Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974-05-29 PC MinutesMounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting, May 29. 1974 Village Hall Chairman Haake "led to ordert 7:35 p•m• by Preeeno: Burggrsff, Shelquist, Blanchard, Houle, Haake, Burmeister, Mackeben, Foss. Absents Glaser Minutes: The minutes of the last meeting were read and approved. Buaineaat Minor Subdivision; Naomi Eastman Divide into 2 lots, Unplatted Lands Section 6 Parcel 030 was in spiittingOhherilotoin she halt. Her garage would end up being on the bank half (or new lot) lot. She would like to extend the front lot (or the lot she would retain) another 34 ft. and this would include i wae the garage be divided in exactly new lines could not continue over to the neighbors lot, since the neighbors hones is five feet over the middle line. The question of the 2 ft. from the garage to the lot line in connection with the utility easement was raised, since a 10 ft. easement was required, the 2 ft. would not be adquate. It was suggested that maybe 8 ft. could be added to Mrs. Eastman@ lot along with the additional 34 ft. she had requested. MSP Ehelquist/ Haake to recommend to the Council that the lot split be granted as presented, except that the back lot line for the front lot be moved west an additional 8 ft. to provide a 10 ft. setback from the garage. This would be 5 ft. of lot and 5 ft. of utility easement, and provide a total'lot depth of 306 tt. It is expected that a split of tie lot to the south will follow tkis line, which will provide adequate setback and easement for the garage on that lot. Building Inspector Skibats measurement tndiolted ;that the setback will bo approximately 16 ft. on the south lot. The west lot will be 222 ft. deep lees a 30 tt. easement. 6 ayes. parried. Minor Subdiiiai:on. Eris *oteson Divide into 2 lots. Anplatted Lands Section 6 Parcel 080 -09 Mr. Johnson has requested a lot split creating 2 lots, me lot being 90 X 264 and leaving a lot of 150 X 264. There was concern and diasoussion of the possibility f having the 150 X 264 lot divided into 2 aubstandard lots of 75 X 264. MSP Pose /Blanchard to accept the subdivision as presented on the !ketch plan, subject to approval by the Council. 8 ayes. Carried. t ri Non Fee Ibem: Mr. Al Zepper. Amending the Zoning Ordinance, Seotion 40.03 Subdivision 6. Concerning the height of fencing. Mr. All Zapper of aawdaw Fending along with several other residents attending the meeting spoke in favor of raising the allowable heighth when putting up fencing. Mr. Al Zepper stated that moos other ooamunities a11ow up to 4 inok fenos. Other residents spoke in favor of allowing up to a 4 inch fence. The Comaiaeion after discussion among the members would liko to recommend to the Council eubjeot to approval by the Village attorney) the followings M3P Shelquist /Burmeister to reooaend to the Council changes in Subdivision 5, 2b and in Subdivision 6, both being in Section 40.03. Subdivision 5, 2b: Terraces, steps, uncovered porches, stoops or similar features provided they do not extend above the height of the ground floor level of the principal structure or to a distance lees than two (2) feet from any lot linty fences wkiok do not *wooed four (4) feet in height. Subdivision 6: Traffic Visibility. No structures excludi peaces, or planting exceeding 30 inoke ti4 center line grade of the street shall be permitted within a triangular area measured thirty (30) feet from the intersection of lot lines, along lot lines, in order to allow for visibility across the corner. Fences within the same described area aunt kmva at lsvpt 9 v y. .xoep a e_R_ may s measured from the Lit 1 ne itrade level. The underlined areas of the above Subdivisions represents the recommended changes. Mr. Ellerd Rosin, Mesaieh Lutheran Church, proposed parking lot for the church. Mr. Rosin indicated that since the proposed parking lot will be in an area that slopes sharply, a.retaing wall to the south will be built, at certain places to be 10 -12 ft. high, to create a level area for parking. A concern for drainage on Knollwood Dr. especially in the area whore Spring Creek crosses the road was expressed. Also Mr. Rosin was advised that the Churok should contact the home owner to the south of the proposed parking lot (7234 Knollwood Dr.) to get the feeling of these hose owners of how the retaing wall would affect them and their property. Also the Church is to oontaot the property owners west of the proposed parking lot (2916 Co. Rd. R2. The Commission felt that the Village Engineer should be con- tented about the drainage, and Mr. Rosin was advised that when he domes back for an official hearing before the Planning Commission, he should have complete drawings of the proposed site, showing drainage end kow the retaining wall is to be handled and the feelings of the property owners this plan will affect. Attacked to tile report is a sketch of Meeeiak Lutkeran Olaurok proposed parking lot. Tae meeting was adjourned at 10015 p.m.