HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-03-07 PC Minutes~ PROCE6DINa8 OF TH~ PLANNING COMMISSION
~
~~ ~ ~ ~~ ;'~F,,, ~ RAM3EY COIINTY,~MINNESOTA
. ~., ~ ~ ,t~ i~., ~
Regular MeeCing
March 7, 1984
lflounde View City Hall
2401 Hvry. 10, Mounde Vieor, MN SSLI2
-'~------------------~_---~-~------------------~---^---------~---~---°
Th6 kioustde View Planning L`ommieeion wne called to
order bp Chalrman Mauntin eC 7s31 PM.
MII(HEltB P%£SENTr Comneiesioners ,Andereon, Snrgent,
orn un~iT7er, Johneon, Lauterbach and Quick,
and Chairman MounCin.
It was noted Conmiieeioner Warren was abeant due to
11l.nese .
AL80 PItEBENT: Clerk/Adminiatrator Pauley and
c or e/Gommunity Daveiopment Director Thetchar.
It wae noted thet Councilmember Blanchard was
abaant. u"ommiueianar Quick agreed to repreeent the
PlanninR Corimieeion at the next Counr.il meeting,
'~~~ Cierk/Aslminis~ra~oz Pauley introduced Direceor
~,,1 Thatcher to eha Planning Commiseion.
Motion Second~ F'orelund/Andereon to approve ehcs
7anuary , 984 minutee ae presented.
8 ayos 0 naye
~. Ca11 tc.Order
2. Roll Gg17.
3. Approvel of
Minutes:
January 18, 1984
Motion Carried
There were no reeidents requeets or commenta from
the floor.
The new Plenning Commieaionexa, Peter Sargent,
Betty Johneon and Mika Lsuterbach eigned their
oath of oPfice. Chairmen Mountin wolcomed them
to tne Planning Copmniseion.
Motion Second: Quick/Lauterbach to table thie item
ant t e axrival of Jahn Johneon.
y.
~'~1 8 ayee 0 nays
~se~/
~i, ReeidenL•e Re-
queete and
Comonents from
tho Floor
5. Naw Plsnnina ~
Commieeion
Member Inaugura- {
tion ~
b. Chriatopher Co.,
Case 148-84
Motion Carried
Maunde View Ylanning Commleelon March 7, 1984
Ra~ular Pieaeing
^---------------°----~-------.,_---------°--------~---- Page xwo
-----°------^---
!""' Clerk/Adminiatrator Peuley advieed the Co~nieeianere 7, Baim Conetr, Co,
that the Council had diacueaed thie item at their. Pinecreet Addn,
agenda aeseion, and with the knowledge that the Recou¢nandation
Planning Commiasion wae prepared to adopt tha to City Council
reealution, they directad Staf£ to go ahead and Regarding Hwy.
prepare tiieir reealution, for ~pprovsl at the 10 Median Cut
March 12 meeting.
Motion Sacond: Forelund/Miller to adopt Fesolu-
C on o. -84.
8 apea ~ nays Motion Carried
Clerk/Admtnistratar Pasley questioned if there 8, Action Items:
wae any epecific infoxmation Che Planning Lot Frontagej
Commiseion required, su Staff could prepare it P.U.D. Aiacueai.on'
£or the next agenda meeting, Overnight Park-
ing
Chairman Mountin e~cplained the Planning Commiseion ,
hae prepared a list of iteme to keep current, and '
they will re.main on the liet until ~t~ey have been ' ',
diecuaeed sndlor reeo2ved.
Thare was ~i~auesion as t4 whether there is an ~.~~
,
~) overnight parking problem, wi.th a epecific apark-
ment location mantioned. It wae agreed to review ~`~
~" ~
Cha
t~r 81 a
the
xt a
d
e
i
Cl
rk/Admi
i- ~
~~
p
t
gen
ne
a s
ss
on.
e
n ,
strator Pauley advised he would have Police Chief
Ramacher do a review of the situation and prepare ~` '
~~'' ' ,
~
a surmary for the agenda seseion. He alea auggedted
diecuesing the isaue with Attorney Meyers, to sQe if ~
it could be required to have a perking gazage for
eacti apurtment •tented. ~
It waa slso agreed that Staff would research the
aitustion for the lot fraitta~e discussi~n, speci-
ficalZy for pie ehaped 1ots.'
Clerk/Administratos Pauley explained L•he purpose 9. Appointment of
of the Citizena 509 taek force. Pater Sargent to
Citizene 509
Commieoioner 5axgent anked that Commlaeioner Task Force
Forslun8 be the alternate for the poeition,'due
to her experience in that area.
M~otion~ S~econd: Miller/Anderson to appoint Peter
argen5 t to the Citizens 509 Taek Force, with
Charlotte Forslund as alternate.
~ 8 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
4foundo View Plgnning Commiesion Masch 7, 1984
Regular Ydeeting Page Three
°-------------------°-~~--------------------~----------------------
/"-1 Motion 9econd~ Forelund/Lauterbach to romove the 6. Chrietopher Co „
tam xam t a table, ~ Eaet 1/2 of Lot
2 aud all of
B ayee 0 n~ys Lote 3 Chrnugh
lI, Nordling
Terraoe, Includ-
St. Stephen
A P~~ 0 U~ D ing Uedic~ted
Right-oP-Way
Caee 148-84
(~ontinued)
Motion Carrind
Mr, Johneon briefly raviewed hie memo of March 2, to
the Planning Ccuunission and CSty Council, outlining
hia revic~w commante of tha plan. Ha etated that,
in conclueion, the plan eaeme t~ meet tha intenelon
of the exieting codce and Ci.ty requireme~nte fnr the
pxeeent time, but may not aerve to aseiet in resolv-
ing the long term isaues of storm water management
for propertiea cutside the eite.
Tt was agreed tl~at the eituation would fall into a
polic:y iseue.
( ) Mr. Juhneon questinned ho~v far the City could go in
~`+-r-' reqairing ona property owrier to eolvc all, the
problems. He pointed out Mr. Andereon owna lQ acres
of the 50 ecre groblem, and aeked whether he ahould
ba raquired to solve the problem for everyone. Ha
reviewed the situation ahd etatad that the plan, ae
pree~nted, should not present ~ flooding problem for
the surroundinA buildinga; howover, if County Roed I
is updat~d in the f~uture, it could become a problem.
Clerk/Adminietrator Pauley pointed out there are
alternativ~e besidea the developer's gond, aueh ae
the church pond.
Co~tente from the Planning Co~iseion included that
this i.s one of the nicest projecta the Gity has seen,
but that even though the developer ie exceeding
9eet~.ng all requtremente, there could be a problem
in the futuxe..
Mr. Jahnson etated that Chrietopher Companies has
indi.cated thet if a feasible solution is suggeeted,
they would be willing to work towerd it. He also
pointed out that the Ci.ty is cloae to determining
the fntuxe uea of money Eor the etnrm systeme for
,i~ the next Pive yeara.
~°j0' It wae queetioned whi, determines which option is
used for the sanitary sewer. Mr. Johnsun replied
that baeically, the City does not need the extre
Mouttda Viaw Planning Commiseion March 7, 1984
keaulax Meeting Page Fqur
' ------~-----_^__°_-^-----°----------------------------------~------
1~ eew~r t4 taka care of, The developer ie •villing to
i build Che aystem, to ~ity epecificaCion, and he nould
~ either keep it as hia own, or could have ~he City
; muintain it.
C1erk/Ariminietrator Pauley added that the dasign of
the sower ie acceptable. Ha alea poinCed out it
h
Cit
d
i
h
'
oes
y
c
t
e
would be on private pxoperty, wh „~
~
not normaily maintain, and the eyRtem would be *
~
very axpenaive to meintain. ~i
It wae quaetioned whether extending the pond on the 'O~t ~
°~
north and of the ~ite would help the eitu¢tion ~~ ~
~
£or watsr retainaga, and if ahnping would help. °~ +
~'Y
Mr. Andereon ouC21n9d Che planned conatruction
ment
d the devalo
l
h
t Ch 1
~~
p
annR
a
ey p
echedule, etati.ng C o
as a continuoue pro~act. ~ ,D
Mr, Johneon stated one option could be to bring the
garagas up higher to be prepared for the 50-100 year
stornt. He aleo explained that shaping the pond would
not help as it would become very baggy and not draln,
and he Wculd prefer to see the eides sloped.
~--~.. The requirement for £encing wae discussed, with Mr.
! Andereon atating they plan on fencing along the norih
~ dide, beliind the garages. It wae also pointed out
that fencing wi12 not relieve anyo~e of liability,
nor ie it a guarantee for keeping children out nf
the ponding area.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised addreesing the
fenciug isane in the resolution, as the developer has
agreed to it.
There wae conaiderable diecusaiou regardin~ the St.
Stephen right-of-way, and whether onl,y half of the
right-of-way could be taken back. Mr, Andereon
pointed out the developmeat iacorporatea half of
the vacated eaeement, as the dedication procase was
not completed fo'r St. Stephen's Street.
Clerk/Adminiatrator Pauley stated he believed the
right-of-way would have to be vacated fully, but he
would have to'check with Attorney Meyera.
The CommisaionerA discuesed the *_imetable of aending
the reeolution on to the Council', with Che questione
that are up in the air, and were hesitant to send it
to the Council until aeverat decieione were made.
~j Mr. Johneon advised evaluatin~ Che St. Stephen'e
StreeC right-of-way usefulnesa within the etorm water
drain~ge eyete.m before a deciaion ie reached,
~ ,.
~ounds View Planning Commioeion March 7, 1984
Regular Meeting Pege Fivo
---------------•_•__-~---°-----^-----------------°---------------°^--
~"1 Mr, Anderaon pointed out they are prov~ding additional
easements over what ia required, and thare ehould ba ~
~ ample room allowod for changes,
Mr. Johneon poineed out tha pond caunot ba dug deaper ~
to provide more etorage, ae it muet meet up wi.th the ~/i;,~~
pipas at tha 899 elevation. He added the eaeement ,
protdcte tha City from waCer from the properCy, fle ~
eleo atated again Cha devaloper ehould not carry the ° ~
burden of Che eolution for the antire ezea. ~.• 1
Afe~r further diaeussi.on on the beet procedura to
follow, it was tha conceneua of the Commisaianera
that the questione are e ecitic enough in the ra-
aolution, that it ~ouia ~e approved and forwarded
to the Council, with languaged added to iteut 6 on
page 2 and an item d be addeci on page 3.
Motion Second: Forslund/SargenC to approve
eso ut on o. 102-84.
8 ayea 0 naye
Chaixman Mountin reported the attendeea at the
.--~, February 1S, IS84 workshop meeting *aere
~ Conuniseionere Miller, P.nd~raon, Quick; Sargent,
~ Johneon and La~iterbach, and Chairman Mountin,
Technician Kampel and Counti].mamber Blanchard.
Membere abeent wexe Commiesinner Warren, with an
excused abeence, and Comtiinsioner Forelund.
Tli~ Commissionere wiahed Technician Kampel well
with hie new employment, and welc:omed Airector
Thaf.alxer to the City.
Jim RuUer, 1916 Harbor Trail, Brooklyn Pnrk,
stated he owns the duplex aG 5055 Sunnyside Road,
and found out, in the procees af trying to puE
up a garage addition, that his property, as we17.
as the rest of the double bungelows on hix aid~
of Che atreet, are zoned R-1, rather than R-2,
and that they are a non-conEorming use in the R-1.
He explained this wae a aurprise to him, as we11
as hia neightors Fe had r„ontacted, and aeked
what could be done about it.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained that parCi~
cular bloc'K ie nat iiaeed as either controvexeiaR
or non-controvexeial on the Compreheneive Plun,
and that the entire area is R-1. He added the
~ entire lengeh of the block would have to be re-
zoned, and the Co~nise3:onera could recommend it
ba added to tha liot tha Council ie woxking on,
, ,~
t '' ~
` a
t '„~
t
Motion Carried
10. Chairman'a
Raport
Mounde View Planning Commiesion March 7, 1984
' Regu~ar Mesting Page Six
---------_~.e_____-----~^-^--°--^-~---^-----^-------~--------__-~^--^
~/"~"`, It wae £elt by xhe Conaniesionera that the srRe muet
have been overlook.ed during the Comp Plan updata,
and it was egreed to diecuss it at the March 21
agends aession.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported tha GalaJYoet 11. StaP£ RecoxC
preliminary plat waa aubmitted late thie aftexnoon,
and srould be on tke Merch 21 agenda for discuesion,
Ae reported the Council is in tha process of doing ~~
r.he CQmprehenaive Plan rezaning, and it couid taka ~~
quiea e while, due to tha nuraber of hearings that ~ ~
muak be held. ~~~
Chairman Hotmtin asked for. a recommendation £rom
Staff on how t,o flag tha Comp Plsn on areae that
orill need work in the next review process.
Moeion Second; Andareon/Sargent Co adjourn the 12. Adjouxmqent
meet ng aC :35 PM.
B ayes 0 nays Motxqn Cazx:~ed
~ ~ Reepectfully autmfi ted,
~..~
~ Stev~~~ er
°ubli,c Works/Commun{,ty Deye].opmenC D~ecta~r
,
~ ,
„
, ~
, ~
~
~
~tf.t=„x . . ..,,. _,.:... , ..,,....
MOt1NDS VIRW PLANNING COMMIS5ION
PF,SOLU'CIUN N0. 1U2-94
~ C[TY QF' MOUNpS VIBW
CUUN'CY OE RAMSEY
' 67A'PR Ot MINNESOTA
~~ RECOMMENDATION 'CO THR CITY COUNCIL RF.GARDING
k~LANNING CA5E 148-84~ CHRISTOPH~R COMPANIES
tdHEREAS, Mr. Chrie Anderaon of Chrlatupher Companies has
roqueated City approvnl r,o conetruce a 233 unit apartment within
the City of Mounds View~ and
WfiEREAS, c~netruction of thesr ~partment un1t5 as requested
would requir~l epprotat oE a majnr aubdivSsion (combining 10 lots
Lnto 1), £lood plain use permit, right-oE-way and easement
vacation, reeidential planned unit development/conditional uso
permit, and developinnnL• anprovalj and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviehod the staEP
r.eport alony witb informatinn aubmitted by thQ applicant which
tncludes the Eollowing:
a) developmont and lahdscape plan
b) site aurvey
/"'\ c) site grading and utility plan
~,1 d) ~,roject summary
e) ill.ustration of: ~imilar charactar propose3 For the
projoct
f) ~videnco oE site contr.ol
g) storm aster management calculations
h) location mapi and
WHEkEAS, the Planning Commissinn lias also reviowed this
propusal tor confqrmity to all eelavent chapters of the Municipal
Code, apeciEically Chaptera 40, 42, 94 and 49A and State Statutesf
and
WHeREAS, this proposal meets all requiremants uf ChapCars
4Q and 42 of tho Municipal Code= and
WHEREAS, a permit has been obtained Erom Rice Croek
Watarsheu Districtj and
WHEREAS, Mr. .TOhn Johneon, the City's consultant engineer
ha~ reviewed the nlans and t.'inds that the follow~ng items need to
be resolved in the finA1 submission and approvalz
a) Tho watermain sizing end loopin~ must provide adeyuate I
Eire flow.
b) Tha interim storm drainage plan appeara ko meet cucrent ~
Chapter 49A requiremants but lony term area-wide
~
drainage impacta may result in additional ponding
storage being raquired.
~,,, ..::,,..... .... .._,Y __.:..,,_ , .., .. _.__
a~socu~rioc~ No, to2-aa
YAGE TWO OF THRGK
/~, c) per the eayu{r.emanhe oF Chaptar 49.07~ 9u6A, 4(n1~
' nntificakinn to the Commiesioner oE Neturel Resourcoa
ahould bu mad~ prlar to r~ubmiCCel tn hha Councll= and
HHEltEA9, the sanltary eawer aystem propoaed appeprs to meet
the CiCy of MounAs Via~o criteria~ and
WNERLAS, easements Eor drainage purposeA ahall be provided
and recoeAed por the plans aubmittedi nnd
WHEREAS, the Firo ChiaE has reviewed this developmant
propoaal Eor canformity with all applicable flre codes and finds
it to be in conPnrmlty with all Eiro codee reviewedi and
WHF.REA5, the Rico Creok Watershed bistrict hae reviewod
thie propoeal and findr, i: to be in conEormance wi12 a21 Codee and
regulaEione of the Rice Creek Watetehacl Diste~ictt
NUW, TIiL•'NEFORE, lih IT RESOLVED that the Mounds Viaw
plar.ning Commtseion rec~~mmenda approval of the roquoet by
Chrietopher Companies of tha following:
11 A major subdivislon combining 10 lotn into 1 lot.
2) A conditional use parmit allowing khe extraction oE
~/'1 maCarials within the rlood plain zoning diatrict.
i
~~ 3) A flood plain use permit wM ch allowa the excavation/
placement of Eill within the Elood plain zoning
diatrict.
41 vacation of the existing 10 Eoot utility and drainuge
easament between exisking lots 7 and 8.
5) Vacation of the existing 25 drainage ea~emenY.e {Document
No. 163496) between existing lota 4 and 5 by relocating
und expanding the easement north nE its existing loca-
tion to the detentiun basin area. All opon areae east
and wost of tho garagea located on the nor.th end of the
property, and all property to a distance of 200 Eeet
norCh of the northern most surface oE the garages
located along the north end oE thia development !n
addition to the oxsting 17.5 foot easement along the
weat pro~erty line shall be oasementod, fSee map fnr
easement lncation.)
6) Vacation oE the existing St. Stephen Streot right-ot-way ~
£rom Bronson Drivo to County Road I conditioned,upon
the retention oE st•orm water drainage/atoraye~easeTant ,
ahould it be determined to be necesrary f,or future storm ~
„„,,, wat'er drainege/atorage by the Storm Water Management
j` 1, Plan. 1'ha existing right-of-way west ot• the cenCer line
~`~ ahall ~evert ko and become par.t of the Nordling Tarraco ,
plat and the existing right-of-wny east oE tha center
~
t
pupr„ ... ...,..,,.. _ .,..... ._ . . . ............. _ . . ,. „ , ~ _ . . ....„.
RE30LUTION N0, 102-84
PAGE '.THREE 0I~ T}lRBE
~ lino aholl ravart beck to and 6ecome paet of thu
proper,ty ownod by 0he eands Apartmenta,
7) A condltional ua~3 pr.r,mit fnr the r,onetruction oP. the
developmont proposed ur+ing the residenElal Pianned tiniE
Developmont sectione oY the Municipal Zoning Code~
BB IT FURTHF.l2 RFSOLVF.D that notiEiostion to the
Commisefonur c~C Nal•ural Rasouccus bc~ givan of the condltionul uso
permit prior to Aubmithal to Che Council Eor public hearing
purpoees~
8E IT FURTHER RESOLVF,D that a development egreement be
entered into batwoon the City and khe developer which includes the
following provisinna:
a) Exhibita:
1) eito grading end utility plun
2) site dovelopment and landacape plan
3) site survey
4) color photographs of pr.opoaed develapment
5) ~asement map
6) lagal deacription
7) Ordinance No. 49A 7-yoar performance bond oE $1,000 .
8) building planq an<i apecificationa
," -.~
~~~ ~ b) Socutlty Eor the development in an amo~nt to be
deter.mined.
~ ol f:xhibiL 2A Co r.oquira tho followingt
1) paymont oE all City expensea above and beyond amounta
' previo~!'Sly submitted,
2) Other items as may be required by the City Council.
c1) Fansing, ne~t less than 42 inchea in height, be
constructed Eeom ttie endb oE Lhe northornmost gar~go
building ho ti~a eaet and weat proparty lines with a gato
for enow removal purpoaea.
~ BE IT rt1RTHBR~RE,OLVBD that the Mounde View Planning ~
Comm~saion directa sraf.E to Eorward this resolution to the City
" Council prior to apNroval of the minutes. '
Adopted khis 7th day of Match, 1984.
i
ATTEST:
, Chairman
l i (SEAL)
i~~i
' D Ye~etor oE Pu 1 c Worka
CommUnity Development
~ . ,. .:,,..,. _ ~: ;,,
» ~~ u.:... ~,_,,..,,~ as;:~_ ~ , . ,~„~ ~ . , _,. ~
.. _. _ . . , ,,i,~
MOUNUS VIL'{V rL11NNING COMMTSSION
RGSOL~UTION N0. 103-84
/'1 , (;I'1'Y Oi~' MOUNUS ViL'W
j CuUNTY ~F I3Ab18GY
`~ S'I'A'1'L; Ol' MINNL•'SOT'A
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL R~GARGING
HIGHWAY 7.0 MEDIAN CUT FOR PINECREST PROPGP,TIES
~
i
WllEltLnS, n. reyu~sl• has been rac<iivad by the City to conaider
the faaelb111ty of a controllad intereection modian cut an iiighway
10 midway betWeon County Road li and County Road H-2j and
WH£RGA~, this request la planned in con3unction with propoeed
d.avAlopment of the pruperty north o[ Hiyhway 10 known as Yinecrest
Additioni and
WHF,AEAS, Planning Distrlet 2, which the Pinecrest Yroperties
and oLher vacant parcels Eall within, and its transportation plan
cail for a median cut on Highway 10 between County Road it and County
tto¢d N-2 in ordcr to providc for emcrgency acccas as well as a workable
traf£ic pattern; and
WHEkEAS, preliminaxy traffic analyees indicate that development
iolrhin the Pinecrest Addition nnd ottter vacant par.cols in Planning
uiatricr. 2 would require a median cul• on kiighway 10 between County Road
~~~ H and CountY Road it-2 in order to alleviate
~otential traf£ic problems
at the interaection of r_ounty Road H/Highway lU anU county Road H-<'/
~-' :ligtiway 10; and
WHEREAS, tha Planning Commisaion concurs that the City should
investigate the fcasibilil•y oP this (~roposed controlled intorsectlon
median cutj
NOW, THCREFORE, BC IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planninq
Conunission recommends to the City Council that a resolutiob be adopked
by the c:iky C.ouncil reyuesting the Minneaota Department of Transporta-
liott pursue the feasibility of a conkr,olled intersection median cut
bahween County Road H and County Road I3-2 on Highway 10 for the future
road connection ~nd development of the Pinecrost Addition;
~.~
BF: IT NU12TH~R RLSOLVL•'U that tha Mounds View Planning Commi[csion
directs staff to Corward this resolution to the City Council prior to
apProval of the minutes.
Adopted L•hia 7th day of Maroh, 1989.
ATTEST:
, , (SEAL)
i
~i
C i~rman ~
D r.ect~ of Pu'l._ic Work~
Community Davelopment