HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 2002/02/19
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
WORKSESSION AGENDA
TUESDAY, February 19TH, 2002
6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL: Sonterre, Quick, Marty, Stigney, Thomas
Items Discussed Per Consensus
_______ 1. Cable Issues
• Cable Commission
• Cable Inventory/Needs Assessment
• Cable Concerns
_______ 2. Continued Discussion Regarding Purchasing Policy - Hansen
_______ 3. Review Proposal to Rename County Road J - Atkinson
_______ 4. Review Chapter 1204, Park Dedication Requirements – Ericson
_______ 5. Review Proposed Changes to Section 1006.06 Regarding Development
Controls – Atkinson
_______ 6. Discussion Regarding Proposed Ordinance 693, an Ordinance Amending
Chapter 1106 of the Mounds View Zoning Code Pertaining to Maximum
Square Footage for Accessory Structures – Atkinson
_______ 7. Continued Discussion Regarding Corridor Trailway Lighting Options – Lee &
Ericson
_______ 8. Continued Discussion Regarding the Billboards Erected on Sysco Property
By DeLite Outdoor Advertising – Ericson (Oral Report)
_______ 9. Community Center Update (Oral Report)
_______ 10. Police Squad car purchases and policy development- Brennan
_______ 11. ADJOURNMENT
Next Council Work Session: March 4, 2002
Next Council Meeting: February 25, 2002
Item No. 2
Type of Business: WK
WK: Work Session; PH: Public Hearing;
CA: Consent Agenda; CB: Council Business
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Charles Hansen, Finance Director
Item Title/Subject: Purchasing Policy
Date of Report: February 14, 2002
Attached is the latest draft of the proposed purchasing policy. This incorporates input the
City Council provided at the January 22, 2002 work session and input from city staff.
The January 22 draft was incomplete with many sections that merely referenced examples
from the purchasing policies from the other cities that I thought would be good models.
These sections have been filled in to complete this draft.
There are a couple of provisions in the draft that I want to point out to the City Council.
Section 2.2 requires sealed bids for purchases that exceed $50,000. This matches state law
and is an increase from the current city policy that requires sealed bids for purchases that
exceed $25,000. My concern is that if Mounds View remains at $25,000 while surrounding
cities move to a $50,000 threshold, contractors may decline to bid on Mounds View projects
between $25,000 and $50,000 due to the extra work of sealed bids. The contractors most
likely to decline to bid will be the busiest ones, which may also be the best contractors.
Sections 4.1 and 4.2. The earlier draft anticipated writing these sections based upon
examples from the other cities’ purchasing policies. It was pointed out that the Mounds View
Personnel Manual already has such a section. In order to avoid having conflicting policies
dealing with the same matter, the Section 1.50 of the Personnel Manual is duplicated in the
draft purchasing policy.
One point to take note of is that the Personnel Manual Section 1.50 provision for Meals
references an IRS Guideline. The IRS Guideline allows a flat amount per day for meals and
incidental expenses, but the amount varies depending upon what state and locality an
employee is in when incurring the expenses. It may be desirable for simplicity sake to
specify a single dollar amount for use in all instances. The IRS Guideline for Minneapolis/St.
Paul is $46.00 per day.
This amount is reasonable for meals and tips for an employee who is traveling for the full
day. The City Council may wish to have a sub limit for local meals or partial day travel.
Respectfully Submitted,
Charles Hansen
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
PURCHASING POLICY
GENERAL DISCUSSION
1.1 AUTHORITY
The purchasing policies of the City of Mounds View are
established by the City Council under the City Charter, the City
Code and state statute.
1.2 PURPOSE
The purpose of this policy is to provide a legal process for the
purchase of materials and services that will be the right product, in
the right quality, in the right quantity, delivered to the right place, at
the right time, for the right price, to allow for the efficient and
effective delivery of public services to the citizens of the City of
Mounds View.
1.3 BUDGET
Under state statute and City Charter, the annual adoption of the
budget shall constitute City Council appropriations for the year.
Budgetary control shall be exercised on the department and fund
levels.
1.4 RESPONSIBILITY
The City Administrator shall identify Department Heads or other
staff who shall be responsible for each fund or department in the
annual budget. These individuals shall be responsible for
compliance with the annual budget and for all expenditures for
their departments and funds.
1.5 DECENTRALIZED PURCHASING
The majority of City purchases are decentralized, meaning that
each department handles procurement of materials and services
needed for their own operation. The responsibility lies with each
department to obtain bids or quotes, maintain records of bids or
quotes, place actual orders, receive deliveries, and approve
invoices for payment.
To be uniform and save time and money in quantity purchases,
the City Administrator may assign a department to centrally
purchase some products. An example of this would be office
supplies.
TYPES OF CONTRACTS AND PURCHASES
2.1 UNIFORM MUNICIPAL CONTRACTING LAW, CHAPTER
471.345
It shall be the policy of the City of Mounds View that the Uniform
Municipal Contracting Law, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 471.345
shall be the policy of the city. Changes in this law will
automatically become the policy of the city. City policy may be
more restrictive than State Law, but may not be less restrictive.
2.2 MAJOR PURCHASES CONTRACTS
Sealed bids shall be obtained by public notice for major contracts
with final award by the City Council. From 2002 onward, this shall
be for contracts over $50,000, per Chapter 471.345.
2.3 INTERMEDIATE PURCHASES CONTRACTS
Three two or more written quotes shall be obtained for
intermediate contracts with final award by the City Council. From
2002 onward, this shall be for contracts between $5,000 $10,000
and $50,000, per Chapter 471.345.
2.4 SMALL PURCHASES CONTRACTS
Purchases may be made by at least two written quotes when
possible, or in the open market, at the discretion of the
Department Head. From 2002 onward, this shall be for contracts
less than $5,000 $10,000, per Chapter 471.345.
Department Heads shall advise the City Administrator prior to
purchases between $1,000 and $5,000. Purchases between
$2,500 and $5,000 shall be approved by the City Council if they
were not part of the annual budget.
ONGOING SERVICE CONTRACTS
Contracts for ongoing services shall be submitted to the City
Council for approval regardless of their dollar amount.
2.5 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Model after a simplified version of Brooklyn Park policy sec. 10.00
on pages 8 - 11.
2.5.1 Applicability
This procedure applies to all advisory auditing, engineering,
financial, legal, personnel, technical, training, or other services.
2.5.2 Competency
Contract shall be made only with responsible consultants who
have the capability to successfully fulfill the contractual
requirements. Consideration shall be given to their past
performance and experience, their financial capacity to complete
the project, the availability of personnel, and other appropriate
criteria.
2.5.3 Solicitation
The nature of the professional service shall be illustrated in a
request for proposals for services of greater magnitude or in a
description of work fro services of lesser magnitude. This shall be
advertised or otherwise distributed to likely and potential service
providers commensurate with the value of the contract.
2.5.4 Selection
Professional service providers shall be selected so as to provide
the best value to the City considering the difficulty of the work
proposed, its value to the City, the expertise and capacity of the
consultant and cost.
2.5.5 Award
All one-time contracts of over $5,000 and any ongoing service
contracts shall be awarded by the City Council. The City
Administrator shall approve one-time contracts less than $5,000.
2.6 EMERGENCY PURCHASES
Model after Blaine policy sec. 3.5 on page 7.
Occasions arise where an immediate purchase is necessary to
protect the life, health, safety, or convenience of the citizens or to
preserve the property of the City or its citizens.
To the greatest extent possible, normal purchasing procedures
shall be followed. However, when expediency is required to rectify
an emergency situation, any or all of these procedures may be
waived. If possible, the City Administrator shall be contacted to
approve the purchase. In the absence of the City Administrator, a
Department Head shall approve the purchase and report to the
City Administrator at the earliest opportunity. A report to the City
Council shall be made at the next regular City Council meeting.
2.7 COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENTS
Model after Blaine policy sec. 3.6 on page 7.
Where a purchase contract has been awarded by the State of
Minnesota, another local government, a cooperative of local
governments, or a federal agency in compliance with applicable
State Statutes, and where it is legally permissible for the City of
Mounds View to participate, a purchase may be through the
vendor named in that contract without advertising for bids or
obtaining quotes locally. The City Council or City Administrator
must still be notified and approve the purchase as defined in this
policy.
2.8 ROUTINE PAYMENTS
The Finance Director may authorize certain routine payments with
approval by the City Council in the form of the Just and Correct
Claims List. These include: partial or progress payments on
contracts or bids previously awarded by the City Council;
payments to federal, state, or other local governments under a
cooperative agreement previously approved by the City Council or
as required by law; payment of employee payroll withholdings,
taxes, and benefits; and payment of ongoing monthly utility
services to city buildings and properties. At a minimum, these
costs shall be reviewed during the annual budget preparation.
PAYMENT METHODS
3.1 JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS LIST
A list of checks paid will be submitted for approval by the City
Council at each regular City Council meeting. Approved checks
will be released the following day. Any checks paid by means of
Direct Expense Authorization since the previous City Council
meeting will also be listed.
3.2 DEPARTMENTAL AUTHORIZATION OF INVOICE PAYMENTS
Each Department Head identified by the City Administrator as
being responsible for a department budget shall report to the
Finance Director any deputies they are authorizing to approve
invoices for payment. All authorized persons shall submit a
sample of their signature or initials to the Finance Department for
verification of invoice approvals.
3.3 DIRECT EXPENSE AUTHORIZATION
The Finance Director is authorized to approve immediate payment
of invoices, without waiting for the Just and Correct Claims List, in
cases where it is necessary make payment to avoid penalties,
secure discounts, or avoid disruption of city business. These
payments will be included in the next Just and Correct Claims List.
3.4 CREDIT CARDS
The City Administrator Council may authorize the issuance of
credit cards to a limited number of city employees per MN Statutes
Chapter 471.382. Credit cards will be issued to the City
Administrator, Assistant City Administrator, and the Finance
Director. Credit cards may be used to make purchases in
instances where payment by check won’t work and extension of
credit by the vendor isn’t available. The Department Head
needing to make such purchases shall approach the credit card
holders to make the purchase in the order of City Administrator,
Assistant City Administrator, and Finance Director. Detailed
documentation shall be secured either at the time of order or the
time of receipt for the service or product purchased. All provisions
of the purchasing policy apply to credit card purchases.
3.5 PETTY CASH
Model after Blaine policy sec. 3.1D on page 4.
The petty cash fund is used for the purchase of small items
needed at once. The City Administrator shall authorize the
number and location of petty cash funds and the amount of cash
deposited in each. To be reimbursed, an employee must fill out a
petty cash slip with their name, description of the purchase,
account to be expensed, and amount of reimbursement. A
receipt, invoice, or other documentation must accompany the slip.
The Department Head or their deputy must sign the petty cash
slip.
3.6 CHARGE ACCOUNTS
In certain cases, it will be advantageous to open charge accounts
with local businesses and vendors which allow employees to
purchase needed goods and services with periodic (usually
monthly) billing to the city. Employees must sign sales slips or
other vendor documentation at the time of sale and submit any
documentation received to their supervisor. The creation of any
new charge accounts will be approved by the Finance Director.
MISCELLANEOUS
4.1 TRAVEL, CONFERENCES, SCHOOLS, & TRAINING
Model after White Bear Lake or Farmington policies.
The City will reimburse employees for reasonable business travel
expenses incurred while on assignments away from the normal
work location. All out of state business travel must be approved in
advance by the City Administrator. The Department Head must
approve all in state business travel in advance.
When approved, the cost of airfare, lodging, and registration may
be paid by check or credit card to the vendor in advance of the
travel date.
The travel policy is stated in section 1.50 in the Personnel Manual as
follows:
POLICY: TRAVEL EXPENSES SECTION:
1.50
A. Meals
B. Lodging
C. Transportation
1. Airline
2. Automobile
D. Reimbursement
An employee’s expenses incurred while conducting City business or
attending approved conferences or training are paid by the City.
Expenses incurred by a spouse or other person attending a conference
with an employee must be paid by the employee.
A. MEALS
Reimbursement for meals while on travel is only for actual
expenditures. The reimbursement rate within Minnesota will follow
the IRS Guidelines. However, the amount may be adjusted for
travel outside of Minnesota. Liquor is not an allowable expense.
B. LODGING
The actual cost for lodging is paid by the City. Room service,
personal telephone calls and other extras must be paid for by the
employee. A telephone call home of reasonable length will be
paid if the employee’s schedule has changed, and the return
time/date is different than originally planned.
C. TRANSPORTATION
1. Airline
The actual cost for coach class is paid by the City. Prizes,
bonuses or free trips awarded by the airlines as a result of travel
paid by the City, become the property of the City and may not be
accepted for personal use.
Airline Travel Credits: Minnesota Statutes §15.435
Whenever City funds are used to pay for airline travel by an
elected official or employee, the employee for whom the
ticket is purchased is responsible for ensuring airline travel
credits (i.e., frequent flyer miles) or benefits resulting from
the travel are transferred to the City.
This policy applies to all airline travel paid for by the City for City
employees.
2. Automobile
If an employee uses his or her own personal vehicle, he or she will
be reimbursed for the amount allowed by the IRS Guidelines.
However, staff cars are to be used in most instances. This
amount will automatically be adjusted per IRS Guidelines and
recognized by the City. See Vehicle Use Section 1.55 for
automobile usage.
D. REIMBURSEMENT
Employees must complete an expense statement form and attach
receipts for any allowable meals, lodging, transportation and/or
parking expenses incurred. After obtaining Supervisor approval,
submit the completed form to the Finance Department. All
expenses must be supported by receipts.
4.2 MEETINGS & MEAL EXPENSES
Model after White Bear Lake or Farmington policies.
4.3 MILEAGE & PARKING EXPENSES
Model after Brooklyn Park policy sec. 35.10 on page 13.
Use of a private automobile by an employee for a city purpose will
be reimbursed at the Internal Revenue Service’s permitted basic
mileage deduction rate. Actual costs for parking fees will be
reimbursed. Parking receipts are required. The appropriate forms
must be completed and approved by the Department Head or
Deputy.
4.4 MEMBERSHIPS
Memberships in professional organizations shall be listed in the
proposed budget and be reviewed during the budget process.
Memberships not listed in the budget will need to be approved by
the City Administrator prior to payment.
Item No: 4
Meeting Date: Feb 19, 2002
Type of Business: Worksession City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: James Ericson, Community Development Director
Item Title/Subject: Review and Discussion Regarding Section 1204.02
Date of Report: Feb 13, 2002
Background:
At a recent City Council meeting, the requirements of the Park Dedication Fee were
briefly discussed. I thought it would be a good idea to briefly review this section with the
Council and seek input as to whether these requirements need any revision. This
Section is attached for your review.
Discussion:
This part of the Code was last revised in 1997 with the adoption of Ordinance 604. The
revisions were put into effect at the suggestion of the City Attorney, who had some
concern regarding the legality and enforceability of the then-existing code. Developers
have litigated the issue of Park Dedication fees, yet if the fee is reasonable and related to
the impact of the development, the fees are generally upheld as valid.
There are two changes staff would recommend making, if changes are to be made, and
one subdivision that the Council should review regarding allowed expenditures:
1. Subd. 2 requires that the Park and Recreation Commission review all subdivisions
where a dedication would be applied. Staff has not brought a subdivision to the PRC
since 1996, partly because the Park and Rec Director at the time instructed that the
PRC would ALWAYS be in favor of the maximum cash dedication, as no additional
park land was desired. Should requirement be eliminated?
2. Staff would suggest that a dedication NOT be applied in instances where the purpose
of the subdivision is simply to change a lot line, where no additional development
would be contemplated or possible. There has to be a reasonable connection
between the fee imposed and the impact to the city’s facilities.
3. Subdivision 1b lists the types of expenditures that can be made within the park
dedication fund. While the list is pretty broad, does it adequately represent the
Council’s park spending philosophy?
Recommendation:
Review and Discuss attached Section 1204.02, Park Dedication Requirements.
_____________________________________
James Ericson
Community Development Director
Section 1204.02, Park Dedication Requirements.
Subd. 1. Dedication Required:
a. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 462.358, in all subdivisions to be developed for
residential, commercial, industrial or other uses or as a planned development which
includes residential, commercial and industrial uses or any combination thereof, a
reasonable portion of each proposed subdivision shall be dedicated to the public for
public use as parks, playgrounds, public open space, wetlands or storm water holding
areas or ponds or, at the option of the Municipality and at its sole discretion, that the
subdivider contribute an equivalent amount in cash based on the fair market value of
the undeveloped land. (Ord. 474, 9-25-89)
b. Cash payments so received shall be placed in a special fund 1 and used only for
the acquisition of land for parks, playgrounds, public open space and storm water
holding areas or ponds, development of existing park and playground sites, public
open space and storm water holding areas or ponds and debt retirement in
connection with land previously acquired for such public purposes. Expenses
incurred by the City in acquiring said cash dedication may be deducted from said
dedication before it is deposited in the Park and Playground Fund.
c. The Municipality, at its sole discretion, may take into consideration the open space,
park, recreational or common areas and facilities which the subdivider has provided
for the exclusive use of the residents of the subdivision; except, that storm water
holding areas or ponds, whether required by the Municipality or any other regulatory
body, may not be taken into consideration.
Subd. 2. Determination of Dedication Procedure: Upon receipt of a qualifying subdivision,
the Council shall refer it to the Parks and Recreation Commission 2. Said
Commission shall report to the Council its dedication recommendation. Upon receipt
of the recommendation, the Council shall call for either a land dedication or a cash
payment, in size, location or amount, as it determines. The Council may require a
professional appraisal to determine market value for purposes of a cash payment.
Subd. 3. Credit for Existing Single-Family Dwelling: The subdivider of any parcel of land
shall receive a credit for an existing single-family dwelling unit by excluding the
acreage of the occupied parcel remaining after subdivision from the computation of
dwelling units per acre if the parcel of land is zoned for single-family residence and
has located thereon one single-family dwelling.
Subd. 4. Dedication for Residential Lands: The subdivider of any tract of land which is to be
developed for residential uses shall dedicate to the public for public use as parks,
playgrounds, public open space or storm water holding areas or ponds, that dollar
value of the tract to be subdivided, which corresponds with the applicable size of the
subdivision in the following schedule:
Cash Dedication
1 See Section 203.06 of this Code.
2 See Chapter 405 of this Code.
Subdivision Size Per Acre__
Residential uses on parcel(s) with a 5% of market
total area of less than one acre value of land
Residential uses on parcel(s) with a 10% of market
total area of one acre or greater value of land
(Ord. 604, 1997)
Subd. 5. Dedication for Commercial and Industrial Lands: The subdivider of any tract of
land which is to be developed for commercial and industrial uses shall dedicate to the
public for public use as parks, playgrounds, public open space or storm water holding
areas or ponds, ten percent (10%) of the land of the proposed subdivision or, at the
option of the Municipality, an equivalent of cash equal to ten percent (10%) of the
market value of the land at the time of the subdivision. (Ord. 604, 1997)
Subd. 6. Dedication for Re-Subdivision: For any subdivision of a parcel on which a cash
dedication for parks has previously been made but on which an additional cash
dedication is required due to re-subdivision, the amount of cash dedication required
on the re-subdivided parcel(s) to be developed for residential uses shall be based on
the market value of the land at the time of re-subdivision based on the schedule set
forth in subdivision 4 of this Section less any applicable credit for the prior cash
dedication. The amount of cash dedication required on the re-subdivided parcel(s) to
be developed for commercial or industrial uses shall be based on ten percent (10%)
of the market value of the land at the time of re-subdivision less any applicable credit
for the prior cash dedication. (1988 Code §42.13) (Ord. 604, 1997)
Item No: 7
Meeting Date: February 19, 2002
Type of Business: Worksession
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: James Ericson, Community Development Director
Item Title/Subject: Continued Discussion Regarding Corridor Trailway
Lighting.
Date of Report: February 14, 2002
Background:
This issue has been discussed at previous Council worksessions, the last occurring on
January 14th, at which time the Council was given information on different lighting
options offered by Xcel Outdoor Lighting. A quote was provided specific to the Mermaid
frontage, for which the EDA had authorized expenditures in 2000. Because we did not
have much opportunity to discuss the quote from Xcel or the fixtures to be used in any
detail, staff wanted to bring this before the Council for additional feedback and direction.
Discussion:
In the information submitted by John Olson of Xcel Outdoor Lighting, the City was
presented with prices (specific to the Mermaid project) for five different types of lighting
fixtures: Traditional, Colonial, Shoebox, Gullwing and Domus. The Traditional design is
the cheapest at $26,500 while the Domus (those erected in front of City Hall and in front
of Walgreens) is the most expensive at $65,000. The Shoebox is the midrange priced
fixture at $47,600. The Traditional and the Colonial design have more of a suburban
residential streetlight appearance, and while cheaper, they would look out of place if used
as corridor trailway lighting. The Council as I recall agreed and decided that the Shoebox
design was the preferred lighting fixture especially in light of the cost of the decorative
Domus fixtures.
Recommendation:
Staff is seeking direction from the Council regarding the selection of a preferred trailway
light fixture for the Corridor and is requesting that the issue be brought back to the EDA
at the February 25th meeting for reauthorization of tax increment funds to pay for the
corridor trailway lighting improvements.
_____________________________________
James Ericson
Community Development Director
763-717-4021
N:\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\Special Projects\SP-106-00 (Corridor Lighting)\Lighting Report - Feb 19, 2002.doc
Item No.10
Type of Business: WS
WK: Work Session; PH: Public Hearing;
CA: Consent Agenda; CB: Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Tim Brennan, Deputy Police Chief/Acting Chief
Item Title/Subject: Purchase of Police Squad Cars for 2002
Date of Report: February 19, 2002
NATURE OF REPORT: The police department has four vehicles in its fleet that currently have about
80,000 miles on them, or higher. Before vehicles obtain such high mileage or substantial maintenance
problems that make them unsafe or undesirable for resale, the police department has tried to plan ahead for
replacement. (**See attached replacement schedule**) The police department budgeted $22,700.00 each for
the replacement of two squad cars, and $22,000.00 for replacement of one police staff vehicle in 2002.
Hinckley Chevrolet has been awarded the state bid for the Chevrolet Impala Police Package for 2002. The
Chevrolet Impala has come down in price to $18,635.00, from last year’s cost of $19, 275.00. The police
package Impala’s come standard with features not included with the Ford Crown Victoria, and the Fords are
priced about $2,000.00 higher. One feature that comes standard with the Impala is a heavy-duty drivers seat,
about a $1,800.00 upgrade on previous models of the Ford.
City staff has indicated a possible need for an additional staff vehicle needed for limited use in and around the
city. One or more of the squad cars scheduled for replacement may be a very viable option for this type of
application.
To participate with the state bid purchase of 2002 Chevrolet Impala Police Package vehicles, orders must be
placed prior to April 5th, 2002.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the replacement of three police department vehicles
under the state bid for 2002 Chevrolet Impala’s at an estimated cost of $18,635.00 for each vehicle.
Respectfully submitted,
_____________________
Tim Brennan
Deputy Police Chief/Acting Chief
2/13/2002
MARKED SQUAD
CARS
SPECIAL
ASSIGNMENT
STAFF VEHICLES
Veh# 011
Make: Chevy Impala
Year: 2001
Mileage: 5,800
Equipment: VHF/UHF,
MDT, Radar, Light bar,
Siren, Shotgun, 1st Aid,
Cage
Veh# Detective Car
Make: Dodge Intrepid
Year/Color: 1997/Black
Lic/Exp: DMT026 (8/02)
Mileage: 45,000
Equipment: VHF, Covert
lights & siren.
Veh# 2701: Chief’s Car
Make: Ford Taurus
Year/Color: 1994/Green
Lic/Exp: 984PTT (5/02)
Mileage: 40,000
Equipment: VHF, Covert
lights & Siren, 1st aid
Veh# 001
Make: Chevy Impala
Year: 2000
Mileage: 30,000
Equipment: VHF/UHF,
MDT, Radar, Light bar,
Siren, Shotgun,
Diffibrillator, Alco-sensor,
Recorder, 1st aid, Cage
Veh# 962: CSO Car
Make: Chevy Caprice
Year/Color: 1996/White
Lic/Exp: 176-000 (Feb 02)
Mileage: 79,000
Equipment: VHF, Cage
Veh# 961: Dep. Chief Car
Make: Ford Crown
Victoria
Year/Color: 1996/White
Lic/Exp: DMT027 (7/02)
Mileage: 88,000
Equipment: VHF, Covert
lights & siren.
↓
Veh# 002
Make: Chevy Impala
Year: 2000
Mileage: 31,000
Equipment: VHF/UHF,
MDT, Radar, Light bar,
Siren, Shotgun,
Diffibrillator, Alco-sensor,
Recorder, 1st aid, Cage
Veh# 971: SRO Car
Make: Ford Crown Victoria
Year/Color: 1997/White
Mileage: 54,000
Equipment: VHF, Covert
lights & Siren, Cage
Sell or
Convert to
City Use
Veh# 991: Sergeant’s Car
Make: Ford Crown Victoria
Year: 1999
Mileage: 36,000
Equipment: VHF/UHF,
MDT, Radar, Light bar,
Siren, Shotgun,
Defibrillator, Alco-sensor,
Recorder, 1st aid, Cage
→
Veh# DARE Vehicle
Make: Olds Bravada
Year/Color: 1991/Blk,Wht
Mileage: 84,000
Equipment: VHF/UHF,
Radar, light bar, Siren,
Cage
→
Convert to
DARE Vehicle
Sell or
Auction
Veh# 982: Spare Car
Make: Ford Crown
Victoria
Year: 1998
Mileage: 90,000 →
Equipment: VHF/UHF,
MDT, Radar, Light bar,
Siren, Shotgun, Cage
Sell or
Convert to
City Use
Bold indicates cars due to be replaced