Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-05-2005 MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION January 5, 2005 -- 7:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETING AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approve Minutes: December 1, 2004 4. Citizens Requests and Comments Relating to Planning and Zoning Issues Not Already Present on the Agenda CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM, AND GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES 5. Discuss Possible Code Amendment Regarding Building Height Restrictions in a Planned Unit Development 6. Election of Officers: Chairperson and Vice Chairperson APPLICANTS: YOUR ATTENDANCE AT THIS MEETING IS REQUESTED. PLEASE NOTIFY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AT 763-717-4020 IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND. 7. Next Planning Commission Meeting: January 19, 2005 8. Adjourn to Agenda Session AGENDA SESSION 1. Review Minutes: December 15, 2004 2. Staff Reports A. Review Code Amendment Regarding Driveways (Clean Copy) 3. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners’ Reports Meeting Date: January 5, 2005 Type of Business: FYI City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mounds View Planning Commission From: James Ericson, Community Development Director Item Title/Subject: Proposed Ordinance 756 Relating to Nonconforming Driveways and Curb Cuts Introduction: At the Planning Commission’s last meeting, staff was asked to provide the Commission with a “clean copy” of the proposed ordinance language that is being forwarded to the City Council for their consideration. Discussion: No discussion or action is necessary; the proposed ordinance language will be presented to the Council on January 10 and again on January 24, 2005. Recommendation: For your review. _____________________________________ James Ericson Community Development Director Attachments: 1. Ordinance 756 2. Clean language ORDINANCE 756 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 902, 1104, 1121 AND 1125 OF THE MOUNDS VIEW MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO NONCONFORMING DRIVEWAYS AND CURB CUTS THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Section 902.02 of the Mounds View Municipal Code pertaining to driveways is hereby amended with the proposed additions underlined and deletions struck out:: 902.02: PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION: Subd. 1. Driveway Construction: No person shall construct a driveway without first obtaining a permit pursuant to the provisions set forth in Chapter 1006 of this Code. (1988 Code §44.05) (Ord. 640, 10-11-99) Subd. 2. Existing, Non-conforming Driveways: Permanent-surfaced driveways which do not conform to the City Code as of October 11, 1999, may be rebuilt, reconstructed or replaced in the same manner, fashion and location as before unless the location of said driveway poses a significant public safety hazard. If a requested building permit is denied due to the presence of such a public safety hazard, the applicant may appeal the decision in writing to the City Council. For the purpose of this subdivision, a permanent surface shall mean bituminous, concrete or brick. (Ord. 640, 10-11-99) Consistent with the provisions of Chapter 1123, driveways that do not conform to the requirements of the City Code may not be replaced or reconstructed without bringing them into compliance. (Minor maintenance and alterations may be permitted.) Driveways which cannot be brought into compliance without undue hardship, as determined by the Director of Community Development, may be improved, replaced or rebuilt however in no case may the extent of the nonconformity increase as a result. If a requested permit is denied due to noncompliance, the property owner may appeal the decision in writing to the City Council. SECTION 2. Subdivision 4b(2) of Section 1104.01 of the Mounds View Zoning Code pertaining to driveways is hereby amended with the proposed additions underlined and deletions struck out: (2) Driveways in existence as of the date of enactment of ordinance 620 and which do not conform to the provisions of this Chapter subsection, may continue subject to the provisions of Section 902.02, subdivision 2. (Ord. 620, 7-27-98; Ord. 642, 1-10-00) Ord. 756 Page 2 SECTION 3. Subdivision 4c(4) of Section 1104.01 of the Mounds View Zoning Code pertaining to parking lots is hereby amended with the proposed additions underlined and deletions struck out: (4) Parking areas in existence as of the date of enactment of Ordinance 620 and which do not conform to the provisions of this Chapter subsection, may continue subject to the provisions of Section Chapter 1123.02, subdivision 1b. (Ord. 620, 7-27-98) SECTION 4. Subdivision 5f of Section 1121.09 of the Mounds View Zoning Code pertaining to curb cuts is hereby amended with the proposed additions underlined and deletions struck out: 5f. Curb cuts in existence as of 10/11/99 that do not conform to this subdivision may remain in existence unless deemed by the Director of Public Works to be a danger or public safety hazard. Notices to abandon a curb cut may be appealed in writing to the City Council. 5g. In conjunction with street improvement projects or in conjunction with individual driveway replacement projects, nonconforming curb cuts shall be made conforming to whatever extent practicable. If, in the opinion of the directors of public works and community development, a nonconforming curb cut cannot be made conforming without undue hardship or disruption to the property, the curb cut may remain in existence, unchanged. Decisions regarding curb cuts may be appealed in writing to the City Council. SECTION 5. Subdivision 6 of Section 1125.02 of the Mounds View Zoning Code pertaining to Administrative Variances is hereby amended with the proposed additions underlined and deletions struck out: a. Types: Residents Property owners seeking relief from the Zoning Code may request an administrative variance, provided that the property is zoned R-1 or R-2 and either of the following is applicable: (1) The property is zoned R-1 or R-2; and (2) The request concerns setbacks; and (3) Tthe variance amount is within twenty-five (25) percent of code requirements, except as provided in Subd. 6a(5) below; and (4) Aapproval of the variance does not result in a setback of less than five (5) feet, except as provided in Subd. 6a(5) below; and (2) (5) The request is related to a pre-existing, non-conforming driveway or curb cut. was previously permitted at a setback up to one-foot from the property line. Ord. 756 Page 3 SECTION 6. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its publication in the official City newspaper. PUBLIC HEARING, INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING by the City Council of the City of Mounds View on this ____ day of ___________, 2005. SECOND READING and ADOPTION by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this _____ day of ___________, 2005. Rob Marty, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________ Kurt Ulrich, City Clerk / Administrator Approved as to form: ______________________ Mounds View City Attorney (SEAL) What the City Code will look like upon adoption of Ordinance 756: 902.02: PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION: Subd. 1. Driveway Construction: No person shall construct a driveway without first obtaining a permit pursuant to the provisions set forth in Chapter 1006 of this Code. (1988 Code §44.05) (Ord. 640, 10-11-99) Subd. 2. Existing, Non-conforming Driveways: Consistent with the provisions of Chapter 1123, driveways that do not conform to the requirements of the City Code may not be replaced or reconstructed without bringing them into compliance. (Minor maintenance and alterations may be permitted.) Driveways which cannot be brought into compliance without undue hardship, as determined by the Director of Community Development, may be improved, replaced or rebuilt however in no case may the extent of the nonconformity increase as a result. If a requested permit is denied due to noncompliance, the property owner may appeal the decision in writing to the City Council. 1104.01 GENERAL ZONING REQUIREMENTS Subd. 4. Minimum Setbacks for Accessory Buildings, Driveways and Parking Areas: b. Driveways: (1) Driveways shall have a minimum setback of five feet (5')(from any lot line, except as permitted in Section 1104.01, subdivision 4c(1)(a) and Section 1121.15, subdivision 2 of this Title. Driveways shall be permitted to cross a required setback area in order to establish access between the lot and a public street. Where a driveway would encroach into an easement, the property owner shall obtain an encroachment permit if required by the City prior to construction of the driveway. Drive aisles and driveways which are within the boundaries of a parking area shall conform to the setbacks required for parking areas. (Ord. 590, 11-25-96; Ord. 620, 7-27-98; Ord. 642, 1-10-00) (2) Driveways which do not conform to the provisions of this Chapter, may continue subject to the provisions of Section 902.02, subdivision 2. (Ord. 620, 7-27-98; Ord. 642, 1-10-00) c. Parking Areas: (4) Parking areas which do not conform to the provisions of this Chapter may continue subject to the provisions of Chapter 1123. (Ord. 620, 7-27-98) 1121.09 STALL, AISLE AND DRIVEWAY DESIGN Subd. 5: Curb Cuts and Driveway Openings: f. Curb cuts that do not conform to this subdivision may remain in existence unless deemed by the Director of Public Works to be a danger or public safety hazard. Notices to abandon a curb cut may be appealed in writing to the City Council. g. In conjunction with street improvement projects or in conjunction with individual driveway replacement projects, nonconforming curb cuts shall be made conforming to whatever extent practicable. If, in the opinion of the directors of public works and community development, a nonconforming curb cut cannot be made conforming without undue hardship or disruption to the property, the curb cut may remain in existence, unchanged. Decisions regarding curb cuts may be appealed in writing to the City Council. 1125.02 VARIANCES AND APPEALS: Subd. 6: Administrative Variance process a. Types: Property owners seeking relief from the Zoning Code may request an administrative variance, provided that the property is zoned R-1 or R-2 and either of the following is applicable: (1) The request concerns setbacks; the variance amount is within twenty-five (25) percent of code requirements; and approval of the variance does not result in a setback of less than five (5) feet. (2) The request is related to a pre-existing, non-conforming driveway or curb cut. b. Review Procedures: The Director of Community Development will review administrative variance requests. In order to be approved, the variance request must meet the hardship criteria as stated in Section 1125.2, Subdivision 2. If hardship is evident and approval is granted, the adjacent property owners must be notified by mail of the preliminary approval and allowed ten days to respond to the decision. Absent any opposition from adjacent property owners, the Planning Commission shall review the administrative variance request at the following regularly scheduled meeting. c. Denial and Appeals: If the Director chooses to deny a request, or if either the adjacent neighbors or the Planning Commission disagrees with administrative approval of a variance request, the request is denied administratively and the applicant may choose to request a formal variance from the Planning Commission. d. Fees: Administrative variances fees are set according to the fee schedule adopted by City Council resolution. Item No: Item 5 Meeting Date: Jan 5, 2005 Type of Business: Review City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mounds View Planning Commission From: James Ericson, Community Development Director Item Title/Subject: Proposed Zoning Code Amendment Regarding Building Height Restrictions in Planned Unit Developments Introduction: As the Commission was made aware at your last meeting, there is an inconsistency in the Zoning Code relating to building heights in PUD districts. The intent of the PUD district and corresponding provisions is to provide maximum flexibility regarding setbacks, density and design for site specific projects in return for preservation of open space, environmental considerations and other beneficial public purposes. Discussion: Chapter 1120 of the City Code addresses Planned Unit Developments and provides for the processing of such development types. The stated purpose and intent can be found in the first paragraph of Chapter 1120: The purpose of this Chapter of the Zoning Code is to provide for the grouping of land parcels for development as an integrated, coordinated unit as opposed to traditional parcel by parcel, piecemeal, sporadic and unplanned approach to development. This Section is intended to introduce flexibility of site design and architecture for the conservation of land and open space through clustering of buildings and activities through conditional use provisions. It is further intended that planned unit developments are to be characterized by central management, integrated planning and architecture, joint or common use of parking, maintenance of open space and other similar facilities and a harmonious selection and efficient distribution of uses In addition to the opening statement, the Code encourages specific actions and identifies ten items for consideration. The last provision communicated is as follows: 10. To allow variation from the provisions of this Title, including setbacks, height, lot area, width and depth, yards, etc. (1988 Code §40.24) As stated above, the PUD process was intended to provide flexibility regarding building height as it was for other variables. But later in the PUD code, a conflicting passage is present: Subd. 12. Building Height: Height limitations shall be the same as imposed in the respective districts. PUD Amendment Report January 5, 2005 Page 2 This apparent inconsistency was discovered when the City processed the Mermaid Planned Unit development. There had been some discussion of a taller hotel and there are still plans for a possible expansion. Rather than preclude such an expansion where appropriate, staff supports adding language to the Code which simply reaffirms the intent and purpose of the Code. Staff recommends adding the following underlined language to Subd. 12 of Section 1120.02: Subd. 12. Building Height: Height limitations shall be the same as imposed in the respective districts unless additional height or stories would serve a better purpose consistent with the intent of this Chapter. Recommendation: Review the proposed amendment and direct staff accordingly. If the amendment as proposed is acceptable, a resolution has been drafted for Commission consideration which would be forwarded to the City Council along with the proposed amendment. _____________________________________ James Ericson Community Development Director Attachments: 1. Chapter 1120 2. Resolution 781-05 1120.01 1120.01 CHAPTER 1120 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS SECTION: 1120.01: Purpose and Intent 1120.02: General Requirements and Standards 1120.03: Special Requirements and Standards 1120.04: Procedure 1120.05: Submittals 1120.01: PURPOSE AND INTENT: The purpose of this Chapter of the Zoning Code is to provide for the grouping of land parcels for development as an integrated, coordinated unit as opposed to traditional parcel by parcel, piecemeal, sporadic and unplanned approach to development. This Section is intended to introduce flexibility of site design and architecture for the conservation of land and open space through clustering of buildings and activities through conditional use provisions. It is further intended that planned unit developments are to be characterized by central management, integrated planning and architecture, joint or common use of parking, maintenance of open space and other similar facilities and a harmonious selection and efficient distribution of uses. Specifically, it is intended to encourage: Subd. 1. Innovations in residential development to the end that the growing demands for housing of all economic levels may be met by greater variety in tenure, type, design and siting of dwellings and by the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. Subd. 2. Higher standards of site and building design through the use of trained and experienced land planners, architects and landscape architects. Subd. 3. More convenience in location of accessory commercial and service area. Subd. 4. The preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics, such as natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion. Subd. 5. A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly transition of land from rural to urban uses. 1120.01 1120.02 Subd. 6. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets, thereby lowering housing costs and public investments. Subd. 7. A development pattern in harmony with the objectives of the Mounds View Comprehensive Plan. Subd. 8. A more desirable environment than would be possible through the strict application of zoning and subdivision regulations of the City1. Subd. 9. To give the landowner and developer reasonable assurance of ultimate approval before expending complete design monies while providing City officials with assurances that the project will retain the character envisioned at the time of concurrence. Subd. 10. To allow variation from the provisions of this Title, including setbacks, height, lot area, width and depth, yards, etc. (1988 Code §40.24) 1120.02: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS: Subd. 1. Ownership: An application for PUD approval must be filed by the landowner or jointly by all landowners of the property included in a project. The application and all submissions must be directed to the development of the property as a unified whole. In the case of multiple ownership, the approval of the final plat shall be binding on all owners. Subd. 2. Comprehensive Plan Consistency: The proposed PUD shall be consistent with the adopted City Comprehensive Plan. Subd. 3. Common Open Space: Common open space at least sufficient to meet the minimum requirements established in this Chapter and such complementary structures and improvements as are necessary and appropriate for the benefit and enjoyment of the residents of the PUD shall be provided within the area of the PUD. Subd. 4. Operating and Maintenance Requirements for PUD Common Open Space/Facilities: Whenever common open space or service facilities are provided within the PUD, the PUD plan shall contain provisions to assure the continued operation and maintenance of such open space and service facilities to a predetermined reasonable standard. Common open space and service facilities within a PUD may be placed under the ownership of one (1) or more of the following as approved by the Council: a. Landlord control, where only use by tenants is anticipated. 1 See Title 1200 of this Code for subdivision regulations. 1120.02 1120.02 b. Property Owners' Association; provided, all of the following conditions are met: (1) Prior to the use, occupancy, sale or the execution of contracts for sale of an individual building unit, parcel, tract, townhouse, apartment or common area, a declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions or an equivalent document and a set of floor plans, such as specified by Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 515 and 515A, shall be filed with the City Clerk-Administrator, said filing to be made prior to the filings of said declaration of documents or floor plans with the recording officers of Ramsey County, Minnesota. (2) The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions or equivalent document shall specify that deeds, leases or documents of conveyance affecting buildings, units, parcels, tracts, townhouses or apartments shall subject said properties to the terms of said declaration. (3) The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions shall provide that an owners' association or corporation shall be formed and that all owners shall be members of said association or corporation which shall maintain all properties and common areas in good repair and which shall assess individual property owners proportionate shares of joint or common costs. This declaration shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney. The intent of this requirement is to protect the property values of the individual owner through establishing effective private control. (4) The declaration shall, additionally, amongst other things, provide that in the event the association or corporation fails to maintain properties in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the City or fails to pay taxes or assessments on properties as they become due and in the event the said City incurs any expenses not immediately reimbursed by the association or corporation, then the City shall have the right to assess each property its pro rata share of said expenses. Such assessments, together with interest thereon and costs of collection, shall be a lien on each property against which such assessment is made. (5) Membership must be mandatory for each owner and any successive buyer. (6) The open space restrictions must be permanent and not for a given period of years. (7) The association must be responsible for liability insurance, local taxes and the maintenance of the open space facilities to be deeded to it. 1120.02 1120.02 (8) Property owners must pay their pro rata share of the cost of the association by means of an assessment to be levied by the association which meets the requirements for becoming a lien on the property in accordance with Minnesota Statutes. (9) The association must be able to adjust the assessment to meet changed needs. (10) The bylaws and rules of the association and all covenants and restrictions to be recorded must be approved by the Council prior to the approval of the final PUD plan. Subd. 5. Staging of Common Open Space: When a PUD provides for common open space, the total area of common open space or land escrow security in any stage of development shall, at a minimum, bear the same relationship to the total open space to be provided in the entire PUD as the stages or units completed or under development bear to the entire PUD. Subd. 6. Density: The exact density allowable shall be determined by standards agreed upon between the applicant and the City. Subd. 7. Utilities: In any PUD, all utilities, including telephone, electricity, gas and telecable, shall be installed underground. Subd. 8. Utility Connections: a. Water Connections: Where more than one (1) property is served from the same service line, a shut-off valve must be located in such a way that each unit's service may be shut off by the City, in addition to the normally supplied shut off at the street. b. Sewer Connections: Where more than one (1) unit is served by a sanitary sewer lateral, the requirements of the Building Code 2 shall apply for lengths between ninety feet (90') and three hundred feet (300'). If the length exceeds three hundred feet (300'), provision must be made for a manhole to allow adequate cleaning and maintenance of the lateral. All maintenance and cleaning shall be the responsibility of the property owners' association or owner. Subd. 9. Roadways: a. Private roadways within the project shall have an improved surface of twenty five feet (25') or more in width and shall be so designed as to permit fire trucks to provide protection to each building. Parking shall be prohibited within this twenty five foot (25') roadway. 2 See Chapter 1001 of this Code. 1120.02 1120.03 b. No portion of the required private road system may be used in calculating required off-street parking space. Subd. 10. Landscaping: In any PUD, landscaping shall be provided according to a plan approved by the City Council, which shall include a detailed planting list with sizes and species indicated as part of the final plat. In assessing the landscaping plan, the City Council shall consider the natural features of the particular site, the architectural characteristics of the proposed structures and the overall scheme of the PUD plan. Subd. 11. Public Services: The proposed project shall be served by the City water and sewer system 3, and fire hydrants shall be installed at such locations as required by the Fire Chief to provide fire protection. Subd. 12. Building Height: Height limitations shall be the same as imposed in the respective districts. Subd. 13. Refuse: Provision for trash pick-up shall be made according to a plan approved by the Planning Commission and City Council 4. Subd. 14. Site Improvement Agreement: Prior to the issuance of a building permit as part of the planned unit development, the permit applicant, builder or developer shall execute and deliver to the City Council a site improvement agreement providing for the installation within one (1) year of all of the off-site and on-site improvements as approved by the City Council, secured by a cash escrow or surety bond in an amount and with surety and conditions satisfactory to the City, to insure the City that such improvements will be actually constructed and installed according to specifications and plans approved by the City as expressed in such agreement. The amount of the bond shall be one and one-half (1-1/2) times the estimated cost of the improvements as determined by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. (1988 Code §40.24) 1120.03: SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS: Subd. 1. Residential Planned Unit Development: a. Purpose: It is the intent of this subdivision to establish special requirements for the granting of a conditional use permit for residential PUD projects which are in compliance with the permitted and conditional uses allowed in a specific district, including dwellings, offices and institutional uses of one (1) or more buildings in relation to an overall design and integrated physical plan and in accordance with the provisions and procedures as prescribed in this Title. 3 See Chapters 906 and 907 of this Code. 4 See Chapter 603 of this Code for garbage and rubbish regulations. 1120.03 1120.03 b. Minimum Project Size: The tract of land for which a planned unit development, general residential project is proposed and permit requested shall contain not less than three (3) acres of land. c. Required Frontage: The tract of land for which a project is proposed and permit requested shall have a width of not less than two hundred feet (200') perpendicular to the side lot line or have two hundred feet (200') of frontage on the public right of way, whichever is most restrictive. d. Yards: (1) The front, side and rear yard restrictions at the periphery of the planned unit development site, at a minimum, shall be the same as imposed in the respective districts. (2) No building shall be nearer than its building height to the rear or side property line when such line abuts an R-1 or R-2 use district. (3) No building shall be located less than twenty feet (20') from the back of the curb line along those roadways which are part of the internal street pattern. (4) No building within the project shall be nearer to another building than one-half (1/2) the sum of the building heights of the two (2) buildings. e. Density Bonus: As a consequence of a planned unit development's planned and integrated character, the number of dwelling units allowed within the respective zoning district may be increased by ten percent (10%). The building, parking and similar requirements for these extra units shall be observed in compliance with this Title. f. Townhouses and Condominiums: (1) Minimum unit lot frontage for townhouses shall be not less than twenty feet (20'). (2) Dwelling unit and accessory use requirements are in compliance with the district provisions in which the development is planned. (3) A townhouse shall have not more than two (2) stories. (4) No single townhouse shall contain more than eight (8) dwelling units. (5) No townhouse shall have a single exterior wall longer than eighty feet (80') nor an offset between walls of more than ten feet (10'). 1120.03 1120.03 (6) Townhouse projects shall have a usable open space area equal to four hundred (400) square feet per dwelling. (7) Condominium buildings containing eight (8) units or less and not more than two (2) stories may entail zero (0) lot line construction; provided, that the association covenant provides for it accordingly. Subd. 2. Commercial or Industrial Planned Unit Development: a. Purpose: The intent of this subdivision is to establish special requirements for the granting of a conditional use permit to allow commercial or industrial PUD projects which are in compliance with the permitted and conditional uses allowed in a specific district in one or more buildings in relation to an overall design and an integrated physical plan. b. Minimum Project Size: The tract of land for which a planned unit development, commercial or industrial project is proposed and permit is requested shall contain not less than five (5) acres for commercial and industrial projects. c. Frontage: The tract of land for which a project is proposed and a permit requested shall have a width of not less than two hundred feet (200') perpendicular to the side lot line or have two hundred feet (200') of frontage on the public right of way, whichever is most restrictive. d. Yard: No building shall be nearer than fifty feet (50') to the side or rear property line when such line abuts an R-1, R-2 or R-3 use district. e. Landscaping, Screening and Surfacing: (1) The entire site, other than that taken up by structures or landscaping, shall be surfaced with a material to control dust, drainage and erosion. (2) A drainage system conforming to the comprehensive storm drainage plan5 and subject to approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer shall be installed. 5 See Chapter 1302 of this Code. 1120.03 1120.04 (3) Development abutting an R-1, R-2 or R-3 District shall be screened and landscaped in compliance with subdivisions 1103.08(l) through (5) of this Title. Subd. 3. Mixed Use Planned Unit Development: a. Purpose: The intent of this subdivision is to establish special requirements for the granting of a zoning district amendment to allow mixed use PUD projects which are in compliance with the permitted and conditional uses allowed within the PUD District and in accordance with the provisions and procedures as prescribed in this subdivision. b. Minimum Project Size: The tract of land for which a mixed use PUD is proposed shall not contain less than five (5) acres. c. Frontage: The tract of land for which the project is proposed shall have a width of not less than two hundred feet (200') perpendicular to the side lot line or have two hundred feet (200') of frontage on the public right of way, whichever is most restrictive. d. Yards: Minimum setbacks shall be the same as imposed in the respective PUD use districts. e. Landscaping, Screening and Surfacing: All site treatment shall be consistent with the requirements of subdivisions 1103.08(l) through (5) of this Title. f. Staging of Residential Development: Whenever any mixed PUD is to be developed in stages, the proportion of residential development completed at any stage, when averaged with all previously completed stages, shall not exceed the proportion of residential development planned for the entire mixed PUD. (1988 Code §40.24) 1120.04: PROCEDURE: Subd. 1. Application Conference: Upon filing of an application for PUD, the applicant of the proposed PUD shall arrange for and attend a conference with the City staff. At such conference, the applicant shall be prepared to generally describe applicant's proposal for a PUD. The primary purpose of the conference shall be to provide the applicant with an opportunity to gather information and obtain guidance as to the general suitability of and conformity to the provisions of this Title before incurring substantial expense in the preparation of plans, surveys and other data. Subd. 2. General Concept Plan: 1120.04 1120.04 a. Purpose: The general concept plan provides an opportunity for the applicant to submit a plan to the City showing applicant's basic intent and the general nature of the entire development without incurring substantial cost. This concept plan serves as the basis for the public hearing so that the proposal may be publicly considered at an early stage. The following elements of the proposed general concept plan represent the immediately significant elements which the City shall review and for which a decision shall be rendered: (1) Overall maximum PUD density range. (2) General location of major streets and pedestrianways. (3) General location and extent of public and common open space. (4) General location of residential and nonresidential land uses with approximate type and intensities of development. (5) Staging and time schedule of development. (6) Other special criteria for development. b. Process: (1) Developer attends application conference. (2) File application for a conditional use permit or rezoning concurrently with the submission of the general concept plan (at least twenty one (21) days prior to Planning Commission meeting) consisting of the information and submissions required under subdivision 1120.05(l) of this Chapter, General Concept Stage. (3) City staff reviews application, prepares report and recommendations. (4) Planning Commission receives application and report of City staff. (5) Planning Commission makes a recommendation to the City Council on the general concept plan. (6) City Council holds a public hearing. (7) City Council reviews all recommendations and approves/denies application(s). 1120.04 1120.04 c. Optional Submission of Development Stage Plan: In cases of single stage PUDs or where the applicant wishes to begin the first stage of a multiple stage PUD immediately, applicant may, at applicant's option, submit development stage plans for the proposed PUD simultaneously with the submission of the general concept plan. In such case, the applicant shall comply with all the provisions of this Chapter applicable to submission of the development stage plan. d. Limitation of General Concept Plan Approval: Unless a development stage plan has been filed within nine (9) months from the date City Council grants general concept plan approval, or in any case where applicant fails to file development stage and final plans and to proceed with development in accordance with the provisions of this Title and of an approved general concept plan, the approval may be revoked by City Council action. The City Council, at its discretion, may extend the filing deadline for a development stage plan when, for good cause shown, such extension is necessary. Subd. 3. Development Stage: a. Purpose: The purpose of the development stage plan is to provide a specific and particular plan upon which the Planning Commission will base its recommendation to the City Council and with which substantial compliance is necessary for the preparation of the final plan. b. Submission of Development Stage: Upon approval of the general concept plan, the applicant shall file with the City Clerk-Administrator a development stage plan consisting of the information and submissions required under subdivision 1120.05(2) of this Chapter for the entire PUD or for one (1) or more stages thereof in accordance with a staging plan approved as part of the general concept plan. The development stage plan shall refine, implement and be in substantial conformity with the approved general concept plan. c. Review and Action by City Staff and Planning Commission: Upon a receipt of a completed development stage plan, the City Clerk-Administrator shall refer such plan to the appropriate City staff, Planning Commission and other review agencies. d. Process: (1) Developer makes application for subdivision (first phase of PUD) at least twenty one (21) days prior to Planning Commission meeting. (2) Within sixty (60) days of the submission, or such further time as may be agreed to by the applicant, the Planning Commission shall review the development stage and submit a written report and recommendations to the City Council. Such report shall contain the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission with respect to the 1120.04 1120.04 conformity of the development stage plan to the approved general concept plan, with respect to the merit or lack of merit of any departure of the development stage plan from substantial conformity with the concept plan, and with respect to the compliance of the development stage plan with the provisions of this Title and all other applicable Federal, State and local codes and ordinances. (3) Within thirty (30) days of receipt of the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission, the City Council shall conduct a public hearing on the plans. Thereafter, the City Council may grant approval, resubmit the plan to the Planning Commission for further consideration or deny approval of the plan. (4) Upon City Council approval, the City Attorney shall draw up a PUD agreement which stipulates the specific terms and conditions established and approved by the City Council and accepted by the applicant. This agreement shall be signed by the Mayor, the City Clerk-Administrator and the applicant. (5) Where the development stage plan is denied approval, City Council action shall be by resolution setting forth the reasons for its action. A certified copy of the document evidencing City Council action shall be delivered to the applicant. e. Limitation on Detailed Plan Approval: Unless a final plan covering the area designated in the first stage of the development stage plan has been filed within six (6) months from the date City Council grants development stage plan approval or in any case where the applicant fails to file final plans and to proceed with development in accordance with the provisions of this Title and/or an approved development stage plan, the approval shall expire. The City Council may, at its discretion, extend for not more than one additional period of six (6) months the filing deadline for any final plan when, for good cause shown, such extension is necessary. In any case, where development plan approval expires, the City Council shall forthwith adopt a resolution repealing the general concept plan approval and the development stage plan approval for that portion of the PUD that has not received final plan approval and re-establishing the zoning and other ordinance provisions that would otherwise be applicable. f. Review and Evaluation Criteria: The evaluation of the proposed development stage plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following criteria: (1) Adequate property control is provided to protect the individual owner's rights and property values and the public responsibility for own maintenance and upkeep. 1120.04 1120.04 (2) The interior circulation plan plus access from and onto public rights of way does not create congestion or dangers and is adequate for the safety of the project residents and the general public. (3) A sufficient amount of usable open space is provided. (4) The arrangement of buildings, structures and accessory uses does not unreasonably disturb the privacy or property values of the surrounding residential uses. (5) The architectural design of the project is compatible with the surrounding area. (6) The drainage and utility system plans are submitted to and subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. (7) The development schedule insures a logical development of the site which will protect the public interest and conserve land. (8) The development is in compliance with the requirements of Chapter 1010 and Titles 1200 and 1300 of this Code. (9) Dwelling unit and accessory use requirements are in compliance with the district provisions in which the development is planned. Subd. 4. Final Plan: a. Purpose: The final plan is to serve as a complete, thorough and permanent public record of the PUD and the manner in which it is to be developed. It shall incorporate all prior approved plans and all approved modifications thereof resulting from the PUD process. It shall serve in conjunction with other City ordinances as the land use regulation applicable to the PUD. b. Submission of the Final Plan: Upon approval of the development stage plan, the applicant shall file with the City Clerk-Administrator a final plan consisting of the information and submissions required by subdivision 1120.05(3), Final Plan Stage, of this Chapter for the entire PUD or for one (1) or more stages. The final plan is intended only to add detail to and to put in final form the information contained in the general concept plan and the development stage plan and shall conform to the development stage plan in all respects. 1120.04 1120.05 c. Review of Final Plan: The Director of Public Works/City Engineer shall review the final plans to assure their compliance with the general concept and development stage plans and shall require appropriate revisions by the applicant wherever they do not so comply. The Director of Public Works/City Engineer shall report the findings to the City Clerk-Administrator who shall notify the applicant, in writing, of approval of the final plan. d. Recording of Final Plan: Within ten (10) days of the City Clerk-Administrator's notice of approval, the applicant shall cause the final plan, or such portions thereof as are appropriate, to be recorded with the County Register of Deeds or Register of Titles. e. Building and Other Permits: Upon receiving notice from the City Clerk-Administrator that the approved final plan has been recorded and upon appropriate application of the applicant, building and other permits may be issued to the applicant for development, construction and other work in the area encompassed by the approved final plan; provided, however, that no such permit shall be issued unless the requirements of all applicable codes and ordinances have been satisfied. f. Limitation of Final Plan Approval: Within one year after the approval of a final plan for PUD, or such shorter time as may be established by the approved development schedule, construction shall commence in accordance with such approved plan. Failure to commence construction within such period shall, unless an extension shall have been granted as hereinafter provided, automatically render void the PUD permit and all approvals of the PUD plan. The area encompassed within the PUD shall thereafter be subject to those provisions of the zoning ordinances and other ordinances applicable in the district in which it is located. In such case, the City Council shall forthwith adopt a resolution repealing the PUD permit and PUD approvals and re-establishing the zoning and other ordinance provisions that would otherwise be applicable. g. Annual Review: The Zoning Administrator shall review each planned unit development at least once each year and shall make a report through the Commission to the City Council on the status of the development in each PUD district. If development is not progressing reasonably well, according to schedule, the owner shall be required to submit a statement to the Zoning Administrator setting forth the reasons for the lack of progress. If the City Council finds that the development has not occurred according to the established development schedule or is not otherwise reasonable in the view of the City Council, the City Council may initiate rezoning(s) to remove the planned unit development district. In any event, it shall not be necessary for the City Council to find the rezoning to a PUD district was in error. (1988 Code §40.24) 1120.05: SUBMITTALS: The applicant shall submit a sufficient number of copies, as required by the City Clerk-Administrator, of the following exhibits, analyses and plans during the PUD review process: 1120.05 1120.05 Subd. 1. General Concept Stage: a. General Information: (1) The landowner's name and address and landowner's interest in the subject property. (2) The applicant's name and address if different from the landowner. (3) The names and addresses of all professional consultants who have contributed to the development of the PUD plan being submitted, including attorney, land planner, engineer and surveyor. (4) Evidence that the applicant has sufficient control over the subject property to effectuate the proposed PUD, including a statement of all legal, beneficial, tenancy and contractual interest held in or affecting the subject property and including an up-to-date certified abstract of title or registered property report and such other evidence as the City Attorney may require to show the status of title or control of the subject property. b. Present Status: (1) The address and legal description of the subject property. (2) The existing zoning classification and present use of the subject property and all lands within five hundred feet (500') of the subject property. (3) A map depicting the existing development of the subject property and all lands within five hundred feet (500') thereof and showing the precise location of existing streets, property lines, easements, water mains and storm and sanitary sewers, with invert elevations on and within one hundred feet (100') of the subject property. c. Statement: A written statement generally describing the proposed PUD and the market which it is intended to serve, showing its relationship to the City's Comprehensive Plan and how the proposed PUD is to be designed, arranged and operated in order to permit the development and use of neighboring property in accordance with the applicable regulations of the City. d. Site Conditions: (1) Where deemed necessary by the City, graphic reproductions of the existing site conditions at a scale of one hundred feet (100') shall be submitted and shall contain the following: 1120.05 1120.05 (a) Contours, minimum two foot (2') intervals. (b) Location, type and extent of tree cover. (c) Slope analysis. (d) Location and extent of water bodies, wetlands and streams and flood plains within three hundred feet (300') of the subject property. (e) Significant rock outcropping. (f) Existing drainage patterns. (g) Vistas and significant views. (h) Soil conditions as they affect development. (2) All of the graphics should be the same scale as the final plan to allow easy cross-reference. The use of overlays is recommended for clear reference. e. Schematic Drawing: Schematic drawing of the proposed development concept, including but not limited to the general location of major circulation elements, public and common open space, residential and other land uses. f. A statement of the estimated total number of dwelling units proposed for the PUD and a tabulation of the proposed approximate allocations of land use expressed in acres and as a percent of the total project area which shall include at least the following: (1) Area devoted to residential uses. (2) Area devoted to residential use by building type. (3) Area devoted to common open space. (4) Area devoted to public open space. (5) Approximate area devoted to streets. (6) Approximate area, and potential floor area, devoted to commercial uses. (7) Approximate area, and potential floor area, devoted to industrial or office uses. 1120.05 1120.05 g. Stages: When the PUD is to be constructed in stages during a period of time extending beyond a single construction season, a schedule for the development of such stages or units shall be submitted stating the approximate beginning and completion date for each such stage or unit and the proportion of the total PUD public or common open space and dwelling units to be provided or constructed during each such stage and the overall chronology of development to be followed from stage to stage. h. Open Space: When the proposed PUD includes provisions for public or common open space or service facilities, a statement describing the provision that is to be made for the care and maintenance of such open space or service facilities shall be submitted. If it is proposed that such open space be owned and/or maintained by any entity other than a governmental authority, copies of the proposed articles of incorporation and bylaws of such entity shall be submitted during the development stage. i. Restrictive Covenants: General intents of any restrictive covenants that are to be recorded with respect to property included in the proposed PUD. j. Feasibility Study: Where deemed necessary, a market feasibility study, including an analysis of the proposal's economic impact on the City shall be submitted. Subd. 2. Development Stage: Development stage submissions should depict and outline the proposed implementation of the general concept stage for the PUD. Information from the general concept stage may be included for background and to provide a basis for the submitted plan. The development stage submissions shall include, but not be limited to: a. Zoning classification required for development stage submission and any other public decision necessary for implementation of the proposed plan. b. Preliminary plans, drawn to a scale of not less than one inch equals one hundred feet (1" = 100') (or scale requested by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer) containing at least the following information: (1) Proposed name of the development (which shall not duplicate nor be similar in pronunciation to the name of any plat theretofore recorded in the County wherein the subject property is situated). (2) Property boundary lines and dimensions of the property and any significant topographical or physical features of the property. (3) The location, size, use and arrangement including height in stones and feet and total square feet of ground area coverage and floor area, or proposed building, and existing buildings which will remain, if any. 1120.05 1120.05 (4) The location, dimensions and number of all driveways, entrances, curb cuts, parking stalls, loading spaces and access aisles and all other circulation elements, including bike and pedestrian and the total site coverage of all circulation elements. (5) Location, designation and total area of all common open space. (6) Proposed lots and blocks, if any, and numbering system. (7) The location, use and size of structures and other land uses on adjacent properties. (8) Preliminary sketches of proposed landscaping. (9) General grading and drainage plans for the developed PUD. (10) Any other information that may have been required by the Planning Commission or City Council in conjunction with the approval of the general concept plan. c. An accurate legal description of the entire area within the PUD for which final development plan approval is sought. d. A tabulation indicating the approximate gross square footage, if any, of commercial and industrial floor space by type of activity (e.g., drugstore, dry cleaning, supermarket). e. Preliminary architectural plans indicating use, floor plan, elevations and exterior wall finishes of proposed buildings, including mobile homes. f. A detailed site plan, suitable for recording, showing the physical layout, design and purpose of all streets, easements, rights of way, utility lines and facilities, lots, block, public and common open space, general landscaping plan, structures, including mobile homes, and uses. g. Preliminary grading and site alteration plan illustrating changes to existing topography and natural site vegetation. The plan should clearly reflect the site treatment and its conformance with the approved concept plan. h. A preliminary and final plat prepared by a land surveyor, duly registered in the State in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, chapter 505, which shall contain a notarized certification by such surveyor that the plat represents a survey made by the surveyor and that the monuments shown herein exist as located and that all dimensions are correct, as required by Section 505.03, subdivision 1, Minnesota Statutes Annotated, and a notarized certification by owner or owners of the adoption of the plat and the dedication of streets and other public areas as required by Section 505.03, subdivision 1, Minnesota Statutes Annotated. 1120.05 1120.05 i. A soil erosion control plan approved by the appropriate watershed districts, Department of Natural Resources or any other agency with review authority clearly illustrating erosion measures to be used during construction and as permanent measures. j. A statement summarizing all changes which have been made in any document, plan data or information previously submitted, together with revised copies of any such document, plan or data. k. Such other and further information as the Planning Commission, Director of Public Works/City Engineer or City Council shall find necessary to a full consideration of the entire proposed PUD or any stage thereof. 1. The Planning Commission may, by a written order, excuse any applicant from submitting any specific item of information or document required herein which it finds to be unnecessary to the consideration of the specific proposal for PUD approval. Subd. 3. Final Plat Stage: After approval of a general concept plan for the PUD and approval of a development stage plan for a Section of the proposed PUD, the applicant will submit the following material for review by City staff prior to issuance of a building or other permits: a. A detailed landscaping plan. b. Proof of recording any easements and restrictive covenants prior to the sale of any land or dwelling unit within the PUD and of the establishment and activation of any entity that is to be responsible for the management and maintenance of any public or common open space or service facility. c. All certificates, seals and signatures required for the dedication of land and recordation of documents. d. Final architectural working drawings of all structures. e. Final engineering plans and specifications for streets, utilities and other public improvements, together with a community/developer agreement for the installation of such improvements and financial guarantees for the completion of such improvements. f. Any other plan, agreements or specifications necessary for the City staff to review the proposed construction. (1988 Code §40.24) MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 781-05 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CODE AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS WHEREAS, the current City Code regulations pertaining to Planned Unit Developments contains an inconsistency regarding building height; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed Chapter 1120 of the Zoning Code and has determined an amendment should be adopted to clarify the height requirements consistent with the stated purpose and intent of the PUD Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of an amendment to Chapter 1120 of the Mounds View Zoning Code substantially similar to the following: Section 1120.02: Subd. 12. Building Height: Height limitations shall be the same as imposed in the respective districts unless additional height or stories would serve a better purpose consistent with the intent of this Chapter. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 5th day of January, 2005. _____________________________________ Gary Stevenson, Chairperson ATTEST: _____________________________________ James Ericson, Community Dev. Director (SEAL) Item No: Item 6 Meeting Date: January 5, 2005 Type of Business: Action City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mounds View Planning Commission From: James Ericson, Community Development Director Item Title/Subject: Election of Planning Commission Officers Introduction: The Planning Commission Bylaws and City Code require that the Planning Commission elect officers annually at the first meeting of the year. The Commission has two Officers: the Chairperson and the Vice Chairperson, who acts as the Chair in the event the Chair is unable to attend a meeting. The process is defined below. Discussion: The chairperson shall invite nominations from Planning Commission members. After nominations have been received, the chairperson shall entertain a motion to close nominations. If such motion is made and passed, and more than one nomination has been made, the chairperson shall distribute ballots to the Commission members and each member shall write his or her selection on the ballot. The recording secretary shall tally the ballots and announce the nominee receiving the most votes. In the event of a tie, the recording secretary shall announce the nominees tied in the voting and balloting shall be repeated until an election occurs. If only one nomination has been received, the chairperson may conduct the voting by voice vote. If a majority of the members present vote in the affirmative for the nominee, the nominee shall be elected. The process shall be repeated for the Vice Chair. Recommendation: As required by Code and Commission Bylaws, nominate and vote for the Chair and Vice Chair. _____________________________________ James Ericson Community Development Director \\Trout\CommDev\Planning Commission\PC Memos & Reports\2005\Election of Officers - Jan 5, 2005.doc PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting December 15, 2004 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 ______________________________________________________________________________ 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair Stevenson at 7:00 p.m., December 15, 2004. ______________________________________________________________________________ 2. Roll Call Members Present: Commissioners Miller, Zwirn, Hegland, Scotch and Stevenson Members Absent: Meehlhause (excused) Also Present: Community Development Director Ericson ________________________________________________________________________ Index to Minutes Page Lot Line Adjustment Minor Subdivision 2 Applicant: Neil Rudnitski Code Amendment Regarding Driveways 3 Set the Planning Commission’s 2005 Meeting Schedule 3 _____________________________________________________________________________ 3. Approve Minutes a. November 17, 2004 MOTION/SECOND: Miller/Zwirn. To Approve the Planning Commission Minutes for November 17, 2004 as Presented. Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. ______________________________________________________________________________ Mounds View Planning Commission December 15, 2004 Regular Meeting Page 2 ________________________________________________________________________ 4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda None. ______________________________________________________________________________ 5. Minor Subdivision Lot Line Adjustment 8265 and 8281 Spring Lake Road Community Development Director Ericson explained that the Rudnitski home when constructed was not constructed in accordance with the survey and approved plans and instead of maintaining the five-foot garage setback and ten-foot living space setback, the builder shifted the stakes after the initial inspection which caused the driveway to be built on the property line, the garage at a 1.6 foot setback and the living space at a 5.7 foot setback. He then explained that the Rudnitskis have applied for a lot line adjustment to shift the line to the north along the east line. Director Ericson indicated that the Council recently gave more leeway on minor subdivisions that do not really intensify the use to allow the City to not require a park dedication fee and Staff is not recommending a park dedication fee in this matter. Director Ericson asked that another stipulation be added indicating that the applicant shall re- consent to the dedication of a perimeter drainage and utility easement in consideration for the lot line adjustment. Chair Stevenson asked if anything in the easement to be vacated would be impacted. Director Ericson indicated he has checked with public works and there would not be an issue. Commissioner Hegland asked how this happened and how it was brought to light. Mr. Rudnitski indicated that they discovered it last fall when the neighbors were going to put in a fence. Chair Stevenson asked what the financial responsibility the builder has taken for this matter. Mr. Rudnitski indicated he took the builder to conciliation court and the day before the hearing they contacted him and met and they paid him money and settled for the amount he had asked for and hopefully this will cover the purchase of the property and whatever legal fees he will need for this matter. MOTION/SECOND: Hegland/Scotch. To Approve Resolution 779-04, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a Lot Line Adjustment (Minor Subdivision) Between 8265 and 8281 Spring Lake Road as Amended. Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. The Commission commended the residents for working this matter out amicably. Mounds View Planning Commission December 15, 2004 Regular Meeting Page 3 ________________________________________________________________________ Commissioner Zwirn asked if the applicant was satisfied on the settlement with the contractor. Mr. Rudnitski indicated he is largely satisfied because he did receive some money but he still has attorney’s fees. Commissioner Zwirn suggested seeking recourse through the title insurance policy if possible. Director Ericson indicated this would be before Council in January. ______________________________________________________________________________ 6. Code Amendment Community Development Director Ericson indicated that this item is a Code amendment regarding driveways, driveway setbacks and curb cuts. He then reviewed the proposed changes to the Code with the Commission. Director Ericson indicated that partial reconstruction or a patch or installing a “T” or making partial improvement should not force a property owner to make the whole driveway code compliant. He then said that from the discussions previously the intent is to not penalize them for making some improvement to the driveway if possible, but if there is a street improvement project then driveways and curb cuts should be made compliant. He then said that if the driveway cannot be made compliant it could be allowed to remain through the variance process. He further said that there is an administrative variance process as well as the option of appealing decisions to the City Council. Director Ericson reviewed the requirements for an administrative variance to be added to the new Section 5 to be inserted into the draft ordinance. Commissioner Hegland asked what 25% of Code means. Director Ericson explained how the 25% would be interpreted. Director Ericson indicated this matter would be presented to the City Council in January. Chair Stevenson asked for a final clean ordinance that is being presented to Council with the entire subsections. MOTION/SECOND: Zwirn/Miller. To Approve Resolution 780-04, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a Code Amendment to the Municipal Code Regarding Nonconforming Driveways and Curb Cuts. Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. ______________________________________________________________________________ Mounds View Planning Commission December 15, 2004 Regular Meeting Page 4 ________________________________________________________________________ 7. Set the Planning Commission’s 2005 Meeting Schedule MOTION/SECOND: Stevenson/Zwirn. To Approve Resolution 778-04, a Resolution Establishing the 2005 Meeting Schedule of the Mounds View Planning and Zoning Commission. Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. ______________________________________________________________________________ 8. Next Planning Commission Meeting: January 5, 2004 ______________________________________________________________________________ 9. Adjournment to Agenda Session There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Chair Stevenson adjourned the meeting at 7:36 p.m. (The meeting immediately adjourned to the Agenda Session) Respectfully submitted, Jim Ericson Community Development Director Transcribed by: Joan Lenzmeier TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.