HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Resolution 560-98
.
.
.
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 560-98
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR A ZERO-FOOT SIDE YARD
PARKING LOT SETBACK FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED AT
2200 - 2214 HIGHWAY 10; PLANNING CASE NO. 536-98
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request of Daniel
Hall, representing the Mermaid, and Charles Herbst, representing the Perkins property, to allow a
joint-use parking lot which overlaps the common property line between the Mermaid, located at
2200 Highway 10, and Perkins, located at 2214 Highway 10; and,
WHEREAS, these properties are zoned B-3, Highway Business District and have the
following property identification numbers (PINs):
Mermaid: 08-3()-23-43-()0()6
08-3 ()-23-43-000 7
08-30-23-43-0008
Perkin...: 08-30-23-41-00J()
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents associated
with this request:
I. Planning Application
2. Location Map
3. Zoning Map
4. Site Plan / Survey
5 Joint Use Agreement
WHEREAS, the parking lot for which this variance is requested has already been
constructed in accordance with the development plans approved by the City Council on May II,
1998 in Resolution 5236; and,
WHEREAS, exceptional or extraordinary circumstances elo apply to the property which
do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or
shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since the
effective date hereof have had no control, in that the plans prepared for the Mermaid expansion
and adopted by the City Council were in error; and,
.
.
.
Planning Conunission Resolution 560-9R
September 16, 1998
Page 2
WHEREAS, the literal interpretation of the provisions of this Title would deprive the
applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district in that the parking
is required to be installed in accordance with the development agreement and that the City Code
does allow for joint parking and off-site parking arrangements; and,
WHEREAS, special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the
applicant in thilt the site plans were drafted by outside consultants, upon whose expertise and
abilities the applicant and City entrusted; and,
WHEREAS, granting the variance requested would not confer on the applicant a special
privilege that is denied by this Title to owners or other lands, structures or buildings in the same
district in that other properties within the City have combined parking lots and joint parking
arrangements; and,
WHEREAS, the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the
hardship, in that the minimum required width for two aisles of parking with an access drive in
between is sixty feet, which is what was shown on the original development plans. The variance
requested will allow for the sixty feet to be installed according to the plans approved by the City
Council; and,
WHEREAS, the variance would not be materially detrimental to the purpose of this Title
or to other properties in the same zone in that both circulation and safety between and within the
two properties would improve while parking can be sufficiently expanded to meet the
requirements as outlined by the City Code; and,
WHEREAS, the variance would not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire
or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the
neighborhood in that the joint parking and access would alleviate congestion, improve public
safety and improve parking on both sites.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mounds View Planning Commission
acting as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals approves the variance request of Daniel Hall and
Charles Herbst, to allow a zero-foot setback for a joint use parking lot between the Mermaid,
located at 2200 Highway 10, and Perkins, located at 2214 Highway 10, with the following
condition:
1. The applicants shall execute and arrange to have recorded with Ramsey County
the reciprocal parking easement document as drafted hy the City Attorney.
Adopted this 16th day of September, 1998
.
.
.
Plmming Conmlission Resolution 560-98
September 16, 1998
Page 3
ATTEST
SEAL
:\:' DA T;\ \e; Rot iPS\CO!\If)E VIDE VCASES\53G-98\560-98A. R ES
!,-.~
Jerry t~on, Chairman
U
Rick Jopke, Co