HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 2002/06/03M:\MasterFiles\1999 thru 2010\2002\City Council\Work Session Packets\06-03-02\Agenda.doc
Cancelled.
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
WORKSESSION AGENDA
MONDAY, June 3, 2002
6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL: Sonterre, Quick, Marty, Stigney, Thomas
Items Discussed Per Consensus
_______ 1. Trunk Highway (TH) 10 Noise Abatement Issue – Lee
_______ 2. Discuss Audio-Technician Position – Miller
______________________________________________________________________
_
Next Council Work Session: July 1, 2002
Next Council Meeting: June 10, 2002
Item No. 1
Type of Business: WK
WK: Work Session; PH: Public Hearing;
CA: Consent Agenda; CB: Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Greg Lee, Director of Public Works
Item Title/Subject: Trunk Highway 10 (TH 10) Noise Abatement Issue
Update Report
Meeting Date: June 3, 2002
Background
Meeting with Mn/DOT
On February 14, 2002, Public Works Director Greg Lee, Community
Development Director Jim Ericson, and resident Michele Sandback met with
representatives from MnDOT to discuss the TH 10 Noise Abatement Issue.
Based on this meeting with Mn/DOT, two distinct options were evident:
Option 1: Install Wall as Required by Law – Staff Recommended
Option 2: Construct required wall to the east – Mn/DOT Proposal
Option 1: Install Wall as Required by Law – Staff Recommended
Under this option, the City would direct Mn/DOT to install a Noise Wall starting at
the point where it currently terminates and extend it approximately 1200 feet to
the east. It would terminate at the point where the three eastbound lanes reduce
to two lanes; the point where the creek crosses TH 10 and where the chain link
fence on the south side of TH 10 has a jog in it.
The wall would be constructed by Mn/DOT and completely at Mn/DOT’s
expense, regardless of the project cost.
Option 2: Construct Wall to the East (City Built) – Mn/DOT Proposal
Under this option, Mn/DOT would enter into a joint powers agreement with the
City of Mounds View and allocate a total of $300,000 to be used to fund a noise
wall. As part of the joint powers agreement, the City would be the project
administrator and would need to hire an engineering consultant. This “city”
consultant would design a noise wall at a location along the TH 10 corridor
specified by the City. This location would need to be approved by Mn/DOT. The
“city” consultant would develop plans and specifications for the wall with the help
of Mn/DOT. The plans and specification would then be sent to Mn/DOT for
approval. The City would then advertise for bids and award a contract. The City
would be responsible for administering the construction, including inspection.
Upon completion of the wall, Mn/DOT would review it and, if they find it
acceptable, require the City to dedicate it to them. Mn/DOT would then be
responsible for future maintenance.
Option 3: Construct Wall to the East (Mn/DOT built) – City Council Proposal
On April 1, 2002, this issue was brought before the Council for discussion. After
Discussion of Options 1 and 2, the City Council proposed a third option - Option
3. This option would be the same as option 2, with the exception that Mn/DOT
would be the project administrator and build the wall according to their
specification and at their expense.
This item was placed on the May Work Session Agenda but was later tabled.
Discussion
Staff suspected legal issues associated with Mn/DOT’s proposal, Option 2, and
City Council ‘s proposal, Option 3. The question was, “Can the City enter into an
agreement with Mn/DOT to take a noise wall that is required to be in a specified
location and move it to a location of the City’s choosing?” Staff discussed this
with the City’s legal counsel on April 15th. Staff also presented this legal issue to
Mn/DOT representatives.
On May 28th staff and the City’s legal counsel met with Mn/DOT representatives
to discuss this issue. In light of the legal issues, Mn/DOT has since revised /
clarified their option, Option 2. In addition to the City constructing a noise wall
further to the east, their proposal (Option 2) now requires that the City construct a
berm in the area where the wall would be constructed under Option 1. Staff legal
assumptions were correct. To be compliant with the law, a noise abatement
technique must be applied to the Arden Park area. Mn/DOT cannot enter into an
agreement with the City unless they address this issue in the agreement.
Under this “New Mn/DOT Proposed Option 2”, all of the requirements of the
original Option 2 would hold true. In addition, the City would be required to
construct a berm, in Arden Park, meeting Mn/DOT’s specifications, at an
estimated cost of $150,000 to $200,000. This berm would be 10 to 15 feet in
height and up to 90 feet in width, located mostly on City property. Mn/DOT also
estimates that the cost of a 1500-foot long wall to abate the noise in the Laport
Drive area would be $450,000, of which Mn/DOT would contribute $300,000. The
City’s combined financial liability for this new Option 2 is estimated to be
$300,000 to $400,000.
At this time staff is requesting direction from Council on what they actions they
prefer in order to seek resolution to this issue. The following is a list of some
possible courses of action:
Action A: Staff continues to recommend Option 1. Should Council select this
action, staff would contact Mn/DOT in writing requesting them to construct the
wall as required by law. The wall would be constructed by MN/DOT during the
2004 construction season at no cost to the City. Mn/DOT would construct the
remaining section of wall, from the east side of Arden Park to I-35W, when either
a third eastbound lane is added or if this area is ranked high on the Noise
Abatement Study. Mn/DOT is currently performing this study, with results
expected by this time next year. With “Action A” the City could continue to work
with Mn/DOT and our legislative representatives to lobby for the completion of
the wall all the way to I-35W. Staff would also conduct a neighborhood meeting
and / or develop a newsletter for the residents along the Trunk Highway 10
corridor explaining the City’s position on this matter and the ensuing steps. Staff
also recommends “Action D” also be considered in conjunction with Action A.
Action B: Council may want to select the revised Option 2. A feasibility report
would need to be ordered to start the public improvement process and develop
cost estimates. Funding sources would also need to be identified.
Action C: Council may want to discuss this issue with Mn/DOT and state
legislatures at the next Work Session Meeting in July. Staff would invite Frank
Pafko, the Mn/DOT Area Representative, and any other Mn/DOT representatives
involved with this issue. Staff would also invite state legislators, as they may be
influential in securing funding or overcoming any legislative obstacles. These
representatives include: State Senator Satveer Chaudhary, State Senator Don
Betzold, State Representative Geri Evans, and State Representative Connie
Bernardy.
Action D: Council may direct the City’s legal counsel to further investigate noise
abatement laws and requirements. It is staff’s understanding that Mn/DOT is now
required to apply noise abatement techniques such as the installation of walls in
areas they have expanded the capacity of their trunk highway system. Question:
did this law apply when the single eastbound lane just west of I-35W was
expanded to two lanes several years ago?
Action E: Any other action the Council may choose.
It has been some time since the City has held a neighborhood meeting pertaining
to this issue. Staff would like direction from Council as to whether (and possibly
when) a meeting should be held. This meeting could be held prior to or after the
City Council takes official action on this matter.
Recommendation:
Staff is looking for direction from the City Council pertaining to this matter.
Specifically, staff is looking for Council input on which action to pursue and
whether (and possibly when) the City should hold a neighborhood meeting
regarding this issue.
Respectfully Submitted,
Greg Lee, Director of Public Works
POSITION DESCRIPTION
Position Title: Part-time Cable TV Technician
Department: Parks, Recreation and ForestryAdministration
Accountable To: Parks, Recreation and Forestry Director Assistant City
Administrator
Status: Non-exempt
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE OF POSITION:
To provide the community with government access programming through the technical
preparation of Cable TV taping, program production, cable casting, video technical
expertise and provides producer-type work for community programming.
SUPERVISION RECEIVED
Works under the general guidance and direction of the Parks, Recreation and Forestry
Director. Assistant City Administrator.
SUPERVISION EXERCISED
None. May supervise additional cable help.
ESSENTIAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
• Cable casts all regular and special City Council meetings and ensures that the
tapes are replayed at scheduled times.
• Cable casts other special public information meetings as directed.
• Sets monthly meetings with the Cable Committee for planning monthly
programs.
• Arranges producer type work regarding Cable TV programs.
• Performs editing as necessary for special programs.
• Performs technician taping procedures for programs intended for viewing.
• Prepares messages for the Cable monitor.
• Maintains the Cable TV equipment, material and supplies so that they are in
good working order.
• Catalogues and stores tapes in the tape resource library.
• Maintains an inventory of Cable TV equipment.
• Purchases supplies as needed for production and technical work.
• Assists in preparation of an annual budget.
• Supervises the use of equipment.
• Prepares grants for Cable TV equipment or programming projects.
• Assists the City in commencing Coordinates an integrated communications
program with the public via Cable TV.
• Coordinates programming with Channel 33 and other programs that would
benefit the community.
• Schedules crew members for tapings that require more than one technician.
• Arranges use of Irondale High School Cable TV production rooms and studio,
and use of the mobile van for special programs such as the Festival Parade.
PERIPHERAL DUTIES
• Assists in other areas as designated, including website maintenance.
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS
(A) High school diploma or GED equivalent.
(B) Two years vocational/technical school
(CB) Ability to operate and run all TV and video equipment.
(DC) Two years experience in established cable TV system.
NECESSARY KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND ABILITIES
(A) Considerable knowledge of the equipment, facilities, operations and techniques
used in a comprehensive government access programming;
(B) Skill in operation of listed tools and equipment;
(C) Ability to develop, coordinate, and direct varied activities involved in government
access programming; Ability to establish and maintain effective working
relationships with employees, supervisors, vendors, contractors, participants,
and the general public; Ability to communicate effectively orally and in writing.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
Valid state driver's license or ability to obtain one.
TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT USED
Video, audio and cable related equipment, calculator; copy and fax machine; phone;
automobile
PHYSICAL DEMANDS
The physical demands described here are representative of those that must be met by
an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job. Reasonable
accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the
essential functions.
While performing the duties of this job, the employee is frequently required to walk, sit
and talk or hear. The employee is occasionally required to use hands to finger, handle,
feel or operate objects, tools, or controls; and reach with hands and arms. The
employee is occasionally required to climb or balance; stoop, kneel, crouch, or crawl.
The employee must occasionally lift and/or move up to 50 pounds. Specific vision
abilities required by this job include close vision, color vision, and the ability to adjust
focus.
WORK ENVIRONMENT
The work environment characteristics described here are representative of those an
employee encounters while performing the essential functions of this job. Reasonable
accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the
essential functions.
While performing the duties of this job, the employee occasionally works in outside
weather conditions. The employee is occasionally exposed to wet and/or humid
conditions, toxic or caustic chemicals.
The noise level in the work environment is usually quiet while in the office, and
moderately loud when in the field.
SELECTION GUIDELINES
Formal application, rating of education and experience; oral interview and reference
check; job related tests may be required.
The duties listed above are intended only as illustrations of the various types of work
that may be performed. The omission of specific statements of duties does not exclude
them from the position if the work is similar, related or a logical assignment to the
position.
The job description does not constitute an employment agreement between the
employer and employee and is subject to change by the employer as the needs of the
employer and requirements of the job change.
Approval: ______________________ Approval: ____________________
Supervisor Appointing Authority
Effective Date: Revision History: 5/02
6/97
4/95
1995 ADA
M:\MasterFiles\1999 thru 2010\2002\City Council\Work Session Packets\06-03-02\Item 02 Discuss AudioTechnician Producer Position.doc
Item No. 2
Type of Business: WK
WK: Work Session; PH: Public Hearing;
CA: Consent Agenda; CB: Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Kathleen Miller, City Administrator
Item Title/Subject: Review Cable TV Technician/Producer Position
Date of Report: June 3, 2002
Background
The City Council preliminarily reviewed this item in conjunction with the 2002 Budget
process. At that time the City Council budgeted for a full-time position but agreed to review
the position at a later point. The position has always been a halftime position, however
finance records indicate that the actual hours worked have exceeded 20 hours per week.
Staff will meet with the Cable Commission this evening to seek their input. That
information will be shared with the City Council at Monday evening’s meeting.
Attached for your convenience is a copy of the job description for this position.
Recommendation:
Staff is seeking City Council input as it relates to the structure of this position.
Respectfully Submitted,
___________________________
Kathleen F. Miller
City Administrator
1
Memorandum
To: All Officers
From: Deputy Chief Brennan
Date: 8/15/2018
Re: Traffic Enforcement Statistics
I have been directed to provide the city council with additional details as to the number of traffic
citations that have been issued in the past. In trying to determine why tickets are down, we ran the
activity for each officer comparing the most recent quarter this year to the same quarter last year.
Attached you will find a printout reflecting this activity. As you will be able to see, the amount of
traffic enforcement activity on the part of most officers is down for this most recent period.
I am presenting you with this information to assist in raising awareness about the type and amount of
enforcement that is being focused on traffic in and around the city.
I believe it may be helpful for officers to have access to this information on a more regular basis. I
will begin compiling and making this information available to all officers on a quarterly basis, if not
more frequently.
Traffic law enforcement is an important part of our job in helping to keep the residents of Mounds
View safe. Please focus more effort on traffic law enforcement whenever time is available.
I am in the process of going through some of the other statistics involving calls for service and
arrests. When I complete that report I will make it available for review.
CONFIDENTIAL