Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
04-07-1999
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION April 7, 1999 7:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETING AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda 4. Approve Minutes: a. February 17, 1999 b. March 3, 1999 CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM, AND GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES 5. Planning Case No. 550-99 Public Hearing 7:00 p.m. Property Involved: 5302 Raymond Avenue. Consideration of a Variance Request to Allow a Five-Foot Building Setback for 11110 Living Space Expansion. Applicant: Don Norris, Property Owner 6. Planning Case No. 549-99 Public Hearing 7:05 p.m. Property Involved: 2791 Highway 10. Consideration of a Variance Request to Install a16-Foot Tall, 48 Square-Foot Advertising Sign on Their Property Facing Highway 10. Applicant: KinderCare (Jones Sign Company, Inc.) 7. Planning Case No. 551-99 Public Hearing 7:10 p.m. Property Involved: 7805 Gloria Circle. Consideration of a Variance Request to Allow a Detached, Two-Stall Garage in the Front Yard of the Subject property. Applicant: Dorothee Dietrich, Property Owner 8. Staff Reports/Items of Information a Review of Council Actions -- 3/22/99 & 4/5/99 b. Recap of GTS Advanced Zoning Seminar -- 4/1/99 9. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports 10. Adjournment to Agenda Meeting (Immediately Following Regular Meeting) * ** * * * * * * * ** * * * *** ** **** *** * * * * * * * ** * ** * • APPLICANTS: YOUR ATTENDANCE AT THIS MEETING IS REQUESTED. PLEASE NOTIFY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AT 717-4020 IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND. THANK YOU. * * * ** * * * * *** * * * * ** * ** * *** * * * * * * ** * ** * * * 111) AGENDA SESSION AGENDA 1. Review Minutes --March 17, 1999 N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\PLANCOMM\PCAGENDA\1999\4-7-99.REG • • REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION • Meeting Date: April 7, 1999 Staff Report by: James Ericson, Planning Associate Planning Case No.: 550-99 Applicant: Don Norris Request: The applicant is requesting a reduced side yard setback to allow for an expansion of living space in conjunction with the construction of a new attached garage. Location: 5302 Raymond Avenue PIN No. 08-30-23-14-0012 Zoning/Land Use: R-2, Single- and Two-Family Residential/Twin home Applicable Regulations: • Section 1104.01, Subd. 3, regarding Setbacks: All principal structures shall have a setback from sideyard lot lines of at least ten feet. An attached garage may have a five foot setback. Section 1125.02, Subd. 2 outlines the criteria to be used by the Planning Commission in its review of variances. Attachments: Planning Application Zoning Map Site Plan Background: The applicant, Don Norris, is requesting a variance from the required ten-foot side yard setback established for principal buildings and living space therein. He plans on constructing an attached, 16-foot wide garage to his twinhome, located at 5302 Raymond Avenue. (He owns both sides, renting out the other unit.) In conjunction with this construction, he would like to add a two-story living space behind the garage, which would maintain the same proposed setback--five feet--as the proposed garage. Currently there is no garage present, and the square footage for his half of the twinhome is about 540 square feet. The garage expansion, which would be allowed unconditionally, is proposed at 368 square feet. • Norris Variance Planning Case No. 550-9 April 7, 1999 • Page 2 The subject property is one of several side by side twin homes that were built in the mid-1960s on the east side of Raymond Avenue. All of the lots are 100 feet wide which leaves little room for expansion possibilities. The applicant has already expanded out the back of the house, creating additional living space, and has constructed a deck and a below-ground pool, which prohibits any further expansion in this area. Analysis: For the Planning Commission to grant a variance, it must examine the criteria established in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2, of the City Code, which relates to hardships. Specifically, a variance may only be granted in those cases where the Code imposes undue hardship or practical difficulties to the property owner. The individual criteria, with responses, are as follows: a. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to the property which does not apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since the effective date hereof have had no control. The circumstance which could be construed as extraordinary relating to this request is the • fact that the lot, which supports a twinhome, is only 100 feet wide--minimum width for zoning requirements. Each unit, assuming the building is built centered on the lot, has fifty feet of lot to work with. Because these buildings were built to accommodate the construction of a garage, the living space is limited to a maximum width of about 29 feet. Because of a recent addition to the rear, a deck and a below-ground pool, any further expansion off the rear of the home is not feasible. b. The literal interpretation of the provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Title. If the minimum setback for living space would be enforced, the applicant would not be prevented from adding bedroom space behind the garage because the bedroom could be constructed 11 feet wide instead of 16 feet, and lengthened an additional by five feet to compensate. The resulting expansion would be the same size, although the back would extend beyond the current rear-line of the house. c. That the special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. While the action for which the applicant is seeking the variance is wholly of his own proposing, the intent is to maximize the use of the land to provide a much-needed living • space expansion while preserving as much of the remaining back yard space as possible. Norris Variance Planning Case No. 550-9 • April 7, 1999 Page 3 d. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Title to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. The granting of this variance would not confer upon the applicant any special privilege, in that property owners are encouraged to update and improve their property. The fact that the subject property presents impediments to further expansion would be the basis for the variance. e. That the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. Economic conditions alone shall not be considered a hardship. If the intent of the variance is to allow a building expansion up to five feet of the property line in keeping with the setback of the proposed garage, then the variance requested is the minimum variance which could alleviate the hardship. f The variance would not be materially detrimental to the purpose of this Title or to other • property in the same zone. The basis for this Code provision is to promote a separation between properties. Maintaining a greater setback for more intensive uses (living space as opposed to garage space) is a means to accomplish this separation. In this case, the proposed addition would be behind a proposed garage, all of which would be buffered and separated from the adjacent property to the north by its own garage. g. The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood Were the variance to be granted, it would not impair any neighboring properties' supply of light or air, it would not create any additional traffic impact nor would it increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. If there would be any impact to property values, the impact is assumed to be positive. According to the City Code, all of the preceding criteria shall be satisfied in order to justify the granting of a variance. As pointed out in the above responses, a hardship may exist in this case. But because the criteria tend to be more subjective in nature, the analysis rarely points to a clear • response. In this situation, if the application for a reduced setback variance were denied, the applicant could still have a living space expansion, however at a potentially-reduced square footage. f Norris Variance Planning Case No. 550-9 April 7, 1999 • Page 4 Resident Comment: Staff has received only one comment after having sent out the required notices to properties within 350 feet of 5302 Raymond Avenue. The comment was from the property owner across the street, who maintained that the subject property is one of the nicest on the block and is in favor of allowing the expansion as proposed. Options: A. Direct staff to prepare a resolution approving a variance for a reduced side-yard setback to allow for the construction of living space up to five feet of the side property line. B. Direct staff to prepare a resolution denying the variance request for a reduced side yard setback. James Ericson, Planning Associate N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\550-99\NORRIS.RPT • • ?1WDZI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION ; 'fu 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View MN 55112 °�*':t-Partners'`'' 612-717-4020 612-784-3462 -FAX Please Type or Print Information-Complete Both Sides of This Form Applicant Information �+ ` —7 Name of Applicant �0 ini q 11 kr) P-S-I(J Telephone(ell. l (e. .3-0 0 0-2 Address 52 0-2-- RA\-/t-.,-,,0 (...it A U. ✓� Fax U'rrl 0 e-4 v'\cis U 4-14J ley)ir,. Interest in Property(check appropriate box) ) Owner of Property ❑ Contract for Deed Owner ❑ Lessee,Operator,Manager 0 Agreement to Purchase ❑ Other(explain) Applicants must provide evidence of interest in property at the time of application,and if you are not the owner of the property,you must provide a letter of permission from the owner giving consent to the filing of this application. The property owner must sign this application for it to be accepted. Property Description/Proposal • Address or General Location �i 3o 2 ✓;.A M c,v N ✓s v E Legal Description t -r 12 1 B v- I N e.a s 1-4 A rJ 3...s 4 A a. t-T-i o,.l Property Identification#(PIN#) C>3 3 0 2-3 i W C O 1'Z #of Acres i?,; G 0 0 (. , 3o A cc-2e Current Zoning a- 2 , Tw c F'4‘,41L.-i, �s t‘ E--r--s-r--1 A L Type of Application ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment $250 o Rezoning $250/acre; min$250 max$1500 o Major Subdivision $250+$250 deposit* O Minor Subdivision $200 ❑ Planned Unit Development(PUD) Refer to rezoning fees O PUD Amendment $350 \, 0Conditional Use Permit R-I, R-2$75;all others$250 NCp Variance R-1, R-2$100 all others$250 O Code Appeal • $100 ❑ Develop Review/Site Plan $125/acre;min$125 max$750 • ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit R-1,R-2$150;all others$200 ❑ Wetland Buffer Permit R-1,R-2$25;all others$100 o Floodplain Permit $200 ❑ Other *Deposits shall be paid to cover all costs of public notices,materials and staff or consultant time spent in the review, • research or preparation of materials associated with this application. The applicant shall be responsible for all reasonable incurred costs in excess of the initial deposit amount. Any portion of the deposit not spent or encumbered shall be refunded to the applicant within thirty(30)days after consideration of the application is completed. Please complete the reverse side of this application. City of Mounds View,MN Development Application Page 2 Present Use of Property • Undeveloped/Vacant 0 Single Family Dwelling Duplex/Two Family Dwelling ❑ Multi-family Dwelling C Business/Commercial Establishment ❑ Industrial Establishment ❑ Other(explain) Property Classification •❑ Abstract 0 Torrens Description of Proposal �- Gc Ott D d of 1 01/16 1/Al2/F+NLE t ALL.Ot..J trXPq-14-40e!a 4-IVIAJ& SPACC tJI 70 Pit., d=am `T BY MY(OUR)SIGNATURE ON THIS APPLICATION,I HEREBY DECLARE THAT,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,THE INFORMATION PRO • IS TRUE AND ACC TE. Signature of Applicant rr't,-,1I i't/ Name of Applicant(typed/printed) b i J m q.. ict l/J ik)0 o' -1 t, Signature of Property Owner �Cl>^- .� /4/1/`11) Name of Property Owner(typed/printed) 12)0/)v't kit in) 2 0` 110 Address of Owner J �e) 7-- Phone Number of Owner t, I y�.—.— (erl —• 0 0 I)2 *********** ********************************* FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date of Submittal .3-i-`I 1 Date of Acceptance 3 -► -ti q Assigned to: '3 i rne. Planning Case No. 60-day Limit Li-3 D-`i'i l20-day limit (0- 19- SSon c\ Fees Paid: Account# Check# Receipt# Application: IV. 100 00 Park Dedication: Deposits: Other: • Total: N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\FORMS\DEVAPP.FOR 1/98 V gill /N V 1 b i 511 5512 5511 • 141111111111 �.\44.7'...... III o 5505 740 ' �, = 503 5504 r 5499 PINEWOOD11 493 5494 5493 SCHOOL I Area of t, 185 5486 5485 5500 1 • Detail ill , i � III � . 175 5478 5475 Ilk araT [ 63 S46 5467 I - I 1 ' s 6 5459 . �Sst 5453 F— �� \ ,5;r sRsp - 5447 � �� y� W I v6, 5439 �0' M Uf) 0) M u i 5433 NNNNN •e' " v BELLE LN 5426 5425 `sv 7�tP , 5425 co in5420 :,:it.21 542 5419 M--ti NNN N N Z.; . :541415 5414 r M 1n rn 5413 g r rn M 1n • 401 M M N O O I� t0 to t1) st M N . 5406 5405 5406 N N N N N N 5405 N N N N N N N Q •N DRIVE 537 Cllyi I - d- c0 co O N co O N d' N 0 O - 'L 537 4 w 395 Z N N N N N N N N N N NR, rn 5392 5391 5392 5391 536 ._ 387 Q N N NNNNNN N N N NN N �l� _ N 5386 5385 5386EZE 536 536 = 381 Q 5380 5379 5380ETE '4 535 w I 373 5372 5371 5372 535 J CO 567 5366 5364 5363 5364 ME 534 e j 0 5357 5358 5357 5358ME ara.53:.I: ri )53 2 ' M N N ' 2 o n 5352 5351 5352 5354 N N N NN N N N N S45 N N N N N N N N N N N 5344 5343 5344 fig = lk LAMBERT AVE N 37 :. 5338 5337 53 AZ 532: ) 31 Lt1NI B I.11 I N N N N N N N N c. °" Z ■�!!� !� !!�! 532 N N N N N N N N N N 5 5330 Ea C •EEE 531 23 5324 PARK Cl 5324 Crr;p Fm � '531 I. W • II 17 PF 531.mg5 5316En! 109 5308 530 5308 5307 301 31) �'l3� mil '. " E Z F 530 5300 ++ Z t X95 Q u) •• ", tt i )87 El 61111 111E115288 528 wIrrE A. M N N N 5275 5267 5263 PUD 5251 > 'n 5230 Zoning Map Planning Case 550-99 Applicant: Don Norris Location: 5302 RaYm and Avenue N4 1 Site Plan for 5302 Raymond Avenue (Existing) II Don Norris, Property Owner T n-ground Pool '•DEi<..``~` ADD'N ADD'N .' ACL( \ N • 8 0 M < 21 Feet > < 21 Feet > 5302 Raymond 5300 Raymond Drive Drive 100 Feet RAYMOND AVENUE • • Site Plan for 5302 Raymond Avenue (Proposed) Don Norris, Property Owner T In-ground Pool ADD N ADD'N : O CK.;'-- '......'...... Proposed 16 x 11 Upper and Lower • Bedrooms 0 < 21 Feet Proposed 16 x 23 Attached 5302 Raymond 5300 Raymond Garage (368sgft.) Drive Drive 100 Feet • RAYMOND AVENUE - - R-0 8030 uj i .....,- 8040 - 8036 8039 8032 8033 8040 8025 J ` 8020 8025 8026 8021 < 8018 8016 8015 p 8025 8011 8000 8005 801. 8009 8006 Ca • 7980 8005 8000: - 7990 ..g.--: 7985 8004 7981 7990 7981 7990 B—� __ I� 7975 7970 7979 7980 7969 7980 g: 79601 7965 7960 7959 7970 7965 7966 N Ca N M ElI7955 7956 7949 I 7954 7959 _ - rn N "" ! 7940 7945 7946 _ o CO 7934 :� 7950 o 7930 7935 7930 - cy,, I � � rn K-4`p n 7900 N I N N 1 7900 °o i� N ®®7900 - `" . HI VIEW IN. in N M '�� ,�.' 788• p 7891 in m 7880 Op i1�::. N N 7661 N * 'L<' 880 M 3r 7876 Z _ • 7885 7866 7860 B-2 7870 7877 7854 m 7850csi Q II ) 7863 7842 3 7801 ��O 7830 0 :�� , X28 7851 p- "` 7820 o UNE O Y ' , Friel �- .: 4.`-30N • .t R-4 1111 ci 7786• -`ti ...> �sr7 7810 0_ .E 7781 7750 6 Wu 7769ME 4\ 7800 1 7758 7759 7770 .......€ ti ,�O' z B-2 0) R-4 7748 7749 7768 776711111 7739 7729 LOW: Q 7 • O 7801 CM tuli, 7729IZ 7723 Es — M p 7719 7715 `N': co Z 7709 7710 7711 7701 7 7710 Z 1 co 7692 7685 N 7690 PUB ::. M r 7685 N 769 o co co B-3 N •N CO E 7669 7670 7663 768768E Y 7665 ��w 7653 g B-3 � 7647 Illiffairiii N 7629 76.34 7635NI •`, 7625 7620, 7619 7600 7601 SILVER VIEW :. 7585 7594 7575 N "• i 7579 7588N -S N n o M o C •I PARK N IR 0 7565.--`• 758• Z N . N T M p�j -2 LCD y NDN 3 7555 7572 gEll ...._lit • to t o in o rn co g J W J r- r--- N$NiQ� t�0 / 0 7545 7560 : 7550 ,fn N Y 7515 M 545 PF M oN! Zoning Map Planning Case 549-99 Applicant: Jones Sign Co /KinderCare N4 7 Location: 2791Highway 10 ..„..,m,irtelAill ,......,.....i...4,-.z.t.,.s.k:1111.4111111..1).ii111.111111L".1111.:11 444414.-:,,LP4kiitk.frtiziUtik !:::::.''''''......................................... ••,,,z,-4.L•kiN,I..lik.1--441:4•-•47e0:ItIti!.]::',..i.i4.i-li:i•ii'l..................................... _.nitmFillitilig.iti.;!.,..4..0111411...iliukiii. : **,... ............................................................. ',..onolliggiRti:%Nilitilitillii4ips::;, ::-..7...... ............:,.!,;!;•itiligAi,..: llt,s,',14-;,-.4‘10-§ 4•?•:::01,7'''''••.. - Y.:.i-i,A'••!:4',:-*I:',-::-....„: .,A1.4.,<N1...ttilftikkatittik:V:101,14 I It.;:',:-41:0'...................:::.:„.........;:;:m411;•,..,,---Bw.. -...F 4'-‘,,,,.;*(.4%.4. .„*A---fEk4ft.tAN.ftsr;.•;*.t.;-,,,,w8.,,i...4,,ge:-, t,:.4.n..,......,_.......„... ......,..........:„.....„,1,....,,,,,,t,,„,,:4. Nti,,.'*' .0i.ittlik-Aii4iiilitlifti!:5!Feti..':•,,2iii" ;H•4,t,:,',*-:::;::::::::w::tiOlagilt:.;:mtlf, :04:47;41./tIlittliiit:::ZitZ41:. &,.0..,4:::,:t>,.-404twEl*,ftz%0-444;i::N4-1:4-]-::::.::A- .,'•,--:-,::ik•..44:4"'"•'- :.:.: ..„ 5302 2 Raymond Frolnt view A',..,4-4„t:...0.:A:l,Ki4Pip!,kk'P-.q_i4':,Ik':,:...,...-:';,„.,,:0.e3,l..,!!1,t*<Igigr::,i,,,',.'.i-ft4,0i,t..'•,..4i.„•,g.;:i:,.,'"::.I-,:.:'•:)k„4:,.',lP:.qe:,,..::7.-..',,,i,,:,i,,.4.;:I:-5::.,.i';4•..-::1e'.:.4,:-,;k,?-.:,;',..il,..1ol.:4_i'),.:-l:;-:-''..!,:(.•:l.4:7:.i.-i,.44,:-:,!7.:I,.-*4,.;'.!;,i..4!l1;i;.--:--t4..,;.t:tii.;..,:.4.',,d-„::.".:4;•?:,.,.i:,-*ht,7.t;:k--.-t3.,0-,,"igi4]•k',.i=,0.;-0kb-.,..i'.,.:t.0.:::„-.::',.isi'•1,,:'„,„.;<•o,',,:•..m'.i,1•,..*..7..::i:•',i,:.:7._:,i,::,:4:.i!tt,.t,,,:q•t;.i-:.*::,-.,:•,.i,.:.„:,.F,l,1':,g:.fri-••.,2::_..,ot'Ai.:--;.,. ,.-.:.:4n-:7.sl.4,"%:-i::..,,..:1:i.;l4FL-..-i,.:-4,-.-:::;:r„„.c.„-,1.1p:i..64.ii:...'"1',:.4-.lI,.";..t0m-eV.4_•;,...-,i-.'::.i:.,,..•2,kt.,:ti;:;.:,.lN--:1.fA..-4.:1ltiI.':t0•.•..-',.::1.,li;A<,-.ii.'-:*'-.:.1.tl•t1i:,;,.0..i-;');,1.:,--..:.•:R-t.:14",;i",r-lt.,k4"..a.t".„.:,iiiil-,'.:-,.!.:ili.*..q•.„.ei31lti4;k,-.t..:61,•:..:,:,!gki:''.i,pi"i't-:,t ,-.,::rtcl.,-•-4„iist,.,1,i,ki:,:.:ii.-tw;.Et;.iiR::4,,fit,i;..::!,,a,l4ri,t,li::i,N,,4ivgi]-kk.uf4g:I`,,i,'-!m-.E,,4n•„4t4,,-:.Iila:.l,':,,,.3„'::i,,i:,nl,-;-i:;--t,„_,l'i',.ii4,,i,Kt-'!,.:i,,m,4..k,:i7:tt.k:.!".%::•:1vIt44„:I.„ei,:N,':i,-.--,ilb:'1,,•4I!;i7:::%-%.4.:..,i-:Att,:41.:,,,,t'%,:' 0,i.'ti.1ft;.:•-.:ii..:.:'o-d..:m.j•1444-14:',.5:.-1.041E-;-,::A-4..,.i,:g' -Q-:.i.1:9A:ti40.i4-,1i.,•.ttf':-,.i.,-4„,;t-..i,...'i-"i....4-6.k;r.4-G.r',,i.t.l'.„;'144.i,:-tl1-..,:-ti.„,•-0":i4;4.4;4"At_,,1A.:,,_4M,:;,.,l.4.:i,,_::..i.!i.,s.i:74!-..tl....t;it40.4."44F.,..„..e..44,M-'. "t::.,i.:1:.i.k_.,%.*-.t_:4.;..4...foi.,z4.4..;.,..1_.-:i.t-tri:'.:,.:-41ki..l::%',"t:-4ii.s.,4."-Ca.•n,.i::.t1,4'%;:rie•,il.,44t:;:0tok4,,A4,.t4ik•?."•::....El,:1..ii.i:,.-:z..•0r•4&.a-A..•i..g4::.,:'.4.k ..1:9--•,:-"--.4..:.4:-i.i.::4:i.'i.ig;7",:4,i-.;%,%„4ftt..t..„0:-:.i'.„1.t7:.'k:I.r,.1u0tk1:.:.1-„,'l..0::'..l,,0.•,.:...:4*1-..]:...,,4T-(I'•.fr4.t.-,!it,,sz'w:t5!:4ilviit:i;i.i%4,.:;-'i1.4.:.A:,.i-.i•:k.„-r„t.,i ,•i,,7:.!,..,i4...i,..:.7'',.oN,i;4sl,4iisl.0:r:ii.is::N•tL,:,-."-.k.4:,.",•,i,,;f1i::,:.-:?.i,ti•ii..tf.?•,,i,,l-...:4-.,;:wii..-h,L-.i.v,.:l'1i*pmi,.,4 iI-:-i:,ll.:,.:4.!t:,- ,:t.k;0:I-„':t.].,i.oi,,ii.T#",:a-;-,i•:„::t.k,,,.%,.,,tggr14..:',s0P4„,:l.l. '' 4, . imi-.,it.t:'1T.S4.0i„„.:,:•:4o.t.f•ri,i.-.•.„9.p,,hfti, ft % , t ,4-:i..4:I,ii.,-,i.,-:,=li.4:-.?it N:t0tg,•t.0:ft-,:„:;,.:iN,gt1,0:•!0.i;..3p,i•'-,i..._1,'tii,4..;,,'".._i..z,xk:f..t:N1„-i1:„.:;,'_".,..Pl:•.1l1,,„1„k'.'o:i "4-.ao-P:1,,i,,g.M::-ij.:-„,1>:.ZN•,.„.,:g"',t,,,,il0:lt-.Sq".iO4.,N,.d".tiq,..,•.;'.:.‘i...,-:,.M1iV.4•4:,ii..l,•-1,„Mii4.A,,4.:;.,1.h:'O1.•.,k,..:,:,•,.,,.4.:AIi4::1',!.g.f',,L,...o,§,!,,k.p-tk.,,1- „'1,-th:.ii,4:ii:t:,i•4iit01!„4i.„,...-!_!-,,:N!,,0N-0!i,4i,,:4,'sl,i,o,';„.?1t..k.4.-%,*i-:kk]5:]$41,:.'-4%,,t..-,*10i:,.„':,oMii.is,„:*7:1.i-;.1;z:i4§,..::::".•'4:4-14i;o'.:'w-1:.„t.•4047..I:,.:1:....",;.4P4.l.:i4;;'.o.4..:,;.i:,1.,4„::.,:,;,..,•,,tt'i:%,,,,4:,ri1n..:40•i:,'.k--,,i0".:)..i.i„;„Y.,••'.1...'•km.,:7,iw4,.*',4,,i,•1,",4‘;,. '•,,4,1,u,,"4•i 44t.-z,.01Og.1,..,-,,:„i'*,4,7-P?i:N1,,L-:'-t•1:.:,,..iA•.4,!,t.,...,„„4:,-4.ii:,i% tf' ft 4o4 , & ft •. v ' 5302 -,.:.4t.-..,,*.,0'.i:.-;i,„::oin„tg,.-,:4:;i;:::,t,,'.,::q,ii,,:,.i,!.:i•::-,R."-t: liIr;:.4k:„a!V.!‘.:i:.:a„..:miihi,.t,:tp4;9.:.-.;i.,:Ii-.,%tki.7".",;p.:.<•,,.'i-.t,.,i2?z!- ,,:,,'.i--.,.:,I,;•:t•.:;7 -.:.5-,.:l,?,:,,:r..•;.;,!., Raymond -l;:a0:,:,'4.4•0"01,,,,q•1Li4•.,l1•,',,'4'',,::•14:P-R::-•4,.::t,,,.!4,0o‘,g.i-:I.,,i.ir(.!,.:,,-,,,.•I.l.oti,,ci;,,,i.ip',.4ii_i:t::1'.,7,it',:A:'.;,.E,,.'•,-'kl-4t'--.1,-m4:.,•.".k5:.1-;.,..-P,i1::-.,,::,:,1qF,.,,'.:1i,k,•.-•l:i1,,.-,1",0,0-:';:4•:::"':'.4."1:,,.,'.,.-i!'',..h1t71...':;:.‘.1w--..1.,;,10:1q:..••;:-0•-;i•:::•::A4q,f-4v-t..1<s:,q::,Ami:-.•iz:i1:.;1q1.:.,,1),,,i,4t1,l,,,,1=:A.,.0.1t--:4;-.i,1i..:4;,.iP•,]„k4-.4*,1i!A:,.1”%i:'.40iit;i:,k;ii,i:c.4:i04,.gE-tt454,%1t0,,L:1,,mt:i1:i,1:I:,4.l:,i:.:!1zr0ki'1:.,'-"5'i.;t.--1'1.-1':,::1'.t'.....;.:-T:.:,,..:)..*6:,,..:-4D'i-N‘.„-t-t.i:.::',••-:,...!j;:•:.:1,-,:-<:,.-:•.::.,'*••;,. ,:,•k 4',1..::,,.,,.f.h•0!.,'-...-;'..1!-l / Rearview • - . r: 1 , • ... 4 ,.. Pool view „ :::f1':,'•si•.',:•.i•:1'.,l':..- •:-1i:k;,':,,t-:-.,.r-:•--1.,:..'1:::.7-:'1.,..-:.m',- :.'.:...:.-..4 ,, ' •.-.--..,‘,..,,l ..k_ .:.: . , ,,..,,..:::-,....::•:.. .,;1i,':::.Nik,.4: :•"-.:',.';' ,',:''"''''''.... ....-,.„.„ ._. III REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION • April 7, 1999 Meeting Date: Staff Report by: James Ericson, Planning Associate Planning Case No.: 549-99 Applicant: Jones Sign Company/KinderCare Request: The applicant is requesting a variance from Chapter 1008 of the Municipal Code (the Sign Code) to allow for an advertising sign at the KinderCare day care center on Highway 10. Location: 2791 Highway 10 PIN No. 06-30-23-43-0033 Zoning/Land Use: R-3, Medium Density Residential/KinderCare Day Care Facility Applicable Regulations: • Section 1008.08, Subd. 2, Signage allowed by zoning district. Section 1125.02, Subd. 2 outlines the criteria to be used by the Planning Commission in its review of variances. Attachments: Planning Application Zoning Map Sign Specifications Background: The applicant, Jones Sign Co. Inc., representing the KinderCare Learning Center, is requesting a variance from the sign code to allow for the installation of a pylon advertising sign at KinderCare located at 2791 Highway 10. This property, even though it supports a commercial use, is zoned R-3, medium-density residential. The basis for this zoning is that day care facilities such as KinderCare were not originally allowed in commercial districts. This restriction was eliminated with the passing of Ordinance 595 in 1997, which allowed as conditional uses day care facilities in all commercial and industrial zoning districts. Were the property zoned commercial, it could have up to 100 square feet of combined permanent signage. The current proposal would add a 16-foot tall, 48 square foot pylon sign to the existing 36 square-foot wall sign. Together the amount of signage would be below the maximum allowed 100 square feet. 4111 KinderCare Variance Planning Case 549-99 March 30, 1999 • Page 2 Analysis: For the Planning Commission to grant a variance, it must examine the criteria established in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2, of the City Code, which relates to hardships. Specifically, a variance may only be granted in those cases where the Code imposes undue hardship or practical difficulties to the property owner. The individual criteria, with responses, are as follows: a. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to the property which does not apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since the effective date hereof have had no control. The circumstance which can be construed as extraordinary relating to this request is the fact that the property is zoned R-3, medium density residential, which effectively does not allow any business signage whatsoever. To prohibit a commercial business fronting Highway 10 from displaying a sign would be a considerable hardship. b. The literal interpretation of the provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Title. • All businesses located in a commercial district, and any day care located within a commercial district, would be allowed a minimum of 100 square feet of signage. Granting of this variance would provide the day care center the same rights commonly enjoyed by other businesses. c. That the special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. The City Code was amended in 1997 which allows day care centers to operate-within-a business district. The fact that the subject property is zoned residential prevents the business from displaying advertising signage as any other commercially zoned business would. This circumstance is not a result of the applicant's own doing. d. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Title to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. This business--a day care facility--is distinctly commercial in nature. It is located along Highway 10, the City's primary commercial corridor. It is a commercial operation that operates under an approved conditional use permit. No other types of commercial uses • are allowed within a residential district and as such, KinderCare would not be receiving preferential or special treatment denied to others in this district. KinderCare Variance Planning Case 549-99 • March 30, 1999 Page 3 e. That the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. Economic conditions alone shall not be considered a hardship. Having a permanent pylon sign in addition to the existing building signage is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. f. The variance would not be materially detrimental to the purpose of this Title or to other property in the same zone. The basis for this Code provision is to prevent the intrusion of commercial signage within residential districts. This property is surrounded on all sides by streets, is located on Highway 10, the City's primary commercial corridor, and is surrounded by commercial uses including Western Bank, Amoco Gas, and the Holiday Stationstore. The proposed sign would be located adjacent to Highway 10. g. The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property • values within the neighborhood Were the variance to be granted, it would not impair any neighboring properties' supply of light or air, it would not create any additional traffic impact nor would it increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. It is assumed that there would be no impact to property values. According to the City Code, all of the preceding criteria shall be satisfied in order to justify the granting of a variance. As pointed out in the above responses, a hardship clearly exists in this case. Resident Comment: As per State notification requirements, staff sent out public hearing notices to all properties within 350 feet of the KinderCare property. Of the 19 properties affected, only 12 are developed residentially. All of the others are developed commercially with the exception of Church on the Rock and a vacant parcel on the south side of Highway 10. Staff has not received any comments concerning this request. Recommendation: Approve Planning Commission Resolution 575-99, a resolution approving a variance from Chapter 1008 of the Municipal Code pertaining to signage to allow a permanent, freestanding • pylon sign at 2791 Highway 10, KinderCare Learning Center. James Ericson, Planning Associate N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DE VCASES\549-99\K-CARE.RPT 02/24/99 WED 10:27 FAX 9204942313 JONES SIGN Z0 2001 02/23/99 12:15 FAX 612 784 3462 CITY OF XV tg{o . O.:11 WV CF ©WM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION 14 `i. 1� 2401 I-Eghway 10, Mounds View MN 55112 1.1„...._ •ruftviO" 612-717-4020 612-784-3462-TAX Please Type or Print formation-Complete Both Sides of This Form Applicant Information O/��.5' �j ,�r��; Name of Applicant -1f�' Tele "laC�- f 4/ (, /TVA Address (71/ #/A1/<L 2iV/ d'e . Fax 9)0 - z/19 -...s f3 .1- 503 '' .h, Tnterest is Property(check appropriate box) ' , O Owner of Property � � t7 Contract for Dced Owner `,. 0 Lessee,Operator,Maya /'�it� 'p Agreement to Purchase - X Other(explain) a inS e// Sis's2 e- ' '' .' 1 Applicants must provide evidence of interact in property as the time of application,and Wyatt are not the owner of the property,you must provide a letter of permission from the owner giving consent to the tiling of this application. The property owner mum figo Ibis application for it to be accepted. • .,1 Proper.Dcstriptioal?ropoeal Addreaa or General taxations 02 79/ 1'�'-4 /0 j hrAeasT • Legal Description _Aloei/76�zT f// t27A - Property Identification#(PIN#) ,; #of Acres d Current Zoning + Type of Application1� 0 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $250 /°* a Rezoning 5250/acre: min$250 num 515(10 -G O Major'Subdivisi n $250+S250 depositit O - Ivor Subdivision $200 i/V. O Planned Unit Development(PUD) Refer to rezoning fees V o POD Amendment 5350 O Conditional Use Permit R-1, R4 S • all others$250 ,/ Variance R.1. R-•` 100 ,11 others$250 yP � hi ; ° Code Appeal 5100 =, o Develop Review/Site Plan $125/acre;min$125 max$750 D Wetland Alteration Permit R-1,R-2$150;all others$200 O wetland Buffer Permit R-1,R-Z$25;all others$100 C� i\if L o Floodplain Permit $200 n / �� A other ' h 01--e�' r1 ii\lree - Deposits shall be paid to cover all costs of public notices,materials and staff or consrsltaat time spent in the review, research or preparation of materials associated with this application. The applicant shall be rosponsiblc for ail reasonablee ,.,,, incurred costs in excess of the initial deposit arRtotmt Any portion of the deposit not spent or encumbered shell be refunded _'.t•` to the applicant within thirty(30)days after consideration of the application is completed. s 'y i Please complete the reverse side of this application. 02/24/99 WED 10:27 FAX 9204942313 JONES SIGN 1/I 002 02!23/89 12:16 FAX 812 764 9462 CITY of Myigj uua 0 City of Mounds View,MN ry Dcvelopmeet Application Pale 2 3 Presetii'Use of Property a Undevelopcd/Yacarat in Single Family Dwelling xDupleceTwo FamilyDwelling ci Yrtutti family Dwelling Busiaess/Camtna cis!Establishment a Industrial Establishment 0 Other(explain) Property Classification a Abstract o Torreas / d Description((Proposal n1GC/ Ode_ 51 SCart€ By/SAi, S/' - , rt BY MY(OUR)SIGNATURE ON THIS APPLICATION(I HEREBY DECLARE THAT,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.TIM INFORMATION PROVIDED IS TRUE AND ACCURATE, Signature of Applicant ______ _ (5)rae.-1-‘e____-/ i Name of Applicant(typed/printed) '!1&^ 41.-6GL=g/«'— J • Signature of Property Owner �sI Male of Property Owner(typed/printed) 1 1/Z)t c Address of Owner o?79/9/ /0 (4J 79$7- aM /'rY Phone Number of Owner #,#st**#gramYd lt4..**tier+hgionoatam••.*********dill quP+ 41dial s**.1.1“k ilm44stk**amwb 4'1.4.40441.4.4.4.* ***** } f FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Data of Submittal Date((Acceptance Assigned Planning Cave No. 60-day Limit ^120-day limit I Fees Paid: Account# Check# !receipt# , Application: 1 Park Dedication: Deposits: Other: • Total: Ni1DaTwcatou SposanawolmsaaEvAppjun 1J913 - R_Q so3o �„T, 8040 .,.,T� - 8036 8039 8032 8033 8040 • • 8026 8025 802; Y - • 8020 8025 8015 8 8025 8018 8011 8000 8016 7980 8005 8000: 8005 801 • 8009 8006 • ` 7990 s 7985 8004 7981 7990 0 7981 7990 B-3 798�In 7975 7970 7979 7980 7969 , 7980 - g. 4 7960 7965 7960 0 7959 7970 796501 7966 N O N M �� 7955 7956 7949 7954 7959 rn N 7940 7945 7946 co 7934 - o Ncoo WV 7950 7930 7935 7930 cy,, ^ N N N 7900 K-4LO in In rx J N 7900 •• 7900 N• ER O I ime H� VIEW ihiiiimio co ital CD 00 N N . M 788 p 7891 N N 7880 •Niv7861 N "'•r" (� _ 78 0 14) • • 7876 Z 7885 7866 OM 7860 m B�2 :. 7870 N 7877 7854 7850 �, �1.^ 7863 7842 : • rn :� 7 7801 4_,AD 7851 7830 0 p N N N 80� `` 0 OAKWO•D DR 7791 .:—30x. , 7820 rn ccoco 7786 • 8750 ti :.. mss�R1 7810.2 . N N 7780,E 6�A `7 7764 7769 7800 B-2 ': 7758 7759 7770 Mill ..... ry^0'' 64) R-4 ti A 7748 7749 7768 7767 0� I .S 7739 7729 Lai Q ti O 7801 7 • 7728 7729 7728 77238' 0: �� 7 7718 p 7719 7718 7715 "�"«�! ' `L6 r 771( 7 7710 Y 7709 7710 7711 770 . •, m 7692 R• ,e: 7685 7685 N 769 N7690 PUD o ,B-3.. 7670 7663 7684 w N •N N 0 7669 7681 7665 7660t. 7653 g h • 10 76- 7647B-3 N Lio"Nkii,11;11hH. 7629 7�47635IIII 7625 7620.7619 7600 7601SILVER VIEW 7 7585 75947575 ; i. 7579 7588 o r-- n°' N 10 PARK •N.' N o • N --' N :Co r7 �O 7565_.. 758 Z 7565 rn z CO LI 2N i3 7555 7572 1131 R-2 ,J 7552 J o°N N.°N cotr,°0) r O 7545 7560 i..... 7550 (1) N N N N N.,rn / NI- Y 7515 545 7542 PF °' ..r7 °N L Zoning Map Planning Case 549-99 Applicant: Jones Sign Co / KinderCare N 7 Location: 2791Highway 10 02/24/99 WED 10:28 FAX 9204942313 JONES SIGN 11004 HP-48 (o X 129 Double Faced IngtaikusT.ed Herlseatal Display) • 12.,0. 11 14 4 = KinderCareLetters yir ,. LEARNING CENTER...: . 6 3/4-fsrs SCALE I/2" i I'•0" "X0=0:r•dq;G've...w,--., .,•••$ i A ••••• " :r•.4. z:<l:'— ^,-,tgi!..0:9iI�,i'''Y,+1'�'f.:r4 MANUFACTURE AND INSTALL,(I)NEW i a 44' s Y S .X;,'':.'''` .,n'..r pit'.! IU.UMINA s.7«t • r r.4 i, h:Y. 3;.r 4 rrA f'S,�z'l^ " ,fi4' .4 DOUBLE FACED TED DISPtILY „ «`� °,� :',r ,««,11 . ,' �r?::« .•,..:,.K «'� �?ew� ,., 'A'PUt1 a`rzgi�,�,. „;f:: ' ;al'; .#,,g ' S7....I d.'''''�`,•';s.s,,•'. Fng;%aye,' CABINET/RETAINER `�•.s;<''3n?;, r,: ,, r•4 rs.f,.._..;,,:,.�:z:, �:II:'' .,:,.:,.>::: •'„ MI ..> ALUMINUM EXTRUSION • PAINT AKZO NOBEL 496 H-1 BLACK POLYURETHANE ENAMEL (SATIN FINISH) FACE .177”THICK WHITE LD(AN ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE SIGNATURE 410 .... GRAPHICS 3M SCOTCHCALSERIES 230 TRANSLUCENT VINYL APPUED FIRST SURFACE `'' " `:::' :� ,`•" "•'� QLOGO iil .ili :Vi yis .: ::iii; ?Irt:........... ilt:: SHINGLE MARKS h. i;;;i,.n ::'ii;.......... >i. .:iii:::::.. ::::::s;;;i;;! OUTLINE AND .,t: . 0- LACK ..... ;i i;i i 23 22 B ;:'. �f��;�si�i �EEiil�i BACKGROUNDs COLOR :i ........,, :i::,....,::,!;�:,..., ROOFANDPO BELL „., .ai" " • . ii: ., _. �::T.;:::::! . O:u::::::ijui;! 230-143 POPPY RED :: .' .. iiir ..;,..,,,•••••; d , , N TEXT • i A ••••• ° ' w'.'•.. 230.22 BLACK ,:.,�,�' _„ A_UARNINGCINTER .: P,�f 41� . ILLUMINATION °`� Yt::, . f far, , E,.,,, .ass x yh i>3. INTERNALLY ILLUMINATE WITH CW Ho ,s,�( +° ":'' , , "3;`Y 1. „'k,-..,::,,:',-- • r zr <. y 3�e ,,iY . .. .i ..::. . • .: aka. z $'l°` /-• SUPPORT POLE t STEEL TUBE SIZE AND HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE . TO BE DETERMINED kz..f , •a' _ t PAINT AKZO NOBEL 496 H-I BLACK y ...AL,1 p,x ..,�.`.. ,..,,r ga POLYURETHANE ENAMEL (SATIN FINIS SIZE TO BE DETERMINED INSTALLATION ;; ly `�3yryf f t '2/'�'y z`Y Kx ( f 5 is INSTALL AT LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED •Y� }< <2,..� 1;'y,.r <,:.-'..-<.';,.:•-•`..",.;:f1".','• '',...7' � �hF•y •f,'. r '''''''':'''):4:''3';:-.'•y , .1a,ls � Z''1i5{^s<y3yF�> P y y. y ; s < t. ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS s@° w i' `` t '.1-=,1.''::3�•64y ;iy2, t ,,,,I.• s� i 5 i. ,ST , s ra �hY i .�Y.+ rf, (I)20 AMP CIRCUIT TO BE PROVIDED f,-„tifs., }••rf 'r x tf� 3.1••¢# a''s b �'' y•}.3f �� •%,,- • ... •4 dCrayy S.'u•i. ♦,.i '' ,1"..?`,':‘ .•sf f i . Date Revisions Revisions Site Number 12.1.08 Date Action • AThI SAY Client #1 O 1 1 --SIGNS 2791 Highway 10 Northeast ': ".. KinderCere - / Moundsview, Minnesota 02/24/99 WED 10:29 FAX 9204942313 JONES SIGN Z005 • •(i•X yr DoiiDl./•.c.a M.slosted Hosiz.stal Pols N.ast.N Di g's'," 0 • AS REQUIRED II 12'- . rr � .. • r s.... V ... ...N<,,,,.. :r.:. -...._ • < .. 14.41D NOR RBD V • O tf.0'OFA'170 Are PIPE C 2C0'TNCX WILL 1 (TN SUBCONTRACTOR) N • • 1 OU(I)MAP.13DVCACI.RT T • I. S/%- SCALE ('-0'' k 54*•:'<. .i 1 •;..•1:4.• ,N • ry.4,,„. 4,,,.44,„ .rect.se,.., ,,k- ., r 4� iY •f2r4.,"-.t'i f r• •'� r !� H Citi• !*€ .T ;moi .r,,••-.i': ' �, leu-'�45Y.'?: e .' •'-•r`. r r_ �J ,A••'1 Irk. /. r I' 3'-0" ill 1 4'-0" j • EXCAVATE 3'x4'x6'DEEP REQUIRES 2.2 YARDS CONCRETE LEAVE FOOTING P-0"BELOW GRADE • . • • Date Revisions Revisions Site Number • 12.1.98 Date Action g-7--b77--- XA3/SAY• client �� I ,1S GKinderCare 42 79/ My N/0 N . i OO 6V*.S 0;494- ) • .44/14(/t/- '11114C1'.1'S 111 c, ,''.1.1 02/24/99 WED 10:30 FAX 9204942313 JONES SIGN Z006 . 41J JD V V-4 � S �v414/ C4 • I.---4ti -0. oil�Q �yV �4.. W MV � C ` F. V c) 4. Zi! Ep rya6� aaaaa aas a . w c •a G 1.Lin ). ••••••• ••••••—• ••,—......... .....—•••—•• •—.......,41r,ty?• • al, Z ,„z-74.5. ter/..17-4, •I? (A. IA )--4 ' ' ' ' ...' 1.-i •,., •a Qc_....7 ,cfacc,//" .----- *'1=C1 • • • • (4. .81 • I . . . • 0: :� • � 713 :© ICS Qi. a •4 • • 'Pi • • W . , . . .... .. ° o a e CP yy��� •' pp /5.. . . l• .V -.Q. .Q ,..tai S IIIEI "Ill "...N.. , . 0 8 . : g . . . = i i C . . . . . , • E14 i .. • MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 575-99 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM CHAPTER 1008 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO SIGNAGE TO ALLOW A PERMANENT, FREESTANDING PYLON SIGN AT 2791 HIGHWAY 10, KINDERCARE LEARNING CENTER; PLANNING CASE NO. 549-99 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request of Jones Sign Company, representing KinderCare Learning Center, to allow for a permanent, freestanding pylon sign at property located at 2791 Highway 10; and, WHEREAS, this property is zoned R-3, Medium Density Residential, and is legally described as follows: Subject to Highway,Lots 129 and 130, Spring Lake Park Hillview, City of Mounds View, County of Ramsey WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents associated • with this request: 1. Planning Application 2. Zoning Map 3. Sign Plans WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, may grant variances to specific requirements within the Zoning Code under unique, exceptional or extraordinary circumstances; and, WHEREAS, exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do apply to the property which do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since the effective date hereof have had no control, in that the use is of a commercial nature and is located within the Highway 10 commercial corridor yet the underlying zoning is residential, a district in which advertising signage is prohibited; and, WHEREAS, the literal interpretation of the provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district in that all businesses --including day care facilities--located in a commercial district are allowed (depending upon the particular zoning district) a minimum of 100 square feet of signage. Granting of this variance would provide the day care center the same rights commonly enjoyed by other businesses; and, • Planning Commission Resolution 575-99 KinderCare Variance April 7, 1999 • Page 2 WHEREAS, special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant in that the City Code was amended in 1997 to conditionally allow for the operation of day care centers within a business district. The fact that the subject property is zoned residential prevents the business from displaying advertising signage as any other commercially zoned business can; and, WHEREAS, granting the variance requested would not confer on the applicant a special privilege that is denied by this Title to owners or other lands, structures or buildings in the same district in that th applicant is a business distinctly commercial in nature. It is located along Highway 10, the City's primary commercial corridor. It is a commercial operation that operates under an approved conditional use permit. No other types of commercial uses are allowed within a residential district, and as such, KinderCare would not be receiving preferential or special treatment denied to others in this district; and, WHEREAS, the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship, in that the addition of one permanent, freestanding pylon sign is the minimum variance to alleviate the hardship; and, WHEREAS, the variance would not be materially detrimental to the purpose of this Title or to other properties in the same zone in that it is expected that a commercial business such as • KinderCare would be permitted a permanent sign similar to other businesses along Highway 10. The intent of this Code provision is to prevent the intrusion of commercial signage within residential districts. This property is surrounded on all sides by streets, fronts Highway 10, the City's primary commercial corridor, and is surrounded by other commercial uses including Western Bank, Amoco Gas, and the Holiday Stationstore. The proposed sign would be adjacent to Highway 10; and, WHEREAS, the variance would not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood in that the constt uction of a fi eestauding sign-could-not coneeivahlyimpair--the supply of light and air to adjacent properties or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mounds View Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, approves the variance to allow a permanent, freestanding pylon sign for KinderCare, located at 2791 Highway 10. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the dimensional specifications attributed to this approved permanent, freestanding pylon sign shall adhere to the requirements listed in Section 1008.08, Subd 2g, of the Sign Code. • Adopted this 7th day of April, 1999. Planning Commission Resolution 575-99 KinderCare Variance April 7, 1999 Page3 • Jerry Peterson, Planning Commission Chairman ATTEST Rick Jopke, Community Development Director SEAL N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\549-99\575-98A.RES • • REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION • Meeting Date: April 7, 1999 Staff Report by: James Ericson, Planning Associate Planning Case No.: 551-99 Applicant: Dorothee Dietrich Request: The applicant is requesting a variance to construct a garage between the front of the home and the street. Location: 7805 Gloria Circle PIN No. 06-30-23-33-0018 Zoning/Land Use: R-1, Single-Family Residential/ Single family residence Applicable Regulations: Section 1104.01, Subd. 4a(1) states that no accessory building shall be located between 111 the front of the principal dwelling and the front lot line. Section 1125.02, Subd. 2 outlines the criteria to be used by the Planning Commission in its review of variances. Attachments: Planning Application Zoning Map Site Plan Letter from Applicant Resolution 576-99 Background: The applicant, Dorothee Dietrich, is requesting approval to build a garage within the established front setback of her property, which is located at 7805 Gloria Circle. This lot is one of the few lots in the City which border Spring Lake, the City's only natural lake. The Zoning Code prohibits the construction of a garage or any accessory building in the front yard of a residential property. The front yard, as it is defined by the Code, is that area between the front line of the principal structure(house) and the front property line. Because homes on lake lots are typically oriented toward the lake, many communities offer a provision for allowing a garage between the home and the street, as it would be undesirable to • construct the garage between the house and the lake. There are six lots in the City where this becomes an issue, and 7805 Gloria Circle is one of those lots. Dietrich Variance Planning Case 551-99 April 7, 1999 • Page 2 Analysis: Other Cities' Codes: The City of Roseville has adopted language that takes into consideration the existence of lakeshore lots. Their Code states, "Accessory buildings on through lots and lakeshore lots may be located between the roadway and the principal structure,provided said accessory building meets the required front yard setback for the district in which it is located. " Other municipalities within the metro area have similar provisions that allow a garage in the front yard provided the garage meets the required setback for a principal structure. Variance Criteria: For the Planning Commission to grant a variance, it must examine the criteria established in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2, of the City Code, which relates to hardships. Specifically, a variance may only be granted in those cases where the Code imposes undue hardship or practical difficulties to the property owner. The individual criteria, with responses, are as follows: a. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to the property which does not apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since the effective date hereof have had no control. The circumstance which can be construed as extraordinaryrelatingto this request is the • q fact that the this is a lake-front property, one of only six in the City. Locating a garage between the home and the lake would be undesirable and would detract from the lake- front aesthetics. Furthermore, the area between the house and the lake is subject to prohibitive development restrictions. b. The literal interpretation of the provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Title. It is not clear that a literal interpretation of the Code would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in this district. There are only very few examples of garages being located between the house and the street, and most often, this is a result of an older home on a subdivided lot which at one time took access from a different street. c. That the special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. The applicant is clearly causing the condition for which the variance is requested. The basis of the request however is reasonable and logical if one is to preserve and enhance the property's most unique asset, that of the lake-front. Disturbing the lake-front with a • garage would not be preferable and would require the approval of a wetland buffer permit. Dietrich Variance Planning Case 551-99 • April 7, 1999 Page 3 d. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Title to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. The granting of this variance would in effect be a special privilege, but the property itself is unique in its lake-front status and prohibitive development restrictions, which might warrant the approval. e. That the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. Economic conditions alone shall not be considered a hardship. As long as the garage can meet the setback requirements for a structure in a residential district (typically thirty feet) staff would assert that the request is the minimum variance to alleviate the hardship. f. The variance would not be materially detrimental to the purpose of this Title or to other property in the same zone. Granting this variance would not be materially detrimental to the purpose of this Title or • to other properties surrounding 7805 Gloria Circle. Constructing a garage between the house and the lake however may be materially detrimental to the perceived or actual value of the subject property, in that it would take away from the property's aesthetic value and would restrict use and enjoyment of the property's primary amenity--Spring Lake. g. The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. r . _ • - - • •- -•, � �••� • . � •.� '�• e• _ 'Property's Supply-of light or air, there would not be any impact to traffic nor would it increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. It is assumed that there would be no negative impact to property values. According to the City Code, all of the preceding criteria shall be satisfied in order to justify the granting of a variance. As pointed out in the responses, the case can be made for the existence of a hardship with regard to the applicant's request. However, because it is not clear that all of the criteria can be met, the undue hardship requirement may not be satisfied. Resident Comment: As per State notification requirements, staff sent out public hearing notices to • all properties within 350 feet of 7805 Gloria Circle. Of the 28 notices sent, only one phone in comments was received. The caller was concerned about setback issues but was not opposed in theory to the requested variance. Dietrich Variance Planning Case 551-99 April 7, 1999 • Page 4 Wetland Setback Requirements: While there are provisions in place to permit building expansion and location of accessory buildings within the buffer area, the intent is that this area should remain in an undeveloped state to protect and preserve the impacted water feature. Amending the Code: In situations where the Code does not anticipate a given situation or can not be applied to a specific property for reasons of undue hardship or through practical difficulties, there are usually two courses of action to remedy the situation: the property owner can request a variance or request an amendment to the City Code. Amending the Code should be done only in the event that (1) a mistake was made in the Code's original construction, (2) discovery of a situation or condition which was not originally anticipated, or(3) because changing community standards over time warrant such a change. Because there are only six properties in the City to which this condition would apply, amending the Code would not be appropriate. Recommendation: Given the supporting variance criteria and wetland buffer considerations associated with this request, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Resolution 576-99, a resolution approving a variance from Section 1104.01, Subd. 4a(1) of the City Code, to allow for the • construction of a garage between the house and the street at 7805 Gloria Circle, subject to maintaining the appropriate setbacks for a principal structure. James Ericson, Planning Associate N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDE V\DEVCASES\551-99\D-TRICH.RPT • OUNIDO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION • ;1%.1,1 F, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View MN 55112 Afro i''''=s-Partners"'Q' 612-717-4020 612-784-3462 -FAX Please Type or Print Information-Complete Both Sides of This Form Applicant Information Name of Applicant Do t-o4-4 e e 3 i of t'r e k Telephone 672- 717 2d yS Address 7d'O S ( Len-;A. Cit-cLe Fax 14044.14 A U,'e w I1 At SS 11 Z Interest in Property(check appropriate box) X Owner of Property ❑ Contract for Deed Owner ❑ Lessee, Operator,Manager 0 Agreement to Purchase ❑ Other(explain) Applicants must provide evidence of interest in property at the time of application,and if you are not the owner of the property,you must provide a letter of permission from the owner giving consent to the filing of this application. The property owner must sign this application for it to be accepted. • Property Description/Proposal Address or General Location 78o - Gt Lo r i cZ Ci yc le / Legal Description 1-0 1" 1 3L0c1( 1 LR.ASide Cot-cm"- Property Identification#(PIN#) 06 3© 2 3 3 3 OO/8 3 #of Acres x . 5- Current Zoning Type of Application ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment $250 ❑ Rezoning $250/acre; min$250 max$1500 ❑ Major Subdivisi•n $250+$250 d-. * ❑ Minor Subdivision $200 ❑ Planned Unit Development(PUD) Refer to rezoning fees ❑ PUD Amendment $350 O Conditional Use Permit R-1, R-2$75;all others$250 a Variance R-1 R-2$100 all others$250 ❑ Code Appeal 1' __L______-1 `� ❑ Develop Review/Site Plan $125/acre;min$125 max$750 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit R-1,R-2$150;all others$200 ❑ Wetland Buffer Permit R-1,R-2$25;all others$100 ❑ Floodplain Permit $200 o Other • *Deposits shall be paid to cover all costs of public notices,materials and staff or consultant time spent in the review, research or preparation of materials associated with this application. The applicant shall be responsible for all reasonable incurred costs in excess of the initial deposit amount. Any portion of the deposit not spent or encumbered shall be refunded to the applicant within thirty(30)days after consideration of the application is completed. Please complete the reverse side of this application. ' -"- C.) 2. City of Mounds View, MN Development Application Page 2 Present Use of Property • ❑ Undeveloped/Vacant X Single Family Dwelling ❑ Duplex/Two Family Dwelling ❑ Multi-family Dwelling O Business/Commercial Establishment ❑ Industrial Establishment a Other(explain) Property Classification 0 Abstract Torrens Description of Proposal pLemSe see 4.# ached O(OCumy,CKql-sc • BY MY(OUR)SIGNATURE ON THIS APPLICATION,I HEREBY DECLARE THAT,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,THE INFORMATION PROVIDED CD 's ACCURATE. Signature of Applicant (Z) -o G' exeirn‘c Name of Applicant(typed/printed) orc,4-4 e ecb1 hr!Cd Signature of Property Owner c) : - • Name of Property Owner(typed/printed) 'Dora+k e e t e.4-n!c. Address of Owner 78as. t LOf i a Circ Le Mou.tAds View HlU ssitZ Phone Number of Owner 6 12- 717 2.8 ifs- FOR sFOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date of Submittal 3-“- Date --“-Date of Acceptance Assigned to: Planning Case No. j,5 1— of 9\ 60-day Limit 120-day limit Fees Paid: Account# Check# Receipt# Application: 1190.0 0 1 0 a 31f lP c /3 fo2, Park Dedication: Deposits: Other: • Total: N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\FORMS\DEVAPP.FOR 1/98 -.. ... _ • . . • --- -.. .t.,. _ . . , , . . . .. . . . • - . .--,.,„..: : . ......,.. : .. . . . • . . , . . ,-, . . . . . ... .. r. . . . ., ., .„., a ,.. .. , ._ . ..... .. . . , . . • •.. • . ... . .. . • . . ...,,„ •_•,•_ . . ... . . . ., .,. , A . , . • 69Z . I---:. I-• ._..., _ . . . .-: . a . .. , , . :: 4 [ • = 1-4 1 --,.: '''''''''''' ,,,,,,,,,,,4„_--_;..7,•,....,,,,,:., ... . • I 1 E------ __------__-, -,-. / . i / 'pew . . . . . III Ii 1 1 1 / , ...........L................;p„ _ I ii. : /• I.._ I • ) ------....., . i . 1 1 —1 Fs GI° PI 4 i • . . circLe '1 „ .• ,. . _ ..„ ... , ........_..._ E..1------1 , . / . , ,... / L..._._____ __ _I • . ,• . ... • - 0 • - . . .. . Description of Proposal: • I am requesting a variance to be able to build a garage on the part of my lot facing Gloria circle (please see attached sketch of lot). The residence does currently have an attached single car garage. I am planing to turn this attached garage into a family room. Therefore I need to build a new garage. As explained to me by the building inspector, Mounds View zoning requires that garages be either adjacent to the residence or behind the residence, away from the street. However, as you can see on the sketch, my lot is a lake lot on Spring Lake and building a garage between the house and the lake would be undesirable. In addition, that part of the lot is inaccessible when considering the 7 feet setback rule and considering that the width of the lot is 90 feet while the house takes up 65 feet, thus not leaving enough space for a driveway to get to a garage facing the lake. Thus I am requesting that I be allowed to build a garage(24 by 26 in dimension) in the area indicated on the sketch. A garage in the location would not impede with traffic visibility and that part of my lot is certainly large enough to accommodate a garage with lots of room to spare. As you can see on the sketch, my lot is rather large(almost half an acre with the lot dimensions of 90 by 268) and a garage would not dominate that part of the lot. Thank you for considering my request for a variance. • • • LLQ,' j 18040 i i 8 8045 8046 8 J, R—Q 8030 8036 — 4 \\� 8026 a - �O_ 8020 8025 8016 _.8 1� •• 8 7980 8005 8000 Z ( I 7990 7 Q Q i B 7980 CL N 7960 71 4. I 01 N N o 7950 7.1 Y ( � Ico N CON 7934 7c Q o O1 i `r 7932 -40 2 R-3 70 0 L_ _J N 792. . 7897 0 Z w ..tml1 alb N 14Et N M �� 7830 :� 7890 7887 • 7861 N Ft. CL r — -� aso � � :::: 1 :• Will7870 7860 m' N commil850 7821 B l :.m i•- 7860 �•1 c5" ..- n! 7801 8 7850 Ct p cn Y _ Ell R-4 4 ' 7786•'13 7750 .... �u 7769 001, 16....,. BM al ' 7775 7758 7759 7770 :,'..?:".24(k d./.4.... .... r::;......... 7748 7749 7768 7757 7765 p Elm. 7739 7729 Q O 0 78 Ire: 7723 R-2 • ^ _J .�07719_.. . tSpring • . Z 12 • Y .{:::c:.`:i::•:i .`a : .: _ `.`:. 3:i: • N 7710 Y 7709 7710 7711' 770<_. ... ............... :C: N. e w 7692 d' 7685 N 7690 :;:,:::::.:-.:•::1:::::.f. .':r = .. . 7686 7685 cq °0 769 ml-. . 7663 CC 768E N 7680 p 7669 7670 7680 W cv N L' o �/0 7675 7670 7665 7660 o a o 0 766C 7653 'n "� "� M 7655 7666 7647 7644 • 7630 7633 7664 7629 7634, 7635 1 7624 7629 7620 7625 7620. 764 7627 7600 7619 7600 7601 W 7611 > 7604 7585 .7594 7g.7 T. -7=13�r n, ---• 7581 75R(L 7 Zoning Map Planning Case 551-99 Applicant: Dorothee Dietrich Location: 8705 Gloria Circle N4 MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION • RESOLUTION NO. 576-99 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM CHAPTER 1104 OF THE ZONING CODE PERTAINING TO SETBACKS, TO ALLOW AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE BETWEEN THE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE AND STREET AT 7805 GLORIA CIRCLE; PLANNING CASE NO. 551-99 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the variance request of Dorothee Dietrich, property owner of 7805 Gloria Circle; and, WHEREAS, this property is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential, legally described as follows: Lot 4, Block 1, Lakeside Court City of Mounds View, County of Ramsey WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents associated with this request: 1. Planning Application • 2. Zoning Map 3. Site Plans 4. Letter from Applicant WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, may grant variances to specific requirements within the Zoning Code under unique, exceptional or extraordinary circumstances; and, do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since the effective date hereof have had no control, in that this property is one of only six lake-front properties in the city and which property is subject to prohibitive development restrictions; and, WHEREAS, special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant in that the presence of Spring Lake is an important aesthetic and environmental feature which needs to be protected and preserved; and, WHEREAS, granting the variance requested would not confer on the applicant a special privilege that is denied by this Title to owners or other lands, structures or buildings in the same district in that the property itself is unique in its lake-front status and associated prohibitive • development restrictions; and, Planning Commission Resolution 576-99 Dietrich Variance April 7, 1999 II/ Page2 WHEREAS, the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship, in that the variance requested is not based upon a specific distance but rather the physical location of the accessory structure between the house and street which is the minimum variance required to alleviate the hardship; and, WHEREAS, the variance would not be materially detrimental to the purpose of this Title or to other properties in the same zone in that no surrounding properties will be impacted by this allowance as the homes are oriented to take full advantage of the lake; and, WHEREAS, the variance would not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood in that the construction of a garage would not impair the supply of light and air to adjacent properties or possibly increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mounds View Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, approves the variance requested by Ms. Dietrich • to allow for a garage to be located between the principal structure and street at 7805 Gloria Circle. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the proposed garage shall conform to all setback requirements as would be applied to a principal structure and conform to the dimensional requirements for accessory structures in a single-family residential district. Adopted this 7th day of April, 1999. Jerry Peterson, Planning Commission Chairman ATTEST Rick Jopke, Community Development Director • SEAL N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDE V\DEVCASES\5 51-991576-9 8 A RES PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION 0 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA March 17, 1999 Mounds View City Hall • 2401 Highway 10, Mounds VwA0, MN 55112 ....el 4v ,. '7:;r4,,k, \ <•, 1. Call to Order k,:' ,f..,..„;..< k.‹..:, ,`,,%'.,`' '• , . The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Peters.jt „'t 7:00..March 2. Roll Call . Vs--',.;• ,1" Members Present: Chairperson Peterson, Commission r fSteV--` -st,gta4t son, Berke, Laube, , ' -g;,.1, . Hegland, Miller and Kaden. Members Absent: Commissioner Braathen h. § S.'f' Agri4ttaksence. f , ,';',41.4.t, Also Present: Community Developmentt?'rector 4" Jo- Pfftd Tanning Associate Jim i Ericson. 1111r,„ a , ,-.;=`, 3. Citizens' requests and coin q s on th tf ems Ng on the agenda 4, • • 41,„ ,, .,",,, There were.,"ts,citizens re,40 `if commert',\Tip, , f,:o that were not on the agenda. eitin, 4414.41,4k,,• ';':-.40,. .t4., Index to Mum Arpu 'too,- Page . Plannint-k,ase No. 57 '',,,41.$A--,,t t,t ional Use Permit Request, Linder's , -1' ‘,.< ,10.,w-- Gr-,:- ouses. Mounds f `,WitZf$1 are Shopping Center, 2523 Highway 10. 2 .,. • _ ,,,,,k- S ViReports/Items of If ormation 2 Public Hearin. in .... ,,,,, , .:. 'lanning . --:, o. 550-99, 5302 Raymond Avenue, Variance •,,vgim....• . ...?,..r se No. 549-99, 2791 Highway 10, Variance ' 1Dri Illren . Case No. 551-99, 7805 Gloria Circle, Variance - 0 Mounds View Planning Commission March 17, 1999 • Regular Meeting Page 2 4. «... ..µ�, Planning Case No. 548-99 ' 2523 Highway 10 '., Consideration of Resolution No. 573-99, a Resolution Rec. . $ .ndati ; $ ', ..al of a Conditional Use Permit for an Outdoor Flower Mart. ,: Applicant: Linder's Greenhouses X`r The applicant was not present. Planning Associate Ericson reviewed this case explainirthat X` ,. `': received a conditional use permit for this use at this site for the last five ye. . :r e repo `'- ,, $Yse have been no tet.. problems associated with this use during that ti *�; -_€, on to sa` '$ / only two percent of the parking is used while the City Code requ' . >>€:. 0` ..outdo• , ales and service uses shall not exceed 30 percent of gross floor <X' . of th-F voti:kt,,,,,i, added that Linders is about two percent of Mounds View Sq i , takinL • 12 .-*Alioe parking lot. The flower mart would operate from about ApriF .. o July He addill at the water for the use is obtained from the nearest hydrant <'°f• . e fees: the watland the appropriate deposits for the • needed equipment are paid to th- "y acco,Ligly. He ded that there has been to impact on the residents 1 areas. He w- o>. :o info AA ffi $44d<ion that Linder's has requested that condition.., ,.ermit co $... -,A •roved .$ $ $ ttively from year to year versus going through �: . the condi ` vvy perms .gf.� a .ch time: explained that the resolution before them does not put an",. i F :date o r_ ;.. tional use permit, but added that one of the conditions state that if there a 41:9,,,t-.4_es or10#:_ ,,. elated to this case, that it would be brought back before the Cit e ad .l ' the other conditions noted in the resolution are the same as in;$ i, •" :,$e pro tided to review them. He added that the conditional use . .. „o.:,,na ac the condi .._ . - . . . • u- . - 'nformed the Com sion.that Minne . :z" '; " tes indicates that this resolution would be valid. Taj °lanning Commiss' ,made a couple of revisions to the proposed resolution: Item 5, Page 2, &.: ff.nged to "....hy$ t wrench and adapter valve..."; Item 8, Page 3, be changed by adding ' ;<. ,; .`VL: sewed bb. Planning Commission and the City Council..." (Is this okay?) i"*��V " -0 0 Johnson/Hegland to approve Resolution No.573-99 as amended, Resolution Recommending to the City Council Approval of the Conditional Use Permit Request by Linder's Greenhouses, Moundsview Square; Planning Case No. 548-99. Ayes - 8 Nays - 0 II Motion Carried. Mounds View Planning Commission March 17, 1999 • Regular Meeting Page 4 5. if Staff Reports /Items of Information tk . Associate Ericson explained that Staff would be announcin hien u e : ' 49 �"`A p �,. p �.; �t = blic hearings would be held, especially since meetings would now be cal -casted. H< " : ,,::hearings _' 44, would be set at a prior Planning Commission meeting, pf: bly undeT'; a .' ;::.' <..:. He • 6-460 informed the Commission that the following public heari • '> woul held on - r° w9, h a. Planning Case No. 550-99, 5302 Raymond A44;i* 4v vivAr. v ` ''n;,� < , U 4114' .s Setback Variance b. Planning Case No. 549-99, 2791 Highway 10, : '. s ign Variance 00, c. Planning Case No. 551-99, 7805 Gloria Ciro 0 iet >. . o F"�'- Setback Variance ANWOON , t:.:oi, 6. :. :;3:.;;:3jyX9A':.:H kr Chairperson and Planning Commissioner R .` f= ,1:,:` t :. eY There were no Chairperson or Planning ,>r `mmissitr repay 8 .s a • AW 7. :..: q Adjournments pa The mee. aw 'ad our k t m. RPi Respectfully1 3.. IP ,%gbiOrizeR, Ric ` :•pke W g t s CI.: !1g unity Developme birector Aikw< :1\USERS\BARB. a"-= f . \KEEP-IT\WPDOCS\MIN[JTES\1999\03-17-99.WPD tiONOWIWAveir y. •