The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1985-09-04 PC Minutes4'~r~~ .,~ . ~ , , , ~. PROCE`EDT`1G9 OF THE PLANNTNO COMt4TS~IUN ~ =CITY OF MOUND3 VIEW RAMSEY COpNTY, MINNE9~TA Aagular Maeting 8aptamber 4, 1985 Maunde View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 1Q, Mounde~ View, MN 55112 ---°....-----~__'^° _°--^-------------°--°----"-----° `--"-----"^'--^°---- The Mounda View Planninq Commieeion wss oulled to 1. Call to order by Rating Chsixman Anfleraon at 7s36 PM on pxder 3eptember q~ 1985. " MEM9EA3 PRG9ENT~ Commissioners Zoliner, Millar, Forslund and Acting Chcirman Andereon. It was noted that Commissioner Rowley had an excused absence. It wae,noted that Chairman Mountin l~ad an unexcused absenca. ALSO PREBENTs Public Worka/Community Developmerit Direator Thataher. ' ._. 1 `--J Motion Seaond: Foralund/ZOllnar to agprove the Auguat 7, 985 minutes as pr.es9nked, 4 ayee 0 nays There,were no reei3ente requests or coinmente Erom tha- £loas, "' It wae noted thnre was n^ one preaent to repreeent 3~:~ J. A. Menkvel~'~& Aseoa~.at$s. ~ ~ Tha Planning Commiaeion reviewed propased Resolution No. 144-85. M~otlon~ Second~ Sallner/M111er to approva Reeolution No, lq4-tl , rec~mmending appr.aval to the City Counoil of Mounds View Planning Caea 179-85, a ma)or subdi- vioion of 2 lots into 9 lota and condit3onxl use parmit ~ for 8085 Waodlavrn Drive. ~ 4 ayea 0 naye 2. RolZ CAll 3. Approval oY _ - Minutesx ' f AugUt~t 7~ 1985 ~ Motion Carrie8 4.' 'Residents JRe- queets and Commenl;6 from tha Floor S. J. A. btenkvelfl & Aesoeiates Caee 174-85 Motion Carried , .:». a ,,...... u.,..,.... .,.:..:. ..:....... ... .:. _ .. ,, ., . ~ , ._,_ ,. r..~.Y .. ,ui., "-rc! .~ . . . ~ ylr;..~~ ~ ~ i t Mnunde Viow Planning Comm~es~on 9eptemher 4, 1985 Ragular Meeting °-^____-_____'-_^'_--°°__-~-°-'----_____-^-____`__^---- Page Two °'°_~-'___'~___-_ ~~. ~ Dire~tor Thatcher axplained thet thQ Counoil had eskad 6. Electrio the Planning Commisalon to addrese thie planning EquiFment progoeal tonight rather than waiting for their next 5ervice Corp. aqenda session, to speed up the procese. He ebatnd Case 181-85 that Staff hae reviewed the propaeal and finde no I maJor probleme wlth ik a.nd would reaommend tha ', Planning Commiseion discuse St at khie time. ' Dan Ric~nann, of Aokerson euildinq C~rporation, raviowed i khe proposed plan for the davelopment. He explained ~ they ars working on the lan~eoaping plane, tahioh wi11 be I generoue, and wi11 hava them into City Hall as ~oon ae ~ poseible. ~ Dennia 5ewi11, preaident of Electrtc Equipment Service ~ Corporation, ~xplained they presently empluy 16 people at their facility in Fri.dley, and project they will have 30 employees within the next two yeare. He reviewed ~ the planned uee of the future storage building and the o~~tdcar gravel. area. i Erian Sjoberg, buainess manaqer of Electric Equipment 8ervice Corporation, explained the process usod in the waste storage handling, and he presented a synopais of r~"~, hazar3ou~ wcnte activit•y a~ it: parbaius L•o tiieir ~: company. Ha added that everything concernina the waste is requlated by the County, as well ae by the EPAf MPCA, ,. and St~ate. Clerk/lfdministrator Pauley reported that Staff has contacted the City af Fridley and found thut Fridlay :~as had only poaitiva experience with thie firm. Ae reportal'also that they had contacted kha MFCA, who ~ will not give aut references,,but werc told that the MPCA had no negative comments to maka. ~ Mr. 6jak~+rg explained that while thay have a temporary j permit now for akorage of hazardous waste for per3oas ~ oY ;io longer than 10 days, they plan to apply for an ~ over 10 day permit in ths future, due to th~ convenirr.ce ( and coat e.ffeotiveness. He emphasized, however, that their fism is'in the biisinese of diaposing of hazardoue waete, not st~ring it, and they would have no incentive I to ever storo ::L- on thoir property. ~ Director Thatcher reviewod the con3itione recommended ~ ~n the development agreement. Ha pointed nut tk,at 10 I porcent of the proposed bul.lding would be used for ;:ha etorage oc hazardou~ ~aste. ° ~ ~'~ Mr. &ewill explained thak 1000 equara feet oE the build^ ~ ~~' ing would be diked, as the hazardoue waete would ba stored in the main bullding to etart with, and then moat lihely moved to the atorage building, once the firm has , grown enough to require that building to be conetruot~ed. Moun~a View Planning Commiseion Septamber 4, 1985 Regular Zleeting Paga ThreA ~ ~----_____-~~__-'__^_^_-__^.___-_~_~_°__~«~~_.-~----_~~--~~_~~_~-_~^_-~_--- ' / ` Commissioner Z~llner queat.loned what would happen na far as the hnzardous wastes are cancerned if there ~ were ever a fise in the building. ShA etatAd she feala ~ an obligation to th4 residente of the community to ~ coneider a12 pogsibilities and protact tham. , i Mr, 8swi11 replied there are many unknowns with nCB'e~ ~ but thay would be ylad to brinry in an of~icial position ~ fro~ thn EPA. Ho added that the wholA building will be epLinkled, , Mr. Rictunann painted out tt~e area for the hazardous waete would ba a dry sprinkling aystem. Mr. Sjoberg alao pointed ouk t.hat a disclosure would be made to tha flre department, advising them oE what type of businese was baing operated and what type af waste waa beinq stored. nirector Thatcher etated he felt there would be adequate fire protection,,,considering what ia requir.ed by the County, MPCA and EPA and the guidallnes khat would have to ba followed, '~ Cierk/AcLuta,ietrator Paulay ~dcised thut th~ ftrs depart•- ~~ ment would automatically be given information on the huilding anc~ lta operation. Cammiaeioner Foralund questioned whether an acceaeory tuildiny in the €uture would require a cond±.tional use permit,, Dizcetor Thatcher xev:lewed L•he section af the code whera aacess~ry buildings would be allowable znd he poin~.ed out that they could not possibly include in the code a11 buslnessea or servicee that could be provided. Cler;k/Rdminietrator Pauley explained the Ciny is exclud.ed from adopting anything more reecrictive than State regulationa. He added the State has the'naceseaxy pe.reonnel to inapect and control this type of operetion. Dizector Thatcher suggested including in the development agreement that the applic~nt zbide by State lawn, EPA~ MPCA and Ramsay County standarda. Mr. Richmann pointed out khe fire protection agency will regulate what type of aprinkling•ie to be used. Commissioner Zollner asked if by ailowing this campeny ~ to etore hazardoua waste, they would be op2ninq up the door to other busl.neas, wtrich eouid pzeaent problems. Maunde Yiew Planning Commiselon Beptember 4, 1985 Reguler Meetin9 ..A __°^~____-_`--__..__~..___~°_~_~___° __~_--_`__ __ °_ __~_ Page Four '^__..___~___~__-___~ ~~, Cler}:/AdministraWr Pauiey xecommended the Plann~ng Comminaion make the appropriata chanqes to the code ko aover all areae of. concern. Acting Chairman Andereon aeked that it be added to Che action item list for the Planning Commiasion. Moti~n Becond: Miller/Andexeon ta approve kesolu- t on Pio. ~-@5, r~corimonding approval tn thd C~unuil oE Mounde View Planning Case 181-85, for Electric Equipment Servica Corporabion. ° 3 ayas 1 nay Motlon Carried Commissioner ForsZund voted againsL• tha motion ae hazardous waste ie not spacifically addreseed in the code. Actinq Chairman Rnderson statad he felt that it was raquia~ed thorouqhly by the Stato and County lawa, and they laave no one in the City w~Ch the expertise to po].ice an operation oY this sort, like tl~e other agenclea would ba abla tn. Commiseionera Miller ~nB Zollner concurr.ecl with Mr. Andersor. ~ ~ '' - Dicector Thatohor ravicwed pro~osed Ree~].uti.on 7. Conaidertttion No. 146-85. of F.enoYution No. 146-85 There was discuasion on whether the ha~ardous wasta iaeve ahould be incl+aded in the,revlew and recommen- datian at thie time. It wae agreed to add a aection stating that L•he recommendation would be forti~comii:g. Motion Seconfl: ForaZund/Zollner to approve Reaolut on No. 195-85, regarding City Code Chaptera 32, 39, 40 an8 41. 4 ay~;s 0 nays Motioa Carrled Director Thatoher reviewed the requost of tha 8. Ray Bodick, applicant for a variance at 5100 Suhnyside Road. 5100 Sunnyside Road, Case Motion Second: Foralund/Zal].ner to approye 100-85 Reeol~~t.on No. 145-85, yranting a vsriance request for Ray Bodick at 5300 Sunnyei3e Road, MounBs Yicw Planning Caae 28Q-A5. , , 4 ayea 0 nays Motion Carried ~~ z ~ Mounde View Planninq Commie~iai ReguXar Meeting 9eptamber 4, 1985 ; Paqe Five ~ --__.... _...._ ~_----^~----~ °-- Diraator Thatchos Yeportad ~here were no aotion item~ 9. Actinn Itame to disouee at thie tima, and ha woulfl bo adding tha hazardoua wastie ie~ue to the naxt agenda eassion. ~ ~ Director Thatcher repozted the atter.dees at the August 21, 1985 agen8a eeesion wese Commiesionere Mi11or, ~'orslund, Anderson, Zollner, Aowley and "! Chnirman Mountin, and Publio Works/Communitp ,, 9evelopmsnt Oixactor Thataher. Dirnotor Thatoher. had no report. 10. Chairman±e Report , 11. 8taff Report I~ ~ i .. 1 . ' s .; ,1I ~~~'`_~......, .....« ,......._ ...,._,....., _ . . w~.. ~.n...r: ....:. r~...,u~..~;~.~... . .a.:..::_~m.ya ~r. . . a:,..~. ,r,.,..r . ~., . , , r.r:...... .. .....~„r...~...~ :.. :+.,+,.. . ~r . .,i,,,.~,..