The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1982-08-04 PC MinutesE"+vk r* : . . ' APPROVED 9; 1/82 PROCEEDiNGS OF TNE PLANNING COMMISSION ,~i~ CITY OF MOllNDS VIEW f } RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNE30TA ~ 1 Regular Meeting August 4, 1982 Mounde View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounde Viaw, MN 55112 --------------------------°------------------°-----------....--------- The Mounde Viaw Planning Comniesion was called 1. Call to Ordar to order by Chairman Mountin at 7:37 PM. MIYIP~ERS PRESENT: Commieaion~re Linke, Andereon, 2. Roll Call arren, er and Chairmsn Mountin. It waR noted Chat Commieaioners McCarthy gnd Breeke had excused abaensae. ALSO~p~ P_ R~: Planning/Engineering Technician 8 it wae noted that Councilmember Forelund was absent. ~~ Motion Second; Linke/Warren to approve the 3. t~pproval of; , ..~ uxts , an~l July 7, 1982 minutee se Minutes: presented. June 2,'1982 and Ju1y 7, 1982 5 ayes 0'nays Motion Carried Thara wore no reaidente comments or requeat•e Erow 4. Residente Coimneata the floor. and Requeeta £rom the Floor Chairman Motnntin reported that Mr. 17eBenedet, the 5. Wayne Herr Conet.; enginaer Eor tha Wayna Herr condominium development, Co., 2908 Higliway', hae xequested a one month exteneior for eubmitL•al 10, Development of theii' rev9.sed plans. Propoeal (Knoll- ~ ~aood Green Condo- Motion Second; Mi11Qr/Andexsan to table diecusRion mini~e Pxopoeal, on t e ayne Fierr Candtruction Co, con3~nninium 32,Unite}, R-4 propoeal, per Che requeet dated .7uly "r2, 1982, until High Denaity ':he 3eptember 1, 1982 Planning Co~iesion maeting. Reeidantial Dstr. Casa 89~81 5 ayee 0 naye Motion Carried ~, J ~.~..:... . _ .~ ,., ,;; , , - , ,, , , , , . .Mounde Viaw Planning Co~iseion Auguet 4, 1982 ' ' Regular Meeking ~' ~~~~~~~~~~~~~u~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Page Two ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ i"\ Technician Kampel raported the architect, Bruce G. Health Central, ~ Tunell, hae presented plane ehawing where the Inc./Unity Medi- ' parking spacee would be localad, cal C~nter, 2559 Mounde View Dr., Thero waL+ cor.eiuarable d:acuseion among the Development Pro- Co~iaeioners regarding the n~nber of parking poeal (Eldarly epaces to be required for th~ devalopment, with 40 Hag. Pro1ect, 40 riance ' ) V U :t epaces. the concensus baing ono per unit, or s , a n ~equest (Parking ~ Technicial Kampel stated the developex had submitted Requirements), , h D it Hi the plane to HUD showing 26 parking apacen, with ene y g R-4, HUD approving the pro~ect baeed on that eite plan. Restdenkial Dstr. :~e added that per Resolution No. 58-82, 40 parking Case 1?2-82 epaces would be required, while under the R•-4 eection of the code, 100 parking epacea would be sequired, , and while the resolution grante a variance fram 100 tn 40 parking epaces, the developer ie aounting on j u change order to fund the additional required parking apacee, which could be added in following I , cot~encement of the pro,~er,t, j Mr. Tunell atated they would like to go ahead with 26 epaces, and if it ia felt the additional 14 spaces are required once the project is completa, they could add them then. He also explained the budget difficul- tiea they have been having with the pro~ect, and the papes•work and xed tape involved in getting HUD to finance the aaditional parking apacee. It was ttie cuncanaus oE the Planning ,^.ommiesion that 40 parking spacas ehould be required, one per unit, and it should be eent to HUD that way, with the Planning Commiseion being w.Llling to meet with whoever was neceasary to get the parking eituat~.on res~lved. Motion_Second: Warren/~~derson +to adopt Resolucion o. 5 ayea 0 nays Motion Carried ltoCion/Second: Linke/Andaraon to adopt Resolution Ro.~-SZ~ 5 ayea 0 naye Moticn Carried Mntion Second: Mountin/Warren to ~orward the infor.- mat on to t e City Council, as eoon ss possible, with a copy to the Planning Commieeion. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried ,~ ~ ~1 ~, f 1 ~ ~ ,Monnds View Planning Commiseion Auguet 4, 1982 ReguJ.ar Mecting ------------------------°------°-------------~---- Page Tturee ------------------~-- It wae the cuncensus of the Planning Co~isaion 7, Mounde View that tihe topography of the site wo~~lu make it School Dietrict very difficult to provida additional parking ~621, 5100 epacea, and the recreational uee of the pro ert mi ht be im aired b furthar davelo - F,dgewood Drive (Ed d 3 H p y g F y p gawoo r. g) ment of parking area. CUP (Community l:enter Requeet) Motion Sacond: Warren/Linke to adopt Resol~ltion Variance Requeet _ o• ~• (Parking Apqvire- mente) R-1, 5 ayea 0 nays Single Fau~ily Residential Ustr. Caee 113-E2 Matian Carrigd Tecfinic3an IZempel report~d the Council doea not 8. Review of MnDOT want to puraue tile issue of the Pleasant View Proposal for Drive/Highway 10 interchange because of posoibls Signalizntion of drainage probl~.ws, land acquisition probleme, Pleasant View fttture materiale and operatin$ coets an~! benefits Drive and Hwy 10 being minimal to the citizens of Mounds View. He added they ha~~e directed Staff to let both MnDOT and Spri.ng Lake Park know their decision. Motion_Second: Mi11er/Anderaon to adopt Resolution 9. Chairman'e o• Raport 5 ayae 0 nays Motion Carried Chairman Mountin reported the attendaen at tt!e joint Planning Cc~iasion/City Gouncil meeting dr. June 16, 1982 regarding Chapter 40 were Mayor McCarty, Councilmembers Aoty and B~relund, Comni- eaioners Anderaon, SresY.e, Linke,,MilJ.er, Mountin and Director Johnson. The attendeea of the 3une 23, 1982 agenda meeting were Co~iesionera Miller, Andereon, Linke, Breeke and Mountin, Councilmember Forelund and Technician Y.empel, witfi Comnissionere Warren and *l~Oarthy havin~ excuaed abseneea. The attendaea af the July 21, 1982 agenda meeting were C~~iesi~nera McCazthq, Ltnke, Andereon, Miller and Mountin, Direceor Joluieon and Technician Kampel, with Cammissioners Warren and Bres[cn having excuoed absenses. Chair.wan Mountin reported the Council had aeked 10. Discuse Paet ~ Por a clartEication of the Planning Coaeaiasions Council Act3on discuseion with Mr. PeCrowski regarding hie and Next Aganda noiae problem on Couztty Road 3 and proposed Mounds View Planning Commiseion Auguet 4, 1982 Regulaz Meeting Page Pour ---------------------------------^-------------------------------------- r"~ garage addiCion. She read Director Johneon'e memo Co the Cauncil, explainitig in detiail the Plenning Co~iesione commente and euggestione to Mr. Patrowek She added thaC the Council hae directad Staff to prepare a letter to be eent to the truck terminale, aeking them not to uee County Rcad J during nighttim houre. Chairman Mountin reported the Comprshensive Plan has been formally adopta8. i, e Techniciacs Kampel reported tl~e Wetlac~da Cammittee will ba completing Lhe wetlanda oxdinance by tha end of the monCh and a memUer of the co~~Lttee would be willing tu came in and talk to the Planning Coicmiseion. it wae the conceneus o£ tha Cowmi.sai.onera that they would like someone to come in and talk to them at an agenda seneion in September. Technician Kampel asked for direction on a phone call he received frcm a citizen, aeking the liability or reaponsibi.lity of a tree ehat wae planted one foot from the property line. It wae tha concensus of the Co~iseion ~hat whatever encrouahed onto the neighbor's property would then beoome the property of the nefghbor. ~ ' Technician Kampel reported the Silvervtew plat was being --- finalized. Susan Gale, 8227 Gruveland Road, asked the Plannin~ Commieaion if they could give hez any direction or re- co~endation rege.rding her pro~erty which was currently involved in vacation proceedings. She explained ahe would like to r~ubdivide her lot but had found out it would coet approximately $25,OJ0 to put a cul-de-aac in to service her lot and the one next to it. She stated she did not care to apend that much money and asked how e].se ahe could service her praperty. The I.'lanning Ca~iAaion spent a great deal of time with Atre, rale but came tu the conclueion that a cul-d~-sac whe the only v3able method of eervicing her property, Co~nissioner Miller was excused at 1U:01 PM. It wae the conceueus o€ the Planning Co~iseion that they would recommend retaining the easements on the proper.ty for furthar developmant and acceee to Ardan Avenue for bike and foo*, trnffic to the park. Cheirman Mountin stated ehe would attend the next ' Council meeting in liau of Councilmember Forelund's ,~ abeence. Auguat 4, 1982 .Mound~ View Planning Oomaiaeion page ~iva • gegulnX Meet~n8 ------------°--------°-- ----_-°_~-_------~-__-------°-------~°-----~-° Te~hnioian Kampel reported that homa oocupatione ~ orould ba placed o~~ ttte nexti aganda for dienuseion, ~ Motion Secandio~An~dereon/Linke to ad'ourn the mee ng a Motion Oarried 4 ayae 0 naye RespactPu~ly,eubmiEted, ~ a ~f-- - ~ sJ~ Frank J . Kampe,l ' Engineeriag/Planx~ing Technician „ . ~~ . , • . , . ~ ,,. , , _ ~~ ~ _ , ~ ' ~, ~ ` ~ ~~ ' :~ ._ t y ~~ `. ~ . - ~~~(' , Yt ? j Y '. , ' r . ~ . T .:9 ~ r ~ ;t4 ~ ., 1 :. as .: , x ~ ` ~6 u x ~4 11 ~ '~~ 1 ~ f ~ + i S ~ t `4~ I \ ~. . ~ ~~ ~'_ } c. . .~~.a A.. .n..' _7.~ .niuS.r.b0.14.. -..49.4(...,,..fF.~.....fr{.,~..dPt.....~.Ja'~ s~ .~:L~ ...Ln{.e..'.b..~~ ,....]...,. , "a . t .1~ 1 ' r~ n i~Y~y"+ rC i j: yFa ~ , n i q~s& v~k J' ~_. ' ~h ~ ~e I~ ~ r ti ~AC . ~ a~1 'i ~ ~F ' 9 i~ l i si r 4 i 1~~ ~t h 1 n ,1t i 1 ~ i~~ k~ 5 ~x~t ~ g > 1 ~ . ~ Y ~ ~ ~ ~ > ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~t 9 '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . 5 i ~ y .~. ~ y ~ 1 (t . ~4 ~ 8 ~ ~~ ~ : . . x ., , i A~ ( aj i"° , ~~~ i~ S '' ~' ~ ~.. ~ 2 r .' 4 ~ ! ,)L ~ ~'~3 t ~ g ` ;a t.. ~ ~ y ~ ~ y _ ~: j t ~ E _ F i. ' l ~ ,. ~. ~ . o i .. . e ;~. ~ .. 1 ' 1 i ~. ]F '- ,S , ar ~ ~ (; rIV . ~ 'c ' . ~ !7 '4 ~n }" $1 u a }~ p . ry . Ir .i `~~~.. r t,n t„ y i ~~ il .~ ` rt -~, r° ' s ik ;~rxi ~ s' ~3 t ~,c r i }. i ~ ~ 'e~ a ~ ~ S~ s ~s t' `+ ~ 1 - f , ~~ ~ ~' ~c '.r ' ti~. J,p - ., ~.: ~ C,~, ~ ~l.i ~ ~ - (:;, ~ 1 i t y ~ ~, . ' J ~ ' ~ I! ~ ~ . 1 F ~ , ~~ f i' 1 ~ ~ 1 - S ~ ~' j . ~ ~~ :' 'I i ~ x . j k f1 1 1 31. ~ ~ yAb 1 Y ~ ~ . ,. '° .l ~~ f . ~ 4 ~ Y~- ~t ~ )1 J ~ r S , ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ V ; 1 § ~~ ~ , } 7 f ' ~ I i ~ A ~ £ ~ ' 1 ~. t . ~. Y ~ ~ ~~ yl . ~ ' ' ' ~ ,~ ra ' , . .. C ~ ' . ~ i :.. ~ .. `~ ~ i ~ ' , + : .., ~ .. : ~ ' ; i, .~ ~ . ( . , ,: '•... . ,,i . ~~~. S ~ ,;. f ~.~; ... ~ ~ / ~~:.:. n.~, ~ ~~ . . .... ' i ~~ *: j J ` , . ' r \J ~ , . ~ ~ ~" ~ , . ~ ' , i ~ .~._. ` ~ ~~ ' 1 i • t, .,. ~~, ~ . .~ _. ' ~rt ~ i ., , '., ~ : . , ~ . . . ., _ .,.._ . i , „ ., -„f - ,:., .,. ~. i . . , .: , ,. , ,.. ~.. ~ . ~~ ~,~~y ,. , , ~ m},y~:t wKUYFxLr.w4YWW'~+~"OY^W" ' . .... ~~y,p . ........~u.~,u.~,s"..:'eS.~Jh&k~S3B.ar~P~+Y~%rsn , ._;`.~ ~_.~i i MO~NU~ VICW PLANNING COh1M15SI0N RL50LU'PZON NO. 56-82A ~ L'ITY OP MOUND9 VIGW ~ ~ COUNTY OF' RAMBCY STA'PL Ol' MINNG50'PA RE$OLUTION RGCOMMGNJING TIIG AMGNDING OF CIIAPTGR 40 OF THC MOUNDB V[f;W MUNICIPAL CODE REGARbING DIANUFACTURED Ii0ME5 WHGREAS, tlie Sh.ate of Minnesota has enac{ed Leqislation prohibiting Ehe oxclusion oE manufactured homes in roaidontial distriatet anc3 WIICRCA5, this same leylslaL•ion docs ytaC~; LhaL• a municipalily can ragulal•e certain elements of manufactured hame cunstructiont NOW, TIiCREPORE, BG IT RGSOI,VPD that the Mo~lnds ViaW Planning Commiesion reonmmends tl~e amending of Chapter 40 of tlie Moundrs View Municipal Cade by addinq the followiny: (1) Chapter 40.02 Rulec and befinitions. , "SUbd. D(68) tdanu acl~ome. A manufactured homo is one that is def ne by .Minnssota Statutes, 327. _.,,~ (2) Chapter 40.06 Araa and Puilding S1.za Regulations. "Subd. F Build n4 Des qn Stan ar s. -'J a. Poundation. A permanent :oundation oE concrete, conerete block, or wood as ahproved by the State 6uildiny Cqda is required for all residential struc- turea with Erost footinga oE at least 42 inches. ~ ' •b. All rosidential atructures,including manufac8ured homea, must comply with the State Duildi'ng Code £or ~1) single family homes. ; ~ c. All manufactured homes shall have available foY insgection, manufacturer's instructions speaifyl.ng ':i how suid home is to be sibuated on a permanant foundati.on. :' ~d. Unlesa located in a doaignated mobile home park, all mobile homes or manufactured homes ahall comply with the provisions of Chapter 40, as nmended from time I ~ to tima. ~~ AdopCed this 4th day of Augusl•, 1962. I ATTESTs Chairman ~~ ~~ (SEALj Pu l~c Works Commun ty Govelopment Directar . _. _._.._ ,.._..__.., ..__.,.,...: • _~ps.._. .,,.~ . -:n,..... r.., a.:: ',.+.i..s.:oo, .,.i .,::.vr ~ ~w,.... ~<.,,snw9 ~ MOUND3 VIEW PLANNING COMAfISSION RL•'SOLUL`lON NQ. 57-82 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAN,SEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTIOt2 RECOMMEND7NG APPROVAL OF A CONbITIONAL USE PEAMIT FOR TNE CONVERSION OF EDGEWOOD J'UNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TO A COMMUNITY RESOUACE CENTER AND VARIANCE FOR TII£ RGDUCEU NUMBEI2 OF kAl2XTNG SPACES WHEREAS, tho Muunds View School District has decicled to closo Cdgewood Junior uigh School at the end of the 1981-1982 achool yeart and WIIERLAS, the Cchool Distriot intends to preserve the building for future educational uset and , WHEREAS, s community reaource center is in operation~itt the City of New Brighton~ and ~ WHER6AS~ the School pistrict viishes to mairitain and expand its present activitie3 which now exist at the New arightoh faaility, j ~'~ although space is somewhat limited at thie facility~ and ~-~ WIiCR~A5, ~dyawood Junicr High Schaol is an ideal loc~ti.on for the aatlyities proposed by the School DiRkriat~ 8hd ^ WFiEREAS, a conditional use permit ia required for a community canter in an R-i residential'~districtJ and hH~RGAS, Chapter 40 of the Municipal Code identifies various requirements for the ~onditional use permit, one of which is pnrking; and , WHEREAS, the existing 161 panking sp>ces (following restsiping) do not conEorm tu Chapter 40 requirements fnr oommuni.ty ~enters which stabes that 843 spaces be provided; and WEtEREAS, a study has been conducted on tho pazkinq situatian ak exiating Edqewood Junior HigF. School to det3rminr.. exieting and future parking requirementaJ and WHEREAS, the exi3ting 140 epaces can be expanded to 161 by rastriping th4 present parking arr,aai and i + ~ I U WHEREA3, an additional 82 apaces can be provided on-site should future naed atisce; and WHEREA9, t.he School Dislzict ha8 determined that the propoaed ~ise ae a community center woul~ allow future reconversion of the build?ng usu to a school.= and Moun9s Viaw rlanninq conimLss.lorf Rosolution No. 57-82 Puyo Two r'~ r WqERCF~S, qlven Cha unccrtainty o[ t.ho ultitnatc ypaca uso of; the building, the additional proposed 82 parkiny spaaes may not bo nocassaryj and Wll~R~A5, the additional proposed spaces unl iLS aceesa will adveruely 9.m~act thc racreationnl uoe oP i•ho property should the apaces ultlmately not ba needed~ and WNEAEA5~ sita topogr.nphy and improvements reatr.ict the construc- tion of;parking areas on a major porEion af the sitej and WHCREAE, additional access drives and walkwflys L•o the proposad parking area wi11 add hard surface area to the site which would increase storm wat•er runoff; NOW, THCRGFORG, ~E I'P RESOLVGO that the bSounds View Planninq Commission recommends approval of ths conditional uae permit !:equest Eor the converaion o~ Edqewood Junior High Schoo~ to a community center, and a variance Lor tha reduced numbcr of parking spacos. Tha uariance shall be £rom B43 spacea to 161 apaces basad upon the following hardshipst 1) This proposal i.s unique in that the school distr.ic~ has nat oompleted determSnation oE the ultimate space use oE " the building, hence the additional parking spaces may not (~ be required with the ultimate uses. ~, 2) Sita tapography ~n3 impxqvements will raskrict additional, parking on a major, portion of the eite. 3) Additional accese drives and walkweys to the propoand parkinq area will add hard surface acea to the site which would increase storm water runoff. BE IT 1'uRTHER RESOLVGD that after a one year period should it ba dehormined hy tha City that additional parking spaces are necessazy, 82 dpaaos wi11 be constructed on tho existing hard surEace area on the east side of the building and acaesa to thi5 lot will be pravtdad conforming to drawings dated June 29, 1982. In additlon, the conditional usa permit shall be reviewed by thc: City on an annual basis to determino whether sufficiant parking spacea uxist for the continued use as a aommunity resouroe center. , Adopted tt~i~ 4th day of August, 1982. ATTESTi (SEAL) C a rman \~ Pu c Wor s Community Deva opment D,irector ._----~-~- - ~. ~ ; ~ ~ ~~ ' . MOUNUS V1GW I'LANNING COMhIL5StON ~ . i ~tI'F~T,II'I'1':~M Nn. SIl-A2 • . ' ~~ C1'1'Y UI^ MUUNUS V1liW ~ ~. , ~~. COUNTY CF RAMSGY ~ -~ I STATG OF MSNNE50TA . RCSOLUT7C`N RCCOMMGNUIPiG TIIC AMENDING TO CIIAPT6R 4U OF THG MOUNDS VIGW MUNICIPAL CODG RGCARDING SCNIOR CITIZGN IIOUSIKG ~ WNEttCAS, the City of Mounda View has .rece~.ved a request to ' cohetruct a 40 unit senior c.itizen housinq project; and ~ WHEREAS, the Mounda View Municipal Coda does not address ~ deaign criteria for senior citizen housing in itg zoning sectiunst and WHEREAS, the Flanning Commiasion finds the need~to regulate theae typo$ of dovelopments £rUm a zoning perspect.ivei and WI~L'R~AS~ the Planning Cammisa3on hns met; and is recommending, that aenior citizen housing b!: included as a conditional use ln an R-4 res:ldential district~ and ~ WHEREA3, followiny sur~~eys conducted of, other senior citizQn ~ ptnjects in the metropolitan area, the Planainy Commisaion has eatabli3hed a definition for senior citizen housing and also specific parking reqt~irements~ ' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RBSOLVED L•hat the following coda clarificationa ara beiny recommend~d: 48.02, Subd. B(all definitions follow.ing senior citizen hnusing wauld be renumbered) Soniur Citizen Housi ar that port•ion o£ a ar Inaxe ~£ the unlts els'over 60 years o£ both.membe.rs over 60 40.07, Subd. H iq. A residential housi.ng development, housing devclopment, in which 60 percent are doaigned for occupanr_y by individu- age or by an elderly couple with,one o•r yeare of aqe (M10.13~ Subci: D). (28) Senior Citizen Houaing. At loast a total of nne (1) apace per hous?nq unit including not 19se then one (l) designated handicapped space per,handicapped housi.ng unlt , and at least 258 of the totel epacea ehall be na lesa than 11' by 20' or equivalent angle atall, inaluding the deaignated handi.cappad Apacea. 40.13, Subd. D (4) Senior Citizen tioueing. . ... ,__.~ , T ~- Mounda ViQw Plcnning Commi~sion Rosolution No. 58-82 Page 2 . , ,-^~. i a. Sixty porcant or moro oc Cho units, exclusivo of any 1 ' or.cupied by the carotaker,,ehall bo dodignatod for ~ occupancy by the eldarly for a duration oE ut laaet ton j . yeare. No amQndment to the conditional use permit that ; changes the designation of these unita for occupancy by thd eldnrly i~hall be mada wi.thiri ton yenrs. Any such emettdmant after ten years muat be a,dopted by a 4/5 vote of the mAmbora of the CiCy Counci].. ' b, if requf,red by the City, the owner of the property shall record a rovenant on the proporty exc~cuted in a form eppzoved by th~ C3ty whi.ch indiaatea the facC that the ~ property is designated for occupancy by the elderly. ; c. The development is assisted by the U.s. Denartment of Houoing and Urban Development under ona of its programe for housing low and moderate incomc e1~lerly or such housing is conatructed and/or operated by a pcofit or a no~-profit organization which can demonstrate experience and a commitment to houuinq for the olderly, and provided such agency shall r.acord at least a 20-year covenant and other land use controle on the property, execuLed in a form approve3 by tha City, which will limit use oP the property or a portian tbereof to the occugancy ~`' by the elderly under the terms of the provisions governing ~Y, senior citizen housing. d. The„development providae for a lounge ur other inside common areae amounting L-o at leaet 15 aquare feet,Eor each unit. e. The devalopment is provided wi,th other special features whlch meet the needs of low ancl moderate income elderly pereone. ~ E. The aite shall be of adeyuate sizo to accommodate the require3 number of parking spacea should the facility aonyert 60 other R-4 permitted uses, and wlll,meet,thQ rNquirements of Sect.ion AO.D5, "Ynrd itoquirements". Adopted this 4th da,y of August, 1982. ATTESTi C a r:;~an (S£AL) ,_., Pu`5 c or s Commun y Dev~,opmen~ DiYector - - ~~.~~.e...~-, , MOUNDS VICW PLANNINC COMMISSTON ,/"~ RGSOLUTSON N0. 59-02 1 -~ Ct'PY OP MOUNDS VILW COUNTY OF RAMStY ~ STATG OC MINN[:SO'PA RESOLUTION ItGCOMMENDING APPROVAL OP TI~C DEVGLOPMBNT OF A~SSNIOR CITIZEPI PROJ~CT AT IIIGIIWAY 10'AND T.ONG LAKE ROAD AND APPROVAL tlP A VARIANCG FOR REDUCED PARKING SPACGS i WHEREAS, unit seninr cit ~ ~ Long Lake Roadj I. WHEREAS~ eld~:rly housinq the City ha~ received a reques{: to consl:ruct a 40 Lzen honaing project at the corner of tlighway 10 and and the Flanning Commission finda a dofinita need for in the City of Mounda View; and i WHERE.BS, present City CodQ does not specifically address design criteria for senior citizan houaing projecte, including their parking requirementaj and WHEREp9, under present code, a development of this t pe would be classi£ied as R-4, High Donsity Residential,'requiring 2~ parki.nq ~~ apaces per unit., totalling 100 spaces of which ane per unit shall be a ~~) garage; and ~ WHEREAS, through surv~^.;s of similar housing in Che metropolitan area, it was detc~rminod that tho occupanta of thi~ propose~l hulld.ing do not need the number oP spaces as required by existing codej and F'I WHEREAS~ the Planning Commission is recommendinq an additio'n"tio the Mounds~View Municipal Codo which adciresses senior citizen housing and parkiny requirements; and i`I WHEREAS, a variance aan be granted where a unique situation =_nd hardship exists; and WHEREAS, undo hardship and possible loss of federal funding for the project may result should approval be dclayed until such time as the proposed code additions are adopked by L•he City CouaaSl; NOW, TH~REFOR~, BE iT RESOI~VED that the Mounds Giew Planning Commisaion recummends to the CiCq C~uncil approval of 8evelopment of the proposed 40 unit senior citizen housing project at the corner of HighWay 10 and'Lony Lake Roadj ~ bE IT FURTHER RESOLVED~that the Mounds View Plunning Commissiun I recommends approeal of a variance to the sequired numbex oY pnrking - apaces (fram 1Q6 to 40) based on the followinqs ~~ 1) At L•he presenk time, the code clarif.icetions beinq recommended ara nnt in effect. Mounds Viaw Planning Commission Rasolution No, 59-82 Pago 1~0 ^ ( 2) Existing Mounds View Code ~oes not dQliniate specific eriterla for senior citizen housinq, inclu~ing parkinq requirementa. 3j Dalays in approval of the project, until such timQ es the cade covering senior citizen housing is adopte~ may cauae loss of Eedural funding for tlie projnct and subsequQnt withdrnwal of tha request. The varianoe approval ahall be conditioned on khe followinq: 1) Five handicapped spaces (12' by 20', one per handicapped unik), 5 ovezsized parking spaces (11' by 20')' a~d 16 regular spaces ~9h' by 20') be constructe3 at the atart of the project. An additional 14 reqular parking spaces shall be constructed before oceupancy. 2j The City,shall review tha parking situation from Eime to, time to determine whether any ~nodifications to the park'inq should Ae made. ~ `~ is, 4th day Hugust,, 1982. , Ado ted th of, ~ P . ; , , ., . , . ,. i ;; ,~ ~ ~ I~~ .. ammFam. ~ ~ .. ,.. ~.~.•