.: 09 � c o oco s � 0a0.cc3c = Nmm � co 00._ 'Q° c � � caco._ L me M .... cm = m _ as c §= E Ec -- cEocc ° M c > .c .n f••• m — m rn��m �� o -: ..J 0 >,m E a) c m o m m 0 c "400. = 10mU f" .II 03 c Q.0 m o mIII .p ° m aD >,° � C Eam c ` > Er m ... >, ° CC W m v) w = 12 "' t c mom = =-0 E o Mt 'a a EV m .a m 'C lc= ° p E. m m — mi- a7 .- M m m s — 0 � mt s m c ... '•- 0) m � - c am co m o= m > _c c 0 6- a) m Q. Q. c ami > p 2 .."0 ai o . N ,oami - daE HCO 0 'a00 -- u) N — oH o C t •- = W pry -C rII .� C.) CD m O m X .0 NI; .c m m 1!i t CO c'D m Effl E N m 'a c Q. c.. W > , f- Q. N a7 t t m m a7 '1"- i- 'II M f- .� Q. V W'C IT •fl N- FL- U) o C. y p • .. ;4 m c X ° vi m117caDW `o "0 0 z 0) ccac o ^�' =CD _ 75-.12 r .Q C .= c L c M m •c o ... .c M Q• _M r ° M a m M t co al a' co Z .a c >, o (~n M Z § am) a o m CI-CD � Z c �' m ~ 0. 0 C m M c t- p o 0 c E Z'a E m �L m m Q. -a O c 0 CC om "r a) 0c ... —_ N w U c e0 cp U � m 0 ...Z. "m `o ai E C U .c >, aci W W Q. ° °° .EZ � ° c « � °'=° c c° M m 03 ° 0) � E t E ° Q. � 1 ° caiasm men a-0Oc .. Q azo M co c c ,- . ac) o ? 3 o m mZiEN m a) ac • E � • aai o 8- ca a) m o m aaa) 0 o ma-0 0 W >..-a1- — .0 0. .,CCCO V � c U C m C O G .0 'Q m •E YM m 'Q Q C M m. m 'II d W N >+ � � - V O G m 0J N as 'x otL.. OD =c 0 'a 0 c a O c E L= U a1 a- en at M M _>• >` a y m •O. O t m OEt .0 m M c Q O m CD 0 d m C a II (n Ez- mV ai 0. c 0 mom _ c m m m .c C•II� oa~ o` oM aci CD 6 0. .._ M U M 'II c � U Y c Q+ 5 .II o O) .. .c o ). m E 3 m � ° mmMmo E c � a1 w � � m � c0) ". Mai .coC>� a m w m -C .0 ca -.F. D.Q m N ° J •a ° C $ P C E m > -- c C a>i c ° " M m H v) °D= � cZN a7 '-• •c o � ° E > E 0 E c c N -a E M Xi >, S2— c •- ° ca...c.: m Q. 0 0 Q ct C 'D E C t E N M - J E m m >; m N >,.0 W 0-%-- -a O)•- W 0 - H p ° Q.w � c as m .Q Ft. -0)% 0) OC Co� � ai .r m .. •II CU . mE t 'aC2 -- � � atGL azEasra .cMm p ca w w � � 2a�i3rn-a m `—r. CD ,oncma- .a o` 0 ° mao0a O00 F c •c � • ppa' Nm -- o °) i.c > Naz — �o � ear al co � � ... . at O Q. G G 3 N v r 3 IA O m e at t .� a) N O m N M M II N p 41 ° = a: -,E, � d oc x N � c M Cl. c M E 7 C �o E a`) c 2 me w >% an ca d C) Q3 H C M m .c m E c Q3 L C a7 . . m N O_ ° U) c o w < aeric c o' s c � a: s ° aE � a'a � m ` m Q. m a) aa'v) c N °) c < 3a a a,) Qh' a -- .v o .... :ao E c C • c E � r i- am c > a) . > .- X IA a� Q W � Xai .... au) - W as a1 a m CI o •v_) WOW ca � c� m ,_- CSC m 03 „o a) en co c a. '- o c CD 0 E o O a) J2 W .c ° N L N 1- .0 p m d L ` m -W •> C a) y a U ° c Wen Z en v ►- 3 .. f- vpt- Ur3 t- o � v °). Q.� !� E0 ao ■ ■ ■ ONa m o m O 0 m 0 per, °: pr, m o - o c vo m co ni ^, -, o; c 0) -0 O C.0 m h m O •C as = 0 .:. C '0[ C — m C �'N o O C U p m O m V 5 m >;•C ` p,� D O L m p ... In w c m C.0 2 ° •C >.to co m 0 z > m JD W LD -c o C C c In m o m 0 _ 'a c4 = = 0 - z : m > m �, •c 3 2 � O O C a = o m N. Q, Er o 0 c w = 0 ._ ,_ 0 0 m c 3 0 Z v 3 O N �` a O iC 8s - o co To -c o12 ,a 3 0 o m > w E IS ••••• 3Com U o c o a..L - m Ec o �t mcg o = Q m •�v a'II c'-a�i c �' v 0 .1 0 m V m aD 0 NI 0 0 I W m O I .0 O m z w Z ui .0 C m > OD 0 0 E o .- m z R' CDCEF. 15- mmc.aN E0 o' (1) ' o mXt) 'C - = o EoccCca = E == m �Emmv, o oo 'on• coc Ep0 c �-o = m p •gym mson ii To t 0• o o03V m m a.cea p i o >• U a. ^- >y O O m o m r m 013 0 • 3 CD �' m Z O F f.. �45 5 c 21 .0 = H � E = m � co 2-_, 2c �' •°co Qm a cyst m Fr SOp O m 0 «m. t OD a,. r 7 ca.a O C = d > a C '� �G Z Y U o �-• _ _ C m f- .� 0 t 7 a r. r >. L' m a 0 w w 11.6 a)C.) 06Toc s •vo om m �' com `otII oatoc .ossa G c o .._ - •c CDC m as .. g m > m .0 � � m ` ti' 3 02 0 c mL = ,,, o ,„ 0 , . II ._ m m mom. m ` o -'am ocm *am o, mS ,.. m ) t0 O 0 .a m •fl tII >. = c s � ate •- 0 V .0 .� o �� D oo h U � .as W2 � ,ma O mm2 i o E •0 E 0 ~ 0 = _. o E c g _ -- 0a 0 = .- �s m m = m = m m m o` Q U o 0 o .t,E c •- r cm= r .r E t 0c ° c0 - 17an- mus' o 1.). -='• 0 ''' d = Cisa� r w mc 'e � CD a' L 03 .12 c c-- o o 1- 0 _ c E-E m•a = ac, a o > o E -' = E, m 'c m 'a 0 m m .c t m eII a .- as O .�`= 5 OD m 'O E a Q OD cp = I, � to 0 .0 0 m 0 = . 0 .- 10 -- O m Io a m >" m _ ` in. m -- V 2 S c jq C m co c > m �0 a Q m ms E asQ m m - ` mt 0. O OD m > V o t5 I O tz _2 I- r ca r •.- m o O In a m -a .c it al !II 'a C m 0 0 m L. 0 r o. .= °' °' c 0 = • O a m m ° m > 0 vmi ? � a� J ea c� > O 0'•- m '- ••• 0 Q. ° .g co m " Q m oc Q la c E O ra o co - • O Le re W -mC vs i as = m H o .c 0 a a' m o tom? ai 0 O 0 a; .= m0 E2 = o m A0. w > ■ f- 3 at .a •0 = ca • i- o E as aD "a • f- - E - o a .- f- •C a o a c 1w Q 0 w '>, u; m 0 r a m ca m m O C V o c � c c m c t O o m m m m r C a C C C CO < >, 0 0 Ia m C m O t as m OCD- - in V W .� 3 r 0) m . 'a Yl m 5 _ 3 m L C d A. h �� > Y ) Cl6 a Ot of O al > f- EC C• _C0 E m - 1- a. m 11) m Cf- .` m 000 � . � 0 C 0W- 0 E3 .0 ° L � o ocd°, � E ". ° cm 512 m N o C = �' m d O W m _C O O H .0 �: m _• 17 c 41 0 '0 O W C C c C CD III m m O ~ O 0 r .0 as 121 € OCCC � '- '- xCD'a000Ut = En, n a o) omHYceo E . ommen mt-5= 0 o m co c � � .o ~~ m 0. as -a 0 c c o f ms c 0 E .0 W C Q = m .D d > a - m 0 a)U III `� a m a E-, 3 c- .c- E 0II > ..cc 0 E D o m ° � Q� 0 m c > > II m � - EUv� acII .c � ca m E 2 C •E .c O .- 0 c cII E .c0. m m •- c m > > .0 a a Ear 0oCa�Doc> ` c 00 .,, = ° m � c 0 •- r C C •O •C .c •- r 0 > >,'m C m 0 • w a miEE aa.0am . E •• C m � ID da, mWm0W wa, EL) > W E m o caao Ew m � .c --- a�' � C aoi E 0 .. m Q c0o ) ` Eccco _cc CO c o -- C • •° 00A: Ecca gaNrC E- W C m ° E 0 0 ai 0 aa)i cmo O o =ca 0 1:3 o = p � W '0 U �II Ki m 43) id...o f Ello t` OD- miD m e ea a: ao cah .- E m ac' m e p o o ~ ami c •_ E as as a m E2 to a; ' m � ca E Ili .2'. m w ... C m O > a •- 4.63 •II C m m o f a m = m E - C C w E - ` i 4 0 0 vi mo • c • ODai m Wr .� a7 Ec ark v Ern E 0c m • 03cc6a co -0 c°� 0 c m cm ° E c mU H oo0 "' � ,�„ .¢a � . CD 0 E t � o � E m •- v, c -acoo ai oEoa acDoE � n m .a � C7d 0 a, m � o` E �' a`D E y y m o, o) 3 0 c Ea. in o Q 0 - .0 � w s .0 o 0 o a m o o am o ' 0 Zrn �' EyQ f- o •n° o` 3E COa •~- I-- e. e.�aac4. 1210 ar-- < inaa) 0eVaa., r 0 — 0 ` v itrnm m - L .fir G 5 0 3 3 '^G 0. 'cc .o> � c ° ° c mc m � nac � -- ° '0...u.). 0 di '0 m .0 0mm O z` ,,,_- u) DJ -C a r�• •� a � Z Zoy > g m2 nm .0"0 a' CD- ° O` E C <a � a! U L o am m ° o m : y c c �. 0 ° w O <c . .onm - U) /...• v)as as mm ?.° 50 „ � c oi a °sc ° � > n > C a' mmy v c 'a �oa �o " r- ° Uc m ocmmem V .] G L70r` a' 0 .° v, nonE >, 00.„000 0 • � vy om C) v' 'c 't E c 6 - Om Omm ` `oo m maz - m •tus C : W0. r o' V >0 d � ° E m I%-t161 n, zr; CE mam •a m - ac u > mo mEOm nm m � -o C E. ...= aso ° o n amC m m u.....?: � 7 .`°r m oV MS 3 cr n mUL ~ me U � � m � ff F, >- .r .. Et1ocom •mma -.5-: -°ma= .a v ,- ...-cm0 .cmt02 ' ... .-. v c y 8O E > - ° � L .re 3 m W O 0 0 .O .0 .r . h- C O` 0 > 5, .° Q „ mN -ns mc > Vit' c � •c v'° �' m n c n� z7 I.Z. m - c m Z - r 0 O W o0- 0 =0 0 0 to ami o o a m m ny m -o .,. >,sa ? m � 15 - C) =� 3 130 = 1"0 � `> ; pct > O = F- o cr_ .H p � c v, F- ash c m Z =? iII '- a g o c' m o ... ° °onU 1:1 O 0 aci .E .5- c c en o .2 z0., -a m - -m 0 am .! 0 m m ai.ix _ �4a - E 15E >. m 3 -0 = c� o = m m € c ass m o 'II E -->, 0--.,M C m p •C > ?+ OU � m a' C' am q m v' -Er m al m m E asz 0 "c 2 m 1p O.U m m 7 m as x m `” m ` - o' 0 W C G:� as Can E = LDas Fmmv'rC 60 cc = Wm s � '= m ... W c noc o .. > C m m o Cr a' o o c -. ... aitt SD 4° n - oZ > o o v;55 > E 0v o mor 2 0 o �" E.. !A .= O m m = = a m .! m W C V O E 0 C• ) 01:3) p ` ° O p �' 6 C) CC .5 .250 ae2mm -O mzma m S-II .ii F. enrd E D 4. E . f o C E ° E mv'm m U o 01 co as 0 D 00 '002C0> c > 9. O 0. m jai O 0 6 m, m .. n .. c C E V L C 0 1" E044 c > mO E-, ...1 2 0 y & E ! C) ° - .a w o` n- nm E nm as ° ac m c� .°j > N ■ Q a S � U Tel a� = m c g amid ■ t as t 0 r o .!o. 11. a. F- o. ea ca < ■ F- m 3 ca ° E m c. H • a � • �� co 10 .0 .Y Z7 m m O {� m '.' u' W ea C c > '_ .0 .o a7 a' ▪ y O C E V' 0 m N co.° O p c CO .C " d GQ°' O d' •3 C O m >. d 6' ., o 3 c ,o mo c 3 = m 'o •€ €D " --0 = 0 a' o • a •� m y C t7 m m ` m Ta 12 O C Cr 0 r a' m m 0 •0 C . U m as mm coW m E Q' mL '3 •o .G " ° n' '- O C - to yJW OL .- >. � ,C �C NJ ... .OL m = co C � � C mCC OL m 10 CD-0 0 o m a' m as _ .._ O L W Q3 QJ U C -65 . 0 m .�'c V C C C >._C O' m 0. 0 C m° G V - y n C' 65 .. .) C m .._ ▪ J m co -0 C W m D c .) E 0 0 Lv'65 o y am E. IID m 0 2 00 C 'O C � E � c o C � E co cs m a .c ° c Y 0co a to0.c � � -t m a m tx 0 ° � cc r 3 C E 0 m o` vyi Evm0- 01° .- m W m _ m go 0 m = = L a' as O r 0 v' m __>. _> x -c 0 ta m 8 '0 2 VLc > 0 aE Ck. § ° 2~ Qsp coo U E ~ n ° E .Y~ o is 0 Ca o a`' X ny c m as m cY2 F•+ y C -= = 000• E 0 m 0 0 C 11CQQ V 0. C) 015 > > 0 0 > w y m ch o c ° Eta.t a1 C •�'` m J L O > J -cc ° 0 a' m a0j c c .c 2 a 0ici ' 0 .G 0 a p V C CD �"0 C yr' � C ��� L r � d' as Q m O O ma a0 0> a- 0 nLS �o'.°-c w ap2 m _ 3 o c o a`' m c' m com w .O ... L o r C C m aJ 'y -t 00 m 0 C C 0 (sl e > 0 �' Lm. Lm. E mrrn-` a d > °' o m . asvm a > me n -. rc A m2 •C ... � 0E •- a; c Z > cN .. F- 0 Fy 0) co m ° E o .- 8 � c C m m •v " m C _cc E >,..-y O a' V 6- O mL m r ` 2 0 m m C a' c a'c4.-. 0 = -- O > : - 0 •• --- 000-o �= ~ m m 2 c' aE - ? C -cnmr C m o 0 o m � .- m - c m v' O ma O Q ... • •O to O � O 0 . co 0 - c >. .r 0 15 0. >.,r N.a7 0 .- 0 0 c 0 n m - y, o • n E >. a € o m E • m EQ �. as0 � � E � ° L mtOF- 3C0 .C .- ° m • C c` L 'c� 0 ... .. o m .- .c 3 0 o 0 o m •C ¢ w � m on m - m . 0C � ° mam' .0c' ° ao O' mon _ a>, o `o .c co a O m 0`..E 0 a) ro Lc-.. •C > m` = o ° ciE F- = -0 o'> m o - 0. 1:3 2 n � � a: 0 co o m c Q a-92 O ca o)-- � r a mets am d � CD = m :l m ... U m a E4) aJ ° m V 0 c C • > c0 m r- "C a c D fSl W r .._ L .0 C O o r Cr) O NL 0. O .0 m C 0 0 j‹ = r .0 co y C m ZMv f"' 0 F- 0 .- C 0 F- W *Fs ... O N F- •O m W c0 m a co F- :e 0 c0 C U .0 0 N G • �- a`' 0 c '= c Z N CO 'E o. a a I° C i ° to r- Z r y) 'r' N 3s -c oEt i 12. I.. as a' •r p r.i o 0 o >,.., . = v, a' � o a c.) a; _ - zZ '" N U i m m i M to a' C >.,0 Z > °' ice z � E � Z a8 - - ts20 go c o avc, = o Oct � � - c a`' Q } y r i C u' p N i L t V 0 a) .c m ° >. OU � acox C7p W >,-a' ') � = C e.• III 12 1:11.0 � � U t .a h � Uh ° ii- `0U S ^ a] magi ...S00 wrnin _ .0 m 0 c c z U) !L � .- C •0 a' — w CO td td 0 6 m e c 0Q w 0 0 cs •v in ? I Z p urjj l N U � C > u0 a'a' oai w o OS � a � � vi, O rn � � EEEa � C) W >. > oa:' � 0 I 0 as LZ �� Q ! w a' .r I 0 � 0 c .C � a Js .O -••�� vii c c C7) CD o 02 .0 H .0 � S ° VL � � J e in en c o2 Eco m m C ZH c—� :QST .� L m me E �a i o� w i � S iJs m i >- M5 ° > > v a E c •• WE = ro = m F >, 0. E ° ai f- N c a _. 'C � E ° a.4� c ... -J _ c cc as O -, 15 i W i c aao a' € as -J n en Q� -o m � a' v, yr W a co mE -0 S.) a Q ZC a � mm € m > >" O a� � 0 � as � a' v� is i0a1a' C 5c .0 r -o a r a i a � � - - NQ •cav 0 c5 H Z 0. 0 2 � aro_ cs d t0 0til J 4) o` '10 0c "6 0 caC >• 0w i i � « as m ami as C c C) cEd :c � 3 ca a' ocC .Q c � cc Q .0 co 0 — 5a) 5 = mai N ca 6 O0 — .= CO i a' o a c •c" E E i a'c _ ... > 0 0c c 0 d as a> dam E co •c i �' Eco > •c0 a c •• o i a, vi' aoic 6. i > o CI a" c o o � � � c a ° •° •c mp •, ca c c )- ° a' v' o i P. =03 0 >• >, c ° ° ° .5 -0 c c i >,.c E' E _a? c •II � = `o m y 3 3 ° ° m � O..0 € � E ascen i o CC m 3 e ° CD W c'-' �° E .c .c C c '° '�= 0 >, i.0 • Cc i c =' o ;�' i a `a E ° CSS E Era c '= C °- � � E i � > 0 E c i o '0 as .0 = :- c c° i i 3 c E "' H � � � � � � > c a i o o a' 0. a � i as S CO cr E ° a7 ° as io. C Oo W = 0 0 0 0 o � "- '� a3 v' N i CL 017 M C .0 w•0 m a ° rte' ° F ... ° , .0) I° E =°ma 0. a' — . c .V 4) - - Ea� � z C ° •Q i 0 c ,:. c > Cr c E c :«. o m � QL i i � > as a' .� irn W t ° 0•.r d C a' C ' .0 =r. 0 vi v' C E C a a. c a,-;"->" W v;� v,~ � ...' : 6 m � a— m•- 0 ms_ E is 0 = � 0 O G) O C .�C c � a? C ° C >. O t o € = v' M = O = Q i '� E0 .icEca ° -6O ° m •0 ; 0a) a' 3a' f. o ali . o la a' i> - 4-- 3 c ai _ 0 3 > 0. o a ws C = ° o' .0 � .. > p• OO a' >. a2 y _Cm >,.c a' = L� Dr O = 3 i 0L a) •0 G c E i -0a v, - ° c N i t .c iS i s z c ° r c me c c S ~ � a F- 0 > 3 0.2).5 %- i C 0 a' � o0.$ - r "' c c, c= ° v) E a v' s c r o o f c1 0 'Q � 0 a � acn O C ° U o y c d a' y 2 0 -E. 0. °" o` E c ca cs i o i a � E C c c a' CLj o = E' � —aii ai o � ".. a' •i .. � > soas c 0 = c .0 =....' C i s .• a• 0i E ..ct -0 a' = c a0i 0 0 Ca ° .I. 0 a0 E c � c � � « ._ W DII a0ca °' c v, 0C a' caowcv' c' E• 2 •y0a' Emi o• = � E n ° a' a aa. 00 a`' 0 c' c°v E a � v c /2t C E - c rnr E o 0 (400. -.) 00 0 Zw .C ._ � i 0 W _ co E' cati c x — ` i a) 0i U i '" Sw ■ 0. 0ac°nvv' a' E. a N - .tU) 0a00 -c Fr- `0 NQ •= 330..00- 00.' ONa. • CA m COz 't a = a � ` 7. inos L O Iv >. � pN d0 cz y W �" �-' Zz , 6 t >, . `o WO E y L < z 00C) 0 Om LOOO C Q a, EO C _,.0 J i p >+ E � t3. —4f- I co 15 2- > Pd VY w U 0wW cc c > .-..... y « 3U = 00 co c c E o w cu W 2 o wE 2 Z - co m u.)z my r. Fr '. c - c :: m O = Q 141 2 O >- E _ 2 00 ,' 0 j ° o p 0 g "'a 1— O t 0 c� L? > co U H o di 50 °" to a 0 -'a `" zO as O '° a I W O- 0 0.o o .. m 'a C E C L E Ecc "L -0 a.- �a It Q m 'd W or m y 0E �c .8O � U > m ,_ z •-0m >,L 7 VyCD•p C yV w c m in °' -I �. oa> � c F■ c I y . ea tea, .0 at c 0 a .-.. � � a 15 b c c 2 0 O °' c wGQ E 0 co o c O _ yz O E Oo LU F}. d N 0 w E 73 c _ Cl) 2 t0W .., _Z c .CVS moai 14 ›. 0 - LI- 0) 0 >+ p _ ..T....7: w '�" 0 C U ~ Z ~ .OIL) i } .aa'i dmv = yo J H Z ° dw 0 a' = a = 0 D m c .a ca"y w � � w I o CO UO H `o acs W m 0 Q ZMv ORDINANCE NO. 598 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A REZONING FROM B-1 AND R-2 TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(Pt]D)FOR COMMERCIAL USES ON THE O'NEIL PROPERTY, 2430 HIGHWAY 10,AND AMENDING THE CITY'S OFFICIAL ZONING MAP. THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Appendix A of the Mounds View Municipal Code entitled"Specific Rezonings",the City's Official Zoning Map and the zoning district classification of the following described land are hereby amended as follows: Part lying southwesterly of centerline of STH No. 10 of southwest 1/4 of • northwest 1/4(subject to roads, highway and easements) in Section 08, Township 30, Range 23. 1 IIP Present classification:B-1 and R-2 New classification: Planned Unit Development(PUD) for commercial uses. SECTION 2. This rezoning approval is subject to the requirements for approval of a general concept plan, development stage plan and final plan as stated in Section 1120 of the Mounds View Municipal Code, and execution of the PUD stipulations by the property owner(s) and recordation of the PUD stipulations-with the-Ransey-Count3,-Recorder. SECTION 3. This ordinance is effective thirty days after its publication. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 12th day of May, 1997. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 27th day of May, 1997. LI • Duane McC l Mayor Ordinance No.598 Page 2 ATTEST: �^ Charles S. Whiting, City C k-Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: Robert Long, City Attorney N:IDATAWSE MPAMSISHARE OEV 71-9740NELOR2 • • ,iri f-t....)v ...L...., \ \ \ 6E7tEeptL cotQcEPT siTE RAA,' siDEWALK TO PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE I •\ lb • • • • • • • • / PARCEL A \\ / / •• / ., ... • . ..,.. • ••• •••• ... \ ‘ / / / • 151/ II. - - - •,. ... .!.. . / ..J, ., -,-1 - ÷ - -:- .. - -,./ ./ ....• _ (1)- I-• ". -t,.,.....i7-.----:•-•-7- • ;•• - -••" - / - -1---- - -- r -- - \ - ° • _......-- - - • --i•u- --c.,iiigoe OP" "* ••• , ••• ••• -\.\-# _ , ..,. ... .L. _ 'FULL SERVICE ' ..< •,. ii7AGGE.55 14. - .,. -. .. ... . ' I ••• •••• f"--.7r t• •. ,• - - - - r - ••.• •- ../I p--•••'-1-1 X-... I .- -- .. ... -• .. .. • kAROIL i: „ -- \ ;... -- •:-I - - - -- .. __ _ _ i i r : 8 ., ,-.- - .. ... -. - .. ... . t.' L- ,064ArtgisN _ It+1 . WEIZAND .. 4. ! gi ; - I -. • J.1•'• . Ippleipx.eay.4;•14-tms l• , •'• ,I !"'M' i -I "r ATVOTTOM ' 1" 7 ."• '''' - rAT.." r2P^N 7 • , . i.i• — — - !. 4- -,- - ,,, , ;,,,!,,.1:27,v,,, ,;*:, , +1 ... + . -r• -.;- -:- - .' ,,,,,,..::.::§1. i,,:iiir,: e.,0,,,e• ..< %. e „ 4.1 4. .,. - _ ... ... .. MATER Kari :, .„, s - •• 'RIGHT IN • ;,,,V;:,,.,•-vo../szA .., .. ....._______....i .. i Ar...C.E5S • .1 1 ' .41,„e ••,. r• T._ '... . • -.•:..•;, ' itl . , : . .......-..-.-...... 3 .404 ., ' 4. . \ 1, . .• •1 ." ... - - - : / . ,1-r• •••••AliaN11111••••••T • , Mii.....1111111111Mi 'ii......1111111.111111111M 1.' '" - ''" - •." : . 402`. OFTRCe etM. Of•PICe St20. Pr 4" : , --7arfoer•-•••— -----wixtrer------- -----17f!'CL4-51-13."-::— 411ZM,..... 'S.... mum 160.-1%-imurierimprdrial.9- ..... ....W__ __" El..401TAREAM 4,-pia 41e,„,rigir : . . .es4DvisTove• iiiresceaw. .-sacvmca -.. : apsait1/, _____ • • _- \ / couNrr ROAD 1+-2 ,IN, SITE FLAN ,,.1 ii.,, i: SCALE: I" = 200' CARMIKE 16 MOUNDS VIE , MN ANTHONY PROPER'TIES Real Estate Deuethasent ik hruestenent HLM ARCHITECTS, INC. 12770 Coit Road.Suite 1170 JOB NO. 96047 Dallas,Texas 7'5251 02-05-97 (972)991-4484• Fax(972)991-4494 r f 7 et ``,',:,%.-4:/ / • s '.rJYr LONG LAKE ROAO '42304 ik — /ter-_—._.— — — — — —.— — — — — — — — — — — — - - - - - :�..T_ . s.r...glW _e Oa ,i f,: • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I — we aus•moo are 11 si g • p •p, 111 I II • ice •= =, Tar i ... • ii 1 t i; )d' = s� �"�L ^� ,./ ay /,/ d da .g i ..'.... ;11110"' : i 1 1 : . ..'. :1••/"; •• !1111 111 I!'Ili 111 1111 i . — m •'61 : el._ - i. c. a 1 :I off: IIiI 8 �8` €}a'3 888 'la ;,...p ' ; 4 rdi pz .1'i=—--..k; e /' ' 5 47 F.: --1--- il It 43 • y \\...---,...„,„..„ i 1 , . _F • _ EDGEw 000 .. • .„ .. DRIVE m// _ . / I = ... , ..0 , . ► / , :• ,! : : ,, , . „.. ,, ; :•' S •• , PPPY I* ! JJIb'J ';4' ... . . I/ 1 1 f �J J1ll a ��_ 1illfPglift:# ' '3 /, 1 a ,S ra F. 4 1 1 f r i f A`)1 y ' - : s ' a r 1 f 311' a=r iri ; Tio .ai f t I • 1 1 i r • + ;II I; �I It ILI ii 11 Ii` I i i ' !lit; 7r-7—BE: _— , CARMIKE CINEMAS. INC. I11 • ow J .� 15 SCREEN THEATREaniseaing,Ise. ' 74:1 :: Iiit +— �• �. J MOUNDS VIEW MINNESOTA �"�.7 ®s tiw„'..w. t• 7 ---i-.-, a i -,...-......,--..,............. a r ' ...., 3 ..---• •••-•:....,•'.....•,.......... re . •—— / ,, '7 • - — - . ..-<-,....,•,a-;_...-Loriet-AKE-Roirair:;:f' .--=e• ---rr- ,._ ,..,..,. , ,.., ,a,d• t, s+, A. .4 5. 5. ‘ 1_,_t__.... - \i , ,2',_,.. . ‘.1, ----..--ii-'...? ...—.-.— 1---. ..--1----.-Z—I—. .": . ....,...___ . 46 ii. ,.. -V-t"-' fie,.„, .. . ,,„,,,-.,-. ._.-t,-..,---.._:1-.. ..1. -- ---.---:ft-------------r---:.--------rr---,\--- --,---,, 1 .. , . i t • •• ; 4'.., • ft • :1 ,=,t ; • . 171, i131 1112401111i1/1Pinilligirli"Pill TIP/ir, , i ,. • . or• •1,1,11.„ ,. .„ .fryli iiii,„ Is 11,1_111/. iiiityrovioniptpli.f le ir:: ot 1.41111 • , i , t ..,„...-..-,-1 I., ..,J 1-1 I, : or, ,,•12.4 lif ili.9 yof slitor 1 . .:„.J _ 1 •liblisit Vilifil,tt Is I 9.;;; fr tii:o I r 1 c ..... ., , ,.. . , , , ... ., i ...!:, . ;.i ..% . .si ifri .7 05.. ri.,,. t, ....., ,I . 1... .,,,,,.,•),,, , .,14w ..., . ... iIP. • ic 1; ..id , • 0 i. 1!I P.:1's '3. ..' *, • iftJ ,i0,,,, ift./4•74a di , \I 1,41 • d \,. , ii.„1 lill R 1 .. .. /.... :....z. 1ife‘...1,,,,N,!: , ....,,,,,,:,/,V..., ,,, 11\ , .1.. •••..,;:, 11, _•.._:...„,.., • . i' hb I ti 1, , 0118 i mi ii, jib, , ) I 1 f't• ' 1 . / 7..• / .- . :. '"\ ti!. ,-=---_--_-s-..-, ,7•.:7. 7:11,14-.,2-- • i i".....,,.• 1, i.: ,i',-/. .." .,.' . / , ammonea.--:-.... .111b"J--.1,!!'44k.„ j„,.,.._41P-,...--- it ( . . / .._:"—..-......-:;;,/,..,,,Tliti - = -- ,••:•-•...../7.- i `" r • i 4 ,,4, , .4, • ,•R„ ._......morair---------....--........ ,-. h : , Ms.....111.1MLI. 1.1 __ r .111••• , • Ar .-- z.-.j-iw-„zr,„„rth :. :::. it-- ---_.0.51.....ma...",iir ..."..-.1,. ....,,ort,t, .., • 1 /.-- • • ./,•..-.0 , , c-- , i el,..cd, 1 iiiiiprrY: ,.,:—. s • . ., , _,..-4.• '--I 4t21....--- si • ' 1.19.1j , ---i.=?.. r i: *-0' ...• y4 , , h, )...11,411•PB,Y1117-.tr, 4• . I iil ,,k4 • r , -.,•;. k -• '.1 .' .•‘-,./ ',' •• •4°- .• '. 1 t -. .,. / 49 .... s's ' ''' 1 : ikillIP . ' 11104L' 1,' . ;. '' C 1 Mal O. P C. 1.1 41 iMil='..'-•. 4 • /li; ./ 0 ,,/ 41. .., • ' , • Igrd,d. . • II Aiofft4reN119:i / '‘, ''•-. // / . 9,;', 1 '--, --- . i il •-• --"'"P•11.471111jr. ....... -. ' ' IllPh..... "'d/ ./ / "i. `• ft sil . , ...-1 ilfkr wrlftwv _ __,.....„....., Litre, ,. ...., LO .../, / _. Ili 12 .i.....• =17... ._.aswates.....4:_yy islio,,...-,-,, / .!., / ;HIM i I ° ta [ , .• ,' I i 111,--721--,----lic---, —14r-- ----Aur,c—c.., •\ *7' , I, ,I1,, I_ :1; liar 41 41 1 ;i ':z• :: 1 m, , 4 ill i a 11 ii ii •,; !:: I 41 i r\li II ' \ J IF )f.....f ,I,-''. 7 Mir' 2 .2 .. 3, / . • 1 i i; A 1 IA 41111 J '..,'..••• I 't.• ''. ek, . D A,ns" -../ ' .,z- /.‘ <<\ ,./-. 4 II L • :4.: iii: _,....c.4.7., z ,,,./-"..1•0.., . , / , ,,..,, .0-.:,.i.: ii 1 • (•••— e l IS' Ir. •'-..-.." • l‘ ip.IFIrg/ • ,• •91,, „ / /\\ /' k . . I lii.: 34..A I. • ' 410hipp7/2 , ' ... / \\ ‘ /// 3 . . . . nriN. I , tir \ /“,p,;,- ..• / ,' / 1 4111 '41.1 ' • 14 iPA..' /1411/ ../ , j f . 1 , . / --- --,— ..),.&.. a • ;i, .. :; 15'=. /111 ;.. "i. A.,),,,,,,44/40, .:.•, 1 . N 1 .t..,...._ ..zrzel ,„Litr,4...* • ... " _:,,,,// N,,,,,,...‘,,zz, • . )',' . /...aav .. • EDGEY4000 DRIVE lilliall -=.-moommroon ,,,,,,:r, si 01 , (----- ,- . . • , .'—' -.. ..•.-V4v4- ' ,,izrailta.. ,' • . • 0 1 a• , . , , a :•'. liql ill; . 04/ • Pin 71 :If'" Will 0 Pli 11 if,li: Pi 11651:9;ii:iff pi Ppfi DH if lifiqiriiiliiiiiiiiiiiiiipiluggi 3 . 1-i ink 1 - • , i: ILI. ivili 4,, I. it fir,'"1 ila I ,h..i i . 'I.1 ti ii,.. if all I,311 4. dr,,k .:!,,,ii in Jritio t•f ill. 1•14:11:10 ft ;41!' •IN t i Ilia Vim wig ro 1,1.1 .1,i;llril II; 4:4 4 ii: ,i; ,i14---wi..1 ii iat 4,1 1, pp! it i ll 1 3,131%bp 4 •--- --13--1..._•-• •hi '.-1 1:.iti.gip 1:1111111;11 411 it it 11 Iel is II 14m;isltili,4,:j:1!1 IIli!: ?,IsHiititrpo g II ,,.. di V11111111 1` 111 'Willi'if i 141111 iiii I Ile fitiltil hilt!'ii li :' 4 It.Iv if. .- 1.• - .9.-,I- , i 41 111.1 if , pi I I,01 1 :11,,,,4 11140..1 i.,, 1 li f '11 •4 LP 11/1 • VI 1 11 II 10:11r. 1 . ill, 411::, I.; i lit II' 11111 I II 11111411}14!"lel; 1 1.111;1 if Iii illit'lliii11/1 il I 1171:1 h ililli1111b;1 1 I 1;ii itilliliii ill i sig 11 illig ifs' Ijibliiri illir111111111 11 I . 1 . ;. i ri t I • • I1 J .13.100- r 1 . Attach C.....V 0....0.'''' '""•."."..." CARMIKE CINEMAS. INC. 'Soak FatersAL Irx. Ark \ ......-"",.—'7, i. 15 SCREEN THEATRE — A .. .1...al....a Iiiir Sgi <•• •••••mos • 11i1 .-- MOUNDS VIEW MINNESOTA :••••••••,..: 1••••f•J• AIL' III 171- • , ! , a .• a: .. 1 • ? •'- . a ..--• , •,.... , •. • 07 • ; , L./L 'LONG ie ROirtr 1:-.' = 7-••••a'• • —n---.--,4—.—_.— 4. ,- - ---,----,-,4,-,_7..6, .. --, ---•-,-:_.. ... ------:-----------.7.-."..,,7?‘ i f fit !!, `' . '1 ' !--.i "!r--'• L .. . f . . q 3 ^ , . i... 1 ,I li 1 , „ xi . „•.; r,-(:--; c7.-, •../ .,,- 7,-• ,.... . 13 •-• / / _if .... j 1'1 . q. „,,,' 7 .••• Z rirl ... !: .\ :11 ..,-.1r 4, — ..I ef -./. I ' *.- .!1 If ii 1 ' . I I".-, , L. IN ...,-- - •• „ • 1 , ei -__ s , 111 1 0; .4 ....• .... ..• .e.le. a •..,.. • !4; ••• .1! • i tr. ,. /4 -- .,/.. ...' ... , 't. . : t • .. ,. . 't I ..., F.: ,."- „' / ? ,, - - / .11141 41111111 .11111111%... -';; "" /., i .." / / . . / .. . ..,mi bi . • A • . . . , • ,.. . , i (---,•,-, .!m \ / I .1 E ; "*'-, • 7..diamor,. . • il a.1-1 4, AY• / / I. ''. ,• .:1—.= % .• ..:.e. „. • """ I • • i. 40 1: :-4 ,1 ‘.:,.,-,/ .,./ , .,.. •-• / ..-i II• al I dr--- ,...„ ,ic-- re• ./ I I 1 , ,s, N .,.... ..- , la • I i .---. ).., .-.. ..,_.: .: ,. ..,:,, .., ,..0 .,,/ ,• 37! .,... /'' '.. a •.'Y ty• •, '4 if lajg 1 ,33 /. i... NIP/ 1 - I / ••• / / -"" •-' •='•.." . , 3,J ill q ,c.,,,• , -,; Mill . ... / ; :';1; t'; •L_Aid j 1 1 c2 - ,•,•• .,• ;‘, ••• 2, ,,, •• •,:)/ .,/ , 14 ixil i 10 / -rr .; .." /-5....... "IIS -, ;70/ ..-7' ."' ,2- .," c.<\ I; I -,.e.•' - . - . • .../ , , c .)., ; ,.. A ill , . • ,' r, - , , • 1 / ' - , , / = ;• ; t;,,.. •,;•,•• 1 . . • t. ...Ai [ 1 , , .•• : ,.,, •„,003 z.., i. i.c..y. ..., ." /.7 , ,.„ :' N n vn`i,s'a 4 ...-...., ..- , EOGEW000 DRIVE ' -- 7,----- . / I' : • ti.. 1 , ' I •: ; ! <, , ; id / ' ' ! 1 - se 0 , -71•Fi:•1•147'•"-- / / .•' .' I z I /• . I 'a' / / /.''' // • 2 1 ' o // / .• . ' // . I . a .' , . .' // ; . 4 I / .'.. / I / . / 1 : 3 ; 3 i lilli PHI 11 Ilifigfilling If 1 Hill filic Illif!;11!MI;If la 2f If Mr ll if OW Prilji q rl" il Ili: li)07 i*I,111•;* g hi.:- . , , +.5111'1 i I I 14 ilj 1 •1 if ID ilti 11.if; il 4 Iii ,ft;1 ,i,,,•.in f if i ;,1 1 . ..p MI a 1/7.4/illy 1 'f 11011 111.1 rp pia II! g 1, !Iii!.... Ill ill 1 1 1 1 . ) ‘ 10 , ) pli ill!j1 (0 ligi iiiii I I?2tpl! 10 214 ii:!! ii! II li _ii ,, , lolifolf4,1. , I Ilijf pa' fill NI: /II I: .1 ,i, • trill.irinx-, . 1 1.1 `'I'M! UP.;Nit c , AI 1 i 3 r 1;11 il 11111. i 11 .1:,1 `;; i'l 1 3. 01.1i17.:-----r-r..7--- CARMIKE CINEMAS. INC. _........,.,-.....-:_:.=. 'n 15 SCREEN THEATRE -u---- 3 ,... tr.., ---- -Ma l•-••15- Rilii•••.tiattl o....:.•I'''rot:at ` u•••••0 • am—1,1,L— um.• Ma i MOUNDS VIEW . MINNESOTA ......... .- i 1 NI III f tlf s d !Ili iilis 1. I,� l i lfi '111 if if! NI'Ili Tim i i; tiff# 13 ((, i EY } rr f J I } rill'Ia Jrtl a E}(�' �t�ll Iaif i III(}} a ila p}' ,it. 11 iI f+•s ' 1111 r ri ifIdlits !!t` fii jt,itiii iI"j i1 �IrI- jj[ Iii' € i f gid1 1 ;II fill ill ibb.!fist tI tj I## lig�Lrt S#1 �il 011 1 lf id} Ii1,1 Ft}d 11 it IIdi I .#i(1;„1ti E { I 11 1 104 I` 1 '1 11 'If 101 }Y' 1/174` 1t1 1i'Si11i ti. i !i i r' rill l IiifJ II• sl II“ 1 ' f tdi {. rill lit JI11-. is IJ} i if Nit �, 1 It 1.. .,_t{ 3 } �If i{ti 11 !fill illi i.s li f id)d � r 1 . i � fill{�pj 1 ,'' � #t I � d Pit , ii.d illi iilj i ll I If F i�jt d till `it S 111 lig Ili!IIt 1 t ti 111 if,t4i lif 11/11..;� II pi, 1 tJ�l}ii t.1 ,jJ,� r zi r =i. 1 illi 1 ri;t;Ii 11.11 ;i�p k .1 Jill to a1,E 1 III ill'di g.litt ill I lit[ 1 figs g ii11f}i ; pf I 1drill iill III 11(.1 flqfilt •,t1] 1! . 1 111 1It 311 1}E 31` ill! 1�s i 1 i.„I I li ;, t f 111.1 . Iii}^ t I+ CJI .1:'dig; tot ii 3 f lz1 t .1 ill 3,1 1,q hill 1111 Ij t)1 I #{ 1, .i�iiti 1 .7 1 •}j}11 JD 1 , , I, i s 111 111 1. tfIt it �J1 r1 1 1•1j1 i ff I' i� iS< i';i lir I: 1,1 11 t :I u, i sitz diff r 1 I di i'\ aaq34 " I ! ff 'iv °°°°°° i I' 3 S o_'o°°°C F i ';O�o odi�t . g °°°>° Ili' 1 n 1.....i ' o ;I d I 1 J io°>°� ,A , 1 II J to d °°°o ' A .,. ga • i .3 a■ pC a I „ \ : iip11 I.s • o5 `p i e 97 i . ,a�‘ \ 1 t ;,,,, o 4 �8414;) fill/,,,,1 z ..'fit 3ihil �jIv 9!! iW I .1? : !Nj ,1 gle h1 e.4 ihi il 1 !.F.q =' a 'I, .f !1 J i'1'' 7—_-----.--..4, CARMIKE CINEMAS, INC. ilk �'"R"- s. -- _ Ila �,rch�Croup, - �'�� 15 SCREEN THEATRE �� E6 �+— —. .. J MOUNDS VIEW . MINNESOTA �_., -- �. � o .7. -,---" -.-- �� `.`� -- - - _I t I ''\ 4; 4` '% 4 s s 1 -, s` ° 00 `7 r� ,, ,, 7 tell.. -� 414kky,,, �4 e. 4. �\1 p 1), ,, r 1 .Ii: .;.-2\ „y..� /p / /II• - i ' z.%::611 'it ( ,, ., , , , , ...., • 4 403;* '6''' -44t.'.„'''. "40 \'‘\ „ .1 '':' 41)Wrr /. � .�ii i Igo � . • -, c tz---.:.--,---- ---, --... i II l\ 1 '" ,��� / 1 o.G?ey t.-�0.0 -I�. _� ,.- 1 \`aA11il ' '!_ '...1=: --�� �: . �Iri11r .. ; . • n o_ i 4 C IL1 111„,. r� aes•ea :i,40.: , 1 111 1�' I �,, di ipEz iii11• ,1101'f1111,11111t1;1 31}SSs t ��'11 r1 1 1 1 7 f t t„ , ! 1{r tis 1• A �_ l Ili s it �p}r� `� di € !• I l l l ,aea.�a,%.,11 .,11logaea Ili P �ir� 111 1 iii t� , , 1rt1 • .-•-.1 .._..�� • ,� �a.rr1•nq Zoe Rood w«._ / , . / / • • A� a--,- - ,�.__'—�_ _----.7___-- _—j__, t ---._-_-....-4-_______:::"- -7...-_;,' �, .-+. .:1- - 7 j Li ,i/1r/ :,1 /,.., \\,„, .1'�1 n n� '• �1 1 � / • �!w . • 1 11 � • : "iii i•i 1 '1.:i•11•1 • , " \ °.1 \ ill: ' / 1 t. '1 'kr, .t', • , , t 1'1.' 1 I• ; it 'i' /'f 11P1)1,', 1 I , t Z ';" 51.''1 •• • .1 ,•, 1 •.'t ; �, _ -17�: ill,,.. `1..; ,:- /'I/ 1 ,il• r •'1 it a1 _ '1 ,t, ' r -4 1 11\" ti,•,1 \% h ..P, 1 `1;11.;i% q '; \ ,r•, , / i•',1/11' by • 1 1,1 / 0 t r•• nrn•�14, i\. // \ irr 'a .,. s\z.*... .______. do ,` 1 I , .,/ • '1 •1,. 1 , f—,.� `1-• `•(� / / En ' 11 '' Irl 1 /// / 1 1 \,1 v •'''�! '• •,i'� •,4 4. .,,'1 �t .1�1 ,t'i ��ti'S,'1r i'(F'� `i,,R' 'h 'iii\ ,//,//i //// I -- — ' 1 -„.r.,1 i7 1••,. •,'1'1. '1/ ►\1.,i •/, ,, ,/,,//y / / T •R(;:GLt S '•, 1 1 1 1 'j •1 l'•, ., 1. /,•1 + ''.,', ,`^/ / c.• .1: 'v I, -i .a. \ -, 'I / ��. t ,1,1,tu',Y•�1 :1.1 •1. /' `1 a \\ �' 1 •i, •1:}'i/ Ir• t r, 11 �/' // C": ; ;:}•111 ( .1...,1;1, ,. , 1 .�„ •y•'-,it" -fir' \,t.. �; • // i • 11•r1 \, ..1,1 1.1 ICI 1'1 / , ., • .\ ... . / '� 'OI .,,,.: 't ' •.,,,,,. 1 :I :.1 i 1 . . // .? / _ �. T '241 '... 1 ; 'il.,'1 i r•, , '1 .rt 1 1 r'1, - ', • O� // ..._ t = ,•ti '• 1!1 1 •i•'i/ t•,1 1 i`�it y , :� . .1 1 '1'.1\;1�\ 1', 1 '1 1 ' i�11/ 1.Y , 4.> // I. !,,;,i :'" • 1.1.4 .:.••,•� 1! / // :� 1 ' ;'.,'1'' •', '1 1.;;;:•:-\\•• 1 11 j 11 1 1 � .. / a a 1 t, •1 1 -1. , '•,• 1'1 i1• /' X10' // • • y J A,.'34 .�\ •, p "I, r u / / / / �, •ytip , j ..\ /' / �. . Jit\,! ' //// • / / '/ e S •..$SZ mit Fittts.111tYialuFiumua ritati r- u t.,ft. -._.0.4-1--“ ,- .a.ii L a,.ina r - 11 r t..i -i''4,1'7,,—;`,.. -ii; r=-. iz n FL"! dfiGAsi4.s• G '. 'sB Sr kifi _. ,a--. n --a'S _., _ 1 ' 1 I • I iI ' I I :111 11 xato,:v�ya.s.+f..0-:—+---' ',E _ -^i ..- 4.,...----1-...,.=-_,-.:-.- _ i__ ._-_-,•____,._,-,-4.< 1.vi a i . i i�,i,' 1 /naa- N aaafaa.- . =�a.Tt iia - a_, aa.j -,/ -a - a=1:tf-T't ,,..T`fari4' a.va a..» a .1..,_72.11.71'"''..7"7:”" h n-.i.1>.;7 r^`3X'_'11'1.7'j."1_7/",77_,'-'7:1.7.::7.'2..":.:>_.,a,<,a >?]r1a_T- baa= .,r-=P:f NIIIIIIIIININuo mm issaul c I ti1-11•11Trtnim.irtitAll fllf iFztYiSIY`ru nYtiriar,7'S1•c:'SSY' 11-slii ibffin li'FGrB Yrlffri sRuts rrEa'uiS IGEEF`. flT�t,�k�.�i S iTFtfi a . •amu .--••,4' n'&".-;,,,,f,c4 ..- "4"J.PitiM.P10 PI..14'MlaMILVV.IV7f.0 rainimpagp4:41 f, oiiiy.ithqiip 'or • - 1 i,li, I. 1,11 . 1 ",': Ii1:*:>11 1,111q1111111.1 741 ., 11:1111111 AN!! ,I I 1 ...1 iTI: - A au i 9 111111'I I '`4r lilitillOci:i:1',.11 rot;j 0 f--. ea, x .0..1 , , ,, ,, E.-. il , • -,. ....a.. Firripplopp 1... .qr a ' p 1 3,1f11,011::I iv.;ell :N001.1c1:1.: ., il ''l 1101 III t'i':?,1 13111 ;IL7'11--21111,1:,i3:.:If I :`,•:--1,11 i `;1 i I ' II "'ill''' ';,111 p — .8 .‘?.•,i'. , r4/ ,..—..,1 .1 .1,•..., ...4 .. I tY:1 ,M4110,1IIIIII'itililtii*:III`r5A!!I ..'••••••• 2 ..111I$IiIVii'l l'I-,;'-'11' .-,$'. • 'AMMI.II ..1 l'14!%:1 ',',-Iii?1111 ,,,',9 • ';! 1/47':,',',.,. i 1 -^r• WWII.4'1 h I I" 7 s . ,: 4 I ''.'; ,.'61.441:4:11111:11.14L ,11 ,,:,Sivioicila:•te,,,,,,. ..,.1 :,...4 . - -4 rim'i 1 i..;.?..:,:....?.4: „.0 willi;.....:4,.:.-j.: El wytt!litligliiii!r, ii=111 ,.i.‘.'..11'::,.I-21 :,! 0 I '1'ri I•: NI Ilil ; .„ .a a 4. I -..-..... .. .. „.,,., 1 .,..u., ..- 0 1 1 vi ill 111 11 I,, ........ . .., ..... ..LT.. __ El_] ._. ...._. •,.1. . It me Intwill""EP' .2e,m ...._• .......1 Ilii • . Zarrifit / III 111 i RIII=111-7- "--`' A E ,9=1,113 ••:y...-111.3 via • III1 1 5,ilg31141 ., - -',..7.– =.1 1 1 , , , sol- i ;,t1--1I Lflifj,...);i:.0 1 IN 1 II fill III f I IIII 1 II° • .. . • ' I I II I.1.111111i II il I ...' Big .. I • y. I - — ! I.1 ., 1.111 II,illii jthii, I.'. nil I Iii !,11,111 1 ..__ „:, . 1 :-:.'i 51,:2-:. ,. iq .1,....... ...„, , ,,, iiii ,!,. 1 1.-:0111 lailiti r!--; '1.: - ' , ::...i.:..:1.:yr:71••• I, ,11.0.1.-,&. :,-;e.' ,___tunis-i:.,.?-_./...1.:•:;,n L.4 ,....i....,::..,v: -..,,-,...- Emin,..;:g:-.{:.....1:j...:, 1101I1 III II1I11 II I/ 11 73: 111111.1f';',4.'JET,: II I till I IIIIIII ! II 111111 . H 'i I. If :,,, 41d1:61 0 q.4001"'?,:' 1.• _ iptitifprilmr; ' • i. 14:1,,11'11:1,011 Aa r iiiiiikiiiiill r„,4,14..1.,, l',11,1q, .1. ', 11 I!Lavil.0• •• r,„, I 1 !' _ „.„..„, 1,, „,,.1,..6 . .„,„,... .,,.,...,,..,,, ,-4...,, , , ., 4...!.1,...!. tsf"60 "iiiit.is , • ..101:1 :', il_ii::i 1 EMI gaol • 1 1111II1 ir :,.— 1 qii• 11111111i'I1i I p [zi1151.1 i 1111.111 111 , !',1 4 1/4.01,112V 10.--...•' • A I • ,'Id r, 1 ,, P:S. ' ,'4Mile. ' I 111111q1 elj 1 i 1.".'$I'• ii '1E11:1 1 "1 't'.0.. • 1;141,inIll r & ili 3 7— I il 111P1111111 mk: ', a .4,'"hi 4 .0A..•.:;a11; ,11 10 1 f..- Ili Iffill11111 I I. IMilii 'ilOn ,,IIIIIIIIIII,:em, L ; I/ I.!4•-,'''r:f 3 • pH., 1 .,, ,: 1 1111,iptti III L43,1, . III t Iii i 0 IIIIJIII,j11. , i i'::...,'4141 1111....11fn li 0 qi '111.4Hhn 4. ,. .11111 III 11111 , il 1 1111. &> 0 II lifrillPS.eptLif fi[1,i'jgl. ,111iiIiiP,11111 Will "tral'. ..., -1 -....,.-... ..._,„,..:51..• .*I:II I C . a 1 171 I Ilij $'\'1 ill MI y Iii I I �Il , ! �; II . 1 \ ' 11 II. 1 INN � II j1 ISI III 111 ' I ii i- I , alIi ( i► Ilk ,L ,:� o ; , - — milx r. ► I ■.i �; 111E1 11 ill11i , I ME ► i I . 11'1,;Ii K. 0 l rikc -.II / 1 111111-. , III ) i NM ,1.:11 /i Iiiiiii.h. I j 'i;'11•Ibi I I:`I i I I III ` ► I: 1I ,L. - t ■iiian mom € o , I E f b;- I:na 2,5 C I:.�,,.!,: •I 4.,,,,u,222222F. N ' .f �' "; ■1 _ a f Iii I MINIMIIIM 0 Z 111111 / \ D 111! i § ii,17,. ,, 1 I t 15 Illi.zi• ►I 1 in i I .'\ i) •, fl "mob Mar 17 98 04: 47p Wendell R. Smith 612-484-0699 p. 3 4 ., 1 i c (�1 =Ti .\\ • Al ku r H . : . - •_ . x ft' e i � ', :'•Iii i iCri� iiiiiiiiiiiiillil ._.. ....1 1 :.:: : Olk 4 vi ..ts 0) PI— a .• 11 7 % • ' 1 i ',.. .',11! li j I • • Atlyci - i .1 • .1 1 I 1 ',:i 1 I -!'.;. — • 7. . •• .." * .0., c) ,../) ,,, 1 ik • , ... = � I •i •= iiii$IIlI1Iiittiii NII111Ut1(JJj • - .1 ill- " '../.. i 0 . ..,...a‘s. "! !... ' •If .. ii . • : - . i. 4. • . 1 .1 . . ...' . • .i ... ;.; --_n_ .. .• .:v!, . i 3 . ; g. 1.6 • 70 t 1 1. .' • :. . . . t. g 1 1D.- :. . . • 2•1 - 1 V i 4i Iv•01° 32 3-8 Jo_ : 4• .. _... . .. t • . . . 1 , . .f4e1----2 4.5).-71. lt. 5 • Mar 17 98 04: 46p Wendell R. Smith 612-484-0699 p. 2 I .ar - 35'-0" 11 T-0" Ida 71 Vit7.--amnr : 17 I ••'- i:n' sus -- •: Z 1 ':' }' '� 's1 ,r 1 +< .3”-" P.-13i7. 0 r<<j i —� .:1 .. ,,,,11- 111.... .. fit 0 1.011110-0 -------------*:: _ r----- ....N... l 1! i (1 1 • i 1 .7 037.. 7111M - r��n�imm •Cid"Over :r 15 ).c m c>m O UO�}�= 2 -m22... fa- 7_ rOM e'-'3) 00 Z.401Z00> m000M2T .jj> rnZ22> CC> n r": - ,,0rn Q n Oz.OQmp.O nd Q ' 'sos0 "-al 0 C)A> 02n •c: co m¢"+mCA 11Z`"O m..0 Si, 2t"+0rnT.L 1�'O fnrit �= P - m G» 0 -4CT p/ vi0_ ' �Il.:.-1r nzrz rtitmn 2=V' -mr- > 2"0M jp0mf m9m)- Zm m_ 11 ' A0,):P0 S ;l e, mne m5Si�rm 02m0 ZPIft) m mOO"� 0 a- Opm. —zvm ..4 ?z o0mcZx 0 pt,,,5r m 65 oh S,m m� 22 c• Cym• m Z 1r 21 T O . i r • PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY,MINNESOTA Special Meeting April 15, 1998 Mounds: „' City Hall 2410 Highway 10, ;and ew,MN 55112 i'2,. .xSS• Index to Minutes 3 - i PlanningCase No. 522-98F” 2535-2585 Highway 10(Mo view ) s6 Consideration of Resolution No. 543-98 Approving a C qg $° Y se Permit yY . for Temporary Produce Sales, Craig Gild(Merryville F. Planning Case No. 520-98, 2824 Woodale Drive, Cons ration x S15 " . ' „ on 4 No. 540.98 Approving a Condition al Use Permit fo an Oversize•(5,> ` 'iat Building,Ronald P. Overton • Planning Case No. 518-98, 7581 Spring L. oad, esolution 5 No. 539-98 Approving a Minor Subdivist:t , CharlN chu • •`.)" • Planning Case No. 516-98, 7858 t $ wake ' . Consi• tion of Resolution 7 No. 541-98 Approving a Conditi$ 'Use Pt for an' ,: ersized Garage, Thomas Lam i •• 'tea# g 'F . Plannin-:` �:' `� :.a .` 9 R.` 507-9`': ,..., _hway 1�, .7�5-7761 Eastwood Road, Considera 't. . .lution`:,.� k:::: 8 and 53 8-98 Denying the Walgreen's Development'a ".. � ompre ,1 Amendment and Rezoning Requests, TOLD Development, ° o .ny •• r , Plannin ` ase No 514-9: a t r k: oral Sea Street, Consideration of Resolution 13 No. 5,42-98 Approving the e::.,elopment Review for Completion of the 2nd Phase of 13 ges Technology BtfildfngBuilding Project,Bridges Leasing Company,LLC 11,„4,nning Case No. 51 < 8, 2430 Highway 10 (O'Neil Property), Consideration of 15 Ilion No. 5448 Approving the Development Review Stage of the PUD, Prel ; ..:>:;:.:,I lat and Wetland Buffer Permit, AP Mounds View Limited Partnership (Anthony >roperties) • Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 • Special Meeting Page 2 1. Call To Order The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Peterson at 7:00 p.m., April 15, 1998. 2. Roll Call Members present: Chairperson Peterson, Commissi• $ :Br. ' .& . :•ks (departed 9:251l Johnston,Miller, Obert, and Stevenson. •< _ `' wF' ff 6s�:': ..:;.a.,..a. lx pis: >:._.. �ii :>. r; Also present: Community Development Directo eke,P g : � . t ''in Associ�- -;:xis;: `. 0>. Council Liaison Koopmeiners,and Recorder Da 3. Citizens' Request and Comments on Items Not v f'.` •g There were no citizen requests or comments,.' ms not o$ ff 8: ea. • 4. Approval of Minutes y a '`' No minutes were considered for • $.royal 10 5. Planning Case No. 522-98 a s • 2535 -258 ,. 7,<t hway 10 tl.ff;. e!view Sq; ' pa/ Applican f "ilb - ; , ,. M Considers • 'esolution` 6 8 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Temporary Produce Sale ° ::. •;: <' <y• '¢'. � z. sr• .. • - - . .. - -. - - . Aor Associate Ericson ma'a his presentation as follows: Merryville arket was requesting a Conditional Use Permit to operate an outdoor -<`' 'produce stand in the parking lot of Moundsview Square Shopping Center from July 1, .41 le • _ pttember 30, 1998. Hours of operation were stated as 10:00 a.m. -7:00 p.m., 9 -..:M"fie gays a week. The stand requires no utility hook-ups. The stand was granted a CUP the last two years at this same location. Staff stated they were not aware of any problems associated with this operation. Linder's Greenhouses, which was also granted an outdoor-sales CUP, will be dismantling • its greenhouse sometime in between June 30 and July 15, so the overlap of operation could be less than the possible 15 days. This overlap, if any, will cause little impact to parking, • Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 3 as the produce stand occupies only 110 square feet of the parking lot. Signage for the produce stand will be accomplished with small banners affixed to the stand structure and lettering on the canvas roof. According to the City Attorney, the City cannot impose any licen• • re. ""ements uon the applicant. The City can, however, control the time place a k n�,,' of the operation through a Conditional Use Permit, so long as the re. f ents$` g".,. •ffect, prohibit the use or impose undue hardship. F Sf. •34Y � fi9,sq., h Staff is recommending the approval of Planning missi.);r esolutio resolution recommending to the City Council thaLk tF `®'rove a Condition. ` J'ermit for Merryville Farm Market to operate n outdoor . nd at Moundsview Square Shopping Center from July 1, 1998 to September 5 z_= ry` a stipulations. The stipulations were listed as follows: 1. The facility shall be allowed t. . . sY � 1, 19'. o September 30, 1998. 2. The hours of operation oft acility $ kqi" .00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. 3. Signage shall be allowed.0 as afi`•d to� ' b.' ' s base and/or canvas roof. y � • 4. Lighting for the use s '.e supp, � ;,;=d by exi ; _ parking lot standards. Chairperson Peterson • lO the app nt if he s Id like to make a presentation. Cray°` i16, Me Aacit4zzi Mark-'1,44,4,02;to make a presentation but offered to $ a quest' s �V` `s•- staff o` "' ommission might have. _< Aj:;. ; �a.:ya;:�: kag>: M. is . "' on/Br.` ., $ .prove Resolution 543-98,a resolution recommending to City Council ... . a Via,a Con. ts#,_ se Permit for outdoor sales at Mounds View Square, requested h ::' t :=:�' .:$ arket;' 'tanning Case No. 522-98, with stipulations. <ceA Nays- 0 Thig otion carried. sz' 3 <` • ssociate Ericson told the applicant the Public Hearing and meeting with the City Council . :. fedited for April 27, 1998. 6. Planning Case No. 520-98 2824 Woodale Drive 1111 Applicant: Ronald Overton Consideration of Resolution No. 540-98 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for and Oversized Accessory Building Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 4 The applicant,Ronald Overton, was present. Associate Ericson, gave his presentation as follows: Ronald Overton was requesting permission to convert an existin_; ._'x 2ngle-car garage to an accessory building. His intent is to move e existi f e 100'back toward the rear of his property, located at 2824 Woodale D ' • pl. �" oved garage,Mr. Overton would be constructing a detached two- _ .ge. No • ££ � N�ew garage have been submitted. Staff is recommending approval of Planning Co ts -4: -3s 'esolution No. "'":0K"11'4 recommending to the City Council approval of a Use Permit for Ronald Overton, allowing a 308 sq.ft. oversized shed at 2 `/42-kV $1A >,Prive,with stipulations. The stipulation were listed as follows: • 1. The Conditional Use Permit s 'th ' s * y County within 60 days of City Council approval, a¢ :. recei. @: ,� g shall be provided to the •City of Mounds View. a s, r • 2. The shed shall be ,; =ned i "the futur o as to provide a uniform and _ f.> consistent buildinge!1 pearan 'th the - . ting house. 3. adz he shed `, • •e used 4 " =. :ace or other uses not allowed by the district ilbos hich 9$ or by th=e'"• `mg Code. Should the use change for which the sf • was g .'� P•' , onditional Use Permit shall become null and void. 4. htiNAimalk ds or buildings, other than the proposed garage,shall be . .ri4k lot. . There sh `' < `tW ehicle access to this shed, nor shall any vehicle be stored within said struc e. ,ate `„ 6. The a. $:Iicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City to ensure a ` _> hi. :'' ality of workmanship and timely completion of the relocation. issioner Brasaemle asked for a clarification as to what constituted a"vehicle". Associate Ericson stated snowmobiles, ATVs, boat, garden tractor, etc are excluded from the Code's definition of a vehicle. The intended Code definition is for items such as cars, vans, etc. Chairperson Peterson asked the applicant if he would like to make a presentation. • Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 5 Mr. Overton, declined to make a presentation. He told the Commission he is waiting on a call from the City's building inspector in regards to the required foundation. Motion/Second: Brasaemle/Miller to approve resolution 540-98, a resolution reco,g3 =•nding the City Council approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow for an oversized .rage: °`d for Ronald Overton, 2824 Woodale Drive: Mounds View Planning Case o. 520-9r ;$ .`tpulations, as amended. k: ) s3'k 22 £ Ck �'4 Ayes 7 Na��� 0 22 T 32k � 5 sJ i 2 The motion carried. Associate Ericson stated that a Public Hearing a g3sore the City Council has , been set for April 1998. P 27, saA 7. � t �nx 7. Planning Case No.518-98 7581 Spring Lake Road sw' Applicant: Charles Schultz Consideration of Resolution No. 5' 3'Appr0 g a Mi ,•r Subdivision Th $ icant, C 3 ltz, . � N= Assogjar443, `' son g. "ntation as follows: • chul requesting approval of a minor subdivision to create two lo "f' A'$ ocate• at 7581 Spring Lake Road. A copy of the surveyor's i w. , .. re• = e -i , was su•mi e.. "" a app ican propose. o sp i o- :5', eaving 80'for th xa : g property. All applicable setback requirements would be met 7 under this confi . ... tion. i' Staff is reco ::ending approval of Resolution 539-98, a resolution recommending to the ,, ity Cou..c approval of this minor subdivision subject to stipulations. " 'stipulations were listed as follows: 1. The applicant shall make payment of a park dedication fee of$1032, as specified by Section 1204.02. 2. The applicant shall record the City Council resolution of approval,the Certificate of Survey and the drainage and utility easement document with Ramsey County Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 6 within sixty(60) days of final adoption,and present proof of such recording o the City of Mounds View, or this approval shall be null and void. Chairperson Peterson asked the applicant for their presentation. siis g Mr. Schultz declined to make a presentation. He adde',the pa on fee was extremely high. E " • r., Associate Ericson told the Commission that the qi,r Dedica;or Fee • 1, or subdivision would be reviewed by the Park and a eatio :;:'o mmission 3 `� meeting, scheduled before the case was to be h E8 < ity Council,an recommendation would accompany the Case to t `K .ancil meeting. Motion/Second: Brasaemle/Brooks to approve Resolu 53'= ; tion recommending to the CityCouncil approval of a minor subdivision for . ° les and u . .,,• ltz, Spring Lake Road,Mounds View Planning Case No. 5 : • ..0` tipulatio ted above. Ayes -7 • • The motion carried. Chairperson Peterson to 82 e appli ° ould be passed on to the City Council for their consideratio; at April 2 .* � ng. 8. Planning Cas 3 ,y '8 7858 Long La Applicant: .• Gara The applican $ omas Lammi, was present. ricson made his presentation as follows: Thomas Lammi has requested permission to construct a 616 sq. ft. garage addition to his house located at 7858 Long Lake Road. The proposed addition would attach seamlessly to the rear of the existing garage and house,tying into the existing roofline, siding,and soffits. Backyard accessory buildings cannot exceed 25 percent of a backyard's area. The garage • addition cannot exceed 1,125 sq. ft. in area. The requested addition meets both of these criteria. A CUP is needed because the addition, in conjunction with the existing garage, • Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 7 exceeds the allowed 864 sq. ft. Staff is recommending the approval of Planning Commission resolution No 541-98,a resolution recommending to the City Council approval of a Conditional Us- ._rmit for Thomas Lammi, allowinga 1 246 sq. ft. oversized garage at 7858> =,.n road with g stipulations. The stipulations were listedas follows: sr 1. The conditional use permit shall be reco •• ! with ' ' sey Coun of City Council approval,and a receipt o g• , ..Warding shall be p o the City of Mounds View. 2. The garage shall be designed and main $d to r eamless and uniform building appearance with the existinl to and• h• } 3. The garage shall not be used f713 other u not allowed by the district in which it is locate•'• by th- wok y ould the use change for which the permit was gra a' d,the c itio it shall become null and void. 4. No other sheds or4 ssory • glifs ings s R •e allowed on this lot. 5. here shal= ehicle a`' •n the west elevation of the addition. > "� e icle i k � s shall • ' e possible through the existing garage. • 6. z .i • 'cant sgo a development agreement with the City to ensure a • • of wo ' p and timely completion of the development. • ^:a_Y. r, 1 . _t 3 i -• • - . • • • . . • make his presentation A Mr.Lammi tol•:1§a"7"ommission the addition would match the existing structure in all materials, includi g shingles. bieVis` Commissi= r Obert asked staff if stipulation No. 3 would protect the City from the •<jj:. ` .;�° '•`A�;_ ..f5"::• nning a business out of the garage. Associate Ericson stated stipulation No. 3, would cover the possibility of the applicant using the garage for some type of business. • Motion/Second: Brasaemle/Obert to approve resolution No. 541-98, a resolution recommending the City Council approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow an oversized garage for Thomas Lammi, 7858 Long Lake Road;Mounds View Planning Case No. 516-98, with stipulations. Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 8 Ayes -7 Nays- 0 The motion carried. Chairperson Peterson told the applicant the case would bepass- ,e n to k `"` Council P PP � City for their review on April 27, 1998. N` 2 X33 . 2 . l£ s$ 3 9. &k 3 ayn Planning Case No 507-97 2625 Highway 10, 7715 -7761 Eastwood Road Applicant: TOLD Development Company au' 3c32 �32ss�.t? Consideration of Resolution Nos. 536-98 and 538-98 1V;, ying' R& ;n's Development Request, Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Reze • Reques ,,, 3 SJ26i ! The applicant, TOLD Developm.#` Comp .,was , 411 Associate Ericson stated o ‘ in e No. 5 =• -97 was back before the Planning Commission for reconsid on of a g t'`ion th. ,o.d d been made at the April 1, 1998 Planning Commissi e e k:.ar meet,, _ . 'on to deny recommending approval by th- ;Council .,• „ . 3 ion No 9 .i d 538-98 had not been voted on because the tl ` the re• } M d not m '".:' th the Planning Commission's approval. Updat $' of eac t were submitted for the Planning Commission's conside_ _ $ -, action`' proposal would need to be taken by May 29, 1998. • tea: QAC. e 9 • • ghborina prnn re presented to the Tanning Commi `t': '-7-''new new information in the case. Chairperson P•' rson clarified the fact that at the last meetingCommissioner Brasaemle had withdra s motion and no action was taken. He asked the applicant if he(TOLD) ad any n`:.::> formation to present in the case. < ,.:44 ,. , .. 9.obCunningham, TOLD Development Company, asked the Planning Commission to pass the case on to the City Council so that he might have an opportunity to address them on the case. He also asked, as a stipulation of approving the Development Plan, that the developer be required to get MnDOT approval for the Highway 10 access into the site. This would lift the burden of overriding a MnDOT decision off of the City's shoulders. 11111 Commissioner Obert asked the applicant if this action meant that the development would • Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 9 continue without the Highway 10 access. Mr. Cunningham concurred. He added there are currently two adjacent property owners that have not reached some type of settlement with the developer on behalf algreens. Carol Arel,7750 Greenwood Drive, made the follo • g state > ,„ "I've prepared some remarks. So I would apprecia x .t being i• ;gid, $ • just allow to say what I have to say. As you all know I have stood up at many of then •efore, along wits , residents of Mounds View. And,although,I may• ',� g - of the few residents you hear from tonight, I'm asking you to consider many o < ' fig � � ew residents that are not here tonight. The residents that Pm asking you onsi o ,_ gh esidents that are unaware of the plans being made to change •mprehe 4� si sus 'or to completion of public hearings on the plan. There are r, 1 •Tc �° . have neir awareness raised to this issue as of yet, due to the cont effie s g w talks • e Comprehensive Plan. Pm asking the Planning Commis to fol1•%. the • .. r ou began to lay out at the • meeting two weeks ago,whic• £ o passecomme g k . ion denying the changes to the Comprehensive Plan. I as .>. ; 'ou d• et an u nate situation of the two week delay due to an inadequa 4i=s •repare• ,. nial pre • • al stop you from, what I believe you saw, as the right cour' . •k"ction tw• • f ga-rf` Mou''.$19;41S".1). d the ' . ' ng Commission in particular, have heard what �f f the • § ?`s>' g Y City"� �, :; you to do as officials of the Ci in connection with the •Ian,an& .- atprior meetings of the Comprehensive--the Comp ���� ><> g P Com re ' R e.• meeti r= ' d that is not to zone commercial property next to R-1 reside • • • • =m is is a'ommuni issue settinga clan erous receden in �f • tY g P >; my • • • - • • t k. •- _onal-is ent property owners. 'm standing befo as a concerned member of the community, who has refused thus far, to be pressu0 into a last-minute agreement with the developer. Because I still believe that communif,l,nd the good of the people in the community should come first. 4 ant to teach mychildren that theycan stillgrow upin a societywhere people �• �. .... P P >: �u each other, not in a society where the "me first attitude" expressed in prior meetings, is the norm. I want my kids to know that if they elect responsible officials, and work within the processes with those officials, it's likely that a reasonable resolution will be reached. . And since Mr. Cunningham has brought up the agreements,I'd like to specifically refer to a couple of things connected to the agreements: Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 10 • The agreement that is proposed by the developer names the City of Mounds View under the"Hold Harmless Clause" of the agreement. I personally am concerned that my City Council, as my elected representatives, have not been given the opportunity to review an agreement in which they are named prior to signatures being obtained from.%~ 'dents. City government, in my opinion, is a difficult job alreas y,as yo •11P?''-±p',"' est to. In carrying out the best interests of the City,I think, it' „,,-t•) - diff' • a5; do not have all of the information available to them for considerat ' Additionally,Td like the Planning Commission t -,,ow th = +is agree - a 4 `ted to us, personally, less than two days ago. We w ; • Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 11 control measures for Greenwood Drive had changed. Mr. Cunningham stated their concern is that they address all traffic safety issues to the best of their ability. Ms.Arel,quoted Terry Moses, the real estate represen tive for ,3 6v-velopment, as saying, "Traffic issues on Greenwood Drive are the /,',18',$ sibil' ity and the citizens." Terry Moses,Prudential Commercial Reality, sF s.' "tha' of what I £ `< - told the Commission that as far as he knows the deve$5:5''„,, ition has not chat regards to traffic safety concerns on Greenwood Drive. Chairperson Peterson told the Commission th. _. act s re or another, needed to be taken on the Case that evening so the Cas =tea d move 8M e City Council for its consideration. A written recommend.�gs�,: g the FI _':'of Fact, needs to be sent to the City Council. 3f Motion/Second: Brooks/Johnston to a • ve dens' •fRe-$ �, - 1o. p�. ;�� ,. 536-98,a resolution • recommending the City Council app g,�,:SY a Com.k‹ ensive s�` � endment from Low Density and High Density Residential to Nt .rhoo• "ommerc ry„§ 'or properties located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715 -7761 E. - .od Roa+ '`annin a No. 507-97. A ays-4 :;•„;>, � • <f:l:.f. t�. is The motio } - • <> . M•ti. - •nd ` ` � Albert t•`g" "s ; ." a Resolution No. 536-98,a resolution recommending the City C., "g'or ropreh= sive Plan Amendment from Low Density and High Density -•- • 7761,EZtwood Road; Plant*` ase No. 507-97, as amended that the Highway 10 access is not a neces ary part of the del.,' `•pnient project, language of the final resolution to be drafted by staff. yes-4 Nays -3 ' $ ot1tt?8" ....w 8. s.Arel stated: "This is a--you're looking at an overall big picture. What you're proposing to do is piecemeal, overall big picture, and I guess I have to disagree with that again as being in the best interest of the City." • Chairperson Peterson stated the feedback gathered from the community forums indicates the residents want the Highway 10 corridor to be the main area of commercial Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 12 development. The support for keeping commercial development on Highway 10 is overwhelming and the buffering issues for this development are undecided. Commissioner Brasaemle made a statement in explanation of his change i•49.ew for the project. He stated the fact that the developer has settled with fou s t of ix adjacent property owners and the developer's willingness to abi•e by a Hite P'cision, one way or another, on the Highway 10 access. Motion/Second: Obert/Peterson to approve Resolution 538-98, x ,olu end .. the City Council approve Ordinance 614,an Ordinance €$ _ ovine w rezoning" $t! g =, z located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715 -7761 Eastwood Y <°tea R-3,Medium ` , . Residential, and R-1, Single-Family Residential,to B-2, 611013',•;;C),`4:) siness District;Planning Case No. 507-97. Ayes -4 • _ The motion carried. Mr.Pinkerton asked the Comm' on howf€ was ;c4i `? et compensated for having an 18' wall with high-intensity built b �"�'nd his t• ome development. He said he i felt like the rug was being t out fry - under h :evelopment half way through its completion. < Co sioner Ob :ked the ,i6 their participation in the process. tr 41,/t.k: $ essed e#.0t•intment in the fact the Planning Commission, while righ• 17:30, 740ds ove "'11,:;t4;4.Airkil., to treat the developers fairly. I find that it was extremeL: ' :te thaCkifills" of proposals were not available two weeks ago, and basi " a'' siden in a position where they got caught off guard." A te -minute recess wa; , B 'at 8:40 p.m. :..ieL on the record at ' 0 p.m. Pan'; ; e No 514-98 8400 oral Sea Street Applicant: Bridges Leasing Company,LLC Consideration of Resolution No 542-98 Approving the Development Review for Completion of the 2nd Phase of Bridges Technology Building Project • Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 13 The applicant,Bridges Leasing Company,LLC,was present. Associate Ericson gave his presentation as follows: Bridges Leasing Company,LLC, is applying for permission to expand its c t facility by building a 35,188 sq. ft. office/warehouse facility. This expan wi #- "ng the total build-out to 64,376 sq. ft. The parcel of land, currentl zoned Ihf tal District, is undeveloped with the western edge of the property land, aining area covered by dense tree cover. The proposed expan ,(' will mate F '" :MO,, y nd style o the existing building. , Two areas of concern were addressed at the Pl. b=a _? f s ission meeting ygfAril 1, 1998. One being parking requirements. The sec• f}g�39trshe closeness of the paved �: parking lot to the adjacent wetland. yha The applicant has provided a master plan sho s¢ how the-` K,"'i . king numbers can be met. A proof of parking for 38 stalls ti• on the ?? This will require either a variance or a conditional use vi g issu n be resolved after approval or denial of the applicatio., h�`achiev • The paved parking area has b odifie8 sugge ;' • ',y the Commission at the April 1, 1998, meeting to show the .,%k,ct poi _ the wet =d as being ten feet. Because work is bei =- d.11- within ,;: etland,the applicant will be required to hay •. etland bu *f g€it appro '$ , z Ts ity. The revised site plan showed the 100- . 41,11 d bu4,04.- of the ‘ r"ent area,and statistics regarding the area of the bu "': ""� Fla perce ' 0.�'N, ;s covered in pervious and impervious surface. C An ordi „,, g the 11,1,P.„`q a and utility easements between Lots 2 and 3 was drafted by tit-. — g 8 • press ted to the Commission. easement docu:-0at will dedicate to the City a drainage and utility easement over the delineated w anr area is being prepared by the City Attorney. • Staff is recommending approval of Resolution 542-98,a resolution recommending wu : .pproval to,, e City Council of a development review for the Bridges Technology Park i-` � �ansion, withstipulations. fir. xa✓:` :.f e .� x.x .:. ipulations were listed as follows: 1. Prior to the issuance of any City permits, the applicant shall accomplish the following: a. Obtain a Rice Creek Watershed District permit(has been met). Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 io Special Meeting Page 14 b. Enter into a development agreement with the City. c. Coordinate with City staff to resolve the parking requirement inconsistency either by obtaining a variance or conditional use permit for t -duced parking ratios. d. Arrange to combine Lots 2 and 3,BI.3' 3 of th` € Industrial Park 2nd Addition with Ramsey County '''• provide . application Via' the City. e. Arrange to have recorded with ' =;R wax ty the drainage ° ty easement document for the wetlan <A R 'z'dicated on the revised site plan dated 4/8/98,and provide pro. '.<-' .; ordation to the City. 2. Approval of this development review be conti ; g 9 g,.,the adoption of Ordinance 615, and ordinance va $ 1`' <_°, •ion of a � _`= and utility easement over and across Lots 2 and 3. Chairperson Peterson asked th- aplicant mak sBRri 'entation. Grady Kinghorn,Bridges r s ;f• g Co$e zany,LL •eclined to make a presentation but offered to answer any qu - s that or the _< mission had. Motion/Se g Stevens• : mle to • y" olution No. 542-98, a resolution recomm-. 2 g .rova ,Counci evelopment Review for the expansion of the Bridges ark, 8. >t� ea Street;Planning Case No. 514-98, with stipulations. 6 Nays-0 The mo carried. Associate Ericso re>•mmended that the applicant return to the next Planning Commission me: s ng to apply for the variance or conditional use permit to allow for the parking ratiosYT shown on the site plan. it :ner Stevenson suggested having more facts present in regards to the shared ,.with Phase I of the project. 11. Planning Case No. 517-98 2430 Highway 10(O'Neil Property) • Applicant: AP Mounds View Limited Partnership (Anthony Properties) • Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 15 Consideration of Resolution No. 544-98 Approving the Development Review Stage of the PUD, Preliminary Plat and a Wetland Buffer Permit. • The applicant, AP Mounds View Limited Partnership (Anthony P .erti= `' . present. Planning Director Jopke gave his presentation as f•, 8 .: • The Planning Commission reviewed this item o •rill, 19 • .' d recommendations and changes that needed to be wn as -, of the sit , # � g available at this meeting. Full public notice was,. („<-_; :r this meeting. . kation �.� was accepted March 17, 1998. The 60-day appro : xpires on May 17, 1998, unless extended. The site is located at 2430 Highway 10 and i s< > d by L•"'e .ad and County Road H2. The property is owned by the27 � and is •�#( ontract for purchase and development by Anthony Prope �" F The de `?'oper is proposing to construct a 63,000 sq. ft., 15 scree,;; -q i ree 10,000 sq. ft. one-story office buildings, a 5000 sq. ft. re rant, §"a 64 'tail building. the movie • theater would be operated by ;$ ike T• ers. Parking for a total of 776 . was pr. ed on R •ite. Joint use of the theater and office parking is indicated •' • £x = of offs R$4? • 1991 a•,:<.uncil a• • ed Resolution 5104, a Comprehensive Plan Am •• ff rdinari a rezoning,and Resolution 5119, approval of the General Concep-` 4 ', .n for t� Pla. . . •w �e orig't al PUD General Concept plan were also reviewed. taff is recommen$In: proval of Resolution No. 544-98 recommending City Council r ` approve a PUD d::a `e opment stage plan with stipulations for the Anthony Properties/O'Neil '':•( development at 0 Highway 10. ' g Y R M tipulatio °''::- ere listed as follows: • hat the landscape plan should be amended to incorporate the changes suggested by the City forester in his 3/31/98 memorandum. 2. That the site plan be amended to incorporate the changes suggested by SEH in the memorandum dated 3/31/98 and the comments from the Fire Marshal. 1111 3. The drainage/utility plan should be amended to eliminate the City storm sewer Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 16 system on the property as per the memorandum from Rocky Keehn dated 4/13/98. 4. The light standards on the theater portion of the site should not exceed 24' in height. 5. Preliminary and final plats in accordance with itle 120 ivision regulations, of the Mounds view Municipal us g $ $ ;gid by the City prior to the issuance of permits for more “ = ne builds 6. City approval of a wetland buffer permit ccor• • #:Y with Tial- �•;s d plain and water management regulations, . i,unds View Mun'',:.T t; ode. 7. Approval of the required permit from the :sE 3 � ,•tershed District. 8. Approval of the permits from MnDO • the acc-• s • hway 10. Director Jopke also mentioned he h• om a a,t elsh, 2558 Mounds View Drive, who indicated he favo v. the evelopment as well as the ring road connection. `$ ig` appli ` mak �3 • Chairperson Peterson ask ,E• t to isresentation. presentation. Wendell Smith, repr- e g gave his presentation as follows: rview 1 � ct was g which restated the facts and details as presented byChan t • # ,}z„'ginal General Concept PUD Plan were reviewed. There was a # ;& i , 31� ish pr .... well as architectural elevations of the theater and offices• � .•n e t• t1 '•ulations,Mr. Wendell responded as follows: ._ ' 1. The deve ta•e` ” ll comply with the City Forester's requests. 2. The dev-.oper will comply with the changes suggested by SEH. :141-:';'City storm sewer will be eliminated from the plan as recommended by Mr. eehn. 4. The developer would like to intermix the 40' standards, as shown on the plan, with some 24' standards. The 40'standards (a total of 6)give off more light and require fewer standards. The 24'standards would be used on the south side of the site, by the office building, which is also closest to the residential areas. 5. The developer will comply with Title 1200. • Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 17 6. The developer will comply with Title 1300. 7. Compliance with the Rice Creek Watershed District is in process and information will be supplied when available. 8. There is a letter from MnDOT, dated Novembe 27, 199E '°s '11:0,„, :'•'roved the signal and the intersection, subject to financing There have been three residential homes purchas ,'•y Antho ly, rop Rsr + .un d H2. One of the homes has been re-sold and the r(1 e v - did not . ... E ' e rtY , east. Motion/Second: Stevenson/Miller to approve Resolutio a 'i 4 resolution recommending the City Council approve a PUD development stage plan, for ses on the O'Neil property, 2430 Highway 10;Planning Case No. 517-98, with sti..4 tion ,a� : •ed, either/or, that the light standards on the theater portion of the site shou • .t excee• "'"4:1;44;2,0„ to bringing the plans to the City Council, a study must be done ' . .- . the ligh.. . standards in the parking lot are not visible along direct sight 1.),. . .. Coun oad H2. Ayes- 6 _` • The motion carried. Commissioner Johns o _ ggeste• z . F /lowed Uses, in the PUD document, sh. ive the d- + $ g t the fl; § x aving a restaurant and/or a retail R � • $$-nt; this hould • ' .` t into the agreement. The word "retail" in this po`' � �1 docu =mag # ead"retail/restaurant". The Commission agreed unam 9 12. Re'orts . - . ..s €_<'' Associate Ericso to • the Commission that he would be representing the City' p g in court on April 16, 1998 '� egards to the property located at 8217 Long Lake Road,the Larry Wolfgram pro t- . This property has had several Nuisance Code violations. 6 554?kj+`.; �':::::. r f� opke told the Commission he had attended the national American Planning . .<. tip: ion Conference, held in Boston Mass. Information from the conference was made available to any interested parties. 13. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners' Reports • No reports were considered. Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 Special Meeting Page 18 14. Adjournment to Agenda Meeting There being no further business before the Special meeting of the Planning Commission, Chairperson Peterson adjourned the meeting at 10:45 p.m. <' (The Special Meeting immediately adjourned to the Agegn). Respectfully submitted, r i Rick Jopke Community Development Director • • ‘„1: ;:i �x rss ix ' Rh. •