The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08-16-2017 PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA August 16, 2017 - 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Special Order of Business A. (none) 4. Citizens Requests and Comments Relating to Planning and Zoning Issues Not Already on the Agenda. (Before speaking, please give your full name and address for the record.) 5. Planning Cases A. MU2017-001: MWF Properties. LLC: Resolution 1076-17, Recommending approval of a Development Review of “Boulevard”, a 60-unit apartment building, generally located at the NW corner of Mounds View Blvd. and Groveland Rd 6. Other Planning Activity A. (none) 7. Reports A. Upcoming Planning Cases & Activity B. Staff Updates C. Council Updates D. Planning Commissioner Reports 8. Approval of Minutes: July 19, 2017 August 2, 2017 9. Next Planning Commission Meetings: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 Wednesday, September 6, 2017 10. Meeting Conclusion Item No: ___5A Meeting Date: August 16, 2017 Type of Business: Planning Case MU2017-001 City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mounds View Planning Commission From: Jon Sevald, Planner Item Title/Subject: MU2017-001: MWF Properties. LLC: Resolution 1076-17, Recommending approval of a Development Review of “Boulevard”, a 60-unit apartment building, generally located at the NW corner of Mounds View Blvd. and Groveland Rd Introduction MWF Properties, requests approval of a Development Review for a 60-unit apartment building to be located at the northwest corner of Mounds View Blvd. and Groveland Rd. Discussion The project includes the following properties: PID Address Existing Use Zoning Comp Plan 06-30-23-31-0029 7980 Groveland Rd Vacant R-4 High Density Residential MU-PUD 06-30-23-31-0030 2865 Mounds View Blvd Single-Family R-4 High Density Residential MU-PUD 06-30-23-31-0031 2901 Mounds View Blvd Vacant R-4 High Density Residential MU-PUD 06-30-23-31-0241 80XX Groveland Rd (unaddressed parcel) Vacant R-4 High Density Residential MU-PUD A Development Review is required for construction activity in which a principal building is increased in size by more than 10%, or more than 10,000 sq ft (excludes single-family and two-family dwellings).1 In this case, the proposed 60-unit apartment building will be 25,000 sq ft in size. The property is zoned R-4 High Density Residential, is within the County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District, and is guided as Mixed Use Planned Unit Development in the Comprehensive Plan. 1 Mounds View Municipal Code, Section 1006.06, Subd 2 (Application of Development Controls) Planning Case MU2017-001 August 16, 2017 Page 2 This project includes multiple applications. Meeting dates include: Application Planning Commission Resolution City Council Resolution Zoning Map Amendment Apr 5, 2017 1067-17 Apr 19, 2017 Ord 934 May 8, 2017 CUP – Multiple Family Dwelling Apr 5, 2017 1068-17 May 8, 2017 8751 Preliminary Plat Jul 19, 2017 1075-17 Jul 24, 2017 8777 Aug 14, 2017 Development Review Jul 19, 2017 1076-17 Jul 24, 2017 8778 Aug 2, 2017 TBD Aug 16, 2017 Tax Increment Financing N/A N/A TBD MWF Properties held a neighborhood meeting on February 16, 2017 at Lakes Run Apartments in New Brighton, an MWF project. Eleven residents attended. Additional discussions were held at City Council Work Sessions on January 3rd, March 6th, and April 3rd, 2017, in addition to discussions by the Mounds View EDA on May 8th and May 22nd, 2017, concerning Tax Increment Financing. During the City Council’s May 8th Public Hearings (Zoning Map Amendment and CUP), several residents expressed concern about (1) additional traffic onto Groveland Rd to be generated by the project, and (2) if additional affordable housing in Mounds View is in the City’s best interest. During the City Council’s July 24th Public Hearing, four residents expressed concern about (1) additional traffic onto Groveland Rd to be generated by the project, (2) if the schools have capacity for additional students receiving free & reduced lunch, and (3) if the workforce housing project will attract crime. During the Planning Commission’s August 2nd meeting, there was not a quorum present. Described below is an attempt by Staff to address questions asked during various public meetings: Q1: Why is the apartments’ driveway on Groveland Rd instead of Mounds View Blvd? A1: A sketch plan with a driveway in the SW corner of the property, accessing Mounds View Blvd was submitted to Ramsey County, and denied. “If access can be obtained from an adjacent street, rather than from a County Road or County State Aid Highway, access should be directed to the minor street” [i.e. Groveland Rd].2 2 Ramsey County Department of Public Works Access Management Policies, 2017, p5. Planning Case MU2017-001 August 16, 2017 Page 3 Q2: How much traffic will the apartments add onto Groveland Rd? A2: As a condition of approval of MWF’s Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Multiple Family Dwelling, (Res 8751), a Traffic Study was required. MWF commissioned a study through Wenck Associations (attached). During peak hours, the apartments are forecasted to generate (see Figure 4 in traffic study): 7:30 – 8:30 AM: 4 trips north on Groveland 21 trips south on Groveland 4:30 – 5:30 PM: 2 trips north on Groveland 11 trips south on Groveland Q3: Can Mounds View Blvd handle the additional traffic? A3: Yes. Traffic capacity is measured as Level of Service (LOS), A, B, C, D, E, & F. LOS A = free flowing. LOS F = stop & go. An LOS of D or E is considered acceptable3. Mounds View Blvd currently has an LOS of D during the AM peak hour, and an LOS E during the PM peak hour. Q4: How will the Mounds View Blvd & Groveland Rd intersection be affected? A4: Based on discussions at the July 19th Planning Commission meeting, one issue is the number of vehicles in the Mounds View Blvd median waiting to turn left onto Mounds View Blvd, how that interferes with cross moving traffic, and the difficulty of seeing oncoming traffic because of the angle of Mounds View Blvd. The traffic study does not address driver behavior through this intersection. Closing the median crossover would improve safety at this intersection, but would also transfer traffic to other intersections (Red Oak Dr and Spring Lake Rd). A more extensive corridor traffic study would be needed. Q5: Can a traffic signal be installed? A5: No. According to Ramsey County, a traffic signal is not warranted. A more extensive corridor traffic study would be needed. Q6: How many accidents have occurred at this intersection (Mounds View Blvd & Groveland Rd)? A6: According to MnDOT, there were 23 vehicle accidents between 2011 and 2015. Of these, nine were right-angle accidents, and ten were “other”. The report does not detail the circumstance of each accident. By comparison, the Mounds View Blvd & Spring Lake Rd intersection had 20 accidents over this same period, including 14 right-angle accidents. 3 Institute of Transportation Engineers (1999). Transportation Planning Handbook, 2nd Addition. Washington D.C. Institute of Transportation Engineers, (p. 208). Planning Case MU2017-001 August 16, 2017 Page 4 Q7: How many people will live in the apartments? Q7: It is not known how many people will live in the apartments, but the building will include the following: 15 one-bedroom units 30 two-bedroom units 15 three-bedroom units Q8: How many children will live in the apartments? A8: According to MWF, 1.2 – 2.0 children per apartment are expected (72-120), based on previous projects. Q9: Can the schools handle more students? A9: Yes, based on conversations between Staff and the Superintendent’s office, the district has no concerns with adding 60-units. Residents will be within the attendance areas of Pinewood, Edgewood, and Irondale schools. During the July 24th City Council Public Hearing (Preliminary Plat), a resident expressed opposition to approving a project which; (1) would increase school enrollment when the School District is saying schools are over capacity; and (2) adding more students on free & reduced lunch when Pinewood Elementary School has 56% of its students eligible for free or reduced lunch. The Mounds View School District convened a facilities task force in 2016/2017. The District is proposing bonding for funds to improve school facilities, including adding capacity to schools. Q10: Does the City own these properties? A10: No. The project includes four properties. Two properties are privately owned, and two are owned by the State of Minnesota through tax forfeiture, and managed by Ramsey County. If the project is approved, the County will sell the land to the City, which will sell it to the Developer at-cost. If the project is not approved, the County will retain control of the tax forfeit properties. Q11: Will the apartments bring more crime into the neighborhood? A11: This is speculative. Mounds View crime statistics may be mapped on https://communitycrimemap.com . The website includes many options in which to analyze types of crime reported based on location. Q12: What is the rent? A12: Planned monthly rents, according to MWF Properties: Planning Case MU2017-001 August 16, 2017 Page 5 $784 one-bedroom $942 two-bedroom $1,115 three-bedroom Q13: How many rental properties are in Mounds View? A13: There are 5,280 housing units in Mounds View (2016). According to the City’s rental licensing records, there are 1,511 multi-family rental units and 240 single- family rental units (2017). The table below is a comparison of Mounds View and neighboring cities, and cities of a similar population (10,000 – 20,000) and location (urban, suburban). City Population Est (2016) Homeownership (2015) Number of Multi-Family units (5+ units) (2016) Median Gross Rent (all housing types) (2015) Anoka 17,995 51.9% 2,793 $856 Arden Hills 9,966 84.9% 424 $1,345 Blaine 64,188 90.5% 2,071 $1,047 Fridley 28,631 61.6% 3,426 $883 Hopkins 19,000 34.6% 5,044 $926 Little Canada 10,101 61.5% 2,083 $854 Mendota Heights 11,283 87.4% 643 $1,105 Mounds View 13,161 69.7% 1,435 $789 New Brighton 22,618 61.5% 3,357 $851 North St. Paul 12,069 66.8% 1,103 $755 Robbinsdale 14,704 66.3% 1,342 $945 Roseville 35,836 64.1% 5,841 $900 Shoreview 26,366 81.6% 1,761 $1,137 Spring Lake Park 6,406 74.6% 528 $884 Vadnais Heights 12,910 81.9% 991 $986 Source: Metropolitan Council Community Profiles Workforce Housing The proposed apartments will include 60-units of affordable workforce housing. Residents will have an income restriction of 60% of the Area Median Income4 (AMI), based on household size. 4 Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, Housing Tax Credits & Tax Exempt Bond Income and Rent Limits, Table I, p. 31 [Ramsey County, effective 03-28-2016]. Planning Case MU2017-001 August 16, 2017 Page 6 Household size 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Max HH Income $36,060 $41,220 $46,380 $51,480 $56,620 $59,760 $63,840 $67,980 # of Apt Bedrooms 1 2 3 4 5 6 Max HH Rent $966 $1,159 $1,338 $1,494 $1,647 $1,801 Est Gross Rent at “Boulevard”5 $784 $942 $1,115 Avg. MV Rent 6 $1,036 $1,282 $1,795 $1,835 Avg. 2016 MV- SLP* Rent 7 $777 $894 $1,304 Avg. 2017 MV- SLP* Rent 8 $803 $902 * MV-SLP = Mounds View – Spring Lake Park prime market area Analysis Plans were submitted on June 15th by the Community Development Dept. to: Public Works Dept., City Attorney, SBM Fire Dept., Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD), Ramsey County Highway Dept., and Ramsey County Surveyor’s office. Comments were received from: Brian Erickson, Mounds View Public Works, June 14, 2017 Samantha Berger, Rice Creek Watershed District, June 23, 2017 Mike Winfield, Ramsey County Surveyor’s office, July 17, 2017 Steve Thorp, Mounds View Community Development (fire), July 18, 2017 Erin Laberee, Ramsey County Highway Dept, Aug 2, 2017 In general, comments referred to standard requirements from each agency. A Development Review includes the following items:9 Minimum Floor Area 10 Minimum Req. Proposed 1 bedroom units 630 sq ft 676 – 786 sq ft 2 bedroom units 750 sq ft 963 – 1,134 sq ft 3 bedroom units 870 sq ft 1,231 – 1,258 sq ft 5 Bowen National Research (2017), Preliminary Tax Credit Support – The Boulevard, Pickerington, OH (p. 2) 6 Rupert, Craig, Bowen National Research, (2017). Price per sq ft – Mounds View, Minnesota. Re: Preliminary Tax Credit Support – The Boulevard (Mounds View, MN). 7 Bujold, M., Wilder, R. (2016). Table 7 Average Rents/Vacancies Trends Primary Market Area Third Quarter 2015. Initial Market Assessment for General Occupancy Market Rate rental housing in Mounds View, MN. 8 Bujold, M. (2017). Table 2 Average Rents/Vacancies Trends Mounds View Primary Market Area First Quarter 2016 and First Quarter 2017. Market Opinion Letter – Mix/Sizes/Pricing – Crossroad Pointe, Mounds View, MN. 9 Mounds View Municipal Code, Section 1006.06, Subd 3 (Development Plan) 10 Mounds View Municipal Code, Section 1104.02, Subd 4(c) (Minimum Floor Area Per Dwelling Unit) Planning Case MU2017-001 August 16, 2017 Page 7 Public Utilities Sewer/water will be provided from Groveland Rd. Surface Water Drainage Storm water will drain into an infiltration basin in the southeast corner of the lot. The dry basin will be 6’ below grade. During the July 19th Planning Commission meeting, there was discussion if this should be a wet pond. Erosion Control A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) is included in the submitted plans. Driveways A 24’ wide driveway is proposed, accessing Groveland Rd (maximum permitted is 32’ in the R-4 district). During the July 19th Planning Commission meeting, there was discussion of adding a center median at the entrance. Trails The City maintains a trail system along Mounds View Blvd. between Groveland Rd and Co Rd H. The applicant proposes to extend this trail at their expense, along the south property line. The 10’ wide trail will be within the county’s right-of-way (ROW), and setback 33’ from the edge of the road pavement, and 13’ – 16’ from the edge of the apartment building. Improvements within the county right-of-way will require approval by Ramsey County. During the July 19th Planning Commission meeting, the Commission recommended that the City extend this trail from the project, to Spring Lake Rd, using park dedication fees from this project, and that this trail be meandering. Parking Required* parking is 1½ uncovered stalls per dwelling unit, and one covered stall per dwelling unit.11 Required* Proposed Uncovered Stalls 90 63 Covered Stalls 60 63 11 Mounds View Municipal Code, Section 1121.13 (Schedule of Off-Street Parking Requirements) Planning Case MU2017-001 August 16, 2017 Page 8 * Within the County Road 10 Corridor Overlay zoning district, parking requirements are intended as a “guideline”.12 Landscaping Usable open space is intended to be accessible for active and passive recreation by the apartment’s residents.13 Required Proposed Usable Open Space 625 sq ft p/unit 60 units = 37,500 sq ft 1,048 sq ft p/unit 60 units = 62,896 sq ft Within the County Road 10 Corridor Overlay zoning district, a minimum of 15% of the lot shall be devoted to landscaped open space (57.8% proposed). A fenced playground is proposed, to be located near the NE corner of the building. Parking lots with more than five stalls must be screened.14 Minimum screening shall consist of a solid fence with a minimum height of 6’, or coniferous trees with a minimum height of 8’. A 6’ privacy fence is proposed as a buffer for homes along Groveland Rd, not otherwise screened by existing trees. During the Aug 2nd Planning Commission meeting, the Commission discussed extending this fence along the south property line of 8020 Groveland Rd. Landscape plant materials 15: Required Proposed Deciduous shade trees 13 32 Coniferous trees 13 25 Understory shrubs 83 94 Ornamental trees 13 13 Staff recommends that additional landscaping (shrubs and perennials) be installed between the building and the trail. 12 Mounds View Municipal Code, Section 1129.05, Subd 4 (Off-Street Parking) 13 Mounds View Municipal Code, Section 1102.02, Subd 127 (Usable Open Space), Section 1104.02, Subd 2(b)(4) 14 Mounds View Municipal Code, Section 1120., Subd 12 (Required Screening), Section 1103.08(6) 15 Mounds View Municipal Code, Section 1127.05, Subd 3 (Number of plant materials required) Planning Case MU2017-001 August 16, 2017 Page 9 Lighting Exterior lighting is required to have shielded fixtures to reduce glare, with a maximum 1.0 foot-candle (fc) measured from the center line of a public street and 0.4 fc measured from residential property lines.16 The photometric plan (p. E101) includes foot-candle (fc) measurements at the property line (not centerline of street). Light glare exceeds these standards at two points: 1. 0.5 fc at the common property line of 8020 Groveland Rd. The lighting source is: (1) parking lot light pole, 87’ away, and (2) light bollard 67’ away. Light trespass should be significantly reduced by the proposed 6’ privacy fence. 2. 0.6 fc at the common property line of 2925 Mounds View Blvd. The lighting source is a light next to an exterior door. The photometric plan may be approved as-is, or the Planning Commission/City Council may require it to comply with lighting maximums. Setbacks Within the County Road 10 Corridor Overlay zoning district, buildings and parking lots “should be” setback 5’ from the Mounds View Blvd. property line.17 The building has a varying setback of 7’ – 9’ from the front property line, about 13’ – 16’ from the trail, and about 56’ – 59’ from the road pavement. Exterior Materials Within the County Road 10 Corridor Overlay zoning district, exterior building finishes shall consist of a minimum of 50% brick, natural stone or cultured stone, glass, masonry stucco, or other materials approved by the City. 16 Mounds View Municipal Code, Section 1103.09 (Glare) 17 Mounds View Municipal Code, Section 1129.05, Subd 3 (Building and Parking Setback Requirements) Planning Case MU2017-001 August 16, 2017 Page 10 Proposed: Exterior Material Percentage North South East West Overall Brick 0% 05% 0% 0% 0% Natural stone or cultured stone 26% 29% 26% 31% 28% Glass 11% 22% 25% 26% 23% Masonry Stucco 22% 5% 3% 4% 7% Other comparable material 6% 1% 1% 0% 0.4% Total 65% 62% 55% 61% 58.4% All mechanical equipment shall be screened. Air conditioner units will be integrated into the exterior walls, and flush with the walls. Trash Disposal Dumpsters are required to be screened from view from Mounds View Blvd. The dumpsters will be kept within the parking garage and rolled out to a collection area outside the garage entrance on collection days. Construction Timetable Pending financial assistance from the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (fall, 2017), construction will be completed in spring, 2019. Summary MWF Properties is requesting approval of a Development Review for a 60-unit apartment building to be located at the northwest corner of Mounds View Blvd. and Groveland Rd. MWF Properties has applied for financial assistance (Low Income Housing Tax Credits) from the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA). This is a competitive program. MHFA awards will be announced in October, 2017. If an award is not received, it is anticipated that MWF Properties will request an extension to the approvals (CUP, Preliminary Plat, and Development Review), and then reapply to MHFA in 2018. The Planning Commission considered this application at their July 19th meeting, tabling it to invite Ramsey County staff to attend the August 2nd Commission meeting to discuss access and traffic concerns. Because there was no quorum at the August 2nd meeting, Ramsey County Staff will attend the August 14th City Council meeting for discussion. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Resolution 1076-17, recommending approval of the Development Review. Planning Case MU2017-001 August 16, 2017 Page 11 Recommendation The Planning Commission is requested to consider the following options: 1. Resolution 1076-17, recommending approval of a Development Review of “Boulevard”, a 60-unit apartment building. 2. The Planning Commission may choose to recommend denial of the Resolution. If the Commission chooses these options, Staff would need to be directed to draft a resolution of denial with findings of fact appropriate to support the denial. 3. Table the request. If additional information is needed before a decision can be rendered or if more discussion is needed, the Commission can simply move to table the request until such information has been provided. MN Statutes requires that the City take action within 60-days (Aug 13, 2017), but allows the City to extend its review for an additional 60-days (Oct 13, 2017), which the City has done in order to allow additional discussion by the Planning Commission and City Council. Please note, that condition #5 in the resolution includes a number of line items discussed by the Planning Commission during various meetings. It is Staff’s intent that the Planning Commission consider each item, and keep, delete, or amend as appropriate. Respectfully submitted, ________________________ Jon Sevald, AICP Planner Attachments 1. Zoning Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Site Photos 4. Elevation Rendering 5. Crash Type Summary (Groveland, Spring Lake Rd intersections with Mounds View Blvd) 6. Resolution 1076-17 (Development Review) 7. Site Plan and related drawings, dated, July 13, 2017 Planning Case MU2017-001 August 16, 2017 Page 12 Zoning Map Planning Case MU2017-001 August 16, 2017 Page 13 Aerial Map Planning Case MU2017-001 August 16, 2017 Page 14 Site Photos Figure 1: View looking north toward Groveland Rd. Figure 2: View looking southeast along Mounds View Blvd, from the western edge of the project. Planning Case MU2017-001 August 16, 2017 Page 15 Figure 3: View looking south toward Groveland Rd & Mounds View Blvd intersection. Figure 4: Sept 12, 2017 storm damage, looking north from NW corner of Groveland Rd & Mounds View Blvd. Planning Case MU2017-001 August 16, 2017 Page 16 Elevation Rendering Planning Case MU2017-001 August 16, 2017 Page 17 Crash Type Summary (Groveland, Spring Lake Rd intersections with Mounds View Blvd) Planning Case MU2017-001 August 16, 2017 Page 18 Crash Type Summary (Groveland, Spring Lake Rd intersections with Mounds View Blvd) RESOLUTION 1076-17 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW OF “BOULEVARD”, A 60-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING, GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MOUNDS VIEW BOULEVARD AND GROVELAND ROAD; PLANNING CASE MU2017-001 WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View Municipal Code, Section 1006.06, Subd 2 (Application of Development Controls) requires a Development Review for construction of a principal building consisting of 10,000 sq ft or greater, or an addition onto a principal building increasing its size by 10% or greater (excludes single-family and two-family dwellings); and, WHEREAS, MWF Properties, LLC, representing Cynthia Johnson, owner of PID: 06- 30-23-31-0029 and PID: 06-30-23-31-0030; and representing the State of Minnesota, owner of PID: 06-30-23-31-0031 and PID: 06-30-23-31-0241, has requested approval of a Development Review for a 60-unit apartment building (principal building), consisting of 25,000 sq ft., and located on land legally described as: Certificate of Title No. 582367 (PID 06-30-23-31-0031): Parcel 1: Lot 50, except that part which lies southwesterly of a line run parallel with and distant 100 feet Northeasterly of the Southwesterly boundary of said Lot 50, also except that part described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Lot 50; thence East 7 feet along the North line of said Lot 50; thence Southerly 100 feet to a point of intersection on the West line of said Lot 50; thence North along said West line of said Lot 50 to the point of commencement; Auditor's Subdivision No. 89, Ramsey Co., Minn. the said excepted part of the above described property, the Southwesterly 100 feet has been taken by the State of Minnesota for public Highway purposes. Resolution 1076-17 Page 2 Parcel 2: All that part of Lot 32, Auditor's Subdivision No. 89, Ramsey Co., Minn., described as follows, to-wit: Commencing at a point on the West line of Lot 50, Auditor's Subdivision No. 89, which point is 100 feet South of the Northwest corner of said Lot 50; thence South to a line 100 feet Northeasterly from and parallel with the Southerly line of Lot 32; thence Northwesterly on said parallel line 32 feet; thence Northeasterly to the point of beginning. Certificate of Title No. 582368 (PID 06-30-23-31-0241): The South 135.00 feet, front and rear, of Lot 47, Auditor's Subdivision No. 89, lying westerly of the East 187.00 feet. Certificate of Title No. 616319 (PID 06-30-23-31-0030): Lot 49, Auditor's Subdivision No. 89, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Certificate of Title No. 593365 (PID 06-30-23-31-0029): That part of Lot 48, Auditor's Subdivision No. 89 lying South of the North 300 feet front and rear thereof, except that portion taken for the Highway right of way purposes. WHEREAS, the properties are zoned R-4 High Density Residential, and are within the County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District, and are guided for Mixed Use PUD within the Comprehensive Plan; and, WHEREAS, MWF Properties, LLC, received a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Multiple-Family Dwelling within an R-4 zoning district, on the subject properties on May 8, 2017 (Resolution 8751); and, WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View Municipal Code, Section 1006.06 (Development Controls) provides for a Development Review of plans for utility service, surface water drainage, erosion and sediment control, streets, driveways, trails, parking, landscaping, screening and buffering, lighting, setbacks, exterior construction design and materials, trash disposal, construction timetable, and other items; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request on July 19, 2017, August 2, 2017, and August 16, 2017, including the following documents: Resolution 1076-17 Page 3 Staff Report, dated August 16, 2017 Site Plan and related drawings dated July 13, 2017, and July 18, 2017 Traffic Impact Study, dated June 29, 2017 Housing Study, dated April 28, 2017 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Planning Commission finds that the request is consistent with the City of Mounds View Municipal Code, Title 1000 (Building and Development Regulations), Title 1100 (Zoning Code), and the Comprehensive Plan; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, based upon the above findings, the information and documents regarding the proposed plans within the Staff Report, and testimony of the applicant, and in consideration of public testimony, the Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval of the Development Review of “Boulevard”, with the following conditions: 1. The applicant, MWF Properties, LLC, shall construct the project consistent with: A. Site Plan, dated July 13, 2017 B. Grading Plan, dated July 13, 2017, or approved as part of the Preliminary Plat of “Boulevard” C. Landscape Plan, dated July 13, 2017 D. Photometric Plan, dated May 31, 2017 E. Exterior Elevation Plans, dated June 15, 2017 F. Exterior Rendering included in the August 16, 2017 Planning Commission staff report 2. The applicant, MWF Properties, LLC, shall obtain all applicable permits from the City of Mounds View (Building, Right-of-Way, Zoning), Ramsey County (Right-of-way), Rice Creek Watershed District, and other applicable agencies. 3. The applicant shall consent to a Developers Agreement, to be completed as part of the Final Plat approval process. 4. Approval of this Development Review is contingent upon approval of the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat of “Boulevard”. 5. The applicant, MWF Properties, LLC, shall install the following, in addition to that shown on the approved Site Plan: A. The private playground located near the NE corner of the building shall be fenced, intended to separate play areas and traffic areas. B. A 6’ tall fence, from the SW corner of the common property line with 8020 Groveland Rd. to the front of the home, intended to be a buffer. Resolution 1076-17 Page 4 C. The stormwater retention basin in the SE corner of the property shall be designed and constructed to hold water, intended to be a landscaped amenity. A revised Grading & Drainage plan shall be submitted for approval to the Public Works Director and Rice Creek Watershed District. D. The pedestrian trail along Mounds View Blvd shall be meandering. A revised Grading & Drainage plan shall be submitted for approval to the Public Works Director, Rice Creek Watershed District, and Ramsey County Public Works. E. Additional shrubs and perennials shall be installed between the pedestrian trail, SW sidewalk, and the building, intended to create a more inviting appearance (none shown on Site Plan). F. A landscaped median within that portion of the driveway, south of 8020 Groveland Rd. Each one-way drive lane shall have a minimum width of 12’ (ingress) and 26’ (egress), intended as a landscaped amenity. A revised Grading & Drainage plan shall be submitted for approval to the Public Works Director, Rice Creek Watershed District, and SBM Fire Marshal. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 16th day of August, 2017 Gary Stevenson, Chair ATTEST: Jon Sevald, Planner (SEAL) WENCK File #2306-12 June 29, 2017 Prepared by: WENCK Associates, Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Maple Plain, MN 55359 Phone: 7963-479-4200 Fax: 763-479-4242 Prepared for: MWF Properties 7645 Lyndale Ave S Minneapolis, MN 55423 Traffic Impact Study for Apartment Building in Mounds View, MN June 2017 i Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................... I 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................... 1-1 2.0 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND ........................................................... 2-1 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................... 3-1 4.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTS ........................................................................ 4-1 5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................... 5-1 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................... 6-1 7.0 APPENDIX ........................................................................................ 7-1 FIGURES FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................. 2-2 FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN ................................................................................ 2-3 FIGURE 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................. 3-2 FIGURE 4 WEEKDAY AM AND PM PEAK HOUR TURN MOVEMENT VOLUMES ..... 4-3 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. __________________________________ DATE: June 29, 2017 Edward F. Terhaar License No. 24441 June 2017 1-1 1.0 Executive Summary The purpose of this Traffic Impact Study is to evaluate the traffic impacts of a proposed new apartment building located in the northwest quadrant of the CSAH 10/Groveland Road intersection in Mounds View, MN. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development at the following intersections: • CSAH 10/Groveland Road • Groveland Road/proposed access Proposed Development Characteristics The proposed project will involve the construction of a 60-unit apartment building. One vehicle access point to the site will be located on Groveland Road on the east side of the building. The project includes 63 underground parking stalls for residents and 60 above ground parking stalls for residents and visitors. The project is expected to be completed and fully occupied in March 2019. The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed project is expected to add 31 trips during the a.m. peak hour, 37 trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 399 weekday trips. • One vehicle access point to the site is provided on Groveland Road on the east side of the building. • The CSAH 10/Groveland Road intersection is expected to operate at acceptable levels of service during all existing and future scenarios. Trips generated by the proposed development have minimal impact on the operations at the CSAH 10/Groveland Road intersection. • The addition of a southbound right turn lane on Groveland Road would separate the southbound right turns from the through/left turns, which would reduce delay for the right turn movement. However, the volume of southbound right turn traffic is small compared to the total volume on CSAH 10, resulting in minimal improvements to the overall intersection operations. June 2017 2-1 2.0 Purpose and Background The purpose of this Traffic Impact Study is to evaluate the traffic impacts of a proposed new apartment building located in the northwest quadrant of the CSAH 10/Groveland Road intersection in Mounds View, MN. The project location is shown in Figure 1. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development at the following intersections: • CSAH 10/Groveland Road • Groveland Road/proposed access Proposed Development Characteristics The proposed project will involve the construction of a 60-unit apartment building. The site plan is shown in Figure 2. One vehicle access point to the site will be located on Groveland Road on the east side of the building. The project includes 63 underground parking stalls for residents and 60 above ground parking stalls for residents and visitors. The project is expected to be completed and fully occupied in March 2019. June 2017 2-2 June 2017 2-3 June 2017 3-1 3.0 Existing Conditions The proposed site currently contains one single family house. The site is bounded by CSAH 10 on the south, Groveland Road on the east, and residential uses on the north and west. Near the site location, CSAH 10 is a four-lane divided roadway with turn lanes at major intersections. Groveland Road is a two-lane north/south roadway. Existing conditions at intersections near the proposed project location are shown in Figure 3 and described below. CSAH 10/Groveland Road (minor street stop control) This intersection has four approaches and is controlled with stop signs on the northbound and southbound approaches. The eastbound and westbound CSAH 10 approaches provide one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one right turn lane. The northbound and southbound approaches provide one lane shared by left turn, through, and right turn movements. The median on CSAH 10 is approximately 30 feet wide, which creates space between the eastbound and westbound lanes for a vehicle to wait before completing a turn onto CSAH 10. This allows for a two-stage crossing maneuver of CSAH 10 for northbound and southbound traffic. Traffic Volume Data Data at the intersection was recorded in May 2017. June 2017 3-2 June 2017 4-1 4.0 Traffic Forecasts Traffic Forecast Scenarios To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project, forecasts and analyses were completed for the year 2020. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts were completed for the following scenarios: • 2017 Existing. Turn movement volumes collected in May 2017 were used for existing conditions. The existing volume information includes trips generated by uses near the project site. • 2020 No-Build. Existing volumes at the subject intersections were increased by 1.0 percent per year to determine 2020 No-Build volumes. The 1.0 percent per year growth rate was based on recent historic traffic volume growth in the project area. • 2020 Build. Trips generated by the proposed use were then added to the 2020 No- Build volumes to determine 2020 Build volumes. Trip Generation-Proposed Project The expected new development trips were calculated based on data presented in Trip Generation, Ninth Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. These calculations represent total trips that will be generated by the proposed development. The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Table 4-1. Table 4-1 Weekday Trip Generation for Proposed Apartment Building Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Proposed Apartments 60 DU 6 25 31 24 13 37 399 Net Total 6 25 31 24 13 37 399 Notes: DU=dwelling units As shown in Table 4-1, the proposed development will add a net total of 31 trips during the a.m. peak hour, 37 trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 399 trips on a daily basis. June 2017 4-2 Trip Distribution Percentages Trip distribution percentages for the subject development trips were established based on the nearby roadway network, existing and expected future traffic patterns, and location of the subject development in relation to major attractions and population concentrations. The distribution percentages for new trips generated by the proposed development are as follows: •40 percent to/from the west on CSAH 10 •40 percent to/from the east on CSAH 10 •15 percent to/from the north on Groveland Road •5 percent to/from the south on Groveland Road Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Development trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the forecasting scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The resultant traffic volumes are presented in Figure 4. FIGURE4WEEKDAY A.M. ANDP.M.PEAKHOURVOLUMESNTRAFFICIMPACT STUDYFOR A PROPOSEDAPARTMENT BUILDINGINMOUNDSVIEW,MNA.M.PEAKP.M.PEAKGROVELAND ROADGROVELAND ROAD65/67/7724/25/2638/39/4934/35/4011/11/1211/11/1614/14/161299/1338/13386/6/650/52/62828/853/85316/16/166/6/8687/708/7082/2/220/21/311501/1546/15469/9/94/4/45/5/93/3/312/12/126/6/73/3/3-/-/1127/131/131-/-/356/58/58-/-/4-/-/21-/-/2-/-/11-/-/525/26/26-/-/2176/78/78ACCESSACCESSCR 10CR 1020172020NO-BUILD2020BUILDLEGENDXX/XX/XX June 2017 5-1 5.0 Traffic Analysis Intersection Level of Service Analysis Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersections for all scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours using Synchro software. Initial analysis was completed using existing geometrics and intersection control. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle usi ng the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. The following is a detailed description of the conditions described by each LOS designation: • Level of service A corresponds to a free flow condition with motorists virtually unaffected by the intersection control mechanism. For a signalized or an unsignalized intersection, the average delay per vehicle would be approximately 10 seconds or less. • Level of service B represents stable flow with a high degree of freedom, but with some influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. For a signalized intersection, the average delay ranges from 10 to 20 seconds. An unsignalized intersection would have delays ranging from 10 to 15 seconds for this level. • Level of service C depicts a restricted flow which remains stable, but with significant influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. The general level of comfort and convenience changes noticeably at this level. The delay ranges from 20 to 35 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 15 to 25 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service D corresponds to high-density flow in which speed and freedom are significantly restricted. Though traffic flow remains stable, reductions in comfort and convenience are experienced. The control delay for this level is 35 to 55 seconds for a signalized intersection and 25 to 35 seconds for an unsignalized intersection. • Level of service E represents unstable flow of traffic at or near the capacity of the intersection with poor levels of comfort and convenience. The delay ranges from 55 to 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 35 to 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service F represents forced flow in which the volume of traffic approaching the intersection exceeds the volume that can be served. Characteristics often experienced include long queues, stop-and-go waves, poor travel times, low comfort and convenience, and increased accident exposure. Delays over 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and over 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection correspond to this level of service. June 2017 5-2 The LOS results for the study intersections are described below. All LOS worksheets are included in the Appendix for further detail. CSAH 10/Groveland Road (minor street stop control) During the weekday a.m. peak hour, all movements operate at LOS D or better under all existing and future scenarios. The overall intersection operates at LOS A under all scenarios. During the weekday p.m. peak hour, all movements operate at LOS E or better under all existing and future scenarios. The overall intersection operates at LOS A under all scenarios. Groveland Road/proposed access (minor street stop control) During the weekday a.m. peak hour, all movements operate at LOS A under the future scenario. The overall intersection operates at LOS A under all scenarios. During the weekday p.m. peak hour, all movements operate at LOS A under the future scenario. The overall intersection operates at LOS A under all scenarios. Overall Intersection Impacts The CSAH 10/Groveland Road intersection is expected to operate at acceptab le levels of service in the year 2020 both without and with the proposed project. Trips generated by the proposed development will have minimal impact on the operations at the intersection. The CSAH 10/Groveland Road intersection has a wide median on CSAH 10, which allows northbound and southbound drivers to complete a two-stage crossing. In addition, the traffic signals located at Silver Lake Road and at Pleasant View Drive create gaps in the CSAH 10 through traffic, allowing vehicles to enter from Groveland Road at times with minimal cross traffic. These operational items were confirmed through field observations completed during the data collection. The combination of these items results in acceptable levels of service for the intersection. The addition of a southbound right turn lane on Groveland Road was also considered. The addition of a right turn lane would separate the southbound right turns from the through/left turns, which would reduce delay for the right turn movement. However, the volume of southbound right turn traffic is small compared to the total volume on CSAH 10, resulting in minimal improvements to the overall intersection operations. Groveland Road Impacts The most recent traffic volume avail able indicates a daily volume of 1,250 vehicle per day on Groveland Road between CSAH 10 and Ardan Avenue. North of Arden Avenue the daily volume drops to 710 vehicles per day. The proposed project is expected to add 60 vehicles per day to Groveland Road north of the development access. This level of increase will have minimal impacts traffic operations. Two-lane local streets can accommodate the traffic volume levels expected on Groveland Road. June 2017 6-1 6.0 Conclusions and Recommendations The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed project is expected to add 31 trips during the a.m. peak hour, 37 trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 399 weekday trips. • One vehicle access point to the site is provided on Groveland Road on the east side of the building. • The CSAH 10/Groveland Road intersection is expected to operate at acceptable levels of service during all existing and future scenarios. Trips generated by the proposed development have minimal impact on the operations at the CSAH 10/Groveland Road intersection. • The addition of a southbound right turn lane on Groveland Road would separate the southbound right turns from the through/left turns, which would reduce delay for th e right turn movement. However, the volume of southbound right turn traffic is small compared to the total volume on CSAH 10, resulting in minimal improvements to the overall intersection operations. June 2017 7-1 7.0 Appendix 3: Groveland & CR 10 06/07/2017 T:\2306\12\synchro\with signals\2017 am.syn Synchro 9 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 14 1299 6 2 687 6 4 5 3 38 24 65 Future Vol, veh/h 14 1299 6 2 687 6 4 5 3 38 24 65 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 200 - 200 200 - 200 - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 15 1412 7 2 747 7 4 5 3 41 26 71 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 747 0 0 1412 0 0 1833 2193 706 1490 2193 373 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1442 1442 - 751 751 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 391 751 - 739 1442 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver *1189 - - *826 - - *249 *218 *552 *249 *218 *795 Stage 1 - - - - - - *520 *456 - *750 *657 - Stage 2 - - - - - - *750 *657 - *520 *456 - Platoon blocked, % 1 - - 1 - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver *1189 - - *826 - - *203 *215 *552 *240 *215 *795 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - *203 *215 - *240 *215 - Stage 1 - - - - - - *514 *450 - *740 *655 - Stage 2 - - - - - - *654 *655 - *505 *450 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 20.3 21 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 248 * 1189 - - * 826 - - 361 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.053 0.013 - - 0.003 - - 0.382 HCM Control Delay (s) 20.3 8.1 - - 9.4 - - 21 HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - - 1.7 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 3: Groveland & CR 10 06/07/2017 T:\2306\12\synchro\with signals\2020 am nb.syn Synchro 9 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 14 1338 6 2 708 6 4 5 3 39 25 67 Future Vol, veh/h 14 1338 6 2 708 6 4 5 3 39 25 67 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 200 - 200 200 - 200 - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 15 1454 7 2 770 7 4 5 3 42 27 73 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 770 0 0 1454 0 0 1888 2259 727 1534 2259 385 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1485 1485 - 774 774 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 403 774 - 760 1485 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver *1189 - - *774 - - *216 *189 *517 *216 *189 *795 Stage 1 - - - - - - *488 *427 - *750 *657 - Stage 2 - - - - - - *750 *657 - *488 *427 - Platoon blocked, % 1 - - 1 - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver *1189 - - *774 - - *172 *186 *517 *208 *186 *795 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - *172 *186 - *208 *186 - Stage 1 - - - - - - *481 *422 - *740 *655 - Stage 2 - - - - - - *651 *655 - *472 *422 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 22.8 24.6 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 215 * 1189 - - * 774 - - 323 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.061 0.013 - - 0.003 - - 0.441 HCM Control Delay (s) 22.8 8.1 - - 9.7 - - 24.6 HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - - 2.2 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 3: Groveland & CR 10 06/07/2017 T:\2306\12\synchro\with signals\2020 am b.syn Synchro 9 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 1338 6 2 708 8 4 6 3 49 26 77 Future Vol, veh/h 16 1338 6 2 708 8 4 6 3 49 26 77 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 200 - 200 200 - 200 - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 17 1454 7 2 770 9 4 7 3 53 28 84 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 770 0 0 1454 0 0 1892 2263 727 1539 2263 385 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1489 1489 - 774 774 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 403 774 - 765 1489 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver *1189 - - *774 - - *216 *189 *517 *216 *189 *795 Stage 1 - - - - - - *488 *427 - *750 *657 - Stage 2 - - - - - - *750 *657 - *488 *427 - Platoon blocked, % 1 - - 1 - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver *1189 - - *774 - - *169 *186 *517 *206 *186 *795 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - *169 *186 - *206 *186 - Stage 1 - - - - - - *481 *421 - *739 *655 - Stage 2 - - - - - - *640 *655 - *470 *421 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 23.3 27.7 HCM LOS C D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 211 * 1189 - - * 774 - - 320 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.067 0.015 - - 0.003 - - 0.516 HCM Control Delay (s) 23.3 8.1 - - 9.7 - - 27.7 HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - - D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - - 2.8 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 3: Groveland & CR 10 06/07/2017 T:\2306\12\synchro\with signals\2017 pm.syn Synchro 9 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 50 828 16 9 1501 20 13 6 3 11 11 34 Future Vol, veh/h 50 828 16 9 1501 20 13 6 3 11 11 34 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 200 - 200 200 - 200 - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 51 845 16 9 1532 20 13 6 3 11 11 35 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1532 0 0 845 0 0 1737 2497 422 2078 2497 766 Stage 1 - - - - - - 947 947 - 1550 1550 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 790 1550 - 528 947 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver *668 - - *1135 - - *174 *143 *759 *174 *143 *446 Stage 1 - - - - - - *653 *585 - *421 *369 - Stage 2 - - - - - - *421 *369 - *716 *585 - Platoon blocked, % 1 - - 1 - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver *668 - - *1135 - - *141 *131 *759 *157 *131 *446 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - *141 *131 - *157 *131 - Stage 1 - - - - - - *603 *541 - *389 *366 - Stage 2 - - - - - - *373 *366 - *651 *541 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 0 32.1 24.3 HCM LOS D C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 155 * 668 - - * 1135 - - 243 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.145 0.076 - - 0.008 - - 0.235 HCM Control Delay (s) 32.1 10.8 - - 8.2 - - 24.3 HCM Lane LOS D B - - A - - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0.2 - - 0 - - 0.9 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 3: Groveland & CR 10 06/07/2017 T:\2306\12\synchro\with signals\2020 pm nb.syn Synchro 9 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 52 853 16 9 1546 21 13 6 3 11 11 35 Future Vol, veh/h 52 853 16 9 1546 21 13 6 3 11 11 35 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 200 - 200 200 - 200 - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 53 870 16 9 1578 21 13 6 3 11 11 36 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1578 0 0 870 0 0 1790 2573 435 2140 2573 789 Stage 1 - - - - - - 977 977 - 1596 1596 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 813 1596 - 544 977 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver *668 - - *1135 - - *123 *108 *759 *123 *108 *446 Stage 1 - - - - - - *616 *561 - *421 *369 - Stage 2 - - - - - - *421 *369 - *716 *561 - Platoon blocked, % 1 - - 1 - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver *668 - - *1135 - - *97 *98 *759 *109 *98 *446 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - *97 *98 - *109 *98 - Stage 1 - - - - - - *567 *516 - *388 *366 - Stage 2 - - - - - - *372 *366 - *648 *516 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 0 45.9 31.1 HCM LOS E D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 110 * 668 - - * 1135 - - 195 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.204 0.079 - - 0.008 - - 0.298 HCM Control Delay (s) 45.9 10.9 - - 8.2 - - 31.1 HCM Lane LOS E B - - A - - D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 0.3 - - 0 - - 1.2 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 3: Groveland & CR 10 06/07/2017 T:\2306\12\synchro\with signals\2020 pm b.syn Synchro 9 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 62 853 16 9 1546 31 13 7 3 16 12 40 Future Vol, veh/h 62 853 16 9 1546 31 13 7 3 16 12 40 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 200 - 200 200 - 200 - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 63 870 16 9 1578 32 13 7 3 16 12 41 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1578 0 0 870 0 0 1810 2593 435 2161 2593 789 Stage 1 - - - - - - 997 997 - 1596 1596 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 813 1596 - 565 997 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver *668 - - *1135 - - *174 *69 *759 *174 *69 *446 Stage 1 - - - - - - *593 *545 - *421 *369 - Stage 2 - - - - - - *421 *369 - *716 *545 - Platoon blocked, % 1 - - 1 - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver *668 - - *1135 - - *124 *62 *759 *146 *62 *446 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - *124 *62 - *146 *62 - Stage 1 - - - - - - *537 *494 - *381 *366 - Stage 2 - - - - - - *367 *366 - *636 *494 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 0 49.4 39.1 HCM LOS E E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 104 * 668 - - * 1135 - - 173 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.226 0.095 - - 0.008 - - 0.401 HCM Control Delay (s) 49.4 11 - - 8.2 - - 39.1 HCM Lane LOS E B - - A - - E HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 0.3 - - 0 - - 1.8 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 12: Groveland & access 06/07/2017 T:\2306\12\synchro\with signals\2020 am b.syn Synchro 9 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1> 0 0 <1 1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 21 5 26 131 1 Future Vol, veh/h 4 21 5 26 131 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 4 23 5 28 142 1 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 182 143 143 0 - 0 Stage 1 143 - - - - - Stage 2 39 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.22 4.12 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 779 905 1440 - - - Stage 1 860 - - - - - Stage 2 976 - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 777 905 1440 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 777 - - - - - Stage 1 857 - - - - - Stage 2 972 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.2 1.2 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1440 - 882 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - 0.031 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 9.2 - - HCM Lane LOS A A A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 - - 12: Groveland & access 06/29/2017 T:\2306\12\synchro\with signals\2020 pm b.syn Synchro 9 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.6 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1> 0 0 <1 1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 11 21 78 58 3 Future Vol, veh/h 2 11 21 78 58 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 11 21 80 59 3 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 183 61 62 0 - 0 Stage 1 61 - - - - - Stage 2 122 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 806 1004 1541 - - - Stage 1 962 - - - - - Stage 2 903 - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 795 1004 1541 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 795 - - - - - Stage 1 962 - - - - - Stage 2 890 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 8.8 1.6 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1541 - 965 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 - 0.014 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 8.8 - - HCM Lane LOS A A A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 - - 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2013 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION6/13/17CITY SUBMITTAL07/13/17CITY RESUBMITTAL......................BOULEVARD 2865-2901 MOUNDS VIEW BLVD / 7980 GROVELAND RD 7645 LYNDALE AVE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423 MWF PROPERTIES PROJECT 44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.07/13/17REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC0.0TITLE SHEET............BOULEVARDMOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTASHEET INDEXSHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEC0.0TITLE SHEETSITE LOCATIONSITE LOCATION MAPNSITE SURVEYC0.1UTILITY PLANC4.0ISSUED FOR: CITY RESUBMITTALMASTER LEGEND:EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALCURB AND GUTTER (T.O = TIP OUT)SPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINEUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURB (GUTTER TOP)SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF WALLSOIL BORING LOCATIONSPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WALLEMERGENCY OVERFLOWPROPOSED MANHOLE STORMPROPOSED GATE VALVEPROPOSED SANITARY SEWERPROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPOSED WATER MAINPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTEXISTING LIGHTEXISTING GAS METEREXISTING MANHOLEEXISTING CATCH BASINEXISTING GATE VALVEEXISTING HYDRANTEXISTING GAS VALVEEXISTING ELECTRIC BOXEXISTING STOPBOXPROPOSED MANHOLE SANITARYPROPOSED CATCH BASIN OR CATCH BASIN MANHOLE STORMDYH PROPOSED SIGNEXISTING SPOT GRADE ELEVATIONINLET PROTECTIONSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEDRAINAGE ARROWDEVELOPER / PROPERTY OWNER:MWF PROPERTIES7645 LYNDALE AVE SOUTHMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:CIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35TH STREETSUITE 200ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416612-615-0060SURVEYOR:GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER:SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONSSW1.0GRADING PLANC3.0C5.0C5.1L1.0DETAILSLANDSCAPE PLANSWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONSSW1.1SWPPP - DETAILSSW1.2C2.0SITE PLANSWPPP - NARRATIVESW1.3DETAILSC1.0REMOVALS PLANC5.2DETAILSCLARK ENGINEERING12755 HIGHWAY 55, SUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55422763-545-9196GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651) 454-0002 LOCALSWPPP - ATTACHMENTSSW1.4SWPPP - ATTACHMENTSSW1.5L1.1LANDSCAPE NOTESEOF=1135.52SB-1TOPROPOSED LIGHTEXISTING SANITARY SEWEREXISTING STORM SEWEREXISTING WATER MAINEXISTING GAS MAINEXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRICEXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMITPRELIMINARY PLATC0.2 REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC0.1SITE SURVEY............01" = 40'-0"40'-0"20'-0"N REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC0.2PRELIMINARY PLAT............01" = 40'-0"40'-0"20'-0"N CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSEXISTING RAINGARDEN TOREMAIN, PROTECTFROM DAMAGEREMOVE EXISTINGOVERHEAD WIRES,COORDINATE WITHUTILITY OWNERREMOVE EXISTING TREEAND BALL ROOT, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING TREEAND BALL ROOT, TYP.EXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.REMOVE EX BUILDING, STRUCTURES,FOUNDATIONS, FOOTINGS & BASEMATERIALS, PER LOCAL STATE & FEDERALSTANDARDS. REMOVE/DISCONNECT ALLSERVICES & UTILITIES PER UTILITYCOMPANY AND/OR L.G.U. STANDARDSREMOVE EXISTINGPAVEMENT AND BASEMATERIAL, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGPAVEMENT AND BASEMATERIAL, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGMECHANICALEQUIPMENTREMOVE EXISTINGFENCE AND FOOTING,TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGFENCE AND FOOTING,TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGFENCE ANDFOOTING, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGPONDREMOVE EXISTINGPAVEMENT AND BASEMATERIAL, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING CURBAND GUTTER TO NEARESTJOINT BEYOND TAPER.SAW CUT EXISTING CURBJOINT AND BITUMINOUSPAVEMENT AT LIP OF CURBPRIOR TO REMOVAL, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGUNDERGROUNDUTILITY, COORDINATEWITH UTILITY OWNERREMOVE EXISTINGSANITARY BACK TOMAIN, COORDINATEWITH CITYEXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.EXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.ALL UNUSED EXISTING WATER SERVICES ANDSANITARY SERVICES WITHIN THE PROPOSEDLIMITS SHALL BE REMOVED BACK TO THE MAINPER CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW STANDARDS.REMOVE ALL EXISTINGUTILITY SERVICES PERUTILITY COMPANY ANDCITY STANDARDSREMOVE EXISTING CURBAND GUTTER TO NEARESTJOINT BEYOND TAPER.SAW CUT EXISTING CURBJOINT AND BITUMINOUSPAVEMENT AT LIP OF CURBPRIOR TO REMOVAL, TYP.REMOVAL NOTES:1.SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN.2.REMOVAL OF MATERIALS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.3.REMOVAL OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.4.EXISTING PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR THE NEAREST JOINT FOR PROPOSED PAVEMENTCONNECTIONS.5.REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF TO A LEGAL OFF-SITE LOCATION AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.6.ABANDON, REMOVAL, CONNECTION, AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE. COORDINATE WITH PROPOSED PLANS.7.EXISTING ON-SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT.8.PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE CONSIDERED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. WORK WITHIN THEGENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL INCLUDE STAGING, DEMOLITION AND CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THEDRAWINGS.9.MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PER CITY REQUIREMENTS.10.DAMAGE BEYOND THE PROPERTY LIMITS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE REPAIRED IN A MANNER APPROVED BY THEENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY.11.PROPOSED WORK (BUILDING AND CIVIL) SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND APPROVED BYTHE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.12.SITE SECURITY MAY BE NECESSARY AND PROVIDED IN A MANNER TO PROHIBIT VANDALISM, AND THEFT, DURING AND AFTER NORMAL WORK HOURS,THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. SECURITY MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY.13.VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTION ACCESS DURING NORMAL OPERATING HOURS. AT NO POINTTHROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT SHALL CIRCULATION OF ADJACENT STREETS BE BLOCKED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.14.ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFICCONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS ASNEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL REMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BYTHE CITY.15.SHORING FOR BUILDING EXCAVATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNERSREPRESENTATIVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.16.STAGING, DEMOLITION, AND CLEAN-UP AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND MAINTAINED IN A MANNERAS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW REMOVAL NOTES:1.PAVEMENT REMOVALS WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE RECTANGULAR IN SHAPE, SAW CUT PLUMB, AND IF IT ENTERS THE DRIVING LANE,SHALL BE EXTENDED TO THE CENTERLINE AS A MINIMUM. IF IT EXTENDS PAST THE CENTERLINE, THE PATCH SHALL BE FULL WIDTH (SEE "CITY OFMOUNDS VIEW RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR EXCAVATION AND OBSTRUCTION PERMITS" FOR MORE INFORMATION).REMOVALS LEGEND:TREE PROTECTIONREMOVAL OF PAVEMENT AND ALL BASE MATERIAL,INCLUDING BIT., CONC., AND GRAVEL PVMTS.REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE INCLUDING ALLFOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0-SW1.5EROSION CONTROL NOTES:TREE REMOVAL - INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPS4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2013 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION6/13/17CITY SUBMITTAL07/13/17CITY RESUBMITTAL......................BOULEVARD 2865-2901 MOUNDS VIEW BLVD / 7980 GROVELAND RD 7645 LYNDALE AVE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423 MWF PROPERTIES PROJECT 44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.07/13/1701" = 30'-0"30'-0"15'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC1.0REMOVALS PLAN............GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651) 454-0002 LOCALEX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2013 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION6/13/17CITY SUBMITTAL07/13/17CITY RESUBMITTAL......................BOULEVARD 2865-2901 MOUNDS VIEW BLVD / 7980 GROVELAND RD 7645 LYNDALE AVE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423 MWF PROPERTIES PROJECT 44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.07/13/17REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC1.1TREE PRESERVATIONPLAN............GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651) 454-0002 LOCALTREE SURVEY: GROVELAND ROADMOUNDS VIEW BOULEVARDTWO-WAY PARKINGLOT ENTRANCE / EXITPROPOSED 10'WIDE BIT. PATH20' SIDE YARD BUILDING SETBACK50' BACK YARD BUILDING SETBACK30' SIDE YARD BUILDING SETBACK5' FRONT YARD BUILDING SETBACK20' SIDE YARD BUILDING SETBACKTWO-WAY UNDERGROUNDLOT ENTRANCE / EXITPUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT18.0'30.0'18.0'18.0'30.0'18.0'24.0' 3 6 . 0 ' 2 4 . 0 '9.0'9.0'R22.0'R3.0'R3.0'R18.0' R 4 2 . 0 'R20.0 ' R3.0'R18.0 'R8.0'R3.0'R20.0 ' R3.0' R3 2 . 0 'R134.7'R18.0'R8.0'R42.0'R42.0'R3.0' R 6 9 . 0 'R76.0'R 2 0 . 0 'R20.0'R10.0'R80.0'R74.0'R42.0 ' R 4 5 . 0 'R100.0'6.7'21.3'6.7'21.3'10.0'8.0' 24.0'BIT. PVMT.,TYPBIT. PVMT.,TYPBIT. PVMT.,TYPBIT. PVMT.,TYPCONCRETESIDEWALK PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.CONCRETE DRIVEWAYAPRON PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.INFILTRATIONBASIN 1PACCESSIBLE PARKINGSPACE, INCL.SIGNAGE, STRIPINGAND RAMPSRETAININGWALL, TYP.PVMT. STRIPINGTYP.PVMT. STRIPINGTYP.PVMT. STRIPINGTYP.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSMATCH EXISTING,TYP.MATCH EXISTINGB618 C & G, TYP.B612 C&G, TYP.B612 C&G, TYP.B612 C&G, TYP.B612 C&G, TYP.B612 C&G, TYP.RETAININGWALL, TYP.CONCRETESIDEWALK PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.231119151CONCRETESIDEWALK PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.MATCH EXISTINGB618 C & G, TYP.CONCRETESIDEWALK PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.DRAINAGE AND UTILITY ESMT.EXISTING RAINGARDEN TOREMAIN, PROTECTFROM DAMAGEFOR CONNECTION OF NEW CURB TO EXISTINGCURB, DRILL AND GROUT TWO NO. 4 EPOXYCOATED DEFORMED REINFORCEMENT BARSINTO EXISTING CURB AND EMBED AT LEAST SIXINCHES. NEW CURB MUST BE CONSTRUCTEDWITHIN 24 HOURS OF REMOVAL OF OLD CURBUNLESS PRE-APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER.PROTECT EXPOSED BITUMINOUS STREET EDGEAND TAKE CARE NOT TO UNDERMINE ORDISTURB UNDERLYING AGGREGATE BASE.6' TALL CEDARFENCING, TYP.6' TALL CEDARFENCING, TYP.1.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO,LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL LOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, DUETO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BYTHE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING A RIGHT-OF-WAY AND STREET OPENING PERMIT.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENTMATERIALS.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THEOWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS.5.LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THEFIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.6.CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TOBUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPEARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING,FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS, BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNERRESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED.8.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS-SEEDETAIL.9.CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC. WIDTH OFCROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED BY ADA ORLOCAL GOVERNING BODIES.10.CURB AND GUTTER TYPE SHALL BE B618 WITHIN THE ROW AND B612 ON PUBLIC PROPERTY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS-TAPERBETWEEN CURB TYPES-SEE DETAIL.11.ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.12.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SITE IMPROVEMENTS.13.FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS.14.PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.15.ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP.16.BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS.17.ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE. SEE LANDSCAPEDOCUMENTS.SITE LAYOUT NOTES:SITE PLAN LEGEND:TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROWSCITY OF MOUNDS VIEW SITE SPECIFIC NOTES:SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED.HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGNNP = NO PARKING FIRE LANEST = STOPCP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2013 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION6/13/17CITY SUBMITTAL07/13/17CITY RESUBMITTAL......................BOULEVARD 2865-2901 MOUNDS VIEW BLVD / 7980 GROVELAND RD 7645 LYNDALE AVE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423 MWF PROPERTIES PROJECT 44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.07/13/1701" = 30'-0"30'-0"15'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.0SITE PLAN............SITE AREA TABLE:1.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM 24 HOUR NOTICE TO PUBLIC WORKS FOR ALL WORK RELATED TO OR AFFECTING MUNICIPALINFRASTRUCTURE (763-717-4050).2.USE OF MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION WILL BE ALLOWED FROM A HYDRANT DESIGNATED BY PUBLIC WORKS NEAR THECONSTRUCTION SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A HYDRANT METER FROM PUBLIC WORKS TO RECORD WATER USAGE AND PAY THEASSOCIATED DEPOSITS AND FEES FOR THE USE OF THE HYDRANT, METER AND WATER CONSUMPTION.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE HAUL TRUCK ROUTES WITH PUBLIC WORKS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION (763-717-4050).4.STREET CLOSURES/DETOURS SHALL BE APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS A MINIMUM OF 24 HOURS PRIOR TO BEING PLACED (763-717-4050).GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651) 454-0002 LOCALCONCRETE PAVEMENT AS SPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK)PROPERTY LINECURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUTGUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLANLIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTHEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTCONSTRUCTION LIMITSTOUSEABLE OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS: CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSEXISTING RAINGARDEN TOREMAIN, PROTECTFROM DAMAGE1.SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT & GENERAL GRADING NOTES.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SITE PREPARATION, SOIL CORRECTION,EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, ETC.) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BECOMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS ANDINSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER.3.GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM(NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS & PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY.4.PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW-LINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.5.GRADES OF WALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 5% MAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1% MIN. AND 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.6.PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. MAXIMUM SLOPES IN MAINTAINED AREAS IS 4:17.PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, FREESTANDING WALLS, OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES GREATER THAN 4' IN HEIGHT SHALL BE DESIGNED ANDENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING WALL ENGINEER. DESIGN DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISHPROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THEENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO TOPSOIL AND SODDING ACTIVITIES.9.IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO AN AREASELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE.10.EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE SITE. THE CONTRACTORSHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR RESPREADING ON THE SITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN EMBANKMENT AREAS,OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS, ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUT CUT AREAS, WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED, TOA DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES.11.FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING, INCLUDING ADJACENTTRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTSWHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADED SHALL BE PROTECTEDFROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALL AREAS THAT HAVE BECOME RUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODEDBY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TOEQUAL OR BETTER THAN ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORK.12.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND/OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THECONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OFTHE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICHSECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITHTHE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER.13. TOLERANCES13.1.THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW, THEPRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE.13.2.THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOTBELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE.13.3.AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESSDIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER.13.4.TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS.14.MAINTENANCE14.1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND EROSION, AND KEEP AREA FREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS.14.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED, ERODED AND RUTTED AREAS TO SPECIFIED TOLERANCES. DURING THECONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED, AND DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD, ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED SHALL BE RESEEDEDAND MULCHED.14.3.WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR ADVERSE WEATHER, CONTRACTORSHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE, AND COMPACT TO REQUIRED DENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION.GENERAL GRADING NOTES:1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALGRADING PLAN LEGEND:SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTERSPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURBSPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRSPER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY xxxxxx ., DATED xxxxxx GROUNDWATER WAS NOT OBSERVEDIN BORINGS RANGING FROM xxxxxx FEET TO xxxxx FEET DEEP.GROUNDWATER INFORMATION:CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW GRADING NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC GRADING NOTES.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0-SW1.5EROSION CONTROL NOTES:4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2013 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION6/13/17CITY SUBMITTAL07/13/17CITY RESUBMITTAL......................BOULEVARD 2865-2901 MOUNDS VIEW BLVD / 7980 GROVELAND RD 7645 LYNDALE AVE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423 MWF PROPERTIES PROJECT 44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.07/13/1701" = 30'-0"30'-0"15'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC3.0GRADING PLAN............GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651) 454-0002 LOCALEX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINEUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)CURB AND GUTTER (T.O = TIP OUT)EMERGENCY OVERFLOWEOF=1135.52TO CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSEXISTING RAINGARDEN TOREMAIN, PROTECTFROM DAMAGE6" COMBINED DIPWATER SERVICE ANDVALVE, STUB TO WITHIN5' FROM BUILDING,COORD. W/MECH'LSTUB SANITARY TO 5'FROM BUILDINGIE @ STUB=906.43IE @ BLDG=906.48COORD. W/MECH'L190 LF 8" PVC SDR26 SANITARYSERVICE @ 1.00%MAKE CONNECTION TOEXISTING SANITARYSEWEREX IE (N/S)=903.74(FIELD VERIFY)PROP IE (E)=903.84COORDINATE WITH CITYMAKE WET TAPCONNECTION TOEXISTING WATERMAIN, COORD. WITHCITY45º BEND45º BEND45º BEND59 LF 8" PVC SDR26 SANITARYSERVICE @ 1.00%SANITARY MH ARIM=915.05IE (E)=905.74IE (NW)=905.84CONSTRUCT PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.PROPOSED GATEVALVE AND VALVE BOXMH 2RIM=913.00IE (NE)=909.80IE (SW)=909.35FES 1IE=909.00INSTALL RIP RAP PERMNDOT STANDARDSCB 16RIM=914.22IE=910.85TRENCH DRAINRIM=905.38IE =903.38CONNECT TO INTERIORBUILDING MECH'L PUMP,SEE MECH'L PLANSCBMH 15RIM=914.00IE=910.67CBMH 14RIM=913.90IE=910.21CBMH 13RIM=913.08IE=909.74MH 12RIM=914.38IE=909.18SUMP=906.18PROVIDE SAFLBAFFLE AND HOOD35 LF OF 12" RCPSTORM @ 1.00%FES 3IE=910.00INSTALL RIP RAP PERMNDOT STANDARDS10 LF OF 12" RCPSTORM @ 2.00%FES 11IE=909.00INSTALL RIP RAP PERMNDOT STANDARDS36 LF OF 18"HDPE STORM@ 0.50%111 LF OF 18"HDPE STORM@ 0.50%93 LF OF 15"HDPE STORM@ 0.50%91 LF OF 15"HDPE STORM@ 0.50%35 LF OF 12"HDPE STORM@ 0.50%45º BENDCB 22RIM=913.20IE=909.31SUMP=906.31PROVIDE HOOD ONOUTLET PIPEFES 21IE=909.00INSTALL RIP RAPPER MNDOTSTANDARDS62 LF OF 12"HDPE STORM@ 0.50%FIRE DEPARTMENTCONNECTION,COORD. W/MECH'LHYD.& GV PERCITY STANDARDSAREA DRAINNUMBERAREA DRAIN SCHEDULE (SEE DETAILS)RIMAD 32A916.00INVERTWYE909.47PIPE SIZE ANDMATERIAL6" PVC SCH40PIPE LENGTH(FT)4PIPE SLOPE(FT/FT)0.0800AD 32BAD 32CAD 32DAD 32EAD 33AAD 33B910.71AD 34A911.21916.50916.506" PVC SCH406" PVC SCH406" PVC SCH406" PVC SCH406" PVC SCH406" PVC SCH406" PVC SCH406444774909.70910.02910.30910.53910.68910.96911.46CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATEALL FINAL AREA DRAIN ANDSPLASH BLOCK (DOWNSPOUT)LOCATIONS W/ ARCHITECTAD 34AFES 31IE=909.00INSTALL RIP RAP PERMNDOT STANDARDSMH 32RIM=915.27IE=909.22SUMP=906.22PROVIDE SAFLBAFFLE AND HOODMH 33RIM=915.73IE (N/SE)=910.37IE (E)=911.23MH 34RIM=915.00IE=911.21229 LF OF 12"HDPE STORM@ 0.50%168 LF OF 12"HDPE STORM@ 0.50%44 LF OF 12"HDPE STORM@ 0.50%AD 33BAD 33AAD 32EAD 32DAD 32CAD 32BAD 32A916.00916.00916.00916.00916.00INVERTPIPE/MH909.22909.45909.77910.05910.28910.43INVERTAD909.79910.18910.34910.62910.85911.24911.52911.780.08000.08000.08000.08000.08000.08000.0800REINSTALLEXISTING FESIE=909.20INSTALL RIP RAPPER MNDOTSTANDARDS11 LF OF 15"RCP STORM@ 0.40%CONNECT TO EXISTING 15"RCP PIPE AND EXTEND TODITCH BOTTOMIE=909.248" STORM SERVICE,STUB TO WITHIN 5'FROM BUILDING,COORD. W/MECH'LBLDG IE=911.37STUB IE=911.272 LF OF 8" SCH40PVC STORM @ 2.00%1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THECONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS.3. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITYLOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILTIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURINGCONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.4. UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINEINSTALLATION" AND "SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA(CEAM), AND SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.5. CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE-USED OR PLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER.6. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.8. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.9. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF FLARED END SECTION.10. UTILTIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THE CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINALCONNECTION TO BUILDING LINES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS.11. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PERDETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS.12. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.13. HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL.14. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN AMINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL.15. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.16. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS AND COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.17.CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCUTRES SHALL BE CORE-DRILLED.18. COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS.19. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES WITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF.20. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BESAWCUT. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THEMINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO SIGNAGE,BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALLBE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY.21. ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE REQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OWNERSMUST BE COMPLIED WITH. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING.22. CONTRACTOR SHALL CORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES.23. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES. COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVESNECESSARY AS TO NOT IMPACT INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES.24. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OFWORK.25.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT. APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BEUSED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES.26.ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED INACCORDANCE WITH MN RULES, CHAPTER 4714, SECTION 1109.0.GENERAL UTILITY NOTES:UTILITY LEGEND:CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW UTILITY NOTES:4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2013 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION6/13/17CITY SUBMITTAL07/13/17CITY RESUBMITTAL......................BOULEVARD 2865-2901 MOUNDS VIEW BLVD / 7980 GROVELAND RD 7645 LYNDALE AVE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423 MWF PROPERTIES PROJECT 44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.07/13/1701" = 30'-0"30'-0"15'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC4.0UTILITY PLAN............GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651) 454-0002 LOCALCATCH BASINGATE VALVE AND VALVE BOXSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATER MAINPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTMANHOLEFES AND RIP RAP1.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM 24 HOUR NOTICE TO PUBLIC WORKS FOR ALL WORK RELATED TO OR AFFECTING MUNICIPALINFRASTRUCTURE (763-717-4050).2.USE OF MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION WILL BE ALLOWED FROM A HYDRANT DESIGNATED BY PUBLIC WORKS NEAR THECONSTRUCTION SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A HYDRANT METER FROM PUBLIC WORKS TO RECORD WATER USAGE AND PAY THEASSOCIATED DEPOSITS AND FEES FOR THE USE OF THE HYDRANT, METER AND WATER CONSUMPTION.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE HAUL TRUCK ROUTES WITH PUBLIC WORKS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION (763-717-4050).4.STREET CLOSURES/DETOURS SHALL BE APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS A MINIMUM OF 24 HOURS PRIOR TO BEING PLACED (763-717-4050).5.PUBLIC WORKS TO OPERATE ALL WATER MAIN GATE VALVES. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO NOTIFY AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS ATLEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF WATER SUPPLY DISRUPTION. PUBLIC WORKS WILL PROVIDE A MAP OF AFFECTED PROPERTIES FORCONTRACTOR'S USE.6.WET TAPPING OF EXISTING WATER MAIN SHALL BE DONE UNDER SUPERVISION OF PUBLIC WORKS STAFF. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATETHIS WORK AND PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS NOTICE. OUTSIDE OF NORMAL WORKING HOURS WORK (7:00 AM - 3:00 PM) MAY RESULT INADDITIONAL STAFF TIME CHARGES. 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2013 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION6/13/17CITY SUBMITTAL07/13/17CITY RESUBMITTAL......................BOULEVARD 2865-2901 MOUNDS VIEW BLVD / 7980 GROVELAND RD 7645 LYNDALE AVE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423 MWF PROPERTIES PROJECT 44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.07/13/17REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC5.0CIVIL DETAILS............6"8"12"13 1/2"6"1/2" RADIUSFINISHED GRADE3" RADIUS CORNERS1:3 BATTER SLOPE GUTTER3/4"/1'NOTES:1. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT10'-0" O.C. +/-2. BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPONSOIL CONDITIONSCLASS V AGGREGATE SUBBASE-SEEBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DETAIL (6" MIN.)FINISHED GRADE0.5% SLOPE-CONSTRUCT WITH REVERSE SLOPEGUTTER (T.O. GUTTER) WHERE THE PAVEMENT SLOPESAWAY FROM CURB. SEE PLANN T SB-612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER7"37"20"FINISHED GRADESLOPE GUTTER 3/4"/1'NOTES:1. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT 10'-0" O.C. +/-2. BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPON SOIL CONDITIONSCONTINUOUS SLOPE CONCRETE CURBAND GUTTERPAVEMENT MATERIALSSEE DETAIL6"6"RIBBON CURBN T S4FINISHED GRADETOOLED CONTROL JOINTSEE DETAIL (TYP.)LIGHT BROOM FINISH PERPENDICULAR TOTRAFFIC WITH 3" WIDE SMOOTHTROWELLED EDGE5" CONCRETE AS SPECIFIED6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASECOMPACTED SUBGRADENOTES:1. INSTALLATION AND REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE CERTIFIED AND INACCORDANCE TO AN ON-SITE A.C.I. TECHNICIAN AS SPECIFIED.2. SEE GEO-TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR GROSS WEIGHTREQUIREMENTS.3. SEE LAYOUT DRAWINGS FOR LIMITS OF WALKS.4. SEE CONCRETE JOINT DETAIL FOR REQUIREMENTS.5. 1/2" WIDE EXPANSION JOINT AND SEALANT AT ALL CURBS.6. WIRE MESH AND CHAIRS REQUIRED FOR ALL WALKS OR IN LOCATIONS FORVEHICULAR TRAFFIC.W1.6 X W1.6 WIRE MESH AND CHAIRS ASSPECIFIEDLIGHT DUTY CONCRETE WALK/PAD3"2"THIS OCCURS ONLY WHEREMULCH MEETS EDGE OF WALKLEAVE TOP OFMULCH DOWN 1"FROM TOP OF WALKN T S68"AS REQUIREDCONCRETE THRUST BLOCKWATERMAINGATE VALVEREFER TO DRAWINGSFOR SIZESVALVE BOXFINISH GRADECOVER SHALL BESTAMPED WITH "WATER"GATE VALVE BOXN T SADJUST TOP TO 1/2" BELOW FINISHEDPAVEMENT GRADE OR 1" BELOW FINISHEDTURF GRADE. SET SO AS TO PROVIDE 12" OFUPWARD ADJUSTMENT.9BENDCROSSTEE45° BENDWYENOTES:1. CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING TO BE POURED AGAINST UNDISTURBED EARTH.2. KEEP CONCRETE CLEAR OF JOINT AND ACCESSORIES.3. IF NOT SHOWN ON PLANS, REQUIRED BEARING AT FITTING SHALL BE AS INDICATED ABOVE, ADJUSTED IFNECESSARY, TO CONFORM TO THE TEST PRESSURE(S) AND ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING STRESS(ES).4. BEARING AREAS AND SPECIAL BLOCKING DETAILS SHOWN ON PLANS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER BEARING AREASAND BLOCKING DETAILS SHOWN THIS STANDARD DETAIL.5. ABOVE BEARING AREAS BASED ON TEST PRESSURE OF 150 P.S.I. AND AN ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING STRESS OF2000 POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT. TO COMPUTE BEARING AREAS FOR DIFFERENT TEST PRESSURES AND SOILBEARING STRESSES, USE THE FOLLOWING EQUATION: BEARING AREA = (TEST PRESSURE/150) X (200/SOIL BEARINGSTRESS) X (TABLE VALUE).PLUGGED CROSSPLUGGED CROSSEACH AREA IS 1/2 OFTABULATED AREAPLUGGED TEEPLUG OR CAP1/4" PLYWOODOVER FACEOF BOLTSA1A2NOMINALFITTING SIZE(INCHES)TYE, WYE,PLUG, OR CAP90° BEND,PLUGGEDCROSSTEE PLUGGEDON RUNA1A245°BEND22.5°BEND11.25°BEND41.01.41.91.41.0--62.13.04.33.01.61.0-105.98.411.88.44.62.61.2128.512.017.012.06.63.41.71411.516.323.016.38.94.62.31615.021.330.021.311.66.03.01819.027.038.027.014.67.63.62023.533.347.033.318.19.44.72434.048.068.048.026.213.66.863.85.37.65.42.91.51.0THRUST BLOCKN T S116" PROVIDE INSULATION PER PLAN FIELD VERIFY DEPTH 6" 4" 6" (MIN.)NOTES:1. INSULATION BOARD TO BE CLOSED CELL. EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE FOAM MEETINGASTM 578, TYPE VI, 40PSI COMPRESSING STRENGTH (ASTM D1621) 0.1%MAX. WATERABSORPTION (ASTM C272).2. BACKFILL MATERIAL AROUND INSULATION MUST BE FINE SAND FREE FROM ROOT,ORGANIC MATERIAL, OR OTHER INJURIOUS MATERIALS.3. OVERLAP ALL INSULATION BOARD JOINTS.UTILITY PIPE INSULATION DETAILN T S1'-6" (MIN)PIPE BEDDINGMATERIALBACKFILL MATERIALFINE SAND (FA7)MIN. 2' WIDE BY 4" THICKINSULATION BOARD (USE 2-2"THICK BOARDS). MASTIC ALL JOINTSEXTEND INSULATION BOARD DOWNSIDES TO 7.5' DEPTH.FINISH GRADED I A DIA + 3'UTILITY PIPE1018" RADIUS5'-6" SQUARE OVERALL3" LINE WIDTH6" LINE WIDTH12" DIAMETER6" RADIUS4"ACCESSIBLE PARKING PAVEMENT MARKINGN T SALL COLORS TO MATCH ADASTANDARD COLORS7HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTXX" CLASS 5 AGGREGATESUBBASE (MNDOT 3138)XX" BINDER COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPNWB330B)TACK COAT (MNDOT 2357)XX" WEAR COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPWEA340B)COMPACTED SUBGRADE (100% OF STANDARDPROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY)N T S1NOTE:SECTION IS FORBIDDING PURPOSESONLY. REFER TOGEOTECH FORFINAL PAVEMENTSECTION.EXTEND POST PAST TOP OF POST10 DEGREE SLOPE1 INCH SILICONE RUBBEROR ASPHALTIC CAULKINGCOMPOUNDFILL ANNULAR SPACE TO 1 INCHFROM TOP WITH SILICA SANDCONCRETE FOOTING AS SPECIFIED6"3'-6"2'-6"60"-66"FROM PAVEMENT TOBOTTOM OF SIGN 1/2"MATERIAL VARIES-SEE PLANMETAL SIGN ACCORDINGTO MN STATE CODENOTE:1. SIGN SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED.2. VERIFY POST PAINT C0LOR WITH LANDSCAPEARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.ACCESSIBLE SIGN AND POSTN T S1'-6"6" O.D. GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE PAINTED WITH 1COAT OF APPROPRIATE PRIMER AND TWO COATSSIGN ENAMEL. FILL ANNULAR SPACE WITH GROUT.COVER WITH YELLOW "IDEAL SHIELD" PLASTICCOVER.GREEN POWDER COATED STEEL SQUAREPOST AS SPECIFIED1/4" METAL PLATE WELDED TOBOTTOM OF 6” PIPEGALVANIZED STEEL FASTENER(TYP. OF 2)8LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTXX" CLASS 5 AGGREGATESUBBASE (MNDOT 3138)XX" BINDER COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPNWB330B)TACK COAT (MNDOT 2357)XX" WEAR COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPWEA340B)COMPACTED SUBGRADE (100% OF STANDARDPROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY)N T SNOTE:SECTION IS FORBIDDING PURPOSESONLY. REFER TOGEOTECH FORFINAL PAVEMENTSECTION.2512"2'-0"1'-0"CONCRETEVALLEYGUTTERMIN. 6" AGGREGATE BASECOURSE TO BEPLACED BY PAVINGCONTRACTOR111'-0" TYP.VALLEY GUTTERN T S7"5 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2013 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION6/13/17CITY SUBMITTAL07/13/17CITY RESUBMITTAL......................BOULEVARD 2865-2901 MOUNDS VIEW BLVD / 7980 GROVELAND RD 7645 LYNDALE AVE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423 MWF PROPERTIES PROJECT 44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.07/13/17REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC5.1CIVIL DETAILS............18"MIN.12"112"27"112"16" O.C.STEPS ON DOWNSTREAM SIDECOVER SHALL BE STAMPED"SANITARY SEWER"BASES SHALL BE 8" STANDARD PRECAST WITH 2" LEAN GROUT, OR POURED 8" SLAB REINFORCED WITH 6" x6" 10/10 MESHPRECAST CONCRETE CONE SECTIONMETAL SEWER CASTING - REFER TOSTRUCTURE SCHEDULE FOR TYPEMIN. 2 AND MAX. 5 ADJUSTING RINGS.GROUT BETWEEN RINGS, CASTING,AND ALONG OUTSIDE.316"VARIABLE1'- 8" MAX.CLSLOPE AT 2 IN./FT. (TYP)FLOWRUBBER BOOTFLOWRUBBERBOOTRUBBER GASKET - TYPAT ALL JOINTSGROUT TO 1/2 PIPESLOPE @ 2 IN./FT.(TYP)SANITARY SEWER MANHOLEN T S1VARIES - TYP. 4'FLOWFLOW61"RIM ELEVATION"PRECAST COVER -8" THICKSTEPS - INSTALL ONDOWNSTREAM SIDE@ 16" O.C.PRECAST CONCRETESECTIONGROUT SHELF ANDCHANNELSMETAL SEWER CASTING -REFER TO STRUCTURESCHEDULE FOR TYPEMIN. 2 AND MAX. 5 ADJUSTINGRINGS. GROUT BETWEENRINGS, CASTING, AND ALONGOUTSIDE.STORM SEWER PIPE - SEEUTILITY PLAN FOR LOCATION,INVERT, AND SIZESBASES SHALL BE 8" STANDARDPRECAST WITH 2" LEAN GROUT, ORPOURED 8" SLAB REINFORCED WITH6" x 6" 10/10 MESHRUBBER GASKET -TYP AT ALL JOINTSCATCH BASINN T SDIMENSIONS FROM BACK OF CURB(BOC) TO CENTER OF PIPE:4' DIA. MH - 9" IN FROM BOC5' DIA. MH - 3" IN FROM BOC6' DIA. MH - 3" BEHIND BOC7' DIA. MH - 9" BEHIND BOC8' DIA. MH - 15" BEHIND BOC2MIN. 2 AND MAX. 5 ADJUSTING RINGS.GROUT BETWEEN RINGS, CASTING, ANDALONG OUTSIDE.METAL SEWER CASTING - REFER TOSTRUCTURE SCHEDULE FOR TYPEPRECAST CONCRETE CONE SECTIONBASES SHALL BE 8" STANDARD PRECASTWITH 2" LEAN GROUT, OR POURED 8"SLAB REINFORCED WITH 6" x 6" 10/10MESHCOVER SHALL BE STAMPED"STORM SEWER"STEPS ON DOWNSTREAM SIDEGROUT SHELF AND CHANNELS16" O.C.VARIABLE27"112"VARIABLE 18"MIN.STORM MANHOLEN T SDIMENSIONS FROM BACK OF CURB(BOC) TO CENTER OF PIPE:4' DIA. MH - 9" IN FROM BOC5' DIA. MH - 3" IN FROM BOC6' DIA. MH - 3" BEHIND BOC7' DIA. MH - 9" BEHIND BOC8' DIA. MH - 15" BEHIND BOC3PIPE BEDDING - RCP & DIPN T S4PIPE BEDDING - PVCN T S5CATCH BASIN/MANHOLE/RISERREMARKSCASTING SCHEDULENOTE:1.CASTINGS SHALL BE NEENAH FOUNDRY CASTINGS OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT.2.CASTINGS SHALL BE STAMPED WITH APPROPRIATE UTILITY NAME ("STORM SEWER", "SANITARY SEWER")CASTING SCHEDULEN T SGRATE TYPE(NEENAH)STORM CURB INLETR-306713, 16, 226STORM AREA DRAIN INLETR-25012, 14, 15STORM MANHOLER-164212, 32-34D24"3H:1L MAX.BIO-INFILTRATION BASIN (RAIN GARDEN - TYP.)N T STYPICAL SECTION VIEW1.INSTALL SILT FENCE AND/OR OR OTHER APPROPRIATE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES TOPREVENT SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING OR ENTERING THE PRACTICE DURING CONSTRUCTION.2.ALL DOWN-GRADIENT PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S MUST BE IN PLACE BEFORE ANY UP GRADIENTLAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY BEGINS.3.PERFORM CONTINUOUS INSPECTIONS OF EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES.4.INSTALL UTILITIES (WATER, SANITARY SEWER, ELECTRIC, PHONE, FIBER OPTIC, ETC) PRIOR TO SETTING FINALGRADE OF BIORETENTION DEVICE.5.ROUGH GRADE THE SITE. IF BIORETENTION AREAS ARE BEING USED AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINSLEAVE A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET OF COVER OVER THE PRACTICE TO PROTECT THE UNDERLYING SOILS FROMCLOGGING.6.PERFORM ALL OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENTS.7.PLANT ALL AREAS AFTER DISTURBANCE.8.CONSTRUCT BIORETENTION DEVICE UPON STABILIZATION OF CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA.9.IMPLEMENT TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES.10.PLANT AND/OR ROCK MULCH BIORETENTION DEVICE.11.REMOVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA ISADEQUATELY VEGETATED.GENERAL NOTES1.IN THE EVENT THAT SEDIMENT IS INTRODUCED INTO THE BMP DURING OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWINGEXCAVATION, THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE PRACTICE PRIOR TO CONTINUINGCONSTRUCTION.2.GRADING OF BIORETENTION DEVICES SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED USING LOW-COMPACTION EARTH-MOVINGEQUIPMENT TO PREVENT COMPACTION OF UNDERLYING SOILS.3.ALL SUB MATERIALS BELOW THE SPECIFIED BIORETENTION DEPTH (ELEVATION) SHALL BE UNDISTURBED,UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCINGRIBBON CURB OR CURB CUT, SEESITE AND GRADING PLANSGRASS PRE-TREATMENT STRIP ORPRE-TREATMENT STRUCTURE, SEEUTILITY AND LANDSCAPE PLANSUNDISTURBED, UNCOMPACTED INSITU SOILNET LESS EROSION BLANKET IN BOTTOM OFBASIN. SLIT BLANKET TO ALLOW PLANTMATERIAL SURFACE IF PLUG PLANTING IS TOBE USED, SEE GRADING AND LANDSCAPEPLANSMIN.PLANTING MEDIUM DEPTH 24"WITH A WELL BLENDED MIXTURE (BY VOLUME):70% HOMOGENOUS CONSTRUCTION SAND30% ORGANIC COMPOSTSEE GRADING PLAN FOR DEPTHPLANT MATERIAL, SEE LANDSCAPE PLANSIDE SLOPE TREATMENTS, SEE GRADING OR LANDSCAPE PLANSMUST OVER EXCAVATE DOWNTO SUITABLE SOILS. FIELDVERIFY WITH SOILS ENGINEER7SANITARY MANHOLER-1642ADOWNSPOUT TO PIPE CONNECTIONN T SVARIES BUILDING DOWNSPOUTREFER TO ARCH'LCAP WITH HOLE CUT OUTFOR DOWNSPOUTCOMPACTED SOIL6" PVC SEWER RISER PIPE(LENGTH AS REQUIRED)6 PVC LONG RADIUS 14BEND SEWER ELBOW6" PVC SEWER PIPECRUSHED ANDCOMPACTED STONE8 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2013 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION6/13/17CITY SUBMITTAL07/13/17CITY RESUBMITTAL......................BOULEVARD 2865-2901 MOUNDS VIEW BLVD / 7980 GROVELAND RD 7645 LYNDALE AVE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423 MWF PROPERTIES PROJECT 44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.07/13/17REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC5.2CIVIL DETAILS............ CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSEXISTING RAINGARDEN TOREMAIN, PROTECTFROM DAMAGE1 - SHL1 - SHL1 - SHL1 - SHL3 - CBS3 - CBS1 - GSL1 - SHL45 - MJ4 - SWO4 - SWO2 - CBS3 - BHS3 - RB2 - GSL3 - NRM1 - ABS1 - ABS9 - SSD5 - CS5 - KFG3 - BES3 - LQFH3 - LQFH10 - SSD5 - CS3 - BES5 - KFG16 - KFG12 - PMD1 - SSC3 - PFC3 - PFC1 - PFC1 - SSC1 - SSCEDGING, TYP.SEED TYPE 1SEED TYPE 2SEED TYPE 218" DECORATIVE ROCKMAINTENANCE STRIP, TYP.18" DECORATIVEROCK MAINTENANCESTRIP, TYP.EDGING, TYP.LAWNLAWNLAWNLAWNLAWN10 - NRM1 - SSCDECORATIVE BOULDERS, TYP.DECOARTIVE BOULDERS, TYP.LAWN43 - NCB8 - CBS6 - BHS1.ALL SHRUB BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 4" DEPTH OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH OVER WEED BARRIER.OWNER'S REP SHALL APPROVE MULCH SAMPLE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. EDGING SHALL BE METAL EDGING OR APPROVEDEQUAL.2.ALL TREES SHALL BE MULCHED WITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OF PLANTINGBED, IF APPLICABLE. ALL MULCH SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN A MINIMUM OF 2" FROM TREE TRUNK.3.PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS AND SHALL BE OFHARDY STOCK, FREE FROM DISEASE, DAMAGE AND DISFIGURATION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAININGPLUMPNESS OF PLANT MATERIAL FOR DURING OF ACCEPTANCE PERIOD.4.UPON DISCOVERY OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITY OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THE SCHEDULE AND THE QUANTITYSHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN.5.CONDITION OF VEGETATION SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THECONTRACT. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PART OF THE CONTRACT SHALL BE WARRANTED FOR ONE (1) FULL GROWING SEASONSFROM SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE.6.ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE 4" LAYER LOAM AND SOD AS SPECIFIED UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS.7.COORDINATE LOCATION OF VEGETATION WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES, LIGHTING FIXTURES, DOORS ANDWINDOWS. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE IN THE FIELD FINAL LOCATION OF TREES AND SHRUBS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVALBY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.8.ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ACCEPTANCE.9.REPAIR AT NO COST TO OWNER ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES.10.SWEEP AND MAINTAIN ALL PAVED SURFACES FREE OF DEBRIS GENERATED FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES.LANDSCAPE NOTES:01" = 30'-0"30'-0"15'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONL1.0LANDSCAPE PLAN............LEGENDPROPOSED CANOPY & EVERGREEN TREE SYMBOLS - SEESCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESSODDECORATIVE BOULDERS, 18"-30" DIA.PROPOSED DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN SHRUBSYMBOLS - SEE SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES ANDPLANTING SIZESPROPOSED PERENNIAL PLANT SYMBOLS - SEESCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES1" DIA. DECORATIVE ROCK MULCH OVER FILTER FABRIC,SAMPLES REQUIREDSHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH OVER FILTER FABRIC,SAMPLES REQUIREDGOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651) 454-0002 LOCAL4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2013 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION6/13/17CITY SUBMITTAL07/13/17CITY RESUBMITTAL......................BOULEVARD 2865-2901 MOUNDS VIEW BLVD / 7980 GROVELAND RD 7645 LYNDALE AVE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423 MWF PROPERTIES PROJECT 24904Patrick J. SarverLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.07/13/17LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS:TREE REPLACEMENT CALCULATIONS:SEED TYPE 2 - MNDOT SEED MIX 35-221 DRY PRAIRIEGENERAL, SEE MNDOT AT RECOMMENDED RATESEED TYPE 1 - MNDOT SEED MIX 34-262 WET PRAIRIE, SEEMNDOT AT RECOMMENDED RATEPLANT SCHEDULE - ENTIRE SITESYMQUANT.COMMON NAMEBOTANICAL NAMESIZEROOTCOMMENTSDECIDUOUS TREESNRM13NORTHWOOD RED MAPLEAcer rubrum 'Northwood'2.5" CAL.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMSHL5SKYLINE HONEYLOCUSTGleditsia triacanthos 'Skycole'2.5" CAL.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMRB3RIVER BIRCH TREEBetula nigra2.5" CAL.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMSWO8SWAMP WHITE OAKQuercus bicolor2.5" CAL.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMGSL3GREENSPIRE LINDENTilia americana 'Greenspire'2.5" CAL.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMORNAMENTAL TREESPFC7PRAIRIEFIRE FLOWERING CRABMalus 'Prairiefire'1.5" CAL.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMABS2AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRYAmelanchier x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance (tree form)'1.5" CAL.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMSSC4SPRING SNOW FLOWERING CRABMalus 'Spring Snow'1.5" CAL.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMEVERGREEN TREESBHS9BLACK HILLS SPRUCEPicea glauca 'Densata'6' ht.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMCBS16COLORADO SPRUCEPicea pungens6' ht.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMSHRUBS - CONIFEROUS & EVERGREENMJ45MEDORA JUNIPERJuniperus scopulorum 'Medora'36" HT.CONT.NCB43NORTHERN CHARM BOXWOODBuxus 'Wilson'24" HT.CONT.LQHF6LITTLE QUICK FIRE HYDRANGEAHydrangea paniculata 'SMHPLQF'24" HT.CONT.PERENNIALS & GRASSESKFG26KARL FOERSTER GRASSCalamagrostis x acutiflora "Karl Foerster"#1CONT.PMD12PARDON ME DAYLILLYHemerocallis 'Pardon Me'#1CONT.SSD19STELLA SUPREME DAYLILYHemerocallis 'Stella Supreme'#1CONT.BES6GOLDSTURM RUDBECKIARudbeckia fulgida 'Goldsturm'#1CONT.CS10CARADONNA SALVIASalvia x sylvestris 'Caradonna'#1CONT.TOTAL DECIDUOUSTREES: 32TOTAL ORNAMENTALTREES: 13TOTAL EVERGREENTREES: 25TOTAL SHRUBS: 94 1.ENTIRE SITE SHALL BE FULLY IRRIGATED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT IRRIGATION SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEWAND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.2.SEE MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR IRRIGATION WATER, METER, AND POWERCONNECTIONS.3.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND/ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES PRIOR TO ANYEXCAVATION/INSTALLATION. ANY DAMAGE TO UNDERGROUND/ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES SHALL BE THERESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH CORRECTING DAMAGES SHALL BE BORNEENTIRELY BY THE CONTRACTOR.4.SERVICE EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE PER LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY STANDARDS AND SHALL BE PERNATIONAL AND LOCAL CODES. EXACT LOCATION OF SERVICE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR EQUIVALENT AT THE JOB SITE.5.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY FOR THE PROPOSED ELECTRICAL SERVICE ANDMETERING FACILITIES.6.IRRIGATION WATER LINE CONNECTION SIZE IS 1-12" AT BUILDING. VERIFY WITH MECHANICAL PLANS.COVAGE.7.ALL MAIN LINES SHALL BE 18" BELOW FINISHED GRADE.8.ALL LATERAL LINES SHALL BE 12" BELLOW FINISHED GRADE.9.ALL EXPOSED PVC RISERS, IF ANY, SHALL BE GRAY IN COLOR.10.CONTRACTOR SHALL LAY ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUIT AT 2'-0" BELOW THE FINISHED GRADE OF THE TOP OF PAVEMENT.EXTEND SLEEVES TO 2'-0" BEYOND PAVEMENT.11.CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK THE LOCATION OF ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUIT WITH THE SLEEVING MATERIAL "ELLED" TO2'-0" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE AND CAPPED.12.FABRICATE ALL PIPE TO MANUFACTURE'S SPECIFICATIONS WITH CLEAN AND SQUARE CUT JOINTS. USE QUALITY GRADEPRIMER AND SOLVENT CEMENT FORMULATED FOR INTENDED TYPE OF CONNECTION.13.BACKFILL ALL TRENCHES WITH SOIL FREE OF SHARP OBJECTS AND DEBRIS.14.ALL VALVE BOXES AND COVERS SHALL BE BLACK IN COLOR.15.GROUP VALVE BOXES TOGETHER FOR EASE WHEN SERVICE IS REQUIRED. LOCATE IN PLANT BED AREAS WHENEVERPOSSIBLE.16.IRRIGATION CONTROLLER LOCATION SHALL BE VERIFIED ON-SITE WITH OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.17.CONTROL WIRES: 14 GAUGE DIRECT BURIAL, SOLID COPPER IRRIGATION WIRE. RUN UNDER MAIN LINE. USEMOISTURE-PROOF SPLICES AND SPLICE ONLY AT VALVES OR PULL BOXES. RUN SEPARATE HOT AND COMMON WIRE TOEACH VALVE AND ONE (1) SPARE WIRE AND GROUND TO FURTHEST VALVE FROM CONTROLLER. LABEL OR COLOR CODEALL WIRES.18.AVOID OVER SPRAY ON BUILDINGS, PAVEMENT, WALLS AND ROADWAYS BY INDIVIDUALLY ADJUSTING RADIUS OR ARCON SPRINKLER HEADS AND FLOW CONTROL ON AUTOMATIC VALVE.19.ADJUST PRESSURE REGULATING VALVES FOR OPTIMUM PRESSURE ON SITE.20.USE SCREENS ON ALL HEADS.21.A SET OF AS-BUILT DRAWINGS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON-SITE AT ALL TIMES IN AN UPDATED CONDITION.22.ALL PIPE 3" AND OVER SHALL HAVE THRUST BLOCKING AT EACH TURN.23.ALL AUTOMATIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVES WILL HAVE 3" MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL UNDERNEATHVALVE AND VALVE BOX. GRAVEL SHALL EXTENT 3" BEYOND PERIMETER OF VALVE BOX.24.THERE SHALL BE 3" MINIMUM SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOM OF VALVE BOX COVER AND TOP OF VALVE STRUCTURE.IRRIGATION NOTES:REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONL1.1LANDSCAPE PLANNOTES & DETAILS............GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651) 454-0002 LOCAL4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2013 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION6/13/17CITY SUBMITTAL07/13/17CITY RESUBMITTAL......................BOULEVARD 2865-2901 MOUNDS VIEW BLVD / 7980 GROVELAND RD 7645 LYNDALE AVE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423 MWF PROPERTIES PROJECT 24904Patrick J. SarverLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.07/13/17FACE OF BUILDING, WALL, OR STRUCTUREMIN. 3" LAYER OF ROCK MULCH AS SPECIFIED. PROVIDE SAMPLE TOLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATIONFINISHED GRADECOMPACTED SUBGRADEWATER PERMEABLE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AS SPECIFIED18" - VERIFY W/ PLANAGGREGATE MAINTANENCE STRIPN T SSTAKED LANDSCAPE EDGER AS SPECIFIED, SEE MANUFACTURER'SINSTRUCTIONS AND SPECS. FOR INSTALLATION AND PLACEMENTSLOPE - MIN. 2%, MAX. 5:1VERIFY W/ GRADING PLAN1PERENNIAL BED PLANTINGN T SPLANT TOP OF ROOTBALL 1-2" ABOVE ABOVESURROUNDING GRADEROOTS AT OUTER EDGE OF ROOTBALL LOOSENED TOENSURE PROPER BACKFILL-TO-ROOT CONTACTSLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OFPLANTING BEDEXISTING GRADEROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPENOTES AND PLAN NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEPMULCH MIN. 2" FROM PLANT STEMBACKFILL AS PER SPECIFICATIONDO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL.SIZE VARIESSEE LANDSCAPE PLANMODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ON LOCATION OF PLANTMATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDS OR OVERALL PLANTPLACEMENT3DECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS SHRUB PLANTINGN T SPRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAINNORMAL SHAPE FOR SPECIES)PLANT TOP OF ROOTBALL 1-2" ABOVE ABOVESURROUNDING GRADEROOTS AT OUTER EDGE OF ROOTBALL LOOSENED TOENSURE PROPER BACKFILL-TO-ROOT CONTACTSLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OFPLANTING BEDEXISTING GRADEROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPENOTES AND PLAN NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEPMULCH MIN. 2" FROM PLANT TRUNKBACKFILL AS PER SPECIFICATIONDO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW ROOTBALL.THREE TIMES WIDTHOF ROOTBALLRULE OF THUMB - MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ONLOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDSOR OVERALL PLANT PLACEMENT4THREE TIMES WIDTHOF ROOTBALLDECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTINGN T SPRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAINNORMAL TREE SHAPE)THREE 2"X4"X8' WOODEN STAKES, STAINED BROWNWITH TWO STRANDS OF WIRE TWISTED TOGETHER.STAKES SHALL BE PLACED AT 120° TO ONE ANOTHER.WIRE SHALL BE THREADED THROUGH BLACK RUBBERHOSE COLLARS. ALTERNATE STABILIZING METHODSMAY BE PROPOSED BY CONTRACTOR.TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION: PLANT TREE 1"-2" ABOVEEXISTING GRADEMULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OFPLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ROCK OR ORGANICMULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES AND PLANNOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEP MULCH MIN. 2" FROMPLANT TRUNKEXISTING GRADECUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOTBALL. IF NON-BIODEGRADABLE, REMOVE COMPLETELYSLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OFPLANTING BEDBACKFILL AS SPECIFIEDCOMPACT BOTTOM OF PIT, TYP.RULE OF THUMB - MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ONLOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDSOR OVERALL PLANT PLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSEXISTING RAINGARDEN TOREMAIN, PROTECTFROM DAMAGECONSTRUCTIONENTRANCECONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEINLET PROTECTION AT ALLDOWNSTREAM CATCHBASINS.INLET PROTECTION,TYP.PERIMETER EROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSION CONTROLAT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSION CONTROLAT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2013 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION6/13/17CITY SUBMITTAL07/13/17CITY RESUBMITTAL......................BOULEVARD 2865-2901 MOUNDS VIEW BLVD / 7980 GROVELAND RD 7645 LYNDALE AVE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423 MWF PROPERTIES PROJECT 44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.07/13/1701" = 30'-0"30'-0"15'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.0SWPPP - EXISTINGCONDITIONS............1. CONTRACTOR AND OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SWPPP DESIGN ANDOBTAINING ALL PERMITS PRIOR TO STARTING ANY WORK ON SITE.2. CONTRACTOR'S EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG BOOK SHALL BE KEPTONSITE AND AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY CITY INSPECTION PERSONNEL.CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW EROSION CONTROL NOTES:1. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL REQUIRE ANMPCA NPDES PERMIT. AN EROSION CONTROL PERMIT IS ALSOREQUIRED FROM THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW.2. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES,DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES.3. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSIONCONTROL NOTES.4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION,INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT.SWPPP NOTES:GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651) 454-0002 LOCALLEGEND:EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALINLET PROTECTIONSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEDRAINAGE ARROW1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMITEROSION CONTROL BLANKETALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, ANDMEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUMREQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURINGTHE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSEXISTING RAINGARDEN TOREMAIN, PROTECTFROM DAMAGECONSTRUCTIONENTRANCECONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEINLET PROTECTION AT ALLDOWNSTREAM CATCHBASINS.INLET PROTECTION,TYP.PERIMETER EROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSION CONTROLAT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSION CONTROLAT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PLACE EROSIONCONTROL BLANKETON ALL SLOPES 4:1 ORSTEEPER, TYP.(MNDOT CATEGORY 3)PLACE EROSIONCONTROL BLANKETON ALL SLOPES 4:1 ORSTEEPER, TYP.(MNDOT CATEGORY 3)PLACE EROSIONCONTROL BLANKETON ALL SLOPES 4:1 ORSTEEPER, TYP.(MNDOT CATEGORY 3)INLET PROTECTION ATCATCH BASINS, TYP.INLET PROTECTION ATCATCH BASINS, TYP.INLET PROTECTION ATCATCH BASINS, TYP.INSTALL ROW OF SILTFENCE AROUNDINFILTRATION BASIN,PROTECT AREA FROMTRAFFIC THROUGHOUTCONSTRUCTION, TYP.4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2013 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION6/13/17CITY SUBMITTAL07/13/17CITY RESUBMITTAL......................BOULEVARD 2865-2901 MOUNDS VIEW BLVD / 7980 GROVELAND RD 7645 LYNDALE AVE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423 MWF PROPERTIES PROJECT 44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.07/13/1701" = 30'-0"30'-0"15'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.1SWPPP - PROPOSEDCONDITIONS............GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651) 454-0002 LOCALCITY OF MOUNDS VIEW EROSION CONTROL NOTES:1. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL REQUIRE ANMPCA NPDES PERMIT. AN EROSION CONTROL PERMIT IS ALSOREQUIRED FROM THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW.2. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES,DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES.3. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSIONCONTROL NOTES.4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION,INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT.SWPPP NOTES:LEGEND:EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALINLET PROTECTIONSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEDRAINAGE ARROW1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMITEROSION CONTROL BLANKETALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, ANDMEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUMREQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURINGTHE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION.1. CONTRACTOR AND OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SWPPP DESIGN ANDOBTAINING ALL PERMITS PRIOR TO STARTING ANY WORK ON SITE.2. CONTRACTOR'S EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG BOOK SHALL BE KEPTONSITE AND AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY CITY INSPECTION PERSONNEL. 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2013 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION6/13/17CITY SUBMITTAL07/13/17CITY RESUBMITTAL......................BOULEVARD 2865-2901 MOUNDS VIEW BLVD / 7980 GROVELAND RD 7645 LYNDALE AVE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423 MWF PROPERTIES PROJECT 44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.07/13/17REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.2SWPPP - DETAILS............OVERFLOW AT TOP OFFILTER ASSEMBLYOVERFLOW IS 12 OF THE CURBBOX HEIGHTHIGH-FLOW FABRICFILTER ASSEMBLY DIAMETER, 6"ON-GRADE 10" AT LOW POINTEXISTING CURB, PLATE, BOX,AND GRATENOTES:1. REPLACE INLET GRATE UPON COMPLETE INSTALLATION OF INLET PROTECTION FABRIC.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS FROM THE SURFACE OF THE SYSTEMAFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND AT THE COMPLETION OF THE CONTRACT.3. REFERENCE APPLE VALLEY STANDARD PLATE ERO-4C.CURB INLET FILTERN T S1PROFILE6" MIN CRUSHED STONE75' MINIMUMPLANFINISHEDGRADETO CONSTRUCTION AREA35' REXISTINGUNDISTURBEDROADWAYN T S30' FROM EDGE OF ROADTO FRONT OF SPEED BUMPGEOTEXTILE FILTERFABRIC4" HIGH, 18" WIDESPEED BUMPSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ACCESS24' (MIN)NOTES:1.PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND UNDISTURBEDROADWAY.2.THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENTONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE OR ADDINGSTONE TO THE LENGTH OF THE ENTRANCE.3.REPAIR AND CLEANOUT MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT.4.ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY SHALL BE REMOVED ASDIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.5.FINAL LOCATION AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.6.CRUSHED STONE SHALL BE 1-1/2" DIA. CLOSE GRADED, AND IN ACCORDANCE TO MNDOT SECTION 2118.EXISTING UNDISTURBED ROADWAY35' RTO CONSTRUCTIONAREA2TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL.SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES,10" SPACING, 4" DOWN FROMTRENCHOVERLAP: BURY UPPER ENDOF LOWER STRIP AS IN 'A'AND 'B'. OVERLAP END OFTOP STRIP 4" AND STAPLE.EROSION STOP: FOLD OF MATTINGBURIED IN SILT TRENCH ANDTAMPED. DOUBLEROW OFSTAPLES.PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APARTTO KEEP MATTING FIRMLYPRESSED TO SOIL.'D''C''B'BURY THE TOP END OF THEMATTING IN A TRENCH 4" ORMORE IN DEPTHTYPICAL STAPLE #8GAUGE WIRE1 1/2"10"OVERFALL'E''A'NOTE:1. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TOKEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TOSOIL.EROSION BLANKETN T S3FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIEDEXISTING GROUNDSURFACEDIRECTION OF FLOWWOODEN STAKES 1/2"X2"X16" MIN. PLACED 10' O.C.WHEN INSTALLED ON GROUND. IF INSTALLED ONPVMT. PROVIDE SANDBAGS BEHIND AND ON TOP ATMIN. 10' O.C.8" MIN.SEDIMENT BIO-ROLL / COMPOST FILTER LOGN T SFILLER AS SPECIFIEDNOTE:1. COMPOST FILTER LOGS (BIO ROLLS) SHALL BE FILTREXX EROSION CONTROL SOXX OR APPROVED EQUAL.2. COMPOST FILLER TO BE MADE FROM A COMPOST BLEND 30%-40% GRADE 2 (SPEC 3890) AND 60%-70%PARTIALLY DECOMPOSED WOOD CHIPS, PER MNDOT SPEC 3897.3. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE GEOTEXTILE KNITTED MATERIAL WITH MAX. OPENINGS OF 3/8".4. IF MULTIPLE ROLLS NEEDED, OVERLAP BY MIN. 12" AT ENDS AND STAKE.5. SILT SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE IT REACHES 80% OF THE HEIGHT OF THE ROLL OR AS DEEMED NECESSARYBY SITE CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN PROPER FUNCTION.FILL UPSTREAM BASE EDGE WITH2" OF DIRT OR COMPOST TOEMBED ROLL.4FILTER FABRIC WITH WIRE SUPPORT NETAS SPECIFIED.METAL POST ASSPECIFIED.FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED SECURETO WIRE SUPPORT NET WITH METALCLIPS 12"O.C.SUPPORT NET: 12 GAUGE 4" x 4"WIRE HOOKED ONTOPREFORMED CHANNELS ONPOSTS AS SPECIFIED.EXISTING GROUNDSURFACECARRY WIRE SUPPORT NETDOWN INTO TRENCHDIRECTION OF FLOWANCHOR FABRIC WITHSOIL, TAMP BACKFILLMETAL POSTS 8'-0" O.C.MAX.24" 24" 24" MIN. 6"6"SEDIMENT FENCEN T S5 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2013 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION6/13/17CITY SUBMITTAL07/13/17CITY RESUBMITTAL......................BOULEVARD 2865-2901 MOUNDS VIEW BLVD / 7980 GROVELAND RD 7645 LYNDALE AVE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423 MWF PROPERTIES PROJECT 44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.07/13/17REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.3SWPPP - NARRATIVE............OWNER:9605 36TH AVE, LLC333 WASHINGTON AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 401MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401OWNER INFORMATIONTRAINING (PART III.A.2)PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PERMANENTSTORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMDESIGN ENGINEER: MATTHEW R. PAVEK P.E.TRAINING COURSE: DESIGN OF SWPPPTRAINING ENTITY: UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAINSTRUCTOR: JOHN CHAPMANDATES OF TRAINING COURSE: 5/15/2011 - 5/16/2011TOTAL TRAINING HOURS: 12RE-CERTIFICATION: 1/13/14-1/13/14 (8 HOURS), EXP. 5/31/2017CONTACT:PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IS REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT TO MEET NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. THEPROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPOSED STORMWATER SYSTEM.AREAS AND QUANTITIES (PART III.A.4.B&C):SWPPP CONTACT PERSONCONTRACTOR:SWPPP INSPECTOR TRAINING:ALL SWPPP INSPECTIONS MUST BE PERFORMED BY APERSON THAT MEETS THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THENPDES CONSTRUCTION SITE PERMIT.TRAINING CREDENTIALS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THECONTRACTOR AND KEPT ON SITE WITH THE SWPPPNOTE: QUANTITIES ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE FOR THEMSELVES THE EXACTQUANTITIES FOR BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION.PROJECT NARRATIVE:PROJECT IS A CONSTRUCTION OF ONE MULTI-FAMILY BUILDING AND PARKING LOT. SITE AND LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WILL OCCUR.SPECIAL TMDL BMP REQUIREMENTS SITE SPECIFIC (IF REQUIRED):THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN ONE MILE OF AND DISCHARGES TO SPRING LAKE. THESE WATERS ARE NOT IDENTIFIED AS AN I MPAIRED WATER ON THEMPCA'S 303(D) IMPAIRED WATERS LIST.PERMANENT STABILIZATION NOTES SITE SPECIFIC:PERMANENT SEED MIX·FOR THIS PROJECT ALL AREAS THAT ARE NOT TO BE SODDED OR LANDSCAPED SHALL RECEIVE A NATIVE PERMANENT SEED MIX.··AREAS IN BUFFERS AND ADJACENT TO OR IN WET AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 (STORMWATER SOUTH AND WEST) AT 35 LBS PERACRE.··DRY AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 35-221 (DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL) AT 40 LBS PER ACRE.·MAINTENANCE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL.·SUPPLEMENTARY SITE SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES:THESE NOTES SUPERCEDE ANY GENERAL SWPPP NOTES.THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN 1.0 ACRES SO AN NPDES PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. THECONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES IN THE NPDES PERMIT THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION.SWPPP ATTACHMENTS (ONLY APPLICABLE IF SITE IS 1 ACRE OR GREATER):CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE FOLLOWING SWPPP ATTACHMENTS WHICH ARE A PART OF THE OVERALL SWPPP PACKAGE:ATTACHMENT A. CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE - SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENTATTACHMENT B. CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLISTATTACHMENT C. MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMSATTACHMENT D: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.ATTACHMENT E: GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.THE CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH A CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT DISTURBS SITE SOIL OR WHO IMPLEMENT A POLLUTANT CONTROL MEASURE IDENTIFIEDIN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES)GENERAL PERMIT (DATED AUGUST 1, 2013 # MNR100001 PAGES 1-35) AND ANY LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION CONCERNING EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL.PART III STORMWATER DISCHARGE DESIGN REQUIREMENTSSWPPP (PART III.A)THE NATURE OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IS REPRESENTED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. SEE THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS ANDSWPPP NARRATIVE (ATTACHMENT A: CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE) FOR ADDITIONAL SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP INFORMATION. THE PLANS SHOW LOCATIONS AND TYPES OF ALLTEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S. STANDARD DETAILS ARE ATTACHED TO THIS SWPPP DOCUMENT.THE INTENDED SEQUENCING OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IS AS FOLLOWS:1. INSTALL STABILIZED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE2. INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE AROUND SITE3. INSTALL ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING AROUND INFILTRATION AREAS.4. CLEAR AND GRUB FOR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND INSTALL5. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND (PART III.B)6. CLEAR AND GRUB REMAINDER OF SITE7. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL8. ROUGH GRADING OF SITE9. STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS AND STOCKPILES10. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN STORM SEWER AND SERVICES11. INSTALL SILT FENCE / INLET PROTECTION AROUND CB'S12. INSTALL STREET SECTION13. INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER14. BITUMINOUS ON STREETS15. FINAL GRADE BOULEVARD, INSTALL SEED AND MULCH16. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM BASIN / POND17. FINAL GRADE POND / INFILTRATION BASINS (DO NOT COMPACT SOILS IN INFILTRATION AREAS.) (PART III.C)18. WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED BY EITHER SEED OR SOD/LANDSCAPING, REMOVE SILT FENCE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BYTHE REMOVAL.RECORDS RETENTION (PART III.E):THE SWPPP (ORIGINAL OR COPIES) INCLUDING, ALL CHANGES TO IT, AND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION BY THEPERMITTEE WHO HAS OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THAT PORTION OF THE SITE. THE SWPPP CAN BE KEPT IN EITHER THE FIELD OFFICE OR IN AN ON SITE VEHICLE DURING NORMALWORKING HOURS.ALL OWNER(S) MUST KEEP THE SWPPP, ALONG WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL RECORDS, ON FILE FOR THREE (3) YEARS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT AS OUTLINED IN PART II.C.THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY RECORDS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT.1.THE FINAL SWPPP;2.ANY OTHER STORMWATER RELATED PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT;3.RECORDS OF ALL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION (SEE PART IV.E. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE);4.ALL PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED, INCLUDING ALL RIGHT OF WAY, CONTRACTS, COVENANTS AND OTHER BINDINGREQUIREMENTS REGARDING PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE; AND5.ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGN OF THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS.SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBILITIES:1.THE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ARE PERMITTEE(S) AS IDENTIFIED BY THE NPDES PERMIT.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ON-SITE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE ACTIVITIES OF ALL OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SUBCONTRACTORS.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A PERSON(S) KNOWLEDGEABLE AND EXPERIENCED IN THE APPLICATION OF EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO OVERSEE ALLINSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF BMPS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PERSON(S) MEETING THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT TO CONDUCT INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSIONPREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT. ONE OF THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR AN ONSITEINSPECTION WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST BY MPCA. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TRAINING DOCUMENTATION FOR THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) AS REQUIRED BY THE NPDES PERMIT.THIS TRAINING DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE RECORDED IN OR WITH THE SWPPP BEFORE THE START OF CONSTRUCTION OR AS SOON AS THE PERSONNEL FOR THE PROJECT HAVEBEEN DETERMINED. DOCUMENTATION SHALL INCLUDE:4.1.NAMES OF THE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE TRAINED PER PART III.F.1 OF THE PERMIT.4.2.DATES OF TRAINING AND NAME OF INSTRUCTOR AND ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING.4.3.CONTENT OF TRAINING COURSE OR WORKSHOP INCLUDING THE NUMBER OF HOURS OF TRAINING.5.FOLLOWING FINAL STABILIZATION AND THE TERMINATION OF COVERAGE FOR THE NPDES PERMIT, THE OWNER IS EXPECTED TO FURNISH LONG TERM OPERATION ANDMAINTENANCE (O & M) OF THE PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.PART IV. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTSCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FIELD REQUIREMENTS:1.ALL FIELD REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT AND STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP).2.THE CONTRACTOR MUST IMPLEMENT THE SWPPP AND PROVIDE BMPS IDENTIFIED IN THE SWPPP IN AN APPROPRIATE AND FUNCTION MANNER.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESPOND TO CHANGING SITE CONDITIONS AND IMPLEMENT/SUPPLEMENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES UTILIZED TOPROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION OF DISTURBED SOILS AND ADEQUATE PREVENTION OF SEDIMENT TRANSPORT OFF-SITE. AT A MINIMUM, THE FOLLOWING STORMWATERPOLLUTION PREVENTION CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FIELD REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE FURNISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR.EROSION PREVENTION (PART IV.B):THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLANING FOR AND IMPLEMENTING APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION PHASING, VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, HORIZONTAL SLOPE GRADING, ANDOTHER CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES THAT MINIMIZE EROSION, SO THAT THE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS OF PART IV.E. ARE COMPLIED WITH. THE LOCATION OFAREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED MUST BE DELINEATED (E.G. WITH FLAGS, STAKES, SIGNS, SILT FENCE ETC.) ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE BEFORE WORK BEGINS.ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION BUT NO LATER THAN THE END OF THE NEXT WORK DAY WHEN EARTH-DISTURBINGACTIVITIES WILL CEASE FOR AT LEAST 14 DAYS. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT SILT, CLAY OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS (E.G., CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCKPILES,DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES) AND THE CONSTRUCTED BASE COMPONENTS OF ROADS, PARKING LOTS AND SIMILAR SURFACES ARE EXEMPT FROM THISREQUIREMENT BUT MUST COMPLY WITH PART IV.C.5.SOILS WITHIN 200 FEET OF A PUBLIC WATER (AS DESIGNATED BY THE MINNESOTA DNR) MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS DURING FISH SPAWNING TIMES.THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF ANY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE THAT DRAINS WATER FROM ANY PORTION OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE, OR DIVERTSWATER AROUND THE SITE, MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 200 LINEAL FEET FROM THE PROPERTY EDGE, OR FROM THE POINT OF DISCHARGE INTO ANY SURFACE WATER. STABILIZATIONOF THE LAST 200 LINEAL FEET MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER.STABILIZATION OF THE REMAINING PORTIONS OF ANY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES MUST BE COMPLETE WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACEWATER AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED.TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES THAT ARE BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM (WITH PROPERLY DESIGNED ROCK DITCH CHECKS, BIO ROLLS, SILTDIKES ETC.) DO NOT NEED TO BE STABILIZED. THESE AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER NO LONGER BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM.PIPE OUTLETS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER.SEED NOTES (PART III.A.4.A):ALL SEED MIXES AND APPLICATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL.GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS:IMMEDIATELY BEFORE SEEDING THE SOIL SHALL BE TILLED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3 INCHES.TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING, MULCHING & BLANKET.SEED·TEMPORARY SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 21-112 (WINTER WHEAT COVER CROP) FOR WINTER AND 21-111 (OATS COVER CROP) FOR SPRING/SUMMER APPLICATIONS. BOTH SEEDMIXES SHALL BE APPLIED AT A SEEDING RATE OF 100 LBS/ACRE.MULCH·IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING, WITHIN 24 HOURS, MNDOT TYPE 1 MULCH SHOULD BE APPLIED TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE SEED GERMINATION. MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT 90%COVERAGE (2 TONS PER ACRE OF STRAW MULCH)SLOPES·3:1 (HORIZ/VERT.) OR FLATTER MUCH SHALL BE COVERED WITH MULCH·SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR DITCH BOTTOMS SHALL BE COVERED WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET.·SEE PLAN FOR MORE DETAILED DITCH AND STEEP SLOPE EROSION CONTROL TREATMENTS.SEDIMENT CONTROL (PART IV.C):SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST MINIMIZE SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS AND STORM SEWER INLETS.a.TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES AND SEDIMENT BASINS THAT ARE DESIGNED AS PART OF A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM (E.G., DITCHES WITH ROCK CHECKDAMS) REQUIRE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ONLY AS APPROPRIATE FOR SITE CONDITIONS.b.IF THE DOWN GRADIENT TREATMENT SYSTEM IS OVERLOADED, ADDITIONAL UPGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES OR REDUNDANT BMPS MUST BE INSTALLED TOELIMINATE THE OVERLOADING, AND THE SWPPP MUST BE AMENDED TO IDENTIFY THESE ADDITIONAL PRACTICES AS REQUIRED IN PART III.A.4, A. THROUGH C.c.IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN SHEET FLOW AND MINIMIZE RILLS AND/OR GULLIES, THERE SHALL BE NO UNBROKEN SLOPE LENGTH OF GREATER THAN 75 FEET FOR SLOPES WITH AGRADE OF 3:1 OR STEEPER.SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE ESTABLISHED ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN. THESE PRACTICESSHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART IV.G.THE TIMING OF THE INSTALLATION OF SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MAY BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOMMODATE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITIES SUCH AS CLEARING OR GRUBBING, OR PASSAGEOF VEHICLES. ANY SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY MUST BE COMPLETED AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE AND THE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THEACTIVITY IS COMPLETED. HOWEVER, SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED BEFORE THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT EVEN IF THE ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE.ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED BY APPROPRIATE BMPS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL ALL SOURCES WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET HAVE BEENSTABILIZED. INLET PROTECTION MAY BE REMOVED FOR A PARTICULAR INLET IF A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN (STREET FLOODING/FREEZING) HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AND THEPERMITTEE(S) HAVE RECEIVED WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY (E.G. CITY/COUNTY/TOWNSHIP/MNDOT ENGINEER) VERIFYING THE NEED FORREMOVAL. THE WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE MUST BE DOCUMENTED IN THE SWPPP OR AVAILABLE WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST. WHEN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE CAN NOT BEOBTAINED IN A TIMELY MANNER, THE SPECIFIC INLET PROTECTION CAN BE REMOVED TO ALLEVIATE THE IMMEDIATE SAFETY CONCERN. HOWEVER, EFFORTS TO OBTAIN WRITTENCORRESPONDENCE MUST BE DOCUMENTED IN THE SWPPP AND AVAILABLE WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST. PERMISSION TO REMOVE INLET PROTECTION BASED ON A SPECIFICSAFETY CONCERN MUST STILL BE OBTAINED FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY WITHIN 30 DAYS OF REMOVAL.TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS, ANDCANNOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORMWATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, OR CONDUITS AND DITCHES UNLESS THERE IS A BYPASS INPLACE FOR THE STORMWATER.VEHICLE TRACKING OF SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE (OR ONTO STREETS WITHIN THE SITE) MUST BE MINIMIZED BY BMPS SUCH AS STONE PADS, CONCRETE OR STEELWASH RACKS, OR EQUIVALENT SYSTEMS. STREET SWEEPING MUST BE USED IF SUCH BMPS ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM BEING TRACKED ONTO THE STREET (SEEPART IV.E.4.D.).THE PERMITEE MUST MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION AND, UNLESS INFEASIBLE, PRESERVE TOPSOIL. MINIMIZING SOIL COMPACTION IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE THE FUNCTION OF THESPECIFIC AREA OF THE SITE DICTATES THAT IT BE COMPACTED. METHODS FOR MINIMIZING COMPACTION INCLUDE THE USE OF TRACKED EQUIPMENT, AND STAYING OFF OF AREAS TO BELEFT UN-COMPACTED. METHODS TO PRESERVE TOPSOIL INCLUDE STRIPPING AND STOCKPILING TOPSOIL PRIOR TO GRADING OR EXCAVATION OPERATIONS.THE PERMITTEE MUST INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS AS REQUIRED IN PART III.B. OF THIS PERMIT.DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING (PART IV.D):DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING (E.G., PUMPED DISCHARGES, TRENCH/DITCH CUTS FOR DRAINAGE) RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT MAY HAVE TURBID OR SEDIMENTLADEN DISCHARGE WATER MUST BE DISCHARGED TO A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASIN ON THE PROJECT SITE WHENEVER POSSIBLE. IF THE WATER CANNOT BEDISCHARGED TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING THE SURFACE WATER, IT MUST BE TREATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE BMP'S SUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE DOES NOTADVERSELY AFFECT THE RECEIVING WATER, DOWNSTREAM LANDOWNERS OR WETLANDS. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT DISCHARGE POINTS ARE ADEQUATELY PROTECTEDFROM EROSION AND SCOUR. THE DISCHARGE MUST BE DISPERSED OVER NATURAL ROCK RIPRAP, SAND BAGS, PLASTIC SHEATHING OR OTHER ACCEPTED ENERGY DISSIPATIONMEASURES. ADEQUATE SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES ARE REQUIRED FOR DISCHARGE WATER THAT CONTAINS SUSPENDED SOLIDS.FILTER BACKWASH WATERS MUST BE HAULED AWAY FOR DISPOSAL, RETURNED TO THE BEGINNING OF THE TREATMENT PROCESS, OR INCORPORATE INTO THE SITE IN A MANNER THATDOES NOT CAUSE EROSION. DISCHARGE OF THE BACKWASH WATER TO SANITARY SEWER IS ALLOWED WITH PERMISSION OF THE SANITARY SEWER AUTHORITY.INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE (PART IV.E):THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE AT ALL TIMES FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND PROPER OPERATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AT AMINIMUM, INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REPAIR ALL DISTURBED SURFACES AND ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES AND SOIL STABILIZATION MEASURES ONCE EVERY SEVEN(7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS FOLLOWING A RAINFALL OF 0.5 INCHES OR GREATER AND WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER THAT. CONTINUE INSPECTION ACTIVITIESUNTIL LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. THEREAFTER THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM THESE RESPONSIBILITIES AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL VEGETATIVE COVER ISESTABLISHED. INSPECTIONS MUST INCLUDE STABILIZED AREAS, EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S AND INFILTRATION AREAS.BASED ON INSPECTION RESULTS THE CONTRACTOR MAY MODIFY THE SWPPP IN ORDER TO PREVENT POLLUTANTS FROM LEAVING THE SITE VIA STORM WATER RUNOFF. THISMODIFICATION MUST BE MADE WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS OF THE INSPECTION UNLESS OTHERWISE REQUIRED BY THE TERMS OF THE PERMIT, LEGAL, REGULATORY, OR PHYSICALACCESS CONSTRAINTS.INSPECTION REPORTS MUST BE RECORDED WITHIN 24 HOURS IN WRITING AND KEPT ON FILE BY THE CONTRACTOR AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE SWPPP ON SITE AND THEN FOR ATLEAST 3 YEARS FROM THE DATE OF COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT.ALL PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES MUST BE REPAIRED, REPLACED OR SUPPLEMENTED WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUNCTIONAL OR THE SEDIMENT REACHES 1/2 OF THE HEIGHT OF THEDEVICE. THESE REPAIRS MUST BE MADE BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY AFTER DISCOVERY, OR THEREAFTER AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS.REMOVE ALL DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE WAYS, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, AND RESTABILIZE THE AREASWHERE SEDIMENT REMOVAL RESULTS IN EXPOSED TOPSOIL. THIS REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MUST TAKE PLACE WITHIN 7 DAYS OF DISCOVERY UNLESS PRECLUDED BY LEGAL,REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS.SEE (ATTACHMENT A: CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE) FOR SITE SPECIFIC INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS.POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT (PART IV.F):THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT THE FOLLOWING POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES ON THE SITE;SOLID WASTE: COLLECTED SEDIMENT, ASPHALT AND CONCRETE MILLINGS, FLOATING DEBRIS, PAPER, PLASTIC, FABRIC, CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS AND OTHER WASTESMUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND MUST COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS.HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: OIL, GASOLINE, PAINT AND ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES MUST BE PROPERLY STORED, INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT, TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OROTHER DISCHARGE. RESTRICTED ACCESS TO STORAGE AREAS MUST BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT VANDALISM. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MUST BE IN COMPLIANCEWITH MPCA REGULATIONS.EXTERNAL WASHING OF TRUCKS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES MUST BE LIMITED TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. RUNOFF MUST BE CONTAINED AND WASTEWATER PROPERLYDISPOSED OF. NO ENGINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE.CONCRETE WASHOUT: ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BY CONCRETE WASHOUT OPERATIONS MUST BE CONTAINED IN A LEAK PROOF CONTAINMENT FACILITY ORIMPERMEABLE LINER. A COMPACTED CLAY LINER THAT DOES NOT ALLOW WASHOUT LIQUIDS TO ENTER THE GROUND IS CONSIDERED AN IMPERMEABLE LINER. THE LIQUID AND SOLIDWASTES MUST NOT CONTACT THE GROUND, AND THERE MUST NOT BE RUNOFF FROM THE CONCRETE WASHOUT OPERATIONS OR AREAS. LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES MUST BE DISPOSEDOF PROPERLY AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA REGULATIONS. A SIGN MUST BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO EACH WASHOUT FACILITY TO INFORM CONCRETE EQUIPMENT OPERATORS TOUTILIZE THE PROPER FACILITIES. CONCRETE WASHOUT MAY ALSO OCCUR OFF SITE ACCORDING TO THE APPROPRIATE REGULATIONS.FUELING OPERATION PLAN: ALL FUELING SHALL TAKE PLACE AT THE DESIGNATED FUELING LOCATION AND ACCORDING TO BEST PRACTICES FOR SITE FUELING OPERATIONS AS TOMINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL FOR SPILLS.SPILL PREVENTION PLAN: ALL SPILLS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY CLEANED UP AFTER DISCOVERY. THE SITE SUPERINTENDENT, WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DAY-TO-DAY ONSITECONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS WILL BE THE SPILL PREVENTION COORDINATOR AND WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING CLEAN UP PROCEDURES, POSTING CLEAN UPRECOMMENDATIONS, AND ENSURING PROPER CLEAN UP TRAINING OF APPROPRIATE PERSONNEL.SANITARY AND SEPTIC WASTE: SANITARY/SEPTIC FACILITIES SHALL BE PROVIDED AND MAINTAINED IN A NEAT AND SANITARY CONDITION, FOR THE USE OF THE CONTRACTOR'SEMPLOYEES. A LICENSED SANITARY WASTE MANAGEMENT CONTRACTOR AS REQUIRED BY STATE REGULATIONS WILL COLLECT SANITARY WASTE FROM PORTABLE UNITS.FINAL STABILIZATION (PART IV.G):THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE ACCORDING THE DEFINITIONS IN THE NPDES GENERAL PERMIT PART IV SECTION G. THE CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMITA NOTICE OF TERMINATION (N.O.T.) WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL STABILIZATION IS COMPLETE OR WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER SELLING THE SITE OR PORTION OF THE SITE (THAT HAS NOTUNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION ) TO ANOTHER PARTY. A COPY OF THIS NOTICE OF TERMINATION / PERMIT MODIFICATION FORM MUST GO TO THE NEW OWNER. THE ORIGINALCURRENT OWNER MUST PROVIDE A SWPPP TO THE NEW OWNER THAT SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSES THE REMAINING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. SEE THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS AND SWPPPNARRATIVE (ATTACHMENT A: CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE) AND SWPPP PLAN SHEETS FOR FINAL STABILIZATION MEASURESGENERAL SWPPP REQUIREMENTS AND NOTES: 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2013 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION6/13/17CITY SUBMITTAL07/13/17CITY RESUBMITTAL......................BOULEVARD 2865-2901 MOUNDS VIEW BLVD / 7980 GROVELAND RD 7645 LYNDALE AVE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423 MWF PROPERTIES PROJECT 44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.07/13/17REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.4SWPPP -ATTACHMENTS............ATTACHMENT A: SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENT 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2013 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION6/13/17CITY SUBMITTAL07/13/17CITY RESUBMITTAL......................BOULEVARD 2865-2901 MOUNDS VIEW BLVD / 7980 GROVELAND RD 7645 LYNDALE AVE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423 MWF PROPERTIES PROJECT 44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.07/13/17REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.5SWPPP -ATTACHMENTS............ATTACHMENT B: SWPPP INSPECTION FORMATTACHMENT C: MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM - DRAFT - PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting July 19, 2017 Mounds View City Hall 2401 County Road 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 ______________________________________________________________________________ 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair Stevenson at 7:00 p.m. for July 19 , 2017. ______________________________________________________________________________ 2. Roll Call Members Present: Commissioners French, Klander, Klebsch, Love, Rundle, and Stevenson. Absent and Excused: Commissioner Schiltgen (excused) Also Present: Planner Jon Sevald and Council Member Gary Meehlhause. ______________________________________________________________________________ Index to Minutes Page MU2017-001 MWF Properties-Preliminary Plat and Development Review 1 Approval of Minutes 8 _____________________________________________________________________________ 3. Special Order of Business None. 4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda None. ______________________________________________________________________________ 5. Planning Cases A. MU2017-001: MWF Properties LLC: Mounds View Planning Commission July 19, 2017 Regular Meeting Page 2 ________________________________________________________________________ • Resolution 1075-17, Recommending approval of the Preliminary Plat of “Boulevard”, generally located at the NW corner of Mounds View Boulevard and Groveland Road • Resolution 1076-17, Recommending approval of a Development Review of “Boulevard”, a 60-unit apartment building, generally located at the NW corner of Mounds View Boulevard and Groveland Road Planner Sevald stated MWF Properties, requests approval of (1) a Preliminary Plat of a Major Subdivision combing four lots into one lot, and (2) a Development Review of a 60-unit apartment, to be located at the northwest corner of Mounds View Boulevard and Groveland Road. Planner Sevald explained a Major Subdivision is the division of land into more than one lot, or includes two acres of land or larger. In this case, four lots will be combined into one lot, 3.5 acres in size. The proposed Preliminary Plat was reviewed in detail with the Commission. Planner Sevald indicated MWF Properties held a neighborhood meeting on February 16, 2017 at Lakes Run Apartments in New Brighton, an MWF project. Eleven residents attended. Additional discussions were held at City Council Work Sessions on January 3rd, March 6th, and April 3rd, 2017, in addition to discussions by the Mounds View EDA on May 8th and May 22nd, 2017, concerning Tax Increment Financing. Planner Sevald stated during the City Council’s May 8th Public Hearing(s), several residents expressed concern about (1) additional traffic onto Groveland Road to be generated by the project, and (2) if additional apartments and affordable housing in Mounds View is in the City’s best interest. The project proposes a driveway access onto Groveland Road. It was noted driveway access onto Mounds View Boulevard (CSAH 10) has been denied by Ramsey County. Planner Sevald reported MWF Properties commissioned a Traffic Impact Study. In summary, the apartments are forecasted to add 31 trips during the morning peak hour and 37 trips during the afternoon peak hour. The study assumes that traffic generated by the apartments will go to Mounds View Boulevard (80%), north on Groveland Road (15% or 5-6 vehicles per AM/PM peak period), and south on Groveland Road (south of MV Blvd) (5%). The study states that the project will have minimal impact to the Mounds View Boulevard & Groveland Road intersection. The study indicates that a right turn lane from south-bound Groveland Rd onto west-bound Mounds View Boulevard would reduce delays, but have minimal impact. A right- turn lane is not proposed as part of the project. Commissioner Klebsch asked if any type of buffer was proposed between the playground structure and the parking lot. Planner Sevald stated no buffer was proposed. He described the trees that were proposed along the retention pond and along Mounds View Boulevard. Commissioner Love questioned how deep the retention basin was. Planner Sevald stated he was uncertain. Mounds View Planning Commission July 19, 2017 Regular Meeting Page 3 ________________________________________________________________________ Commissioner Klebsch recommended that the playground be enclosed for safety purposes or be moved to another location. Chris Stokka, MWF Properties, thanked the Commission for the input and stated he would support the playground being fenced. Chair Stevenson asked what type of fence would be placed around the playground. Mr. Stokka stated that the fence would be see through and would be four feet in height. Commissioner Love commented on the BioLife retention pond and suggested this site also have an open water retention pond. Mr. Stokka stated he was not a stormwater pond expert and anticipated this would require additional space. He explained he could investigate this matter further. Chair Stevenson indicated his biggest concern was the safety of this project and the movement of traffic from Groveland Road onto Mounds View Boulevard. He commented further on the number of accidents that have occurred at this intersection. Commissioner Klander requested further information from the applicant on the Traffic Study. Mr. Stokka reviewed the Traffic Study and vehicle counts in detail with the Commission. He apologized for not having his traffic engineer in attendance. Commissioner Klander stated he lived in this neighborhood and used the Groveland Road/Mounds View Boulevard intersection on a daily basis. He believed the challenge at this intersection was people not following basic traffic regulations and the fact that cars stacked up in the median. Commissioner Love inquired if there was discussion of putting a light at this intersection. Mr. Stokka stated this was not considered. Commissioner Klebsch commented on the poor visibility for left hand turns at Groveland Road and Mound View Boulevard. She questioned if the median on Mounds View Boulevard could be removed so that left hand turns at Groveland Road were no longer allowed. Planner Sevald stated if this were to happen, a large number of residents would be upset. Commissioner Klebsch asked if the large trees on the site plan near the intersection of Groveland Road and Mounds View Boulevard should be removed for improved visibility. Planner Sevald anticipated this could be done. Commissioner Klander questioned if the County offered any comments as to why they denied access to Mounds View Boulevard. Mr. Stokka stated their initial feedback was brought to the City and no formal written opinion was provided. It was his understanding the County did not support a right-in/right-out onto Mounds View Boulevard and therefore recommended the development utilize Groveland Road. Mounds View Planning Commission July 19, 2017 Regular Meeting Page 4 ________________________________________________________________________ Councilmember Klander inquired if the semi-trucks visiting Steve’s appliance have been considered by the developer. Planner Sevald stated this was an enforcement issue on the City’s part and explained parking was not allowed on Groveland Road. Commissioner Love asked if this was the proper location for concentrated affordable housing. Planner Sevald commented on the number of affordable units available in Mounds View and throughout the metro area. He explained there is a concentration of affordable housing units along the US Highway 10 corridor, outside of Mounds View. He reviewed a concentration of poverty map provided by Met Council with the Commission and noted Mounds View was not at risk. Mr. Stokka stated he understood that too much affordable housing in one area can become a concern. He explained the State had this same understanding and provided funding for projects based on proper economic integration. He reported the projects he has completed in the past that were similar in size had no negative impacts on the community. He reiterated that this development was at 60% AMI threshold. He provided further comment on the housing market and strong need for affordable housing in Mounds View. Commissioner Klebsch questioned why MWF was not pursuing a mixed income housing project. Mr. Stokka stated MWF specializes in affordable housing. He explained it was his experience that it was difficult for him to find renters that wanted to pay a premium for rent on some units while others were receiving the same unit at a subsidized price. Commissioner Klebsch commented she was a big proponent of affordable housing. She stated she worked in economic development and had only seen mixed income developments. She reported she had not seen an issue filling the market rate or affordable units. She anticipated that this development could receive more than market rate for some of the units. She explained she did have a concern with locating the development on this corner due to traffic/safety concerns. Commissioner Love asked if the proposed trail could meander. Planner Sevald stated he would have to speak with the County to see if they would allow the trail to go closer to the roadway and ditch. Chair Stevenson understood the developer would be installing a 10-foot bituminous trail. Mr. Stokka reported this was the case and noted he would be installing the trail as a part of the development. Planner Sevald commented the trail would end at the west property line. Chair Stevenson recommended the trail be extended to Spring Lake Park Road and that the expense be paid for with the park dedication fees. Planner Sevald encouraged the Commission to make this a recommendation to the City Council and noted this portion of trail would cost more than the proposed Park Dedication fees of $39,000. The Commission was in agreement to recommend the City Council use the Park Dedication fees to complete the trail to Spring Lake Park Road. Mounds View Planning Commission July 19, 2017 Regular Meeting Page 5 ________________________________________________________________________ Commissioner Klander requested a five-minute recess. Chair Stevenson recessed the Planning Commission meeting at 8:06 p.m. Chair Stevenson reconvened the Planning Commission meeting at 8:10 p.m. Commissioner Klander asked if Park Dedication fees would be recalculated if the project was not completed until 2018. Planner Sevald reported the Park Dedication fees were based on 10% of the current land market value. He indicated if the Final Plat was not brought before the Council until 2018, the numbers would be updated, otherwise 2017 numbers would be used. Chair Stevenson did not anticipate the City Attorney or the City Council would have a problem with changing this language to 10% of the current land market value. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Rundle/Commissioner Klander. To approve Resolution 1075-17, a Resolution Recommending approval of the Preliminary Plat of “Boulevard”, generally located at the NW corner of Mounds View Boulevard and Groveland Road, recommending the playground be fenced; Planning Case No. MU2017-001, as amended. Planner Sevald read the six conditions within Resolution 1075-17 aloud and in full for the record. Commissioner Klebsch noted under Condition #2 that the playground was to be fully fenced. Planner Sevald recommended this item be addressed under the Development Review. Commissioner Klander stated he remained unsatisfied based on the traffic concerns. He explained he wanted to hear from Ramsey County on this matter in order to problem solve this issue. He supported tabling this motion and the next motion until further information was available from the County. Chair Stevenson believed the Preliminary Plat and the Development Review were two separate items. Commissioner Love asked if either the Preliminary Plat or the Development Review required a Public Hearing. Planner Sevald reported the Preliminary Plat would require a Public Hearing by the City Council and this was scheduled to be held on Monday, July 24th. Commissioner Klebsch supported the Commission moving forward with the plat and asked if both Resolution’s had to move forward at the same time. Planner Sevald believed this would be the easiest course of action for the request. He commented further on the 60-day timeline for this Planning Case and reported a 60 day extension would be required if the matter were tabled. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Klander/Commissioner French. To table action on the Preliminary Plat to the August 2, 2017 Planning Commission meeting. Mounds View Planning Commission July 19, 2017 Regular Meeting Page 6 ________________________________________________________________________ Ayes – 2 (French, Klander) Nays – 3 (Love, Rundle & Stevenson) Abstain – 1 (Klebsch) Motion failed. Chair Stevenson called the question on the original motion. Ayes – 4 Nays – 2 (French, Klander) Motion carried. Planner Sevald reported a Development Review is required for construction activity in which a principal building is increased in size by more than 10%, or more than 10,000 square feet (excludes single-family and two-family dwellings). In this case, the proposed 60-unit apartment building will be 25,000 square feet in size. The building rendering and landscape plan was reviewed in detail with the Commission. Planner Sevald explained the proposed apartments will include 60-units of affordable workforce housing. Residents will have an income restriction of 60% of the Area Median Income (AMI), based on household size. During a previous Planning Commission meeting, there were questions about how many rental units there are in the City, and how many are affordable. Staff noted there are 5,280 housing units in Mounds View (2016). According to the City’s rental licensing records, there are 1,511 multi-family rental units and 240 single-family rental units (2017) (33% of total housing stock is rental). It was noted balconies were being recommended in order to enhance the pedestrian-like feel of the development. Staff provided further comment on the request, recommended the Planning Commission approve the Development Review. Commissioner Klander asked if the applicant supported City staff’s recommendations. Mr. Stokka stated it was his goal to keep the proposed building as far away from the adjacent residents as possible, which he has been able to do. He explained that if balconies were required, this would have to change. He requested the balconies not be required, but rather that bay windows be added, so as to eliminate the eyesore of items being stored on the balconies. He stated he supported the proposed play area. Commissioner Klander agreed that balconies could become an eyesore and for this reason, he could support the removal of the balconies so long as bay windows were added. Commissioner Love explained she was a fan of trees and stated she preferred the play area to be park-like that was planted with trees. She asked if the applicant supported the median at the entrance. Mr. Stokka stated he supported this recommendation. Commissioner Klebsch commented on the lighting plan and noted the applicant was proposing more lighting than required by the City. Planner Sevald reported adjustments could be made with different light fixtures, but noted more light would be required at the entrance points for safety purposes. Commissioner Klebsch stated she did not want the lighting from this site to impact the adjacent neighborhood or passing traffic. Planner Sevald recommended the light fixtures be changed in Mounds View Planning Commission July 19, 2017 Regular Meeting Page 7 ________________________________________________________________________ order to stay within the City’s requirements. He noted he did support brighter lighting along the trail and at the entrance to the property. Commissioner Love asked if the trail lighting would match the existing lights along the trail. Planner Sevald stated this could be written into the Development Agreement. Commissioner Klebsch inquired if the developer was requesting TIF for this project. Planner Sevald reported the developer would be requesting TIF. Mr. Stokka stated he was requesting a 15 year pay as you go TIF note for $550,000. Commissioner Klebsch stated she supported the Preliminary Plat and understood that at some point this corner would develop and the properties would have to be combined. However, she had questions regarding traffic at this corner and she did not want to be responsible for increased accidents at this corner. She supported the City speaking further with Ramsey County regarding a potential right-in right-out. She asked if the Planning Commission could hold a special meeting in order to address this concern with the County. Planner Sevald reported the Planning Commission could hold a special meeting. Council Member Bill Bergeron, 7729 Woodlawn Drive, indicated the City Council would be holding a public hearing only for the Preliminary Plat on Monday, July 24th and noted the Planning Commission already recommended approval for this item. It was noted the City did not require a Public Hearing for the Development Review. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Klebsch/Commissioner Klander. To Table Action on the Development Review of “Boulevard”, a 60-unit apartment building, generally located at the NW corner of Mounds View Boulevard and Groveland Road to the August 2, 2017 Planning Commission meeting to allow staff to gather more information from Ramsey County regarding the Traffic Study and a potential right-in right-out on Mounds View Boulevard. Ayes – 5 Nays – 1 (Rundle opposed) Motion carried. _____________________________________________________________________________ 6. Other Planning Activity None. ______________________________________________________________________________ 7. Reports A. Upcoming Planning Cases & Activity Planner Sevald discussed upcoming planning cases. He anticipated the Commission would be addressing a City Code amendment that would allow for small cell towers in Mounds View. B. Staff Updates Mounds View Planning Commission July 19, 2017 Regular Meeting Page 8 ________________________________________________________________________ Planner Sevald provided the Commission with an update from staff. C. Council Updates Council Member Meehlhause provided the Planning Commission with an update from the City Council and commented on the developers that had made presentations for the Crossroad Pointe redevelopment. He noted the Council approved the hire of a Housing and Code Enforcement Inspector at their last meeting. He explained Don Peterson has been appointed as the City’s Interim Public Works Director. He noted the City Council would be holding a Public Hearing on July 24th to discuss the language for a ballot question that would add one additional Police Officer to the Mounds View Police Department. He indicated the Charter Commission met with the Council and would be reviewing the City’s special election language. Further discussion ensued regarding the City’s proposed 2018 budget. Lastly, he reported City Administrator Jim Ericson would be resigning his position with the City after 21 years of service. D. Planning Commissioner Reports None. 8. Approval of Minutes July 5 , 2017. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Klebsch/Commissioner Love. To approve the Minutes of the July 5, 2017 regular Planning Commission meetings as slightly amended. Ayes – 6 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 9. Next Planning Commission Meeting: A. Wednesday, August 2, 2017 B. Wednesday, August 16, 2017 ______________________________________________________________________________ 10. Adjournment There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Chair Stevenson adjourned the meeting at 9:28 p.m. ______________________________________________________________________________ Respectfully submitted, Mounds View Planning Commission July 19, 2017 Regular Meeting Page 9 ________________________________________________________________________ Jon Sevald Planner Transcribed by: Heidi Guenther TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. - DRAFT - PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting August 2, 2017 Mounds View City Hall 2401 County Road 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 ______________________________________________________________________________ 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair Stevenson at 7:00 p.m. for August 2, 2017. ______________________________________________________________________________ 2. Roll Call Members Present: Commissioners Rundle, Schiltgen, and Stevenson. (A quorum was not present) Absent and Excused: Commissioners French, Klander, Klebsch and Love. Also Present: Planner Jon Sevald, Council Member Gary Meehlhause, and Council Member Bill Bergeron. ______________________________________________________________________________ Index to Minutes Page MU2017-001 MWF Properties Development Review 2 Discussion of Amending Zoning Code to decrease the front yard 3 Setback for covered porches Approval of Minutes 4 _____________________________________________________________________________ 3. Special Order of Business None. 4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda None. ______________________________________________________________________________ Mounds View Planning Commission August 2, 2017 Regular Meeting Page 2 ________________________________________________________________________ 5. Planning Cases A. MU2017-001: MWF Properties, LLC: Resolution 1076-17, Recommending approval of a Development Review of “Boulevard”, a 60-unit apartment building, generally located at the NW corner of Mounds View Boulevard and Groveland Road Planner Sevald stated the applicant MWF Properties, requests approval of a Development Review for a 60-unit apartment building to be located at the northwest corner of Mounds View Boulevard and Groveland Road. A Development Review is required for construction activity in which a principal building is increased in size by more than 10%, or more than 10,000 square feet (excludes single-family and two-family dwellings). In this case, the proposed 60-unit apartment building will be 25,000 square feet in size. The property is zoned R-4 High Density Residential, is within the County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District, and is guided as Mixed Use Planned Unit Development in the Comprehensive Plan. Planner Sevald reported MWF Properties has applied for financial assistance (Low Income Housing Tax Credits) from the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA). This is a competitive program. MHFA awards will be announced in October, 2017. If an award is not received, it is anticipated that MWF Properties will request an extension to the approvals (CUP, Preliminary Plat, and Development Review), and then reapply to MHFA in 2018. Planner Sevald explained the Planning Commission considered this application at their July 19th meeting, where the Preliminary Plat was approved and the Development Review was tabled to invite Ramsey County staff to attend the August 2nd Commission meeting to discuss access and traffic concerns. He explained the City Council reviewed the Preliminary Plat at their July 24th meeting and was tabled. Staff summarized the response the City received from Ramsey County and the recommended that the Commission continue this item to their August 16th meeting. He reviewed the 60-day time period rule and noted this request could be extended another 60 days. Commissioner Schiltgen requested further information on the traffic study. Planner Sevald commented on the additional information that was being requested within the traffic study. Chair Stevenson asked if the number of accidents at this intersection has been considered. Planner Sevald stated the data shows between 2011 and 2015 there were 23 accidents at this intersection with two injuries. He reported the data does not show where in the intersection the accidents occurred. Chair Stevenson questioned why Silver Lake Commons was not included in the market study information provided to the City. Chris Stokka, MWF Properties, stated he hired a third party to complete the market study. He stated he would investigate Silver Lake Commons and would report back to the City. Mounds View Planning Commission August 2, 2017 Regular Meeting Page 3 ________________________________________________________________________ Chair Stevenson inquired where the six-foot cedar fence would be located along the rear property line. Mr. Stokka reviewed the location of the proposed cedar fence. Planner Sevald commented on the City’s requirements regarding fences and buffers. Commissioner Schiltgen commented on how this apartment complex would impact the school district. He stated it was his understanding the school district was already aware of the proposed development. Planner Sevald stated this was the case. Chair Stevenson believed the proposed rental rates were properly aligned. He then asked if Mounds View had too many rental units. Planner Sevald was of the opinion the City could support more rental units. Chair Stevenson asked if how many of the new tenants would need access to public transportation. Mr. Stokka stated he did not have exact statistics but explained public transportation was a good selling point and noted the closest bus stop was approximately one- quarter of a mile from the proposed apartment complex. Commissioner Schiltgen questioned if the developer was hoping to have access from Mounds View Boulevard. Mr. Stokka explained he was not as familiar with Mounds View as the Commissioners or the County and stated he would follow the recommendation from the experts. Being that there was no quorum present, the Commission took no action. _____________________________________________________________________________ 6. Other Planning Activity A. Discussion of amending Zoning Code to decrease the front yard setback for covered porches Planner Sevald stated within the R-1 Single-Family Residential zoning district, the minimum front yard setback is 30’ for a house, including covered porches. An exception is if all of the homes on the same side of the block have a greater setback (e.g. 50’+), then the minimum setback shall be equal to the home with the least setback (e.g. 50’). The minimum front yard setback for a patio or deck is 2’. Planner Sevald explained recently, a resident has asked to build a covered porch onto the front of their house. The house is setback 30’, as are adjacent homes. The requested porch is not allowed. The resident has an option of applying for a Variance if there is a practical difficulty unique to this property. Another option is to consider amending the Zoning Code to decrease the setback for a covered (open) porch. He explained that with this request, staff found there to be no hardship. Planner Sevald reported in recent years, the City has granted two variances to allow a decreased setback for a front porch. One was less than 30’ and one greater than 30’ from the front property Mounds View Planning Commission August 2, 2017 Regular Meeting Page 4 ________________________________________________________________________ line. Staff discussed the setback requirements in further detail with the Commission and requested feedback. Chair Stevenson supported this matter being further discussed when the Planning Commission had a quorum present. He stated he could support amending the City Code. Planner Sevald explained he would further investigate how other cities address this matter and would report back to the Commission at a future meeting. ______________________________________________________________________________ 7. Reports A. Upcoming Planning Cases & Activity Planner Sevald discussed upcoming planning cases noting the items the Commission would be addressing on August 16th. B. Staff Updates Planner Sevald provided the Commission with an update from staff. He thanked all of the Mounds View residents that participated in Night to Unite. C. Council Updates Council Member Meehlhause provided the Planning Commission with an update from the City Council noting the Council approved a ballot question for a special election that would approve the hire of an additional Police Officer for the Mounds View Police Department. This additional officer would be a part of the Ramsey County Drug Task Force. He noted the Council hired Springsted Waters to assist with the hiring of a new City Administrator. D. Planning Commissioner Reports None. 8. Approval of Minutes Action on the July 24, 2017 was delayed to the August 16, 2017 Planning Commission meeting. 9. Next Planning Commission Meeting: A. Wednesday, August 16, 2017 B. Wednesday, September 6, 2017 ______________________________________________________________________________ Mounds View Planning Commission August 2, 2017 Regular Meeting Page 5 ________________________________________________________________________ 10. Adjournment There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Chair Stevenson adjourned the meeting at 7:40 p.m. ______________________________________________________________________________ Respectfully submitted, Jon Sevald Planner Transcribed by: Heidi Guenther TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.