HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-03-2004
PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
November 3, 2004
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
______________________________________________________________________________
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order by Chair Stevenson at 7:00 p.m., November 3, 2004.
______________________________________________________________________________
2. Roll Call Members Present: Commissioners Miller, Stevenson, Scotch, Hegland, Zwirn,
and Meehlhause
Members Absent: None.
Also Present: Community Development Director Ericson and Planner Prososki
________________________________________________________________________
Index to Minutes Page
Planning Case CU2004-005
Consideration of CUP for “The Station” 2280 County Road I 2
_____________________________________________________________________________
3. Approve Minutes
a. October 6, 2004
MOTION/SECOND: Miller/Zwirn. To Approve the Planning Commission Minutes for October
6, 2004 as Presented.
Ayes – 6 Nays – 0 Motion carried.
______________________________________________________________________________
4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda
None.
______________________________________________________________________________
Mounds View Planning Commission November 3, 2004
Regular Meeting Page 2
________________________________________________________________________
5. Planning Case CU2004-005 CUP 2280 County Road I “The Station”
Community Development Director Ericson indicated that the applicants have requested approval
of a Conditional Use Permit for The Station at 2280 County Road I. He then reminded the
Commission that The Station is an existing nonconforming use as the property is not zoned
properly and, even if it were zoned properly, it does not have a conditional use permit and
currently does not satisfy the area and dimensional requirements for this type of use.
Director Ericson indicated that the owners of The Station would like to expand the use by adding
two more fuel dispensing stations. He then said that this matter was discussed at the October 6,
2004 meeting and Staff was asked to conduct research into the issue and determine whether it
may be appropriate to make an amendment to the City’s Code to differentiate between large and
small fueling stations.
Director Ericson indicated that he conducted the requested research and was unable to find any
other cities that differentiate between small and large fueling stations. He then said that there are
concerns with the size of the lot and that there are congestion issues on the site. He further
commented that he contacted someone in the fuel station industry for an unbiased opinion and
was told that the additional fuel dispensing stations probably would not bring in further
customers, as a fueling station’s customer base is rather definite and this person felt that the
additional fueling stations probably would not add to the congestion and may, possibly, alleviate
some existing congestion at the site.
Director Ericson summarized for the Commission the list of issues with this request including the
fact that The Station does not have a CUP, it is not zoned properly for its use, it does not comply
with the Comprehensive Plan, it is not a conforming use, non-conforming uses cannot be
expanded, the City Attorney has indicated that adding fuel stations would constitute an
expansion of a non-conforming use and therefore it is prohibited, the City Code indicates that
non-conforming uses shall eventually be brought into conformity, the owners have requested a
conditional use permit to bring The Station into conformity with the Code, and The Station does
not satisfy the minimum requirements of a fuel station.
Director Ericson reviewed the Commission’s options which include recommending denial of the
CUP as it does not satisfy the minimum requirements, recommending denial of the expansion of
The Station’s request to add two fuel stations, recommending denial of the CUP, yet recommend
the applicants’ request a Code amendment, conditionally recommend approval of the CUP
request subject to satisfaction of all requirements within a specified time period, including: lot
size, parking, setbacks, lot width, zoning, Comprehensive Plan.
Director Ericson indicated that Staff recommends approval of a resolution recommending denial
and not because Staff has anything against the Station but, based on City Code and the
recommendation of the City Attorney, that this would constitute a violation in that an expansion
of a nonconforming use is not allowed.
Chair Stevenson asked Staff to review the findings of fact listed in the Resolution of denial.
Mounds View Planning Commission November 3, 2004
Regular Meeting Page 3
________________________________________________________________________
Director Ericson read them for the Commission.
Chair Stevenson indicated that the Commission looked specifically at this property and
considered it nonconforming at the time the Comprehensive Plan was reviewed and amended
and chose not to change the Comprehensive Plan for this property as the City did not feel a
fueling station would be appropriate at this location in the future.
Tom Manke, co-owner of “The Station”, indicated that they are trying to satisfy the needs of
their existing customers and they feel this would make things better not worse. He then clarified
that they are not asking for two more pumps but two more fueling positions to service their 650
to 750 customers per day, 300 of whom purchase gas.
Commissioner Miller asked if there would be a way to increase the size of the property.
Mr. Manke stated not at this time.
Chair Stevenson indicated that the options would be denial or changing the Code.
Commissioner Miller indicated she does not see an expansion of the canopy as the same type of
thing as an expansion of fueling nozzles.
Commissioner Hegland indicated that he feels that this request is clearly an expansion.
Commissioner Miller commented that the site seems particularly crowded when delivery trucks
are at the location.
Mr. Manke indicated that they are trying to accommodate morning drive and night drive
customers as that is the busy time. He then said that deliveries are to be daytime or after hours
for gasoline and groceries during the off peak mid day hours.
Director Ericson indicated that with the recommendation of denial the Commission has the
opportunity to state whether it feels a Code amendment would be supportable.
Chair Stevenson indicated that the Commission does not support a recommendation of a Code
amendment.
MOTION/SECOND: Zwirn/Hegland. To Approve Resolution 775-04, a Resolution
Recommending Denial of a Conditional Use Permit to Allow for a Motor Fuel Station at 2280
County Road I.
Ayes – 6 Nays – 0 Motion carried.
Director Ericson indicated this would be on Council’s November 22, 2004 meeting agenda.
______________________________________________________________________________
Mounds View Planning Commission November 3, 2004
Regular Meeting Page 4
________________________________________________________________________
6. Next Planning Commission Meeting: November 17, 2004
______________________________________________________________________________
7. Adjournment to Agenda Session
There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Chair Stevenson adjourned the
meeting at 7:27 p.m.
(The meeting immediately adjourned to the Agenda Session)
Respectfully submitted,
Jim Ericson
Community Development Director
Transcribed by:
Joan Lenzmeier
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.