Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-04-02 PC Minutes;s° a 1~~ ~~ ~~ PROCEEDINOS OF THE PLANNINO COMMISSION CITY OF MOUN9S VIFW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting April 2,1980 Mounds Vlaw City Nalt 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds Vlew, HN 55112 .._.""--"."'.--'."°---_""-'-..'--.'-' ^.'-.-. -"'-_'-'-•--."'-'-"`.-----°. The Mounds Vlew ptanning Commieslon was celled to order at 7i;5 P.M., Aprll 2, 1980, by Chalrperson Mountln. Mem6ars Presant: Chairparson Mountin, Comnlsslon mambers: McCarthy, fiedor, ,iamr, Burmolster, Sktbe, Haeke~ and Goebel. Mem6urs Absentt Freertare CORRECTION9: Haake corrected tha spe111ng of the Kraus-Anderson reprosantaClre, Dick Korsh, on page 9. Haaka asked to daleta the port(on "wa make the motlon" o~ page 6(last peragraph) and add ~'We mova to racomnend". McCarthy addad anothar canment to paga 6-'?In the welr-diha canscruction, who would be constructing tha conttoi valve. Mr~ Kranxir answeraA that he'wouid 6e doing thls tn tha constructlon of the take area,~~ Clezer edded enother reaaon to page 7-~'it appeared the pond was being bullt to satisfy.the resolution of g83 raCher Yhan an Improved amer.ity to the park recreatione! system." The Planning Cemmission accepted tha amendad 3/19/80 mi~utas. Applicants request to subdivide a lot measurtng 165' x 231' Into two lots, ona measurin9 77' x 231~, tlie other measuring 88' x 23~'. Both lots meet the minimum area requiraments for a single fam(ly devalop- ment. ihe lots meat tha front footege requlrements pursusnt to the old and new subdivlsion ord!nance, section k40.06, Subdivlsion B(9). ~ The exlating bouse on the )ot will meet side yard setback requfremants of 10'. Tha existing garega wtll be removed/relocatad (Percel B) prlor to the deed being approvad 6y the city. The zoning plan danotes the area as R-I s!ngle family. I. ROCL CALL OF COMMISSION~RS 2. APPROVAL OF 3/19/80 MINUTES 3• REQUEST FOR MINOR SUBDIVISION (1 lot into 2) BY SHERRY AND JERRY.VAN HOUTEN, 8066 SUNNY^ SIOE ROAD ~,;, . , MOUNOS VIEW PLANNING COMMiSSION Regular Meeting Pd~a-~----~--°--°^- °--°°°°----------°---°------°Aerll_21_1~80 ~ Nr. Van Noueen hed nothing to add to staff's presentstlon end thara were no conments fran the audience. Fedor-Seas no problem with removing tha driveway and cmment sleb. Burmafeter quastianed how tong it would taka to removu the driveway end e7ab? Mr. Van Houten sald it coutd ba done In a relatively shart tlme, Skiba-No questions. Gleser-No qu9stlons. McCerthy questionad whara lhe drlveway was going to ba putT Mr. Van Houten responded It would ba on the othar ~Ide of the house and that It vrould bn canp'le¢aly ramoved from the one slde. Goebet quostlonad Rosa on what tha varlanca of thts pro- posal wasl Rose stated there wes none and that it was regular pracedure to hendld thesa through tha Planning Cammission. Mountln asked Mr. Van Houten what the surfaco of the naw ~~ driveway would ba7 Mr. Van Houten rasponded it would be a biack top driva. llcCarthy asked how closa thls pleca of propnr[y would be to the next door neighbors? Mr. Van Houten reaponded It would ba 10' away. Haake mada a motlon to recamwnd to the Council for the approval of the mtnnr subdlvixlon i'or Sheryl and Jerry Ven Houtan tha two lots (88~ x 231' and 77~ x 231'). This motlon Is grantad with the stipulatlon that the existing driveway and slab be totelly removed, saconded by McCerthy. Tha motlon was carried. Ayes ^ 8 Rose asked to move on to the naxt Item as the app1l^ cunts wara presant for itam 5 while ICem 4 had none who would be preeant. Further, ha statad that It was stlll tabled from the lest meating. Rose reported th~ applicants tiave requaetad to construct an office/warehouse fecfllty on Lot 3, Block I of Mounds View Industrial Park q3 W~th Tax Exempt Flnancing. I Tlie request meets the xoning ~nd tand use raqulrements, ~~~ Lhe drolnege requlrements of Rasolutlon N983 are met, the davaloper Is provtd~ng en easamant to tha Clty water tower to allow potentiel releasing of the existfng ease- mant of 2A' alang the east prcparty line. Nater and sewer are avallebla to this lot, and It meats the requlra- 4. NOIiTH STAit INDUSTRIAL PARK (BLAINE), STORM WATER DRA~NAGE FACILI71E5 REVIEWAL JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT, CASE 48-80 5. WOLp 8 ASSOCIATES PROPERTY iC."~OLVED: 4P.60 MUSTANG CIRCLE, DEVELOpMENT PROPOSAI (13,zz5 SQ.F7. OFfICE/WAREHOUSE), 1-1 DEVELOPMENT, CASE 50-80 MOUNDS VIEW PLANNIN6 COMHISSION Regular Maeting Page 3 Aprl) 2, I9B0 ~ .................•._-°_.-..-..-...-...._..._...._...-..-..^._---.-_-._...._... ments. Both the parking area and proposed butid~ng side maet tha mtnimum setback requlrements. The financing hae been approved by tha City under the Industria! Ravenue Bond end Tax Exempt Mortgage. Glezer queetloned the tex exemp[ flnancfng indlcating he undarstood the Commlssion was not to meke a Judg- ment on tha dastrabllity or non^deslrability of the ftnancirtg beh-nd thls proJect. Ro`e statdd tkat tha Cammlss~on eouid moka a recamrendetion as to tha Clty allnwtng tham to usa this type of flnanc(ng. Chelrparson Mountin oskad if there were any further camients from the audiance. Nilllam Ouckley, a reprasnntatlve from Nolf b Assoclates~ Introduced Lou DeNars, m rapresentatfve from Nlllar/Schroeder and Tom Zumhwald~ arahltect, who were availeble for eny questlons fran tha Commtsslon end audience. There wera no quastions from tha audlence. Goabel requeshad a definition on tha tax exempt mortgage. lou DeMars(reprasentattve from M111er/ Schroeder) statad .hat somaone who buys a 6ond is Rxempt fran paying stata and fe.deral ineome tax on tha'intapest. Thls adv~ntcge ts so the campany can finnnee e proJect at a tow rata of interest, Sklba-no quastion3. Goebe;-~o qucsttons. Glazer refarred to a statemant In tha booklet whtch ' said ~4here was no anvtronmantul lmpact on thle proJect." Ha esked for clariftcetion on tM s,since vlrtualty enything one d~J had en environmental impact of some sort. Mr. Duckley (No1f 6 ASaccietos) expia{ned thet they had deslgned the system with ' thotr engtneers, and thare wouid be no large machines~ no snwka stacks, and no vreste praducts. McCerthy questioned whare the dellvery areas would be located. Mr. Duckley tndicated they would 6e on the east and north sida. " rlcCarthy ssks~± tf they hed obtelned a permanent easemant. Mr. Duckley responded by stating tha easement was to ba granted w(thin tha parking area, , a typa of fnvlslble Ilne. V ~ !, ~' ,,- F , ;~ . , _.. ,. .,. , ;,... . .: __ _ . .. . ,,;.,. , .. ,,.«.::;~ , . ,~,, , , . - ~A'~. MOUMDS VECw PLANt11~C COi~riISSIt1N Page 4 Rogular Meating Apr11 2,1980 ~ ---°-° ..............°.°°----°-'-'°---._•_--.-•,_^.- + ----------°_ ..m.t., , Coabal quastloned the me.etfng of Requtrements of Resolution N983. Rosa steted when the Moundeviaw Industrfal Park N3 Was approvad, facillt-es were Installad to meet the requfrnmanCS of q98g for the whole plot. Haaka-no questlons. ~ McCarthy asked if 50$ tight fndustrlat were mat ' by tho standord warehouse spuce. Rose responded ~ thaL it was falt fc met thfs requlrement. i Rose further s4ated the applicant ptannad to I expand the assembly aree In th~ futura. I McCarthy askad (f tha ts~and on the corner vrould ~ presant p~oblems for ctty truck to ertter. Rose ,' stated he felt the eccass would be adequate. ~ Haaka made a motlon to recoemend Yo tha councll tha approval of tha davelopmant proposal submitted to the Comnlssion this e.vening by WotPe e Assoctates 4 for Mounds Ytew Industrtat Park p3, ~~860 Mustang. Circle, the requlrtng of the unimpeded easement 20~ ~ as designat~d tn an exhtblt attached, dated Nar~h 28, 1980, and the easement would excead south of tha property and take a 90~ angte north to the water towar proparty. Th~ partles wtll anter to a develop- , ment agreamant and bondtng whfch wf11 (nc~ude the ~ foilowing: a)concreta curb and guttar, b) paving, c) IanAscap(ng (plantfngs, sldewalks, soddtng, etc), and d)perktng iot atrlping. V!a further recommend the exlsting 20~ easement Prom Mustartg Road along . the east of tha Mounds Vlew Park q3 be vacated~ and suggest the presant gate to tha water iower be rolocated to the wasi to lead up ko the new easement. ~ ` Secondad by Coebel. ~ Ayns - 7 Nays - 1 ~ dlezar statad he voted no due to the problem with tha ~ devetopment as presented and he had reservntions about tha method af financing. He was not entfraty ~ convtnced that now Is the best time for tha village ~ to extend its Indebetedness bonded and exacerbata already bad Interest ratas. He stated ha dfdn't ~ f brtng th(s up durfng the discussion beceuse he felt 3 It was a polnt which woutdn't go anywhere. t ~ Item !l4 was still left tabled. 4. NORTH STAR INDUSTRIAL PARK ~ ~ Goebet stat~d he did not feel ~t was tfie Planntng (BLAINE), STORM WATfR ; Comnisslon~s lntant Por the Council noY to continue DRAIWAGE fACILITIES REVIEWAL,`, with this matter but thak they requested mora Infor- ~OINT POWERS AGREEMENT, ; matlon and review time. Rosa stated they would CASE 48-80. recetva addttional informatfon on this. ~.c, ~.n :.. _. . MOUND5 VIEW PLANNING COMMIS510N aegular Neeting i Page 5 Ap:ll 2`1980 ; `" The Planning Commlbelon~ in general, ais~~s88a^the ••' " Y• I next work aeasion~ It le to cona~et of work on . 6r.els and P011cles~ Thcy fur[her etated that staff attendaece was not neceseary. Ooe6e1 moved to adJourn et 9t30 P.M. Seconded by Heeka. Ayes - y , ~, ~ Raspectfully submltted, ~ !" , ~ ` ~ ~rOt ~ .~ n~ ~~ Ve i 4i .. ~. ~ ., e t , ~~~' v; a 9S ' W ', t t, .? 2r 4 ~ ~. ~ ~i. . ~ rrr «~~ N ~ ~ '~ t i . ~~r 6 t.. e ' ~ . ~ .,. R f ~ ~~ i ~ i~i ~ u~,.~ S~ ~ i t i a. i I t~~ i ' t ^ ~ , ; ~ ~ , ~.... ' ~ .- 1 i E ~. F g ~ s a ~ t .. / ~ 1 ] '`~ ,' ~ 1 _ ! .~ 5 ~' ' a k . ._, . ~.. , ~t t f l~(~ ~ f~ 1'f. ~i J 1 . ,• . i , '~! , ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ r ,. . , ~ . ~ r i. , , . ~ ~ z ~' ~ ' I a xk ~ ,U .a~/ .~ ~i . , . , • ; _ r . . ` , ,'.' t .., .:' . , _ ,... ,~ , ' " ~' ~ ~ ' ` ' ~ , , ~ , ~~ m~; ,. . -~ . . i~' . .r~ . i • ~ . , f "r , , . ~ ~ , , ~ . ~ ~ .. . .., t s ', . ~ '~f. ; ! ~ 1 . .. . , ., . . ...; . . ` ~ t i ti : ° } r, ~ SF tr .. , .. , .. t ,'6 . ^ i ' ~ ~ ' ;. ~ ,.., i'i '~ , .~, , h ' .S. . . _ .. , ~ .,,,- . I ~ , .. :.. . ~ ,.: ~ .; ,. . . .. ° '~~ ' ; ~ ~~ , .1+ ~ ` , ~ ~ ~~ +i ! .. ,. .y.. :~ ' :, =' ; . '.. .. .°~ ~ ~,. ~ . ~,,. ° ' ~, ~ ~ . , , , .:. .. ~ ~ ~ w ~ . .: . . . ~ -' .:... . . ., .~ ;.,, . , ~~.' .~ :. : . . .~,~..:' ~ .t ; ,.. .. ' ~. .< ~ .,,..,~. ~ ,!;. , . .. ~ r ,... , , .,..j... ,. , , , ~ . ,. i„'.. ~ , . .. .. ~ . . . ~ ~ ,.^-... , , . , . , . , . " . ' ~ , , . , _ .. .. . , ,, ~. ~/ ~ , ,. ,. , . ,. ~ : ' ' i. ~ - ~1. k ... : ~1: .. ~ ,. ,1 .. ' ~, .. ~ ~ - .....~.._.... -..... . ....,. . ......un.... ..~_. ........ ~. . . ......" ..wm . .w.'e+LL.l:n~ y~aa..w44w{ iK•d ' . , . . , +N+e'n..y t:x:.w~,.,al. .y. I