HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-21-2006 47 r Cofl 11 Cy)
1
le
MOUNDS VIEW
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA
April 21, 2006
7:30 A.M. 6/i0: 1/20/(A
NEW BRIGHTON CITY HALL* - CITY COUNCIL CH CA-6 7i4z*(4
*Note that the EDC is meeting at the New Brighton lo c '//zi/44
due to city hall renovation in Mounds View. 7
1. CALL TO ORDER 71 ° A.M. 10/21
2. ROLL CALL (Present = P, Absent = A)
Belting 1 Entsminger
./ Field '-' Helgemoe
Jaker v Johnson
(Open) _/ Backman (Staff)
-,/ Ericson (Staff)
3. APPROVE EDC MINUTES
March 18, 2005 Marck /7,_,Icai.
I) —
Motion: I`P.?'" Second: 9Vote: 5 Z °
7- ii,vv.y PAL EV),+LyALA, /1 $ .A, a
4. SPECIAL BUSINESS
A. None
1741 04 —11A4A4
5. EDC BUSINESS 77*
'444"41?NA' 3/6 i
A. Discussion of Economic Development Funding Priori Jim
rm
Ericson's April 19, 2006 Report to the Planning Co
ilioA44 34
a
6. REPORT OF COMMISSIONERS, STAFF AND EDA LIA ,, t: 6,014 /3/4
A. Report of Commissioners -No Materials Attached - 94.%, S-dt
B. Reports of Staff
cr,,ItY' 1. Update on Medtronic CRM Corporate Campus
t'
P.Ot'l P '' • Medtronic and Opus paid the City $1,414,643.67 ($865,000 for park
dedication fee; $549,643.67 for building permits and utility fees for the
North Building and the Parking Ramp) on March 24, 2006. Plan
review for the Central Building is completed, with permits to be issued.
71t4 6 • M.V. City Council authorized the execution of easements with Ramsey
County associated with the Co. Road J Project on March 27, 2(006.,..
fi.,., 0) /41, _.t,.E1Y) ,... p4s,...„ ..fil A 7 A , -7--l1
-)NO2 Pil
6P°°Is' 7 fe,44— a)
Noi
1
B. Reports of Staff (Continued)
0 • Ramsey County Board approved MnDOT Agreement for the
reconstruction of Co. Road J and DEED Grant Agreement (reflecting
revised legislation recently enacted) on March 28th.
• Bidletting on March 31st by Ramsey County for Co. Rd. J Project;
Lunda Construction, the low bidder, was within engineer's estimates.
• Two weeks ago concrete footings for the first building were begun. I
This week concrete footings for the parking ramp were begun.
• City moved two metal bridges from Medtronic site on April 12 & 13th.
They will be reused elsewhere in the City.
• Work on mitigation ponds on the east side of the property near 1-35W
is progressing. One pond is largely completed.
Arm-ii,'':,L
2. Update on SYSCO Minnesota Parking Expansio 64Aj
:40rPu "4-
,----------------
3. Hidden Hollow South Residential Project—Dan E.
Banker/Burnet 4 ift 1 l‘" 'N- tftirvo
4. Status of the Premium Stop Site fr /4--115
fii(41 -, ,
5. Legislative Activity: $1.2 million appropriation for I m44,14 /1'
Study and the Noise Wall Extension in Mounds Vit
II, 6. Other
7. ADJOURN at Vil A.M
ie/$44-, 1'44
Next Regularly Schedu
1/4/4.4"17) fiA)4" l'r i
—AA it,tr.,/,A 0,41,1 7-m.-14 mAs-vim
..4.31a
k 9/
4-
ar,14.4 13-
AL-
TroutlComrnDev\Economic Development\EDC\Agendas\Agenda064-21-06.doc
ii
....
Not Approved
Minutes of the Economic Development Commission
City of Mounds View
• Ramsey County, Minnesota
Regular Meeting
April 21, 2006
City of Mounds View, Council Chambers
2401 Highway.10, Mounds View, MN 55112
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Toni Johnson called the meeting to order at 7:40 a.m.
2. ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Jackie Entsminger, Tom Field, Jerry Jaker, Jason Helgemoe, Toni Johnson
Members Absent: Greg Belting
Staff Present: Economic Development Coordinator Aaron Backman
Others Present: Community Development Director Jim Ericson
3. APPROVAL OF EDC MINUTES:
• Motion/Second: Field made a motion to approve the March 18, 2005 minutes. Seconded by
Entsminger. Approved 5 to 0. Johnson noted correction at the adjournment of the March 17, 2006
minutes. Jaker made a motion to approve the March 17, 2006 minutes as amended. Seconded by
Entsminger. Approved 5 to 0.
4. SPECIAL BUSINESS
A. None.
5. EDC BUSINESS
A. Discussion of the Economic Development Funding Priorities and Philosophy. Backman reviewed
Jim Ericson's April 19, 2006 report to the M.V. Planning Commission. Ericson explored five
potential outcomes of its economic development policy review. First,the City could maximize the
flow of increment or revenues. Continuing TIF in the present fashion generates $14.4 million
over the next nine years. A variety of projects can be funded because of the flexibility with these
TIF districts. Second, the City could reduce the amount of increment available for economic
development purposes. Third, the percentage of the tax capacity captured in the existing
districts could be reduced. Fourth, the geographic area contained in the current TIF districts
could be reduced. Fifth,the City could reduce the financial burden of the TIF districts on non-TIF
properties. Backman reviewed the existing obligations for the three districts. District#3 is the
district that could be decertified the earliest based upon its current obligations. Ericson noted
that with these options the City would be looking at a percentage or specific dollar amount target.
•
Johnson asked if 16.3% of captured tax capacity is high or low. Ericson replied that there is no
standard with the state or the Office of State Auditor. It is really up to the individual communities
setting their priorities. Backman indicated that he was less concerned about the specific
EDC Minutes ,ter
April 21, 2006 Not Approved
Page 2
percentage. He is more concerned about the overall policies—for example, whether we do
• Election A or B regarding fiscal disparities. From a financial standpoint, it may be difficult to do
both the decertification of a district and opting for Election B (fiscal disparities only from the
district). With those assumptions the City might not have sufficient resources to do critical
improvements, such as the Co. Rd 10 Corridor. Backman is seeking input from the EDC as to
what the members feel more comfortable with—status quo, decertification, Election B, etc.
Ericson indicated that the Planning Commission did not take a position regarding the finances or
what should be done with the districts. The PC wanted to focus on four areas—Silverview Plaza,
Moundsview Square, County Road 10, and infrastructure. According to Ericson, the greater
question is where we spend the dollars. Johnson stated that spending TIF resources for
infrastructure is beneficial because it benefits both businesses and residents. She is concerned
about the fairness of the distribution of those funds (e.g. for feeder roads). Ericson posed the
question of whether the EDC supports current levels of TIF funding or reducing TIF revenues.
Field indicated that the public desires to reduce the amount of TIF. Johnson stated that she did
not ready to do a motion on fiscal disparities options A or B. Jaker felt he did not have enough
information about the clarity of options to make a decision that is helpful to the City. After further
discussion,Johnson made a motion to direct the EDA to pursue options to reduce the amount of
TIF collected while still meeting the Economic Development goals and priorities set forth by the
City. Helgemoe seconded the motion. Passed 5 to 0.
6. REPORT OF COMMISSIONERS, STAFF AND EDA LIAISON
A. Report of Commissioners. Field has noticed the project near Scotland Green during the past
several weeks. Being a Commissioner he wants to be informed about all economic development
projects in M.V. Field expressed his disappointment at how the residential project proceeded
111 and the clearcutting that has gone on. Ericson indicated that the City's hands are tied since the
judge ruled in favor of the developer, Harstad Homes, regarding the approvals and requirements
for Red Oak Estates#3. He added that the ruling does not apply to other projects in the City. On
a different item, Helgemoe mentioned the upcoming Chamber Golf event on June 2nd at Majestic
Oaks. It is a significant fundraiser for the TCN Chamber. Entsminger reminded members of the
upcoming Town Hall meeting on Saturday, April 29 at the Mounds View Community Center.
B. Report of Staff:
1. Update on Medtronic CRM Corporate Campus: Backman discussed the payments the City
has received to date. On March 24, 2006, the City received about$1.4 million—Medtronic
paid the City$865,000 for the park dedication fee; Opus,the design builder for the Medtronic
CRM Campus, paid $549,643.67 for building permits and utility fees for the North Building
and the Parking Ramp. The fees are already greater than the City originally forecasted and
additional permit fees will be paid. The larger amounts are due to greater building values
and to higher SAC/WAC fees as calculated by the Met Council. Backman showed
construction photos and unrolled a large diagram of the County Road J project. Backman
discussed different components of the road project. Helgemoe asked about red and green
areas on the diagram. Ericson indicated they were raised medians (red) and landscaped
medians(green). Road construction is slated to begin in mid-May, and the bridge over 35W
will be demolished this fall. Two of the four metal bridges were moved by the City to the
Public Works parking lot(Medtronic kept two of them). The pouring of concrete footings for
the North Building began during the first week of April. Field asked about the status of the
billboards. Backman replied that signs #4 and 5 were removed starting March 14th. Next
• year in March signs#2 and 3 will be removed. Ericson noted that the City is looking at the
sign code ordinance to facilitate alternate locations for these signs,focusing on areas along
I-35W, Highway 10, and Old Highway 8.
EDC Minutes r
April 21, 2006 Not Approved,
Page 3
• 2. Update on SYSCO Minnesota Parking Expansion: Backman provided a quick background
regarding the parking lot expansion. On April 14th Sysco submitted construction plans and
the final plat. Overall the project looks good and is moving forward.
3. Hidden Hollow South Residential Proiect—Dan Saplis, Co[dwell Banker/Burnet: Mr.Saplis,
the developer is going before the City Council on April 24, 2006 for approval of the final plat
and development agreement. A model home is planned for Lot#6 and the builder will be
moving to Mounds View. Plans for the model home were submitted to Community
Development on April 14th and are being reviewed.
4. Status of the Premium Stop Site: The gasoline tanks were removed on or about April l 3th.
Now the contractors are in the environmental review process. Ericson has spoken with the
owner. The environmental review process has been completed. Results showed the site to
be relatively clean. Reports should be ready in a couple of weeks. Field asked who is
responsible for the demolition of the structures. Ericson replied that the City would do so.
5. Legislative Activity: $1.2 million appropriation for I-35W Design Concept Study and the
Noise Wall Extension in Mounds View: Backman indicated that there has been a fair amount
of activity on this over the past month. The City has been seeking$1.2 million--$822,000 for
the design study for improvements to 35W from Lexington to 694, and $400,000 for
additional resources for the noise wall extension on the south side of Trunk Highway 10.
(MnDot already has programmed$300,000 in 2007 for the noise wall project.) City staff and
the I-35W Corridor Coalition have been trying to get legislation heard or amended to the
Omnibus Transportation bill. Thus far, it has not happened. There is good support from
. area legislators, the Governor's office and Medtronic. However, it appears that the budget
targets do not allow for the appropriation this year. The City will work with legislators in the
upcoming legislative session to move it forward.
7. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the Commission, Helgemoe adjourned the April 21st meeting of
the Economic Development Commission at 8:57 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Aaron A. Backman
Economic Development Coordinator
\\Trout\CommDev\Economic Development\EDC\Minutes\Min06\4-21-06.doc
•