Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-04-2003 MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION June 4, 2003 -- 7:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETING AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approve Minutes (No minutes to approve) 4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM, AND GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES 5. Zoning Code Amendment to Require a CUP for any Expansion of Existing Multiple-Family Dwellings. 6. Consideration of the Acquisition of the Property Located Between 3016 and 3000 County Road H2. APPLICANTS: YOUR ATTENDANCE AT THIS MEETING IS REQUESTED. PLEASE NOTIFY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AT 763-717-4020 IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND. 7. Next Planning Commission Meeting: June 18, 2003 8. Adjournment to Agenda Session AGENDA SESSION 1. Review Minutes: May 7, 2003 May 21, 2003 2. Staff Reports 3. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners’ Reports MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 729-03 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE ACQUISITION OF TAX FORFEITED PROPERTY WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission is required to review proposed acquisitions of real estate within the City by the City; and, WHEREAS, the City currently owns or controls five lots covering approximately 6.5 acres in the block bounded by County Road H2, Knollwood Dr., Woodale Drive, and Pleasant View Drive; and, WHEREAS, the proposed use of this property would be to facilitate the development of a housing subdivision in the City of Mounds View; and, WHEREAS, the City has sought and obtained residential concept plans from three area developers interested in developing municipal and privately-owned property for such residential development; and, WHEREAS, the City was notified by Ramsey County that the tax-forfeited property legally described as Lot 36, Knollwood Park, is available for $68,874.44 and the reconveyance cost is $26.70; and, WHEREAS, this parcel of land is located within an area designated for low density residential development according to the City’s Comprehensive Plan; and, WHEREAS, the anticipated use of this property would be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Mounds View, finding the proposed use consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, hereby recommends approval to the City Council of the City of Mounds View regarding the acquisition of Knollwood Park, Lot 36, the property between 3000 and 3016 Co. Rd. H2 with the PIN number of 07-30-23-32-0005. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 4th day of June, 2003. ____________________________________ Gary Stevenson, Chairperson ATTEST ____________________________________ James Ericson, Interim City Administrator (SEAL) \\Ntserver\CityHall\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\Planning Commission\PC Resolutions\729-03, H2 Tax Forfeit Parcel.doc MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 730-03 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 1108.04 OF THE MOUNDS VIEW ZONING CODE PERTAINING TO CONDITIONAL USES WITHIN THE R-3 ZONING DISTRICT WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Planning Commission to recommend language to amend the Zoning Code to require City Council review and approval of multi-family residential expansions; and, WHEREAS, on April 16, 2003, the Mounds View Planning Commission reviewed language pertaining to conditional uses with the R-3, Medium Density Residential, Zoning District; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends the addition of the following language to Section 1108.04 of the Mounds View Zoning Code: Multifamily Expansion. Multifamily developments having been constructed prior to January 1, 2003 shall first obtain a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) prior to expanding the number of dwelling units or the principal building footprint. In addition to the criteria outlined in Section 1125, all zoning, building and parking requirements shall be satisfied as a condition of approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of an ordinance amending Section 1108.04 of the Mounds View Zoning Code to require a Conditional use Permit for any expansion to existing multi-family residential facilities. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 4th day of June, 2003. ______________________________________ Gary Stevenson, Chairperson ATTEST: ______________________________________ James Ericson, Interim City Administrator (SEAL) Item No: 5 Meeting Date: June 4, 2003 Type of Business: Action City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Mounds View Planning Commission From: James Ericson, Acting City Administrator Item Title/Subject: Consideration of Resolution 730-03, a Resolution Recommending an Amendment to the Zoning Code to Require a CUP for Expansions of Existing Multi-Family Developments Introduction: At your April 16 meeting I presented the Commission with a brief report concerning multiple family properties and the fact that the City Council was interested in having the Planning Commission review the Zoning Code and make a recommendation that would either restrict or control the process by which an existing multi-family residential development could expand. Discussion: The method by which control can be exercised is by requiring all existing developments to go through a conditional use process to expand density (the number of individual dwelling units.) The following language was proposed and the Commission supported such an amendment: Multi-Family developments having been constructed prior to January 1, 2003 shall first obtain a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) prior to expanding the number of dwelling units or the principal building footprint. In addition to the criteria outlined in Section 1125, all zoning, building and parking requirements shall be satisfied as a condition of approval. Recommendation: Review the attached draft ordinance and if found acceptable, approve Resolution 730-03 which recommends amendment of the zoning code as suggested. _____________________________________ James Ericson Interim City Clerk/Administrator Attachments: 1. Draft Ordinance 2. Resolution 730-03 ORDINANCE NO. ___ CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MOUNDS VIEW ZONING CODE SECTION 1108.04, PERTAINING TO CONDITIONAL USES WITH THE R-3 ZONING DISTRICT THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ORDAINS: SECTION 1: Section 1108.04 of the Mounds View Zoning Code pertaining to conditional uses within the R-3 Zoning District is hereby amended by adding new language underlined to read as follows: 1108.04: CONDITIONAL USES: The following are conditional uses in an R-3 District (requiring a conditional use permit based upon procedures set forth in and regulated by Section 1125.01 of this Title): All conditional uses allowed in an R-2 District. Multifamily dwelling structures containing six (6) or less dwelling units. Multifamily Expansion. Multifamily developments having been constructed prior to January 1, 2003 shall first obtain a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) prior to expanding the number of dwelling units or the principal building footprint. In addition to the criteria outlined in Section 1125, all zoning, building and parking requirements shall be satisfied as a condition of approval. SECTION 2. This Ordinance becomes effective thirty (30) days after its publication in the official City newspaper. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View on this ____ day of _____, 2003. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this _____ day of _________, 2003. Jerry Linke, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ James Ericson, Interim Clerk Administrator (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________ City Attorney MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 730-03 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 1108.04 OF THE MOUNDS VIEW ZONING CODE PERTAINING TO CONDITIONAL USES WITHIN THE R-3 ZONING DISTRICT WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Planning Commission to recommend language to amend the Zoning Code to require City Council review and approval of multi-family residential expansions; and, WHEREAS, on April 16, 2003, the Mounds View Planning Commission reviewed language pertaining to conditional uses with the R-3, Medium Density Residential, Zoning District; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends the addition of the following language to Section 1108.04 of the Mounds View Zoning Code: Multifamily Expansion. Multifamily developments having been constructed prior to January 1, 2003 shall first obtain a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) prior to expanding the number of dwelling units or the principal building footprint. In addition to the criteria outlined in Section 1125, all zoning, building and parking requirements shall be satisfied as a condition of approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of an ordinance amending Section 1108.04 of the Mounds View Zoning Code to require a Conditional use Permit for any expansion to existing multi-family residential facilities. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 4th day of June, 2003. _____________________________________ Gary Stevenson, Chairperson ATTEST: _____________________________________ James Ericson, Interim City Administrator (SEAL) City of Mounds View Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: June 4, 2003 Title: REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING A PROPOSED ACQUISITION OF TAX-FORFEITED PROPERTY LOCATED ON COUNTY ROAD H2 Introduction: Minnesota Statutes require that the Planning Commission review and make recommendations regarding proposed purchases of real estate within the City of Mounds View by the City to make sure such acquisitions are in keeping with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The City of Mounds View has the opportunity to acquire tax-forfeited property located between 3000 and 3016 County Road H2 for $68,901.14 (See attached calculation statement from Ramsey County). The City currently has a use deed, however, acquiring the 1.5 acre lot in the north central portion of the block would facilitate the development of a significant housing subdivision in the City of Mounds View. Discussion: Currently the City owns or controls approximately 6.5 acres of land in the block bounded by County Road H2, Knollwood Dr., and Woodale Drive, and what would be Pleasant View Dr. if it existed (see attached parcel map). During the past eight years the City has acquired three lots along Co. Road H2—2946, the parcel behind 3000, and 3016. Two of the lots are over 630 ft in length and are among the largest in the City not fully developed. The lot between 3016 and 3000 is a tax-forfeited property owned by Ramsey County and controlled by the City though a use deed. In February of this year, one of the neighboring property owners, Blaine Fyksen, expressed a willingness to work with the City to develop his property for single-family homes. Mr. Fyksen owns several parcels (totaling 4.1 acres) that border the City’s property to the west. He does not want to see high-density residential development in the area, but would be willing to sell if the property would be developed for high-end homes (approx. $400-500,000 each). The entire block is currently zoned R-1. During this spring three developer groups have been preparing concept plans for the proposed County Road H2 Residential Project. City Staff presented these initial concept plans to the Planning Commission at its 5/21/03 meeting. The developers (Dave Regel Construction, Homes by James, and Pro Craft Homes) were present to respond to Commissioners’ questions. The Planning Commission viewed all the concept plans as appropriate and ones that would be positive for the City. The Planning Commission encouraged that all three developers be considered by the City Council. Item # 6 Tax-Forfeited Property Acquisition June 4, 2003 Page 2 Staff presented the concept plans for the proposed residential project to the Mounds View Economic Development Authority on May 27th. The majority of the EDA members expressed support of the proposed residential development and authorized the City to move forward with soil borings on Mr. Fyksen’s and the municipal property. Staff has developed additional developer selection criteria and requested that the developers submit this additional information to the City by June 5th so that it can be considered at the next EDA meeting on June 9th. Once a developer is selected, the City would seek to develop a Letter of Intent or Pre-Development Agreement with the respective developer that would govern the project. Recommendation: Adopt the attached Resolution 729-03 that recommends to the City Council approval of the acquisition of Parcel 36, the tax-forfeited property located between 3000 and 3016 County Road H2. This acquisition would enable the development of a 15 to 21 unit housing development in the southwest portion of the City of Mounds View. Respectfully submitted, ____________________________ Aaron Backman Economic Development Coordinator Attachments: 1. Purchase Statement from Ramsey County 2. Site Map \\Ntserver\CityHall\DATA\GROUPS\COMDEV\Planning Commission\PC Memos & Reports\2003\Tax-Forfeited Property Acquisition - June 4, 2003.doc County Road H2 Parcels Mr. Fyksen’s properties City owned or controlled properties Property to be acquired MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 729-03 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE ACQUISITION OF TAX FORFEITED PROPERTY WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission is required to review proposed acquisitions of real estate within the City by the City; and, WHEREAS, the City currently owns or controls five lots covering approximately 6.5 acres in the block bounded by County Road H2, Knollwood Dr., Woodale Drive, and Pleasant View Drive; and, WHEREAS, the proposed use of this property would be to facilitate the development of a housing subdivision in the City of Mounds View; and, WHEREAS, the City has sought and obtained residential concept plans from three area developers interested in developing municipal and privately-owned property for such residential development; and, WHEREAS, the City was notified by Ramsey County that the tax-forfeited property legally described as Lot 36, Knollwood Park, is available for $68,874.44 and the reconveyance cost is $26.70; and, WHEREAS, this parcel of land is located within an area designated for low density residential development according to the City’s Comprehensive Plan; and, WHEREAS, the anticipated use of this property would be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Mounds View, finding the proposed use consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, hereby recommends approval to the City Council of the City of Mounds View regarding the acquisition of Knollwood Park, Lot 36, the property between 3000 and 3016 Co. Rd. H2 with the PIN number of 07-30-23-32-0005. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 4th day of June, 2003. ____________________________________ Gary Stevenson, Chairperson ATTEST ____________________________________ James Ericson, Interim City Administrator (SEAL) PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting May 7, 2003 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 ______________________________________________________________________________ 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair Stevenson at 7:00 p.m., May 7, 2003. ______________________________________________________________________________ 2. Roll Call Members Present: Commissioners Stevenson, Hegland, Song, Zwirn, Miller, Scotch, and Johnson Members Absent: None. Also Present: Community Development Director Ericson ________________________________________________________________________ Index to Minutes Page Planning Case CU03-002 2 Location: 7988 Edgewood Drive Planning Case PD03-001 3 Location: 2442 County Highway 10 Planning Case No. SP-114-03 4 Pawnshop Ordinance ______________________________________________________________________________ 3. Approve Minutes a. April 2, 2003 MOTION/SECOND: Scotch/Miller. To Approve the Planning Commission Minutes for April 2, 2003 as Presented. Ayes – 7 Nays – 0 Motion carried. ______________________________________________________________________________ Mounds View Planning Commission May 7, 2003 Regular Meeting Page 2 ________________________________________________________________________ 4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda None. ______________________________________________________________________________ 5. Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Request Regarding Property Located at 7988 Edgewood Drive Community Development Director Ericson reviewed the conditional use permit request with the Commission. He then indicated that the applicant had revised the plan to orient the garage differently to bring it into compliance with the City’s Code for front footage. Commissioner Miller asked what the combined square footage of the garage and shed would be. Mr. Eyler indicated that the square footage would be approximately 1,644 and that would be within the 1,800 square foot limitations. Chair Stevenson asked how many useable garage doors there would be. Mr. Eyler explained that he has three college children at home and that amounts to five cars, a boat and a snowmobile in the garage. He then explained how he intended to orient the garage to best utilize the space and be able to get the boat into the garage. Chair Stevenson asked where the garage doors were and how many were off of the driveway. Mr. Eyler indicated there would be one 18 foot door and one nine foot door and, in the back, there would be an eight foot roll up door for access to the boat as well as a service door along the side. Community Development Director Ericson read Resolution 726-03, a Resolution recommending approval of a 1,344 square foot garage at 7988 Edgewood Drive. Community Development Director Ericson indicated that the Resolution requires the applicant to remove the second curb cut. MOTION/SECOND: Johnson/Hegland. To Approve Resolution 726-03, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a 1,344 Square Foot Garage at 7988 Edgewood Drive. Ayes – 7 Nays – 0 Motion carried. Community Development Director Ericson indicated that the City Council would hear the recommendation and make a final decision. ______________________________________________________________________________ Mounds View Planning Commission May 7, 2003 Regular Meeting Page 3 ________________________________________________________________________ 6. Consideration of Development Review Requests Regarding Properties Located at 2436 and 2442 Highway 10 Community Development Director Ericson explained where the parcels were located and provided an overview of the development. Director Ericson indicated that the applicant would need 60 parking stalls or would need to shrink the size of the building to conform to the Code. Director Ericson indicated the applicant would need to provide photometric analysis for the adjacent residential properties to conform to the Code. Director Ericson indicated the applicant would need to provide further specifications with regard to the garbage enclosure. Director Ericson indicated the landscaping plans provided look nice but the City Forester will review it and make recommendations for specific plantings. Director Ericson indicated that no sign plan had been submitted yet but the PUD will dictate what type of sign is allowed. Director Ericson indicated that it looks as though the site plan submitted was carried over from a previous site plan so there are some notes to be revised on it. Director Ericson indicated that all dimensional requirements and setbacks are met for Outparcel B. Director Ericson indicated that Staff is recommending that the developer revise the plans and correct them as noted but feels no reason not to approve the development review at the next meeting. Commissioner Miller asked if Staff addressed the distance from the pond as it seems there would be additional parking available. Director Ericson indicated the problem is that the pond is already there and, if it is adequate to suit the needs of the site it may not be possible to change it. Commissioner Zwirn asked how long Rice Creek would take to review this development. Director Ericson indicated it usually takes from 30 to 45 days for Rice Creek Watershed approval. Audie Tarpley addressed the Commission and apologized for the shortcomings in the drawings and explained that limited engineering work was done in case the project is turned down. He then said that the building is 12,500 square feet of useable space and that is what they based the Mounds View Planning Commission May 7, 2003 Regular Meeting Page 4 ________________________________________________________________________ parking on. He further commented that the plans would be amended and they would meet all City requirements should the project proceed. Chair Stevenson asked if the extra spaces could be added. Mr. Tarpley indicated that they had tried to respect the setbacks but could add six more spaces on site with some consideration from the City. Chair Stevenson commented that the Commission is keenly aware of how parking issues can affect the surrounding area and will ensure that the development has adequate parking. Commissioner Miller asked how many uses were expected for the building. Mr. Tarpley indicated he expected four or five and no more than six. Commissioner Johnson asked if the tenants would be medical and dental. Mr. Tarpley indicated he thought so but lost a big user that he was planning on. He then said that he has been talking to other medical practitioners but they are not as heavy as a use as what was initially proposed. The Commission asked whether a coffee shop was possible. Mr. Tarpley indicated he was working very hard on a coffee shop but said he did not want to disrupt their relationships with their landlords by naming names. ______________________________________________________________________________ 7. Consideration of Resolution 724-03, a Resolution Recommending Approval of Two Ordinances Related to Pawnshops, Zoning and Licensing in Mounds View Community Development Director Ericson overviewed the history of the pawnshop ordinances for the Commission. Director Ericson indicated he had not added the manager definition but will do so. He then asked for clarification on the buy hold and the pawn hold and reviewed the other changes that were made based on the discussions at the last meeting. Director Ericson indicated that Mr. Sonterre had raised a number of issues at the last meeting and overviewed them with the Commission. He then said that the way the Code is drafted concerning violations and revocation allows the City flexibility to review the violation and make a determination as to whether it warrants revocation. Director Ericson indicated that Staff had reviewed the fees of other cities and found Mounds View’s fees to be in the middle. He then said that if it is determined that the recommended fee is inadequate the fee would be changed immediately. Mounds View Planning Commission May 7, 2003 Regular Meeting Page 5 ________________________________________________________________________ Director Ericson indicated that Minnesota Statutes sets the maximum interest rate but the City of Mounds View could set something less if the City feels 24% is excessive. Director Ericson indicated that the Commission needed to discuss the possibility of creating an overlay district and where that would be located. He then said the current version of the Ordinance allows pawnshops in the B-4 zoning district. Director Ericson indicated he would like the definition of manager to include that the manager is on site an average total of 80 hours per month. Chair Stevenson indicated he would like fee recommendations to be included when the recommendation goes to Council. Director Ericson indicated he would add it after the first now therefore be it resolved. Commissioner Hegland indicated he would like to hear from Chief Sommer as to whether he feels the fees are adequate. Chief Sommer addressed the Commission and provided an overview of how the police department would use the APS system. Commissioner Hegland asked whether the system was used only for investigating or periodically. Chief Sommer indicated the use would depend upon how much time the department can devote to the investigation of pawnshops. Commissioner Hegland commented that the APS system is a deterrent for thieves attempting to unload stolen goods because, if the system is used properly, they will get caught. Chief Sommer indicated that is a side benefit but there are many items of stolen property that end up in pawnshops with the automated pawn system. Commissioner Hegland asked for the percentage of stolen goods pawned. Chief Sommer indicated that some items cannot be easily tracked such as CD’s and things without serial numbers. He then said that he has no information to be able to answer what the percentage of stolen goods would be. Commissioner Zwirn asked whether it was the consensus of the Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Mounds View Police Departments that the automated system becomes another avenue for legalized fencing. Mounds View Planning Commission May 7, 2003 Regular Meeting Page 6 ________________________________________________________________________ Chief Sommer said he does know that some stolen property ends up in pawnshops but he does not want to make the statement that a pawnshop is a legitimate fencing operation. Commissioner Zwirn indicated the City’s police department is stressed already and adding a pawnshop to Mounds View will take police man hours away from other duties and he is concerned that the fees being charged do not take into account the time for the police department. Chief Sommer indicated he is not able to say how many hours will be spent on it because he simply does not know what it will involve at this point. Commissioner Scotch asked whether Staff looked into how often police departments from other cities are called to pawnshops. Commissioner Zwirn asked whether adding the pawnshop will further stress the department because of the time involved. Chief Sommer indicated there would be more staff time used for managing pawnshops that was previously used on other tasks. Commissioner Hegland asked if a sworn officer has to do the tasks or if an administrative staff member can. Chief Sommer indicated the City does not have anyone to review the system so it would be extra duties given to someone that already has a full plate of duties. Commissioner Zwirn asked if, in discussions with other cities, Staff had learned whether the fees are high enough to pay for the extra man hours or if the cities are in a deficit situation where the city is picking up the tab for the extra requirements from a pawnshop. Chief Sommer indicated that cities fall into both those of those categories as some spend a lot more time than others. Commissioner Johnson commented that there are cites that have large pawnshops in excess of 20,000 square feet and the pawnshop proposed for Mounds View is a lot smaller. Commissioner Zwirn asked how many police calls are attributed to Mounds View Square for malicious mischief, theft and vandalism. Chief Sommer indicated he did not have that information with him. Commissioner Zwirn indicated he had learned from residents and business owners that there are a number of police calls to Mounds View Square. Mounds View Planning Commission May 7, 2003 Regular Meeting Page 7 ________________________________________________________________________ Chief Sommer indicated it would be hard for him to say how much extra time would be involved. Commissioner Scotch recommended getting some statistics from the City of Fridley. Commissioner Johnson indicated this is one small pawnshop. Commissioner Zwirn indicated he has issues with the location and issues with regard to youth activities at Mounds View Square including vandalism and theft and he is vehemently opposed to something of this nature in that mall. Director Ericson indicated that Staff had researched the amount of time other cities spend on managing pawnshops and then reviewed the time spent and the cities that were checked. He then said that all cities contacted recommended not allowing handguns. Commissioner Hegland indicated he did not have an issue with the applicant but wants to make sure that the Commission’s recommendation to Council for this ordinance takes into consideration all the possible scenarios and possible owners. Commissioner Zwirn thanked Staff for the information on how much time communities spend on pawnshops but then said that he has information from Blaine, Anoka and Roseville that indicates that pawnshops are an overpowering stress on the department and they cannot supply the demand for following up on items stolen. Further, those departments feel that the fees are a joke and do not cover the manpower that is lost by having a police officer taking time to do the checking and not doing other things he is trained to do making for double time lost. Commissioner Zwirn indicated he feels the need to either increase the fees or deal with the situation with regard to pawnshops in the community. He then said that all the cities he asked said they would be better off with out a pawnshop and he wants Commissioners to really consider whether they want a pawnshop in Mounds View due to the negative aspects associated with it. Chief Sommer commented that the City’s police department is below the state average and the fees will not allow the City to hire additional officers so there will be extra work with the same number of people. Mr. Przetycki said he appreciated the concern that this could be a problem but said it is a legal business and it is something that police departments do use to find recovered merchandise. Mr. Przetycki indicated he has relationships with other pawnshop owners and they have not had much of a problem with stolen merchandise. He then said that he has an incentive to ensure that the merchandise he accepts is not stolen because, if it is stolen, he has to turn the item over to the police and is out the money he spent to purchase it. Mounds View Planning Commission May 7, 2003 Regular Meeting Page 8 ________________________________________________________________________ Chair Stevenson indicated that this Commission was challenged by Council to come up with an ordinance and a location for a pawnshop. He then said that whether they want a pawnshop or not is not the issue as the task is to ensure that the Commission makes a good recommendation to Council on how to regulate pawnshops and where to locate them. He further commented that he feels the Commission has spent a lot of time and done a lot of research on the ordinances and he feels it is time to send the recommendation to Council for further discussion and public input. Commissioner Johnson asked if during all the research done with other police departments if they had all said they would rather not have a pawnshop. Chief Sommer said, generally, yes.” Commissioner Zwirn said he disagreed with Chair Stevenson with regard to how much time and effort needs to be put into this ordinance. He then said that expediency is not the answer to this problem and he is vehemently opposed to the location proposed. He further commented that Penny Pinchers is right next door to the proposed location and that is an establishment that works with kids. Commissioner Zwirn indicated that there is a liquor store only 50 feet away from the proposed pawnshop location and there have been numerous break-ins and vandalism incidents at that location. He further commented that he does not feel it would be appropriate to allow a pawnshop in that location as it would further exacerbate the vandalism and break-ins and draw a certain type of person that pawnshops attract to a family mall. Commissioner Miller indicated that she went to a couple of pawnshops and even made a purchase and she was very impressed with the operation and the way that things were displayed. She then said that the people coming and going from the pawnshops seemed to be upstanding citizens so she is not sure what is meant by the types of people that frequent pawnshops. Director Ericson indicated he would prefer not to have a pawnshop located in Mounds View but, legally, the City cannot say no to the pawnshop but can decide where it goes and how to regulate it. He then said the City is spending a lot of money to upgrade the corridor and this may not be something the City wants in the corridor but, if not in Mounds View Square in B-4 zoning, then where should it be located? Commissioner Zwirn indicated he feels the Commission needs to put more time into this and find a location that will not impact the corridor and a family run mall. He then said that he understands that the applicant has entered into a lease with the mall which is a little premature. He further commented that he feels that the City needs to create fees that are high enough so that locating in Mounds View is unattractive. He also said he is aware that the City cannot prohibit pawnshops but could make the fees so high that it is not attractive to come to Mounds View and he does not want the pawnshop in Mounds View Square. Commissioner Scotch asked where Commissioner Zwirn proposed to locate the pawnshop. Mounds View Planning Commission May 7, 2003 Regular Meeting Page 9 ________________________________________________________________________ Commissioner Zwirn suggested the industrial park or across the street but not where children congregate and there is a lot of loitering and mischievous activities already occurring. Council Member Gunn addressed the Commission and said she has begun receiving input from residents that are concerned about the pawnshop and the primary concern is the proposed location. She then said that she feels it is time to consider an alternate location. Commissioner Zwirn indicated he has fielded 30 telephone calls with regard to pawnshops being located in the mall and a number of tenants were not told about the pawnshop proposal or it was misrepresented to them by Paster Enterprises. Secondly, the residents surrounding the mall within a three or four block area have indicated that they do not want a pawnshop in the mall. Some were okay with having a pawnshop but not in the mall and not in a family area they want it away from children and not around apartment areas and this Commission needs to address that issue and/or raise fees so high that it is not attractive. Chair Stevenson indicated he is not opposed to limiting Mounds View Square. Commissioner Hegland asked if there is any square footage limit to the size of the operation or if it is possible for this business to take over the entire Mounds View Square. Director Ericson indicated there is no limitation as to the size. Director Ericson indicated that he would hesitate to comment on the record making the fees high enough to discourage someone from locating in Mounds View. Director Ericson indicated that the Commission could discuss creating a new overlay district but he is not sure of a consensus on the position of the Commission and asked whether it would be necessary to discuss the location further or if the Commission was ready to make a recommendation. Chair Stevenson indicated that one of the reasons why Mounds View Square was chosen was because of the uniqueness of a B-4 zoning district and, this being the only one, it would limit the number of pawnshops in the City. Commissioner Song indicated the fee is only an estimate and can always be raised if necessary. She then said she believes the owner will cooperate very nicely with the City. Commissioner Miller indicated the Commission discussed and determined that the best location would be Mounds View Square. She then said she has a problem with the comments concerning the types of people that frequent pawnshops after having been in one and seen people coming and going. Chair Stevenson indicated he feels that the Commission has spent a lot of time on this recommendation and now it is time to pass it on to Council who will deal with the resident input and amend the recommendation as necessary. Mounds View Planning Commission May 7, 2003 Regular Meeting Page 10 ________________________________________________________________________ Commissioner Hegland indicated the City needed to limit the square footage for the business. The Commission agreed to a 5,000 square foot limitation. Commissioner Zwirn asked if any of the Commissioners had gone to Mounds View Square and seen the activity in the evening. He then asked if any of them wanted the pawnshop in the mall. Commissioner Zwirn indicated that most of the people that he talked to had not been given a notice and nobody informed them about what is going on. He then said he is tired of this community passing things without informing residents that later negatively impacts them. Commissioner Johnson indicated that what the Commission is doing does not require public notice and that is why no one is informed. He then said that once the recommendation goes to Council the notices will go out and residents will have an opportunity to come to Council and voice concerns. He further commented that the City can only do so much to notify people and the rest is up to residents to keep informed of what is going on within the City. He also commented that the information will be on the website, cable, and in the paper so, if residents are not informed it is because of a lack of effort on their part. Commissioner Zwirn indicated he feels the Commission needs further information. Commissioner Hegland indicated it is not the Commission’s job to inform the residents. Commissioner Johnson indicated that if there is as much outrage at the Council level as has been eluded to at this meeting then the pawnshop at Mounds View Square will not fly but that is up to Council to determine. Commissioner Zwirn said he has been a victim of this process with Mr. Mezzenga and he is still dealing with the fallout. He then commented that the people in this community do not have the time that it takes to worry about what variances are being approved and how that is going to affect them and it is the City’s responsibility to inform them. Council Member Gunn indicated that residents are concerned as there has never been a pawnshop in the City and they do not know how it will impact them. She then said that the Commission has done a lot of work on the ordinances and she feels it is time to forward the recommendation to Council for further research and public input. Commissioner Hegland indicated that no matter where the pawnshop is located it is in someone’s backyard and they will say they do not want it. Commissioner Johnson indicated an overlay is a band-aid for the problem as it would have to be in the industrial parks and he is not sure that is a good idea. He then said he would like to limit the square footage and pass the recommendation to Council for further consideration. Mounds View Planning Commission May 7, 2003 Regular Meeting Page 11 ________________________________________________________________________ MOTION/SECOND: Miller/Song. To Approve Resolution 724-03, a Resolution Recommending Approval of Two Ordinances Related to Pawnshops, Zoning and Licensing in Mounds View. Ayes – 6 Nays – 1(Zwirn) Motion carried. Director Ericson indicated that there would be coverage of the issue in the newspaper as well as the required notification, website and cable channel. He then explained the reason the City does not go overboard on notifying for the Planning Commission meetings is because of the sheer volume of opposition has the possibility of tainting the recommendation to Council. Director Ericson indicated that the City is in no way trying to exclude public input and Paster Enterprises should have been more forthright with their tenants but the City cannot control that. He then said that proper notification will be provided for the Council meeting and all interested public comments will be taken. ______________________________________________________________________________ 9. Next Planning Commission Meeting: May 21, 2003 ______________________________________________________________________________ 10. Adjournment to Agenda Session There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Chair Stevenson adjourned the meeting at 9:04 p.m. (The meeting immediately adjourned to the Agenda Session) Respectfully submitted, Jim Ericson Community Development Director Transcribed by: Joan Lenzmeier TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting May 21, 2003 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 ______________________________________________________________________________ 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair Stevenson at 7:04 p.m., May 21, 2003. ______________________________________________________________________________ 2. Roll Call Members Present: Commissioners Stevenson, Hegland, Zwirn, and Johnson Members Absent: Scotch, Song, and Miller. Also Present: Community Development Director Ericson ________________________________________________________________________ Index to Minutes Page Planning Case VR03-003 2 Location: 7375 Pleasant View Drive Planning Cases DE03-001 and DE03-002 3 Location2436 Highway 10 and 2442 Highway 10 ______________________________________________________________________________ 3. Approve Minutes a. April 16, 2003 MOTION/SECOND: Stevenson/Johnson. To Approve the Planning Commission Minutes for April 16, 2003 as Presented. Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. ______________________________________________________________________________ Mounds View Planning Commission May 21, 2003 Regular Meeting Page 2 ________________________________________________________________________ 4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda None. ______________________________________________________________________________ 5. Public Hearing and Consideration of a Variance Request Regarding Property Located at 7375 Pleasant View Drive. Community Development Director Ericson indicated that this request was for a one-foot garage setback at 7375 Pleasant View Drive. He then explained that this property is only 66 feet wide making it unusual within the City. Director Ericson explained that the applicant would like to remove the existing garage and construct a new garage maintaining the same one-foot setback in order to preserve an adequate site line to the backyard and preserve mature trees. Director Ericson reviewed the criteria that were discussed in his Staff report with the Commission and indicated that Staff feels that this case warrants the approval of a variance. Director Ericson indicated that Resolution 727-03 would approve a variance for this property. He then reviewed the stipulations attached to the approval. Director Ericson indicated that the neighbors are not opposed to the project and he has received no calls or correspondence on the matter. Chair Stevenson opened the public hearing at 7:10 p.m. Chair Stevenson asked why the garage would be set back 50 feet. Mr. Loder explained that the garage is set back 50 feet to allow room for an addition to the house at a later point in time while still allowing access to the garage. Chair Stevenson asked whether the applicant was aware of the requirement to provide an approved surface for the driveway and to remove the two existing buildings. Mr. Loder indicated he was aware of the requirements and indicated he intended to blacktop the driveway. Chair Stevenson closed the public hearing at 7:13 p.m. MOTION/SECOND: Zwirn/Hegland. To Approve Resolution 727-03, a Resolution Approving a Variance for a one-foot garage setback at 7375 Pleasant View Drive. Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. ______________________________________________________________________________ Mounds View Planning Commission May 21, 2003 Regular Meeting Page 3 ________________________________________________________________________ 6. Consideration of Development Review Requests Regarding Properties Located at 2436 and 2442 Highway 10 Community Development Director Ericson indicated that all changes that had been recommended by Staff and the Planning Commission at the previous meeting had been addressed by the developer. Most importantly, the parking has been changed to include 10 additional stalls. Director Ericson indicated there are still some items requiring attention such as a snow storage plan, garbage enclosure, signage, and wetland delineation. Director Ericson recommended approval of Resolution 728-03 recommending approval of the development plan. He then read the stipulations set forth in the Resolution. Commissioner Zwirn asked whether the tenants would still be primarily medical providers. Mr. Humason indicated the tenants have not been formalized and he cannot guarantee that but the target is medical. Chair Stevenson asked how many more spaces than is required are being provided. Director Ericson indicated that either four or six extra spaces are being provided over and above what the City’s Code requires. Director Ericson indicated the City Council approved the PUD amendment for office use at the corner. MOTION/SECOND: Stevenson/Johnson. To Approve Resolution 728-03, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a Development Review for Properties Located at 2436 and 2442 County Highway 10. Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. ______________________________________________________________________________ 7. Next Planning Commission Meeting: June 4, 2003 ______________________________________________________________________________ 8. Adjournment to Agenda Session There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Chair Stevenson adjourned the meeting at 7:25 p.m. (The meeting immediately adjourned to the Agenda Session) Mounds View Planning Commission May 21, 2003 Regular Meeting Page 4 ________________________________________________________________________ Respectfully submitted, Jim Ericson Community Development Director Transcribed by: Joan Lenzmeier TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. ORDINANCE NO. ___ CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MOUNDS VIEW ZONING CODE SECTION 1108.04, PERTAINING TO CONDITIONAL USES WITH THE R-3 ZONING DISTRICT THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ORDAINS: SECTION 1: Section 1108.04 of the Mounds View Zoning Code pertaining to conditional uses within the R-3 Zoning District is hereby amended by adding new language underlined to read as follows: 1108.04: CONDITIONAL USES: The following are conditional uses in an R-3 District (requiring a conditional use permit based upon procedures set forth in and regulated by Section 1125.01 of this Title): All conditional uses allowed in an R-2 District. Multifamily dwelling structures containing six (6) or less dwelling units. Multifamily Expansion. Multifamily developments having been constructed prior to January 1, 2003 shall first obtain a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) prior to expanding the number of dwelling units or the principal building footprint. In addition to the criteria outlined in Section 1125, all zoning, building and parking requirements shall be satisfied as a condition of approval. SECTION 2. This Ordinance becomes effective thirty (30) days after its publication in the official City newspaper. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View on this ____ day of _____, 2003. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this _____ day of _________, 2003. Jerry Linke, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ James Ericson, Interim Clerk Administrator (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________ City Attorney