Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-01-28 PC Minutes • MIHUTES pY THE MOUNDS VIEW BLANNTNG COMMISSION January 28, 1976 ~ P The Mounds View Planntng Commisaioa was called to orde.r at the City Hall by ita chairpereon garbara Haake at 7;31 pm, on Wednesday, Ja~mary 28, 1976. The foilowing merabera wose presont: Don Mackeben, Paul Fedor, Robert Glaz=r, Phy1J.l.s Blanchard, Robart Rosaman, Nancy Burmeister and Darbara Haake. Gerald Poes arrfveA ut :r40 pm. The following correctione were made in tha January 14, 1976, minutees 9th parayraph, la:;t ocntence, af~er ths word "subetandard" and before the word "anyway" add the worde "in width." Tn the 5th paragraph, add the aentence: "It wae called to Mr. Ford's attention that if a lot were d3vided eyually the e~hed would etill be more than tlie 5 feat mittimum requirement from the :iack lat lina." in the 6th paragraph, 2nd sentenca, aFtar the word "and" and before the word"the" add the wnr8 "deny". in t:ie 7th paraqraph, 2na sentence, deleee the worda "that we" and inaert in lieu thoreof tha wards "Mr. Hrufloc]t's request was granted, the Ylanning Comnission". Page two, 3rd pazagraph, aftQr the worr~ "felt" and before the word "that" ineert the words "since .ir. Novak had to split his 'ot equally than his (t4r. rord's) would most likely only be approved if it waro also done equally." Delate the rest oE that sentence. In the 4th paragraph, last sentence, it should road: 216.6 x BO and 211.6 x 80. , In tha 7th paray~:aph, laat sentence, aftar the word "the" and be~ore i the word "garage" ad~3 the word "axisting". AEter the word "gsrege" 1 delete the word "with" and insert in lieu thereoE the ~aorda "on the ;~ south lot~~ . In the Bth paragraph, 2nd sentence, a£ter tha word variattce and ;~efore tihe word located add rhe worda oP 6.5 feet or the width of t'he north lot", and in the 3rd eentence after j the word "the" and befoxe the word "north" add the ward "eald'. On paqe d,6th aentence, aft..P the wor6 "situation" and. before t.he i word "aoald" add the worde `•for a tennia oourt" and aEter the ward ! "shave" and beEora the word "but" add the word "eome". In the 4th ~ paragraph, 7th sentence delete the numhez "150" and insert in lieu ~ thereof the number "350". On page 5, 2nd paragrnph, let eenCence, ; after the word "the" and before the word "cod~" add the wor8 "new". ; 2he minutes were approved as carzected. 8 ayea; ITEM3 FCR COl:SIDERATIONt Daug Bryant - Parke and AeoreAtion" Pr.eeentation of "Trsile". In summary Mr. Bzyant etated Lhnt th» oity hired er~gl.neera for a study of the city drainaqe eyebam. mhere ie a pooeibilltg~, if tile,atc. is used on the drainage syeCema, that it would ba ideal to have a tLail syetem run hand in hend , Midweat Planning hea reoommended a trail nyatem for blkee, pedeatrlan, ski. traila. (om m~p) ~he property within the blue lend~o will aftaat the ouhaomc o! the engineer'r~ atudy of o~xr water problem. The trail ayetam cauld ba developed at the same time the b41e syatem is dnveloped. Ma. Heaka aeked where the money would come lrorn and Mr. gxy~nt replie8 lrom community development, i ! ~~ t i '2- Dept. of Natural Resources. Tha city providea 288 nnd the stieta 75~~ ~ There ia a pos~ibility thet we might be able Co qe~ lull fundinq iP wa taikod to the appropriaks PeaPle ae it ie euoh a unique mpproaoh. ~ Nancy Burmeister ask~d him ae to the uaae tox tih~ tr411. Mr~ Bxyenb answered for s~.i t•ouring, biking, enowmobiling snd peAeatsinn-- multipla trails. If we oaa get aaay from the asphault it ~s muoh better Ec.r l•ha ca~r~nuntty, sucondary traile aleo are being cons~derad. Tr.ail bikea would not be inaluded. Ma. Heake aeked i! lhey intand to fenae both sides and Mr. Bryant replied not witl~in Che peYk property. Mr. Mackeben aeke~ if we were wi~linq bo move trail ~ystems within drainage eyetem linee. Mr. 8rynnt ekaCed tha6 that is the key question to all oi tihis. ~t thaC ti:ne we oen disnua~ 3t and decide if we want to give and take. ~he primery reapon~ib,iiit~ would be to have a gaad draii~aqe nyetem. Na Pee1e thnt iti i^ a unigue approach to areatinq a trail syetem end cut ooats ns w~ll. Mr. Fass asked how they were 9oiny to croee Highwey 10? Mr. Pcyant: ~rhare ie a requeet ~s~ Eor a rer.oning. Thruugh a lend or cash dedication program xt ie very loqicel thnt we eould gat e bri33e. He Eurthex etated ~hak h~ would i,{.~o e8diklo»el oomm~nto or. ~houghts and he wi11 talk to Attorney Meyera to lind out it there are any legal problema. tde, xaake: 2 am pleased that you cama betore ue enpaaially beasuoa whan people come to ua for Au~divielon~ we knaw yout idea~ end oan plan accerdingly. MSP (BUrmaieter-FOes) tl~at wo ineert the propoeed oona~pt ~hati Doug Bryant ~f the Parks and Recreatlon Depnrtmene pres~ntQd baloYe ;'~~ the Planning Commieaiun: "Where artiFiaiel ahnnnol~ mu~t b~ ~~ conetrncted to augtnenl• the natural dxe~neqe syetemr /uch oh~nn~lw as we11 as the naturml drainage waya mny be plo»neQ nr parG oF w recreational trail eyetem. Channels ehall ba dssigned to b~ q~~tihat~ ically compatible Eor rocreati~nal trail use." 8 4yd~ CounaiLnan eaumgartnar etated that a pvblio he~ring on the u~s o! community Punding money ie pendinq nnd the prsridenE o! ths L~apuo oi W~r,.n Votera indicated thaC the Laague wa~ in lavvr c~ bbr urQ of money for a trail system nnd aomo at the money fox 2hi~ b~lQqa. They would like to see thie bxidge ao theb people ~oulh of Hlghaay 30 co~ild walk to tha ehopping oenter. Next item on ~he agends: Fred o'reil - Property invalved - Lend Cast ~P Lon Laka Aoed, NoYth of Co. Rd. H3 and &outhweet oE Nighwey lp exce~k 1~00 HiQhwsy 10 (Donatallo'e) - Rezoning H-1 to 8-3. Duane olson, Conaulting Englreer, epoke !ox Mr. o'Nei.l. He exyieinod that the property is immediately weat ot D, Narth oi H1, Hxyhwey lA N~ 1lmite, zuna elong Long Lake Road, nnd they havic e petl~i~n in for rezoning. The preeent zoning ie limitad bus~n0oe, ~nd Ch~y are aaking Yor n genetnl bueine~e xoning. Mhmy would e1s0 lika :a hnve a grading permit to remove peet trom the we~t portion en~ lS11 it with uesable mbc~riai. Tha utilttiee nre in Long Lake Robd and County Rd lix. ~ Mr. Fedor askAd them what they pleaneQ to build and he replisd khat a Mr. &teak was intereatiad, the Tandy Company i~ looktog !or o lree e:anding building, and they have had sAVeral oth3r i»quirier, -3- Ma. Hanke aeked him if ne wae awara that we ar:e invulvad 1n a now ~/~, onmpreheneive plan, Their property has fallen into plann~ng District ~ 1 1 and for khis part;icule,x area. they had in mind multiple density dwellinge (PUD). The community ae a whole seama to go along wtth thiu. Mr. Olaon etated that the problem ie twafold. No matter wtia~,: they do with it it ie ueelees in ita present stato. They would 'r~upefully work out, somathing tihat is compatible with the drainage p.ropoeals end Mr. 0'Neil's use of the property. Mr. Foes aeked if, an the na:th on Long Lake Road, wuuld that be commercial also7 Mr. Olson replied, yea, imaginary lota 1-11 would be R-2, the remainder would be 3. Ma. Burmeister inquired ae t.o tha sixe of tihq lote and he raplied: 100 x 125, bixt we ar4 Plexible. Mri. Haake made a motion to deny Mr. 0'Dleil's requaec foc a rezoning from B1 to D 3 of the property located at east of Long Lake Road, North oE Co. Ad. ti2 and Southwost uE Highway 10 except 2400 Highway 10, beoause it is in conflict witi~ eu~ proposed comprenenaive plan in which this aroa ia recomutended ~nr a deaignation of madium daneity PUD. Thia motion was seconded by Nancy Burmei3ter. Me. Rurmeieter sCated that oux plan has c~one to the Metropolitan Council and they have approved it and tihia requeat is something ~hat we have tried to avoid. We have tried to prese~ve it as rr:aidential in bhie area. Mr. Foss asked if there wore a pos~ibility of talking to MSdwest P7,anning as he queationa ivhether thiu particular piece of land !~ is euitable £~~r tha denaity we gave it. I peraonally feel this ~/ is a better way to use this. It ie more auitable and benefictal in the long run to the city to hava it commercial, i feel it has eome merit. Me. Bumneiaters The pub:Lic did not want that to go aommercial when we had tho public heariri.~e. They wera happy with the meditun denaity. Hew can wa change i~ now? Mr. Foae saiQ thay could have another hearlny. Ms. 8umeieter sai3 it has only been a sh~rt time ngo that wa did this. Don MackAben called Ear the question. Tho motion carrier,. 7 ]. Mr. L'oes expla.tn~d h1.s aba~ention: I Feel that tha ares along Highway 10 will have to be rezoned to soma type of commercial eventuslly. I thlnk we are going to be facing this. it ia not going to be sn ideal aituation for residential development. Me. Blanchard stated khat she woulfl be more incl±ned to go along with it if we knew definitely what they plan to put in there. The next item is Rol.and W. M111er - Property involved - 262Q ttighcrsy 10, Aeturn Item - Var.iance of new setbacks. Spacial Use Permit - Indaor Tennie !.n 8-3 Zoning. Ms. Haake aeked Councilman Shelquiet ~as holdinq up the adoption of tha cott~prehensive plan. He replied that ha will mentlon thia et the agenda meeting Monday evening. Ms. Haake eaidt I undaretand, Mr. Miller, tl~at you are here with a new aet bac!~. You have narrowed and lengthened your building and the eide yard eetbacke are now 24', whi,ch ie a varianco needed of 26 Feet on the East and West eides. I ayasl abet ~ I i ~ ~q' ~ eill McMaho» epoka £or Roland Miller and etated bhat the radiu~ of the rooP will rnmain th~ ~ar,.e. From the outeide af bhe building there ~ ie a 21 Eoot heighe at the peint oY the buildiny~ Thero Qre no aguj.nr in ehe building. We wi11 ebill retain the 53 parking spaoee (9 x 20). The L111ydalg Tennie Club hae 9 indoor tennis courte and 9 racguet bal~ courte, whioh is muah larger than oure, and have 72 parking plaaee and their parking Zot haa never been filled. If ws run into a parking situation we do have a tennis court runninq eaet and west and we can usg that if it becomes neaeseary. Ms. Burmeistet: etated that our zoning Qode has to be applied to everybody. I£ we let you go ~elow khan eomebody else can come back and not think thie is a good argument. Mr. Fose stated khat he folt that parking ie plenty adaquate when corr,pared to okher courta. Councilman Shelquiet auggested ~hat if you grac.t a variance on the parking you qive consideration to what you would be willing to liva with in a aimilax type of facility. Me. B~i•rtteieter aeked if many probleme will come up with juat tl~e one exit. That is w}~y I wondered if you had conaidered a road. Have you checked what tho width would be if you went bahind 51mon's? Steve from the ataff atated thal• there is enough room to do it if they want to. i reully think their 53 spacea would bo adequato in moat aituatione exaept Eor once or twica a yesr. Mr. Mackeben stated that he waa not concerned about t.he parking or the exi~. ' Diauussion followed aa to what to call the structur.e. ids. Burmaister ' atatad that it ie by itaelf, not attached to the principle bullding. It is not a building, it is a atructure. Steva: I feel.it would come under an accessory builling. I ~., Ms. Haake etated that we ~ave to define what it is. , sill McMahon wanted to know if ~t could be evaluated ae part af. the origlnal project? The entire thing wil.l bo enalaaed at a 10 toot haight. We will go 6 axonnd the decor of the building hut have to go ta 10 feat where the courta ara. Councilman 8he2quist stated that 1t is a atructusa rather than a fence haoause it ia permanettt in a sense and it is sdequately aet,back 'I ~caa thv property line. St ia part af the use of the ].and. Guese ,ycu , don't have to grant a variance on the height ot it. i Me. Haake poiled the Conmisoion an to whether to det.ino i~ as ~: ! accesaory building. Mr. F~es: Fits the fiefinitton of str.ucture, ~uat giva them permission. Mr. Rosaman: Side yard set backs no problem. j Ms. Blanchard: What are we oparating under: the pruposed p1an3 Ms. Burmeieter: No anower ' Mr. Glazer: tend toward varianc9. Mr. Fedor: Grant variance becauae we have a proposed zoning ordinance that will brina it into the neighbnrhood. Mr. ~hai:ka~sn: Concerned abont granting that varia~aaa buC it is good pianning so would grant it. Ms. Haake: ~u-25 foot s?thack in caaes 11ke thi~. I would say yes. ~ Aoland Miller atated that the parking tacil.it,~aa at ?ak companp would not be available at all timea. Th~y propooe Eo have gates, and when Chay had a tournament the gates would ba opened and extend their parking back there. Ma. eurmeister etaked that there wa~t no neod for it every day and ~~'' an agreement could be written up to this effoct. -5- ~M~ Roland Miller~ Fine, no prablem. ~ ) Counoilman Bhelqulet etated that the parking lot code wnuld be applied in the lightiny. 8111 61cMahon~ We would aonForm with all lighting codee baee3 an what the code ie. MBP (Faes-Fedos) that we reoommend to tihe Counoil that they give a speaial uae permit tu Ehe property at 2028 Nigflwuy 10 to Rolund W. Miller requeating a 26 foot varianoe on the eabe and waet for aideyard aetbaok and that we granti tr,am the variance on the oft etreet parking requlremente eo that they wlll provide 53 spacee and will ~aoaive Erom theSr adjoining neighbor, the Paa Co~pany, a joint facilitiee parking errangement. Oe tha eareening requiremonte we would add that they landecupe around t}~e entire building except for the nortih part whicn faces the Pac auildlnq, and that they would aleo meet ous fencing requlrements exoept for the araa south of the building, dimensione ae followe: c~eat being 110 f~et, south line ie 152 feet, east line ie 110, where we would grant a 3 1/2 ~oot variance. On the noise raquiraments it will be contingent on *_alking with adjoining nelqhbors before wa reach a Pinal deciaion on the operatinq houra. The drainaqe requireunante muat pasa through thQ Engineer.ing Dapartment, ASce Creek Waterehed, and other appropriste ¢gencies. The oxterior matarials aad li~}itiasg o£ the building an3 landecapinq will al.l have ta be approved by the Planning Commission. The reaeon the 26 foot vari- anae was allowed wae bocause the existing ordinance calls for 50 Poot eldeyard setbacks but in our i~ew proposed,ordinance the eideyard +.~ setback will be either 20 or 25 fedt. Conaideration wae given to ~~~' the faet that the neareat rasidential housing o~as 104 feet on the weat and an apartment building ie 74 Eeet an the east of the propoaed building. It ie noted tl~at the new zoning code wi11 all.ow a maximum height o~ e feet for a£enco. Mo. Haake explained to them that this ie a special uae permit 1 nay so there will be a public hearing. Jerry Woltman, 8095 Fairchild, appoared baEore the Commiseion regarding permisaion to put a basement in .:iis home, that is currently aet on a cement eT.ab excent for one bedroom. The house is set back 91 feet from tha canter os the straet. Ma. Haake told him to pay his fae and come bofore the Cnmmiaaion in two weaks. Can aee no problem, except perhuga tivatar. Don Mackeben was eleotod vice chairman o~ the Planning Commiesian. Ms. Haa;.e atated that Howard Muechnig, 8oi1 Conaervatioritet from Rrunsey Soil and Watar Conservation DietricE, will come an3 arcak to the Planniny Commisainn at cha next meeting and the Council will be invlted. MSP (BUrmeiater-Glazer) to adjourn at 1Or35.p.m. $ ayo ! ~~~ ? Aer~pectfully e~uUmitted, '~~ ~~t7~ udith 6wanholm Recording Secretary