The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1984-06-06 PC Minutes~ ;. I'R0~7EEDIN08 OF THE PLANNTNO COIR~SI98ION ~ OITY OF MOUNDB VIEW MM6EY COUNTY, MINNEBaTA Regular Meeting Juna 6, 1984 Mounde View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounde View, MN 55112 ...................................°_----------------------------------°- Thr Mound~ Vi~w Planning Cortmieaion wae called to 1. Cail ta O:dar ord~r by Chairman MounCin a~ 7i?4 PM on J~ne 6, 1984. MEMBERB P1tE8ENT~ Coaoni~oion~re Andereon, Miller, c, nrgen , Warren and Chairman Mountin, It wa~ nobod Chat Commiseioner Forelund and Leutmrbaoh had exou~ud abeenoee. C~mmieaionar ~ohn.on wea alau no~ed ae abeent. ALBO PRLBEDiTi Fublic Worke/Cortmmnity Development C xan or atr.hsr and Councilm~mber Slanchard. Modion Banondc Wsrran/3argent to approve tha May 2, m nuC~e as praeentmd. aye~ 0 naye Thars worm no reeidente requesta or co~ente from tho Etoor, 2. Roll Cali Motion Carried 4. Residents Re- queate and Cort~enta Erom the Floor Disactor Thatcher preeented the Plann.ing Co~iesion 5. Bay Weet, Inc. wiCh eita plans and a proposed reaolution for the 4751 Muatang Ln. davalopment. He raview~d the request of the applicant Case 154-84 ~ kn coneeruct a 10,100 equare foot office and warehouse building. Ha explained that Bay West, Inc, repaire oil linee and othar linae that break, and he reviewed the planning coneideratione for the pro~ect. Daniel Rickunann, of Ackareon Building Corporation, introduaed himaelf and Rondi Exickoon of Bay Weat, Inc. He etated they hava already made application to the Rice Creek Waterehed Dietrict, and are on that agenda for June 25. He also explained hie engineer hae not ~,/at finiehed his c~lculatione for Ordinance 49, but he wiJ.l be bringing them inL•o City Hall later in the week. ~~r. Richmann etated they are aeking for final eite plan approval and pro,~eat approval. He also asked for a clarification on the cost of improvements, as worded in the Staff Report, and also of etipulation ~k2 under ;,. Mounds View Planning Co~tiesion June 6, 1984 Raguler Meeting Page rwo °---------------°------------^-------°--^-----------------------°----- ~xhiUit 2A aonditione. °`Chsirnnn Mountitt explained th.st in the City of Mounde View, property that ie benflfitted by a etreet c~rould pay fox their side of the street, She also e~cplainad that the Planning Commieaion ie looking epecifically at the land usa and compraheneiva plan. Chairman MounCin notad th~~ eince the Planning Commieaion did not eee a formal application for thie propoaul ar thelr reguler meeCing, they could table Che diecuesion. She added that while all requir mtente eeem tn be met, parking ahould be further addressed, Co~iesioner Warren questioned the planttQd setback, in relation tn Che landseaping that ie planned. Di.rector Thatcher exp lained they are glanning to sad into the ruad eesement, which ie not inappr4priaCe. 8e added they plan to sod any area that is tora up durin~ con- atruction, and Che aaeements ara already 3n rilace. Me. Erickeon etated thare nre 14 employeea pxeaently at their lacatiott in St. Paul, and the cruahed rock erea would b~ used for overPiow parkin~ end for parkin~ their ~!`aquipmenL•. ~-birector Thatcher noted there is ample space for the draina~c area, fle also noted that they plan on putting up a 6 cyclone fence, and ecreening ie only requirad if they were abuttin$ a residential area. Mr. Richmann atated that very few vehiclea will be moving in and out, and until Mustang Lane is fully developed, they cannot make better utilization of their propertp. He added ther4 is already a good deal of this type oE equipment in the aree already. Cummiaeioner Warren etated ehe would ltke landscaping included on the eite plan. Mr, Richmentt replied they ~af.ll add it, and bxing it in later in the week. Concern was also expxessed about drainage, which will be addressed by Chapter 40A. ~ha•lrman Mountin recommended adding a etipaLation to Che pxopoeed redolution, to include the 'Landecaping plan and approval from Ri~., eek Watershed Dietrict. MB. Erickaon asked if approval could be granted tionighC, ,based on those stipulatione, as they vrould like to begin ~ naCruction July 1, and would like to gat on to the ~ty Qouncil. Mr. Rlctimann staCed he had been told they could pzoceed with getting approvaL from the'Ciey Council, rvi.th L~~ ' Mouttde View Planning Co~iseion Sune 6, 1984 Regular Meeting PaBe Three _~------------------°----------------------------------------^------^- ~tipulation that a builaing permit not ba iseued until ~he approval From Rice Creek wae raceive~, He added he hae been work~ng closaly with Rice Creek and feels tharo will ba no probl6m getting thaC approval. Councilm~mbar Blnnchurd etatad tha Council would be willing to grant approval, with the ettpulation that approval muet be raceivad from Rica Craek. Mr. Richmann also notad they are planning on 8-10" of cruehed li.mestone in the nverflow parking area, which ehould not cauae q duet problem. Motion Second: Quick/Anderson to adupt ReaolttCion No. , recummending approval of the development pro- posal of Bay West, Inc. 5 ayes 0 nays Chairman Mounti.n asked that Staff provide the drainsge information at the next aganda seseion, as well ae an updated eite plan. Chairman Mountin noted rkie appllcattt was ttot preaent. ~irector Thatther raviewed the applicant's request, -atating that on Che aite plan, the diatance from the etreet to r_he house was 69', and Che 1' aetbnck would be 28' in length., Chaixman Mountin stated that in cansidering variances, the Planning Commiiseion sitould review State land uae lawe, and she reviewed the criteria to be considered. There wae conoiderab2e diecuesion amottg the Co~niesioners as ta whcther a hardahip was involved. MoCion Second: Warren/Sargant to adopt Resolution No. lZf9- , approving tho variance request of Charles L. Koenig at 7869 Greenwood Drive. 5 ayes 1 nay Chuirman Mountin voted against the motion ae she did not feel Chere wae a finding of hardehip , and thera was no gaxage to which the driveway would provide accase. After a Eurther dieaueaion among the Commiseioners of the cxiteria needed for granting variances and ~tting pzecedence, the £ollawirt3 motion wae.made. Motion Second: Quick/Miller to seconeider the prev ous mot on. Aiotion Carried 6, qhar:Les Koenig ~ 7864 Greenwood Dr; Csse 155-8k Motion Carricad 4 ayes 2 naya Motion Carried Mounde View Planning Cotmmiseion June 6, 1984 Regular Meating Page Four ~------^------^-------------^------^-----°-------------------------° 4'Y"'~'ommiseS~nere Warraz~ attd Sargent voted against L•he ( ~otion. Coomia~ioner Qu:ek etated the reaeon for hie motion wae they had not addresoed the iaeue bafore, and the applicant wae not praeent, and it ehould be diecueeed further befare making auch a dacieion. Commiaeionera Warren and 3argant etated they voCed againet the mntion ae they felt the original motion, granting the variance, wae eatiefactory. Motion Second; 4uick/Miller to table the item until e e next agenda aeseion, 3 ayee 3 nnys Commiaeionera Andereon, Warren and Sargent voted aga3nst Che motion. DirecCOr Thatcher mxde eome auggeated changee to the language of the raeoLution, concerning any Eurther extension to the driveway. Mo~tio~~n~Secflnd: Andereon/Warren to adopt 2ieaolution " 'V~b~-$~ as emended. '-~3 ayea 3 nays Co~iseionere Mi11er, Quick and Chairman Mountin voted against the motion. Commiseioner Quick stated he did not feel tihere was a hardship involved, and the applicent has not applied for a variance L•or a garage or further dri.veway e::- tension. Coumisaioner Miller etated ehe did not wanc to plan for tha applicant where a tuture garaga ehoul.d go. Chairman Mountin atated ehe did not feel there was a hardship tnvcJ.ved. Motion/Second: Quick/Warren to eable thia itr_m until 'tTiE next agenda aeseion. 6 aye.s 0 nays ,~`rouncilmember Rlanchard reported thexe are some legal ~{~eatione on the rezonings for K Gae and Steve's Appliances, which ara being looked into. Motien Fai,led Motion Fai.led 7. Action Item: Lot Prontage/ PUD Discuseion Motion CArried 8. Past Counr.il ' Action and Next Agenda Chairman Mountin recommended the City coneider ueing ~ Mounde View Planning Cau~ieaton Juna b 198G Ragular Me~ting ~R,ga ~~ye ---°-----~---~--~----°~--~----------°----------°---------------°----~- ,O"'~ave Liaht of Midweet Planning on the rePOninga, ~ ~ "°rhe Planning Coaaniseion directed Staft to cohtact Mr.nicht to eeu if Che languaga ie sufficiant for the rezoninga, and to have n eufficient hietory of how the recoauneudatione came about. It was noted the funding would t;ave to be approved by tho Cauncil. Director Thatchar noted nothing was scheduled yet for the ne°t agettda eaosion. The attendees at the May 16 agenda aeseion were 9. Cheirmoa's Co~iaeionera Andereon, Quick, Lauterbach, Miller, Report Warren, Fore2und and Sargent, b3rector ThaCCher and Councilmember Blanchard. Chairman Mountin asked Staff to check into when the next land uee law course would be off~red through tl~e U of M, ae it would be very helpful for the Com~iesionare, Dixector Tha.taher updated the Plenning Coffinieaion !0. Staff Repozt !"qn the H$rsCad property rezoning, etating nothing ~ !ad beexi reaeived ba~k or. it qet, and on the Richard ~--Lind variance requeat, etating that Mr. Lind had decide.d to change his plan and would not require a variance any langer. Director Thatcher reported that Holiday Statione ia propoaing to devel.op on the property weet of the inte~section af Silver Lake Road and Highway 10, where Northwest Marine i.e presentl~+ locaCed. He eteted their drawinga are available in the library, and they will be in soon before the Ylan.ning Co~iseion. Chairman Mountin notod that a conditiona2 uee permit w~uld ba required, and that if they met alI the requirements, Che City w~uld have a haxd time denying it. Director Thatcher reparted that the property known as the Church triangle ia in the procaea of being sol.d to Kinder CarQ, Tnc. He reported the Council had told the Church at their public hearing that if a c.c~py of the purchase agreemenC was received at Ciey Hall before the eecond reading oE the rezoning, they would reconeider. He added aff now has a copy of the purchase agreement, ~d if ti:e Council agreee with it, it may be back before the Planning Commiseion. .:;..,. ... ... ... .._.. „. Maunds View Plannit~g Comniaeion Juno 6 1984 Aegular Me~ting ~'~$~ S~ ----°-----°__----_ "---------------------------------^_~~-----~--_- ~ireci•or Thatcher r¢ported Building,Inspactor Roee ,ad been approaehed bq somaone wanting Co put a "'double btuigelow on an R-1 lot, requiring a rezoning to R-2 ~nd only having a 90' frontage, rather than the lOb' required. Sta£f infosmed the individual that chancee were very elim of that being approved. Chairman Mountin asked Staff to reeearch the critaria established for R-2 property. .,,,.,,,,.~ . .,. ,....... _ .a.,~:.k~<.. ,..~.~_.:.,.,,;-..._..,: . ~ ._. ,... ,3~.u ;r. ..~,.x.:....:µa ,,.~ :,r,~,,. t,,!_;... IW~1{'+~vnvlxrv ~. ~ /''~ MOUNDS VIEW PLANNIN6 COMMI53ION ( `; RESOLUTION N0. 109-84 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTX OF RAMSEY ~ ATATE 4~F MINNESOTA i~~., ~~ ~- ~ ,.e~c, ~,l•~'e RE80LUTION APPROVING VARIANCF REQUEST OF CHARLES L. ROENIa AT 7869 GREENWOOD DRIVE , ~ _. WHEREA3, Charlee L. Koen~y has epplisd far a driveway , setack variance of 4 feet~ and WHEREAS, Mr. Koenig hae proved herdehip by de£inition of 2oning Code &ection 40.26, Subd. Di and WHEREA9, the hardship includes lacation of the existing , drivoway unimproved for t:he laut 38 yearei end WHEREAS, 15 yeare ago a subdivision occurred plac}.ng the driveway closar thnn 5 feet to the properky linei and WHER6A3, the owner. Mr. Koenig, now requeate to pave and imprnye tha drivewayi NOW, THERS°ORE~ 9E LT RESOLVEA th±~t th~ Mounda View Planiiing CommJ.saion approves tha var.iance for Mr. Koenig t~ecauae of due hardshYp allowinq the drivewey to be placed within one Eoot oE the 2roperty line for approximately 28 feet= BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the remainder of the driveway and a Euture qerefle muet be 5 Eeet from the property line. „ Adopted thie 6,th dey aE June, 1984. ATTESTs C e rmen (SEAL) D ceotor oE Publ a Worka ' Community Development , ~'^~ ' 1 ,~i ! ~ ~ , a~x,..:... ._ ......... ........~r,.,,.._.,..~...,... - .,n... . , :.r,.,~,:,~,.' - ~ MOUND5 VIEW PLANNING COMMI8SION REBOLUTION N0. 110-84 ^ CITY OP MQUNDS VIEW ~ ~ COUNTY OF RAMSEY ~ ' ' BTATE OF MINNE~OTA ' RESOLUTION RECOMMBN~-ING APPROVAL O,F THE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL OF BAY WBST~ INC.~ PGANNItiG CASE 15/^84 , WHEREAS, Bay Weat, Inc. has requested Co build a 10,100 equere Coot oEEice/warehouse buildinqt and WNBREAG, Mounde View Code 5ection 59.07 requlrer dovolopmont revisw of such pcoposalsr and WHEREAS, the applicant, Bay West, Inc., hes submitted a eite plan and Elooc planj and WH6REAS, the site plart and floor plan meet a~inimum Code requiremantes and WHEREAS, the proposed usa ie elso in compllancA wi~h tha existing zoning and Comprehensive Plan deaignation~ " NOW, THEREFOAE, Bk IT RESOLVED tNat the Mounde Vlew ~-~ ,Planninfl Cammiasinn recommends approval oE the propoaal with the ( fo23owing conditiona: '~ 1) 8-6-18 curbfng be used for parking areas and araas ncoding drainage contr~l, , 2) rhaC the pplicant agtee to pave Mustanq Gane aL a future time as an emergency secortdary entrance For the industrial park. 3) ExhibLGa Eor the development agreement incl~de: a. b. c. , d. e. ! ' f. 9• Site bond Pla-s and speclEications Sito Plan and landscaping plan Chapter 49A drainage requireme~te Chapter 49A securiEy Exhibik A to include items 1 and 2 ebove Rice Creek Watershed District approval BE TT FURTHER RESOLVED that the M~unds View Planning Commission direct staff to Eorward this resolution to tha City Council prior to epproval of the minutes. Adopted this 6th day of June, 1984. ` ' ATTESTr r ~ C a rman (SEAL) ~ D rectoc o Pu c Wor e Community Development