The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1981-08-19 PC MinutesPROCEEDIN6S OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDB VSEW I RAM9EY COUNTY~ MINNESOTA Reqular Meetinq Auquet 19, 14e1 Mounde View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View MN 55112 ---°"----"°---°^-°------------------------'--"-°--° °---° `------`----' The Mounde Viaw Planning C~mmiseion wae oalled ro order at ~i35 PM on Auguet 19, 1981 by Chairperean Mountin. MEMBERS PRESENT~ Commiesionare Anderaon, c nr y, azos, Warren, Miller and Breske, and C:hairper~on Mountin. AL80 PRE6ENTt Huilding and Zon3ng OEEicial Rose, wnY~cT that Councilmember ForsSund wua abeent, and Commieeioner Warren would atter.d the next Council meetiny. Motion Seconde Warren/Anderson to approve the 1"~~u y , minute~. C~ J v6 ayes 0 naye 1 abstain Cotnmieeioner Glazer abstained from the vote ae ha had nat bedn present at the ~uly 1 meetinq. Official Roee reporCad that Mr, H~elie was requeaking two variancee, one baing a 2' aide- yard setback variance on the nnrth and oE the property, and the eacond a 15' side-yard set- back on the south end of tche proper.ty . He aleo noted the applioant was reques~ing a 44' curb out for a driveway, whereas code all.owe Eur a 22' cut. Mrs. HjElle stated that thay were xequesting tha variances ae they would like to build a 3 etall garage to house ~heir two vehiclea and miacellar.eoue itema, and being the eecond awners of the home, they had not had input i.^.~o how the atructiure was placed on the lot. She ay~ted they felt the pzoposed plan would minimize blockage of the aPternoon and evening aunlight, maintain aa open an area as pneeible, d maintain the preeent land slope ae much ae ~saible, while it would not a£fent aa£oty because the garaqe would be mora than 70 feet Prom the intereeation an8 traffic on Woodale 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call Agprova7. oP Minutea: July 1, 1981 Motion Ca:ried 4: Harold H. xjelie Propsrty Involveds 5161 Aed Oak Drive, Variei~ce Request (Side-Yard Setbaak) 9inqle Family Case 96-81 Mounde View Planning Commieeion Auguet 19, 1981 Ragular Meeting Page TWo ____________________°__-__-__~___~~____~_______-__'-_°_~_~~~~^~__`__~-- ~a light. There wae consSderable diecuesion on bhe re- queeted varianaee, with the Commieeionare expreesinq aoncern over whether a non- financial hardship was ~eing ehown~ w~~h a 44' ourb out versus the allowable 22' cut, euggesting the qarage be turned to run parallel with the houee, whethor there would be adeguate viaability for the inter- seotion oE Waodale and Red Oak Drive, if Woodale would be furthor developed in the future, if the driveway, 1E allowed to be 49' ;:ide, would preaent run-off problems, and of putting the appliuant koo olose to his neichbor by allowing the 2' variance for the propoaed Pamily room. mra. Hjelle replied that ~he Pelt they had a non-Einanc~al hardahip aa they waro not able to add on to the existing qarage due to it b31ng so clo3e to the property line. She 9taked the 44' driveway was being re- quested for the three car garage, allowing xtra room for parkinq of an 18' motor home, (~nd that it was not £easibl.e to turn the garage to run parallel with the houee se t~ere would nat be enough room lo angle intn the stalls. She etated they did not ' care to move the garage further back on the lot to maet the 30' setbaok requirement ae it would take up half bhe back fard and also ~ block Che south and wast eun Erom a good . portion of her home. She added t.hat ahe did have a aigned agreement from her noigh- bor to allow the 2' variance for her family room to abut hie garaqe. OE£icial Roea added that there were no plane " at thie time to extend or Eurther develop Woodale ~rive, and that the propoaed 44' driveway wae not considered to be a problem for run-o£f. M~tion/Second~ Breake/McCarthy that whereby • e ann ng Commies~,on ie obli.ga~ed to uphol8 thg existing City ordinanoea, and whereae the requeet for variencee at 5161 Red Oak Driva by Harold Hjelle for a 2' aide-yard variance, a 15'. aetback varianc~, and an excess 22' ourb aut, lack aufEioient non-economia hardehip, ~the requeet is denied. 6 ayos 1 nay Motion Carried Mounds V~ew Planning Commiseion Auguet 19, 1981 Regular Meeting ~age ThXee --°---------------------------------------°°-------------------------- ~mmissioner Warren etated ehe hnd voted aqainet the motion ae she Eelt the requeet of the a~plicant had not been out oE line. Chairpareon Mountin atated that 3taEf would be in touoh w~th the Hjelle~e to explain tihe appeal procedure. Jim Houkert, 290G Oakwood Drive, aeked t£ 5. Residente Requeata Cha~rpereon Mountln wao antitled to vote on and CommenLe from motions. She explained that she was and that tk~e Eloor she had voted on the previous motione. Chairgerean Mountin explaiued that the 6. Wayne Herr Coaetruc- Planninq Commleaion had not had an opportunity tion Co., Property i to diacuse the memo £rom the City Attorney, Invo].ved: 2~08 Nigh- ~ &newerinq their quaetlons on oondomis~ium way 10, Development law and r~commended the item be tabled until Proposal, High Den~ity j they had disaueeed it. Residantial, Caae ~ 89-91 ~ Mr. Herr atated he had no objeation, as long ae he was notified when i.~ would be disousand. ,~ ~iotio~n Saco~nds Breeke/McCarh.y to teble the `--sequest oE Waynu Herr Construction Companp until the September 2, 1981 Planjiing Commiseion meebing, 7 ayes 0 nays OfEioial Roee presented a eanitary eewar plan to the Planning Comm9.salon. Ha etated that khe Metropolil:an Wanta Control CommieF- inn wae holding ug ite review process of the Mounde V'.ew Comprehenslve Plan, aw~,itinq fuxbher information on ito sanitary sewer plan. Offioial Rose aaked Eor Planning Commisaion approval. oE the plan so that it could be forwarded on to the MWCC. Motion Seconds Breske/Mc.:azty to direct Sta o,,;'t;iward the Sanitary Sewer Plan to the City Counail, and prepare a reeo- l~tion aaceptinq tho aPeciali.zed eanitr~ry aewer plan, 7 ayee 0 nays 1 ~ 'w.~/ Motion Carried 7. Reaiew of Sp2aialized Plans for Comprehen- sive Plan Ragarding Timing oE Develogment, Waete WateY F1oW F~recasta, Snter- Community sewer Serviae and Ptopaeed Trunk sawere Motion Carried {ri; ~ C~ ~ ~ Mounde View Planning Commieeion Auguet 19, 1981 ~ Aegular Meetinq ---°---°°---°----------------°---'--^-°----^- ----- Page Four --------------'-° ~"tommiseioner Breeke aelced how tihe Tyuon 8. Disouee Paet ~uokinq developmenl: wae coming along. Counoil Aotion and 'OEfioial Roee replied that they would Next Agenda be meeting the requiremente of the PCA Eor noiee aonbrol. Offiaial Roee reported that the Mounds View ~ Square preliminary plat wae echeduled Eor a publia hea.rinq ab the 9eptember 14, 1981 City Counail meeting. ! i C:nairperaon Mountin zeportted that '~. Chairpereon'e I Commioaionere Fiarren, MnCarthy, Anderson, Report ; Miller and Breeke, OEficial Rosa snd i heraeif had been present at the July 15 aqenda eaesion. I ° Motion seconds Anderaon/Warren to adjourn l0. Adjournment I e mee ng at ~~15 PM. I 7 eyee 0 naye Motion Carried I ; ^ RespeatEully aubmittad, ~~.J I i . I , ', Stieven A. Rose ' _. I ' I ? ~ ~ Building and Zoning 0£Eiaial . 4 ~ i~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ __ , i~ , .~ . . ~ ~ ~ ' ~ , ~- 0 ei ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~/ i I I I I