Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 1996/01/22Page 1 January 22, 1996 Mounds View City Council ~ ~ ~, R,, . _ ~1 ~~ ~ 4~ PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting January 22, 1996 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 CALL TO ORDER The Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor Linke at 7:00 p.m. on January 22, 1996. • PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT Mayor Linke, Council members Trude, Hankner and Quick. MEMBERS ABSENT: Council member Blanchard ALSO PRESENT: Paul Harrington, Interim City Administrator Joyce Pruitt, Planning Associate ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA: Mr. Harrington asked that one item be added to the Agenda under Council Business. This was to be Item (C) Request for Use of Contingency Funds for brush removal. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: a. January 8, 1996 Regular City Council Meeting. MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Hankner to approve the minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting on January 8, 1996, as presented. VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carned Page 2 January 22, 1996 Mounds View City Council ACCEPTANCE OF ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION/SECOND: Hankner/Quick to accept the minutes of the Planning Commission for meeting held on December 6, 1995 as presented. VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: There was no Special Order of Business scheduled for this meeting. CONSENT AGENDA: Mr. Harrington, Interim City Administrator, read the Consent Agenda as follows: A. Adopt Resolution No. 4886, Approving the 1996 Compensation Schedule and the 1996 Insurance Contribution Schedule for All City Employees and Approving the 1996 Bargaining Unit Contract for Public Works and Parks Maintenance. B. Approve 1996 Pay Equity Implementation Report and Authorize Its Submission to the Department of Employee Relations. C. Adopt Resolution No. 4887, Approving Reclassification of Administrative Aide from Part Time to Full Time Status. D. Declare Surplus Equipment. E. Set Public Hearing for 7:05 p.m., Monday, February 12, 1996, to Consider Off-Sale Non-Intoxicating Liquor License for Twin City Stores, Inc. aka Oasis Market (formerly Brooks). F. Set Public Hearing for 7:10 p.m., Monday, February 12, 1996 to Consider Request for Conditional Use Permit, Geri Grosslein, 8455 Red Oak Drive. G. Adopt Resolution No. 4888, Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds. H. Licenses for Approval: KENNELS -Expires 8/31/96 Richard Oliverius -Residential -New CIGARETTE AND TOBACCO PRODUCTS -Expires 12/31/96 Twin City Stores (aka Oasis) -New GASOLINE STATIONS -Expires 12/31/96 Page 3 • January 22, 1996 Mounds View City Council Twin City Stores (aka Oasis) -New HVAC -Expires 6/30/96 Kraemer Heating -New SEWER/WATER -Expires 6/30/96 Classic Construction of Cedar Minnesota, Inc. -New Mayor Linke asked if there were any council members who would like any items removed from the Consent Agenda. There were none. MOTION/SECOND: Hankner/Trude to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR: • Mayor Linke explained that this portion of the meeting was designated for anyone who wished to speak to the Council on items that were not on the Agenda. There were no comments or requests. PUBLIC HEARINGS: a. Informational Meeting Regarding Proposed Highway 610 Toll Road Project and Old Highway 8 Reconstruction Plans. Mayor Linke opened the Informational Meeting at 7:05 p.m. Mr. Elwyn Tinklenberg, the Mayor of Blaine, representing the North Metro Mayor's Association was present and stated as the Mayor of a neighboring community and as part of the North Metro Mayor's Association, they are very concerned about what this proposal represents. He acknowledged the need for transportation access in the communities and the problems in securing funding for transportation improvements throughout the metro area, noting a profound imbalance that has occurred throughout the transportation system. He stated the 610 project is a commitment to the area and a result of the coordinated, consolidated and cooperative effort among all of the communities, the business people and residents of the area to bring about some balance and fairness to the region and to bring about economic opportunity and development for our area. Therefore they believe that this proposal would be a betrayal of that effort and all of the planning that has gone into the project. Mayor Linke introduced Mr. Bob Zauner, Chairman of the MN Transportation Group. Mr. Zauner began by presenting slides to show the proposed project. He stated the proposal is intended to provide an easier, more direct commute to and from work and other activities as well as reduce congestion thus providing for better safety, and also the opportunity to achieve Economic Development much sooner. The sooner the project can be completed in its entirety, the more attractive the area would be to potential developers/builders/employers. • Page 4 • January 22, 1996 Mounds Vtew City Counctl Mr. Zauner explained that the state is experiencing a transportation funding gap -the number of automobiles is up, the fuel consumption is down and the average life of the vehicle is increasing thus funding for transportation costs is declining. Mr. Zauner noted that their proposal would include a second river crossing at the Mississippi River. The original proposal for the 610 connection did not include the second bridge or improvements to the East of the bridge. He provided a layout of the project, noting that they intend to the complete the entire project to the full design and long-terns goals that have been established and to deliver the completion of the project within four years. Mr. Zauner explained how the proposed toll road would function. He noted that a transponder would be installed to the dashboard of a vehicle and as the vehicle passes under, the vehicles use of the road would be recorded and the driver would be charged for the use of the road that they used. Those vehicles from outside the area that did not have the transponder device would be recorded via video imaging and those people would be billed accordingly and charged a premium for the extra postage involved in that process. He explained that their proposal would be privately financed and would not include tax exempt fmancing of any kind. There would be no taxpayer risks. Furtherniore the project would be completed much sooner that it would ever be completed under traditional methods. He noted they did not include the state resources that are presently committed to the project and it is their vision that the state revenues would be part of a negotiation with the Department of Transportation and the execution of the proposed agreement and that the money would be made available to the communities in this area to fiuther provide additional infrastructure that otherwise would not be committed to the area. He also presented a video which provided information in regard to how the proposed toll road would function. Mayor Linke stated he understands that their commitment would be similar to a franchise with the State Department of Transportation. As he was told by them, after a period of time (after the contractor has recouped his costs), that franchise would go away. Mr. Zauner stated this is correct. From the beginning of the design process to the conclusion of the agreement period, the State would retain the ownership of it. After the project is constructed, the contractor would receive a franchise to operate it for the period of time necessary to retire the debt. The State and legislation require that the project would never be used for anything other than what the purpose for which it was intended. Ms. Hankner asked what would happen after the debt on the project has been paid in full. Mr. Zauner stated it would then become the property of the State for the state to do as it pleases. A special fund would be set up for long term maintenance. Ms. Hankner asked what the cost would be to complete the 610 project. Mr. Zauner stated at this point they were looking at approximately $200,000,000 to complete the entire project between 35W and 94. • Ms. Hankner asked what is in it for their company. Page 5 January 22, 1996 Mounds Vtew Crty Counctl Mr. Zauner stated. they would only be looking at a return on the investment of their down payment on the project. Ms. Trade asked if the state has contracted with their company for a set rate of return on that investment. Mr. Zauner stated this would be a part of the negotiation as well. They would need to establish a maximum. Furthermore if the traffic was greater than what was anticipated, that would also be subject to negotiation as far as how it would be split up. He stated communities such as Mounds View could certainly be a part of that. Ms. Trade asked if the state would be able to limit fee increases. Mr. Zauner stated that would be regulated by the rate of return. Mayor Linke stated he could see potential camera imaging problems in reading license plates during winter months due to snow cover. He wonders if it would even work in an area such as this. Mr. Zauner stated they are presently installing a system like this in Toronto. That road will be open in the Fall and they will provide guarantees on the readability of the plates and the collections of the fees for the • transponders. Ms. Hankner asked what Mr. Zauner feels the payback time frame would be for this project, estimating $200,000,000. Mr. Zauner stated the payback would be on the invested capital, not on the $200,000,000. The amount financed would be approximately 20% of the total cost. They will not be able to determine the time frame until they see how the project is finally envisioned in its final forn~ and agreed to. Ms. Trade stated generally toll ways have fewer entry points and she wondered if this proposal has fewer than what the federal government has been working with. Mr. Zauner stated their proposal is the same work plan as far an entrances and exits are concerned as they were envisioned by MNDOT. He noted that"toll roads generally have a better safety record than other roads primarily because they provide a high level of service and they are better maintained than traditionally funded roadways. Ms. Trade stated she is concerned that many of the occasional users the area roads (in particular many vehicles pulling Recreational Vehicles) may not find the tolls reasonable. Their charges may seem high because they have many axles or they are pulling a heavy load. Additionally there is much semi traffic. She feels many of these types of vehicles will not use the toll roads but will rather use the free roads. Mr. Zauner stated they feel they can provide a higher level of service such that the fee that they pay to use that road will actually be a savings in comparison to the time that is saved. Mayor Linke asked how the fee schedule works for those vehicles who have a transponder. • Page 5 January 22, 1996 Mounds Vtew Ctty Counctl Mr. Zauner stated they would only be looking at a return on the investment of their down payment on the project. Ms. Trude asked if the state has contracted with their company for a set rate of return on that investment. Mr. Zauner stated this would be a part of the negotiation as well. They would need to establish a maximum. Furthermore if the traffic was greater than what was anticipated, that would also be subject to negotiation as far as how it would be split up. He stated communities such as Mounds View could certainly be a part of that. Ms. Trude asked if the state would be able to limit fee increases. Mr. Zauner stated that would be regulated by the rate of return. Mayor Linke stated he could see potential camera imaging problems in reading license plates during winter months due to snow cover. He wonders if it would even work in an area such as this. Mr. Zauner stated they are presently installing a system like this in Toronto. That road will be open in the Fall and they will provide guarantees on the readability of the plates and the collections of the fees for the • transponders. Ms. Hankner asked what Mr. Zauner feels the payback time frame would be for this project, estimating $200,000,000. Mr. Zauner stated the payback would be on the invested capital, not on the $200,000,000. The amount financed would be approximately 20% of the total cost. They will not be able to determine the time frame until they see how the project is finally envisioned in its final form and agreed to. Ms. Trude stated generally toll ways have fewer entry points and she wondered if this proposal has fewer than what the federal government has been working with. Mr. Zauner stated their proposal is the same work plan as far an entrances and exits are concerned as they were envisioned by MNDOT. He noted that toll roads generally have a better safety record than other roads primarily because they provide a high level of service and they are better maintained than traditionally funded roadways. Ms. Trude stated she is concerned that many of the occasional users the area roads (in particular many vehicles pulling Recreational Vehicles) may not find the tolls reasonable. Their charges may seem high because they have many axles or they are pulling a heavy load. Additionally there is much semi traffic. She feels many of these types of vehicles will not use the toll roads but will rather use the free roads. Mr. Zauner stated they feel they can provide a higher level of service such that the fee that they pay to use that road will actually be a savings in comparison to the time that is saved. Mayor Linke asked how the fee schedule works for those vehicles who have a transponder. • Page 6 • January 22, 1996 Mounds Vtew Crty Council Mr. Zauner explained that it can be run on a debit or a credit system, whichever is preferred. The transponder would run between $30 and $40, however there could also be some type of incentives set up. Ms. Trude asked what the fees run for use of the toll road. Mr. Zauner stated the total corndor is approximately ] 6 miles. The driver would only pay for the actual area he traveled on the corridor. Based on a rate often cents per mile, a vehicle would pay twenty cents if he drove two miles. The type of vehicle (passenger or commercial) would deternune the rate. Duane McCariy, $060 Long Lake Road, stated he would like to know what the cost differential is for public versus private over the life of the project -which is the most expensive and how much? Mr. Zauner stated he is not able to anticipate what the cost differential would be because no one knows what would not happen if the project is not completed. He stated he was told by the MN Department of Transportation that there is no vision at all for the far portion of this project west of 169 or the river crossing. Mr. McCarty stated he thinks that the public needs something more solid in terms of factual information before any decision is made. He thinks that perhaps the communities should look as hard at the possibility of doing . the project ourselves as we have in the past. He thinks the public should look into dedicating the motor vehicle excise tax Yo a transportation trust fund, rather than see it put into the general fund of the State of MN. Kent Allen, 7295 Silver Lake Road, asked what would happen if the revenues are not generated that are anticipated. Would the State be forced to take the project back over and therefore experience an expense that Mr. Zauner claims does not exist. He also wondered what would prevent use of the system by police force to issue speeding violations. Also, if someone was hauling a boat trailer, what would prevent a fine from being generated by the transponder only being registered with the car and not also the trailer. Mr. Zauner explained that they are a private company and they do not share information with the police department. If the project should fail, it is their risk and the investor's risk. The legislation states that the project must continue to be used for what it is designed at. The state would either operate it or it would be sold to another investor. The road would not be shut down. Tom Snell, Director of the Metro North/Anoka County Chamber of Commerce stated that their Board of Directors is opposed to this toll road and they believe that a toll road located in their community would potentially adversely impact future economic development. Moreover it would represent a break in the bi- partisan pledge to build and fund this project with support from the State of Minnesota. They feel that they should continue to press that this project can be completed with full support of the State of Minnesota and they would vehemently oppose a toll road. Mike Aanestad, 3127 131st Avenue N.W., Coon Rapids, asked what existing roads would be taken into the project. Mr. Zauner stated their proposal would just connect 35W and Interstate 94 • Bruce Brasaemle, 5127 Long Lake Road, asked if Hwy. t ] 8 would be part of the mainline corridor. He also wondered what the State and local government's benefit would be for the highways that were a part of the Page 7 • January 22, 1996 Mounds Vtew Crty Counctl mainline already in existence. What kind of return on investment could they expect for private companies and private individuals on that part of the highway? Mr. Brasaemle asked where Mi•. Zauner is expecting to relieve congestion. He believes there would be a highway open with people who were willing to pay for a little further north that was free of congestion, but there would still be the same congestion here, especially if the traffic is expected to increase dramatically by 2010. Is there any way of insuring that the economic development would truly benefit the eastern end of this corridor? Mr. Zauner stated that the return the local communities and users would get is that they envision that there would be some upgrading and improvement to that stretch. That would lower the cost of the development, lowers the amount that would need to be financed and in essence it would reduce the fee that would have to be paid. In regard to economic development, they have not done any research on it but he feels quality transportation would encourage development. A resident of Coon Rapids on 94th Circle stated her development is located at the off-ramp for 610 and the State has been negotiating with them to acquire some of their land. She wondered who they would be selling the land to -the state or a private investment company? Does that make a difference in how much they should . be receiving for that land? Mayor Linke explained that he would assume that they would continue to deal with the MN Department of Transportation. Jim Sailthoip, 8250 Eastwood Road, stated he wondered why the project includes both the 118 corridor and the area over in Brooklyn Park. Is that actually two different projects and could they be separated and still be viable? Mr. Zauner stated the completion of the project in its entirety is of the most benefit. Tying it all together creates a root of value for all users and that is the way the project was envisioned. Gary Henrickson of Northeast Minneapolis, stated he feels the November timetable given for a decision to be made in regard to the project is inadequate. He further stated if we are connecting and using highway 118, we have already paid for that highway and he would not want to be party to paying for that a second time. Mr. Henrickson also wondered if a person with a transponder in their vehicle would be paying a monthly fee even if they did not use the toll road. Also why would those without transponders be billed at a premium rate? Mr. Zauner explained that there would not be a charge if the toll road was not used. The premium rate is merely the same rate of usage plus postage and handling. Andy Piilolia, 2649 Brighton Avenue N.E., representing MN Trucking Association, asked what the toll rate would be for large trucks and what constitutes a "large" truck. He stated he also has concerns in regard to freight movement and interstate truck operators that will be passing through the area. Also, trailers are interchanged among trucks and he wondered how those trailers would be tracked. He understands that $82.5 million will come from MNDOT. That is money that is paid by highway users and if they would also be required to pay a toll, he feels it is double taxation. Page 8 • January 22, 1996 Mounds View City Council Mr. Zauner stated the federal money incorporated into the project merely reduces the cost of the fmancing and also the cost of the toll. As far as the trucker's license plates, the front of the vehicle will also be scanned. The amount charged would commensurate with the use and damage impacted on the roads by trucks in relation to automobiles. Generally the rate for trucks is 3-4 times what the cost of a car is. Dave Wagner, 3252 Mississippi Street, New Brighton, stated he understood from a recent radio talk show that there is some concern as to whether or not MNDOT is managing its funds appropriately or whether there are other things we should be looking at in terms of transportation funding. He feels we should separate the issues of toll roads from the issue of private financing. Kevin McCarty, 219 91st Lane N.E., Blaine, asked what the official standing of MNDOT is on this issue. Mayor Linke stated it is his understanding that this is just out for proposals and they are looking for some input from the communities themselves. Bruce Brasaemle, 5127 Long Lake Road, asked if this meeting is the only opportunity that will be given for input from the public. • Mayor Linke stated he was initially told that a decision needed to be made by February, however it appears this date has been extended. A decision will not be made tonight and he encouraged input from the public, asking that they call or write to city hall give their opinions as well as keep themselves posted as to the council agendas. Bill Fritz, 8072 Long Lake Road, asked what this proposal will do for him as a resident of Mounds View. In comparison, what will it do TO HIM? Rhonda Smieja, 5298 Steffen Street, asked if the project was bid competitively. Mr. Zauner stated the MN Department of Transportation solicited proposals. The project goes through a competitive process. There were no further questions in regard to this project and Mayor Linke recessed the meeting at 8:30 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 8:40 p.m. by Mayor Linke. He explained that Mr. Dave Rholl of the Ramsey County Public Works Department was present to discuss the proposed reconstruction plans for OId Hwy. 8. Mr. Rholl explained that this project is basically a partnership between Ramsey County and the City of Mounds View. He provided a diagram to indicate the proposed realignment of the roadway which would include turn lanes, new curb & gutters, etc. The proposal also includes a trailway and a parking area for canners. Mr. Rholl stated Ramsey County anticipates that it will take four to five months to obtain the necessary permits for the reconstruction of the roadway. They plan to start that process within the next six to eight weeks. It appears that the bulk of the construction will be done in 1997. . Mr. Greg Lane of Midwest Industrial Supply stated the area has been a congestion problem for a number of years. He noted some concern about the four Lanes being reduced to two lanes just in front of his building. Page 9 January 22, 1996 Mounds Vtew Crty Counctl Barbara Matelsky, 4949 Old Highway 8, stated she purchased her home in February of 1994. At that time, she inquired as to whether there were any proposals which would affect her property. She was not provided with any information in regard to this. She was concerned that acquisition of a portion of her property would bring the roadway too close to her home. Ms. Trude asked if trees on the property would be lost. Mr. Rholl noted that as proposed, some mature trees would be lost. The proposal provides fora 40 foot roadway, which is a very popular roadway size. Gil Groberg, 2657 Sherwood Road, suggested that they look at different design options. Chet Glisan, 4943 Old Highway 8, stated he felt it would be necessary to provide sidewalks to address the safety issue. He noted that the area is used regularly for rollerblading and he feels a safe area should be provided for these people as well as other pedestrians. He further stated he felt they may need to acquire more land than what is currently anticipated. He stated trucks turning onto Mustang Drive create problems in the flow of traffic. • Mr. Bruce Brasaemle, 5127 Long Lake Road, stated he is in favor of providing a solution to the continual congestion problem at County Rd. H and Hwy. 10. He however, would suggest that the county look at providing a 36 foot roadway rather than 40 foot and install a sidewalk for the kids at the mobile home park. Mr. Rholl stated he would like to schedule a neighborhood information meeting in approximately one month to provide further information in regard to the proposed project. There were no further questions and Mayor Lirilce closed the informational meeting at 915 p.m. Public Hearing to consider a Conditional Use Permit request to allow an oversized garage at 2908 Ardan Avenue. Mayor Linke opened the Public Hearing at 9:15 p.m. Ms. Joyce Pruitt, Planning Associate, explained that Mr. Anthony Honkomp had made an application for Conditional Use Permit to allow for the construction of a 994 square foot attached garage to his proposed single family home at 2908 Ardan Avenue. She stated the Mounds View Zoning Ordinance allows, by conditional use permit, up to 1,264 square feet of garage/accessory buildings square footage on one lot. Ms. Pruitt stated the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and has recommended approval. However, approval of the request would be based upon two conditions which she outlined in the resolution. These include: (a) the conditional use permit be recorded with Ramsey County within 60 days of City Council approval, and a receipt of such recording shall be provided to the City of Mounds View; and (b) the building be designed and maintained to provide a uniform building appearing with the dwelling unit. Mayor Linke closed the Public Hearing at 9:19 p.m. MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Quick to approve Resolution No. 4878, Approving a Conditional Use Permit to • Allow and Oversized Garage for Anthony Honkomp, 2908 Ardan Avenue. Page 10 January 22, 1996 Mounds View City Council VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Public Hearing to Consider Request for Conditional Use Permit, Development Resource Group, 7295 Silver Lake Road. Mayor Linke opened the Public Hearing at 9:.19 p.m Ms. Joyce Pruitt explained that Terry Malley had applied for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a software and hardware engineering firm at 7295 Silver Lake Road. The property is zoned B-1 and the Municipal Code allows for professional and commercial offices by Conditional Use Permit. She stated the application is in compliance with the Municipal Code and the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommended approval with the three following conditions: a. As per the direction of the City Forester, landscaping including the placement of three 2-inch shade trees, American Linden or Sugar Maple, on the north boulevard of the property. b. Repair potholes and seal cracks on the parking lot of the property. c. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with Ramsey County within 60 days of City Council approval, and a receipt of such recording shall be provided to the City of Mounds View. Ms. Pruitt stated the city had received a concern from a neighbor. He noted that the spotlight shines directly into his duplex. She has talked with the applicant in regard to this concern and he has agreed to angle the light downward to alleviate the problem. The second concern addressed the fence on the back end l~ u Page I 1 • January 22, 1996 Mounds Vtew Ctty Counctl provide a report of the official statements, the annual audit and material events, which his company would be able to complete on behalf of the city for a fee. The sale of the bonds would take place on February 12, 1996. MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Hankner to authorize staff to begin preparing necessary documents for the refunding of the municipal bonds. Mayor Linke called for a Special Meeting to be held at 6:00 p.m. on Monday, February 5, 1996 to further discuss this item. A resolution will be presented to the City Council for their consideration at this meeting. VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried B. Consideration of Resolution No. 4889, Appointing Pedestrian Bridge Citizen Task Force. Ms. Trude explained that the time has come in which to appoint a Citizen Task Force for the Pedestrian Bridge. As per the contract with BRW, it allows for a Task Force to meet three times with the architect to come up with recommendations in regard to the bridge design to be presented to the City Council. The following recommendations have been made to the Task Force Committee: Sue Fisher (Marketing Task Force), Sue • Weber, Pam Starr (Parks & Rec.), Delayne Welsch (Hwy. 10 Task Force), Florence Johnson (wheelchair user/resident of Wildwood Manor), Ed Hanson (Manager of Snyder's), Sue Hankner, Julie Trude and staff members Mary Saarion, Mike Ulrich, Joyce Pruitt, and Rick Jarson who would serve an advisory role. MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Quick to approve Resolution 4889, Appointing a Task Force to Select a Design for the Highway 10 Pedestrian Bridge. VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried C. Use of Contingency Funds for Brush Removal. Mr. Paul Harrington explained that City Forester Rick Wriskey went through the city to assess the damage from the ice storm. He has recommended that a City Clean Up be funded. His concern is that damaged limbs, if not removed, could cause further damage and the potential of disease. He has estimated that the total cleanup will cost between $5,000 and $ l 0,000. The City would be divided into quadrants and certain days would be established to have residents put their brush on the right of way and a contractor would pick it up. Mr. Harrington explained that a flyer could be printed, it would be run on Cable TV, and it would be run in the Bulletin and the Focus Newspaper. MOTION/SECOND: Hankner/Trude to authorize the use of Contingency.Funds not to exceed $10,000 for brush removal. VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Ms. Trude noted that seniors who need assistance getting their brush to the curb can contact the Northwest Youth and Family Services. • REPORTS: Page 12 • January 22, 1996 Mounds View City Council 1. Report of Council members: Quick: No Report. Hankner: No Report. Trude: No Report. 2. Report of Mayor Linke: No Report. 3. Report of Interim City Administrator: No Report. Mayor Linke stated a Goal Setting Council Session has been scheduled for February 1, 1996. The Next Council Work Session is February 5, 1996 and the Next Regular Council Meeting is on February 12, 1996. Mayor Linke adjourned the meeting at 9:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, • Tamara D. Saefke Recording Secretary l~ u ~I ~ u~ s Ali ~~ ~la~ l~(~~~s ~ ~~--- ~ ~ ~y v-tt'~C-~~-- ~~~~ ~5~2 Jerry ~.~'~~, C~r~r~ S~ev~yw ~ ~~~,~~ ~~1~,~ ~~ r ~~2 s ~~ ~ v c~ z ~ ~s G~~~ X38 / ~ c ~CSat ,D/! 9o S. 7~'~ 5 ~' , g cZs ~~. ~w ~. -fir . aZ~ ~ ~ ~r~ ~-v a q 3~ G 7 ~~` ~~~ ~ ~/ S 2 ~\ 1~j~.,~K~ 1a~~L ~ ~. m~~lfV~ Mks V ~ ,~ ,~.~. ~D~vn d~ (~, Pc~.~ ~r1 ~'a~~c~s ~p~ ~ M.U. ~~ /,J • ~ r++ '' ~v `vt~ ~ 7=/LGY •~v ~rc~•EN ~'sY0 1~~Gl~vG <.,t :c! ~- V ,~a.ra. l`'I a,~/sIC~/ ~q~9 Ulan / ~'loc~nc~~ ?/i ~v-- ~~;-~~~ ~ ~, ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~Grw~h Sc.`tulz 7~8 r ~dSe~~ ~~ MV ~i ~(~ l~~rl.G(S ~~ `„ ems-- ~, ~~ ~i ~ N~ ~. ~ ~~~5~ Ct+-ar~CY1~ - -~~~o ~C~ou~R-u~--1~u~t~a~~5, lm~ ~l~~rA~-~~-~ ~ ~. ~ ~-~ ~~Nw ~~~~ ~~. ~,~ ss~Dy ;1~0 /n/G~~` ~J SLR /~av~E9v ~¢ ~9D GJM~Tt ,og~Q-C ~A~~' y/ /~D ~~~ ~_l ~ ` ~~ ~ ~ ~~ J~ ~ G ~,~f er ,~-_ 3 zSz. i'1q cssr s~ rP 9 ~ s~ NeW ~r'~~ ~~ ~S l i Z ~~(~ ~ ~ ~~-r''°2cU ~/ ~ j o ~ ~G' c~~d ~ ~~_ ~ r~' `still L+/~ Zd ~J 11 ~ ~ ~~ i w, ~l yg.~~L! /~ ~-s~r lo. ~~,,,~ ,~~ !~~ S~-0~~w. ~Y,~ s,3'7~6 •~ ~ ~. L ~N A1~ .54PPLy ,IQs v~~w ,,l Ssttz G'~{~ OGv,~y T,NO ~ Mo~c ~ I''t gym, ~o~~ ~~ ~n ~' ~ ~~~~~~ ~~ 1 ~~ - ~' ~ ~ ~ l ~ '~ ~( • -. i~ \ ~ ~ I ~` I~' ~t I'I' ... - ~ .. , l~i P ~t { , '~. ,f ._ ' ~ 4 a y 1 .. '~'. ~. .. ~ ,. .~. 'v. • ~ , , - ~.. ~ -~-4 t ~ .. ~ ,. ..off `~. ,,.,'_~ ~" i •