The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1982-05-05 PC Minutes/~~ PROCEEDINGS fJF THE PLANNING COMMI3STON f i CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ~ RAMSEY COUNTY, MSNNE30TA Ragular Meeting May 5, 1982 Mounds View City Fiall 2401 tivn~, 10, Mounde Vinw, Mtr 55112 -----^---------------------.._---------------------------~---^------- The Mounds View Planning Commiseion wae called to order by Chairman Mounrin at 7:30 PM. MEMBGRS PRESENT: Comu~isaionera Linke, Andereon, c art y arr ved at 7:32 PM), ~7arren, Mi11er atid IIreake and Chairman Mounr,in. ALSO PRESENT: Councilmember Forslund and SuiId3.n~ Zoning Official Rose. MoL•ion/Second: Linke/Breake to approve tha rc , and April 7, 1982 minutes as preaented. ~~~; 6 ayes 0 nays .~ i Commiaeioner MeCarthy arrived at this time. Jim Petrowski, 2708 Co4nty Road J, etated he would like co~ente from the Planning Commieoion, regarding the garege additior: he ie propoeing to build, so he would know whether to proceed wiCh filLng an application and paying the required fees. He presen.ted the Planning Commieaion with copies of a sketch of hia iot and the proposed building. He explained he wanted to put the garage in the proposed epot to aerve ae a'noiea buffar from the traffic on County Road J. He added that he cannot aleep in the bedroom in his house that is closest to Counky Road J. OEficisl Roae explained the right of. way ie 33' from the center of the road, and ttiere would be approximately 18' Erom L•ha proposed addition to the right of way. He also etated Mr. Petroweki was presently in line with his neighbors. There was coneiderable diecueaion among the ~~ Commieaioners regarding the poaeibiliCy of granting a variance, with co~enes being made that the code ehould be adhezed to, attd Call to Order Aoll Call 3. Approval of Minutes; March 3, 1982 April 7, 198? Motion Carried 4. Reeidente Requeste and Caumienr_8 from the Floor Mounds View Planning Commie~ion Mny 5, 1982 Regular Meeting Page 'Irao -•-°--------------------------------------------------^-------------- ~ differencos in opinion being atated about whethez the traffic increase ~:uuld be a unique situation, ae well ae the suggestion that barriere could be used, such as shruba and trees, or additional inaulation in the houae, that the propoaed garage could cut off the line of vieion Por neighbors, with the ma,jority agreeing that there were alterna- tivea to be used other than a variance. Chairman Mountin advised Mr. Petroweki that he could mt~ke an application Eor variance, if he wiahed, and if tt~e Planning Commiseion deni.ed it, he caould have the right to appeal it to the City Council. She al.ao adviaed him that the Council has a time for reaidente requeats and coum~ents at their meeting if he wiahed to addresa r..hem. Official Roae explained the requeated variance is 5. Gregory & Mary 7'10" and drew e sketch of the propErty involved Windaperger, and the propoeed addition. He reported the 2610 Louiea property directly acrosa the atreet is classified Avenue, Variance wetlanda and may never develoQed, as well as Request (Reduced Greenwood not being a through etreet and naver side yard aetback, will be, corner lot) R-1 .- Single Family The Planning Co~nisaion diacueaed the request, ` Zone ._~ clarifying the grade of the property, and making Case 106-82 the puinta that it ie actually only half a corner, that there ia etill potential for devalop- ment of the watlanda, that it is not neceaearily a unique aikuation, and there could be a safety factor involved with peop2e driving around the corner, and ehey ehould etay as clase to the required aethacka as posaible. Motion 5econd; Breake/Miller to approve Resolu- t on o. - 1 ae amended, granting approval oE the requeAted variance. 2 ayee 5 naye Motion Denied Coimaiaeionera Breske and Miller voted in favor of the motion. The remaining Co~isaioners etated thpy did not feel it wae a unique aituation, and an 8' variatnce requeet was too large, wieh a aimilar varianca requeat being denied in the past. Motion/Second: MnCarthy/Linke to adopt Reso'ru- o~i n Ao: 52=fS2 as presented, denying the variance r~queat. 6 ayea 1 nay ~ Motion Carrted Commisaioner Breske stated he did feel the s3tua- tion wus unique. Mounde View Planniny Cammiesion Ragular Meoting ---------------------°--------~-------- Official Rose reviewed tha applicanti's proposal. ~ Thara wa~a no ona present to represent the applicant. Councilmember F~rslund stated eha had to leave tho meeting to attend a f.amiiy funetion. Motiun Second: McCarthy/Anderson to table dis- cuse on an e variance request for 2091 Terrace Drive. l ayea 0 nays ~.~/ May 5~ 1982 Page Three 6. Mr. & Mrs. Ar.thur poelz, 2091 Terraae Dr., Varianoe ttequest (Front Yard Seb•• back), R-1 Single Family Zone Case 107-82 Motion Carried Councilmember Forslund answered quest.lona from i. Di.ecusa Paet the Planning Commiseion regarding what had Counoil Acticn occurred at the last Councii meeting. Chairman and Next ]1gan4a Mountin requested that the Plaaning Commieuinners r.ecoive copie~ of• the Council's upcoming agendas, so they will know what is being discussed beforahand. Counai2mamber Foralund 3nformed the Planning Commission that as of the June 2, 1982, Plann3ng Commisaion meeting, there will be a change in Staff responeibilities. Upon questioning from the Planning Commission, ahe stated that the new City Engineer, John Johnaon, wae doing the implementation of tha reorganization and she was not sure how it would afEect the Plunninq Commiesion, Chairrnan i~iountin stated ahe £elt the Planning Commis-- sion ehould be inc'luded in any reorganization dis- cueaiona, as they appear to bo directly affected. ShQ stated the Planninq Commisaion does have input to give the Counei.l, and she f.eala the Council has left the Planaing Commission'totally in the dark, and they would like to be invited to discuss the iesued with the Cauncil. Chairman Mountin etated the Plann~.ng Commiasion would like to get togeChor with the Council to diecuse the Ckiapter 40 roview, and reoommended t.he Council come to a Planning Commission agenda eassion, where it could'be the oniy topic on the agenda. Councilmamber Forslund left ttie meeting at 9:07 Pid. Motion Second: Warren/MCCarthy to remove the agenda 6, (Continued) from t e a e. 7 ayes 0 nayn Motian Carried Mounda View Planning Commission Mey 5, 1982 Regular Mceting Page Four --------------^---------------~--~-^----^----------°--^-------------- /~~ Chairman Mountin repor.ted they had directed Seaff [~ at the agenda meeting to prepare Reeoluti.on No. 53-82, to deny the var~.Ance requaet. Motion/Second: Miller/Andereon to adopt Rasolu- t on o. - 2. 7 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Secondz Miller/Breske to adopt Raeolutiott 8. Lea Watkine o, -, granting epproval of the requested 2604 Louiea Ave. fill permit. Fill Permit 7 ayes 0 nnys Xard)etR~l~Single Family Zone Case 109-A2 Motion Ca:ried Official Rose repurted that the Council hae 9. Mounds View given praliminary approval'to the idea oE tax i fi i Residence, Inc. ' ncrement nanc ng to asaiet the proposed Connell Dr. 2551 0 Mnnnda View Reaidence, Tnc., elderly houaing D~velopment Pro- ,~-. project. Ae atated State law roquires the poael (40 Unit ' planning agency for the City review auch tax I J Apartment Complex) ~. increment £inancing propueals to assura its HUD 202 Slderly compliance with the City'e planning documents Houaing Pro~ect auch as the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. Tax Increment Hu added the Planning Commiaeion hae reviewed Financing the pro~ect before, and this raview ie tn R-2 High Denaity ineure that all requiremente are followed, to Residential meat tax increment f'nancing guideli.nes, Ceae 11,0-82 Gary Winter, of Etolmea and Gr&ven, etated he was repx•esenting Mounds View Residence, Inc. and Health Central. He reviewed the proposal for the tax increment financiag, and answered qveer_ions from the Co~niseionera. He added that a public hearing hao been set for 7:40 PM on Muy 19, at the City Council meeting. Motion Second: MounCin/McCarthy to recot~end aparova o~'the profect for elderly housing to uxe tax increment financing, to be located within the Silve'r Lakz Woode PUD, as submi.tted by Krsus/Anderaon and M&E Realty, which previausly hava meet with coatinuity af the Compreheneive Plan'a deaignation for the area. 7 ayee 0 nays Motion Carried ~~~ Mounde View Planning C~canisaion ~ May 5, 1982 Regular Meet~ng ---------------------~-----~----^------------------------ Page Five __------^--- ~~ Offici.al Roae reported Tom Thumb ha~ lost part of 7. Diecuoa Paet ( t ite fence, which wae a 6' basketweave, and the~ Counci2 Actioa - would now like to put up a colored taeketweave and Naxt Agenda chainlink fenee. Official Rase askad if the (Continued) Planning Commiaeion concurred that a 6' fence ehould etill he raquired, Motion Second: Warren/Mil],er adviee Sta£f to direot om o put up a 6' haskatweave, ahainlink £ence ae ari equal replacement. 7 ayos 0 naye Motiott Carried OEficial Rose aeked if the Planning Commiaeion had any direction for the reaident nn Terrace Drive regarding his setback. 'The Pianning Commiselon eaked that he come in and addresa th~m. '' OEEicial ~ose rAported he had met with Commieaiotter :d~ Andereon and a repreaentative of Homeward Round, ia an organization that provides housing for handicapped ;~ and diaebled children aud yaung adulte, He atated they are tentatively interested in building in I Muunds View and will be checking into it further, - 0£fiaial Roae reported thio would mnat likely be ; hie laet meeting vrorking for the Plannin Commiasion and th k d h d i ~ _ an e t em an told t iem how muclt e had, enjoyed working with them. ~< Chairman Nlountin atated the Planning Commiseion has $' e~joyed n very goad working relationehip with ,. Official Rpsa and he wi11 be mlased greatly by ~ tha Planning Commisaion. She wished him the vezy best in hia future po~ition. Chairmen Mountin reported that sha hae asked 10. Chairman's ~ Councilmember Forslund for a,jo3.nt meeting to Report review the proposed code changes, and hae also ~ requeated a mPeting with the Council ragarding upcoming StafE changea. Chairman D3ountin reporCad the next agenda maeting will be on May 19. Commiseioner Warren ~ etaCed'she would be out o£ tawn for thal• meeting. Chairm~n !•foutttin raporced Che attendeea at the Apri1 2I ag~nda nteetin were Coimnisaioners ~ Warren, McCarthy, Bzea e, Linke, Andereon, Miller and Mountin, and Official Rose and Councilmember Forslund. , `~ ~ ,, ~.,~....__~ yNM}'~y~R Krl:~ 1 ~:t~~.: - ~. ..... ~SNV . _.~~.i~.~.. . ~..... .. . .. ...• ..~ .. ... .:....: . . ... ... .. . ~..... ..r....~~ .... .. Mounde View Planning Commiseion May 5, 19$2 , • ~ Regular Meeting ~----'------~-------~------- __ Page Six ----------~----------------, ~------ ~ Motion Sacondt McCarthy/Linke to ad,journ the 11. Ad~ournment mee ng at :3b PM. , 0 Motion Carried naye 7 ayea Reepectfully submiteed, ~ ~ I ! ~ . ~ Stevan A. Roeu I , Building and Zoning Official „ I , . ~ ~ , . .,_. _ . ,, ~ .. +,..~ . , , _ . ., .~ .~ . . ...-~.i_ ~. . .,.,,, - ,, , ,: .~ , . ~. , , , . , .. , ~ . ~ ~ " : , ,.x ~,. , ; ... . .~. . .~ .. . . r r.~; ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ,~. ~. ' r ~ . ~ ~ , ~ t-~ ~-~ ~ ` ~ . ,: , ., ~,~t~ , ~ ~ c{: ,. ~ ;~r ~ ( t - ; ; ~ t~ , js ~-s ~ . ~ ° ~ ': ~ r ' ~ ~ „~ , ~ , , y s S : ~ ~ ', f r,;~ ` ,: ,. ~ ' ' .:. f~'. ,;-'1 ` r ~ ~ , x '~ r., ,r~ ~ r ` , , ~ ~ S {~ Y dl ? ~}g` ~~ 4 ~ S` " ~ ~ ' B y ~ ~ " . i C 1 F lN ' ,' : ~ r;.> > t+ - ~ :Y4 . M Iy 1 ~ ~R ~ h h r 4 ~ t~ `" ` - ~ t ' Sl ~ . ., ,~~ q ~ ;_. 3 L <LSLf4, la 1 << '. ' ~ .. . ( 1 : I k ~ _~ ~ ., l~.j~i~ ~ i~.> ~ny,~4~ tir,~~ 4 k L)~~; ~ j . t5 ~~~ : ~ '' " ;~ ~,!~ w' t r zk. i 7 i V ~p ~, c. .. ._ . ... Y ~ ~ t ~ ~ ' f f : ~ " . ~ t~ t' I. t4 ~F ~ a ~ ° - . . ( ?S~ ~ 1~.~ i ~ t r nY 7 ~ . . Y Y , . '~t '{ , ~A ~ S '~ {i . r .41 4 ~ ~m Y'~ w~ -~ ~ ~ ~ i .. ~ _{~d ~ t p . . s p i t ~ iv~ n ~t Y~7~ ~~ ~Slf rp ~~ ;"~y~v2 1YF ~ ~b t ' ' ! ~ 5 ' .' e i~ ,i~ ~ y ~~ . ' i G „s. r ¢1, I ~ t ~~ l~ ; i ~ s ~ys c# :~~ ~ ( ~ . r _ ~ ~~ t ~ ., q i~_`;, ai ~ ,. ., i ' ~ ~ ~'t ,,~, ~ ~fq.r ii ; ~ .s ~ ~ ~ ~' , .r . 1 ~~::t ,. r , . ~ ' . j. i 1'~~. I ~!~ ~ 1 ~Y- ) 1~ ~'„ A t"% S 1 ~ l . . ,s~; r i .. ~ r ~ .. r ' :ti . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ " .. - ~ jf .. s . ~ ~ ~' ' , ' ~ ~ ~ . . ~, ~ ~ , . , . .. .. . ,~ . : ,.. .. ~, ~ , } ; E , , ,. ~,.., . . ~-' ., ,. , ~. . ~ ,- , .,~ ~ , ., ~ ~ . : , :', ~ ..~ . ~ ~ .. , . ~ ~i ~ .~. .. ., ~ ~. ' ,. _ . .~. ~ . ,,~ , .._.. . . ~ ' , , ~,. i ~~. . .... , .. .. , x . .. ~ ; ~ ~ ~. ; , ,. , : . . ': ~..: ,. ' :. ~.. ~ ~ , ., . . _. , ~~ . . . . . , . .< .::.. : , ~.... : ; ,+* , ..., .. ~. , . . , . ~ , ..: . , .~ ' . ~ _ ~ . , , ,:' , :~ ~ ,. .. .,. . ' . .. . . ~ ' e ~ ~. , , : . ,.. „ . . , ' , . , l° ; ' , I ' ~ .:.~ ' ; , '. .. ~ .. . . , , .. . ' . .. , __ . ,~ ..~,..... . . . . , - ... ,.,:. . . , . , .. . ... _ .....,, ~ _.~.. ~.,.,.. .._ _ ~ ..., t.~~.,~.. ~ .; : _ ... ....,..,. .,. .. . . . . , . ,,. , , ~ . ~ „ , „ i ~ '~ „ ~..~..~........... ..~...........~. . . .+wi.~..~.r~.r~. . ie. ..~}'.Ma..YJ~a(XIA~~.ri<n 4'Yf- K.iY314fU.»"tLiN ~~~...J~. .>F~ .tr. .~. FY.^N4kJi. . ... MOUNDS VIEW PLF~NN7Na COMMISSION ~ RESOLUTiON N0. 52-02 ~ ' CITY OF MOUND3 VIEW COUNTY OF RAMS&Y STATE OF MINNESOTA ,--,,. i ~ ~.~/' I ~ RE30LUTSON DENYING A VARSANCE REQUEST FOR 2610 LOUSBA AVENUE FOR REDUCED SIDE YARD SETBACK MOUND5 VIEW PLANNIN6 CASE 106-82 WHEREAS, the ouners o£ 2610 Louisa Avenue have,requeated a vsrianae for reduced slde yard set,baok of a corner lot for an . addition to their ainqle f~mily struoture~ and WHEftEAS, the ownera have submittad aketahea an8 diagrams and a etetement of hard~hip explaining the requested variancet and WEIEREAS, tha Planning Conuniaeion hae reviewed trheee submiseions as we11 as r~taff reporta} and i WHEREAS~ the Planning C~mmiaeion finds no unlque hardahip 7reyardinq the variance request as it per.tains to tlie Mounda VieW zoning Codaj } NOW~ TH~REFORE, BE IT TYESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission deniea Eh~ variance requeat of the owners oE 2610~LOUisa Avenue Eor;.a reduoed eade yaYd aetback'due,to,laok. of hardehip meating'the requiremente of the Mounds View ~oning Code. ~ Adoptad this Sth day of May, 1982. ATTESTs ,. ~-, , .' I.. ' ~ ;t , , ~, (SEAL) I , ~ ~ ~ , ' I ~~ ,. .F... MOUNDS VILW PLANNING COMMISSION .,,„,. RESOLUTION N0. 53-82 CITY OF M~UNDS VIEN COUNTY OF RAM3EY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTIUN DENYINCi A VARIANCE REqUEST FOR 2091 TERHACE DRIVE FtlR REDUCEDF.'RONT YARD S~TBACY. MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE 107-82 WNEREA9, the ownera nf 2091 Terraoe Drive hevo requested a varlanom for reduced Eront yard setback Yor an additioa to Cheir aingle family atructura~ and WHEREAS, the owner.a have eubmitted aketchae and diagrama and a atatement of hardship t~xplaining tha requasted varinncet and , WHEREAS, the Plahning Commiaeion hae revieWed these eubmiesione as well, as ataf£ reporta= and ' ^, WHEREA3, tY.e Planninq Commiasion finde no unique hardahip ~ 1 regarding the var3ance request as it perCains to Ehe Mound'd View ~ Zoning QodeJ , NOWr THEREFORE~ HE IT RfiSOLVED that the Motlitde ViaW Planning Commi~sion denies i:ha variance request of the owners oE 2091 Terraoe Drfva for a reduosd £ront yard setbaok due to lack o£ hardship meating the requiremente of the Moundm Viaw Zonin.7'. Code. Adopted this 5th dny oP May, 1982. !-" ATTESTr ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ , ~C s rman , .. . ;~ ~ ~ ~~i (SEAL) ' i u ng e onng0 ap~ .~, ~ ~ MOUND3 VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION ~~"1 R~80LUT1'ON NO. 54-8"1 `-- CITY OF MOUNDB VTGW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATC OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION R~COMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPRUVAL OF THE FILL PEI2MIT REQUESTED BY THE OWNER OF 2609 LOUISA AVENUE WHERGAS, the owner of 2609 Louisa Avenue hae raqueste~ a permit to fill purtions of his reaz yardi and WHFREAS, the owner hae submitted various eketchee whlch proposed filliny pcrtions o£ hj.s rear yardj and WHEREAS~ the Mounde View Planning Commieaion has reviewad thuae eketcheat and WHEREAS, the Planninq Comm.teaion flnda tha~ the proposed filling would oe within the Codee and requirementa, ea required by £illing, oE the City of Mounde View; and WHEREAS, the owner of 2609 Louiea Avenue hae agreed , that ho will qrade along his eide propsrty lines to meet hia j neighbor'e exiating grade linea und at ihe same time not pravi3- -, ing additional runof£ onto hia neighbor's propertyj NOW~ THEREFCAE~ BE IT RESOLVED that the MOUnds VieW Planning Commiseion raoommenda approval of the grading permit'as requested by the owner of 2609 Louisa Avenufl provided that the grading maets tho axisting conditions o£ t•he naighbor's side yarde and that tho runo£f is not inc.reasad. Aflopted this 5th day o£ May, 1981.. ATTESTt a rman (:IEAL) Bu ng 6 2on nn 0 f cial ~ ~! ~ A D D E N D U M Plsnning Commiseion minutes dated May 5~ 1982