The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1981-01-07 PC MinutesPROCEEDING8 OF THE PLP~NNING COMMISSION w CITY OF MOUNDB VIEW ~ ~ PAM66Y COUNTY~ MINNESOTA ,. Rugular Meeting ~anuery 7, 1931 Mounde View City Hall 1401 kiwy. '°-'°°-' ° ^'-.."-"^'-.."'-''-""""--"' ° ° °"-"-' -- 10~ Mounde View MN 55112 -'--"""--""°--"'-' ° The Mounde View Plnnninq CnmmiseSon wae ca2led ho 1. Call to Oxder ordar at ~,;+5 p.m. on .7anuary 7, 1981, by chairman Mountin. Mambere Preeent~ Commiaeionere McCarthy, Loeding, Fedor 2. Ro17. Call Millar, Breake~ Glezar, Warren~ Chairman Mountin. also pPesent~ Councilmember Forelund, Building and Zqning OEficial Roee, Mayor McCarty, G.ly ~oneul~ing EngiueeY 9oxrud. ~ Mambare Ahsenti Ncne ' „ ' Commiusioner Haake has retired from [he Planning CommSaeion. She hae been a member o£ the Commiesion eince 1972 and served ae Chairman Eor oix yeazs. We . wieh to~thank hor for her civic-minded service to the cormnunity. , , orrection to the Dec. 3, 1980, Minutee: 3. Approval of the Dec. 7~ 1980 and Dec. 10,. 1980 Loedinyi pg. 1, Item 2, Roll Call Mintues~. Also Present: Councilmemiser Hodqea and ~ Mayor. McCarty. , , Motion/Second~ McCarthy/LOedinq nwved to approve tha ' minutea o£ December 3, 1980, ae corrected and the ' , minuteB o£ DeCembOr 10, 1889~ eH wYitten. ~ 8 ayea 0 naye ~ MOTION CARRxED _ Motion/Second: Warren/McCarthy movad to adopt 4. Adoption c£ Resolution Reeolution No. OL-B1,-EStabliahing Meetinga an3 ~ No. O.t-8b Establiahin9 Timeline 9ubmiseion Dates. ( Exhibir A) ; Maet~nge and Timeline Submiaeion Detes 8 ayes 0 naye pyplicant requeete approval oP preliminary plat called . 5. Millor Industcial Plat Miller Induetrial Plat and rezoning oC the land whioh , 2400 County Aoad J preeently has sections of R-1 and B-3 to I-1 for Preliminary Plat Aeview develornnent o£ an Induetrial Park. SZ loto into 18) - Rezaning~A~l and H-3 to I-l, Case 47-80 ~£icial Rose had no additinnal material to present to ~ e commiasion. , . ,.....:,... . ..__.... .,.. ....., . _. , -.....,,.... , ,-:a.. ~..~. ~ , $'1' . . ,.; . ..,.. ,..,~ .,.. ,,:...~, .a... ~..:.., ~ , ,:. .,,.;i:y NCUf70C VIL14 PI.AlIHIHC CQ'9FIISSICN Regular Meeting pege 2 January 7~ 1981 The planning Commiesion tablad the request Decembar 10, 1980, pending reeeipt of reporto £rom tl~e City ~ttnr.nny a~d city Enginaer. + Atkornay ~feyers met wit•h thn Commisaion Dacember 22, 1980. Coneulting Enqineer Boxrud reviewed the applicant's r.evieed drainage plan xeceived January 2, 1981 and 3hort-Elliutt-NOndrickaon rocomrt;endationa. npplicant Millor introduced hie attorney~. Bruce Malkerson, Engineer Gary Cometock, and aon Jim Miller. Motion/Seaond~ Fedor/McCaxthy moved to take the Miller pcopoeal, Case 47-80, £rom the cable. 8 eyeo 0 nays t40TIUN CARRIED Cc:mniasioner Loeding sitad rh~p~_or A2 of r.he Municipal Code etating the the zoning should be resolved prior to eubdiviaion oE the parcel. ~ Th~ Coamiseion diacuesed the desirabillty of,a P.U.D. ~ deeignation on the parcel. tdz. t.iller eteted that ho is not in favor of th4 2.U.D~p , ~ , '^Nr. Malkareon not6d.that. they would not be oppoaed to ' he language in the reeolution recommending such action ---~to tha Counail. ~ Motion/Seoond~ Iaedinq/McCarthy moved to approved Resolu- ' ,~ tion No. 02-81, xecoumiondinq rezoning of Miller Induetrial Plat, a4 amended. (Exhiblt 8) 7 ayee 1 nay , MOTION CARRIED Nay Vote~ Glazari 8tated that he felt that the wetland cannot ba adequatoly protected by a blanket rezoning , ' ' ' oE the pazcel. Motion,~Second: Loeding/M111ar moved'to adopt Resolution ' No. 03-81 (Exhiblt C ) recommending denial 04 tho '' , Preliminary Miller Induatrial Ylat. 3 ayes 5 Naya MOTION FAILS Nay Votest Breske: 1) Is concurned abo~t it and wente to preserve wetlande but for a reaeona67.e ~ ' ,'~'""~'1 purpose. In this caee for aesthetic v reseons, not recreational. To enhance tha devalopmant. , ~ : i : ' MOUNDB VIEW PLANNING COMMI68ION Reyular Meeting Page 3 ~a_'_-"-- _""""""""'-""~_~"~'--_"~ ~ ~ -"""'~_~""" Januery 7, 1981 "'-"~_~-"""^"""' Nay Votae (aont.)~ ~ Breeke~ 2) Feale adequat~ etudy hae been given . to Ghe pxoposal by the Planning Commiesion. 3) Oeveloper ehouldn't be put off any longer. 4) To ineure cooperativa development between the Citp and the developer. ~~ We need to make a poeitive recommenda- tion and provide support for recommen- dation and aur coucer~~e ho the Councll. Glaxer~ Feals that ~he second part oE the resol.u- , Cion is auperfluous, but does agree tvith ~ the recomnandatlon to deny. ' Warren~ We have given adequate study to the ~ propoeal~ that we ahould lipt our ~ ' reco~mnendations to the Counail regaxding ~ ~ waclan3s, roacla, £ire protection,. etc. ' ~ that we ehould pase this pzopoeal on to ~; ~ ~` , the Council Eor the~r conei8eration. - . ' .. , ' Fedore Cannot support a denial and approval ~~'~ f'''~ combination in the sama motion. ' ~' ~ r ~~~ Mountinr Concura with previoue ~tetemente, ' ' ~t: Motion/Secondi Hreske/Warren moved to adopt Aeeulu- ~'-~ tion No. 03-81 (Exhibit R) recouunanding approval ~ ' , " ' oE the Pre liminary Miller InduaCrial Plat. , ~ ~ , 4 ayee 4 Naye . MOTION FAILS ~ Nay Votee~ , , ' Miller: Tha wetland proteotion Sesue ehould be ~ reeolvod be£ore the parcel is 5ubdivldod~. Glazerr Aqreea with Yhe ~3evaloper that P.U.D, deaignation ~ is not in the best intereste oE the City or ~ tbe developer and ig not able to make a , recommendation without knowing the zoning. '~ ,. Loeding~ A vote £or aubdivision ie a vote againet preaerving the wetlnnd. ~ ~ ~ Fedori £eele that our optione in protectton o£ tha wetland would be minimal once the ' ~ parcel is eubdivided. ~ ~ _ ~. . . _.. _. ... . ~ , . . 4is,j: .. _ , „ ,.. ,. , 9Y, s MOUNDS VIEW PL6NNING COMMI68ION Pege 4 Motion 9econdi i~oedinq/MCCarthy moved to adopE Reao- u.o~ o. -91 (EUh~ibit ~) rOCOmmenditt~ a Aenial o£ A~"~he proposed preliminery Miller Induatrial Plat. r f .,,. 6 ayes 2 naye . Nay Vateae Breeke~ Feals that he muet remain conaistant with his poeition £flvoring the aubdi- vieion of the parcel. Mountin~ Concura Motion/Second~ I.oeding/Warren movad to recommend that the City Council not take action on the lliller Propoeal until they have reaeived and reviewed the Planning Commiesion minutea whiah indicate the concerne of the commiesioner9. 8 ayes 0 naye ' O££iaial Rose notad that the applicant was not ready to appear befora tha Commiseion and requested that hie groposal be tabled. t~otion/Second: Glazer/Breske moved to l•abla the '"'RObert Eiqenhaer requeet for major subdivision~ Case 65-80~ uniil Fabruary 4~ 1981, per the c3eveloper'e request. 8 ayes 0 nays Motion/Secands Miller/McCarthy moved to table agenda iteme 7 and 8 untll the next reqularly acheduled agenda meetinq: e ayae 0 nays Motion/Second: Breske/Glnzer moved to recommend adoption a£ Amended Chapter 32 and Hy-Lawe, final draft 12/23/80, to the City Counail. 6 aye~ 2 nays Nay Votae~ ~.,_~ Loedinq: ~ieaqsees with the electlon of the ~ chairmaR by the Commission and,the provision Eor r.emuneration. Warren~ Concere Regular Meeting January 7, 1981 MOTION CARRIED MOTIOH CARRIED 6. Aobert Eiganheer 2381 Coianty Road I Majar~SUbdivieion (1 lot into~2U) Caee.65-80 ~MOTION CARRIED 7. 8torage Building size xeview .8. Ordinance Review of Liyht Industrial Park Veage. ' MOTIUN CAAEtIED MOTION CARAIED ., .~ :.. , , ., _ ~,,. .;r.. . ,. .. ,. . ~.,~ .. .. . . ';.~;, a.,,..... -' ' MOUNDB VIEW PLl~NNINa COHMI98ION Hogular Meeting '~~ Paqe 5 Janunry 7, 1981 ~ _' _ _ ^' _' _ _"_"~' _ ~ _' _ _ _"' _"' _ ~"_' ~"_ _"' ~" _' _""~' _ ~' ~.. ~"' _"' ~ ~"' ~"' ~ _"""' _ The Commie~ion conduated~a ballot vote and eleoEed 10. Eleat~on of Viae- ~7oi1 Loading Vice-Chaisman. Cfiairmnn ~„fotion/Secohd~ Fedor/MCCarthy moved to adjourn. ~ S1. Adjournment -~11 PM ' 8 ayee 0 naye - ~ ~ ~~ ;MOTJON CARRIED ., ~ ., ~ ., ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ' ~ . ~ , .. . ~, .. ~ . ~~ , .~. . . ~. ~~ " ~. ~ , . . , ~~ ..~. ... , . : ;, ~ ~ ~ '' ~ ~ ' ~ ,. ~~; ~.:,; , .. . ,~ . .,~ :,. ~ ,. . .. . ~ ~~ ~ ~ -' .' ~ , , , `~~ . . ~ ' .~r ~ , . ~.. .. ,. . , .,, , -, ~. , ... . , , .., ' .: ~ i ~ '~ ~ . ..'i, ~ ,' ; ,. ...,', ~ ". :. ..:;~ r .,, .''w ~r': ., ~~ „ ~ ~ ' ~~ ~ el! ~i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ : - ~„ ~ ti ~~ i r t}~r.~' 1 iYt~ ' t ,.1 u 1 ._ , ~ ~ r. :, E~:i ~~ ° T~ ~: ~ ~. , a !t ~ t r.., . , ., _ ~ ~ . k ~~ ~ i f it ~ i 5 ~+ ~, , :~ ~,~„ ..' ,,: i "~ ~ .S .t i r ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~; ~ ~;; ~ ~" ' r ~ ~ y `E . ? ~ •. < ~ tx - .I ~ n . 3 .-t9 , ~'t a , ~ Y,G' t ~ R } : ~ f YR ' T ~ i', Y "' i t P' ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ r T x w ~ ~ i rf ~ ~ - ( t t ~ _ y t ~ ~ S ~ . ~ t ~ I - ~ ` S ~ ~, i .. E ~ ' ~ ~y ~ ' ~t ~~.i~. ar,~ ero~ id' ' ~ ~ ~~ ' :. ' . ~.. ' e - n, x z a ~ 4 + : ~ 3 ~ ~ ., ` ~ ` 1 ; ! :~ ~ s r n ~ ' ~ a Z n ~ n .c ~ +r . t v , i h L f ~~ ' ~ ~'e ~ y3 ~ d ~~ ~ i ~ ~, 1 i ~ ~, . le ~ ! . t~ ~ t~ . . i ~ c . 1 r t i i txf !'., ' Y n ,~ ~ rq-!E1 ~ # ~ 6 a 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' i ~ § r~ 4 :n ! t ~ y ~ . 1 . i fM~yer1 ~ ' ~ 1 # ~ ' { .. ~ ' ' S n:, i. r H '• A M1 ~ 1 ~L ~~~~~ ~ 3 j ~~ ~'~1 ~ 4~' A M4.~ y e xW~ ~ . ~~t ~. M p'~"E ! d i Z ~ j ~ a , } E . 1~' S'. f 1 ~ t q 1 i~~~ . , : .. _ .i~ ~ ~,'~ . . . . r .~ la . i. , ~ , . ~s F ..Y bt . S .~ ~ h t,+ t C v. ~ ~ I ti f t ~ T' ~~f ~ ~ ~ ~ } ~ ~' ~ ' ~ { . ~ ~ ~ t t ~ 1 ~g { j ~ . i ~ t , } `r } R ~' ~ t ' ~ '. ' . 1 . t fiP Pr . t i . 4" .J• iL~ (~ •Y ~ 1e ;,` ~. f p . . ~~ { ~~ ~ L f : l. Y f x. 4 : . .... :. `5 ' 5 ~ Y~~ '~~... 1 ~ ~ .' V .i : 1 ~ 5 f ~ 6f . ~ ~~ " ~ .~~ ~ .• ~ .li " ~ ~ i' ~ ~ _ ~ : i !{ , . ,. 1..~ cl 71 $~ ~ 1.~;, ~ ! A.x ~ _ .~ ~ ~, ' ~ . .,. f , i. ~: ~ ]{. v L f ~ ~ 'L ;. o- ` ` r ~ ~ ~ +~ :- c.; , i , ;~ 1 ,. . xt ..~. '. ; ,.' f t . , , _ Z .. ~ ~ ' /( i ~ q . , ~ .~ . ( ~ , y T .6 ~ .i.. ,. t 1 ~ . , , ~ .. . - .. . ' .. - .. ~ ~,, . ~ 1~ _. ~ r ' ~ ~l i ` . 4. , , _. ._ , . ~~... . . . . ~.... .. , ' ~ ,..,.y f ._ . .... .'1 ,. r ,. :~ ~ r. x , . ~ . ~ .. [ . '.. ._; ." ".._ ..' . . .. . ~' ~ ° };. . ~ ..: F ' ..~. Ct ,> i ,.. r~:,.. . .. ' ~ , ': . ., , , .: ~ . `. - : ~ ... . :._ ' ~ .,. . 1,} ., „ . . _... .. . ._. ,'.til. . . ~. '. ':?~ ~ . .. ~.., - .. , ' ~` ~ ~ ~ ..., .. J ~ ;.L . , ~ t. . ' ::.. ,: 'Y . ' r ~, ~ : :.. ...:.~ . ' . '! ~ " nn • ~.,:' ~: . ,..:_ ~ ' _ .,. ~.. . r . ~_ .._... ' " ~ .,_. . _ ., . . ~ ' ,i... .. ~ ~ , . ~ ... .y, .... '• ,'.',: 1; ... .~" . ,. ~ . .: 'y~y9ye:.4~:Ei-.tl~.b.«.-,.,,a.~.~S.er..e`rti~.~.r+.wk61>aNa.nux,¢}v4nreA .,~714`.1kY~h`3~"iC"k,£AS4°r,,k.ts'+ k~A1x~+i4~?"tri., e~~'«s"`K.~sk'~nkJxhtiifY~~.Y~$S'Rr~aL^.~~~6N'7~"S+te`srrwe:#n;i4a6 RE80LUTION N0, 01-81 CTTY OF MOUND9 'JxEW ~ COUNTY OF RAM3EY - STATE OF MINNESOTA ESTABLISHZNG MEETING ANO.TIMELINE SUBMISSION ~ATE9 ~ WHEAEAS, the Mounda View Planning Commiseion will be holdinq one regular moetinq per month eEEeotive immediatelyt and WHEREAS, the Planninq Commiesion hae requeeted to reView i raguJ.ar meeting aqenda iteme at their agenda ae~eion, two weeka prior to tl~a ragular meeting~ and WHEREAS, staYf neade ample time to Frepare reports f4r the Planning Commiseion's revieN~ and WHEREAS, dev6lopsrs, oitiaene or other intereetad parties should he advised of'deadlinee Eor materials uaed by ataEf to prepare a report a:~d uaed by the P].anninq Commiasionera to deol,de on a particular development ~.esuet and WHERCAe, that a dSsp].ay of m~etinq datas and eubmiasion deadline dates be establiahed to provide an orderly eystem for use .-. by the Planning Commiesion, staff and the qeneral publ:tc. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT t2~30LVED, that the P1a~aning Commiseion oE the City of Mounds View eatabliehes meeting and submisaion Y.imetabla dates aetting deadlines for submisaion of materiale for regular meetinqs and agenda seesiona oi the Planning Commiesion and 'f also aetting tha dates oP tha ragular meetinge and aqenda sessions thameelves. , 8E IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Exhibit ~1 becoma an integral par.t o£ thie reaol:utionj and BE ZT FURTHER RESOLVEA that 1f the Planning Commieaion ic requlred to or deaires to hold s»ecial meetings, they will do ao in accordanae with State law, code requirements and byl.awo, Adopted this 7th day of Januarv , 1981 ,as Exhibit A. ATTEST: (SEAL) ~ Chairparaon ~ Building & Zoning Offtaial , f i i r ~r ~ H ( ~ T ~ 1981 1~~1 i901 {UM MOM 1U! WFD 7NU fAI SA1 SUN MOX 111[ WfU 11N fFl . SAI -. SUX pOM NE WFO 11N tN SAI - -- ~ 1~ -2 3 3 4 6 8 7 1 2 1 2 3 h 6 - 8 9. s -- A 4 6 8 7 8 9 10 10 11 12 13 14 16 18 P 8 7 8 9 10 it 12 N M T A 11 12 13 14 16 - 10 17 Y 17 18 19 20 21 - 23 M 13 1•4 15 18 i7 19 R - - ~ B v 18 19 20 21 22 -- 24 24 26 28 27 28 29 30 c 20 21 22 23 24 2b 28 R 26 28 27 8 29 30 31 31 1 2 3 A 5 6 27 28 29 30 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 fi G 1 7 8 9 1~ it 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 F 0 E _ R A 9 10 11 12 13 14 ~ 1A 15 18 17 18 ; 20 T 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ~ U - - - . N - - - - - -- - - 15 16 11 i0 19 21 E 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 E 18 19 20 21 22 24 fl R ~ Y 22 23 24 25 2G 27 28 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 25 28 27 28 7.9 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 8 7 5 8 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 3 4 6 8 7 A J 10 11 12 13 14 12 13 14 15 i6 1R p 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 M A J V _ ~ i5 iB 17 18 19 21 ~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ~ 15 lE 17 18 19 21 Y B H - - -- -- - - 22 23 24 2 ~ti 27 28 26 27 Z8 29 30 31 1 R 22 13 24 2 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 29 30 1 2 3 4 5 5 6 1 8 9 10 11 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 7 II 9 10 11 12 0 A _ E p 12 13 14 15 18 18 16 17 18 18 20 22 13 14 15 16 17 13 ~ E R U M ~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 23 24 25 2B 27 28 29 20 21 22 23 24 25 ~6 T E R 26 27 28 29 30 30 31 27 28 29 3 31 SUN MON illf WEO IIIU fAI SAI SUN MON lUE WEO IH0 fAI SAI SUN MON IDE WEO 1HI1 FA1 SAi ~ IiEGUOAR MEETING ~ AGGNDA MBETING APPLICA'PTOH DFADLINE FOR NEW APPLICATIONS ~ (FFOM DBVEIAPERS TO STAFE] INFOFMATIOCI OEADLINE FOR EXISTZNG PROPOSALS (PtttW u~..,.,.~.v~uRB TO BTAFF) DEADLINE FOR INFORMATION ' SUBMISSION TO PLANNING ~ COMMZSSION FROM STAFF SHALL BE TNE FHZDAY BEFOt3E AGENDA AND REGULAR MEETING DATES. , ~~ ~~ AE90LUTION N0. 02-81 ~ CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY 3TATE OF MINNESOTA MOTION CONOERNING W:QUE6T F'OR RE20NING ~ CAS~ 47-80 (MILLER INDUSTRIAL PLAT) WHEREAS, the requaet by Mr. John A. Miller dated November 26, 19B0, for partial rezoninq of the 69.8 aores oE property baun~lec3 by Lfinna~ota Trunk tiighway #10, County Road J, and Judiclal ^itch N1, complies with the industrial zoninq designation for the property in the current updatie of the Compreht~nsive Plar, approved by the City Council on 6eptember 22, 158tl; and WHEttEAS, the said request for industrial zoning ie consis- tant witih the recommendatiuns datied Nevember 4, 1980,, by the CiS:y's Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants~ and WHEREAS, the planned unit 8evelopment (PUD) concept poten~ tially o£fere Ehe xdvantages to the xequestor of conservation oE land and flexibility in design while'providing the City the oppor- -"-` tunity to establiah conditions for development which are in the public interesti ~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVGD by the Planning and Zoning Commiseion as follows: That approval is reconunendad to the City Council.Eor ~ezoning all portions oE the cited property to Light induatrial (I-1), and'further recommend khac a PUD designation be placed on the parcel. Adopted this 7th day oE January, 19B1, as ~xhibit B. ATTESTt CTiairperson , (SEAL} su ld ng 6 Zon ng OPfic al ~. RESOLUTION N0. 0~-81 ~ CITY OP MOUNDS VIEW ~ COUNTY OF RAMSEY ' STA'1'E OF MTNNESOTA MOTION CONCERNING REQUEST FOR SUBDIVISION CASE 47-80 (MILLER INDUSTRIAL PLAT) wNEREAS, it is generally recognized that wetlanda aan consti- tuta important physical, aeathetic, recreational and economic assets of exiating and futura residenta of the communityj and .WHEP.EAS, a letter datad April 2, 1980, from khH Depsrtmont ot Natural Ftesources to the subdivider, Mr. John A. Miller, indicates that the property bounded by Minnesota mrunk Highway #10, County Road J and .7udicial Ditch #1 is a Type II wetlandf and WHEREA9, tha Mounde View Comprehens.ive Plan etates ~ho following under Induatrial Goala and Policies: "Industrial development ahall be prohibited on wetlands, flood plains, shoreline, and other natural EAaturea that perform important publlc protectiion functiane in their natural atate."y and WHEREAS, the proposed subdiviaion holda a eubstantial portion of the remaining wetlanda in Mounda Viewj and WHEREAS, the nttachment to t.he preliminary plat entitled "Drainaye Plan" (received by the City on January 2, 1981) ehows that the exist.ing wetlanda would easentially be eliminz~~:ad through filling if the propoaed subdiviaion were tio be approvedj NOW, THFREFORE, BE TT RESOLVEU bx the Planninq and Zoning Commiasion that tha following are recommended to the City Council: 1) That the aubdivis:on ahown on tha preliminary plat (revised 11/14/80) and attached drainage plan, received January,2, 1981, be c~.aniad as proposed. 2) That the City Caunci.l determine which portiona of tho wetlands on the citad property should be protected an~l ~reaerveQ in the public interest before conaideration is given to alternative proposals by the aubdivider. Adopted,this 7th day o~ Jan~.ary, 1981., a~ Exhibit F.. ATT$ST: . C a rpereon ~../ (SEAL) u ng &.Zon ng 0 c a EXHIBIT C RESOLUTION N0. 03-B1 ~ CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ~ COUNTY OF AAMSEY ° STATE OF MINNESOTA MOTION CONCERNING REQUEST FOR 3UHPIVISION CASE 97^BO (MILLER INDUSTRIAL ;'':~1T) WHEItEA3, it is generally recognized that wetlanda uan consti- tute important phyeical, aesthetic, recreational and economic assets oE exieting snd future rasidante of the r,ommunityr ar.d WHEREAS, a letter datad april 2, 19D0, from the Departmant of Natural Reauurces to thA eubdivider, Mr. John A. Miller, indicatea that hhe property bounded by Minn9sota Trunk Highway q10, Ccu»ty Road J and Judicial Ditch fll, is a Type II watlur~dj and WHEREAS, the Mounda View Compreheneive Plan atates the folbow- ing under Industrial Goale and Policiea: "Industrial development ehall be prohibited on wetlands, Elood plains, ahoreline, and other natural £ee~ures that perform importznt public protaction functione in thair natural etate."r and WHEttEAS, the proposed eubdivision holds a substantial portion of the remaining wetlarida in Mounds Viawj and j --~' WHEREAS, the attachment to tha preliminary plat entitle8 ~ "Drainaga Plan" {received by the City on January 2, 1981) ahows that ~ bhe exietSnq watlands would aesetttially ba eliminated khrough f3111na ~ if the propoaed suUdi.vision ware to be apprnvedj ~~~I NOW, THEREF~JRE,SE IT RESOLVED by tho Planning and Zoning ~, Commisaion that the Eollowing aro recommended to the City Couttcil: 1) That the subdivision shown on the ~reliminary plat (revised 11/14/80) and attached drainage plan, received January Z~ 5.981, be denied as propoaed. 2) That L•he City Council detiarmine which portions of the wetlands on the c3ted property ~hould be protacted and preserved tn the public interest beEore consideration is given to alternative pzoposals by the subdividar. If, however, tha City Council chooses to approve the propoxed eubcli° vision (and accompanying zoning changes), then tha Planning and 2oning Commission recommends that such approval be continqent upon the fol.lowing: 1) Adminiatrative approval is obtained from Rice Creek Watezshed District. ~ 2) All outatanding Eees are paid by the subdivider. Raeolution No. 03-81 Paqe 2 ~ 3) The recommendxtione Eor erosion control are to be £ollowed ~ W~;~I,~ awd are citad in ,tha raport dated 7/17/80 by Mr. Stan .. Wendland of the Soil Coneervation Service of the U.S. Departmant o£ Aqricultura. 4) ~xcavation or cleaning oE Judiaial Ditah Ml is carried out by the aubdividar aufficient to assure the nacesaary capaaitiy to handle the anticipata3 inarease in rate of ntorm water due ~~o developmsnt and eo ae to prevant backup to upstream property. 5) Conversion by the aubdivider of hia drainaqe plan to a drainage and gradinq plan, and revision of tha proposed sanitury sewer, watermian, and stree~ syateme~ as recommended in tha report datad Dc+cember 12, 1980, by the Cit;~'s con- aulting engineering firm, Shor*_-~liiott-Hendrickson. (It may be 3eairablE, however, to require further modification of the watermain syetem based on posoible recommendations by Chief Ron Fagerabrom of the Fire Departmer.t.) 6) Addition to tha platttng of the property which lies to the cast of Judicial Ditch #1 and is bounded on the north by Cuunty xoad J, on the south by property belonqing to MnDOT and on the east by the City line. 7) Rice Creek Watershed District be usked to make an integrated plan for drainage of the encixe basin aE which the requested sub3lvision farms a part (including the appropriate portions in the City of Blaino). 8) Becauae the praposad subdivieion would consume a large portion of the renaining reserva capacity in the City`s axisting water system, ad~ustment ba made in huokup charqes for this and othar fut:ure subdivisions to c~ver the cost oE anticipated needs £or expanded facilities (i.n line with the principal em- bodied in City Resolution No. 983 which holds subdividers r~thar than tha ganeral puhlic reaponsible £or coata generated by the aubdivision). 9j Tha construction and maintenanr,e o~ a natural landscape buffer parallelinq County Road J which abuts the residentiai zoning .in the City ot Blaine. 10) The removal of all unsuitable materials (peat) in roadbeds, parking lots, and building sites with rnplacement suitable fill. 11) l~edication oE a 4C' watermain easement bc~tween lots 5 and 6, Block 3 and review af all easemente by the City's engineer. l06/ ~°Ii1~:Y.in;.._:..., _ .,... ,..._ ,. ~' ' . . . .... ._,..: ,. yr,~, .:....„... .a:,. .:. .,,.,~ ..,, . ~ . -..... , . ,A.r.. , . . . .. . _ . „r. ~ • Raeolution No. 03-81 page 3 ~ .~ . RE90LUTION N0. 03-81 L'ITY OP MOUN03 VIEW i COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA GXHTDIT D RB3ULUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISTON AND PARTIt.L REZONING OF THE PROPERTY OWNED BY JOHN A. MILLER WHEREAS, Mr. John A. Miller has submitted an application Eor eubdivision of 69.8 acXee of property bounaed by Minnesofa mrunk Hiqhway ~10, County Roa~ J, and Judicial Ditch #1. A capy of tha preliminary ~lat rdneived January 2, 1981, ie attached herer.o as Exhibit AJ and WHEREAS, the Planning ra~iaeion of the City of Mounds View hae reviewad this ap~lication as well as tha reports o£ the City Staff, Northwaet Aesociated Conaultants, Ino, and Short-Elliott- Hendrickhon, in raqard to"thia appllcationt a~d WHEREAS, the Department of Natural Reaourcea has identif.iad the area as a Type II wetland. The Ramaey Soil and Water Conservation DieL~ict statsa that the aoils on this site present severe limituC- : ,to developmentt and i~ W[tEREAS, the Mounda Viaw Comprehensive Plan recommend~ that ~--' a large lot, low intensity industrial developmer.t, designed to mini- mize the impact on this environmently senaitive area, 6e coneidered the best use of said parcel; , NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planr.ing Commi~sion of the City of Mounds V;,ew as followa: A. That the'preliminary plat 1s rccommended for approval subject to the followinq conditions: 1) In final platting, the east portion of the site plai~ belonging to Mr. L4atson be included in the ~ plat.`' 2) That a PUD designation be placed on the properL•y to permit the City detailed review or proposed usea. 3) That the Board of Managera of the Rice Creak '~aterahed Diatrict give final ratification'oE the revised site plan attd issues the proper . permita require~ to develop the property. 4) That the pre~iminary plat be revised to meat ~ the sanitary aewer and watermain requirements set forth on the Short-~lliott-Hendrickeon report date 12/5/80. ~~. l~l > -.. ~.;~', ~ x.,~.~ Resolution No. 03-81 Paqe 2 B. That tha developer be required to addresa the following concorna in the Final Pla~ Review: 1) The preaervation of as much oE tho natural aite features ae poseible during site d~velapment. 2) Thn aonatruction and maintenanae of a nature land- eaape buff9r paralleling County Road J which abuts the residential zoning in the City of Blaine. `~,3) 5tringent aoi7. oroaion precautions be followed " during the entire construction procesa which nra cited in the report from the U.S. Department of Agriculture dated 7/17/B0. 4) The removal and replacemAnt of a1.L unsuitable (peat) materials in roadbed areas, parkinq lota, and build- ~ inq eites, 5) Delote the Long Laku Road Cul-de-~ac oouth of 89th Lane. 6) Drainage and ultility easement'should be subjeot to ` review of S3hort-Elliott-Hendrickson befora.Einal ,, approval. , C. Further recommendation to the Council: lj The cleaning of the exiating drainage,ditch from,tha " fraaway fenoo to Ju3loial Ditclt N1. • 2) Prior to aubmisaion of a final plat, authorize further . study to determine a aet percentage oE eaoh lo~ that ~ ~an be developed (a ratio of building area to lot,size) , in ardei' to preaerye'as much of the natural sita as , poesible. , ATTESTt ~- ~' , C airperson ~ (SEAL) u ng 6 on ng o ic a , ~ , ~ ,_... .,~_ _... ,._ .. . .. .....: ...... . ..:. ...... ,_;,_;,m~..> :~,:,. .. ;:: , :,'.^,