The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1982-04-07 PC MinuteslY}+" : ~ ~/1 PROCEEDINGS OF THE PI.ANNING COMMISSION CITY ON MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEX COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting April 7, 1982 Mounda Viaw City Hall 2401 liwy. 10, Mounde View, Mti 55112 -------------------°--------------------^------------------------^---- The Mounda View Planning Commiesion wae called to ordar by Chairman Mountin ac 7=40 PM, MEMBERS PQESENT: Coffiniesionera Linke, Anderson, Aairen,~iil~and Breske, and Chnirman Moutttin. Zt was noted that Co~issiouer McCarthy wae abaent and excused, ALSO PRESENT; Councilmember Forslund and ~u ng an 2oning Official Roea. Motion~Second: Linke/Andergon to table approval o t~e Marc'~n 3, 1982 minutes until all members hxd revi~±wed them. ~ k ; 6 ayes 0 nays Thare were no residents requeets or comments from fihe floor. OEficiel ~tose reported the Planning Co~i~sion had xaviewed a eimilar proposal from the chuxch eerlier in the year. He ststed the board members and paetor hava decided they would raCher use the church building than the paraonage for the day care Facility, dua to epace limitations, kle scated ehat he had prepared Reaoluticn No, 44-82, per the Plann3ng Commiseiotte direction, Reverend Ankeny stated the church board had decided it would be too costly to modify the parsonage, and thua wouZd like to uae the ' Sunday School wing of the church. Commiss3oner Warren aeked if thera was a limi.t to the numbe~t of rhildren thaC could be cared for. Official Roee replied L•hat it is resulated 6y the SL•ate Code, with 50 equare feet required per occupant, He added they wi1l. be reviewing the area once they are in operation. Chairman Mountin atated they would also be eebject to Anm~41 rewiew by the State for raltceneing. 1, Call to Order 2, Roll Call 3. A.pproval of Minutee: MSrch 3, 1982 Motiott Qazried k. Residunkn Requeete and Commante £rom the Floor 5. Sunrisa United Methodiet Church, Property Involved: 2520 County Road I, CUP Requeet (Day Care Facility) R-1, SingLs k'amily D3aerict, Case 102- Mounds View Plantting Commiseion April 7, 1982 Regular Meat~n~ Page Two --~ °-----------~-------------~------~--------------------~---------- '1 ~ i~3ot~ion~'~Sswondi ;dnrren/Linke to adOpt R90e1Vt~on No, 44-tl2. 6 ayes 0 nays Off;t.atal Roee reported the Planning Commiesion had previouely raceivad an informational paclcat from Marvin Andereon Aomes, alot:g with another submiseion Chie evening, He explained the City had entered into an agreement with Kraus/ Andareon and M&E ReaJ.ty in September 1980, regarding development of the aub~ect area, and Marv Andereon Homes has eince decidad that the typa of houeing they hnd proposeri aay not be as ~iablr L-o sell as the~ had thought, and they nr.e now proposing e~.lan o.E eight uni.t con3ominiums. Fred Haas, Vice Presiclent of Marvin Andereon Homea, explained that aEter receiving the origirial approval from the City for their development, they had put up eigne and advesCieed the development to geC salee inquiries, ~:ith the majoritq of the intereated parties looking for housing in the $70-80,000 price range. He explained thut the ori 3na1 plan had called for trwnhomes etarting at ~128,000, so they are now proposing the con3ominium plan which thay fael wili meet tlie aeede of s wide range of people. He added ehat they do plan to keep the quality of the tznits up, attd aze now plar.ning 16J condominiume on the site that would havc houaed 104 towrthouees, wiCh the condomini~ms uaing 3/10 of att acra lesa land that the townhousee, thus leaving more open space. Mr. 'Haas atated the con~lominiwne will start at $70,000, He added that there are same ma,~or trees in Lha area and wieh condomintume, ehe land ie ttot platted, so they can ehift them while building to save ae many treea ae possible, He also reportad the condominiuwa caa liave full basements, with eome being walkouts, nnd all the units will have a double Earage on each end. Concsrn wae expreseed by the Plonnirtg Co~nission that the area might look ltl:e ona large driveway, Mr. Y.r~ae explained thaL each unit wfll be heavily lendeceped, ae well ae the road being curved, and the unite have four different elavatinne, with nine diffarent colora. He aleo etated they plan on eetting tham back 35' from the road, which wi11 allow ample area to see oncam3ng traffic. He aLao explainad the condominium aseociation will bs in charge oE enow removal, with the anow to be Motion Carriad 6, Marvin H. Andereon Homee, Proparty Involved: Appro- ximately 2600 Highway 1Q, Plenned UniC Development, Revieion of Deve~op- ment Plan, Tract A, Regiatered Lend Survey ~k360, Case 85-b1 Moundp view Planninq Commission April 7, 1982 Regular Meeting Paq4 Three ° --_-'°_---`--°--__-^-•._-----"---°---••-~-_°-_-~-__-_-__`--_-°_- -^~, piled on snme ~f the open areae. Chairman Mauntin etated that while the condominium build.- ings wer~ vary aitraotiva, thelr. large qiz? miqh~. have an oppreasive appearanaA i~ the front yard eatbaak ia to be only 30 to .i5 feat. She aeked Mr. Haas if they mi~yht consider a greal•er eetback~ Mr. Haas roplied that they are receptive to increae- ing or. porhaps even varyinq tha setbacks to provide s i~iore gleaeing effect. Chairman Mountin stated that the Planning Commisaion had directed 3taff to prepare Resolution No. 50-82. Motion/Seaonda Anderaon/Mountin to adoption Resoiu- ~ion No. T~0-~2. 6 ayes 0 naye Motion Carrted Convniosioner Millex queaticned how parking would be handled. Official Rose replied that tbe nesoaiation has the riqht to build more garages at a later date, ae well as the buyers knowing how may garsges will be available. Chairman Mountin added 9he Peels the Asaociation will clasely regulate what can be storad in f.ront, and ~~ ser,ommended parking be addreased separately in ~.i~ the Code review. The Planning Commission diecussed the parking aitua- i tion and potantial problems with it. Mar,7.in Grant, Preeident o£ Marvin Anderean Homea, expleined they have not had a probletn with parking in,the past in other d~vel~pments thoy have done, aven those ' havtng single garages. He explained that many oE ~ the buyers will be couples whose children have laft, I t~oma, or young, eingle career people without families. Chalrman Mountin asked it be noted that the Planning Commieaion has ciiecussod parking raquirements, and they feel the reqexiremant a and Municipal Code should be readdressed concerning condominium requiXemonts. O£Eicial aose reported the Planning Commission 7. Alaxander ~iver- haa viewed the property in queation on two eified Sa1es, Inc. separate occaeiona. He staYe3 the proposal now Property Involved: bafore the Planning Commiseion ie for a tire sales 2848 Highway 10, and installatiott repaj,r center, whieh falls under CUP (B-3, Minor a minor auto repair aectinn. Auto Repair Usa) Mr.. Alexandez etated he p].ana to repaint the ' building. He also exYSained the exiating scr~en- '-J inq betwaen tSe buslness and resideni:ial property • hlou;ide View Planning Commlesion Requ.lar Meeting -~ is a fence approximately 4' high. He added he would be using only the exietinq lighting, ae wall as the two seourity lighta that are prasently there. Motion/Second: Miller/Linke to adopt Resulution ~~'4-"8~'- 5 ayas 1 nap Chairman Mountin statad that while she is not oppoaed to Mr. Alexandar's operation, ehe f~els ehe ehould be coneietent with her previoue vating reoord, and felt the proposal was not in compliance with the Comprehanoive Plan, and t~o heavy a use to be adjaaent to R-1 property, with Mr. Alaxander already having a reasonable use of the property. April 7, 1982 Pag'e 4 Motion carried Chairman Mnuntin reported the attandeea at the 8. Chairman's Report March 17 workahop were ~ommiesioners .T,inke, Anderaon, MoCarthy, Miller and Mountin. Membere pre~ent at the Maroh 24 agenda seesion were. Commisaioners Andereon, Linka, Breske and ~-~, MeCarthy and Offioial Roee, with Commisaionere Warren~ Miller an3 Mountic havin~ excused abp`ances. ` J/ Councilmember Foralund reported hhe wetlanda atufly hearing had been held, and reported on the resulte. She also reportad the City wou=d be hiring a part- time engineer to pull the wetlands ordinance toqether, along with the atorm wai:er management plan. She added he wi17. be h~.red £or a aix montk period. Off:cial Rose updated the Planning Commisaton on the s'tatus oE the Code raview. He atated tho r,orrectioxie have been made and queations answered, and it will be ready for typing soon. He reaommended the Planninq Commisaion atill address antannas and wi~d qenerators. He nlso recommended they mee*. 3n two weeko fox a combined work seasion and agenda, sesaion on April 19. Discyss Pant Council Action and tVext AgenBa Motion/Second: Anderson/Miller to adjourn the 10. Adjournment meetinq at 8c59 PM. 6 ayes 0 nays Motion oarried ~"` Respeatfully submitted, ~/~ Steven A. Roae Building & Zoning Of£icial MOUNDa VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 49-82 ~\' CITY OF MOUNbS VIEW ° COUNTY OF RAMSEY 3TATE OF MZNNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MINOR AUTO REFAIR AT 2048 HIGyWAY 10 WHEREAS, the property known ae 2848 Highway 10 ie zoned E-3, ~ liighway Suslnese~ and ' WHEIiEA3, thP propoaed tire sales and aervice is a conditional uee ~ertniL• use known,as'minor auto repair7 and WHEREAS, the Caty's previoue approval of a condit±onal use per- mit Eor both auto sales and a since removed minor auto repair are no ~ longer in use ~n the propertyj and i . WHEREAS, the proposed eite plan will meet minimum aoninq "'~ requiroments~ ~ -J NOW,: THEREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED~that the Mounda View Planning~ i Commission reaommende approval oE thc~ eonditional use permit requeat , for minor auto repair at 2848,Hiqhway 10 provided thata 1) All work be donu inside tho bui7.ding. 2) Any outside st~r.age be adequate].y screened fro.m the publia view. Adopted thia 7th day of April, 1982. WHEREAS, Alexander Diveraified Sales, Inc. has requeuted a conditiona} ust permi.t for minor auto repair at 2848 [~ighway lOj and II~ IT FURTHER AESOLVED that klie Moun3s View Plnnning Commission recommends that the previ.oue conditional use permit request;s granted for this proporty he offici.ally ~erminated. ~ ATTES'A': -~~ I' 7SEAL} C a rperson ~ Hu nq & Zon ng c a - ~J ~ x ~ MOUND9 VIEW PLANNING COM6fIS3I0N /~~ RE90LUTION N0. 50-82 f r~_} I CITX OP MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA I RESOLUTSON RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A REVISION ~ TO THE SILVER LAHE WOO~u DEVELOPMENT STAGE I FpR A PLANNED UNIT DEVCLUPMENT ' WHEREAB, the Mounde View Planning Cornmisaion on May 6, ,'i 19B1, recommended approval af a development ataqe for tha ~ilver, Lake Wooda Planned Unit Developmentj and ' 1 ' WHEREAS, part of that recommended approval lncluded town- homea propoaed ~n Tract D of Regietere3 Land 5urvey N360 or Block 1 through,34'of the propoaed Silver Lake Woode Plsts and ;-,~ WHEREAS „bha develaper, Marvin H. Anderson Conetruction Company, has propoaed condominiuma for the devalopment stage ,:., portion of townhomea in the oriqinal planned unit development ~ in order t'a provid~ more affordable housingj and ,"~ WHEREAS, the Mounfla View Planning Commisaion has reviewed i i the propoaed modification and finds it to conEorm to the Zoning ~ Code and previous agreement made; and i ~ ~ WHEREnS, t:e required zoning for the proposed ohange ',i would ba R-4i ' "'~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Plan- 'i niug Commisaion recommend to the City Council approval of the revised development atage for the Silver Lake Wcoda planned unit ''`i development from townhornea to condominiums for portion~+ oE Traat ~:"! D of Regietered Land Survey N360 ae presented in bhe ravised plan I frorn Marvin H. Anderson Conatruction Co. datad March 22, 1982 and ~ received t4arch 22, 1982. i z :, %!'~ Adopted this 7th day of' April, 1982. ' : ATTEST: ~ ~ ~ a zperson ~ (SEAL) ~ ~ u ng & on ng O• n al-- _, L MOUNbS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSSON RESOLUTION N0. 51-82 QO^l CITX OF MOUNDS VIEW T ` COUNTY OF RAMSEY • RTATE OF M2NNE&OTA REBOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL ~ USE PERMIT FOR DAY CARE FAC7LITIES AT 2520 COUNTY AOAD I MOUNDS VIEW PLANNTNG CASE 102-B1 (RE9CINDING RE60LU!!'i0N N0.44-82) WHEREAS~ the Applicant/Owner, Sunriee Unltad tQatho3ist Churah, of 2520 Cuunty Road I has requesled the uae of its ahurch 3unday 9ahool ares as a day nare facility~ and WHEREAS, the zoning oE tha property at 2520 County Road i is R-1J and WHEAEA3, a day care facility ia a1lo~ved by conditional uae permit in an R-1 zoned districti and WHEREAS, the City's Inspection Depart~nent han been requesYsd to aonduct an E-3 Occupaney inepection of the proposed facilityj and WHEREAS, the inspectic+n hae been made and a 7.etter reporting ~~ the findings is attaeh~dj and WHERFAS, the Mounda View Planning Commission finda that thare ie a need for day caze £acilities in Mounds viewJ , NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Moundn~View Planning Commieaion recommends approval of the conditionai use parmit rGtqueat fcr a day care faaility at 2520 County~ROad I within the church Sunday School areai BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the M~unds Vj.ew Planning Commis- . aion racommends that the findinqa of the E-3 in'spection be a atipulated requirement and that the provisiona ~e completed prior to the etart o£ day care operation. Adopted tha.s 7~h day of April, 1982. ATR`EST: C a rperson (SEAL) ~ s'u?IcT~&' Zon ng 9 a a ~ .~