HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-16-2014
PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
April 16, 2014
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
______________________________________________________________________________
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order by Chair Stevenson at 7:00 p.m. for April 16, 2014.
______________________________________________________________________________
2. Roll Call
Members Present: Commissioners Birken, Carvelli-Yu, Elofson, Love, Rundle, Schiltgen,
and Stevenson.
Absent and Excused: None.
Also Present: Planning Associate Heidi Heller.
______________________________________________________________________________
Index to Minutes Page
Approval of Minutes 1
MU2014-001-CU-1 Conditional Use Permit for an Oversize Garage 2
MU2014-001-VR-1 Variance for a Reduced Driveway Setback
County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District Discussion 4
_____________________________________________________________________________
3. Approval of Minutes
March 19, 2014.
MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Schiltgen/Commissioner Carvelli-Yu. To approve the
Minutes of the March 19, 2014 regular Planning Commission meeting as presented.
Ayes – 7 Nays – 0 Motion carried.
Mounds View Planning Commission April 16, 2014
Regular Meeting Page 2
________________________________________________________________________
4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda
None.
______________________________________________________________________________
5. Planning Cases
A. MU2014-001-CU-1 Conditional Use Permit for an Oversize Garage
MU2014-001-VR-1 Variance for a Reduced Driveway Setback
Applicant: Chuck Pelton
Address: 8312 Red Oak Drive
Planning Associate Heller indicated the applicant, Chuck Pelton, is requesting approval of a
conditional use permit for an oversize detached garage and a variance for a reduced driveway
setback on his property at 8312 Red Oak Drive. The applicant wants to expand his house by
attaching the existing detached garage and turning it into living space. He then plans to build a
new 1,800 square foot garage behind the house with a driveway.
Associate Heller explained the applicant submitted plans for a garage larger than what City Code
allows without a conditional use permit. Any building larger than 952 square feet must get City
approval of a conditional use permit. The applicant will also be installing a driveway that
connects to the existing driveway and leads to the new garage in the backyard. This driveway
will run past the house and be closer than five feet to the property line, which requires a reduced
driveway setback variance.
Associate Heller reviewed the conditional use permit and variance requirements per City Code
and recommended the Commission hold a public hearing, take comments and approve the CUP
and variance as requested.
Chair Stevenson opened the public hearing at 7:10 p.m.
Curt Lyons, 2649 Ridge Lane, asked how close the new driveway would be to the property line.
Associate Heller noted the driveway would be two feet from the property line.
Mr. Lyons questioned if the applicant would be working out of the new garage.
Chuck Pelton, 8312 Red Oak Drive, explained he was an HVAC contractor and noted the garage
would be used for personal storage and not for business. He reported his commercial truck
would be stored in the garage.
Dave Notoro, 8325 Fairchild Avenue, requested further information on why a conditional use
permit was required.
Mounds View Planning Commission April 16, 2014
Regular Meeting Page 3
________________________________________________________________________
Associate Heller commented that the conditional use permit was required because the applicant
as requesting to build a garage larger than was allowed by City Code. She reported the
conditional use permit process involved a public hearing, and had to be reviewed and approved
by both the Planning Commission and City Council. She explained that the conditional use
permit process allowed the City to place conditions on the permit prior to approval and the
applicant would be required to comply with these conditions.
Dave Moracco, 8335 Fairchild Avenue, wanted assurance that no commerce or commercial
activity would be taking place in the new garage.
Chair Stevenson indicated the applicant has admitted the garage would be used to store a
commercial vehicle and was not being used for commercial HVAC service. This was well
within City Code for the R-1 Residential zoning district.
Mr. Moracco requested the City continue to monitor this garage to ensure that the applicant does
not begin using the detached garage for commercial purposes.
Associate Heller discussed how the City regulated home based businesses in Mounds View. She
reported homeowners were allowed to store commercial vehicles within garages.
Chair Stevenson added that the City had a Code Enforcement Officer that assisted with these
matters.
Mr. Notoro asked what conditions would be placed on the permit for approval. He questioned
the size and height of the detached garage and inquired if any trees on the applicant’s property
would be removed.
Mr. Pelton stated the garage size was somewhat fluid but would be approximately 36 feet wide
and 50 feet deep. He indicated three trees would need to be removed in order for him to put in
the garage and driveway. He explained the garage would have cedar log siding to match the
home.
Associate Heller reported the garage could be no higher than 18 feet to the peak.
Chair Stevenson closed the public hearing at 7:31 p.m.
Commissioner Schiltgen requested further information about how the new driveway would be
configured.
Mr. Pelton stated the original driveway was 80 feet in length and would be continued another 40
feet along the existing garage to the new garage.
Commissioner Love asked if the current driveway would remain in place.
Mr. Pelton stated the existing cement driveway in front of the house would remain as is.
Mounds View Planning Commission April 16, 2014
Regular Meeting Page 4
________________________________________________________________________
Commissioner Love inquired if the City or the watershed district had any guidelines regarding
the additional impervious surface.
Associate Heller commented the restrictions regarding impervious surfaces only came into effect
when covering more than an acre.
MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Schiltgen/Commissioner Elofson. To approve Resolution
998-14, a Resolution Recommending Approval of the Conditional Use Permit for an Oversize
Garage; Planning Case No. MU2014-001-CU-1.
Ayes – 7 Nays – 0 Motion carried.
MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Love/Commissioner Birken. To approve Resolution 999-
14, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a Variance for a Reduced Driveway Setback;
Planning Case No. MU2014-001-VR-1.
Ayes – 7 Nays – 0 Motion carried.
_____________________________________________________________________________
6. Other Planning Activity
A. County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District Discussion
Planning Associate Heller reviewed the changes made to the overlay district Ordinance since the
last Planning Commission meeting with the Commission in detail. She recommended cultured
stone be included as an acceptable building material.
Chair Stevenson questioned if the Commission really wanted to require that 50% of all four sides
of buildings along the corridor be brick faced.
Commissioner Carvelli-Yu and Commissioner Birken supported this requirement.
Associate Heller stated this requirement would improve the quality of the developments along
the corridor.
Associate Heller recommended the Commission hold a joint meeting with the City Council on
June 2, 2014 to further discuss the overlay district Ordinance.
______________________________________________________________________________
7. Next Planning Commission Meeting:
A. May 7, 2014
B. May 21, 2014
______________________________________________________________________________
Mounds View Planning Commission April 16, 2014
Regular Meeting Page 5
________________________________________________________________________
8. Review Minutes:
A. April 2, 2014
The Commission discussed the April 2, 2014 meeting minutes. No changes were made.
9. Staff Updates
A. Upcoming Planning Cases
Planning Associate Heller discussed upcoming planning cases. She explained the Commission
would be reviewing the sign ordinance at a future meeting. She reported Coventry Senior Living
was pouring walls and the car wash would be removed in the near future.
______________________________________________________________________________
10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports
None.
11. Adjournment
There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Chair Stevenson adjourned the
meeting at 7:54 p.m.
______________________________________________________________________________
Respectfully submitted,
Heidi Heller
Planning Associate
Transcribed by:
Heidi Guenther
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.