Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974-12-18 PC Minutesounde View Planning Commission ity Hall December 18, 1974 Meeting called to order: 7:39 P.M. by Chairman Basks Members presents Foes, Burmeister, Ratke, Burggraff, Mackeben, Roseman Members absents Blanchard, Shelquist, Glazer Minutes: The minutes for November 20, 1974 <ere read and approved, 6 Ayes, motion oarried. Business: Geo. Payne Jr., owner of property looated at 8035 Eastwood Rd. Side yard set -beck requirements not mot by subdivision approved by Planning Commission on June 213, 1972. Mr. Mrs. Douglas Schroeder, 8051 Eastwood Road appeared at the Planning Commission. They are the ownera of the north lot which was created in the original lot split. Mr. Schroeder gave the Commission the following informations At the time of the lot split there was an older building on splitr000urred be the south the the lot lo line. At this time Mr. Payne indicated he would tear down the building and possibly would build another home. it middle of theuwinter,Mr. renting building, chro deragreed to lettingtthg chcupantp❑utay in the building until spring of 1973. The occupants did not move out in the spring of 1973 but continued to live there until the first part of 'December 1974, then moved out and within a few days, new occupants moved in. Not only is the house on the lot line but Mr. Schroeder stated that when he put it-fence up, he had to curve out from his starting point because of the house being on the lot line. In the spring there is 'also trouble with the septic tank on the property in that it backs up and causes a run -off that orates en unpleasant odor Also that.: is a largo van located in back of the building which is up on block's and apparently is used as a storage shed. Upon reviewing the Planning Commission minutes for June 28', 1972, the Commission could not find any indication that Mr. Payne "had agreed to tear down the building, the minutes only contained the motion to approve a lot split. The letter be sent to Mr. recommend! to Council mailindicating that it is the understanding of the Commission that Mr. Payne had a verbal agreement to tear down the building located at 8035 Eastwood Road at the time he was granted A lot split. He has not done this and is now in violation of our Ordinance 67, (thisi is was so i n dica t e di in n tie 40). as original motion, 6/28/72), (ord now and is requested to vacate the premises and remove the structure. He is given 2 weeks to respond to this letter, Subdivision with a Vatianoe. Request to divide present 153' x 458' lot into three (3) lots with a variance John Juntuaen, 8297 Spring of the lots. ngLake Road. Planning Commission member Pose has a conflict of interest for this request,agAsts. Juntunen and was Foss at the applicant s exoused from the Commission, 8 :10 P.M. The lots created would be: A. 77' x 214' (16,4 sq. ft.) B, 76' x 214' (16,2264 sq. ft.) C. 153' x 214' (32,74 ■q. ft.1 The variance request would involve lots A 8. There was also an alternative suggestion making lot A 73'x 214' (15,622 a$. ft.) and lot B 80'x 2111'(17,120 sq. ft.) to bring the property line further away from the existing house on lot A, due to maintenance, etc. lot A is then the exieting house on the thepropertyline.. If lot A is 80' x 214' then the existing house would be 5 from the property line.' Lot C is located to the rear of lots A B and would front on the proposed Knollwood Dr. With creating two (2) pub- 'standard facing dpring Lek* splitting lot 0 into there is always dard the y lots when Knollwood Drive Is completed. Thu Knollwuod Drive easement ha: already been taken. MEP Burggradll/Rosaman to recommend approval of subdivision creating three (3) lots, all lots are subject to the Live (5) foot utility easement and subject to the Park ant Recreation dedication fund. The lots would be of the following size: Lot A 80' x 214' Lot B -73' x 214' Loo 0 -153' x 214' Ayes 3 Nays 2 Motion carried Pais 3 we divided in such a asyto because notsl.3owinga re 10 side yard at book on the existing house on lot A. Commission member Burmeister voted nay because of con curranoe with Commission member Meckabents reason and also the the cresting more At 8135 P.M. Commission member Foss rejoined the Planning Commission. Subdivision request. Donald Sobm 6206 oroveland Road This item was previously considered by the Planning Commission on July 25, 1974 and the request was granted subject to a 15 driveway to e mununtil il Knollwood Drive was oomplstsd. The item is now being returned to the Commission from the Council for further consideration regarding 30 public vate otrset easement on west edge of property, 151 arivat street easement on south edge of east lot, postal of west lot, extension of Knollwood Drive south of Arden Avenue and lot sassausenta. The Commission feels that there is the possibility that Knollwood Drive may never go in south of Arden Ave., and does easement ralreadytexisting,� south MSP Roseman/Macktben reaffirms the July 25, 1974 recommendation with a 15 driveway easement. Al o subject to the Park and Recreation dedication fund. Ayes 6. Motion carried. Rotes The July 25, 197!1 motion, did not include the dedication to the Park Reorestion fund but is included in the now motion made 12/18/74. Ponsibls Subdivision. Brentwood Subdiviaion Development. Mr. Ed Dropps Auditor's Subdividion 89, lots 2,3,4 M^. Bob Carlson appeared with Mr. Droppsto get the feeling of the Commission of it proposed subdivision. The Commission oould see no problems with the plan and told Mr. Dropps he could go ahead and appear before the Commission on this under a fee item. But Mr. Droppswas also told that 3 ambers of the Commission were absent and there was no guarantee that his plan would be accepted until the Commission reviewed it under the normal process of being on the Agenda is a fee item. Variance. Mr. Ed Dropp; Pinetree Builders Property involved, 7830 Eastwood Road. Mr. Droppssppeared requesting a variance for a 70 front yard set -baok. The digging for the foundation had Already been started when the Building inspector, Wally Skiba stopped the work. Upon inapeotian, Wally ekiba found tha new proposed house would be set back further than the already existing houses on either side. Mr. Dropp■ stated that he did not realise you had to have a variance to set bank further, but only to have less at baok than is required. He indicated the reason the house is to be built in this particular area is because tho owner wishes to save 2 large pine trees located in the front. Mr. Dropps also presented 2 signed statements by the residents on either side of the proposed house, stating they did not object to the looation.of the new house. Statements signed by Mr. Mrs. Harold F. Glaser and Mr. Mrs. Lamont C. Bolduc. MSP Roasmat/Foss to approve the variance for an ypproximate 70 I set back for the new house at 7830 Eastwood Road. The Commission would like to comment on Building Inspector Skiba's sharp Observation of this problem. Commission member Mackaben was excused at 9:5 P.M. Meeting adjourned by Chairmen Hake at 10:00 P.M.