The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1982-02-03 PC Minutes. . ( ~ PROCEEDxN08 OF THE PLANNINa COMMI38ION CITY OF MOUND9 VIEW AAM3EY COUNTY, MINNE30TA Aegular Meeting Febr.uary 3, 1982 Mounde View City Hall 2ko1 Hwy, 10, Mounde View, MN 55112 -^-----~_~--------------------------------°^--------~-----° °,------- The Mounde Viaw Planning Commisaion was callad to order by Chairman Mountin at 7~32 PM on February 3, 1982. MEMBERS PRESGNT: Co~mniseianere Linke, Andereon, c art y, arren, Miller and Breske, and Chairntan Mountin, ALSO PRE3ENT: Counc3lmember Forelund and Su3Td n and 2oning Official Rose, Motion/Sacond; Linke/McCarthy to epprove ehe 3anuary S; i~f82 minutes ae preeented. 1, Call Co Order 2. Ro12 Call 3. Approval oP Minutes: January 6, 1982 ~~ 7 ayes 0 nays Councilmember Forelund aeked that on page 2, Item 7, it be clariFied tha:: the Council had heen diecuseing problema with driveway aetbacka, Motion Second: MilJ.er/Linke to include drive- wey aet ac a as parC of the minutee of January 6, 1982, under item 7, ~ ayes 0 nays Motian Carried Motion Carried There were no xeeidenta reque:~te or commeate fr.om 4. the floor. Official Ruse reviecved the applicant'e re~quaet and cited sectiottR of the Mounda View Code which were applic~ble. Mr. Kxtapp stated that Officiul Rose hsd covered ttll the pointa he wiehed r.o meke and that he had ao commente to add. '~",It wae the ooncenuue of tt~e Planning ConmiieaionerR ~`~thae Mr. Knepp's application was in order and there , were no probler~e with hie requeet. They thanked him for following tha correct proceduree and coming before the Commiaeion eo tvell prepared. Reeidenee Aequeete and Cou,~ence From the Floor 5, Arnold Knapp, Property Involved: 8140 Eaetwood Road CUP Requeat A-1,Single Family Districe Qaee 103-82 Mounde View Plann~ng Commieaion Februery 3, 1982 Regular Meehing Paga Two -----------^-------------------^-^---------------------~------------ f""~ Chairman Mountin etated t~at Mr, Knapp'e raqueet had been reviewed at ~n agenda seeeion, at which tim~ 8taff had bean dfrected to prepare a reeo~ lution, In dieoueeing the reeolution, there waa concern with tha worA "parmanent" in referenee to Che dri.vc~aay eurEace, Official Roea zeplied that the word followe Code, but it could be changed to "permenent or improved", Mr, Knapp atated ha would agree to that, ae he did not want eny Cypa of road or drivaway put ln, Motion Second: Andereon/MeCarthy to adopt eso ut on Aa. 47-A?, 7 ayes 0 nayo Official Roae reviewed the applicant's requeat. Mr. Johneon sCated hie businees ie a amall buslnees, with moet of the care to be worked on to be picked up from service statione in ^~ the area, se well as eome hc would be srorking i J on at home. He stated he would not allow ~~ custamezs to leave their care overnight, and Chere would rarely be more Lhan two cara at his home at one Cime. The Commieaionere were polled and they expressed their concerns that while tihey could appreciate tl:e fact 3t was a amall businesa, the area wae zoned reaidential end cuxrent ?oning must be maintained, hut that it might be poeeible to rezotte when the eurrounding property ie developed ia Che £utuxe. They also expreased concern that it would be spoe rezoning, and that a great deal of work has been done on the Compreheneive P1an in determing what direction the City ehould take on development, ancl the Ylanning CommisRion ie obligaCed to try and daVelop the City eccording Co that plan Ghairman Mauntin rAported that Stnff had been dlzected to prepare Resolution No, 46-$2. MoCion-Sacond: LLnke/Warren to edopt Reeolution 7 ayee 0 naya Mation Carried Gregory A. Johneon Property Involved: 2865 Highway 10 Aezorling R-1 to S-3 CUP Requaet Existing 3ingla Family DietriCt Case 104-82 Motion Caxx~ed ~'-~ Chairmen Mountin advised Mr. John$on of hie right to appeal the decisiun beEore the City Council. Mounda View Planning Comcnieaion February 3, 1982 Regu~ar Meating ------^------~-°---------------------------°------- Rage ~tuee ----------~----- /~ Co~iesioner Warren reported she h~d reviewed 7, Spring Lake Park ! 1 Spring Lake Park's Comprehensive Plan and she Comprehenoivo Plan ~ : felt Mounde View ehould make eome type of Review - Adopt atatement regarding the propoeed eignalization Recommendation to requeet for Pleasant View and Highway 10, and City Council some type of comment regarding the airport as they eeem to ekirt the iesue, as well ae Cheir etorm water proposal, which does not address the epecific problem which aoncerne Mounda View. Of£icial Rose recommended thaC in reviawing the Plan, it ehould be with the underetanding that whatever ia etated in the resolution should be something the Met Cauncil can do eomething with. Counrilmember Forsluttd reported thet Spring Lake Paxk repraeantat~ves had been preeent at the laet Council mneting to diecues the signal un Highway 10. She added that there La to he a joint cotmnittee between the Planning Commiseions of Mounds Vie.w and Spring Lake Park to work on the signalization. Official Roos stated L•hat Staf£ could add commenxs to the proposed reaolution regarding the poinY.s mada which should be covered. ' ~~ (~ Motion Second: Breske/Warren to table further ecueaion on the Spring Lake Park Compreheneive Plan until t~e March meeting, 7 ayee 0 nays Motion Carried Councilm~uber Foxslund reportPd thse the Council 8. Diecusu Past Council had had the firet reading of the existing Action and Neact morltori~mm ordtnRnce. She also asked that the Agenda Planning Commiseion work on the driveway ordience at the next work seesion. She also xeported 'that RecyclYng Unlimited will be having a recyclina pick- up container on the second 9atur~ay of each month in the City Hall parking lot. She stated an article, would be in the City NeWaletter. Commiseioner Warren reported that the Planning Coqmieetan muer, have ite article for the Neweletter in by Friday. Moti~n~Seaond: Bxeske./Andarson to retain the or g"3~.n'aI a`utTiore to prepare an artical for the NewsletCer. ; 7 ayes 0 nays Mution Carxied ~~ ~I ~ f ( l ( __ ., .. . . n . r~Y' . , . . . ,. . . Mounds Viaw Planning Commisaion FaUruary 3, 1982 PAga koux Regular Meeting ----------°-----------°---------------------------- ---------------- ,1Chairmen Mountin reported thae mambers praoent ~, had ti 9. Cheirman's Report ~ ng at the January 13, ].982 workehop mee been Commieeioners Miller, Breeke, Linka, d McCarthy and Mountin, and Official Rose an Councilmember Forelund. Y ~~ n n n p Y due to cancelled bee had age da meeting 1982 a etorm, ~ riembero preeent ap the January 27, 1982 re- saheduled agenda meeting wera Cammfaeloners i Miller, Bresk~a, Linke, Anderson, McCarthy and 2lountin, and Official Roea. T~lotion Second: MeCarthy/1Linke to adJourn the 10. Adjournment meet ng at "~29 PM, ' Motion Carried' 7 ayeB 0 naye Respectfully ~tubmitted,, , ,. ~ _ ~ J ~ ~ ' Staven A. Roae 1 ' p BUilding and Zoning ~ Official , , ;i ~ ' ~ ~ ~ . ~ 4~ ~~~ . ~ ~. ' , ~',i ' ~ , .~ ~ , ~~ . ~ . . ~ . ~ , , ~ ~ i~~ , ., ' .. , . ~ ~ ' ' . ' . ,. ~ ' , . ,. . I , . , , .. ., . ~ . - ~ ~. ~1, ~~ , , . ,. _ , .. . , ~ „ .i . .. . .. , , , , .. I" ~ .,~; I 3~ , ~ .'. , ;. ~ ~ : , , , ~ . , ~. , ~ r`G `~ ~ . • ~. n i~ , ~ ~ ~ I ~.......~...nw.~'~wr A.v.svow.i4..~ ~..a..i:: ~. .. ... ..~..~ .x~atnF.u.n/:~~NY~ wf..YiY.b': 'vi+ - ~~yMy4aw w..+•-n....~ I ~J,~+zw~::nw-+.. .~.ya~~.....wAN+~r~~n.....vrv.~r..r...-.._ ' MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMIS5ION „yl RESOLUTION N0. 46-82 (., 1 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ~~ COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTIO[4 RECOMFIENDING DSNIAL OF RLZONING AND CONDITInNAL US~ PERMIT REQUEST FOR 2865 HIGHWAY 10 WHEREAS, the property known as 2865 Highway 1D is pre3ently zoned R-1 (single family); and WHEREAS, the applicant, Graqory A. Johnson, has requested a rezoning fot a n~inor auto repair uae requiring a H-3 designa- tion and conditional use permit appr6valj and WNEREAS, the ~ubject property is located in Distrtct 6 of the Mounds View Lancl Usa Map found in the Comprehensive Plan Update (copy attachad) and; WHEREAS, the predominate use within District 6 directa tne development and redevelopmont of praperty along Highway 10 to be medium density reaidential to protect and buf£er the ~ existing sing7.e family dwellinqsj and WHEREAS, the Mounda View Planntng Commission and City Counci} in 1981 recommended denial and denied, rospectivaly, a rezoning requeat from R-1 to B-1 for a parcel directly adjacant to the subject parcel 2865 Highway l0i and WHExEAS, it is the Planniny Commisaion's duty to be consistant and to carry out'the comprehensive planned direction of the C7.ty's Plan Udatej NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounde View Planning Commiasion recommends to the City Counoil denial of tha rezoning (R-1 to e-3) and conditional use permit raqueet for a minor suto repair Eor 2fl65 liighway 10. Adopted thi.s 3rd day of Februa:y, 1982. '`; ATTEST: :I C airperson (SEAL) u ing & on ng c a MOUNDS VIGW PLANNING COMMIgSION ; RESOLUTION N0. 47-82 arw-~ CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ! ~ COUNTY OF RAM.SEY `^~-"` STATE OF MINNESOTA RF30LUTION APPROVING THE CONDITIONAL US~ PERMIT REQJF.ST~ ~ '~. FOR AN OVERSIZED ACCESSORY BUILDING AT 8190 EASTWOOD ROA6 ~ WHEREAS, tho Moiinds View 'Laning Code requirea a conditional use permit approval for an acaessory building over 218 square feet in sizeJ and WHEREAS, the app].icant has requasted tha keeping of an existing garage (unattached, 768 square feet) while building a new h~me with an attac}ied garagP at 8190 Eastwood R~~ady and WHEREAS, the Mounds View Code does restrict the accessory building to be less than 258 of the rear yard which is not axceeded by this request; ' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVE[~ thaY: che Mounde View Planning Commi§sion recommends approval oE the conditional use permit requast provided that i:he following conditions are adhered to: ^~ 1) The proper use of the building is incidental to the ~~ primary use of the propert} and used for domestic storac~e. 2) That the buildinq ba aimilar and maintained like the principal uae of the property. 3) That the accessory Uuildinq shall not be ~erved by a permanent or improved driveway suzi~ico. Adopted this 3rd day of N'ebruary, lyt3~. ATTCSTt I I ; C a rperson (SEAL) ~ ' ~ ~ ' ~. ~ ~ bu3T id' nq & zon ng o a i ~ ~ „ i i ~ we,._,...,. . _ .,...,.... . ...,...._. ,, ~~..,..~. . , ,. , ~.. , ~.~.., , . . . ~ • , I '~ MOUNDS V[EW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 48-82 CITY OF MOUNOS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMM~NDING APPROVAL OF TNE SPRIN6 LAKE PARK COMPRENENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, the Mounds 41ew Planning Comnission has received the City of Spring Lake'park's Comprehensive Plan for farmal rev9Qw; and WHE~~AS, the Plan has been furmatly reviewed; and WHEREAS, the ~4ounds View Planning Comnission recommends that the City of Spring Lake Park respond to the fallowing considerations: 1. Tliat the City of Spring Lake Park include in the Storm Water Orainage implementation Plan corrective actions co elimin~te ar reduce periodic'flooding probtems that occur between Spring Lake Park and Mounds View above Highway 10. ~~ 2. That the City of Spring Luke Park consider the existing and proposed development pattern of Mounds Yiew in the location of Pleasant View Drive and Highway 10 in their consSderations for signalization. WH,EREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission requests tfie above two considerations because in both cases the areas involved for Mounds View are substan- tialty developed while for Spriny Lake Park ei,ther undeveloped or proposed for re- development; and ' WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Cammission further recomnends that the City ', of Sprin9 Lake Park keep actively involved in the Anoka County Airport planning process to assure that it st~ys in coinpliance with the direction af the Plan (i.e., not being expanded beyond its currenL capabiiities); and WNEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Comnissian finds that remainder of the Plan ,., to be in harmony with the Mounds View Plan Update; i NOW, iHEREFORE, BE IT RESOWED that the MounCs View Planning Commission recommends appraval of the Spri~g Lake Park Gomprehensive Plan with the consideratians listed and noted in this resolution. Adopted this 3rd day of t4arch, 7982. I ATTEST: ''I Chairperson ~ (SEAL) i ' ~./ u ng on ng c a