The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1984-09-19 PC Minutes~,,;_: :: PROCEEDIN(i8 OF THE PLANNINO (:UMMI9920N ~ CITY OF MOfJND3 VIEW RAM9EY COttNTY~ MINN690TA Special Meeting 8eptember 19, 1984 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Nwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 __-~-_--___--'--~-'-'°----_-__-^-^____-___'________________^ The Mounde View Planning Commiasion was called to 1. Ccll to OrdeY order by Chairman Mountin at 7i35 p.m. MEMBERB PRE86NT~ Commisaioners Quick, Anderaon, 2. Roll Call Lautar~acf, MIller, Forslund an8 Chairman Mountin. Tt was noted thai• Commiseioner Sargent had an uxuaed absence. Commiseiuner Warren was also abaent. AL30 PRESENTZ Public Worka/Community Developmant ~ director Thatcher. Commisaioner Foralund inquired why the developer 3. Holiday 9tahion did not make a depoeit with the City for the hiring Stores, Inc, of David Licht, the City's planning consultant. '~' 280Q~Highwey 10 ! 0.UrP.~ Dave2opment ~,he deve3oper stated that the Planning Commiasion Reviuw agreed to a prasentatiort by Holiday's plannei and ~-3, HWy. Huaineas that hiring bavid Licht would have given the City Cesa 153-84 money to review the Comprehensive 21an and zoning. CommissionAr Forslund atated thak studies oE th~ following were not ine]uded in the plahning rep~rt submitted by John Shardlow of Howard Dahigren Assoc3atea, the Developer's planning coneultanti 1) Site ueilizations 2) Treffic etacking on Highway 10 end Silver Lake Road. 3) Peak hour trnffic. 4) Noiae, emmisaions and odor. Commisaioner Miller inqutred as to how the 'traEfic -; from Kinder Cara affects the Holiday traffic. Motion/Second: Anderaon/Forelund to adopC Reaolution No, I22-H4. 1 aye 5 nays Notion Fai1s LauCerbachc The developar does not adhere to + j the spirit and intent oE the Comp ~,/ Plan. ,~,. , „ .... . ... .. .. .. . „ _ . .. , .... ._ '}~~qp^~~l~Y.Y.~.~...•a r ~ ~ .. . . . .. -.• .... I! Mounde View Planning Corcmiseion September 19, 1994 + ' 8pecial Mseting Page Two _-___-___^____________________________'-°°----°--°-°-~------__-___^_~-_^ , ~ Millert The developer does not meeC Comp Plan ~~ requiremanta, ~ v Forslund: InauCCicient planning consultant roport. ; C _uick~ The Developer doea not a~Ihere to the ~ apirit and ir~Eent oE the ~omp Plan. MoUntin~ Concure with the above. Dieauasion topicet Several questione that were previoualy diecuased in thie meeting are not a»awered and need addroaeing. There ie general agreement with Commiseioner Forslund, Orte Commiaeioner believes the development is eaceptable. Another Commissioner believes the Comprehenaive Plan ehould be addressed ficet. Motion.~9acond: Lauterbar.hlQuick to adopC Reeolution ~ No, 123-84. ~ 5 ayea 1 nay Motion Carried Artderaon~ This is an appropriai:e dovelopment and ~ land use for the site. ~..~fotion Second: Quic'n Lauterbach to adjourn,Lhe meoting 7. Arijournmenb at 9s30 p.m. 6 ayes 0 nayn „ Motion Carried Respectfully°submitted, ' !~..r `y'/~~ ~ ~~ , ~ ~ Steveh W. 'Lhabcher Director of Public Worka/Communtty Development __.... .... _.~. . . ,.,..:..i. . ,. ~....a> ,. r.~~,. a~:. ~.~.~...~.~ .., ,t .......... ..: ~~.,. ... .._ y: ~, v::> .; r, ra f ' ~ . , ~nJ .. ~ _.ile_.~ ~ s ~ /'!' ~~1 /~-~'`~- ~a~Gt. MOUND~3 VIEW PLANNING COMDISSSION RESULUTION NO. 122-04 CITY OF MOUNb5 VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RECOMMENDATI0:1 TO THE CITY COUNCIL REGARUING MOUND3 VYEW PLANNING CASE N0. .153-84~ HOLIDAY STATION 6TORES WHEREAS, Holiday Station Btor.ea has requeated City approval to conatruct a gasoline/convenience attore within the C16y of Mowids Viaw; and WNERBA~S, coe~atructian of this gasolir~e/conveneince store facility ae requested requiros approval of a minor subdivision (combinin4 2 lote into 1), conditional uee permit~ and, develapment approvals and HHEREAS, the Planning Commiasion has revl.awed the Sta£f Report and has reviewed a report on the development by John Shardlow of Howard Dahlgren Aasociates, Inc., alony w1t~ in£ormation aubmitted by the applicant which includxe the following~ a) Development Plan b) Site Survey c) Project 3ummary d) Evidence of Site Controlt nnd WHEREAS, the Planning Commisaion has also revieaed tfiis proposal and it ia in conformance with all chaptera oE the Municipal Code, specifically Chaptsrs 90, 42, A9 and 49A and State Statutesr and WHEREAS, this proposal meets all requirements of Chnpters 40, 42 and d9 of tha Manicipal Codej and WHEREAS, Rice Creek Watershad District, Minnesota Departmsnt of Tranapor.tation and Ramsey County will revlew the develop~nent pcior to constructlonj NOW, THEREFORE, dE TT RESOLVED chat the Mounda Viert Planning Coramisaion recommenda approval of the requeet by Holiday Stat4on Storee of tho followinga 1. A minor 9ubdivision combining 2 lote into 1. ~~~..~ 2. The Camprehenaive Pl+~n should bs amended. i ,. , ,,,.,, '~°, ; . ., ~. ., ;~~ >,:: , MOUND8 VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION ~ RE80LUTION NO, 122-84 ~ 1 ~ , ~ PAOE TWO OF TWO y ' `'p ~ ., ,~ BE IT PURTNER RESOLVED'thaE a development apeeement be ' entered into beEween the, CiEy and the Deve3.opar which includes ~ kha fo.llowing provisions~ ;, j ~:. ~ a) ~xhibits~ r ~ '+ , 1. 91to, Grading and Utility Plen ~~?. i 2. Site, Devolopment end Landacepe Plan ~ 3. 81te survey u~ ~. Leyal pescription . 5. Ordinence No. 49A 7-Year Peformance Bond ' oE $1,000,00 A~~,% 6. Building Plana and Specificationa ~~ b) Security for the development in an amount ko be "4' ; deterenined. , .... .~ ~" , c) Exhibit 2A to require tha followings , y '? G' ' 1. Payment ~f alI City expensea above and beyond : ~ i amounts previ.ouely aubmitted. • : . f /~~ ~" ?[ ~ ' ' 2. Other items as may be reguired by the Clty CounciL ,': ~ ~,,,~,~ `" ~ 3. Maximum hours of operation,ehall be from 6~00 e.m. ~`• to 11s00 p.m. cr,, ?~~~ ' . BE IT FURTHER RESO4VE0 that a conditional use permit be ~' granted vhich includen the above itemsJ °"~ .j~~~ . BE IT FURTH6R RESQLVED that the Mounds View~Planning~ , ~; '= Commiaeion direct ataff td forward'this reaolution to the City ~,:: ; Council prior to approval of the minutea. ~~ ~ "? a3opted thie 19th day of September, 198~. tt'; , ATTESTt ~~ '' , ~ , cnauman I - i ISEAL) , ~ ,. ~~ ~ ~ , , ~ ~ _ , D rector o Pub c,Worka i ~ Comnunity Develppnaent ^ .~:....,...~..~. .,,..,.~:.:.~.~w.,..wWx. ~ .~,....,:. .., ~ir,,.. :~~.., <., , .:::~.;. ,..~ ~ ;.:~ , .k , . . ~.. ~ . ., ~rt ....i~~ +~~'Y~ K... ~''~~ MOUNbB VI~W PLANNING COMMISSIUN ' i RESOLUTION N0. 123-H4 ~,.. ° CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW WUNTY OF AAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RECDMMENDATION TO TH~ CITY COUNCIL R~dARUIN6 MOUNDB VIEW PLANNING CABE N0. 153-84, HOLIDAY 84'ATION STORE9 WHEREAS, Holidey 8tation Storea hae requeekad City , approvel to construat a gaeoline/convenience etore within the City of Mounde Viewr end WHEREA9, cor.struction of thia gasoline/uonvenience storo Pacility as requ~~ted requirea epproval of a minor eubdivieior~ (combininq 2 lota into 1), conditional uee permit, and davelopmont approvalJ and WHEREAS, the P1Anning Commission has revlewed the 6tePE Report and hae reviswed a report on tha development by John Shardlow of tioward Dahlgren Aesociates, Inc.. tl~e applicant's coneultant, along with lnfocmatlan submitted by the applicant ; ~ which includes the following: , a) Development Plan b1 Site survey c) Project summary d) Evidence oE Proper scs-~~eiaing and Lands~apingr and WNEREAS, the Developor has declined aubmitting the pSan to , David Licht, the City consultant, Eor developmant'reviewp and WHEREAS, the Planniny Commission hae also reviewed thia propoeal and it is in conformance with all chapters of the Municipnl Code, Epecifical2y Chaptera 40, 42, 49 and 49A ar~d State Statutesi and WH6RBA9, this propoeql moete all requirementa of Chaptere 4U, 42 and 49 of the Municipal Coder and WHEREAS, Rice Creek Wstershed District, Minnesota Department of Transportntion and Ramsey County will revier the dove~upment prior to conatruction~ and WNEREAS, the axisting ComQrohenaive Plan recommends thet this area should be developed medium denslty resideneial: and WHEREA9, the T+lanning Commisston has reviewed the --'~4, Comprehensfve Plan to idontify the policy and planninq issues ~ 1 regarding continued etrip.commerciel development on Highway l0i '\.n/ ~i • MOUND~ VI6W PLANNING CQMMI93ION RESOLUTION NO. 123-84 ,~, PAaE TWO 6E TWO ' NOW, TNEREPORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounde VieW Plenning Commi~uton recommende deniel of the requeat by Holiday Station Storeo based on the Eollowing Eindinges 1. Propoeed development in not in conFormance with the exieking Compreheneive Land Uae Plan commoraiel gaale and pollcies, and the apirit end intant of the Compreheneive Plan to limit commerciel etrip development on Nighway 10. 2. A development review by !he npplicant's planning aoneultent~ John Bhaedlow oF Howard Dahl~ren Aseociatee, Inc., did not eddrsse the PollowinQ plenning ie~uesi A. 9t&eking of peak hour treffic on Highway 10 and Silver Laka Road. B. TraEfic relationehip to proposed Rinder Care and the exlsting bank operati~n. j C. Ingresa and egross traffic pakterns. j' '~~ D, Noiae end emissiona. I I ~ ~~' E. GeneYal environmental issues, i 1 F. Si*.e Utilization, j BE IT PURTHER RESOLVED that tho Mounds Vlew Planning ~ Commieeion direct ataff to f.orward thts reso.lutian and unapproved ~ Plannirlg Commieaion ~ninutea of 6eptember 5, 1984 and f3eptembar ~ 19, 1984 to the City Council prior to approval o£ the minutes. Adopted this 19th day of September, 1984, j ATTE3Tt (SEAL) Cha rman i .. . D rect~"or of- Pub c Work,s T- , Community bevelopmenh. ~ ti , ., ,..