The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1982-01-06 PC MinutesPROCEEDINQ9 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ~'""1 CITY ~F MOUNDS VIEW ~) RAf1SEX COUNTY, MYNNESOTA Regular Meeeing January 6, 1982 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy, 10, Mounde View, MN 55112 •------------`--------------------------------^---~--------------~ ~hairwoman Mountin callad the Planning 1, Call to Order Commiaeion to order et 7;40 P:d on Jan~uary 6, 1982, MEMBERS P[tE9ENT: Commisaionare Anderaon, 2. Roll Call c art , Warren, Miller, Sreske and Linke (asrived at 7:k2 PM} and Cha!.r- woman Mountin. ALSQ PRESENT: Councilme.mber Foraluttd an3 u ng an Zoning ~fficial Rose, Motio~cond: Warren/McCarthy to approve 3. Approval of MinuCea: t~he becem~2, 1981 minutes ae preaented, Deaember 2, 1981 6.syes 0 nays 1 abetention Motioh Carried ~./ Chairwoman Mountin abatained from tha vote as ehe,had net been preeenC at the Dacecnber 2 meeting. There were tto reeidente requests or comments 4. Reeidenta Requesta and from the flaor. Commeata from the Floor Official Roae reviewed the propoaed addition 5. Bauer k'elding & I'abri- for Bauer Weiding, noting that while Che ~ating, Property parking did not meet the numbex required Invol.ved: 2159 Mustang by code bq area, there were nmple spacee Drive Development Review al].owed when ueieg the employee number for (Building AddiCi.on) calculaCing the apaces required. He also I-1, Induatrial noted that the preeent ponding is only Case 101-81 adequaee for Phase I, aiid that 11,000 cubi.c Feet oE atorage would liave to be provided Eoz Phaae II, and 26,000 cubic feet for Phase III. He aleo noted that they i~.ave the capability o~ providing the panding: Mr. Sauer etated thac the only thing he had to add to Official Roae'a report was "'~ rhnt he now employs approximaCely 80 ~peopLa and doea not anticipate hixing any more than iu paaple in ti~< Poreaee- able future, and thst they are juat cxpan3ing their exieting operation. ................... . .. ..._ ._ ,_._._. _ , ~ f~yC41r ,,, . .,.... .. .~ . Mounde Vipw Plamiing Commiaeion January 6, 1982 Regular DleeCing ~ag~ xWO , -~--`-°-^---~-`-------------°---~----~------~-`---------^-~------_` /""\ The Commisaionera reviewed Lhe proposed ~ ~ develupmenC and raised questiane cos~cerning whether curb and gutter would be required, whether tY~e 87 parkin~ spacea would he ample, and if thare would be A YLLri-Oi~ problew from the motel behiad the development. Official Roee roplied that curb and gutter was noC originally rRquired and hhat i~ 3s a policy decieion and the Planning Commisaion could ch~se to require 3n for the ttew phase, or decide if this is eo be conaidered new conetruction, He also stated thexe ehould not be a run-off problem from the aotel a~ there ie ponding betoreen the two properties. Mr. Bauer added thrtt he did not feel the parking epaces would preaent tt problem as msny emplopees car-pool to work, and they have aeven apacea de~signaCed as visitor parking, with rarelp more than three baing uaed aC once. The Commiseion reviewed proposed &eaolution No. 45-82, wkiich they had as&ed Staff to prepare. One change was msde, to add "and ~^^~ intent" in the f3fth whereae, after "1n ( J keeping with Che epirit", v Motion Second; McCarthy/Anderson to approve esa ation Plo. 45-82. 7 ayea 0 nays It wae noted that there wae not a represen- tative present from Sunrise Methodiet Church. Motion Second: Warren/Miller to apprave eao ue nn o. 44-82. 7 ayee 0 nays Rounailmember Fors7.und updated the Planning Commieeion on what the Couacil hae b~en wnrking on, epecifica2ly the budget, She also etated that the Council had bean die- cussing problema with drivewaqs and orould like the Planning Commission to Took at the aode and ~eviae it ev that a drivaway 'is not claea:fied as a etrucCUre. OF£icial Rose reported ehat the Compreheneive Plan wi7.1 be before the Met C~une11 oa Januasy Motion Carried Sunriee Methodi~s Church froperty Involv~d~ 2830 County Road I, Condi~- tional Bee Fexmit (Ds,~ Care Fecilityy, R-1, Singlo Family Aras Caes 102-81 Motion Carried Mscua~ Yast Qouncii Aatian and N~xe A.~anda Mounda View Planning Cammisaion January ~6, 1482 Regular i4eeC~,ng -~-------------------------------------^------^---- Page xt~'e.Q ---------~-_---' /""~ 7 for approval, and he would be qt the 1:30 ' ) meeCing to anawer any queations they may have. °'' Ae added there was no indicaeion oE any prohlams. Chairwoman Mountin reported that ehe 8, Chairwoman's Report attendees at Che November 7 workahop had been Co~isai~nere Miller, Warren, T.inke, Breeke, McCarthy and Mount.tn. The attendaes i at the December 9 wurkehap were Ca~isaionera Anderson, Breeke and Linke and Oificial Rose, ~I Chairtooman Mountin scheduled a work eeeaion ~ fur January 13, 1982, to aerve as a natch-up I eeesion, se wa11 as work on other exeae. Commiesioner Warran asked the status of the radiator ehop. OfEicial Rose replied thst i a pxe-tri.el has been echeduled for January 18. MQtion~Sanond: Mountin/Breske to ad journ the , meet n~, g a'~8-i27 PM. ' ' ;_ ~ 7 ayes 0 naye Motion Carried i Respect£ully submitted, I I ~ , SCeven A. Rose ; ' ' ' building and Zoning 0£ticial ~ x;~ , i ., . ,. ~;,'' ri, ~ [i, . ~ , ~~ ' ~ , , , ,; ,; _ , . ~ i , ~•,~, . ~ ~ , ~ , , ~ , ~ , ,~..:1 _ , '. .• N4b~N'i.LV14n'l~luarYMN'3S4N~lCVilk:a'-fW~'r~,kb1M Nt~.r4~v1Y/ ~44ulYY~~{n~YS~+ /P`P11~VFV'fY!N'd-.it~~k4`,~~deN~Y.R}L` aei ~nti.!yr~0 f A6,sviryaflVN4al.:lM'Y~.nIW.~~nnMn......~ , MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION ~ RESOLUTION N0. 44-H2 ~~~• CITY OC [40UNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATG OF MINNESOTA RGSOLUTION RGCOMMCNDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USG~PERM2T C•OR DAY CARE FACILTTIES AT 2520 COUNTY ROAD I MCUNDS VIEW PLANNING CA3E 102-81 WHEREAS, the Applicant/Ocuner, Sunriae United MaChadl.st Church, ef 2520 County Road I has soquested the uee oE ite parsonage as a day care facilityJ and WHEREAS, the zuning of tha property at 2520 Caunty Road I is R-lJ and WHEREt+s, a day care facility is a.llowed by aonditional uae permit in an 1t-1 zoned districtj and WHEaEAS, the City's Inapoction Depastment hae been requeste3 tco conduct an E-3 Ocaupancy inepeation of tha proposed facillty; and ~ WHCRCAS, tho inspection has been made and a lettes r.eporting the findings ia attachodj and Wt~ERCAS, the Mounds View Planning Commiesian finde'tihat tiiere is a need for day care faoilities in Mounde V1ewt NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Moullds View Planning ::ommiseion recommende approval uf the oonditionel u~~ permit request for a day care £aaility at 2520 County P.ond I within the parsonagej ~ BE IT FURTHER RC50LV~D thst bha MaUlt~a V10W Planning , Commiesion recommends that the Eindings oE the E-3 insF;:ution be a stipulated requirement and the.t thg provleione be oomploted prior to the elarb of day card o~aratian. Adopted thi.s 6th day of January, 1962. ATTEST: a rpereon (SEAL) u ng an ~n nq a a ~~% , MOUNDS V1EW PLANPJING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0, 46-82 ~ CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSC•Y j STATE OF MINNESOTA ~ RESOLUT(ON APpROVING THE DEVEIOPMEN7 PROPQSAL OF AN ADDITION, PNASE 2, 2159 MUSTANG ORIVE, 9AUER WELDIPIG AND METAL FABRICATORS, MOUWOS VIEW PLANNING CASE 101-81 WkEREAS the Mounds View Code, 59.07, requires the revfew of the proyosed eddit;on, Rhase 2, to 2159 Mustang Urive; and ~, WNEREaS, the Mounds W ew Planning Comnission has reW ewed the propused addition, Phese 2; and WHENEAS, the Mounds View Planning Cormnission has revtewed the original su6mtssion which included the additian, Phase 2; and i WNEREAS, !he orig9nal approvai of the development was under a prevtous j Zoning Code; and WHERFAS, the Mounds 'liew Planni~g Commission finds that the proposed ad~ition, Phase 2, is simllar to the originai proposai and in keepfng w9th the spirit and tntent of'the Zonfnc~ Code requirements; ~~ NOW, TNERfFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission racemmends approvai of the stte plan submitted December 15, 1981, in a dzvelopment j agreement executed to ioclude the fallowing: , 1) The following items should he exM bits of the development agreement: - site plan ~ ' - grading plan ; - final plans and specifieations ; - legal description - Resalution No. 988 requirements - Resolution No. 983 7-yeaP security j 2) A security in the amount oF E10,000 for the site improvements, i ~ 3) The fo7lowing Exhibit 2A conditions should be included: ~ a) Payment of all City expenses within 30 days, '; b) Provide additional parking if necassary in futurP. Adopted this 6th day of Japuar,y, ,19Ei2. ATTEST; ; C a rperson ~ ~ _ (SEAL) Bu d ny an on ng 0 f ct~-