Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-13-2000M:\MasterFiles\1999 thru 2010\2000\EDA\EDA Packets\03-13-00\Agenda.doc CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MONDAY, March 13, 2000 AGENDA ROLL CALL: President Coughlin, Vice President Stigney, Commissioner Marty, Commissioner Quick, Commissioner Thomason 1. AGENDA ADDITIONS: 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Approve Minutes of February 28th, 2000 3. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: None 4. CONSENT AGENDA None 5. EDA BUSINESS A. Business Retention Visit Program B. Potential Options for 2901 Highway 10 C. Tax Abatement Policy Development D. Consideration of Resolution No. 00-EDA124 Adopting the City’s Business Subsidy Policy under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 116J.993 through 116J.995 E. Approval of Agreement Terms with Springsted Public Finance Advisors for Conducting a Highway 10 Community Discussion for the City 6. REPORTS 7. ADJOURNMENT PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW EDA CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting February 28, 2000 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 10:29 P.M. CALL MEETING TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Coughlin, Marty, Quick, Stigney, and Thomason. NOT PRESENT: None. 1. AGENDA ADDITIONS A. Approve agenda of February 28, 2000 President Coughlin asked the Commission if anyone would like to add items to the agenda. MOTION/SECOND: Thomason/Stigney. To approve the agenda of EDA for February 28, 2000, as presented. Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 2. APPROVAL OF EDA MINUTES A. Approve minutes of January 10, 2000. MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Marty. To approve the minutes of EDA for January 10, 2000, as presented. Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 3. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS None. 4. CONSENT AGENDA None. Mounds View EDA February 28, 2000 Regular Meeting Page 2 5. EDA BUSINESS A. Award of Demolition Bid for EDA-owned property located at 2225 Hillview Road. Planning Associate Ericson stated on February 9, 2000, staff mailed out requests for proposals for the demolition of the home located at 2225 Hillview Road. He indicated staff received five bids, which are listed in the Staff Report, and Kevitt Excavating Inc. returned the low bid, at $5,475. Planning Associate Ericson stated staff has drafted Resolution 00-EDA-123, which awards the demolition contract to Kevitt Excavating, Inc. He indicated staff has received a reference for Kevitt Excavating, Inc., who has done significant work for the city of Crystal, and they come with glowing recommendation from that city. MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Thomason. To Approve Resolution 00-EDA-123, a Resolution Approving and Authorizing the Expenditure of Tax Increment Funds for the Demolition of Home at 2225 Hillview Road as Part of the EDA Housing Replacement Program. Commissioner Marty stated the project is to be completed by March 25, 2000, however, in light of this late approval date, an extension of time may be required in order to deal with the hazardous materials that may be present at the site. Planning Associate Ericson stated the demolition project requires a 10-day notification with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. He explained that this was a small house and there was not an extensive amount of hazardous material involved, therefore, the March 25 completion date should be workable. President Coughlin pointed out that if there is need for an extension, the Council would meet on March 13, 2000, and could add an EDA meeting to extend this date if necessary. Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. B. Set a Public Hearing for Monday, March 13, 2000, at 7:05 p.m. to Consider a Resolution on the Proposed Adoption of the City’s Business Subsidy Policy under Minnesota Statues, Sections 116J.993 through 116J.995. Community Development Director Jopke stated earlier that evening, the public hearing was set under the Council’s Consent Agenda, and it should be held at 7:10 p.m., in order to be consistent with that action. MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Stigney. To Set the Public Hearing for Monday, March 13, 2000, at 7:10 p.m., to Consider a Resolution on the Proposed Adoption of the City’s Business Subsidy Mounds View EDA February 28, 2000 Regular Meeting Page 3 Policy under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 116J.993 through 116J.995. Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. C. Adopt Resolution No. 00-EDA122 Approving the Appointment of the Economic Development Commission Elected Chairperson. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Thomason. To Approve Resolution No. 00-EDA122, a Resolution Approving the Appointment of the Economic Development Commission Elected Chairperson. Commissioner Marty noted a discrepancy in the Staff Report pertaining to the name of the individual elected to act as Chairperson for the Economic Development Commission. Community Development Director Jopke advised that the information contained in the resolution before the Authority is correct, and indicates that Tom Field will serve as Chairperson for the Commission. Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 6. REPORTS President Coughlin reported he attended the Economic Development Commission meeting and would provide information regarding the proceedings of that meeting at the next Council Work Session, as time permits. No further reports were considered. 7. ADJOURNMENT President Coughlin adjourned the meeting at 10:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Recorded and transcribed by: Trish Pearson TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. M:\MasterFiles\1999 thru 2010\2000\EDA\EDA Packets\03-13-00\Item No. 05A,05B,05C--Aaron Parrish.doc Item No. 5A - 5C Staff Report No. Meeting Date: 3-13-00 Type of Business: EDA WK: Work Session; PH: Public Hearing; CA: Consent Agenda; CB: Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: EDA President and Commissioners From: Aaron Parrish, Economic Development Coordinator Item Title/Subject: Economic Development Commission Direction Date of Report: March 13, 2000 Background: At the February 24th meeting of the Economic Development Commission, Commission Members expressed an interest in conducting business retention visits and addressing potential options for 2901 Highway 10. Business Retention Visits Last month the EDC developed a work plan (available on the following page) to guide their activities in the proceeding year. Recognizing the importance of business retention in Mounds View, one particular component of the work plan calls for the Commission to “Participate with staff in retention calls to local businesses.” Accordingly, the Commission respectfully requests direction/authorization from the EDA to develop a Business Retention Visit Program. 2901 Highway 10 Informally, the EDC inquired about potential options available for the redevelopment of 2901 Highway 10, or the former Kunz Oil property. At this point, there appears to be three preliminary options including purchase of the site, active code enforcement, and demolition assistance. Direction is requested to further investigate the aforementioned options for the site. Tax Abatement Policy In 1997, local units of government were given the authority to grant property tax abatements. In essence, tax abatement allows local units of government (city, county, school district) discretion in abating their portion of property taxes. In comparison to TIF, abatement is project specific whereas TIF is district dependent. Unlike TIF, there are no restrictions on how or where abatement proceeds may be spent. The above information is offered to provide context. There are many additional facets of abatement that have yet to be enumerated. However, direction is sought for the EDC to examine the potential use of tax abatement in Mounds View, and if necessary to develop a tax abatement policy. Recommendation: Provide direction to the EDC regarding business retention visits, 2901 Highway 10, and tax abatement. ____________________________ Aaron Parrish Economic Development Coordinator ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 2000 WORK PLAN Mission Statement: The Economic Development Commission shall serve as an advisory body to the Economic Development Authority to promote a positive economic climate and revitalize the community by developing programs to retain and expand existing businesses, attract desirable new businesses, and redevelop target areas in the City. Action Steps: # Review and make recommendations to the EDA on programs and opportunities to enhance business development and retention. # Recognize Highway 10 redevelopment as an important element in the positive economic vitality of Mounds View. # Evaluate the effectiveness of the Business Improvement Partnership Loan Program and make recommendations for revisions to the Program to meet the needs of the business community. # Evaluate staff research on innovative programs of other metro area cities as it relates to development, redevelopment and housing rehabilitation. # The Economic Development Commission will work cooperatively to coordinate the goals of the respective commissions. # Annually monitor and provide input on the Mounds View Housing Replacement Program and other housing initiatives. Evaluate the effectiveness of housing program as a tool in providing the community with affordable and life cycle housing and generating positive long-term economic growth. Ensure that any housing program using TIF meets the requirements under the Mounds View’s Tax Increment Plan. # Advocate continued staff involvement in the New Brighton/Mounds View Area Chamber of Commerce to provide a framework for the evaluation of business concern and to help support a positive business climate. Encourage the participation of the business community in Chamber activities. # Participate with staff in retention calls to local businesses. # Because the work of the I-35W Corridor Coalition could have a positive economic impact on the development and redevelopment of the City of Mounds View, the EDC would advocate for staff to provide a quarterly report on the status of the Coalition and provide input on the Coalition strategies as needed. # Communicate on a regular basis with the public on the Economic Development Commission activities, encouraging written or verbal comment, through the City Newsletter, cable and other interactive avenues. M:\MasterFiles\1999 thru 2010\2000\EDA\EDA Packets\03-13-00\Item No. 05D--Business Subsidy Policy Adoption--Aaron Parrish.doc Item No. 5D Staff Report No. Meeting Date: 3-13-00 Type of Business: EDA WK: Work Session; PH: Public Hearing; CA: Consent Agenda; CB: Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report To: EDA President and Commissioners From: Aaron Parrish, Economic Development Coordinator Item Title/Subject: Consideration of Resolution No. 00-EDA124 Adopting the City’s Business Subsidy Policy Date of Report: January 13, 2000 Background: Last year the Minnesota Legislature and Governor passed the “1999 Business Subsidies Law” (Minnesota Statutes § 116J.993 through §116J.995). As a result, communities are required to develop and adopt a business subsidy policy for all subsidies granted after August 1st, 1999. The policy recommended by the EDC was reviewed at the March 6th Work Session. A public hearing is set for the March 13th Council Meeting. In accordance with the legislation, it is necessary for both the City Council and the EDA to adopt a policy. Recommendation: Consider adoption of the City’s Business Subsidy Policy ____________________________ Aaron Parrish Economic Development Coordinator M:\MasterFiles\1999 thru 2010\2000\EDA\EDA Packets\03-13-00\Item No. 05D--Business Subsidy Policy Adoption-- Aaron Parrish.doc RESOLUTION NO. 00-EDA-124 MOUNDS VIEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION ADOPTING BUSINESS SUBSIDY CRITERIA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Sections 116J.993 through 116J.995 (the “Statutes”) require the adoption of criteria for the granting of business subsidies as defined in the Statutes; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View Economic Development Authority has determined that it is necessary and appropriate to adopt business subsidy criteria pursuant to the Statutes; and, WHEREAS, the Economic Development Authority has performed all the actions required by law to be performed prior to the adoption and the approval of the proposed business subsidies, including the holding of a public hearing upon published notice as required by law on March 13th, 2000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mound View Economic Development Authority, Mounds View Minnesota, that the business subsidy criteria, contained in Exhibit A of this resolution are hereby approved, ratified, established, and adopted and shall be placed on file at City Hall. The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Commissioner ___seconded by Commissioner __, and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted this___.Day of __ __ ______________________________________ Dan Coughlin, President ATTEST: ______________________________________ Charles S. Whiting, Executive Director M:\MasterFiles\1999 thru 2010\2000\EDA\EDA Packets\03-13-00\Item No. 05D--Business Subsidy Policy Adoption--Aaron Parrish.doc Exhibit A: Mounds View’s Business Subsidy Policy This Policy is adopted for purposes of the business subsidies act (the “Act”), which is Minnesota Statutes, Sections 116J.993 through 116J.995. Terms used in this Policy are intended to have the same meanings as used in the Act, and this Policy shall apply only with respect to subsidies granted under the Act if and to the extent required thereby. While it is recognized that the creation of good paying jobs is a desirable goal which benefits the community, it must also be recognized that not all projects assisted with subsidies derive their public purposes and importance solely by virtue of job creation. In addition, the imposition of high job creation requirements and high wage levels may be unrealistic and counter-productive in the face of larger economic forces and the financial and competitive circumstances of an individual business. With respect to subsidies, the determination of the number of jobs to be created and the wage levels thereof shall be guided by the following principles and criteria: Each project shall be evaluated on a case by case basis, recognizing its importance and benefit to the community from all perspectives, including created or retained employment positions. If a particular project does not involve the creation of jobs, but is nonetheless found to be worthy of support and subsidy, it may be approved without any specific job or wage goals, as may be permitted by applicable law. In cases where the objective is the retention of existing jobs, the recipient of the subsidy shall be required to provide reasonably demonstrable evidence that the loss of those jobs is imminent. The setting of wage and job goals must be sensitive to prevailing wage rates, local economic conditions, external economic forces over which neither the grantor nor the recipient of the subsidy has control, the individual financial resources of the recipient and the competitive environment in which the recipient’s business exists. Because it is not possible to anticipate every type of project which may in its context and time present desirable community building or preservation goals and objectives, the governing body must retain the right in its discretion to approve projects and subsidies which may vary from the principles and criteria of this Policy. Adopted by: ______________________________ Date of adoption: ___________________________ Date of public hearing: March 13th, 2000_________