Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout820-05 . . . MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 820-05 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL DENIAL OF A REQUEST FROM KRAUS-ANDERSON REALTY COMPANY TO REZONE THE PROPERTY AT 2544-2574 COUNTY ROAD 10 FROM B-2, LIMITED BUSINESS, TO B-3, HIGHWAY BUSINESS; PLANNING CASE NO. ZC05-003 WHEREAS, Kraus-Anderson Realty Company, representing property owner M & E Realty Company, has requested to rezone the property located at 2544 - 2574 County Road 10 from B-2. limited Business, to B-3, Highway Business; and, WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as follows: Tract C, Registered land Survey No. 414 Ramsey County, Minnesota WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents regarding this proposal: 1. Application 2. Applicant's Letter and Supporting Research 3. Zoning Map 4. Location Map 5. Aerial Map 6. Public Meeting Notice 7. Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map 8. Correspondence from Affected Property Owners 9. Resolution 820-05 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public meeting regarding this request on Wednesday, November 16, 2005; and, WHEREAS, according to Section 1125 of the Mounds View Zoning Code, the Planning Commission is to consider the possible adverse effects of the proposed rezoning and shall make a finding of fact related to its review of the request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission makes the following findings regarding the possible adverse effects of this rezoning as required by the Mounds View Zoning Code: . . . Resolution 820-05 Page 2 1. A rezoning of the property from B-2 to B-3 would adversely impact the adjacent residential properties with additional noise, additional traffic and additional parking as a result of the more intensive commercial businesses that could locate in the facility. 2. The Property does not have adequate access to support the more intense commercial uses. 3. The Property does not have sufficient parking stalls available to meet the demands of the more intense commercial uses that would be permitted as a result of the requested rezoning. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, based upon the above findings, the information and documents presented by staff and the concerns raised by area residents and testimony provided at the public meeting, the Planning Commission does hereby recommend denial of the requested rezoning from B-2 to B-3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 16th day of November, 2005. ...y' /,/ ." ...'.-..../, ,t"'~/ ~- ----..--.........- ,/',.// "., /1 /' .--'-..---..... /...... ," / _ #!--J .' / L.-t./Z;~~ " ..., \.-/,. I ~..!. Gary Stevenson, 9hairperson Attest: J" C r c.:'.o . "<J',~"'7 '-- '- L'\'"VI.-"'-...~ C..-/l"'V\,. -1.,/ James Ericson, Community Development Director (Seal)