Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-19-1999 PuhtL, !Cr0 • MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION May 19, 1999 7:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETING AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM, AND GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES 4. Approve Minutes: a. April 21, 1999 5. Planning Case No. 553-99 Property Involved: 7386 Parkview Terrace Consideration of a variance request for a reduced side yard setback for a three- season porch. Applicant: Mike& Sandy Leon 6. Staff Reports/Items of Information a. Billboard Update b. Previous Council Action 7. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports 8. Adjournment to Agenda Meeting (Immediately Following Regular Meeting) * * * * ** * * * * * * * * *** * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * APPLICANTS: YOUR ATTENDANCE AT THIS MEETING IS REQUESTED. PLEASE NOTIFY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AT 717-4020 IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND. THANK YOU. * ** * * * * ** **** * ** *** * * ** * * * * * ** * * *** ** * * AGENDA SESSION AGENDA 1. Review Minutes --May 5, 1999 N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\PLANCOMM\PCAGENDA\1999\5-19-99.REG • REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Meeting Date: May 19, 1999 Staff Report by: James Ericson, Planning Associate Planning Case No.: 553-99 Applicant: Michael & Sandy Leon Request: The applicant is requesting a reduced side yard setback to allow for a porch addition in place of an existing deck Location: 7386 Parkview Terrace PIN No. 07-30-23-13-0056 Zoning/Land Use: R-1, Single Family Residential/ Single Family Dwelling Applicable Regulations: Section 1104.01, Subd. 3, regarding Setbacks: All principal structures shall have a • setback from sideyard lot lines of at least ten feet. Section 1125.02, Subd. 2 outlines the criteria to be used by the Planning Commission in its review of variances. Attachments: Planning Application Zoning Map Surveyor's Certificate Proposed Porch Plan Proposed Porch Elevation Letter from the Contractor Letter from Affected Neighbor at 7390 Parkview Terrace Background: The applicants, Mike and Sandy Leon, are requesting a variance from the required ten-foot side yard setback established for principal buildings and living space therein. They would like to replace an existing 10 x 12 square foot deck with a three-season porch of the same size in the same location. The deck, which has existed since the construction of the house, is five feet from the north side of the property. Decks require a minimum two foot side yard setback. The subject property is located in the Silver Lake Woods single family home development at the • northeast corner of County Road H2 and Silver Lake Road. The home, which faces east, is one of many in this development that have a street at the front (Parkview Terrace) and back(Silver Lake Road) of the property. The lot size of this property is only 9,150 square feet. I Leon Variance Planning Case No. 553-99 May 19, 1999 • Page 2 Analysis: As with any variance application, for the Planning Commission to act favorably, there must be a demonstrated hardship or practical difficulty associated with the property which makes a literal interpretation of the Code overly burdensome or even restrictive to a property owner. State statutes require that the governing body review a set of specified criteria for each application and make its decision in accordance with these criteria. These criteria are set forth in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2, of the City Code. The Code clearly states that a hardship exists when all of the criteria are met. The individual criteria, with responses, are as follows: a. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to the property which do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since the effective date hereof have had no control. Staff could not discern any exceptional circumstances applicable to this property. b. The literal interpretation of the provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Title. • While the literal interpretation of the Code would not prohibit the property owners from building a porch, because of the setback requirement, the porch could only be seven feet deep. c. That the special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. The variance request is the result of the applicants' desire to construct a three season porch. d. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Title to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. While three-season porches and other like living space additions are allowed in this district and are a desirable property improvement, not every property has room to accommodate such an expansion, especially in a side yard. e. That the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. Economic conditions alone shall not be considered a hardship. The property owners wish to replace an existing deck with the porch. If the porch were to • be constructed observing the proper setbacks, it would only be seven feet deep--not enough room for a table and chairs. Leon Variance Planning Case No. 553-99 • May 19, 1999 Page 3 f. The variance would not be materially detrimental to the purpose of this Title or to other property in the same zone. The purpose of the Code with regard to setbacks is that living space shall maintain a greater setback from the property lines than an accessory building (shed or garage) which requires a five-foot setback; or a deck, which requires a two-foot setback. The rationale is that living space is a more intensive use. Approving a reduced setback without suitable hardship would compromise the intent of the Code. g. The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood A porch at the reduced side yard setback would probably not impair a supply of light or increase congestion, nor would it increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or diminish property values. According to the City Code, all of the preceding criteria shall be satisfied in order to justify the • granting of a variance. After much analysis, it appears to staff that in this case there is no hardship, unless the Planning Commission were to take into consideration that the lot area is substandard. (The lot is 75 feet wide by 122 feet deep, for an area of 9,150 square feet, substantially less than the required 11,000 square feet.) Yet the width of the property--75 feet-- does comply with the Code,and it is a matter of property width, not depth or area, which is basis for this variance. Silver Lake Woods PUD: This lot was approved in 1985 as part of the Silver Lake Woods 2nd Addition subdivision and in conjunction with the Silver Lake Woods Planned Unit Development agreement. While density bonuses and reductions in frontage requirements were given to the development to allow for substandard lots, no mention is made in the documentation about allowance for reduced setbacks. Resident Comment: Staff sent out the required public hearing notices to properties within 350 feet of 7386 Parkview Terrace. The property owners to the north, Ken and Ann Stagg of 7390 Parkview Terrace, who would be most affected by this request, have provided a letter in which they indicate their support for this request. Options: A. Direct staff to prepare a resolution approving a variance for a reduced side-yard setback to • allow for the construction of a three-season porch five feet from the side property line. 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • '` DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View MN 55112 die"t,-r,r«els$1.4.' 612-717-4020 612-784-3462 -FAX / Please Type or Print Information-Complete Both Sides of This Form Applicant Information / / r / / Name of Applicant /'�jG1,az �IferA?d' Zen// Telephone(6;i2.. 475 0 3`i 71 Address '73 S6 /`q:ekal 4c Fax /41 oft4,K.0/a. , Interest in Property(check appropriate box) XOwner of Property 0 Contract for Deed Owner ❑ Lessee, Operator,Manager ❑ Agreement to Purchase ❑ Other(explain) Applicants must provide evidence of interest in property at the time of application,and if you are not the owner of the property,you must provide a letter of permission from the owner giving consent to the filing of this application. The property owner must sign this application for it to be accepted. Property Description/Proposal • Address or General Location 3 86' !D 1 V%..?Anl 1 y� Legal Description ` O+ l(7 ( i k I Si j u N Lake woo 4 Property Identification#(PIN#) Or? —30 — )-3 —13- 0©5 Cs -- y #of Acres Current Zoning Type of Application ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment $250 ❑ Rezoning $250/acre; min$250 max$1500 ❑ Major Subdivision $250+$250 deposit* ❑ Minor Subdivision $200 ❑ Planned Unit Development(PUD) Refer to rezoning fees ❑ PUD Amendment $350 ❑ Conditional Use Permit R-1, R-2$75;all others$250 X. (Variance;: R-1, R-2$100 all others$250 0 Code Appeal $100 ❑ Develop Review/Site Plan $125/acre;min$125 max$750 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit R-1,R-2$150;all others$200 ❑ Wetland Buffer Permit R-1,R-2$25;all others$100 ❑ Floodplain Permit $200 ❑ Other *Deposits shall be paid to cover all costs of public notices,materials and staff or consultant time spent in the review, • research or preparation of materials associated with this application. The applicant shall be responsible for all reasonable incurred costs in excess of the initial deposit amount. Any portion of the deposit not spent or encumbered shall be refunded to the applicant within thirty(30)days after consideration of the application is completed. Please complete the reverse side of this application. City of Mounds View, MN Development Application Pagel Present Use of Property • ❑ Undeveloped/Vacant X, Single Family Dwelling ❑ Duplex/Two Family Dwelling ❑ Multi-family Dwelling O Business/Commercial Establishment 0 Industrial Establishment ❑ Other(explain) Property Classification 0 Abstract ❑ Torrens �' ' Descript'on of P oposal GUL W `S 1 / `/./ 0,6t. e �./.�"�iv (l� �/0 /Z� OYi t. OU2 rraM/A - 3 5' ,1 A /i �.� /k. BY MY(OUR)SIGNATURE ON THIS APPLICATION,I HEREBY DECLARE THAT,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ,IISTRUE AND ACCURATE. Signature of Applicant / J Q,'1 A &c r N Name of Applicant(typed/printed) Ai‘ Signature of Property Owner Name of Property Owner(typed/printed) (hI/-1 ' £ LP 0�✓ • Address of Owner 7;3( r k U r`& ) /E'. 4Jk.C..( filts tbktic 4../1.,1,.r" Gas/ 63-5-- /K Phone Number of Owner �J 8b J 3'0 • ""{' �J0 r (,- 0 Y J ' /4)a.-10x/4)a.-10xIZD�_sJ ****************************************************************** *** ***** `**********' FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date of Submittal 9 9 Date of Acceptance Assigned to: Planning Case No. $'5 3 •9 9 60-day Limit 120-day limit Fees Paid: Account# Check# Receipt# Application: f 0 0 • OC Too 3 16 ..IL J ) I'('1 21-04 Park Dedication: Deposits: Other: - Total: • N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\FORMS\DEVAPP.FOR 1/98 7759'///0 7749 vt50 30. fIi 10 771E 7715 co coo7711 ,770c N N i R-2 P 4co 7692 9 .1 • NI'; ' ; N N m 2 ',2 G', 2553 7692 N7690 PUD CO ui n u, nin CO ICILON N pN Nn "MpB-3 NNNN NNNNN 2551- 9 7670IIIIA] � ID 2255449p 76E 7660 g 2545 7644 o B-3 eA B-4 2541 N � 2539 I 7634. 7635 iiii N 2537• 7620_ ivttP • 7600 7601 till SILVER VIEW . 1,._ 7594 7575 N o Q'' y P 7588 n n N ... B-2 �' PARK N i,- 7584 Dnal N.' N.O' CO.' ,. 5 75728 et to 'ma°,m .:. B— W� (D p M 'N N 1�,'i' 5 7560:uasi o.,N N.3n co ccoo 5 N N N N Ni'm 0, coOro J� A I MNOVIIr n N p N J N 2,1 N IS 7532 _..CO o o w '.'N N N M p«N ���... DRIVE N—N 0(0 �y�✓i. .' ► N Si' N $NNI r7.-j��j 4'1��\" f0 O 2 N J 7485 1 MI 1 4,'14 ., to , ro.c2o N .........:... .,s?ko N N V N N p co t0 4 ®E ' _ N N N ON N+'N BRON - co 0 ' lailowt _I. tsit ° i 7415Ilin ti gill, lia, N ...... ........................ p 7409 jig745 41: ;: Td „ R 7 N r•:' 7329 7395 7400own /329 7390 ® N N N '?n rn N M H!D �V iO c'�o ; p q _ N N N •, 1111 ISM 7350 � �� 44 n `W100111 t= •111-.1111.11=11111 �� p co co 0 co 3277. m:ah,7630 gli / p co co N 325 N �� N N N ■►t ■����■-}]]T�■y��]�l]�kii 7310 ����, . .. R-4 N • ;. R-2 pp N o 7295 ;. ®� coowwo i N N N B 1 �� c0�1�0���in N NNNNNN B i � . g52 � lir �_ �11 ® n 11"_1314_11111111Ei�.zi7 526 �■ 60 Pi�lii ISIMAl©©Isil©Lii���Laaaa� 5260 LOUISA AVE f 0 51785177 0 sr o N co 1 v OT ml N 1 W a' O'DO 525 7250 p 0 ��Q coo is m m m cNo co m cn O 524 .4• W •O N N N '. N N N N N N N Cl 0 5,76517,>�a� '") I m ui r7 rn 1 , ro w Z D M M N N W W ��� N , N N N N N N N, N N N N v.1r� "�its� 5174517:A®� CLEARVIEW AVE 7191 R-4 5172 617' ■�U r 7.'���]UUULIuuE N PF 5230 EU ELI- Lill] ._ 718 5170 ELIFI®®U®U®B®®®®EIIIIIL 5169 illinunne 5168 5167 230_..., 'IDLE t0 N p p O m b b N - O 5166 5165 ®� 5212 521 N 521 5212 m m m 8 8 2 to N _(y rr N �DR� m gY 51645163Q ® Z NN��NN NN�N N 52C 11____i n I N I o �, a 5208 5206 5207 5206 5207 5206 0 0 P O 0 __ Fta�a�a,0 5205 S Zoning Map Planning Case 553-99 Applicant: Mike & Sandy Leon NLocation: 7386 Parkview Terrace IO uy m l98.59_ •...g•: 98. 9 ! ` • W 11 1 Ri 1V � � ill a) 104.3') / J o.4( w �/. p, .3. I4.- • 8 4.41 `� _~ _ 0 '� _ hi RIVE 4 ", C4. t, —.-AGE — — ,`150 •1 t Ra. s Rs6033,� ob I° \rte — . (48) o 51 w` ,�. ►014 -•-'/974 ;'I za. il, J ,.(.+g7S' T.:.,29.Ss.�\, 0Z.,.3'S:._-- � ' ebs 1.91K�',ti -2 43' 92 S 1(44)- t 1 41 (6) _ ,07 "r 9 0 (4 (.6.o7s Iib C,) " a 6 ° 7 in : �_ 4.- , . .ikr-4o 133.3' M r-1oo '� • . o P . o DRli°q3 � � �` RK V �W c4 �,.� ,.'Z° 1 ..-- — _ '�4&o,56 60 5 06 0 9 Cis) •� 6° . . (4s) . o (52)' 1/4.53 85.0...: 8(33) o c° o Cis) w r-1 CJI 0' IA (3�) Cu) 3 N 1 a 2 4 ' S s 32.' Nil •o: to O ��Al W ` It8.04 9781 a5`�'ti 7D 1 S O 'i`(15) •r'O (¢¢) WI/1i (o3S 9Z 90,93 143a s 4 ap y�.9 ... ..i...: 0 4 (� L. ' IN 6 ^ 06)`fa _d lel • 5.1 �[�IA3s •9R. •0. 3 a. Ol ( 9 116.18 'A , h e 4 n 4HODGES LANE ,2 6' a -6/. 24.9 119 J. RA3 ?1.0,9 67)9 1 M 7(53) b 0 (4.) c '6). a (4 ) ,S' ,. 'Zs.' ., .I1. D CX 2 -'a. 2- 3 °' i, i,.. . 126.06. i • I r .N. 43 ) tT X (5.4 0 liii 9? ,3)— .71 ` C3A) 1 `9 TER t' 3 3 too.c, I 43o)." s�76 3.6� 78,1°1 4as ��� o D. . 49� ' CO)� (47) vo_ (zz)5 14 (20 IA I SP�� o 0 3 ' 2 = 1 - .a, = 4 14� - (38 a • 131.45 9%34 9O loo I 0 - •• •• 2co.G 33 , ( 420 . ..�. . - _ -. COU N TY6� ':7 - - - - Plat Map Planning Case 553-99 Applicant: Mike & Sandy Leon N4 7 Location: 7386 Parkview Terrace • . C40ALVIN H. HEDLUND 7726 MORGAN AVE. SO. MINNEAPOLIS, MINN: 55423 Surveyor Civil Engineer PHONE NO. 866-2523 „s?cceio-, Survcqor? Ccrak JOB NO. /003, --' SURVEY FOR: MARVIN II. ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION CO. DESCRIBED AS: Lot 10, Block 1, SILVER LAKE WOODS 2ND ADDITION, City of Mounds View, Ramsey County, Minnesota reserving the drainage and utility easements as shown on the 1— record plat thereof. �c0/e 0'7/4----"To'' .S/Z/,�`i j-' _4% 44 , 24 ) • pdS" qas- -,;-?,1/2,-,-;,/:,2 �xi("A- -- _---- 1`(\l„,1 lh:1:1 0n /� j 111 .l It r Al° ..‘ . ./..\.,. ride ,N\.. 0„, _ /1 .1°'5 \. ..‘ ki..\ N'• . . z -i,,/-,, ,,,,e; / .7 ..""'':,\— ' . 's . '' T-,---+—:---::: :.. F.'71 lj _ it.4-' i .-?.T4.. . :'..`, .6 -... A . :-:-.25 -7 IC} ‘Aile• ; :� 19 1 ,ti ii, • i3 El . ,, . >` _:ty `:• \ , , .-•t---v ri t1 � l ' `' 'ti TJ N N N � '` ,X\‘ '. . re, a� c�3 -M 0f�.a to ,,, 'Cl N N C� � � l� s°-. t. EI n, 'i E1. 9_ ____7 _1 M 0— : ill 0_ r celvace-..---e-6:7411.4.40/g 1i II 74o.x.e • o p) 11'rAIK. C TIC.;,._r..CC"!).1;ill".;, /�i 7 k/i57/ i%`% I2'(. �! 1 • ScEnTIFICATJ Of 5U VEY ' I hereby certify that on 5/6/87 I surveyed the property described above and that the above plot is a correct representation of said survey. • / Aff,���� �Lode!/ Calvin H. Hedlund, Minn. Reg. No. 5942 . _ . . ': :. • ::',..; •."' ..'..i;.; :•,.'.;. .4 fl!........7- . .- . - P• I'do‘. 1 • . . . ,•,. • ,•• . ,•:•::. . ,•••.,...„.. , ••,, . . • • . .. . • . ,, .•,• , , . .. . • • . . ... . , . . . . .. , • ,. .,,,',,-,..,....• • . -k is Q) n •. . . ci.. .kt . -4 . . a . , .. . . , . . . .: .. • ,JII. , . . . , . . . .. . • . • . . . - • . .. , . . . ,•• . . . . . • . .....-, • .T.-,..... .. t• ...lis„.. . .... '''' 't111111 • • . . • . ....,.. ................d.,.. • . . , , . I ..- • . . •. . f'''''''"--4'4 \ • . . • ,.. i'.. , • .. , 11. ,, - --, - - • . • 11111 I • - .,...t.. . • gr4 IA.! j; . ii.. It'I • . . ' v.!.`'.. . • •za 1.. :. / 1 " • " - 1 ilr{.. .• ; ,.. . . .::: . .. . I I I • --7,:!. ,,.. . .. • ... :,.. .• • k , . . 0 011111310 Iii:',: t. • 3 - • - I ,.• 1,, .....-8 . . I. . • P. i I • • ; . dill I ' - 11 IP'I' .•'.' - :.- • ' ' • . • ' • ' ' \ \0,,,,‘,.......iiI'J•I I' ill.. ;Al 4::.''.:.; .;;,.:•t4.44. 11111141:1111.11:111111'. . . I ik •r•i, .tr.q1r101.' ,l'",,g' : , • • iik,..(1-- t . '').-",:::: i• • . 111111 ri„...:, M41 • • r•. 1 . . . . . • -, 64 •-3-• ..• . . • ,. " . • Se • ill'II . .. • . , .'..;,.!.. , . r 11, . 1.11111111111.1 . liMillal . • . • .1 • !i,f)' ' •::-'.: II."'" "' - " ' •- • • e. • . ...- .. • ,:. , .t%.: ,f ... • I II nlitaimik . i 0 .. • . • ••• " i . . , Hi i ,• .i. .. .... , ... oil i.,... . ..„• , . 1, . ........,. :, ; . Ili „...!.:.... , ... ._.....7.,...... ... .7-7:--- .7-.*.":" ,,-".,-..7:7.-;".! '",-. ..'2.7•-•-.77.:n:..:'.;‘: 1::.. ,',-..1M , I - 1, ., - !....- .-.;:i • ..,!:";..."' ' .-.."•- i'.., :•:•'': :',I.., ' :;-.1:-. ; k ,, ! -'l.' ').. .1' .• f:I'' . .;,. •' ;."'' -..i:;1* • :' . .. . . 11 .' '. '• ' '. h i - • ' . .-.',.:: ., '. .'• .."- , .. ' '. .•...• ... .. ., :. . *.i. •, ; :; :,. . i'?'.;,• ., ,'..., ; • i,:', .i.',C;..',. .:::": .;.••••N . . ' . . illill ". — . . • -,,/. e i ...:. - „: . :: , ,. , .-. .. - . , :-, .. .. A ) t. ! • . ... . . . I-. I-. ! .? • ':. ' : t , ,`• :II ••-i: • " I I 1 1 RigaINIMI , 1 , !• ; I . - - . • .7.'•I. . l. 1,.. 1, ;'. 'TS 1.11.1.(14414i7361111....11.ft,.,1 '.'.!,' -1'• .,... Tvr,11.44?..Alt )!VilitaT ,!_... . :•:. . ,•: • • • • ire ' iribi , .. iii it , ...; .:.,.:4':.:11!.10611111,11!..1: i. • ......t.,!*•'-...*.,, • ' . , - • Iftit:0 .! . '• , -. t ,. .0 iligiosiN . .. ,.: :-.•. , • • , .. ,-. - , , ." ..• oitt.,,,, ats.,nrafgaudiactuir i •, •... • :I 1,101.taa:S.11 . 4. :..: , . . ...• . . . , , . - ,PC,,,t•ctl, . 9.,........!..,...;:.,',; :iii;fliftiiiiialfalfraliOizsii. f .: ,%.,:: 14101411F441113.1 ,!, ..,.0. . ' • , . I 1 i it 111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111:11111;1:1:1111 / i ..'il.....- - . - 'd • • . I 111111111 . . ps,, ,I • i 'L thIL11,3 IA i . Ruhi,,i -,;,..i 1 i ::-..'..it.. .. ..,.,....'..'_.';, • •: i . ... . • .' . . • • ' . . . ,. . ., . „. ,. ;If; 2ni,; p j . ill.iiiiii,... ill 1 ..., i 11111 ,. , WO Illi . 1,11:111)111iiii, i,:;.„.;f..:;.1.(A.-7 ....;:,i.•,. :., . . .!:: • 1 :111fiki • 1 I[ I . ', 1 , ,, . . ,,, . • ,.,. t• i ,'' • • ' Ottli , . . I ii . i I ' 1 ' ' 1 ' 1 1 11 1 , iii;,,,,ioitli.iii ' , :e.:,..,:;,:,..,11'..... :;;!,16.:\''.'1:*::.:.., .•'. . ' .. .. . , : I . 1 . .. .. I , ; 1 illill •1.1. , i , 1 i v.'d.. .411 . ..(,-• ... - • , . ,, -, •..,: .t .' , ,I,. ""'"- .--.:-- ',- -,,,,-iterlgicyliketro,t,,:.,i,tit..51,,,c,,r pit, 4 N4,3.1;-,i ., '..; .: 1 io tititriiatl.t!t1-::.",}ii3. ..,::,..i.... . a)•• • : 1 .!••'1'.•. • :.;.:,‘ I 114 ,,,itra. .,. .. :. _ 4iiii... -ist fi, T. ,,•-; I/ .,-1 ,i •' .,.:141;,!' ', 1 1..ki.Wir4 ilik44 kill Oil MI ril 4 1 . ' 1 1 °:."' 1 , 1•'', :'•'I"'' 'r . • . . , . . •,:,.-,' .,%.,. .....1.„s„ C.1.1:44,11.1VIViriffart4,1*.ctis s : •.‘...! i ''..1.''''.''''•''''', 4'!•.! .ii.* ;;:-I,...:::1,,1'. . • • , . • •• *. .. 1: 5;,•:::. ii• ... ; r i 1; I 1.1. 1. - ' • . . . iiitP,t11'11,,:74. it • •:'!: : , ...i •I.1.•'; : ' ..... .... • 1 • 1 ...1 , . . . , : i I • : ••.f.1 .k ..., ..1 . . .• ,,'1, i ••4 i ! • . . , . . i . . . ..• \ • c • ,,:.'', ,.. 11111 .--•;111:.• li' . ..: .:.: .....'. .11 : . .'I ,(.!•;'.'.?..:::.'{I'' ' '.tL: i : . . ,. . • ' . . .• 111. S. 1 • ,....,, .1,I. • ". . tilitill • I ,, law . • •i -. .... . ' . .i.$., ,•1,.; ,,,, : .. ,17.7$7,*I,4,...l 1...1., ,ff: ,4,,,:.....,..s.clif .. • i : - • l' i. .!. , .. . • .. ' .':.' /I ''..1 '''\ '; '''' : . i 1 INI 'tlillinniff ;, •:.. ' "'...•••• • . . lialNialgariSli . :. .. 1. ' le . .• i . ",.. i!. • •0.',„.r..., '. s •; ; .... ........t.'"."."'""..rr.I'tn'.`:r............ : ... '.7'G'•• .. - • ! • .. . . .. . ' . • . .l '2":.: ' ..' • " • 111111111111Ili. .... • 41 • I • . . ,•' • .' .1. . . ..... • '. . i•-•4., , : ..., . •• .!.. ...tri, „, ,..„ . J.I.,,, r...1,-,.., . .r .„. ,. , .. 41 , .. . . tt . . . • .. . .. ...... . .._ ,.,. .,A,.. ... ,.: , .; , . ,..... ....,,, ,....;....,, , . I,'.• • •: i.-. '. 't . • . • • ' Thivo u-Pac. 2Q4. Ti2GtSSef a C. Le-0 IQ gs t'c ►,c Cr._._ u"O s r3 i le A4. -v t -r-2 Rao ' S i"'f �fi @S V4s a . 30 ib -zoo-r ---FQ i'l— y �J e p_.,-/q ttos S 1\Nq )�- J y / J 5& streGlIZOL� I ax& Sf14ds I b"0 c O R It .walk Nsct d-t',01.4 • Bu.; t Ai it rLe Ni L1.442 A limi i N tA4A.. i i N i, �, Stl.Qef'2o Com- �R s • 3A;(..1 TG- R ta" !NS - �\NI/RX/©,ois /61/ 0. C. .../M... I,/ E so d; i) w�� 4-,,,, k_ • ' ' I . . : 1/0111 ' . e, r/inOtk 7n�i,:'�tcp . r f • "0 - -i MwM r-I0 OC 0) m wpm ODQ °. Mos < < Z 0) p0 Z7JZ azo 12' C In 2648-2W `o 2648-2W —11l fill II m m - u) x m -I 0 M 7 n 5 I vC2 = z z, o 0 Z - O O • X o M /\ 2448 2448 y 0 z ozm 7J0C 0w0. - rn D 0 m c � m z •p Y N 1 M CA Z n X • A O • EEarlOQTCTEI remodeling 215 old highway 8 sw. • p.o. box 120388 new brighton, mn 55112 • (612) 633-8611 minnesota building contractor id #0002624 . April 23, 1999 City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View,MN 55112 RE: Proposed variance for Mike& Sandy Leon 7386 Parkview Terrace Mounds View,MN 55112 To Whom It May Concern: The Leons have been residing at the above referenced address for the past several years. They currently wish to add a porch on to their home. II If you refer to the attached floor lans; ou will see that the onl lace for them to add on p Y YP is to the north. Adding a porch on to the rear(west)of the home is impossible because it would deny the homeowner convenient access, as this is where all the bedrooms are located. Access would mean going through a bedroom. On the south side of the house is the garage; there is no way to add a porch on there. Finally,to the front(east), the house is currently at a 32' setback,thus not allowing any additional room to add on. That leaves us with the north side. Currently,there is a 10' X 12' deck off the existing dining room. The Leons propose to add on a 10' X 12' porch(the exact size of the existing deck),thereby not encroaching any further towards the north property line than currently exists. ., It is our understanding that Mounds View zoning code allows a 5' side yard set back for a deck, but a minimum of a 10' sideyard set back for finished space. Therefore, we'are requesting a variance to allow the Leons to construct the proposed porch additio .-- • ak 414 /?1ThmN4.4484' „, ®sp�5 =AI ,,k , i nx REMODELN/C IN�USTRV we.rsww�.wwwn+ 144 Rernoaelou a division of timbercraft enterprises, inc. BUILDtdE TVA V CITIES • In conclusion,we feel that the Leons should be allowed to have a porch on their home; due to the design of their house and it's layout on the lot, the only place to locate the new porch would be on the north side. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Pelir J. lowski CGR Pr side ; • 110 S April 21, 1999 City ofMoundsView 2401 Highway 10 • MoundsView,MN. 55112 Attention: Planning Commission Re: Proposed variance for porch addition at the Leon residence at 7386 Parkview Terrace,MoundsView,MN. 55112. Dear Commissioners, We are the neighbors directly next door,to the north of the Leons. The Leons proposed addition will be adjacent to our south property line. Mr. and Mrs. Leon have met with us and shown us the plans for the porch addition. We understand that they are asking for a variance to build their porch with a five foot set • back from their north(our south)property line. We want to express our support for this project, and see no reason why the Leons should not be granted this variance. Sincerely, '73g0 Park-View reic e MoRyids v;evv, rnrS 6-S-11 - 411, -s 1• • PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting May 5, 1999 Mounds ,Af` City Hall 2401 Highway 10, '€: nds:r, 'ew, MN 55112 1. Call to Order '''z The meeting was called to order at 7:04 p.m., May 5, 1 e�: o, Sinoth Chairpe .8e :- and Vice Chairperson Stevenson were absent, consensus wa - <,0_,i,, to designate Co toner Miller to Chair the meeting. 2. Roll Call ' Members Present: Interim Acting Chairperson ,i,jriMit t issioner ' ; e, Hegland, Johnson, Kaden, and Laube. rp ,3 >.... and Stevenson with prior tir Members Absent: Chairperson Petersonommis finer Br.::..5:" $�k' notice. m = t: ,4. Also Present: Community Deve ijos ent Di 0 .,•r Ric opke, Council Liaison Roger Stigney, and RecordersC.g la Wirth and. ', "earson. ` r A,..;.. Index to i;# 4*%4; ,A Page ti Staff Reports, „ ff atioi' ' 2 Chairp ,>.on and Plannint i: `` `:' sioners Reports 5 :. Citizens' Req, i. .is and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda D -x,� ,..,:,*'4,r comments on items not on the agenda were considered. 4. pp oval of Minutes A. April 7, 1999 MOTION/SECOND: Laube/Johnson to approve the April 7, 1999 meeting minutes as presented. • I Mounds View Planning Commission May 5, 1999 • Regular Meeting Page 2 Ayes- 6 Nays - 0 The motion carried. 5. Staff Reports /Items of Information µ : A. Billboards 5 ' Community Development Director Jopke explained the `'ncil has 4 d th`,4414.41,z,;,' 'w . Commission to continue to look into and make recomm= .tion .rQi -a'whether bi ' fi i 'd be allowed and what process should be used if it is determi ;�� '$: >$ "Y e City wants to'• ., •i lboards at the golf course. He stated that he was not a"fan" of b'` �: '`::4:4,,,,,,,,,d has serious misgivings about granting variances to allow billboards on the golf t1` * a' ;thr sites in Mounds View. He stated he believes this would constitute a use varia 'i - whic VI •,:g �. ed by State Statutes. He suggested, as an alternate method of addressing t,... . ' the City` z ' :: :"� ermit billboards, that they consider a Code amendment. Jopke stated if the City wishes to procee• ,4t.--" pprov ,ill .'<t -":' ould recommend the Code be amended to allow billboards by condi R`•nal use rmit a;i� • pecific standards for billboards be specified in the Code. He reviewe0e type eofstandar$ . that could be included (maximum Ill sign area, maximum sign height, •.'$;s . m dis : ce betwe.`billboards, pole type, sign face configuration, minimum distanc-,,A$!/or: scr- .. g re• ents from residential property, total number of b' boards allow •tlli, tted to o94A§:140', urn length of permit, and minimum setback r- ents). t; 'Te Jopke stat $ :<<�". • g issue t • $ ,ave to be overcome is that the billboard company will have to also o' „ ! • $- 1 't fro ,which requires that billboards must be located in vl.commercial o. ;::e o o'ng dis">.. The golf course is zoned CRP and it is unclear whether MnDOT fes.°`• app • u-....:� ' 4.in th.t zoning district. An alternative would be to rezone the - , ' - _ t i _ •--es -• _ _es in the PF district. However, the current sign. e technically do ., rmit any signage in the CRP or PF zone. Under this scenario, the C• could be amended= i a ow billboards in PF and/or CRP districts if a conditional use permit i `i'J wined. 410:1,:, _este• Tanning Commission discuss the general concept outlined as well as what 01t process should be utilized. Based on direction from the Planning C• i ,° , , staff could then prepare draft ordinance amendments for their consideration at a future meeting. Commissioner Johnson asked if this will "open the door" for Highway 10 billboard requests. Jopke suggested the Code specify specific areas and where billboards would and would not be permitted with a CUP process. Highway 10 would not need to be listed as a permitted area. Ill Mounds View Planning Commission May 5, 1999 • Regular Meeting Page 3 Commissioner Johnson asked how many signs the golf course would be limited to. Jopke stated he thinks eleven potential sites were identified but two did not have access and several of the remaining nine were not on the golf course property. Commissioner Laube agreed that several, perhaps three, were of on t rse property. ;, .. ` . x is Commissioner Berke asked if there will be a problem wit ate approv i- ' 't. Jopke stated that could be the case. Berke asked if this proces ould be • plete : .PP is first.ascertained. 01, Commissioner Kaden asked if it would"open the door" o.h;.r,. ;<,:' dy to get a CUP. Jopke stated it is correct that anyone who abides by all of the condition €ou e',. 'le to make application. Commissioner Laube asked if there will be problem So• the ld go° : �4.e,e rezoned. Jopke stated this will depend on the zoning selected. . ed he wo€ •t anticipate major problems since golf courses are permitted in •ist..:.Y e. uld n•`open the door" for a lot of other requests. ' • Commissioner Laube suggested sta' tact the 'ate to s; . i they would allow billboards in a PF zoning district prior to the Co s'on spu ing a loti time on the issues. He stated if the State has no problem with billbo 'then t Emmis.. . 'could start looking at what surroundingommunities h. gf •illboare = s such as size, height, etc. Also, the State may have g§. sum stan ,•!,T41can be n2r,8:::. Commissi ` asked ' v iii out if Shoreview permits billboards. •Acting Chai • s` {` ,plaine• olf Course Superintendent was charged with finding additional ••:maces o ` ` : ' t she` Ponders if there may be other opportunities that are not as cumber r e as the billb ss. 'ssioner Berke as i there is any indication of the revenue estimated from the billboards. cil Liaison Stigneffdvised it was estimated at $1,000 per sign per month. Jopke agreed the e ranged fro ,000 to $2,000 per sign per month. Commissioner Laube stated his 'on the fig,. tie is based on size, location, and customer. C• g., # ; - ohnson stated he does not think the community will support billboards on the golf course and he is concerned about"opening the door" for billboards along Highway 10 or 35W. Jopke stated staff will conduct further research on State requirements and whether there is merit to pursue this option. He stated he will also ask the State and neighboring communities what • r Mounds View Planning Commission May 5, 1999 • Regular Meeting Page 4 design standard they use. Jopke stated that staff will also research other revenue generating opportunities that would be available for the golf course. Jopke asked what type of citizen input process would be used. Commissioner Laube suggested staff obtain information o • 4 urn n, :.: , number, and allowed content before citizen hearings are held. ."*.,. ,-e,-:.:,,:--4 > Jopke agreed that hearings will be considered once spe It stand. ::'* are deters n" 7,14,14".. Commissioner Kaden asked if the billboard issue was rail :.y...$'m`. he Focus 2000 meetings. Jopke stated he is unsure but will find out. Kaden noted 4. I :.:`,, are currently prohibited. Jopke stated this is correct but existing billboards wer _'lowed .: g . Jopke explained how the CUP process would b >::. Iboards 1 > ?miig notification, pubic hearing, and standards to consider. Commissioner Laube suggested that information also bed=` s " prior to holding public hearings. }s<-zi,,z= III Ai, , ,, ,, Commissioner Hegland stated thtt •mmiss' lso ne-t : •etter revenue estimates prior to making a de sion. He expr- ..a oncern >4 ,11:::01`-ss could take a lot of time with the City getting ve a ' .,,- out of' : g d sugge l'-t .,,t O o r lboard companies be contacted for these specific a� tubers ' mission' oesn't have to make a decision based on a scenario. ,a Commissions `•: w :. ed he s-41*, --o\-like to know how the revenue will be used, whether it will be designat.- g - t a eral fu .� , if course, and what percent of the entire budget this revenue w 6 equa"`-, .V Co 6 sioner Laube stag s g nderstanding that anything on the golf course property had to be dine'=d to the golf cour b •get, not the general fund. igzs g stated he will < out that information. `a `Er : g igney explained that funding restriction was part of the golf course bond - gr�... i' • ag. ' e does not know if that can be amended. g B. Previous Council Action Community Development Director Jopke updated the Commission regarding action taken by the Council at their meeting of April 26, 1999, to approve first reading of an ordinance amending 0 • Mounds View Planning Commission May 5, 1999 Regular Meeting Page 5 Chapter 401 of the Code, denial of the CUP for the dog kennel on Bronson Drive, and approval of a CUP for an oversized garage on Terrace Drive. rte" x :s Jopke reported the EDA discussed the Building N agreement and, after . ts, approved it. He advised the development will proceed and initial grading ork has ki Jopke reported on Council discussion from their work se a1'K ' Monda y, g y g' g the • �� = . .. � request from the nollwood Green homeowners associ. to have;,"+i Cit'•'' m 4.oan .� o siding improvements since they do not have enough mo in the' . -serve fund informed them that they don't have enough collateral. , ;a oil indicated the tc es are in reasonably good shape and the association hasn't expl:Preikations so the Council was not interested in proceeding. They directed staff to work wi 10-..A iAermine another option. Jopke stated the City had made housing grant progr. R splicatio ;: •' '•'oth Ramsey County and MHFA for $150,000 to help fund the housi, i :::.Iknt prog . m ich would allow the EDA to purchase blighted housing, clear the : Mounds View Planning Commission May 5, 1999 0 Regular Meeting Page 6 jurisdictional planning, and billboards. She thanked the City for the opportunity to attend this worthwhile seminar. No other reports were considered. $ti11 7. Adjournment '' F u There being no further business before the Planning Co a $ sion, Int,:-: ' Ac ; . <$-,=,;,::a:erso Miller adjourned the meeting at 7:40 p.m. (The meeting immediately adjourned tsbx 40'''',W1 !`:-pda Session) Respectfully submitted, + Rick 7opke Community Development Director 410 Transcribed by: PF Carla Wirth , sa sem? TimeSaver 0 Site Secretary `. N:\DATA\ :110,41#4.Z!\SHARE CS\MIINUTES1'°•05-05-99.WPD F, re 6 ' k om` <.. 1110