HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-16-1998 r z
• MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
December 16, 1998
7:00 P.M.
SPECIAL MEETING
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda
CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM,
AND GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES
4. Approval of Minutes
a. November 18, 1998
5. Planning Case No. 543-98
Property Involved: 5145 Program Avenue
• Consideration of Resolution No. 565-98, a Resolution Recommending Approval of an
Alternate Site Plan (Development Review) for the Proposed Building N Development,
Mounds View Business Park.
Applicant: Everest Development, Ltd., Represented by Tim Nelson.
6. Special Planning Case No. SP-064-98 [Public Meeting]
Properties Involved: Corner Lots, Single Family Residential Districts.
Consideration of an Amendment to Chapter 1121 of the Mounds View City Code
(Off-Street Parking Requirements) Regarding Multiple Curb Cits on Corner Lots
within Single Family Residential Districts.
7. Staff Reports
8. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports
9. Adjournment to Agenda Meeting
(Immediately Following Regular Meeting)
* * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * ** ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
APPLICANTS: YOUR ATTENDANCE AT THIS MEETING IS
REQUESTED. PLEASE NOTIFY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AT 717-4020
IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND. THANK YOU.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ** * * ** * * * * * * ** * *
AGENDA MEETING •
AGENDA
1. Review of the December 2, 1998, minutes of the Planning Commission
N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\PLANCOMM\PCAGENDA\1998\12-16-98.AGN
•
•
• REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Meeting Date: December 16, 1998
Staff Report by: James Ericson, Planning Associate
Planning Case No.: 543-98
Request: Development Review
Petitioner: The Everest Development, Ltd.
Location: 5145 Program Avenue
PIN Nos.: 08-3-23-41-0012 08-30-23-44-0002
08-3-23-44-0016 08-30-23-44-0012
Legal Description: Lot 3, Block 3, Programmed Land First Addition.
Lot 2, Block 1, Programmed Land Second Addition.
That part of Outlot A, Mounds View Business Park lying east of a
line beginning at a point on the south line of said Outlot A, said
• point being South 89 degrees 19 minutes 21 seconds East, assumed
bearing, 409.00 feet from the southwest corner of said Outlot A;
thence North 31 degrees 43 minutes 48 seconds East 19.26 feet to
the north line of said Outlot A and said line there terminating.
That part of the South five acres of Lot 2, Block 2, Pinecrest
Addition, lying West of the easterly 80 feet of said Lot and lying
East of Mounds View Business Park East Addition.
Zoning/Land Use: Office - Warehouse PUD/undeveloped lot
Applicable Regulations:
• Development Review: Section 1006.06 requires that all commercial and industrial
development within the City be subject to review by the Planning Commission and
approval by the City Council.
• Minimum Lot Size: Section 1104.02, Subd. 2 establishes the minimum lot size in an the
Industrial Zone as one acre (43,560 square feet.)
Summary:
• The applicant, Everest Development, is requesting approval of an alternate site plan for the
Building N site located within the Mounds View Business Park, which was originally approved by
the City Council in 1994. The applicant requests that either plan (the 1996 version or the plan
contemplated now) be permitted to allow greater flexibility in marketing the building to
prospective tenants or owners. The new proposal shows a building of a reduced size of 69,582
square feet, which is 33 percent smaller than the originally approved 102,950 square foot building.
Building N Site Plan
Planning Case 543-98
December 16, 1998 •
Page 2
The appearance of the single-story, brick-faced office/flex building will match that of the Liberty
Check building. The building would accommodate user needs for office, laboratory, production,
high-tech assembly or storage uses. It is anticipated that office uses will occupy 50 to 75 percent
of the building.
Discussion:
Dimensional Requirements:
Required Provided Met?
Lot Area: 1 acre 6.89 acres Yes
Building Height: _< 45 feet 19 feet Yes
Building Setbacks
• Front (Program Avenue): 40 feet 80 feet Yes
• Side 20 feet 55 feet Yes
• Rear: 40 feet 50 feet Yes
Parking Lot Setbacks
• Front (Program Avenue): 40 feet 10 feet Yes
• Side: 5 feet 20 feet Yes
• Rear: 5 feet 5 feet Yes •
The parking lot for this building is for the most part set back from Program Avenue by a minimum
of ten feet, with the except for an area where the dedicated right-of-way jogs into the property.
While the front yard parking lot setback for a building of this type would normally be 40 feet,
because this is within an approved PUD and is zoned accordingly, the setbacks can deviate from
the norm. The 1994-approved plans indicated the same front setback.
Drainage Considerations:
- ' - - -- . . - i-• p' R WD permit in force for the .reviousl
approved Building N development. Staff has forwarded a revised set of plans to the district office
for their review. It is possible that the existing permit will need to be amended or a new permit
will need to be obtained. Staff had not yet received word from RCWD as to which if either will
be required. The plans have also been sent to the City Engineer for their review.
Parking:
The site plans show a total of 344 parking stalls being provided for the building at a ratio of one
space per 181 square feet of usable space . According to the parking ratios listed in Chapter 1121
of the City Code, office uses require 3 spaces plus 1 per 175 square feet of floor area and while
warehouse uses require 8 spaces plus 1 per 500 square feet of floor area. The parking provided, •
according to these requirements, will be adequate to serve the building as long as office uses do
not exceed 75 percent of the usable floor area of the building (the balance used as warehouse,
storage or manufacturing.)
Landscaping: The City Forester, Rick Wriskey, reviewed and approved the original landscape
Building N Site Plan
• Planning Case 543-98
December 16, 1998
Page 3
plans. Even though the current landscape plan indicates all of the same species and in the same
general ratios and even exceeds the previous plan by an additional five plantings, staff has asked
the City Forester to review the revised landscape plan in the event that any of the species have
been recently found to be susceptible to disease or any other problems.
Public Safety: The access and drive aisles are in conformance with Fire Department
requirements and standards. There are three entrances from Program Avenue to the site, two of
which are 30 feet wide and are for truck traffic and the third, which would be for automobile
traffic only, is 25 feet wide. Because of the angle loading bays at the rear of the building, truck
traffic will enter only from the north driveway and exit only from the south driveway. There is 45
feet of impervious surface at the rear of the building to sufficiently accommodate the turning and
maneuvering of the trucks.
Utilities: The building will tie into existing watermains, one under Program Avenue, the other
just north of the building creating a looped water source for better circulation and pressure. The
sanitary sewer will tie in to the existing service also under Program Avenue. The Fire Marshall
has been sent a copy of the utility plan to verify the location and number of the fire hydrants
available for the site and building.
•
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Resolution 565-98, a resolution
recommending approval of an alternate site plan for development of the 6.89-acre Building N site,
Mounds View Business Park, as requested by Everest Group.
James_Er-icson, Planning Associate
Attachments:
1. Planning Application
2. Zoning Map
3. Site Plans,date-stamped 11/25/98
4. Resolution 565-98
N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\543-98\REPORT.PC 1
•
um
11/24/98 18:54 FAX 812 784 3482 CITY OF MY (j002/00!
[11:rit,
' CO DEVELOPMENT DEPAR711
it
DEVELOPMINT APPLICA
alg
2401 H"igtcway 10, Mounds View MN 55112
612-717-4020
��-�`�` 612-7843462-FAX
Plea+e Type or Print Information-Complete Soto Sides wen&Fotal
Applicant lnform:stion
Name ofApplicant Everest Development , Ltd. Telephone 651/636-5500
Address 2,6 6.5 Long Lake acad.,Su.i_t_e_ 120_.—_ gm._ ••6.51/636-0183
osevirle ; 'R1 55111 ••
._
7atierest in Property(check appcopaaio box)
a Ovracrofprop, 1, • 'a Contract far Deed Owner
a Lessee.Operator. a Agreement to Purchase
`G Qtber(explain) Affiliate of _property owner . Michael TnvpgrnPnta
•
Applicants must provide cvidemee of intsrrst is peopeety'sidle itme of application,and if you ase not the owner dike
ply,you mast provide z letter dpermMaion from the owner giving ceoseot to the tiling of this application. The
preflerh'ower muse siva this application for it to be accepted.
Property DeseriptioniPrespenal III
Address ar General Location 5 X X X X Program kv a*t ti e
•
Legal Description Sae a t t a r h a d F.xh i fi i t A 5
PmPertYrdeo aAl(Pari A-''1n_'1-1_ii 1.:0no3..z7"'Aad3718230=71-44-71 t .77:
$afAcres 6 . 89 Acres .-• ---.-• -- . .
Curran Zoning p _ tj _ n _ (Planned Unit Development)
Type of Application '
a Campcebessive Pim Ameadasmt S
zsa
a Rrg SZ50/aaz min 5250 owe 51500
a Major Subdivision 5250+5250 deposit!
a Mtncr Subdivision $200
a Ptaanea Unit Development(PUD) Rehr rJ rezoning
fact
a PUD Amendment5350 •
a Coadieoesi Use Passat R-'-. R-2 S75;all ache=5250
a variance R-1. R-Z 5100 all others SZ50
a Cade Appeal S lo3
Kt Develop Revue Plan SI25/acr=rain 5125=ac S750
a Wedaod Alteration Pmt R-1.R-2 5150:ail ahem S200
a Wetland Buffer Permit R-1.R-2 S25:ail Others 5100
a Floodplain Permit 5200
a Omer
*Deposita sisaal be paid to cover all coats of public notices. ri materials and smear co sultaut time spent u
the review. II
rescarb or preparation at=serials associated with this application. The applicant shall be aespoesibbe lar ail reasonable
incurred naso in=cosi of the initial deposit amount Any portion of the deposit me,Peat or encumbered shall be minded
to the appiianc within rbarty(30)days atter consideration aid=application iscompleted.
Pimie canopies:the swerve side of this application.
11/24/98 16:54 FAZ 612 784 3462 CITY OF YY 003/00
• City of Mounds View.MN
Development Application Pa 'Q'
. Pram Use af?rcpsty
• A Unda+ralopad/Va�at aTowle Fronly Dwelling •
a Dnpia/l'wo Family Dwelling a g
a EttbileilliCommavial Establishment a bxbrariai Emblisbmmt
Other(=plain)
•
Property CIassificadan Abstract EX Tomas
uaof Alternate site plan approval for development of 69 1A7
squarefoot . siingle-story office/ flex building and associated porn$ end
site improvements . . Approval is requested to permit devetopm.Pnt of
• E11HER previously approved 97 ,463 office/warehouse or 69 . 167 sgpn ra foot
office/ flex building .
•
BY MY(OUR)SIGNATURE ON MIS APPLICATION.IHERFBY DECLARE TEAT_TO TEE BEST OF MY
I4NOWL.EDGE.THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. -
•
• Sganenre of Applicant • witIAd14 41(& J / , Vice President
Name ofApplieum(typed/printed) • Everest D: ' e l o p m e n t , Ltd.
Sig�ninn a ofProperty Owner
• Natao afPrvpeitT Owner(tYg � M i c hL(.1 . (Tra vie s t m e n t s
' AddommofOwtt+er • 2665 Long LakW Rd"_"Suite 12n
•
•Ros-evil1a , ..MN. 55173. ._ _
PSaoe Namber of Owner
651/636-5500
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Dace of Submittal . . .
Dace of Acceptance Assiglaed tt►:
MazmthgCamNo. S`F -G `6 604av Limit 120-day lick
•
Account ,
R
Fees Paid: 1 3 �G 4°1 G � #
Pads Dedcztiom
Depasiec
• . :
M D�►T.1 BVAIT-FOC u9s
JJL J...
-• VcrAp
5317j PF ` 5316 531 5316 53150 S30• > r
5309 5308 530 U 5308 5307 530' N
110
•45298
5301 5302 .`30i 5300 529 5300 5299 5Y9' Z
p 5295 — 5294 529 3294 5293 52 O
W U 529 m m n n w n N N = o w or r�0 52 —
5287N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 5288 52 5288 5287 h 52
8— c7 CO RQ H2
r 4' M N
5275
_ �-3 N 5267
H-3.1 )40111 It
ti
5263
92123M Ilp f-• 5251 W
� PUD
=• [�•7 ;o� 4lisi, 0 5230
70� CM' ®� � N
80 b141R�I~' • :• .26600 •
WOODALE DR
5. 525' �• '� tx. CNI
N 5200 �'
•�•R't7_ IM -'. I= 5240 crjp • 5205 "' N N j;
3/31=M EEMEM F a.� V 5201
2° 5�22/9�I�r}Ekre.g .'` .'� 1�� 7. j0 / a 4
iAt
1•�0��g.5210� ESE ry�,h
.. 5 .• - •• 52005209 •• tiry 5150 5145
a o w CO ' Building"N"
N N N N N
EDGEWOOD NNNNN titi.9 8-3 Site
Of Na
JR. HIGH ti,,�
N.
SCHOOL
ilklg
PUD �o� -�3`ZN
O P
•
5100 ry�� i0"P �pf g
8-3 ��� �`oE
21g0
I RICE...ORS i
rn.M.a....1 .1 _Mil" Cb
al
C.4 j � . Q
CO — . . — RD —3 {—
cn
w
F—
z
CRP —
rat:1kt,,
N.— y�•
$. y1'J
R-5 Aii
rs
_1.1«:.1.«r_,.1•�.A.,� 4,111 AID
j�, 8-3
TOWNS EDGE TERRACE i -Y«
MOBILE HOME PARK 4- -
•
Zoning Map Planning Case 543-98
Applicant: Everest Building, Ltd. N
Location: 5145 Program Avenue
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
• RESOLUTION NO. 565-98
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ALTERNATE SITE PLAN
(DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ) FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUILDING N
SITE, MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK, 5145 PROGRAM DRIVE;
PLANNING CASE NO. 543-98
WHEREAS, Everest Group, represented by Tim Nelson, has requested City approval of
an alternate site plan for the development of the Building N site, legally described as follows:
Lot 3, Block 3, Programmed Land First Addition;
and,
Lot 2, Block 1, Programmed Land Second Addition;
and,
That part of Outlot A, Mounds View Business Park lying east of a line beginning at a point
on the south line of said Outlot A, said point being South 89 degrees 19 minutes 21 seconds
East, assumed bearing, 409.00 feet from the southwest corner of said Outlot A; thence North
31 degrees 43 minutes 48 seconds East 19.26 feet to the north line of said Outlot A and said
• line there terminating;
and,
That part of the South five acres of Lot 2, Block 2, Pinecrest Addition, lying West of the
easterly 80 feet of said Lot and lying East of Mounds View Business Park East Addition.
WHEREAS, Chapter 1006 of the Mounds View Municipal Code requires that a
development review be conducted for all commercial and industrial development within the City;
and,
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the following
documen s regarding this proposal:
1. Planning Application,dated 12/2/98
2. Zoning and Location Map
3. Site Plans,date-stamped 11/25/98
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission finds that the site plans date-
stamped 11/25/98 conform to the requirements of Chapter 1120, Planned Unit Developments
District; and,
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has been sent the site plans in order to review the proposed
• utility and drainage plans and will provide comments prior to City Council review of this request; and,
WHEREAS, the Rice Creek Watershed District has been sent the site plans in order to
review the proposed drainage plans and will provide comments prior to City Council review of
this request; and,
Planning Commission Resolution 565-98
Building N Alternative Plans
•
December 16, 1998
Page 2
WHEREAS, the City Forester has been sent the site plans in order to review the proposed
planting schedule and will provide comments prior to City Council review of this request; and,
WHEREAS, the Fire Marshal has been sent the site plans in order to review the proposed
placement of fire hydrants and will provide comments prior to City Council review of this request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mounds View Planning
Commission recommends approval of an alternative site plan for the Building N development,
Mounds View Business Park, to allow for a 69,582 square-foot office/flex building as shown on
the site plans dated 11/25/98, subject to the following stipulations:
1. The site plans shall be revised in the event any changes are suggested by the City
Engineer, the City Forester, the Fire Marshal or Rice Creek Watershed District prior to
City Council review.
2. There shall be no more than a 75 percent office coverage within this development so as to
not exceed the parking stalls provided. The City shall be furnished documentation from
the property owners or managers to verifying this limitation as the building becomes
leased. •
3. Before any building permits are issued for this development, the applicant shall arrange
to file the final plat with Ramsey County and arrange to pay the required park dedication
fee, as stipulated in Resolution 5168, adopted October 27, 1997.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs Staff to forward
this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes.
Adopted this 16th day of December, 1998
Jerry Peterson, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Rick Jopke, Community Development Director
SEAL
•
N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\543-981565-98PC.RES
II PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
December 2, 1998
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Highway 10, Mit ndsA: :iew, MN 55112
1. Call to Order
•:.s:16,' *5:::%:Mf,:-Vni„ .,,,:
The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Peters. rs. 7:00 i in., Decemb-
:::4406war: Vegiev",'
VOW,
2. Roll Call silmvoti.w::;&,
-,tsiopt:4,:,
Members Present: Chairperson Peterson, CommissionersBrasSe0,210g, Obert, and
Stevenson. ...4101b, •.%:,,!!;->t,.*,•4.a4",
Members Absent: Commissioner Johnson(5rie''11111‘,, :10
,An
IIICommunity1A.Also Present:
Developmentpirector..,Vtk Jopit .::
ng Associate Jim Ericson,
and Recorder Stacy Caton.
it
. - •
Also Absent: Council Liaison Kooamemer
ilk 1
:23,, -Sidtitallif
..rfnl**.to ,.......4.1"...m:-.?..-
,:apeA,A,wm,, 40%04.e0,,
Index tcAlgrittlit•::.'„, '-:1A144*,:c::;..,:a: Page
--,:....,i,:v15t.,,
Planning Case Tlit,-:;,,:,;,,;,;:!4., ConSideaft.9,tfResolution No. 562-98, a Resolution 2
Recommending Approvalg4 Conatt7--
ial Use Permit Request to Allow for a
---7
ResidentiailDtig Kennel Use- Schmitt
..., Na-R13%,.
Planning Case No. 539-9 Consideration of Resolution No. 563-98, a Resolution 3
Denying a Variance Request toAllow a Zero-Foot Driveway Setback. Blacktop Paving
off..!,,. , Representing Ted Jarvis, Property Owner.
al& ,::,•,-
i.i:VRe" ,Av
Planning Case No6541-98, Consideration of Resolution No. 564-98, a Resolution 4
Ril : 41tVglikriproval of a Preliminary Plat to Subdivide a 25-acre parcel into
SegiTiiit '..?Anthony Properties, Represented by Wendell Smith.
Planning Case No. 538-98, Consideration of Resolution No. 561-98, a Resolution 6
Approving a Variance Request to Allow for a reduced Front Yard setback for a
IIIParking Lot in a Commercial District - Donatelles, represented by Wendell Smith.
• --- ,
,.
Mounds View Planning Commission December 2, 1998 0
Regular Meeting Page 2
3. Citizens' Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda
Chairperson Peterson opened the floor for requests and comments on items not on#agenda.
No requests or comments were considered, and the floor wasceturned011WOMmission.
4. Approval of Minutes ,wo:••
, m
.,aagt**,
----wo.:Nii4".
A. November 4, 1998M
v'kd '‘rarglAil;
6,,,.. lif. ....44,::,,,,
e':"AVI.,::',!:•: 'ISO"
.
Motion/Second: Brasaemle/Miller to approve the Planniiiii'::::: sion Regular Meeting
Minutes of November 4, 1998. 404144.4".:,
4:,-.• -.4r.,;..:!:.;::.m•-•
1.44rX7N.:
Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 .Agm, AbstaiWONmeir,
4woic::-A APO*/
:oxpr!"-a.<2.:,,,-. 'Inv •
The motion carried. diOrig.:,41146, Ar
41, II :Al let:iliMatir
'..-
Ar ..,,dr -Nomer
5. ..:Agy .97..:,:.,
-40:, :1-:'' •
Planning Case No. 542-98 ..„.., ... 0
,.,4:::.: •.. M,,,' ,-*
Property Involved: 2206 HillvieSbad
.,..,,4;',
Consideration of NoResolutio :462-98, ailWojjqiy:,4'' ecommending Approval of a Conditional
Use Permit#Apest to Alli Residential ar ennel Use.
Applicant Tammy tRatgy SchnifttiO,A!-:
14101MAX. '‘U,4611IN„.
14111M.:':.%,. Aga",.,,
emegh.
The applicant,.movgigagh loor
„::,:deow—NotigirOX, "g
:::„fir. 11111111igk.
ssociaW ricson gave ,71ir ailfport asfollows:
,r,o, Itseaf
pl NIfr.
The4pplicant, Tammy Schmitt, was applying for a conditional use permit for a residential dog
kennel, a Code requirement for property owners with three or four dogs. One of the licensing
zawo, Ar
requirements is thatAeproperty owner shall obtain signatures of approval from more than 50
tiktgOgt*:019r*Otits within 500 feet of the property proposing the kennel. The applicant was
*410Vtiiiiiii6fi ife those properties within 500 feet along with a corresponding list of property
ImmtAwmast."' -
owners/taxpayers. Of the 62 properties which fell into this category, 44 signatures were gathered
in support of the application. Staff had inquired with the Police Department regarding any call or
complaints associated with dogs at Ms. Schmitt's home; there were none. Ms. Schmitt currently
owns two dogs and wishes to add one more to her household. The backyard to Ms. Schmitt's
home is being completely fenced in to contain the dogs. 0
• Mounds View Planning Commission December 2, 1998
Regular Meeting Page 3
Staff was recommending approval of Resolution 562-98, a resolution recommending approval of
a condition use permit for a dog kennel for Tammy Schmitt, located at 2206 Hillview Road, with
stipulations as stated in the staff report dated December 2, 1998. :5
Brasaemle asked for the height of the fence that was being installed in !:" i:;:a4044.:,
. .'`'':rd.
Tammy Schmitt, 2206 Hillview Road, told the Commiss $ e fence .. ,`,:: ' 8 ately four.:
4010
feet high. z" a: :..
Motion/Second: Stevenson/Obert to approve Resolutio" <:, >._ A Resolution R-' V.$ $f -nding
Approval of a conditional Use Permit Request to Allow f%"::'t; w t .. tial Dog Kennel Use, with
stipulations as stated in the December 2, 1998, staff repo.'
Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 .i« ' ::
The motion carried.
Associate Ericson told Ms. Schmitt she would need>toi : ter
atteecember 28, 1998, City
• c
Council Meeting for final a final rulini her alcation.
Or
.100:" 40 ::,,,,-..,,,
Planning
-AI:, 4044S,5397.2%** APP",
:
Property': $:<.: . 222 ` v ' :Road
Consideration: : < ;. o.ution"1 4 a Resolution Denying a Variance Request to Allow a
Zero-Foot Driveway : etback. ' .4
Applicant: BlaglaiiPita4,ofMigiiiita,Blacktop Representing Ted Jarvis, Property Owner
The,aplicant and the coot were not present.
A Eiate Ericson gavese staff report as follows:
itlth 401.
molt
:�: t er, B:l op Paving of Minnesota installed a twelve-foot expansion to Mr. Jarvis'
*antwitdhaving obtained the proper building permit. The City's Code requirement
spec tharriveways shall maintain at least a one-foot setback from a property line. Staff, on
routine inspections in this neighborhood, observed a fresh driveway expansion clearly too close to
the property line, at which time it was discovered that no permit had been obtained for the work
that Mr. Jarvis had contracted for. Repeated attempts to resolve the encroachment issue have
. been unsuccessful. On November 10, 1998, a development application was received from Mr.
Jarvis.
Mounds View Planning Commission December 2, 1998 •
Regular Meeting Page 4
After reviewing the criteria for this type of variance, staff determined there was no hardship to
justify approving a variance for this condition.
Staff was recommending approval of Planning Commission Resolution NO,563-9 a resolution
letdenying the variance request of Blacktop Paving of Minnesota to allow_a 'of setback for a
driveway and requiring said contractor to remove one foot, .. $th o ..<. e 2' ;.ent and restore
the area with sod, weather permitting. 1,:47l : i :' ':*
ON Chairperson Peterson opened the public hearing. r `
No comments were considered from the public, and the.11 . .r;`` returned to the Commission.
a:.
Stevenson expressed his concern that the contractor w s>icens-'�. kCity of Mounds View and
should have been aware of permit and code require_ t Ericson k ontractor had told
staff it was an oversight on their part. Brasaemle si t :efe as no 444" as to where the
property line was because there is an existingc e
..:. Ir ; ..r
dr i'' ',-:; 441!grirl e
Motion/Second: Brasaemle/Obert to a ;__;rove resoli ion Nief:0•98,98 a Resolution Denying a
Variance Request to Allow a Zero-Foo 'rivewa:;;.Setback; 2223 Hillview Road. •
Ayes - 5 �_ ys - 0 •;
The motion`' 'ied. ,. ::: T : >;:fi. 4
M1. x6 ` : ams e,7. Viag . K
,
Planning CasegUr541:49fk,, :Nov
Property Ins1ved: '2I Hiway 10'
Consider ti. . . -- ::! 8`rec..•..:-98, a Resolution Recommending-Approval of-a-Pr- -. -.
Plat t€ rSubdivide a 25-At0cel Into Seven Lots.
AR ant: Anthony Properties, Represented by Wendell Smith
Asti .411f
liNoo:fyz> fn:
T liRant wast present.
Assate; ri'eson gave the staff report as follows:
The Mounds View City Council approved the development stage of the Anthony Properties
Planned Unit Development (PUD) on April 27, 1998. This PUD allows for the 15-screen movie
theater, three office buildings and two retail or restaurant uses. The final plan for this •
development was approved administratively by the City and Building permits have been issued for
• Mounds View Planning Commission December 2, 1998
Regular Meeting Page 5
the theater building only. The parking lot has been paved and striped and access points have been
stubbed into both Highway 10 and Donatelles. The access to County Road H2 has been installed
completely. >
Yfo
Because of the multiple uses and potential for multiple owner . 'p entit ` .i; l ing of the theater
site, which encompasses approximately 25 acres, is require- ;Y . "'.,.,t. .
Per City Code, copies of the plat have been sent to Ram•:- `County,.:.:!:- City , ff•, he G?:
Engineer, the Director of Public Works, and the Rice.0.1..',-t Water= ed District` ' 1
under these organization's various disciplines. The City §y/..;:.,: requires a park'.' tion
either in land or a cash payment in lieu of land. Anthony ° ; '=' ; has indicated they will pay the
required ten percent of the property's $1,032,500 value. ._>` ;pix>; ` `
A public hearing has been scheduled for the City Co_unc eeting t '�l December 14, 1998.
^'�"t3'°s '^ g `. is
Staff was recommending approval of Plannin:. Whr i olution 'o. 564-98, a resolution
recommending to the City Council approva� f the pt t fb the Anthony Properties
� �� `ber 2, 1998.
Addition, with stipulations as stated in th�+ ystaff report date „>. ;k-- <
al4.1
Al Ai A
Miller suggested including in the Resolution thatthe resole tion was forwarded to the Council ,
before the adoption of the minutesEricson } <g.cated he'" ould add the "standard" clause to the
resolution. ,, ..
D Vit.:' ��v- ieote: .,y`a�?`:a,...:,-
...040
�.;.
:. k.)%.,: Mtn -i:�:. :FSS..
Brasaern . be we,,,,,;:04:.. .,cr e was it ctt ded with the theater acreage, and that the reason
the parking-1iseparate fro eaters was because of the public right-of-way issue.
Ericson confirh.. .,; .mle s st went'
Stevenson asked�E'rrc n to r Wendell Smith's written comments into the record. Ericson read
the letteinto the records ° r
Stenson asked if there fid"been talk early on in the project of blacktopping the walking path all
theay from Long Lake Road to County Road H2 in lieu of some of the park dedication fee.
TheT her Commissioners said the discussion did not take place. Ericson concurred.
`ij?y
Motref_e>` ndi. fiiller/Obert to approve Resolution No. 564-98, a Resolution Recommending
Ap €va o = Preliminary Plat to Subdivide a 25-acre Parcel into Seven Lots with stipulation as
stated in the staff report dated December 2, 1998.
Ayes - 5 Nays - 0
IIIThe motion carried.
.
Mounds View Planning Commission December 2, 1998
Regular Meeting Page 6 40
8. A.
Planning Case No. 538-98 F`
ilk 4
Property Involved: 2400 Highway 10, Donatelles Supper Club Ayr
Consideration of Resolution No. 651-98, a Resolution App. _ a VI" :. ::; :•''.• ,uest to Allow
for a reduced Front Yard setback for a Parking Lot in a co"> ' ercial D' „,,...,::,„.0”.: .:
Applicant: Donatelles, Represented by Jeff Weyek .4a0"0,,,.4... °may'
A
The applicant was present. 10510k,
Associate Ericson gave the staff report as follows: "A'''
at itier
At the Commission's last two meetings in Novem `t a: : exits of this�t ance and the criteria for
granting variances were discussed. The publice`arir ": :. equest however was continued
to the December 2, 1998, meeting to ensuz that all.:,,eettijoftphad an opportunity to
address the CommissionP rior to it taki gaction. <r-` lose
0
iiir
Staff was recommending the appr<vaat of Plan ,i'�`►g Commis,on Resolution No. 561-98, a •
resolution approving a reduced f '` yard p.,_ ,g lot se:.z ck for Donatelles Supper Club.
Motion/Sec<�n<.< Brasae .; ;'.:::_ to approve lution No. 561-98, a Resolution Approving a
Variance reque :to Allow 0-016.14e d Front and Setback for a Parking Lot in a Commercial
District. s - ki .
lamp=
Chairperson Peterso open d the pub q-hearing.
,anommozigisionank, --::7
• • - :i:_ •,- - • ` « €e:-':;;:. ; i:.ti - ••• • , . • - " •$ . - _ • - .• to the Commission.
IgNalt
it
Peton asked if there v. uld'be a sidewalk installed on the northwest side of the building that
Ai
would accommodate pedestrian access. Weyek said there would be no sidewalk but there would
1scaping.
oRIVIth, „ay
Illba
<, ; <r<I ;>r Ayes - 5 Nays - 0
The motion carried.
9. Staff Reports/Information Items
II)
• Mounds View Planning Commission December 2, 1998
Regular Meeting Page 7
A. Setting of a Public Hearing for Wednesday, December 16, 1998, at 7:00 p.m., at the
Mounds View City hall, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112, to consider
amending Chapter 1121 of the City Code regarding curb cuts on corn is in
single-family residential districts. •>=': Atv
Ericson told the Commission the public hearing was being 4.0:,
respo` �_ ; Tobias' appeal
to the City Council of the Planning Commission's denial a � variance G ffi.: 5` : Tobias fee.
there is a public safety issue, which is his having to back. .': of his dr irway`t` ` . , ".3& ;ng tr c.
The Council saw merits in both sides of the argument anbled a action on t`"y :`$g.': e
Council is directing the Planning Commission to discuss„ s of allowing two :4uts for
corner lots. Jopke added that the second issue that shoult . 6sed is whether or not this type
of work, as Mr. Tobias argued, is maintenance work as q:::b = tw construction or
replacement work. ::*40-4,,,.
x
Obert said the original asphalt, base and even sc me tree s had be=`$_:r j oved in order to do
the work that Mr. Tobias had contracted for ,, . asp$} r $ ' that " work done at the Tobias
residence was new construction. Obert expressed hi rcon1 ° ::t a citing a code just to
accommodate one variance request woul 'set a vesdanget' tecedent for the future of the
0 City; more dangerous than granting,thilariancelvimbrasaem1ruggested that the Commission
revisit the Code; however, the mese that should be sent the Council is that this variance is a
separate issue and should not beto the a" ;come o£> s reconsideration of the Code. Jopke
said it is important to understand'the Code:;::; makeire that the reasons for the Code are still
valid and neiid Obert kto makre. at the Council Liaison is present at the
"2:Y�a�`�c-`:a:�;E&_ �` ::�i?�:ess^y:fR:4ff110%,', cember<:< :�'>:�%s
Planning Commisston meeting o 1'61998. Ericson stated he would include
commentsfr tit Attor '�� t�;:,.1i2,"y �,staff report that is prepared for the public hearing.
Peterson suggesd ,,,ing theothat was used when the code was implemented in
1979. H: s..•
„og
Jop e tos-t e ommiss hz€=< .::
m . tffe rut - n- axation meeting a. seen e s t e previous
Monday evening. The o points that came out of the meeting are that the City will adopt the
maximum levy increase a4. ''percent. The franchise fee will be raised from 2.5 percent to 3
pecnt. The YMCA is": ill under consideration for the management of the Community Center as
vsl as the Park and Redreation Department facilities. The City is also considering "contracting
r
vg}!.,.: or'building inspection services. Hiring of a new CSO is being considered. This person
t"}f `esponsible for traffic control and code enforcement.
Obert asked if the projected budget shortfall was based on the City operating the Parks and
Recreation Department or the YMCA operating the Parks and Recreation Department. Jopke
said the projection was based on the YMCA running the Parks and Recreation Department.
0 Jopke told the Commission MnDOT has indicated that when Highway 10, 610, and 118 are
Mounds View Planning Commission December 2, 1998 •
Regular Meeting Page 8
complete they will be prepared to turn the facilities back to the County. MnDOT has indicated
this will happen in July of 1999.
t
el
Joke told the Commission that televisingof the PlanningCommission 1
p tn �ting�>"�s� begin
sometime early in the new year. «':ink. <
10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Repos " -.:.41t."4-,;,..:.01„,:4:,.
No reports were considered from the Planning Commis 5_. x "
11. Adjournment to Agenda Meeting -. % :;: :.- : ,
There being no further business before the Mounds Viewi'lannt64 ssion, Chairperson
Peterson adjourned the meeting at 8:11 p.m. „oteRN, IOWA,
'(The meetingimmediate)Y. lourne � 4gendassion.)
>
'3i:
Respectfully submitted, : 6.
71:10: ir
•
crzax :
Rick Jopke � f p :Via;
Communit. : :;r,>:` a:;'
AeigifigINHARAO: lap
ArY la-V
HaG3
APIANN .iiPx
latoinsgmatof
•