Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
06-16-1999
1,14✓ MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 16, 1999 . 7:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETING AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING,PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM,AND GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES 4. Approve Minutes: a. May 19, 1999 5. Planning Case No.554-99 Property Involved: 2523 Highway 10 (Mounds View Square) Consideration of a conditional use permit to operate a produce stand Applicant: Craig J. Gilb (Merryville Farm Market) 6. Planning Case No.557-99 Property Involved: 7690/7692 Silver Lake Road Consideration of a minor subdivision Applicant: Meiho Lee 11110 7. Planning Case No.561-99 Property Involved: 7613-7619 Woodlawn Drive Consideration of a development review request for a four-unit residential rental dwelling Applicant: PMJ Group (Mike Juaire) 7. Staff Reports/Items of Information a. Previous Council Action 8. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports 9. Adjournment to Agenda Meeting (Immediately Following Regular Meeting) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * APPLICANTS: YOUR ATTENDANCE AT THIS MEETING IS REQUESTED. PLEASE NOTIFY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AT 717-4020 IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND. THANK YOU. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * AGENDA SESSION AGENDA 1. Review Minutes --June 2, 1999 N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\PLANCOMM\PCAGENDA\1999\6-16-99.REG 1 r REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION • MeetingDate: June 16, 1999 Staff Report by: James Ericson, Planning Associate Planning Case No.: 554-99 Request: The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to operate an outdoor sales produce stand at Moundsview Square. Applicant: Craig Gilb, representing Merryville Farm Market Location: Moundsview Square Shopping Center parking lot PIN No. 07-30-23-11- 0079 Zoning/Land Use: R-4, Regional Business District;Moundsview Square Shopping Center Applicable Regulations: • Section 1115.04, Subd. 2, which allows for open or outdoor service, sales and rental as an accessory use with a conditional use permit. • • Section 1125.01, Subd. le, which states that the Planning Commission shall consider possible adverse effects of proposed conditional uses. • Section 1125.01, Subd. lg, which states that the Planning Commission shall make findings of fact and recommend such actions or conditions relating to the request as it deems necessary to carry out the intent and purpose of the Zoning Code and forward such findings to the City Council. Attachments: Planning Application Zoning Map Site Plan Letter from Paster Enterprises, 5/26/99 Resolution 581-99 Background: Craig Gilb, representing Merryville Farm Market, is requesting a conditional use permit to operate an outdoor produce stand in the parking lot of Moundsview Square Shopping Center from July 1, 1998 to September 30, 1999. The produce stand would be open seven days a week from 10:00 am to 7:00 pm. and would be selling produce home-grown from Waverly, Minnesota. The stand is a five-sided gazebo-like structure with a canvas roof, and is 14 feet wide at its widest point and • 9 feet high at the peak. The stand requires no utility hook-ups. The produce stand was granted a CUP the last three years at this same location. Staff is not aware of any problems associated with this operation. Merryville Farm Market CUP Planning Case No. 554-99 June 16, 1999 • Page 2 Analysis: Mr. Gilb has stated that this will be the same operation that was approved last year for this location. No changes have been proposed. The dates of operation for the farm market, if approved as requested, would overlap by 15 days with Linder's Greenhouses, which was granted an outdoor sales CUP through July 15, 1999. Linder's will be dismantling its greenhouse sometime in between June 30 and July 15, so the overlap of operations could be less than the possible 15 days. In the occurrence of an overlap of uses, there should be little impact to parking, as the produce stand would occupy only 110 square feet of the parking lot. Signage for the produce stand will be accomplished with small banners affixed to the gazebo base and lettering on the canvas roof. As was done for the Linder's Greenhouses, the conditional use permit for Merryville is drafted in such a way so that future appearances before the Planning Commission and City Council are not required. The CUP will remain in effect indefinitely so long as there are no changes to the operation and there have been no problems or reasons which would warrant the City Council to re- examine the CUP. CUP Requirements: The criteria for approval of a conditional use permit appear in Section 1115.04, Subd. 2 of the • Mounds View Municipal Code. They are as follows: a. Outdoor service,sales and equipment rental connected with the principal use is limited to thirty percent(30%)of the gross floor area of the principal use. The shopping center contains 102,035 square feet of building area. The applicant proposes to occupy 110 square feet of the parking lot, which is less than 1% of the building square footage on the site. This criterion has been met. b. Outside sales areas are fenced or screened from view of neighboring residential uses or an abutting residential district in compliance with Subdivisions 1103.08(1)through(5)of this Title. The parking lot fronting Highway 10 does not abut any residential properties. The nearest residential property is Wildwood Manor, an apartment building for senior citizens, which would be well screened from the proposed use by a stand of trees. c. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source shall not be visible from the public right of way or from neighboring residences and shall be in compliance with Section 1103.09 of the Code. The applicant will not have any lighting associated with the produce stand as it will be operating during daylight hours. • Merryville Farm Market CUP Planning Case No. 554-99 • June 16, 1999 Page 3 d. Sales area is grassed or surfaced to control dust. The applicant is proposing to use an existing parking lot which is surfaced with asphalt. This criterion is met. Staff believes the criteria for granting a CUP have been met. The Planning Commission shall also consider any possible adverse effects of the proposed use as required by Section 1125.01(1)e of the Municipal Code, which are as follows: (1) Relationship to Municipal Comprehensive Plan. (2) The geographical area involved. (3) Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. (4) The character of the surrounding area. (5) The demonstrated need for such use. The proposal is for a temporary produce stand in the parking lot of an existing shopping center. The Comprehensive Plan designates this site as HC--Highway Commercial. The produce stand is an appropriate use within this designation. The shopping center is surrounded by roadways and the area where the use is to be located is 1,000 feet from the nearest residential property. The sale of produce is a typical seasonal business in a community such as Mounds View and it serves a • community need. The short duration of the use will result in little, if any, adverse effect upon the surrounding area. Recommendation: Approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 581-99 recommending to the City Council approval of a conditional use permit for Merryville Farm Market to operate an outdoor produce stand at Moundsview Square Shopping Center from July 1, 1999 to September 15, 1999, with stipulations. James Ericson, Planning Associate N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\554-99\MERRY-PC.RPT • CLITY �`•�f)' ( COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION • 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View MN 5511 -‘1'=1'Partner$4 612-717-4020 612-784-3462 -FAX Please pe or Print Information-Complete Both Sides of This Form Applicant Information / Name of Applicant /�i r( . GI' G Telephone 1.e/a-F 0 /-/ F •�:,. Address 0 2-5' 14' S' tir/ Fax Fax vi-I)/ A4 N S ' 390 Interest in Property heck appropriate box) ❑ Owner of Pr••erty ❑ Contract for Deed Owner Lessee,Op-Gator,Manager a Agreement to Purchase ❑ Other(expl ) Applicants must p vide evidence of interest in property at the time of application,and if you are not the owner of the property,you must provide a letter of permission from the owner giving consent to the filing of this application. The property owner must sign this application for it to be accepted. Property Description/Proposal �n � �S ,�� Address or General Location /"1 V 5--au a i-a- \ • Legal Description 67Property Identification#(PIN#) 07 - 30- a-3 — )� — D 0 7 #of Acres Current Zo g - Type of Application ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment $250 ❑ Rezoning $250/acre; min$250 max$1500 ❑ Major Subdivision $250+$250 deposit* O Minor Subdivision $200 ❑ Planned Unit Development(PUD) Refer to rezoning fees ❑ PUD Amendment $350 Conditional Use Permit R-1, R-2$75;all others$250 ❑ Variance R-1, R-2$100 all others$250 ❑ Code Appeal $100 ❑ Develop Review/Site Plan $125/acre;min$125 max$750 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit R-1,R-2$150;all others$200 ❑ Wetland Buffer Permit R-l,R-2$25;all others$100 O Floodplain Permit $200 ❑ Other *Deposits shall be paid to cover all costs of public notices,materials and staff or consultant time spent in the review, • research or preparation of materials associated with this application. The applicant shall be responsible for all reasonable incurred costs in excess of the initial deposit amount. Any portion of the deposit not spent or encumbered shall be refunded to the applicant within thirty(30)days after consideration of the application is completed. • Please complete the reverse side of this application. City of Mounds View,MN Development Application Page 2 • Present Use of Property ❑ Undeveloped/Vacant ❑ Single Family Dwelling ❑ Duplex/Two Family Dwelling 0 Multi-family Dwelling arc._ Business/Commercial Establishment ❑ Industrial Establishment ❑ Other(explain) Property Classification 0 Abstract 0 Torrens 11 Des ' tion of Proposa �,.:�,�i `�"'�'^� J BY MY(OUR) SIGNATURE ON THIS APPLICATION,I HEREBY DECLARE THAT,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. Signature of Applicant >---2-%2%4 �� 9'- Name of Applicant(typed/printed) C / -4 rr 97-- 6116 GO Le.se • Signature of Property Owner _) ,,,„� Name of Property Owner(typed/printed) C , Address of Owner Phone Number of Owner ********** ** **************************** FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date of Submittal 5- /3- 1 I_ Date of Acceptance C-. Z( - Cj Assigned to: c--11 444 Planning Case No. s `i= q / 60-day Limit .7-2 5 09 120-day limit i t-25-q 9 Fees Paid: Account# Check# Receipt# Application: a 5.0' 0 0 / 0 D 3 p--7 °) 3030 � e &3 Park Dedication: Deposits: Other: • Total: N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\FORMS\DEVAPP.FOR 1/98 802=<- _-� ----. 8030 c.102.1 duL/ mit0 8025 8018 8011 8000 8021 8022 8019 801' 8009 8006 8000 8001 8010 8011 I 8000 8005 8012 8004 7981 7990 0 7981 7990 0 7989 7996cc re 7993 7990 7977 • 7970 7979 7980 7969 7980 7979 7980 C 7985 7970 7984 7989 7960 G 7959 7970 7965 7960 7961 7964 7975 7980 7971 7968 ix 7949 7954 _7959 7966 7969 7950 7951 7954 7956 7950 7940 7945 7946 7927 I HILLVIEW 7955 7944 7953 7948 7930 7935 7930 7917 7940 7945 7934 7931 ; h h a h n 7901 PARK 7930 N 17900 7901 7900 • m 7900 7901 0 7900 ; 901 n 1 .5;1: o n N N N N N i PF ` N ry FF'. N 7900 N N N N P HILLVIEW ROAD N 1,, /� IAA 11:D 7891 N N 17880 7895 N N 7890 7885 N N ® 7889 _ M N :::Eit.:.®®� 7888 v .r a _ 7876 7885 7866 7857 7870 7869 7858 7852 -� 7875 7868 7869 7860 8-2 7870 y 7877 7854 7851 7860 7865 W 7853 - 7870 ��~— 'y^ �� 7963 7842 7841 7850 7855 7846 �.::; 7861 7854 cc p 7857 7850 7851 7830 7840 7835 7840 -� 7845 784C 011111...: Q 7847 7844 7837 7830 1=—30� 7820 0 7815 7790 7815 7800 7817 �r 0 7833 7832 - q� ryp �' 7810 7805 7780 7801780 0 3 7815 7827 7 7814 til 400 B-2 7800 7809 7770 = 7801 7760 7797 �- 7817 7800 7801 7800;ifte toy (i-4 7801 11W 7751 7750 _ 7787 7778 7749 7750 7807 'bet 7767 7760 7741 7740 7787 T768 7739 7740 7751 ro �' 7761 7750 7731 7730 �� 7753 -= 7729 7730 7741 774d' 7755 7730 7721 7720 7728 B-2 g 7719 7720 Q 7731 7730 • �! 7745 7711 MI 7710 7709 7710 p 7721 7720 1 0 ��,`��',-� 0] 771' o N 7700 M�1[*�aJ` 7701 7700 770 w 4 R;:............................... r:-.,:s2 �R Zan �— z'=+1 '13 cp CO PUD :.M.- _ 'NM n n s 2 .• �o G s a 2553 11 v -1 Y ' .m h8-3 NNNN M NNN Ch1 2551 C,go gt 7695 N N N N N N N 2549 Q N 2547 .� 7687 —3 766i n _ B-3 ti�°p '\16,... B-4 225541 R-4 1wn. N 2539 4���yy 2537 `:"`Qi 7835 iii ., 1 7655 . 1.: 7645 SILVER VIEW i ::Ici` , I N h n flf, ry ar h F e u O, 1 PARK f4-4-2`.%4 ,N n ilis , CI n n n N 763 • 7s1: N Nc:13111:. T „7.41/4, .._ii L R-3 e - B-3 �► m o m h • �p M m a T N N ''�, �hft N N N c1.4 _ 47.F.2 04"'N r n N p ■7.N N N—c.,, N NRI c.; �2Cmj Ij�� ii N 1:4, PF WI CIN HALL wn CO.yb N N V N N N N N N N N N N h�N ............:.:7.:•: r f = q. mON \11111_,4 h 2• - - o en - N 742 -*u440i 733 8-1 o 740 r(1 e Zoning Map Case No. 554-99 Highway 10—Moundsview Square N4 Applicant: Merryville Farms MAY-26-1999 16 26 PASTER ENTERPRISES 612 646 1389 P.02/02 411 ;t l 1 ► J PE / )1 WP a division terprises May 26, 1999 MERRYVILLE FARMS are entitled to run their produce market from July 1, 1999- September 30, 1999. Permission is granted by Paster Enterprises, owners of Moundsview Square Shopping Center and the merchants of Moundsview Square. MERRYVILLE FARMS will place their market/stand in the area highlighted on the 11 enclosed site plan. Sincerely, Lciff Stephanie A. Kirchmaier Director of Marketing Paster Enterprises • 2227 University Ave. •St.Paul, MN •55114-1677 651.646.7901 • Fx 651.646.1389 eadvertis1n p p@paster-enterprises.eom www.pasterenterprlses.eom — """' "' '• TOTAL P.02 ) 7 10011l1•P!"cars 01102 3)1171 01.101 _ \ i 1 • I i , I .1.1191.11W IT l 1 .. I-1 - r , I.- I _ Z J u . . LL 8a 1/I co hJJflii_I_ F / 7. AMR . A •~ /: 1MCM _ t"1" — i 1pY"l1 . r-. mtNl r _ ^� r' + M P - - Fe,...9, rov_ 11' e C ln..R iY i_ av $ 40 g !. a .:_' — .. / • _,,o. .. . 0 ;:- g :‹3-i.__ ,:,- ,zti . • V y _- . / ,. L. .. ,' / / ! -j. W Q 1111A1111111.11131 I , /1. / . . /,(:115 �'C. OOOOtDOOhl�taUO RONrf►SSOOOtD w �WVrglrrrOtYN'N NrNrNN *7..m.7 Q r r r Z Z N F- 111 2 W z v a a F UI CC Uotl DV to N N W am w2 = 0 W LL mo/ Li/ 5 Z i..> iHJ IPãlk j ! N4�O y nom CC 0. ill liti a 7G� cc OCe.. 0211.1.4.0n 0=2000.0 a mS= oz TN4l7eIWtorZOi CfOrC4C44 CS/,:45iQfNNN • MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 581-99 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OUTDOOR PRODUCE SALES AT MOUNDSVIEW SQUARE, REQUESTED BY MERRYVILLE FARM MARKET; PLANNING CASE NO. 554-99 WHEREAS, Craig Gilb, representing Merryville Farm Market, has applied for a conditional use permit to conduct open and outdoor sales at Moundsview Square Shopping Center; property zoned B-4, legally described as follows: That Part Lying Northeasterly of the Centerline of State Trunk Highway 10 of NE'/ ofNE'/ (Subject to Roads and Highways) in Section 7, Township 30, Range 23 WHEREAS, the Mound View Zoning Code allows open and outdoor sales in the B-4 Regional Business District with the approval of a conditional use permit; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding • this proposal: a. Planning Application b. Zoning Map c. Site Plan d. Letter from Property Owner WHEREAS, The Mounds View Planning Commission makes the following findings that the criteria for approval in Section 1115.04, Subd. 2 have been met: a. Outdoor service,sales and equipment rental connected with the principal use is limited to thirty percent(30%)of the gross floor area of the principal use. The shopping center contains 102,035 square feet of building area. The applicant proposes to occupy 110 square feet of the parking lot, which is less than 1% of the building square footage on the site. This criterion has been met. b. Outside sales areas are fenced or screened from view of neighboring residential uses or an abutting residential district in compliance with Subdivisions 1103.08(1)through(5)of this Title. The parking lot fronting Highway 10 does not abut any residential properties. The nearest residential property is Wildwood Manor, an apartment building for senior citizens, which • would be well screened from the proposed use by a stand of trees. Merryville Farm Market Planning Commission Resolution 581-99 June 14, 1999 • Page 2 c. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source shall not be visible from the public right of way or from neighboring residences and shall be in compliance with Section 1103.09 of the Code. The applicant will not have any lighting associated with the produce stand as it will be operating during daylight hours. d. Sales area is grassed or surfaced to control dust. The applicant is proposing to use an existing parking lot which is surfaced with asphalt. This criterion is met. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered the provisions from Section 1125.01(1)e of the Zoning Code regarding possible adverse effects of the proposed use and makes the following findings: (1) Relationship to Municipal Comprehensive Plan. (2) The geographical area involved. (3) Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. • (4) The character of the surrounding area. (5) The demonstrated need for such use. The proposal is for a temporary produce stand in the parking lot of an existing shopping center. The Comprehensive Plan designates this site as HC--Highway Commercial. The produce stand is an appropriate use within this designation. The shopping center is surrounded by roadways and the area where the use is to be located is 1,000 feet from the nearest residential property. The sale of produce is a typical seasonal business in a community such as Mounds View and it serves a community need. The short duration of the use will resul in i e, i-any, as verse e-ec upon e surrounding area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the conditional use permit with the following stipulations: 1. The facility shall be allowed to operate from July 1 to September 30 of each year. 2. The hours of operation of the facility shall not exceed 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. 3. Signage shall be allowed only as affixed to the gazebo base and/or canvas roof. 4. Lighting for the use shall be supplied by existing parking lot standards. 5. The applicant shall provide the following on an annual basis to the Director of • Community Development: Merryville Farm Market Planning Commission Resolution 581-99 • June 14, 1999 Page 3 a. Letter of permission from property owner. b. Complete set of site plans c. Narrative description of the proposal. 6. This Conditional Use Permit may be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council if any problems develop or if there are any changes to the operation deemed substantial enough to warrant such review, in the estimation of the Director of Community Development or the City Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Conditional Use Permit shall have no expiration date and shall remain in force so long as the conditions agreed upon herein are observed. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 16th day of June, 1999. • Jerry Peterson, Chairperson Attest: Rick Jopke, Community Development Director (Seal) N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\5 54-99\581-99PC.RES • REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION • Meeting Date: June 16, 1999 Staff Report by: James Ericson, Planning Associate Planning Case No.: 558-99 Request: Development Review Petitioner: Mike Juaire (PMJ Group, Inc.) Location: 7613 - 7619 Woodlawn Drive PIN Nos. 08-30-23-22-0003 Zoning/Land Use: R-3, Medium Density Residential Applicable Regulations: Section 1006.06, Development controls Section 1104.01. General zoning provisions -- yard requirements Section 1104.02, Area and building size regulations Attachments: Planning Application Zoning Map • Site, Landscape&Parking Plans (Separate Attachment) Building Elevations (Separate Attachment) Planning Commission Resolution 583-99 Background: The applicant, Mike Juaire, representing PMJ Group, has requested approval of a development review for a four-plex to be located at 7613 - 7619 Woodlawn Drive, currently vacant property. The applicant has purchased this lot through the Ramsey County tax forfeit auction and is also the owner of the adjoining lot to the west, for which the Planning Commission already recommended approval of a separate development review. The elevations provided for the four-plex show a two-story structure built at grade level (no basements) with the four dwelling units lined in a row. The two middle units will have three bedrooms and two baths, while the west-end unit, because of the diagonal wall, will have only two bedrooms and one bath. The east-end unit, while smaller than the middle two, will also have three bedrooms but only the one bath. All of the units, with the exception of the west-end unit, will have a two-car tuck-under garage. The west end unit will only have a one-car garage. The end dwelling units have entrances at the sides of the building while the middle units take access from the building's front. The utilities (washer, dryer, furnace, etc.) are on the lower level of the units. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the development review for the four-plex on • the adjoining lot at the June 2nd meeting, conditioned upon several modifications being made concerning the overall site, parking and landscape plans. All of Staff's and the Planning Juaire Development Review Lot 10,Woodlawn Terrace Planning Case 558-99 June 11, 1999 Page 2 Commission's requested modifications have been accomplished by the applicant, with the exception of some additional detail needing to be added to the landscape plan in the area highlighted. Analysis: Dimensional Requirements: Building Setbacks: Required Proposed: Met ? Front(Woodlawn Dr.) 30 feet 30 feet Yes Side (West): 20 feet 20 feet Yes Side(East): 20 feet 20 feet Yes Rear(North): 40 feet 40 feet Yes Minimum lot width: 100 feet 120 feet Yes * Minimum lot area: (2,500 sq. ft per D. U.): 10,000 sq.ft. 14,998 sq.ft. Yes Minimum Open Space (625 sq.ft. per dwelling unit) 2,500 sq. ft. 3,900 sq. ft. Yes Building height: 45 feet 26 feet Yes Minimum floor area for: • three-bedroom dwelling units: 870 sq. ft. 956 sq. ft. Yes two-bedroom units: 750 sq. ft. 806 sq. ft. Yes Parking requirements: Uncovered: (1.5 per unit) 6 spaces 8 spaces Yes Covered: (1.0 per unit) 4 spaces 7 spaces Yes *Since this lot is located on the curve of a street,the lot width dimension is measured at the 30-foot building setback line. Drainage: The applicant has submitted for evie alis for`thwo -, : which showing a storm sewer that drains into a catch basin on County Road I, the other utilizing on site grading to direct flow into the drainage easement areas. Both drainage plan alternatives have been reviewed by City staff and the City Engineer, who find either approach to be sufficient to accommodate the on-site stormwater runoff Landscape Plan: In Section 1103.08 of the City Code pertaining to Fencing, Screening and Landscaping, it states that the lot area remaining after providing for off-street parking, sidewalks, driveway,building and other requirements shall be planted and maintained in grass, sodding, shrubs or other acceptable vegetation or materials generally used in landscaping. The applicant has submitted a landscape plan which addressed the recommendations of the Planning Commission. The plan-was forwarded to • the City Forester, who made suggested substitutions for two of the plantings which the applicant Juaire Development Review Lot 10,Woodlawn Terrace Planning Case 558-99 June 11, 1999 • Page 3 has agreed to. In addition, the plan has been revised to show either a row of plantings or decorative fencing along the southwest property line on Lot 9 bordering Woodlawn Terrace. Parking: Each of the three-bedroom dwelling units are shown to have a two-car garage on the lower level of the building, while the two-bedroom unit shows a single stall garage. Each of the four units will also have two uncovered (outside) parking spaces available, which meets the City's parking requirements. The units will take direct access to the street without any type of parking area or turnaround, which will require residents to back out of the units onto Woodlawn Drive. Because of the minimal distance between the units and the street as well as the unobstructed views in either direction, staff does not believe this to be an issue of concern. Utilities and Easements There are water and sewer lines in Woodlawn Drive so utilities are available to the site. There are ten-foot drainage and utility easements on the property's north and west sides which will more than likely serve as drainage areas for the development. To accommodate the proposed drainage plans, additional drainage easement areas will need to be dedicated. The applicant has indicated a willingness to dedicate those areas shown on the certificates of survey, however the document preparation will not be completed before final Council action due to requested title commitments from the City Attorney. The applicant will sign a statement agreeing to the dedication of those • areas so marked on the surveys as a matter of assurance to the City. Conclusions: Staff recommends approval of Planning Commission Resolution 583-99, a resolution recommending approval (with stipulations) of a development review for a four-unit multi-family structure at 7613 - 7619 Woodlawn Drive, as requested by Mike Juaire, representing PMJ Group, Inc. c 1A E�� James Ericson, Planning Associate N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\5 58-99UUAIRE.PC1 • 08/04/99 09:28 FAX 812 784 2482 CITY OF 1W VW.11. MY OF 1 1 'LUNN COMMUNITY DEV!LOPMINr DEPARThIZN'T • • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION 2401 Mghwsy 10,Mauna View 14IN 55112 ' •pre.._ 612-717-4020 • 612-7843462-PAX Pluck Type or Paler Ietbrmeefoo-Complete loth Okla atm Finns NameISOOTIlitition Appliamc __LLI lTelephon (ea—3 f5-3/51. Adams 421 gG- Fax '15—5'914 ePOtc l_�A) PAe4!k /►1N 5s 3 Wont la Property(check appropriate box) sak Owmercf)tepetty a CaatractiazDeed Owner C Lem,°Peramor,Meager o pmt to Actium Other(eegtlaal - Appikant►lama prhVid.evtdes.eee at Interest in property et the then of appliaaltoa„end Wynn are eon the myna or property,you atwt pie*letter of permission from the awumer tag eaaaeat to the Ms of this appitndon. The ply owner must sip thin appfia01os fbritto be eaapt.d. Property Deeerfptlee/Froposel Andress or Geaupal Coelia► Z ,rS War t t=_©61r woo, d- WV. s CNCGe4Ei'S i t) Leger Daaos> iso Lo-r- �D Bt.c k d. PIVP1 V�'Er-� T, R �1 ADP • Property Idmtifwaoa#.(pjrT t% 6 —3 0 —2 3 ^2.2 OCO? y #of Ansae 6 '3S A C as Currant Zoning. Rte_ Type of Application C Careprebeative Plot MicadONGt x250 a Re2oaits =sex , min 1250 max 51500 a Mejcr 5ttbdivisiec $250*S250 deposit* C Miner Subdivision 5200 btanced T T.dtyalopeacas- \ Rsbr to O PUD Amod t ��T`��"�" C Conditional Use Pesch R-1,R-2$75;all olhm^s$250 a Vatiataae Rr 1, R-2$100 All atoll$250 C Coda Appeal $100 pC. Develop Review to Plea • $l25/.om min S125 max x750 a Wetland Alteration Permit R-1,R-2 S150',all ethos$200 a Wetland Star Permit R-1.14.-2$25,all otbets MOO O0 m Floodplain Permit S200 o Other �.....�,_ *Deposits sball be paid to cow ail coats of public rodeo,materials and=dor coasukant time spent in the review, errant or preparation of materials anaciated with this application. The applicasd alkali be responsible fbr all seasonable incurred oaata its emcee of the initial deposit amours.t. Any portico of the deft not spent or*►cambered shall be refunded to the applicant within thirty(30)days akar ccoaideradon of the applicatioa is aomplensi. • Plass eamptete the reverse side of this applicitloa. c;111 OF MV iii OQ2 Oty of Mounds View,Mid • newtons*itaalicatian —....„ __________ Par°2 Prolog Ute, o Single Family Dwelling a Deo Falk/Dwelling a Moldy Dwelling p Ilemineesannammial ilisabliabmmt o Asa Establisbaman • a Quer(explain) itt/P217 Cloadegien o mama ), Tomo Deoription 074n:c i! .1 �... .a... a • CF ' 1 _ , . , 4 .. BY MY(OUR)SIGNATURE ON THIS APPLICATION,I HERM DECLARE THAT,TO THE BEST OF MY DIOWLEDGE,THE INFORMATION PROVED IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. upon cn ol(Appliomc2.1t,et,..itui R - Name ofApplinesfl(typed/printed) *t..eult.I P i re. Spore dPrap�►owner _�.:._ • Name ofPro1P Y Owner(lypadlpri ) I Q- i* a_r2 Addte s LOwner _ ci24,.._` eff '1 .9 Ply/, PQM it MP .s5 -3 Phone Number of Owacr2-- 31:-3-1.P3------------. w .*e*****wwrwme. *w.e ••••********.*•**** *.worwe is. .»s .**»***rem**rte» Q Cr— 7Z1FFt+ v Daae afSubmiaal _ SE ONLYp�agoad to: Dara of Planning Case N . 60-dal'Unit ,,,1.120-dtY.limit pfaaaiag Cnee Na. Meek k I Receipt 0 Pees PaAad* � -��� ,�,�"�-�, . Ap iico� _„_L,� - o e,r� =3 b ._-- Panic Dedication; --- 17S -- Other ... Tocol: •-- inn 0 NODAT LOIMCOMD EW1021,4V tVAPP .FOR r 7 7869 I /1.1.JU ::: vrinr 7853 7878 7875 786; 7869 7860 7855 r 3 7865 7852 LI 7870 7861 = - 0 7857 785• 5619' - 7855 7846 Y 7841 Z 5613 g • : 7836 3 7845 • 784 7840 7829 g 7847 ='• 5607 • )- 7835 �- -:. 7820 0 7833 78376212 > 782' 7815 7800 7817 _ 3 7815 7827 "� 5601 7809 7814 0 —8O 7805 7780 7801 7806 7817 "� _ff 5563 0 O 7801 7760 7797 7800 7801 =2MI5557 —Z 7787 7778 7749 ' 7807 �, r —w 7751 7750 7777 � � m 5551 7768 "' n 7741 7740 7767 7739 gm i • 0.,... N N ' 5545 7731 7730 7753 7748 7729 7730 7741 • PINEWOOD CIR ®= 111 I o N `t r co .2 5539 l 7721 7720 7728 7719 • • N N N M 388 5533 - 7711 7710 7709 m m , N ] orm oro ao r 5527. 0303 co Li,Lo 07700 N N 77A 7700 770: 7 1 N N N N N 5521 . . _ ... ... R-2 CO ,. .... . ....... ao - 00 11110111151111 o as I ifi N u co in to L 2553 7695 N N N N N .. .. N M LA 2551 C� ._... .t co CNI 2547 O 7687 1h12 !"�;; N 2547 —I R— R-4 7643 2545 Jig 764 EM 7661 B-4 2541 II fitilis 2539 : 76 7651 2537 �"*�s ;• 7635 : .•• . ��7630 La 7655 � 7645 #„ 7625'.� 7641 • T im • e1D1�1�1�►1ri�MM tail' 761 + ;; �'. ,,,wWf► Y w 7cl 59 7631 z Wit' tit ry 763'.•.:. Iiiii r •7581 • _ 7531ni B-3_... N co co 4 ,— N 7565 7564 Im. 7521 `l, N N • N N 7551 755+ 7535 753' 7521 752+ " :� 7501 y 750517504 T PF CITY HALL O m 5394 on eN N pp O 'k t� J.O '11 111111r. lo 0 N N B-1 , 1 LO v N �5 OZ .1u1 0 Zoning Map Planning Case 558-99 Applicant: Mike Juaire (PMJ Group, Inc.) N4 7 Location: 7613-7619 Woodlawn Drive MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 583-99 • CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR A FOUR-UNIT MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING LOCATED AT 7613 - 7619 WOODLAWN DRIVE; PLANNING CASE NO. 558-99 WHEREAS, PMJ Group, represented by Mike Juaire, has requested City approval of a development review for a four-unit multiple family residential structure to be located at 7613 - 7619 Woodlawn Drive, legally described as follows: Lot 10,Block 1,Parkview Terrace Ramsey County,Minnesota WHEREAS, Chapter 1006 of the Mounds View Municipal Code requires that a development review be conducted for all commercial and industrial development and all residential development where more than two dwelling units are being erected within the City; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the following • documents regarding this proposal: 1. Planning Application 2. Zoning Map 3. Site,Parking,Landscape Plan,date-stamped 6/7/99 4. Elevations and Floor Plans,date-stamped 6/4/99 5. Drainage Plans,date-stamped 6/7/99 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission finds that the site plan date-stamped June 7, 1999 conforms to the general zoning requirements of Chapter 1104 with regard to setbacks, parking requirements, building height, minimum floor space, open space, and floor area; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission is aware that City staff has reviewed and the City Engineer has approved two alternative drainage plans for the site. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of a development review for a four unit multiple family residential structure to be located at 7613 - 7619 Woodlawn Drive, subject to the following stipulations: • 1. The landscape plan shall be revised to include a row of plantings or decorative fencing along the southwestern-most property line of Lot 9. Any plantings shall meet with the approval of the City Forester to ensure compatibility with Mounds View soils. Resolution 583-99 Juaire Development Review June 16, 1999 • Page 2 2. Drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated to the City prior to building permits being issued for those areas to be utilized for drainage purposes where none have been previously dedicated. A signed and notarized "Intent to Dedicate" agreement document will be acceptable in the event easement document preparation is not completed prior to building permits being issued. 3. Those areas of the Woodlawn Terrace apartment complex encroaching upon the subject property shall be removed and relocated according to City setback requirements in conjunction with grading activities on the site. In no event shall a certificate of occupancy be issued before this has occurred. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 16th day of June, 1999 Jerry Peterson, Chairperson • ATTEST: Rick Jopke, Community Development Director SEAL N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDE V\DE VCASES\5 5 8-99\5 83-99PC.RES • REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION • ** Summary Report ** Meeting Date: June 16, 1999 Staff Report by: James Ericson, Planning Associate Planning Case No. 557-99 Request: Minor Subdivision(Lot Split) Applicant: Meiho Lee Address: 7690/7692 Silver Lake Road PIN#: 07-30-23-21-0002 Zoning/Land Use: R-2, Two-Family and Single Family Residential Lot Size: 25,415 Square Feet Applicable Regulations: • Surveyor's Certificate: Section 1202.01, Subd. 3b requires that the applicant provide a certificate of survey prepared by a Minnesota registered land surveyor. A full plat of the 410 property may be substituted.. • Minimum Lot Size and Widths: Section 1104.02, Subd. 2b, as amended by Ordinance 590, sets the minimum R-2 zoned lot size at 12,500 square feet. The minimum width for R-2 lots is 100 feet. • Provision of Easements: Section 1203.04 requires that drainage and utility easements be provided in the event of property subdivisions. • Park Dedication Fee: Section 1204.02 requires that a park dedication fee be paid in an amount equivalent to five percent(5%) of the land value of the property to be subdivided. Attachments: Planning Application Zoning Map Certificate of Survey(Separate Attachment) Background: The applicant, Meiho Lee, is requesting City approval of a minor subdivision to create two lots from her property located at 7690/7692 Silver Lake Road. The City's subdivision regulations • allow for approval of a surveyor's certificate in these situations, however a more complex and detailed full plat may be substituted. A copy of the surveyor's certificate showing the proposed plat is attached. This property, located at the southwest corner of County Road I and Silver Lake Meiho Lee Minor Subdivision 7690/7692 Silver Lake Road Planning Case No. 557-99 • June 16, 1999 Page2 Road, currently has 202 feet of frontage on County Road I and 101 feet along Silver lake Road. There is a twin home existing on the lot that takes access from Silver Lake Road. The applicant proposes to split off an irregular portion of land from the west half of the existing lot to create a new, 12,500 square-foot lot with 102 feet of frontage on County Road I. The remaining lot will be 12,915 square feet with 100 feet of frontage on County Road I. The dimensions of both of these lots, as shown on the survey, would meet the City's minimum requirements as specified in the Chapter 1104 of the Zoning Code. Analysis: Lot Irregularities: As divided, the lot becomes quite irregular, departing from the typical and preferred rectangular subdivision. The reason for the irregular split is due to additional right of way on taken by the County for Silver Lake Road improvements. Were it not for this additional right of way, the lot could have been split in a more conventional nature. The alternative to this irregular subdivision is the granting of a variance to allow for the creation of a non-conforming lot. Drainage Considerations: The subject property, as well as the lot adjoining to the south, are low- 41) lying. In periods of heavy rains, the backyards fills with stormwater having nowhere to drain. Staff has been advised that at times, the neighbor to the south pumps the stormwater out onto County Road I. The proposed subdivision would in all likelihood increase the amount of stormwater that collects in the backyards. While the survey does show that the rear 30 feet of the proposed lot would be reserved for drainage and utility purposes, staff would require that extra measures be undertaken to minimize any additional runoff to the back yard area Staff has sent a letter to the applicant and the surveyor requesting modifications to the survey to make it conform to City and County Plat standards. In addition, Staff has sent a copy of the proposed plat to the City Attorney and the City Engineer for -ei comm-- • revi-w. • , Staff has sent a copy of the proposed plat to Ramsey County for their comment. Any information that comes to light prior to the Commission's meeting on June 16 will be presented verbally to the Commission. Park dedication: According to Section 1204.02 of the Municipal Code, every subdivision of land within the City is subject to a park dedication fee. Because the area to be subdivided is less than one acre, the Code specifies that a five percent(5%) park dedication fee is required to be paid before the subdivision can be approved. Ramsey County assessor's records value this property at $27,500. Five percent of that amount would be $1,375. Subdivision 3 of this Section, however, allows for the exclusion of the land under the existing home remaining after the subdivision. With this exclusion, the dedication requirement would be reduced 51 percent to $673.75 • Meiho Lee Minor Subdivision 7690/7692 Silver Lake Road Planning Case No. 557-99 • June 16, 1999 Page 3 Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission discuss this request and to direct staff to draft a resolution of approval or denial for action at the next Planning Commission meeting based upon deliberations at the meeting on June 14th taking into consideration any additional information brought forward by staff or the applicant not contained within this report. James Ericson, Planning Associate N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\DEVCASES\557-99\MEIHOLEE.PC1 • • 4riiTY CF. OUNDO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEN DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIOlp ts� 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View MN 55112 11119P1;* •PartoetshIQ' 612-717-4020 612-784-3462 -FAX Please Type or Print Information-Complete Both Sides of This Form Applicant Information /� ' _f-'O LEE , / Name of Applicant l 1 Telephone -G5 ) ' z!'—(1 Address .54—'73—L e t h b 1 Ave (�, Fax • TI—loec:._Vi.--tAJ Interest in Property(check appropriate box) Owner of Property ❑ Contract for Deed Owner ❑ Lessee,Operator,Manager 0 Agreement to Purchase O Other(explain) Applicants must provide evidence of interest in property at the time of application,and if you are not the owner of the property,you must provide a letter of permission from the owner giving consent to the filing of this application. The property owner must sign this application for it to be accepted. Property Description/Proposal • , �y Address or General Location `t'-" 2 Z6pd • V(o wv1S ‘flAW I Legal Description 7A-e �A41- ,'fi I �, Sn - t47 ik k // 4 elA II /" A , Property Identification#(PIN#) Paa7ynsC;why T #of Acres Current Zoning Type of Application ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment $250 ❑ Rezoning $250/acre; min$250 max$1500 ❑ Major Subdivisio• • + I it* \/Minor Subdivision $200 Planned Unit Development(PUD) Refer to rezoning fees o PUD Amendment $350 Conditional Use Permit R-1, R-2$75;all others$250 i •�: Variance R-1, R-2$100 all others$250 • Code Appeal $100 O Develop Review/Site Plan $125/acre;min$125 max$750 • ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit R-1,R-2$150;all others$200 O Wetland Buffer Permit R-1,R-2$25;all others$100 ❑ Floodplain Permit $200 ❑ Other *Deposits shall be paid to cover all costs of public notices,materials and staff or consultant time spent in the review, research or preparation of materials associated with this application. The applicant shall be responsible for all reasonable • incurred costs in excess of the initial deposit amount. Any portion of the deposit not spent or encumbered shall be refunded to the applicant within thirty(30)days after consideration of the application is completed. Please complete the reverse side of this application. City of Mounds View,MN Development Application Page 2 S Present Use of Property ❑ Undeveloped/Vacant 0 Single Family Dwelling Duplex/Two Family Dwelling 0 Multi-family Dwelling ❑s Business/Commercial Establishment • 0 Industrial Establishment ❑ Other(explain) Property Classification 0 Abstract 0 Torrens Description of Proposal BY MY(OUR) SIGNATURE ON THIS APPLICATION,I HEREBY DECLARE THAT,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. Signature of Applicant -C-.-'- ' ir/ • Name of Applicant(typed/printed) NA L.Z.H"1 C 1--E-67-7.-- • Signature of Property Owner CL:-T ,'—- - ' mak _.)--7"1 Nam rroperty O.ue:(tyred`pri^t,x1) Lt-ixal I L — ,.'.L/ O L E Address of Owner �' L— ), off , � /-J 144 , /t,/ cH��-vl z-. . Y-A1 . ..s-- -7)-----6-, Phone Number of Owner ( si ) 4 -i-t'—'6%/(:).C- 44**44.** #****?k—FIs#************************************************** FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date of Submittal T '') Date of Acceptance Assigned to: Planning Case No. 60-day Limit 120-day limit Fees Paid: Account# Check# Receipt#. Application: O,•00 i v r,) -.�4f Z / -7,A 5 / Wiz?/ 5 Park Dedication: Deposits: Other: • Total: N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\FORMS\DEVAPP.FOR 1/98 l ' 1 rn 4O N ro 796o 7965 7960 7959 N co Km 7955 7956° 7949 I I cNI rn N .. 7934 7933 7950 1 7932 • 2 40 c413. , to ___ _ —J 7897 N � N N N 79001 7901 HILLY A7830 T 7887 :— M AI)) 4, N 7835 7890 1 - 7861 N : `y c" 7820 •' 7825 7880 7879 • gm M: o i B-2 781• 7815 7870. 7865 7860 N 7850 _ N •=' 7805 7860 7851 B coo c 7850 7841 i;) _ 7801 d N 101015 . co � . ►tt��i i' lin R-4 -- • „, • 7821 rn a`to 77860CIE 7750.: . B 776: 7769 7775 7758 7759 7770 III ti^ ^,, O' { :... . 7748 7749 7768 7767... 11111 ti 7765 -_-� • ■ :F 7738 7729 `,0011midii - ...... . ....... 7755 77280 7 xliii " .,. 3 7729 ;: 7718p 7719 7715 • ..,-4:::::: i Lake! !' rn Z 7711 N 771 ° L ......... . .. ..,..._........,....__... . 7709 r 7711 770. :=:_........_. C0 ttt t 7692 c 7686 7685 N 7691 7685 N 7690 PFJ 0./0 N 7680 p_7669 7670 7663 768• w < 7675 7670 cc., - o O 7665 7660 S M rn to0 0 7660 0: 7644 0 7655 7666 7647 7630 7633 7664 7629 7634 7635 N 7624 7629 7620 7625 7620 7614 7627 7600 7619 7600 7601 7604. ( 7585 7594 SILVER VIEW 7581 7580 7575 7584 7579 7588 PARK 7564 7565 0 7565.. 758, 0 7565 7546 7555 7556 3 z cc 7555 7572 w 755IN La - 5 7552 7545 7550 O 7545 7560 : _7550 7538 w 7546Y 7515 PF YQ N in M 7540 j M M J 7501 N N 7500 N N N N DRIVE 7530 NSON 7522 N d `O qsmi 7485 i RI • '!!+ a o , 7474 7489 i■ 7490 N r` o .. rj in r� ►49' '0; oo fro) 750 7465 MN7471 7474 N N r:-::-•c:., — —74G2 BRONSON - 74 743 ..... „............. 454 174. R .t I !m l 1 `` "� Zoning Map Planning Case 557-99 Applicant: Meiho Lee N.Location: 7690 7692Silver Lake Road 1 )i 7 PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION • CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY,MINNESOTA Regular Meeting June 2, 1999 Mounds °w City Hall 2401 Highway 10, rA,nd .V ew,MN 55112 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Peters• 7 01��. ., June 2, 2. Roll Call Members Present: Chairperson Peterson, Commissioners Be -n, Hegland, Johnson, Kaden, Laube, Miller, and Stevenson. Members Absent: None. , Also Present: Planning Associate Jim son, C. ` unity -.pment Director Rick Jopke, and Recorders Carla Wirth and Trish• PtAg?,, Index to Minutes = Page Plamm�•s � . 553-" ® � kview tee, Mike& Sandy Leon, Property" P sidera , iance request for a reduced side yard setback for a .n pore 2 Planning 3-76 oodlawn Drive, PMJ Group (Mike Juaire), Applica' onsiderat q (A44 -lopment review request for a four-unit Si J'eports/Items o =i formation 9 # ,4)' son and ' �'n Commissioners Reports 12 y 3. L,0.0-fk sRequests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda There were no citizen requests or comments on items not on the agenda. 4. Approval of Minutes • Mounds View Planning Commission June 2, 1999 Regular Meeting Page 2 • A. May 5, 1999 MOTION/SECOND: Miller/Kaden to approve theMay 5, 1999 meeting minutes .: ' bmitted. Ayes—9 Nays—0 T ii _7-carried. carried. 5. PlanningCase No. 553-99 � r+ �' fit' Property Involved: 7386 Parkview Terrace :5 Consideration of a variance request for a reduced side yarn or athree-season porch Applicant: Mike & Sandy Leon �� 3w � The applicant was present. a� Planning Associate Ericson gave the staf port as -• to The applicants,Mike and Sandy Lei= requ g a van e fro:' :1 m the required ten-foot side yard setback established for principal gs an'ter ing sp °'herein. They would like to replace an 0 existing 10 x 12 square-foot 4 ec `''ith a aso a ng space addition of the same size in the same locate The deck, s existe nstruction of the house,is five feet from the north side f grope x � c'ect pro: * ° ocated in the Silver Lake Woods single family home de t the � ikAiii�� srner of County Road H2 and Silver Lake Road, and is only 9,150 s uare �� ft-of: Thi ,r s first heard at the May 19, 1999 Commission meeting, and after muc mT �� sta � 1' rected to explore in greater detail possible language addressing � � a� d •crite� "for granting a variance. Ericss t Voted the seven � . .bu shed for consideration of a variance whi . . .� + ., stat "that a variance ms obe granted in those cases where the Code imposes undue hardship o , ctical difficulties as ciated with the property which makes a literal interpretation of the Code • , burdensome or "trictive to a property owner. Ericson stated that it appeared to staff that in e a hards � es exist, and recommended that, if the Planning Commission concurred, a B. -i,c•• fl � anted to allow the applicants to construct a living space addition five feet from t � �`� y line. He stated that based upon the discussion at the last Commission meeting, staf a'% drafted language that related to the criteria in Resolution 579-99, a resolution which approves the Leons' variance request. He stated that he had received correspondence from adjacent property owners who indicated their support for the project. He noted that the date of adoption of the Resolution, listed on Page 3, should be amended to the present date. 0 Mounds View Planning Commission June 2, 1999 • Regular Meeting Page 3 Commissioner Kaden asked if a permit would be required should the applicant wish to turn the porch into a living space in the future. Ericson stated the resolution is drafted to indicate"living space" since the Code provisions consider the porch to be a living space expansion. Chair Peterson noted that the case number on Page 5 of the Re •lution ct,and stated that it should be changed to 553-99. • Commissioner Miller stated that Item 7 of the Reso.`,fifon show • �•enti : 4 hb• o supported the project as "the neighbor to the north." Commissioner Kaden asked if the neighbors to the north that the applicants planned on using the three-season porch as additional living space. Mike Leon, the applicant, stated they were aware • seen th ® ® on plans. MOTION/SECOND: JohnsonBerke,to ado ' ® -solu " Resolution Approving a Variance from Section 1104.01, Subd. 3, of the Mo, •s Vie.751) •� o• ? 'aining to Setbacks, to Allow for a Reduced Side-Yard Setback for a ng Spa ' xpan 86 Parkview Terrace; Mounds View Planning Case No. 553-99,as a ded to • ge the •. e of adoption stated on Page 3 to June 2, 1999, to correct the case num,���• Pag oto Case ��. 553-99, and to identify the adjacent neighbor referred to in Item 7 as ie neigh o the • " • ,, -0 The motion carried. F i s, T 6. Plannm, �,� 555 ' Property 'olved 7•.— oodlawn Drive • - • . • - • " 44eview request-for a four unit_resiclential rental dwelling Ap ant: PMJ Group OF uaire) 4.4 i � •licant wa p gent. .e� P Pgez 'ate Ericson gave the staff report as follows: The applicant, Mike Juaire, representing PMJ Group, hadrequested approval of a development review for the four-plex to be located at 7623 –7629 Woodlawn Drive, currently vacant property. The applicant had purchased this lot and the adjoining formerly tax-forfeited property to the east, and plans on developing both with four-unit dwellings. The elevations provided for the four-plex • Mounds View Planning Commission June 2, 1999 Regular Meeting Page 4 • show a simple, four-unit back-to-back building with no architectural features to break the building's uninterrupted straight lines. The front elevation shows four windows, four garage doors and four entryways. The side elevations do not show any windows,while rear elevation show, of ee windows per unit. Ericson reviewed the site plan and explained what each are -sent aned that the si e is flat with little,if any,elevation change from one end to t a er. He s:"Sitttic4il 4111_, has revie _,, a preliminary drainage plan for the four-plex, and has fo + it wouls suf i e no other mitigating factors. He stated that there are three ple o the nortickwit4iVRCment complex to the west of the subject property, which nsive run-off tie onto the applicant's property. He stated that this run-off causes poo, . a 9 cumulation of storm water on the applicant's property. Ericson stated that one optiog Q �e issue would be that with minor grading,the property could utilize the catch basin d a right-of-way could be established to carry run-off into the City sto ' � - •re �1 : ��r he applicant has no easement for the storm sewer, and suggested 1 .440easeme granted to facilitate the storm water run-off. Ericson stated that therms - see' 0 ussi", '•etween the applicant and the adjacent property owner inan effort to olve th;rai a and another option might be that the Woodlawn Terrace Apartmen omple s uld di titi ~it run-off from the applicant's property. He stated that because m5f.tVoptio exist, ff feels confident that an acceptable solution will be achieved. y • Ericson sta that, at ed nothing more than sod and decorative rock fora Q �.. ng p fated th j commends that specific plantings be shown on the fina6 `ika a quality that would be acceptable to both the applicant and the City. Ericson stat ome simple changes which could be utilized to improve the exterior, =aranceo .. •ment. First, he suggested that the entryways be moved so that they 64 ;it-w•f•e - • , -ctcd by some type of overhang—See end;t e sheuld be .47c'- tenor light betw entryway and garage for safety and security purposes. He stated th e exterior lighting shown in the site plan at this time.Third,with the lowered entryway,there 3 c be sufficient retia for a second window for each unit, perhaps in the foyer area. Last, the —.,K . a ys for the tat,V units could be moved so that access is taken from the sides of the building le � ¢ �� • Ericson stated that these changes, and any others proposed by the Planning ,)1:11R6,1°'4 ould be incorporated into the site plans for final approval by the City Council. Ericson stated that there were considerations to be taken in regard to the parking situation. He stated that the third unit to the north could not park in front of the garage as there was not enough room. He stated that the applicant could possibly provide on-site parking elsewhere, and though this was not a desirable situation, it could be acceptable if the tenants were made aware of this restriction. Secondly,he stated,there does not appear to be sufficient area for backing out of the complex. He • • Mounds View Planning Commission June 2, 1999 • Regular Meeting Page 5 stated that all four units would have to exit the property in reverse,which could be a safety concern. He stated that these issues would be addressed and staff believed there were means to resolve them. Ericson referred to the Certificate of Survey, on-site plans, and a graphs *ispl•< tating that two areas of the Woodlawn Terrace Apartment complex encroach upon t • •roperty, near the southern end,toward Woodlawn Drive. He stated that Wo•, : Te = _ ,, e ster and parkin lot cross the lot line, which is in violation of the City Co e statedrt d be meet with the owner of the apartment complex to discuss this other iss art"'elan • vel. ent of the four-plex. Ericson stated that there were water and sewer lines in Wo• 've so utilities are available to the site. There are ten-foot drainage and utility easeme � rty's north and west sides which will more than likely serve as drainage areas fo i edev •• �ti e stated that he would be consulting with the City Attorney regarding a f � side y. a<and utility easement along the east lot line between the two vacant pr' ® �a •. vide for:10,Vonal drainage. He stated that the City typically requires that an ease•• •e • •r tha purpose. He noted that the easement would not be privately owne• t retai + • • e stated, however, that the developer could be required to mamta, F the ea ent � is would be addressed in his discussion with the City Attorney. Ericson summarized the issues . ated th ha•_• ed a resolution recommending approval of the devel' . ent review four-pl y ations. Mike J 114,11601vt, stai40,..1.A ad submitted the site plan changes as set forth in the second stipulation • 1g.',4 • ution Commissio if the s contained anything to address the parkingsituation on the Yt g northern piS unit ire stated that it 4 `eir intention to create two additional parking spaces in the northeast c•� of the site,but t •lans had not yet been redrawn. _ § ire, appli stated the end parking spaces will eliminate the back out movement. He s � �,, a � nsidering putting up signs and striping a no-parking zone in an attempt to a em of congestion. They will also have separate operating procedures as an adjunct to th=} se. Commissioner Miller asked about the composition of the exterior of the building. Mike Juaire stated that it was comprised of maintenance-free siding and steel doors. Chair Peterson asked if the building location on the lot could be adjusted. Mounds View Planning Commission June 2, 1999 Regular Meeting Page 6 • Ericson stated that it could not,but the building itself could be wider,explaining that there was a 20 foot setback to the west. He stated,however,that this would not increase the function of the parking area or the building itself. Chair Peterson asked if there were plans to develop the secons. of in th ike Juaire stated they were preparing paperwork which would be submit sh• k Ericson stated that the lot was relatively flat but with a on, P oot chan• ele r • d g, providing channels and swales,and given the sandy con .a cy ofd ounds Vie •s ieved the property would drain but may result in standing vat •' sort period of tim II;*'our). Commissioner Kaden asked about the exterior lighting, 1.: + Q ed, was not indicated in the building plan revision. Mike Juaire stated that there was isting istingou,9 • ting for each entryway, and that floodlighting was planned for the back of cture. � mm## Ericson stated that plan will need to be sub • pri l cil c. l.faeration. Commissioner Braathen requested clan .tion of sti they to divert the water run-off. He asked if it would drain onto County ilid I, an. so,whelk:,'''from that point. Ericson stated that the driveway "ld be b : • to •moCi-rt the water to remain on the property, or diverted fro.c, ,he existing • • 1` to the 4 f4:.-d that the volume of run-off was minimal, and that - ; •ortio �� `,water • i absorbed before reaching County Road I. He statedth e y •ken to t5 9 ks Director Ulrich who agreed,and stated that the utilization of the ten ince - pipe iently accommodate the run-off. Commissionel,4 AE,•arkin•' Y. allowed on Woodlawn Drive. He stated that the applicant planned 0 • ace a p: ii ' 0, on the south side, and asked if there would be room for visitor parki B �aire stated that h. P elieved parking was restricted on one side of Woodlawn Drive. � wstated that 7 pplicant was required to provide only 2.5 parking spaces per unit, and was � E � � � ,t1i `de visitor parking. He agreed this level of parking may not be sufficient for an o 01: 9aefoii `t but visitors could park on the street prior to 2 a.m. Commissioner Stevenson stated that he is not satisfied with the landscaping plan and would like the site plan reviewed by the City Forester for additional plantings and landscaping design. He stated that it should be specified that some of the green area on the site plan contain plantings. • Mounds View Planning Commission June 2, 1999 • Regular Meeting Page 7 Ericson stated that the City Forester could make suggestions on specific species that thrive best in Mounds View soils but further direction should be provided. Chair Peterson suggested requiring one tree per unit and possibly som •w a inane shrubs along the foundation. Commissioner Stevenson added that plantings could be ed on eacke building encourage slower traffic. Ericson agreed, stating the property manager of Woodla p^ r - has indicated the �' '•roblems with vehicles running over the edge of the property so, p gits0dscape plantings will indicate to the driver the demarcation of the property line and entrance V a L ` 11k.:-. suggested staff be allowed to review and approve the landscape plan prior to Cityounce n on. Commissioner Hegland asked about plans for s Bill Juaer ed that they have other units and plan to contract with the same fi �5'rem� ® "a d p1 e it between the drives and to the west. The sidewalks would be cle w1•y indi. u g asked if the residents would be informed to move their cars. Mr. Ju.,it stated. at they 5,,,./t4.1101 •e. • Chair Peterson asked if the apphc 46ed e Arr prope similar to this four-plex development project. Bill Juaire stated that t• j own • , me Vis plex in Columbia Heights and a newly rebuilt side- -side duple ey. Commis -1 , ®e askeI � t 4 •uld be plastic or drain tile under the landscaping. Bill Juaire stated that 14, • instal � k.,, d a sump pump to alleviate the accumulation of water under the concr_� state• 'et0: elieved one sump pump per unit would be sufficient for that purpose _•: = • • :.-1MON •.erty owners had-the-same_prohlems with water run-off Ericson stat 66 at the owners of�� d 2432 Woodlawn Drive had installed a storm sewer which would be t all of the prope •wners. Chair Peterson stated that this would be a good opportunity for 4perty owners to, ? icipate in resolving the run-off problems. gdit at he was attempting to learn more about the drainage situation, and had • ,- •tter with City Engineer Hess. Braathen stated that there should be consideration not to jeopardize other properties. He added that the Rice Creek Watershed District would be concerned with possible liability. Ericson stated that the surrounding buildings were sufficiently protected from run-off. He stated that staff believes the four-plexes located to the north would not be impacted by the drainage plan, noting that the run-off 11 originated from their property. He added that the plans could address this issue. Mounds View Planning Commission June 2, 1999 Regular Meeting Page 8 Kaden asked who would pay for the drainage improvements. Ericson stated that the applicant would be responsible for the cost of the improvements, and possibly the other improved pro s erty owners. Chair Peterson asked about the warranty for the drainage plan. Ericson ed t' here would be a warranty period to cover repairs should they be needed. In the future, . mould be the City's responsibility which, in his opinion, would be desirable to to o ' a . Miller asked about entrances for emergency vehicles. E'son state® tsw 11®' w,. . e;® y and vehicles could ingress and egress without difficulty. 7 ,stated at the lots . t ough to insure access. Miller asked where the fire hydrant ;4 1 �d. Bill Juaire stikeiir it was located at the southern corner of the lot. Hegland asked why there appeared to be a rush to coni. r this a.® o Ericson explained that he had been working with the applicant for two mo� �.urmg wht•s g as not made known to the developer that they would be required to F0:940. t . he City trilir He stated that staff was attempting to minimize the impact to th -,, icao 1. 1. add sing the matter earlier. He added that if the Planning Commission ; not co r .o e opting the Resolution at this time, they could hold the matter over u r P'the ne e Kaden asked what guarantees the r i R -ment ;, •uld be r if the Planning Commission made their recommendation to the City Cou to appro � i Eric . tated that if the conditions were not met, staff would T.9 ng it forware ,g L next Co s -g and recommend denial. Heglan. • ,she as. m 2e, to address revisions to the parking lot and providing additional o" 6, g spa Braathen re. .n to 14s- age regarding the drainage plan. Ericson stated that Page 2 of the ution in final drainage planwill be submitted and will be approved by the City .11.-neer." :110 requested the wo "them"in Item 4 of the Resolution be omitted. • ked if the ii cage pertaining to the landscaping was sufficient. Ericson stated that staff 0.1 guage based upon the discussion,but he believed it was sufficient. Chatrson requested that Condition 1 of the Resolution include the statement"approved by City staff and the City Forester." Hegland requested the addition on the plan of standard, to-scale, vehicle outlines to indicate the amount of room available in the parking spaces. Ericson stated staff will assure parking spaces are in accordance with the City Code. Mounds View Planning Commission June 2, 1999 • Regular Meeting Page 9 Stevenson asked if the Commissioners were comfortable with voting at this time. Miller noted that at other times when all items were not as requested,the Commissio d asked that the matter be brought back at the next meeting. Chair Peterson stated that although he would prefer two m .s,heY son the matter at this time. Kaden stated that he would feel comfortable voting at *me if e ` of the stip met. He asked when the Resolution was set to go before the 4.1i)ii.(.11xvircil. Ericson stated that it was set to go before the Council at eeting on June 14. Chair Peterson asked if staff could prepare the paps ork aE . the final draft to the Commissioners for review prior to the Council m X aden as g L ommissioners could then go before the Council and address any ite __ 't as req +. Ericson stated that he �� .e1* for e Council Meeting. would submit the plans to the Commission- � or they� � �, �.: MOTION/SECOND: Stevenson/Mill to ad Plann 66 mmission Resolution 580-99, Resolution Recommending Approv a Devpment Riew for a Four-Unit Multiple Family • Residential Dwelling Located at 44!)::' 7621. oodlarive; Planning Case No. 55-999, with stipulations as amended and mo d. ' -0 The motion carried. 6. Staff R + W;�, ms of '01,51.0, ion • Silver ,, . Trail Paving Plan 21, 4 Co 44 issioner Stevenso t I'd that he had attended the last meeting of the Parks and Recreation CO-Y.0 ittee where discutt"I n took place in regard to the trail surrounding the Silverview Pond. He s . that for severa =`ars,there had been consideration of paving the trail, which is at this time ed of w ooci ips. He stated that there was unanimous support for the proposed paving Z ' neighborhood residents. He stated that the project would require some -'ettsF4ges, but would run along the current wood chip trail. Stevenson stated that some of the is ents on the north end of the pond had voiced concerns about the boggy nature of the east side of the pond. He stated that there were also inquiries regarding the construction of a bridge on Long Lake. He added that the construction of the bridge would not take place at this time due to the need for time-consuming engineering work. 110 Mounds View Planning Commission June 2, 1999 Regular Meeting Page 10 • Community Development Director Jopke stated that formal action was not required at this time, and he would relay the comments and concerns of the Commission to the City Council. Stevenson stated that a portion of the funds used for paving the trail w d c.®-- from the park dedication fees paid by the theater. Commissioner Berke stated that he had heard that funds 1 •een prow •tt-W Loper for ,��� project several years prior, but the Cityhad spent the fuelsewher Stevenson stated that he has served on the Park Comb r 12 years and n.VM-41 n -41Bard that comment. Stevenson stated that the maintenance requirements ould •0 ~ ® for the blacktop trail, explaining that the existing wood chips required ® @ ainten. i Sated that the issue of snow removal was discussed at the meet. ng, E d wing wo of facilitate large snow removal equipment. He stated that he was ,� oro , • • wi 'y e project. Commissioner Kaden asked if any of th sidents th pro. 000t to the trail had objected to the paving project. He noted that incr- t traffic„ d activit ` ight be cause for concern regarding ill loitering and crime. Debbie Jo on, 7405 P. rive, s'gi141 0' e is located on the south side and adjacent to the o- tated t�q heard oY ' ve feedback from the other residents in regard to the prj 4t tated e ` ved the occurrence of crime might actually be decreased by the increase: �$ he not a; ,11 xisting wood chips are difficult to walk or ride a bicycle Kaden a •ted the idea the paved trail would not be plowed in the winter. -o • 1• - • .j. • � � ` - - ,•, . •• -• -• ion among the residents in this area. Cirg issioner Braathe eked if the proposed paving would be blacktop, explaining that blacktop � ® facilitate a fas:4-, snow melt. Jopke stated that the trails would be paved with blacktop. f4 n asked if g -, was access to the trails, other than the resident's properties. tated that there was an access on Long Lake Road, from County Road H2, at the sour " o the pond. Commissioner Miller asked how long the project would take to complete. Stevenson stated that he did not know. S Mounds View Planning Commission June 2, 1999 • Regular Meeting Page 11 Chair Peterson asked where the proposed bridge would be located. Ms. Johnson stated that she believed it would be located at the narrows of the pond. Chair Peterson stated that the paving would be a benefit to the neig brhoo m d would help encourage a higher standard of maintenance which was in th- best int park. Commissioner Johnson stated that he agreed. Kaden stated that eleven community members had attenI d d s their sup. ; oject. MOTION/SECOND: Laube/Hegland to support utiliz®. ,, .edication funds to pave the remainder of the trail that surrounds Silverview Pond. Ayes—9 Nays ® ® �� ton •carried. B. Previous Council Actio "_ � • Community Development DirectorAt e repo ,r d on CitP ouncil action from their meeting on May 24. He stated that there wer- entati• of certifo''es for the Girl Scout Award recipients and a Resolution of Commendafp was p ted t red firefighter, Timothy C. Hawley. He stated that cession w in rega_ - =iO4+ditional franchise agreement for Reliant Energy co wh 416E43,9 � kuesting ` ,` ® ct business within the City of Mounds View. Jopke state• s * DA � 4, Nblic hearing was held for the sale of property located at 6991 Pleasant60k o Mare-11;4M*ers,Inc. He stated that this property had been purchased by the City e -44461.® omen e stated that the City had expressed the desire to purchase the pro.s locatedllview Road for participation in the Housing Redevelopment � , - . ..- - 4 _ -- ::- ':ility-of using ! : _ . — . . — ••anity-funding to IP eed with the rede 4 s ent project. J 0 , ,stated he will b- t of town next Wednesday and asked that the study session be canceled. rtiVW0,e''-fite1),,y;, Focus will advertise the Miracle Farm Market's produce stand which has o e Mounds View Square parking lot and will be addressed via a SUP. This consi = `"ion will be on the June 16 meeting agenda. Ericson stated that he would be attending the Focus 2000 meeting on Thursday, and that the first item on the agenda would be the discussion of a minor subdivision located at Silver Lake Road and County Road I. He stated that this was the proposed subdivision of a 20-26,000 square foot lot into • Mounds View Planning Commission June 2, 1999 Regular Meeting Page 12 • 12,500 square foot lots, and that he would bring the discussion forward at the next Commission meeting on June 16. 7. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Report Commissioners Braathen and Stevenson stated that they wo g unab the next meeting of the Planning Commission. No other reports were considered. 8. Adjournment t� There being no further business before the Planning C.mmissi et # 'eterson adjourned the meeting at 9:00 p.m. (The meeting immediately at ei a ,i da S ion) Respectfully submitted, s . . Rick Jop Commu � •ment . Transcribed by Trish Pearson; TimeSav f Site Se' ' - c. xF • CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNCIL AGENDA MONDAY,JUNE 14, 1999 7:00 PM • 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL: Coughlin, Quick,Marty, Stigney,Thomason 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. City Council May 24, 1999 Minutes • 5. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: • 6. REPORTS 7. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve Just and Correct Claims B. Set a public hearing for 7:05 pm,Monday,June 28, 1999,for the second reading of Ordinance 628, an ordinance amending Chapter 1001 of the Mounds View Building Code pertaining to Contractors Licenses C. Set a public hearing for 7:10 pm,Monday,June 28, 1999, for consideration of resolution regarding request of Merryville Farm Market to operate an outdoor produce sales stand at Moundsview Square D. Set a public hearing for 7:15 pm,June 28, 1999 for Second Reading of Ordinance 625 regarding Reliant Energy Minnegasco Franchise • E. Set a public hearing for 7:20 pm June 28, 1999 and 7:20 pm July 12, 1999 for Review of Streets Committee Report F. Set a public hearing for 7:25 p.m.June 28, 1999 for Approval of renewal intoxicating liquor licenses G. Set a public hearing for 7:30 pm June 28, 1999 for the second reading of Ordinance 630, Right of Way management 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 9. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR A. Citizens: Before speaking must give their full name and address for the minutes. Please limit your comments to three minutes. 10. COUNCIL BUSINESS A. Introduction(First Reading)of Ordinance 628, an ordinance amending Chapter 1001 of the Mounds View building Code pertaining to Contractors Licenses and work requiring a City license B. Resolution 5339 accepting Public Improvements at the Theater Project C. Resolution requesting Extension of Comprehensive Plan Submittal Date D. Consideration of Resolution No. 5340 approving a development review for a four-plex on vacant land at 7623-7629 Woodlawn Drive E. Introduction(First Reading) of Ordinance 630,Right of Way Management Page Two City Council Agenda June 14, 1999 • 11. Next Council Work Session: Monday, June 21, 1999 -7:00 PM Next Council Meeting: Monday, June 28, 1999 - 7:00 PM 12. ADJOURNMENT II' • • June 10, 1999 • To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Chuck Whiting, City Administrator Re: June 14, 1999 City Council Meeting The agenda items for Monday's meeting are straight forward. We will not have either the right of way ordinance nor the Minnegasco franchise agreement under Council business for Monday, but instead will for the June 28 meeting. We need to have public hearings set up for the second readings of both, and Council action to call those hearings will be on the censent agenda. The rest of the meeting items should be relatively simple. A report will be give on the public improvements at the theater site and an extension for the comprehensive plan will be asked for. The council is familiar with the four-plex matter on Woodlawn Drive as well. So all in all I cannot add much here you don't already know. Monday afternoon the council does have the first of three police chief candidate interviews. Feel free to call with questions, interests and concerns if there is anything I can help with. As I was able to mention to most of you during the week, I applied for a position vacancy on the League of Minnesota Cities board. The decision is made at the conference in Rochester next • week. Thanks for your support and we will see what happens. Have a good weekend and see you on Monday. 4110 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW MEETING MINUTES • MONDAY, MAY 24, 1999 7:00 P.M. 1. MEETING IS CALLED TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL: Marty, Quick, Stigney, and Thomason. NOT PRESENT: Coughlin Acting Mayor Stigney announced the birth of Mayor Coughlin's daughter, Shannon Marie Coughlin and extended his best wishes to the family. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Monday, May 10, 1999, City Council Minutes Council Member Marty said he was not present at the May 10, 1999,meeting but had several questions. He requested a clarification on Page 5, Presentation of the 1998 Audit Report, second paragraph, indicating the General Fund balance was $3,031,784 but the next paragraph notes it is just over$300,000. • Council Member Marty noted Page 6, second paragraph, indicates there was a$704,000 deficit in the MSA fund which was covered by a transfer. He asked why there was a deficit and where the transfer came from. City Manager Whiting stated he will ask the Finance Director for these clarifications. Council Member Marty noted Page 7, third paragraph, indicating"...at the end of the year these dollars were under collateralized by$206,000. Mr. Wischmann explained that in order to resolve that situation, funds were transferred into the 4M Fund which gained compliance with applicable Statutes." He asked where the funds came from and how it impacted the fund it was transferred from. City Administrator Whiting explained the transfer involved the transfer of those funds into another fund, the 4M fund. He explained the funds were still in the City's account,but not in the same depository. Council Member Marty reviewed the remark by Council Member Thomason on Page 9, last paragraph, regarding the theater lighting specifications and indicating"she noticed the lenses do exceed below the housing but the PUD indicates they shouldn't."He noted the minutes also • C:\ADMIN\MINUTES\CC\CC052499.MIN indicate"staff will ask the developer to verify the light levels." Council Member Marty asked if the developer will verify the light levels and if the City will also verify the light levels. • Council Member Thomason reported she has been working with Planning Associate Jopke and the City has a$100,000 bond to assure completion of the theater. She explained that all unresolved issues will need to be resolved by the end of the month and the light levels will be measured before full release of the bond. Acting Mayor Stigney requested the term"Starr Retreat Report"be corrected to state"Staff Retreat Report"where it occurs on Page 3. Acting Mayor Stigney requested a correction to Page 3, last paragraph to indicate"Council Member Stigney stated his acceptance with the understanding this information only reflects what was generated at the meeting from the majority of those in attendance." Acting Mayor Stigney, requested the following corrections: Page 6, eighth paragraph, to indicate: "Council Member Stigney inquired regarding the TIF Districts which are generating funds..." Page 7, second paragraph, "...file to document allowable costs for the TIF districts in the event of an audit." Council Member Marty advised that Mayor Coughlin has requested a correction to Page 2, first • paragraph, Reports, last sentence to indicate: "Mayor Coughlin extended his appreciation to Planning Commissioner Kaden who took time off from work to help represent the City at this meeting." MOTION/SECOND: Thomason/Stigney. To accept the May 10, 1999 City Council minutes as corrected above. Ayes - 3. Nays - 0. Abstain- 1 (Marty). Motion carried. 4. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS A. Presentation of certificates to Anna-Marie Baumhoefner,Amy Baumhoefner, and Sha-Na Marie Furney,Recipients of Girl Scout Gold and Silver Awards Acting Mayor Stigney asked those involved to come forward for the presentation of their awards. The Gold and Silver Awards were distributed by City Administrator Whiting to Anna-Marie Baumhoefner,Amy Baumhoefner, and Sha-na Marie Fumey. C:\ADMIN\MINUTES\CC\CC052499.MIN Elizabeth Schwerm, Girl Scout Service Unit Manager, congratulated the award winners and noted that Anna-Marie Baumhoefner has earned the highest Girl Scout award possible, the Gold • Award. She then presented flowers to each recipient. B. Presentation of resolution of commendation to retired firefighter Timothy C. Hawley Administrator Whiting read in full and presented a Resolution of Commendation to Timothy C. Hawley, retired firefighter, and thanked him for his years of service to the City of Mounds View. Acting Mayor Stigney and Council Members offered their congratulations and appreciation for his volunteerism. 5. REPORTS Council Member Quick had no report. Council Member Marty reported the Parks and Recreation Committee did not meet. He advised that Frank Silvis a stalwart member of the community who had been active for years on the Parks and Recreation Committee had a heart attack and is not doing very well. He stated his thoughts and prayers are with Mr. Silvis and his family. Council Member Marty read a prepared statement from Mayor Coughlin thanking all for their • thoughts and well wishes to his family over the birth of their daughter, Shannon Marie Coughlin. Council Member Marty extended the Council's best wishes to Laura, Shannon, and Mayor Coughlin. Mayor Coughlin's report also offered congratulations to the Pinewood Elementary DARE graduates and appreciation to Police Officer Tim Brennan who has worked with these graduates Mayor Coughlin's report announced the upcoming bond referendum scheduled for May 25, 1999, and noted the Mounds View polling place is Edgewood Middle School. Mayor Coughlin's report extended his thanks and gratitude to City Attorney Long, City Administrator Whiting, and Representative Haake for their efforts above and beyond the call of duty in working with the Reliever Airport Legislation, meeting attendance, and attempts to resolve the on-going dispute with MAC over the Blaine airport. Mayor Coughlin's report thanked Acting Mayor Stigney for chairing the meeting tonight so he could take his wife and new daughter home. Acting Mayor Stigney stated he attended the DARE graduation which was a very nice ceremony and he was impressed with the attitude of the graduates. He stated he hopes this attitude will • C:\ADMIN\MINUTES\CC\CC052499.MIN help resole drug problems in the future. Acting Mayor Stigney extended his appreciation to Police Officer Brennan as well. • Acting Mayor Stigney stated he attended the May 13 Charter Commission meeting to review by laws which will be voted on at the next meeting. He stated they also received input on things the Commissioners want to change in the Charter which will be addressed on an item-by-item basis as time allows. Acting Mayor Stigney stated they reviewed recommendations from a League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) attorney regarding recommended changes to the Charter. Acting Mayor Stigney reported he filled in for the Mayor at the May 20, 1999 Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) conference which was their 25th annual meeting. He stated recent legislative actions were summarized and many past presidents were in attendance. Acting Mayor Stigney noted that one of the past presidents was City Attorney Bob Long who received recognition. Council Member Thomason reported that last week she met with residents of the area surrounding the theater, representative from the City,representatives of the theater group, and the developer. She explained the basis of the meeting was to alleviate traffic problems before they occur. Council Member Thomason thanked the Police Department for their diligence in directing traffic. She stated she has not received one complaint from that neighborhood which is due to the efforts of Lt. David Brick in placing road blocks, and Public Works Director Mike Ulrich for placing traffic counters. City Administrator Whiting reported on his meeting with the Transportation Advisory Board of • the Metropolitan Council to discuss the rule change on the no-build zone around minor class airports. He reported it appears the change will not affect the City of Mounds View but they talked about the issue of airport noise, referenced Mound View's struggles, and seem to be acutely aware of the impact the airport has on existing development. He stated the rule change was approved to go through the Metropolitan Council for hearings and additional information is expected by mid-July regarding their noise"footprint"in areas where they exclude development. City Administrator Whiting noted the closed session which will be held later tonight to discuss the airport litigation and where issues will be addressed in more detail. City Attorney Long reported on the legislative process for the airport and advised the Bill cleared all policy committees in the Senate and House and reached the floor of both bodies. He explained that through discussion with State Representatives Haake, Larson, and Paulsen,they did agree with the Speaker of the House and Majority Leader to send the Bill to the Rules Committee so it is ready for immediate floor action in the Senate and House at the start of the next session. Council Member Marty advised that residents of Mound View and New Brighton received a public hearing notice regarding the expansion of the New Brighton Post Office which is being • C:\ADMIN\MINUTES\CC\CC052499.MIN held tonight. He stated his wife is attending that meeting to gather information and he will report information as it is available. • Acting Mayor Stigney noted Planning Associate Ericson was to address contractor licenses. Planning Associate Ericson explained staff will bring to the Council an ordinance to amend the City Code pertaining to contractor licenses which are currently renewed annually and expire June 30 of each year. He explained contractors have advised staff that this presents a hardship since it sometimes requires them to obtain two licenses. Planning Associate Ericson stated staff will recommend the licenses expire December 31st of each year rather than in June. 6. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve Just and Correct Claims B. Contractor Licenses for Approval C. Amusement Center License for 2430 Highway 10 Acting Mayor Stigney asked the Council if anyone would like to remove items for discussion. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Marty. To approve the Consent Agenda for items A, B, and C as listed above. Ayes- 4. Nays - 0. Motion carried. II/ 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. 8. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR There were no requests or comments from the floor. 9. COUNCIL BUSINESS A. First Reading- Franchise Ordinance 625 and Reliant Energy Minnegasco City Administrator Whiting explained a request was received from Reliant Energy Minnegasco requesting they be allowed to do gas distribution within Mounds View which requires the adoption of an ordinance. He stated this is the first time the Council has seen this item. He explained that procedurally this would be the first reading and discussion can take place prior to consideration of second reading. He noted it will be three weeks until the next Council meeting. City Administrator Whiting stated this ordinance warrants a more discussion which can occur at the next work session. • C:\ADMIN\MINUTES\CC\CC052499.MIN t City Attorney Long stated the ordinance contained in the meeting packet was presented by Reliant Energy Minnegasco but tonight he has distributed an ordinance his firm prepared for • Council consideration based on the standard LMC format. He stated this is called an ordinance but a franchise agreement must be agreed on by both parties. City Attorney Long explained that over a year ago an existing customer of Minnegasco opened a business in Mounds View and asked if Minnegasco could continue providing service. At that time, staff began to prepare a franchise agreement but, since there was a lot of discussion about a model ordinance, it was placed on hold. However, the City did allow Minnegasco to extend a line to that one customer so Minnegasco has been operating in Mounds View(for that one business) for some time. Staff recommends the City consider a franchise ordinance that incorporates the newest provisions including a franchise fee at the same level as NSP. Council Member Marty asked if Minnegasco is running their own lines in or using NSP lines with a Minnegasco meter. Peter Melander, representing Reliant Energy Minnegasco, explained that Zeff Manufacturing is being serviced by their own line and they are now working on an account that would require a new line. He stated Minnegasco could handle that under the permitting process but needs the franchise agreement to address the Zeff Manufacturing account and any new accounts would be handled individually. Council Member Marty stated this is first reading so the technical issues do not need to be • addressed tonight and can be discussed during the work session. City Attorney Long stated the meeting agenda tonight should have included an item on the LMC prepared model right-of-way ordinance dealing with digging in public rights-of-way for utilities. He stated it might not be a bad idea to think about the right-of-way ordinance so it is in place for any utility company that wants to dig lines in those areas. City Attorney Long suggested that issue also be discussed at the workshop meeting. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Marty. To waive the reading and approve first reading of Ordinance 625, an Ordinance Granting to Reliant Energy Minnegasco, a Natural Gas Utility, a Division of Reliant Resources Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, its Successors and Assigns, a Nonexclusive Franchise to Construct, Operate, Repair and Maintain Facilities and Equipment for the Transportation,Distribution, Manufacture and Sale of Gas Energy for Public and Private Use and to Use Public Ways and Public Grounds of the City for Such Purposes and Prescribing Certain Terms and Conditions Thereof. Ayes-4. Nays-0 Motion carried. B. YMCA Agreement C:\ADMIN\MINUTES\CC\CC052499.MIN City Administrator Whiting noted the memorandum prepared by Finance Director Kessel regarding the latest draft of the Agreement with the YMCA and noted the changes. • Council Member Marty requested this item be tabled until the Finance Director is available to answer questions. He stated he noticed some issues which he would like resolved since this is a long-term agreement. MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Thomason. To table consideration of the YMCA Agreement for additional discussion at the June 8, 1999, or June 21, 1999 work session. City Administrator Whiting stated the Finance Director will not be available until June 21st but if the Council has questions he can refer them to the Finance Director. If answers are available, it can be considered June 8, otherwise it can be delayed to June 21. Ayes -4. Nays - 0. Motion carried. City Attorney Long provided the Council with a copy of the newly revised Agreement. C. Surplus List of Cable Equipment City Administrator Whiting presented a list identifying the surplus from this past winter's upgrade. He noted the recommendation to authorize staff to dispose of surplus inventory as stipulated in the policy. He explained that in the past the items have been taken to an auction • house. MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Quick. To authorize staff to dispose of surplus inventory as stipulated in the policy for disposition of surplus property. Acting Mayor Stigney stated he and others may wish to bid on some of the items listed and suggested the list of items be posted at the City Hall with information on when they will be auctioned. Ayes- 4. Nays- 0. Motion carried. 10. Next Council Work Session: Monday,June 7, 1999 at 6:00 PM Next Council Meeting: Monday,June, 14, 1999 at 7:00 PM No action required. In consideration of audience members present, Acting Mayor Stigney suggested the EDA meeting be held prior to the closed session. The Council agreed. Acting Mayor Stigney recessed the Council meeting to the EDA meeting at 7:50 p.m. • C:\ADMIN\MINUTES\CC\CC052499.MIN Following adjournment of the EDA meeting, Acting Mayor Stigney announced the Council will now meet in closed executive session to discuss litigation. He adjourned the regular meeting to a • closed executive session at 8:28 P.M. 11. CLOSED SESSION A. Airport Litigation This item was addressed by the Council in a closed executive session which was not open to the public. 12. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Coughlin adjourned the meeting at 9:35 P.M. Transcribed and recorded by: Carla Wirth TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. • 11111 C:\ADMIN\MINUTES\CC\CC052499.MIN