HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 2019/07/08CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
MOUNDS VIEW CITY HALL
Monday, July 8, 2019
6:30 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL: Mueller, Gunn, Hull, Meehlhause, Bergeron
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
5. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Minutes: June 24, 2019
B. Just and Correct Claims
6. PUBLIC COMMENT
Citizens may speak to issues not on tonight's agenda. Before speaking,
please give your full name and address for the minutes. Also, please limit
your comments to three minutes.
7. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS
8. COUNCIL BUSINESS
A. Public Hearing: First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 960, Amending
City Code, Chapter 1204, and the 2019 Fee Ordinance, related to Park
Dedication Fees
B. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 958, Amending the
Zoning Map for 2390 and 2394 Mounds View Boulevard, and 2400
County Road H2
C. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 959, Amending Section
1104.02, Subd 4(c) (Minimum Floor Area Per Dwelling Unit)
D. Resolution 9132, Approving a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a
Residential Planned Unit Development of Crossroad Pointe (Tabled
from June 24, 2019)
E. Resolution 9133, Approving the Preliminary Plat of Crossroad Pointe
(Tabled from June 24, 2019)
F. Resolution 9134, Authorize Stormwater Pipe Repairs at 8240
Sunnyside Road
G. Resolution 9135, Authorizing the Consulting Services for the design
and construction for the 2020 Street Improvement Project
H. Resolution 9136, Approving No Parking on the West Side of Long Lake
Road from County Road H to County Road H2, in Coordination of
Road Improvements by Ramsey County
9. REPORTS
A. Reports of Mayor and Council
B. Reports of Staff
C. Reports of City Attorney
10. NEXT COUNCIL WORK SESSION: August 5, 2019
NEXT COUNCIL MEETING: July 22, 2019
11. ADJOURNMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
June 24, 2019
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Mounds View Boulevard, Mounds View, MN 55112
6:33 P.M.
1. MEETING IS CALLED TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL: Bergeron, Gunn, Hull (arrived at 7:54 p.m.), Meehlhause, Mueller
NOT PRESENT: None
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A. Monday, June 24, 2019, City Council Agenda.
MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Bergeron. To Approve the Monday, June 24, 2019, agenda as
presented.
Ayes — 4 Nays — 0 Motion carried.
5. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Minutes: June 10, 2019.
B. Just and Correct Claims.
C. Resolution 9129, Approving Severance for Police Support Manager.
D. Resolution 9130, Approving Revised Job Description and Authorizing
Advertisement of the Police Records/Evidence Technician.
E. Resolution 9131, Approving Revisions to City of Mounds View Solid Waste
Management Standards.
F. Resolution 9127, Authorizing Purchase of Three Copy Machines and
Maintenance Agreement.
MOTION/SECOND: Bergeron/Meehlhause. To Approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
Ayes — 4 Nays — 0 Motion carried.
6. PUBLIC COMMENT
Mounds View City Council June 24, 2019
Regular Meeting Page 2
1 Maria O'Reilly, formerly lived at 3048 Woodale Drive, commented on the Council's recent
2 proceedings towards Brian Amundsen and Jonathan Thomas. She explained she has known
3 Brian Amundsen for the past 40 years, as he was her dad. She indicated he was a man of high
4 moral character and integrity. She stated he values rules and does not shy away from conflict.
5 She commented on his many years of public service in Mounds View and stated she believed the
6 residents of Mounds View were very fortunate to have someone like Brian Amundsen serving on
7 the Charter Commission. She believed there was some sort of misunderstanding or
8 miscommunication that had happened as the portrayal of Brian Amundsen was contradictory to
9 the person she knew him to be. She reported she attended the last Council meeting as a sign of
10 support for her father. She noted the parking lot and Council Chambers were flooded with
11 numerous other people attending to support Brian Amundsen and Jonathan Thomas. She
12 expressed frustration with the fact a motion was made and passed that took the extreme step to
13 send a message to a judge requesting Brian Amundsen and Jonathan Thomas be removed from
14 the Charter Commission. She recommended a public meeting and/or open dialogue be held to
15 improve communication between the two parties. She stated all Mounds View residents wanted
16 the best for the community. It was her hope that her children would see how government can
17 work for good, while seeking truth and reconciliation. She encouraged the Council to put away
18 the gardening sheers in order to work towards a positive solution that values and respects long
19 time dedicated members of the community.
20
21 Mayor Mueller reported a meeting was scheduled between the two senior members and the three
22 members tendering their resignation and the members tendering their resignation would not
23 attend the meeting. For this reason, an individual meeting was held.
24
25 Bob King, 7408 Silver Lake Road, stated it was his belief the issues facing the Charter
26 Commission came down to personality conflicts. He did not believe this should have anything to
27 do with their service. He was of the opinion the Charter Commission should be focusing on the
28 Charter and its laws.
29
30 Bill Loven, 5284 Greenfield Avenue — Apartment #21, stated he was upset that Greenfield
31 Avenue had been cut off in the interest of a new apartment building. He discussed how he and
32 his neighbors would be impacted by this change.
33
34 Mayor Mueller reported the Crossroad Pointe project would be discussed later in the agenda. She
35 explained based on feedback received from other neighbors, the City was proposing to close
36 access to Greenfield Avenue.
37
38 7. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS
39 A. Discussion — Assisted Living Concept (Dan Carlson).
40
41 Community Development Director Sevald discussed an assisted living concept with the Council.
42 He explained Dan Carlson and Ben Hanf were looking at a property on Lambert Avenue to be
43 used as an assisted living facility. He requested the Council provide the developers with
44 feedback on the proposed concept.
45
Mounds View City Council June 24, 2019
Regular Meeting Page 3
1 Ben Hanf, 13894 Edenwood Way, explained he was representing Living Hope Homes. He stated
2 he would like to build four single family homes along Lambert Avenue that would be used for 24
3 hour assisted living services. He indicated he would like to have 10 residents in each of the
4 homes, instead of six. He commented he was excited to be bringing this concept to the City of
5 Mounds View.
6
7 Mayor Mueller asked how many bedrooms each of the homes would have. Mr. Hanf anticipated
8 each home would have eight to ten bedrooms. He reported the properties would not have parking
9 concerns as the residents would not have vehicles. The only vehicles onsite would be for staff
10 members. Further discussion ensued regarding potential locations for visitor parking.
11
12 Dan Carlson, 4448 Cosette Lane in Hugo, explained he would be designing the homes and
13 reported he had a background in custom designing commercial/residential assisted living
14 facilities.
15
16 Council Member Meehlhause asked how many square feet each home would have. Mr. Carlson
17 estimated each home would be approximately 3,800 square feet of finished space. He noted the
18 homes would have an elevator and a main floor walk in shower. He commented further on the
19 amenities that would be included in the homes. Mr. Hanf explained it would be his goal to have
20 these homes look like a regular house in Mounds View.
21
22 Council Member Meehlhause questioned if there were any zoning issues the City would have to
23 consider for this request. Community Development Director Sevald stated the property is zoned
24 and guided for single family. He reported State Statute allows group homes in any zoning
25 district. He explained the City views this type of use as a nursing home and the property would
26 have to be zoned R-4 or PUD, and the land would have to be guided multi -family residential or
27 institutional. He commented until the Comprehensive Plan was approved, the property could not
28 be re -guided, but the property could be rezoned.
29
30 Council Member Gunn asked why ten residents were being requested versus six. Mr. Hanf
31 explained this came down to the expense of providing 24-hour care for the residents.
32
33 Council Member Meehlhause inquired if the four homes would be located on the vacant piece of
34 land along with the current home property. Mr. Hanf reported this was the case.
35
36 Council Member Bergeron questioned what type of vans would be visiting the group homes. Mr.
37 Hanf indicated the vans would provide rides to residents on an as needed basis.
38
39 Council Member Bergeron asked if the properties would ever be used for hospice. Mr. Hanf
40 stated this was a possibility.
41
42 Council Member Bergeron inquired how many care takers would be onsite overnight. Mr. Hanf
43 reported there would be two care takers onsite overnight.
44
Mounds View City Council June 24, 2019
Regular Meeting Page 4
1 Council Member Meehlhause questioned if memory care would occur in these homes. Mr. Hanf
2 was uncertain and noted his partner Andrea Temple would be making this decision.
3
4 Council Member Gunn stated this was an interesting concept and noted this would provide a new
5 type of housing that was not already available in the City. She indicated she could support this
6 project moving forward.
7
8 Council Member Meehlhause agreed this was an intriguing concept. He stated he understood
9 there was a need for assisted living in the community. He supported this project moving
l o forward.
11
12 Council Member Bergeron indicated he too was in favor of exploring this concept further.
13
14 Mayor Mueller commented she did not support the proposal moving forward. She explained she
15 would rather see single family homes on these lots versus assist living units. She expressed
16 concern with the number of lower level units and how individuals in these bedrooms would
17 escape if there happened to be a fire.
18
19 Mr. Carlson reported the four homes would have a walkout basement. He explained each
20 basement bedroom would have an egress window.
21
22 Mayor Mueller asked who would be responsible for yard maintenance. Mr. Carlson indicated a
23 yard company would be contracted to complete this work.
24
25 Council Member Gunn questioned when the applicant would like to begin this project. Mr.
26 Carlson explained he and his partners were coordinating this project with the City. He stated his
27 goal would be to begin the homes yet this summer.
28
29 Council Member Gunn asked how this project could proceed given the fact the Comprehensive
30 Plan was not yet approved. Community Development Director Sevald indicated the homes could
31 not be occupied for assisted living until the zoning was changed.
32
33 Council Member Meehlhause stated the City had just rezoned several properties. Community
34 Development Director Sevald reported this was the case and noted these rezonings were
35 completed to fix an error that occurred 20 years ago in the Zoning Map. He explained these
36 rezonings did not change the Comprehensive Plan.
37
38 Council consensus was to direct staff to move forward with this project.
39
40 8. COUNCIL BUSINESS
41 A. Public Hearing: Resolution 9128, Approving a Chicken/Duck Keeping
42 License for Seth Kaduce at 8086 Long Lake Road.
43
44 Assistant City Administrator Beeman requested the Council approve a chicken/duck keeping
45 license for Seth Kaduce for the property at 8086 Long Lake Road. He commented on the
Mounds View City Council June 24, 2019
Regular Meeting Page 5
1 restrictions in place for chicken/duck keeping and noted Mr. Kaduce was proposing to have a
2 chicken coop that was in conformance with City Code. Staff commented further on the request
3 and recommended approval.
4
5 Mayor Mueller opened the public hearing at 7:25 p.m.
6
7 Sandra Spector, 2556 Sherwood Road, indicated she lived next to Seth Kaduce. She requested
8 further information about what to expect if her neighbor is keeping chickens and if there would
9 be an odor. Mayor Mueller reviewed the location of the proposed chicken coop and noted it
10 would be fenced.
11
12 Hearing no further public input, Mayor Mueller closed the public hearing at 7:27 p.m.
13
14 Assistant City Administrator Beeman explained the cages would have to be cleaned regularly.
15 He explained he understood chickens were great at managing ticks and other insects.
16
17 Seth Kaduce, 8086 Long Lake Road, explained he and his wife would be moving into his
18 parent's house while he searches for a home in the area. He indicated he has applied for eight
19 chickens noting he now had seven. He reported he cleaned his coop four times a year and noted
20 his neighbors would not hear the chickens from 25 feet away. He noted this would be his fourth
21 year with chickens.
22
23 MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Meehlhause. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 9128,
24 Approving a Chicken/Duck Keeping License for Seth Kaduce at 8086 Long Lake Road.
25
26 Ayes — 4 Nays — 0 Motion carried.
27
28 B. Public Hearing: First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 958,
29 Amending the Zoning Map for 2390, 2394 Mounds View Boulevard and 2400
30 County Road H2.
31
32 Community Development Director Sevald requested the Council introduce Ordinance 958
33 amending the Zoning Map for 2390 and 2394 Mounds View Boulevard and 2400 County Road
34 H2. He explained these properties were known as Crossroad Pointe. He explained INH
35 Properties is proposing to develop a 128 -unit apartment building at the south corner of Mounds
36 View Boulevard and County Road H2. The project involves multiple planning applications
37 including a request to rezone the applicable properties from B-3 Highway Business to PUD
38 Planned Unit Development. Staff provided further comment on the proposed project and reported
39 the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Ordinance amendment.
40
41 Mayor Mueller opened the public hearing at 7:39 p.m.
42
43 Celena Monn, 2357 Sherwood Road, stated she has expressed many concerns regarding the
44 rezoning of this property. She agreed this would be a great opportunity for Mounds View, but
45 feared limiting this project to only apartments restricted the goals of the Comprehensive Plan.
Mounds View City Council June 24, 2019
Regular Meeting Page 6
1 She explained this project was supposed to be a mixed use development with commercial and
2 residential units. She reported the City already had numerous apartment complexes. She
3 encouraged the Council to reconsider this project to include retail.
4
5 Sandra Spector, 2556 Sherwood Road, agreed with Ms. Monn on this. She stated she would like
6 to see Mounds View Boulevard more City friendly with commercial, restaurant and retail
7 developments and less apartments. She noted this property was vital to the corridor and she
8 believed it would benefit the City to have more retail.
9
10 Hearing no further public input, Mayor Mueller closed the public hearing at 7:43 p.m.
11
12 Mayor Mueller explained a portion of this property was obtained in 2006, and the Robert's
13 property was added in 2013. She indicated the City has aggressively marketed this property with
14 the idea of having a mixed use development on this site. She commented after working with a
15 developer for some time, the financing fell through. She reported the INH team came forward
16 with a project that initially was mixed use with specialty retail, which included a gun club. She
17 stated this use was not supported by the community which led INH to go back to the drawing
18 board and the site was proposed for apartments and a Kwik Trip gas station. She indicated the
19 surrounding residents did not support having a 24-hour gas station across from where they lived.
20 For this reason, the Council has pursued a market rate apartment complex. She noted the City
21 has not had a market rate apartment complex built in Mounds View since the late 1970's or early
22 1980's.
23
24 Council Member Bergeron thanked the residents for bringing the comments to the Council. He
25 noted the Council was concerned about the overall look of Mounds View Boulevard. He stated it
26 was his understanding that if density was built, retail would follow. He understood the City did
27 not have enough restaurants in the community but believed this development was a step in the
28 right direction. He reported this property has been marketed for mixed use for a number of years
29 and noted a market rate apartment complex was the most viable use for the site.
30
31 Council Member Meehlhause discussed the history of this project and noted Hy -Vee was
32 contacted to see if they were interested in building in Mounds View. He indicated the Crossroad
33 Pointe parcel was too small for a Hy -Vee. He explained several restaurants were contacted as
34 well, and there has been no interest.
35
36 MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Bergeron. To Waive the First Reading and Introduce Ordinance
37 958, Amending the Zoning Map for 2390, 2394 Mounds View Boulevard and 2400 County Road
38 H2.
39
40 Ayes — 4 Nays — 0 Motion carried.
41
42 C. Public Hearing: First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 959,
43 Amending Section 1104.02, Subd 4(c) (Minimum Floor Area Per Dwelling
44 Unit).
45
Mounds View City Council June 24, 2019
Regular Meeting Page 7
1 Community Development Director Sevald stated INH Properties is proposing to develop a 128-
2 unit apartment building at the south corner of Mounds View Boulevard and County Road H2.
3 The project involves multiple planning applications including a request to amend the City Code
4 to allow Studio Apartments. He discussed the allowed square footage and the proposed change to
5 the allowed square footage. He reviewed the minimum square footage allowed in neighboring
6 communities. Staff provided further comment on the proposed City Code amendment with
7 respect to minimum floor area per dwelling unit and reported the Planning Commission
8 recommended approval of the Ordinance amendment as requested.
9
1 o Council Member Hull arrived at the Council meeting at 7:54 p.m.
11
12 Mayor Mueller questioned how many of the units would be studio apartments. Community
13 Development Director Sevald reported 7% of the units would be studio apartments.
14
15 Mayor Mueller opened the public hearing at 7:58 p.m.
16
17 Sandra Spector, 2556 Sherwood Road, asked if townhouses were considered for this site. She
18 commented on the benefits of having owner -occupied units versus additional rental units.
19
20 David Piskorski, 7878 Woodlawn Drive, questioned what the concerns were to having the
21 apartments units 630 square feet. He inquired what the drawbacks would be to building a
22 development with 520 square foot units that the market did not support.
23
24 Mayor Mueller stated the impact to the City would be none, but the developer would see a
25 reduction in revenues.
26
27 Hearing no further public input, Mayor Mueller closed the public hearing at 8:02 p.m.
28
29 Mayor Mueller asked if there was a demand for studio apartments. Community Development
30 Director Sevald stated he believed this was the case. He noted the developer completed a market
31 study and there was a need for studio, 1, 2, and 3 -bedroom apartments.
32
33 Mayor Mueller requested the developers come forward and speak to the size of studio
34 apartments.
35
36 Jim Elias, INH Properties, commented on the professional third -party market study that was
37 completed for this project. He noted he also conducted his own research. He stated there was a
38 demand for 10% to 15% of the building to be studio units. He discussed how modern apartment
39 buildings have a great deal of amenities (community rooms, theaters, fitness room, etc.) which
40 led renters to have smaller square foot apartments. Because of this change, there was a very high
41 demand for studio apartments. He commented 16 total units would be studio apartments. He
42 further discussed the floor plans for the studio apartments.
43
44 Council Member Meehlhause asked if a developer came forward with a townhome development
45 for this site. Assistant City Administrator Beeman stated there were inquiries, but noted the
Mounds View City Council June 24, 2019
Regular Meeting Page 8
1 numbers did not work.
2
3 MOTION/SECOND: Meehlhause/Bergeron. To Waive the First Reading and Introduce
4 Ordinance 959, Amending Section 1104.02, Subd 4(c) (Minimum Floor Area Per Dwelling
5 Unit).
6
7 Mayor Mueller asked if future developers would be required to have amenities if wishing to
8 construct studio apartments. Community Development Director Sevald explained the amenities
9 would not be required.
10
11 Ayes — 4 Nays — 1 (Mueller opposed) Motion carried.
12
13 D. Public Hearing: Resolution 9132, Approving a Conditional Use Permit (CUP)
14 for a Residential Planned Unit Development of Crossroad Pointe.
15
16 Community Development Director Sevald stated INH Properties is proposing to develop a 128-
17 unit apartment building at the south corner of Mounds View Boulevard and County Road H2.
18 The project involves multiple planning applications including a request for a CUP for a PUD,
19 and a Development Review. It was noted the Comprehensive Plan guides this property for
20 Mixed Use PUD. He discussed how the development would impact the School District and
21 noted the street closures that were being considered. It was noted the project narrative still had to
22 be completed for this project. Staff commented further on the proposed PUD and recommended
23 action on this item be tabled to the July 8, 2019 City Council meeting so all Crossroad Pointe
24 items can be approved at the same meeting.
25
26 Mayor Mueller opened the public hearing at 8:26 p.m.
27
28 Bill Buckingham, 5220 Greenfield Avenue, stated he was glad to see the Council addressing
29 market rate housing in Mounds View. He did not realize the City had not constructed market
30 rate apartments since the late 1970's. He explained this project could provide a great housing
31 option for seniors who were looking to downsize. He noted Realife Cooperative had a two-year
32 waiting list. He asked if Mounds View residents would be given a priority for the new Crossroad
33 Pointe apartments. He questioned what the duration of the leases would be and inquired what
34 other expenses residents in these units would have.
35
36 Ben Sigrist, 5270 Greenfield Avenue, explained he lived very close to the proposed project. He
37 stated he supported the hammerhead on Greenfield Avenue. He thanked the Council for working
38 on this project and noted he offered his full support.
39
40 Hearing no further public input, Mayor Mueller closed the public hearing at 8:32 p.m.
41
42 Jim Elias, INH Properties, commented he looked forward to Mr. Buckingham being a future
43 resident. He stated typically there is no restriction or priority given to residents living within the
44 City. However, he noted he would want to promote this property locally.
45
Mounds View City Council June 24, 2019
Regular Meeting Page 9
1 Further discussion ensued regarding how the Bel Ray offered a first option to Mounds View
2 residents prior to opening the building to outside communities.
3
4 Mr. Elias reported the initial lease term would be one year. After the first year, a six-month,
5 nine-month and twelve-month option would be offered. He explained each unit would be
6 responsible for there gas and electric expenses. He reported the rent pricing structure would
7 include one underground parking space. He then reviewed the proposed rental rates for the
8 apartment units noting studios would cost around $1,000 per month, one -bedroom units would
9 cost around $1,300 per month, two-bedroom units would cost around $1,500 to $1,600 per
10 month and three-bedroom units would cost around $2,000 per month. He stated water and sewer
11 charges may be billed back to apartment units on a pro rata basis. He noted trash would be
12 included in the rent, along with wi-fi. He commented further on the amenities that would be
13 included in the building, which were a community room, mail area with parcel lockers, fitness
14 center, two elevators, game room, BBQ grill area, playground, fenced in pet area, pet spa, and
15 theater room.
16
17 Mayor Mueller asked if each unit had a washer and dryer. Mr. Elias reported this was the case.
18 He explained each unit came with a full appliance package.
19
20 Corey Gears, Alliance Building Corporation, explained he would be constructing the apartment
21 building for INH.
22
23 Mayor Mueller questioned what the mix of apartment units would be. Mr. Elias reviewed the
24 mix of apartment units being proposed for the project.
25
26 Council Member Meehlhause stated he supported the proposed parking ratio.
27
28 Community Development Director Sevald requested feedback from the Council on whether they
29 would like to see more greenspace or have two additional parking stalls. The consensus of the
30 Council was to recommend the site have additional greenspace.
31
32 MOTION/SECOND: Meehlhause/Gunn. To Table Action on Resolution 9132 to the July 8,
33 2019 City Council meeting.
34
35 Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried.
36
37 E. Public Hearing: Resolution 9133, Approving the Preliminary Plat of
38 Crossroad Pointe.
39
40 Community Development Director Sevald stated INH Properties is proposing to develop a 128-
41 unit apartment building at the south corner of Mounds View Boulevard and County Road H2.
42 The project involves multiple planning applications including a request for Preliminary Plat
43 approval. He noted this project consisted of three lots that would need to be combined into one
44 lot. Staff commented further on the Preliminary Plat for Crossroad Pointe and recommended
Mounds View City Council June 24, 2019
Regular Meeting Page 10
1 action on this item be tabled to the July 8, 2019 City Council meeting so all Crossroad Pointe
2 items can be approved at the same meeting.
3
4 Mayor Mueller opened the public hearing at 8:56 p.m.
5
6 Celena Monn, 2357 Sherwood Road, expressed concerns with the fact some residents within this
7 building may have allergies to pets, but the entire building would be pet friendly. She stated she
8 would like to learn more about the security measures being proposed for this apartment building.
9 She explained she would like to see a bike rack outside the main entrance to the building, along
10 with a trash receptacle. She questioned what type of emergency plan was in place for this
11 building. She noted Mounds View was a GreenStep city and encouraged the developer to
12 consider using sustainable and Earth friendly building materials. She recommended the parking
13 garage have plug -ins for electric vehicles. In addition, she noted Mounds View was a pollinator
14 friendly community.
15
16 Hearing no further public input, Mayor Mueller closed the public hearing at 9:01 p.m.
17
18 Mayor Mueller questioned what type of experience the builder had with green construction.
19
20 Corey Gears, Alliance Building Corporation, noted LED fixtures would be used inside and
21 outside of the building. He reported all appliances would be Energy Star and low flow fixtures
22 would be used. He indicated the windows would be highly efficient to cut down on heat loss.
23
24 Mayor Mueller requested further information on how the underground water coffers would work.
25 Mr. Gears discussed how the underground stormwater runoff system would work for the site.
26
27 Mayor Mueller encouraged the applicant to consider creating a pollinator friendly area within the
28 development. She requested further information on how the site would be accessed by the fire
29 department. Mr. Gears reported the fire department had reviewed the site plans and would be
30 able to access the site from two locations in the event of an emergency.
31
32 Mayor Mueller requested further commented on the security system that would be in place for
33 this apartment building. Mr. Elias explained security in the building was extremely important to
34 him. He noted a controlled entry system would be put in place with key fobs and an electric lock
35 system. In addition, each unit would have an electronic lock. Mr. Elias commented further on
36 how pets would be managed in the building and reported the building would be smoke free. He
37 indicated he could place a bike rack on the grounds if a suitable location were found and noted
38 the dog/park area would have trash receptacles. He explained he does not have designated stalls
39 for electric cars, but noted a handful of stalls would accommodate electric plug in stalls.
40
41 Council Member Gunn stated it would be up to the individual apartment dwellers to lock their
42 doors and windows for security purposes.
43
44 Mayor Mueller questioned what would be done in an emergency storm situation. Mr. Gears
45 reported the parking garage was 12 -inch -thick concrete walls and would serve as a storm shelter
Mounds View City Council June 24, 2019
Regular Meeting Page 11
1 in an emergency situation. Mr. Elias reported a handbook would be provided to each individual
2 upon leasing a unit and emergency protocols would be addressed in this handbook.
3
4 MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Hull. To Table Action on Resolution 9133 to the July 8, 2019 City
5 Council meeting.
6
7 Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried.
8
9 9. REPORTS
10 A. Reports of Mayor and Council.
11
12 Council Member Bergeron reported discussions were held at the June 3rd Council worksession as
13 a result of the May 21St Charter Commission meeting that led the Council to direct staff to seek
14 the resignation of two commission members. At the June 10th Council meeting, after Public
15 Comment, it was moved and approved a meeting or meetings should be held between
16 representatives of the Council, and members of the Charter Commission. On June 18th a meeting
17 was held with four members of the Charter Commission. These were individual meetings as not
18 all members could accommodate being in the same room at the same time. At the conclusion of
19 these meetings, the decision was made not recommend changing the Council's direction to staff.
20
21 Mayor Mueller thanked Council Member Bergeron for the summary and noted she too attended
22 these meetings. She noted this matter would be taken up again by the City Council at the July 1st
23 worksession meeting.
24
25 Council Member Meehlhause stated he would be attending the League of Minnesota Cities
26 Conference in Duluth later this week.
27
28 Council Member Gunn noted she would also be attending this conference. She stated the Police
29 Foundation would be meeting on Tuesday, July 91h and the Festival in the Park Committee would
30 be meeting on Tuesday, July 161h
31
32 Mayor Mueller stated on Tuesday, June 25th at 10:00 a.m. a story time would be hosted at the
33 corner of Groveland and Arden. She encouraged all residents with children to attend.
34
35 Mayor Mueller indicated she appreciated the fact the majority of the Council would be attending
36 the League of Minnesota Cities Conference this week. She congratulated Council Member
37 Sherry Gunn for being named the Elected Official Leadership Award which was presented by the
38 Minnesota Women in City Government. A round of applause was offered by all in attendance.
39
40 Mayor Mueller reported the next Police Foundation fundraiser at Von Hansen's would be held on
41 Saturday, July 20th
42
43 Mayor Mueller indicated Cone with a Cop would be held on Saturday, July 131h at the Mounds
44 View McDonald's from 6:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.
45
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
B. Reports of Staff.
June 24, 2019
Page 12
Assistant City Administrator Beeman reported staff continues to work on the demolition process
for the Skyline Motel. He anticipated a controlled burn would be held at this property on
Saturday, July 13tH
Community Development Director Sevald stated driveway setbacks were discussed by the
Planning Commission at their last meeting. He noted this issue may be coming forward for an
Ordinance amendment reducing driveway setbacks.
C. Reports of City Attorney.
Assistant City Attorney Anderson had nothing additional to report.
10. Next Council Work Session:
Next Council Meeting:
11. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 9:32 p.m.
Transcribed by:
Heidi Guenther
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
Monday, July 1, 2019, at 6:30 p.m.
Monday, July 8, 2019, at 6:30 p.m.
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
APPROVING JUST AND CORRECT
CLAIMS AGAINST CITY FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View, pursuant to Minnesota Statute
412.141, has full authority over the financial affairs of the City and;
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the claim number
19181 through 19191 in the amount of $ 5,160.40
144931 in the amount of $ 957,717.98
TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIMS PRESENTED $ 962,878.38
And has found said claims to be just and correct;
It was moved that the City Council of Mounds View hereby approve the
attached list of claims dated 07/09/2019 by the vote ayes nays.
7/01/2019 2:36 PM
PACKET: 02206 Ck Date 7-3-19 - 8
VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View
BANK: PYBNK Western Bank
DIRECT PAYABLES CHECK REGISTER
**** CHECK LISTING ****
PAGE: 1
CHECK
CHECK
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
I.D.
NAME TYPE
DATE DISCOUNT
AMOUNT
NO#
AMOUNT
A3035
AFLAC
I-51020190703
RD103 AFLAC R
7/03/2019
20.46
019181
I-52020190703
RD103 AFLAC R
7/03/2019
48.60
019181
69.06
A9329
Fidelity Security Life
I-62020190703
50790-1492 PLAN 980 R
7/03/2019
168.94
019182
168.94
L0549
Law Enforcement Labor Services,
I-70020190703
Police Union Dues R
7/03/2019
969,00
019183
969.00
L7160
The Lincoln Nat'l Life Insuranc
I-63020190703
STD # 10249130 R
7/03/2019
406.70
019184
406,70
L7165
The Lincoln National Life Insur
I-30120190703
Life Ins #400238774 R
7/03/2019
792.63
019185
792.63
*VOID*
019186
VOID CHECK V
7/03/2019
019186
**VOID**
M7152
MN Child Support Payment Center
I-99520190703
Case 40015244278 R
7/03/2019
813.10
019187
813.10
M7152
MN Child Support Payment Center
I-99720190703
CASE # 001454401101 R
7/03/2019
423.07
019188
423.07
M7156
MN Child Support Payment Center
I-99020190703
#001511549601 R
7/03/2019
222.88
019189
222.88
N0525
643400 - NCPERS MN Grp Life Ins
I-30020190703
NCPERS Life Ins R
7/03/2019
112.00
019190
112.00
S4107
Secure Benefits Systems Corp.
I-50020190703
Flex Medical R
7/03/2019
221.52
019191
I-50320190703
Flex Daycare R
7/03/2019
961.50
019191
11183.02
** B A N K T O T A L S **
NO#
DISCOUNTS
CHECK AMT
TOTAL APPLIED
REGULAR CHECKS:
10
0.00
5,160.40
5,160.40
HANDWRITTEN CHECKS:
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
PRE -WRITE CHECKS:
0
0100
0.00
0.00
DRAFTS:
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
VOID CHECKS:
1
0.00
0,00
0.00
NON CHECKS:
0
0.00
0.00
0,00
CORRECTIONS:
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
BANK TOTALS:
11
0.00
5,160.40
5,160440
7/03/2019 10:17 AM
A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT
PAGE:
1
VENDOR SET: 01 City of
Mounds View
BANK: * ALL BANKS
DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU
99/99/9999
CHECK
CHECK
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR I.D.
NAME
STATUS
DATE
AMOUNT
DISCOUNT NO
STATUS
AMOUNT
C-CHECK
VOID CHECK
V
7/09/2019
144877
C-CHECK
VOID CHECK
V
7/09/2019
144878
C-CHECK
VOID CHECK
V
7/09/2019
144879
C-CHECK
VOID CHECK
V
7/09/2019
144880
* * T 0 T A L S * *
NO
INVOICE AMOUNT
DISCOUNTS
CHECK
AMOUNT
REGULAR CHECKS:
HAND CHECKS:
DRAFTS:
EFT:
NON CHECKS:
0
0
0
0
0
0000
0000
0000
0600
0400
0000
0000
0000
0400
0600
0000
0400
0000
0000
0.00
VOID CHECKS:
4 VOID
VOID
DEBITS
CREDITS
0000
0600
0000
0.00
TOTAL ERRORS: 0
NO
INVOICE AMOUNT
DISCOUNTS
CHECK
AMOUNT
VENDOR SET: 01 BANK: *
TOTALS:
4
0.00
0000
0000
BANK: * TOTALS:
4
0000
0.00
0000
7/03/2019 10:17 AM
A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT
PAGE:
2
7/03/2019 10:17 AM
A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT
PAGE:
3
7/03/2019 10:17 AM
A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT
PAGE:
VENDOR
SET:
01 City of
Mounds View
BANK:
DATE RANGE:
APBNK US Bank
0/00/0000 THRU
99/99/9999
CHECK
CHECK CHECK CHECK
VENDOR
I.D.
NAME
STATUS DATE
AMOUNT
DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT
C3221
Central Turf & Irrigation Supp
I-6065877-00
Irrigation Repairs
R 7/09/2019
144873
100
4360-1210
SUPPLIES, BUILDINGS & GROUNDS
Irrigation Repairs
62.48
62.48
C3600
Certified Laboratories
I-3581962
Gloves -Shop Supplies
R 7/09/2019
144674
100
4465-1230
SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
Gloves -Shop Supplies
214.86
I-3588940
Bee Repellent
R 7/09/2019
144874
100
4360-1600
OPERATING SUPPLIES
Bee Repellent
219.05
433.91
C4500
City Wide Maintenance of Minne
I-I00059012
CH/PW/PD/MVCC Cleaning
R 7/09/2019
144875
100
252
4460-3030
4350-3030
OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CH/PW/PD
MVCC
1,920.52
957.22
21877.74
C4510
Cintas
I-4024161911
252 4730-3030
MVCC Linens, Mats, Towels...
OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
R 7/09/2019
Linens
146.55
144876
252 4350-2410
252 4350-1600
I-4024356016
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
OPERATING SUPPLIES
Mats & Towels
Mop heads, Towels
R 7/09/2019
42.91
36.43
144876
100
4360-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
& Towels
12.29
100
4410-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
& Towels
0.95
100
100
100
100
4460-2410
4465-2410
4470-2410
4472-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
& Towels
& Towels
& Towels
& Towels
1.53
4.00
7.35
6.11
100
4475-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
& Towels
1.24
252
700
4350-2410
4823-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
& Towels
& Towels
4.95
10.40
700
4825-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
& Towels
4.00
730
4823-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
& Towels
13.82
745
4415-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
& Towels
4.95
745 4417-2410
I-4024356113
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
Uniforms & Clothing
& Towels
R 7/09/2019
1.15
144876
100
4360-2400
UNIFORM & CLOTHING
Uniforms & Clothing
13.35
100
4410-2400
UNIFORM & CLOTHING
Uniforms & Clothing
1.03
100
4460-2400
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
Uniforms & Clothing
1.66
100
4465-2400
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
Uniforms & Clothing
4.35
100
4470-2400
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
Uniforms & Clothing
7.98
100
4472-2400
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
Uniforms & Clothing
6.64
100
4475-2400
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
Uniforms & Clothing
1.34
252
4350-2400
UNIFORM & CLOTHING
Uniforms & Clothing
5.37
700
4823-2400
UNIFORM & CLOTHING
Uniforms & Clothing
11.30
700
4825-2400
UNIFORM & CLOTHING
Uniforms & Clothing
4.35
730
4823-2400
UNIFORM & CLOTHING
Uniforms & Clothing
15.01
745
4415-2400
UNIFORM & CLOTHING
Uniforms & Clothing
5.37
745
I-4024619729
4417-2400
UNIFORM & CLOTHING
MVCC Linens, Mats, Towels...
Uniforms & Clothing
R 7/09/2019
1.26
144876
7/03/2019 10:17 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT
VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View
BANK: APBNK US Bank
DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU 99/99/9999
CHECK
VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT
C9510
Cintas CONT
I-4024619729
MVCC Linens, Mats, Towels...
R 7/09/2019
252
4730-3030
OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Linens
7.17
252
4350-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
42.91
252
4350-1600
OPERATING SUPPLIES
Mop heads, Towels
36.43
I-4024841659
CH Floor Mats
R 7/09/2019
100
4160-1600
OPERATING SUPPLIES
CH Floor Mats
37.92
I-4024841728
Mats & Towels
R 7/09/2019
100
4360-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
& Towels
11.28
100
4410-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
& Towels
0.87
100
4460-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
& Towels
1.40
100
4465-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
& Towels
3.67
100
4470-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
& Towels
6.74
100
4472-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
& Towels
5.61
100
4475-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
& Towels
1.13
252
4350-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
& Towels
4.54
700
4823-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
& Towels
9.54
700
4825-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
& Towels
3.67
730
4823-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
& Towels
12.68
745
4415-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
& Towels
4.54
745
4417-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats
& Towels
1.07
I-4024841816
Uniforms & Clothing
R 7/09/2019
100
4360-2400
UNIFORM & CLOTHING
Uniforms & Clothing
13.35
100
4410-2400
UNIFORM & CLOTHING
Uniforms & Clothing
1.03
100
4460-2400
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
Uniforms & Clothing
1.66
100
4465-2400
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
Uniforms & Clothing
4.35
100
4470-2400
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
Uniforms & Clothing
7.98
100
4472-2400
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
Uniforms & Clothing
6.64
100
4475-2400
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
Uniforms & Clothing
1.34
252
4350-2400
UNIFORM & CLOTHING
Uniforms & Clothing
5.37
700
4823-2400
UNIFORM & CLOTHING
Uniforms & Clothing
11.30
700
4825-2400
UNIFORM & CLOTHING
Uniforms & Clothing
4.35
730
4823-2400
UNIFORM & CLOTHING
Uniforms & Clothing
15.01
745
4415-2400
UNIFORM & CLOTHING
Uniforms & Clothing
5.37
745
4417-2400
UNIFORM & CLOTHING
Uniforms & Clothing
1.26
C5900
Commercial Asphalt Co.
I-190615
Water SVC Repairs
R 7/09/2019
700
4823-1240
SUPPLIES, STREETS
Water SVC Repairs
683.62
D2406
Deere & Company
I-116634173
Resol 9063 Mower
R 7/09/2019
460
4360-7030
Equipment - Parks
Resol 9063 Mower
111510.96
PAGE: 5
CHECK CHECK CHECK
DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT
144876
144876
144876
194876
144861
647.82
683.62
11,510.96
7/03/2019 10:17 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE:
VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View
BANK: APBNK US Bank
DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU 99/99/9999
CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK
VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT
D2616 Dept. of Labor & Industry
I -June 2019 June 2018 Surcharge Report R 7/09/2019 144883
100 3280 BUILDING SURCHARGE June 2018 Surcharge 990.30
100 3281 FIXED FEE BUILDING SURCHARGE June 2018 Surcharge 15.36
100 3283 HVAC SURCHARGE June 2018 Surcharge 159.02
100 3284 PLUMBING SURCHARGE June 2018 Surcharge 68.03 1,232.71
D6500 Diamond Vogel Paint Center
I-802188336 Traffic Paint & Supplies R 7/09/2019 144884
100 4475-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES Traffic Paint & Supp 435.09 435.09
E1550 Ebert Construction, Inc.
I-PW App #15b PW Facility R 7/09/2019 144885
480 4470-7050-108 PW BUILDING CONSTUCTION PW Facility 7,441.94 7,441.94
E5005 Electric Pump
I-0065722-IN Lift Station Pumps R 7/09/2019 144886
730 4823-1250 SUPPLIES, UTILITIES Lift Station Pumps 246.00 246.00
F1005 F.M.Trucking, Inc.
I-5632 Sod Prep -Water SVC Repairs R 7/09/2019 144887
700 4823-1240 SUPPLIES, STREETS Sod Prep -Water SVC R 30.95 30.95
F1010 Factory Motor Parts Co.
I-159-019592 Lamps R 7/09/2019 144888
100 4465-1220 SUPPLIES, VEHICLES Lamps 33.73
I-159-Z03094 Batteries R 7/09/2019 144888
700 4823-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES Batteries 12.78 46.51
F1050 Fastenal Company
I-MNSPR144298 Nuts & Bolts for Signage R 7/09/2019 144889
100 4475-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES Nuts & Bolts for Sig 48.15 48.15
F1095 Ferguson WaterWorks #2516
I-0331985 Hydrant Part R 7/09/2019 144890
700 4823-1250 SUPPLIES, UTILITIES Hydrant Part 756.91 756.91
F2056 First Call
I-3298-328039 Mower Belt R 7/09/2019 144891
100 4360-1230 SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT Mower Belt 23.80 23.80
F6010 PreCise MRM, LLC
I-200-1021606 GPS Pooled Data Plan, Network R 7/09/2019 144892
100 4472-3100 Telephone GPS Pooled Data Plan 42.20 42.20
0
7/03/2019 10:17 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE:
VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View
BANK: APBNK US Bank
DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU 99/99/9999
7
CHECK
CHECK
CHECK CHECK
VENDOR
I.D.
NAME
STATUS DATE
AMOUNT
DISCOUNT NO
STATUS AMOUNT
F6725
4 Seasons Tree Care, Inc.
I-8139
Red Oak Estates-0 Cty Rd H2
R 7/09/2019
144693
100 4380-3520
TREE REMOVAL
Diseased Tree Remova
700.00
I-8164
City Property -Lois Drive -Elm
R 7/09/2019
144893
100 4380-3520
TREE REMOVAL
Diseased Tree Remova
364.00
I-8168
City Prop: SL Rd, Jackson Rd
R 7/09/2019
144893
100 4380-3520
TREE REMOVAL
Pinewood Circle-Dise
2,475.00
3,539.00
F6752
Fox Valley Technical College
I-TPB0000537464
Pete B., Jeremy H.
R 7/09/2019
144894
100 4200-3630
TRAINING & CONFERENCES
Pete B., Jeremy H.
790.00
790.00
F8100
Friendly Chevrolet, Inc.
I-1004027
CH 4107 Leaks: oil, transmiss.
R 7/09/2019
144895
100 4465-5120
REPAIRS, VEHICLES
CH #107 Leaks: oil,
1,465.79
1/465679
G0555
Government Finance Officers As
I-2927955
GFOA Fin Stats & Conversions
R 7/09/2019
144896
100 4150-3630
TRAINING & CONFERENCES
GFOA Fin Stats & Con
85.00
85.00
G5800
Government Leasing & Finance,
I-201907027093
EMC Contract
R 7/09/2019
144897
100 4750-8011
LEASE PAYABLE
EMC Contract
1,627.58
100 4750-8021
LEASE, INTEREST
EMC Contract
413.65
252 43SO-8011
LEASE PAYABLE
EMC Contract
3,529.53
252 4350-8021
LEASE, INTEREST
EMC Contract
897.04
740 4416-8011
LEASE PAYABLE
EMC Contract
614.70
740 4416-8021
LEASE INTEREST
EMC Contract
156.23
7,238.73
G8020
Grainger
I-9191854026
PW # Pressure washer
R 7/09/2019
144898
700 4823-1230
SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
PW # Pressure washer
62.96
I-9194318920
Solenoid -Treatment Plant
R 7/09/2019
144898
700 4823-1250
SUPPLIES, UTILITIES
Solenoid -Treatment P
245.53
I-9197657407
HVAC Filters
R 7/09/2019
144898
252 4350-1230
SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
MVCC
1,217.71
100 4460-1230
SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
CH/PD
405.90
1,932.10
H4035
Hillyard/Minneapolis
I-603485754
Cleaning & Paper Supplies
R 7/09/2019
144899
252 4350-1600
OPERATING SUPPLIES
MVCC
257.69
100 4460-1600
OPERATING SUPPLIES
CH/PD/PW
509.32
767.01
7/03/2019 10:17 AM
A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT
PAGE:
VENDOR
SET: 01 City of
Mounds View
BANK:
APBNK US Bank
DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU
99/99/9999
CHECK
CHECK
CHECK CHECK
VENDOR
I.D.
NAME
STATUS DATE
AMOUNT
DISCOUNT NO
STATUS AMOUNT
H7175
Holiday Companies
I-201907027099
Com Dev & PD Car Washes
R 7/09/2019
144900
100 4470-1700
100 4200-1700
MOTOR FUELS & LUBRICANTS
MOTOR FUELS & LUBRICANTS
Com DevCar Washes
PD Car Washes
5.36
37.52
42.88
I6560
I-IN2559994
100 4200-1600
Innovative Office Solutions, L
Paper, Stationery, Certifs,
OPERATING SUPPLIES
R 7/09/2019
Paper, Stationery, C
21.56
144901
I-IN2562513
100 4200-1600
I-IN2567101
730 4823-1600
I-IN2567103
Pens, Certif 25 SH GN
OPERATING SUPPLIES
PW Toner, Pens,
OPERATING SUPPLIES
Envelopes, Supplies CH
R 7/09/2019
Pens, Certif 25 SH G
R 7/09/2019
PW Toner, Pens.
R 7/09/2019
42.04
352.55
144901
144901
144901
100 4160-1600
OPERATING SUPPLIES
Envelopes, Supplies
116.77
532.92
I6823
Allstream
I-16212269
Phones 06/23/19 - 07/22/19
R 7/09/2019
144902
100 4160-3100
TELEPHONE
Phones: 1/23/19 - 2/
158.58
252 4350-3100
700 4823-3100
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
Phones: 1/23/19 - 2/
Phones: 1/23/19 - 2/
118.92
39.64
317.14
M0300
MMNTB
I-201907027094
100 4653-3045
I-201907027095
100 4653-3045
May Hotel Tax: AmericInn R 7/09/2019
CONTRACTUAL N. METRO CONF BUREMay Hotel Tax: Ameri
May Hotel Tax: Days Inn R 7/09/2019
CONTRACTUAL N. METRO CONF BUREMay Hotel Tax: Days
3,720.99
2,160.68
144903
144903
5,881.67
M0900
I-1219090-00
M.T.I. Distributing, Inc.
PW #319 Pulley
R 7/09/2019
144904
100 4360-1230
SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
PW #319 Pulley
26.62
26.62
M1010
I-P20785
MacQueen Equipment, Inc.
Decal
R 7/09/2019
144905
730 4823-1230
SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
Decal
95.91
95.91
M3030
Gary Meehlhause
I-201907037104
LMC 2019 Annual Conference
R 7/09/2019
144906
100 4100-3630
TRAINING & CONFERENCES
LMC 2019 Annual Conf
199.50
199.50
M3505
Menards
I-77468
Air Compressor Oil
R 7/09/2019
144907
700 4823-1600
OPERATING SUPPLIES
Air Compressor Oil
34.99
I-77581
Brooms/Dust Pans Park Bldgs
R 7/09/2019
144907
100 4360-1210
SUPPLIES, BUILDINGS & GROUNDS
Brooms/Dust Pans Par
50.97
I-77689
PVC Pipe
R 7/09/2019
144907
100 4360-1210
SUPPLIES, BUILDINGS & GROUNDS
PVC Pipe
19.46
105.42
0
7/03/2019 10:17 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE:
VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View
BANK: APBNK US Bank
DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU 99/99/9999
0
CHECK
CHECK
CHECK CHECK
VENDOR
I.D.
NAME
STATUS DATE
AMOUNT
DISCOUNT NO
STATUS AMOUNT
M5300
Midway Ford Company
I-377040
PD# 144 Rear Pads & Rotors
R 7/09/2019
144908
100 4465-1220
SUPPLIES, VEHICLES
PD# 144 Rear Pads &
165.29
1-518117
PW# 448 Front Hub Seals, Horn
R 7/09/2019
144908
100 4470-1230
SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
PW# 448 Front Hub S
1,417.35
1,582.64
M6400
Minnesota Equipment
I-P95320
Aebi - 3 point hitch belts
R 7/09/2019
144909
100 4360-1230
SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
Aebi - 3 point hitch
17.00
17.00
M7315
MN Department of Health
I-201907027101
Chris A. Operator Renewal
R 7/09/2019
144910
700 4823-3630
TRAINING & CONFERENCES
Chris A. Operator Re
23.00
23.00
M7635
MN Pollution Control Agency
I-201907027100
Chris A. Operator Certificate
R 7/09/2019
144911
730 4823-3630
TRAINING & CONFERENCES
Chris A. Operator Ce
23.00
23.00
M7960
Minnesota/Wisconsin Playground
I-2019220
Bike Rack PW
R 7/09/2019
144912
100 4460-1210
SUPPLIES, BUILDINGS & GROUNDS
Bike Rack PW
135.00
135.00
N5822
North Valley, Inc.
I -Request No. 1
SV Park, Woodale, SBM FD
R 7/09/2019
144913
485 4470-7050-321
Silver View Park Parking Lot
Silver View Park
166,430.76
485 4470-7050-322
2019 STREET PROJ WOODALE
Woodale
250,009.22
485 4470-7050-322
2019 STREET PROJ WOODALE
SBM
106,424.53
522,864.51
N6245
Northern Tier Retail, LLC
I-201907027102
Overpayment of Tobacco License
R 7/09/2019
144914
100 3221
TOBACCO LICENSE
Overpayment of Tobac
100.00
100 3212
LIQUOR: OFF -SALE
Not renewing Off -sal
260.00
360.00
N6300
Northern Safety Technology, In
I-48364
PW# 647 Reverse -Floodlight
R 7/09/2019
144915
745 4415-1230
SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
PW# 647 Reverse-Floo
172.84
172.84
P1415
Paragon Company
I-19231 05152019
Sewer Bay Trench Repairs
R 7/09/2019
144916
480 4180-3030
OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Sewer Bay Trench Rep
2,651.00
2,651.00
P9030
Pump and Meter Services, Inc.
I-369847
Lift Inspection-PW Facility
R 7/09/2019
144917
100 4465-1230
SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
Lift Inspection-PW F
491.00
491.00
7/03/2019 10:17 AM
A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT
PAGE:
10
7/03/2019 10:17 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE:
VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View
BANK: APBNK US Bank
DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU 99/99/9999
CHECK
CHECK
CHECK CHECK
VENDOR
I.D.
NAME
STATUS
DATE
AMOUNT
DISCOUNT NO
STATUS AMOUNT
V4105
Verizon Wireless CONT
I-9831790446
PW Staff Phones & Data Cards
R
7/09/2019
144926
700 4823-3100
TELEPHONE
PW Staff
Phones & Da
146.37
730 4823-3100
TELEPHONE
PW Staff
Phones & Da
141087
745 4415-3100
TELEPHONE
PW Staff
Phones & Da
60.81
720s6l
W1602
Water Conservation Service, In
I-9626
Leak SVCS
R
7/09/2019
144927
700 4823-3030
OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Leak SVCS
287.98
287.98
Y1000
YMCA of Greater Twin Cities
I-201907027098
Salary, Retirement, Health Ins
R
7/09/2019
144928
100 4350-3036
CONTRACTUAL RECREATION
Salary,
Retirement,
30,652*92
252 4730-3030
OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Salary,
Retirement,
11,677.30
252 4732-3030
OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Salary,
Retirement,
30,652.92
72,983*14
Y4090
YRC Freight
I-798-063020-X
Rope Pull Workout Machine
R
7/09/2019
144929
100 4200-3070
COPS EVENTS
Transport
75.00
75,00
Z2000
Zarnoth Brush Works, Inc.
I-0175741-IN
PW# Bobcat box broom
R
7/09/2019
144930
100 4470-1230
SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
PW# Bobcat
box broom
433.50
433.50
Z2040
Zee Medical Service
I-54051135
Eye/Skin Flush Sol, Wall Mount
R
7/09/2019
144931
100 4160-1600
OPERATING SUPPLIES
Eye/Skin
Flush Sol,
515050
515.50
* *
T 0 T A L S * *
NO
INVOICE AMOUNT
DISCOUNTS
CHECK AMOUNT
REGULAR
CHECKS:
73
957,717.98
0.00
957,717.98
HAND CHECKS:
0
0000
0000
0400
DRAFTS:
0
0.00
0600
0000
EFT:
0
0000
0.00
0400
NON CHECKS:
0
0000
0000
0,00
VOID CHECKS:
0 VOID DEBITS
0000
VOID CREDITS
0000
0600
0000
TOTAL ERRORS: 0
7/03/2019 10:17 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT
VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View
BANK: APBNK US Bank
DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU 99/99/9999
PAGE: 12
** G/L ACCOUNT TOTALS **
G/L ACCOUNT NAME AMOUNT
100
3212
LIQUOR: OFF -SALE
260.00
100
3221
TOBACCO LICENSE
100.00
100
3280
BUILDING SURCHARGE
990.30
100
3281
FIXED FEE BUILDING SURCHARGE
15.36
100
3283
HVAC SURCHARGE
159.02
100
3284
PLUMBING SURCHARGE
68.03
100
4100-3630
TRAINING & CONFERENCES
199.50
100
4130-3630
TRAINING & CONFERENCES
612.08
100
4150-3100
COMMUNICATIONS
100.00
100
4150-3630
TRAINING & CONFERENCES
137.34
100
4160-1600
OPERATING SUPPLIES
670.19
100
4160-3030
OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
297.00
100
4160-3100
TELEPHONE
158.58
100
4160-3800
MILEAGE & PARKING
52.69
100
4200-1600
OPERATING SUPPLIES
109.14
100
4200-1700
MOTOR FUELS & LUBRICANTS
37.52
100
4200-3070
COPS EVENTS
323.00
100
4200-3610
MEMBERSHIPS
450.00
100
4200-3630
TRAINING & CONFERENCES
790.00
100
4210-8010
PRINCIPAL
54,440.23
100
4210-8020
INTEREST
91250.74
100
4350-3036
CONTRACTUAL RECREATION
301652.92
100
4360-1210
SUPPLIES, BUILDINGS & GROUNDS
157.60
100
4360-1230
SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
147.41
100
4360-1600
OPERATING SUPPLIES
490.33
100
4360-2400
UNIFORM & CLOTHING
26.70
100
4360-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,E
23.57
100
4360-3100
TELEPHONE
94.58
100
4380-3520
TREE REMOVAL
3,539900
100
4410-2400
UNIFORM & CLOTHING
2.06
100
4410-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,E
1.82
100
4410-3100
Telephone
60.80
100
4460-1210
SUPPLIES, BUILDINGS & GROUNDS
578.56
100
4460-1230
SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
405.90
100
4460-1600
OPERATING SUPPLIES
567.56
100
4460-2400
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
3.32
100
4460-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,E
2.93
100
4460-3030
OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1/920052
100
4460-3100
Telephone
11.26
100
4460-5130
REPAIRS, EQUIPMENT
202.00
100
4465-1220
SUPPLIES, VEHICLES
199.02
100
4465-1230
SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
705.86
100
4465-1600
OPERATING SUPPLIES
74.98
100
4465-2400
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
8.70
100
4465-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,E
7.67
100
4465-3100
TELEPHONE
29.27
7/03/2019 10:17 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 13
VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View
BANK: APBNK US Bank
DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU 99/99/9999
** G/L ACCOUNT TOTALS **
G/L ACCOUNT NAME AMOUNT
--------------------------------------------------------------------
100
4965-5120
REPAIRS, VEHICLES
1,965.79
100
4470-1230
SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
1185098S
100
4470-1240
SUPPLIES, STREETS
67.65
100
4470-1700
MOTOR FUELS & LUBRICANTS
5.36
100
4470-2400
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
15.96
100
4470-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,E
14.09
100
4470-3100
TELEPHONE
81.07
100
4472-2400
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
13.28
100
4472-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,E
11.72
100
4472-3100
Telephone
87.24
100
4475-1600
OPERATING SUPPLIES
483.24
100
4475-2400
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
2.68
100
4475-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,E
2.37
100
4475-3100
Telephone
13.51
100
4653-3045
CONTRACTUAL N. METRO CONF BURE
5,881.67
100
4750-8011
LEASE PAYABLE
11627.58
100
4750-8021
LEASE, INTEREST
413.65
*** FUND TOTAL ***
121,172.77
230 4650-3100 TELEPHONE 50.00
230 4650-3800 MILEAGE & PARKING 735.45
*** FUND TOTAL *** 785.45
252
4350-1230
SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
1,217.71
252
4350-1600
OPERATING SUPPLIES
330.55
252
4350-2400
UNIFORM & CLOTHING
10.74
252
4350-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,E
95.31
252
4350-3030
OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
957.22
252
43SO-3100
TELEPHONE
154.95
252
4350-8011
LEASE PAYABLE
31529.53
252
43SO-8021
LEASE, INTEREST
897.04
252
4730-3030
OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
111831.02
252
4732-3030
OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
30,652.92
252
4732-3430
PRINTING
527.34
*** FUND TOTAL ***
501204.33
460
4360-7030
Equipment - Parks
11,510696
*** FUND TOTAL ***
111510.96
480
4160-7050-110
2019 PD Remodel
986.05
480
4180-3030
OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
21651.00
480
4180-7030
EQUIPMENT
31000.00
480
4180-7050
CONSTRUCTION
271036.54
480
4470-7050-108
PW BUILDING CONSTUCTION
71441.94
480
4470-7050-109
City Hall Park/Splash Pad
68,243.25
*** FUND TOTAL ***
109,358.78
7/03/2019 10:17 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 14
VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View
BANK: APBNK US Bank
DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU 99/99/9999
G/L ACCOUNT
** G/L ACCOUNT TOTALS **
NAME
AMOUNT
485 4470-7050 CONSTRUCTION 961493.56
485 4470-7050-321 Silver View Park Parking Lot 1661430.76
485 4470-7050-322 2019 STREET PROJ WOODALE 356,433.75
*** FUND TOTAL *** 6191358.07
700
1152
UTILITY DELQ. RELIEVABLE
56.15
700
4820-3300
POSTAGE
527.33
700
4823-1230
SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
62.96
700
4823-1240
SUPPLIES, STREETS
714.57
700
4823-1250
SUPPLIES,,UTILITIES
lf002e44
700
4823-1600
OPERATING SUPPLIES
486.43
700
4823-2400
UNIFORM & CLOTHING
22.60
700
4823-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,E
19.94
700
4823-3030
OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
287.98
700
4823-3100
TELEPHONE
186.01
700
4823-3630
TRAINING & CONFERENCES
23.00
700
4823-7050
CONSTRUCTION
35,810.00
700
4825-2400
UNIFORM & CLOTHING
8.70
700
4825-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,E
7.67
*** FUND TOTAL ***
391215.78
730
4820-3300
POSTAGE
527.33
730
4823-1230
SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
95.91
730
4823-1250
SUPPLIES, UTILITIES
264.28
730
4823-1600
OPERATING SUPPLIES
21956.94
730
4823-2400
UNIFORM & CLOTHING
30.02
730
4823-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,E
26.50
730
4823-3100
TELEPHONE
141.87
730
4823-3630
TRAINING & CONFERENCES
23.00
*** FUND TOTAL ***
41065.35
740
4416-8011
LEASE PAYABLE
614.70
790
4416-8021
LEASE INTEREST
156.23
*** FUND TOTAL ***
770.93
745
4415-1230
SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
1,189.78
745
4415-2400
UNIFORM & CLOTHING
10.74
745
4415-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,E
9.49
745
4415-3100
TELEPHONE
60.81
745
4417-2400
UNIFORM & CLOTHING
2.52
745
4417-2410
MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,E
2.22
*** FUND TOTAL ***
1,275.56
7/03/2019 10:17 AM
A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT
PAGE:
15
Item No: 08A
Meeting Date: July 8, 2019
MOUNDS VIEW Type of Business: Council Business
City Administrator Review:
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Jon Sevald, Community Development Director
Item Title/Subject: Public Hearing: First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 960,
Amending City Code, Chapter 1204, and the 2019 Fee Ordinance,
related to Park Dedication Fees (Special Planning Case SP -215-
19)
Introduction:
A Park Dedication Fee may consist of land or cash charged to a Developer, to be used for
capital improvements to parks, trails, and open space. The Fee cannot be used for operations
or maintenance. The intent is for the Fee to offset the City's cost of providing park facilities for
use by these new residents and new businesses (e.g. Nexus between fee and need).'
This item was discussed during the May 6, 2019 Council Work Session. The Council provided a
consensus to change the Fee to $3,500 per residential unit, and to keep the Fee as -is for
commercial/industrial projects.
Discussion:
Mounds View's Park Dedication Fee is 10% of the land, or 10% of the estimated market value
(EMV) of the land (or a combination of the two).2
Credit is provided for single-family redevelopment projects, in which the existing home is kept.
For example, if one lot is subdivide into two lots, only one fee is charged.3
Because the cash fee is based on the EMV of land, which can vary widely, Staff have found this
difficult to estimate on projects involving multiple properties. For example, on the planned Long
Lake Woods Second Addition, the EMV varies between $0.40 and $2.19 per sq ft.
The City of Roseville conducts an annual survey of Park Dedication Fees, finding that most
cities charge a flat fee per dwelling unit (about $3,500), or per acre ($9,400 average p/acre) in
the case of commercial/industrial developments.
Attached is a chart comparing Park Dedication Fees of recent Mounds View developments if
those projects had been in nearby cities. In summary, Mounds View charges a reasonable fee
for single-family developments, a low fee for multi -family, and a high fee for commercial and
industrial developments.
Strategic Plan Strategy/Goal:
Maintain and plan for infrastructure improvements including waste water, water, &
transportation.
' MN Statute 462.358, Subd 2(c) (Nexus)
2 In 2004, Ord 745 increased the fee from 5% EMV to 10% EMV for residential subdivisions less than 1 -acre. If
greater than 1 -acre, the fee remained 10%. It is believed the City has charged a park Fee since 1988, and is based
on 1980 legislation.
s City Code, Section 1204.02, Subd 3 (Credit for Existing Single -Family Dwelling)
Item 08A
Page 2 of 2
Financial Impact:
In considering the Fee, the Council needs to consider the "nexus", between the need (park
funding) and the additional demand of new users associated with new development. Increasing
this Fee would mean less dependence on the Special Projects Fund, to fund discussed projects
such as; completing the Mounds View Blvd trail, Veterans Memorial, band shell, dog park,
pedestrian crossing over Mounds View Blvd, etc.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a Public Hearing, and First Reading and
Introduction of Ordinance 960, Amending City Code Chapter 1204, and the Fee Ordinance,
related to Park Dedication Fees.
A Public Hearing Noticed was published in the June 26, 2019 New Brighton -Mounds View
Bulletin.
Respectfully submitted,
�eQx
Jon Sevald, AICP
Community Development Director
ATTACHED
1. Park Dedication Fee (Fee if Mounds View project was built in the respective City)
2. Ordinance 960
The Mounds View Vision
A Thriving Desirable Community
Park Dedication Fee (Fee if Mounds View project was built in the respective City)
Units (Or x
c v
acres if non- m �
Project residential) DU p/ac EMV p/sf ¢ m
7800 Eastwood Rd (2016)
c
2.1
1.55
$ 6,500
3
$ 1,800
$ 2,000
O
N
a �
>
�
T C
C 0
N
O
v o
U
1
7800 Eastwood Rd (2016)
1
2.1
1.55
$ 6,500
$ 4,320
$ 1,800
$ 2,000
$ 3,000
$ 1,500 $
1,082
$ 3,500
$ 1,825
$ 4,000
$ 866
$ 2,200
$ 2,645
$ (1,563)
8456 Red Oak Dr (2018)
1
2.2
2.87
$ 6,500
$ 4,320
$ 1,800
$ 2,000
$ 3,000
$ 1,500 $
4,972
$ 3,500
$ 1,825
$ 4,000
$ 2,486
$ 2,200
$ 3,146
$ 1,826
Long View Estates (2014)
10
1.7
0.39
$ 65,000
$ 43,200
$ 18,000
$ 20,000
$ 30,000
$ 15,000 $
12,000
$ 35,000
$ 18,250
$ 40,000
$ 4,800
$ 22,000
$ 26,205
$ (14,205)
Long Lake Woods Second (2020)
12
2.1
1.45
$ 78,000
$ 51,840
$ 21,600
$ 24,000
$ 36,000
$ 18,000 $
35,955
$ 42,000
$ 21,900
$ 48,000
$ 17,978
$ 26,400
$ 34,516
$ 1,439
Boulevard (2018)
60
18.4
2.80
$ 390,000
$ 259,200
$108,000
$ 81,600
$ 180,000
$ 90,000 $
38,576
$ 210,000
$ 109,500
$ 240,000
$ 39,720
$ 132,000
$151,691
$ (113,115)
Bel Rae (2011)
95
43.0
7.10
$ 617,500
$ 410,400
$ 171,000
$ 129,200
$ 285,000
$ 142,500 $
75,760
$ 332,500
$ 173,375
$ 380,000
$ 67,500
$ 209,000
$ 241,930
$ (166,170)
Crossroad Pointe (2019)
128
30.1
5.95
$ 832,000
$ 552,960
$ 230,400
$ 174,080
$ 384,000
$ 192,000 $
110,000
$ 448,000
$ 233,600
$ 512,000
$ 110,152
$ 281,600
$ 328,436
$(218,436)
Mounds View Business Park 3rd Add (2014)
17.79
0.0
4.49
$ -
$ 154,844
$ -
$ 71,160
$ 42,696
$ 17,823 $
115,426
$ 115,426
$ 239,187
$ 115,426
$ 115,426
$ 104,383
$ 88,761
$ 26,665
Skyline Motel/Hotel (2020)
3.50
0.0 $
4.58
$
$ 30,451
$
$ 17,493
$ 8,396
$ 3,505 $
69,780
$ 69,780
$ 47,037
$ 69,780
$ 69,780
$ 20,934
$ 30,651
$ 39,129
$ (444,428)
w �
w v
y 0
a
O
a
no �
Q �
$ (2,581)
$ (2,581)
$ (25,806)
$ (30,968)
$ (150,038)
$ (237,559)
$ (320,080)
$ (93,190)
$ (24,700)
Res Fee
Com/Ind Fee
Arden Hills
$6,500 p/DU
$ -
Blaine
$4,320 p/DU
$8,704/$6,702 p/ac
Circle Pines
$1,800 p/DU
-
Coon Rapids
$5,000/$4,000 p/ac
(Single -Family)
$2,000 p/DU
(Two -Family)
$1,700 p/DU
(Muyltiple-Family)
$1,360 p/DU
Lino Lakes
$3,000 p/DU
$2,400 p/ac
Fridley
$1,500 p/DU
$0.023 p/sf (e.g. $1,001.88 p/ac)
Mounds View
10% of EMV
30% EMV
New Brighton
$1,825 p/DU
$13,445 p/ac
Roseville
$4,000 p/DU
10% EMV
Shoreview
10% EMV
(0 - 2 DU/ac)
4% EMV
(2.1- 3 DU/ac)
5% EMV
(3.1- 4 DU/ac)
6% EMV
(4.1- 5 DU/ac)
7% EMV
(5.1 + DU/ac)
10% EMV
Spring Lake Park
$2,200 p/DU
3% EMV
w �
w v
y 0
a
O
a
no �
Q �
$ (2,581)
$ (2,581)
$ (25,806)
$ (30,968)
$ (150,038)
$ (237,559)
$ (320,080)
$ (93,190)
$ (24,700)
ORDINANCE NO. 960
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 1200, CHAPTER 1204 OF THE MOUNDS VIEW
CITY CODE RELATING TO PARK DEDICATION FEE,
AND THE 2019 FEE SCHEDULE
THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Mounds View hereby amends Title 1200, Chapter
1204, Section 1204.02 of the Mounds View Municipal Code by adding the double -underlined
material and deleting the seri material as follows:
Subd 4. De-'.--,.-.. s !.- !.- - — —
ivisi
ten per -cent (100%) of the buildable land of the proposed subdivision o
ys9°
Dedication Amount: Un to ten percent (10%) of the buildable land of the
proposed subdivision, or:
Residential: $3,500 per Dwelling Unit
Commercial/Industrial: Cash equivalent of up to ten percent (10%) of the
estimated market value of buildable land based on
the fair market value.
The exact portion of land or its ogtfi ,alert amount ;. cash shall be established by
the City based on the following factors:
• Type of the proposed subdivision land use: residential, industrial or
commercial;
• The need for open space generated by the proposed subdivision;
• Existence of land dedicated for public use within the proposed subdivision,
excluding areas reserved as storm water holding ponds;
• Fair market value of the land;
• Other relevant factors unique to a particular subdivision supporting the need
for dedication of lands for public use.
Ordinance 960
Page 2 of 2
If an equivalent ameti t i a cash fee from the subdivider for part or the entire
portion required to be dedicated is to be paid by the subdivider, such amount is
due no later than at the time of final approval of the proposed subdivision.
SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Mounds View hereby amends the 2019 Fee
Schedule by adding the double -underlined material and deleting the sin material as follows:
IL OTHER INSPECTION / PLANNING FEES
Park Dedication Fees (Ord. 745-960 Up to 109% of fair- ,,.,.,fket valt e
Up to ten percent (10%) of the buildable
land of the proposed subdivision, or:
Residential: $3,500 per Dwelling Unit,
Commercial/Industrial: Cash equivalent of
up to ten percent (10%) of the estimated
market value of buildable land based on
SECTION 3. In accordance with Section 3.07 of the City Charter, City staff shall have the
following summary printed in the official City newspaper in lieu of the complete ordinance:
On July 22, 2019, the City Council adopted Ordinance 960 that amends Title 1200,
Chapter 1204, of the Mounds View City Code relating to Park Dedication Fees, and the
correlating section of the 2019 Fee Schedule.
A printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection during regular business hours
at Mounds View City Hall and is available online at the City's web site located at
www.moundsviewnm.org.
SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage and
publication, in accordance with Section 3.09 of the City Charter.
Introduction and First Reading by the Mounds View City Council on July 8, 2019.
Second Reading and Adoption by the Mounds View City Council on July 22, 2019.
Publication Date: August 2, 2019.
Carol A. Mueller, Mayor
Attest:
Nyle Zikmund, City Administrator
(SEAL)
Item No: 08B
Meeting Date: July 8, 2019
MOUNDS
VIEW
Type of Business: Council Business
City Administrator Review:
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Jon Sevald, Community Development Director
Item Title/Subject: Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 958, Amending the
Zoning Map for 2390 and 2394 Mounds View Boulevard, and 2400
County Road H2
Introduction:
INH Properties is proposing to develop a 128 -unit apartment building at the south corner of
Mounds View Boulevard and County Road H2. The project involves multiple planning
applications, including a request to rezone the applicable properties from B-3 Highway Business
to PUD Planned Unit Development.
Discussion:
The properties previously had commercial uses (e.g. restaurant, gas station, car wash),
consistent with the B-3 designation, and are guided as Mixed Use MU -PUD in the
Comprehensive Plan.' 2
As proposed, an apartment of this size would be a Conditional Use (CUP) in the R-4 High
Density Residential district. The proposed project includes deviations from the City Code, which
may be allowed as a Planned Unit Development (PUD), as an alternative to obtaining variances
to the Code. PUD's are a Conditional Use only within the PUD district, thus, the next step in the
project review process is to rezone the properties from B-3 to PUD.
Analysis
The purpose of the PUD district is "to provide for the integration and coordination of land parcels
as well as the combination of varying types of residential, commercial and industrial uses."
Within the PUD district, all permitted and conditional uses in all districts, are a Permitted Use in
the PUD district. There may be different types of PUD's such as Residential, Commercial -
Industrial, and Mixed -Use. This project will be Residential. Once zoned PUD, the intent is that
all uses will be consistent with an approved PUD Narrative, to be approved as part of the CUP
process.
Strategic Plan Strategy/Goal:
Continue BR&E program, maximize utilization of development space and current list of available
sites, encourage land owners to maintain their properties, & consider residential development.
Financial Impact:
None.
Summary
INH Properties is proposing to build a 128 -unit apartment building, requiring multiple planning
approvals, including rezoning the properties from B-3 Highway Business to PUD Planned Unit
Development.
A Public Hearing was held on June 24, 2019.
Mounds View Comprehensive Plan (2008), Figure 6: Future Land Use Map
Note: The Draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan guides the properties as Mixed Use.
Item 08B
Page 2 of 4
Planning Commission Recommendation:
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning at its June 19, 2019 meeting
(Resolution 1097-19).
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the Council conduct a Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 958.
Respectfully,
Ar'ecisxv
Jon Sevald, AICP
Community Development Director
Attachments
1. Zoning Map
2. Aerial Map
3. Ordinance 958
The Mounds View Vision
A Thriving Desirable Community
Item O8B
Page 3 of 4
Zoning Map
Ii40I""'I
CITY sans 'sal
3 HAL
//�� aa11 asly 7111
�4
- �
0 ago-
� PUD 5a46 sem- —
e3aa
iknl
PUD sa
e -a
7QA4 {j,a
0258 7Q4, OYBf 5 lIQOE 926 0-3
yr5a ti � s@s7 5277
a �w PUC
5239 32,74
`+ 14 5237 *232 a CLEAWqEW AVE
}231 5224 S2}i Y 0240 0261 .DQE gpll
S rc. L %;tea
',IZI 041 927 a,'Ta 9241} S 9710 pio 7Y ?#14
n
5@i
�L 1.1030 1234 sr.+o 9 5934
Pw w w St# a224 a32032 ai
aYOa
°aa
g � ry a214 a27 1214 a2+ 121 027 Ss1
� � 74 �. � w a�oo a s2a4 s2n1 also
51
SI
*000&E
51
w
L1
5'18 07 1 1
51
3147
61716 6714
a1
51
51
1'-05 Si7S
3148 5,
611
61
5'}4 566 '
37'A S1ru
al
S11
5122 5'405140 EdEW00d '
B-1
y1
5.12c 3'#4 Si so- s, ,IR. HIGH
CONSERVANCY, RECREATION & PRESERVATION
�q1 gS
dJ x:_6141
510S.SCHOOL
ARE R-1 DISTRICTS
_
6016
o1€n a a+
I
:444
n wn i 91{0
6071
.5750 5075` '
.Y.T.I Y.T1 1
6019
SC97.I 'S
d _f _
Sues 5031 57}.
--
1 Cl�CRIR
7
- R-1
SINGLE—FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
3-2
LIMITED BUSINESS
R-2
SINGLE & TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
3-3
HIGHWAY BUSINESS
R-3
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
B -A
REGIONAL BUSINESS
R-4
HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
1-1
INDUSTRIAL
R-5
MOBILE HOME
PF
PUBLIC FACILITIES
R -O
RESIDENTIAL/OFFICE
PUD
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
B-1
NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS
CRP
CONSERVANCY, RECREATION & PRESERVATION
• AREAS N07 LABELED
ARE R-1 DISTRICTS
The Mounds View Vision
A Thriving Desirable Community
Item 08B
Page 4 of 4
The Mounds View Vision
A Thriving Desirable Community
Aerial Map
ORDINANCE NO. 958
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP, REZONING 2390 AND 2394
MOUNDS VIEW BOULEVARD, AND 2400 COUNTY ROAD H2, FROM B-3
HIGHWAY BUSINESS TO PUD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, the Zoning Map was established on May 1, 1980 in the Mounds View City
Code, Chapter 1105.02, and may be amended by the City Council from time to time; and,
WHEREAS, INH Property Management Inc, representing the property owner; Mounds
View Economic Development Authority, is requesting to rezone the subject properties; legally
described as:
Address
PID
Legal Description
Current
Zoning
Proposed
Zoning
2400
08-30-23-31-0005
The North 363 feet of the West 330 feet of the
B-3
PUD
County
Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 8,
Road H2
Township 30, Range 23, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
2394
08-30-23-31-0071
That part of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4
B-3
PUD
Mounds
of Section 8, Township 30, Range 23, Ramsey County,
View Blvd
Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the
intersection of the East line of the West 330 feet and
the South line of the North 365.46 feet of said
Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4; thence North
parallel with the West line of said Northeast 1/4 of
the Southwest 1/4 a distance of 255 feet; thence East
parallel with the North line of said Northeast 1/4 of
the Southwest 1/4 a distance of 47.07 feet; thence
Southeasterly to the intersection of the East line of
the West 475 feet and the South line of the North
193.01 feet of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest
1/4; thence South parallel with the West line of said
Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 and to the South
line of the North 365.46 feet thereof; thence West to
the point of beginning, according to the United States
Government Survey thereof and situate in Ramsey
County, Minnesota. Together with a non-exclusive
easement for driveway purposes, 25 feet in width,
over and across part of the Northeast 1/4 of the
Southwest 1/4 of Section 8, Township 30, Range 23,
Ramsey County, Minnesota, the South and
Southwesterly lines of which are described as
Ordinance 958
Page 2 of 4
follows: Beginning at the intersection of the East line
of the West 360 feet and the South line of the North
110.46 feet of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest
1/4; thence East parallel with the North line of said
Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 a distance of
17.07 feet; thence Southeasterly to the First
American Title Insurance Company intersection of
the East line of the West 475 feet and the South line
of the North 193.01 feet of said Northeast 1/4 of the
Southwest 1/4; and said line there terminating.
2390
08-30-23-31-0072
That part of the North 365.46 feet of the NE % of the
B-3
PUD
Mounds
SW % of Section 8, Township 30, Range 23, Ramsey
View Blvd
County, Minnesota lying Southwesterly of the center
line of State Trunk Highway No. 10 except the West
330 feet there of and except that part described as
follows: Beginning at the intersection of the East line
of the West 330 feet and the South line of the North
365.46 feet of said NE % of the SW %; thence North
parallel with the West line of said NE % of the SW % a
distance of 255 feet; thence East parallel with the
North line of said NE % of the SW % a distance of
47.07 feet; thence Southeasterly to the intersection
of the East line of the West 475 feet and the South
line of the North 193.01 feet of said NE % of the SW
%; thence South parallel with the West line of said NE
of the SW % and to the South line of the North
365.46 feet thereof; thence West to the point of
beginning. Together with a non-exclusive easement
for driveway purposes over and across the South 31
feet of the North 345.46 feet of the East 115 feet of
the West 475 feet of the NE % of the SW % of Section
8, Township 30, Range 23, Ramsey Comity,
Minnesota. Together with a non-exclusive easement
for parking purposes over and across the East 10 feet
of that part of the NE % of the SW % of Section 8,
Township 30, Range 23, Ramsey County, Minnesota
described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of
the East line of the West 330feet and the South line
of the North 365.46 feet of said NE % of the SW %;
thence North parallel with the West line of said NE
of the SW % a distance of 255 feet; thence East
parallel with the North line of said NE % of the SW % a
distance of 47.07 feet; thence Southeasterly to the
intersection of the East line of the West 475 feet and
the South line of the North 193.01 feet of said NE
of the SW %; thence South parallel with the West line
of sad NE % of the SW % and to the South line of the
365.46 feet thereof; thence West to the point of
beginning. Together with an easement for utility
purposes over, under and across the South 10 feet of
the North 314.46 feet of the East 115 feet of the
Ordinance 958
Page 3 of 4
West 475 feet of the NE Y. of the SW % of Section 8,
Township 30, Range 23, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the properties are within the County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District;
and,
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission recommended approval of the
Zoning Map Amendment (Resolution 1197-19); and,
WHEREAS, the City Council held a dully noticed Public Hearing on June 24, 2019; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View City Council has
considered possible adverse effects of the proposed Zoning Map Amendment, and makes the
following Findings (italics):
1. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan.
Findings: These properties are guided for Mixed Use — PUD in the Comprehensive
Plan (2008). The proposed use; multi family residential, is consistent with
the residential component of the Mixed Use PUD future land use
designation.
2. The geographical area involved.
Findings: The geographical area is conducive to a Residential PUD.
3. Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed.
Findings: The proposed rezoning from B-3 Highway Business to PUD Planned Unit
Development has no demonstrated effect on surrounding property values.
4. The character pf the surrounding area.
Findings: The character of the surrounding area includes a mix of commercial
(restaurant, liquor store, auto dealership), multi family residential
(apartments, senior independent & assisted living), and single-family
attached and detached residential. The proposed Zoning Map amendment
is consistent with this mix of uses.
5. The demonstrated need for such use.
Findings: The proposed use is a 128 -unit market -rate apartment building, to be
developed as a Planned Unit Development.
Ordinance 958
Page 4 of 4
INH Properties commissioned a market study, completed by Viewpoint
Consulting Group; entitled, "Demand Assessment for Market Rate Rental
Housing in Mounds View, Minnesota ", dated April 23, 2018.
The study suggests an unmet market rate rental demand of 866 units
within the Mounds View Prime Market Area, generally including all or
portions of; Arden Hills, Blaine, Circle Pines, Columbia Heights, Coon
Rapids, Fridley, Lexington, Mounds View, New Brighton, Saint Anthony
Village, Shoreview, and Spring Lake Park. The study recommends 130 —
140 units be developed on the subject properties, capturing 15% - 20% of
that demand, between years 2017 — 2022.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, In accordance with Section
3.07 of the City Charter, City staff shall have the following summary printed in the official City
newspaper in lieu of the complete ordinance:
On July 8, 2019, the City Council adopted Ordinance 958, amending the Official Zoning
Map, from B-3 Highway Business to PUD Planned Unit Development, for properties
located at 2390 Mounds View Boulevard, 2394 Mounds View Boulevard, and 2400
County Road H2. This project is commonly known as Crossroad Pointe.
A printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection during regular business hours
at Mounds View City Hall and is available on line at the City's web site located at
www.moundsviewmn.org.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, This ordinance shall take effect
and be in force 30 days from and after its passage and publication, in accordance with Section
3.09 of the City Charter.
Introduction and First Reading by the Mounds View City Council on June 24, 2019.
Second Reading and Adoption by the Mounds View City Council on July 8, 2019.
Publication Date: July 17, 2019.
Carol A. Mueller, Mayor
Attest:
Nyle Zikmund
City Administrator
(SEAL)
Item No: 08C
Meeting Date: July 8, 2019
MOUNDS
VIEW
Type of Business: Council Business
City Administrator Review:
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Jon Sevald, Community Development Director
Item Title/Subject: Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 959, Amending
Section 1104.02, Subd 4(c) (Minimum Floor Area Per Dwelling
Unit) (Planning Case MU2019-001)
Introduction:
INH Properties is proposing to develop a 128 -unit apartment building at the south corner of
Mounds View Boulevard and County Road H2. The project involves multiple planning
applications, including a request to amend the City Code to allow Studio Apartments.
Discussion:
The proposed apartments will include a mix of studios, one -bedroom, two-bedroom, and three-
bedroom units. The City Code establishes a minimum floor area based on the number of
bedrooms. The Code does not recognize studio apartments, thus, Staff has interpreted a studio
the same as a one -bedroom unit.
Minimum dwelling size (sq ft):
The Building Code allows for Efficiency Units, 120 sq ft for one -occupant, and 220 sq ft for two
occupants.2 However, the City Code takes precedence over the Building Code in this instance.
The Zoning Code allows Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU), 300 sq ft in size.
For comparison, regarding minimum dwelling size for apartments:
Minimum
Required'
Minimum
Proposed
Studio
630
526
1 -Bedroom
630
762
2 -Bedroom
750
1,057
3 -Bedroom
870
1,352
The Building Code allows for Efficiency Units, 120 sq ft for one -occupant, and 220 sq ft for two
occupants.2 However, the City Code takes precedence over the Building Code in this instance.
The Zoning Code allows Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU), 300 sq ft in size.
For comparison, regarding minimum dwelling size for apartments:
'City Code, Section 1104.02, Subd 4(c) (Minimum Floor Area Per Dwelling Unit)
'International Property Maintenance Code section 404.6
'City of Blaine City Code, Part 3, Section 29.66 (Standards — Multiple dwelling). Note: for Elderly units, the
minimum dwelling size is; Efficiency: 440 sf, One -Bedroom; 520 sf; Two -Bedroom: 700 sf.
'Note: According to Blaine Staff, all recent apartments have been developed as PUD's, allowing flexibility from
these standards.
Studio
1 -Bedroom
2 -Bedroom
3 -Bedroom
Blaine3
600 sf°
600 sf
720 sf
840 sf
Fridley
400 sf
520 sf
650 sf
775 sf
New Brighton
500 sf
650 sf
800 sf
1,000 sf
Shoreview
-
-
-
-
'City Code, Section 1104.02, Subd 4(c) (Minimum Floor Area Per Dwelling Unit)
'International Property Maintenance Code section 404.6
'City of Blaine City Code, Part 3, Section 29.66 (Standards — Multiple dwelling). Note: for Elderly units, the
minimum dwelling size is; Efficiency: 440 sf, One -Bedroom; 520 sf; Two -Bedroom: 700 sf.
'Note: According to Blaine Staff, all recent apartments have been developed as PUD's, allowing flexibility from
these standards.
Item 08B
Page 2 of 3
Strategic Plan Strategy/Goal:
N/A.
Financial Impact:
None.
Summary
INH Properties is proposing to build a 128 -unit apartment building, and is requesting an
amendment to the Zoning Code to reduce the minimum unit size, from 630 sq ft, to 526 sq ft.
A Public Hearing was held on June 24, 2019.
Planning Commission Recommendation:
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Ordinance Amendment at its June 19,
2019 meeting (Resolution 1098-19).
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the Council conduct a Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance 959.
Respectfully,
Ar, 4QO
Jon Sevald, AICP
Community Development Director
Attachments
1. Example of Studio Apartments (Crossroad Pointe)
2. Ordinance 959
The Mounds View Vision
A Thriving Desirable Community
Item 08B
Page 3 of 3
Example of Studio Apartments (Crossroad Pointe)
UNIT 'tµ . B" FLOORr�� PLAN UNITerµ "B.I" FLOOR mer PLAN........�
wi m s"mu ne^' LOG
The Mounds View Vision
A Thriving Desirable Community
ORDINANCE NO. 959
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 1100, CHAPTER 1104 OF THE MOUNDS VIEW
CITY CODE RELATING TO MINIMUM FLOOR AREA PER DWELLING UNIT
THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Mounds View hereby amends Title 1100, Chapter
1104, Section 1104.02 of the Mounds View Municipal Code by adding the double -underlined
material and deleting the sin material as follows:
Subd. 4. Minimum Floor Area Per Dwelling Unit:
C. Multiple Dwelling Units: Living units classified as multiple dwellings shall have
the following minimum floor areas per unit:
Less than (1) bedroom unit 520 square feet
(1) One (1) bedroom units 630 square feet
(2) Two (2) bedroom units 750 square feet
(3) More than two (2) bedroom units - an additional one hundred twenty (120)
square feet for each additional bedroom.
SECTION 2. In accordance with Section 3.07 of the City Charter, City staff shall have the
following summary printed in the official City newspaper in lieu of the complete ordinance:
On July 8, 2019, the City Council adopted Ordinance 959 that amends Title 1100,
Chapter 1104, of the Mounds View City Code, relating to the minimum floor area per
dwelling unit.
A printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection during regular business hours at
Mounds View City Hall and is available on line at the City's web site located at
www.moundsviewmn.org.
Ordinance 959
Page 2 of 2
SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage and
publication, in accordance with Section 3.09 of the City Charter.
Introduction and First Reading by the Mounds View City Council on June 24, 2019.
Second Reading and Adoption by the Mounds View City Council on July 8, 2019.
Publication Date: July 17, 2019.
Carol A. Mueller, Mayor
Attest:
Nyle Zikmund
City Administrator
(SEAL)
Item No: 08D
Meeting Date: July 8, 2019
Type of Business: Council BusinessMOTVDS VIEW
City Administrator Review:
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Jon Sevald, Community Development Director
Item Title/Subject: Resolution 9132, Approving a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a
Residential Planned Unit Development of Crossroad Pointe
(Planning Case MU2019-001)
Introduction:
INH Properties is proposing to develop a 128 -unit apartment building at the south corner of
Mounds View Boulevard and County Road H2. The project involves multiple planning
applications, including a request for a CUP for a PUD, and a Development Review. To simplify
this process, the CUP and Development Review have been combined into one Resolution.
This item was Tabled at the June 24, 2019 Council meeting, with the intent that the Council
would take action on all Crossroad Pointe items at the same meeting.
Discussion:
Within a PUD district, a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) may be issued for a Residential PUD,
Commercial/Industrial PUD, or Mixed -Use PUD, subject to an approved "PUD Narrative" which
establishes project restrictions (e.g. refers to the approved site plan, landscaping, building design
& materials, etc.).
A Development Review is required for projects which include building projects of 10,000 sq ft or
greater, or building additions of 10% or greater (excluding single-family homes). The proposed
apartments will be 144,934 sq ft in total area.
In general, the process of approving a PUD is a give & take. The City approves variations (gives)
from standard City Code requirements, in return for (takes) higher standards in building and site
design than the minimum required by the City Code. PUD's are intended to allow flexibility, within
the limits of the PUD Narrative.
Analysis:
Project Size
4.06 acres (minimum 3 -acres required as a PUD).
Zoning
The property is proposed to be zoned PUD, and is within the County Road 10 Corridor Overlay
District. The overlay district has greater standards for building design and landscaping, which
may be superseded as a PUD.
Comprehensive Plan
The property is guided for Mixed -Use PUD in the Comprehensive Plan (2008), and is guided as
Mixed -Use in the Draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Draft Plan identifies the residential
component of Mixed Use to have a density of 15 to 30 units per acre (31.53 units per acre is the
proposed density).
Item 08D
Page 2 of 11
Density
31.5 units per acre is the proposed density. As a PUD, a higher density may be approved.
Without a PUD (R-4 district), the maximum density would be 17.4 units per acre, or 71 units for
a property this size.
The apartments will have an estimated 221 residents', including 20 school aged children2.
Open Space'
Usable Open Space is intended to be maintained for active or passive recreation (e.g. play area
and/or woods). The proposed Landscape Plan identifies all non -pervious surfaces as Open
Space, rather than that intended for recreation.
Min Required Proposed PUD
625 sf per unit 461 sf per unit
With the increased density and necessary parking, there are limits to how much land is left for
open space. If the project were not a PUD, and the maximum 71 units built, about 1 -acre of
open space would be required for the 4 -acre project.
The project will add a sidewalk along County Road H2, and along the south property line. There
is an existing sidewalk along Edgewood Drive, and a trail along Mounds View Boulevard.
These are public sidewalks/trails, and will be maintained by the City.
Exterior Lighting
Glare from exterior lighting shall be limited to 1 foot-candle (fc) measured at the centerline of the
street, and 0.4 fc measured from neighboring property lines. The lighting plan submitted does
not include all of these boundaries (e.g. centerline of Edgewood Drive, County Road H2, and
residential boundaries along Edgewood Drive.
Lighting along the south property line adjacent to the neighboring apartment building exceeds
the maximum light trespass by 3X (1.8 fc proposed). Staff recommends that this pole be
eliminated, or an alternative fixture be considered.
During the Planning Commission's June 19th meeting, the Developer stated that an adjustable
box shade will be installed. The Developer will measure the amount of light trespass after the
lights are installed, and will adjust the shade accordingly, to comply with the City Code.
The project site includes existing street lights at the intersections of Co Rd H2 & Edgewood Dr,
and County Road H2 & Mounds View Blvd. These will be kept as -is, as well as the ornamental
lights along the Mounds View Blvd trail.
Estimates based on Metropolitan Council estimates for persons per household, for multi -family dwellings, based
on number of bedrooms per unit.
Estimate based on Metropolitan Council estimates, using the 2017 American Community Survey Public Use
Microdata Sample; 0-1 bedroom unit = 0.019491 children; 2 bedrooms = 0.29903 children; 3 or more bedrooms =
0.70972 children.
3 City Code, Section 1102.02, Subd 127 (Usable Open Space)
The Mounds View Visiot_
A Thriving Desirable Commit,«iy
Item 08D
Page 3 of 11
Landscaping
Minimum Landscapinga s:
Min Reauired Proposed PUD
Deciduous shade tree 236 11
Coniferous tree 237 24
Shrub 1568 157
Ornamental tree 239 29
Additional shade trees may be considered along the south property line (SE area of property), if
the overhead power line is buried. Staff recommends that this (more trees) be a judgement call
made on-site during construction.
During the Planning Commission's June 5` Work Session, and June 19th Meeting, the Dog Run
was discussed. The Developer agreed that a 4' ornamental fence would be installed (chain-link
shown on plans).
The project will include two Stormwater infiltration basins, located in the southeast corner, and
along Edgewood Dr, between the Dog Run and the private tot lot. The basins are designed to
hold water during storm events, and should be dry otherwise. The basins will have a 3:1 slope.
The bottom of the basins will be 8' below grade. The 3:1 slope is within an acceptable range,
however, Staff is concerned about the appearance of the western basin, because of its close
proximity to the sidewalk and tot lot. Staff recommends that additional landscaping be installed
as a buffer, but that this be a judgement call made on-site during construction. Other
Stormwater storage will occur in underground chambers below the parking lot.
During the June 24th Public Hearing, a resident asked about pollinator friendly landscaping. The
Developer stated they could add this. Staff recommends that pollinator friendly grass/flower
seed be installed in the stromwater infiltration basins, and in the areas between the private
sidewalk and the building (e.g. areas under the decks).
Snow Storage
There is no firm plan for on-site snow storage, without displacing parking stalls. The Developer
has discussed hauling snow off-site, as necessary.
Off -Street Parking
Guideline # of stalls10 Proposed stalls
Garage 128 128
Parking Lot 192 133
TOTAL 320 261
" City Code, Section 1120.02, Subd 10 (Landscaping)
5 City Code, Section 1127.05 (Landscaping)
6 One overstory deciduous shade tree for every 2,000 sq ft of the total building footprint, e.g. 46,845 sq ft foot print
= 23 deciduous trees.
One coniferous tree for every 2,000 sq ft of building or one coniferous tree for every 200 feet of site perimeter,
whichever is greater, e.g. 23 coniferous trees if building footprint, or 9 trees if 1,799' site perimeter (23 is greater
number).
8 One understory shrub for every 300 sq ft of building, or one shrub for every 30' of site perimeter, whichever is
greater, (156 shrubs if using building footprint, or 60 shrubs if using site perimeter).
9 One ornamental tree for every 2,000 sq ft of building or one ornamental tree for every 200' of site perimeter,
whichever is greater, (e.g. 23 ornamental trees or 9).
11 City Code, Section 1121.13 (Schedule of Off -Street Parking Requirements; Multiple -family dwellings)
The Mounds View Vision
A Thriving Desirable Commit,«ty
Item 08D
Page 4 of 11
The parking to apartment ratio is 2.04 spaces per unit (2.5 required if outside of the County
Road 10 overlay district). Staff's opinion is that two spaces per unit is adequate.
Bike storage will be accommodated within the parking garage.
During the June 24th Council meeting, Staff expressed a concern about the 16'-6" setback of the
parking lot (SE corner). The Developer agreed to match the parking lot setback to that of the
building (27'), resulting in the loss of one or two parking stalls.
Traffic & Access
A traffic study has not been required.
There is one driveway into the property, on Edgewood Drive. The Driveway is situated such
that headlights should not impact homes across the street.
The Developer has agreed to install an emergency access at the Greenfield Ave. hammerhead.
This will feature a geo-tech surface, allowing fire trucks access into the parking lot from
Greenfield Ave., but will appear as grass growing through the geo-tech material.
Building Setbacks
Min Required Proposed PUD
Mounds View Blvd 5' * 27'
Co Rd H2 30'
Edgewood Rd 30'
South 50'
17'
66' ***
57'
* Maximum setback is 5' along Mounds View Blvd. � � Staff is supportive of the proposed 27' setback to
allow for landscaping.
** 0' setback for patio and stairs to the community deck along Co Rd H2. As a PUD, the City Council
may grant a lesser building setback.
*** 56' setback for stairs/deck, along Edgewood Dr.
Building Height
The building will have 3-storeis above a 1 -story garage. Building height is 55' from garage floor
to roof peak. The grade will be built up such that the garage will be partially underground in
some areas (e.g. south building entrance, and along County Road H2).
The maximum building height allowed in Mounds View is 3 -stories, unless a PUD.
Exterior Building Material
At least 50% of all exterior wall finishes on any building must be comprised of a combination of
at least two of the following materials 12:
Required Material *Comparable Proposed (total %)
Brick Cultured Brick 30%
Natural Stone or Cultured Stone
Glass
Masonry Stucco
Other comparable materials*
TOTAL
14.5%
19.5%
0%
Board & Batten Panel 7.25%
Textured Lap Siding 18.5%
89.75%
" City Code, Section 1129.05, Subd 3 (Building and Parking Setback Requirements)
City Code, Section 1129.05, Subd 1 (Construction Materials)
The Mounds View Visiot_
A Thriving Desirable Commit,«iy
Item 08D
Page 5 of 11
Signage
Ground Signs are proposed to be located at the NE corner (200 sq ft), and NW corner (40 sf).
Within the City Code, signage may be determined through a PUD Narrative. If no Narrative
exists, signage shall comply with the B-3 district (e.g. 200 sq ft ground sign, maximum height of
16').
Staff recommends that signage comply with the R-4 district; allowing grounds signs of 32 sq ft in
area, and height of 8'. Staff is supportive of allowing two grounds signs.
Dwelling Size
An Ordinance Amendment has been proposed to allow studios to be 520 sq ft in size.
Construction Timeline
Construction is planned, Fall 2019 thru Spring 2021.
During the Planning Commission's June 51" Work Session, it was asked about construction
hours. The City Code follows state noise standards 14. The Developer stated construction
would occur 7:00 AM - 7:00 PM.
PUD Narrative:
The intent of a PUD Narrative is to interpret drawings into a text format, which clarifies the
approved variations from the City Code, allowed as a PUD. The Narrative is used by Staff when
reviewing plans after the project is constructed, e.g. 20 or 30 years from now, when the owner
requests to replace a sign, or re -side the building, etc.
A DRAFT PUD Narrative is attached. It is Staff's intent that assuming the Council approves the
Resolution as written, the Developer will then update the Site Plan, to be included in a final PUD
Narrative. The final narrative will not need to be re -approved by the Council.
Summary:
INH Properties proposes to build a 128 -unit apartment building on property zoned PUD, and
subject to approval of a CUP for a Residential PUD and a Development Review.
As mentioned earlier, approving a PUD is a give and take process. As a PUD, the City Council
may grant deviations from the City Code. Proposed deviations include:
'3 City Code, Section 1104.02, Subd 4(c) (Minimum Floor Area Per Dwelling Unit)
'a MN Rule 7030.0040 (Noise Standards) establishes maximum levels for daytime (7:00 AM — 10:00 PM) and
nighttime activities, based on the type of land use. For example, residential properties (Noise Area Classification
1). This means that during the one-hour period of monitoring, daytime noise levels cannot exceed 65 dBA for
more than 10% of the time or 60 dBA more than 50% of the time. 60dBA is the equivalent of the volume of
normal speech. 90 dBA is the equivalent of a lawnmower.
The Mounds View Vision
A Thriving Desirable Community
Minimum
Required 13
Minimum
Proposed
Studio
630
526
1 -Bedroom
630
762
2 -Bedroom
750
1,057
3 -Bedroom
870
1,352
An Ordinance Amendment has been proposed to allow studios to be 520 sq ft in size.
Construction Timeline
Construction is planned, Fall 2019 thru Spring 2021.
During the Planning Commission's June 51" Work Session, it was asked about construction
hours. The City Code follows state noise standards 14. The Developer stated construction
would occur 7:00 AM - 7:00 PM.
PUD Narrative:
The intent of a PUD Narrative is to interpret drawings into a text format, which clarifies the
approved variations from the City Code, allowed as a PUD. The Narrative is used by Staff when
reviewing plans after the project is constructed, e.g. 20 or 30 years from now, when the owner
requests to replace a sign, or re -side the building, etc.
A DRAFT PUD Narrative is attached. It is Staff's intent that assuming the Council approves the
Resolution as written, the Developer will then update the Site Plan, to be included in a final PUD
Narrative. The final narrative will not need to be re -approved by the Council.
Summary:
INH Properties proposes to build a 128 -unit apartment building on property zoned PUD, and
subject to approval of a CUP for a Residential PUD and a Development Review.
As mentioned earlier, approving a PUD is a give and take process. As a PUD, the City Council
may grant deviations from the City Code. Proposed deviations include:
'3 City Code, Section 1104.02, Subd 4(c) (Minimum Floor Area Per Dwelling Unit)
'a MN Rule 7030.0040 (Noise Standards) establishes maximum levels for daytime (7:00 AM — 10:00 PM) and
nighttime activities, based on the type of land use. For example, residential properties (Noise Area Classification
1). This means that during the one-hour period of monitoring, daytime noise levels cannot exceed 65 dBA for
more than 10% of the time or 60 dBA more than 50% of the time. 60dBA is the equivalent of the volume of
normal speech. 90 dBA is the equivalent of a lawnmower.
The Mounds View Vision
A Thriving Desirable Community
Item 08D
Page 6 of 11
1. Increased density (+ 57 units).
2. Decreased over -story shade trees (- 12).
3. Decreased open space (- 0.48 acres).
4. Decreased minimum building setbacks along County Road H2 (- 13'), and increased
maximum setbacks along Mounds View Boulevard (+ 22').
5. Increased glare from exterior lighting along the south property line adjacent to the
neighboring apartment building (+ 1.4 fc).
6. Increased building height (+ one story).
As a PUD, the project exceeds the minimum standards in the following areas:
1. Increased exterior finishes (+ 40%).
2. Increased pedestrian access (e.g. sidewalks).
3. Private amenities viewable from public roads which enhance a "sense of community" at
this corner (common areas = patios, decks, outdoor seating, playground, dog run, etc.)
4. The architecture of the building complements that of the neighboring Bel Rae Senior
Living.
A Public Hearing was held June 24, 2019. Public comments included questions and answers
about private amenities to be provided to renters; opposition to a non -mixed-use development,
as this was the intent of the Comprehensive Plan; opposition to adding more apartments, when
restaurants are needed; and opposition to closing Greenfield Avenue.
The Developer provided a list of private amenities to be included. In comparing Crossroad
Pointe to other suburban projects mentioned, Crossroad Pointe will not have a pool or dedicated
unit for short-term rentals (e.g. nightly), but will be similar in character to most modern
apartments.
It has been Staff's experience in marketing this property for several years that vertical mixed-
use (apartments above retail) is not practical at this site.
Strategic Plan Strategy/Goal:
Continue BR&E program, maximize utilization of development space and current list of available
sites, encourage land owners to maintain their properties, & consider residential development.
Financial Impact:
None.
Planning Commission Recommendation:
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the CUP for a Residential PUD, and
Development Review at its June 19, 2019 meeting (Resolution 1099-19).
The Mounds View Vision
A Thriving Desirable Community
Item 08D
Page 7 of 11
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the CUP and Development Review, pending updated plans are
submitted, and a DRAFT PUD Narrative is finalized.
Staff recommends the following changes to plans submitted May 30, 2019:
1. Exterior Lighting:
Remove or modify an exterior light in the parking lot which causes
light trespass exceeding the City's lighting standards. (decision should
be made on-site after the building and parking lot are built).
2. Dog Run:
4' chain-link fence be changed to 4' ornamental fence.
3. Over -story Trees:
Consider additional trees along the project perimeter (decision should
be made on-site after the building and parking lot are built).
4. Infiltration Basin:
Consider installing additional landscaping as a buffer between the
west Stormwater infiltration basin, and the Edgewood Drive sidewalk
and private tot lot (decision should be made on-site after the building
and improvements are installed).
5. Fire Access:
Consider emergency access between Greenfield Ave hammerhead,
and parking lot.
6. Parking Lot Setback:
The parking lot setback to match the building setback (27') in the SE
corner, resulting in the loss of one or two parking stalls.
7. Pollinator Friendly:
Seeding native grasses and wild flowers in; (1) Stormwater infiltration
basins; and (2) areas between the private sidewalk and building
(areas near/under decks).
Respectfully submitted,
04
Jon Seva d, AICP
Community Development Director
Attachments
1. Aerial Map
2. Site Photos
3. PUD Narrative (DRAFT)
4. Resolution 9132
5. StarTribune Article, Suburban leaders allowing larger, denser developments in this building
boom, Jun 1, 2019
6. Plan set, submitted May 30, 2019
The Mounds View Vision
A Thriving Desirable Community
Item 08D
Page 8 of 11
Aerial Map
The Mounds View Vision
A Thriving Desirable Community
jL
4
end
2
d
._
o
2
d
Item 08D
Page 10 of 11
View from Edgewood Dr, looking north (hoe's), (May 29, 2019)
View from Co Rd H2 & Edgewood Dr, looking south (May 29, 2019)
The Mounds View Vision
A Thriving Desirable Community
Item 08D
Page 11 of 11
View from Co Rd H2 & Greenwood Dr, looking south (May 29, 2019)
1 View of Bel Rae (left) and Brentwood Terrace (right), looking SE (May 29, 2019)
The Mounds View Vision
A Thriving Desirable Community
Crossroad Pointe PUD Narrative
Vicinity Map / PUD Area
COUNTY ROAO 41 . -\
O
NI ti
o � �
3
3 }�
111 \
q�
A 128 JNIT 4 STORYY 61�.��� (D scTE PLAN
4PAPTYENT SIIILCING ale. eav
LITH '28 GARAGE STALLS
5 i
1.
Purpose'
The general purpose of this PUD Narrative is to provide the City of Mounds View (City) and
Crossroads Pointe MV, LLC (Applicant) clarification of Approved variations from the City
Code that is allowed as a Planned Unit Development (PUD). Where there is a conflict
between this document and the City Code, this document shall take precedence. If a
question or topic of regulation arises which is not addressed by this document, then the
regulation shall be addressed as if the property were zoned R-4 High Density Residential.
Because zoning regulations change from time to time, if the purpose of the R-4 district or its
regulations significantly changes (as of 2019), then the City Administrator or their designee
may interpret and determine, at their discretion.
2.
Legal Descriptions (proposed):
Lot 1, Block 1, Crossroad Pointe
3.
Zoning:
PUD — Planned Unit Development (Residential)
4.
Permitted Use:
Multi -Family Residential
5.
Site Data:
1 Note: It is the intent that this DRAFT PUD Narrative may be revised for clarity (not substance), after review by
the Developer, City Staff and consultants, prior to a Final PUD Narrative being signed.
Crossroad Pointe PUD Narrative Mounds View Planning Case MU2019-001
Page 1 of 5
Crossroad Pointe PUD Narrative
2 Note: 133 stalls likely to be reduced to 132 or 131, pending revised site plan to reduce parking lot setback to
match that of the building.
Crossroad Pointe PUD Narrative Mounds View Planning Case MU2019-001
Page 2 of 5
Total Land Area: 4.06 acres
Total Building Footprint: 186,934 square feet
6.
Dimensional Requirements:
Minimum Building Setbacks 17' North (County Road H)
27' East (Mounds View Boulevard)
50' South
66' West (Edgewood Drive)
Building Height 4 -stories
Parking Setbacks 27' (east)
11' (south)
Parking Requirements 2:1 parking ratio (one indoor + one outdoor parking
stall, per unit).
NOTE: Proposed parking includes 126 indoor, and
1332 outdoor parking stalls (2.04:1 ratio). The intent
of requiring 2:1 ratio (vs. 2.04:1) is to allow some
variation (e.g. -5 stalls) in the event that the
displacement of parking stalls for another use is
necessary (e.g. to provide space for an unforeseen
amenity).
7.
PUD Review Process
Application Conference:
The Applicant (INH Properties, precursor to Crossroads Pointe MV, LLC) met with City Staff
on numerous occasions, beginning on or about July, 2017. Discussions about the current
all -apartment concept occurred on or about July, 2018.
Concept Plan:
The PUD concept plan (aka Sketch Plan) was reviewed by the Planning Commission on
January 16, 2019, and by the City Council on February 4, 2019. Commissioners and
Councilmembers provided individual opinions. The City Council provided a consensus to
close Greenfield Avenue through the project area, such that all vehicular access is to be
from Edgewood Drive.
Development Stage, and Final Plan:
This process (Conditional Use Permit for a PUD, and Development Review) is intended to
occur concurrently with the review and approval of the Preliminary Plat. Any topic which
cannot be addressed through this process, is intended to be addressed through the Final
Plat or through a Development Agreement.
2 Note: 133 stalls likely to be reduced to 132 or 131, pending revised site plan to reduce parking lot setback to
match that of the building.
Crossroad Pointe PUD Narrative Mounds View Planning Case MU2019-001
Page 2 of 5
Crossroad Pointe PUD Narrative
' Note: it is the intent that the Developer will revise the Landscape plan, pending Council approval on July 8, 2019,
adding wild grass & flower seeding in areas; (1) stormwater infiltration basins; and (2) areas between private
sidewalk and building (near/under decks).
Crossroad Pointe PUD Narrative Mounds View Planning Case MU2019-001
Page 3 of 5
8.
Accessory Buildings, Outdoor Storage
No Accessory Buildings shall be permitted. No Outdoor Storage shall be permitted, other
than ancillary recreational equipment.
9.
Landscaping
All landscaping shall be consistent with the landscape plan (p. L010), included in the City
Council's July 8, 2019 packet, to be revised as detailed in the July 8, 2019 City Council Staff
Report.'
It is the intent that after the building is built and landscaping is installed (e.g. within one
year after), Staff and the Developer shall inspect the property, and determine if additional
landscaping is necessary; (1) as a buffer between the Edgewood Road sidewalk and
Stormwater retention basin; and (2) along the south property line; and (3) elsewhere as
agreed upon between City Staff and the developer.
10.
Drainage
All on-site drainage shall comply with Rice Creek Watershed District permit requirements,
and the City Code.
11.
Exterior Lighting
All exterior lighting shall comply with the City Code.
12.
Garbage and Recycling Dumpsters
All garbage and recycling dumpsters shall be stored internally (e.g. inside the garage), and
may be temporally (24 -hours) stored outside within an enclosed area as identified on the
Site Plan, on the day of pick-up.
13.
Site Maintenance, Snow Storage & Removal
All grounds will be maintained by the owner, and in compliance with City Codes. Snow
Storage may occur on the property such that it does not displace the demand for on-site
parking. When displacement of demand for on-site parking occurs, the Owner shall remove
stored snow from the site.
14.
Signage
All signage shall comply with the City Code, R-4 zoning district, except that there may be
two ground signs, each measuring the maximum size permitted.
15.
Architectural Character
' Note: it is the intent that the Developer will revise the Landscape plan, pending Council approval on July 8, 2019,
adding wild grass & flower seeding in areas; (1) stormwater infiltration basins; and (2) areas between private
sidewalk and building (near/under decks).
Crossroad Pointe PUD Narrative Mounds View Planning Case MU2019-001
Page 3 of 5
Crossroad Pointe PUD Narrative
Crossroad Pointe PUD Narrative Mounds View Planning Case MU2019-001
Page 4 of 5
Architectural character shall be consistent with plans included in the July 8, 2019 City
Council packet. These drawings are undated, but were received May 31, 2019 (exterior
elevations, and 3D renderings).
16.
Access; On -Site Construction
Temporary construction access may be permitted through the Mounds View Public Works
Department. Permanent access will be through Edgewood Drive. Emergency access may be
through Greenfield Avenue, as approved by the SBM Fire Chief, and Public Works Director.
17.
Sidewalks and Trailways
Public sidewalks and trails will be designed and installed to City standards, and maintained
by the City. Private sidewalks will be privately maintained.
18.
Platting and Easements
The property shall be platted in accordance with City Code, county, and state regulations.
19.
Undergrounding of Utilities; Utility Design
All utilities shall be underground. Public utilities shall be included within Drainage & Utility,
included in the Plat.
20.
Amendments
This PUD Narrative may be amended by the City Council at any time.
21.
Developers Agreement
It is the City Attorney's discretion if a Development Agreement is to be required.
23.
Signatures
Jim Illies, Jr., Crossroads Pointe MV, LLC Date
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of , 2019, by Jim
Illies, Jr., the President of Crossroads Pointe MV, LLC, a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of
the corporation.
Notary Public
Crossroad Pointe PUD Narrative Mounds View Planning Case MU2019-001
Page 4 of 5
Crossroad Pointe PUD Narrative
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
Carol A. Mueller, Mayor
Nyle Zikmund, City Administrator
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of , 2019, by
Carol A. Mueller, Mayor of the City of Mounds View; and Nyle Zikmund, City Administrator
of the City of Mounds View, a municipal corporation, on behalf of the City.
Notary Public
Crossroad Pointe PUD Narrative Mounds View Planning Case MU2019-001
Page 5 of 5
RESOLUTION 9132
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW OF CROSSROAD POINTE, A MULTI -FAMILY
DWELLING TO BE LOCATED AT 2390, 2394 MOUNDS VIEW BOULEVARD, AND
2400 COUNTY ROAD H2
WHEREAS, INH Property Management Inc (Developer), representing the property
owner; Mounds View Economic Development Authority, is requesting a Conditional Use Permit
for a Residential Planned Unit Development, and a Development Review on property; legally
described as:
Address
PID
Legal Description
2400
08-30-23-31-0005
The North 363 feet of the West 330 feet of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest
County
1/4 of Section 8, Township 30, Range 23, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
Road H2
2394
08-30-23-31-0071
That part of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 8, Township 30,
Mounds
Range 23, Ramsey County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the
View Blvd
intersection of the East line of the West 330 feet and the South line of the
North 365.46 feet of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4; thence North
parallel with the West line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 a
distance of 255 feet; thence East parallel with the North line of said Northeast
1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 a distance of 47.07 feet; thence Southeasterly to the
intersection of the East line of the West 475 feet and the South line of the
North 193.01 feet of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 ; thence South
parallel with the West line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 and to
the South line of the North 365.46 feet thereof; thence West to the point of
beginning, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and
situate in Ramsey County, Minnesota. Together with a non-exclusive easement
for driveway purposes, 25 feet in width, over and across part of the Northeast
1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 8, Township 30, Range 23, Ramsey County,
Minnesota, the South and Southwesterly lines of which are described as
follows: Beginning at the intersection of the East line of the West 360 feet and
the South line of the North 110.46 feet of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest
1/4; thence East parallel with the North line of said Northeast 1/4 of the
Southwest 1/4 a distance of 17.07 feet; thence Southeasterly to the First
American Title Insurance Company intersection of the East line of the West
475 feet and the South line of the North 193.01 feet of said Northeast 1/4 of
the Southwest 1/4; and said line there terminating.
2390
08-30-23-31-0072
That part of the North 365.46 feet of the NE % of the SW % of Section 8,
Mounds
Township 30, Range 23, Ramsey County, Minnesota lying Southwesterly of the
View Blvd
center line of State Trunk Highway No. 10 except the West 330 feet there of
and except that part described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the
East line of the West 330 feet and the South line of the North
Resolution 9132
Page 2 of 5
365.46 feet of said NE % of the SW %; thence North parallel with the West line
of said NE % of the SW % a distance of 255 feet; thence East parallel with the
North line of said NE % of the SW % a distance of 47.07 feet; thence
Southeasterly to the intersection of the East line of the West 475 feet and the
South line of the North 193.01 feet of said NE % of the SW %; thence South
parallel with the West line of said NE % of the SW % and to the South line of
the North 365.46 feet thereof; thence West to the point of beginning.
Together with a non-exclusive easement for driveway purposes over and
across the South 31 feet of the North 345.46 feet of the East 115 feet of the
West 475 feet of the NE % of the SW % of Section 8, Township 30, Range 23,
Ramsey Comity, Minnesota. Together with a non-exclusive easement for
parking purposes over and across the East 10 feet of that part of the NE % of
the SW % of Section 8, Township 30, Range 23, Ramsey County, Minnesota
described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the East line of the West
330feet and the South line of the North 365.46 feet of said NE % of the SW %;
thence North parallel with the West line of said NE % of the SW % a distance of
255 feet; thence East parallel with the North line of said NE % of the SW % a
distance of 47.07 feet; thence Southeasterly to the intersection of the East line
of the West 475 feet and the South line of the North 193.01 feet of said NE
of the SW %; thence South parallel with the West line of sad NE % of the SW
and to the South line of the 365.46 feet thereof; thence West to the point of
beginning. Together with an easement for utility purposes over, under and
across the South 10 feet of the North 314.46 feet of the East 115 feet of the
West 475 feet of the NE % of the SW % of Section 8, Township 30, Range 23,
Ramsey County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the properties are zoned PUD Planned Unit Development, and are within
the County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District; and,
WHEREAS, all permitted uses, accessory uses, and conditional uses within all zoning
districts are a Permitted Use within a PUD district. Multi -Family Dwellings are a Conditional
Use within the R-4 High Density Residential district, and therefore are a Permitted Use within
the PUD District, subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a Residential Planned Unit
Development; and,
WHEREAS, a Development Review is required for construction activity that increases
the gross square footage of the principle building by 10% or 10,000 square feet. The Developer
has proposed a new 145,000 sq ft building; and,
WHEREAS, the Developer has submitted the following;
Applications
Geotechnical Report (Chosen Valley Testing)
3D renderings
Site Plan (Cole Group)
Civil plans (Schultz Engineering)
Landscape Plan (Cole Group)
Photometric Plan (Rouzer Group)
dated, Jan 14, 2019
dated Mar 21, 2019, received May 2, 2019)
undated, received, May 30, 2019
undated, received May 30, 2019
undated, received May 30, 2019
undated, received May 30, 2019
dated May 30, 2019, received May 30, 2019
Resolution 9132
Page 3 of 5
Architectural Plans (Cole Group)
Elevation plans (Cole Group)
Preliminary Plat (O'Malley & Kron)
Final Plat (O'Malley & Kron)
undated, received May 2, 2019
undated, received May 30, 2019
undated, received May 30, 2019
undated, received May 30, 2019
WHEREAS, plans submitted by the Developer, received May 2, 2019, were distributed
by Staff to applicable departments and agencies. Comments were received from the following:
Tyler McLeete, Stantec, City Engineer
(May 21, 2019)
Nick Henly, Mounds View, Building Official
(May 17, 2019)
Jacob Martin, Mounds View, Fire Inspector I
(May 16, 2019)
Gregg Gund, Ramsey County, Survey Technician
(May 29, 2019)
Erin Laberee, Ramsey County, Traffic Engineer
(May 7, 2019)
Nick Tomczik, Rice Creek Watershed District, Permit Coordinator
(May 7, 2019)
WHEREAS, the Developer submitted revised plans on May 30, 2019. Applicable plans
were included in the June 24, 2019 City Council Staff Report; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request at its June 19, 2019
meeting, recommending approval (Resolution 1099-19); and,
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a dully noticed Public Hearing on June 24,
2019; and makes the following Findings (italics):
The use will not create an excessive burden on existing parks, schools, streets and other
public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area.
Finding: The proposed 128 -unit apartment building will not create an excessive
burden on public facilities.
2. The use will be sufficiently compatible or separated by distance or screening from
adjacent residentially zoned or used land so that existing homes will not be depreciated in
value and there will be no deterrence to development of vacant land.
Finding: The proposed 128 -unit apartment building includes sufficient setbacks and
landscaped screening from adjacent single-family homes.
3. The structure and site shall have an appearance that will not have an adverse effect upon
adjacent residential properties.
Finding: The proposed 128 -unit apartment building includes features such as decks
and patios along Edgewood Dr to better assimilate into its residential
setting.
4. The use, in the opinion of the City Council, is reasonably related to the overall needs of
the City and to the existing land use.
Resolution 9132
Page 4 of 5
Finding: The proposed 128 -unit apartment building fits a need for additional
market -rate housing, as demonstrated by a housing study submitted by the
Developer, and completed by Viewpoint Consulting Group, dated April
23, 2018. The study supports a need for 130 —173 market -rate apartment
units between the years 2017-2022 within the Mounds View area, to
capture 15% - 20% of the unmet demand within the area.
5. The use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the
zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use.
Finding: The proposed 128 -unit apartment building is consistent with the purposes
of a Planned Unit Development.
6. The use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan of the City.
Finding: The Comprehensive Plan (2008) guides these properties as Mixed Use
PUD. The proposed apartment building is consistent with the residential
component of the Mixed -Use designation.
7. The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion.
Finding: The addition of a 128 -unit apartment building will significantly increase
local traffic. Careful consideration was made on the appropriate location
of the property's driveway access, with consultation from Ramsey County
and the City Engineer. The proposed location on Edgewood Drive will
have the least impact on the greatest number of residents and users.
8. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and necessary facilities have been or will be
provided.
Finding: Adequate utilities, roads, and drainage facilities exist, or will be
constructed as part of the project.
WHEREAS, Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Developer shall submit a
Landscape Escrow to the City, or other surety acceptable to the City Attorney, in an amount
equal to 150% of the estimated cost of landscape materials and labor. The City may hold this in
a non-interest bearing account. Landscaping shall be completed prior to a Certificate of
Occupancy (C/O) being issued. On or about one year after the C/O is issued and landscaping is
completed, landscaping shall be inspected by Staff. Any landscaping that has not survived or is
in poor health, shall be replaced by the Developer. The City shall refund the escrow, but may
withhold a proportionate amount until one-year after the replaced landscape materials have been
inspected and determined satisfactory.
Resolution 9132
Page 5 of 5
WHEREAS, in permitting a new conditional use, the City Council may impose
additional conditions which the City Council considers necessary to protect the best interest of
the surrounding area or community as a whole. These conditions shall be described in a PUD
Narrative and consistent with plans submitted May 30, 2019, to be approved by the City Council;
and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the Mounds View City
Council approves of this Conditional Use Permit for a Residential Planned Unit Development,
and Development Review, and directs Staff to prepare a Final PUD Narrative, to be reviewed by
the City Attorney, and may be signed by the Mayor, City Administrator, and Applicant.
Adopted this 8t" day of July, 2019.
Carol A. Mueller, Mayor
ATTEST:
Nyle Zikmund, City Administrator
(SEAL)
6/29/2019
EAST METRO
Suburban leaders allowing larger, denser developments in this building boom - StarTribune.com
Suburban leaders allowing larger, denser
developments in this building boom
Many are skirting development restrictions to meet housing
demand.
By Shannon Prather (http://www.startribune.com/shannon-prather/188067161/)
JUNE 1, 2019 — 10:54PM
The White Bear Lake City Council soon will consider the fate of a 193 -unit apartment
complex on about 5 acres, a project that is taller and has more units than the city code
allows.
But city planners say the project meets a local housing need, so it's worth exempting the
developer from a few city restrictions.
White Bear Lake is among a growing number of suburbs that are working around
longtime development restrictions to transform oddly shaped or blighted lots into new
apartments, homes and businesses.
Increasingly, suburban officials are relying on these projects to rejuvenate stagnant
corners of their communities and draw new residents of varying ages and incomes.
"Suburban zoning codes are often not keeping up with the changing market and
consumer expectations," said Anne Kane, White Bear Lake's director of community
development.
White Bear Lake is relying on a mechanism called a planned -unit development (PUD),
which allows developers to break from city code on building height and unit numbers in
exchange for giving city leaders a say in expansive, multimillion -dollar projects.
The trade-off is clear: Developers get a more lucrative project, and the city welcomes
new residents, businesses and tax revenue.
Some residents say the partnership that forms between city planners and developers
means the public is largely cut out of the process.
Shoreview resident Richard Braun said he was saddened when the city allowed the
construction of the McMillan, a 134 -unit, four-story apartment building at Rice Street
and Interstate 694 that's taller and denser than city code allows. Crews tore down a
flagging strip mall to make room for it.
"They had their minds made up way before the public meeting and there was nothing we
could do to change them," said Braun, a retiree. "We kind of figured out residents don't
matter as much."
Suburban leaders say the measures are justified to meet demand and alleviate the
region's housing shortage.
"So much has changed in the market in the last five years. Cities are trying to play catch-
up and capture part of the market," said Cathy Capone Bennett, director of advisory
services at Urban Land Institute Minnesota.
Looking for flexibility
Such development tools are increasingly popular as suburbs move from the
straightforward development of vacant land to thornier redevelopment that often
involves teardowns and hazardous cleanups, said Plymouth Community Development
Director Steve Juetten.
At the 204 -unit Loden apartments in Shoreview,
the developer added amenities including green
space and a seating area for small groups.
www.startribune.com/suburban-leaders-allowing-larger-denser-developments-in-this-building-boom/510713362/ 1/3
6/29/2019 Suburban leaders allowing larger, denser developments in this building boom - StarTribune.com
City leaders also are using code exemptions to entice developers to build better projects.
For instance, in exchange for height and density concessions, the developer is giving
White Bear Lake land for a trail and a more appealing design.
"It's got a lake lodge feel," Kane said. "We want distinctive architecture that reflects our
community."
North St. Paul is leaning on the PUD process to revive its downtown
(http://www.startribune.com/north-st-paul-finds-itself-in-a-building-boom-with-400-
new-homes-apartments-in-the-works/507741822/) and add more housing. It has nearly
400 new townhouses and apartments in the works on four different sites, which city
leaders hope will attract more shops and cafes.
The new housing projects are denser than city code allows. But after watching the city be
overlooked by developers for years, community leaders say they are thrilled at the surge
in new investment.
"Traditional zoning does not allow for much flexibility," said Molly Just, a senior
planner with WSB who does work for North St. Paul. "PUDs are really intended to
provide flexibility and creativity for developers, but at the same time meeting stated
objectives set by municipalities."
Shoreview has used such incentives for decades, allowing developers to build
townhouses, condos and the Rice Creek Corporate Park area.
It recently approved more than 1,000 new apartments in four complexes. The city
exempted developers from existing codes on the maximum height of new buildings, the
density of new units and the number of parking spots.
The incentives "are used in exchange for higher -end amenities and other elements in the
projects," said Shoreview Mayor Sandy Martin.
She said some redevelopment projects would be nearly impossible without them. One of
the newer apartments, Lakeview Terrace, replaced an aging strip mall and had to be
built around railroad tracks and a pond. It required a street realignment.
"Redevelopment projects are more complex and expensive," she said. "Developers tend
to shy away from those if [the codes] are too rigid."
So far, the new suburban apartments are filling up.
The first phase of the Loden apartments at Interstate 694 and Lexington Avenue opened
in Shoreview last winter. All 204 apartments were rented in four months, and there's a
waiting list for the next phase.
The developer, Greco Properties, and East Ridge Partners tore down a long -vacant
industrial building close to the freeway. In exchange for more units, the developer added
green space, a dog run, a pickleball court and a pool. Greco officials also agreed to make
about two dozen units affordable for lower-income families.
"This is probably the highest quality development we've ever done," said Greco
Properties President Josh Brandsted, sitting in the Loden's expansive commons room
with a pool table, fireplace and ample high-end finishes.
Greco had primarily built apartments in Minneapolis, so this market -rate suburban
complex was "uncharted territory." Brandsted said Shoreview's willingness to partner
with them rather than treating them like the "big, bad developer" was critical.
"I think they are doing it right," he said.
Making a course correction
Not everyone thinks such incentives are the best tools.
Roseville leaders said they felt developers were abusing the process, so they stopped
offering incentives in 2010.
ANTHONY SOUFFLE
Residents used the gym facilities at the Loden.
www.startribune.com/suburban-leaders-allowing-larger-denser-developments-in-this-building-boom/5l O7l3362/ 2/3
6/29/2019 Suburban leaders allowing larger, denser developments in this building boom - StarTribune.com
"If someone wants to break the rules, so to speak, all they had to do is get the council to
approve a PUD," said Roseville Mayor Dan Roe. "It was completely unpredictable for
surrounding neighbors. That kind of thing left a bad taste in residents' mouths."
Instead, Roseville overhauled its city codes and zoning to better reflect the market,
which makes the process more straightforward for residents and developers.
"The last major rewrite had been in 1950s. We had a lot of outdated provisions," Roe
said.
Roseville did reinstate the use of PUDs in 2015 but with strict limits, the mayor said. So
far, not one has been approved.
ANTHONYSOUFFLE
Other communities have joined Roseville in adding new restrictions. Individual and small group seating spaces filled
the common area at the Loden.
This spring, the city of Vadnais Heights added more requirements for developers seeking
PUDs, including public meetings.
The issue came to a head in 2017 when Mendota Heights approved
(httP://www.startribune.com/mendota-heights-residents-battle-city-over-apartment-
project/462942083/) two 70 -unit apartment buildings on Hwy. 13, prompting a lawsuit
by a group of residents. They argued that the project's size, limited parking, proximity to
wetlands and large swaths of paved surfaces violated city ordinances. But they lost in the
Minnesota Court of Appeals, and the apartments are now under construction.
Suburban leaders say they are also making longer-term changes to their codes to
accommodate new, denser kinds of development.
In recent years, several suburbs changed their local comprehensive plans to permit more
density and allow some commercial areas to become residential neighborhoods. Cities
are now finishing up their 2040 comprehensive plans and more changes could come, said
Lisa Barajas, the Metropolitan Council's director of community development.
Kane said suburban development is in the middle of a much-needed course correction
after decades of antiquated planning and land -use policies.
"After World War II, planners really liked to separate things — residential here, jobs here,
commercial and recreational here," she said. "Planners now recognize it was forced
separation and not how humans want to live. They want walkable, mixed-use
communities."
Shannon Prather covers Ramsey County for the Star Tribune. Previously, she covered philanthropy
and nonprofits. Prather has two decades of experience reporting for newspapers in Minnesota,
California, Idaho, Wisconsin and North Dakota. She has covered a variety of topics including the legal
system, law enforcement, education, municipal government and slice -of -life community news.
Shannon.Prather@startribune.com 612-673-4804 ShannonMPrather
www.startribune.com/suburban-leaders-allowing-larger-denser-developments-in-this-building-boom/5l O7l3362/ 3/3
t
�� �.i.'s t ;r` �-tib• ,.
1IY[� �.. •,,. � r 1, j
U1nni
," III I'!'
IOSSROAD POINTE APARTMENTS M�NNESO T fl
[FRSF[Ti n N n F rn u NTY ROAD H 2 F m n H N ns VIEW Rn u IFVA Rr
11
FT
f � . 1�� /�• I � I Ill f � It ��I - _ a ' r. -
i -
�
LI! _
I
I
I
--��
- _ � _ - � SII
I I
rn
III
............
i;III ,.
n l I l l
........-----•- �......,., Illi til _
i• I
ED -' ITII .. .. =_ _•
' t I -y I '
1 ul I M Ii I
Crossroad Pointe Apartments . ..
1 .1_
III
F _ MOUNS View. MN �� !r►► l :Ililllll
41-
4
-Ar.
/-- /
itJILDINCY C --'.ORP. I
!i� I T � 11
I; ±� 2
1
i1' III
,-n °
! I•. I! var R•.: k� . •:.A rel► :erg/,�i!�s „t
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
MMR %PL 11 A In WML Irl I'k 11111 IN A i9m
■■Idr�rir■�rrV�r■rii■
■■■n■n■.■R�ne��ar.�rara■
1
1
_ `� , ,� rat /� . ` • / a �R ' , � .t - - -
R
`'i�� • � � i • 1w•'w �1
hie 1
�W;�-ZP
y t z
. 1
:� • � II 1 1
y ,y
I I
... .•r � � �) /
[NiI
r
.•.. I _ __'' ... -.. - `-
[. . - i •� � ,•'. ..,.. dll I _.. 111
I _
t"
I
t
i �
T
r
r
� Y
fff :I
s
(
I'
� [7, rr, (j
~ r•
i
If
r.
Ai
y
+www1
I
'r. bA [Ah
P ^'
40
41,
w
3UILDING LOA
'.rix � > �;,.. • �'
9
Lmnuu�l6, /��I�II�I
Vol
glow. ihl : •
a St � �I `i ��• ,a
IIIII;�•. �� tuN" Mal
li��,l� 111 I
....,.� _ ...•.. lIII�� .. .•...
•'•U 111 - . _ _.. ..._ n .,. III
L' C
t
r_
r_
L rl II!r 4• .C_C I f-' i �•.r" - j 4 1
�� �,'.r'7F„.r i• I f� If ._,t .er :. +w r� II II � d.� •µ.. � v f, '^' � I) II .I.
of
I
�. • �; ; , ,.... � ......II �: ,,� „ ,°' ...��....,..II SILL .. .. ,-�. -� II �I (III 1
t 5
t -
i
•r 7 L
A~ �
_ � •t11
,
•t' t ,:
� I: r. ; r • •T. r
I .z
a
r
a
k
r i
'7 •ii is
- I
A
.Q
I
I 1 (11111 Illllllllllr-•-
I
c I 1 IIII 1
I
%•t
I
I
I.
• .. . .•. .... r-'- I .... .. ;-... _.. .. ,. ... _. _ Wiz-^ _
I
II i
1�-it:oe.:
4W ft 1 -
1
�.l e • ,. A' � 1 ' 1 t--r�,�"G"' ` /
'.81, �.'x �, r!'•} I ''' t jam- `Y T t 1 t. rY -
•*` = r` = er ri. Oii-il IliLaino
r
IIS V
.. .. r•�_..�. �r';�
,wImA _
I H
A& w iml& 19WAL
r
���II,,III I' .1. ; IIIII� J✓� Ta;: � ii • ML
II►III II�II��: II+'q �.- •� , 11.. � •�� - �, �� �- + �..
R III I • I ~ v. y� tyJrf.' 4•.
t• ��1
I I I I II , I I I III � �', I't n� , y•
z
I!
. I
,r
h.
y ►.�14' � I= � � • ... ....« ...•.... �'y., <,-^ l • Vii- w.,; i' i . .'in ..a•. w -
•, � ,�., « ..t •fit.
. }* ..._ n. 1. ,. . 1 /, F }..•''-�1".�+-. I iti•?�,• .'r ;�, LJt+• , t..}'�+,`•?( r•, .� �..'k. `�,
S
1 'I.
J�
s� Y L •
4
4 t
T Ny
Z`
1
I A.'
r a
t rl'
I y.
ca
i
I
5
Y
h �
1 � r
I �
Y
�yAID�Y
raw►' �'�1
11[Ii 11 iii �i Prii '�i it iG
��r�L'■��YiriCs�
-
'q
L
0
- - COUNTY _ROAD H2
ti
REMOVE EXIST. �.�
CI1R6 AND DRIVE
NEW 6'—p" SfDEWALK AS REQ'D. \ON
NEW 6'-O" SIDEWALK t _
7m
16
WOO
�- z
• In
p
a
i
COUNTY ROAD x-12
1101 :0
fi
o�LU<
a
oo
W
oa �
"
or
CL
F-
73
d
w
-I
cn
COMMON NAME
BOTANICAL NAME
zF- LL-
E< C)
4
U
At--'Ai�rN)T1'1EN I 5UILL) INU
MMMM��
O ' 2 O' 4 O' 6 0'
LU
U-11
0Z
= OPEN L,4NDSCAFE 4RE,4S
59,014 3F = 32.��% OF LOT AREA
� �S
LANDSCAPE PLAN NUMBER NOTES E -O
I. LANDSCAPE CLOTH, w/ ROCK / CEDAR MULCH THIS AREA SHOWN HATCHED.
2. TOPSOIL SPREAD OVER THE PROPOSED LAWN AREAS.
3. PLASTIC EDGING 36" OUT FROM BUILDING, AND OTHER MARKED AREAS.
4.
GENERAL NOTE:
A) VERIFY EXISTING TREE LOCATIONS AND QUANTITIES TO REMAIN,
AND ADJUST PLANTING SCHEDULE ACCORDINGLY, TO BE APPROVED BY CITY.
B) ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS TO BE IRRIGATED. EQUIPMENT TO HAVE BACK FLOW
PREVENTION DEVICE AND RAIN SENSOR DEVICE. VERIFY W/ G.C.
C) ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS WITHOUT ROCK / CEDAR MULCH TO HAVE SOD OR SEED. VERIFY W/ G.C.
D) PLANTING DEPTH OF ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE SUCH THAT THE ROOT FLAIR
IS AT FINISHED GRADE.
E) ALL DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL BE BALL AND BURLAP AND STAKES
GUYED PER NATIONAL NURSERYMEN'S STANDARDS. ALL SHRUBS SHALL BE POTTED.
PLANTING SCHEDULE
o�LU<
W
oa �
CL
F-
73
d
w
-I
cn
COMMON NAME
BOTANICAL NAME
zF- LL-
E< C)
4
U
c1 -<w
<r:x
O
(Y
REMARKS
3
A
AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE
Acer rubrum 'Autumn Blaze'
-
2 1/2"
-
B t B
STRAIGHT LEADER
AND FULL CROWN
n o
B
LITTLE LEAF LINDEN
T-
dia cordata
2 I/2"
-
B t 8
STRAIGHT LEADER
cz
AND FULL CROWN
LU"
>o Luca
4
C
CRIMSON KING MAPLE
Acer platanoides
-
2 1/2"
-
B t B
STRAIGHT LEADER
AND FULL CROWN
-
D
0-
_
-
-
-
-
II
IDECIDUOU5 TREES PROVIDED
w11
E
0
FLOWERING CRABAPPLE
Malus 'Snowdrift'
—
2"
—
g t g
STRAIGHT LEADER
u,o�c
AND FULL CROWN
�<
5
F
SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE
Malus 'Spring Snow'
-
2
_
B t B
STRAIGHT LEADER
o�
AND FULL CROWN
UZ
G
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
Q�-
-
03
H
SUNBURST HONEYLOCUST
Gleditsia Tmacanthos
-
2"
_
g t g
STRAIGHT LEADER
AND FULL CROWN
1-91DECIDUOUS
TREES PROVIDED
12
J BLACK HILLS SPRUCE
Picea glauca densata
6'-O"
-
-
B t B
STRAIGHT LEADER
W
LU LU
o�
12
K COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE
Picea pungens
61_0.0
_
_
B t B
STRAIGHT LEADER
24
CONIFEROUS TREES PROVIDED
cQ
II
L
GOLD MOUND SPIREA
Spiraea bumalda 'goldmound'
24"
-
-
POTTED
-
oe
In
10
M
NINEBARK SUMMER WINE
Pfiysocarpus opulifolws
24"
-
-
POTTED
-
en
0
23
N
COMPACT PJM RHODODENDRON
Spiraea bumalda 'goldmound'
24"
POTTED
-
U
LU
Il
P
C)
MISS KIM LILAC
syringa pantula 'miss kim'
24"
-
-
POTTED
-
SS
TOTAL DECIDUOUS SHRUBS PROVIDED
35
Q
DWARF GOLDEN ARBORVITAE
Thula occidentalis "Golden Globe"
24"
-
-
POTTED
-
LU
Lm
°;x
46
R
SAYIN JUNIPER
Juniperus Sabina
24
-
-
POTTED
-
W
21
S
HETZ MIDGET ARBORVITAE
Thula occidentalis "Hetz Midget"
2411
-
-
POTTED
-
102
TOTAL EVERGREEN SHRUBS PROVIDED
0
U
N
00
0
CO
w
J
i
N
i
0
w
0
J
m
RRP�� ' I✓
P N
OTI ZONED: B-31(HIGHWAY BUSINESS) \
A NOT PLA TIED
BL OCK I 1 REMOVE EXISTING DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE \
REPLACE WITH TURF PER COUNTY\
REQUIREMENTS h
1
PIM=906.59kd
\\4 I
INV=902.05 y \ REMOVE EXISTING ROAD ENTRANCE
REPLACE WITH TURF PER COUNTY
RIM=907.00 COUNTY ROAD H "� JNV=896.221 REQUIREMENTS \RIM=906.86 S 89°46'28" W 965.83
INV=894.60INV 5E=901.88INV 5=896.15N 89°46'28" E 1318.36 SN T SN SN SN SN8"V C P SN SN SN SN 907.74CENTER OF
RIM=906.78 O I SEC. OF SEC.
URB GUTTER INV=902.81 r, 8, T.30, R.23.
G G 12"C.I.P' I I I I I ` 0yO
W1/4 CORNER I I� I \ CURB &GUTTER cURe c
CUR CUT
OF SEC. 8,O OHP OHP OHP HP OHP p P E NOTE: DOWNSPOUTS LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND
T.30, R.23. L^ _ _ G EAST SIDES OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE CONNECTED TO
_RAI ==C 60_ _ 997 8' 0 0T � _ 9tJ8 - - o - \ ADJACENT PVC STORM SEWER VIA APPROPRIATE WYES,
30 BENDS, AND SCH 40 PVC PIPE. VERIFY LOCATION OF
30 30 CB8 - - - - - - - - Hla-910. 8 �' b �" C05 GOA \ F DOWNSPOUTS W/ ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
Is
C08 ELWI \y \
w NO E00
20 08.00 1q 45 1 1 1/4 SWl/ \
90 09 F SEC. 8, 23. `\ F
9 O O AJNDERGROUND STORMTE �
1 ST WATER STORA E E1�1 #3: I c° -
ZONED: R-2 v I O 74.4 (12) ROOF (9) SC -7 HAM ERS I H
Li J
(SINGLE & TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAI I �R S W/ ISOLAT R ROW 1 `\ \\ \ n` \ SOUTH BOUND CL
1 O AS (SEE 5/C3) 1 I 1 \ \ (/ \
OF STATE TRUNK
O O�ss 080 1 v Ln / 47 0 09. \ HIGHWAY NO. 10-62
�
�° of 08 0n O EAST LI OF I� \ ccs �I \ \ CO2 \ \ \
1 INFILTRATION BASIN #2
(SEE 2/C3)
BOTTOM OF BASIN =-SkO.0
I S3 w
O
JtWtK Hl't LLAVINQ7
LENGTH SIZE
I�
I
I
15
1 16
BASIN OUTLET = 903CO
1 TOP OF BASIN = 90 .
m
00 v
O
I
I
"
CO2
I
BOTTOM OF BASIN
4" SAND/COMPOST
1 CONNECTTF_�_EXISTING
O
R-1976
909.65
STORM MANHOLE
100 LF
8" SCH 40 PVC @ 1.00%
CO3
2 INV = 899181
1 (FIELD VERIFY)
CL:= �i
v L�Lj >
8"
R-1976
910.05
00
Ln
8" SCH 40 PVC @ 1.00%
ZONED: P-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
O
C04
8"
R-1976
W
903.28
70 LF
1 RIM=903.79 I
CB1
PROJECT
CBI
INV=901.64
-
905.50
INV=902.58=
SUMP=898.58
1 RIM=903.79
15"R.C.P
FES1/IB1
INV 902.50
R
lIV V=7U1.4�
NOTE: ALL EXISTING STORM
SEWER LOCATED EAST OF
1 EXISTING CONNECTION
/ 1FELE SlIALL BE REMOVED
�N DI POSED OF OFF-SITE
BASIN SIDEWALL
4" SAND/
COMPOST MIX
I
Al
4
3.
ELEV = 899.5
VARIES
NATIVE SAND
SOILS
NOTES: 1. BASIN BOTTOM 2• SAND/COMPOST MIX SHALL CONSIST OF 70% CLEAN
SHALL BE SEEDED W/ SAND & 30% COMPOST (MN STORM WATER MANUAL MIX
NATIVE SEED MIX AND/ "B"). SAND SHALL CONSIST OF CLEAN CONSTRUCTION
OR PLANTINGS SAND, FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIALS - AASHTO M-6 OR
ASTM C-33 WASHED. COMPOST SHALL CONSIST OF MNDOT
GRADE2
1 INFILTRATION BASIN #1
NTS
BOTTOM OF BASIN
4" SAND/COMPOST
MIX
BASIN SIDEWALL
4" SAND/
COMPOST MIX
3:7
/ ELEV = 900.0
Wil -
VARIES
NATIVE SAND
SOILS
NOTES: 1. BASIN BOTTOM 2• SAND/COMPOST MIX SHALL CONSIST OF 70% CLEAN
SHALL BE SEEDED W/ SAND & 30% COMPOST (MN STORM WATER MANUAL MIX
NATIVE SEED MIX AND/ "B"). SAND SHALL CONSIST OF CLEAN CONSTRUCTION
OR PLANTINGS SAND, FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIALS - AASHTO M-6 OR
ASTM C-33 WASHED. COMPOST SHALL CONSIST OF MNDOT
GRADE2
INFILTRATION BASIN #2
NTS
I
JtWtK Hl't LLAVINQ7
LENGTH SIZE
I�
I
I
15
1 16
6"
GFE = 903.50
O
906.28
�J
1
CO2
I
BOTTOM OF BASIN
4" SAND/COMPOST
CO2
MIX
BASIN SIDEWALL
4" SAND/
COMPOST MIX
I
Al
4
3.
ELEV = 899.5
VARIES
NATIVE SAND
SOILS
NOTES: 1. BASIN BOTTOM 2• SAND/COMPOST MIX SHALL CONSIST OF 70% CLEAN
SHALL BE SEEDED W/ SAND & 30% COMPOST (MN STORM WATER MANUAL MIX
NATIVE SEED MIX AND/ "B"). SAND SHALL CONSIST OF CLEAN CONSTRUCTION
OR PLANTINGS SAND, FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIALS - AASHTO M-6 OR
ASTM C-33 WASHED. COMPOST SHALL CONSIST OF MNDOT
GRADE2
1 INFILTRATION BASIN #1
NTS
BOTTOM OF BASIN
4" SAND/COMPOST
MIX
BASIN SIDEWALL
4" SAND/
COMPOST MIX
3:7
/ ELEV = 900.0
Wil -
VARIES
NATIVE SAND
SOILS
NOTES: 1. BASIN BOTTOM 2• SAND/COMPOST MIX SHALL CONSIST OF 70% CLEAN
SHALL BE SEEDED W/ SAND & 30% COMPOST (MN STORM WATER MANUAL MIX
NATIVE SEED MIX AND/ "B"). SAND SHALL CONSIST OF CLEAN CONSTRUCTION
OR PLANTINGS SAND, FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIALS - AASHTO M-6 OR
ASTM C-33 WASHED. COMPOST SHALL CONSIST OF MNDOT
GRADE2
INFILTRATION BASIN #2
NTS
ST - �iST -
14.45
5T ST -
-8" ORIFICE AT 903.00
CB10
K�
I
ST
ST
� I J • 1
L •
• �I��III �1Sol
STORM SEWER PIPE SCHEDULE
MANHULt UK UAIUN BASIN
STRUCTURE INSIDE DIA.* CASTING**
PROPOSED
JtWtK Hl't LLAVINQ7
LENGTH SIZE
BUILDING
14.45
MFE = 914.50
6"
GFE = 903.50
O
906.28
100 LF
6" SCH 40 PVC @ 1.00%
ST - �iST -
14.45
5T ST -
-8" ORIFICE AT 903.00
CB10
K�
I
ST
ST
� I J • 1
L •
• �I��III �1Sol
STORM SEWER PIPE SCHEDULE
MANHULt UK UAIUN BASIN
STRUCTURE INSIDE DIA.* CASTING**
tLLVAIIUNJ
RIM INVERT
JtWtK Hl't LLAVINQ7
LENGTH SIZE
IU
STRUCTURE
1
COMMENTS
CO1
6"
R-1976
909.20
906.28
100 LF
6" SCH 40 PVC @ 1.00%
CO2
CHAMBERS W/ ISOLATOR RO
CO2
8"
R-1976
909.65
905.28
100 LF
8" SCH 40 PVC @ 1.00%
CO3
MINIMUM OF 4 -INCHES OF SAND/COMPOST MIX. SAND/COMPOST MIX SHALL BE
CO3
8"
R-1976
910.05
904.28
100 LF
8" SCH 40 PVC @ 1.00%
C04
O
C04
8"
R-1976
909.60
903.28
70 LF
8" SCH 40 PVC @ 1.00%
CB1
PROJECT
CBI
48"
R -3067-L
905.50
INV=902.58=
SUMP=898.58
16 LF
15" HDPE @ 0.50%
FES1/IB1
INV 902.50
FES2/1131
N/A
N/A
N/A
902.50
14 LF
12" HDPE @ 0.40%
STRUCTURE #1
STRUCTURE #1
SEE DETAIL
902.44
130 LF
12" HDPE @ 0.40%
CB2
U
CB2
48"
R -3067-L
905.30
901.92
32 LF
12" HDPE @ 0.40%
CB3
CB3
48"
R -3067-L
905.30
901.79
70 LF
12" HDPE @ 0.40%
CB4
CB4
48"
R -3067-L
905.50
901.51
96 LF
18" SCH 40 PVC @ 0.307o
CB5
O
60"
R -3067-L
905.50
=01.22CB5
897 22
SIUMP 9
24 LF
24" HDPE @ 0.30%
STORMTECH
INV = 901.15
SIUKMILCH
SYSTEM
N/A
N/A
N/A
901.15
10 LF
12" HDPE @ 0.40%
OUTLET
STRUCTURE #2
STRUCTURE #2
SEE DETAIL
901.11
38 LF
12" HDPE @ 0.40%
STMH1
C136
48"
R -3067-L
906.30
902.30
106 LF
15" RCP @ 1.08%
CB7
C137
48"
R -3067-L
906.30
901.16
18 LF
15" RCP @ 1.11%
STMH1
STMH 1
48"
R-1733
906.80
900.96
214 LF
15" RCP @ 0.35%
STMH2
STMH2
48"
R-1733
904.70
900.21
86 LF
15" RCP @ 0.34%
STMH3
STMH3
48"
R-1733
905.00
"ORIFICE=903.
INV=899.91
30 LF
15" RCP @ 0.33%
EXISTING MH
=
INV 899.81
C05
6"
R-1976
909.25
906.60
76 LF
6" SCH 40 PVC @ 1.00%
C06
C06
6"
R-1976
908.25
905.84
76 LF
6" SCH 40 PVC @ 1.00%
C07
C07
8"
R-1976
908.05
905.08
76 LF
8" SCH 40 PVC @ 1.00%
C08
C08
8"
R-1976
908.20
904.32
100 LF
8" SCH 40 PVC @ 1.00%
CB8
CB8
48"
R -3067-L
906.50
SIUMP9899.32
108 LF
15" HDPE @ 0.30%
FES3/IB2
INV = 903.00
CB9
48"
R -3067-L
903.00
INV=RMTECH
SUMP=895.07
14 LF
24" HDPE @ 0.50%
SYSTEM #2
INV = 899.00
CB10
48"
R -3067-L
903.00
900.00
86 LF
15" HDPE @ 1.06%
CBl0A
CBl0A
48"
R -3067-L
905 90
18 LF
24"HDPE @ 0 50%
INV - 899 00
2.40 STORAX WATER STORAC,Y \ \ x� SUMP=895.09 -
4 SYSTEM`#2: p \
,20 C7 I -9!D (9) ROWS 0(10) SC -7,40 \ \ \ / *MANHOLE INTERIOR DIAMETERS WERE DETERMINED USING SIZING CALCULATION SOFTWARE PROVIDED BY CRETEX NORTH CONCRETE.
972 O CHAMBERS W7 ISO�fCTOR THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT THE INTERIOR DIAMETERS SHOWN ON THE ABOVE TABLE ARE APPROPRIATE.
ROW SEE 4/C3 / \ \ \ \ ' !i
1 1'85 SS "� Ntj. v I I / 10 30 I CO '7-1\ *ALL SPECIFIED CASTINGS ARE MANUFACTURED BY NEENAH FOUNDARY COMPANY
I I \ \ \ c
12.5 1 1 I INTERSE �%i
q I EASTLINoFwEST \ \ \� \\\ �� GRADING NOTES:
10 p 475 FT & 56UTH LIN \ \
1 I I OF NORTH 1901 FT O \ \ E 0 \ 410
`
1 I OF NEI/4 OF 51 °0 \ \ \ \\\ \ / 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS INCLUDING LOCATIONS, AND RIM
9 5T M= 6.0 1 SEC. 8, T.30, R.23.\ SW'LY F \ \�\ O AND INVERT ELEVATIONS, OF EXISTING DRAINAGE AND SANITARY STRUCTURES. LOCATION
2015"R.C..- IN 18 � � STATE TR AND SIZE OF EXISTING SANITARY, WATER, AND STORM SEWER STUBS, AND EXISTING
10 TtN\ V -q I I 6 N-^' \ \ \ �\ \ GRADES SHALL ALSO BE VERIFIED.
1 I 03.45 p Coote
2. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM A TOPOGRAPHICAL
FT
90
�� 08
ACROSS INFILTRATION BASIN AREAS, AND BE ONLY LOW IMPACT TRACK EQUIPMENT. BASIN
OUTLET
STRUCTURE #2
AREAS SHALL BE EXCAVATED WITH A BACKHOE STATIONED OUTSIDE OF THE AREA AS MUCH
(SEE 10/C2)
AS POSSIBLE.
UNDERGROUND STORMTECH
2. DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE ADJACENT PARKING LOT AND BUILDING, THE
STORM WATER STORAGE SYSTEM #1:
INFILTRATION BASIN AREA SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM TRAFFIC AND SEDIMENT
(10) ROWS OF (16) MC -4500 -
WITH SILT FENCE.
CHAMBERS W/ ISOLATOR RO
(SEE 3/C3)
ZONED: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL)
NOT
OF 24 INCHES WITH THE USE OF APPROPRIATE EQUIPMENT (TILLER, RIPPER, ETC.).
INFILTRATION BASIN NOTES:
1 1 FT \ \ \ SURVEY PROVIDED BY O'MALLEY & KRON LAND SURVEYORS, COLD SPRING, MN. (320) 685-5905
C. 3 , R.2 03.45
139 KI E _ \ \ \ \ 3. BENCHMARK: TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED IN SOUTHWEST QUADRANT OF INTERSECTION
C
Tv \ OF COUNTY ROAD H2 AND GREENFIELD AVENUE - ELEV = 910.79 (88 DATUM)
o J •�S � \�tiA \ \ \ �
Cg D o O 4. NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ANY INCONSISTENCIES ARE DISCOVERED BETWEEN
/07• I� EDdt IGS E 0 O��O ` \ \ ACTUAL SITE CONDITIONS AND WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WHICH ARE
SO o O O \0 \ \ \ SIGNIFICANT ENOUGH TO ALTER THE INTENT OF THE DRAWINGS.
D6 CB
RB CU CB _ - - - - - `3 Os \ \\ \ \
06 0 ` \\ \ ` \ 5. IF REQUIRED BY THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, THE
F ROUTE - -_� 906 •8 h � \ O \ \
- - �`V C 1 / 4 \ o \ \\ OWNER OR CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A PLUMBING PERMIT PRIOR TO THE
ss i O b x \ \ INSTALLATION OF ANY STORM SEWER UTILITIES.
-u' WA
O6 1 0 .60 O TH
N R DOC.
CB 90 E1/4O / - \ \ 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER ONE CALL AT (800) 252-1166 FOR A
CB7 CB6
CB3 \ 5 _ _ _ \ Com° \ UTILITY LOCATE PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION AND VERIFY LOCATIONS OF
m-- 1 - _ - - 90 EOROU \� UTILITIES BEFORE BEGINNING WORK.
06.,501 z OHP` \ \ \ 7. SEE SHEET C2 FOR STANDARD DETAILS.
------ �_-- O \ \
6, S 55 EOF ROUTE EOF ROUTE - - \ \ \ \ 8. ALL LENGTHS OF STORM SEWER OR CULVERT PIPE SPECIFIED ON THIS PLAN INCLUDE
1 L 1 EX I O$ 0)�S / �\ \ THE LENGTHS OF ANY ASSOCIATED FLARED END SECTIONS.
Z 1 INTERSECTION OF RETAINING WALL NOTE: HIGHEST ELEVATION ALONG FES1
EAST LINE OF WEST LENGTH = 34 LF EMERGENCY OVERFLOW (EOF) FES2 \ \ 9. TRASH GUARDS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL STORM SEWER END SECTIONS.
RIM- 330 FT & SOUTH LINE HEIGHT= 0 TO 1.5 -FT ROUTE IS 906.0
I =897. 95 EX i O N OUTLET ZO ED: PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) \ 10. FINISHED ELEVATIONS OF LAWN/GREEN AREAS ADJACENT TO BUILDINGS SHALL BE
DEMOLITION sA W OF NORTH 365.46 FT ZONED: R-4 (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) I STRUCTURE #1 A MINIMUM OF 6" BELOW FINISHED FLOOR OR TOP -OF -BLOCK ELEVATION.
LIMITS I OF NEI/4 OF SWI/4, D I (SEE 9/C2) INFILTRATION BASIN #1
1 Q I SEC. 8, T.30, R.23. 1 D (SEE 1/C3)
1 I A BOTTOM F IN = 899.5 1 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM CALCULATIONS TO VERIFY EARTHWORK QUANTITIES.
O I D BASIN O (�--2.5 CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL BE BASED ON EARTHWORK CALCULATIONS COMPLETED BY
I J N I TOP OF SIN = 906.0 THE CONTRACTOR
I � I SEGO NE
12. SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE FLOW LINE AND/OR FINISHED GRADES, UNLESS OTHERWISE
I 1 INDICATED. TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONS ARE 6" ABOVE THE FLOW LINE SPOT
NEER BLOCK BLOCK ELEVATION SHOWN ON THE PLANS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
1 IGEN 13. "EX" DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONS. "HP" DENOTES HIGH POINTS.
I � I C
14. ALL PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ARE TOP OF PAVING OR GUTTER, UNLESS NOTED
OTHERWISE. PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ARE INTENDED TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE
1. TRAFFIC FROM CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LIMITED AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE
4. ONCE EXCAVATED TO FINAL GRADE INFILTRATION AREAS SHALL BE INSPECTED TO ENSURE
ACROSS INFILTRATION BASIN AREAS, AND BE ONLY LOW IMPACT TRACK EQUIPMENT. BASIN
THAT NO SEDIMENT FROM ONGOING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS REACHING THE
AREAS SHALL BE EXCAVATED WITH A BACKHOE STATIONED OUTSIDE OF THE AREA AS MUCH
INFILTRATION AREA. ALL INFILTRATION AREAS SHALL BE INSPECTED TO ENSURE THAT
AS POSSIBLE.
UNAUTHORIZED EQUIPMENT IS NOT BEING DRIVEN ACROSS THE INFILTRATION AREAS.
2. DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE ADJACENT PARKING LOT AND BUILDING, THE
5. ONCE THE INFILTRATION BASINS ARE COMPLETED AND THE SITE HAS BEEN
INFILTRATION BASIN AREA SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM TRAFFIC AND SEDIMENT
STABILIZED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE AND PAY FOR TESTING THE
WITH SILT FENCE.
INFILTRATION RATES OF THE BOTTOMS OF THE BASINS. THE TEST RESULTS SHALL
BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY AND THE ENGINEER.
3. THE BOTTOM OF THE INFILTRATION BASIN SHALL BE SCARIFIED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH
6. FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE INFILTRATION BASINS SHALL NOT BE COMPLETED UNTIL
OF 24 INCHES WITH THE USE OF APPROPRIATE EQUIPMENT (TILLER, RIPPER, ETC.).
THE UPSTREAM DRAINAGE AREAS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED.
AFTER SCARIFICATION, THE BASIN SIDEWALLS AND BOTTOM SHALL BE LINED WITH A
Z
MINIMUM OF 4 -INCHES OF SAND/COMPOST MIX. SAND/COMPOST MIX SHALL BE
PLACED AS LOOSELY AS POSSIBLE.
w
BOTTOM OF BACKFILL/
TOP OF CRUSHED ROCK
ELEVATION =905.23
TOP OF CHAMBER
ELEVATION=904.23
U
TOP OF PAVEMENT
LOW ELEVATION = 906.70
HIGH ELEVATION = 910.75
BOTTOM OF CLASS 5/
TOP OF BACKFILL
LOW ELEVATION = 905.95
HIGH ELEVATION = 910.00
INLET - ELEVATION=901.15 J
(VERIFY W/ MANUFACTURER)
BOTTOM OF CHAMBER
OUTLET - ELEVATION=901.15 ELEVATION=899.23
(VERIFY W/ MANUFACTURER) BOTTOM OF STONE
ELEVATION =898.48
NOTE: PAVEMENT AND CLASS 5
ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS
DETAIL ARE THE ELEVATIONS AT
THE HIGHEST AND LOWEST
PAVEMENT ELEVATION ABOVE
THE SYSTEM. SURFACE
ELEVATIONS WILL VARY ABOVE
THE STORMTECH SYSTEM.
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
REGARDING THE STORMTECH
SYSTEM, CONTACT THE
FOLLOWING:
ADS CONTACTS:
TOM ROONEY
(612)756-3552
MIKE ARENDS
(612)597-1909
NOTE: THE PURPOSE OF THIS DETAIL IS TO SHOW THE RELEVANT ELEVATIONS OF THE STORMTECH MC -4500
UNDERGROUND STORM WATER SYSTEM FOR THIS PROJECT. SEE PLAN FOR NUMBER OF ROWS, AS WELL AS NUMBER
OF CHAMBERS PER ROW. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE UNDERGROUND STORM WATER SYSTEM PER SHOP
DRAWINGS TO BE PREPARED BY THE SUPPLIER AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. THE SYSTEM SHALL ALSO BE
INSTALLED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL OF THE MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
UNDERGROUND STORM WATER STORAGE SYSTEM # 1 ELEV
NTS
TOWARDS CATCH BASINS AND/OR OUTLETS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
STORMTECH SYSTEM NOTES. RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED ELEVATIONS, WHICH WILL PROMOTE
POSITIVE DRAINAGE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT SITE.
1. TRAFFIC FROM CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LIMITED AS MUCH AS
POSSIBLE ACROSS AREA DESIGNATED FOR STORMTECH SYSTEM, AND BE ONLY
LOW IMPACT TRACK EQUIPMENT. DESIGNATED AREA SHALL BE EXCAVATED
WITH A BACKHOE STATIONED OUTSIDE OF THE AREA AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.
2. THE BOTTOM OF THE STORMTECH EXCAVATION SHALL BE SCARIFIED TO A
MINIMUM DEPTH OF 24 INCHES WITH THE USE OF APPROPRIATE EQUIPMENT
(TILLER, RIPPER, ETC.) PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE CRUSHED ROCK BASE
3. ONCE THE EXCAVATION AND SCARIFICATION IS COMPLETED, THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL ARRANGE AND PAY FOR TESTING THE INFILTRATION RATE OF THE BOTTOM OF
THE EXCAVATION PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE CRUSHED ROCK BASE. THE TEST
RESULTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY AND THE ENGINEER.
4. STORMTECH SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE
MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.
TOP OF PAVEMENT
LOW ELEVATION = 903 70
BOTTOM OF BACKFILL/
TOP OF CRUSHED ROCK
HIGH ELEVATION = 907.00
ELEVATION =902.00
BOTTOM OF CLASS 5/
TOP OF CHAMBER
TOP OF BACKFILL
ELEVATION=901.50
LOW ELEVATION = 903.05
_
HIGH ELEVATION = 906.25
INLET - ELEVATION =899.00 -
(VERIFY W/ MANUFACTURER)
BOTTOM OF CHAMBER
ELEVATION =899.00
BOTTOM OF STONE
ELEVATION=898.50
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
REGARDING THE STORMTECH
SYSTEM, CONTACT THE
FOLLOWING:
ADS CONTACTS:
TOM ROONEY
(612)756-3552
MIKE ARENDS
(612) 597-1909
NOTE: THE PURPOSE OF THIS DETAIL IS TO SHOW THE RELEVANT ELEVATIONS OF THE STORMTECH SC -740
UNDERGROUND STORM WATER SYSTEM FOR THIS PROJECT. SEE PLAN FOR NUMBER OF ROWS, AS WELL AS NUMBER
OF CHAMBERS PER ROW. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE UNDERGROUND STORM WATER SYSTEM PER SHOP
DRAWINGS TO BE PREPARED BY THE SUPPLIER AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. THE SYSTEM SHALL ALSO BE
INSTALLED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL OF THE MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
UNDERGROUND STORM WATER STORAGE SYSTEM #2 ELEV
NTS
BOTTOM OF BACKFILL/
TOP OF CRUSHED ROCK
ELEVATION=902.00
TOP OF CHAMBER
ELEVATION =901.507
NOTE: CADD FILES FOR ESTIMATING EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ARE AVAILABLE
TO CONTRACTORS FOR PREPARING BIDS. IN ORDER TO RECEIVE THE CADD FILES,
THE CONTRACTOR WILL NEED TO SIGN A HOLD -HARMLESS AGREEMENT PROVIDED
BY SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, AND AGREE TO PAY A $50 PROCESSING
FEE. THE CADD FILES WILL BE RELEASED UPON RECEIPT OF THE CHECK
TOP OF PAVEMENT
LOW ELEVATION = 905.95
HIGH ELEVATION = 909.20
BOTTOM OF CLASS 5/
TOP OF BACKFILL
LOW ELEVATION = 905.20
HIGH ELEVATION = 908.45
yl n
u V
INLET - ELEVATION =899.00
(VERIFY W/ MANUFACTURER)
BOTTOM OF CHAMBER
ELEVATION=899.00
BOTTOM OF STONE
ELEVATION=898.50
NOTE: PAVEMENT AND CLASS 5
ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS
DETAIL ARE THE ELEVATIONS AT
THE HIGHEST AND LOWEST
PAVEMENT ELEVATION ABOVE
THE SYSTEM. SURFACE
ELEVATIONS WILL VARY ABOVE
THE STORMTECH SYSTEM.
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
REGARDING THE STORMTECH
SYSTEM, CONTACT THE
FOLLOWING:
ADS CONTACTS:
TOM ROONEY
(612) 756-3552
MIKE ARENDS
(612)597-1909
NOTE: THE PURPOSE OF THIS DETAIL IS TO SHOW THE RELEVANT ELEVATIONS OF THE STORMTECH SC -740
UNDERGROUND STORM WATER SYSTEM FOR THIS PROJECT. SEE PLAN FOR NUMBER OF ROWS, AS WELL AS NUMBER
OF CHAMBERS PER ROW. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE UNDERGROUND STORM WATER SYSTEM PER SHOP
DRAWINGS TO BE PREPARED BY THE SUPPLIER AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. THE SYSTEM SHALL ALSO BE
INSTALLED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL OF THE MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
UNDERGROUND STORM WATER STORAGE SYSTEM #3 ELEV
NTS
GRADING PLAN
T
O CL
N 0_
O Q
Oa
Lo O 3 O
I o0E
0 0
J (D} 0
a O c C
O�
m 0 C N
D U'N
O.5:
Q- V)
N O N
� Q L
�N
U O Q� N
N
E
z(D N
� -
c c
�>
U �0 a)
N
(r - 0)
w
W
0
w
w �
N O
04
x
U �
X
x
C 0
0 0
m
LL
V
(D � 0
U
Z
O
z
_
� co _>
��
OO N
co
Q 7
Z
N
z
w
0- Li _c
2
Z
U0
O
W
X11 w
U
0
UQ
�
PROJECT
N
NUMBER:
W
0'
c
19007
W
NC
N
U)
SCALE:
c
1 "=40'
_J
O
N
N
D
L
U
C3 of 6
W
U
U
>
N �
r
co
OC Z
O
0:3N =
N �
�
Z
O
w
U
Lu
Lu
0
� w
Z
o
Lu O N co v
� Z
w
Z
O
Q 7
Ow
Lu
O <
z
UQ
�
PROJECT
o-)
NUMBER:
19007
SCALE:
1 "=40'
0
C3 of 6
�m
I1 m
�m
� ku?
I V�A
0 if
Not to Scale
0
-4 5 10 L1l� _
d�
I,
F - MVA- ME
IM WM4q�
PM
Hill Ma MIN er ��r'7�rt�� � ISI ■ �,'�J �`■iil JAL
�
0.5
�v
O -
•
V
0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0 0.5 0.5 0.5 .5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5
_
6 0.7 .8 0.
0.41/.7 0.9
0. 0.9 1.3
1.3 1. 1. 0.8
.2 2.0 1. 1. 0.8 0.5 / \'
0. 1.3 1.8 2.4 3.1 2.7 2.8 3.2 2.5 2.1 1.7 1.6 1.9 2.2 .8 3.2 2.4 2.9 2.1 1.6 1.0 0.5
N
O.E 1.6 2.3 3.0 4.0 3.6 3.6 4.1 3.2 2.6 2.1 1.8 2.4 2.8 .7 4.1 3.1 .0 3. 2.7 .1 1 2 0.6 0.4 0.2 ` \
CD
O.E 1.7 2.6 3.5 512 5 3 5.3 5.3 3.-, 3.0; 3 0 .,; .6 3.2 4.3 5.6 4. .8 .6 3.0 2. 1.3 0.6 4 .2 0.2
9
O.E 1.8 2.8 400 b'�1 yYF .0 5.5 4 2.5 1.3 0.6 .4 0 0. 0.2 0
0. s 2 .1 3.1 4 2 6 2 6.2 6.7 4. 3.5 2 7 2 .3 3 .1 3. 3 6.8 9 5. 3.6 2. 1.5 .7 0/4/0.3 0. 0. 0.2 0.2
LJJ``
1. 2 .3 3.3 4r -'Ll N-6.4 5'8 5.8 6.4 4.7 3.8 3.0 2.7 3.4 4.1 5 6.5 5. 6. 5.4 3.8 .9 1.7 0.8 0 0.4 .3 0.3 0.3 \ O
1. m.4.6 6.4 5 ti 5.7 6.5 4.9 4.0 3.2 2.9 3.6 4.3 5 7 6.4 4.9 .4 .0 3 1. 0.9 0�6 0.` 0 4 0. 0.5 0.5 0.5 0 4 .4/ 5
4 028' _ 24 1 �vv 99. _0.. •
1.1 2.3 3.4 4.6 6.35/.6 5.6 6.4 4.8 3.9 3.1 2.8 3.6 4.2 5.7 6.4 E.0 .4 5. 3.9 3.0 1.7 0.9 0.6 .5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 .7 6 0.4 \ 0 4 0. 9
1 3.2 4.3 605 6 4 6.4 6.6 4. 3.6 2 9 .6 .3 4.0 5 7 7.1 .4 .8 5.3 3.7 2.8 .5 a':8` ` 0.6 8 1.2 1.3 1 3 1. 0 6 0.3 \ o .6 1.1 1.3 1.4 1. 1. 0.5
7
� ("� O D \
0. 1.9 2.9 4.2 b .2 _ 6.6 .1 5.0 .5 .5 1 0.7 0.8 1.4 1. 1.9 .9 1.9 1.4 0. 0.5 0. �0. 1.1 1.8 0 .1 2.1 1.
0. E 1.8 2.7 3.7 5.8 5 5 5.5 5.8 3.9 3.1 2.4 .1 .8 3.5 5 3 6.3 .4 .0 4.8 3. 2.4 0.9 0.8 1.3 .0 2.4 2. 3.0 2.7 713 1.0 0.7 0.5 .4 ® 0 9 1. 2.3 .6 3. 7 0.4 C
44.C)
0. 1.7 2.4 3.2 415 4.1 4.1 4.6 3.4 2.8 2.3 2.0 2.6 3.0 4.2 4.7 3.7 4.6 3.9 2.8 2 1.4 1.1 1.4 2. 2.5 3.0/ 3.9 3.9 2, 8 2. / 2.2 1.5 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.3 cb
0.5 0.8 .6 2. 2.9 3.9 .0 2. �.8 C
V�
N. ;� 4� k� ,
0. 1.4 2.1 2.6 �6 3.2 3.2 3.6 2.8 2.4 2.0 1.8 2.2 2.6 3. 3.6 2.8 3 6 3.1 2.4 2.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.1 4.6 4 4 3.1 5 2. 1� �l.1 0.7 .4 .3 0.2 0 `� 0. .3 2.0 .6 3.9 / 4.6 1.6 5 0.1 C
N J*, *%
0.2 0 A 0. 1.1 1.5 1.9 2.6 2.3 2.3 2.7 2.1 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.7 2.0 2. 2.6 2.2 2.7 2.3 1.9 1. 1.5 1.6 2.6 3.9 5.4 .1 5.2 3. \ 7 F&1 0.7 .4 .3 2 0. .3 .5 0 1. 2.2 3.1 5.4 1.9 0.5 0.2 0.
F- \\ \ \ I I I,/ ,
0.1 0.1 .1 1.4 1.7 1.5I 1.6 2.1 .0 4. 5.1 .0 6.4 5.2 3 .3 1. 1.1 0 4 0. 0. 0. 0. 1.0 1. 2.2 3.4 3.9 .5 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.0
161- Ln
0.0 0.1if) 0.1 0.9 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.0 1. 0.9 0.8 1 0 .1 1.0 1.0 1.1 1. 1 9 2.9 3. 3.0 5.0 5.3 3. 7 2.1 1.4 0.� 0.4 .4 2.1 2.7 .0 .9 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0
70' 0" o - o
0.0 0.7� 0.1 0.1 .2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 .5 0.5 0.6 0.7 J� 2 1 .2 2.2 3.1 3.8 3.5 2.7 2. 1.5 0.8 5 0.3 0.2 0.2 ,/� 0. 0.3� 0.5 0.7 1.1 .7 1 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
l� 12 '-Q 013
" `
0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 .3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 P4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0. 0.4 0.3 0 4 .5 0.6 0.6 0.7 9 1.0 1.2 2.7 2 2.4 2.1 1. 0.8 .4 0.3 0. 0.2 0. 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0. 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 -0. �30 0. 0.2 0.2 0 3 0.3 0.4 6 0. .8 1 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
W
N W N O
" O O
A a)
ro c v d
.1 o ro
C U 0 a c
a O
m -" a) 0 O X -" N
a) i) O N a) A
a N a s aNi aai m
v s41i w° m
N a E N .0 .7 E
103 '� .Oi
a o c O
m W03 G U C 01 u
v av aa,aa" IE)
c m v y a v rn o
" u) N N N •/I N W tT c U
o y iL 0 43
N N 0 Sroi -S+ N i 0
E a� cL o rn w
a �� N m a 00a m
c ova
O ."
w w O C
mw a,x N oar rote-"
a O 0 H- a i 4 m a N 0
ti x m v a) m a y
N W
y v oa) o m
> a - 43 c E
a A
N N U 0 w N m
O N N O N C R. E O
a o Uro ro R a
n a >43
m .ti C1a. UJ w G w m roc P.
y a y w 5 H o 4, ro c v
ti ro C C a C N3 N° N
E O -"
v m sUi sEi a
>. C o a
vmow°c'Hc4ranEE�°-.H
C O~ U G N ro
a) a O O U 2 a) o N W c
a"ro a m rn� rob m E
0. N 41 N -UJ c a c ti
a N v ami w> v a0i 0 E a
N a Owow
m C a a
0
4 E>1
N U G H" i� O O
ro .A a s ,� c ro '0
ax a > a >OP
mN �ti -H-
-H 0
" -"ow sm>c
t� c ow".i sU ro-
a a r ro> v a a v
a ." a u> aa w m 100
> a) O o " N
H iL S1 ti E W E% O 1) H ro
Q
1.1
W
14
1.1 1.1 1.4 1
.1 1'0
1.1
.3 1.4
1.0
CD
212
--
2.0 2.0 2.3 18
1.5 1. 1
.6
.0 2.3
1.9
1.7
1.7
4
54' -0"
8'8-61.36
Byg �'
O
-g0"02
7
' -
1.3 1. 1. 0.8
.2 2.0 1. 1. 0.8 0.5 / \'
0. 1.3 1.8 2.4 3.1 2.7 2.8 3.2 2.5 2.1 1.7 1.6 1.9 2.2 .8 3.2 2.4 2.9 2.1 1.6 1.0 0.5
N
O.E 1.6 2.3 3.0 4.0 3.6 3.6 4.1 3.2 2.6 2.1 1.8 2.4 2.8 .7 4.1 3.1 .0 3. 2.7 .1 1 2 0.6 0.4 0.2 ` \
CD
O.E 1.7 2.6 3.5 512 5 3 5.3 5.3 3.-, 3.0; 3 0 .,; .6 3.2 4.3 5.6 4. .8 .6 3.0 2. 1.3 0.6 4 .2 0.2
9
O.E 1.8 2.8 400 b'�1 yYF .0 5.5 4 2.5 1.3 0.6 .4 0 0. 0.2 0
0. s 2 .1 3.1 4 2 6 2 6.2 6.7 4. 3.5 2 7 2 .3 3 .1 3. 3 6.8 9 5. 3.6 2. 1.5 .7 0/4/0.3 0. 0. 0.2 0.2
LJJ``
1. 2 .3 3.3 4r -'Ll N-6.4 5'8 5.8 6.4 4.7 3.8 3.0 2.7 3.4 4.1 5 6.5 5. 6. 5.4 3.8 .9 1.7 0.8 0 0.4 .3 0.3 0.3 \ O
1. m.4.6 6.4 5 ti 5.7 6.5 4.9 4.0 3.2 2.9 3.6 4.3 5 7 6.4 4.9 .4 .0 3 1. 0.9 0�6 0.` 0 4 0. 0.5 0.5 0.5 0 4 .4/ 5
4 028' _ 24 1 �vv 99. _0.. •
1.1 2.3 3.4 4.6 6.35/.6 5.6 6.4 4.8 3.9 3.1 2.8 3.6 4.2 5.7 6.4 E.0 .4 5. 3.9 3.0 1.7 0.9 0.6 .5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 .7 6 0.4 \ 0 4 0. 9
1 3.2 4.3 605 6 4 6.4 6.6 4. 3.6 2 9 .6 .3 4.0 5 7 7.1 .4 .8 5.3 3.7 2.8 .5 a':8` ` 0.6 8 1.2 1.3 1 3 1. 0 6 0.3 \ o .6 1.1 1.3 1.4 1. 1. 0.5
7
� ("� O D \
0. 1.9 2.9 4.2 b .2 _ 6.6 .1 5.0 .5 .5 1 0.7 0.8 1.4 1. 1.9 .9 1.9 1.4 0. 0.5 0. �0. 1.1 1.8 0 .1 2.1 1.
0. E 1.8 2.7 3.7 5.8 5 5 5.5 5.8 3.9 3.1 2.4 .1 .8 3.5 5 3 6.3 .4 .0 4.8 3. 2.4 0.9 0.8 1.3 .0 2.4 2. 3.0 2.7 713 1.0 0.7 0.5 .4 ® 0 9 1. 2.3 .6 3. 7 0.4 C
44.C)
0. 1.7 2.4 3.2 415 4.1 4.1 4.6 3.4 2.8 2.3 2.0 2.6 3.0 4.2 4.7 3.7 4.6 3.9 2.8 2 1.4 1.1 1.4 2. 2.5 3.0/ 3.9 3.9 2, 8 2. / 2.2 1.5 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.3 cb
0.5 0.8 .6 2. 2.9 3.9 .0 2. �.8 C
V�
N. ;� 4� k� ,
0. 1.4 2.1 2.6 �6 3.2 3.2 3.6 2.8 2.4 2.0 1.8 2.2 2.6 3. 3.6 2.8 3 6 3.1 2.4 2.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.1 4.6 4 4 3.1 5 2. 1� �l.1 0.7 .4 .3 0.2 0 `� 0. .3 2.0 .6 3.9 / 4.6 1.6 5 0.1 C
N J*, *%
0.2 0 A 0. 1.1 1.5 1.9 2.6 2.3 2.3 2.7 2.1 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.7 2.0 2. 2.6 2.2 2.7 2.3 1.9 1. 1.5 1.6 2.6 3.9 5.4 .1 5.2 3. \ 7 F&1 0.7 .4 .3 2 0. .3 .5 0 1. 2.2 3.1 5.4 1.9 0.5 0.2 0.
F- \\ \ \ I I I,/ ,
0.1 0.1 .1 1.4 1.7 1.5I 1.6 2.1 .0 4. 5.1 .0 6.4 5.2 3 .3 1. 1.1 0 4 0. 0. 0. 0. 1.0 1. 2.2 3.4 3.9 .5 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.0
161- Ln
0.0 0.1if) 0.1 0.9 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.0 1. 0.9 0.8 1 0 .1 1.0 1.0 1.1 1. 1 9 2.9 3. 3.0 5.0 5.3 3. 7 2.1 1.4 0.� 0.4 .4 2.1 2.7 .0 .9 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0
70' 0" o - o
0.0 0.7� 0.1 0.1 .2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 .5 0.5 0.6 0.7 J� 2 1 .2 2.2 3.1 3.8 3.5 2.7 2. 1.5 0.8 5 0.3 0.2 0.2 ,/� 0. 0.3� 0.5 0.7 1.1 .7 1 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
l� 12 '-Q 013
" `
0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 .3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 P4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0. 0.4 0.3 0 4 .5 0.6 0.6 0.7 9 1.0 1.2 2.7 2 2.4 2.1 1. 0.8 .4 0.3 0. 0.2 0. 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0. 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 -0. �30 0. 0.2 0.2 0 3 0.3 0.4 6 0. .8 1 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
W
N W N O
" O O
A a)
ro c v d
.1 o ro
C U 0 a c
a O
m -" a) 0 O X -" N
a) i) O N a) A
a N a s aNi aai m
v s41i w° m
N a E N .0 .7 E
103 '� .Oi
a o c O
m W03 G U C 01 u
v av aa,aa" IE)
c m v y a v rn o
" u) N N N •/I N W tT c U
o y iL 0 43
N N 0 Sroi -S+ N i 0
E a� cL o rn w
a �� N m a 00a m
c ova
O ."
w w O C
mw a,x N oar rote-"
a O 0 H- a i 4 m a N 0
ti x m v a) m a y
N W
y v oa) o m
> a - 43 c E
a A
N N U 0 w N m
O N N O N C R. E O
a o Uro ro R a
n a >43
m .ti C1a. UJ w G w m roc P.
y a y w 5 H o 4, ro c v
ti ro C C a C N3 N° N
E O -"
v m sUi sEi a
>. C o a
vmow°c'Hc4ranEE�°-.H
C O~ U G N ro
a) a O O U 2 a) o N W c
a"ro a m rn� rob m E
0. N 41 N -UJ c a c ti
a N v ami w> v a0i 0 E a
N a Owow
m C a a
0
4 E>1
N U G H" i� O O
ro .A a s ,� c ro '0
ax a > a >OP
mN �ti -H-
-H 0
" -"ow sm>c
t� c ow".i sU ro-
a a r ro> v a a v
a ." a u> aa w m 100
> a) O o " N
H iL S1 ti E W E% O 1) H ro
a) >�
E>JQ
M-0 0
Z c �--
Z3 i
>
Q
N
O
O
>
Z
U
CY)O
O
W
O
2
0
CD
M
m
o
o
a) >�
E>JQ
M-0 0
Z c �--
Z3 i
>
Item No: 08E
Meeting Date: July 8, 2019
MOUNDS VIEW Type of Business: Council Business
City Administrator Review:
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Jon Sevald, Community Development Director
Item Title/Subject: Resolution 9133, Approving the Preliminary Plat of Crossroad
Pointe (Tabled from June 24, 2019) (Planning Case MU2019-001)
Introduction:
INH Properties is proposing to develop a 128 -unit apartment building at the south corner of
Mounds View Boulevard and County Road H2. The project involves multiple planning
applications, including a request for Preliminary Plat approval.
This item was Tabled at the June 24, 2019 Council meeting, with the intent that the Council
would take action on all Crossroad Pointe items at the same meeting.
Discussion:
As -is, the project consists of three parcels, divided by Greenfield Ave. The Developer is proposing
that the City vacate the street and all city easements, and combine the properties into one lot.
Greenfield Avenue would terminate as a Hammerhead dead-end. There would be no access
from Greenfield Avenue into the plat. All access from the plat would be from Edgewood Drive, as
was directed by the City Council at its February 4, 2019 Work Session.
Analysis
A Preliminary Plat of a Major Subdivision involves the division of property in which more than
one additional parcel or lot is created, or which is two acres or larger in size. The subject
property is four acres (excluding right-of-way dedication).
The property is proposed to be zoned PUD Planned Unit Development, and guided as Mixed
Use PUD in the Comprehensive Plan (2008). Minimum lot size and dimensions are to be
determined by the City Council as subject to an approved PUD.
The Developer has submitted a Survey, Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, and Grading & Drainage
Plan to the City. Staff disseminated plans to applicable departments and agencies for
comments. The City has completed a Title Certificate, to be reviewed by the City Attorney.
In general, the Preliminary Plat is consistent with the City Code, subject to Rice Creek
Watershed District (RCWD) permitting requirements, and any requirements of the County
Surveyor.
Approval of a Preliminary Plat provides direction from the City to the Developer, to prepare a
Final Plat to be approved at a later date.
Strategic Plan Strategy/Goal:
Continue BR&E program, maximize utilization of development space and current list of available
sites, encourage land owners to maintain their properties, & consider residential development.
Item 08E
Page 2 of 3
Financial Impact:
None.
Summary
INH Properties is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat to combine three parcels into one lot,
for a planned apartment building. Prior to Final Plat approval, it is the City's intent to vacate a
portion of Greenfield Avenue.
A Public Hearing was held on June 24, 2019.
Planning Commission Recommendation:
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat at its June 19, 2019
meeting (Resolution 1100-19).
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat.
The City Council is requested to consider the following options:
1. Approve Resolution 9133, approving the Preliminary Plat.
2. Deny Resolution 9133. If the Council chooses this option, Staff would need to be directed to
draft a resolution of denial with findings of fact appropriate to support the denial.
3. Table the request. If additional information is needed before a decision can be rendered or
if more discussion is needed, the Council can simply move to table the request until such
information has been provided.
Respectfully submitted,
04
Jon —S e'07, A I C P
Community Development Director
Attachments
1. Aerial Map
2. Resolution 9133
3. Preliminary Plat, submitted May 30, 2019
The Mounds View Vision
A Thriving Desirable Community
Item 08E
Page 3 of 3
Aerial Map
The Mounds View Vision
A Thriving Desirable Community
RESOLUTION 9133
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF CROSSROAD POINTE
WHEREAS, INH Property Management Inc (Developer), representing the property
owner; Mounds View Economic Development Authority, is requesting approval of a Preliminary
Plat of a Major Subdivision on property; legally described as:
Address
PID
Legal Description
2400
08-30-23-31-0005
The North 363 feet of the West 330 feet of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest
County
1/4 of Section 8, Township 30, Range 23, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
Road H2
2394
08-30-23-31-0071
That part of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 8, Township 30,
Mounds
Range 23, Ramsey County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the
View Blvd
intersection of the East line of the West 330 feet and the South line of the
North 365.46 feet of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4; thence North
parallel with the West line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 a
distance of 255 feet; thence East parallel with the North line of said Northeast
1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 a distance of 47.07 feet; thence Southeasterly to the
intersection of the East line of the West 475 feet and the South line of the
North 193.01 feet of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 ; thence South
parallel with the West line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 and to
the South line of the North 365.46 feet thereof; thence West to the point of
beginning, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and
situate in Ramsey County, Minnesota. Together with a non-exclusive easement
for driveway purposes, 25 feet in width, over and across part of the Northeast
1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 8, Township 30, Range 23, Ramsey County,
Minnesota, the South and Southwesterly lines of which are described as
follows: Beginning at the intersection of the East line of the West 360 feet and
the South line of the North 110.46 feet of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest
1/4; thence East parallel with the North line of said Northeast 1/4 of the
Southwest 1/4 a distance of 17.07 feet; thence Southeasterly to the First
American Title Insurance Company intersection of the East line of the West
475 feet and the South line of the North 193.01 feet of said Northeast 1/4 of
the Southwest 1/4; and said line there terminating.
2390
08-30-23-31-0072
That part of the North 365.46 feet of the NE % of the SW % of Section 8,
Mounds
Township 30, Range 23, Ramsey County, Minnesota lying Southwesterly of the
View Blvd
center line of State Trunk Highway No. 10 except the West 330 feet there of
and except that part described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the
East line of the West 330 feet and the South line of the North
365.46 feet of said NE % of the SW %; thence North parallel with the West line
of said NE % of the SW % a distance of 255 feet; thence East parallel with the
North line of said NE % of the SW % a distance of 47.07 feet; thence
Resolution 9133
Page 2 of 3
Southeasterly to the intersection of the East line of the West 475 feet and the
South line of the North 193.01 feet of said NE % of the SW %; thence South
parallel with the West line of said NE % of the SW % and to the South line of
the North 365.46 feet thereof; thence West to the point of beginning.
Together with a non-exclusive easement for driveway purposes over and
across the South 31 feet of the North 345.46 feet of the East 115 feet of the
West 475 feet of the NE % of the SW % of Section 8, Township 30, Range 23,
Ramsey Comity, Minnesota. Together with a non-exclusive easement for
parking purposes over and across the East 10 feet of that part of the NE % of
the SW % of Section 8, Township 30, Range 23, Ramsey County, Minnesota
described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the East line of the West
330feet and the South line of the North 365.46 feet of said NE % of the SW %;
thence North parallel with the West line of said NE % of the SW % a distance of
255 feet; thence East parallel with the North line of said NE % of the SW % a
distance of 47.07 feet; thence Southeasterly to the intersection of the East line
of the West 475 feet and the South line of the North 193.01 feet of said NE
of the SW %; thence South parallel with the West line of sad NE % of the SW
and to the South line of the 365.46 feet thereof, thence West to the point of
beginning. Together with an easement for utility purposes over, under and
across the South 10 feet of the North 314.46 feet of the East 115 feet of the
West 475 feet of the NE % of the SW % of Section 8, Township 30, Range 23,
Ramsey County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the properties are zoned PUD Planned Unit Development, and are within the
County Road 10 Corridor Overlay District. The proposed land use is Multi -Family Residential, and is
consistent with approved uses within these districts; and,
WHEREAS, the properties are guided for Mixed Use PUD in the Comprehensive Plan (2008).
The City Council Finds that the Preliminary Plat is consist with the Comprehensive Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the Developer has submitted a Preliminary Plat and related plans to the City. These
plans were disseminated by Staff to applicable departments and agencies for comments.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the request, recommending Approval of the
Preliminary Plat at its June 19, 2019 meeting (Resolution 1100-19); and,
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a dully noticed Public Hearing on June 24, 2019; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mounds View City Council
approves of the Preliminary Plat of Crossroad Pointe, subject to compliance with the following
conditions:
The Developer shall comply with applicable requirements, received from:
Erin Laberee, Ramsey County, Traffic Engineer
(May 7, 2019)
Nick Tomczik, Rice Creek Watershed District, Permit Coordinator
(May 7, 2019)
Jacob Martin, Mounds View, Fire Inspector I
(May 16, 2019)
Nick Henly, Mounds View, Building Official
(May 17, 2019)
Tyler McLeete, Stantec, City Engineer
(May 21, 2019)
Greg Gund, Ramsey County, Survey Technician
(May 29, 2019)
Resolution 9133
Page 3 of 3
2. The Developer shall comply with any requirements of a Plat Opinion, to be issued by the City
Attorney.
The Developer shall pay a Park Dedication Fee of $110,000, equal to 10% of the land value (e.g.
10% of the agreed purchase price between the Mounds View EDA and INH Property
Management, excluding allowances). This fee shall be paid prior to the City signing the Final
Plat Mylar's.
4. The Developer shall construct all improvements shown on the Preliminary Plat (dated May 29,
2019), and Grading & Drainage Plan (undated, but received May 30, 2019) including, but not
limited to:
A. Greenfield Ave. hammerhead dead-end.
B. Removal of existing driveway access on Mounds View Blvd, restoration of landscaping
and trail, and restriping of shoulder.
C. All sidewalks and trails, whether within public right-of-way, or on private property.
D. All Stormwater infiltration basins, and related drainage infrastructure. Basins and
infrastructure shall be privately maintained.
E. All utilities shall be located, or relocated underground.
Minor variations from these plans may be administratively approved during the review process of
building permits and construction plans.
5. Approval of the Grading & Drainage Plan is subject to an approved permit issued by the Rice
Creek Watershed District (RCWD). A permit shall be approved or conditionally approved, prior
City approval of the Final Plat.
6. The Developer shall prepare and submit a Final Plat to the City for its review, and approval by
the City Council.
7. The City intends to Vacate any applicable public easement, prior to approval of the Final Plat.
8. Recording of the Final Plat shall occur after conveyance of the land from the EDA to the
Developer. All applicable easements shall be recorded concurrent with the Final Plat.
9. The Developer shall reimburse the City for all plan review expenses in excess of the Plat
Application Fee, including, but not limited to; City Engineer review, City Attorney review.
Adopted this 8t1i day of July, 2019.
Carol A. Mueller, Mayor
ATTEST:
Nyle Zikmund, City Administrator
(SEAL)
m
n=b-�=
=OCI��
H Ci �V cn
G m <
Orem
C7 Z m
fTl l7 H
H a C m
O Z m
m(7a
H H H O Z
mL,_r--n
-I
C7 C7 C7
cz
ti„ -1=
Z�H m moo
M
D H T
::j v i
O n v Om
30
m4)UD m
v
V = y D
mmLn
��
O7v�O
v<=
n -<)a=
F-4
Z 7v
y 1 C
X • r G
w N C
NJ Z
rr
rn c1u M rm
rC31 Z
G 0 '� r
rn r
Q` C7
w
N
G
1 H 0
X w r -p.
r
G N
�w�Cn
00 Z- -i
rWz
0 � cs m
r,: N N
O`
�
m
�
O
Z
Z�
Z
m
N
O
or
���
n
M
C7
N
uJ
LA
p mZ
H
n
D
c
�1O
m
y
Z
o
m
c
z
O
Z
��x
O
�
�
7C7
H
I
m
b
7C7
•
O<
m
p
H
ZZ
m
O
>dr
CD
r - ;v
mx�
n
Y
O y
1 H 0
X w r -p.
r
G N
�w�Cn
00 Z- -i
rWz
0 � cs m
r,: N N
O`
O
H
�
m
�
O
Z
Z�
Z
m
N
O
or
���
d�
00
N
uJ
m
p mZ
ITI
O
�1O
w w Z
y
Z
y
y Z
°
�y
z
O
Z
��x
N
O
H
I
zz
CI)h
H
--i
a
m
O
>dr
CD
r - ;v
mx�
n
Y
O y
I
y
l?j
�
m
O
M
��tA
+
m
00
I
H
¢¢
w
0
�
W
m
CAI Pt
m
�
CD ~
cD
dd
bx
m
m
O
C)
.8 'p, `C
C
m
a
N
O
H
�
m
�
O
Z
Z
Z
m
N
O
oDi
���
H
00
N
uJ
m
p mZ
m
cn
O
�1O
w w Z
NO
Z
N
°
m
O
Z
Z
C
Z
O
H
I
-n
H
m
n
mn
m
co Q
�(J)
HTj
Tj
<
m
Tj
Tj
H m
C7
Tj
O
H �7
Z H
<
00 I'D
�O O
00 rn
r T T
N
O
Z
m
v
H
Z
G>
r
m
m
a
7D
m
U)
H
C7
m
Z
a
N
O
nv u vv i i m
1G l..l.t'.Cal
vv
:::. N 00050'29 363.02
......... .......... . ... ... .... w
—8"V.C,P................................. HIGHWAY EASEMENT 9 ° H
w . HIGHWAY EASEMENT . ...�7 00� l�aoN% PER DOC. NO. 1445107 .::06..... °.. I:
o �" PER DOC. NO. 1445110 -I CURB & GUTTER y
<< c
(A U U)
--- - W 2002 mo Z
— — -
-I— ------- 5�'25� 3 --------- Xc y ao J
-----_ — \..............— —C aAOk� rn o o Ln
H Z7 v
00
H
< I-..:... 00 �m I I Ln
Z
H l0 (71
H I
•�,.. OO ZH I NOo ••
O W G :"L--- 10 W� 7D
m ..w-4 �0ZA Zp �� 1 J �H �0�0 43
" <� I-iI I m I o
^•- I rn-< 0oI �m C Z
00 0
00 w�
\ I N V 00
69FT SETBACK I
OMM
I Om cnpp Iii �.. ��O I I p C
�m� I I �m� I I I I= Z I
v
A I oz� I -...i :.... oZm I I I
H Qq Ar Ap cy I M I I
m 0 v H -i vQ1 0 Q
m W ZI-+ �z
a 0I� m I I I I w
v
pl I
m I / ICA
m rq
H �mZ
v m of I I J Cb
Z (.04 v `oI mmoo I / oo I I
t,,4 m a
O -I(T)�mwt- /
I11• 0?Z
m 1'-''= ' / m GA
f?a N m O I H 7q C17 Z H
WIC -n < I / I <
,1 I w
P = m o o � - N
H
` - m 01v <�H �� �— H�con 11
4-
O ( 4-': I \ ... S �� mmm> Z pej N�
Op + 17' c� . cn v -� cn 001
tip f'..'..:•. \ ?� amO O 0041-1r Zm G1rrm
I \ v -i �+ O w " I
L 2" R.C.P.
\ ch O> x�' o��m 33110I,R�'i ,�D
N 00013'31" W I o JI mvii M M -n 3 Z 0O
30.50 I I I Z A *-kW� _ '':"� ala i
\ m < C m / A I
w m in
a oo
-7r_w o mac H o
Z
w I r C.I.P. I
<� - �--- --- 90fr� —
996 `.
or cuRIB &GurTEP
J o :; ... HIGHWAY EASEMENT R H
:
........._.
� 5 N PER DOC.I� O. 1445110 ....... n';...:•.:: t.. 1 , NS S � S ""...
S
{.. NS
a NS I 7P1S S. B VCP nS'."..yS.... .. Z H /
..................... 255.0
0 .
tt - - - ..
<
;:..:
CURB &GUTTER bo 0
HIGHWAY EASEMENT
:•...........::: :..:....:: ---= ----- DOC. NO. 109
...........
rn — 1445 � rn v
3 3 N
0
— — — — — — — — — — —:— - �' — w � � E — — — — — — — — — — —
-3- - e9-- - ��-........... I
0
--�F -----� / -� I... omo In /
�ZZOcn -
i I 1 am mmm \0�0 /
�m m-Irn Z� Ln y Oo0 I co -71 I
Ln p ma iso \/ / j mmHr
N I I
nL 2. 6 On Imm,rt� �"� / Z C
oowOOH Cil S 00 '32" I A �m - o aH ro
W�Arn ��„O � m wmpH �/ s2
�=�Z I aA oma„= / /'W\-�/ a
° rmO I H �. me /
�m{Z�m C21 I I ��m '> A;/ wm
Z Y
m Ln y
d I� �� ` I
I wm
i� b
I I
a
1 / O
H I 0D C7H ODZZ�-'fm
x •.
'n cnOZ m0 ir7D / / J 1>7
a SII m
m v l o y o -n / a
I m m
00 w o=� Z
� DC (n -i Z (n -I cp �O
---.. 7v 0m I I �m°(Z m 00 ��Z- /
H O� �m m
z I I �z 7z
H - �O�m =tntn
IIS=�o =n� / �v
II womO-71 m �m�
w
O C /
�I N
y''
I>
4rll
....... I 1 HP / tTr °`'/ta i = o cn - 4�,
n m o
I 1 co oc
o�z
c
I r O v
N ..
`\t O
N
Z
C7 /
m
Z
=d
H H
7v Z
O zE
H
Z
Z C7 (7
Z
w„\
oDi
���
H
0�4�-
-niDi
Z
m
p mZ
m
cn
m
Q.
w w Z
�
Z
N
°
m
O
Z
Z
C
Z
O
H
I
-n
CI)h
H
--i
a
m
O
r-
CD
r - ;v
...
n
-..-
<
I
W
n
m
,°�
��
���
��tA
+
m
00
I
H
¢¢
w
0
�
W
m
�
CD ~
cD
Z
bx
m
m
O
C)
.8 'p, `C
N
r+
m
a
N
o-�
H A
cn
CDS
cn
(n
'm
OFs✓
cn
<�
cn
cn cn
�-�
0° \0
- `'-
H
\-D 0
00
o CD °0
CD
Z
01 co
N
O
nv u vv i i m
1G l..l.t'.Cal
vv
:::. N 00050'29 363.02
......... .......... . ... ... .... w
—8"V.C,P................................. HIGHWAY EASEMENT 9 ° H
w . HIGHWAY EASEMENT . ...�7 00� l�aoN% PER DOC. NO. 1445107 .::06..... °.. I:
o �" PER DOC. NO. 1445110 -I CURB & GUTTER y
<< c
(A U U)
--- - W 2002 mo Z
— — -
-I— ------- 5�'25� 3 --------- Xc y ao J
-----_ — \..............— —C aAOk� rn o o Ln
H Z7 v
00
H
< I-..:... 00 �m I I Ln
Z
H l0 (71
H I
•�,.. OO ZH I NOo ••
O W G :"L--- 10 W� 7D
m ..w-4 �0ZA Zp �� 1 J �H �0�0 43
" <� I-iI I m I o
^•- I rn-< 0oI �m C Z
00 0
00 w�
\ I N V 00
69FT SETBACK I
OMM
I Om cnpp Iii �.. ��O I I p C
�m� I I �m� I I I I= Z I
v
A I oz� I -...i :.... oZm I I I
H Qq Ar Ap cy I M I I
m 0 v H -i vQ1 0 Q
m W ZI-+ �z
a 0I� m I I I I w
v
pl I
m I / ICA
m rq
H �mZ
v m of I I J Cb
Z (.04 v `oI mmoo I / oo I I
t,,4 m a
O -I(T)�mwt- /
I11• 0?Z
m 1'-''= ' / m GA
f?a N m O I H 7q C17 Z H
WIC -n < I / I <
,1 I w
P = m o o � - N
H
` - m 01v <�H �� �— H�con 11
4-
O ( 4-': I \ ... S �� mmm> Z pej N�
Op + 17' c� . cn v -� cn 001
tip f'..'..:•. \ ?� amO O 0041-1r Zm G1rrm
I \ v -i �+ O w " I
L 2" R.C.P.
\ ch O> x�' o��m 33110I,R�'i ,�D
N 00013'31" W I o JI mvii M M -n 3 Z 0O
30.50 I I I Z A *-kW� _ '':"� ala i
\ m < C m / A I
w m in
a oo
-7r_w o mac H o
Z
w I r C.I.P. I
<� - �--- --- 90fr� —
996 `.
or cuRIB &GurTEP
J o :; ... HIGHWAY EASEMENT R H
:
........._.
� 5 N PER DOC.I� O. 1445110 ....... n';...:•.:: t.. 1 , NS S � S ""...
S
{.. NS
a NS I 7P1S S. B VCP nS'."..yS.... .. Z H /
..................... 255.0
0 .
tt - - - ..
<
;:..:
CURB &GUTTER bo 0
HIGHWAY EASEMENT
:•...........::: :..:....:: ---= ----- DOC. NO. 109
...........
rn — 1445 � rn v
3 3 N
0
— — — — — — — — — — —:— - �' — w � � E — — — — — — — — — — —
-3- - e9-- - ��-........... I
0
--�F -----� / -� I... omo In /
�ZZOcn -
i I 1 am mmm \0�0 /
�m m-Irn Z� Ln y Oo0 I co -71 I
Ln p ma iso \/ / j mmHr
N I I
nL 2. 6 On Imm,rt� �"� / Z C
oowOOH Cil S 00 '32" I A �m - o aH ro
W�Arn ��„O � m wmpH �/ s2
�=�Z I aA oma„= / /'W\-�/ a
° rmO I H �. me /
�m{Z�m C21 I I ��m '> A;/ wm
Z Y
m Ln y
d I� �� ` I
I wm
i� b
I I
a
1 / O
H I 0D C7H ODZZ�-'fm
x •.
'n cnOZ m0 ir7D / / J 1>7
a SII m
m v l o y o -n / a
I m m
00 w o=� Z
� DC (n -i Z (n -I cp �O
---.. 7v 0m I I �m°(Z m 00 ��Z- /
H O� �m m
z I I �z 7z
H - �O�m =tntn
IIS=�o =n� / �v
II womO-71 m �m�
w
O C /
�I N
y''
I>
4rll
....... I 1 HP / tTr °`'/ta i = o cn - 4�,
n m o
I 1 co oc
o�z
c
I r O v
N ..
`\t O
N
Z
C7 /
m
Z
=d
H H
7v Z
H
Z
H
Z
Z C7 (7
y
C7
oDi
���
H
H H
-niDi
Z
Z m
C cn
m
Ln
m
cn
m
O
O
Z
Z
Z m
m
O
Z
Z
C
Z
H
m
m
CI)h
H
--i
a
m
O
r-
CD
Z
m
n
n
C7
w
L
CD
W Iv
t� C7
0 0 1
H
H
y
H
DCD
���
H
H H
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
it
° ao 4o-
m
RD
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
G CD CD . O
CD
p NCD
0
CD
n
n
n
n
rr
°
n
n
n
,°�
��
���
��tA
+
m
��°c
¢¢
Y
0
W
CD
�
CD ~
cD
CD
bx
m
m
O
C)
.8 'p, `C
N
r+
m
m
N
o-�
D5��Q.a
cn
CDS
cn
(n
'm
OFs✓
cn
a�
cn
cn cn
�-�
ni l D Z
H
H
H
00
o CD °0
CD
Z
-i
a
>
�
m
<
0CD
Z
Z
Z
43
0
Z
O
Z
CD
' R
o
u
u
m
N CD 0,
H
n
7o
m
n
• C
CD 0CD
m
.�
w
D
O
CD
CT r CDCD
m
Q)
�
�
11
0
P. I
n
CD
H
iv
/
00 (n n
�mZ
w Om
A-T) A
m O
ccn-Iv
(nm�Z
O H H m
= m 6 D
0 Z5 C7
H � -n
m
m O r -
(n M
0 � :Em
ZH�Vn
M
U) = m
�Z
7_
l7 l'n
� D
C7 70
tim
Z
Q� Z
a I
Z I�10.00
m
I
z
C7
C
I
r -
H I
m I
---10.00
m
m
z
cn
® > X X n m G)
LA,
LA,
7O
D
C7
H
Z
�y
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H H
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z Z
m
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H H
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n n
0
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m m
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn cn
H
H
H
H
H
H
Z
Z
-i
a
>
�
m
<
Z
Z
Z
Z
>
0
Z
O
Z
m
o
o
u
u
Z O
H
H
n
7o
m
m
m
m
H
w
D
r-
m
Q)
�
�
11
n
70
H
iv
701
)v
)v
70 In
U)
Z
o
O
O
O
O
� m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
Z
y
2
cn
O
Z
Z
Z
Z
m m
cn
cn
n
H
("Im
G>
r-
Z
O
�
v
v
a
a
=
m
'�
C
H
O
m
c^
a
n
r--
("I
m
D
m
m
m
H
m
H
H
�CA
m
Z
�
�
m
H
m
m
m
m
r-
0
c�
O -h O O Z ZO°j O°, -] -] > Cn G Cn t:7' Cn Cn Z � Z '5 ?: v' '� >
o p' CD O m Z m Z coo
CD
O
w �C °�� COD CD
CD CD
00 O5 $ is CIO �CD 2,°�� �'� ��
a`grg— �°� "' 0 7��' �'°'� �o ° ° ��' CD o w CD
X1-1
Un
CD CD +
n C4 '024 En
CD 0
° C ¢, y W W VqCOD CD ° N CD
-t 01 t n
Ery w� °-n \w� � � °. p wg, CD �O CD
°�° r
�0-h �. O , ''� � F -. O a. Q CCD �, Q- ` \ CD
CD
O r ~ O N ° CD c�D �+ cn po CIQ ..� �� ~ O Z `` p °
n CD CL .+. N p� 1 ,� CD ''� �. CD CD 0 W T
CD o c°i D CD
n CD ': °-n trJ O p � o �� n!
O� x \ Vi OZ O F* 0 O .� v c. Cn 'C3 � C� V C
n CD _ Q CD Q. ° W O
CD lT1 p, CC O Z VCCD O lT1 p G. 00 O
Cn
CD ID COD- CD
1-r c
N °' O' '�' • O ff.-%�, CS Cn 'U -,
W o
CD
CD Uq
En CD 0
CD oz In 0 z
ctq CD -E<:� w� G1� ��c�i, o vs °°cn CD 0 0 o o
0 FD
CD W
CD 0 F5
5. O0 �, 01 O ,� 00 0 CD � Q 0. CD CD "x
CD ° CD aq
r -
m
Q)
m
0
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
V
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
n
H
("Im
G>
r-
70
(Z
C
-n
00
m
c^
n
r--
("I
m
H
H
H
Hz
�
�
m
m
m
m
r-
0
H
o
m
cn
C
cnm
m
<
C
cn
C?
m
n
C
-i
70
m
r
n
m
O -h O O Z ZO°j O°, -] -] > Cn G Cn t:7' Cn Cn Z � Z '5 ?: v' '� >
o p' CD O m Z m Z coo
CD
O
w �C °�� COD CD
CD CD
00 O5 $ is CIO �CD 2,°�� �'� ��
a`grg— �°� "' 0 7��' �'°'� �o ° ° ��' CD o w CD
X1-1
Un
CD CD +
n C4 '024 En
CD 0
° C ¢, y W W VqCOD CD ° N CD
-t 01 t n
Ery w� °-n \w� � � °. p wg, CD �O CD
°�° r
�0-h �. O , ''� � F -. O a. Q CCD �, Q- ` \ CD
CD
O r ~ O N ° CD c�D �+ cn po CIQ ..� �� ~ O Z `` p °
n CD CL .+. N p� 1 ,� CD ''� �. CD CD 0 W T
CD o c°i D CD
n CD ': °-n trJ O p � o �� n!
O� x \ Vi OZ O F* 0 O .� v c. Cn 'C3 � C� V C
n CD _ Q CD Q. ° W O
CD lT1 p, CC O Z VCCD O lT1 p G. 00 O
Cn
CD ID COD- CD
1-r c
N °' O' '�' • O ff.-%�, CS Cn 'U -,
W o
CD
CD Uq
En CD 0
CD oz In 0 z
ctq CD -E<:� w� G1� ��c�i, o vs °°cn CD 0 0 o o
0 FD
CD W
CD 0 F5
5. O0 �, 01 O ,� 00 0 CD � Q 0. CD CD "x
CD ° CD aq
-
'q
L
0
- - COUNTY _ROAD H2
ti
REMOVE EXIST. �.�
CI1R6 AND DRIVE
NEW 6'—p" SfDEWALK AS REQ'D. \ON
NEW 6'-O" SIDEWALK t _
7m
16
WOO
�- z
• In
p
a
i
RRP�� ' I✓
P N
OTI ZONED: B-31(HIGHWAY BUSINESS) \
A NOT PLA TIED
BL OCK I 1 REMOVE EXISTING DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE \
REPLACE WITH TURF PER COUNTY\
REQUIREMENTS h
1
PIM=906.59kd
\\4 I
INV=902.05 y \ REMOVE EXISTING ROAD ENTRANCE
REPLACE WITH TURF PER COUNTY
RIM=907.00 COUNTY ROAD H "� JNV=896.221 REQUIREMENTS \RIM=906.86 S 89°46'28" W 965.83
INV=894.60INV 5E=901.88INV 5=896.15N 89°46'28" E 1318.36 SN T SN SN SN SN8"V C P SN SN SN SN 907.74CENTER OF
RIM=906.78 O I SEC. OF SEC.
URB GUTTER INV=902.81 r, 8, T.30, R.23.
G G 12"C.I.P' I I I I I ` 0yO
W1/4 CORNER I I� I \ CURB &GUTTER cURe c
CUR CUT
OF SEC. 8,O OHP OHP OHP HP OHP p P E NOTE: DOWNSPOUTS LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND
T.30, R.23. L^ _ _ G EAST SIDES OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE CONNECTED TO
_RAI ==C 60_ _ 997 8' 0 0T � _ 9tJ8 - - o - \ ADJACENT PVC STORM SEWER VIA APPROPRIATE WYES,
30 BENDS, AND SCH 40 PVC PIPE. VERIFY LOCATION OF
30 30 CB8 - - - - - - - - Hla-910. 8 �' b �" C05 GOA \ F DOWNSPOUTS W/ ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
Is
C08 ELWI \y \
w NO E00
20 08.00 1q 45 1 1 1/4 SWl/ \
90 09 F SEC. 8, 23. `\ F
9 O O AJNDERGROUND STORMTE �
1 ST WATER STORA E E1�1 #3: I c° -
ZONED: R-2 v I O 74.4 (12) ROOF (9) SC -7 HAM ERS I H
Li J
(SINGLE & TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAI I �R S W/ ISOLAT R ROW 1 `\ \\ \ n` \ SOUTH BOUND CL
1 O AS (SEE 5/C3) 1 I 1 \ \ (/ \
OF STATE TRUNK
O O�ss 080 1 v Ln / 47 0 09. \ HIGHWAY NO. 10-62
�
�° of 08 0n O EAST LI OF I� \ ccs �I \ \ CO2 \ \ \
1 INFILTRATION BASIN #2
(SEE 2/C3)
BOTTOM OF BASIN =-SkO.0
I S3 w
O
JtWtK Hl't LLAVINQ7
LENGTH SIZE
I�
I
I
15
1 16
BASIN OUTLET = 903CO
1 TOP OF BASIN = 90 .
m
00 v
O
I
I
"
CO2
I
BOTTOM OF BASIN
4" SAND/COMPOST
1 CONNECTTF_�_EXISTING
O
R-1976
909.65
STORM MANHOLE
100 LF
8" SCH 40 PVC @ 1.00%
CO3
2 INV = 899181
1 (FIELD VERIFY)
CL:= �i
v L�Lj >
8"
R-1976
910.05
00
Ln
8" SCH 40 PVC @ 1.00%
ZONED: P-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
O
C04
8"
R-1976
W
903.28
70 LF
1 RIM=903.79 I
CB1
PROJECT
CBI
INV=901.64
-
905.50
INV=902.58=
SUMP=898.58
1 RIM=903.79
15"R.C.P
FES1/IB1
INV 902.50
R
lIV V=7U1.4�
NOTE: ALL EXISTING STORM
SEWER LOCATED EAST OF
1 EXISTING CONNECTION
/ 1FELE SlIALL BE REMOVED
�N DI POSED OF OFF-SITE
BASIN SIDEWALL
4" SAND/
COMPOST MIX
I
Al
4
3.
ELEV = 899.5
VARIES
NATIVE SAND
SOILS
NOTES: 1. BASIN BOTTOM 2• SAND/COMPOST MIX SHALL CONSIST OF 70% CLEAN
SHALL BE SEEDED W/ SAND & 30% COMPOST (MN STORM WATER MANUAL MIX
NATIVE SEED MIX AND/ "B"). SAND SHALL CONSIST OF CLEAN CONSTRUCTION
OR PLANTINGS SAND, FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIALS - AASHTO M-6 OR
ASTM C-33 WASHED. COMPOST SHALL CONSIST OF MNDOT
GRADE2
1 INFILTRATION BASIN #1
NTS
BOTTOM OF BASIN
4" SAND/COMPOST
MIX
BASIN SIDEWALL
4" SAND/
COMPOST MIX
3:7
/ ELEV = 900.0
Wil -
VARIES
NATIVE SAND
SOILS
NOTES: 1. BASIN BOTTOM 2• SAND/COMPOST MIX SHALL CONSIST OF 70% CLEAN
SHALL BE SEEDED W/ SAND & 30% COMPOST (MN STORM WATER MANUAL MIX
NATIVE SEED MIX AND/ "B"). SAND SHALL CONSIST OF CLEAN CONSTRUCTION
OR PLANTINGS SAND, FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIALS - AASHTO M-6 OR
ASTM C-33 WASHED. COMPOST SHALL CONSIST OF MNDOT
GRADE2
INFILTRATION BASIN #2
NTS
I
JtWtK Hl't LLAVINQ7
LENGTH SIZE
I�
I
I
15
1 16
6"
GFE = 903.50
O
906.28
�J
1
CO2
I
BOTTOM OF BASIN
4" SAND/COMPOST
CO2
MIX
BASIN SIDEWALL
4" SAND/
COMPOST MIX
I
Al
4
3.
ELEV = 899.5
VARIES
NATIVE SAND
SOILS
NOTES: 1. BASIN BOTTOM 2• SAND/COMPOST MIX SHALL CONSIST OF 70% CLEAN
SHALL BE SEEDED W/ SAND & 30% COMPOST (MN STORM WATER MANUAL MIX
NATIVE SEED MIX AND/ "B"). SAND SHALL CONSIST OF CLEAN CONSTRUCTION
OR PLANTINGS SAND, FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIALS - AASHTO M-6 OR
ASTM C-33 WASHED. COMPOST SHALL CONSIST OF MNDOT
GRADE2
1 INFILTRATION BASIN #1
NTS
BOTTOM OF BASIN
4" SAND/COMPOST
MIX
BASIN SIDEWALL
4" SAND/
COMPOST MIX
3:7
/ ELEV = 900.0
Wil -
VARIES
NATIVE SAND
SOILS
NOTES: 1. BASIN BOTTOM 2• SAND/COMPOST MIX SHALL CONSIST OF 70% CLEAN
SHALL BE SEEDED W/ SAND & 30% COMPOST (MN STORM WATER MANUAL MIX
NATIVE SEED MIX AND/ "B"). SAND SHALL CONSIST OF CLEAN CONSTRUCTION
OR PLANTINGS SAND, FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIALS - AASHTO M-6 OR
ASTM C-33 WASHED. COMPOST SHALL CONSIST OF MNDOT
GRADE2
INFILTRATION BASIN #2
NTS
ST - �iST -
14.45
5T ST -
-8" ORIFICE AT 903.00
CB10
K�
I
ST
ST
� I J • 1
L •
• �I��III �1Sol
STORM SEWER PIPE SCHEDULE
MANHULt UK UAIUN BASIN
STRUCTURE INSIDE DIA.* CASTING**
PROPOSED
JtWtK Hl't LLAVINQ7
LENGTH SIZE
BUILDING
14.45
MFE = 914.50
6"
GFE = 903.50
O
906.28
100 LF
6" SCH 40 PVC @ 1.00%
ST - �iST -
14.45
5T ST -
-8" ORIFICE AT 903.00
CB10
K�
I
ST
ST
� I J • 1
L •
• �I��III �1Sol
STORM SEWER PIPE SCHEDULE
MANHULt UK UAIUN BASIN
STRUCTURE INSIDE DIA.* CASTING**
tLLVAIIUNJ
RIM INVERT
JtWtK Hl't LLAVINQ7
LENGTH SIZE
IU
STRUCTURE
1
COMMENTS
CO1
6"
R-1976
909.20
906.28
100 LF
6" SCH 40 PVC @ 1.00%
CO2
CHAMBERS W/ ISOLATOR RO
CO2
8"
R-1976
909.65
905.28
100 LF
8" SCH 40 PVC @ 1.00%
CO3
MINIMUM OF 4 -INCHES OF SAND/COMPOST MIX. SAND/COMPOST MIX SHALL BE
CO3
8"
R-1976
910.05
904.28
100 LF
8" SCH 40 PVC @ 1.00%
C04
O
C04
8"
R-1976
909.60
903.28
70 LF
8" SCH 40 PVC @ 1.00%
CB1
PROJECT
CBI
48"
R -3067-L
905.50
INV=902.58=
SUMP=898.58
16 LF
15" HDPE @ 0.50%
FES1/IB1
INV 902.50
FES2/1131
N/A
N/A
N/A
902.50
14 LF
12" HDPE @ 0.40%
STRUCTURE #1
STRUCTURE #1
SEE DETAIL
902.44
130 LF
12" HDPE @ 0.40%
CB2
U
CB2
48"
R -3067-L
905.30
901.92
32 LF
12" HDPE @ 0.40%
CB3
CB3
48"
R -3067-L
905.30
901.79
70 LF
12" HDPE @ 0.40%
CB4
CB4
48"
R -3067-L
905.50
901.51
96 LF
18" SCH 40 PVC @ 0.307o
CB5
O
60"
R -3067-L
905.50
=01.22CB5
897 22
SIUMP 9
24 LF
24" HDPE @ 0.30%
STORMTECH
INV = 901.15
SIUKMILCH
SYSTEM
N/A
N/A
N/A
901.15
10 LF
12" HDPE @ 0.40%
OUTLET
STRUCTURE #2
STRUCTURE #2
SEE DETAIL
901.11
38 LF
12" HDPE @ 0.40%
STMH1
C136
48"
R -3067-L
906.30
902.30
106 LF
15" RCP @ 1.08%
CB7
C137
48"
R -3067-L
906.30
901.16
18 LF
15" RCP @ 1.11%
STMH1
STMH 1
48"
R-1733
906.80
900.96
214 LF
15" RCP @ 0.35%
STMH2
STMH2
48"
R-1733
904.70
900.21
86 LF
15" RCP @ 0.34%
STMH3
STMH3
48"
R-1733
905.00
"ORIFICE=903.
INV=899.91
30 LF
15" RCP @ 0.33%
EXISTING MH
=
INV 899.81
C05
6"
R-1976
909.25
906.60
76 LF
6" SCH 40 PVC @ 1.00%
C06
C06
6"
R-1976
908.25
905.84
76 LF
6" SCH 40 PVC @ 1.00%
C07
C07
8"
R-1976
908.05
905.08
76 LF
8" SCH 40 PVC @ 1.00%
C08
C08
8"
R-1976
908.20
904.32
100 LF
8" SCH 40 PVC @ 1.00%
CB8
CB8
48"
R -3067-L
906.50
SIUMP9899.32
108 LF
15" HDPE @ 0.30%
FES3/IB2
INV = 903.00
CB9
48"
R -3067-L
903.00
INV=RMTECH
SUMP=895.07
14 LF
24" HDPE @ 0.50%
SYSTEM #2
INV = 899.00
CB10
48"
R -3067-L
903.00
900.00
86 LF
15" HDPE @ 1.06%
CBl0A
CBl0A
48"
R -3067-L
905 90
18 LF
24"HDPE @ 0 50%
INV - 899 00
2.40 STORAX WATER STORAC,Y \ \ x� SUMP=895.09 -
4 SYSTEM`#2: p \
,20 C7 I -9!D (9) ROWS 0(10) SC -7,40 \ \ \ / *MANHOLE INTERIOR DIAMETERS WERE DETERMINED USING SIZING CALCULATION SOFTWARE PROVIDED BY CRETEX NORTH CONCRETE.
972 O CHAMBERS W7 ISO�fCTOR THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT THE INTERIOR DIAMETERS SHOWN ON THE ABOVE TABLE ARE APPROPRIATE.
ROW SEE 4/C3 / \ \ \ \ ' !i
1 1'85 SS "� Ntj. v I I / 10 30 I CO '7-1\ *ALL SPECIFIED CASTINGS ARE MANUFACTURED BY NEENAH FOUNDARY COMPANY
I I \ \ \ c
12.5 1 1 I INTERSE �%i
q I EASTLINoFwEST \ \ \� \\\ �� GRADING NOTES:
10 p 475 FT & 56UTH LIN \ \
1 I I OF NORTH 1901 FT O \ \ E 0 \ 410
`
1 I OF NEI/4 OF 51 °0 \ \ \ \\\ \ / 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS INCLUDING LOCATIONS, AND RIM
9 5T M= 6.0 1 SEC. 8, T.30, R.23.\ SW'LY F \ \�\ O AND INVERT ELEVATIONS, OF EXISTING DRAINAGE AND SANITARY STRUCTURES. LOCATION
2015"R.C..- IN 18 � � STATE TR AND SIZE OF EXISTING SANITARY, WATER, AND STORM SEWER STUBS, AND EXISTING
10 TtN\ V -q I I 6 N-^' \ \ \ �\ \ GRADES SHALL ALSO BE VERIFIED.
1 I 03.45 p Coote
2. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM A TOPOGRAPHICAL
FT
90
�� 08
ACROSS INFILTRATION BASIN AREAS, AND BE ONLY LOW IMPACT TRACK EQUIPMENT. BASIN
OUTLET
STRUCTURE #2
AREAS SHALL BE EXCAVATED WITH A BACKHOE STATIONED OUTSIDE OF THE AREA AS MUCH
(SEE 10/C2)
AS POSSIBLE.
UNDERGROUND STORMTECH
2. DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE ADJACENT PARKING LOT AND BUILDING, THE
STORM WATER STORAGE SYSTEM #1:
INFILTRATION BASIN AREA SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM TRAFFIC AND SEDIMENT
(10) ROWS OF (16) MC -4500 -
WITH SILT FENCE.
CHAMBERS W/ ISOLATOR RO
(SEE 3/C3)
ZONED: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL)
NOT
OF 24 INCHES WITH THE USE OF APPROPRIATE EQUIPMENT (TILLER, RIPPER, ETC.).
INFILTRATION BASIN NOTES:
1 1 FT \ \ \ SURVEY PROVIDED BY O'MALLEY & KRON LAND SURVEYORS, COLD SPRING, MN. (320) 685-5905
C. 3 , R.2 03.45
139 KI E _ \ \ \ \ 3. BENCHMARK: TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED IN SOUTHWEST QUADRANT OF INTERSECTION
C
Tv \ OF COUNTY ROAD H2 AND GREENFIELD AVENUE - ELEV = 910.79 (88 DATUM)
o J •�S � \�tiA \ \ \ �
Cg D o O 4. NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ANY INCONSISTENCIES ARE DISCOVERED BETWEEN
/07• I� EDdt IGS E 0 O��O ` \ \ ACTUAL SITE CONDITIONS AND WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WHICH ARE
SO o O O \0 \ \ \ SIGNIFICANT ENOUGH TO ALTER THE INTENT OF THE DRAWINGS.
D6 CB
RB CU CB _ - - - - - `3 Os \ \\ \ \
06 0 ` \\ \ ` \ 5. IF REQUIRED BY THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, THE
F ROUTE - -_� 906 •8 h � \ O \ \
- - �`V C 1 / 4 \ o \ \\ OWNER OR CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A PLUMBING PERMIT PRIOR TO THE
ss i O b x \ \ INSTALLATION OF ANY STORM SEWER UTILITIES.
-u' WA
O6 1 0 .60 O TH
N R DOC.
CB 90 E1/4O / - \ \ 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER ONE CALL AT (800) 252-1166 FOR A
CB7 CB6
CB3 \ 5 _ _ _ \ Com° \ UTILITY LOCATE PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION AND VERIFY LOCATIONS OF
m-- 1 - _ - - 90 EOROU \� UTILITIES BEFORE BEGINNING WORK.
06.,501 z OHP` \ \ \ 7. SEE SHEET C2 FOR STANDARD DETAILS.
------ �_-- O \ \
6, S 55 EOF ROUTE EOF ROUTE - - \ \ \ \ 8. ALL LENGTHS OF STORM SEWER OR CULVERT PIPE SPECIFIED ON THIS PLAN INCLUDE
1 L 1 EX I O$ 0)�S / �\ \ THE LENGTHS OF ANY ASSOCIATED FLARED END SECTIONS.
Z 1 INTERSECTION OF RETAINING WALL NOTE: HIGHEST ELEVATION ALONG FES1
EAST LINE OF WEST LENGTH = 34 LF EMERGENCY OVERFLOW (EOF) FES2 \ \ 9. TRASH GUARDS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL STORM SEWER END SECTIONS.
RIM- 330 FT & SOUTH LINE HEIGHT= 0 TO 1.5 -FT ROUTE IS 906.0
I =897. 95 EX i O N OUTLET ZO ED: PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) \ 10. FINISHED ELEVATIONS OF LAWN/GREEN AREAS ADJACENT TO BUILDINGS SHALL BE
DEMOLITION sA W OF NORTH 365.46 FT ZONED: R-4 (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) I STRUCTURE #1 A MINIMUM OF 6" BELOW FINISHED FLOOR OR TOP -OF -BLOCK ELEVATION.
LIMITS I OF NEI/4 OF SWI/4, D I (SEE 9/C2) INFILTRATION BASIN #1
1 Q I SEC. 8, T.30, R.23. 1 D (SEE 1/C3)
1 I A BOTTOM F IN = 899.5 1 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM CALCULATIONS TO VERIFY EARTHWORK QUANTITIES.
O I D BASIN O (�--2.5 CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL BE BASED ON EARTHWORK CALCULATIONS COMPLETED BY
I J N I TOP OF SIN = 906.0 THE CONTRACTOR
I � I SEGO NE
12. SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE FLOW LINE AND/OR FINISHED GRADES, UNLESS OTHERWISE
I 1 INDICATED. TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONS ARE 6" ABOVE THE FLOW LINE SPOT
NEER BLOCK BLOCK ELEVATION SHOWN ON THE PLANS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
1 IGEN 13. "EX" DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONS. "HP" DENOTES HIGH POINTS.
I � I C
14. ALL PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ARE TOP OF PAVING OR GUTTER, UNLESS NOTED
OTHERWISE. PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ARE INTENDED TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE
1. TRAFFIC FROM CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LIMITED AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE
4. ONCE EXCAVATED TO FINAL GRADE INFILTRATION AREAS SHALL BE INSPECTED TO ENSURE
ACROSS INFILTRATION BASIN AREAS, AND BE ONLY LOW IMPACT TRACK EQUIPMENT. BASIN
THAT NO SEDIMENT FROM ONGOING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS REACHING THE
AREAS SHALL BE EXCAVATED WITH A BACKHOE STATIONED OUTSIDE OF THE AREA AS MUCH
INFILTRATION AREA. ALL INFILTRATION AREAS SHALL BE INSPECTED TO ENSURE THAT
AS POSSIBLE.
UNAUTHORIZED EQUIPMENT IS NOT BEING DRIVEN ACROSS THE INFILTRATION AREAS.
2. DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE ADJACENT PARKING LOT AND BUILDING, THE
5. ONCE THE INFILTRATION BASINS ARE COMPLETED AND THE SITE HAS BEEN
INFILTRATION BASIN AREA SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM TRAFFIC AND SEDIMENT
STABILIZED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE AND PAY FOR TESTING THE
WITH SILT FENCE.
INFILTRATION RATES OF THE BOTTOMS OF THE BASINS. THE TEST RESULTS SHALL
BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY AND THE ENGINEER.
3. THE BOTTOM OF THE INFILTRATION BASIN SHALL BE SCARIFIED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH
6. FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE INFILTRATION BASINS SHALL NOT BE COMPLETED UNTIL
OF 24 INCHES WITH THE USE OF APPROPRIATE EQUIPMENT (TILLER, RIPPER, ETC.).
THE UPSTREAM DRAINAGE AREAS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED.
AFTER SCARIFICATION, THE BASIN SIDEWALLS AND BOTTOM SHALL BE LINED WITH A
Z
MINIMUM OF 4 -INCHES OF SAND/COMPOST MIX. SAND/COMPOST MIX SHALL BE
PLACED AS LOOSELY AS POSSIBLE.
w
BOTTOM OF BACKFILL/
TOP OF CRUSHED ROCK
ELEVATION =905.23
TOP OF CHAMBER
ELEVATION=904.23
U
TOP OF PAVEMENT
LOW ELEVATION = 906.70
HIGH ELEVATION = 910.75
BOTTOM OF CLASS 5/
TOP OF BACKFILL
LOW ELEVATION = 905.95
HIGH ELEVATION = 910.00
INLET - ELEVATION=901.15 J
(VERIFY W/ MANUFACTURER)
BOTTOM OF CHAMBER
OUTLET - ELEVATION=901.15 ELEVATION=899.23
(VERIFY W/ MANUFACTURER) BOTTOM OF STONE
ELEVATION =898.48
NOTE: PAVEMENT AND CLASS 5
ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS
DETAIL ARE THE ELEVATIONS AT
THE HIGHEST AND LOWEST
PAVEMENT ELEVATION ABOVE
THE SYSTEM. SURFACE
ELEVATIONS WILL VARY ABOVE
THE STORMTECH SYSTEM.
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
REGARDING THE STORMTECH
SYSTEM, CONTACT THE
FOLLOWING:
ADS CONTACTS:
TOM ROONEY
(612)756-3552
MIKE ARENDS
(612)597-1909
NOTE: THE PURPOSE OF THIS DETAIL IS TO SHOW THE RELEVANT ELEVATIONS OF THE STORMTECH MC -4500
UNDERGROUND STORM WATER SYSTEM FOR THIS PROJECT. SEE PLAN FOR NUMBER OF ROWS, AS WELL AS NUMBER
OF CHAMBERS PER ROW. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE UNDERGROUND STORM WATER SYSTEM PER SHOP
DRAWINGS TO BE PREPARED BY THE SUPPLIER AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. THE SYSTEM SHALL ALSO BE
INSTALLED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL OF THE MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
UNDERGROUND STORM WATER STORAGE SYSTEM # 1 ELEV
NTS
TOWARDS CATCH BASINS AND/OR OUTLETS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
STORMTECH SYSTEM NOTES. RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED ELEVATIONS, WHICH WILL PROMOTE
POSITIVE DRAINAGE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT SITE.
1. TRAFFIC FROM CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LIMITED AS MUCH AS
POSSIBLE ACROSS AREA DESIGNATED FOR STORMTECH SYSTEM, AND BE ONLY
LOW IMPACT TRACK EQUIPMENT. DESIGNATED AREA SHALL BE EXCAVATED
WITH A BACKHOE STATIONED OUTSIDE OF THE AREA AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.
2. THE BOTTOM OF THE STORMTECH EXCAVATION SHALL BE SCARIFIED TO A
MINIMUM DEPTH OF 24 INCHES WITH THE USE OF APPROPRIATE EQUIPMENT
(TILLER, RIPPER, ETC.) PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE CRUSHED ROCK BASE
3. ONCE THE EXCAVATION AND SCARIFICATION IS COMPLETED, THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL ARRANGE AND PAY FOR TESTING THE INFILTRATION RATE OF THE BOTTOM OF
THE EXCAVATION PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE CRUSHED ROCK BASE. THE TEST
RESULTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY AND THE ENGINEER.
4. STORMTECH SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE
MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.
TOP OF PAVEMENT
LOW ELEVATION = 903 70
BOTTOM OF BACKFILL/
TOP OF CRUSHED ROCK
HIGH ELEVATION = 907.00
ELEVATION =902.00
BOTTOM OF CLASS 5/
TOP OF CHAMBER
TOP OF BACKFILL
ELEVATION=901.50
LOW ELEVATION = 903.05
_
HIGH ELEVATION = 906.25
INLET - ELEVATION =899.00 -
(VERIFY W/ MANUFACTURER)
BOTTOM OF CHAMBER
ELEVATION =899.00
BOTTOM OF STONE
ELEVATION=898.50
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
REGARDING THE STORMTECH
SYSTEM, CONTACT THE
FOLLOWING:
ADS CONTACTS:
TOM ROONEY
(612)756-3552
MIKE ARENDS
(612) 597-1909
NOTE: THE PURPOSE OF THIS DETAIL IS TO SHOW THE RELEVANT ELEVATIONS OF THE STORMTECH SC -740
UNDERGROUND STORM WATER SYSTEM FOR THIS PROJECT. SEE PLAN FOR NUMBER OF ROWS, AS WELL AS NUMBER
OF CHAMBERS PER ROW. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE UNDERGROUND STORM WATER SYSTEM PER SHOP
DRAWINGS TO BE PREPARED BY THE SUPPLIER AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. THE SYSTEM SHALL ALSO BE
INSTALLED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL OF THE MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
UNDERGROUND STORM WATER STORAGE SYSTEM #2 ELEV
NTS
BOTTOM OF BACKFILL/
TOP OF CRUSHED ROCK
ELEVATION=902.00
TOP OF CHAMBER
ELEVATION =901.507
NOTE: CADD FILES FOR ESTIMATING EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ARE AVAILABLE
TO CONTRACTORS FOR PREPARING BIDS. IN ORDER TO RECEIVE THE CADD FILES,
THE CONTRACTOR WILL NEED TO SIGN A HOLD -HARMLESS AGREEMENT PROVIDED
BY SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, AND AGREE TO PAY A $50 PROCESSING
FEE. THE CADD FILES WILL BE RELEASED UPON RECEIPT OF THE CHECK
TOP OF PAVEMENT
LOW ELEVATION = 905.95
HIGH ELEVATION = 909.20
BOTTOM OF CLASS 5/
TOP OF BACKFILL
LOW ELEVATION = 905.20
HIGH ELEVATION = 908.45
yl n
u V
INLET - ELEVATION =899.00
(VERIFY W/ MANUFACTURER)
BOTTOM OF CHAMBER
ELEVATION=899.00
BOTTOM OF STONE
ELEVATION=898.50
NOTE: PAVEMENT AND CLASS 5
ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS
DETAIL ARE THE ELEVATIONS AT
THE HIGHEST AND LOWEST
PAVEMENT ELEVATION ABOVE
THE SYSTEM. SURFACE
ELEVATIONS WILL VARY ABOVE
THE STORMTECH SYSTEM.
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
REGARDING THE STORMTECH
SYSTEM, CONTACT THE
FOLLOWING:
ADS CONTACTS:
TOM ROONEY
(612) 756-3552
MIKE ARENDS
(612)597-1909
NOTE: THE PURPOSE OF THIS DETAIL IS TO SHOW THE RELEVANT ELEVATIONS OF THE STORMTECH SC -740
UNDERGROUND STORM WATER SYSTEM FOR THIS PROJECT. SEE PLAN FOR NUMBER OF ROWS, AS WELL AS NUMBER
OF CHAMBERS PER ROW. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE UNDERGROUND STORM WATER SYSTEM PER SHOP
DRAWINGS TO BE PREPARED BY THE SUPPLIER AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. THE SYSTEM SHALL ALSO BE
INSTALLED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL OF THE MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
UNDERGROUND STORM WATER STORAGE SYSTEM #3 ELEV
NTS
GRADING PLAN
T
O CL
N 0_
O Q
Oa
Lo O 3 O
I o0E
0 0
J (D} 0
a O c C
O�
m 0 C N
D U'N
O.5:
Q- V)
N O N
� Q L
�N
U O Q� N
N
E
z(D N
� -
c c
�>
U �0 a)
N
(r - 0)
w
W
0
w
w �
N O
04
x
U �
X
x
C 0
0 0
m
LL
V
(D � 0
U
Z
O
z
_
� co _>
��
OO N
co
Q 7
Z
N
z
w
0- Li _c
2
Z
U0
O
W
X11 w
U
0
UQ
�
PROJECT
N
NUMBER:
W
0'
c
19007
W
NC
N
U)
SCALE:
c
1 "=40'
_J
O
N
N
D
L
U
C3 of 6
W
U
U
>
N �
r
co
OC Z
O
0:3N =
N �
�
Z
O
w
U
Lu
Lu
0
� w
Z
o
Lu O N co v
� Z
w
Z
O
Q 7
Ow
Lu
O <
z
UQ
�
PROJECT
o-)
NUMBER:
19007
SCALE:
1 "=40'
0
C3 of 6
' I✓
,qg6
INSTALL
P ROPE`
'6 CY CLASS III RIP RAP
BASIN CTION
OVERLYING TYPE 4
912
ADDIT1ON ZONED: B-31(HIGHWA
BL OCK I
F
1
RIM=906.86
I
INV=894.60
ST ST
ST -
V N 89046'28" E 1318.36
5N
z
G
W1/4 CORNER
I
I�
OF SEC. 8,?-
O
ST ST -
Ln OHP
T.30, R.23.
O
Wi'�
wc
30
30
OC
a
`J �
N
1
N
ZONED: R-2
v
(SINGLE, & TWO FAMILY RE5I1)ENTIAI
W
I
PERIMETER SILT
N
V J
U)
FENCE (TYP)
C
_J
N
w 1�
LuLu
� I-
U
ry
o
0
O
V
V
C)
Ut
C)
2
H
v Li
N00
ZONED: P-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL)
Q
(DLo
1 RIM=903.79 I
I
INV=901.64
O
co
-
RIM=903.79
15"
� N =
o
INV=901
1 INSTALL CATCH
BASIN PROTECTION
I
00
(TYP)
cn
BL OCK I
I\ v I
30
30
I
I
TEMPORARY ROCK
CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
1 I A
4
0
00000
Opp 00()000
SSS 00000000
GGA 00000000`
P 0000000��
0 00
0000000
O
6" BUMP FOR
KEEPING RUNOFF
ON SITE
V BUSINESS) \
lel 0 T PLA T TED
\
INSTALL CATCH RIM=906.59 a
BASIN PROTECT INV=902.05 O
RIM=907.00 (TYP) PROTECT ROAD H2 INSTAL CATCH \
INV 5E=901.88 PERIMETER SILT BASIN ROTECTION
INV 5=896.15 - - - - - FENCE (TYP) - 11-0
- (TYP) -
T SN SN SN SN 8" C P SN SNRIM-906.78 O RIM=907.74
CURB GL . 12"C.I.P. T INV=902.81 r, I INV=896.22 1 \
CUR
PCUT�
OHP OHP -OHP 0
RI =906906 89 - 9e7 _ 8 - -� 90$
\
S 89046'28" W 965.83
CENTER OF
\ SEC. OF SEC.
8, T.30, R.23.
\A CURB & GUTTER CURB C
EIF�
if7V=902.63 RM------- - -=gyp+--jK
ELWITP ` O
`y
E OF�\ .
\ \ 1 I NEI/4 SW1/4 \ \
�\ \ OF SEC. 8, 23 \ P I TER SILT
c^ - - \ \ FEN YP)
INSTALL CATCH SOUTH BOUND CL
BASIN PROTECTION \ I \ \ \ \ \\V OF STATE TRUNK
(TYP) \ I H U, 47 �� \ \ HIGHWAY NO. 10-62
,o v
a�ol EAST LINE OF THE \
F\ \
0 FT OF
a PROPOSED NEl/4 THE 5 1/4
BUILDING SEC. 8, I ° m
GFE = 903.50
II�M= .57
UV= 0 3 .63
11 •• 1B SIN PROTECTIOT'
.,:
MIL
• • • • • • • • • •
COAR EAGGREGATE
••
I-- ST -
905.87
cn I \ l \ C�p6OC
® �� J \
06/
CURB U \ h \ \ \
v I INTERSE TION OF
ml a EAST LIN OF WEST \ \ \ \\ \
475 FT & 5C6UTH LINE \ \ \
I
CURB CUT,
,qg6
INSTALL
'6 CY CLASS III RIP RAP
BASIN CTION
OVERLYING TYPE 4
912
`PERIMETER SILT-
FENCE (TYP)
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
F
n
I
ST ST
ST -
NO ( N
CATEG Y 3
z
EROS, 0NTROL
z
BLAN (TYP)
L�
l
ST ST -
zU0
II�M= .57
UV= 0 3 .63
11 •• 1B SIN PROTECTIOT'
.,:
MIL
• • • • • • • • • •
COAR EAGGREGATE
••
I-- ST -
905.87
cn I \ l \ C�p6OC
® �� J \
06/
CURB U \ h \ \ \
v I INTERSE TION OF
ml a EAST LIN OF WEST \ \ \ \\ \
475 FT & 5C6UTH LINE \ \ \
I
CURB CUT,
RIM- 07.16
T I E D DEMOLITION I I =897.8
�A6 A
Q
P�
ITS
ZONED: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL)
NOT z
I
1. THE ROCK ENTRANCE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO THE
START OF GRADING OPERATIONS.
2. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE GRADED SUCH THAT POSITIVE DRAINAGE
DURING CONSTRUCTION IS PROVIDED.
3. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN SUCH A CONDITION SUCH
THAT IT PREVENTS MUD TRACKING OFF SITE. ADDITIONAL ROCK OR
REPLACEMENT OF THE ENTRANCE MAY BE REQUIRED PERIODICALLY
IF MUD STARTS TO TRACK OFF SITE.
4. THE ROCK ENTRANCE MAY BE REMOVED JUST PRIOR TO THE
PLACEMENT OF AGGREGATE BASE.
0
"WIN
\�o 11.,.
• M M�, '•o.
lq
,i!RS�iO��!���t�<<►�
� �1��. ' � • • . �i gyp' � � ���%�! ��e���`��►•1��� ��w��C
rim f4
All
`►'►��� ��
Illi \� r \ _ • - p'/I%�<I_r��7_�.v�w o��,a I �I �1�g Cid
-1FENCE (TYP) ' • _
• • •-GEOTEXTILE
EAST LINE OF WEST EROSION CONTROL BASIN PROTECTION
•SOUTH
• •�• • • •
• DD
SE
SON
NEER
� 1 GEN
� E
3 PLASTIC ZIP TIES 5' MINIMUM LENGTH STEEL T -POST
AT LEAST 1" APART & MAXIMUM SPACING
(SOLB TENSILE) POST NIPPLES FACES AWAY FROM
LOCATED IN TOP 8" GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
OF STEEL POST
z GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
3' WIDE
M TIRE COMPACTION ZONE
f i-- FLO\N
BL OCK 5
z _MACHINE SLICE
8" - 12" DEPTH
NOTE: PLACING FILTER FABRIC UNDER THE ROCK ENTRANCE MAY N
REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF MAINTENANCE IT WOULD REQUIRE. 1. USE PROPER EQUIPMENT SUCH THAT THE SOIL IS
SLICED, NOT TURNED OVER.
TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 2. AFTER SILT FENCE INSTALLATION, COMPACT THE SOIL
MATERIALS PER MNDOT 3886 IMMEDIATELY NEXT TO THE GEOTEXTILE BY DRIVING
NTS INSTALLATION PER MNDOT 2573.3C1 OVER IT WITH A TRACTOR TIRE AT LEAST TWICE
STAPLE PLASTIC
SHEETING
EVERY 5' (TYP)
1'
CONCRETE WASHOUT
CONSTRUCT BERM
AROUND ENTIRE
WASHOUT AREA
10 MIL PLASTIC
SHEETING LINER
PLACED WITHIN
WASHOUT AREA
1
1. BOTTOM OF CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA SHALL BE
10'X10'
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE WASH LIQUID FROM
CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA AND DISPOSE OF PER
MPCA REQUIREMENTS WHEN WASHOUT AREA
BECOMES HALF FULL.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL SELECT THE MOST OPTIMAL
LOCATION FOR THE CONCRETE WASHOUT
NTS
SILT FENCE (MACHINE SLICED
NTS
EROSION CONTROL \A\
BLANKET (TYP) \
ZONED: PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) \
gEL RAC
THE
BL OCK I
1 i ad- 1 ' TO 3' no
6"
l
A CHECK SLOT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT THE TOP
OF STEEP SLOPES (4:1 OR STEEPER) WHERE EROSION CONTROL �\
BLANKET IS PLACED AS PER THE FOLLOWING: �\
1. DIG 6" X 6" TRENCH
2. LAY BLANKET END INTO TRENCH \/
3. STAPLE BLANKET IN BOTTOM OF TRENCH EVERY 1 FT
4. BACKFILL TRENCH WITH SOIL AND COMPACT
5. IF SLOPE LENGTH (L) IS GREATER THAN 100 FT DIG A CHECK SLOT 1/3 FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE
SLOPE AND STAPLE THE BLANKET IN AS IN THE TOP TRENCH.
EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
SWPPP - PLAN VIEW
T 0
O Q(D
N �-
O �-
0-a
o
Lo ?:0
~` E
Q0 0
J (D 0
a o c c
F � �
O�
m c N
0
N a
U) N'j
Q-
_
Q-
C)
O N O
U V,
3
C) N
E 4-7
z
O �, c
D
U �0
N
'0)
w
z
0
w
rn
N O
-5 C14
U x
U �
x
x
c
U O
m �
0
V
INSTALL
RY 3
BASIN CTION
EROSIOCATEGN CONT
BLANKET (TYP)
`PERIMETER SILT-
FENCE (TYP)
^`
6� V>/
co
z
RIM- 07.16
T I E D DEMOLITION I I =897.8
�A6 A
Q
P�
ITS
ZONED: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL)
NOT z
I
1. THE ROCK ENTRANCE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO THE
START OF GRADING OPERATIONS.
2. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE GRADED SUCH THAT POSITIVE DRAINAGE
DURING CONSTRUCTION IS PROVIDED.
3. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN SUCH A CONDITION SUCH
THAT IT PREVENTS MUD TRACKING OFF SITE. ADDITIONAL ROCK OR
REPLACEMENT OF THE ENTRANCE MAY BE REQUIRED PERIODICALLY
IF MUD STARTS TO TRACK OFF SITE.
4. THE ROCK ENTRANCE MAY BE REMOVED JUST PRIOR TO THE
PLACEMENT OF AGGREGATE BASE.
0
"WIN
\�o 11.,.
• M M�, '•o.
lq
,i!RS�iO��!���t�<<►�
� �1��. ' � • • . �i gyp' � � ���%�! ��e���`��►•1��� ��w��C
rim f4
All
`►'►��� ��
Illi \� r \ _ • - p'/I%�<I_r��7_�.v�w o��,a I �I �1�g Cid
-1FENCE (TYP) ' • _
• • •-GEOTEXTILE
EAST LINE OF WEST EROSION CONTROL BASIN PROTECTION
•SOUTH
• •�• • • •
• DD
SE
SON
NEER
� 1 GEN
� E
3 PLASTIC ZIP TIES 5' MINIMUM LENGTH STEEL T -POST
AT LEAST 1" APART & MAXIMUM SPACING
(SOLB TENSILE) POST NIPPLES FACES AWAY FROM
LOCATED IN TOP 8" GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
OF STEEL POST
z GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
3' WIDE
M TIRE COMPACTION ZONE
f i-- FLO\N
BL OCK 5
z _MACHINE SLICE
8" - 12" DEPTH
NOTE: PLACING FILTER FABRIC UNDER THE ROCK ENTRANCE MAY N
REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF MAINTENANCE IT WOULD REQUIRE. 1. USE PROPER EQUIPMENT SUCH THAT THE SOIL IS
SLICED, NOT TURNED OVER.
TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 2. AFTER SILT FENCE INSTALLATION, COMPACT THE SOIL
MATERIALS PER MNDOT 3886 IMMEDIATELY NEXT TO THE GEOTEXTILE BY DRIVING
NTS INSTALLATION PER MNDOT 2573.3C1 OVER IT WITH A TRACTOR TIRE AT LEAST TWICE
STAPLE PLASTIC
SHEETING
EVERY 5' (TYP)
1'
CONCRETE WASHOUT
CONSTRUCT BERM
AROUND ENTIRE
WASHOUT AREA
10 MIL PLASTIC
SHEETING LINER
PLACED WITHIN
WASHOUT AREA
1
1. BOTTOM OF CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA SHALL BE
10'X10'
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE WASH LIQUID FROM
CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA AND DISPOSE OF PER
MPCA REQUIREMENTS WHEN WASHOUT AREA
BECOMES HALF FULL.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL SELECT THE MOST OPTIMAL
LOCATION FOR THE CONCRETE WASHOUT
NTS
SILT FENCE (MACHINE SLICED
NTS
EROSION CONTROL \A\
BLANKET (TYP) \
ZONED: PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) \
gEL RAC
THE
BL OCK I
1 i ad- 1 ' TO 3' no
6"
l
A CHECK SLOT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT THE TOP
OF STEEP SLOPES (4:1 OR STEEPER) WHERE EROSION CONTROL �\
BLANKET IS PLACED AS PER THE FOLLOWING: �\
1. DIG 6" X 6" TRENCH
2. LAY BLANKET END INTO TRENCH \/
3. STAPLE BLANKET IN BOTTOM OF TRENCH EVERY 1 FT
4. BACKFILL TRENCH WITH SOIL AND COMPACT
5. IF SLOPE LENGTH (L) IS GREATER THAN 100 FT DIG A CHECK SLOT 1/3 FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE
SLOPE AND STAPLE THE BLANKET IN AS IN THE TOP TRENCH.
EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
SWPPP - PLAN VIEW
T 0
O Q(D
N �-
O �-
0-a
o
Lo ?:0
~` E
Q0 0
J (D 0
a o c c
F � �
O�
m c N
0
N a
U) N'j
Q-
_
Q-
C)
O N O
U V,
3
C) N
E 4-7
z
O �, c
D
U �0
N
'0)
w
z
0
w
rn
N O
-5 C14
U x
U �
x
x
c
U O
m �
0
V
0
(c) 00 U
Q T
z
O
z
_
^`
6� V>/
co
n
co (c)
n v)
L]
NO ( N
Q 7
z
M N
z
1..1..1 V
ILL L
V
zU0
O
Wi'�
wc
U
�_
OC
a
`J �
N
N
W
0'
c
W
I
N
N
V J
U)
C
_J
N
U
ry
0
0
U
Q
r
co
(DLo
If Z
O
co
� N =
o
00
Z
0
CII
U
CIOLu
0
L/) Lu
z
O o
V)
I O N (1) v
� Z
Lu
z
O
n
n v)
Zz
Q 7
Ow
Lu
V
>
O <
z
U Q
PROJECT
NUMBER:
I
19007
N
SCALE:
1 "=40'
0
C5 OF 6
PRO P ` I I✓ I REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT
P N N AS NECESSARY FOR NEW
N N I T� I " ZONED: B-3I(HIGHWAY BUSINESS) \ CONNECTION NOTE: ALL EXISTING 8" VCP SANITARY SEWER NOTE: ALL EXISTING b" CIP WATER MAIN
AREPLACE PAVEMENT AS PER LOCATED BETWEEN NORTH BUILDING WALL LOCATED BETWEEN EXISTING HYDRANT
NOT0 T PLA TEI+✓1 eQISTING ROAD ENTRANCECOUNTY AND/OR CITY AND NEW SANITARY MANHOLE (SANMHI) (NORTH) AND NEW HYDRANT PIPE TEE BLOCK I I REMOVE EXISTING DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE REPLACE WITH SIDEWALK PER COUNTY \ REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE REMOVED OF, AND DISPOSED OF CONNECTION (SOUTH) SHALL BE REMOVED
\ OFF-SITE OF, AND DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE
REPLACE WITH SIDEWALK PER COUNTY REQUIREMENTS
REQUIREMENTS h
RIM=906.59 6618 CURB & CONNECT TO EXISTING
INV=902.05 a GUTTER (TYP) a 12" CIP WATERMAIN PER
CITY REQUIREMENTS
RIM=906.86 RIM=907.00 COUNTY ROAD f B618CURBP N COOS RETE S 89 4628 W 965.83
SIDEWALK (TYP) (WET TAP) o
INV -894.60 INV SE=901.88 CONCRETE ( )
- INV 5=896.15 - - SIDEWALK (TYP)
N 89046'28" E 1318.36 SN 7, SN SN SN SN 8.. C.p. SIN SN EXISTING RIM 07. 4 8° 45° BEND �N EXISTATCING
CENTER OF
RI =90F 3 O � 8" 22�° BEND \EXISTING SEC. OF SEC.
CURB HYDRANT IN V= SIDEWALK
G
4_1 T GUTTER 2"CIP I V- M I O 8" C900 PVC 8, T.30, R.23,
W1/4 CORNER I I I I I I \A CURB TTER (TYP) cuRe c
OF SEC. 8, U' CUR CU4y NOTE: EXISTING SANITARY, WATER, AND STORM
r� O OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP O p Ems,'
T.30, R.23. �n I G STUBS, WHICH WILL NO LONGER BE IN USE, SHALL BE
EXISTING _RI=9�MATCH-� _ _ _ � _ _ - - o - \ REMOVED TO THE MAIN AND CAPPED/PLUGGED.
iNV=9G�., - - 45° N CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXISTING STUBS,
SIDEWALK / K 30 ° WHICH MAY NOT BE SHOWN ON THIS PLAN, OR THE
EXISTING 30 30 - - -a ° = - - - - - - - - -=�0. �S8 �" - �+ - " I` g cc ASSOCIATED SURVEY.
HYDRANT
Ivi � OR EOF
I CON'C-RF`E
SIDEWALK (TYP) 8" SANITARY SERVI SEC. 8, .23. \ \
I (EXISTING VCP SAA SEWER) m Ln
[SURFACING
E: VERIFY PATIO INV @ BLDG = �`k�� I \ \
ZONED: R-2 v I W/ OWNER \
(SINGLE & TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAI \ \\ T \ SOUTH BOUND CL
CONCRETEI THICKENED EDGE 8" COMBIN�D WATER \ OF STATE TRUNK
SIDEWALK (TYP I r�i I ERVICE W/ 8' TE \ \ HIGHWAY NO. 10-62
SIDEWALK (TYP) � � v 47 0 � "'�
_ I EAST LINE OF THE I\ VeLVE & BOA Pr
OFT OF �� �
PROPOSED
NEl/4 THE 5 1/4BUILDIN
EC. 8, \ ��
Lu I MFE = 914.50 ° ' . I 0m \ A ('p \ \ \ \
\ j -{ I GFE = 903.50 \ Off,
A �mMma)ffl_ G,6/
O I ac� CONCRETE -9ab ' EDGE
I I SIDEWALK (TYP)' 8612 CURB & CURB CUT �, THIo1cENE�
O OO I GUTTER (TYP) HYDRANT II II ll2 RB ° SIDEWfLi� (TYP) / \ \ \ \ IT -
6"
O I 6 B AXE VAL E �1 ( P) 9 I
CL: �5 /RIM=905.8 ° 06.11 I \ \ \ C
2 v I INV=900.2 ° I I 6" 4 BE I
ao
Ln ST ST /5T-,
BITU IN US I 6" l° N ° EASTINTELIN IN OSE � WEST \ \ \�\ \ \ `'� 9 H
ZONED: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Q THICKE D EDGE PA EM NT (Y m I I \ \\ \ EXIS G
c I 475 FT & 56UTH LINE \ \
RIM -905. SIDEV (TYP) ° OF NORTH 1901 FT \ \ \ \ 'I EWr 01
- I INV -900. 7. v o � OF NEI/4 OF 521/4, O
RIM=903.79 I - M= 06.01 SEC. 8, T.30, R.23.\
INV=901.64 ST T ST ST ST ST 15"R.C. -90185/ SW'LY F \ \ \
RIM -904.44 IM=905.87 = STATE TR \ \ \ \\
5-121, V=899.81 CONCRETE I V-9 Tf T z1vo I I 2 -FT V LLEY HIGHWA`' ^' 2 \ \
RIM=903.79 SIDEWALK (TYP) GUTTER JT P) C CRE
\ \ SIDE LK ( \ \
INV -901.45 � 903.61 IAll� ARA L L E O °
' THICKENED EDGE
R M=903.57 1 F T 5\
I V= 00.6 SIDEWALK (TYP) \ \
2 -FT VALLEY bl CUB OF 61 3 &R.2 KI E M NT \ \ \
MATCH INSULATE' GUTTER (TYP) B I q G ER p \ \ \ \
BL OCK EXISTING I SANITARY SEWER, n r. - - _ - ' I IDD O. I \ \ \ y
SIDEWALK AS NECESSARY \ I
T IN S CONCRfTE 6"X6' EE I EL ITU
/ E N (Y)
SIDE (TYP)I cn 6" 45 BENq ^ SFOR E fjAVE ENT (TYP) \� \O \
CONNECT TO EXISTING / FIF/ CURB Cl I 0 I - L - I B612 CUMI US 6612 CURB&
SANITARY MANHOLE I ,-, v 6"G ` �_ _ _ _ GUTTER (TY & ° i PA MENT (TY GUTTE�(fYP)
\ (FIELD VERIFY)
I 30 30 m 9P \�O \ \ \ \ \
CORE DRILL W/ BOOT 363 FT OF I �g TH\-
( ) I _ ELECTR1, 4 OF THE SW_ u 6" 1 ° BEND EN ER DOC. T 365.46 T OF
THE NE1/4 OF
REMOVE EXISTING
PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY E
FOR NEW CONNECTION - - - - - -
6"C900PVC 11 6" C9 PVCH
I �_ - - �- -----=�FIP--------------------� \ \ \
REPLACE PAVEMENT AS I - - - - - - SAN H 1
PER CITY REQUIREMENTS HYDRANT
8" PVC SANMH3 CONCRETE b" GATE VALVE @ 0.46% I INV S 9897.61 HYDRANT
@ 0.46% RIM = 904.75 SIDEWALK (TYP) &BOX CONNECT TO L I INV W = 897.51 6" GATE VALVE
CONNECT TO EXISTING INV E = 896.10 6" 450 BEND EXISTING 6" I - Z I INTERSECTION OF RETAINING WALL &BOX
WATERMAIN 4 INV NW = 896.00 8612 CURB & WATERMAIN LENGTH = 34 LF CONCRETE \
EAST LINE OF WEST � \
R 907.1 HEIGHT= 0 TO 1.5 -FT
b" GATE VALVE &BOX GUTTER (TYP) SANMH2 6"X6" TEE 330 FT &SOUTH LINE SIDEWALK (TYP)
CONCRETE RIM = 907 N b" GATE VALVE =897.8 ZONED: PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT)
DRIVEWAY IN E8 &BOX I OF NORTH 365.46 FT ZONED: R-4 (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) I I O N
v 6 I ENTRANCE �N t� i OF NEI/4 OF SWl/4, , ADD
/" ` SEC. 8, T.301 R.23.RAE
ZONED: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) CONNECT TO EXISTING I CONNECT TO EXISTING
WATERMAIN I SANITARY SEWER N N D V
b" GATE VALVE & BOX INV = 897.64 I �J V
Q� I NOT 8618 CURB & I i (FIELD VERIFY) C T E
GUTTER (TYP) I BITUMINOUS
PAVEMENT (TYP) BL OCK 5 BL OCK I
cc MATCH EXISTING G C
PAVEMENT, AND C
CURB & GUTTER
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION
1�' BITUMINOUS WEARING
COURSE (MNDOT 2360 TYPE
S P W EA340B)
TACK COAT BETWEEN
BITUMINOUS COURSES
1�' BITUMINOUS BASE
COURSE (MNDOT 2360 TYPE
SPNWB330B)
b" MNDOT CLASS 5
AGGREGATE BASE
APPROVED COMPACTED
SUBGRADE
NTS
2'-0'
1
VALLEY GUTTER
CONCRETE
SEE PLANS FOR
8„ GUTTER SLOPE
2" MIN COMPACTED
CLASS 5 BELOW VALLEY
GUTTER
APPROVED COMPACTED
SUBGRADE
NTS
CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL
BE CONSTRUCTED AS PER MNDOT SPEC.
2521.3C2
CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTION
ENGINEER WITH THE TOTAL DRAINAGE FIXTURE UNITS (DFUs) FOR THE INTERIOR 00)
O
PLUMBING TO VERIFY THE CORRECT SIZING AND SLOPE OF THE SANITARY SEWER LL
(0 � p
U
SERVICE
�V)
O
T
C
O
Q�
z
'j
W
O
N
UTILITY AND SURFACING NOTES:
0
Q>_
_
Q z
N �
-5
U
LQ
p
WATER AND SANITARY SEWER UTILITIES
O
o E
V
Q�
J
(D 0
1. WATER MAIN AND ANY WATER SERVICE LINES SHALL BE PLACED AT A MINIMUM DEPTH
OC Z
O
OF 8 FEET BELOW FINISHED GRADE.
O
c9
N =
O
� N �
2
O-0
2. IF CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED WHERE WATER MAIN CROSSES EXISTING SANITARY
OU
SEWER, SERVICE LINES, OR STORM SEWER, THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE RAISED OR
m
N
LOWERED APPROPRIATELY WHILE STILL MAINTAINING A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 8 FEET BELOW
U .O
FINISHED GRADE.
W
N'j
1 ''=40'
3. INSULATION SHALL BE PLACED AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE STORM SEWER CROSSES
Q
SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, OR ASSOCIATED SERVICES. INSULATION SHALL CONSISTC)}
OF AN 8 -FT X 8 -FT SQUARE OF 3" -THICK RIGID INSULATION. INSULATION SHALL BE PLACED
U
Q U N
BETWEEN THE STORM SEWER AND PIPE CROSSING WITH THE EDGES OF THE INSULATION
� .� �
PARALLEL TO THE PIPING AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.
C) N
4. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE LINE CLEANOUTS AS REQUIRED BY THE
MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE
O
N
c
U >
5. SEE SHEET C3 FOR STORM SEWER GRADING, AND SHEET C2 FOR MISCELLANEOUS
U
O N
DETAILS RELATING TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE UTILITIES.
N
�
w
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL EXISTING
__Q
UTILITIES PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION.
z
0
7. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER, AND ORDERING ASSOCIATED
MATERIALS, THE CONTRACTOR'S PLUMBING DESIGNER SHALL PROVIDE THE
ENGINEER WITH THE TOTAL DRAINAGE FIXTURE UNITS (DFUs) FOR THE INTERIOR 00)
O
PLUMBING TO VERIFY THE CORRECT SIZING AND SLOPE OF THE SANITARY SEWER LL
(0 � p
U
SERVICE
O r
O
z
z
w
c� i coo
ILL]
�'
C
W
N �-
z
OO N
z
M N
z
'j
W
O
N
W
LL L
_
Q z
U
.2 Z (n
8. CONNECTION TO EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURES SHALL BE DONE UNDER SUPERVISION ' ^ U
OF PUBLIC WORKS STAFF, AND SHALL BE COMPLETED BY CORE DRILLING INTO W V 0
EXISTING STRUCTURE. a Q 4
N
9. PUBLIC WORKS STAFF SHALL OPERATE ALL WATER MAIN GATE VALVES. CONTRACTOR
IS RESPONSIBLE TO NOTIFY AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS AT LEAST 24 -HOURS IN ADVANCE
OF WATER SUPPLY DISRUPTION. PUBLIC WORKS WILL PROVIDE A MAP OF AFFECTED
PROPERTIES FOR CONTRACTOR'S USE.
10. WET TAPPING OF EXISTING 12" CIP WATER MAIN SHALL BE DONE UNDER SUPERVISION
OF PUBLIC WORKS STAFF. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THIS WORK AND PROVIDE
A MINIMUM OF 48 -HOURS NOTICE. OUTSIDE OF NORMAL WORKING HOURS (BEFORE
7:OOAM OR AFTER 3:OOPM) MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL STAFF TIME CHARGES.
11. CONNECTION TO EXISTING WATER MAIN SHALL BE DONE UNDER SUPERVISION OF
PUBLIC WORKS STAFF. CONNECTION SHALL BE COMPLETED BY WET TAP.
SURFACING
1. SUBGRADES SHALL BE SCARIFIED AND/OR COMPACTED AS NECESSARY TO ATTAIN
THE REQUIRED COMPACTION DESCRIBED IN THE GENERAL NOTES (SHEET Cl).
TEST ROLLING OF THE SUBGRADE SHALL BE OBSERVED BY A QUALIFIED GEOTECHNICAL
ENGINEER OR TECHNICIAN. LOCATIONS EXHIBITING EXCESSIVE RUTTING (PER MNDOT
SPEC. 21 1 1) SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO
THE PLACEMENT OF AGGREGATE BASE. COMPACTION TESTING IN UTILITY TRENCHES
SHALL BE PERFORMED BY AN INDEPENDENT TESTING FIRM.
2. GRAVEL BASE COURSES SHALL BE ROLLED AND COMPACTED. TEST ROLLING OF THE
GRAVEL BASE SHALL BE OBSERVED BY A SOILS ENGINEER TO VERIFY STABILITY.
3. ALL EXISTING BITUMINOUS OR CONCRETE EDGES, WHICH WILL ABUT NEW BITUMINOUS
OR CONCRETE SURFACING SHALL BE SAWCUT TO OBTAIN A VERTICAL EDGE.
4. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE NEW CONCRETE
ABUTS EXISTING CONCRETE, AND AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE SEPARATE CONCRETE
POURS ABUT EACH OTHER.
5. SEE SHEET Cl FOR SPECIFICATIONS REGARDING THE CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS,
AND CURB AND GUTTER.
6. STREET PAVEMENT REMOVAL ASSOCIATED WITH NEW UTILITY CONNECTIONS SHALL BE
RECTANGULAR IN SHAPE, AND SAWCUT PLUMB. PAVEMENT PATCHING SECTION SHALL
MATCH THE EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION, TO BE FIELD VERIFIED.
4" CONCRETE
(MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3F52)
PARKING
LOT 4" CONCRETE
(MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3F52)
1" CHAMFER
4" MNDOT 3149.262 SELECT
GRANULAR BORROWT4
6',
APPROVED COMPACTED
SUBGRADE
4" MNDOT 3149.262 SELECT
GRANULAR BORROW
CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL
BE CONSTRUCTED AS PER MNDOT SPEC. APPROVED COMPACTED
2521.3C2 SUBGRADE
NTS
THICKENED EDGE SIDEWALK
NTS
UTILITY & PAVING PLAN
Z
w
-a
ILL]
�'
C
W
N �-
z
N
C
O
O
C
_J
n
O
N
W
L
U
Q z
U
Q
Lu
V
>
r
(y)
CO
z
OC Z
O
c9
N =
O
� N �
NUMBER:
Z
O
U
CIOLu
0
cn w
Z
O o
V)
w O N ��
� z
w
z
O
n
Z
Q z
Ow
Lu
V
>
O <
z
UQ
PROJECT
NUMBER:
'>
0
19007
SCALE:
o_
1 ''=40'
0
C6 OF 6
MOUNDS �ViEw
City of Mounds View Staff Report
Item No: 8F
Meeting Date: July 8, 2019
Type of Business: Council Business
Administrator Review:
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Don Peterson, Public Works Director
Item Title/Subject: Resolution 9134, Authorize Stormwater Pipe Repairs at 8240
Sunnyside Road
Background / Discussion:
In June, the Public Works Staff was notified of a potential problem with the storm sewer
located at 8240 Sunnyside Road. Staff investigated the issue and it was determined that
two sections of the pipe including the structure, would need to be replaced.
Staff contacted two companies to provide a quote to complete the necessary repair work
and they are as follows:
• Dave Perkins Contracting Inc. $16,950.00
• Belair Sitework Services $18,343.00
Funding for this work would come from the Storm Water Fund, 745-4415-5150, which
includes $110,000.00 in the adopted 2019 budget for storm sewer repairs and
maintenance.
Strategic Plan Strategy/Goal: Maintain and Plan for Infrastructure Improvements.
Financial Impact: No Impact to the 2019 Budget as repairs are budgeted, Storm Water
Fund account 745-4415-5150, will be utilized for the repair.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that Council approve the quote from Dave Perkins Contracting Inc of
Nowthen MN, for $16,950.00. Staff also recommends that a 7% contingency of $1,186.50
be included for any unforeseen problems that may arise during this repair for a total of
$18,136.50 for the repairs of the Storm Sewer located at 8240 Sunnyside Road with
funding from the Storm Water Fund, 745-4415-5150.
Respectfully submitted,
Don Peterson — Public Works Director
The Mounds View Vision
A Thriving Desirable Community
RESOLUTION 9134
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AUTHORIZE STORMWATER PIPE REPAIRS AT 8240 SUNNYSIDE ROAD
WHEREAS, the Public Works Staff investigated a potential problem with the storm sewer
system at 8240 Sunnyside Road; and
WHEREAS, Staff determined that two sections of pipe and the structure would need to be
replaced; and
WHEREAS, Staff contacted two companies to provide a quote to complete the necessary
repair work and they are as follows:
• Dave Perkins Contracting Inc. $16,950.00
• Belair Sitework Services $18,343.00
WHEREAS, funding for this work would come from the Storm Water Fund, 745-4415-
5150, which includes $110,000.00 in the adopted 2019 budget for storm sewer repairs and
maintenance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mounds View,
Ramsey County, Minnesota as follows:
1. The City Council hereby approves the quote from Dave Perkins Contracting Inc. of
Nowthen MN, for $16,950.00 for Storm Sewer Repairs at 8240 Sunnyside Road. The
City Council approves a 7% contingency of $1,186.50 be included for any unforeseen
problems that may arise during this repair for a total of $18,136.50.
2. Funding will be from the 2019 adopted budget, Storm Water Fund, 745-4415-5150.
3. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to execute all
appropriate documents to effectuate the actions contemplated by this resolution.
4. The Mayor and City Administrator, Staff and consultants are hereby authorized and
directed to take any and all additional steps and actions necessary or convenient in
order to accomplish the intent of this Resolution.
Adopted this 8th day of July, 2019
Carol A Mueller, Mayor
ATTEST:
Nyle Zikmund, City Administrator
(SEAL)
MOUNDS VIEW
Item No: 8G
Meeting Date: July 8, 2019
Type of Business: CB
Administrator Review:
City or Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Don Peterson, Public Works Director
Item Title/Subject: Resolution 9135 Authorizing the Consulting Services for the
design and construction for the 2020 Street Improvement
Project
Background/Discussion:
The City is in the process of rehabilitating streets throughout the City that were not
included in the 2007 Street Rehabilitation Plan. The 2020 proposed project includes
Quincy Street from County Road H2 to County Road I.
Quincy Street from County Road H2 to County Road I is approximately 2,660 feet in
length. The street segment has concrete curb and gutter (MN/DOT Design B618) with a
bituminous pavement surface measuring 42 -feet wide average back - to - back of curb.
Quincy was originally constructed in 1967. This street segment serves Pinewood
Elementary School along with several residential properties.
Maintenance has included seal coating, pothole patching and skim coating as needed.
The current pavement is in poor condition with significant surface patching, potholes,
and moderate to high severity traverse cracking and pavement heaving; curb and gutter
is in fair to good condition.
Discussion:
Public Works Staff has solicited a fee estimate proposal from Stantec for professional
engineering services for the 2020 Street Project as follows:
• Design/Construction Documents fee: $93,000
• Bidding fee: $4,000
• Construction Services/Survey fee: $37,000
• Record Plans fee $4,100
Total Estimate Engineering Fees of $138,100 for the 2020 Street Project, funding for the
design portion of the project would come from the Street Improvement Fund account
485-4470-7050 which has $55,000 in the 2019 adopted budget for engineering costs
regarding Quincy Street.
Strategic Plan Strategy/Goal: Maintain and Plan for Infrastructure Improvements.
Financial Impact: No Financial Impact to the 2019 budget because there is funding in
the Street Improvement Fund account of $55,000 for the engineering costs.
The Mounds View Visioi.
A Thriving Desirable Community
Resol 9135 Staff Report Continued
Recommendation:
Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the proposal
from Stantec Consulting Services for the design and construction documents for the 2020
Street Improvement Project, for Quincy Street from County Road H2 to County Road I.
Respectfully submitted,
Don Peterson
Public Works Director
The Mounds View Vision
A Thriving Desirable Community
RESOLUTION 9135
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AUTHORIZING THE CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
FOR THE 2020 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View is considering the 2020 Street Project which includes
Quincy Street from County Road H2 to County Road I; and
WHEREAS, Quincy Street from County Road H2 to County Road I is approximately 2,660
feet in length and maintenance has included seal coating, pothole patching and skim coating as
needed; and
WHEREAS, Public Works Staff has solicited a fee estimate proposal from Stantec for
professional engineering services for the 2020 Street Project as follows:
• Design/Construction Documents fee: $93,000
• Bidding fee: $4,000
• Construction Services/Survey fee: $37,000
• Record Plans fee $4,100
WHEREAS, funding for the design portion of the project would come from the Street
Improvement Fund account, 485-4470-7050 with a 2019 budget amount of $55,000 for
engineering Quincy Street.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mounds View,
Ramsey County, Minnesota as follows:
1. The City hereby approves the quote from Stantec Consulting Services of Minneapolis
MN, for the 2020 Quincy Street Rehabilitation for a total estimated cost of $138,100.
2. The City Council approves the design portion of the proposal of Quincy Street from
County Road H2 to County Road I, from the Street Improvement Fund, 485-4470-
7050.
3. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to execute all
appropriate documents to effectuate the actions contemplated by this resolution.
4. The Mayor and City Administrator, Staff and consultants are hereby authorized and
directed to take any and all additional steps and actions necessary or convenient in
order to accomplish the intent of this Resolution.
Adopted this 8th day of July, 2019
Carol A. Mueller, Mayor
ATTEST:
Nyle Zikmund, City Administrator
(SEAL)
MOUNDS'MrW
City of Mounds View Staff Report
Item No. 8H
Meeting Date: July 8, 2019
Type of Business: CB
Administrator Review:
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Don Peterson, Director of Public Works
Item Title/Subject: Resolution 9136, Approving No Parking on the West Side of
Long Lake Road from County Road H to County Road H2, in
Coordination of Road Improvements by Ramsey County
Introduction / Discussion:
Ramsey County will be performing road maintenance on Long Lake Road from County
Road H to County Road H2. The road maintenance will consist of milling the current
pavement to a depth of 2 inches and re -surface with new asphalt.
Ramsey County is requesting that the City Council approve, with a resolution, approving "No
Parking" on the west side of Long Lake Road. The parking shall be as follows:
• On the west side between County Road H and County Road H2
• On the east side from County Road H to 160' north of County Road H
• On the east side from County Road H2 to 150' south of County Road H2
Ramsey County held a public meeting on June 11 to present the information. Attached is
the sign in sheet, written comments from the meeting and one comment received by email.
Recommendation:
Ramsey County is seeking Council's support with a City Resolution for "No Parking" on the
West side of Long Lake Road from County Road H to County Road H2.
Respectfully Submitted:
Don Peterson, Public Works Director
The Mounds View Vision
A Thriving Desirable Community
RESOLUTION 9136
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
APPROVING NO PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF LONG LAKE ROAD FROM
COUNTY ROAD H TO COUNTY ROAD H2.
WHEREAS, Ramsey County will be performing road maintenance on Long Lake
Road from County Road H to County Road H2, and;
WHEREAS, The County is recommending No Parking on the West side of Long
Lake Road as follows:
• On the west side between County Road H and County Road H2
• On the east side from County Road H to 160' north of County Road H
• On the east side from County Road H2 to 150' south of County Road H2
WHEREAS, Ramsey County is requesting the City of Mounds View provide, by a
resolution of support, "No Parking" on the West side of Long Lake Road from County Road
H to County Road H2.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mounds
View, Ramsey County, Minnesota as follows:
1. The City Council of the City of Mounds View agrees to the No Parking on the
West Side of Long Lake Road from County Road H to County Road H2.
2. The No Parking shall be as follows:
• On the west side between County Road H and County Road H2
• On the east side from County Road H to 160' north of County Road H
• On the east side from County Road H2 to 150' south of County Road H2
Adopted this 8th day of July, 2019
Carol A. Mueller, Mayor
ATTEST:
Nyle Zikmund, City Administrator
(SEAL)
The Mounds View Vision
A Thriving Desirable Community
= RAMSEY COUNTY
Public Works
July 3, 2019
Don Peterson
Public Works Director
2466 Bronson Drive
Mounds View, MN 55112
Mr. Peterson,
Ramsey County is planning on resurfacing Long Lake Road (County State Aid Highway 45)
between the Rice Creek bridge and County Road H2 during the 2019 construction season.
The resurfacing project provides an opportunity to change the pavement markings and
operation of the roadway. The proposed lane configuration between County Road H and
County Road H2 is 2 auto lanes, 2 bike lanes, and one parking lane.
To meet Minnesota Department of Transportation State Aid standards given the existing road
widths, the segment between County Road H and County Road H2 will need to be posted no
parking.
A public meeting was held on June 11th, to present project information. Attached is the sign in
sheet, a written comment from the meeting and an email. After review of the comments and
evaluation of the technical and operational criteria for proposed bike facilities, county staff is
recommending implementation of bike lanes on Long Lake Road between County Road H and
and County Road H2.
We are requesting the city of Mounds View provide a resolution recommending to the
county that parking be prohibited on Long Lake Road:
On the west side between County Road H and County Road H2
On the east side from County Road H to 160' north of County Road H
On the east side from County Road H2 to 150' south of County Road H2
Please contact Andrew Meidl at 651-266-7135 or at andrew.meidl(a-).co.ramsey.mn.us if you
need further information.
Sincerely,
Kathy Jas e, P. E.
Design Engineer
Enc.
1425 Paul Kirkwold Drive
Arden Hills, MN 55112
Phone: (651) 266-2264
www. ra mseycou nty. us
The Mounds View Vision
A Thriving Desirable Community
0) L
Q �
N O
� U
N
Cl
L
M
M
El
O
E
Z
13
U
E
•E
W
v
JO
W
QH
r
O
N
Cl
L
M
M
El
O
E
Z
13
JO
'�
J
n�
1 1
Q
�
�
d
.,.
j
N
V
= RAMSEY COUNTY
Public Works
COMMENTS
Long Lake Road
Rice Creek Bridge to County Road H2
Proposed Resurfacing and Bicycle Lanes
June 11, 2019
Mounds View Community Center
Return to address above or send comments to kathyjaschke@co.ramsey.mn.us
Name W2U%r'y Tly D —1 T1 G4i—
Address s13y (G..►i, C,<1Yf 9(),XP,J 1I1� M� 5112_
Phone and/or email SZ - Fs 97, - 23 cl�1 as) f'L u'TD PL,A .r !� 14e t i
Comments:
go A,0 : d K Qj K F C. --)-j FS
R OI 5 orlS : SFASo•./ i S 4' OTT r o.S E
}2) M05'; PiFOI-t Ap -vo'T .SFS To 44,0e 'iii- Ru,/J 0A U-44.e-A►!f
i P'9nY,d4 1(,foM 7)1,F J-Ii /ZE--F'T i C/fUu,.-j,, �s Ng2gtooUS-
FO2 9rSOX73 o,4 UiEST Sr E OF S- epi (T'?�1FrIG 5PErAv,d(;�,
044
(yrs' IL19' 1 'To SFLL
A H0InE WtL.L 86
rnC -f A1F; ICULT'
I�S
N C Q�}2 YC. r i>-1
.S 1 2 r E i W E L L /2E /}
F��4tt"►1 E,
1425 Paul Kirkwold Drive
Arden Hills, MN 55112
Phone: (651) 266-7100
www. co. ram sey. rn n. us
The Mounds View Vision
A Thriving Desirable Community
Jaschke, Kathy
From: andria grove <agrove44@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2019 2:46 PM
To: Jaschke, Kathy
Subject: Opposition to the elimination of parking on the west side of long lake rd
External message alert: This message originated from outside the Ramsey County email system. Use caution when
clicking hyperlinks, downloading pictures or opening attachments.
I have a major concern on the elimination of parking on the west side of Long Lake Rd. My concerns are as follow.
- During high volume traffic times I feel it's going to be nearly impossible to get out of my driveway as I live on the west
side of the street. This is already hard especially during the school months.
- I feel there is definitely much more room for cars to park on the west side due to the major spacing of driveways.
there is little to no parking on the east side of the street in front of my house due to the closeness of driveways and
also the bus stop and fire hydrant
- any guests that may eventually find parking on the east side of street will have a difficult time crossing due to the high
amount of people who speed down this road. I don't think a narrower lane or less parking will abolish this problem
- when 1 go to get my mail I feel I would be at greater risk of getting hit by a car due to the narrowing of the our already
existing shoulder.
- most cars park on the west side of the street rather than east side.
- my home will not have the same parking opportunities as it did when I bought it. If and whenever I decide to sell.
- if I have guests over and parking is eliminated I don't know how far they will have to walk when coming to my home.
Andria Grove
5155 Long Lake Rd
Mounds View MN 55112
Sent from Yahoo Mail for Phone