HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-26-2006PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW EDA
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
June 26, 2006
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
6:30 P.M.
1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL: President Marty, Vice President Stigney, Commissioner Gunn,
Commissioner Flaherty, and Commissioner Thomas.
NOT PRESENT: None.
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION/SECOND: GUNN/FLAHERTY. To Approve the June 26, 2006 Agenda as presented.
Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried.
4. PUBLIC INPUT
There was none.
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. EDA Minutes, June 12, 2006.
MOTION/SECOND: FLAHERTY/STIGNEY. To Approve the June 12, 2006 Minutes as
amended.
Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried.
6. CONSENT AGENDA
None.
7. EDA BUSINESS
A. Consider EDA Resolution 06-EDA-220 Authorizing the Acquisition of the
Premium Stop Property Located at 2390 County Road 10 Consistent with the
terms of the Approved Purchase Agreement.
Mounds View EDA June 26, 2006
Regular Meeting Page 2
Community Development Director Ericson stated this item was on the last agenda but tabled
pending additional review of environmental issues. He stated Staff reviewed the proposal and the
sellers have agreed to escrow $25,000 for two years to take care of remediation or environmental
issues on the site.
Community Development Director Ericson said the site has been closed by the MPCA and the
engineer gave it a full bill of health. In the Environmental Report there is trace contamination
and the MPCA said it is fairly common in places like this. They stated further action is not
required.
Community Development Director Ericson explained the City has requested a “no liability “
letter that releases the City of any liability in the chain of ownership and the previous owners of
the property will be responsible for any contamination. He stated Staff believes they have
enough information to go ahead with the purchase and recommends authorizing the acquisition
of the property. He stated it is the same resolution as was presented at the last meeting with the
added clause.
Community Development Director Ericson explained the payment will be for the full amount
and the title company will set the amount aside in escrow. Everyone feels it is a clean site and
there is a strong likelihood that no remediation will be necessary. He added that redevelopment
for commercial or retail should be fine.
Commissioner Flaherty asked for clarification about the purchase price. Community
Development Director Ericson responded the purchase price is $625,000.
Commissioner Flaherty asked about the way the MPCA identifies the site versus the way the
City identifies the site. Community Development Director Ericson stated that the way the MPCA
designates the property is as the original owner and it has no effect on the purchase.
Commissioner Flaherty asked about the MPCA letter regarding the liability language. He
questioned the fact that nobody is saying it is a clean site and asked if nobody is saying it’s a
clean site. City Attorney Riggs stated that under federal law, anyone who purchases the property
must go through the MPCA and the liability letter will remove the City from the chain of
ownership.
Commissioner Flaherty asked who would be responsible if a future developer insists on a clean
site. City Attorney Riggs responded that the City will not be able to say it’s a clean site and will
not enter an agreement that indemnifies the City. He stated based on his discussions, and based
on potential usage and zoning, there will not be an issue with the site.
Commissioner Flaherty stated he wants to make sure the City is not “thrown a curveball” later on
and is on the hook for a large clean up. City Attorney Riggs said his staff has been trying to
make sure that the City will not be responsible. He stated it appears the City will not be
responsible, but there is no 100% guarantee. He said the City cannot say it’s a clean property
and, in case soil has to be moved or remediated, the $25,000 in escrow will take care of the
expense. City Attorney Riggs said the escrow covers any kind of environmental problem that
Mounds View EDA June 26, 2006
Regular Meeting Page 3
comes up in the next 2-2.5 years and it favors the EDA.
Commissioner Thomas said until the letter is in hand, her trust level is very low. She said she is
less concerned about financial liabilities and more concerned about timing issues. She said she
has very little trust that the previous owners, who will be liable legally, can be contacted in a
timely manner. She said she believes the City is in a tenuous position. She said if something
were to happen, she suspects the City will have to step in and is not thrilled with the idea. She
said she is looking for every shred of assurance before she will sign off on the purchase.
President Marty said he feels the same way and would like to have the letter in hand. He
commended the staff report with the several options about how to market the land. He said there
were two options for the site, and he likes the second option of hiring consultants to conduct a
site-specific market analysis as to the highest and best use of the parcel recognizing its inherent
impediments such as lot configuration, access, and lot size rather than simply reacting to
proposals as they are presented.
President Marty stated that Staff could actively market the site to developers who specialize in
areas identified in the analysis consistent with the declared plans optioned by the City. He said
such a plan could conceivably involve adjacent properties as well. He stated Staff is
recommending such a plan and if the EDA concurs, they will go ahead and receive proposals
from consultant firms.
President Marty added he sees this as proactive rather than reactive and commends Staff for such
a stance. He said he would like to have some consultants look at the area and market it as is
determined. He stated he agrees with the Staff report.
President Marty explained that some of the costs could be passed on to future developers.
Community Development Director Ericson said those costs could be passed on to the developers
through the asking price of the property.
Vice President Stigney said they are talking about adjacent properties as well and asked how it
would be paid for, whether through TIF funding or development funds. He said he wished all of
that was “ironed out” before it was brought to the EDA.
President Marty noted that one of the adjoining property owners has stated willingness to sell
depending on the price. He said the other property just opened, but it would not necessarily be up
to the City to acquire the properties, but having the consultants looking at the adjacent properties
for future development.
Vice President Stigney asked if TIF funds would be used, and Community Development Director
Ericson said that would not be indicated up front. He said the EDA could communicate to
potential developers that TIF funding would not be used, but does not want to “close the door”
on TIF funding.
Vice President Stigney stated TIF could always be opened up, but if the developers know TIF
Mounds View EDA June 26, 2006
Regular Meeting Page 4
could be used, they may try to get TIF funding. He added that the EDA should not offer TIF
funding.
President Marty agreed, and said he would like to keep TIF off the table. He said if something
comes in that appeals to the Council, it will be addressed at that time. Commissioner Thomas
said this discussion is premature and should wait until it is the Council’s to discuss. She said
there is some thought the EDA could put into it as far as options for the property once that time
comes.
Commissioner Flaherty said he agrees, but does not believe he would say right now that TIF is
not available and added developers could ask on a case-by-case basis. He asked that any City
funds put toward demolition reflect in the selling price of the property.
Community Development Director Ericson said the liability letter is forthcoming and states that
the tanks were removed prior to the City maintaining ownership. The letter is a statement to the
fact that the City has not caused any of the contamination that is out there. He said the
letter is coming and it is clear that the City has nothing to do with the contamination. He said
from a Staff perspective, he shares the concern about not having the letter, but if the property is
before June 30th, it will save the City close to $20,000 in 2007 taxes.
Commissioner Thomas suggested that a resolution be contingent on receipt of the letter, although
it still makes her nervous. Community Development Director Ericson stated the letter could be
here as soon as tomorrow. President Marty said he would like it to be contingent on the letter as
well and Vice President Stigney agreed.
Vice President Stigney said the City should not buy the property since it is currently on the tax
roll and will be off the tax roll once it is purchased by the City. He stated he does not support the
purchase.
President Marty that it is one mile of streets off of the tax roll, but is blighted property right on
the main street and if it can be developed, he hopes the City will get a higher and better use for
property which will generate considerable more taxes than the gas station brought in. He said the
only other interest has been from other gas station companies and he would like to get a higher
and better use.
Vice President Stigney said there will have to be a pretty high price to gain more tax income.
President Marty said depending on how it is developed, the City should be able to recoup some
money.
MOTION/SECOND: GUNN/FLAHERTY. To Approve the Resolution 06-EDA-220
Authorizing the Acquisition of the Premium Stop Property Located at 2390 County Road 10
Consistent with the terms of the Approved Purchase Agreement, contingent upon the receipt of
the liability letter from the MPCA.
Ayes – 4 Nays – 1 (Stigney) Motion carried.
Mounds View EDA June 26, 2006
Regular Meeting Page 5
B. Review Mounds View Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Policy
Community Development Director Ericson suggested this action be deferred until the next EDA
meeting since it is a potentially long discussion.
MOTION/SECOND: GUNN/STIGNEY. To postpone the review of the Mounds View Tax
Increment Funding (TIF) Policy until the July 10th meeting.
Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried.
8. REPORTS
Economic Development Coordinator Backman said he attended the Economic Development
Association of Minnesota, or EDAM, conference the past week where nine awards were
presented to various projects. He stated the best business retention and expansion was to Red
Wing, the Best Recruitment Project award went to Greater Mankato for the Wal-Mart
distribution center, Best Redevelopment award was to Columbia Heights for Parkview, and
Presidents Award for best overall project was awarded to Mounds View for the Medtronic
project.
Economic Development Coordinator Backman presented the award to the EDA. He said past
winners have included the Phalen Corridor in St. Paul, and stated Mounds View is in honored
company for the award. He said it was a team effort on part of Council and other parties
involved.
Economic Development Coordinator Backman explained the selection criteria and stated the
City did well in all categories. He stated it is an honor to be recognized by peers on a statewide
level.
9. NEXT EDA MEETING: Monday, July 10, 2006 at 6:30 p.m.
10. ADJOURNMENT
President Marty adjourned the meeting at 7:05 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Recorded and transcribed by:
Lauren McKay
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.