HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-18-2015
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
March 18, 2015 -- 7:00 P.M.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Minutes:
February 4, 2015
4. Citizens Requests and Comments Relating to Planning and Zoning Issues Not
Already on the Agenda. (Before speaking, give your full name and address for the record.)
5. Planning Cases
A. VR2015-001 Variance Request to Exceed Allowed Ground Sign Height
Applicant: George Winiecki, WIN Insurance Agency
Address: 2704 County Road 10
6. Other Planning Activity
A. Planning Commission Public Service Announcement Volunteer (Oral Report)
B. Discuss a Code Amendment to Allow Columbaria
7. Review Minutes:
A. February 18, 2015
8. Reports
A. Upcoming Planning Cases
B. Staff Updates
C. Council Updates
D. Planning Commissioner Reports
9. Next Planning Commission Meetings:
A. Wednesday, April 1, 2015
B. Wednesday, April 15, 2015
10. Adjourn
PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
February 18, 2015
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
______________________________________________________________________________
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order by Chair Stevenson at 7:00 p.m. for February 18, 2015.
______________________________________________________________________________
2. Roll Call
Members Present: Commissioners Elofson, Love, Rundle, Schiltgen, and Stevenson.
Absent and Excused: Commissioner Birken and Carvelli-Yu.
Also Present: Planning Associate Heidi Heller.
______________________________________________________________________________
Index to Minutes Page
Approval of Minutes 1
Review Code Amendment for Fish Houses 2
Discuss a Potential Code Amendment to Allow Columbariums 3
Discuss a Potential Code Amendment to Allow Brew Pubs 4
Review Bylaws 4
_____________________________________________________________________________
3. Approval of Minutes
January 21, 2015.
MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Rundle/Commissioner Schiltgen. To approve the Minutes
of the January 21, 2015 regular Planning Commission meeting as slightly amended.
Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried.
Mounds View Planning Commission February 18, 2015
Regular Meeting Page 2
________________________________________________________________________
4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda
None.
______________________________________________________________________________
5. Planning Cases
None.
_____________________________________________________________________________
6. Other Planning Activity
A. Review Code Amendment for Fish Houses
Planning Associate Heller informed the Commission that a resident sent in a request to amend
the City Code relating to parking of fish houses in residential districts. He is requesting that the
code be amended to allow drop axle fish houses to be in the front yard area of properties longer
than 24 hours. The City Council is supportive of being more permissive of fish houses being kept
on properties and asked the Planning Commission to discuss and make a recommendation.
Associate Heller explained that the Planning Commission discussed this in great length at the
February 4, 2015 meeting, and decided to allow only “drop axle style” fish houses to be stored
for any length of time on residential properties. Staff is suggesting that a definition of drop axle
fish house also be added to the code. Staff reviewed the drafted a resolution with the proposed
language. She requested the Commission review Resolution 1020-15 with a proposed code
amendment relating to fish houses and provide staff with direction on how to proceed.
Chair Stevenson supported the proposed language from staff.
Commissioner Love stated she has never been bothered by a fish house being placed in a front
yard in all her years of living in Mounds View. She believed that homeowners should be
allowed to have 10 days to store any fish house in their driveway.
Discussion ensued regarding the aesthetic concerns of having a fish house or children’s play
equipment in a front yard.
Commissioner Schiltgen supported the code amendment language.
MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Rundle/Commissioner Elofson. To adopt Resolution 1020-
15, approving a Code Amendment to Chapter 607 of the Mounds View City Code regarding Fish
House Storage.
Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried.
______________________________________________________________________________
Mounds View Planning Commission February 18, 2015
Regular Meeting Page 3
________________________________________________________________________
B. Discuss a Potential Code Amendment to Allow Columbaria
Planning Associate Heller informed the Commission that a Mounds View church member
recently contacted the City to inquire if a columbarium would be allowed on the church property.
Their church was considering adding a columbarium and the church member said many churches
are now considering installing a columbarium for their patrons. They are considering one or two
structures that would be about 10 feet long and 6 feet tall. Many funeral homes report that more
than 50% of deaths now result in cremation rather than a burial, so it is understandable that more
places are needed to store urns. Mounds View does not currently have any cemeteries, nor does
the City Code address cemeteries or columbaria.
Associate Heller explained that a columbarium is a place for the respectful and usually public
storage of cinerary urns (i.e. urns holding a deceased’s cremated remains). Today's columbaria
can be either freestanding units, or part of a mausoleum or another building. Some manufacturers
produce columbaria that are built entirely off-site and brought to the cemetery by a large truck.
Many modern crematoria have columbaria. In other cases, columbaria are built into church
structures. She discussed the matter in further detail and requested comment from the
Commission.
Chair Stevenson stated he had only seen columbaria as part of a cemetery. He had concerns with
a columbarium being added to a church and then the church leaving the community.
Associate Heller stated that language could be added to address this concern.
Commissioner Love suggested that if a church were to move out of the community, it could be
required that the columbarium also be removed.
Associate Heller believed that family members would want to pick up the urns prior to them
being moved out of the City.
Council Liaison Meehlhause suggested a conditional use permit be required for the
columbarium.
Associate Heller did not recommend a conditional use permit be required as this would be an
expense for the church and would also require a public hearing and is more review than needed
for this use.
Chair Stevenson wanted to be assured that a structure was built in a pleasing manner that met the
City’s building requirements.
Commissioner Schiltgen agreed and wanted to see staff review plans prior to being built.
Further discussion ensued regarding the preferred building materials for columbaria.
Mounds View Planning Commission February 18, 2015
Regular Meeting Page 4
________________________________________________________________________
The Commission was in favor of allowing columbariums in churches, be built out of solid stone,
and be considered an accessory building.
Associate Heller explained this would be a starting place for the City Code and could be
amended in the future.
_____________________________________________________________________________
C. Discuss a Potential Code Amendment to Allow Brew Pubs
Planning Associate Heller informed the Commission that the City Council discussed allowing
businesses like brewpubs or taprooms in the City since they are becoming very popular after the
State of Minnesota loosened up regulations relating to these types of businesses. The City
Council is open to allowing these types of uses and has asked the Planning Commission to
discuss this. A new taproom, Hammerheart Brewing (www.hammerheartbrewing.com) recently
opened in Lino Lakes, and Minneapolis and St. Paul have several, with more in the works.
Currently the Mounds View Zoning Code does not address brewpubs, taprooms or any type of
brewery, therefore none of them are allowed. Staff requested the Commission discuss this matter
and provide staff with direction on how to proceed.
Commissioner Elofson questioned if a brew pub would be successful in Mounds View.
Associate Heller stated that most brew pubs have been locating in Minneapolis and St. Paul. She
discussed how a taproom may work in the City if industrial space were made available.
Commissioner Love expressed concern with the amount of water a brewery or brew pub would
be using.
Associate Heller explained that State mandates would limit the number of barrels that could be
made on a yearly basis. She did not believe that water usage would be a concern.
Commissioner Schlitgen supported bringing a brew pub to Mounds View. He believed this
would be a unique amenity for the City.
Commissioner Rundle was in favor of allowing a brew pub or taproom and brewery as well.
Commissioner Love suggested that wine making also be considered.
The Commission recommended staff proceed with a code amendment to allow breweries,
taprooms, brew pubs or wineries in the City of Mounds View.
______________________________________________________________________________
D. Review Bylaws
Planning Associate Heller informed the Commission that the Planning Commission’s Bylaws
state that the Commission shall review the Bylaws on an annual basis. She explained that the last
Mounds View Planning Commission February 18, 2015
Regular Meeting Page 5
________________________________________________________________________
time the Planning Commission amended the Bylaws was in January of 2007. The last change
was about the number of absences a commissioner may have in a given year. Staff
recommended that the Commission adopt the Bylaws for the Planning Commission.
Commissioner Love asked about reviewing the minutes in a timelier manner.
Associate Heller discussed the process used for approving Commission minutes. She explained
that a service was hired to complete the minutes on a monthly basis.
Commissioner Schiltgen commented that there have been very few changes made to the minutes
over the past six months.
Chair Stevenson believed that the current system worked well and saved on paper.
MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Rundle/Commissioner Love. To approve the Bylaws for
the Planning Commission with no changes.
Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried.
______________________________________________________________________________
7. Review Minutes:
A. February 4, 2015
The Commission discussed the February 4, 2015 meeting minutes.
8. Reports
A. Upcoming Planning Cases
Planning Associate Heller explained no planning cases have been applied for at this time.
B. Staff Updates
Planning Associate Heller provided the Commission with a staff update. She discussed the Bel
Rae and BioLife projects. She noted the City newsletter would be sent out next week.
C. Council Updates
Councilmember Meehlhause provided the Planning Commission with an update from the City
Council. He commented how the City was working on a code amendment to improve its
recycling program. He explained that the Citizen of the Year nominee requirements may be
amended to include those individuals who work in the community. He indicated the Town Hall
meeting would be held on Monday, March 30th at 6:00 p.m.
Mounds View Planning Commission February 18, 2015
Regular Meeting Page 6
________________________________________________________________________
D. Planning Commissioner Reports
None.
9. Next Planning Commission Meeting:
A. Wednesday, March 4, 2015
B. Wednesday, March 18, 2015
______________________________________________________________________________
10. Adjournment
There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Chair Stevenson adjourned the
meeting at 8:25 p.m.
______________________________________________________________________________
Respectfully submitted,
Heidi Heller
Planning Associate
Transcribed by:
Heidi Guenther
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
Item No: 5A
Meeting Date: March 18, 2015
Type of Business: Public Hearing
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Mounds View Planning Commission
From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate
Item Title/Subject: Consideration of a 4.5 foot Variance to Allow a 20.5 Foot Tall
Ground Sign at 2704 County Road 10; Planning Case VR2015-
001
Introduction:
The applicant, George Winiecki, owner of 2704 County Road 10, is requesting a variance to allow the
existing ground sign to be expanded 4.5 feet, to 20.5 feet tall. The Zoning Code indicates that no
ground sign in a business district may exceed 16 feet in height.
Discussion:
According to the Municipal Code, Section 1008.09, Subdivision 3, ground signs are limited to a height
of no more than 16 feet without a variance. The applicant owns the building at 2704 County Road 10
and operates his insurance agency here. He also rents some of the building to a few different
tenants who have their business information on the sign. Mr. Winiecki has an existing ground sign
that is 16.5 feet tall with a brick base. He wants to reconfigure the sign panels and possibly add an
electronic sign. Since his ground sign meets the current sign code in regards to it already having
masonry on it, Mr. Winiecki can change more than just the panels on his sign. He intends to keep
the existing brick base and the sign frame, and just change the sizes of the individual businesses
sign panels. He feels that in order to best meet his and his tenant’s sign needs, the ground sign
should be four feet taller. The applicant’s sign is currently 104 square feet, within the allowed 200
square feet. The sign could instead be widened and then would not need a variance. The cost to
change the sign base and frame in order to support a wider sign is high, and the applicant has
chosen to apply for a height variance instead.
Variance Considerations:
For the City to approve this variance, as with any variance request, there needs to be demonstrated
practical difficulty associated with the property that makes a literal interpretation of the Code overly
burdensome or restrictive to a property owner. State statutes require that the governing body (the
Planning Commission) review a set of specified criteria for each application and make its decision in
accordance with these criteria. The City has set these criteria in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2, of
the City Code. The Code clearly states that a hardship exists when all of the criteria are met. The
individual criteria and a staff comment about each are as follows:
a. The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of these regulations.
The property at 2704 County Road 10 is a commercial property that fronts the main commercial
corridor through the city, which is not unique. The sign code was amended in 2013 to lower the
height limits of all the ground signs in business and industrial zoning districts down to 16 feet in
order to improve the aesthetics of the County Road 10 corridor.
2704 County Road 10 Variance Report
March 18, 2015
Page 2
b. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
While the Comprehensive Plan does not specify signage criteria for businesses, it does support
improvements to, and the success of the City’s businesses. The installation of more signage is
typically helpful to the success of a business. The Comprehensive Plan does focus on
improvements to the County Road 10 corridor, and taller signs is not one of the things the City
feels is visually appealing.
c. The applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this
Title or the City Code.
The applicant is asking for the additional ground signage in order for the business to be more
visible to potential customers, and to help new customers find his location.
d. Unique circumstances apply to the property which do not apply to other properties in the
same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances
over which the owner of the property since the enactment of this Title has had no control.
The unique circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant.
The somewhat unique circumstance of this building is that it looks like a residential property
rather than a business, so the tenants rely on the ground sign to attract and direct customers to
their location. The building was originally constructed and used by a home builder for their
office. It was not built by the applicant.
e. The variance does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood.
A 4-foot height expansion may not alter the character of the neighborhood since it is entirely a
commercial area along the County Road 10 corridor where every business has a ground sign of
varying heights. The adjacent business has a 6 foot tall monument style sign and the other side
of the subject property is a wooded area.
f. The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical
difficulties. Economic conditions alone do not constitute practical difficulties.
The applicant feels that a 4.5-foot variance is the minimum variance needed to meet his
business signage needs. There is another option to expand the sign square footage that
doesn’t require a variance, but it’s much more expensive to make the sign wider rather than
taller.
g. The Planning Commission may impose such conditions upon the premises benefited by a
variance as may be necessary to comply with the standards established by this Title or to
reduce or minimize the effect of such variance upon other properties in the neighborhood,
and to better carry out the intent of the variance. The condition must be directly related to
and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance.
Staff does not have any suggested conditions.
2704 County Road 10 Variance Report
March 18, 2015
Page 3
Based upon the review of the above criteria, it appears to staff that the requested variance does not
satisfy the practical difficulty threshold as the basis for the variance request is primarily for financial
reasons. Staff has drafted resolutions of both denial and approval for the Commission to consider.
Public Hearing:
As with any requested variance, a public hearing is required. City staff mailed notices to all property
owners within 350 feet of 2704 County Road 10.
Recommendation:
After holding the public hearing and taking testimony from staff, the applicant and any neighbors, the
Commission should take one of the following actions:
1. Approve the variance as requested. Resolution 1021-15 (approval version) is attached for the
Commission’s approval if they so choose.
2. Deny the requested variance. Resolution 1021-15 (denial version) is attached for the
Commission’s approval if they so choose.
3. Table the request. If the Commission needs more information before making a decision or if
more discussion is needed, the Commission can table the request until they are provided such
information.
Respectfully submitted,
Heidi Heller
Planning Associate
Attachments:
1. Zoning Map
2. Aerial Photo
3. Drawing of Proposed Sign Expansion
4. Letter from Applicant
5. Photographic Documentation
6. Resolution 1021-15
ZONING MAP
* Properties not indicated with a designation are zoned R-1,
Single Family Residential
Aerial View
County Road 10
2704 County
Road 10 sign
Burger King
Holiday Gas
Technical Life Care
Existing sign is a total of 16.5 feet tall – it has a 3 foot tall by 8 foot wide brick base,
and a 6 inch space separates the base from the sign frame. The sign copy area is
13 feet tall by 8 feet wide.
Site plan from Applicant
Sign copy area
13’ tall x 8’ wide
Sign base - brick
3’ tall x 8’ wide
Proposed expansion
4’ tall x 8’ wide
Letter from Applicant
Photographic Documentation
Technical Life Care
sign
Holiday Gas sign
Building at 2704 County Road 10
Photographic Documentation
Looking southwest
Looking northeast
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 1021-15
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION DENYING A 4.5-FOOT HEIGHT VARIANCE FOR A GROUND SIGN AT
2704 COUNTY ROAD 10; PLANNING CASE VR2015-001
WHEREAS, the applicant, George Winiecki, owner of 2704 County Road 10, has applied for
a 4.5-foot variance to allow a 20.5-foot tall ground sign; and,
WHEREAS, 2704 County Road 10 is zoned B-2, Limited Business, and is legally described
as follows:
NELY 275 FT OF PART OF SE ¼ LYING SWLY OF CL OF HWY NO 10 AND BET 2 PAR
LINES RUN SWLY AT RA FROM SD CL AND FROM POINTS MEASURED THEREON 765.9
FT AND 865.9 FT NW FROM S LINE OF SD ¼ (SUBJ TO HWY) IN SEC 6, TN 30, RN 23
PIN: 06-30-23-43-0011
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents
regarding this proposal:
1. Site Plan
2. Zoning Map
3. Aerial View
4. Staff Report
5. Photographic Documentation
WHEREAS, Section 1008.09 of the Sign Code indicates that the maximum height for ground
signs in a business zoning district is 16 feet; and,
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a 4.5 foot variance to allow a 20.5 foot tall ground
sign; and,
WHEREAS, the purpose of the variance provision in the Zoning Code is to give relief to
property owners when the strict enforcement of the zoning code requirements imposes a hardship
thereby restricting the improvement of property due to practical difficulties brought about by unique
or extraordinary features of the physical property that are beyond the property owner’s control; and,
Denial
Version
Resolution 1021-15
Page 2
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly-noticed public hearing regarding this
request on March 18, 2015; and,
WHEREAS, according to Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal
Code, the Planning Commission is to review a standard set of criteria, of which all must be
satisfied, in order to grant a variance to the Zoning Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission finds that the
criteria as identified in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal Code are not
satisfied and finds there to be insufficient practical difficulty with regard to the property located at
2704 County Road 10, and makes the following findings of fact related to its decision:
1. The general intent of the Zoning Code regarding signage limits is for aesthetic reasons, and
the sign code was recently amended to lower sign height limits for this specific reason.
2. The Comprehensive Plan focuses on improvements to the County Road 10 corridor, and
even thought the applicant is trying to keep the business successful with the additional
signage, allowing taller signs is not part of the desired look of the corridor.
3. The applicant is requesting this variance because the building now has additional tenants
who need their business information on the sign.
4. The property is part of the County Road 10 commercial corridor and has no unique
circumstances that cause a practical difficulty. The sign could be made wider and would not
need a variance, but the applicant does not want to do that because of the high cost.
5. The additional sign height would make the applicant’s ground sign that much taller and
inconsistent with the adjacent business’s 6 foot tall monument sign.
6. The variance requested is the minimum variance the applicant feels is required to provide
the suitable amount of signage for his and his tenants businesses, and alleviate the
applicant’s practical difficulty.
7. The Planning Commission may impose conditions upon the premises as may be necessary
to comply with city standards and to minimize the effect of such variance upon other
properties in the neighborhood.
Resolution 1021-15
Page 3
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission,
based upon the above findings, denies the 4.5 foot variance request of property owner, George
Winiecki, to allow a 20.5 foot tall ground sign at 2704 County Road 10.
Adopted this 18th day of March, 2015.
________________________________
Gary Stevenson, Chair
ATTEST:
________________________________
James Ericson, City Administrator
(SEAL)
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 1021-15
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING A 4.5-FOOT VARIANCE TO ALLOW THE GROUND SIGN AT
2704 COUNTY ROAD 10 TO EXCEED THE HEIGHT LIMIT;
PLANNING CASE VR2015-001
WHEREAS, the applicant, George Winiecki, owner of 2704 County Road 10, has applied for
a 4.5-foot variance to allow a 20.5-foot tall ground sign; and,
WHEREAS, 2704 County Road 10 is zoned B-2, Limited Business, and is legally described
as follows:
NELY 275 FT OF PART OF SE ¼ LYING SWLY OF CL OF HWY NO 10 AND BET 2 PAR
LINES RUN SWLY AT RA FROM SD CL AND FROM POINTS MEASURED THEREON 765.9
FT AND 865.9 FT NW FROM S LINE OF SD ¼ (SUBJ TO HWY) IN SEC 6, TN 30, RN 23
PIN: 06-30-23-43-0011
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents
regarding this proposal:
6. Site Plan
7. Zoning Map
8. Aerial View
9. Staff Report
10. Photographic Documentation
WHEREAS, Section 1008.09 of the Sign Code indicates that the maximum height for ground
signs in a business zoning district is 16 feet; and,
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a variance to allow a 20.5 foot tall ground sign;
and,
WHEREAS, the purpose of the variance provision in the Zoning Code is to give relief to
property owners when the strict enforcement of the zoning code requirements imposes a hardship
thereby restricting the improvement of property due to practical difficulties brought about by unique
or extraordinary features of the physical property that are beyond the property owner’s control; and,
Approval
Version
Resolution 1021-15
Page 2
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly-noticed public hearing regarding this
request on March 18, 2015; and,
WHEREAS, according to Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal
Code, the Planning Commission is to review a standard set of criteria, of which all must be
satisfied, in order to grant a variance to the Zoning Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission finds that the
criteria as identified in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal Code are
satisfied and finds there to be sufficient practical difficulty with regard to the property located at
2704 County Road 10, and makes the following findings of fact related to its decision:
8. The general intent of the Zoning Code regarding signage limits is for aesthetic reasons. The
requested additional signage still meets the general purpose and intent of the zoning code.
9. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in that the applicant is trying to
keep the business successful.
10. The applicant is requesting this variance because the building now has additional tenants
who need their business information on the sign.
11. The unique feature of this property is the style of the building as it looks like a house rather
than an office building and signage is very important to direct new and existing customers to
the building.
12. The additional sign height will not alter the existing commercial character of the
neighborhood.
13. The variance requested is the minimum variance the applicant feels is required to provide
the suitable amount of signage and alleviate the applicant’s practical difficulty.
14. The Planning Commission may impose conditions upon the premises as may be necessary
to comply with city standards and to minimize the effect of such variance upon other
properties in the neighborhood.
Resolution 1021-15
Page 3
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission,
based upon the above findings, approves the variance request of George Winiecki, property owner,
to allow a 20.5 foot tall ground sign at 2704 County Road 10.
Adopted this 18th day of March, 2015.
________________________________
Gary Stevenson, Chair
ATTEST:
________________________________
James Ericson, City Administrator
(SEAL)
Item No: 6B
Meeting Date: March 18, 2015
Type of Business: Other Planning Activity
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Planning Commission
From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate
Item Title/Subject: Review Code Amendment to Allow a Columbarium on Religious
Institution Properties
A Mounds View church member recently contacted the City to inquire if a columbarium would
be allowed on the church property. Due to the large increase in cremations rather than burials,
it is understandable that more places are needed to store urns. Mounds View does not
currently have any cemeteries, nor does the City Code address cemeteries or columbaria.
The Planning Commission discussed columbaria on church properties, and the Commission
was supportive of adding language to the zoning code to allow columbaria. The Commission
decided to consider a columbarium an allowed accessory use to a church and base the
regulations from the accessory building requirements. Staff recommends also adding a
definition of a columbarium to the zoning code.
The Planning Commission requested that a permit be required for the installation of columbaria
in order for staff to review the proposal and site plan. Staff will amend the fee schedule to add
the permit fees in.
Recommendation
Review Resolution 1022-15 with the proposed language for a code amendment relating to a
columbarium.
Sincerely,
Heidi Heller, Planning Associate
Attachments:
1. Resolution 1022-15
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 1022-15
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO
TITLE 1100, CHAPTERS 1102 AND 1106 OF THE MOUNDS VIEW ZONING CODE
TO ALLOW COLUMBARIA AT RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS;
SPECIAL PLANNING CASE 193-15
WHEREAS, City staff has recommended that amendments be made to the
zoning code relating to columbaria at religious institutions; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission agrees with the City Staff
recommendation to allow columbaria on the properties of religious institutions as an
accessory use; and,
WHEREAS, City staff has amended Chapter 1102.02 and Chapter 1106.03 of
the Mounds View City Code by deleting the stricken language and adding the
underlined text as follows:
1102.02: DEFINITIONS: The following words and terms, wherever they occur in this
Code, shall be defined as follows:
Subd. 17. COLUMBARIUM: A place for the usually public storage urns holding a
deceased’s cremated remains. Columbaria can be either free standing units, or part of a
mausoleum or another building.
1106.03: ACCESSORY USES: The following are permitted accessory uses in an R-1
District:
Subd. 8. Columbarium as an accessory use to a religious institution, such as churches,
chapels, temples and synagogues; subject to the following conditions:
(a) Must not be constructed of brick.
(b) The combined square footage of all accessory buildings, including
columbaria, shall not exceed 1,800 square feet.
(c) Columbaria shall only be placed in a side yard or rear yard area.
Resolution 1022-15
Page 2
(d) Columbaria shall have a minimum side yard and rear yard setback
of five (5’) feet.
(e) Columbaria height shall not exceed eighteen (18’) feet or that of the
principal structure, whichever is less.
(f) If the religious institution ceases operation, all urns and remains
must be removed from the property within three (3) months of the institution’s
closing.
WHEREAS, amending the City Code to allow columbaria as an accessory use at
religious institutions in residential zoning districts would better serve the public; and,
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission concurs that an amendment to the City Code is warranted and justified.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning
Commission recommends approval of amendments to Sections 1102.02 and 1106.03 of
the Mounds View City Code as defined herein.
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs
staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes.
Adopted this 18th day of March, 2015.
________________________________
Gary Stevenson, Chair
ATTEST:
________________________________
James Ericson, City Administrator
(SEAL)