HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-09-01 PC Minutes~
PROCEEDIN3S OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meating
September 1, 1982
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, Ms1 ;5112
---°------~------~-°--------------------------~•----------------------
The Mounde View Planning Coimnieeion.wae callsd 1. Ca12 to Order
to order by Chairman Mountin at 7:49 PM.
~/
:~
MEMI~?TtS PRF.3E~NT: Commiesioners Ginke, Mdereon,
Aii~r an'3ZTi~i~rman Mountin.
It was noted Comm'.esioner9 McCarthp and Warren
had excusad absences.
Commissioners Sreake was noted as absent.
it was noted Councilmember Forelund waa aLtend-
ing gnother meeting at City Hall.
~_pRE~ SENT: Planning/Engineering Technician
?•SoCion Second: Linke/Miller to approve the
uguax , 2 minutas as pxeaented.
4 syes 0 nays
There were no citizen requests ~r coc~ents from
the f]oor.
Teahnician Kampe7. repurted the developer hna
aubmiCteu a revieed site plan, bnsed on the
Planning Commissions zecoumendationa made st
the July 7 meeting.
Technician Kampel reviewed the changea made;
tnoae being the 20' setback rec~uired by code,
wiYh the building now being 20 back from the
curb; Che Rice Creek Wutershed District has
verbally approved thP projece and will be send-
ing formal approval ehortly; the homeovmere
aeeociaCion will be responeible for the snow
removal on the. road, with thz F1ra Ae.partment
requiring Che entize 25' width be plowed; the
2, Roll CaYI
3.. Approval of
Minutes:
Auguet 4, 1982
Motian Carried
4, Citizen Requeats
and Co~nents Exom
the Floo..
5. Wayne Harr Cnstr.
, Co., Property
Involved: 2908
Highway lU, R-4,
Righ Density
ResidPntial Dstr.
Caee 89-81
~ ,.....::.
q~'44.::ri::...,.. . -:.'..: ,~, . ..i: :. . .i ,'., i . y~': ' ~ ;.:i.i .+i ,. .tj „ rx ,t:~: 3 Rks'x'SY~PGS Yia~ix.M1'}.~3r~
iY . ,
Mbunde Vie~a Ylanni.ng Comniaei~n Saptembar 1, 1982
Regula~ Maezing Page Ta~o
----------------------------------°---------------°------°-------------
kttoak-down bairier hae been verbally approved by
~ the Fire Degartment, for a railroed typa barrier,
with the formal plane to go to them up~on receipt
from the,developez'g engine~er; the 40 distance
from tha nnxthe`rn Juilding to the nozth property
line now meets eaeback requirementst and a valid
accese permit to Fiighway 10 hae been verbally
approved by MnDOT.
James DuHanedet, the engineer for the deveZopmpnt,
scaeed MnDOT appro~~al had 9.ust been received in
the mail, and preeented Technician Kempel with a
copy.
Motion Second: Linke/Anderson to remove Case
rom h e table.
4 eyes 0 nay~a MotSon Carried
Mr. Herr wae given a copy of proposed Resolution
No. 56-82.
lleug Dindorf, 2901 Oakwood Drive, aeked k*ho woulrl
ba respunsibie for anow removal. Technician Kampel
xep~.Led thR hame ow~eere aosociation vrould be.
~ Chairman l~auntin,added thaC t,he eanaw wi.ll be can-
~ tained on the proparCy, and it is felt there ie
edeqnaCe atorage apace for i~.
The Planning Coauaisai.ott asked Mr. Herr how much
open epace would nnw be availabla, how the home
owners aesociation would operate, and ~ahethhr the
property ownere are ind3vidnnliy tsxed on the
proparL•y
Mr. lleBanedet replied the oyen space would be
157' . Mx. Hsrr eacplained how tiie home nwnera
aeeociacion wo~ild operate, etating that by
Minneeota statute, the~ heve the right to fila
a lien oa anyone in araars for 30 daya, and at
60 days have th~e right to foreoloee on the
propPrty, se11 it and collect the daae. He
explained that they will lat the contract fax
enow removal, and will use a front loader and
pil~e tha cnow an the bufEer zone. He also
etated they will carry a blankat hazard and
lisbilicy policy and vrill accese each homa
own~r a monthly charge,
Chairman Mountia aeked if the City conld requtra
a perfozmance bond fxom the hame ownera aesocia-
tion to aseure L•here are no problema with anow ~
~j removal. Technician Kamnel replied it could be
dealt wieh in the development agreement.
Mr. Herr also expl$ined that the property otanera
Mbunde View Flanning Co~ission Saptember 1, 1982
Regnlav Meating Page Three
-----------^~----------------------------------------------------------
r"1 aru individually taxad on the3r property, and
alna a ehare of the co~on epace.
Mr, DeBenedet statad he hae diecueeed the knock-
down barriar ta':h the Fire Department and have
agraed on what it will luok like attd how it will
work. He added ha will coma back with a detatled
drttwing , and doearibed it as a railruad sroesing
gaCe with a eteel pin with a padlock, for which
the Fire A~spart~ent will hgve a key,
Ntr. Dinedorf asked what the plane are for the
buffer epace on the eouth aide uP the pruperty.
Mr, baBenedet repliQ3 it will iacluNe the halding
pond, .^.hairman Mountin added the elevation in
the area incrc+asee only 1', and the open spnce
will be Yied to the Conditional Use Permit, which
will prohibit them frum ever building on the
prop~rty wtthout going through L•iie reviaw process.
Mr. bt.nadorf usked tha purpose of the bituminous
walkway. Technician Kampal replied the children
will use it basically for going to their bus etop.
Mr, Dinadorf asked who will pay the coat of extend-
~ ing OaTa.rood Drive up to the 25' eaeement. Chalrman
Mour.tin repliad the bQnefited property ownexe, and
adde3 t~tat Aince Mr.,Dinsdorf had already been asseased
oa hie other side, since he is a corner lot, he wi11
not be eeeeesed again. Mr. Heir, added he wi.ll,be
willing to do whatever it takes to ~et the rnad in,
Jim Hackert, 2900 Oakwoud Drive, aeked wlio will
pay for the maintenance of the walkway. Technicir~n
Kampel replied the developer wi.11,
Motion_Secottd: Anderson/Miller to adopt RQeolution
. o.
4 ayee 0 nays
Motion_3econd: Linke/Andereon to adopt Rosolution
o.
4 ayes 0 nays
It 4rae decided the Plannittg Co~ission would
~"~ meet on September 15 to wvrk on home occupations
~J and eubdiviaione.
1Motion Carried
6. Chap ter 48,
Wetlande - Recom
mendation to
City Council
Motion Carried
7. Discuea Paat
Council Actio~
and Next Agenda
Chairmen Mouatin sepozt~d the CQUncil with meeting
with MAC to diacues the operation of the Anoka
County airport, an1 the frudtrations the City has
L~ v„J
~
~
. ...._. ...
~~.
?~
Muunde View Planning Co~ieaion September 1, 19&2
Regulax 2~eetinp, ~'aBa'~Fou7C
---------°-----••-----------------------^-----------~------------------
in dealing with Che airport.
Comm~ies3oner Miller queetitfnad if anything was
eaid about tha length vereus wldth of manufactured
homes, Co avoid a long, ekinny type homa. Commieeioner
Linke replied thay muet maeC tBe UBC, which does not
aJ.low tr<~31er typee. 'Tachnician Kampsl added tt~at
the Counoil has directed 5CafE to draft an ordinance
for approval regaxding menufacturad homee, and thay
aeked that the width requirement ba addressed,
wiCh a width/?,ength rntio, with ths length not to
be more than threa times the width, excluding tha
garage.'
Teclinician Ksmpel reported the October agenda has
nothing schaduled to dato.
Motion Second: Linke/Anderaon eo adjourn the meut- 8. Ad,journment
ng at ,: .
Motion Curried
;
4 aye~ 0 nays ~
Raepectfully sub~itted,
~.~. ~~
Frank J. Kempel '
' EnSineering/Planning Technician
~ ~, ~
, ' , ~
,.. ~
,
, ~
, ~ .. ~o-. r~iw.,a,~ra}ria4 s~VAw»~~.+Y::tiiSU{u«wa~~,M~~+'t:w .iu.~;s1~+:yY.UN.M1~.r1Y.`~~t^Y~ii.c+P~4r!w, .-'3,':5's..i ~+`IY<.a~csrri~C
,_ •--.._ .. _...
MOUND5 VIEW PLANNING CODIMSSSION
RGSOLUTION N0. 5G-02 ,
~ CITY OF MOUND"u VIEW ~
' ~ COUNTY OF RAMSGY {
STATG OF MINNGSOTA ~ i
P.ESOLUTION APPkOVING THE CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT REQUGST AND DEVGLOPMGNT PROPOSAL OF
WAYNE IICRR CpNSTRUCTION COMPANY
WHERCAS, the a~plicant, Wayno Ilerr, has requested to construct
4-8 un.it aondomin~um building at a si#.e locr,ted at 2908 Nlghway l0t
and
WHEREAS, the applicant is requestfng Development Stage appreval
For this projoct under the Ylanning Unit Development Chapter of the
2oning Code; and
WHEREAS, per oxtating Zoning Code, a conditional uso permit is
regul,red Eor residential P.U.D. projecteJ and
WHERGAS, tha
flexibllity oE site
land and open apace
through conditional
WIIEI2EAS , f:hQ
~-l unit• developmenk zo
Plahr~ed Unit Developmant is intended to intrcduce
design and architecture fur the conservation of
throuqh cluatering of builcl.ing and activitids
use provisions; arid
szta plnn subm.itted meel•s mtnSmum zoning and planned
iing requir.emenks; and
WtIERGAS, the dovelopment is consistant with thc exirting zoniqg
for the property, R-4, High Denxity Rosidential; and
WHEREAS, condominium developments are allowed in an R-4, Hiyh
Density iteaidenEial ~iatrict;
NOW, THEREFORE, BG IT RGSOLVLD that the Mounds View Plr.nning
Commiasion r.acommenda apQroval of the condttional use permi.t sequest
under the Reeidential Y.U.D. Chapter of the Zoning Code provided that:
1) An upen'epace bu£fer be maintained bekween the southernmoat
condominium unit and the It-l, Singla Family ttesidenhial hroa.
5uch open space. ahall be na leas thatn 156 feet from north to
south.
2) The full 25 foot roadway width be maintained during all seaeons
Por emazgency vehicle access on all etreets wlthin thia ~~aveiop-
ment including the 25 foot road easement to the south o£ this
property.
3j The desiqn of the knock down barrier be submittPd and approved '
, by the P3re Chief prior to conditional use permit final approval.
..,.
~,/ 4} A landecape plan shall be submitted to confcrm wi.th Chapter 40.22,
Subdivision B(10).
Planning Cummiseion
Resolution No. 56-82
Page 2
/^1
5) Public pearing nolices roqarding the condit•ional use permit be
aent to a11 property owners within tho f.ollowinq areai
a) South of Highway 10 - the area east of Spring Lake Road,
ndrth of Countiy Road I and wast of Groveland Road.
b) North of Higho~ay 10 - within a radiue of 350 faet of the
north properCy line of this development.
6) Per the copy of aite qlan date~ Auguat 25, 1902, ~he follawing '
itemo delineatad on this plan should be maintained:
a) Mot~hernmoot bui2dinq setback is 40 feet from kiighway lU.
b) Uistance betwe9n buildings is 30 feet.
c) Ponding volume of .16 acre feet minimum.
d) Sixty-Eour covered and twenty-nine uncovered parking
s~aces (.4 hahdicapped epaces will be provided).
ea:SpeciEie,areas for trash collection. ~
£), As modified from the original plan, f.ire flow to this ~
development shall be 1,500 gallons per minute at a minimum.
g) Sanitary aewer aervica to connect to existing main at
Knollwood Drive and onkwood Drive. "
h) Croes easement access to property to the east off of
Highway 10.
i) Northernmost garage setback to be 40 £eet Erom Highway 10.
Adopted this lat day of Saptember, 1982. ;".
~ , ~ , . ; :.,
c a rman ''
, ~ ~. ~ ~rector a Pu ,c Works Commun~ty ",
Development
I
; . , , ,, ... .,, .. ~ .: ..
.. ~<,.,, ,r .
MpUND5 VIliW PL11NN1NC COMMISSION
RGSOLUTiON NO, GO-f72
CITY OP MOUND9 VIGW
~'~~!'" ' rOUNTY OP ttnMSEY
STATE OF MINNE50TA
RGSOLUTION,~R~COMMCNDING ADUPTION QF CI9APTER 48,
, , . "WGTLANDS", TO THG CITY COUNCIL
WHF,AEAS, the Mounds View Planning Commiasioli recognizes
that wetl~nds aie critical to the health, eafety and welfare oE
ttie Cityt ane
WHEAEAS, ~ wetlands subcommittee hae bee:: organized to
study the wetland issue; and
~.~~ WHGP.EAS, this sulacornmittee has presented ~ko the Planning
Commission a draft copy oE the proposed wetland ori:inance for
° review and commenti and
WHCRCAS, it is the Planninq Commission's desire to maintain
a consistency betipreen the watland ordinanco nnd the aoning ordi-.
nance, subQivieion ordinance and the ed~pted Comprehensive Plan
of the City;
,~
NOW,. THEREpORE, II~ IT RESOLVEU that the Mounds VieW Planning
u~ Commission hae reviewed and determined that draft'.No. 3 of Chapter
"~' 48 eptitled, "Wetlands", is c~nsistont with the goals nnd policies
o£ the Mounds View ~omprehenaiva Plpnl
HE IT FURTHEA 1iE50LVGD that the Mounds ~'iew P1ann~.ng.COmin3.g-+~
sion hereby zecommends to,the City Counail adoption of 6hia CHtlptes
of the Municipal Code. '.
,~
Adopted thi~s l~t day of Septemhez, 1982.
ii'TTE5T s
' C a zman
„
,
.(S~*SL) ' ~ ~
Public Works Commun ty Development
Director
~,
-` , ~ ,
~ ~ ~
~, , '
5.!
M+IWr : Lv~F~,{x..~ elabksm :/~i~i{~i[ fPY_>~d~X.tSF+ ~h ~J_, ~ , 1 - .•'•
a r.rar, k, tE :~~s-z}rb a`W:aP,f:;~ a~.r, r...rc.s i e ~ n::, rt,:sri~'M7k"~~r ~Y~r'~"~:~ .~ s'~.~~~ i' ,.~;~