The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02-19-2014 PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA February 19, 2014 -- 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: December 4, 2013 4. Citizens Requests and Comments Relating to Planning and Zoning Issues Not Already on the Agenda. (Before speaking, give your full name and address for the record.) 5. Planning Cases None 6. Other Planning Activity A. County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District Discussion B. Review Crossroad Point Development Area Visioning Process 7. Next Planning Commission Meetings: A. Wednesday, March 5, 2014 B. Wednesday, March 19, 2014 8. Review Minutes: A. January 8, 2014 9. Staff Reports A. Upcoming Planning Cases 10. Chairperson and Planning Commissioner’s Reports 11. Meeting Conclusion PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting January 8, 2014 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 ______________________________________________________________________________ 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair Stevenson at 7:00 p.m. for January 8, 2014. ______________________________________________________________________________ 2. Roll Call Members Present: Commissioners Carvelli-Yu, Elofson, Love, Rundle, Birken, Schiltgen, and Stevenson. Absent and Excused: None. Also Present: Planning Associate Heidi Heller. ______________________________________________________________________________ 3. Special Order of Business A. Oath of Office for Commissioners Planning Associate Heller administered the Oath of Office to Commissioners Gary Rundle and Jessica Runkin. B. Election of Officers – Chair and Vice-Chair Planning Associate Heller requested the Commission elect a Chair and Vice-Chair for the Planning Commission for 2014. Commissioner Rundle nominated Gary Stevenson as Chair of the Planning Commission. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Rundle/Commissioner Love. To elect Gary Stevenson as the Chair of the Planning Commission for 2014. Ayes – 7 Nays – 0 Motion carried. Commissioner Carvelli-Yu nominated Paul Schiltgen as Vice-Chair of the Planning Commission. Mounds View Planning Commission January 8, 2014 Regular Meeting Page 2 ________________________________________________________________________ MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Carvelli-Yu/Chair Stevenson. To elect Paul Schiltgen as the Vice-Chair of the Planning Commission for 2014. Ayes – 7 Nays – 0 Motion carried. Index to Minutes Page Approval of Minutes 2 Review Crossroad Point Development Area Visioning Process 2 _____________________________________________________________________________ 4. Approval of Minutes November 6, 2013. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Carvelli-Yu/Commissioner Schiltgen. To approve the Minutes of the November 6, 2013 regular Planning Commission meetings as presented. Ayes – 7 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 5. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda None. ______________________________________________________________________________ 6. Planning Cases None. _____________________________________________________________________________ 7. Other Planning Activity A. Review Crossroad Point Development Area Visioning Process (Oral Report) Planning Associate Heller discussed the Crossroad Point Development Area with the Commission. She explained the site was expanded when the City purchased the previous Taiko Restaurant and Robert’s Sports Bar last year, which are adjacent to the Premium Stop lot that was already City owned. The site was approximately 4.25 acres, and the City was proposing to vacate Greenfield Street to allow the site to become one contiguous lot. The City was hoping to have a mixed use on the site in the future. Mounds View Planning Commission January 8, 2014 Regular Meeting Page 3 ________________________________________________________________________ Associate Heller reviewed the Council’s brainstorming session from a recent work session meeting regarding Mounds View’s priorities and goals for the site. Strengths and weaknesses for the City and the site were discussed in detail. She commented a consultant was working with Council and staff. This consultant would be taking the comments from the recent work session meeting and would be drawing up plans for the Council to review in the future. She reported the City would be holding an Open House for the public to review these plans in the near future. Commissioner Carvelli-Yu encouraged staff to notify commercial bankers regarding the potential development options for this property. Commissioner Love suggested public comments be gathered at the proposed Open House, for Council consideration. Associate Heller agreed it would be important to gather public input. ______________________________________________________________________________ 8. Next Planning Commission Meeting: A. January 22, 2014 B. February 5, 2014 ______________________________________________________________________________ 9. Review Minutes: A. December 4, 2013 The Commission discussed the December 4, 2013 meeting minutes. 10. Staff Updates A. Upcoming Planning Cases Planning Associate Heller discussed upcoming planning cases. She reviewed the progress being made on the Coventry Senior Living project. She discussed the changes the Mounds View School District was proposing to meet the all-day kindergarten needs. The school district would be occupying a portion of Silver View Plaza for adult education and the vacant office building next to the movie theater. 11. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Reports None. Mounds View Planning Commission January 8, 2014 Regular Meeting Page 4 ________________________________________________________________________ 12. Adjournment There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Chair Stevenson adjourned the meeting at 7:40 p.m. ______________________________________________________________________________ Respectfully submitted, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Transcribed by: Heidi Guenther TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 01.22.14 Redevelopment Concepts COUNTY H2 & COUNTY ROAD 10 Project # 193802610 page 1N0’ 50’ 150ft Clearview Avenue >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Clearview Avenue >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l l llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l l l l l l l l l l l l lllllllD-OFD-OFFO-DFO-DD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFFO-D FO-D OHPD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GSS Concept 1: Primarily Residential Precedent Images 32 Townhomes 30’x55’ Footprint 1-2 Floors 2 Car Garages (per Requirement) On-Street Guest Parking (32 Required “Townhome”) Senior Independent Living 36 Units TOTAL 15,600sf/Floor 1200sf Unit (gross) 12 Units/Floor @3 Floors Parking 52 Potential Garage Spaces (16 Required “Nursing Home”) Potential Extension of Coventry Senior Living 9 Guest Parking Spaces TownhomesTownhomesTownhomesTownhomesSenior Independent Living Green Space County H2 County Road 10 01.22.14 Redevelopment Concepts COUNTY H2 & COUNTY ROAD 10 Project # 193802610 page 2N0’ 50’ 150ft Concept 2: Primarily Commercial Precedent Images Clearview Avenue >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Clearview Avenue >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l l llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l l l l l l l l l l l l lllllllD-OFD-OFFO-DFO-DD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFFO-D FO-D OHPD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GSS Multifamily (54 Units) 22,400sf/Floor 1200sf Units (gross) 18 Units/Floor @ 3 Floors 78 Garage Parking Spaces (54 Required) 57 Surface Parking Spaces (81Required) Office Building West 15,000sf/Floor 2 Floors 45 Potential Garage Spaces (172 Parking Spaces Required) Office Building East 11,600sf/Floor 2 Floors 35 Potential Garage Spaces (133 Parking Spaces Required) Parking 152 Surface Parking Spaces Phased Structured Parking Provides 85 Additional Spaces Multifamily Office Building West Office Building East Pond Pond Outdoor Seating Area County H2 County Road 10Phased Structured Parking 01.22.14 Redevelopment Concepts COUNTY H2 & COUNTY ROAD 10 Project # 193802610 page 3N0’ 50’ 150ft Concept 3: Mixed-Use Multifamily (30 Units) 12,375sf/Floor / 1200sf Units 10 Units/Floor @ 3 Floors 32 Garage Parking Spaces (30 Required) 22 Surface Parking Spaces (45 Required) On-Street & Shared Temporally with Office 1 Office Building 13,000sf/Floor 2 Floors 45 Garage Parking Spaces 149 Parking Required Total 12 Townhomes 30’x55’ Footprint 1-2 Floors 2 Car Garages On-Street Guest Parking 1 Restaurant 3,900sf/Floor @ 1 Floor Drive-Thru Ready Coffee/Bagel Place 64 Parking Required Precedent Images Clearview Avenue >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Clearview Avenue >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l l llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l l l l l l l l l l l l lllllllD-OFD-OFFO-DFO-DD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFFO-D FO-D OHPD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GSS Parking 213 Spaces Required (Office & Restaurant) 197 Surface + Garage Spaces Available Townhomes Convenience Restaurant Multifamily Office Building Outdoor Seating Area Pond PondTownhomesCounty H2 County Road 10 Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study Open House Questionnaire 1 Open House Questionnaire Responses Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study Do you live, work, or own property or a business in the City of Mounds View? If so, do you live, work, or own property or a business near the Crossroad Pointe site?  Live: 11  Work: 1  Live and Work: 2  Own Property or Business: 1  Near Site: 13  No: 1 Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study Open House Questionnaire 2 How did you find out about the meeting tonight?  Letter from Jim Erickson: 6  From a friend/neighbor: 6  Email from Heidi Heller: 2  City Facebook: 1  City Council Member: 1 What type of development (residential, retail, office, etc.) would you LIKE to see on the Crossroad Pointe site? In other words, what would you shop at, work at, visit, or live in at this site?  Stage 1 of a long range, comprehensive plan to create a walkable downtown with amenities for people along the life span  Chiropractic wellness center  May be best to do nothing , until another commercial space is put to use along the immediate Co. Rd. 10 corridor  Mixed use of residential and commercial/office, not necessarily vertical mixed use  Include sizeable green space usable for residents, possibly public space  Maintain N/S access aligned with Greenfield; not convinced vacating street is desirable  Structured parking please, limit surface parking lots  Restaurant will blow up parking, avoid unless you have a quality tenant and long term lease  Prefer residential  I would really like a good, moderately priced restaurant-a Davanni’s would be perfect  Restaurants, office  I would rather have more retail and office space. Things that close at a decent time and won’t produce as much noise as Roberts did.  Greenspace, pond(s), fountain, walking path, garden. Do not over crowd.  Keep high end quick food service, i.e. Chipotle, Starbucks  Restaurant, retail  I like townhomes  Small restaurants—St. Paul has wonderful little shops to eat  Combination of residential and retail. Something like a Whole Foods, Trader Joe’s, or the new “mini” Target  I would like mixed use—nice apartments, business, retail, restaurants, café, ice cream  Senior apartments are good Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study Open House Questionnaire 3 What type of development (residential, retail, office, etc.) would you NOT LIKE to see on the Crossroad Pointe site? In other words, what would you NOT shop at, work at, visit, or live in at this site?  Another car-centered plan. We need a pedestrian-centered design that doesn’t discriminate against those without cars-children, elderly  We specifically do not want housing, certainly not high density housing that is going to flood the area with people and traffic  Fast food restaurants  Large surface parking lots  Office space OK with no retail  Senior apartments. We need to attract more young families  I’d be very cautious about an office complex. Townhome/senior living/small restaurant would be much better  I would rather not have multifamily. I feel that will increase crime and decrease my property value. Townhomes wouldn’t be as bad. No more senior living!  No burger fast foot  No low income housing  No small retail tailored to unique markets, i.e. guitar sales, corvette store—keep more broad— floral, gift, cell phone, hair salon  More multifamily units  No more drugstores!  No chain stores  Mounds View doesn’t seem to be able to keep shops more than a few months. Please not another complex or other rental which brings in more crime  Office space does not seem to be occupied  No townhomes  No bars  No health club  No cheap apartments What other types of amenities would you like to see developed on the Crossroad Pointe site?  Underground parking to allow for more green space at ground level  Good sidewalk connections  Well-designed “front door” presence on all public streets  Park, larger community center (similar to New Brighton’s Eagle Nest)  Hardware store  Park & garden for different events, weddings, farmers market, concerts  More community space. No real parks near area. No green space near area either  Seating around fountain  Many trees and gardens Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study Open House Questionnaire 4  Something that can be decorated during holidays  A really nice eating place  I like storefront with apartments/condos on top General Comments?  Young families are looking for amenities. The 5-minute walk contains the middle school grounds, movie theatre, drug stores. I especially appreciate the wide view.  Thanks for keeping the neighbors involved.  I like the idea of residential, especially if the senior living building is put in. It seems there are many vacant retail areas already. Would like to see those filled or redeveloped later on before adding more retail that could potentially sit vacant. Since so many retail facilities have failed in the past, it would be nice to see the area have a long term use.  I would like to see something unique with character that would stand out from the rest. Give it a small town feel.  Whatever is done, the entrance should not be on H2. When turning left from 10, if someone decides to turn in, they will stop traffic and cause potential traffic issue as cars try to clear the intersection.  Mounds View Square has become a discount haven—it attracts the wrong shoppers. Any retail store or restaurant should be run by the other chains.  Months ago I learned that Kozlaks Royal Oaks had lost its place in Arden Hills and mentioned to someone at the City (don’t remember who) that City should approach Kozlak about coming to Mounds View. What a great asset. Don’t think City ever followed up.  Whichever developer is chosen needs to have tenants/businesses lined up so the spaces do not sit empty.  I would like Greenfield cut off from this development—makes property larger and reduces traffic on our street. This development will directly impact our street. I am concerned about traffic & H2 intersection. H2&10 needs improvement. The angle makes it difficult to see and the light is slow going from H2 to 10. Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study Open House Concept Option Comments Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study Concept 1: Primarily Residential 1. 2 votes 2. Post-it comments: a. I like this one b. No green space for residents Concept 2: Primarily Commercial 1. 4 votes 2. Post-it comments: a. Not enough play area for children b. Cut back on buildings and provide more green space c. Nice (with arrow pointing to picture of Starbucks) d. Can we make stage 1 of a downtown? e. Trails should meander. Open space needs amenity f. Too much asphalt g. More green space on corner with fountain (CR10 and H2) h. Mixed use zoning—1st story retail, 2nd & 3rd apartments i. I don’t have a compelling use suggestion but we do feel strongly that the space should not be used for apartments, townhouses, or multifamily Concept 3: Mixed-Use 1. 12 votes 2. Post-it comments: a. Require underground and shared parking to limit surface lots and maximize useable green space b. Would like to see path to connect Edgewood to Hwy 10 path c. Provide green amenity space for new development that is visible to/from public ways and possibly accessible to public d. Maintain Greenfield Ave. connection to H2 or pedestrian and bike connection in its place e. No drive-thru restaurants please f. Would like to see good architecture to add good curb appeal g. Access to County 10 from parking lot would be problematic Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study Open House Challenges and Opportunities Results Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study What do you think is the best feature or opportunity for redevelopment on the Crossroad Pointe site? 1. Resident–usable/walkable-don’t need to go outside Mounds View for shopping, eating, entertainment, recreation: 15 votes 2. Opportunity for multi-level, multi-use, views, social spaces, apartments, condos, retail: 9 votes 3. City willing to work with developers, which will increase tax base – lessen burden for homeowners: 6 votes 4. Close to 35W & CR10 & H2, with good access to Hwy 65 and Silver Lake Road: 5 votes 5. Good traffic counts/visual image/presentation to interest developers: 5 votes 6. Convenient to schools, shopping, & community center/midpoint for other surrounding uses: 4 votes 7. Close to TCAAP: 3 votes 8. Low crime: 3 votes and 1 negative vote 9. Significant size (4.25 acres) for redevelopment: 0 votes 10. 24-hour gathering place: 0 votes Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study What do you think is the biggest weakness or challenge for redevelopment on the Crossroad Pointe site? 1. Doing nothing: 9 votes 2. Access from CR10/H2 needs improvement: 8 votes 3. Greenfield Avenue cuts through property: 6 votes 4. Hiring a bad developer or a developer who doesn’t do what they say they will: 6 votes 5. Size of parcel could be limiting (4.25 acres): 5 votes 6. Lack of enough surrounding commercial/retail to feed off of to support more development: 4 votes 7. Too close to residential: 2 votes 8. Diagonal roadway (CR 10) creates irregular parcel: 1 vote 9. TCAAP development will draw people away from Crossroad Pointe site: 1 vote 10. Economy could go into recession: 0 votes Item No: 6A Meeting Date: February 19, 2014 Type of Business: Other Planning Activity City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: County Road 10 Corridor Discussion The corridor continues to be the City Council’s priority and the Planning Commission has been reviewing the Zoning Code in order to better promote and accommodate development along County Road 10. The Commission has now amended the City Code to change the requirements for ground signs on properties that are on the Corridor. The Code was changed to lower the allowed heights and require higher quality design materials, but the signs can be closer to County Road 10. Our discussion began by focusing on creating a Corridor Overlay District in order to give more flexibility to new projects on the corridor. The City is willing to be flexible on requirements such as setbacks, parking, density and height, but the City also wants projects that are high quality. I have included the chapter in the Envisioning Better Communities book about transforming highway commercial strips. None of the highways talked about in this chapter are as wide or fast as County Road 10, but there are some ideas and photos of good and not-so-good streetscapes and buildings. Recommendation Continue the discussion about a County Road 10 Corridor District Overlay that would promote and support development on the corridor. Sincerely, Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Attachments: 1. Part Five of Envisioning Better Communities: Transforming Highway Commercial Strips into Mixed Use Centers and Corridors (pages 119-167) Item No: 6B Meeting Date: February 19, 2014 Type of Business: Other Planning Activity City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mounds View Planning Commission From: Heidi Heller, Planning Associate Item Title/Subject: Crossroad Pointe Development Area Discussion: On January 27, 2014, the City hosted an open house for residents to see three concept ideas that Stantec, our planning consultants, put together for the city-owned four acre site now known as “Crossroad Pointe.” This open house also gave attendees a chance to comment on the three ideas, offer any other suggestions, and answer some questions about the site in general. We received the tallied results of the open house comments from the Stantec team. There was no consensus of what anyone would like to see, or not see, on the site. The next step will be for Stantec to develop concept plans that show what uses could be feasible in Mounds View, on this site. Respectfully submitted, Heidi Heller Planning Associate Attachments: 1. 3 Development Concept Ideas 2. Open house results for Crossroad Pointe Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study Open House Concept Option Comments Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study Concept 1: Primarily Residential 1. 2 votes 2. Post-it comments: a. I like this one b. No green space for residents Concept 2: Primarily Commercial 1. 4 votes 2. Post-it comments: a. Not enough play area for children b. Cut back on buildings and provide more green space c. Nice (with arrow pointing to picture of Starbucks) d. Can we make stage 1 of a downtown? e. Trails should meander. Open space needs amenity f. Too much asphalt g. More green space on corner with fountain (CR10 and H2) h. Mixed use zoning—1st story retail, 2nd & 3rd apartments i. I don’t have a compelling use suggestion but we do feel strongly that the space should not be used for apartments, townhouses, or multifamily Concept 3: Mixed-Use 1. 12 votes 2. Post-it comments: a. Require underground and shared parking to limit surface lots and maximize useable green space b. Would like to see path to connect Edgewood to Hwy 10 path c. Provide green amenity space for new development that is visible to/from public ways and possibly accessible to public d. Maintain Greenfield Ave. connection to H2 or pedestrian and bike connection in its place e. No drive-thru restaurants please f. Would like to see good architecture to add good curb appeal g. Access to County 10 from parking lot would be problematic Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study Open House Questionnaire 1 Open House Questionnaire Responses Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study Do you live, work, or own property or a business in the City of Mounds View? If so, do you live, work, or own property or a business near the Crossroad Pointe site?  Live: 11  Work: 1  Live and Work: 2  Own Property or Business: 1  Near Site: 13  No: 1 Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study Open House Challenges and Opportunities Results Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study What do you think is the best feature or opportunity for redevelopment on the Crossroad Pointe site? 1. Resident–usable/walkable-don’t need to go outside Mounds View for shopping, eating, entertainment, recreation: 15 votes 2. Opportunity for multi-level, multi-use, views, social spaces, apartments, condos, retail: 9 votes 3. City willing to work with developers, which will increase tax base – lessen burden for homeowners: 6 votes 4. Close to 35W & CR10 & H2, with good access to Hwy 65 and Silver Lake Road: 5 votes 5. Good traffic counts/visual image/presentation to interest developers: 5 votes 6. Convenient to schools, shopping, & community center/midpoint for other surrounding uses: 4 votes 7. Close to TCAAP: 3 votes 8. Low crime: 3 votes and 1 negative vote 9. Significant size (4.25 acres) for redevelopment: 0 votes 10. 24-hour gathering place: 0 votes Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study What do you think is the biggest weakness or challenge for redevelopment on the Crossroad Pointe site? 1. Doing nothing: 9 votes 2. Access from CR10/H2 needs improvement: 8 votes 3. Greenfield Avenue cuts through property: 6 votes 4. Hiring a bad developer or a developer who doesn’t do what they say they will: 6 votes 5. Size of parcel could be limiting (4.25 acres): 5 votes 6. Lack of enough surrounding commercial/retail to feed off of to support more development: 4 votes 7. Too close to residential: 2 votes 8. Diagonal roadway (CR 10) creates irregular parcel: 1 vote 9. TCAAP development will draw people away from Crossroad Pointe site: 1 vote 10. Economy could go into recession: 0 votes Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study Open House Questionnaire 2 How did you find out about the meeting tonight?  Letter from Jim Erickson: 6  From a friend/neighbor: 6  Email from Heidi Heller: 2  City Facebook: 1  City Council Member: 1 What type of development (residential, retail, office, etc.) would you LIKE to see on the Crossroad Pointe site? In other words, what would you shop at, work at, visit, or live in at this site?  Stage 1 of a long range, comprehensive plan to create a walkable downtown with amenities for people along the life span  Chiropractic wellness center  May be best to do nothing , until another commercial space is put to use along the immediate Co. Rd. 10 corridor  Mixed use of residential and commercial/office, not necessarily vertical mixed use  Include sizeable green space usable for residents, possibly public space  Maintain N/S access aligned with Greenfield; not convinced vacating street is desirable  Structured parking please, limit surface parking lots  Restaurant will blow up parking, avoid unless you have a quality tenant and long term lease  Prefer residential  I would really like a good, moderately priced restaurant-a Davanni’s would be perfect  Restaurants, office  I would rather have more retail and office space. Things that close at a decent time and won’t produce as much noise as Roberts did.  Greenspace, pond(s), fountain, walking path, garden. Do not over crowd.  Keep high end quick food service, i.e. Chipotle, Starbucks  Restaurant, retail  I like townhomes  Small restaurants—St. Paul has wonderful little shops to eat  Combination of residential and retail. Something like a Whole Foods, Trader Joe’s, or the new “mini” Target  I would like mixed use—nice apartments, business, retail, restaurants, café, ice cream  Senior apartments are good Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study Open House Questionnaire 3 What type of development (residential, retail, office, etc.) would you NOT LIKE to see on the Crossroad Pointe site? In other words, what would you NOT shop at, work at, visit, or live in at this site?  Another car-centered plan. We need a pedestrian-centered design that doesn’t discriminate against those without cars-children, elderly  We specifically do not want housing, certainly not high density housing that is going to flood the area with people and traffic  Fast food restaurants  Large surface parking lots  Office space OK with no retail  Senior apartments. We need to attract more young families  I’d be very cautious about an office complex. Townhome/senior living/small restaurant would be much better  I would rather not have multifamily. I feel that will increase crime and decrease my property value. Townhomes wouldn’t be as bad. No more senior living!  No burger fast foot  No low income housing  No small retail tailored to unique markets, i.e. guitar sales, corvette store—keep more broad— floral, gift, cell phone, hair salon  More multifamily units  No more drugstores!  No chain stores  Mounds View doesn’t seem to be able to keep shops more than a few months. Please not another complex or other rental which brings in more crime  Office space does not seem to be occupied  No townhomes  No bars  No health club  No cheap apartments What other types of amenities would you like to see developed on the Crossroad Pointe site?  Underground parking to allow for more green space at ground level  Good sidewalk connections  Well-designed “front door” presence on all public streets  Park, larger community center (similar to New Brighton’s Eagle Nest)  Hardware store  Park & garden for different events, weddings, farmers market, concerts  More community space. No real parks near area. No green space near area either  Seating around fountain  Many trees and gardens Crossroad Pointe Redevelopment Study Open House Questionnaire 4  Something that can be decorated during holidays  A really nice eating place  I like storefront with apartments/condos on top General Comments?  Young families are looking for amenities. The 5-minute walk contains the middle school grounds, movie theatre, drug stores. I especially appreciate the wide view.  Thanks for keeping the neighbors involved.  I like the idea of residential, especially if the senior living building is put in. It seems there are many vacant retail areas already. Would like to see those filled or redeveloped later on before adding more retail that could potentially sit vacant. Since so many retail facilities have failed in the past, it would be nice to see the area have a long term use.  I would like to see something unique with character that would stand out from the rest. Give it a small town feel.  Whatever is done, the entrance should not be on H2. When turning left from 10, if someone decides to turn in, they will stop traffic and cause potential traffic issue as cars try to clear the intersection.  Mounds View Square has become a discount haven—it attracts the wrong shoppers. Any retail store or restaurant should be run by the other chains.  Months ago I learned that Kozlaks Royal Oaks had lost its place in Arden Hills and mentioned to someone at the City (don’t remember who) that City should approach Kozlak about coming to Mounds View. What a great asset. Don’t think City ever followed up.  Whichever developer is chosen needs to have tenants/businesses lined up so the spaces do not sit empty.  I would like Greenfield cut off from this development—makes property larger and reduces traffic on our street. This development will directly impact our street. I am concerned about traffic & H2 intersection. H2&10 needs improvement. The angle makes it difficult to see and the light is slow going from H2 to 10. 01.22.14 Redevelopment Concepts COUNTY H2 & COUNTY ROAD 10 Project # 193802610 page 1N0’ 50’ 150ft Clearview Avenue >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Clearview Avenue >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l l llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l l l l l l l l l l l l lllllllD-OFD-OFFO-DFO-DD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFFO-D FO-D OHPD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GSS Concept 1: Primarily Residential Precedent Images 32 Townhomes 30’x55’ Footprint 1-2 Floors 2 Car Garages (per Requirement) On-Street Guest Parking (32 Required “Townhome”) Senior Independent Living 36 Units TOTAL 15,600sf/Floor 1200sf Unit (gross) 12 Units/Floor @3 Floors Parking 52 Potential Garage Spaces (16 Required “Nursing Home”) Potential Extension of Coventry Senior Living 9 Guest Parking Spaces TownhomesTownhomesTownhomesTownhomesSenior Independent Living Green Space County H2 County Road 10 01.22.14 Redevelopment Concepts COUNTY H2 & COUNTY ROAD 10 Project # 193802610 page 2N0’ 50’ 150ft Concept 2: Primarily Commercial Precedent Images Clearview Avenue >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Clearview Avenue >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l l llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l l l l l l l l l l l l lllllllD-OFD-OFFO-DFO-DD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFFO-D FO-D OHPD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GSS Multifamily (54 Units) 22,400sf/Floor 1200sf Units (gross) 18 Units/Floor @ 3 Floors 78 Garage Parking Spaces (54 Required) 57 Surface Parking Spaces (81Required) Office Building West 15,000sf/Floor 2 Floors 45 Potential Garage Spaces (172 Parking Spaces Required) Office Building East 11,600sf/Floor 2 Floors 35 Potential Garage Spaces (133 Parking Spaces Required) Parking 152 Surface Parking Spaces Phased Structured Parking Provides 85 Additional Spaces Multifamily Office Building West Office Building East Pond Pond Outdoor Seating Area County H2 County Road 10Phased Structured Parking 01.22.14 Redevelopment Concepts COUNTY H2 & COUNTY ROAD 10 Project # 193802610 page 3N0’ 50’ 150ft Concept 3: Mixed-Use Multifamily (30 Units) 12,375sf/Floor / 1200sf Units 10 Units/Floor @ 3 Floors 32 Garage Parking Spaces (30 Required) 22 Surface Parking Spaces (45 Required) On-Street & Shared Temporally with Office 1 Office Building 13,000sf/Floor 2 Floors 45 Garage Parking Spaces 149 Parking Required Total 12 Townhomes 30’x55’ Footprint 1-2 Floors 2 Car Garages On-Street Guest Parking 1 Restaurant 3,900sf/Floor @ 1 Floor Drive-Thru Ready Coffee/Bagel Place 64 Parking Required Precedent Images Clearview Avenue >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Clearview Avenue >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l l llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l l l l l l l l l l l l lllllllD-OFD-OFFO-DFO-DD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFD-OFFO-D FO-D OHPD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GD-GSS Parking 213 Spaces Required (Office & Restaurant) 197 Surface + Garage Spaces Available Townhomes Convenience Restaurant Multifamily Office Building Outdoor Seating Area Pond PondTownhomesCounty H2 County Road 10