Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packets - 2021/09/13
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA MOUNDS VIEW CITY HALL Monday, September 13, 2021 5 minutes after conclusion of 6:30 PM EDA meeting HYBRID MEETING — IN PERSON AND ZOOM https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85135932266?pwd=RGMOTHRuNmNIUEVnbkVZSkp KUE5ydz09 Passcode:973193 Or One tap mobile: US: +13126266799, 85135932266# or +16465588656, 85135932266# Or Telephone: Dial (for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): US: +1 312 626 6799 or +1 646 558 8656 or +1 301 715 8592 or +1 346 248 7799 or +1 669 900 9128 or +1 253 215 8782 or 877 853 5247 (Toll Free) or 888 788 0099 (Toll Free) or 833 548 0276 (Toll Free) or 833 548 0282 (Toll Free) Webinar ID: 851 3593 2266 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL: Mueller, Hull, Meehlhause, Bergeron, Cermak 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 5. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of Minutes: B. Just and Correct Claims C. Resolution 9470 Establishing Sustainability Committee 6. PUBLIC COMMENT Citizens may speak to issues not on tonight's agenda. Before speaking, please give your full name and address for the minutes. Also, please limit your comments to three minutes. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS A. Request to Appeal Rental License Re -Inspection Fees for properties located at 5661, 5671, and 5691 Quincy Street 8. COUNCIL BUSINESS A. PUBLIC HEARING, Resolution 9465, Amending the Crossroad Pointe PUD Narrative, 2390 Mounds View Boulevard B. Resolution 9466 Appeal of the Planning Commission's Denial of a Variance, 5045 Rainbow Lane C. Resolution 9468 Authorizing Certification of the Preliminary General Fund Budget and Preliminary Property Tax Levy for Fiscal Year 2022 D. Resolution 9467 Approving the Preliminary EDA Property Tax Levy Request and Budget for Fiscal Year 2022 E. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 980, an Ordinance Amending the Mounds View Municipal Code, Title XI, to Add a New Chapter Regulating Mobile Food Vehicles and Vendors ROLL CALL VOTE F. Resolution 9469 Adoption of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan G. Resolution 9471 Review 60% of Design Plans for the 2022/2023 Street Project and Authorization to continue with the Project 9. REPORTS A. Reports of Mayor and Council B. Reports of Staff • Discussion; 5491 Adams Street (Fedor's) C. Reports of City Attorney 10. NEXT COUNCIL WORK SESSION: Monday, October 4, 2021 NEXT COUNCIL MEETING: Monday, September 27, 2021 11. ADJOURNMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting August 23, 2021 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Mounds View Boulevard, Mounds View, MN 55112 6:50 P.M. 1. MEETING IS CALLED TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL: Bergeron, Cermak, Hull, Meehlhause, Mueller NOT PRESENT: None. 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA A. Monday, August 23, 2021, City Council Agenda. MOTION/SECOND: Meehlhause/Cermak. To Approve the Monday, August 23, 2021, agenda as amended adding Item 8I - Resolution 9464, Approving the Final Plat of Anthony Properties Second Addition. Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. 5. CONSENT AGENDA Council Member Meehlhause asked to remove Item 5C. A. Approval of Minutes: August 9, 2021. B. Just and Correct Claims. D. Resolution 9458, Approving Annual Polling Place Designations for 2021 and 2022. MOTION/SECOND: Bergeron/Hull. To Approve the Consent Agenda as amended removing Item 5C. Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. C. Resolution 9450, Approving the Promotion of Michael Hanson to Police Mounds View City Council August 23, 2024 Regular Meeting Page 2 Sergeant. 2 3 Council Member Meehlhause stated he fully supported the Police Department adding a fourth 4 sergeant. He explained the department ran many shifts without sergeants and the addition would 5 assist in providing more supervision to patrol officers on the street. He congratulated Officer 6 Mike Hanson on his promotion to Sergeant. 7 8 MOTION/SECOND: Meehlhause/Bergeron. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 9 9450, Approving the Promotion of Michael Hanson to Police Sergeant. 10 1 1 Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. 12 13 6. PUBLIC COMMENT 14 15 Marcus Curtis, 7660 Spring Lake Road, commented on the upcoming street improvement 16 projects that will be completed on Spring Lake Road. He explained he opposed the staff 17 recommendations. He noted he purchased his home in May of 2021 in hopes of improving the 18 home over time and raising his family in a neighborhood that offers great schools, parks and 19 outdoor recreation. He commented because his home has frontage on County Road I, he chose to 20 compromise on the desire to be away from traffic because he fell in love with the area and the 21 tranquility of Spring Lake Road. He explained the majority of the community do not oppose the 22 project in its entirety, but rather oppose the trail system and the loss of heritage oak trees. He 23 stated it would be shame to see such large trees lost from the cityscape. He commented about 24 how some cities were pursuing green streets without concrete curb and gutter. He explained he 25 supported the replacement of Spring Lake Road, but noted this was not an arterial roadway. He 26 requested the City not pursue an MSA designation for Spring Lake Road and stated he had a 27 petition to this effect with 35 signatures. 28 29 Gretchen Crowder, corner of Spring Lake Road and Bronson Drive, stated she opposed the 30 destruction of any oak trees along Spring Lake Road. She believed a sidewalk should not be 31 installed along Spring Lake Road noting this would require the loss of more trees. 32 33 Brandy Pinski, 7313 Spring Lake Road, stated she purchased her home on this street because of 34 the tree canopy. She reported one of her daughter's favorite things to do was take pictures the 35 landscape and she does this with every change of the season. She discussed how upsetting it 36 would be to her daughter if all the trees along Spring Lake Road were removed. She explained 37 she does not want her street widened, nor does she want a sidewalk or trail. She indicated her 38 street was not meant for that. She requested the City allow Spring Lake Road to remain as is. 39 40 Kathleen Smith, 7405 Spring Lake Road, explained she was before the City Council previously 41 to request a beekeeping license. She stated she was now present to discuss the plans for Spring 42 Lake Road. She thanked Marcus and Brandy for their efforts on the petition. She discussed the 43 old growth trees along road right of way. She commented on the negative impacts of the 44 proposed project and requested the City not pursue an MSA designation for Spring Lake Road. Mounds View City Council August 23, 2024 Regular Meeting Page 3 1 She did not believe it was in the City's best interest to pursue additional pavement versus 2 greenspace. 3 4 Rachel Green, 7584 Spring Lake Road, stated she has lived in her home since 2016 and noted the 5 street and trees drew her to the house. She explained she was disappointed with the street 6 improvement plans and indicated she did not want to see the street expanded or having sidewalks 7 added. She requested the street be allowed to remain as is. 8 9 Dan Dryer, 7830 Spring Lake Road, commented one of the things he loves about his property 10 was the park like feel. He explained people stop and take wedding photos on his property 1 1 because it was truly scenic. He discussed how his property would be negatively impacted if the 12 trees were removed. He discussed how bike lanes were sometimes unsafe noting his daughter 13 was hit on County Road I. He indicated there was great value in a large tree canopy. He 14 cautioned the City Council from further pursuing wider streets and additional sidewalks where 15 they may not be needed. 16 17 Peter Hawkins, 2008 County Road I, explained he has lived in his home for the past 49 years. He 18 reported he has a deep seeded appreciation for his neighborhood and encouraged the City to 19 protect the trees along Spring Lake Road. He did not believe a bike trail or sidewalk was 20 necessary along this roadway. He discussed how deeply he respected the trees on his property and 21 commented a number of trees may be lost due to the drought. He did not want to see further tree 22 Loss from the proposed street improvement project. 23 24 Gerald Drysinger, 7555 Spring Lake Road, stated he has lived in his home since 1992. He 25 explained he fell in love with his lot due to the trees and the tree canopy. He reported he was a 26 widower but has opted to remain in his house because he loves his home and lot. He discussed 27 how the proposed trail and sidewalks would negatively impact the neighborhood and requested 28 the City not pursue this. 29 30 Michelle Dryer, 7830 Spring Lake Road, commented she has lived in her home for the past 15 31 years. She questioned what would be happening to her property and asked how she could find out 32 this information. She noted she was on the north side of the S curve and has lost her mailbox six 33 times. She stated she would greatly support a speed reduction along Spring Lake Road. She 34 feared that widening Spring Lake Road would only increase the speed and decrease safety along 35 this roadway. 36 37 Mary Eschalan, 7465 Spring Lake Road, explained he purchased his home in 1980 because the 38 neighborhood was so beautiful. He indicated he did not want any changes to the street, nor did 39 he want sidewalks or trails added. He recommended the street remain as is. 40 41 Gene Dixon, 7538 Spring Lake Road, stated he has lived in his home since 1973. He explained 42 he has lost oak trees over the years due to storms and he did not want to lose anymore. He 43 reported this was a beautiful neighborhood and he wanted it to remain that way. 44 Mounds View City Council August 23, 2021 Regular Meeting Page 4 1 Mayor Mueller thanked the residents for coming forward to share their comments and concerns 2 with the Council. She discussed the history of the City's street improvement program 3 commenting on how the City had worked to create a 17-year program that would update all 4 streets without assessments. She commented on how the sidewalks along her street (Groveland 5 Road) has improved safety. She noted she has not reviewed the plans for Spring Lake Road but 6 she encouraged all of the residents in attendance to attend the upcoming neighborhood meeting, 7 which was scheduled for Wednesday, August 25, 2021. She reiterated that the common goal was 8 for the City to update the infrastructure under the street, while also providing residents with new 9 curb, gutters and streets. 10 11 Council Member Bergeron commented until he knows what the plans are his vote will be up in 12 the air. He noted he would be attending the neighborhood meeting on Wednesday night. 13 14 7. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS 15 A. 2nd Quarter Police Report — Chief Harder. 16 17 Police Chief Harder provided the Council with a presentation on the 2nd Quarter Report on behalf 18 of the Mounds View Police Department. He stated he was very happy with the two officers that 19 were hired during the second quarter. He explained two cold case suspects were arrested in the 20 community and were awaiting trial. He noted traffic stats were back up along with community 21 engagement and outreach. He reported the department received a DUI grant again this year, 22 along with a grant for a use of force/de-escalation virtual reality simulator. He noted this 23 simulator would be shared with other agencies. He reviewed the calls for service in 2021 and 24 noted there has been an increase in violent crimes. He expressed frustration with the repeat 25 crimes that were occurring in the community but noted his officers were doing great work to 26 make arrests. 27 28 Council Member Hull asked why repeat crimes are being committed. Police Chief Harder 29 explained this was occurring because the offenders are being given probation on top of probation 30 or are bonded out immediately by the Minnesota Freedom Fund. 31 32 Council Member Bergeron commended the department for increasing the number of traffic stops 33 in the community. He stated this was very encouraging to him. Police Chief Harder explained 34 speeding became a huge concern during the pandemic. He reported the radar trailer has been 35 deployed, along with signs in hopes of reducing speed. He indicated his officers were committed 36 to addressing this concern and were conducting a lot of stops. 37 38 Mayor Mueller requested further information regarding the sacrifices the team made during the 39 civil unrest and throughout the pandemic. Police Chief Harder reported he had to cancel vacation 40 time for about six months. He appreciated the fact his officers stepped up, even if they got sick. 41 He indicated the call stats over the past year speak volumes as to the level of commitment his 42 officers have to the department. He stated last year was not an easy year for any officer. 43 44 Mayor Mueller commented she was incredibly proud of how the Mounds View Police 45 Department has served the community and its people over the past year and a half. Mounds View City Council August 23, 2024 Regular Meeting Page 5 1 2 Council Member Meehlhause requested further information regarding the City's traffic/DUI 3 officer. Police Chief Harder explained the department's full-time DUI/Traffic Officer Alex Aase 4 was honored with the Minnesota Rookie of the Year Award along with the top DUI enforcer. He 5 noted he has also been recognized by Minnesota Towards Zero Death on two different occasions. 6 7 Council Member Meehlhause thanked Police Chief Harder for his tremendous leadership and 8 commitment to the City stating his leadership had worked its way throughout the entire 9 department. 10 11 Mayor Mueller explained the Mounds View Police Foundation would be hosting the Mounds 12 View Police Department in a softball game against the SBM Fire Department on Saturday, 13 September 11 at City Hall Park. 14 15 B. Resolution 9452, Approving the 2020 Citizen of the Year. 16 17 Human Resources Coordinator Ewald reported annually the City recognizes a citizen who gives 18 back to the community. She reported George Winnicke was selected as the 2020 Citizen of the 19 Year. She noted a plaque would be created for Mr. Winnicke and this plaque would be presented 20 at the September 20, 2021 Town Hall meeting at 6:00 p.m. at the Mounds View Community 21 Center. 22 23 Mayor Mueller reported the 2019 Citizen of the Year was Amy Hodges. She noted Amy would 24 be presented with her plaque at the September 20th Town Hall meeting as well. 25 26 Mayor Mueller read Resolution 9452 in full for the record. 27 28 MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Hull. To Adopt Resolution 9452, Approving the 2020 Citizen of 29 the Year. 30 31 Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. 32 33 C. Resolution 9453, Approving the 2019 Coach of the Year. 34 35 Human Resources Coordinator Ewald reported annually the Parks, Recreation and Forestry 36 Commission recognizes a coach who teaches sportsmanship and leadership skills to area youth. 37 She reported Jessie Opine was selected as the 2019 Coach of the Year. She noted a plaque would 38 be created for Mr. Opine and this plaque would be presented at the September 20, 2021 Town 39 Hall meeting at 6:00 p.m. at the Mounds View Community Center. 40 41 Council Member Meehlhause read Resolution 9453 in full for the record. 42 43 MOTION/SECOND: Meehlhause/Cermak. To Adopt Resolution 9453, Approving the 2019 44 Coach of the Year. 45 t 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 Mounds View City Council August 23, 2024 Regular Meeting Page 6 Ayes — 5 Nays 0 Motion carried. D. Resolution 9454, Approving the 2020 Coach of the Year. Human Resources Coordinator Ewald reported annually the Parks, Recreation and Forestry Commission recognizes a coach who teaches sportsmanship and leadership skills to area youth. She reported Lexie Jorgenson was selected as the 2020 Coach of the Year. She noted a plaque would be created for Ms. Jorgenson and this plaque would be presented at the September 20, 2021 Town Hall meeting at 6:00 p.m. at the Mounds View Community Center. Council Member Hull read Resolution 9454 in full for the record. MOTION/SECOND: Hull/Meehlhause. To Adopt Resolution 9454, Approving the 2020 Coach of the Year. Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. 8. COUNCIL BUSINESS A. Public Hearing: Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 978, an Ordinance Continuing a Franchise Fee on Center Point Energy Natural Gas Operations within the City of Mounds View. Finance Director Beer requested the Council adopt an Ordinance continuing a franchise fee on Center Point Energy Natural Gas for operations in the City of Mounds View. It was noted Center Pointe Energy has one customer in Mounds View. He explained this franchise fee would sunset December 31, 2026. He reported the franchise fees collected are used for street maintenance and General Fund operations in the City. He requested the Council hold a public hearing and adopt the Ordinance. Mayor Mueller opened the public hearing at 7:57 p.m. Hearing no public input, Mayor Mueller closed the public hearing at 7:57 p.m. Council Member Meehlhause asked what type of revenues were generated for the City each year through franchise fees. Finance Director Beer estimated this to be $610,000 per year. MOTION/SECOND: Meehlhause/Bergeron. To Waive the Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance 978, an Ordinance Continuing a Franchise Fee on Center Point Energy Natural Gas Operations within the City of Mounds View and to direct staff to publish the Ordinance summary. ROLL CALL: Bergeron/Cermak/Hull/Meehlhause/Mueller. Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting August 23, 2024 Page 7 1 B. Public Hearing: Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 979, an 2 Ordinance Continuing a Franchise Fee on Xcel Energy Electric and Natural 3 Gas Operations within the City of Mounds View. 4 5 Finance Director Beer requested the Council adopt an Ordinance continuing a franchise fee on 6 Xcel Energy Electric and Natural Gas for operations in the City of Mounds View. It was noted 7 Xcel Energy was the primary provider of electric and natural gas services in Mounds View. He 8 explained this franchise fee would sunset December 31, 2026. He reported the franchise fees 9 collected are used for street maintenance and General Fund operations in the City. He requested 10 the Council hold a public hearing and adopt the Ordinance. 11 12 Mayor Mueller opened the public hearing at 8:02 p.m. 13 14 Hearing no public input, Mayor Mueller closed the public hearing at 8:02 p.m. 15 16 MOTION/SECOND: Hull/Cermak. To Waive the Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance 979, 17 an Ordinance Continuing a Franchise Fee on Xcel Energy Electric and Natural Gas Operations 18 within the City of Mounds View and to direct staff to publish the Ordinance summary. 19 20 ROLL CALL: Bergeron/Cermak/Hull/Meehlhause/Mueller. 21 22 Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. 23 24 C. Public Hearing: Resolution 9459, Approval of On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor 25 License for American Multi -Cinema, Inc. at 2430 Mounds View Boulevard. 26 27 City Administrator Zikmund requested the Council approve an on -sale intoxicating liquor license 28 for American Multi -Cinema, Inc. at 2430 Mounds View Boulevard. He reported the applicant 29 has met all City requirements noting staff would be working with the applicant to resolve the 30 insurance policy matter long term. Staff recommended the Council approve the on -sale liquor 31 license through December 31, 2021. 32 33 Mayor Mueller opened the public hearing at 8:06 p.m. 34 35 Susan Navarro, AMC Theaters representative, thanked the Council for their time and 36 consideration. She noted she was available for comments or questions. 37 38 Christopher Lecher, General Manager of the Mounds View AMC, introduced himself to the 39 Council. 40 41 Hearing no public input, Mayor Mueller closed the public hearing at 8:09 p.m. 42 43 MOTION/SECOND: Meehlhause/Bergeron. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 44 9459, Approval of On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for American Multi -Cinema, Inc. at 2430 45 Mounds View Boulevard. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 Mounds View City Council August 23, 2024 Regular Meeting Page 8 Council Member Meehlhause stated he supported extending the liquor license through December 31, 2021. He explained he was very pleased to see the movie theater open again. Mayor Mueller agreed stating she was happy to see the movie theater back in business noting this was an important entertainment option for the community. Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. D. Resolution 9460, Approval of a Class B Restaurant License for American Multi -Cinema, Inc. at 2430 Mounds View Boulevard. City Administrator Zikmund requested the Council approve a Class B Restaurant License for American Multi -Cinema at 2430 Mounds View Boulevard. MOTION/SECOND: Bergeron/Hull. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 9460, Approval of a Class B Restaurant License for American Multi -Cinema, Inc. at 2430 Mounds View Boulevard. Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. E. Resolution 9461, Approval of an Amusement Device License for Dean Superior Vending Co. at 2430 Mounds View Boulevard. City Administrator Zikmund requested the Council approve an Amusement Device License for Dean Superior Vending for the AMC Theater at 2430 Mounds View Boulevard. MOTION/SECOND: Bergeron/Hull. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 9461, Approval of an Amusement Device License for Dean Superior Vending Co. at 2430 Mounds View Boulevard. Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. F. Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance 980 Amending Title XI of the Mounds View City Code to Add a New Chapter Regulating Mobile Food Vehicles and Vendors. City Administrator Zikmund requested the Council introduce an Ordinance that would Amend Title XI of the Mounds View City Code to add a new chapter that would regulate mobile food vehicles and vendors. He discussed the proposed changes noting vendors would now be allowed to have a 10 day license without having to pay for a full -year license. Council Member Bergeron stated one of the Night to Unite parties he attended had a food truck. He explained the neighbors appreciated the fact the City was allowing food trucks in the community to be a part of these types of events. Mounds View City Council August 23, 2024 Regular Meeting Page 9 1 2 MOTION/SECOND: Bergeron/Meehlhause. To Waive the First Reading and Introduce 3 Ordinance 980 Amending Title XI of the Mounds View City Code to Add a New Chapter 4 Regulating Mobile Food Vehicles and Vendors. 5 6 Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. 7 8 G. Resolution 9462, Requesting a Variance from Street Design Standard for 9 State Aid Road. 10 1 1 Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson requested the Council request a variance 12 from the street design standards for State Aid Road. He explained staff and consulting engineers 13 were working on the 2022-2023 Street Improvement Project. He stated at the April 12, 2021 14 Council Meeting, the Council authorized Stantec to complete preliminary designs and surveys of 15 the project area. Staff has since discovered an issue or challenge with Spring Lake Road around 16 the lake. He reviewed the plans with the Council, noting a portion of Spring Lake Road was on 17 private property. He reported Spring Lake Road was an MSA roadway and because of this, 18 certain standards have to be met, including moving the road out of private property. He 19 discussed how the roadway would be moved into public right-of-way in order to meet MSA 20 requirements. At this time, a variance has to be approved because the curve was sharp and 21 required 20 mile per hour signage. It was noted the City Attorney had reviewed the Resolution 22 and recommends approval. 23 24 Council Member Meehlhause clarified the Council was being asked to pass a Resolution 25 supporting staff going to the State to get approval for a variance because of the curve in the 26 roadway that requires a 20 mile per hour speed limit versus a 30 mile per hour speed limit. 27 Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson reported this was the case. 28 29 Council Member Bergeron questioned if the movement of the road would impact the trees along 30 the roadway. Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson explained he would have to 31 look at the plans to see if any trees would be impacted. He did not believe any trees would be 32 impacted because the road would be centered. 33 34 Council Member Bergeron commented this work would correct a mistake that was made in the 35 past. Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson stated this was the case. 36 37 Council Member Meehlhause indicated the one side of the street does not have any residents 38 because of the lake. Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson reported this was true, 39 but noted the City still had to fit the road width design within the road right of way. He further 40 discussed the variance that was being requested for the sharp curve and how this went against 41 MSA design standards. 42 43 MOTION/SECOND: Hull/Meehlhause. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 9462, 44 Requesting a Variance from Street Design Standard for State Aid Road. 45 Mounds View City Council August 23, 2024 Regular Meeting Page 10 1 Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. 2 3 H. Resolution 9463, Disposal of Surplus Property. 4 5 City Administrator Zikmund requested the Council approve the disposal of surplus property. He 6 explained the City had a large amount of racking that could be sold. He noted the New 7 Brighton/Mounds View Rotary Club had a need for this racking and was grateful to the City. 8 Staff recommended the Council offer their approval for the disposal of this surplus property. 9 1 o MOTION/SECOND: Bergeron/Hull. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 9463, 11 Disposal of Surplus Property. 12 13 Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. 14 15 I. Resolution 9464, Approving the Final Plat of Anthony Properties Second 16 Addition. 17 18 Community Development Director Sevald requested the Council approve the Final Plat for the 19 Anthony Properties Second Addition. He reported this plat was for the movie theater parking lot 20 and would subdivide one lot into three lots. He explained Lot 1 would be for Caribou Cabin, Lot 21 2 would be for the AMC Movie Theater and Lot 3 would provide additional parking for Moe's. 22 He indicated no significant changes have been made to the plat since the Preliminary Plat was 23 approved, except for a minor change to the drainage plans. Staff recommended approval of the 24 Final Plat with the addition of Condition 11 stating: The developer shall reimburse the City for 25 consultant fees, including engineering and legal. 26 27 Mark Krogh, Java Companies, thanked the Council for their consideration. He stated he was 28 excited to get this project moving forward in Mounds View. 29 30 Council Member Meehlhause asked what the difference was between this Caribou and the 31 existing Caribou in Mounds View. Mr. Krogh explained the Caribou Cabin would be a drive-thru 32 only with two to four workers. It was noted the Caribou Cabin would have outdoor seating. 33 34 MOTION/SECOND: Meehlhause/Hull. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 9464, 35 Approving the Final Plat of Anthony Properties Second Addition as amended. 36 37 Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. 38 39 9. REPORTS 40 A. Reports of Mayor and Council. 41 42 Council Member Cermak stated the Cops against the Hoses softball game would be held on 43 Saturday, September 11, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. at City Hall Park. She encouraged the public to 44 come out and cheer on these great public servants. 45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 Mounds View City Council August 23, 2024 Regular Meeting Page 11 Council Member Meehlhause thanked all of the residents that attended the Festival in the Park events and parade this past weekend. Council Member Bergeron thanked the Festival in the Park Committee for planning and putting on a tremendous family friendly event for the community. Mayor Mueller thanked Council Member Cermak for her tremendous dedication in the past to the Festival in the Park. She thanked Catherine Smith for serving as the new Festival in the Park Committee President. She thanked everyone who worked on the committee and volunteered at the event. Mayor Mueller discussed the meeting she recently attended which included a Ramsey County Dispatch Policy Committee meeting, Minnesota Women in City Government meeting, the Minnesota Mayors Association meeting, and the Ramsey County League of Local Government Work Group meeting. Mayor Mueller stated she looked forward to attending the neighborhood meeting on Wednesday, August 25, 2021. B. Reports of Staff. Finance Director Beer reported the Council would be adopting a preliminary levy at the September 13, 2021 City Council meeting. Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson explained street maintenance would begin this week. Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson reported Water Treatment Plant 1 rehabilitation would begin this week. Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson stated the splash pad would be closing on Labor Day. Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson commented on the great success the City has had with its parks and recreation programming. He noted staff had begun planning for winter and spring programming. Council Member Meehlhause thanked Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson for all of the time he put into the Festival in the Park. Community Development Director Sevald reported permits were up for 2021. City Administrator Zikmund thanked the Mounds View Lions for their great work at the Festival in the Park. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Mounds View City Council August 23, 2024 Regular Meeting Page 12 City Administrator Zikmund invited the public to attend the Town Hall Meeting, which was scheduled for Monday, September 20, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. at the Community Center. C. Reports of City Attorney. City Attorney Riggs had nothing additional to report. 10. Next Council Work Session Next Council Meeting: Town Hall Meeting: 11. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 9:08 p.m. Transcribed by: Heidi Guenther Minute Maker Secretarial Monday, September 7, 2021, at 6:30 p.m. Monday, September 13, 2021, at 6:30 p.m. Monday, September 20, 2021, at 6:00 p.m. CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA APPROVING JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS AGAINST CITY FUNDS WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View, pursuant to Minnesota Statute 412.141, has full authority over the financial affairs of the City and; WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the claim number 19728 through 19749 in the amount of 64,522.45 149319 through 149415 in the amount of $ 201,068.38 TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIMS PRESENTED $ 265,590.83 And has found said claims to be just and correct; It was moved that the City Council of Mounds View hereby approve the attached list of claims dated 09/14/21 by the vote ayes nays. ` Finance Director 5/24/_^C2I !C:C4 AM DIRECT PAYABLES CHECK REGISTER PACKET: 125E7 Ck Da[e - E VENDOR SET: Cl Ci y cr Mc,; ds View *k'* CHECK LISTING -11, s BANK: PYBNK Western Bank ?OL g CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK VENDOR ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I.D. NAME TYPE DATE DISCOUNT AMOUNT NO# AMOUNT L7160 The Lincoln Nat'l Life Insuranc I-610201--10826 LTD #1588135 R 8/26/2031 712.58 019728 712.58 L7165 The Lir,ccln National Life Insur I-3C120210826 Life Ins #400238774 R 8/26/2C21 78C.48 C19729 78C.48 *VOID* 019730 VOID CHECK V 8/26/2021 019730 **VO.ID** M7152 MN Child Support Payment Center I-99520210826 Case #0015244278 R 8/26/2021 838.94 019731 838.94 S4107 Secure Benefits Systems Corp. I-50020210826 Flex Medical R 8/26/2021 41.67 019732 I-50320210826 Flex Daycare R 8/26/2021 1,383.32 019732 1,424.99 ** B A N K T O T A L S ** NO# DISCOUNTS CHECK AMT TOTAL APPLIED REGULAR CHECKS: 4 0.00 3,756.99 3,756.99 HANDWRITTEN CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0..00 PRE -WRITE CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 DRAFTS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 VOID CHECKS: 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 NON CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 CORRECTIONS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 BANK TOTALS: 5 0_00 3,7.56.99 3,756.99 3 : 4 3 PM DIRECT FAYABi.ES CHECK REGISTER PACKET: C-SEE Ck Cate VENDCR SET: C1 City ct McGnds View kz*Y CHECK LISTING ***` BANK: PYBNK Western Bank CHECK CHECK VENDOR I.C. NAME TYPE DATE DISCOUNT AMOUNT PCV CHECK CHECK NO# AMOUNT ------------------------------- H3000 Health Partners I-12020210812 Medical Expense R 9/01/2021 25,822.50 019733 1-12020210826 Medical Expense R 9/01/2021 2.5,643.65 019733 I-2CC2C21C612 Dental Expense R 9/Cl/2C21 2,157.86 C19733 I-20020210826 Dental Expense R 9/01/2C21 1,851.51 C19733 55,475.52 *VOID* 019734 VOID CHECK V 9/01/2021 019734 **VOID** *VOID* 019735 VOID CHECK V 9/01/2021 019735 **VOID** *VOID* 019736 VOID CHECK V 9/01/2021 019736 **VOID** *VOID* 019737 VOID CHECK V 9/01/2021 019731 **VOID** *VOID* 019738 VOID CHECK V 9/01/2021 019738 **VOID** *VOID* 019739 VOID CHECK V 9/01/2021 019739 **VOID** *VOID* 019740 VOID CHECK V 9/01/2021 019740 **VOID** *VOID* 019741 VOID CHECK V 9/01/2021 019741 **VOID** ** B A N K T 0 T A L S ** NO# DISCOUNTS CHECK AMT TOTAL APPLIED REGULAR CHECKS: 1 0.00 55,475.52 55,475.52 HANDWRITTEN CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRE -WRITE CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 DRAFTS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 VOID CHECKS: 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 NON CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 CORRECTIONS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 BANK TOTALS: 9 0.00 55,475.52 55,475.52 9/07/1-021 12:42 PM DIRECT PAYABLES CHECK REGISTER __... -. PACKET: 02878 Ck Da`e 9-�-'02 - 6 VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View **** CHECK LISTING -•'** r BANK: PYBNK Western Bank CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK VENDOR ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I.D. NAME TYPE DATE DISCOUNT AMOUNT NO# AMOUNT A9329 Fidelity Security Life I-62C2C21C9C9 50790-1492 PLAN 98C R 9/09/2C21 228.8E C19742 228.88 L0549 Law Enforcement Labor Services, I-70020210909 Police Union Dues R 9/09/2021 1,206.50 019743 1,206.50 L7160 The Lincoln Nat'l Life Insuranc I-63C20210909 STD # 1024913C R 9/09/2021 73C.1C 019744 730.10 L7165 The Lincoln National Life Insur I-30120210909 Life Ins 4400238774 R 9/09/2021 780.53 019745 780.53 *VOID* C19746 VOID CHECK V 9/09/2021 C19746 **VOID** M7152 MN Child Support Payment Center 1-99520210909 Case 40015244278 R 9/09/2021 838.94 019747 838.94 N0525 643400 - NCPERS MN Grp Life Ins I-30020210909 NCPERS Life Ins R 9/09/2021 80.00 019748 80.00 S4107 Secure Benefits Systems Corp. I-50020210909 Flex Medical R 9/09/2021 41.67 019749 I-50320210909 Flex Daycare R 9/09/2021 1,383.32 019749 1,424.99 ** B A N K T 0 T A L S ** NO# DISCOUNTS CHECK AMT TOTAL APPLIED REGULAR CHECKS: 7 0.00 5,289.94 5„289.94 HANDWRITTEN CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 PRE -WRITE CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 DRAFTS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 VOID CHECKS: 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 NON CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 CORRECTIONS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 BANK TOTALS: 8 0.00 5,289.94 5,289.94 9/09/2021 8:37 AM VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View BANK: * ALL BANKS DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU 99/99/9999 VENDOR I.D. NAME C-CHECK VOID CHECK C-CHECK VOID CHECK C-CHECK VOID CHECK C-CHECK VOID CHECK C-CHECK VOID CHECK C-CHECK VOID CHECK C-CHECK VOID CHECK C-CHECK VOID CHECK C-CHECK VOID CHECK C-CHECK VOID CHECK C-CHECK VOID CHECK C-CHECK VOID CHECK C-CHECK VOID CHECK ** T 0 T A L S REGULAR CHECKS: HAND CHECKS: DRAFTS: EFT: NON CHECKS: VOID CHECKS: TOTAL ERRORS: 0 VENDOR SET: 01 BANK: * TOTALS: BANK: * TOTALS:, A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 1 CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT V 9/01/2021 149322 V 9/01/2021 149323 V 9/01/2021 149324 V 9/14/2021 149346 V 9/14/2021 149347 V 9/14/2021 149348 V 9/14/2021 149349 V 9/14/2021 149350 V 9/14/2021 149351 V 9/14/2021 149356 V 9/14/2021 149363 V 9/14/2021 149375 V 9/14/2021 149376 NO INVOICE AMOUNT DISCOUNTS CHECK AMOUNT 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 13 VOID DEBITS 0.00 VOID CREDITS 0.00 0.00 0.00 NO INVOICE AMOUNT DISCOUNTS CHECK AMOUNT 13 0.00 0.00 0.00 13 0.00 0.00 0.00 9/09/2021 8:37 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 2 VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View BANK: APBNK US Bank DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU 99/99/9999 CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT S5747 Wes Smith I-202108198295 MV Festival in the Park 2021 R 8/19/2021 149319 100 4110-3900 GRANTS TO OTHER ORGANIZATIONS MV Festival in the P 300.00 300.00 1 GAHLON, AMANDA I-00020210825829E US REFUND R 8/25/2021 149320 700 1152 UTILITY DELQ. RECIEVABLE 05-0870-02 31,14 31.14 X6000 Xcel Energy I-745297742 Aug. Xcel R 9/01/2021 149321 252 4350-3210 ELECTRICITY Community Center-Ele 2,712.69 252 4350-3220 NATURAL GAS Community Center -Gas 352.12 100 4460-3220 NATURAL GAS City Hall -Gas 227.02 100 4360-3210 ELECTRICITY Greenfield Park/Tenn 81.66 700 4823-3220 NATURAL GAS Well #4-Gas 26.00 700 4823-3220 NATURAL GAS Well #6-Gas 26.00 255 4350-3210 ELECTRICITY Lakeside Shelter-Ele 101.60 100 4360-3210 ELECTRICITY Silver View Park-Ele 253.97 730 4823-3210 ELECTRICITY Lift Station #1-Elec 90.85 700 4825-3210 ELECTRICITY Booster Station Load 4,579.31 740 4416-3210 ELECTRICITY Street Light-8228 Sp 15.21 700 4825-3210 ELECTRICITY Well #5, Electric 2,951.01 100 4360-3210 ELECTRICITY Random Park Electric 117.77 700 4823-3220 NATURAL GAS Booster Station -Gas 32.30 700 4825-3210 ELECTRICITY Well #6 Load-Electri 4,512.99 700 4823-3220 NATURAL GAS Well #5-Gas 26.00 100 4475-3250 ELECTRICTY-TRAFFIC LIGHTS Traffic Sig.-2234 Hw 45.76 700 4823-3220 NATURAL GAS Well #3-Gas 70.26 700 4823-3220 NATURAL GAS Well #2-Gas 26.00 100 4475-3250 ELECTRICTY-TRAFFIC LIGHTS Traff.Sig.-2800 Hwy. 112.87 700 4825-3210 ELECTRICITY Well #4-Elec. 31.77 255 4350-3210 ELECTRICITY Lakeside Park, 3030 30.14 730 4823-3210 ELECTRICITY Lift Station #2 129.67 700 4825-3210 ELECTRICITY Well #1-Electric 208.92 100 4460-3210 ELECTRICITY City Hall -Electric 2,006.79 700 4825-3210 ELECTRICITY Well #2-Electric 133.19 100 4360-3210 ELECTRICITY Warming House-Electr 26.07 252 4350-3210 ELECTRICITY Community Center-Ele 4,053.84 100 4460-3210 ELECTRICITY City Hall -Electric 133.19 100 4475-3250 ELECTRICTY-TRAFFIC LIGHTS Traffic Sig.-2399 Hw 45.21 100 4360-3210 ELECTRICITY Hillview Park Warmin 163.85 100 4360-3220 NATURAL GAS Hillview Park Warmin 26.00 100 4475-3250 ELECTRICTY-TRAFFIC LIGHTS Traffic Sig.-2428 Hw 49.77 100 4360-3220 NATURAL GAS Random Park -Gas 28.86 100 4360-3210 ELECTRICITY 2815 Ardan-Electric 193.29 100 4360-3220 NATURAL GAS 2815 Ardan-Gas 26.00 100 4360-3210 ELECTRICITY 5590 Quincy St.-Elec 43.76 740 4416-3210 ELECTRICITY 2650 Hwy.10-Electric 82.10 9/09/2021 8:37 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 3 VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View BANK: APBNK US Bank DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU 99/99/9999 CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT X6000 Xcel Energy CONT I-745297742 Aug. Xcel R 9/01/2021 149321 740 4416-3210 ELECTRICITY 2530 Hwy.10-Electric 79.86 740 4416-3210 ELECTRICITY 2383 Hwy.10-Electric 65.61 740 4416-3210 ELECTRICITY 2699 Hwy.10-Electric 66.35 740 4416-3210 ELECTRICITY 2221 Hwy.10-Electric 56.82 740 4416-3210 ELECTRICITY 2551 Highway 10-Elec 58.90 740 4416-3210 ELECTRICITY 2547 Highway 10-Elec 56.24 100 4360-3210 ELECTRICITY Lambert Park-5324 Ja 212.30 100 4360-3220 NATURAL GAS Lambert Park-5324 Ja 26.00 100 4360-3220 NATURAL GAS 8303 Groveland-Gas 32.88 100 4475-3250 ELECTRICTY-TRAFFIC LIGHTS Traffic Signal-5510 46.39 740 4416-3210 ELECTRICITY 2378 Mounds View Blv 65.15 740 4416.-3210 ELECTRICITY 2440 Mounds View Blv 29.64 740 4416-3210 ELECTRICITY 2805 Mounds View Blv 41.90 740 4416-3210 ELECTRICITY 2150 Cty Rd H 5.46 100 4460-3210 ELECTRICITY 2466 Bronson Dr. (PW 1,122.79 100 4460-3.220 NATURAL GAS 2466 Bronson Dr (PW 43.80 100 4200-3210 ELECTRICITY 8303 Groveland Siren 13.75 100 4360-3210 ELECTRICITY 2401 MV Blvd Electri 763.79 730 4823-3210 ELECTRICITY 5374 Raymond Ave -Gas 26.57 100 4200-3210 ELECTRICITY Sirens 23.01 740 4416-3210 ELECTRICITY Street Lighting 6,216.83 32,827.85 1 BOEHM, ALEXANDER 1-000202109078311 US REFUND R 9/14/2021 149325 700 1152 UTILITY DELQ. RECIEVABLE 03-1700-01 104.95 104.95 1 FEHLEN, PHILIP 1-000202109078312 US. REFUND R 9/14/2021 149326 700 1152 UTILITY DELQ. RECIEVABLE 11-1320-02 52.06 52.06 1 STRASSER, ANN 1-000202109078313 US REFUND R 9/14/2021 149327 700 1152 UTILITY DELQ. RECIEVABLE 12-1120-00 108.04 108.04 1 WAGER, DEB I-000202109078314 US REFUND R 9/14/2021 149328 700 1152 UTILITY DELQ. RECIEVABLE 09-0390-01 180.21 180.21 1 WILCOX, JOHN I-000202109078315 US REFUND R 9/14/2021 149329 700 1152 UTILITY DELQ. RECIEVABLE 11-0120-03 25.55 25.55 9/09/2021 8:37 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 4 VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View BANK: APBNK US Bank DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU 99/99/9999 CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT 1 FORBES, DANA/KIM I-000202109098324 US REFUND R 9/14/2021 149330 700 1152 UTILITY DELQ. RECIEVABLE 06-2000-01 394.67 394.67 1 WILLIAM JACQMEIN I-000202109098325 US REFUND R 9/14/2021 149331 700 1152 UTILITY DELQ. RECIEVABLE 17-3980-02 119.80 119.80 A5080 Amazon Capital Services I-1QML-GJHY-LiJK Face Masks,Docking Station... R 9/14/2021 149332 100 4160-1230 SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT Docking Station, Cha 191.50 100 4160-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES Face Masks, Ink Cart 577.41 100 4200-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES General Office Suppl 219.10 988.01 A8210 Athletic Outfitters I-100426 Park & Rec Uniforms R 9/14/2021 149333 252 4350-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Park & Rec Uniforms 2,068.48 2,068.48 A9328 Automotive Training Group I-160851 Sery Writers,Manage Expect S.V R 9/14/2021 149334 100 4465-3630 TRAINING & CONFERENCES Sery Writers,Manage 50.00 50.00 B3045 Brian Beeman I-202109028297 MREE Meeting, Cell Phone R 9/14/2021 149335 230 4650-3800 MILEAGE & PARKING MREE Meeting 30.24 230 4650-3100 TELEPHONE Cell Phone 5.0.00 80.24 B3055 Mark Beer I-202109028298 Phone, Mileage R 9/14/2021 149336 100 4150-3100 COMMUNICATIONS Phone 100.00 100 4150-3630 TRAINING & CONFERENCES Mileage 23.52 123.52 B4000 Beisswenger's Do It Best I-465876 Parks Equip:Plug,Blowgun,Nozzl R 9/14/2021 149337 100 4360-1230 SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT Parks Equip:Plug,Blo 22.57 I-471351 Woodcutter Bar Oil R 9/14/2021 149337 100 4460-1230 SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT Woodcutter Bar Oil 26.38 I-489791 Downspout Repairs -Kids Care R 9/14/2021 149337 252 4350-5110 REPAIRS, BUILDINGS & GROUNDS Downspout Repairs-Ki 13.89 62.84 B4056 Leah Vandecar I-202109028299 Supplies for Explore More R 9/14/2021 149338 252 4732-1230 SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT Supplies for Explore 57.78 57.78 9/09/2021 8:37 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View BANK: APBNK US Bank DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU 99/99/9999 CHECK VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE B7055 Bredemus Hardware Co., Inc. I-264373 MVCC Kitch:Hollow Metal Louver R 9/14/2021 252 4350-5110 REPAIRS, BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MVCC Kitch:Hollow Me B8850 BSN Sports I-913280064 Soccerball,Ball Net,BattingTee R 9/14/2021 252 4732-1230 SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT Soccerball,Ball Net, C1347 Capital One Trade Credit I-4042229258 Festival In/t Park Stage Tarp R 9/14/2021 100 4360-1210 SUPPLIES, BUILDINGS & GROUNDS Festival In/t Park S C1470 Cardmember Service I-202109028300 F1agFootball,CraigsList,PD,ICC R 9/14/2021 100 4160-2100 BOOKS & PERIODICALS ICC:Deck Contruction 100 4200-3070 COPS EVENTS PD:Kids Safety, Book 100 4200-3630 TRAINING & CONFERENCES Crime Prevent Confer 100 4160-3420 ADVERTISING 5 - Craig's List Ads 252 4732-1230 SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT NFL Flag Football Je 100 4200-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES .40 Practice Ammo 100 4200-3630 TRAINING & CONFERENCES Marie Ridgeway Rfnd C3255 Central Rental I-1-597972 Chair Rental: Festival In/t Pk R 9/14/2021 100 4110-3900 GRANTS TO OTHER ORGANIZATIONS Chair Rental: Festiv C4500 City Wide Maintenance of Minne I-32009003460 Sept Cleaning: CH,PW,MVCC R 9/14/2021 100 4460-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CH 100 4460-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PW 252 4350-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MVCC I-42009001164 July: Kitchen Prep R 9/14/2021 252 4350-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES July: Kitchen Prep C4510 Cintas I-4092894740 Mats & Towels R 9/14/2021 100. 4360-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 100 4410-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 100 4460-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 100 4465-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 100 4470-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 100 4472-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 100 4475-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 252 4350-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 700 4823-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 700 4825-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 730 4823-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 745 4415-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels PAGE: 5 CHECK CHECK CHECK AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT 351.00 455.35 72.98 50.45 237.45 225.00 225.00 810.00 339.14 150.00CR 342,00 1,758.14 319.07 1,035.35 60.00 11.01 0.85 0.26 3.58 6.58 5.47 1.11 5.47 7.17 3.58 14.60 4.43 149339 351.00 149340 455.35 149341 72.98 149342 1,737.04 149343 342.00 149344 149344 3,172.56 149345 9/09/2021 8:37 AM VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View BANK: APBNK US Bank DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU 99/99/9999 A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 6 CHECK VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE C4510 Cintas CONT I-4092894740 Mats & Towels R 9/14/2021 745 4417-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels I-4092895004 Uniforms & Clothing R 9/14/2021 100 4360-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 100 4360-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 100 4410-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 100 4460-2400 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 100 4465-2400 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 100 4470-2400 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 100 4472-2400 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 100 4475-2400 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 252 4350-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 700 4823-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 700 4825-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 730 4823-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 745 4415-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 745 4417-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing I-4093280674 MVCC Linens, Mats, Towels... R 9/14/2021 252 4730-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MVCC Linens, Mats, T 252 4350-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMVCC Linens, Mats, T I-4093556939 CH/PD Mats R 9/14/2021 100 4160-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES CH/PD Mats I-4093556948 Mats & Towels R 9/14/2021 100 4360-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 100 4410-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 100 4460-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 100 4465-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 100 4470-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 100 4472-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 100 4475-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 252 4350-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 700 4823-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 700 4825-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 730 4823-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 745 4415-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 745 4417-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels I-4093557059 Uniforms & Clothing R 9/14/2021 100 4360-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 100 4360-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 100 4410-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 100 4460-2400 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 100 4465-2400 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 100 4470-2400 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 100 4472-2400 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 100 4475-2400 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 252 4350-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 700 4823-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing CHECK CHECK CHECK AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT 149345 1.05 149345 28.32 1.25 1.30 0.46 5.58 10.32 8.59 1.67 8.56 11.16 9.02 41.62 6.88 1.68 149345 6.76 64.96 149345 25.75 149345 10.00 0.77 0.24 3.25 5.98 4.97 1.01 4.97 6.51 3.25 13.25 4.02 0.94 149345 32.04 1.25 9.57 3.23 9.45 15.22 10.26 2.04 10.41 13.58 9/09/2021 8:37 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 7 VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View BANK: APBNK US Bank DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU 99/99/9999 CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT C4510 Cintas CONT I-4093557059 Uniforms & Clothing R 9/14/2021 149345 700 4825-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 16.31 730 4823-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 44.13 745 4415-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 8.38 745 4417-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 2..04 I-4093955841 MVCC Linens, Mats, Towels... R 9/14/2021 149345 252 4730-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MVCC Linens, Mats, T 6.76 252 4350-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMVCC Linens, Mats, T 64.96 I-4094217677 Mats & Towels R 9/14/2021 149345 100 4360-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 11.01 100 4410-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 0.85 100 4460-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 0.26 ' 100 4465-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 3.58 100 4470-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 6.58 100 4472-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 5.47 100 4475-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 1.11 252 4350-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 5.47 700 4823-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 7.17 700 4825-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 3.58 730 4823-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 14.60 745 4415-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 4.43 745 4417-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,EMats & Towels 1.05 I-4094217776 Uniforms & Clothing R 9/14/2021 149345 100 4360-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 28.32 100 4360-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 1.25 100 4410-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 1.30 100 4460-2400 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 0.46 100 4465-2400 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 5.58 100 4470-2400 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 10.32 100 4472-2400 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 8.59 100 4475-2400 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 1.67 252 4350-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 8.56 700 4823-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 11.16 700 4825-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 9.02 730 4823-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 41.62 745 4415-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 6.88 745 4417-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Uniforms & Clothing 1.68 809.40 C5855 Comcast I-202109028301 Aug -Sept SCADA Backup R 9/14/2021 149352 700 4823-3100 TELEPHONE Aug -Sept SCADA Backu 46.64 46.64 9/09/2021 8:37 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 8 VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View BANK: APBNK US Bank DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU 99/99/9999 CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT D2001 Davis Lock & Safe I-87929 Bay Door Repair & Keys R 9/14/2021 149353 100 4360-1210 SUPPLIES, BUILDINGS & GROUNDS Bay Door Repair & Ke 59.95 59.95 D6500 Diamond Vogel Paint Center I-802202410 Crosswalk Painting R 9/14/2021 149354 100 4475-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES Crosswalk Painting 71.00 71.00 - F8000 City of Fridley I-202109088323 2nd QTR 2021 UBs R 9/14/2021 149355 730 4823-3200 WATER & SEWER 3048 Bronson Dr. N.E 159.77 730 4823-3200 WATER & SEWER 7325 Pleasant View D 102.98 730 4823-3200 WATER & SEWER 7365 Pleasant View D 71.43 730 4823-3200 WATER & SEWER 7375 Pleasant View D 128.22 730 4823-3200 WATER & SEWER 7385 Pleasant View D 71.43 730 4823-3200 WATER & SEWER 7415 Pleasant View D 58.81 730 4823-3200 WATER & SEWER 7425 Pleasant View D 65.12 730 4823-3200 WATER & SEWER 7447 Pleasant View D 115.60 730 4823-3200 WATER & SEWER 7457 Pleasant View D 77.74 700 4823-3200 WATER & SEWER 7545 Pleasant View D 445.66 730 4823-3200 WATER & SEWER 7545 Pleasant View D 61.81 700 4823-3200 WATER & SEWER 7555 Pleasant View D 114.33 730 4823-3200 WATER & SEWER 7555 Pleasant View D 91.21 700 4823-3200 WATER & SEWER 7581 Pleasant View D 46.74 730 4823-3200 WATER & SEWER 7581 Pleasant View D 61.93 700 4823-3200 WATER & SEWER 7611 Pleasant View D 56.96 730 4823-3200 WATER & SEWER 7611 Pleasant View D 72.03 1,801.77 F8100 Friendly Chevrolet, Inc. I-945038 PD# 145 Harness R 9/14/2021 149357 100 4465-1220 SUPPLIES, VEHICLES PD# 145 Harness 246.62 246.62 H2805 Hawkins, Inc. I-5005047 Chlorine R 9/14/2021 149358 700 4825-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES Chlorine 3,582.11 I-6005805 Chlorine R 9/14/2021 149358 700 4825-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES Chlorine 1,698.80 5,280.91 H4055 Hirshfield's Paint Mfg, Inc. I-28101483 Traffic Paint (White) R 9/14/2021 149359 100 4475-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES Traffic Paint (White 217.90 217.90 H7175 Holiday Companies 1-202109028302 Comm Dev & PD Washes R 9/14/2021 149360 100 4470-1700 MOTOR FUELS & LUBRICANTS Comm Dev & PD Washes 21.62 100 4200-1700 MOTOR FUELS & LUBRICANTS Comm Dev & PD Washes 16.80 38.42 9/0.9/2021 8:37 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 9 VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View BANK: APBNK US Bank DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU 99/99/9999 CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT H7206 Horizon Commercial Pool Supply I-210812211-NH Splash Pad Cable Replacement R 9/14/2021 149361 100 4360-1210 SUPPLIES, BUILDINGS & GROUNDS Splash Pad Cable Rep 265.00 I-210818066-ER Splash Pad Chemicals R 9/14/2021 149361 100 4360-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES Splash Pad Chemicals 103.76 368.76 I6560 Innovative Office Solutions, L I-IN3449660 PW:Pens, Paper... R 9/14/2021 149362 100 4460-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES PW:Pens, Paper... 74.56 I-IN3454425 Festival in the Park Signage R 9/14/2021 149362 100 4410-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES Festival in the Park 90.25 I-IN3456757 PW: Dry Markers, Clips #1 R 9/14/2021 149362 100 4460-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES PW: Dry Markers, Cli 9.97 I-IN3457942 PW: Sharpie Marker, Pointer R 9/14/2021 149362 100 4460-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES PW: Sharpie Marker, 109.94 I-IN3461155 PW: Roll of 361, White Paper R 9/14/2021 149362 100 4460-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES PW: Roll of 36" Whit 42.12 I-IN3463083 PW: Roll of 24" White Paper R 9/14/2021 149362 100 4460-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES PW: Roll of 24" Whit 30.00 I-IN3464274 CH Copy Paper R 9/14/2021 149362 100 4160-1120 COPY SUPPLIES CH Copy Paper 305.28 I-IN3465586 MVCC Copy Paper R 9/14/2021 149362 252 4350-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES MVCC Copy Paper 118.32 780.44 I6823 Allstream I-17676504 Phones: Aug - Sept R 9/14/2021 149364 100 4160-3100 TELEPHONE Phones: Aug - Sept 55.95 252 4350-3100 TELEPHONE Phones: Aug - Sept 51.27 107.22 K3040 Hanna Kenow I-202109058305 Pants & Shoes R 9/14/2021 149365 100 4200-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Pants 74.99 100 4200-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Shoes 149.99 224.98 K5020 Benjamin Knitter I-202109058310 Lunches: MDA Class / Rochester R 9/14/2021 149366 100 4200-3630 TRAINING & CONFERENCES Lunches: MDA Class / 27.38 27.38 L5020 League of Minnesota Cities I-348187 MV Annual Membership 21-22 R 9/14/2021 149367 100 4160-3610 MEMBERSHIPS MV Annual Membership 12,732.00 12,732.00 L7165 The Lincoln National Life Insu I-202109088316 EAP Fee: 3rd QTR 2021 R 9/14/2021 149368 100 4160-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EAP Fee: 3rd QTR 202 211.20 211.20 9/09/2021 8:37 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 10 VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View BANK: APBNK US Bank DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU 99/99/9999 CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT M0300 MMNTB I-202109058306 July Hotel Tax: MV Lodging R 9/14/2021 149369 100 4653-3045 CONTRACTUAL N. METRO CONF BUREJuly Hotel Tax: MV L 2,728.49 I-202109058307 July Hotel Tax: Days Inn R 9/14/2021 149369 100 4653-3045 CONTRACTUAL N. METRO CONF BUREJuly Hotel Tax.: Days 3,225.97 5,954.46 M1477 Marie Ridgeway LICSW, LLC I-1428 MH Check: KL, MH R 9/14/2021 149370 100 4200-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MH Check: KL, MH 220.00 220.00 M1480 Marco Technologies LLC I-INV9078563 Camera Mount R 9/14/2021 149371 100 4160-1230 SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT Camera Mount 71.32 71.32 M1505 Martin -McAllister Consulting P I-14132 Personnel Evaluation: MH R 9/14/2021 149372 100 4200-3630 TRAINING & CONFERENCES Conference 1,000.00 100 4160-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Personnel Evaluation 1,350.00 2,350.00 M2100 McClellan Sales, Inc. I-011697 Power Cord, MVCC Nit Gloves R 9/14/2021 149373 100 4110-3900 GRANTS TO OTHER ORGANIZATIONS Power Cord:Festival 127.68 252 4350-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES MVCC Nit Gloves 7 mi 289.50 I-011711 Nitrile Gloves PF 9M R 9/14/2021 149373 730 4823-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES Nitrile Gloves PF 9M 120.07 100 4470-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES Nitrile Gloves PF 9M 119.00 745 4417-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES Nitrile Gloves PF 9M 119.00 775.25 M3505 Menards - Blaine I-19626 Lambert Drinking Fountain R 9/14/2021 149374 100 4360-1220 SUPPLIES, VEHICLES Lambert Drinking Fou 35.04 I-19768 Tools: Drive Bits,Socket Adapt R 9/14/2021 149374 ' 100 4475-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES Tools: Drive Bits,So 96.54 I-19782 Splash Pad: Filter Cleaning R 9/14/2021 149374 100 4360-1210 - SUPPLIES, BUILDINGS & GROUNDS Splash Pad: Filter C 69.69 I-19832 Toolbox, Ladders for Plants R 9/14/2021 149374 700 4823-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES Toolbox, Ladders for 299.94 I-19973 MVCC:Toggles,Screws,Anchor... R 9/14/2021 149374 252 4350-1210 SUPPLIES, BUILDING & GROUNDS MVCC:Toggles,Screws, 16.54 I-20036 30' Ratchet X 10K 1PK R 9/14/2021 149374 100 4360-1210 SUPPLIES., BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 30' Ratchet X 10K 1 41.96 I-20038 Tail Lights R 9/14/2021 149374 740 4416-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES Tail Lights 19.98 I-20211 100' Flexzilla Hose R 9/14/2021 149374 100 4110-3900 GRANTS TO OTHER ORGANIZATIONS 100' Flexzilla Hose 129.98 I-20378 MVCC: Drano, Heat Drain,Saw... R 9/14/2021 149374 252 4350-5130 REPAIRS, EQUIPMENT MVCC: Drano, Heat Dr 31.03 I-20439 Hot Shot W&H Killer R 9/14/2021 149374 9/09/2021 8:37 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 11 VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View BANK: APBNK US Bank DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU 99/99/9999 CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT M3505 Menards - Blaine CONT I-20439 Hot Shot W&H Killer R 9/14/2021 149374 100 4360-1210 SUPPLIES, BUILDINGS & GROUNDS Hot Shot W&H Killer 29.70 I-20487 Random Bldg: ZEP Carpet Extrac R 9/14/2021 149374 100 4360-1210 SUPPLIES, BUILDINGS & GROUNDS Random Bldg: ZEP Car 26.90 I-20534 Emergency Lights R 9/14/2021 149374 - 252 4350-5130 REPAIRS, EQUIPMENT Emergency Lights 28.26 825.56 M4025 Metro Products, Inc. I-161401 Shield Anchor R 9/14/2021 149377 100 4465-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES Shield Anchor 36.75 ' I-161692 Ty Wraps, MAG Mech, HHCS... R 9/14/2021 149377 100 4465-1220 SUPPLIES, VEHICLES Ty Wraps, MAG Mech, 210.87 247.62 M5300 Midway Ford Company I-475445 PD# 163 Pipe - F R 9/14/2021 149378 100 4465-1220 SUPPLIES, VEHICLES PD# 163 Pipe - F 188.10 I-475534 PW#706 Tube Asy R 9/14/2021 149378 700 4823-1220 SUPPLIES, VEHICLES PW#706 Tube Asy 59.70 I-475891 PD# 172 Moulding R 9/14/2021 149378 100 4465-1220 SUPPLIES, VEHICLES PD# 172 Moulding 41.38 I-476752 PD# 172 Moulding R 9/14/2021 149378 100 4465-1220 SUPPLIES, VEHICLES PD# 172 Moulding 43.24 332.42 M7477 MN Mayors Association I-202109088319 Mayor Membership: 21-22 R 9/14/2021 149379 100 4100-3610 MEMBERSHIPS Mayor Membership: 21 30.00 30.0.0 M7690 MN Rural Water Assn. I-202109088320 W&W Cert Refresher/Exam: NH R 9/14/2021 149380 700 4823-3630 TRAINING & CONFERENCES W&W Cert Refresher: 25.5.00 255.00 M7969 Minute Maker Secretarial I-M1328 8/04 Plan Comm, 8/09 CC R 9/14/2021 149381 100 4110-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8/04 Plan Comm 151.00 100 4100-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8/09 CC 151.00 I-M1338 8/18 Plan Comm, 8/23 CC R 9/14/2021 149381 100 4110-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8/18 Plan Comm 187.00 100 4100-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8/23 CC 297.50 786.50 M9595 Municipal Builders, Inc. I -TWO 6/1 to 8/31 WTP No 1 Rehab R 9/14/2021 149382 700 4823-7050 CONSTRUCTION 6/1 to 8/31 WTPNo 1 51,347.50 51,347.50 9/09/2021 8:37 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 12 VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View BANK: APBNK US Bank DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU 99/99/9999 CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT 05510 On Site Companies - OSSTC I-0001187353 Festival in the Park Restrooms R 9/14/2021 149383 100 4110-3900 GRANTS TO OTHER ORGANIZATIONS Festival in the Park 740.00 740.00 08125 Lucas Osowski I-202109088321 Parking in St. Cloud for Class R 9/14/2021 149384 700 4823-3630 TRAINING & CONFERENCES Parking in St. Cloud 18.50 I-202109088322 PW Boot Allowance 2020-22 R 9/14/2021 149384 730 4823-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING PW Boot Allowance 20 157.52 176.02 P1565 Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc. I-27798 8020 Groveland Rd: Mob/,Demob R 9/14/2021 149385 700 4823-5155 REPAIR, WATER SERVICE 8020 Groveland Rd: M 4,388.78 4,388.78 P3765 Petsmart I-202109058308 K-9 Food: Grizz & Niko R 9/14/2021 149386 100 4200-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES K-9 Food: Grizz & Ni 135.98 135.98 P6750 Pomp's Tire Service - Milwauke I-210548252 PW#320 Carlisle Mult TC. R 9/14/2021 149387 100 4360-1230 SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT PW#320 Carlisle Mult 286.38 286.38 P7123 Press Publications I-712131 PH Crossroads Point R 9/14/2021 149388 100 4160-3410 LEGAL NOTICES PH Crossroads Point 31.40 I-713603 Ord 979 R 9/14/2021 14938.8 100 4160-3410 LEGAL NOTICES Ord 979 21.98 I-713604 Ord 978 R 9/14/2021 149368 100 4160-3410 LEGAL NOTICES Ord 978 21.98 75.36 P7250 Print Central I-142073 Project Meeting Format Bonds R 9/14/2021 149389 485 4470-7050-324 2022 STREET PROJECT Project Meeting Form 257.87 I-142081 Laminating of Maps R 9/14/2021 149389 700 4823-1210 SUPPLIES, BUILDING & GROUNDS Laminating of Maps 24.00 281.87 P7281 Pro-Tec Design, Inc. I-102175 Splash Pad Keyless Locks R 9/14/2021 149390 100 4360-5110 REPAIRS, BUILDINGS & GROUNDS Splash Pad Keyless L 510.00 I-102215 CH/PD Programming Help Desk R 9/14/2021 149390 100 4460-5110 REPAIRS, BUILDINGS & GROUNDS CH/PD Programming He 127.50 637.50 P9260 Pyrotechnic Display, Inc. I-17295 Festival in the Park - 8/21/21 R 9/14/2021 149391 100 4110.-3900 GRANTS TO OTHER ORGANIZATIONS Festival in the Park 4,500.00 4,500.00 9/09/2021 8:37 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 13 VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View BANK: APBNK US Bank DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU 99/99/9999 CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT Q1048 Quadient Leasing USA, Inc. I-N9028570 July 4-Oct 3: N17092716 R 9/14/2021 149392 100 4160-4010 RENTAL, EQUIPMENT July 4-Oct 3: N17092 455.07 455.07 R3002 Ramsey County I-PRRRV-001636 3rd QTR Election Services R 9/14/2021 149393 100 4140-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3rd QTR Election Ser 7,816.00 7,816.00 S3024 Stantec Consulting Services, I I-1826446, 47, 48 July-Aug:Gen EGR, St Recon... R 9/14/2021 149394 100 4470-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Meetings 380.00 700 4823-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES General Engineering 2,805.00 p 730 4823-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2021 CIP Project 202 733.25 ' 485 4470.-7050-324 2022 STREET PROJECT 2022-23 Street Recon 35,596.75 39,515.00 S4224 Sensible Office Solutions I-0050333-001 Business Cards: Don Peterson R 9/14/2021 149395 100 4160-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES Business Cards: Don 34.00 34.00 S8802 Streicher's - Minneapolis I-I1520514 Police Line Barrier Tape R 9/14/2021 149396 100 4200-1230 SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT Police Line Barrier 109.93 I-I1521470 Headlamps: Sewer Manholes R 9/14/2021 149396 730 4.823-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES Headlamps: Sewer Man 101.98 211.91 S9010 Surplus Services I-20039943 Random Park Tables R 9/14/2021 149397 100 4360-1210 SUPPLIES, BUILDINGS & GROUNDS Random Park Tables 140.00 140.00 T1150 TAHO SPORTSWEAR I-21TS2911 Youth & Adult T-Shirts R 9/14/2021 149398 252 4732-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Youth & Adult T-Shir 495.35 I-21TS2931 Youth T-Shirts R 9/14/2021 149398 252 4732-1230 SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT Youth T-shirts 393.50 888.85 T4423 Titan Energy Systems Inc. I-210826-001 Groveland Lift Station:GenLink R 9/14/2021 149399 730 4823-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Groveland Lift Stati 680.00 680.00 T5000 Toll Gas & Welding Supply I-10418099 Oxygen R 9/14/2021 149400 730 4823-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES Oxygen 33.79 I-10418389 Propane R 9/14/2021 149400 700 4823-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES Propane 76.62 110.41 9/09/2021 8:37 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 14 VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View BANK: APBNK US Bank DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU 99/99/9999 CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT T6010 TransUnion Risk and Alternativ I-1065517-202108-1 August Person Search R 9/14/2021 149401 100 4200-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES August Person Search 75.00 75.00 T6022 Trane I-311947293 CH/PD RTU 4 Ceiling Valve R 9/14/2021 149402 100 4460-5130 REPAIRS, EQUIPMENT CH/PD RTU 4 Ceiling 1,074.75 I-311947297 Day Care Rooms 1 & 2 (Hot Air) R 9/14/2021 149402 252 4350-5130 REPAIRS, EQUIPMENT Day Care Rooms 1 & 2 721.75 1-311947840 CH: RTU 4 R 9/14/2021 149402 100 4460-5130 REPAIRS, EQUIPMENT CH: RTU 4 436.00 2,232.50 T6105 Atlas Toyota -Lift of Minnesota I-W285524 Fork Maintenance: Oil, Lube... R 9/14/2021 149403 100 4465-1220 SUPPLIES, VEHICLES Fork Maintenance: Oi 132.50 I-W285590 Fork CO Test R 9/14/2021 149403 100 4465-1220 SUPPLIES, VEHICLES Fork CO Test 40.00 172.,50 T6107 TOXALERT I-31658 PW Shop: Yearly Air Test R 9/14/2021 149404 100 4460-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PW Shop: Yearly Air 350.00 350.00 T7125 Tyler Technologies, Inc. 1-025-345841 Handheld Meter Interface R 9/14/2021 149405 700 4820-5130 REPAIRS, EQUIPMENT Handheld Meter Inter 519.01 730 4820-5130 REPAIRS, EQUIPMENT Handheld Meter Inter 519.02 1,038.03 U7010 Uline I-137219117 Trash Pickers R 9/14/2021 149406 100 4470-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES Trash Pickers 65.98 100 4360-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES Trash Pickers 65.99 131.97 U7925 Universal Athletic, LLC I-150-0054196-01 Base Set, Home Plate R 9/14/2021 149407 100 4360-1230 SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT Base Set, Home Plate 292.96 I-150-0054196-02 Home Plate R 9/14/2021 149407 100 4360-1230 SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT Home Plate 94.75 I-150-0054197-01 Pitchers Schutt,Protective Tag R 9/14/2021 149407 100 4360-1230 SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT Pitchers Schutt,Prot 229.92 617.63 V4075 Velocity Systems I-61710 SWAT Tactical Gear R 9/14/2021 149408 100 4200-3630 TRAINING & CONFERENCES SWAT Tactical Gear 1,323.50 1,323.50 9/09/2021 8:37 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View BANK: APBNK US Bank DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU 99/99/9999 PAGE: 15 CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT V4105 Verizon Wireless I-9887159127 Aug: PD & Com Dev Data/SCADA R 9/14/2021 149409 100 4200-3100 TELEPHONE PD 526.13 100 4180-3100 TELEPHONE Comm Dev 80.02 606.15 V5400 Viking Electric Supply, Inc. I-S004967490.001 Street Lights -Trail Near Moe-s R 9/14/2021 149410 740 4416-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES Street Lights -Trail 330.12 330.12 W0565 Walters Recycling & Refuse Inc I-0005552365 August Garbage & Recycling R 9/14/2021 149411 100 4460-3530 REFUSE COLLECTION CH / PW 798.91 252 4350-3530 REFUSE COLLECTION MVCC 363.13 290 4420-3530 REFUSE COLLECTION Recycling 170.57 1,332.61 W1609 DAN WATTENHOFER I-202109058309 Boot Allow Balance for #149236 R 9/14/2021 149412 100 4360-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING Boot Allow Balance f 20.70 20.70 W1610 WatchGuard Video I-ACCINV0032450 Equipment: WiFi, Rear Camera R 9/14/2021 149413 100 4200-5100 REPAIRS, COMPUTERS Equipment: WiFi, Rea 340.00 340.00 X6000 Xcel Energy I-744307008 Silver View Park R 9/14/2021 149414 100 4360-3210 ELECTRICITY Silver View Park 12.25 12.25 '11000 YMCA I-09012021 Sept. Fitness Equipment R 9/14/2021 149415 252 4732-4010 RENTAL, EQUIPMENT Sept. Fitness Equipm 1,486.00 1,486.00 ' * * T O T A L S * * NO INVOICE AMOUNT DISCOUNTS CHECK AMOUNT REGULAR CHECKS: 84 201,068.38 0.00 201,068.3.8 HAND CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 DRAFTS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 ` EFT: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 NON CHECKS: 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 VOID CHECKS: 0 VOID DEBITS 0.00 VOID CREDITS 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL 1 ERRORS: 0 9/09/2021 8:37 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View BANK: APBNK US Bank DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU 99/99/9999 ** G/L ACCOUNT TOTALS ** G/L ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ACCOUNT NAME AMOUNT 100 4100-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 448.50 100 4100-3610 MEMBERSHIPS 30.00 100 4110-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 338.00 100 4110-3900 GRANTS TO OTHER ORGANIZATIONS 6,139.66 100 4140-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,816.00 100 4150-3100 COMMUNICATIONS 100.00 100 4150-3630 TRAINING & CONFERENCES 23.52 100 4160-1120 COPY SUPPLIES 305.28 100 4160-1230 SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT 262.82 100 4160-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES 637.16 100 4160-2100 BOOKS & PERIODICALS 50.45 100 4160-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,561.20 100 4160-3100 TELEPHONE 55.95 100 4160-3410 LEGAL NOTICES 75.36 100 4160-3420 ADVERTISING 225.00 100 4160-3610 MEMBERSHIPS 12,732.00 100 4160-4010 RENTAL, EQUIPMENT 455.07 ' 100 4180-3100 TELEPHONE - 80.02 100 4200-1230 SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT 109.93 100 4200-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES 694.22 100 4200-1700 MOTOR FUELS & LUBRICANTS 16.80 100 4200-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING 224.98 100 4200-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 295.00 100 4200-3070 COPS EVENTS 237.45 100 4200-3100 TELEPHONE 526.13 100 4200-3210 ELECTRICITY 36.76 100 4200-3630 TRAINING & CONFERENCES 2,425.88 100 4200-5100 REPAIRS, COMPUTERS 340.00 100 4360-1210 SUPPLIES, BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 706.18 100 4360-1220 SUPPLIES, VEHICLES 35.04 100 4360-1230 SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT 926.58 100 4360-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES 169.75 100 4360-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING 113.13 100 4360-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,E 32.02 100 4360-3210 ELECTRICITY 1,868.71 100 4360-3220 NATURAL GAS 139.74 100 4360-5110 REPAIRS, BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 510.00 100 4410-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES 90.25 100 4410-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING 12.17 100 4410-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,E 2.47 100 4460-1230 SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT 26.38 100 4460-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES 266.59 100 4460-2400 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 4.15 100 4460-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,E 0.76 100 4460-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,427.21 100 4460-3210 ELECTRICITY 3,262.77 PAGE: 16 9/09/2021 8:37 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View BANK: APBNK US Bank DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU 99/99/9999 PAGE: 17 ** G/L ACCOUNT TOTALS ** G/L ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ACCOUNT NAME AMOUNT 100 4460-3220 NATURAL GAS 270.82 100 4460-3530 REFUSE COLLECTION 798.91 100 4460-5110 REPAIRS, BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 127.50 100 4460-5130 REPAIRS, EQUIPMENT 1,510.75 100 4465-1220 SUPPLIES, VEHICLES 902.71 100 4465-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES 36.75 100 4465-2400 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 20.61 100 4465-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,E 10.41 100 4465-3630 TRAINING & CONFERENCES 50.00 100 4470-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES 184.98 100 4470-1700 MOTOR FUELS & LUBRICANTS 21.62 100 4470-2400 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 35.86 100 4470-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,E 19.14 100 4470-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 380.00 100 4472-2400 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 27.44 100 4472-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,E 15.91 100 4475-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES 385.44 100 4475-2400 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 5.38 100 4475-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,E 3.23 100 4475-3250 ELECTRICTY-TRAFFIC LIGHTS 300.00 100 4653-3045 CONTRACTUAL N. METRO CONE BURE 5,954.46 *** FUND TOTAL *** 57,898.96 230 4650-3100 TELEPHONE 50.00 230 4650-3800 MILEAGE & PARKING 30.24 *** FUND TOTAL *** 80.24 252 4350-1210 SUPPLIES, BUILDING & GROUNDS 16.54 252 4350-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES 407.82 252 4350-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING 2,096.01 252 4350-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,E 145.83 252 4350-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,095.35 252 4350-3100 TELEPHONE 51.27 252 4350-3210 ELECTRICITY 6,766.53 252 4350-3220 NATURAL GAS 352.12 252 4350-3530 REFUSE COLLECTION 363.13 252 4350-5110 REPAIRS, BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 364.89 252 4350-5130 REPAIRS, EQUIPMENT 781.04 252 4730-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 13.52 252 4732-1230 SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT 1,716.63 252 4732-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 495.35 252 4732-4010 RENTAL, EQUIPMENT 1,486.00 *** FUND TOTAL *** 16,152.03 255 4350-3210 ELECTRICITY 131.74 *** FUND TOTAL *** 131.74 9/09/2021 8:37 AM VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View BANK: APBNK US Bank DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU 99/99/9999 A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 18 ** G/L ACCOUNT TOTALS ** G/L ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ACCOUNT NAME AMOUNT 290 4420-3530 REFUSE COLLECTION 170.57 *** FUND TOTAL *** 170.57 485 4470-7050-324 2022 STREET PROJECT 35,854.62 *** FUND TOTAL *** 35,854.62 700 1152 UTILITY DELQ. RECIEVABLE 1,016.42 700 4820-5130 REPAIRS, EQUIPMENT 519.01 700 4823-1210 SUPPLIES, BUILDING & GROUNDS 24.00 700 4823-1220 SUPPLIES, VEHICLES 59.70 700 4823-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES 376.56 700 4823-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING 35.90 700 4823.-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,E 20.85 700 4823-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,805.00 700 4823-3100 TELEPHONE 46.64 700 4823-3200 WATER & SEWER 663.69 700 4823-3220 NATURAL GAS 206.56 700 4823-3630 TRAINING & CONFERENCES 273.50 700 4823-5155 REPAIR, WATER SERVICE 4,388.78 700 4823-7050 CONSTRUCTION 51,347.50 700 4825-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES 5,280.91 700 4825-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING 34.35 700 4825-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,E 10.41 700 4825-3210 ELECTRICITY 12,417.19 *** FUND TOTAL *** 79,526.97 730 4820-5130 REPAIRS, EQUIPMENT 519.02 730 4823-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES 255.84 730 4823-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING 284.89 730 4823-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,E 42.45 730 4823-3030 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,413.25 730 4823-3200 WATER & SEWER 1,138.08 730 4823-3210 ELECTRICITY 247.09 *** FUND TOTAL *** 3,900.62 740 4416-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES 350.10 740 4416-3210 ELECTRICITY 6,840.07 *** FUND TOTAL *** 7,190.17 745 4415-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING 22.14 745 4415-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,E 12.88 745 4417-1600 OPERATING SUPPLIES 119.00 745 4417-2400 UNIFORM & CLOTHING 5.40 745 4417-2410 MAINTENANCE;MATS,TOWELS,MOPS,E 3.04 *** FUND TOTAL *** 162.46 9/09/2021 8:37 AM A/P HISTORY CHECK REPORT PAGE: 19 VENDOR SET: 01 City of Mounds View BANK: APBNK US Bank DATE RANGE: 0/00/0000 THRU 99/99/9999 CHECK CHECK CHECK CHECK VENDOR I.D. NAME STATUS DATE AMOUNT DISCOUNT NO STATUS AMOUNT NO INVOICE AMOUNT DISCOUNTS CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR SET: 01 BANK: APBNK TOTALS: 84 201,068.38 0.00 201,068.38 BANK: APBNK TOTALS: 84 201,068.38 0.00 201,068.38 REPORT TOTALS: 84 201,068.38 0.00 201,068.38 THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY Item No: 5C MOUN-DS VIEW Meeting Date: September 13 ss Type of Business: Consent Business Administrator Review: City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Nyle Zikmund, City Administrator/Don Peterson — Public Works, Park/Rec/Forestry Director Item Title/Subject: Resolution 9470 Establishment of Sustainability Commission Introduction: As part of the Green Step Cities Process, a sustainability committee was explored via a combination of staff and selected residents. That group met three times with different speakers and then twice more. Upon conclusion, the group presented their findings to the June 7, 2021, Council Work Session. The Council requested Staff to bring back recommendations on what the group would have oversight on along with committee make up/selection criteria. There was council consensus that the committee focus should be limited to environmental sustainability issues. To refresh; 1. Organize community events — One Off projects 2. Provide Ideas 3. Council can use commission to bounce ideas off of. 4. Support of Green Corps 5. Review and Monitor Green Steps 6. Write a sustainability plan 7. Identify, advocate for and help maintain Green Space 8. Spring and Fall Clean Up 9. Arbor Day/Earth Day (Staff and PRF Commission already do) 10. Refuse and Recycling 11. Provides network/conduit for other non -profits, city programs, and community members to give back to their community. 12. Provide feedback on future development sites and impacts on open/green space and wetlands. a. May result in conflict with P & Z and/or delays in processing applications. 13. Look at establishing conservation easements or selecting sites as conservation preserves. 14. Review projects for impacts to the storm water system 15. Make recommendations on ordinance changes as it relates to Environmental — (phosphate free fertilizer etc...), Pollinator Friendly. 16. Review/familiarize themselves with the MS4 permit. If this group in focused on the Environmental this may be a good have a group understand the regulations and be the cheerleader for the City. 17. Review residents request to remove rain gardens, make the determination and make a recommendation to the Council for or not to remove (would set criteria needed in order for the removal). Discussion: The council has discussed this multiple times (more than 3) and at their September 7, 2021 workshop unanimously consented to moving forward with the creation and establishment of a Sustainability Commission consisting of 5 to 9 members and targeting January 1, 2022 as a start date. Strategic Plan: This action aligns with the strategic goals of maintain good infrastructure and being a progressive city that is welcoming and desirable destination where residents can work, live and play. Recommendation: Approve resolution 9470 to create a Sustainability Commission. Respectfully Submitted, Nyle Zikmund, City Administrator Don Peterson, Public Works — Park/Rec/Forestry Director RESOLUTION NO. 9470 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AUTHORIZATION TO ESTABLISH SUSTAINABILITY COMMISSION WHEREAS, the city has a long history of commitment to sustainability and protecting the environment; and WHEREAS, as part of this action, an ad hoc committee was formed to explore and report back to the council, a recommendation on creation of a Sustainability Committee; and WHEREAS, the committee, consisting of residents Sherry Gunn, Gary Rundle, and Marcia Weinandt along with Mounds View Department Heads Don Peterson and Jon Sevald and City Administrator Nyle Zikmund concurring, recommended establishment; and WHEREAS, the committee provided a detailed list of focus, all environmental, along with a recommendation of 4 to 8 members, and WHEREAS, Council has spent considerable workshop time on this, most recently their September 7, 2021 workshop to critically review the tasks and appropriate number of members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mounds View, Ramsey County, Minnesota that authorization is granted to establish a Sustainability Commission consisting of 4 to 8 members drawn for the resident population with a target start date of January 1, 2022. Adopted this 13t" day of September, 2021. Carol Mueller, Mayor ATTEST: Nyle Zikmund, City Administrator (seal) THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY Item No: 06A Meeting Date: Sep 13, 2021 Type of Business: Special Order City Administrator Review: of Mounds View Staff R To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Jon Sevald, Community Development Director Item Title/Subject: Request to Appeal Rental License Re -Inspection Fees for properties located at 5661, 5671, and 5691 Quincy Street Introduction: Erik Halvorson owns three apartment buildings located at 5661, 5671, and 5691 Quincy Street. Between October 2020 and June 2021, the properties failed various inspections, and were re- inspected. A $63.25 re -inspection fee' was charged per inspection for eight re -inspections ($506 total). This fee is established through the 2021 Fee Schedule, consistent with MN Statute §326B.153(c)(2); "other inspections and fees". The City Code does not establish a process to appeal fees. It is a question if the City wrongfully charged these fees. Notice of fees were mailed on June 1, 2021 (no due date was provided). Mr. Halvorson submitted an Appeal on September 7, 2021. Unpaid fees are assessed to property taxes in October. Discussion: The three properties were inspected 16 times between October 19, 2020 and June 1, 2021. 130 code violations were found, ranging from torn carpeting, clogged gutters, and missing light bulbs, to leaky plumbing fixtures, broken windows, and exposed electrical wiring. Corrections were made, and the cases closed in May/June, 2021. Generally, Rental License holders are charged re -inspection fees at the time an inspection passes and the violation case is closed. In this case, because there is common ownership and some cases were on -going, the City waited until all three cases were closed before notifying the owner of the charges June 1, 2021. Re - inspection fees are applicable after the second inspection. Strategic Plan Strategy/Goal: Continue BR&E program, maximize utilization of development space and current list of available sites, encourage land owners to maintain their properties, & consider residential redevelopment Financial Impact: None. If the Council grants the appeal, the $506 re -inspection fees will be $0. Recommendation: Staff recommends denial. Mr. Halvorson will be in attendance. Staff suggests a 3-5 minute time limit. Since the code violations were closed in June, new violations have occurred. On August 3011 the City placard 5691 Quincy Street, Unit #1 as unfit for human habitation. The City responded to a death in the unit, finding inoperable plumbing, unsanitary conditions and electrical hazards in the unit, and missing fire extinguishers in the common areas. A re -inspection is scheduled for September 131n Respectfully, Jon Sevald, AICP Community Development Director Attached Letter from Erik Halvorson, received September 7, 2021 2021 Fee Schedule; I Building/Community Development Related Fees (Building Permit Reinspection; $63.25 per Stat Statute 326B.153) RF4 Eutt 9--7-Z�Zj Item No: 08A Meeting Date: Sep 13, 2021 Type of Business: Council Business City Administrator Review: of Mounds View Staff R To: Honorable Mayor, and City Council From: Jon Sevald, Community Development Director Item Title/Subject: PUBLIC HEARING, Resolution 9465, Amending the Crossroad Pointe PUD Narrative, 2390 Mounds View Boulevard Introduction: The applicant is requesting to amend the Crossroad Pointe PUD Narrative (aka Gray Stone Flats apartments), related to building setbacks and fencing. Discussion: Gray Stone Flats was approved as a Planned Unit Development (PUD). At the time (2019), the project was known as Crossroad Pointe. A PUD may be approved with deviations from the minimum standards in the Municipal Code. Those deviations are detailed in a PUD Narrative. It is the intent for projects to be constructed "consistent" with plans approved by the City Council, but does allow some wiggle -room to occur during construction, at Staff's discretion. Minimum Building Setbacks (foundation): Min Reg1 As-BuR2 North (County Road 112 17' 14.5' East Mounds View Blvd 27' 26.5' South 50' 57.1' West (Edgewood Dr) 60' 63.5' Staff was aware of the slight setback deviations at the time the building permit was approved, and opined that the setbacks are consistent with the intent of the PUD Narrative. After discussing with the developer, it was agreed to apply to amend the PUD Narrative after a more recent survey was completed, and in the event the developer wished to change the Landscaping Plan, and prior to the City issuing a Certificate of Occupancy. The building received a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy in March, 2021. Landscaping was installed spring, 2021. Proposed deviations from the Landscape Plan, include: 1. Five-foot tall fence (existing) around the pet exercise area, whereas, the PUD Narrative did not address fence heights. The maximum fence height permitted in a front yard, is 4'.3 The purpose of the taller fence is to prevent pets from getting loose. 2. Eight -foot tall panel fence along portions of the patio (corner of Co Rd H2 & Edgewood Dr) whereas, the maximum fence height permitted in a front yard, is 4'. The purpose of the fence is for aesthetics, not privacy. The fence will be in-between shrub rows. Analysis: Planned Unit Developments allow flexibility from the strict requirements of the City Code.4 The ' Crossroad Pointe PUD Narrative, #6 (Dimensional Requirements) 2 As -Built Survey, November 19, 2019 s Municipal Code, §160.030(C)(1) (Fencing, Screening and Landscaping) a Mounds View Municipal Code § 160.315(B)(10) (Purpose and Intent) Item 08A Page 2 of 3 building's design was intended to bring it closer to the street along Mounds View Blvd, and Co Rd H2, and to maintain a deeper setback along Edgewood Drive, consistent with neighboring homes. Strategic Plan Strategy/Goal: (not applicable) Financial Impact: (none) Planning Commission Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommended approval of the amendment to the PUD Narrative, as requested by the applicant. The Commission also directed Staff to research increasing the maximum fence height permitted in a front yard. Resolution 9465 is written based on the Planning Commission's recommendation (e.g. approve - all). Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends; (1) approving the reduction in building foundation setbacks; (2) denying the increased height of fencing for the pet exercise area; and (3) has no recommendation for the panel fence along Co Rd H2. It is Staff's opinion that; (1) the reduction in building foundation setbacks is justifiable as a PUD. The amendment to the PUD Narrative is necessary so that the building is legally conforming to the PUD Narrative (as opposed to non -conforming); (2) that the 5' chain -link fence installed around the pet exercise area is excessive and does not meet the `higher standards of site and building design...." intended with PUD's5 (3) that the proposed 8' tall panel fence along Co Rd H2 could meet the "higher standards of site and building design.... " intended with PUD's. The design and location is subjective. A Public Hearing Notice was published in the August 17, 2021 Shoreview Press, and mailed to property owners within 350'. Respectfully, �eQx Jon Sevald, AICP Community Development Director ATTACHED Site Photos Survey, Nov 19, 2019 Segmented Panel Fence detail Crossroad Pointe PUD Narrative Resolution 9465 5 Mounds View Municipal Code § 160.315(B)(l 0) (Purpose and Intent) The Mounds View Visior_ A Thriving Desirable Community Item 08A Page 3 of 3 2390 Mounds View Blvd (Gray Stone Flats), panoramic photo looking southeast toward patio (photo Aug 18, 2021) 2390 Mounds View Blvd (Gray Stone Flats), panoramic photo looking northwest across patio (photo Aug 18, 2021). ®rJ 2390 Mounds View Blvd (Gray Stone Flats)), looking north along Edgewood Dr. The chain -link fence around the pet exercise area was constructed at S' in height, whereas 4' is the maximum permitted (photo Aug 18, 2021) The Mounds View Vision A Thriving Desirable Community �_,. � a � �+'� G�� a ���� �� � � 75 [1905] 75 [1905] EARTH r48 CONCRETE-7f �I I I- [1219.20] _III 4 4 12 [113.84] 9 [304.E [227.68] GRAVEL DETAIL C SCALE 1 :4 ITEM NO. PART MATERIAL QTY. 1 POST = 3" X 3" X 148" L 6005 ALUMINUM 1/8" WALL, POWDER 3 COATED BLACK HORIZONTAL CHANNELS, 2 INSIDE DIMENSION = 1.125" 6005 ALUMINUM 1/8" WALL, POWDER 4 BACK X 1.250" SIDES X 91" COATED BLACK LONG 3 1" X 5.5" X 71.5" BOARD, WOOD OR COMPOSITE 34 410 STAINLESS STEEL WOOD 4 SCREW COATED BLACK 410 STAINLESS STEEL 92 MAGNI, #8 X 3/4", PAN HEAD WITH #2 PHILLIPS DRIVE 410 STAINLESS STEEL SELF 5 DRILLING SCREW, #12 X 3/4" 410 STAINLESS STEEL 20 FLAT HEAD WITH #3 PHILL IPS DRIVE HEAD DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES TOLERANCES: DRAWN FRACTIONAL± ANGULAR: MACH, BEND + CHECKED TWO PLACE DECIMAL ± ENG APPR. PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL THREE PLACE DECIMAL * MFG APPR. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS MATERIAL Q.A. DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF COMMENTS: TAHOE SLIPFENCE. ANY REPRODUCTION FINISH IN PART OR AS A WHOLE WITHOUT NEXT ASSY USED ON _ THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF TAHOE SUPFENCE IS PROHIBITED. APPLICATION DO NOT SCALE DRAWING NAME DATE .,.r Oakville, ON TRASER 'aLIPFEIVCE` Phone: 1-866-336-2340 DESIGN INC. W W W.SLIPFENCE.COM SIZE DWG. NO REV. A TSF-8FT-RES-HORZ-SPEC SCALE:1:32 WEIGHT: SHEET 1 OF 7 Vicinitv Mar) 1 PUD Area Crossroad Pointe PUD Narrative Mrsc 1. Purpose The general purpose of this PUD Narrative is to provide the City of Mounds View (City) and Crossroads Pointe MV, LLC (Applicant) clarification of Approved variations from the City Code that is allowed as a Planned Unit Development (PUD). Where there is a conflict between this document and the City Code, this document shall take precedence. If a question or topic of regulation arises which is not addressed by this document, then the regulation shall be addressed as if the property were zoned R-4 High Density Residential. Because zoning regulations change from time to time, if the purpose of the R-4 district or its regulations significantly changes (as of 2019), then the City Administrator or their designee may interpret and determine, at their discretion. 2. Legal Descriptions (proposed): Lot 1, Block 1, Crossroad Pointe 3. Zoning: PUD — Planned Unit Development (Residential) 4. Permitted Use: Multi -Family Residential 5. Site Data: Total Land Area: 4.06 acres Total Building Footprint: 186,934 square feet 6. Dimensional Requirements: Crossroad Pointe PUD Narrative Mounds View Planning Case MU2019-001 Page 1 of 4 Crossroad Pointe PUD Narrative Minimum Building Setbacks 17' North (County Road H) 27' East (Mounds View Boulevard) 50' South 66' West (Edgewood Drive) Building Height 4-stories Parking Setbacks 27' (east) 11' (south) Parking Requirements 2:1 parking ratio (one indoor + one outdoor parking stall, per unit). NOTE: Proposed parking includes 126 indoor, and 131 outdoor parking stalls (2.04:1 ratio). The intent of requiring 2:1 ratio (vs. 2.02:1) is to allow some variation (e.g. -5 stalls) in the event that the displacement of parking stalls for another use is necessary (e.g. to provide space for an unforeseen amenity). PUD Review Process Application Conference: The Applicant (INH Properties, precursor to Crossroads Pointe MV, LLC) met with City Staff on numerous occasions, beginning on or about July, 2017. Discussions about the current all -apartment concept occurred on or about July, 2018. Concept Plan: The PUD concept plan (aka Sketch Plan) was reviewed by the Planning Commission on January 16, 2019, and by the City Council on February 4, 2019. Commissioners and Councilmembers provided individual opinions. The City Council provided a consensus to close Greenfield Avenue through the project area, such that all vehicular access is to be from Edgewood Drive. Development Stage, and Final Plan: This process (Conditional Use Permit for a PUD, and Development Review) is intended to occur concurrently with the review and approval of the Preliminary Plat. Any topic which cannot be addressed through this process, is intended to be addressed through the Final Plat or through a Development Agreement. 8. I Accessory Buildings, Outdoor Storage No Accessory Buildings shall be permitted. than ancillary recreational equipment. Crossroad Pointe PUD Narrative Page 2 of 4 No Outdoor Storage shall be permitted, other Mounds View Planning Case MU2019-001 Crossroad Pointe PUD Narrative 9. Landscaping All landscaping shall be consistent with the landscape plan (p. L010), included in the City Council's July 8, 2019 packet, to be revised as detailed in the July 8, 2019 City Council Staff Report [Revised Plan = p. L010, dated Sept 6, 2019]. It is the intent that after the building is built and landscaping is installed (e.g. within one year after), Staff and the Developer shall inspect the property, and determine if additional landscaping is necessary; (1) as a buffer between the Edgewood Road sidewalk and Stormwater retention basin; and (2) along the south property line; and (3) elsewhere as agreed upon between City Staff and the developer. 10. 1 Drainage All on -site drainage shall comply with Rice Creek Watershed District permit requirements, and the City Code. 11. Exterior Lighting All exterior lighting shall comply with the City Code. 12. Garbage and Recycling Dumpsters All garbage and recycling dumpsters shall be stored internally (e.g. inside the garage), and may be temporally (24-hours) stored outside within an enclosed area as identified on the Site Plan, on the day of pick-up. 13. Site Maintenance, Snow Storage & Removal All grounds will be maintained by the owner, and in compliance with City Codes. Snow Storage may occur on the property such that it does not displace the demand for on -site parking. When displacement of demand for on -site parking occurs, the Owner shall remove stored snow from the site. 14. Signage All signage shall comply with the City Code, R-4 zoning district, except that there may be two ground signs, each measuring the maximum size permitted. 15. Architectural Character Architectural character shall be consistent with plans included in the July 8, 2019 City Council packet. These drawings are undated, but were received May 31, 2019 (exterior elevations, and 3D renderings). 16. Access; On -Site Construction Temporary construction access may be permitted through the Mounds View Public Works Department. Permanent access will be through Edgewood Drive. Emergency access may be through Greenfield Avenue, as approved by the SBM Fire Chief, and Public Works Director. 17. Sidewalks and Trailways Public sidewalks and trails will be designed and installed to City standards, and maintained by the City. Private sidewalks will be privately maintained. Crossroad Pointe PUD Narrative Mounds View Planning Case MU2019-001 Page 3 of 4 Crossroad Pointe PUD Narrative 18. Platting and Easements The property shall be platted in accordance with City Code, county, and state regulations. i 19. Undergrounding of Utilities; Utility Design All utilities shall be underground. Public utilities shall be included within Drainage & Utility, included in the Plat [Exception: existing overhead utilities may remain]. 20. Amendments This PUD Narrative may be amended by the City Council at any time. 21. Developers Agreement It is the City Attorney's discretion if a Development Agreement is to be required. 23. Signatures Jit_11_lNres, Jr., Crossroads Pointe MV, LLC Date STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ?AA%j ) The foregoing was acknowledged before me this �7 day of 4rdaff;e=, 2019, bylim Illies, Jr., the President of Crossroads Pointe MV, LLC, a 7,77, car ❑rati , on behalf of the corporation. JONATHAN M. SEVAL.D Noy, Pub c Notary Public MWWOW My Cornlldslofr i 8.lan. M, 2020 CITY OF MOUNDS VIE Carol A. Mueller, Mayor �� t 9� /— J Nyle ik d, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF OMV,-f ) The foregoing was acknowledged before me this L day of 2: AA . 2019, by Carol A. Mueller, Mayor of the City of Mounds View; and Nyle Zikmund, City Administrator of the City of Mounds View, a municipal corporation, on behalf of>e City. JONATHAN M. SEVALD Notary Public Nat Pu My Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2020 Crossroad Pointe Page 4 of 4 Mounds View Planning Case MU2019-001 RESOULTUION 9465 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CROSSROAD POINTE PUD NARRATIVE WHEREAS, the applicant, Corey Gerads (Alliance Building Corp.), representing property owner, Crossroads Pointe MV LLC; is requesting an Amendment to the Crossroad Pointe PUD Narrative, on property located at 2390 Mounds View Boulevard, legally described as: PID: 08-30-23-31-0078 Lot 1, Block 1, Crossroad Pointe WHEREAS, a Planned Unit Development (PUD) was approved for Crossroad Pointe (now known as Gray Stone Flats) in 2019 (Resolution 9132). The PUD Narrative (#6) specifies Dimensional Requirements; and, WHEREAS, the building foundation as constructed, deviates from these Dimensional Requirements, for which the applicant is requesting to amend the PUD Narrative, to be consistent (reduces north side yard building foundation setback from 17' to 14.5', and east side yard building foundation setback from 27' to 26.5'). Additionally, at the time the PUD Narrative was approved, the Landscaping Plan did not include details on fence height for the pet exercise area, and other areas of the yard. The applicant is requesting to maintain a 5' tall chain -link fence around the pet exercise area; and to install an 8' tall panel fence in portions along the patio for aesthetic reasons; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View Municipal Code § 160.315(B) intends PUD's to encourage; (2) Higher standards of site and building design through the use of trained and experienced land planners, architects and landscape architects. (10) To allow variation from the provisions of this chapter, including setbacks, height, lot area, width and depth, yards and the like; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission reviewed the proposed amendment, recommending approval (Resolution 1137-21); and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View Municipal Code § 160.302 (Special Procedures) includes PUD amendment procedures, referencing § 160.450(E) (Adverse Effects), and § 160.450(G) (Findings of Fact). The City Council makes the following Findings (italics); Resolution 9465 Page 2 of 4 Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The project area is guided Mixed Use (2040 Comprehensive Plan; "The City of Mounds View seeks to achieve Mixed Use Districts by... ...Demanding high quality design to ensure compatibility between residential and commercial uses. Creating attractive, community -oriented development that positively reflects on the identity and quality of life in Mounds View" (Comprehensive Plan, p. 2-9, 2-10). A. The proposed amendment to the PUD Narrative to reduce building foundation setbacks is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. B. The proposed amendment to the PUD Narrative to allow a fence within a front yard to exceed 48 " (specifically, 60"around pet exercise area) is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. C. The proposed amendment to the PUD Narrative to allow a fence within a front yard to exceed 48 " (specifically, 8' tall panel fence around portions of the patio) is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The geographical area involved. Finding: The geographical area has been considered. 3. Whether the use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. Finding: There is no evidence that the proposed amendment to the PUD Narrative will affect property values, or depreciate the area. 4. The character of the surrounding area; and Finding: A. The proposed amendment to the PUD Narrative to reduce building foundation setbacks is consistent with the surrounding area. The deviation is minimal (6" on the east, and 2.5' on the north), and is not visibly noticeable. B. The proposed amendment to the PUD Narrative to allow a fence within a front yard to exceed 48 " (specifically, 60"around pet exercise area) is consistent with the character of the surrounding area along Edgewood Drive. C. The proposed amendment to the PUD Narrative to allow a fence within a front yard to exceed 48 " (specifically, 8' tall panel fence Resolution 9465 Page 3 of 4 around portions of the patio) is consistent with the character of the surrounding neighborhood. 5. The demonstrated need for the use. Finding: The applicant has sufficiently demonstrated the following needs for an amendment to the PUD Narrative; A. A demonstrated need for reduced building foundation setbacks is to be consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code, allowing creative use of lands for PUD's. B. A demonstrated need for increased fence height, from 48 " to 60 ", around the pet exercise area is for increased security to contain pets within those confines. C. A demonstrated need to increase fence height from 48 " to 8' for panel fencing along County Road H2 is to be consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code, allowing creative use of lands for PUD's. WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on Monday, September 13, 2021 at 6:30 PM. A Public Hearing Notice was published in the August 17, 2021 edition of the Shoreview Press, and mailed to property owners within 350' of the subject property; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View City Council approves the following Amendment to the Crossroad Pointe Planned Unit Development Narrative (S4ieken text to be amended by underlined text): 6. Dimensional Requirements: Minimum Building Setbacks 4-7-1 14.5' North (County Road I-2) 2-T 26.5' East (Mounds View Boulevard) 50' South 66' West (Edgewood Drive 9. Landscaping: All landscaping shall be consistent with the landscape plan (p.L010) included in the City Council's July 8, 2019 packet, to be revised as detailed in the July 8, 2019 City Council Staff Report [Revised Plan = p. LO10, dated Sept 6, 2019]. It is the itent that t after the building is built and landscaping is installed (e.g. whining one year after), Staff and the Developer shall inspect the property, and determine if additional landscaping is necessary; (1) as a buffer between the Edgewood Road sidewalk and Stormwater retention basin; and (2) along the south property line; and (3) elsewhere as agreed upon between City Staff and the developer. Resolution 9465 amends the Landscaping Plan, dated Sept 6, 2019, to allow; (1) a 5' tall fence around the pet exercise area; and (2) an 8' tall fence along portions of the patio, consistent with the September 13, 2021 City Council Staff Report attachments. Resolution 9465 Page 4 of 4 Adopted this 13"' day of September, 2021 Carol A. Mueller, Mayor Attest: Nyle Zikmund, City Administrator (SEAL) Item No: 08B Meeting Date: Sep 13, 2021 MOUNDS VIEW Type of Business: Council Business City Administrator Review: City of Mounds View Staff Report To: Honorable Mayer, and City Council From: Jon Sevald, Community Development Director Item Title/Subject: Resolution 9466, Appeal of Planning Commission's Denial of a Variance to exceed permitted fence height in a front yard; 5045 Rainbow Lane Introduction: Aaron Strand (homeowner), requested approval of a Variance to allow a 6' fence in a front yard, whereas 4' is the maximum height allowed. The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on August 18, 2021, and Denied the Variance. The applicant has appealed, and is requesting that the City Council reverse the Planning Commission's Denial of the Variance.' Discussion: The applicant received a Zoning Permit (after construction began) in November 2020 to replace a chain -link fence with a solid wooden fence. The permit application was for a 4' fence in the front yard, with a portion tapering to 6' in height near the house. The approved permit was for 4' (not 6'). Four -feet is the maximum fence height permitted within a front yard. 5045 Rainbow Lane, panoramic view from front steps toward front yard, and County Road H (at right) (photo, Aug 26, 2021). The applicant has three dogs. The house is on a corner lot, across from Sunnyside Elementary School. During the school year, there are crossing guards on the corner. The Applicant's intention with the solid wooden fence (vs. chain -link) is to screen the dogs' view of pedestrians. The front steps are very near the fence. The intent of having a 6' fence in this area is to deter the dogs from jumping over the fence, whereas a 4' fence may not contain the dogs. The fence constructed is in violation of Municipal Code 160.030 (Fencing, Screening and Landscaping). The applicant was instructed to remove that portion of the fence exceeding 4' in height, or apply for a Variance. The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on August 18, 2021. A Public Hearing notice was published in the August 3, 2021 Shoreview Press, and mailed to property owners within 350' of the subject property. Staff received two letters; one in support of the Variance (from next door neighbor), and one in opposition (anomalous letter). Mounds View Municipal Code 16& 0.467 (Appeals); ..... `If the Board denies the applicant's relief, the applicant, within 60 days from the decision of the Board, may appeal to the City Council for the relief sought. " Item 08B Page 2 of 6 During the Commission's discussion, consideration was given as to the uniqueness of the property compared to other corner lots, and to the protection that a taller fence could provide (protection of children from the applicant's dogs). The Planning Commission denied the Variance, on a 4-2 vote (Resolution 1136-21). Analysis: The Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Adjustment, may approve Variances to provide relief to the landowner in those cases where the code imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of property owner's land.... A variance may be granted only in the event that all of the following circumstances exist.2 (1) The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this chapter- (2) The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; (3) The applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this chapter or the city code; (4) Unique circumstances apply to the property which do not apply to other properties in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owner of the property since the enactment of this chapter has had no control. The unique circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant; (5) The variance does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; (6) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulties. Economic conditions alone do not constitute practical difficulties; and (7) The Board of Adjustment and Appeals may impose such conditions upon the premises benefitted by a variance as may be necessary to comply with the standards established by this chapter or to reduce or minimize the effect of the variance upon other properties in the neighborhood and to better carry out the intent of the variance. The condition must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. Strategic Plan Strategy/Goal: (none) Financial Impact: (none) Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council Deny the Appeal of the Planning Commission's Denial of the Variance. Although the request is reasonable, it is Staff's opinion that the request does not meet #4; "Unique circumstances apply to the property which do not apply to other properties in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owner of the property since the enactment of this chapter has had no control. The unique circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. " Mounds View Municipal Code § 160.466 (Criteria for Granting Variances) The Mounds View Vision A Thriving Desirable Community Item 08B Page 3 of 6 It is Staff's opinion that the need for the Variance is caused by the temperament of the Applicant's dogs. The fence as constructed is 6' in height nearest to the front door steps, and is 4' otherwise around the front yard. If the applicant is concerned that the dogs will jump from the front steps over a 4' fence, then the applicant can move the 4' fence further away from the front steps. Staff agrees with the Applicant that the corner lot is unique because over half of the rear yard consists of the garage and driveway, leaving a grassy area for the dogs to run behind the garage, which is not viewable from within the house because the garage blocks the view. Therefore, the front yard and the front (side) yard is the most practical area for the dogs. The front (side) yard along County Road H is not fenced, but would allow a 6' fence behind the front of the house (see attached "Allowable Fence Height). Staff has prepared a Resolution for Approval / Denial of the Appeal (Circle one, cross out the other). The Planning Commission's Findings for Denial are numbered 1 and 4 on the Resolution. The Council is asked to consider if one or both Findings were in error. If in error, the Council should provide reasoning (Findings) to support approval of the Variance. Respectfully, �4Q0 Jon Sevald, AICP Community Development Director ATTACHED Allowable Fence Height City Code, 160.030 (Fencing, Screening and Landscaping) Site Photos Applicant's Letter, August 26, 2021 Letters of Support/Opposition Planning Commission Resolution 1136-21 Resolution 9466 The Mounds View Vision A Thriving Desirable Community Item 08B Page 4 of 6 Allowable Fence Height 5045 Rainbow Ln, illustrating allowable fence height for corner porperties. The Mounds View Vision A Thriving Desirable Community Item 08B Page 5 of 6 City Code, 160.030 (Fencing, Screening and Landscaping) Mounds View Municipal Code &160.030 (Fencing, Screening and Landscaping) (A) Height. No fence shall exceed eight feet in height, and in the case of grade separation, such as the division of properties by a retaining wall, the height shall be determined on the basis of measurement from the average point between the highest and lowest grade. (B) Intersections. No structures or plantings 30 inches or more in height, or fences shall be permitted within 30 feet of any corner formed by the intersection of street property lines or the right-of-way of a railway intersecting a street, except properly constructed chain link fences. The chain link fences shall not exceed 48 inches in height from the grade level at the lot line and shall have openings in the wire mesh of not less than one and five -eighths inches, nor more than two and one-fourth inches. The fences may follow the lot line to the lot corner. The 30-foot restriction noted above shall consist of the triangle formed by connecting the two points on intersecting lot lines that are each 30 feet from the lot corner. (C) Location. (1) Except as provided in division (8) above, fences not to exceed 48 inches in height may be located on any part of a lot. Fences not to exceed 96 inches in height may be erected on any part of a lot behind the front line of the principal building. The City Council may require or approve fencing up to 96 inches in height in a front yard to satisfy a buffer or screening condition of a development review or conditional use permit. (2) A fence or retaining wall shall be installed on the applicant's property. The fence or retaining wall shall not be installed directly over the property line, but shall not otherwise be subject to a setback requirement, except as provided in division (C)(3) below. (3) Fences on corner lots whose side yard abuts a roadway may be six feet in height beginning at the front building line of the principle structure. (D) Landscaping required. In all zoning districts, the lot area remaining after providing for off- street parking, off-street loading, sidewalks, driveway, building site and/or other requirements shall be planted and maintained in grass, sodding, shrubs or other acceptable vegetation or treatment generally used in landscaping. The requirements of § 160.419 of this chapter must be met for all new developments in the R-3, R-4, B-1, B- 2, B-3, B-4, 1-1 and PUD Districts. (E) Surface of fences. (1) Any fence shall be so constructed that the surface facing adjoining properties or public rights -of -way shall be of finished construction. (2) No fence or wall shall obstruct natural drainage or impede the function and flowage within a dedicated drainage easement. (3) Fences located on public and semi-public properties may be erected to a height of eight feet anywhere on the property. Item 08B Page 6 of 6 5045 Rainbow Lane, view looking north-northwest from Sunnyside Elementary School crossing. Red circle is portion offence exceeding 4' in height (photo July 21, 2021) 5045 Sunnyside Lane, view from Sunnyside Lane, looking southwest. Red circle is portion offence exceeding 4' in height (photo, July 21, 2021). The Mounds View Vision A Thriving Desirable Community City of Mounds View, City Council 2401 Mounds View Blvd, Mounds View, MN 55112 To whom this may concern, Hello, I have lived in Mounds View over 8 years now doing many improvements to my house and the neighborhood I live in. You can thank me for the new roads on Long Lake Road and county Rd H as I used to work for Ramsey County Public Works and pushed hard for the improvements to get them on the list of roads resurfaced. I'm now a small business owner and own Minnesota Automotive (Auto repair shop) in Coon Rapids which has me working 60- hour work weeks and I cannot be home as much as I would like to be for now. At my house at 5045 Rainbow Lane, I had a new roof installed, new siding, new garage door, new windows, land scaping and much more done since I moved in. I'm all about making this area better than I found it. I have been a single father of 2 sons since 2014 as my boys have lived with me 99 % of the time. I now just recently remarried and working on the blended family thing. Studies have shown that having dogs at your home is good for mental health, especially for teenage boys, it's nice to come home to someone happy to see you. I had 2 dogs and now a 3 since my oldest son moved out and now back in after being gone for just a short time. I would like to apply for a variance for my fence in my front yard. I am asking to let the fence to be 6 foot tall for about the first 6 feet of my front yard, to compensate for my front steps on my house. The reason we live across from sunny side elementary school. We have school patrols on my conner every morning, afternoon, and many other times during the day, during the school year. I have dogs that we do are best to keep from barking, when outside and disturbing the peace of the neighborhood. We are making more effort to keep the peace in the neighborhood, then the average Joe with our dogs. Also, the steps are vey close to the fence and need to be at the 6 ft height to keep the safety of the neighborhood/ school as I would not want my Pitbull dog getting out by jumping a 4 ft fence next to the front steps. Many have asked why not put a fence in your back yard? The answer is simple, I have a corner lot, with my house and garage almost on top of each other. 75% of my back yard is taken up by my garage and driveway, which is more like a side yard then a back yard, a corner lot issue. No other house is like mine in Mounds View that I know of. The only way to make a fenced in back yard would have power gate made for my driveway which would be 10's of thousands of dollars. Not in my budget right now. If you were to really look at my house it's unique to the area. No other house has the same house and Garage combo as mine does. My house and garage are just 7 ft apart not much space at all. Tell me or show another house like this one? There is not one. I did not build it this way just happened to buy it this way. This should be cut and dry, this is about public safety for our kids in school and the neighborhood, and the safety of my dog's. I'm trying to prevent a tragedy for our family and everyone else in the neighborhood. Other benefits, it looks nice and will complement the neighborhood when done with the added landscaping planned... Also, many other neighbors support the fence height or don't care about the height as much as the fence itself. Warm regards, Aaron Strand Home owner 612-747-0121 From: Brian Eichers To: Jon Sevald Subject: Public Hearing - 5045 Rainbow Ln Date: Monday, August 9, 2021 3:05:52 PM Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution. Mr Sevald, I will not be attending the public hearing on Aug 18th because I will be out of state on military Reserve business, but also because the 6ft fence violation doesn't really bother me too much, given that it doesn't stick too far from the front corners of the house. I am Aaron's next door neighbor and share a property line with him. Unknown if anyone will take the time to appear in person to object, but since I am Aaron's neighbor, I get the bulk of complaints from the block regarding his yard. This is America, and rather than deal with a person directly, us Americans like to complain to other people instead. No one has commented on the sections that exceed 6ft specifically, however I have had at least three neighbors on the street comment endlessly about his 4ft privacy fence since he built it in his front yard last year. Comments range from how ugly and ghetto it looks, to how it causes safety concerns for school children walking from Sunnyside, because they cannot see his three unlicensed, obnoxiously loud barking dogs until they walk past the fence and get the crap scared out of them. Other comments wonder why he is the only property in the City who is allowed a screened privacy fence in the front yard at all, whether it is 4ft or not. Other fence -related complaints that I have received about him within the last year include the south side of his yard on Co Rd H. There are numerous post holes dug and left open, for probably the last year or so. Drive past today and you can clearly see them open and exposed. There is also concern that he plans to build another wooden privacy fence along the Co Rd H boulevard and extend it almost to the corner intersection of Co Rd H and Rainbow Ln. I have addressed that with him personally in the past and even referenced City ordinances that explain the need for setback so vehicles can see around corners at an intersection, but who knows what his plans are. Aaron is a good neighbor and I like him. Is his 4ft privacy fence ugly and negatively affect my house resale potential? Yes. Do the small sections which are 6ft tall cause me any problems? No. Compared to a tiny yard that smells heavily of dog poop and three dogs that yap endlessly when let outside (he tries his best to control that) the 6ft section of the front fence does not really bother me. Thanks for your time. v/r, Brian Eichers 5053 Rainbow Ln 612-361-2924 Aob- IQ, Mounds View Planning Commission Mounds View City Hall 2401 Mounds View Boulevard Mounds View, MN 55112 This factual letter is anonymous from the fear of Aaron Strand's two sons who are convicted felons living at home and possessing illegal firearms that frighten the neighborhood who fears revenge to informants. Strand should be treated as any other resident who violates city codes. ALL RESIDENTS ARE SUBJECT TO THE SAME LAWS. As a former city employee, he was fully aware of Mounds View's building rules and regulation, many times bragging that he "had ways of getting by." Also, it's now August and the city knew of Strand's illegal activities since at least October 2020. Strand further is guilty of building without permits BEFORE construction started on this FENCE and other previous projects. Moreover, Sunnyside teachers reported to the city that the construction site was littered with dangerous used fence, old post holes and lumber that school children played on, around and in BUT nothing was done months ago. Additionally, Strand has three dogs (over the city limit) that are constantly barking and not secured safely by a make -shift, non-standard gate in the illegal fence. Strand had bragged that by erecting the fence, the dogs would not see walkers, especially children, and never make a noise, especially after curfew: a total lie. The fence does not match the house and is an eye sore for the neighborhood, impeding reality sales potential. Curb appeal suffers from Strand's fence and also lessens the value of homes. There are several law firms ready to challenge pro bono any conclusion that favors Strand's selfishness if the city doesn't follow its own laws. So please do what the city of Mounds View has set for legal procedure. And don't set a terrible precedent that honest homeowners will have to suffer from. This will make a good story for the Startrib and Pioneer Press. MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 1136-21 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLULTION DENYING A VARIANCE TO INCREASE THE FENCE HEIGHT IN A FRONT YARD FROM FOUR -FEET, TO SIX -FEET, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5045 RAINBOW LANE (PLANNING CASE VR2021-002) WHEREAS, the applicant, Aaron Strand, has applied for a Variance to allow a fence to exceed 4' in height in a front yard, on property located at 5045 Rainbow Lane, legally described as: PID: 07-3 0-23-44-0059 Lot 8 Block 4 of TWELVE OAKS 2ND ADDITION WHEREAS, the Mounds View Municipal Code §160.030(C)(1) permits fences up to 4' in height, anywhere on a lot. The Municipal Code § 160.030(C)(3) permits corner lots to have up to 6' in height, within the side (front) yard, "beginning at the front building line of the principal structure;" and, WHEREAS, the applicant installed a fence in the front yard of a corner lot, a portion of which is 6' in height, in violation of the Mounds View Municipal Code § 160.030(C)(3), and is requesting approval of a Variance to allow it to stay; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing on August 18, 2021. A notice was published in the August 3, 2021 edition of the Shoreview Press, and mailed to property owners within 350' of the subject property; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, may provide relief to the landowner in those cases where the code imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of a property owner's land. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. No variances shall be granted that would allow any use that is not allowed in the zoning district in which the subject property is located. A variance may be granted only in the event that all of the following circumstances exist [Findings in italics]: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Mounds View Municipal Code; Res 1136-21 Page 2 of 3 Finding: The Variance is not in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Mounds View Municipal Code, §160.030(C)(3), which limits front yard fences to 4' in height. 2. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; Finding: The Variance is not applicable to the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The applicant proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this chapter or the city code; Finding: The Variance is a reasonable use. The proposed 6' tall fence extends about 10' into the front yard from the house, and does not appear out of place. 4. Unique circumstances apply to the property which do not apply to other properties in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owner of the property since the enactment of this chapter has had no control. The unique circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant; Finding; There are no unique circumstances to the property. The property is a corner lot across the street from a school. There are many corner lots, and many lots across the street from a school or other venue frequented by pedestrians. The applicant's dogs bark at the school crossing guards, and other pedestrians. The intent of the 6' tall fence is to screen the dog's view of pedestrians, enticing the dogs to bark. There are other means to control the dogs' barking, other than a 6' fence. 5. The variance does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; Finding; The variance does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. 6. The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulties. Economic conditions alone do not constitute practical difficulties; and Finding: The variance requested is the minimum which would alleviate the practical difficulty. 7. The Board of Adjustment and Appeals may impose such conditions upon the premises benefitted by a variance as may be necessary to comply with the standards established by this chapter or to reduce or minimize the effect of the variance upon other properties in the neighborhood and to better carry out the intent of the variance. The condition must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Adjustment, based upon the above Findings, the Staff Report, and in Res1136-21 Page 3 of 3 consideration of public testimony, DENIES a Variance to increase the front (east) fence height from 4' to 6', on property located at 5045 Rainbow Lane. Adopted this 181h day of August, 2021. Attest: (Seal) Community Development Director RESOLUTION 9466 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLULTION APPROVING / DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMISSION'S DENAIL OF A VARIANCE TO INCREASE THE FENCE HEIGHT IN A FRONT YARD FROM FOUR -FEET, TO SIX -FEET, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5045 RAINBOW LANE (PLANNING CASE VR2021-002) WHEREAS, the applicant, Aaron Strand, applied for a Variance to allow a fence to exceed 4' in height in a front yard, on property located at 5045 Rainbow Lane, legally described as: PID: 07-30-23-44-0059 Lot 8 Block 4 of TWELVE OAKS 2ND ADDITION WHEREAS, the Mounds View Municipal Code §160.030(C)(1) permits fences up to 4' in height, anywhere on a lot. The Municipal Code § 160.030(C)(3) permits corner lots to have up to 6' in height, within the side (front) yard, "beginning at the front building line of the principal structure;" and, WHEREAS, the applicant installed a fence in the front yard of a corner lot, a portion of which is 6' in height, in violation of the Mounds View Municipal Code § 160.030(C)(3), and is requesting approval of a Variance to allow it to stay; and, WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission held a duly noticed Public Hearing on August 18, 2021. A notice was published in the August 3, 2021 edition of the Shoreview Press, and mailed to property owners within 350' of the subject property; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, may provide relief to the landowner in those cases where the code imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of a property owner's land; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the seven criteria for granting a Variance (Municipal Code §160.466(B), and denied the Variance (Resolution 1136-21). Among the Commission's Findings (Findings in italics): 1. The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Mounds View Municipal Code; Res 1136-21 Page 2 of 2 Finding: The Variance is not in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Mounds View Municipal Code, §1 60.030(C) (3), which limits front yard fences to 4' in height. 4. Unique circumstances apply to the property which do not apply to other properties in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owner of the property since the enactment of this chapter has had no control. The unique circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant; Finding; There are no unique circumstances to the property. The property is a corner lot across the street from a school. There are many corner lots, and many lots across the street from a school or other venue frequented by pedestrians. The applicant's dogs bark at the school crossing guards, and other pedestrians. The intent of the 6' tall fence is to screen the dogs view of pedestrians, enticing the dogs to bark. There are other means to control the dogs' barking, other than a 6' fence. WHEREAS, the Municipal Code, §160.467 allows 60-days (e.g. October 18, 2021) for the applicant to appeal the Planning Commission's decision, to the City Council. The applicant, Aaron Strand, filed an appeal on August 26, 2021; and, WHEREAS, on August 25, 2021, the applicant, Aaron Strand, appealed the Planning Commission's August 18, 2021 Denial of the Variance; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the September 13, 2021 City Council Staff Report, including the Planning Commission's Resolution 1136-21 Denying the Variance, and Agrees / Disagrees with the Commission's Findings; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View City Council Approves / Denies the applicant's Appeal of the Planning Commission's Denial of the Variance to increase the front (east) fence height from 4' to 6', on property located at 5045 Rainbow Lane. Adopted this 131h day of September 2021. Carol A. Mueller, Mayor ATTEST: Nyle Zikmund, City Administrator (SEAL) THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY 1 City of Mounds View Staff Report Item No: 8.C. Meeting Date: September 13, 2021 Type of Business: Council Business City Administrator Review: To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Mark Beer, Finance Director Item Title/Subject: Resolution 9468 Authorizing Certification of the Preliminary General Fund Budget and Preliminary Property Tax Levy for Fiscal Year 2022 State law requires that the City certify a preliminary General Fund Budget and preliminary property tax levy to Ramsey County by September 30. The City Council reviewed the General Fund budget at the May Special work session and will review the budget again before final approval in December. The Charter limits the levy increase to inflation plus 2% or 5% whichever is less unless otherwise excluded (referendums and debt service/capital levies are excluded from the charter limit). (Inflation is 3.3%) Each 1 % levy increase is an additional $58,663. The state has certified Local Government Aid (LGA) for 2022 at $850,373. The Strategic Plan adopted by the City Council calls for less dependence on LGA. LGA is included in the General Fund budget at 90% of the certified amount. The Strategic Plan also calls for reducing dependence on the Levy Reduction Assigned Fund balance by 3-5% per year. Prior budgets have used $250,000, we used $242,000 for 2021 to balance the budget. For 202Z $238,000 is proposed and $234,000 for 2023 is proposed to meet the goal of the Strategic Plan. Unassigned fund balance was $4,662,432 at December 31, 2020 and represents 56.4% of draft 2022 budgeted expenditures and transfers in. The Assigned Levy Reduction fund balance was $5,033,580 at December 31, 2020 and will be approximately $4,816,748 at December 31, 2021. Staff is recommending that the preliminary levy be set at the maximum allowed by charter to provide flexibility for the Council in case there are additional unforeseen challenges between now and final adoption. The goal is to have the smallest levy increase needed. The base General Fund levy would be $4,960,174 and special levies for Fire Debt Service of $165,916, 2004 police personnel referendum of $255,000, 2017 police personnel referendum of $130,000, PERA rate increase special levy of $39,145 for a total General Fund levy of $5,550,235. A debt service levy for the 2017A PW Facility Debt Service is $416,766, an increase of $2,782 over 2021. A base levy for the Street Improvement fund of $150,000 will be continued for 2022. The EDA levy of $100,000 is no increase over 2021. The total of all base and special levies proposed is $6,217,001, 5.98% increase over 2021. Once this amount is set, the levy cannot be increased but can be lowered. The final levy will be adopted on or about December 13, 2021 along with the General Fund budget and all other City funds budgets. The EDA levy will be set in a separate resolution. The draft General Fund budget for preliminary approval is $8,272,074. This amount is subject to change as the Council gets additional information and provides additional direction to staff before final approval in December. Respectfully submitted, Mark Beer, Finance Director The Mounds View Vision A Thriving Desirable Community RESOLUTION NO. 9468 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA Resolution Authorizing Certification of the Preliminary General Fund Budget and Preliminary Property Tax Levy for Fiscal Year 2022 WHEREAS, current state statute requires cities to certify a preliminary budget and tax levy to the county auditor; and WHEREAS, guidelines established by the Commissioner of Revenue require certification to occur on or before September 30, 2021; and WHEREAS, the Department of Revenue has certified the amount of Local Government Aid payable to the City in 2022; and WHEREAS, the City Council has elected to have a preliminary levy increase of 5.98% and; WHEREAS, a referendum levy passed in 2004 for two additional police officers is set at $255,000 and a referendum levy passed in 2017 for one police officer is set at $130,000; and WHEREAS, a street levy of $150,000 will be continued to improve streets that were not part of the Street Improvement Program and to maintain the streets that were recently improved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mounds View that the preliminary expenditure budget for the General Fund for fiscal year 2022 is $8,272,074. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proposed 2022 base property tax levy is $4,960,174 and $150,000 and the proposed 2022 special levies are $1,006,827 for a total net property tax levy of $6,117,001. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Truth -In -Taxation meeting will be held on December 6, 2021 at 6:00 pm with a continuation meeting to be held on December 13, 2021 at 6:30 pm if needed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director shall certify these amounts to the Ramsey County Auditor. Adopted this 131" Day of September 2021. Carol A. Mueller, Mayor (ATTEST) Nyle Zikmund, City Administrator (SEAL) The Mounds View Vision A Thriving Desirable Community City of Mounds View 2022 Budget Summary 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Change from 2020 General Fund: Actual Actual Actual Budget Request Dollar Percent Revenues: Property taxes - Base levy 4,082,924 4,245,901 4,516,708 4,666,859 4,960,174 293,315 6.29% Special tax levies, Bonds 90,835 165,800 171,190 166,291 165,916 (375) -0.23% Special tax levies, Operations 244,145 349,145 369,145 369,145 424,145 55,000 14.90% Franchise tax 338,919 308,835 301,755 305,000 305,000 - 0.00% Other taxes 23,046 26,477 29,309 26,000 26,000 0.00% Hotel/moteltax 77,115 71,957 29,264 50,000 50,000 0.00% Licenses and permits 312,047 348,201 269,447 245,872 252,872 7,000 2.85% Intergovernmental 1,229,019 1,303,053 2,419,722 956,075 1,237,202 281,127 29.40% Charges for services 23,736 38,007 60,384 24,625 49,625 25,000 101.52% Fines & forfeitures 35,800 46,098 25,596 33,750 33,750 - 0.00% Interest 157,074 316,381 196,579 60,000 80,000 20,000 33.33% Miscellaneous 304,719 323,497 310,601 298,162 274,221 (23,941) -8.03% Transfers: Water Fund 78,103 80,446 82,859 85,345 87,905 2,560 3.00% Sewer Fund 61,860 80,446 82,859 85,345 87,905 2,560 3.00% Storm Water Fund 8,067 8,309 8,558 8,815 9,079 264 2.99% Street Light Fund 2,771 2,854 2,940 3,028 3,119 91 3.01% Vehicle & Equipment Fund - - - 25,000 26,000 1,000 4.00% Debt proceeds 175,191 - - - - - 0.00% Total revenues 7,245,371 7,715,407 8,876,916 7,409,312 8,072,913 663,601 8.96% Expenditures: Legislative Services: City Council 58,903 58,013 50,168 62,239 61,953 (286) -0.46% Advisory Commissions 15,352 39,379 3,900 26,000 24,850 (1,150) -4.42% Subtotal 74,255 97,392 54,068 88,239 86,803 (1,436) -1.63% Administrative Services: City Administrator 286,882 305,115 307,051 310,722 340,326 29,604 9.53% Elections 33,460 26,954 27,023 36,265 36,265 - 0.00% Finance 268,325 274,866 282,535 294,777 306,737 11,960 4.06% Central Services 261,610 298,124 252,163 312,459 321,261 8,802 2.82% Subtotal 850,277 905,059 868,772 954,223 1,004,589 50,366 5.28% Community Development 435,152 441,676 417,362 477,040 506,702 29,662 6.22% Police 2,969,790 3,325,570 3,258,674 3,442,885 3,631,966 189,081 5.49% Fire 802,223 693,855 685,219 635,221 731,098 95,877 15.09% Public Works Administration 149,353 153,706 118,975 123,606 129,389 5,783 4.68% Parks, Recreation & Forestry: Recreation 123,961 125,940 96,795 - - - 0.00% Parks 286,911 342,429 399,410 467,094 493,211 26,117 5.59% Forestry 36,836 44,185 64,092 54,213 77,940 23,727 43.77% Subtotal 447,708 512,554 560,297 521,307 571,151 49,844 9.56% Fleet Services: Building & Grounds Mtnce 144,415 143,343 171,071 153,709 137,318 (16,391) -10.66% Vehicle & Equipment Mtnce 124,811 113,381 136,106 132,526 144,803 12,277 9.26% Subtotal 269,226 256,724 307,177 286,235 282,121 (4,114) -1.44% Streets: Pavement Management 205,269 234,368 218,179 226,268 238,050 11,782 5.21% Snow & Iee Control 168,529 177,992 161,346 154,884 162,487 7,603 4.91% Sign Maintenance 47,325 47,318 42,676 68,283 70,512 2,229 3.26% Subtotal 421,123 459,678 422,201 449,435 471,049 21,614 4.81% Other Convention & Visitor's Bureau 73,260 65,455 29,314 47,500 47,500 - 0.00% Social Service Coordination 20,748 35,329 57,054 51,656 53,206 1,550 3.00% Miscellaneous/contingency 3,766 3,662 3,574 6,500 6,500 - 0.00% Transfers to other funds 640,000 690,000 1,374,000 774,000 750,000 (24,000) -3.10% Debt service 24,495 24,495 166,468 - - - 0.00% Subtotal 762,269 818,941 1,630,410 879,656 857,206 (22,450) -2.55% Total expenditures 7,181,376 7,665,155 8,323,155 7,857,847 8,272,074 414,227 5.27% Net change in fund balance 63,995 50,252 553,761 (448,535) (199,161) 249,374 Beginning Fund Balance 9,476,539 9,445,463 9,476,539 10,030,300 9,581,765 Ending Fund Balance 9,540,534 9,4959715 10,0309300 9,5819765 9,3829604 2499374 9/8/2021 7:53 AM THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY Item No: 8.D. Meeting Date: September 13, 2021 MOTypeUN-DISVVIEW of Business: Council Business City Administrator Review: City of Mounds View Staff Report To: City Council From: Mark Beer, Finance Director Item Title/Subject: Resolution 9467 Approving the Preliminary EDA Property Tax Levy Request and Budget for Fiscal Year 2022 Previously the City's economic development activities were funded with tax increment revenues. These tax increment revenues were discontinued as required by state statute when the districts were decertified. This left the City with limited resources to continue existing business outreach, marketing, advertising, small scale incentives, property acquisitions, professional services, and staff training and development. The EDA established a levy of $100,000 in 2017 for these purposes. There is no proposed increase in this amount for 2021. The City's EDA is requesting that the City levy on behalf of the EDA $100,000 to support the above activities within the City of Mounds View. The EDA has been authorized with joint powers of an Economic Development Authority (EDA) and a Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA). The EDA may choose to establish either an EDA levy or an HRA levy, or both, to fund the above activities. The proposed EDA budget of $249,633 is attached, there may be changes as additional information becomes available. Once this amount is set, the levy cannot be increased but can be lowered. A Truth -In -Taxation meeting will be held December 6, 2021 at 6pm at City Hall or via remote meeting. The final levy will be adopted on or about December 13, 2021. Vision: Financial Stability and Structurally Balanced Budgets that Fund the Needs of the Community Strategic Plan Strategy/Goal: Increase EDA Levy: Spur Redevelopment to Increase Tax Valuation, Add Jobs, and Housing Diversity 1. Increase the EDA and HRA levies to the maximum allowed over time. Respectfully submitted, Mark Beer, Finance Director The Mounds View Vision A Thriving Desirable Community RESOLUTION NO. 9467 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY EDA PROPERTY TAX LEVY REQUEST AND BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022 WHEREAS, the Mounds View Economic Development Authority (the "EDA") has requested that the City of Mounds View levy a tax for the benefit of the EDA pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.107, Subdivision 1. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mounds View hereby gives preliminary approval for the collection of a levy for the benefit of the economic development activities within the community in fiscal year 2022 in the amount not to exceed $100,000, which amount shall be included in the City's proposed levy and the proposed EDA budget of $249,633 is adopted. Adopted this 13th Day of September 2021. Carol A. Mueller, Mayor (ATTEST) Nyle Zikmund, Administrator (SEAL) The Mounds View Vision A Thriving Desirable Community 2022 Budget Summary 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Change from 2021 Actual Actual Actual Budget Request Dollar Percent EDA (Fund 230): Revenues 3101 Tax collections 100,215 93,170 100,774 100,000 100,000 - 0.00% 3610 Investment income - - - - - - 0.00% 3615 Interest received on notes 558 309 45 - - - 0.00% 3680 Otherrevenue - 1,654 - - - - 0.00% 3972 Transfers 133,543 135,563 839,036 146,679 149,633 2,954 2.01% Total revenue 234,316 230,696 939,855 246,679 249,633 2,954 1.20% Operating expenses Housing and Economic Development (4650): Personnel services 0100 Salaries, regular 60,860 91,694 114,465 116,178 119,753 3,575 3.08% 0150 Salaries, part-time 21,245 12,719 - - - - 0.00% 0300 Social security 5,721 6,884 7,694 8,888 9,161 273 3.07% 0321 PERA 6,018 7,676 8,560 8,714 8,981 267 3.06% 0400 Group insurance 13,822 14,249 14,616 15,073 17,808 2,735 18.15% 0500 Workers compensation 362 569 666 841 847 6 0.71% Total personnel services 108,028 133,791 146,001 149,694 156,550 6,856 4.58% Materials & supplies 1600 Supplies, operating 45 - 751 200 200 - 0.00% 2100 Book & periodicals 139 - - 150 150 - 0.00% Total materials & supplies 184 - 751 350 350 - 0.00% Contractual services 3030 Other professional services 20,186 33,461 30,563 32,472 32,472 - 0.00% 3100 Telephone - 550 600 600 600 - 0.00% 3420 Advertisements 780 780 - 1,500 1,500 - 0.00% 3430 Printing - - - 500 500 - 0.00% 3610 Memberships 720 940 110 1,010 950 (60) -5.94% 3630 Training & conferences 2,407 2,647 351 3,430 3,490 60 1.75% 3800 Mileage 156 1,790 247 350 350 - 0.00% 4750 Real estate taxes - 19,993 - - - - 0.00% 4800 Insurance 447 475 754 649 649 - 0.00% 5210 Housing improvement 2,341 2,570 1,524 23,000 22,222 (778) -3.38% Total contractual services 27,037 63,206 34,149 63,511 62,733 (778) -1.22% Capital outlays 9300 Business subsidies - - - 30,000 30,000 - 0.00% Total expenditures 135,249 196,997 180,901 243,555 249,633 6,078 2.50% Net change in fund balance 99,067 33,699 758,954 3,124 - (3,124) -100.00% Fund balance, beginning year 345,768 444,835 478,534 1,237,488 1,240,612 3,124 0.25% Adj for land held for resale Fund balance, end of year 444,835 478,534 1,237,488 1,240,612 1,240,612 - 0.00% 9/7/2021 8:51 AM Fund: 230 FDA Revenues Account Description 2019 2020 2021 2022 Description 3101 Tax revenue 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 EDA/HRA Levy 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 3972 Transfers 85,563 - 50,000 88,036 - 50,000 701,000 89,690 6,989 50,000 91,484 8,149 50,000 - Transfers from TIF 5 Transfers from TIF 6 Transfers from General Fund Transfer from Street Improvement 135,563 1 839,036 146,679 1 149,633 235.563 939,036 246,679 249.633 Fund: 230 Department: 4650 1600 Supplies, operating 400 360 200 Housing and Economic Development 200 Misc office supplies 200 400 360 200 2100 Books & periodicals 200 200 150 150 Misc. reports & periodicals (Finance & Commerce) 200 200 150 150 3030 Other professional services 4,000 5,000 14,500 1,703 4,500 7,000 4,000 5,000 14,500 1,738 4,500 1,000 4,000 5,000 14,500 1,772 4,500 2,700 4,000 5,000 14,500 1,772 4,500 1 2,700 Legal fees for development reviews Financial consultant fees (Ehlers) Special project consultant fees 5% of audit (22-35,440, 23-36,145, 24-36,870, 25-37,605, 26-38,360) Loan Program and Energy Audit Consultant (CEE) Marketing Consultant fees 36,703 30,738 32,472 32,472 3100 Telephone 600 600 600 Cell phone - 600 600 600 3420 Advertising 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Targeted advertisements. 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 3430 Printing 400 100 400 100 400 100 400 100 Property ad printing Misc printing 500 500 500 500 3610 Mcmbcrships 400 250 - 60 400 250 - 60 400 250 300 60 400 250 300 - Economic Development Assoc of MN (EDAM) Twin Cities North Chamber of Commerce dues Mn Real Estate Exchangers (MREE) MN Assoc. of Govt. Communicators (MAGC) 710 710 1,010 950 3630 Training & conferences 535 275 600 2,000 535 275 600 2,007 535 275 600 2,020 535 275 1,200 1,480 IEDC Conference Minneapolis Ehlers Finance Seminar EDAM spring/summer conferences Other miscellaneous training 3,410 9,417 3,430 3,490 3800 Mileage 350 350 350 350 Misc. mileage 4800 Insurance 649 649 649 649 Allocation of the City's property & liability insurance 649 649 649 649 5210 Housing programs 50,000 23,000 23,000 22,222 Housing Improvement programs 50,000 23,000 23,000 22,222 5220 Highway 10 redevelopment 28,000 - Trailways & lighting in highway corridor, Gateway Signage 28,000 - - - 9300 Business loans/subsidies/grants 50,000 25,000 30 000 30,000 Business improvement partnership loans/subsidies/grants 50,000 25,000 30,000 30,000 172,422 93,024 93,861 93,083 -0.04%-46.05% 0.90% -0.83% 9/7/2021 8:59 AM M0U--N-DitSVV!rW City of Mounds View Staff Report Item No: 08E Meeting Date: September 13, 2021 Type of Business: Council Business City Administrator Review: To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Nyle Zikmund, City Administrator Item Title/Subject: Second Reading and Adoption, Ordinance 980, Amending Title XI of the Mounds View City Code to Add a New Chapter Regulating Mobile Food Vehicles and Vendors Introduction: Because Staff was receiving numerous inquiries this year related to food trucks, and because our City Code does not specifically address them, Staff introduced Ordinance 980 for first reading at your August 23, 2021 City Council meeting. This ordinance specifically addresses food vehicles and vendors. Discussion: As stated previously, with current social distancing guidelines still in place, people are having more celebrations outside and in parks. Staff saw the need to include a new section in the Code to address the increased inquires and requests for mobile food vehicles and vendors. Staff brought this issue to your May 3 City Council Work Session for discussion. With your support, Staff worked with our City Attorney to draft an ordinance which was brought to your June 6 Work Session for review. The introduction and first reading took place on August 23, 2021. Attached please find Ordinance 980. Additionally, on June 14, 2021 the City Council adopted Resolution 9436, which revised the 2021 Fee Schedule to include fees for Mobile Food Vehicles and Vendors. Strategic Plan Strategy/Goal: Our ordinance and this application are consistent with the Vision Statement, "...welcoming a desirable destination to all ages and cultures ... and a place where residents can live, work and play." Financial Impact: None Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council conduct the Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance 980. Publication of the ordinance summary will be in the September 28, 2021 edition of the Shoreview Press. Respectfully, Nyle Zikmund City Administrator ORDINANCE NO.980 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE XI OF THE MOUNDS VIEW CITY CODE TO ADD A NEW CHAPTER REGULATING MOBILE FOOD VEHICLES AND VENDORS THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ORDAINS: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Mounds View hereby amends Title XI of the Mounds View Municipal Code by adding a new Chapter 120 as follows: CHAPTER 120: MOBILE FOOD VEHICLES AND VENDORS Section 420.001 Definitions 120.002 License Required 420.003 License Requirements 120.004 Licensing Exceptions 120.005 Ineligibility for License 120.006 License Denial Procedure 120.007 Suspension and Revocation 120.008 Transferability 120.009 Restrictions § 120.001 DEFINITIONS For the purpose of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply unless the context clearly indicates or requires a different meaning. (A) ISSUING A UTHORITY. The City Administrator or its authorized designee. (B) LICENSING TERM. Licenses may be issued for terms of one day, thirty days or one year. (C) MOBILE FOOD VEHICLE. Any vehicle or trailer used for the purpose of selling food or beverage prepared for consumption inside the vehicle and while the vehicle is parked. (D) MOBILE FOOD VENDOR. Any vehicle or trailer used for the purpose of selling prepackaged food or beverages while parked or while going from street -to -street including, but not limited to, ice cream trucks/vendors. § 120.002 LICENSE REQUIRED It is unlawful for any person to sell food or beverages out of a Mobile Food Vehicle in the City or operate as a Mobile Food Vendor in the City without a license from the City issued under this chapter. Any person operating pursuant to a duly issued license required in this chapter does not need a separate City license under chapter 113 of the City Code. Ordinance No. 980 Page 2 § 120.003 LICENSE REQUIREMENTS (A) Application. Applications for Mobile Food Vehicle Licenses and Mobile Food Vendor Licenses will be made on forms supplied by the City. All license applications must be submitted to the Issuing Authority a minimum of fifteen (15) regular business days before the applicant desires to begin conducting business within the City. The Issuing Authority may require such information on the application, as it deems reasonable and necessary. (B) Fee. All applications for a license shall be accompanied by a fee established in the City's approved Fee Schedule (C) Licensing Procedure. Upon receipt of the application and of the license fee, the Issuing Authority will, within three (3) regular business days, determine if the application is complete. An application will be considered complete if all required information is provided. If an application is determined incomplete, the Issuing Authority must inform the applicant of what required or otherwise necessary information is missing. If the application is complete, the Issuing Authority will forward the application to any other department deemed necessary to conduct background checks and investigations, as required in part (D) of this section, and to verify eligible zoning locations. Within fifteen (15) regular business days of receiving a completed application, the Issuing Authority must issue the license unless grounds exist for denying the license application under section 120.005. (D) Background Check. The City will perform a background investigation on any and all persons that will conduct any Mobile Food Vehicle or Mobile Food Vendor operations in the City. (E) License Duration. Licenses for mobile food vehicles may be issued for periods of one day, thirty days or one year. Applicants may choose one from the following two (3) types of licenses during the initial application process: (1) A one -day license that shall be valid for one day from 12:00 a.m. to 11:59 p.m. (2) A thirty -day license that shall be valid for thirty days from the date of issuance. (3) A one-year license that shall be valid -for one year from the date of issuance. Licenses for mobile food vendors may be issued for periods of one day or one year. (1) A one -day license shall be valid for one day from 12:00 a.m. to 11:59 p.m. (2) A one-year license shall be valid for one year from the date of issuance. (F) Display of License. All licenses issued shall be visibly displayed or accessible on the inside of the vehicle or trailer at all times during business conduction. Ordinance No. 980 Page 3 (G) ID Badges. Any individual preparing or selling products from a Mobile Food Vehicle or otherwise operating as a Mobile Food Vendor must pass a background check as part of the licensing process. The City will issue ID badges to each approved individual and said badges shall be worn at all times while operating within the City pursuant to this chapter. (H) Site Plan. Applicants shall provide a site plan showing the location of the parked truck or trailer on the property and its distance from all permanent structures and property lines. (Moving mobile food vendors are exempt from this requirement). (I) Location Duration. Applicants shall operate no more than 21 days annually at any one place without the approval of the regulatory authority as defined in Minnesota Statutes. (J) Insurance. Applicants shall provide, along with their application, a certificate of insurance by an insurance company authorized to do business in the state, evidencing the following forms of insurance: a. Commercial general liability insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 per each occurrence. If such insurance contains an annual aggregate limit, the annual aggregate limit shall be not less than $1,500,000; b. Automobile liability insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit. The insurance shall cover liability arising out of any automobile, including owned, hired, and non -owned vehicles; c. Food products liability insurance, with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 per each occurrence; and d. Workers compensation insurance (statutory limits) or evidence of exemption from state law. § 120.004 LICENSING EXCEPTIONS (A) City Events. Mobile Food Vehicles and Mobile Food Vendors participating in organized events approved by the City, including, but not necessary limited to, City - sanctioned festivals, shall be exempt from the licensing requirements of this chapter; provided, however, that said Mobile Food Vehicles and Mobile Food Vendors otherwise adhere to any County or State licensing requirements or any_other City requirements related to such organized events. (B) Private Events. Mobile Food Vehicles and Mobile Food Vendors participating in events that are entirely private and not open to the public are not exempt from the licensing requirements of this chapter; however, no background investigations shall be required. Written authorization from the property owner is required. Mobile Food Vehicles and Vendors may be allowed on City -owned property, including parks, with prior authorization in writing from the City Administrator or its designee. § 120.005 INELIGIBILITY FOR LICENSE OR REGISTRATION The following shall be grounds for denying a license or registration required under this chapter: Ordinance No. 980 Page 4 (A) The failure of an applicant to obtain and demonstrate proof of all necessary licenses or permits required by state, county, or local health and transportation authorities. (B) The failure of an applicant to truthfully provide any information requested by the city as part of the application process. (C) The failure of an applicant to sign the application. (D) The failure of an applicant to pay the required fee, if any, at the time of application. (E) A conviction within the past five (5) years of the date of application for any violation of any federal or state statute or regulation, or of any local ordinance, which adversely reflects upon the person's ability to conduct the business for which the license or registration is being sought in a professional, honest and legal manner. Such violations shall include, but are not limited to, burglary, theft, larceny, swindling, fraud, unlawful business practices, and any form of actual or threatened physical harm against another person or property. (F) The revocation within the past five (5) years of any similar licenses issued to an applicant in any jurisdiction. (G) Evidence of any unresolved or ongoing government or legal action against the business filed by any state or government entity. (H) The existence of three (3) or more substantiated complaints about the business conduct within the preceding three (3) years from city residents or other jurisdictions where licenses have been issued to the applicant. (I) When the Issuing Authority has learned the applicant has changed any name or names relating to the applicant or business in an attempt to hide or escape any legal obligation(s). (J) If after investigation, the Issuing Authority finds the character and business responsibility of the applicant to be unsatisfactory or a potential harm to the public. (K) The failure to meet or comply with fire codes or safety standards upon inspection completed by any local, county, or state authorities. § 120.006 LICENSE DENIAL PROCEDURE If the city denies the license or registration application, the applicant must be notified in writing of the decision and the reason for denial. Notice shall be delivered in person or by regular mail to the applicant at the address provided in the application and shall inform the applicant of the applicant's right to appeal the denial by requesting in writing, within ten (10) calendar days of receiving notice of denial, a hearing before the City Council. The City Council shall then hear the appeal within twenty (20) calendar days of the date of the request for a hearing and, during or before its next regular meeting, shall either affirm or reverse the denial and make written findings supporting its decision. Ordinance No. 980 Page 5 § 120.007 SUSPENSION AND REVOCATION (A) Generally. Any license issued under this chapter may be suspended or revoked at the discretion of the Issuing Authority for violation of any of the following: (1) Subsequent knowledge by the city of fraud, misrepresentation or incorrect statements provided by an applicant on the application form. (2) Fraud, misrepresentation or false statements made during the course of the licensed activity. (3) Subsequent event to which the granting of the license could have been denied under section 120.005. (4) Engaging in any prohibited activity as provided under section 120.009. (B) Notice and Right to Hearing. Prior to revoking or suspending any license, the Issuing Authority shall provide a license holder with written notice of the alleged violations and inform the licensee or registrant of his or her right to a hearing on the alleged violations. Notice shall be delivered in person or by regular mail to the applicant at the address provided in the application and shall inform the applicant of the applicant's right to a hearing. If no request for a hearing is received within ten (10) calendar days following the service of the notice, the Issuing Authority may proceed with the suspension or revocation. For the purpose of a mailed notice service shall be considered complete as of the date the notice is placed in the mail. If a hearing is requested within the stated time frame, a hearing shall be scheduled before the City Council within twenty (20) calendar days from the date of the request. During or before its next regular meeting following said hearing, the City Council shall make a decision regarding suspension or revocation and make written findings supporting said decision. (C) Emergency. If, in the discretion of the Issuing Authority, imminent harm to the health or safety of the public may occur if any operations licensed under this chapter are allowed to continue, the Issuing Authority may immediately suspend a license and provide notice of the right to hold a subsequent hearing as prescribed in part (B) of this section. Immediate suspension shall result unless and until the City Council holds a hearing and makes a subsequent determination pursuant to the process outlined in said part (B). § 120.008 TRANSFERABILITY No license or registration issued under this chapter -is transferable. § 120.009 RESTRICTIONS No person licensed hereunder to operate as a Mobile Food Vehicle or Mobile Food Vendor shall conduct business in any of the following manners and in the following areas: Ordinance No. 980 Page 6 (A) Calling attention to his or her business or the items to be sold by means of blowing any horn or whistle, ringing any bell, crying out, or by any other noise, so as to be unreasonably audible. (B) Obstructing the free flow of traffic, either vehicular or pedestrian, on any street, sidewalk, alleyway, or other public right-of-way. (C) Conducting business in a way as to create a threat to the health, safety and welfare of any specific individual or the general public. (D) Conducting business before 7 a.m. or after 10 p.m., unless expressly authorized in the license issued hereunder. (E) Failing to provide proof of license and identification when requested. (F) Using the license of another person. (G) Alleging false or misleading statements about the products being sold, including untrue statements of endorsement. No Mobile Food Vehicle or Mobile Food Vendor shall claim to have the endorsement of the City solely based on the City having issued a license to that person. (H) Remaining on the property of another when requested to leave or returning to that property after leaving, without written permission of the property owner. (I) Otherwise operating their business in any manner that a reasonable person may find obscene, threatening, intimidating or abusive. (J) Conducting business in a City park or parking lot unless expressly authorized in the license issued hereunder. (K) Operate business less than two thousand (2,000) feet away when there is a permit issued for another food or similar permitted event, festival, celebration, or tournament at the same location unless expressly authorized in the license issued hereunder. (L) Failing to maintain their vehicle or trailer in good repair, order, and neat appearance. (M) Failing to clean up around their vehicle or trailer at the end of each business day. (N) Dispensing liquid and or other waste products from their vehicle or trailer on to City, public, and private property. (0) Conducting business less than two thousand (2,000) feet away from any food service business unless expressly authorized by the City. SECTION 2. In accordance with Section 3.07 of the City Charter, City staff shall have the following summary printed in the official City newspaper in lieu of the complete ordinance: Ordinance No. 980 Page 7 On September 13, 2021, the City Council adopted Ordinance 980, entitled "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE XI OF THE MOUNDS VIEW CITY CODE TO ADD A NEW CHAPTER REGULATING MOBILE FOOD VEHICLES AND VENDORS." The ordinance establishes a new chapter in the City Code, which regulates mobile food vehicles and mobile food vendors, and requires that such business activities obtain a license from the city prior to operating. The ordinance also establishes procedural requirements for issuing, denying, suspending, and revoking such licenses, and it further implements certain regulations relating to said business activities to further public health, safety, and welfare. A printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection during regular business hours at Mounds View City Hall and is available online at the City's website located at www.moundsviewmn.org. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its passage and publication, in accordance with Section 3.09 of the City Charter. Introduction and First Reading by the Mounds View City Council on August 23, 2021. Second Reading and Adoption by the Mounds View City Council on September 13, 2021. Publication Date: September 28, 2021. Carol A. Mueller Mayor Attest: Nyle Zikmund City Administrator (SEAL) MOUNDtSVVI EW of Mounds View Staff R, Item No: 08F Meeting Date: Sep 13, 2021 Type of Business: Council Business City Administrator Review: To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Jon Sevald, Community Development Director Item Title/Subject: Resolution 9469 Adoption of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Discussion: The City submitted the Draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan (the Plan) to the Metropolitan Council for its review in October 2020. The Plan was reviewed by various committees, and the Metropolitan Council at its December 23, 2020 meeting, which authorized the City "to put its plan into effect", conditioned upon complying with advisements detailed in a 19-page "Committee Report". City Staff erroneously interpreted this to mean; don't adopt the Comprehensive Plan until the Local Watershed Management Plan (LWMP) is approved by Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD). The LWMP was submitted to RCWD in April, revised and resubmitted in July. RCWD will take action at its September 22, 2021 meeting. The City Council discussed the Comprehensive Plan at its August 2, 2021 Work Session, directing Staff to bring the Plan's adoption forward as soon as possible. Strategic Plan Strategy/Goal: The Comprehensive Plan impacts four of the five 2020-2022 strategies (does not affect HR strategy). Financial Impact: (none) Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. There have been no changes since the City Council reviewed the Draft Comprehensive Plan in October 2020. No changes can be made to the Plan in-between the Metropolitan Council's December 23, 2020 meeting and the City Council's adoption (tonight). Therefore, no copies of the Plan have been provided for this report. Copies will be distributed once the Plan is adopted by the City Council (tonight), and the LWMP is approved as an addendum to the Plan (September 27'h) RTpeEpfully, Jon Sevai , AICP Community Development Director ATTACHED Resolution 9469 The Mounds View Vision A Thriving Desirable Community RESOLUTION NO. 9469 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA ADOPTION OF THE 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, MN Statute §462.355 and §473.864 requires municipalities within the metropolitan area to prepare a comprehensive municipal plan, and update the plan, fiscal devices, and official controls, every ten years to determine if an amendment is necessary to conform to the Metropolitan Systems Plans; and, WHEREAS, the Village of Mounds View adopted a comprehensive plan (the Plan) in 1959, and updated it in 1975, 1979, 1998, and 2010; and, WHEREAS, MN Statute §473.145 requires the Metropolitan Council to prepare and adopt a comprehensive development guide for the metropolitan area. The current guide; Thrive MSP 2040, was adopted by the Metropolitan Council on May 28, 2014. In compliance with MN Statute §473.856, the Metropolitan Council distributed the 2015 System Statement for the City of Mounds View on September 17, 2015. Receipt of this System Statement, requires the City to review its Comprehensive Plan, fiscal devices, and official controls to determine if an amendment is necessary to conform to Thrive MSP 2040. The City determined that an amendment to its Comprehensive Plan, adopted on February 8, 2010 (Resolution 7571) was necessary; and, WHEREAS, the City Council appointed a Comprehensive Plan Taskforce (Resolution 8877), and authorized $99,441 to complete the 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Resolution 8878, 9254). The City requested, and received a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Extension Request on May 15, 2018, extending the submission deadline to December 31, 2019. The Taskforce, facilitated by Staff and Stantec, met regularly in 2018 and 2019 to review the updating of the Comprehensive Plan. On April 23, 2019, a joint work session was held by the Taskforce, City Council, and all advisory commissions to review the Draft Comprehensive Plan, which was then distributed to affected jurisdictions for their review in May 2019, in compliance with MN Statute §473.858, Subd 2. The City Council conducted a Public Hearing on December 9, 2019, directing Staff to forward the Plan to the Metropolitan Council (Resolution 9195), which was submitted on December 20, 2019; and, WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council determined that the 2040 Comprehensive Plan was incomplete, thereby suspending its review until additional information was submitted and found complete. Revisions were made, and the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on October 7, 2020, recommending approval of the revised draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Resolution 1123-20). The City Council approved re -submission on October 12, 2020 (Resolution 9318); and, WHEREAS, the 2040 Comprehensive Plan was reviewed by the Metropolitan Council's Community Development Committee on December 7, 2020; the Environment Committee on December 8, 2020, and the Metropolitan Council on December 23, 2020, finding that the Plan Resolution 9469 Page 2 of 2 meets all Metropolitan Land Planning Act requirements; conforms to the regional system plans including transportation, aviation, water resources management, and parks; is consistent with Thrive MSP 2040; and is compatible with the plans of adjacent jurisdictions. In addition to the Advisory Comments and Review Record (Metropolitan Council Review File No. 22396-1), the Metropolitan Council authorized the City of Mounds View to put its 2040 Comprehensive Plan into effect; in addition to revisions and advisements detailed in the 19-page Review Record; and, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the 2040 Comprehensive Plan is put into effect; and, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the 2040 Comprehensive Plan as put into effect, includes the final Local Water Management Plan, in addition to complying with Recommendations of the Metropolitan Council's Community Development Committee, and Environment Committee, as described in the Metropolitan Council staff report, dated December 23, 2020. Adopted this 13th day of September 2021. Carol A. Mueller, Mayor ATTEST: Nyle Zikmund, City Administrator (SEAL) The Mounds View Vision A Thriving Desirable Community THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY MOUNDS VIEW City or Mounds View Staff Report Item No: 8G Meeting Date: September 13, 2021 Type of Business: CB Administrator Review: To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Don Peterson, Director of Public Works/Parks and Recreation Item Title/Subject: Resolution 9471 Review 60% of Design Plans for the 2022/2023 Street Project and Authorization to continue with the Project Background/Discussion: The City is in the process of rehabilitating streets that were not included in the 2007 Street Rehabilitation Plan. The 2022/2023 Street Project Overview Map (Attachment A) indicates the streets to be rehabilitated. Following is the proposed schedule for the project: • September 7, 2021 - City Council Works session - Review Community Engagement Feedback and preliminary plans. • September 13, 2021 - City Council Meeting - Council Reviews 60% plans. Review Community Engagement feedback. Provide Staff Direction moving forward. • October 25, 2021 - City Council reviews 100% plans before it is submitted to State Aid for approval. • November 8, 2021 - City Council reviews draft plans incorporating comments from State Aid and approves routing for signatures. City Council authorizes completion of plans and specifications for the project. • December 13, 2021 - City Council accepts plans and specifications, authorizes advertisement for bidding. Overview of Current Conditions: Pleasant View Dr. is approximately 2,546 feet in length, has a 4 inch bituminous curb with a bituminous pavement surface measuring 28-feet wide average. Pleasant View Dr. was originally constructed in 1976 and serves residential properties. Spring Lake Road, North of Mounds View Blvd, is approximately 3,505 feet in length. Spring Lake Road, South of Mounds View Blvd, is approximately 4,050 feet in length. Spring Lake Road is a rural section of road with no concrete curb or gutter and has a bituminous pavement surface measuring an average of 26-feet wide. Spring Lake Road was originally constructed in 1967 and serves residential properties and is a minor arterial road. The Mounds View Vision A Thriving Desirable Community Maintenance has included seal coating, pothole patching and skim coating as needed. The current pavement is in poor condition with significant surface patching, potholes, and moderate to high severity traverse cracking and pavement heaving. Proposed Street Design Received: The City Council approved Stantec to perform engineering services at the April 12, 2021 City Council Meeting, (Res 9420). Stantec has completed the preliminary design along with the community engagement portion of the proposal. The City has received a proposed approved street design for the 2022-2023 Street Rehabilitation Project. (Design standards were approved by the City Council on October 22, 2007, Res 7176 as recommended by the Street and Utility Task Force.) Breakdown of Each Proposed Street Design: Pleasant View Drive and 84t" Ave NE — Current pavement sections are 13.3'-13.5', (Attachment B), for a total pavement width of 26.8'-27'. Asphalt curbing is in place. The proposed pavement section is for 14' drive lanes, which will accommodate on street parking (currently in place). The proposed pavement section includes adding concrete curb and gutter, (Attachment B). Pleasant View Court - will have the same pavement design, with the surmountable curb to stay in place with only limited repairs or replacement. Spring Lake Road- Current drive lane section ranges from 11.8'-14' (Attachment C), for a total pavement width of 23.6'-28'. The proposed pavement section is for 13', this would be 11' drive lanes with a 2' reaction zone. For a total pavement width of 26'. The proposed pavement section will include concrete curb and gutter. Note: Since the Work Session of September 7, 2021, Stantec created plan sheets (Attachment Q) indicating where the new pavement edge will be in comparison to the existing. Trail: A trail is proposed for the West side of Spring Lake Road (Attachment D). The trail installation is in accordance with the 2008 and the 2040 Comp Plans (Attachments E) as well as the draft master trail and sidewalk plan presented at the Parks and Recreation and Forestry Commission meeting on February 25, 2021 (Attachment F). Community Engagement: As part of the proposed project, community engagement was undertaken with the assistance of Stantec. As part of the community engagement a story board was created describing the proposed project which included a short survey. The survey questions were as follows: 1) How important are the following improvements to you? • Pedestrian Safety • Shared Use Paths • Surface Water Drainage The Mounds View Visio A Thriving Desirable Come....... . 2) Spring Lake Road would require widening to possibly include parking. Do you support a parking lane and the necessary widening of Spring Lake Road? 4) Would you be interested in a potential Tree Replacement Program? 5) Does your property have a sump pump? 6) Do you have any concerns regarding the street project? (Comment Section) Public Information Meeting on August 25, 2021: Notification was mailed on August 5, 2021 (Attachment G) regarding the informational meeting along with the opportunity on how to obtain and submit a survey regarding design options. 217 affected properties were mailed the notification; 67 surveys were received. One survey needed to be eliminated for incorrect address submitted. Staff would like to note that the following verbiage was included in the notification: "should you choose to not fill out the survey, the City will assume you have no opinion regarding the rehabilitation project'. The number of residents that signed in at the August 25th meeting were 64; 19 people spoke. Attachment J is the Q & A written transcript from the meeting. Survey Results: The survey results including comments are Attachments H & I. Of the 66 surveys completed, 43 out of 146 (30%) properties are from area J and 23 out of 74 (31 %) properties are from area K. At the end of the survey a section for comments was added, these comments are included as attachment (1). Trail Proposal Reviewed by the Parks and Recreation and Forestry Commission: The Parks and Recreation and Forestry Commission reviewed the proposed trail section at their August 26, 2021 meeting. The Commission has reviewed all proposed sidewalks and trails for each of the street rehabilitation projects since 2007. The Commission bases their recommendations on the Master Trail and Sidewalk plan. (Attachment F) The Commission also reviews the connectivity of Mounds View's sidewalk and trail system with the trail system of Ramsey County and neighboring communities. (Attachment K) Map of Ramsey County trail system (Attachment K). Attachment L is informatior regarding sidewalks and trails from Ramsey County Walkable Communities and Greenstep Cities. The Parks and Recreation and Forestry Commission voted and recommended the City Council to continue to move forward with installing the proposed trail along Spring Lake Road. Trees: Residents voiced concerns over losing trees due to the design of the trail. Staff informed those in attendance that the presented tree removal plans were in a preliminary stage of the project. Staff has since reviewed the proposed removal and is making the recommendations as outlined on the plans (Attachment M). Upon field verifying, Staff also recommends that fencing may be installed to signify that no construction will occur at or around a certain tree during the project. This should help in reducing any damage to the root system of trees that are located within the Right of Way, and potentially outside of the work zone. Strategic Plan Strategy/Goal: Maintain and Plan for Infrastructure Improvements. Financial Impact: No Financial Impact to 2021 Budget. Recommendation: a. Staff is requesting authorization to move forward with the proposed 2022-2023 Street Rehabilitation project. b. Staff is requesting that Council provide direction regarding the design options for the 2022-23 Street Rehabilitation project. Respectfully submitted, Don Peterson Director of Public Works/Parks and Recreation Attachments A-Q Emails Received Letter and Petition received 8/23 Letter and Petition received 9/7 RESOLUTION NO. 9471 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA REVIEW 60% OF DESIGN PLANS FOR THE 2022/2023 STREET PROJECT AND AUTHORIZATION TO CONTINUE WITH THE PROJECT WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View is considering the 2022-2023 Street Project to include Pleasant View Drive and Spring Lake Road (as outlined on the attached map); and WHEREAS, Pleasant View Dr. is approximately 2,546 feet in length. Spring Lake Road North of Mounds Blvd is approximately 3,505 feet in length and maintenance has included seal coating, pothole patching and skim coating as needed; and WHEREAS, Spring Lake Road South of Mounds View Blvd. is approximately 4,050 feet in length and maintenance has included seal coating, pothole patching and skim coating as needed; and WHEREAS, Stantec has provided the City with a proposed street design for the 2022-2023 Street Rehabilitation Project. (Design standards were approved by the City Council on October 22, 2007, Res 7176 as recommended by the Street and Utility Task Force.) WHEREAS, the City held a Public Information Meeting on August 25, 2021 to gain information from the residents in the proposed Street Rehabilitation Project, and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the proposed project at the September 7, 2021 Work Session. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mounds View, Ramsey County, Minnesota as follows: 1. The City hereby approves the 60% plans as submitted by Stantec and further authorizes Stantec to continue in the design for the proposed 2022-2023 Street Rehabilitation Project of Pleasant View Drive, Pleasant View Court, 84th Ave N.E. and Spring Lake Road. 2. The City Council also authorizes the continued design of the trail on Spring Lake Road as proposed in the 60% street design. The Mounds View Vision A Thriving Desirable Community Resolution 9471 Continued 3. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to execute all appropriate documents to effectuate the actions contemplated by this resolution. 4. The Mayor and City Administrator, Staff and consultants are hereby authorized and directed to take any and all additional steps and actions necessary or convenient in order to accomplish the intent of this Resolution. Adopted this 13th day of September, 2021 Carol A. Mueller, Mayor ATTEST: Nyle Zikmund, City Administrator (seal) The Mounds View Vision A Thriving Desirable Community As of: 8/25/2021 BLAINE SPRING LAKE PARK .71 �Cp o or �i► Attachment A "0 M M El M M 01 ED Or 84V WIN =71 8370 8360 --11 8�363 8350 8355 O 8344.8345 g 833 8335z 8320 8325 831& L93 5 83 �305 8 821J 82M NOW MKI Proposed Maintenanc( Project Year 202A'o Aipla 8t No 85 ■ r77 •IL 81k 9 , A - *61 1155 1149 #87 8383 8371 83583 Ap J 047 VJ 1125 15 ,#�7 � M-M. E:1 8245 • 8217 ❑ 8 8175 o Capital Improvement Plan N Rehabilitation 819 Area J (2022) 41iij> V P1 2022 Project Property (146) P1. 0 0 -�7 I" i � ' � 1 W30 FBI 716-91 X mom ■ \ As of: 8/25/2021 � � � ■ ❑. � o Proo sed Ma i nt�n ncl 1 a f, Attachment A w . LU - o g rode ear 2 � � � 1 no� � 7897 ° VI ❑ 7# ❑7N0 7887 7»20 78 5 718 ❑ . ■4c, 7> 10 415 .1870 ❑ 7865 a - ■� 7�5 7*6 E78,51 0 7841 2 ❑� �. 7850 ❑ o� ❑ 7821 7830 � ItI El�7 5 ° o 7785 7775 "'7 ❑ a ' E� ❑ 7765 7 • 7755 7?�5 ` o 7735 '1 ❑ ■ 29�U It 2917 0 m ■� iti 76W Ll . ❑� a r�u o. 660 El El ■ - Q Y ■ ❑ ■ ■ IF ❑ ' 76 M33 s ❑ LU ❑ Cg7 ° 76140 7 t. El i + z ° 7 . can ° 7�581 "� Y �• �' ❑ 0 0 75$4P o C� ■ ■ ❑� � � � 0 75� O 7 55 IPD �� • • oil I �545 o � ■ i❑ 07 0381 o , ❑ ❑ �A �01 7501 i -rnnLtr do —�7=.nbW W'l El L74�� o i 71115 0 °Bronson Ur_ ' 7462T Ell ❑744$1 �4°45 ED 1I ° ° ° ■ ■� ' © 7430� MP7435 T� • r, ■ ©© 7406 74056 RI ❑ 738 7381 Y vMoUNDs `� PUBLIC WORKS Attachment B Pleasant View Drive, Pleasant View Court and 84t" Ave NE. Current Pavement Section VARIES 11'-16' r-= 13.3'-13.5' r-a 13.3'-13.5' VARIES 11'-16'� 84TH AVE NE PLEASANT VIEW DRIVE PLEASANT VIEW COURT Proposed Street Design - VARIES 11'-16' 14' 14' - - VARIES 11'-16' 50'-60' - 84TH AVE NE PLEASANT VIEW DRIVE PLEASANT VIEW COURT Attachment C Spring Lake Road Current Pavement Section r-O - VARIES IV-21 50' TO 70' SPRING LAKE ROAD Proposed Street Design VARIES VARIES 13' 13' r--= VARIES 5'-25' 50' TO 70' SPRING LAKE ROAD x�wog oelutl,s Mi. , ZOK5 NV4 Stldneuulw 10211N00 NOIS0213 A21 d210dW31 0001 e11n5'enueny epenbloyN Oft (%OE) 103f021d N011b'11119`dH9N 133813 EZOZ-ZZOZ 0 $ ' 307tu el SNd7d J�2Jt�NIWl132�d VIOS3NNIW 'M3VA SaNnovq 30 Aiio o - - I I 7469 I N /'� N �L I I I I I', �•, �� -----------i I F----------- 1 -------- I I�., I I+ •47 I I 17365 I I S I I ' � 1 ' � I +• �s� lY �• �46 7350 1 I I I lI 0 I} n I ! I 71. I I � 7462 I --------- I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---j „' --- I I I I I I 1 I ! I I 7445 7340 1 744E '4n I 71 I I �' 1 \ I ,' I•� l�3x_'i.` _ it I I � rn I f -- 7337 --- - --- - ---� In ' 1��'I �-}-------- I It o I •, I I it � I � �� � a I { 1 7435 I I 7430 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I V I 1 I I 3 (' r i I i s i i I 3001 I I I , l I I I' r• I IIy I I I I I I --- I__---------�---- � •j- -- I w-I 7313------- - ---, u I, f l? I l I 11 i aG6 7405 7406 I I i I I _ o /II w � I H w I^ w 1 Iln w? a z d381 ---- r— — — --- wm V------; dw 7380 i n I I g w II II COC 0 � I zo �w I I Ow wp m I rn LL uwi 3 vLLi i it to w II III ..gatJr --_ II -----------�— -- ----- I 1 ® ---- Z zoutn M C LSS%lY1CS-0Ilf'A1 YI4�so.tTM.'SLRfAI't)t+St�tM1SGNo'A1-xIC�L1"S(M1:.SfNMdI 7rtK"[t1f{0¢CSI ".SIB. E@ES(IAfdl\'109Ur}•"41KlndovtdwolLR�n11MtlCF>'�v4nan41tu�tlOC:S�ZDT.I/. � stl010 .rinlua'll s }31lIV o f� nva<+Holm• Svin ryvul uanta aadrtd ar+Yllnl xn eu nN1.1i .7['MiN'37nAVlL ail AItlZIO/d Alt i!V 4T6N'/Ntl mIV 511tMln 11V nl'�VnIN/dtll� to 'IVTYIInOH11Mt•IYli01 niI>•(MG13B lml4 [N]nR'Nl Yo Lynwfll nN "VlN5rL0 1 IMIDI1�1ntli•tblttl91Mt111V NOli>FtM1".ldL-ES 1, OIIV AMKI/111M+tNOI]V'NI•I ?dHl WOJ'JBIUD�S"MAV.M1 -- - - Q ZOIK9 NW'+IlDdoauulW IO&NOD NOISOND ANVdOd W31 0001 BIInS'anueny aIIBDbioW EELFSNV-l-cJl (%Ozi) 131FO 1d NOIl`dlll OVb ON A3 81S £ZOZ-ZZOZ Y o 7cilue�$ ),�IdNIMIED:Jd VIOSINNIW IMIIA SaNnovW �O loll z Q I I I I � I � I � + ---(J-------_.—_-------I Ii 4--+ . I � II 7604 I. I _ I I I 7584 I I 03 S. o 11 I I I II I' I I - -- - - ---------- �?. rr`I UJ O .r� I 7581 I 7501 I I I q'- -o- -! 1 F Ir I .go �Q I - -- o M /�� tY Z � Ni lJ u �iay r -//.. --— — — — — — — II 0 I f I I s I I I O II JC I I I II 11• I I-------- -- 7655 I+ I I I - i 1021 ---------------�-- I 7630 7624 w ' I s I � I J II � I 0 7614 I z H w < w a m } w zG I I I w g o �I 2 LnU 7604 {, k �z] WAS W aa O AGO I u J a U zD u vLL 90 I I I 7633 I I D�1 I I I ' I I I I I 762s } 0 I I I I � I 1 I � 7627 I I I I I I l — I 7581 _ - 6+,n[WaS^tSIMMnI1rOP�4NB'�d:+'.".vwnlu+�lwl m'�.••+•••�"+•�••'-.•'•..'.____—, __ uleBc:s .+my{Iieo�Oloa Iaa ,11Gw"tl jIT,vLc if M rolo,Imy I1'+'11nNI'"Ijo i 'Wl r4l,IV aM IM IKe W-InEW4111 }7�h S�F•�.kH. n W]KSS•IO591.'ID IS�OXAS� FMVWl. 3HI ih �•[ Idl1 [M'1+✓�^<1'>f'/IIC�I �A�P1f � SQ1�'.aNii1 T%�i IY�I'1 Vtl1>�a 3H1 •Ippinrywtl s;]yllyl9 y� p}jflTHlftY:1Y111 lirfre ci•liu as�wila �•��aai i NW��JRdl67•W �YLSIUaytfldp�a �1 deY S'J�I.kYnu sA Y LrJ1510 ilr {]i LVt4y+I6) A4 1.y� Ir�1+W 3JInYis Ci 13a ' 41UI:AM•'I W 3N1IYDW7ftlM1.V4vj!1¢,Uesm AN pi—NmlW,15y]4w�3lll woo•oetuors Au WKS NW'Sllodoeuulyq oopl ejInS'enueny eilenbAopr EEL :)Olu e4s Nod SNV-ld .Q:JVNlNl-132Hd loalN0o Nolsoa3 A?NwjocIN31 131MNd NOUV1I11WHIN ll3NIS EZOZ-ZZOZ ViOS]NNIW "M]In S4Nnow AO J,llo Q 0 w U 2 0 N N 0 I I I I I I I I I. I I ! st I I ' { I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I 1 I I o I I I vOs 1 I �I I in I I I I j I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I _ I I S,y I I I I �I r------ - - - I I I I I I I �I - ------ -- - - - P�� I I I _ o � t I u7t I — ' yl 7897 If I I I I I OHC f °JF I I I I o ! I I zw, _ I I I , If ! 11 7887 w l{ s1 QI I g I I w I I Q x I I � oI � o Lw zz } t zu f it < w iI wm - 0- zG -- o -a -- -- - -- JLn a 7880 sic' 7879 G w z pC o w a .II vtnQ � f•. P J7 � o it I orr wx� N y �Ir tLn u- !!! w Q wLn I L o w� - - - - - - z ----__--�I uLU z D u 0 nnmo.o�:l:mlrcte la ecrr.n++Nr Irw NrMi aalitnzc�u iln nni rn.o uaIYYJ�N-Sf9-Amyl E An, r�r..0wl-f+'sJN+Avryd [HYS!�•M�M ltr of tlu!Jr>o.ilr]3�¢ nW 3nmrYM awms nl (>ai—%H 9f T1rr�.�fl+Ulwvo Na SNNxI Af:Y IMY� y_i.tN+[.,v ze-41M T' 4a a fl—Ahm 11s1R Ai-1 RluCli.1A g� I s! 1 1 I I nI CS I I I I I gl I x I I I I I I I y I I I I I I I I I s1 I iI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I i I I I t 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I st I I I I I I I I I I I I I � \ N N \ \ C il" d I \\ I I \ `\ I I I I I' { I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I - ubof::s-IZmIZI/Bo Pa Iqd 7��u-V ls MAN\ Q 10KNOJ NOISONAkNVNOdW31 ,oW EEL/ � OOI 103f 02Jd NOIlb11l19bH�?J 133?J1S £ZOZ-ZZOZ.)C� uSNV1dQAVNIW1-1D�Jd y1OS3NNIW M31n SaNfIOW �O Jlllo 4-1 I U 1 � l f 8200 8180 8160 r•, I I i - — — — — — -- - 8158 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N F +i N 1 i •.I , �� N I B I � 1 a 01 312 f I I i � 1 � ;- I 6297 1 j 8493 , j��--------------- I I. I i $f m I I 'I I I I I I I�.l 11 I I G I I I � 1� I II I sf 1 f II V 8493 sf I�— — — —`===_ W -- — I � I o II I u I 1 � I 1 I 8493 I I I I I aT I� I I 8290 F �11 I II I I I I I ow I 8493 u I I 3 d I I bpI i = 8228 c6 I �w w z lD Ifs — — -- — — — —^ -- — — co I � f z I 8493 " 1 w� 5a of I a O Owg o _�L,. � 01 Z sf �a a �Go 1 �w 8493 ® vo 8210 w�0 w o vwi Z 7 U 0 8270 8248 1 I I I I I I I I I ! — I: ------- ----- I 1 • 8289 sIf I I I � I I I I I I 8265 I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I f , I I r � — — — — — — — — — — — --- �1 I r I I 1I/ I 2940 11f{�1 1t f II I I I I 1 I I I ----- ------- --- 1 f I� I I q I' 7 1 I I 1 .Irf. rn , !•�I�' II 1 I I I I110 -- I I I j I I I I + I I I 1 155%EBESRNC61 '>'IesmA 1r((yDOC61'tll�YE0C37BEAl."-�.^-'""-""`8�61 '�7G�`�'�ar rra�K B,^P'OOL] EOESONE61 �h[wA.-�s}9�d'Y��a1�11na11elo7ddV}nim�uir'n�e'.t�aR}'i:ew�.'P.u•�n Kl �.�'JO9ND111 .'ial1M1L ARrj. DiyRY NW'N!nR YiI,C13L51AM xrvY bLH iN n'1 unlu ae.s rlainc M�1fHweO riiu].rrm rmrn Mx-4iy'aM,I. 1, momw 3H13='s�l^_�, M'cvtYS�i�w[I1W Mefswii,iZtA[L— Atl19A mN![A[fl'+s'�IiK,]3{! wov' 'sljod s• UU!V4 L06SS N W 'SpodoeuulW 0001 .-11anueny eAanbj.W EEL 304u e4S I I I I +� f I I UI I � I I I I ---------------- �� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 8368 8340 '---- -- ----- —1—J �- I I I I I I 1 I f I I I I I I I 8336 I I I II � I� 11 I� II II I I I I I I I I I I I I I ci IO&NOD NOIS021D AVNOOWll I0 Nod 1O3('ONd N011Villl9`dHDN 133211S £ZOZ-ZZOZ o SNd-ld MAVNIINnEI�d ViOS�NNIW nM�IA SCMEY4 jO ,kilo -------------- - — I o .1 I N 83 I N - - j i ----- - t 8455 _—___—______ 8383 I I I I II + --------------- If T o �} I � I I 8316 I I I ' 1 f1I L ? it I L M T]'LXn.J H ]3lIMc 10 CsiM['/Ilry [�ul urnl sllflaa. "N WvAnt m k, H�vl]n06YX3A'.]11M'Iz lid 1iFN[]NT F43XV 1']IAMr!!7 �nnv f•%'+F911'15115lV�'�IAR19 illl '[vgq l!'O�IIw ]ti�•yis of M[A�ih� f•ulic4 AAI[nnrT+A�••'-'1nIMHN amYNMju lir 3n v� aTPI YVHS rLi[�r+lurn:rl II O .l 8335 ------------' --- -- I� 1I 8311 I. I 8442 I II II -------------- I 8436 II I+ I. I i I I I I - --- I I 8430 I I I�--I I I I I I I I I I I I I I JI 8418 I I 3 o I I l II II II II 11 I I 1, I JI 8406 o----------------pro a I � a I I = I 8394 j wI �w zz I z u <w I I 'Y J � w I � I I � ma �wz—_---------�TJ V I p owg z� o L �pww o0 f� G? I �3s L�� ��o I Flo I w 8380 j z�u(n 8425 I t I I I I I I I I I' I 4 � I ^ ^ 1 8403 t;i� II I I I I- - - - - ------ II I I I I 8 8391 mt I • I I I A I { 1IIr I I { t 15SY LLK'L0G(AE'�I J�m�{'n{SfA[e1'vri{i"'ajF'Soeedl'��1"SSMSoaFAI '11:Sx Ern.�PiCi1 "YIn1Y 1'06:7?Of90FSF1�vu4[� 17�dr'IdYrnlll��"�11.M�Cld[HlnrcXamuujdIIC:5 IZZM,111/B0::eP(l Old w000eluols•mn+M Z065S NW •sllodoeuu!V4 0001 allnS •enunny .14—bioy4 EEL � U 24s (f) MOO SMd-ld QJVNINFIAA Ad IONINOD NOISO?J3 ANV?JOdW31 LO-NONd N011b'1I11OWIN 139KS EZOZ-ZZOZ VIOSANNIW "MIIA SCNnovq �O ,kilo iH U cC 8490 8482 8462 8454 i c I g+ x 11` Y r-------------- — II I I I I 1 I . 493 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I S — -- I 8485 q I I ---------------- 0 8477 I I I I I ' I I ' I I =— — — — — — — — — — — — —— I I I 8469 I I I x'I�1 t I j I pl I� I I I � --. -- -----d lJ I st " j I I I I i I � I I I I i I� _ 4 + Ir—— — — — --- d �� 11 "I l v I i I 3 \�---------- 8461 L-- x c6 WED. �— — I I I uI I I II 1, +s --so S - --- - - - - III i 8442 I f tiarP3=re:H ::.-: �I � �. is n n3miownY tYHr .wn n�rn �snmwilar.rxPs>,�a u(Nl�ro[.:.�3Y-'31M'Vl1(iilainPMd wl i1VY :'Ju�+1.Y1iQ a!IY SI`JK%131�'fJr ��AIf?73H1 'rl M Irow. ,Hv1f l!1 RiIM]Iftl P�il1nK S•i]�l �d GNC•NF31xv :NaxYNO 3H131Y�{1PI+M'i�+dnlT'�.'133Y %C>•'110v' II3f'JA �•��Y'M'lr✓11[rOra✓✓t1�3H1 jnn o — bz 7c6 I W - - --- ¢z .� x w m rtl { _ -- — — — — — — - - - - - ----- �— �o ems•:= ,� ; I , m�2 �wz I 8455 0 o w 3 0 I I z� xlnt7 I I ce o 0 ox� I G J Ln I jLLw owxn 1 I I WGo I I 6izt`% I ® z� w I I �---- 155Y'EOCSC3�51 '4e?><'d'[d^fi RGF1 •LMiT.1r[�1[LSIBPdI 'lePa4 SfILSDBi:/1 '1vS�;7iKx9b<'61 'sloe IMvfmm']'uwrns tYa.aYl 9api'pZg fnFS{RIF.51lVi1af¢IwhgYShcnelHVPaFioln0�1'�niPl+>Ply wtl15:P• li:Oryfl!®l �erMll'rG1 Attachment E 2008 Mounds View Comprehensive Plan The proposed Mounds View trailway system consists of a combination of on -street and off-street arteries and connectors. The following roadways serve as arteries for connecting streets and links to other trailway systems: • County Road H • County Road H2 • County Road I • County Road J • Silver Lake Road • Long Lake Road • Groveland Road (continuing with Knollwood Road south of County Highway 10) The following roadways serve as connectors to the roadway and trailway systems: • Ardan Avenue • Hillview Road • Bronson Drive • Edgewood Drive • Woodale Drive • Quincy Street • Mounds View Drive • Pleasant View Drive The City does not provide trailways on every street. Mounds View intends the trailway system to provide reasonable accessibility to all areas of the city, making special provisions to provide access to schools, parks, business areas and the City Hall and Community Center area. Trailway priorities established by the City in 1992 include: 1. Stripe and mark one or both sides of City roads with sufficient width to provide on -street trails consistent with the trailways plan. 2. Pursue grants and funding sources for the development of trailways in Mounds View. 3. Consider adding trailways during street reconstruction and improvements. The City has started a program to construct new trailways along both sides of County Highway 10. The project involves constructing an off -road trail along the County Highway 10 corridor from County Road H to Silver Lake Road in the city. This segment of County Highway 10 contains several destinations vital to the city: Mounds View City Hall, Community Center, Ramsey County public library, parks, transit facilities and various commercial developments, most of which are currently accessible only by vehicle. The new trails along County Highway 10 will provide pedestrians safe access to these facilities as well as provide access to several local trail segments and regional trail systems. The City will investigate future trail expansion to the western city limits for potential extension in the neighboring city. Chapter 6: Transportation 6-32 Attachment E City of Mounds View 1 2040 Comprehensive Plan DRAFT September 21, 2020 Goal 3: Improve connections between local trails and regional trail systems. Complete the City's trail and sidewalk master plan with connections to trails/sidewalks in adjacent cities. Coordinate with Ramsey County and DNR for improvements to the Rice Creek Water trail and the regional trail system. Goal 4: Conduct inventory and needs analysis of park facilities to address if parks are addressing the needs of the immediate neighborhood and the larger community. Identify gaps in facilities, and program improvements through the CIP and annual budget. Consider repurposing of under-utilized properties in a manner that achieves the highest and best use and increases the value (not limited to monetary) to the community while mitigating impacts on surrounding neighborhoods. Study park dedication fees and how they are handled by other municipalities. Goal 5: Create a pollinator friendly community. • Encourage pollinator friendly practices in private gardens. • Partner with local schools. Goal 6: Maintain, repair, and improve the City's stormwater system infrastructure as necessary. EXISTING PARKS AND TRAIL NETWORK Parks and open space areas in Mounds View include municipally owned and operated neighborhood and community parks and special use facilities. There are nine neighborhood parks, three community parks, and one special use park. These publicly owned parcels are highlighted in Figure 4-1. The City owns several properties that do not have a designated use. Many of these are not publicly accessible or consist of wetlands and flood plain. The City intends to consider the land's highest and best use, which may be leaving it as open space. City trails and sidewalks are identified in Figure 4-2. The City plans to complete a trail segment along Mounds View Boulevard, with connections to the Rice Creek North Regional Trail (east), and planned trails in Spring Lake Park (west). The City has added sidewalks as part of its street reconstruction program. It is the intent that every household be within a'/4 mile of a sidewalk or trail, and that all busy roads have a sidewalk or trail. MOUNDS VIEW Rice Creek North Regional Trail Master Plan The 14-mile Rice Creek Regional Trail extends from the Chain of Lakes Regional Park Reserve in Lino Lakes (5,500 acres), to the Mississippi River in Fridley. Within Ramsey County, the trail passes through a wildlife corridor adjacent to the Arden Hills Army Training Site, and through Long Lake Regional Park in New Brighton (217 acres). Anoka and Ramsey counties are conducting a trail master plan. The main activity center will be in and around Building 189 in Arden Hills. Within Mounds View, planned improvements include: Trails for hiking, mountain biking, and cross-country skiing, east of and adjacent to Irondale HS. Redevelopment of the parking lot at Old Hwy 8 to include improved water trail access, fishing area, restrooms, increased parking. Overflow parking at Edgewood Middle School. (Below) Proposed Development (south section). Mounds View is highlighted in yellow. Chapter 4: Parks, Trails, and Community Facilities 1 4-2 As of: 9/2/2021 Pedestrian/Bike System a> > 84Th Ave NEI U_ 1 1 as Groveland o o � Ct o j �, c � Y 1? -4 Groveland v C Park :v aport Dr CD Laport Qi (D cc Sherwood PI Er- U- Q 0 0 L` Hillview Rd� 0.0 / IH c' ■cn O Lakeside Park Oakwood Dr 0 0 ntvp Ardan Ave 0 0 0 a� Y 0 0 0 U, a3 w Hillviesh Park Hillview Rd o 0 3 0 0 0 0 ew Qr o o o o m v c amsey Q) I Bronson Dr v) yG Silver C c View Parlcp (a Bronson Dr I o cNa o p' d Sa' co,,, o ocis Ln G \\and Ct o er Q So° d H W Laport Dr 0 Cn Sherwood Rd CU Squire Ln c;r ld U) o @@raker Ln o Grse� Park > 2 0 Q ��a U O�o`s Ruffid Ln LL' Cornell Dr 1 Hillview Ll Oakwood Dr I oar ood o Oakwood --�JI � oDr [Park! Terrace Dr m Pinewood Cir t�i Cn Pinewood Dr CU —C`n, linty Rnarl 118 CI)—I�D Pinewood Q Groberg St W Elementary y 0 -o School °' Y o CO � - Bronson Dr � a � Y � ��� " - -, is orks Facility -0 c CU Belle Ln Q o o City Hall v GI6� Park _ Bronson Dr m m � 0 p Q a D Lambert Ave o o 0 a� 0) �GJ� L ma Bert Park = E o J � o U _0 County Road H2 W Se I L ouniyBoa H (D U cf) o Louisa Ave o s Hidden ClearviewAve �0 ClearviewAve C oco 0' Ridge Ln Random Park ��e Y o o m Woodale Dr -1 o > Woodale D LY- a Woodale Dr o 6 -5 0t -0 S� 3-0 C Woodcresti5)� co � -0 o 0 NS'oodcrest 0 Cf) Park o Woodcrest Dr a) C� a �`oview > w CL I I I I I I II 101-1 Pedestrian Gap (1.72 miles) Walkway Sidewalk, Existing (11.5 mi.) Informal Crossing or Connector, EXISTING Formal Crossing, EXISTING — Trail,EXISTING Footpath, EXISTING Cycling Bike Lane,EXISTING Striped Shoulder, EXISTING County -Trails 0 O� 0� Woodale Dr I� L U -- v Q 0o a e Dr Quo Edgewood C" Middle 0i] _ School Ro Road H W ��re C�ge5hire4� Q Kings6ay Ln Buckingham Ln Dickens Ln 0 Q aw y� �5 d� C Mustang Dr 1\ N1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 MOUNDS VIEW P U BLIC WORKS .I . — — U Co FM L F a m a m L O 401 p M L a 2 0 uj Z LU cc W NJ Q a r-I N O N Q m uj LL 1-1 +.; a) LA +� (A 00 U � N O O =5 Q U U_ C: Q) OLn Q N O .0 O Un O O v O ate+ Q) E > � p m Q) > Q Ln U Q Q) N p � Q Q) Q) +� 41 Q O � Q N N 0 N O NLn Un (B (p UA O O O c� cn }, cn Ln H Ln Q) 4-U t] p `� cn Ln p O O }, > Q N H i () }� InQJ i (B N c .— > f� Q) > U Un t Q i 0 O v U O Q O Q i N Q >� E •Q E N c: Ln (� (� -0 L Q •— (B L Vf Q H a+ O G Ln C7 N U C �, E 3: O Q O -0 M UA i Q) } 4-J c6 4 ' CL OLn Q j Q t p a N 4� i U U v a) 4� O N 4� a) O vN Un c:cs C Q) n E VI O 4- O 4- QJ > U ate-+ ate-+ 0 — U � 4-+ N N LID O (U Q j, +w+ �` (U N Q O Ln f6 Lw +' w E Q� U of Q U Ov x Q) N O Q (U�n U 3 a--+ O -0 -0(BLn :EQ1 c� �O Q) Q > (B Q N O O t o L o 4- co o U > 4�o O 4� N � > w w U N U_n O o +, 5 v o w � i Q i N 4 U Q) Q) ca 07 O v N _O a- a- (6 � i1 O U (1) (1) ton N +' U c� > ate-+ O O 0 _ L Q1 L L (p O O N — N m 0 U - O 4- m Q) " 4� Q) O N (6 +� (3) (3) S- � — =5 _ - L (a O O Q Q ca O 4 CO 4� O Q) a) 4 (a N U 5, N Q E -0 _O N '5 Q) N O > a o D U -6 6 N U 00 rri N O O t U N N N Ln Q) s✓ � f0 N � U i� U L Uj � c6 N Q) E E N U U •U p ++ QJ E Q) N O U +� i S- N N O O X aN+ U Q) U V N 0 c6 i p Q +� f6 N T p N O LnQ m E O Q O O O N +, tv � aN+ c (B do fB U O O a--+ N Q) U m O U Q) (B O - C1A N X a + a) QJ U U U Q) Ln 4-- O � �° O U o O o M ate--+ 5. N N a, E p S? N Q) CB a N N Q) ++ a, O U m Q) a-' O E p N Q)O � m Q) a-' E p � a" U Q) Q) O U C L L- O C w a — a U w (6 -6 U -6 6 (N () +_+ N N O N v +- Q +-) Q O p U U > c_ O > U Q) , N rr Q i N (II Q L U O .O � O E � E *' c� c +� > i O CL •� Q O 0 O (UU N Ln N Qi 3 U .m m t= � 4J �_ O O > � .N Q m LU d Ln 3 cB N O 0- 0 i Q Q O (7 ate-+ U N u � U O Q Q) N N U) c� m c� � N L i ~ Q) 4Q) (N 4- Q a- Q) p O U Q) O N O Ql N U —0 G ,5 I O I O 0 Q N N Q1 cc O c O la- Ln an Ln sZ .� •� ) a- c� Ln L.L E i O O N U E U O O > m -0 N -0 0 N O u o a� O Z o • • • a � m V) U Q) Q) 00 c ; o — L � V) � J Q) V) N co Q) L Q) m ate- �O v) 4- � V) c Q O - Q= Z3 c6 Q) Q) f6 4 QJ >, Q � Z3 p ?> � H > E 4� U i U O Ln U _ W O bA E Q) co p a) ro i Q) co N +�+ Q1 QJ ro O O +� Ln Q) Q) O c L � jH Q + Z4-O Q) O Q) O p Ln O UO Q)roco O O-r 0 U O �C ++ �_ r N Q) p Q) U - Q) � Z +� Ov � Q1 Ov � 0O ro _0 Q) Q= +1 4- t Q) Q) O U O o N O U � Q N 0- Q1 U i > Q) E Q) �O Q N =5 Vfru U f6 Q) Q j Q) QJ }' H -a C Q) 00 Ln c O � co ro � co E O Q) a o O cn — to Q) CL Q= a-o ILO ro E V 2 Q) 4- Q) Co C:� ro V) Q a� Q) V) N a--+ p 3 _ a✓ o 4.1 q Q O co p = 4, +� L U N� -000 Q) i � Q) -'j - p O Q) c p Q= � U = U N co � +j O > cc Q O O O Q1 'Q 'Q= Q) N Q) � bA � Q) N F U Q1 Q Q) ro Q O �q 0 N �j a� O C: � a� V)N > to _ 4O O c C:Lnn E �O O VbA +' cn +, Q) aA Ln +' 1 U Ln N 4- _0 >- bl) Ln ru Q) Q) = Ln U m E N 42 Q= > E _I_- >- J - U N Z C:Q) Q) O O Q) M *' N m Q) +' Q) 4 - 4 - i N Ln Y Ln Q Ln r ro CAQ (Mo O � 0 4-+ a- Ln V) to O a Qlf Q ?� � +�+ co u _ _ Q _ O — `n H V O � — O � H U +, o _ O Co O bA p � U � bo O p 4 O H U Q) U r J Q) � O O � G — 3 J O • C -0 ;-, O O p Q) aA O � ,} Y m `1 � Q) Ln }' tup Ln U bA w V) Q= a, Q) > a, Q) a) o a, Q H a✓ Q U Itt v U N +-+ — i 00 f6 O O O O Q tw m `0 p 0 O U }, =5 DC N O N = U cu N UO ro J cc p aJ cII ca > > m v — N � L — ro m O a+ O ° i m N >, � U a t 4� _ N c� p J W N OC 4A d Y aJ J 4„J 0 0- L/) CB J i O N p ° O fB a-u O U _I_- � c ao V) a� L p 0 o O cn c� U � O c +:+ O U E tB +� o a, +' +, r ° �' ro -j V > Uo0 `—^ O O ro _0 p L J U 3 N 4 � ° L LL 4� O N p � C n 0 f6 d N U 4- CU Z i A `� +�+ 4O cn O t �. E a) O U 0 N v O V N O +' O 4- 41 }, N N 3 o •� 4a _�, U a' r p 4- �, N N L w 0 � O +� D G \ Y a)U +- O U o c O 0- a ° 2 a Ln s I3� u° 0 ° O 0 0 , 3 0 t O 0txo •> O 73 L- 4� U U Ln _I_-U m dA O O O aJ C i f0 O -0 N •i E Q t t p O i L i L Q O Q cif H U Z H 0- LL � N U 0 Ln U 00 N 4-0 3 0 cc ++ L Q E t� cv N aJ aJ i Ln bA U a) O U L O V) (1) a) 4 L- c6 V) m bA L Q) N Q) V) N a a) N O Q) i Q) O L bA a) N 4- N � N Q � N 4 ro O 4- L L-- Q) 4- O o 0 bA o a, m N _0 _0 m m 5 O O N 4- a-J � � C O U U • • • Q) n3 O 0 > DC oC > a >. y a) U Q = U N fC W 0 n3 O a) CU o N > 0 ao w m 0 J c o (16 O Y J i > N O J Q a) Q) 4" N u t 0 Z us 4- (A t]A 0 ro L — >, I a) a) •- Z 3: 0 +� _0 ro 0 00 cn E N N cc E m a)L bn 0 L 0 Q) a--i a--+ -0 Q)U cB L 0 W Q) Q)c6 N p �_ N +-1 I N l�A Q) N _N L ° L Q)0 }, Q0 = ate+ U O — N N O } O =5CL E Ln L O N f6 a) — 0 Q ) a U 73 4-s O Q) �5 Y cc Cc ro N L O O -0 O U U a) QJ 0 f6 L �_ > 0 N N N > (/7 i7i N � N N > Q) cc -a !E -0 N 0 4- _ U o O m Ln >� V) N = L2 L L � Q) Q) C)a + Q) U C -0 O c6 0_ p O U N N Q) 0 O L 0 0 (B >c v Q) v Z N � H C:O N Q ++ N C: N 0 N LU N N .2 Cc 0 Y E6. > > U L ,� -0 O u a o ° a) _0 ° oc uA c� 0 a) 0 N E 0 0 N N 0 0 Q) QJ N U N L (2) w > N C) H U-)O Q ° N D U E m N 0 U — O Q) v u ++ 0 UA N I cBCUN V) v >. — m f6 N 0 U '� a a) + 0 > 0 0 U N Q) *; L ca _I_— 0) }' ro � Q p E E m p � N _0� Q Z )u Q) 0 ++ _0 m Q) O N Q) = C: m UL ro CD Q)U J z m Z 4O z m ca Q) 3 o `� _ � aJ — CC t1A U0 Y cB mO .; �W N U Q Q) I Q) - J _ Ln - O 0 U t= bO O M c cn 0 0 3 O dJ dJ o � m N 0 N + L + V N U m O QJ Lh • • • • N +-1 U a) 0 L Q a) L U L N c� L 4 O U 0 4 U Q) 0 a) N N 0 0- n ate- N = qA O N 00 i Co O N l]A Q) Lf1 Q1 CB Q Q f6 c _r_ cn O Q O qp aJ i1 QJ U N E: a + Q1 a--+ a--+ E L V (� N O N O O > U N O O v N O O (� O U Q1 ate- f6 \ Q O N ° Q co U -0 C a--+ i ON Q1 Q� O Q) t a--+ c In > U Q C6 Q S- E f0 ate+ N U `n Qj p O o 4 O Ln Q) Ln O QJ N N O O J U N > oi N O +�+ IO ) E a+ V >, U N E' cB E >- � E O U N U Q= U -0 f6 N ° •4� O ate+ �_ N (10 U a+ L � b 0 > QJ Q a ° ZD cn cn • , _0 4� v In 0 C Q Ln ate+ N OU Q) N QO Q1 c O +-' ate-+ +' Q) f6 Q }' Q) Q1 cn � � U f6 QJ � +� L QJ � qA 4 � N C1A ° Qj a--+ O N CB a Q 4, `-' 0 vi N O U b i -0 O vi > O cn > X }' 4 -' -0U _0 a v N Q OLn ° Q1 Q f6 a+ E N 2 m N ++ QJ Q � U � 1 O •— �A +-+ -0N � Q= Q v�i 0) t1A U f6 >' Cr6 f0 — Ln Q1 O a) Q > � d — f6 d Z3 vi > 'a--+ E d C6 (B O � o o `� U) Q) 4-1 tDo N V Q) > QJ N Q) Q) VY O 0 °_ o 0 3 3 N Q z — = a, Y 'm M Q) LI) — Q f6 U • • • • .. V 00 m 4-0 F- M LL NQ ILL C M a GJ m a E w 4.1 T T m 3 L c Of U QJ O p : U + � U U p W Q) 0 + o a O M "o v o o o = a, o Q = U oc c U t — U cc o� 'a N O Y O U O D "� oc a..' .� Q)u z O N Q) o -p +-+ L O Q) N �.. U > O o0 O Q Qj U O O N Oi m p O 3 U 'O % p -0O� = O c Q) = v z i j +" Oi t J L s m O- -Q U L Q) -0 = v Q) _ M= c 0 m — O Q) - - p E UN Q1 Ov E C �' U OD O > O O 7 p — 0 a) -O = Q) O Q) i Q) +aJ .. O N O Q= 3 0 = U+teJ 0 a., CO j N O Or1i +E > o 2 Y 2 o E a)p v Et cc oo °vv)) o v 2Qv 13 � U U o0 ti O O ra a U tD u N O O E EE O v 00 Qoj N Z3 - .z, O 'O Qj O w p v Y '^ p +, Q i Y +., �^ ro +� rY t3 L Q) �n c U -a N ro O O O a O (� N m p Q) `n a m v v) Y a, Q U O > 3 v O U L O O ++ try O Y N +� �n Y Q N S N +� +� o N B O O 3 O O O N 3 > p p 0 o o zz a v v v '> .� v 3 o v E a nro O Q ca ut O Q, E— o° O+ a O v v m N 3 '� O Q, O p -c � a O v a � 'n `I) sZ p +� u E a v� 00 O O z v c oco � a z� i E 3 � Q QJ O O z E v z - N o +-� - U J Q z +-. a +� O O z � + - Q z z 7 4+ Q) Q Q r t L Q C 1 Q S C L � m CL C Q) '- p ro to O +, O C o to O O 'a C O nj % 'L O O i 0 .Q" L -a O O c o p Z3 'a kAtn0007za Uo�� 3'a U ELu uM: �� a4°Utn �,� a U on 'a t Q 1 •� 'Q 3 L U U E c p p Q ro v Y L >. f6 On ate•+ Q) > w U +' �n ( j r0 O- C O c O v) o L O vCL O U ,Gl N u •(6 c u U + = 7 j C Or 3 Q) L 3 Q) L +••� C° c_ E c -p O C to a O N .Q" ro vi O= a 3 E U o .c L -O tut IO d L U N �^ L U (v _o ++ I U (D L to U z ro v)ro c m 3 u d } rt3 [6 L m= N Y-0 O O O O c z J O O CO bIJ v) N ra bA c C \ u c m c c L 0 3 u w u O w u a O O L O O L O O t v t —_ O Y a+ T ++ ++ u u ++ O u ra o + +Q) u � a o v +� co L +� u O ++ u o + u J u M w w' Q z a c ar a z c U' 3 L ar Q) 3 ar a, 3 Q, Q) u Y _ o Ln D co W o to � c? o o o 00 OL L 000 L.L Q i= ft3 d' U Cl. U Cl. U J L O +T+ 2 2 a Y L -p Q) 0 > O 0 O v C) v a +`� 00 Ln N co J m Y to ro O O v) t 0 v 3 pp L J U 3 _ Z ��/ "= L ra v) i (n c o J � Lu ��.( V O n U 00 F9 42 a CLO O O D Q p` H Y L N O J O O N J N J aj C m L pi °_° o �n m v °> o c m Qj 4 vj �o Y O O -r3 3 O U 3 O co 3 •� O ° � n ia) s i s N L -0 O ro vi J LL O WLU Q O O 0 U > mIU— 3 O tNo ' N- N ra � t O a) L C a) N .° + N a n3 ° Y ° 'Q w i � -T3 in ° � � Ln ` 0) 0 U -a 'a i p aJ -O N o, Q Z Cl n3 N a, ° Ln _ ° .� o o v cm a' p = ii� : in a = Y N Ln 'a _ ° ` E � Q E cn O aJ +�+ - m LO O O a '- Q `� v 'O o, 11— v _ N oo a a m a) QjO 3 rp Qj v o L L a v aco v° o a o N 3 3 v O o a, n3 a 6 f "� 3 3 0 3 o° g O O a v Y N o c= O= O o s o O 00 E> a "� o va v p a > ai a> O N v O a 3 N c _ N 0 + aJ 7v5 _ N O p-1 O Q , c Y N D. �^ in N c qa bn tz3 >v. -O _ Ov33v -n ao 0)ao t� Ln ° > o o mum aoa ° o a o a 0 at � 0 0 i7i co H° u v v o �k"a3v v oo ° = o a °° C a o `n a 3= v= E a v a a) o o Z o a, E_ a N N = = Zs _ _ O 00 N in N N O `ti N O a v a aJ O Y- +� o o a 'f6 n; - N p av v o o a, = a, v c Y a V) ° O to \ in Q n3 'y 'a ° +� O �. ++ 7 z H O v ++ .O a, z- O a U v c o c z Qj a a O 4 � � aE > a=CcO E c� � c OY v 0 a Cc O° 0 a O z 0 a i7� ' � o � UU °n U � 74J� 3 a p 3 N Y 3 a a) L Q C Ln fLU U 'C a) a) 3 � LL > U (� (6 > -0 > W L LL O a) a) a > E E aJ +� T > +� m a, O D: 0)Q O a) N w > U-0 a) N E p U N c N L U N > ° Q u Q N a) O Lp � U -O 41 41 O Q n3 w U IQ Ln m c O c 3 V) N M c L '- Y c ca c co /� O w U p O O N O U qp t p + O N N �- aJ aJ c �0 a c •}�—, c m Q C7 v a M"^ � M i M o Q o M U-o cn Of o 00 s > s c c ns c en V) V) V) p o= +-� o +� > bn ++ T Na v U v v tNo > '- a) � U N O U a QJ w c c c w N a)v N w = N w c w L c o a o o n 'c t . N _ o fu o V c ° LL U m U U M" LL J LL ~ N m LL a, L L LL LL U LL U O L .� L .i •' a H O 7 O m _ Lh v u1 W > O >N 3 Q �_ � of N 0 > = 7of O W U Q 2 U U U 0 Q 00 � m (U w � Q � � � � a LA m a E 2 4A � § � w 2 o \ � \ k \ 2 \ / to ¢ 2 % m } \ a 2 0 Ln w a Z t k = / / % % / k « y = ) % / / \ 3 § cx %m 7\ _ = o \CC k { \ tio CLj \ \ 7 \ � / Z E \ { \ / 4 0 } 0 @ E 0 ac 0 3 I j E t> / » \ \ / / = 3 i � ° c E / \ \ \ \ ( \ \ \ k { 3 7 { § \ 7 \ k > $ 2 a / j 7 / » § - / } 2 / a \ \ \ \ \ \ § \ k [ \ \ Zn u u» e& m%\ 3%\ u 32 u � \ J Ln \ y < 2 = / / > § L cr � w 7 2 2 m } CL / 0 ! u E 2 2 \ } - coa)2 � 4 f 0 \ 3 E / = \ 5 \ § \ < 5 \ ® � } Q § 2 ! < § — o/_ u/ u/ u$ u � - - - - - L. 0: a ' k Ln CL CL e s » \ E \ a \ \ < \ _ _ V 00 G! 3 U f� a F m 4-0 (1 LL LL I� I C f0 a L Q) LA H m a E G1 N 4A m 3 L a a a 3 3 3 x o C o C o v a C a a oo oo HE . ' vv c vwv c c o W CX c>a = o c>a = O n' '� c>o = o> O °i '� = O 3 a c>a = a a> o U) o 3 C; z "a z a c Q �i v z a 2. c a p a a; v z a> c a U- +; a� z a fO a E 4 = a E ii = ai L D. = a E 4 = (U L i, = a E ii = ai L D. = a E 4 = Ln u a u a u a a u a a u a u a t� �7 C7 u C� t� u0 C� l� C7 n3 s >- 0 3 O �' O {A L o 3 Q i 0 N v o 3 L T -0 o w-0 O c 3 = Q bZ _00 r w s 3 vi Y +- N > L ro L O +L- cn aJ '> a L cL � N � N O = 'a � L C c Q O 'O o > *: m Q O O a1 = On a1 O 3: Coa1 > u J OA O t L (7 O - Q c 0 O U w O w O U +�+ Vf L N N -c- N LU N u O u L u u u O u u N u 0 h0 ClA � O C .� O a) C c 0 0 C O C O c .� O aJ 0 0 O N 0 0 0 U c U ++ U U U c U +� U-0 U U O a� a ' 3 3 3 3 3 3 LA t 7 n3 O O O a 0 — O 3: N +' a1 v L 4a' u O > > O O +' 7 Y O o 2 L L O U 0 LAN �' J C 0 O w-0 a+ 3 bA c c > Q > Q 0 a1 c 2 O O 0 O 0 0 3> 0 c 0 N L c c 3 J V)> c t 3 3 L v >> J co E E n> v O OO O Q (n J 0O W CO W Z 2 cc u Attachment G MOT TM DS ; jM F Release Date: IP U B L I C W O R K�f 5�f August 4, 2021 2466 BRONSON DRIVE • MOUNDS VIEW, MN 55112 (763) 717-4050 * FAX (763) 717-4049*Email: publicworks@moundsviewmn.org www.moundsviewmn.org IMPORTANT NOTICE *********************************************************************** 2022 STREET PROJECT — AREA J (SPRING LAKE ROAD, 84T" AVENUE NE, PLEASANT VIEW DRIVE, PLEASANT VIEW CT, NORTH OF MOUNDS VIEW BOULEVARD) 2023 STREET PROJECT — AREA K (SPRING LAKE ROAD, SOUTH OF MOUNDS VIEW BOULEVARD) ********************************************************************************************************************* Your property is located on a street that the City of Mounds View has proposed to rehabilitate in the summer of 2022 (Area J) and in the summer of 2023 (Area K). The City invites you to attend a public information meeting to learn more about the proposed street rehabilitation projects and to provide you the opportunity to ask questions and voice concerns. The meeting details are as follows: STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT, AREAS J AND K 6:00 P.M. — 7:30 P.M. - AUGUST 25, 2021 MOUNDS VIEW COMMUNITY CENTER — 5394 EDGEWOOD DRIVE The meeting agenda will be: 6:00 — 6:30 p.m. — Staff Presentation (doors open at 5:45 p.m.) 6:30 — 7:30 p.m. — Q&A (Questions & Answers) 8:00 p.m. —Meeting Closed A project survey has been posted on the City's website and we encourage all property owners within project areas of J and K to participate. (One survey per parcel/property/household.) Blank copies of the survey will be available at the meeting for those that require one. The survey will be available until 3:30 pm, August 27, 2021. Should you choose not to fill out the survey, the City will assume you have no opinion regarding the rehabilitation project. All handouts, forms, and other project information will be available via the Area J and K project webpage link located on the homepage of the website, look for the following icon: Sign up for project updates using "Notify Me", www.moundsviewmn.org/enotify/index.php If you cannot attend the meeting, it will be replayed on Channel 16. You may also stream the meeting replay from the City's website at www.moundsviewmn.org. Attachment I Area J- Resident Concerns • In terms of the Parking, we are not for or against it, we feel it should be up to the people that live on Spring Lake Road to determine if they are in support or against it. I stated No above, but default to whatever that group prefers on that issue. • Having sidewalks on one, or even better, both sides of Spring Lake road north of Mounds View Blvd would be outstanding. Currently it is a safety hazard for pedestrians. • We are on the corner lot of Ardan Ave & Spring Lake Park Rd. We are walkers but don't walk on Spring Lake Park Road because we don't feel safe. We support the sidewalk and curb & gutter but don't feel the need for parking on the street. • PLEASE add a sidewalk or trail on Spring Lake Road. It's so dangerous to walk or bike. High speed traffic cuts through from J to MV Blvd, and especially during rush hour. Please give us a safe connection to Mounds View's awesome sidewalks and trails. • My only concern is that there will not be enough done to improve the conditions on Spring Lake Road. Many pedestrians and not a safe place to walk, bike, etc. The city MUST use this opportunity to widen Spring Lake Road and make it safe for cars and peds. • You state that Pleasant View Court has asphalt curbing when in fact we have concrete curbing. I am concerned that it would be replaced with asphalt curbing. • Having to park away from our home. Concerned about vehicle break ins and damage. • Taking out trees losing the canopy. Putting in curb and gutter with no stop sign or speed humps will increase speed for cars, semi trucks. New houses on Cnty J will mean more people trying to avoid 65. People drive at least 45 to 50. Love our street now. • wider street not needed. Residents park in driveways. Street is in good condition, just rebuilt in 1999. Water drains onto lawns -seems good. • Loss of trees! Attachment I • Would like a sidewalk along Spring Lk Rd, dangerous to walk/run/bike on. Remove asphalt path at Spring Lk Rd/Ardan - change to sidewalk. Looks crappy & cars park on it. Bike lane over parking lane. Need stop signs at sides streets to slow cars down!!! • 1 do not want grouped mailboxes as part of the street improvement. I would like mail boxes to stay in the location they are currently. I do not want a rain garden on my property. It would also be nice to offer a drain scope as part of the street project. • Driveway was constructed by Hage Construction. Has Lifetime warranty on the driveway. Imprint is on the end of driveway. Commercial grade construction with rebar throughout. Touching part of the driveway will destroy integrity and invalidate warranty. • No water gardens on my property- I get enough runoff from neighboring props incldg SLIP with heavy rains. No shared mail box posts. Add'I street lites on PVD. Minimize dust with water. Add better sod than the Gas Guys left after that project. • New mail box locations, not keen on the grouped mailbox idea. Do not need Rain Gardens. Spring Lake Road defiantly needs a sidewalk. Will this include a sidewalk along Mounds View Blvd connecting to Groveland? Need more information. Thank you. • No combined mailbox! Speed bumps to slow traffic! Asphalt curb!! No removal of mature trees! No shared Mailbox! • No combined mailboxes. Speed bumps to slow down traffic. Asphalt curb. No removal of mature trees. No removal of mailboxes. Existing paths are not being maintained. • We would like a normal high curb. We want to keep our mailbox on our property in front of our house. Mail theft is a problem in Mounds View, we want to watch our mailbox in front of our house. • Spring Lake Rd north of Mounds View Blvd, although a bus route, still maintains a quiet neighborhood feel. Adding sidewalks, and shared use paths will add more people traffic. We would like to keep this quiet side street, as is. Attachment I 1 am concerned impending improvements will interfere with curb appeal of Pleasant View as majority of homes have small gardens/trees in the area of mailboxes. Also concerned with length of project as seen in Blaine that took all spring/summer. • Keep it simple and inexspesive. Let my mailbox be my mailbox. / am an individual, not a collective. • Quantity and speed of traffic: The amount of traffic has increased tremendously in the past 5 years, and with the new development near the airport, there will be even more. Many drivers are driving well over the limit. PLEASE DO SOMETHING ABOUT THE SPEED! • Cost to me for this project.... I would not be apposed to widening the street if the cost is reasonable to home owners side walks are a good idea ther is alot of people I see walking down to edge of the road.. • I'd really like to see more biking trails around. I've been taking my young children biking, but Pleasant View and Spring Lake Road are troublesome without at least a sidewalk for the kids. • Not a fan of the rain gardens as they look like you have a ditch in your front yard. They are an eye sore. • Yes, widening Spring Lake Rd will increase speeding, it is a short, straight shot from 85th Ave to Mounds View Blvd. SLR needs stop signs at 84th Ave & Arden. • 1 do not want a rain garden in my front yard. It is small enough as it is. If the city takes out trees, it pay full replacement costs. We have managed quite well for over 40 years without a sidewalk. Think of sidewalks when putting in new developments. • 8412 PLEASANT VIEW DR. On every heavy rain, the street floods in front of my house and halfway up my yard. The grate in front of my house often gets clogged or is just too much for it to handle. St Floods all the time. Attachment I • Serious safety concerns on this road & do not walk or bike on it. Terrible for children! Serious safety issue with no sidewalks to wait for the school bus. We absolutely dont want parking on the road. We would prefer the street not be made any wider! • This street is the most dangerous I walk on in Mounds View. 1 never had or needed a sump pump since moved in in 1978. Do not expect any drainage project --ie rain gardens some different drainage to cause me to need one. If do expect it to be city responsibility. Also do not want my driveway drainage affected No rain garden on our property. Where to park when the street is torn up? How much is it going to cost? Are they going to replace sewer lines? Please add speed bumps on Pleasant View. keep individual mail boxes • Widening the road causes more speed on the road- we already have the speedy cars, trucks, bus now. • Not at this time. • 8458 pleasant view dr The puddling in the area on 84th and Pleasant view needs to be fixed/drained. After any rain fall there is standing water for a few days. 1 live in Mounds View because of the green, the trees, the tranquility. Any change that increases cement and asphalt at the expense of greenery is hard to support. My main concern is that the roadway not significantly widened. That we have adequate parking nearby when the improvements are being made. • What's the difference between sidewalk, off street trail, and shared use path? I can't know what I support if I don't have definitions and specifics about what you're asking. Very much opposed to on street parking. We all have driveways. Not needed. 1 have many questions regarding the length and logistics of this project, what kind of inconveniences are involved, and what the final result will be. No parking lane Attachment I Area K- Resident Concerns • By the lake it needs a bike lane and sidewalk. • No sidewalk! • This questionnaire is biased, it is framed specifically to make people feel as though pedestrian safety in general is important. On our street this makes no sense. People from other streets walk on our street specifically because it is quiet and safe. • I strongly oppose any alterations to Spring Lake Road. This Street is in very good condition. • The two options I would support are: Turning Spring Lake Road into a one-way road in order to accomplish both the city and residence concerns. Redevelop Spring Lake Road keeping the same width as it currently is and install rain gardens. • Numerous. Until the survey ZERO information has been communicated regarding unnecessarily widening the road or adding a trail and in turn destroying hundred year old trees in the process. • Yes, o We have trees we planted, that have special & sentimental reasons. o If we wanted a walking path/possibly parking etc., we would have moved elsewhere. o Spend the money on the hole in the road by the church i fall into daily! " • My main concern is I definitely want a sidewalk is a sidewalk on Spring Lake road Too many people walk in the streets are gonna get hit • The current plan is not acceptable and not well thought through. Widening the road as well a grossly oversized trail down a small city street is absolutely ridiculous. An improved road may be sustainable, but there is no need for a trail. Period. Attachment I • We bought here over 40 years ago because this two -block street is like country living in the city and we want to keep it that way. This is a Mounds View treasure that should remain the way it is. • Can the street just be repaired? No trail, No walk, no gutters or curbs? • If you are putting a path in, please put it on the west side of the road. Do not touch my lilacs • Yes, many. I strongly oppose as do many of my neighbors. It's unnecessary, a waste of taxpayer money, and a tragedy to cut down long-standing oak trees. • We are concerned about the proposed project. Residents on our street love the tree coverage and would be deeply disappointed to see our old trees cut down. Our road has a homey feel that drew us to the property when we purchased. Please don't change it. • Lane widening as well as curb and gutter, are enough for this roadway. Sidewalks, Boulevards, Parking lanes, are DEFINITELY NOT needed for the couple of blocks south if Co. Rd. I. Loss of Trees in and out of the right-of-way would be Very significant. • I strongly oppose the proposed addition of a multi -use trail and any widening of Spring Lake Road, south of County I and north of County H2 for a number of reasons. Curb and gutter and blacktop replacement would be a nice improvement. • Do something about vehicles constantly running thru stop signs at Co. Rd. I & Spring Lake Rd. if your going to put in a pedestrian trail or people will get injured or killed. Don't wait until their are injuries!!!! Be proactive! • the city should be planning projects that have the least impact on the existing environment • I am concerned that my house will end up to close to the street and that my lakeshore will be less accessible. Attachment I • 7821 Spring Lake Road: In my opinion, the tree replacement is definitely a high priority. Additionally, with all of these road improvements for the street, there should be equally, if not more concern with the lake's (Spring Lake) water level & quality. • I appreciate the work that has gone into this already & the more that is to come. I'm very happy to see this project happening! August 25, 2021 Mounds View 2022/2023 Street Project Mounds View Community Center Transcript of Recording Pages 1— 14 — In order of speakers Page 15 — Residents from Bronson Drive who spoke (2 — Husband/Wife, each spoke) Page 16 — Resident from County Road I who spoke (1) Pages 17 & 18 — Resident from Pleasant View Drive who spoke (2 — and 1 resident who spoke twice) Pages 19 to 29 - Residents from Spring Lake Road who spoke (15 with two speaking twice) Page 30 — SLP Road list in numerical order and date visited 00:32 Barb Haake — 3024 County Road I, 1 live on Spring Lake — I am the one that probably gave the city council really headaches because I am the one that went around in the latter part of 1990s, 1988, 97, 99 and I went up and down spring lake road and other people too, we did not want curb and gutter, I also was on their street committees back in the early parts of 2000. All I want to say is, I have been serving, 22 years on Rice Creek Watershed, I have been on City Council, Planning Commission, Park Board, State Rep, I have been all these frickin things. But what I want to get to is that my Rice Creek Watershed business told me that we have sugar sand we never really needed curb and gutter but there is one thing, Nyle is not going to like this, and I am sure the council is not going to like it either, but my main question is were going to have all these things were going to look at, the state aid and everything else. Has this been before Rice Creek Watershed yet and I will wait in a minute for an answer? But my whole point is, when this was built and we did all this streets and reconstructing in Mounds View even though there were only a few people that had water that were really an issue that we probably could have taken care of. I can go back to 1970 even and tell you when we hauled stuff, we could use water and have it go into wetlands, etc. which is neither here nor there. But when we did all that and decided it, and it went to Rice Creek, Rice Creek said you are probably going to have to purchase homes to be able to take all your sewer water, this is the storm sewer water, and you take it over to an area; where it is going to have to settle out before it can be released into Rice Creek. That would have cost the city a lot of money, so the agreement that came about was there had to be rain gardens and there were a lot of people that on the new streets and everything like that they had meetings like this and people volunteered weather they put a rain garden in their yard or not. Now I have not seen on this plan any rain gardens, not sure. I will be calling Rice Creek tomorrow to see if this has come before it yet. And like I said, I know this is something this is something the city is not going to like to have and have me butt my head into this again. But it's just something that has to be done, I don't know about if anybody else has asked for a rain garden in their yards, to be able to have it, so that sanitary water that's going to come off the impervious surface, were going to have more impervious surface. Is that going to be clean before it goes into Rice Creek or not? That's something to do. Now my question — has this gone before Rice Creek yet, and I guess this goes to Don and Nyle? Don Peterson (DP) — I can answer this for you. First to let everyone know, you have three minutes, just like council meetings and yes Ms. Haake, it has gone to Rice Creek, their engineers are reviewing it and I can tell you that as of today, with what we are proposing, we do not need to put in rain gardens. BWSR (Board of Water Soil) has changed the requirements for a street rehabilitation project. And because of what we are doing, and it really has to do with the layers we are going thru, we are milling — or going thru the top layer and the base layer of the sub surface. We are not going into the layer below that — what they would call virgin soil, were not disturbing that, were not doing the full blown utility project where its sanitary sewer and water main. If we were doing that, then yes, but now they (BWSR) has changed that and their also looking at what we are shedding as far as water and we are not changing overall asphalt impervious surface. So rain gardens at this point in time, and I have been trying to get ahold of Rice Creek for the past three days, but I know I have talked to Tyler (Stantec) and what Stantec has looked at, in the preliminary of what we received back from Rice Creek is that Rain Gardens will not have to be put in with that. Now, I can add one caveat on that — if we decide to put parking on Spring Lake Road, then it's probably going to be a different story, because now we are increasing what we have, even though I know Tyler has run some preliminary numbers, were on the border with that. If we add more asphalt, then are probably going to have to look adding those infiltration basins. I can tell you one of the things we are looking at including into the storm water, you talk about before it gets into Rice Creek, were looking at stormcepters, sand separators, girt chambers in a lot of those areas to help filter that. Spring Lake Road, right now has a very large one, right before it goes to the lake, and that we clean twice a year, if you see crews down there. That's what they are doing vacuuming that out, whether it's with our large combination unit or the sweeper, it's a large tank under the ground and that's where the sand and leaves go that we can can't catch when we're sweeping. So the answer right now — yes it has. But for my ??, we will have to put in rain gardens (6:03). 6:15 — Kathy Smith 7405 Spring Lake Road — And I did speak with Rice Creek Watershed District and I also spoke with Ramsey County Watershed District and White Eagle, spoke with her, for a number of hours also Laura at Rice Creek and I'm sure that your aware. I hope you can explain to the audience that Rice Creek partners with Ramsey County to offer up to $100,000 for cities to narrow their streets, not widen their streets. There is also new terminology, not sure if you are aware of it, a lot of cities like Fridley, Shoreview, Edina, St. Paul are all going to do what's called Green Streets or Living Streets or road diet, we don't need more impervious surface, I know you can throw all the gutters out there, all the clean basins and stuff like that, once you put this in, that's it. These trees, 49 trees I heard, these trees were here before the road was. It's not needed. Drive around the city, the road, the edges, and I also heard that your plow drivers are having problems, that means that's their probably additional training. We want water on our yards, look at the fires going on out there, do you want to take out more trees that are giving out oxygen, you guys are having problems with Oak Wilt, Dutch Elm, Emerald Ash Borer, Buckthorn, you want to hire more staff, I know you said that people are not going to be assessed but every taxpayer in Mounds View, taxes are going up, you gotta hire more staff, you gotta buy more equipment, you gotta sweep, you gotta plow that sidewalk you want to put in. By the way, that curb and gutter, on Cty Rd. H your plow driver took the curb and gutter out which will cost all of us to replace. So I want every residence, actually does their homework, and oh, by the way, that survey, I need to ask you specifically — do you know the term biased survey? The first question was pedestrian safety, I have two little neighbor kids that I love to come over. I walk them to and from, across the street. I care about pedestrian safety, but the ways you guys wrote that survey you're trying to make it sound like I want a wider street and I want a sidewalk and I don't. Let me just finish, every resident that wants to take their survey back, make sure that is done. 9:23 9:28 Don Hinrichs 7785 Spring Lake Road, on the lake, on the curve. There is very little land between the road and lake. It looks to me when I look at your plan, that you will take out half my yard in order to have a path 6', a wider road, curb and gutter and I could be wrong but I just don't see where you are going to put a path on that side of the road unless you're going with a boardwalk of something that is 2 right over the lake. And I understand you can do it, but when I bought the house I like it the way it is, I like the road the way it is, I don't need curb and gutter, everything has been working fine. So that's my opinion, so am I right, will you be taking about half my yard up? Don P — Will have to take a look at it, but I know the proposed trail around Spring Lake, next to where, you are talking will be right behind curb, there will not be that buffer in that location. Don H — But still, its 8 fee, it's still going into the yard quite a bit. (Don P — on the lakeside) No, on the other side — you will have to move it over (Don P — no, everything we are proposing is staying in the ROW where we have the right to work). But right where the road is, towards the lake, it goes right down to the lake. There's only 2 feet there. I would love it if a path would work, but if it means taking out half my yard then I am not for it. And somehow that has to be considered. Don P — We will take certainly take a look. I am just going to address the trees we have counted there. Those trees being removed — I know that, staff (PW) has never viewed all the plans and met with Stantec on what is being proposed. These are preliminary plans, 60%, we are nowhere near final plans. There are a number of meetings and a lot of direction we have to get, not only hearing from you but from City Council. 11:58 12:01— Vincent Meyer — 8380 Spring Lake Road Myer Construction. In 1999 the city tried to ram it down our throats with the gutters and stuff and we as homeowners turned it down, you guys never even had a proposal for resurfacing, you rammed it down our throat, we shut it down and I hope we shut it down now. Where did the power pole goes, can you go back to that, on that picture, back it up, where the power pole go, that pictures looks like it has been photo -shopped, I don't see any of our power poles. DP — Not photo -shopped, one of our current roads. VM - Where is the power poles? DP —There are no power poles on this street VM - There is too, that's my yard right there sir, I know my yard. Also you brought up here where the curb is going to support the road. Look on 85th right now; where they are tearing out all the curb right now because it did not support the road. Thank you. 13:20 13:25 — Dan Dreier 7830 Spring Lake Road —There is very limited space on that side of the road if you want to put in a 6 to 8 foot wide trail. There is enough space there but eventually you will get to my property and its going to create additional issues for me — City council I brought this up, I have a driveway that goes underneath my house and when you go further out there already at the issue where I have to back up far trying to make sure I don't hit any kids or anyone zipping in the curb bike trail that may be there, now if you move it 6 to 8 feet closer, I am not sure how I am going to avoid hitting people because they are going to be driving too quickly, they're going to have hit the side of my car as I go out and I will be neither of our fault and it will be in the public ROW. I am backing up, can't be my fault, they are the ones that have to be looking. It creates a real problem, it's a safety issue. On top of it, I am the only house on the road that has a gravel parking area in front of my house, I am not the one that installed it but the part I have come appreciate is that when you have older people, especially in winter time, and your driveway angles downward, they tend to take a topple. So parents come over, they're going to get out of their car there, which means I have to park on top of that ROW or whatever, and as I am looking at all of these things stacking up, between endangering people in that area, because it's so wide and so close to my driveway in that area going down, no place to park in order to get people safely into the house, there's not a lot of options left for me other than pursuing a variance or something. Its new information for me, I am digesting it, trying to be open minded about it there are always things that are positive and negative. I do like that the road is going to change a little bit to make it slower, that's a positive, I am concerned about a few areas and hoping to find some resolution to it. 15:42 15:52 — Ashely Stevens 7406 Spring Lake Road — I am looking at the Spring Lake Road daily traffic numbers, that's correct, that's daily, and how is that information obtained. DP — we put traffic counters out. AS - Is that like public information we can review? DP — Sure it is, might be on our website but state has all that information, we have to report it. AS - It just seems pretty high numbers for daily. Also a couple questions I have — seems like pedestrian safety is being pushed a lot, what's the foot traffic on Spring Lake Road, daily, weekly, monthly, yearly what are the numbers. I know you mentioned about like in the winter, there's snow pushed up, are these numbers still, is this, pertaining to pedestrian safety, has there been any research on how many people are actually walking. DP — No. AS - So have there been any pedestrian accidents on Spring Lake Road? DP —to his knowledge no. AS - Ok, have you received any requests from residents on Spring Lake Road requesting a trail. DP —yes I have. AS - Do you have that information, the numbers? DP- 5 or 6 over the past couple days putting in trail or sidewalk. AS - Out of how many are on Spring Lake Road? Do you plan on doing any research on how many, how much foot traffic there is on Spring Lake Road? DP —That has not been talked about— no. AS - So I guess I am curious why a trail is being proposed without the research? DP — refers back to the comprehensive plan PRF — master trail and sidewalk plan. AS - So this is from a trail/ proposal in what year? DP — It was just updated this year. AS - Approved? 4 DP — Anytime there has been a project put in — and I am getting the note the 3 minutes is up, anytime the project goes in, the direction is to look into seeing if a sidewalk/trail can go in at the same time. 18:44 18:55 Mary Malrick — 8289 Spring Lake Road — When you look at preliminary design, did they have any other designs that they created that we have not seen yet. DP — No. MM - So they were just given one? DP — that is all we were given at this point in time, and after we receive the feedback we present that to council. If/from the feedback we present to council, they want us to look at other designs then that will go back to Stantec for other options for the City Council. MM - And how do we move that forward to have other designs looked at? DP - I would direct your question to both myself and/or Administrator Zikmund and the City Council at a council meeting. MM- Ok —So when we look at the one design on Spring Lake Road there are sections that do not currently have storm sewer. Does that $6.4 million dollars — is that putting in storm sewers all down there or are we leaving some of it for the rain water to just move to the side? DP —That does include storm sewer the entire length. MM - All through it? DP — yes. MM - So you will be updating that piece of it? DP — yes, that includes adding storm sewer to the entire stretch. MM - OK, going back to the traffic count, there was a section on there — 2,000 cars on Spring Lake Road, and it looks like that I maybe am not thinking about the road correctly, it said there was a number from Sherwood Road to Mounds View, I can't think of where Spring Lake Road intersection with Sherwood Road. DP — it should be Sherwood Place. MM - I can't think of Sherwood any, is that County J to Mounds View Blvd? Discussion, Do we have a count from J to Mounds View Blvd? DP — Have to ask James, the location is determined by the state, we submit those, they tell us where on a map and we put it anywhere in that area. They typically tell us not to do them when school is in session, they do not want to have the busses, it has to be when normal traffic, when school is not in session. MM - What I am thinking about, is how many of those cars are drive thru' s, and how many are turning off on Ardan and going home, so to speak, and maybe have a stop sign or have something, There is that big new housing developing going on north of J, and I am thinking like everyone else, we are going to get a lot more drive thru, so it would be nice and I would ask if we could put on a counter, not a county counter, but a Mounds View counter, put one on both ends so we can get an accurate count and see how many are residential and how many are driving thru. DP — something we can certainly look into. MM - Ok. 23:11 23:19 —Terri Hougen — 8340 Spring Lake Road I am a tree lover, I hate to see trees go, but a lot of people walk and bike, still have strollers on the street, we unfortunately we need a sidewalk for safety. We have tons for traffic than we used too and I would say at least half the traffic is speeding. Question, why is the bike path suggested for the west side, if it was on the east side it would hook up with Ardan which can steer people crossing Spring Lake Road. And why do we need the boulevard from the grass to the curb and then the sidewalk over here, why can't it look like Ardan does? DP — it certainly can, I know just that's what has been proposed. 24:09 24:16 — Michelle Dreier 7830 Spring Lake Road — Wanted to concur with Scott, a previous speaker - with looking at the measurements, even if there is no boulevard between the trail and road. I don't think there is enough room between the road and Spring Lake unless you're going to fill in the flood plain, I do not think there is enough room for it — an 8' trail, I would have to see the stakes. But I would revisit that and take a measurement. I also have a concern regarding the water levels on Spring Lake. We talked about Rice Creek but the water levels in Spring Lake are receding and I am wondering if there have been any studies as to how the collection of all the water in the storm and gutter is going to effect the water levels in Spring Lake. As someone that lives on the lake, the water levels from October last year to the snow melt to this year went down drastically. And because were in a drought throughout the summer the water levels have continued to recede to the point where it's getting a bit alarming how far the lake goes out. Just something to consider as we move forward if we are collecting more water into the storm sewers and it's not going into the lake, yes we have no pollutants going into the lake but are we going to lose the lake. 25:42. DP — Why are we looking at the west or east side — I don't recall. Tyler — Typically the power poles, west side has the utilities Question — Can you put it underground? DP/Tyler 0 IF you pay for it. Reason is we looked at the utility poles and if we put it in. We could put it underground but we would have to pay for it. That's how it works, city has to pay for it, and it is quite costly. Reason trail is being proposed with the boulevard is for watershed reasons, if you provide that green space between the trail and roadway it does not increase your impervious surface footprint for calculation of whether or not you need to do rain gardens and if we do put trail back of curb we are going to end up triggering rain gardens throughout the entire project. That's one of the things were trying to mitigate in the preliminary plan, Kathy Smith —The city can apply for a variance to go outside of MNDOT standards, you did it for the speed on the curve. 28:06 0 28:08 Gretchen Crowder 3001 Bronson Drive — One of my concerns, and in 40 years I have never had water in my basement and I have a concern that all this fiddling around with the streets and the sidewalk my put water in my basement? DP — I can tell you that any of the designs, street designs, we cannot shed water back into private property. Water from the street or sidewalk it has to shed or drain into the cities infrastructure. 29:00 29:05 — Richard Oehlenschlager 7545 Spring Lake Road — Lived there since 1978. 1 am concerned were losing a lot of our aesthetics because of the beautiful trees that are over 100 years old and in addition to that the root disturbance from any of the other surrounding trees that I have can spread and wipe out my entire grove of pin oak (Latin name), those are threatened because I am going to lose some for sure and suffer for sure because of his project. This project was not called for, not asked for, not needed and environmentally unsound. And 2, when I questioned the surveyors who came out and they said this is a foregone conclusion, it's a done deal and how much did them surveyors cost? DP — Will have to go back and look at the bill, do not have that off the top of my head. And if they surveyor told you that, it is wrong, it is not a done deal. The city council makes the final decision. RO — It sure sounds like it has been. AI MMOM i 1111Ki DP — I am going to ask you if you have comment or question to come forward. This is really to get feedback from you on the project. If you want to voice and have the council hear it you need to go a council meeting to have them hear your passion about this project. Staff does not make the decision whether or not this project moves forward. We take the information we receive from you, your concerns and we forward those and give those to the city council. I understand the passion, I understand the concern. We will bring that forward to the council, they will make that final decision and give staff the direction. Whether that is including the trail or coming up with a different design of the street. I can also tell you that we cannot let that street go. If that street — ultimately if you as the residents decide to let this street go and that's the council direction, that is not sustainable. 1999 until now — 20 plus years, if we wait another 20 years that road will be completely gone. Why do I say 20 years, I already mentioned that 5 year CIP, we have to go back to other streets, and start reconstructing those for mill and overlay. That impacts the funding and the money we set aside, that the city council sets aside. That means that this street will drop to the bottom of the list. Because even after this we have other streets that we have to get to. We place these in order based off those pavement rating indexes, based off the City Council direction to us. Now, if the passion that you're showing hear, I would tell you again that you need to show that to the city council, they're the ones that make the decision. This is not a city council meeting though, you have to do this at a formal city council meeting. This meeting is designed specifically to get questions about the project and to hear some of those concerns. 32:52 32:57 Joel Kvamme 8477 Spring Lake Road Far north of SLP Road since 1975. 1 moved because of the stand of red oaks that were part of that environment in those years and I have lost 11 mature oaks. But I have planted 51 trees since then and I enjoy that environment. I am on the east side, would that trail extend that far north, I am just 3 houses south of County Road J? DP —The proposed trail goes all the way from County Road J to County Road H2. 7 My sympathy with my neighbors on the west side, if it is on the West side I breathe a sigh of relief. If it's on the east side I do have about 9, no 5 mature trees that may be in peril of the 8 foot extension in my direction. That would be pretty tough to take. I live in Mounds View because of greenery, trees and relative tranquility so a major concern that I have about this project is that any widening of a very busy artery, already would invite, I suspect, even more traffic. Lot of people come from the north, they get off Highway 10 to avoid a terrible intersection at J and 65. They cut down Spring Lake Road to Mounds View Blvd. The rush hour is significant on the North end and any invitation to even more traffic is something I rather wary of and I think it is a safety issue for us to put it up into that kind of situation. Maybe I should be talking to council, I am not sure to whom these points should be made but that's my thoughts. 35: 10 35:15 Kimberly Oberg 8340 Pleasant View Drive — I have some unrelated questions to each other. When is there a council meeting where this is on the agenda, we wanna go and find out it's not on the agenda, can we have that address right now? DP — When is it on the agenda — September 131" and the work session on September the 71n KO - All right, so is the road situation is not sustainable the way it is right now, why do we only get one option, though back in my school board meeting days when were told that were going to do, not asked or given another option, what's the other option? I would like to see another option. DP — We'll bring that forward to the city. KO - I would like to see another option. It's not a choice if we don't have an option. It's a command. Were we told about the mailbox thing, were we given a warning that we better not spend $200 in a beautiful mailbox that we designed and now we have to be in these nasty looking little boxes to conform? I spent $200 and endless amount of work engineering my box, the best clang box in the city; and I want my box, sorry but I'm really upset. I just put it in two years ago. I'm also concerned, I live on Pleasant View Drive and I understand, I went out and measured, we have 14 and 14, so that would be more like 13 and a half, its close enough, I measured it, so I know what I am talking about and just listening to people tell me what I should think, not that you're doing that. But I like to know and I like to come prepared — so 11 to 16' of my yard, is it going to be destroyed, is this an option is there like a possible only 5', could you discuss the destruction that could happen. DP — Is there a possibility, yes that does not mean we are going to go right to the edge of the property line. Within that ROW that is 50 to 60 or 70' that is the area that we do have to work in but that does not mean we are going to take the full width. KO - Well that's good because I am concerned about that because I don't have a lot of front yard like , I have a nice back yard with lots of beautiful trees and I do have one of the most beautiful trees in my front yard and love it and its, it may get destroyed. Am I allowed to have another session at the mic as I might be over my three minutes? 38:16 38:38 — Brian Kaden 7675 Spring Lake Road — I have called you I believe, I called the mayor and I called the Deputy Chief of Police to complain what I think about are the traffic problems on County Road I, not necessarily Spring Lake Road per sea. But one of my biggest concerns about a trail is where it would connect with County Road I trail across from where the waterworks pipes run underneath. Due to traffic issues on County Road I and what I have observed over almost 30 years of living there, this W coming May it will be 30 years that I have owned that house. There was a year and a half, I told you during our conversation that I was disabled and had not a lot better to do but look at the lake and look at the traffic and by my observation approximately 1/3 of the people run that stop sign. I have a real big issue with safety of having only a marked crosswalk at that stop sign. At one point in my life, when I was told by a former Chief of Police that there have no deaths, no injuries, no accidents and we have to put our resources elsewhere in the city. I get that, I could just complain, but last Friday night, shortly after it got dark my daughter whose in the back there said, "dad, why is that truck in our yard?" and I looked up and it wasn't a truck, it was a semi, and it was more than 8' on my property on County Road I past the landscaping rocks I have out there. That's one of many stories I could tell you and if there was a walking trail or crosswalk over there, well; you know what could happen. Anyway, that would be a good thing to bring up to Parks meeting that they should hear a story like that. That guy ran right thru the stop sign, he was either sleeping, drunk, or playing with his phone driving with a Class A license or whatever they have, not a good idea. Couple other questions I have for you, when they take these traffic counts you mentioned that they don't like to do it when buses is on the road because that messes up , average. That's nine months out of the year, I not a statistician, but that's over half the year. DP — I completely understand and raised the same concern that we are missing traffic. Those are their rules and that we have to follow. By no means that does not mean that we cannot go out there and catch some of that traffic. Those traffic counts go on all the MSA streets, they indicate when we put those out there and again, it is not during the school year. BK - That does make sense, I don't see the traffic counts on say Spring Lake Road from County Road I to Bronson and other parts of Spring Lake Road out there and I would love to see all of it. DP — I think that is something we can get posted, out on the website BK - Some of them may not be that different but I would just like to see it. One other question I have for when talk about the ROW, would the clearing be done, I think you may have answered this already, not all the way to the property line? DP — I know on the plans there right now it is indicating we have a lot of trees to remove, but again, we have not done the final review. I can tell you on other projects we have not gone right to the edge of the property and removed every single tree, we look at that to see what is in there, and to see what trees should be removed for safety and what trees we can actually save. BK - When you say for safety — what does that mean, plow drivers? DP — No, it's actually for someone driving down the road. BK - So how many feet from the side? DP — I was going to ask Tyler that, what clearance. Back to the ROW line? Tyler — That is typically not required for a 30 MPH road. It's not the requirement for a 30 MPH road. So if I have tree that's approximately 3.5 feet in diameter about 3 or 4 four feet from the edge of the road it may not get cut down if it does not have to be for construction. DP — I would tell you that it's case by case, we look at that. 44:08 0 44:15 Rosemary Lensing 8310 Pleasant View Drive — I just have some minor questions, I want to know the time frame of this, is it going to be 6 months long that were driving on dirt and asphalt, tar and what? DP — I can't have a real solid answer for you because what ends up happening after we go out to bid we sit down with the contractor. They give us a phasing of far as when the construction starts, we do have limitations on how long they can pull the asphalt off road and when it has to be put down. RL - So can we drive on the road? DP — Yes RL - When they are tarring it? DP —That would be about the only time that there might be limited driving on. RL - How about the concrete, our driveway apron? DP — that would be another time that you would not be able. RL - Where would you go? DP — Your either parking on the street in the evening, and I know in past projects that if there is somebody that has to have access with their car, if their handicapped the contractors have to build a ramp and give you access to your driveway, but all of that would be covered in the spring when we have another meeting like this and talk about construction, talk about what's going to go on there and timing. We just don't know that until after we meet with the contractor at that time. RL - OK, and part of that pedestrian safety were going to have mailboxes on one side of the road, were going to have a lot of people crossing roads, I think we should have our own individual mailboxes in that situation. And to slow down traffic I would advise maybe speed bumps, traffic has been picking up, faster and faster and with people crossing thru, like everyone has mentioned, especially with the new development over in Blaine. 46:15 46:28 Bill Crowder 3001 Bronson Drive I am an avowed tree hugger, I love our trees. I remember when I first moved to Mounds View in 1977 one of the first things I did was I climbed my great big White Pine tree and sat out there and watched the tree sway back and forth and I look at all the trees in our neighborhood and how lucky we are that we didn't buy a piece of property up in Ham Lake that was a beautiful house but we had a twig in our front yard. I've got a forest in my yard, you look at my property from the east — Spring Lake Road and Bronson Drive you can't see my house because of the foliage and I would like to maintain that. I think it's environmentally sound that we have trees providing us with oxygen and shade, climbing materials, I enjoy climbing my tree and I am very fortunate to live in Mounds View and I would like to keep it as it is. And whatever project you decide, if its curb and gutter or sidewalk also, I would like to see a minimization of cutting down of trees. That's all I am going to say. 47:54 48:11 Steve Duncan 7821 Spring Lake Road — I inherited the property, I have been there for 61 years, the house was built in 1938, its one of the first homes on Spring Lake. One of the gentlemen that came 10 up here lives adjacent to my property and is talking about, he would lose half his front yard, I live right next door to him, the gentleman that was talking about his driveway goes underneath his home, lives across the street from me, so you can see it's on the corner where Spring Lake comes down and turns onto the lake. So the road is between my home and the lake. With this project, if they expand it, to include a gutter system and sidewalk or pathway, on the east side I would lose 95% of the trees on my property, there is absolutely no room for expansion on that road and quite frankly, in all the 65 years that I have been there, I have never seen a water problem unless there is an ice dam on the water drain that is in front of my home. Other than that, the road is in really good shape, there are no potholes, the road is in excellent shape, in fact they just did all the markings for the side and center line. My point is, more directed to some of the statistics, first of all, this statistic from Hillview Road to County Road I, which I am in the middle of I would really like to, my thoughts are that's absurd — I just can't see 1,000 cars running past my home on a daily basis. I have been there for 65 years, I just don't see that kind of traffic. As far as foot traffic, I live walking distance to Spring Lake beach, and, since the water table/ level have been so low on Spring Lake, for years, the beach has been closed so it eliminated most of the traffic. We do see traffic on County Road I, that sidewalk — so, with that said, if they were going to put a walkway on Spring Lake Road, it would meet with the walkway on County Road I, which would put that walkway on the west side, on the lake side. However, I will go with the guy that said his property/ driveway goes under his garage his home, that part of the street does not accommodate for that, it's just not wide enough. Of course none of these are questions, these are all comments in my opinion, I just don't see the need for this kind of an update and project. Thanks for listening. 51:37 51:44 Liz Klisch 8217 Spring Lake Road —My husband bought this house in 1984, when I met him, one of the things I remember, I grew up down in northeast with the Elms as the canopy, heartbreaking loss when they cut those down, did not have to take them all, but they cut a lot of them at that was one of the attractions of that street, was the canopy of those Oaks, their healthy trees, you can't be taking those down. The thing on Spring Lake Road, it is a pass-thru, we need traffic to slow down, somebody brought up speed bumps, I deliver for a living, there's speed humps, where it's not that, it slows traffic down, that would be amazing. As far as the traffic counters you talk about, when we were kids, we used to jump on them so I don't know how accurate that is, we used to stand and jump on them, we used to do that all the time as kids. Ok we have to do it four times because that would be one car, we did that. We have, in our front yard, a Cotton Wood, that the base of the tree is 8 feet, there is no way you are going to replace that, the shade of that covers probably about 7 houses, I don't know, its huge, but you probably know, it's one of the biggest trees on the street. So, you can't replace those, not in our lifetime are we ever going to see those trees, ever. OK, and to take down, or even to do anything, if you're going to take those Oaks down, we lost two healthy Red Oaks due to Oak Wilt. That's exactly what's going to happen, you're going to lose those to Oaks. You cannot get that back, so I think you need to work on the traffic counters cause I think there's a bunch of kids jumping on them. DP — On the traffic counters, we don't go out there and see if there are kids jumping on them. But when we report to the state, if they see an anomaly with the past, we have to go out there an recount, we have to set those again, and in the past we have had to do that numerous times. I know when we submit them, they say it can't be, its too low. Others, they will come back and say either way, we have to go back and reset them. LK - And also on one of those pictures on Spring Lake Road, I don't know what side it was it showed, and they've got the lines in there where there's a pretty big shoulder where they have the yellow line, that 11 itself is somewhat of a walking path, it keeps people away. But I think speed humps would slow that traffic down, the people who live on that street don't speed on it, it's the people who are passing thru, so I think that just slowing them down would be a huge thing and I think that is all you really need to do. 54:31 54:39 — Dan Dreier 7830 Spring Lake Road - I have another idea from hearing discussion about other alternatives, I used to live in Portland, Oregon, lot of good stuff there, there is some great stuff there now to. One of the things there great about is green, bicycling and pedestrian traffic, they give priority to pedestrian traffic, one of the ways they did it was they took a street that goes two ways, turned it into a one way and used the extra part to make the thing everyone wanted but it didn't affect anyone's homes, the greenspace, the canopy stayed and, I think when we look at, when it was stated earlier, the survey was a little biased, I kind of have a feeling it was more, hey were thinking were going to do this, how would you like this handled, versus a choice between turning your road into a one way road with a bike lane, or having, removing some of the trees that are closer to it, keeping it a two way road and adding an 8' trail. Those kind of considerations, I think would go a long way to serving, how do people feel about a one way. Maybe it's a terrible idea I don't know, it's an alternative. 55:54 56:01 Larry Myslicki 8454 Spring Lake Road — Been there since 1975 and back in the 90's when we rejected the trail and they redid the road, the majority of residents on that road rejected it. Now you have 5 or 6 requests, is all you said, yet sounds like overwhelmingly majority again, reject that trail, so who proposed the trail, is my question, who asked for this trail? DP —The city is proposing the trail. LM - The residents are the city. DP —The city, which is staff and Stantec (contract engineers), looking at past projects and direction from council very project that we look at putting in a trail or sidewalk, so we put this in there, and we look for feedback, and that's what this exactly that meeting is for, to get that feedback and to get that direction, and yes the council is here to hear all this, and as I have said this before, if the council says to look at other alternatives then we will do that, they will receive all the information, they will receive all the comments, they will receive the comments on the survey, all that information will be presented to them and if they tell us, as staff, to take the trail out, then the trail will be out. It is not, staff telling you - that this is going in, it's what we look at, no different than the road design, if the council says we have to look at a different road design, we will look do that as well. From talking to council, whether that's in a work session or council, talking to Parks Rec and Forestry Commission again, getting that direction is where we decide what we are going to propose. I hope council is taking notes because most people don't want to lose trees, we don't want that trail, I hope they are paying attention. 58:21— Kathy Smith 7405 Spring Lake Road — From what I understand I took a look at the current, in place Comprehensive Plan which is from 2008, nowhere in their states a trail, can you confirm that? DP — I don't work the Comprehensive Plan, you would have to ask Jon (Sevald — Community Planner) JS — I cannot think of what the trail plan was in 2008. 12 KS - Its not in there. Then the current plan that you have from 2040 has not been approved by Rice Creek Watershed District, or Ramsey County Watershed District because I have talked to both ladies and both of them stated they would hope we would actually have a narrow plan and go with green streets, living streets or street diet, and they would actually offer $100,000 in grant money that's going to come available in October, deadline is December 31, 2021. And each landowner would be up to $7,500 each to put in a rain garden. I don't know about you but $7,500 bucks, I think some people people would take that versus having curb and gutter. I think if you took a show of hands tonight you would actually see a majority of people don't want this, and actually the best idea I heard tonight is the gentleman of the one way, I would be more than happy to drive around five blocks if I had to go down one way on my own street just to save the trees that are going to be taken down. Like I said, I along with many other people here bought the house for the trees. I paid thousands of dollars, when I added onto my house, thousands of dollars for the cement truck to have a big dragon to pour the concrete because I did not want to have one tree taken down not one. No matter the looks of the tree or anything. Those trees were here before that road went in, we don't need more impervious surface and I can't believe that there's not other options and I really hope city council takes a real fear to everybody tonight. And everybody should write in, something you don't think about right now, that you want to ask for say, write it in, write it into the mayor, write it into the council, write it in the media, Facebook. 61:22 DP —Two more questions, time for staff and questions. 61:38 Mike Hegland 7604 Spring Lake Road — Am I correct that this is your proposal as the city, it's this plan with all the impervious surface you described? DP — Its our proposal MH - This is your proposal that you're starting with? I am going to say that I object to this plan that you have proposed because you said that's what this meeting was for and I think there's a much better plan out there and it's not this one. 62:24 62:30 — Kim Oberg 8340 Pleasant View Drive — I have a clarification question — You were asked about why is the trail/sidewalk going in, you said 5 or 6 people asked, the key is; did they ask about whether there would be sidewalks or they asked for sidewalks. Because if I asked will there be sidewalks, I'm not affirming I want sidewalks, I am asking will there be sidewalks. Can you clarify what those 5 or 6 people said? DP — Yes, they asked if we were including sidewalks in the project. KO - But they did not say I want sidewalks? DP — A few of them did say they want sidewalks. KO - How many people are represented/homes in Spring Lake Park Road, in the plan. DP — In the total project in 2022 there is 146 and in 2023 there are 74 so there are 220 total properties. That includes Pleasant View Drive, Pleasant View Court and 84th Avenue. KO - Would it be too much to ask for an individual survey on those homes, is that a reasonable thing to ask; would you like a sidewalk? DP — We can look into. 13 KO - Did the council themselves decide to propose this trail. Did the council themselves say we want this trail, cause if there's just two people of all those Spring Lake Park People, and I did hear one lady say this is a safety issue today, and I appreciate that, I do walk with a stroller, I stay on the side with the wide berth instead of the side with little nothing, so I manage my safety, did they decide to do that? DP — When we talked about this, within the budget, we indicated we would look at putting a trail or sidewalk in. KO - Is that like an option that could be dropped? DP —Yes, absolutely KO - One thing, just a thought, I hadn't thought of it until this meeting, a lot of really smart people here, observing that we are about to step into a real mess on Spring Lake Park road, I live on Pleasant View so I guess I could just turn my head but when all those homes go active, there all going to go south to get on 10, and then at night there going to go North, and Spring Lake Park needs something, a speed bump, a speed hill, a speed something, a one way to stop that traffic, before we step any further before we spend any money, what could we do right now to save the safety, because that's important even though the question I agree was worded, but the safety is going to be greatly compromised for our people and for the cars and all of them and maybe we take a moment and say let's open this up to ideas about Spring Lake Park based on new development, I think we did not know about or maybe we do, I don't know how these things work. Thank you for your time I think I am over my three minutes. DP — Done. 66:45 14 Bronson Drive residents who spoke 28:08 Gretchen Crowder 3001 Bronson Drive — One of my concerns, and in 40 years I have never had water in my basement and I have a concern that all this fiddling around with the streets and the sidewalk my put water in my basement? DP — I can tell you that any of the designs, street designs, we cannot shed water back into private property. Water from the street or sidewalk it has to shed or drain into the cities infrastructure. 29:00 46:28 Bill Crowder 3001 Bronson Drive I am an avowed tree hugger, I love our trees. I remember when I first moved to Mounds View in 1977 one of the first things I did was I climbed my great big White Pine tree and sat out there and watched the tree sway back and forth and I look at all the trees in our neighborhood and how lucky we are that we didn't buy a piece of property up in Ham Lake that was a beautiful house but we had a twig in our front yard. I've got a forest in my yard, you look at my property from the east — Spring Lake Road and Bronson Drive you can't see my house because of the foliage and I would like to maintain that. I think it's environmentally sound that we have trees providing us with oxygen and shade, climbing materials, I enjoy climbing my tree and I am very fortunate to live in Mounds View and I would like to keep it as it is. And whatever project you decide, if its curb and gutter or sidewalk also, I would like to see a minimization of cutting down of trees. That's all I am going to say. 47:54 15 Resident from County Road I who spoke 00:32 Barb Haake — 3024 County Road I, 1 live on Spring Lake — I am the one that probably gave the city council really headaches because I am the one that went around in the latter part of 1990s, 1988, 97, 99 and I went up and down spring lake road and other people too, we did not want curb and gutter, I also was on their street committees back in the early parts of 2000. All I want to say is, I have been serving, 22 years on Rice Creek Watershed, I have been on City Council, Planning Commission, Park Board, State Rep, I have been all these frickin things. But what I want to get to is that my Rice Creek Watershed business told me that we have sugar sand we never really needed curb and gutter but there is one thing, Nyle is not going to like this, and I am sure the council is not going to like it either, but my main question is were going to have all these things were going to look at, the state aid and everything else. Has this been before Rice Creek Watershed yet and I will wait in a minute for an answer? But my whole point is, when this was built and we did all this streets and reconstructing in Mounds View even though there were only a few people that had water that were really an issue that we probably could have taken care of. I can go back to 1970 even and tell you when we hauled stuff, we could use water and have it go into wetlands, etc. which is neither here nor there. But when we did all that and decided it, and it went to Rice Creek, Rice Creek said you are probably going to have to purchase homes to be able to take all your sewer water, this is the storm sewer water, and you take it over to an area; where it is going to have to settle out before it can be released into Rice Creek. That would have cost the city a lot of money, so the agreement that came about was there had to be rain gardens and there were a lot of people that on the new streets and everything like that they had meetings like this and people volunteered weather they put a rain garden in their yard or not. Now I have not seen on this plan any rain gardens, not sure. I will be calling Rice Creek tomorrow to see if this has come before it yet. And like I said, I know this is something this is something the city is not going to like to have and have me butt my head into this again. But it's just something that has to be done, I don't know about if anybody else has asked for a rain garden in their yards, to be able to have it, so that sanitary water that's going to come off the impervious surface, were going to have more impervious surface. Is that going to be clean before it goes into Rice Creek or not? That's something to do. Now my question — has this gone before Rice Creek yet, and I guess this goes to Don and Nyle? 16 Residents from Pleasant View Drive who spoke 35:15 Kimberly Oberg 8340 Pleasant View Drive — I have some unrelated questions to each other. When is there a council meeting where this is on the agenda, we wanna go and find out it's not on the agenda, can we have that address right now? DP — When is it on the agenda — September 13t" and the work session on September the 7tn KO - All right, so is the road situation is not sustainable the way it is right now, why do we only get one option, though back in my school board meeting days when were told that were going to do, not asked or given another option, what's the other option? I would like to see another option. DP — We'll bring that forward to the city. KO - I would like to see another option. It's not a choice if we don't have an option. It's a command. Were we told about the mailbox thing, were we given a warning that we better not spend $200 in a beautiful mailbox that we designed and now we have to be in these nasty looking little boxes to conform? I spent $200 and endless amount of work engineering my box, the best clang box in the city; and I want my box, sorry but I'm really upset. I just put it in two years ago. I'm also concerned, I live on Pleasant View Drive and I understand, I went out and measured, we have 14 and 14, so that would be more like 13 and a half, its close enough, I measured it, so I know what I am talking about and just listening to people tell me what I should think, not that you're doing that. But I like to know and I like to come prepared — so 11 to 16' of my yard, is it going to be destroyed, is this an option is there like a possible only 5', could you discuss the destruction that could happen. DP — Is there a possibility, yes that does not mean we are going to go right to the edge of the property line. Within that ROW that is 50 to 60 or 70' that is the area that we do have to work in but that does not mean we are going to take the full width. KO - Well that's good because I am concerned about that because I don't have a lot of front yard like , I have a nice back yard with lots of beautiful trees and I do have one of the most beautiful trees in my front yard and love it and its, it may get destroyed. Am I allowed to have another session at the mic as I might be over my three minutes? 38:16 62:30 — Kim Oberg 8340 Pleasant View Drive — I have a clarification question — You were asked about why is the trail/sidewalk going in, you said 5 or 6 people asked, the key is; did they ask about whether there would be sidewalks or they asked for sidewalks. Because if I asked will there be sidewalks, I'm not affirming I want sidewalks, I am asking will there be sidewalks. Can you clarify what those 5 or 6 people said? DP — Yes, they asked if we were including sidewalks in the project. KO - But they did not say I want sidewalks? DP — A few of them did say they want sidewalks. KO - How many people are represented/homes in Spring Lake Park Road, in the plan. 17 DP — In the total project in 2022 there is 146 and in 2023 there are 74 so there are 220 total properties. That includes Pleasant View Drive, Pleasant View Court and 841" Avenue. KO - Would it be too much to ask for an individual survey on those homes, is that a reasonable thing to ask; would you like a sidewalk? DP — We can look into. KO - Did the council themselves decide to propose this trail. Did the council themselves say we want this trail, cause if there's just two people of all those Spring Lake Park People, and I did hear one lady say this is a safety issue today, and I appreciate that, I do walk with a stroller, I stay on the side with the wide berth instead of the side with little nothing, so I manage my safety, did they decide to do that? DP — When we talked about this, within the budget, we indicated we would look at putting a trail or sidewalk in. KO - Is that like an option that could be dropped? DP —Yes, absolutely KO - One thing, just a thought, I hadn't thought of it until this meeting, a lot of really smart people here, observing that we are about to step into a real mess on Spring Lake Park road, I live on Pleasant View so I guess I could just turn my head but when all those homes go active, there all going to go south to get on 10, and then at night there going to go North, and Spring Lake Park needs something, a speed bump, a speed hill, a speed something, a one way to stop that traffic, before we step any further before we spend any money, what could we do right now to save the safety, because that's important even though the question I agree was worded, but the safety is going to be greatly compromised for our people and for the cars and all of them and maybe we take a moment and say let's open this up to ideas about Spring Lake Park based on new development, I think we did not know about or maybe we do, I don't know how these things work. Thank you for your time I think I am over my three minutes. 44:15 Rosemary Lensing 8310 Pleasant View Drive — I just have some minor questions, I want to know the time frame of this, is it going to be 6 months long that were driving on dirt and asphalt, tar and what? DP — I can't have a real solid answer for you because what ends up happening after we go out to bid we sit down with the contractor. They give us a phasing of far as when the construction starts, we do have limitations on how long they can pull the asphalt off road and when it has to be put down. RL - So can we drive on the road? DP — Yes RL - When they are tarring it? DP —That would be about the only time that there might be limited driving on. RL - How about the concrete, our driveway apron? DP — that would be another time that you would not be able. 18 RL - Where would you go? DP — Your either parking on the street in the evening, and I know in past projects that if there is somebody that has to have access with their car, if their handicapped the contractors have to build a ramp and give you access to your driveway, but all of that would be covered in the spring when we have another meeting like this and talk about construction, talk about what's going to go on there and timing. We just don't know that until after we meet with the contractor at that time. RL - OK, and part of that pedestrian safety were going to have mailboxes on one side of the road, were going to have a lot of people crossing roads, I think we should have our own individual mailboxes in that situation. And to slow down traffic I would advise maybe speed bumps, traffic has been picking up, faster and faster and with people crossing thru, like everyone has mentioned, especially with the new development over in Blaine. 46:15 19 Residents from Spring Lake Park Road who spoke 6:15 — Kathy Smith 7405 Spring Lake Road — And I did speak with Rice Creek Watershed District and I also spoke with Ramsey County Watershed District and White Eagle, spoke with her, for a number of hours also Laura at Rice Creek and I'm sure that your aware. I hope you can explain to the audience that Rice Creek partners with Ramsey County to offer up to $100,000 for cities to narrow their streets, not widen their streets. There is also new terminology, not sure if you are aware of it, a lot of cities like Fridley, Shoreview, Edina, St. Paul are all going to do what's called Green Streets or Living Streets or road diet, we don't need more impervious surface, I know you can throw all the gutters out there, all the clean basins and stuff like that, once you put this in, that's it. These trees, 49 trees I heard, these trees were here before the world was. It's not needed. Drive around the city, the road, the edges, and I also heard that your plow drivers are having problems, that means that's their probably additional training. We want water on our yards, look at the fires going on out there, do you want to take out more trees that are giving out oxygen, you guys are having problems with Oak Wilt, Dutch Elm, Emerald Ash Borer, Buckthorn, you want to hire more staff, I know you said that people are not going to be assessed but every taxpayer in Mounds View, taxes are going up, you gotta hire more staff, you gotta buy more equipment, you gotta sweep, you gotta plow that sidewalk you want to put in. By the way, that curb and gutter, on Cty Rd. H your plow driver took the curb and gutter out which will cost all of us to replace. So I want every residence, actually does their homework, and oh, by the way, that survey, I need to ask you specifically — do you know the term biased survey? The first question was pedestrian safety, I have two little neighbor kids that I love to come over. I walk them to and from, across the street. I care about pedestrian safety, but the ways you guys wrote that survey you're trying to make it sound like I want a wider street and I want a sidewalk and I don't. Let me just finish, every resident that wants to take their survey back, make sure that is done. 9:23 9:28 Don Hinrichs 7785 Spring Lake Road, on the lake, on the curve. There is very little land between the road and lake. It looks to me when I look at your plan, that you will take out half my yard in order to have a path 6', a wider road, curb and gutter and I could be wrong but I just don't see where you are going to put a path on that side of the road unless you're going with a boardwalk of something that is right over the lake. And I understand you can do it, but when I bought the house I like it the way it is, I like the road the way it is, I don't need curb and gutter, everything has been working fine. So that's my opinion, so am I right, will you be taking about half my yard up? Don P — Will have to take a look at it, but I know the proposed trail around Spring Lake, next to where, you are talking will be right behind curb, there will not be that buffer in that location. Don H — But still, its 8 fee, it's still going into the yard quite a bit. (Don P — on the lakeside) No, on the other side — you will have to move it over (Don P — no, everything we are proposing is staying in the ROW where we have the right to work). But right where the road is, towards the lake, it goes right down to the lake. There's only 2 feet there. I would love it if a path would work, but if it means taking out half my yard then I am not for it. And somehow that has to be considered. 20 Don P — We will take certainly take a look. I am just going to address the trees we have counted there. Those trees being removed — I know that, staff (PW) has never viewed all the plans and met with Stantec on what is being proposed. These are preliminary plans, 60%, we are nowhere near final plans. There are a number of meetings and a lot of direction we have to get, not only hearing from you but from City Council. 11:58 12:01— Vincent Meyer — 8380 Spring Lake Road Myer Construction. In 1999 the city tried to ram it down our throats with the gutters and stuff and we as homeowners turned it down, you guys never even had a proposal for resurfacing, you rammed it down our throat, we shut it down and I hope we shut it down now. Where did the power pole goes, can you go back to that, on that picture, back it up, where the power pole go, that pictures looks like it has been photo -shopped, I don't see any of our power poles. DP — Not photo -shopped, one of our current roads. VM - Where is the power poles? DP —There are no power poles on this street VM - There is too, that's my yard right there sir, I know my yard. Also you brought up here where the curb is going to support the road. Look on 85th right now; where they are tearing out all the curb right now because it did not support the road. Thank you. 13:20 13:25 — Dan Dreier 7830 Spring Lake Road —There is very limited space on that side of the road if you want to put in a 6 to 8 foot wide trail. There is enough space there but eventually you will get to my property and its going to create additional issues for me — City council I brought this up, I have a driveway that goes underneath my house and when you go further out there already at the issue where I have to back up far trying to make sure I don't hit any kids or anyone zipping in the curb bike trail that may be there, now if you move it 6 to 8 feet closer, I am not sure how I am going to avoid hitting people because they are going to be driving too quickly, they're going to have hit the side of my car as I go out and I will be neither of our fault and it will be in the public ROW. I am backing up, can't be my fault, they are the ones that have to be looking. It creates a real problem, it's a safety issue. On top of it, I am the only house on the road that has a gravel parking area in front of my house, I am not the one that installed it but the part I have come appreciate is that when you have older people, especially in winter time, and your driveway angles downward, they tend to take a topple. So parents come over, they're going to get out of their car there, which means I have to park on top of that ROW or whatever, and as I am looking at all of these things stacking up, between endangering people in that area, because it's so wide and so close to my driveway in that area going down, no place to park in order to get people safely into the house, there's not a lot of options left for me other than pursuing a variance or something. Its new information for me, I am digesting it, trying to be open minded about it there are always things that are positive and negative. I do like that the road is going to change a little bit to make it slower, that's a positive, I am concerned about a few areas and hoping to find some resolution to it. 15:42 21 15:52 — Ashely Stevens 7406 Spring Lake Road — I am looking at the Spring Lake Road daily traffic numbers, that's correct, that's daily, and how is that information obtained. DP — we put traffic counters out. AS - Is that like public information we can review? DP — Sure it is, might be on our website but state has all that information, we have to report it. AS - It just seems pretty high numbers for daily. Also a couple questions I have — seems like pedestrian safety is being pushed a lot, what's the foot traffic on Spring Lake Road, daily, weekly, monthly, yearly what are the numbers. I know you mentioned about like in the winter, there's snow pushed up, are these numbers still, is this, pertaining to pedestrian safety, has there been any research on how many people are actually walking. DP — No. AS - So have there been any pedestrian accidents on Spring Lake Road? DP —to his knowledge no. AS - Ok, have you received any requests from residents on Spring Lake Road requesting a trail. DP —yes I have. AS - Do you have that information, the numbers? DP- 5 or 6 over the past couple days putting in trail or sidewalk. AS - Out of how many are on Spring Lake Road? Do you plan on doing any research on how many, how much foot traffic there is on Spring Lake Road? DP —That has not been talked about — no. AS - So I guess I am curious why a trail is being proposed without the research? DP — refers back to the comprehensive plan PRF — master trail and sidewalk plan. AS - So this is from a trail/ proposal in what year? DP — It was just updated this year. AS - Approved? DP — Anytime there has been a project put in — and I am getting the note the 3 minutes is up, anytime the project goes in, the direction is to look into seeing if a sidewalk/trail can go in at the same time. 18:44 18:55 Mary Malrick — 8289 Spring Lake Road — When you look at preliminary design, did they have any other designs that they created that we have not seen yet. DP — No. 22 MM - So they were just given one? DP — that is all we were given at this point in time, and after we receive the feedback we present that to council. If/from the feedback we present to council, they want us to look at other designs then that will go back to Stantec for other options for the City Council. MM - And how do we move that forward to have other designs looked at? DP - I would direct your question to both myself and/or Administrator Zikmund and the City Council at a council meeting. MM- Ok —So when we look at the one design on Spring Lake Road there are sections that do not currently have storm sewer. Does that $6.4 million dollars — is that putting in storm sewers all down there or are we leaving some of it for the rain water to just move to the side? DP —That does include storm sewer the entire length. MM - All through it? DP — yes. MM - So you will be updating that piece of it? DP — yes, that includes adding storm sewer to the entire stretch. MM - OK, going back to the traffic count, there was a section on there — 2,000 cars on Spring Lake Road, and it looks like that I maybe am not thinking about the road correctly, it said there was a number from Sherwood Road to Mounds View, I can't think of where Spring Lake Road intersection with Sherwood Road. DP — it should be Sherwood Place. MM - I can't think of Sherwood any, is that County J to Mounds View Blvd? Discussion, Do we have a count from J to Mounds View Blvd? DP — Have to ask James, the location is determined by the state, we submit those, they tell us where on a map and we put it anywhere in that area. They typically tell us not to do them when school is in session, they do not want to have the busses, it has to be when normal traffic, when school is not in session. MM - What I am thinking about, is how many of those cars are drive thru' s, and how many are turning off on Ardan and going home, so to speak, and maybe have a stop sign or have something, There is that big new housing developing going on north of J, and I am thinking like everyone else, we are going to get a lot more drive thru, so it would be nice and I would ask if we could put on a counter, not a county counter, but a Mounds View counter, put one on both ends so we can get an accurate count and see how many are residential and how many are driving thru. DP — something we can certainly look into. MM - Ok. 23:11 23 23:19 —Terri Hougen — 8340 Spring Lake Road I am a tree lover, I hate to see trees go, but a lot of people walk and bike, still have strollers on the street, we unfortunately we need a sidewalk for safety. We have tons for traffic than we used too and I would say at least half the traffic is speeding. Question, why is the bike path suggested for the west side, if it was on the east side it would hook up with Ardan which can steer people crossing Spring Lake Road. And why do we need the boulevard from the grass to the curb and then the sidewalk over here, why can't it look like Ardan does? DP — it certainly can, I know just that's what has been proposed. 24:09 24:16 — Michelle Dreier 7830 Spring Lake Road — Wanted to concur with Scott, a previous speaker - with looking at the measurements, even if there is no boulevard between the trail and road. I don't think there is enough room between the road and Spring Lake unless you're going to fill in the flood plain, I do not think there is enough room for it — an 8' trail, I would have to see the stakes. But I would revisit that and take a measurement. I also have a concern regarding the water levels on Spring Lake. We talked about Rice Creek but the water levels in Spring Lake are receding and I am wondering if there have been any studies as to how the collection of all the water in the storm and gutter is going to effect the water levels in Spring Lake. As someone that lives on the lake, the water levels from October last year to the snow melt to this year went down drastically. And because were in a drought throughout the summer the water levels have continued to recede to the point where it's getting a bit alarming how far the lake goes out. Just something to consider as we move forward if we are collecting more water into the storm sewers and it's not going into the lake, yes we have no pollutants going into the lake but are we going to lose the lake. 25:42. DP — Why are we looking at the west or east side — I don't recall. Tyler — Typically the power poles, west side has the utilities Question — Can you put it underground? DP/Tyler 0 IF you pay for it. Reason is we looked at the utility poles and if we put it in. We could put it underground but we would have to pay for it. That's how it works, city has to pay for it, and it is quite costly. Reason trail is being proposed with the boulevard is for watershed reasons, if you provide that green space between the trail and roadway it does not increase your impervious surface footprint for calculation of whether or not you need to do rain gardens and if we do put trail back of curb we are going to end up triggering rain gardens throughout the entire project. That's one of the things were trying to mitigate in the preliminary plan, Kathy Smith —The city can apply for a variance to go outside of MNDOT standards, you did it for the speed on the curve. 28:06 29:05 — Richard Oehlenschlager 7545 Spring Lake Road — Lived there since 1978. 1 am concerned were losing a lot of our aesthetics because of the beautiful trees that are over 100 years old and in addition to that the root disturbance from any of the other surrounding trees that I have can spread and wipe out my entire grove of pin oak (Latin name), those are threatened because I am going to lose some for sure and suffer for sure because of his project. This project was not called for, not asked for, not needed and 24 environmentally unsound. And 2, when I questioned the surveyors who came out and they said this is a foregone conclusion, it's a done deal and how much did them surveyors cost? DP — Will have to go back and look at the bill, do not have that off the top of my head. And if they surveyor told you that, it is wrong, it is not a done deal. The city council makes the final decision. RO — It sure sounds like it has been. DP — No sir. 30:20 DP — I am going to ask you if you have comment or question to come forward. This is really to get feedback from you on the project. If you want to voice and have the council hear it you need to go a council meeting to have them hear your passion about this project. Staff does not make the decision whether or not this project moves forward. We take the information we receive from you, your concerns and we forward those and give those to the city council. I understand the passion, I understand the concern. We will bring that forward to the council, they will make that final decision and give staff the direction. Whether that is including the trail or coming up with a different design of the street. I can also tell you that we cannot let that street go. If that street — ultimately if you as the residents decide to let this street go and that's the council direction, that is not sustainable. 1999 until now — 20 plus years, if we wait another 20 years that road will be completely gone. Why do I say 20 years, I already mentioned that 5 year CIP, we have to go back to other streets, and start reconstructing those for mill and overlay. That impacts the funding and the money we set aside, that the city council sets aside. That means that this street will drop to the bottom of the list. Because even after this we have other streets that we have to get to. We place these in order based off those pavement rating indexes, based off the City Council direction to us. Now, if the passion that you're showing hear, I would tell you again that you need to show that to the city council, they're the ones that make the decision. This is not a city council meeting though, you have to do this at a formal city council meeting. This meeting is designed specifically to get questions about the project and to hear some of those concerns. 32:52 32:57 Joel Kvamme 8477 Spring Lake Road Far north of SLID Road since 1975. 1 moved because of the stand of red oaks that were part of that environment in those years and I have lost 11 mature oaks. But I have planted 51 trees since then and I enjoy that environment. I am on the east side, would that trail extend that far north, I am just 3 houses south of County Road J? DP —The proposed trail goes all the way from County Road J to County Road H2. My sympathy with my neighbors on the west side, if it is on the West side I breathe a sigh of relief. If it's on the east side I do have about 9, no 5 mature trees that may be in peril of the 8 foot extension in my direction. That would be pretty tough to take. I live in Mounds View because of greenery, trees and relative tranquility so a major concern that I have about this project is that any widening of a very busy artery, already would invite, I suspect, even more traffic. Lot of people come from the north, they get off Highway 10 to avoid a terrible intersection at J and 65. They cut down Spring Lake Road to Mounds View Blvd. The rush hour is significant on the North end and any invitation to even more traffic is something I rather wary of and I think it is a safety issue for us to put it up into that kind of situation. Maybe I should be talking to council, I am not sure to whom these points should be made but that's my thoughts. 35: 10 25 48:11 Steve Duncan 7821 Spring Lake Road — I inherited the property, I have been there for 61 years, the house was built in 1938, its one of the first homes on Spring Lake. One of the gentlemen that came up here lives adjacent to my property and is talking about, he would lose half his front yard, I live right next door to him, the gentleman that was talking about his driveway goes underneath his home, lives across the street from me, so you can see it's on the corner where Spring Lake comes down and turns onto the lake. So the road is between my home and the lake. With this project, if they expand it, to include a gutter system and sidewalk or pathway, on the east side I would lose 95% of the trees on my property, there is absolutely no room for expansion on that road and quite frankly, in all the 65 years that I have been there, I have never seen a water problem unless there is an ice dam on the water drain that is in front of my home. Other than that, the road is in really good shape, there are no potholes, the road is in excellent shape, in fact they just did all the markings for the side and center line. My point is, more directed to some of the statistics, first of all, this statistic from Hillview Road to County Road I, which I am in the middle of I would really like to, my thoughts are that's absurd — I just can't see 1,000 cars running past my home on a daily basis. I have been there for 65 years, I just don't see that kind of traffic. As far as foot traffic, I live walking distance to Spring Lake beach, and, since the water table/ level have been so low on Spring Lake, for years, the beach has been closed so it eliminated most of the traffic. We do see traffic on County Road 1, that sidewalk — so, with that said, if they were going to put a walkway on Spring Lake Road, it would meet with the walkway on County Road I, which would put that walkway on the west side, on the lake side. However, I will go with the guy that said his property/ driveway goes under his garage his home, that part of the street does not accommodate for that, it's just not wide enough. Of course none of these are questions, these are all comments in my opinion, I just don't see the need for this kind of an update and project. Thanks for listening. 51:37 38:38 — Brian Kaden 7675 Spring Lake Road — I have called you I believe, I called the mayor and I called the Deputy Chief of Police to complain what I think about are the traffic problems on County Road I, not necessarily Spring Lake Road per sea. But one of my biggest concerns about a trail is where it would connect with County Road I trail across from where the waterworks pipes run underneath. Due to traffic issues on County Road I and what I have observed over almost 30 years of living there, this coming May it will be 30 years that I have owned that house. There was a year and a half, I told you during our conversation that I was disabled and had not a lot better to do but look at the lake and look at the traffic and by my observation approximately 1/3 of the people run that stop sign. I have a real big issue with safety of having only a marked crosswalk at that stop sign. At one point in my life, when I was told by a former Chief of Police that there have no deaths, no injuries, no accidents and we have to put our resources elsewhere in the city. I get that, I could just complain, but last Friday night, shortly after it got dark my daughter whose in the back there said, "dad, why is that truck in our yard?" and I looked up and it wasn't a truck, it was a semi, and it was more than 8' on my property on County Road I past the landscaping rocks I have out there. That's one of many stories I could tell you and if there was a walking trail or crosswalk over there, well; you know what could happen. Anyway, that would be a good thing to bring up to Parks meeting that they should hear a story like that. That guy ran right thru the stop sign, he was either sleeping, drunk, or playing with his phone driving with a Class A license or whatever they have, not a good idea. Couple other questions I have for you, when they take these traffic counts you mentioned that they don't like to do it when buses is on the road because that messes up , average. That's nine months out of the year, I not a statistician, but that's over half the year. 26 DP — I completely understand and raised the same concern that we are missing traffic. Those are their rules and that we have to follow. By no means that does not mean that we cannot go out there and catch some of that traffic. Those traffic counts go on all the MSA streets, they indicate when we put those out there and again, it is not during the school year. BK - That does make sense, I don't see the traffic counts on say Spring Lake Road from County Road I to Bronson and other parts of Spring Lake Road out there and I would love to see all of it. DP — I think that is something we can get posted, out on the website BK - Some of them may not be that different but I would just like to see it. One other question I have for when talk about the ROW, would the clearing be done, I think you may have answered this already, not all the way to the property line? DP — I know on the plans there right now it is indicating we have a lot of trees to remove, but again, we have not done the final review. I can tell you on other projects we have not gone right to the edge of the property and removed every single tree, we look at that to see what is in there, and to see what trees should be removed for safety and what trees we can actually save. BK - When you say for safety — what does that mean, plow drivers? DP — No, it's actually for someone driving down the road. BK - So how many feet from the side? DP — I was going to ask Tyler that, what clearance. Back to the ROW line? Tyler — That is typically not required for a 30 MPH road. It's not the requirement for a 30 MPH road. So if I have tree that's approximately 3.5 feet in diameter about 3 or 4 four feet from the edge of the road it may not get cut down if it does not have to be for construction. DP — I would tell you that it's case by case, we look at that. 44:08 51:44 Liz Klisch 8217 Spring Lake Road —My husband bought this house in 1984, when I met him, one of the things I remember, I grew up down in northeast with the Elms as the canopy, heartbreaking loss when they cut those down, did not have to take them all, but they cut a lot of them at that was one of the attractions of that street, was the canopy of those Oaks, their healthy trees, you can't be taking those down. The thing on Spring Lake Road, it is a pass-thru, we need traffic to slow down, somebody brought up speed bumps, I deliver for a living, there's speed humps, where it's not that, it slows traffic down, that would be amazing. As far as the traffic counters you talk about, when we were kids, we used to jump on them so I don't know how accurate that is, we used to stand and jump on them, we used to do that all the time as kids. Ok we have to do it four times because that would be one car, we did that. We have, in our front yard, a Cotton Wood, that the base of the tree is 8 feet, there is no way you are going to replace that, the shade of that covers probably about 7 houses, I don't know, its huge, but you probably know, it's one of the biggest trees on the street. So, you can't replace those, not in our lifetime are we ever going to see those trees, ever. OK, and to take down, or even to do anything, if you're going to take those Oaks down, we lost two healthy Red Oaks due to Oak Wilt. That's exactly 27 what's going to happen, you're going to lose those to Oaks. You cannot get that back, so I think you need to work on the traffic counters cause I think there's a bunch of kids jumping on them. DP — On the traffic counters, we don't go out there and see if there are kids jumping on them. But when we report to the state, if they see an anomaly with the past, we have to go out there an recount, we have to set those again, and in the past we have had to do that numerous times. I know when we submit them, they say it can't be, its too low. Others, they will come back and say either way, we have to go back and reset them. LK - And also on one of those pictures on Spring Lake Road, I don't know what side it was it showed, and they've got the lines in there where there's a pretty big shoulder where they have the yellow line, that itself is somewhat of a walking path, it keeps people away. But I think speed humps would slow that traffic down, the people who live on that street don't speed on it, it's the people who are passing thru, so I think that just slowing them down would be a huge thing and I think that is all you really need to do. 54:31 54:39 — Dan Dreier 7830 Spring Lake Road - I have another idea from hearing discussion about other alternatives, I used to live in Portland, Oregon, lot of good stuff there, there is some great stuff there now to. One of the things there great about is green, bicycling and pedestrian traffic, they give priority to pedestrian traffic, one of the ways they did it was they took a street that goes two ways, turned it into a one way and used the extra part to make the thing everyone wanted but it didn't affect anyone's homes, the greenspace, the canopy stayed and, I think when we look at, when it was stated earlier, the survey was a little biased, I kind of have a feeling it was more, hey were thinking were going to do this, how would you like this handled, versus a choice between turning your road into a one way road with a bike lane, or having, removing some of the trees that are closer to it, keeping it a two way road and adding an 8' trail. Those kind of considerations, I think would go a long way to serving, how do people feel about a one way. Maybe it's a terrible idea I don't know, it's an alternative. 55:54 56:01 Larry Myslicki 8454 Spring Lake Road — Been there since 1975 and back in the 90's when we rejected the trail and they redid the road, the majority of residents on that road rejected it. Now you have 5 or 6 requests, is all you said, yet sounds like overwhelmingly majority again, reject that trail, so who proposed the trail, is my question, who asked for this trail? DP —The city is proposing the trail. LM - The residents are the city. DP —The city, which is staff and Stantec (contract engineers), looking at past projects and direction from council very project that we look at putting in a trail or sidewalk, so we put this in there, and we look for feedback, and that's what this exactly that meeting is for, to get that feedback and to get that direction, and yes the council is here to hear all this, and as I have said this before, if the council says to look at other alternatives then we will do that, they will receive all the information, they will receive all the comments, they will receive the comments on the survey, all that information will be presented to them and if they tell us, as staff, to take the trail out, then the trail will be out. It is not, staff telling you - that this is going in, it's what we look at, no different than the road design, if the council says we have to look at a different road design, we will look do that as well. From talking to council, whether that's in a work 28 session or council, talking to Parks Rec and Forestry Commission again, getting that direction is where we decide what we are going to propose. I hope council is taking notes because most people don't want to lose trees, we don't want that trail, I hope they are paying attention. 58:21— Kathy Smith 7405 Spring Lake Road — From what I understand I took a look at the current, in place Comprehensive Plan which is from 2008, nowhere in their states a trail, can you confirm that? DP — I don't work the Comprehensive Plan, you would have to ask Jon (Sevald — Community Planner) JS — I cannot think of what the trail plan was in 2008. KS - Its not in there. Then the current plan that you have from 2040 has not been approved by Rice Creek Watershed District, or Ramsey County Watershed District because I have talked to both ladies and both of them stated they would hope we would actually have a narrow plan and go with green streets, living streets or street diet, and they would actually offer $100,000 in grant money that's going to come available in October, deadline is December 31, 2021. And each landowner would be up to $7,500 each to put in a rain garden. I don't know about you but $7,500 bucks, I think some people people would take that versus having curb and gutter. I think if you took a show of hands tonight you would actually see a majority of people don't want this, and actually the best idea I heard tonight is the gentleman of the one way, I would be more than happy to drive around five blocks if I had to go down one way on my own street just to save the trees that are going to be taken down. Like I said, I along with many other people here bought the house for the trees. I paid thousands of dollars, when I added onto my house, thousands of dollars for the cement truck to have a big dragon to pour the concrete because I did not want to have one tree taken down not one. No matter the looks of the tree or anything. Those trees were here before that road went in, we don't need more impervious surface and I can't believe that there's not other options and I really hope city council takes a real fear to everybody tonight. And everybody should write in, something you don't think about right now, that you want to ask for say, write it in, write it into the mayor, write it into the council, write it in the media, Facebook. 61:22 DP —Two more questions, time for staff and questions. 61:38 Mike Hegland 7604 Spring Lake Road — Am I correct that this is your proposal as the city, it's this plan with all the impervious surface you described? DP — Its our proposal MH - This is your proposal that you're starting with? I am going to say that I object to this plan that you have proposed because you said that's what this meeting was for and I think there's a much better plan out there and it's not this one. 62:24 29 SLP Road in numerical order Address Door Knock 7405 Spring Lake Road — Kathy Smith (twice) 8-30 and 9-1 (not home) 7406 Spring Lake Road — Ashely Stevens 8-30 7545 Spring Lake Road - Richard Oehlenschlager 8-30 7604 Spring Lake Road — Mike Hegland 8-20 and 9-1 7675 Spring Lake Road — Brian Kaden 8-30 (not home) 7785 Spring Lake Road — Don Hinrichs 8-30 (cutting grass) 7821 Spring Lake Road - Steve Duncan 8-30 (not home) 7830 Spring Lake Road — Dan Dreier (twice) 8-30 talked to Michelle 7830 Spring Lake Road - Michelle Dreier 8-30 8217 Spring Lake Road — Liz Klish 8-30 and 9-1 (not home) 8289 Spring Lake Road - Mary Malrick 9-1 (not home) 8340 Spring Lake Road - Terri Hougen 9-1 (not home) 8380 Spring Lake Road - Vincent Meyer 8-30 8454 Spring Lake Road - Larry Myslicki 8-30 8477 Spring Lake Road - Joel Kvamme 8-30 (not home) 30 Map 2A-10: Ramsey County Existing and Planned Bicycle Network Attachment K BLAINE , r r— I 10 MOUNDS_ — , WHITE BEAR VIEW NORTH TOWNSHIP —�--- —% CD OAKS — — — — ARDEN 0yi 10 HILLS Cz ' � HWY-96 � SHOREVIEW 'NEW,' f¢ — —=ss'' w C) —G - — — ■ ,BRIGHTON 'J VADNAIS GEM A_ fD WHITE HEIGHTS LAKE I. BEAR LAKE _Co Rd E East, If-- SAINT- ANTHONY 88 �` �� C VILLAGE : fr _ ter z •^� LITTLE CAt / z`� �4--- NADA rD T J __NORTH/ 1I --- D ![ ROSE VILLE �t ;-� SAINTI'� 36 36 PAUL 1 CoBRdW -" rr- i MAPLEWOOD I 1 , i �t LAUDERDALE FALCON � — $ m HEIGHTS _ Lar-i- --teurAve E 1 �. Network - - � --- -- r-- ; , = -'-- 2 y 1 1 1 i � 1 , ¢ 1 f-D 1 Maryland Ave W r r' 1 1 , m I rD Existing Trail- - - - - Planned Trail , 1 r-1- Existing Bike _ _ Boulevard = - ;�, ; x ; --; 's �� -- - --�- ry -i--4- UniversityAve W ---- Planned Bike--•---1-t. Boulevard _ Existing Bike PAUL ' Route Planned Bike ---- 1 1 1 ' 1 _1 I I - 1` 52 1 Route _ `a 1 Lower Afton Rd Existing Bike dol h Ave Ran Lane p Planned Bike Lane - - Ford Pkwy� Existing Striped1 JMiles -� Shoulder 0 1.5 3 N z Planned Striped Shoulder Data Sources: Active Living Ramsey Communities, - - 1 Ramsey County, Met Council Rivers & Lakes Parks 1 ARDEN HILLS NOW 35E /435W -� 694� I 694 • t� LITTLE v r 35E Il 1 • l hi �UL — I vim.— �, _ •r �i � ■II�1111--�1111■}}R111��N. milli ma !Egg_�■_--- rom 0.R_- �._WWII cc ^--- \ A 94 .. . 94 =_ =ilil==i1 �I- -I r�uS•i- /�l�� •. ■:=__=====°11====7�35E unm'.i`—=^EEC: RAMSEY COUNTY -WIDE Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan ��[�1�I�I�iN[�7• jON vw,r%Ar •l11l11l1l2ll1[: :j avivi 0 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 4-2 1 THE CONNECTED RAMSEY COMMUNITIES NETWORK Introduction Active Living Ramsey Communities seeks to empower local communities with the tools and framework to enhance their local network with county -wide benefits. Built from local networks and guided by regional planning efforts, the Connected Ramsey Communities network links all of the communities in Ramsey County through high quality long-distance and connector routes. These are the countywide connections that will bring people from place to place throughout Ramsey County, and will act as a county -wide backbone between communities. The County -wide Planning Framework The Connected Ramsey Communities network is a planning framework for the County and local jurisdictions to refer to when planning, prioritizing and designing an active transportation network. Three types of bikeways work together in the Connected Ramsey Communities network: Major County -wide Corridors Major routes provide long-distance travel between communities. They act as bicycle freeway corridors, and are envisioned as high quality facilities that can accommodate large volumes of users of all ages and abilities. These routes require wider -than -standard bikeway widths, separate pedestrian space where pedestrian use is expected and enhanced crossings of streets where bicyclists receive protected traffic signals or upgraded crosswalks designed for motor vehicles to yield to bicyclists. County -wide Connector Corridors Connector routes provide frequent links between major routes to provide a dense level of connectivity and minimize out of direction travel. These routes are also designed for all ages and abilities use, but may not require the high -capacity design elements desired on major routes. Intersection crossing safety and comfort are very important on the connector routes in order to maintain a high -quality experience. Local Corridors Local bikeways are the adopted networks endorsed by the communities within Ramsey County. These may be included in local bikeway plans such as the Saint Paul Bicycle Plan, multi -jurisdictional plans such as the Lake Links Trail Plan or routes identified in the transportation, recreation or other sections of a local comprehensive plan. 4-3 1 THE CONNECTED RAMSEY COMMUNITIES NETWORK "Identified Need" Planning Gaps Most of the Connected Ramsey Communities network aligns with existing and planned bikeway routes. In some cases, small portions of the recommended alignments are not included in local plans. These non -planned locations are called "Identified Needs" and will need further local coordination to evaluate and adopt these missing links into local transportation system plans. 4-4 1 THE CONNECTED RAMSEY COMMUNITIES NETWORK The Connected Ramsey Communities Network The Connected Ramsey Communities Network is 327 miles of bikeways connecting every corner of Ramsey County. Map 4-1 at the end of this section displays the full Connected Ramsey Communities Network, and brief statistics are below: Built from: 216 + 111 miles miles of Major County- of County -wide wide Corridors Connector Corridors Made up of: The nets 71% facilities existing facilities based on planned facility types. Bike Boule 2% Bike Lane Bike Route 7% 3% Some "complete"facilities are still too stressful for users of all ages and abilities. Today, the network is made up of.• 37% :L9% 4% 25% Low Stress segments, appropriate for users of all ages and abilities. Moderate Stress segments, appropriate for most adult bicyclists. High Stress segments, appropriate for confident, trained, adult bicyclists. Extreme Stress segments, not appropriate for most people. Map 4-2 at the end of this section displays the level of traffic stress on all county- wide links of the Connected Ramsey Communities Network. 4-5 1 THE CONNECTED RAMSEY COMMUNITIES NETWORK Relationship with the Metropolitan Council Networks The Connected Ramsey Communities network is complementary to other regional -scale planning networks. The Metropolitan Council networks define a connected regional -scale system of on -street and off-street bikeways and were informed by local partners and community outreach. The Metropolitan Council has identified two primary regional bicycle transportation systems across the twin -cities region: • Regional Bicycle Transportation Network (RBTN) • Regional Trail System (RTS) To support these plans, most RBTN and RTS corridors in Ramsey County are included within the Connected Ramsey Communities network: Tier 1 Alignments and Corridors Most Tier 1 RBTN alignments and corridors are included as Major County -wide Corridors. If an RTS Connection fills a clear gap in the Tier 1 network, it is also included here. This classification also includes alignment recommendations as determined by the advisory teams for the planning effort with the goal of establishing a roughly 1.5 mile grid across the county. Tier 2 Alignments and Corridors Most Tier 2 RBTN alignments and corridors and all remaining RTS alignments are included in the County -wide Connector Corridors. In some cases, county -wide classifications differ from RBTN tiers. These classification and alignment recommendations were informed by the advisory teams and public engagement efforts for the plan. Route Alignment Alignments of specific corridors shown on the Connected Ramsey Communities map have been identified in conformance with local and regional bikeway networks. Upon implementation, these routes should be subject to further study and analysis of opportunities and constraints. 4-6 1 THE CONNECTED RAMSEY COMMUNITIES NETWORK Ramsey Community Corridors The Connected Ramsey Communities Network is consolidated across 62 distinct community corridors. These corridors offer a convenient way to organize and understand the Connected Ramsey Communities Network and may provide a coordinated way to group routes for implementation. Each corridor has been briefly summarized in Table 4-1, with information on the extent, level of completion and level of traffic stress of the current alignment. Full summary tables for each corridor are included in the project library, available online. 4-7 1 THE CONNECTED RAMSEY COMMUNITIES NETWORK Table 4-1: Community Corridors of the Connected Ramsey Communities Network Corridor Name Total Miles Percent Existing* Percent Missing** Percent Low Stress 5th 2.70 83% 17% 23% 7th/Margaret 10.98 11% 89% 6% Annapolis 2.82 0% 100% 0% Ash/Sherwood/Co Rd 1 7.13 100% 0% 27% Bald Eagle/1-12 2.85 86% 14% 0% Bruce Vento 13.61 81% 19% 55% Carver 1.28 0% 100% 0% Centerville 4.91 100% 0% 43% Century Ave 11.51 71% 29% 15% Cherokee 1.87 90% 10% 90% Co Rd 96/1-ake Links South 10.68 94% 6% 78% Co Rd D 5.43 78% 22% 37% Co Rd E 4.10 56% 44% 0% Co Rd J 5.39 100% 0% 97% Como 5.91 99% 1% 18% CP Rail Trail 4.41 0% 100% 0% Edgerton/McMenemy 8.39 83% 17% 20% Elmer Andersen/Co Rd E/Goose Lake 10.80 67% 33% 21% Fairview 8.88 52% 48% 10% Ford/Montreal 3.15 35% 65% 7% Furness/Hazel/Ruth 3.64 74% 26% 60% Gateway 8.70 91% 9% 79% Grotto/Dale 5.59 36% 64% 28% Hamline/Co Rd 10 16.23 49% 51% 18% Hodgson 5.19 82% 18% 65% Indian Mounds/Upper Afton 5.08 60% 40% 41% Jefferson 4.05 91% 9% 0% Johnson 1.92 100% 0% 0% Lafayette 1.81 73% 27% 73% Lake Links North 1.25 100% 0% 0% Larpenteur 3.30 88% 12% 0% Lexington 11.24 91% 9% 89% Lilydale 2.17 100% 0% 100% Lower Afton 1.95 100% 0% 100% Marshall 4.51 57% 43% 0% McKnight 11.78 79% 21% 45% 4-8 1 THE CONNECTED RAMSEY COMMUNITIES NETWORK Table 4-1 (Continued) Corridor Name Total Miles Percent Existing* Percent Missing** Percent Low Stress Mississippi River 5.42 100% 0% 100% NE Diagonal/Co Rd C/ Keller Pkwy 14.57 74% 26% 40% Oakdale 0.72 0% 100% 0% Ohio 0.88 0% 100% 0% Old Hwy 8/1-ong Lake 6.98 58% 42% 27% Otter Lake 1.53 100% 0% 0% Park/John Ireland 1.73 88% 12% 15% Pelham/Raymond 2.19 100% 0% 15% Pierce Butler/Phalen 6.67 63% 37% 17% Plato/Airport 3.13 0% 100% 0% Point Douglas 4.81 100% 0% 41% Rice Creek 5.93 80% 20% 76% Rice Creek Commons 2.82 42% 58% 42% Roselawn/Reservoir Woods 6.65 96% 4% 50% Sam Morgan 8.60 100% 0% 100% Silver Lake Rd 5.18 0% 100% 0% South Ave 0.99 100% 0% 0% Stillwater Blvd 0.86 100% 0% 100% Stinson 1.77 27% 73% 0% Summit/High Bridge 5.24 86% 14% 10% Trout Brook 8.95 63% 37% 63% U of M Transitway 1.32 45% 55% 45% University Ave/Charles 5.46 62% 38% 0% Wabasha/Cesar Chavez/Concord 2.78 78% 22% 21% Western 1.53 15.62 0% 100% 0% Wheelock 100% 0% 21% * "Percent Existing" includes segments identified as complete according to local plans. This may include facilities that are completed as on facility type, such as a shoulder, but are also planned to receive future upgrades, such as conversion to a shared used path. ** "Percent Missing" includes segments identified for future implementation in local plans and segments classified as "identified needs" in this plan. 4-9 1 THE CONNECTED RAMSEY COMMUNITIES NETWORK Local Integration of the Connected Ramsey Communities Network At the county level, this plan is a vision. At the local level it becomes reality. To move forward, local communities can commit to prioritizing the Major and Connector routes as an important part of their bikeway network and aim to construct the routes to a high quality that serves all ages and abilities. Building for all ages and abilites may require exceeding current local design standards for trails and bikeways as described in the Infrastructure Design primer. Local Next Steps Local jurisdictions can support the development of the Connected Ramsey Communities network through an adopted resolution. The implementation section of this plan includes a sample resolution for cities. It includes supporting coordination in development of the network and adoption of Major County- wide Corridors and County -wide Connector Corridors as Major Bikeways in the appropriate section of a comprehensive plan. Other specific options for support through resolution include: • Incorporate "identified needs" into local and major route alignments. These segments complete missing links or direct gaps between facilities and will strengthen a local bikeway network regardless of full adoption of the Connected Ramsey Communities network. • Establish a Major Bikeway classification in the transportation element of the comprehensive plan, in addition to local bikeway classifications. This classification type does not specify the precise type of bikeway, but should include policy support for creating a low -stress, high -quality facility appropriate for the prevailing traffic conditions. • Integrate the Major Bikeway classification into project prioritization and public works street design processes. These routes are important and should be given a high degree of attention and interest. • Create local design guides for the community based on the Infrastructure Design primer. There is no one -size fits all solution, but these designs should create facilities that serve users of all ages and abilities. 4-10 1 THE CONNECTED RAMSEY COMMUNITIES NETWORK THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 4-11 1 THE CONNECTED RAMSEY COMMUNITIES NETWORK The Maps E Map 4-1: The Connected Ramsey Communities Network Map 4-2: Level of Traffic Stress of the Connected Ramsey Communities Network Map 4-3: Corridors of the Connected Ramsey Communities Network Map 4-1: The Connected Ramsey Communities Network BRIGHTON �V.o, <I b STH Sl L� - SAINT,o Z: ANTHON' °2? = VILLAGE W. <- CO RDD CO RD B2 TERMINAI-R oo`'P 3 36 aP LAUDEff ALE ROSEIILAWN AVE'' FNFRa Connected Ramsey Communities Network Major County -wide Corridor County -wide ConnectorCorridor Local Corridor Existing Planned Upgrade Planned _ Identified Need ............. Inter -county Connection Version: 2015.10.18A ,11/1//� Map 4-2: Level of Traffic Stress of the Connected Ramsey Communities Network CO RD J r ` Q 1 10 Y LL coy MOUNDS VIEW a gCO RD H 'o� RF�OP m ARDEN m� HILLS oti 9� A D -NEW BRIGHTON gLPKE VALEryT/� w D' 10TH ST SRO 10 (^ 5TH ST CO RD E Z 2 5TH ST NW G L Z CO RD E SAINT zm ANTHONY - VILLAGE m CO RDD u 1 � �PvT�1LN� g OSOO Z TERMS INP.L z o 3 36 a z 0 LAUDERDALE ? F y ROSELAWN AVE F 280 w w FALCON e� HEIGHTS a� a i w F' o c� FORD PARKWAY I MONTREALAVENUE MONTREAL AVE a O 000e R' w m � � w U m O � 0 J w �U too Connected Ramsey Communities Network Level of Traffic Stress SHERWOOD ROAD CO RD I O OP TURTLE LAKE ASH ST NORTH OAKS y0 NO CO HWY 96 2 101 90 �� t W SHOREVIEW CO RDF j g w N w n � x U m ® A KOEHLER ROAD Low Stress Moderate Stress High Stress Extreme Stress Non Applicable Note: Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) analysis displayed here applies to street segments only and does not included a detailed analysis of intersections or street crossings. The quality of crossings is critical and should be evaluated for further improvement. CO RD J I1 ���� WHITE BEAR m P9 TOWNSHIP O � , 0 w CO RD H2 A PARKAVENUE w HWy yS v rOLEO 8VJ0 • 0 G� �J 0 SOUTH WHITE BEAR LAKE J i CARVER AVENUE 4 \hqS T iNC SA�F Version: 2015.10.25A f Z 0 0 Map 4-3: Corridors of the Connected Ramsey Communities Network *Note that varied colors are used on the map to show the alignment of named coordi- dors used to generate summary statistics shown in Table 4-1. Version: 2015.10.25A RAMSEY COUNTY -WIDE Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan purpose_ Vision N •r. Introduction For over 10 years, Active Living Ramsey Communities, with all of its community partners, has facilitated change to create environments that make it safe and easy for people of all ages and abilities to be physically active in their daily routine. Active Living Ramsey Communities encourages healthy lifestyles by bringing people and resources together to build active, bikeable and walkable communities. Their vision and collaborative efforts inform all aspects of this plan and support active transportation in Ramsey County. This plan is a resource and a framework for development of a connected Ramsey County where communities and residents are engaged in the process of building a great place for walking and bicycling. This is not a typical plan focused on specific projects for an individual jurisdiction, but rather a set of tools, analyses and actions to engage community members at all levels in supporting a place where people of all ages and abilities can safely and comfortably walk and bicycle. Active Living Ramsey Communities Background State, county, municipality, school, business, health care and nonprofit representatives, community groups and local residents came together to create Active Living Ramsey Communities in December of 2004. Community engagement formed the core of the organization's mission. The organization promotes and creates environments that make it safe and easy for everyone to integrate physical activity into their daily routine. The graphic below illustrates many highlights of Active Living Ramsey Communities accomplishments over the past ten years. z012 zo,() 1-2 1 CONTEXT & VISION ACTIVE LIVING RAMSEY COMMUNITIES HIGHLIGHTS INCLUDE: • Engaging the community to improve health by collaborating with nearly 19 Ramsey County municipalities, leaders, practitioners and residents to create and promote environments to make it safe and easy for everyone to be physically active in their daily routine. • Developing the Go Ramsey mapping portal for residents and visitors to find all the green spaces and fun places to be active in Ramsey County. http://goramsey.co.ramsey.mn.us/Pages/default.aspx • Building pathways to health through the Be Active! Be Green! Recycling Bench Initiative. https://parks.co.ramsey.mn.us/alrc/Pages/benches.aspx • Incorporating health and active living into County and municipal comprehensive plans. https://parks.co.ramsey.mn.us/Documents/working with.0 • Developing comprehensive, county -wide Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data layers and maps of all the pedestrian and bicycle facilities and connectivity gaps. https://Parks.co.ramsey.mn.us/alrc/Pages/gapmaps.aspx • Creating a Ramsey County parks and trails wayfinding master plan. https://Parks.co.ramsey.mn.us/alrc/Documents/Ramsey/`20County/`20Wayfinding%20Masterplan.pdf • Facilitating the Active Living Ramsey Communities Biking and Walking Team which works to create a safe, efficient and accessible recreation and transportation system for pedestrians, bicyclists and transit users. • Implementing an Active Living policy initiative in Ramsey County departments which resulted in bike parking, Sheriff's Cross -fit training program, library bike lock check out, the Active Minds! Active Lives! library summer reading program, and the Ramsey County Employees Committed to Health Steering Committee (REACH). • Developing a Bicycle and Pedestrian System Gap Analysis to create a safe, efficient and accessible biking and walking system. • Conducting a community survey on physical activities, safety issues, city -suburb differences, walking and bicycling. • Initial Findings, Fall 2005 https://Parks.co.ramsey.mn.us/Documents/2005 residential survey initial.pdf • Full Report, Spring 2006 https://parks.co.ramsey.mn.us/Documents/2005 residential survey complete.pdf • Winning awards from the Association of Minnesota Counties, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota, Minnesota Recreation and Parks Association and League of American Bicyclists. Active Living Ramsey Communities Identified Four Overlapping Strategies: TRANSFORM SYSTEMS Creating change in organizations and advancing broad efforts. IDENTIFY POLICY Identifying evidence based policies and best practices. ENHANCE BUILT ENVIRONMENT Encouraging smart decisions about transportation infrastructure, land use, zoning and community design. ENGAGE COMMUNITIES Involving leaders, practitioners and residents in improving health by creating and promoting environments, so it is safe and easy for everyone to be physically active in their daily routine. Projects in the areas of overlap across these strategies have the highest potential for impact and help to advance the mission in multiple ways. For example, developing this plan to support cities in implementing walking and bicycling infrastructure and programs lies directly in the overlap area of all four strategies. This effort influences each strategy directly and clearly. 1-4 1 CONTEXT & VISION Planning Process The purpose of this plan is to develop a county -wide resource that integrates with Ramsey County municipal plans to provide a seamless transition of pedestrian and bicycle facilities across the communities. Active Living Ramsey Communities recognizes that disparities exist in how its residents access and use transportation and recreation resources. Recommendations in this plan support the elimination of these disparities by focusing additional attention toward improving conditions for walking and biking in communities experiencing disparities. The tools and resources provided in this plan were developed through a collaborative process. The collaborative activities included public outreach and engagement, involvement of two advisory committees, coordination with local groups and agencies and technical analysis. The analyses and discussions take a county -wide view and envision a web of communities fully connected with safe and comfortable facilities for pedestrians and bicyclists throughout the county. STAKEHOLDER ADVISORY TEAMS Active Living Ramsey Communities enlisted its partners aligned with the overall mission, those with a key stake in or responsibility for implementation of pedestrian and bicycle facilities and programs as well as community members who are impacted by safe, efficient and accessible walking and biking facilities. Two advisory committees were engaged throughout the planning process and are described below. PROJECT ADVISORY TEAM The Project Advisory Team included community advocates, agency and community group representatives and County staff. This team advised the planning team on process and methods and served as liaisons to their representative groups, sharing information about the plan. SYSTEM ADVISORY TEAM The System Advisory Team included representatives from municipalities and implementation partners throughout the county, with representatives focused on community and economic development, parks and recreation and public works. This team provided pedestrian and bicycle facility inventories and plans as well as peer review on strategies and analysis. CONTEXT & VISION 1 1-5 Purpose Of Creating Vibrant, Livable, Walkable & Bikeable Communities A walkable and bikeable community is one where people walk and ride bicycles, because it is a convenient, fun, safe and healthy choice. It is a community in which people of all ages and abilities walk and bicycle in their daily routine for many types of trips. This plan provides a framework for Ramsey County communities to come together to create vibrant, livable, walkable and bikeable neighborhoods. There is tremendous opportunity to increase physical activity in our daily routine through recreation and active transportation like walking, biking and using transit. A connected network for walking and bicycling can help support health and prosperity for all people in Ramsey County. Improve The Overall Quality Of Life Studies show that For All walkable neighbor by creating a community where it is easy to 'foster greater soc walk and bike, engage in physical activity, cohesion and a se access resources, enjoy nature and interact community," than with others. 0 09 n hoods ial 40% of Minnesotans do not drive.Z Increase Social Interaction & Physical Movement In Public Spaces Increase Mobility For All People by considering the transportation needs of people of all ages, abilities and preferences. which can support improved health for Ramsey County community members. According to a recent survey, 86% of Millenials want to live in a city that offers opportunities to live and work without relying on a car.' 1-6 1 CONTEXT & VISION • • u Currently, only 44% of Ramsey County residents report engaging in any physical activity.I Foster Economic Prosperity & Growth by attracting a diverse and educated workforce and creating jobs and economic development that all community members will benefit from. Increase Opportunities For Active Transportation by creating safe, convenient and enjoyable places for walking and biking. This includes increasing connections to public transportation. While only 9% of all trips are made by walking and biking nationally, 13% of all vehicle crash deaths are cyclists and pedestrians.6 01 O Improve Community & Individual Health In Ramsey County, 9% of adults bike or walk to works Increase Bicycle & Pedestrian Safety through the design and implementation of safe and convenient active transportation corridors and crossing locations. This includes educating all road users on how to act safely and responsibly. by creating a place with increased opportunities to engage in healthy activities that reduce the burden of chronic disease and increase positive health outcomes for everyone in Ramsey County. Every O 10 MILE O� O 1 BIKE TRIP ■ saves Reducing 10 miles of driving every week would eliminate about 500 pounds of carbon GALLON dioxide emissions a year.8 OF GAS Residents in a HIGHLY WALKABLE NEIGHBORHOOD complete about 70MORE • I • •• MINUTES PER WEEK of moderate & vigorous physical activity than residents in low-walkability neighborhoods.' Improve The Health Of The Natural Environment and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation system by encouraging the use of energy -efficient, non-polluting and healthy forms of transportation. 1-7 1 CONTEXT & VISION The Vision For Ramsey County Communities within Ramsey County are not alone in the effort to become walkable and bikeable places. Other communities have achieved success in transforming from auto -oriented places into places where walking and biking are safe and normal daily activities. Cities like neighboring Minneapolis and Portland, Oregon have seen a large increase in the cycling mode share, while experiencing a decrease in crash rates. Bicycle Ridership Increase and Crash Rate Decrease in Minneapolis, MN uicoe Q-MMVker5 10.000 Reported Gashes g.000 Crash Rate{Ratia of bicycle crashes to bicycle commulets] m � r{ 4 4. ! w Jill III M M 0 13 1993 19941995 1996199719981499 20110 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 ZOO7 2008 2W9 2010 2011 CREATING WALKABLE & BIKEABLE PLACES Ramsey County can look to other communities as a precedent for creating walkable and bikeable places. As seen in the US and worldwide, there are several important components that all successful walkable and bikeable cities share: • Dedicated infrastructure for biking and walking, including on -street bike lanes, physically separated bike lanes, sidewalks, trails and wayfinding systems. • A connected system that creates access to key destinations and public transportation. • Fun events that create opportunities to get out and ride or walk, make social connections and get familiarized with existing infrastructure. 1-8 1 CONTEXT & VISION • As part of the 2005 federal transportation funding bill, Minneapolis and the surrounding area received $24 million to participate in the Non -motorized Transportation Pilot Program to fund local bicycle and pedestrian investments. • While cycling rates have increased, the number of bicycle involved crashes has stayed the roughly the same since 1993, resulting in a decreased crash rate. • Extensive investment in bicycle networks, in particular, the off street path system. • 4.1% of commuters bike to work, six times the national average of 0.6%. • In some neighborhoods, over 12% of commuters bike to work. • Bicycle ridership rates have tripled since 2001. • While cycling rates have increased, the number of bicycle involved crashes has stayed the same since 1995, resulting in a decreased crash rate. • Extensive investment in bicycle networks, including bike boulevards and on -street bike lanes. • The country's first bike/pedestrian/transit only bridge - no cars, Tilikum Crossing, which opened in September 2015. • 6% of commuters bike to work, about 10 times the national average. • In some neighborhoods, over 20% of commuters bike to work. o" f 1-9 1 CONTEXT & VISION • Installed more than 300 miles of dedicated bikeways. • Consistent, long-term community efforts and urban planning. • Designated Gold -Level Walk Friendly Community. • Pedestrian -only Pearl Street Mall attracts residents and tourism. • 10% of commuters walk to work. • Comprehensive transit system with 90% of bus stops accessible by wheelchair. • 78 bicycle and pedestrian underpasses to create a more connected network. • Suburban town of about 49,000 people. • 26% of all commuter trips are taken by bike. • Lowest bike fatality rate in the world, 5 times less than in the U.S. • Almost every major street features safe and protected bicycle facilities. • Bike facilities include separated bike lanes, bike signals and bike highways. 1-10 1 CONTEXT & VISION Vision And Goals VISION: PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS MOVE FREELY ON A SAFE AND WELL INTEGRATED SYSTEM THAT CONNECTS PEOPLE AND PLACES IN RAMSEY COUNTY. WALKING AND BICYCLING IS A COMFORTABLE AND INTEGRAL PART OF DAILY LIFE IN RAMSEY COUNTY FOR PEOPLE OF ALL AGES AND ABILITIES. Turning the vision into action can be simplified into a process of establishing clear goals, identifying key objectives and tracking performance measures to keep on the right track and make progress. The goals provide guidance for achieving the vision. Objectives achieve and measure progress toward realizing each goal. Potential measurable targets describe progress and performance towards plan implementation. BUILDING ON 10 YEARS OF ACTIVE LIVING RAMSEY COMMUNITIES Built on 10 years of history, engagement and collaboration, the goals and objectives on the next page offer communities in Ramsey County a starting point for framing their local efforts to implement plans, improve walking and biking conditions and collectively develop a world class, county -wide walking and biking system. CONTEXT & VISION 1 1-11 GOAL: HEALTHY AND ACTIVE MOBILITY FOR ALL Increased walking and bicycling has the potential to increase physical activity levels and improve health and quality of life for people in Ramsey County. Objectives: • Increase walking and bicycling for short trips as part of people's daily routine. • Increase the number of trips made by walking and bicycling for recreation and transportation in the county. • Improve connectivity, quality and reliability of pedestrian and bicycling facilities. • Develop locally -oriented design guidelines for the transportation system that support safety and mobility for the most vulnerable users. • Improve opportunities for people to commute to work and school by walking and bicycling. GOAL: A COMPLETE AND CONNECTED MULTI -MODAL NETWORK In order for a pedestrian and bicycle system to be heavily used, it must be connected and get people conveniently to their destinations: work, shopping, school, parks and transit stations. Objectives: • Build and enhance pedestrian and bicycle connections to transit. • Support development of links between communities to create a complete network. • Coordinate with transit and leverage transit lines and stops. • Improve system efficiency through connected networks for all modes. • Employ best practices and context sensitivity to design bicycling and walking facilities for as many people as possible. GOAL: A SAFE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM FOR PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS OF ALL AGES AND ABILITIES Bicyclists and pedestrians are particularly vulnerable users of the transportation system. Improving facilities and design standards can enhance safety and increase predictability, not only for pedestrians and people riding bicycles, but also for transit users and drivers of cars and trucks. 1-12 1 CONTEXT & VISION Objectives: • Reduce the number and severity of crashes involving bicyclists and pedestrians. GOAL: EQUITY AND SOCIAL JUSTICE IN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT Objectives: • Comply with civil rights laws for all transportation projects. • Support inclusive public participation for transportation system and project planning. • Incorporate an equity framework in transportation policy and project implementation in the County. • Engage vulnerable communities in discussions about walking and bicycling and their transportation needs. GOAL: A COORDINATED APPROACH TO FILLING GAPS IN THE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SYSTEM Objectives: • Create a shared understanding and common language about pedestrian and bicycle project selection, design, construction, operation and maintenance. • Engage community leaders, practitioners and residents to contribute, review, buy into and help implement the pedestrian and bicycle system plan, especially those who live in underrepresented and underserved communities. • Improve coordination between communities in support of bicycling and walking. • Improve coordination and communication among responsible governmental units, as well as with the public. • Create aspirational vision for walking and cycling among the general public. GOAL: A TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM THAT CONTRIBUTES TO SUSTAINABLE AND PROSPEROUS COMMUNITIES Objectives: • Create educational resources on bicycle and pedestrian benefits, laws, definitions and best practices. • Support transportation that responds to disparities and helps to close the opportunity gap. CONTEXT & VISION 1 1-13 References 1. Center for Civic Partnerships. California Healthy Cities and Communities. http://www.civicpartnerships.org/#Ica-healthy-cities-and-communities-progra/ cing 2. Active Living Ramsey County Residential Survey 2005. http://www.co.ramsev.mn.us/NR/rdonlyres/7E12AEA2-2D5F-4E3E-A5B4- D557DDCBF194/25211/active living baseline survey.pdf 3. What Millenials Want. City Lab. http://www.citylab.com/housing/2014/05/what-millennials-wantand-why- cities-are-right-pay-them-so-much-attention/9032/ 4. Active Living Ramsey County Residential Survey 2005. http://www.co.ramsev.mn.us/NR/rdonlyres/7E12AEA2-2D5F-4E3E-A5B4- D557DDCBF194/25211/active living baseline survey.pdf 5. Pucher, J. and J. L. Renne (2003). "Socioeconomics of urban travel: evidence from the 2001 NHTS." Transportation Quarterly 57(3): 49-77. 6. B.E. Saelens et al., "Neighborhood Based Differences in Physical Activity: An Environmental Scale Evaluation." Am. J. PH. 93 (2003):1552-1558 7. University of Michigan. Green Facts. http://hr.umich.edu/mhealthy/programs/activity/pdf/green-facts.pdf 1-14 1 CONTEXT & VISION Green Step Cities Attachment L Living & Complete Streets {BP No. 11) (for steps 1, 2, and 3) Create a network of green complete streets that improves city quality of life, public health, and adds value to surrounding properties. Best Practice Actions 1. Adopt a complete streets policy, or a living streets policy, which addresses landscaping and stormwater. 2. Adopt zoning language or approve a skinny street/development project that follows green street and/or walkable streets principles. 3. Modify a street in compliance with the city's complete streets policy. 4. Identify, prioritize and remedy complete streets gaps and lack of connectivity/safety within your road network by, for example, adding a bike route/lane, truck route, sidewalk or mid -block alley. 5. Identify and remedy street -trail gaps between city streets and off -road trails/bike trails to better facilitate walking and biking. 6. Implement traffic calming policy/measures, including lane conversions (road diets), roundabouts, low -speed streets, shared space and depaving, in at least one street redevelopment project. For Step 4 - Optional Metric for Step 4 Recognition Metric # 4: Infrastructure for Biking and Walking Data from their web page. 93% of MN adults believe transportation projects should accommodate walkers and bikers, and 72% of MN adults believe in policies supporting sidewalks and bike paths (MN Physical Activity Survey, MN Dept. of Health: 2010). 61 % of Minnesotans who have two or more community features to help them be physically active (sidewalks, parks, trails) report exercising 3 or more days/week, more than the 42% who have fewer community features. (Center for Prevention: 2015) Business Performance in Walkable Shopping Areas (Active Living Research: 2013) examines the economic benefits to businesses in walkable communities, finding that enterprises in walkable shopping Green Step Cities Attachment L areas are able to pay higher rents for their space, and housing near walkable commercial areas commonly sells for higher prices than in more distant areas. Note four 2018 road conversion (road diet) case studies on the MnDOT web site. • Connected street networks —grids or modified grids —disperse rather than concentrate traffic as do hierarchical streets networks (with with loop roads and cul-de-sacs branching off of arterials) and provide a cerfect corrective for congestion. Modest street and lane reconfigurations, attending to context sensitive street design principles and adding traffic -calming measures, can reduce speeding by 40%, auto crashes by more than 50% and increase the number of walkers and bikers. In urban areas the least severe crashes are achieved when lane width is between 10.5 and 11 feet. Narrower vehicle lanes also carry more cars up to 40 m.p.h. See Safer Streets, Stronger Economies (Smart Growth American: 2015) for data analysis of benefits from 37 complete streets projects. See also The National Association of City Transportation Officials Street Design Guide. Note that a car hitting a pedestrian at 20 m.ph. kills the pedestrian 10% of the time, but at 40 m.ph. kills the pedestrian 90% of the time. A 2010 Metropolitan Council analysis of the effects of land planning and urban design on travel demand documented that changes in vehicle miles traveled are most strongly related to (1) accessibility to destinations, especially jobs, and (2) street network design variables. Those variables - street connectivity and intersection density - correlate with improved public health outcomes. These variables are the key attributes of the old-fashioned grided networks that allow multiple ways to travel from A to B. Recent research shows that hierarchical street systems (the dendritic pattern of freeways, arterials, collectors and local streets) are less resilient to disruption and have less capacity than the grided network of streets. Arterials and collectors are also especially hostile to non -automotive modes of travel such as bikes and pedestrians. Quantitative measures of walkability, the degree to which a neighborhood or city facilitates people to walk/shop in it, include Score. Property values increase between $700 and $3,000 for each point increase in the Walk Score of a property. In cities walkability, facilitated by small blocks and a higher proportion of land area devoted to streets, is in tension with efficiency (large blocks with few streets and higher speed traffic). Like Walk Score and Transit Score, Score provides an easy way to evaluate bikeability at a specific location. Green Step Cities Attachment L • The energy savings from no signals and no/little idling at roundabouts, compared to signalized intersections, has been estimated to be about 9% (averaging $84,000/yr.). As for safety benefits of roundabouts, a 2017 study by MnDOT documented a reduction of as much as 90% in fatal or incapacity injuries, a 75% decrease in injury -producing crashes, and a 39% decrease in all types of auto crashes. Roundabouts also slow traffic, reducing the need for police patrols, are cheaper (by roughly $150,00) to build than signalized intersections, and increase hourly traffic flow in excess of 65%. Safety for bikes and pedestrians in dense urban areas is an open question. • The State of Transportation and Health Equity (Smart Growth America: 2019) identifies the biggest challenges to health equity facing transportation systems at different levels of government, best tools to address these issues, and success stories highlighting benefits Proposed Maintenance ,SPRING LAKE PARK Project Year 2022 IF NEF 11 ■ El F-1 is Ir El LU • • , , `� ..,,irk 1 �� �� (D z F-1 mop D Ln 0 0 L'Iff 'm" a UNDSIVIEW PUBLIC WORKS As of: 9/9/2021 MOUNDS VIEW 190-0 0 1 837J Q 8360 J1 Capital Improveffient Plan Rehabilitation ?350 Area J (2022) 2022 Project Property (81) Project ROW Tree * 'Sustain -(83) * Removal (li)833(�- 8320 M °a 9 ❑ 18385 1p : 9 : 8436 it 8406 NJ BLAINE Proposed Maintenance Project Year--Z02-Z IFS 8JE ED 8 36 16 L W_ E] 485 77 A t61 1[455 ■ J449 ■ .w: *- L 21 El 9 48407 El F84433 ❑El 191 87 ❑ ■ 83 ■ El a71 AP 59 El ■ 147 8335 00 El 325 315 As of: 1 8330 LU (D z N 2: 45 3:: s 8305 Ell 82 ■ ■ , Lk 5 0 8316 -Proposed Maintenance — Project Year 2022 F1 I 81A 83':. 8290W F] E—D 8 O 824 8 El Capital Im cement Plan Rehabilitation Area J (2022) 2022 Project Property (66) Project ROW Tree O Sustain (86) Removal (17) El 0 N �8311 89 8201 Ave 8245 82 1 1 4 7 816 N 016 11 Sherwood- P/ 0 EU E As of: 9/9/2021 e � a 9 • 1 Prwosed Maintenance • Er x ab LU El E4 :5 ir ■ • ' • 1II■ �� ■ � • ..�, I I III s l i • a • r•r ■, iy ov :� ■ ® �® �- • • �® •9 ■JP IL � � a CT t .r : �,i • • ■ '• ■ n tr 1 I Q ■� a O L � ■ � • ■=fTl7i:�nlTi s Capital Improvement P1 J 9 Rehabilitation Area K 1 ■ 2023 ProjectProperty�� ■ Project Sustain 1 ■ a , Removal- ■ C Don Peterson From: - Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2021 9:39 PM To: Don Peterson Subject: Area K Street Project Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution. Hi Don, I was at the public meeting this evening (8-25-2021) regarding the upcoming road projects (Ii'm in area K), and I just wanted to say that I'm very happy this project is happening, and I thought the information and presentation you gave was well organized and complete, especially for this phase of the project. I was only able to stay for a couple of the questions in the Q&A portion of the meeting, but was a little bummed to hear such strong sentiments against the project. I guess I understand some of the environmental concerns expressed, but the tone of the questioners felt very anti -improvement. I'm sure you have a thicker skin than I, but I just wanted to let you know that I'm grateful this project is happening, I hope it continues to happen, and I thank you and your team for the work you're doing. Thanks, Don Peterson From: Sent: Friday, August 27, 2021 11:16 AM To: Don Peterson Subject: Meeting on Wednesday, August 25th Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution. We are residents of Mounds View since 1976. Our names ar( — t and live at %. We attended the public meeting on 8/25 and were very disappointed with the negativity and immature comments made by those that spoke at the meeting. We felt the meeting was for comments and feedback about the project but soon realized it turned out to be only the people that are against the project. We are in favor of the curbs, gutters and sidewalk. We enjoy walking down Ardan Ave and Groveland Ave where sidewalks were put in. In would be nice to walk down Spring Lake Park Road for a different route but feel with the traffic it is not safe to do so. Just wanted to give our input. We left the meeting after half an hour of the Q&A's because of the rude comments made by most of the people that spoke. Public Remarks Marcus Curtis, 7660 Spring Lake Road Concerning Spring Lake Road Reconstruction Good evening Mrs. Mayor and Council Members. My name is Marcus Curtis and I reside at 7660 Spring Lake Road along with my wife, Sarah and our nine -month - old son, Odin. My comments this evening are in regards to the upcoming street improvement project and the current staff recommendations relating to Spring Lake Road. At times, I will speak in general terms representing some of the many individuals who live between County Road I and County Road H2 opposing the staff recommendations. I do expect several other members of the community, who undoubtedly have a greater history in the community than myself, to also address the council this evening following my remarks. Sarah and I purchased our home in May of this year with hopes of improving it over time and raising a family in a neighborhood that offered great schools, parks and outdoor recreation along with an overall tranquility one might only expect from a small town in outstate Minnesota. Knowing that our home had frontage on County Road I we admittedly chose to compromise on our desire to be away from traffic primarily because we fell in love with the area and the tranquility of Spring Lake Road. A quintessential neighborhood street. The current staff recommendation for this project, as published on the project website, reads: "City Staff recommends a 13" drive lane in either direction with added curb, gutter, and multi -use trail on the west side of the road." By and large, the community is not opposing the project in its entirety. Rather, the majority of landowners oppose the trail system. Likewise, there are numerous heritage trees- mostly Oak trees- that are in danger of being removed. This is of great concern especially for those landowners who host those trees as part of their homes landscape. Public Remarks Marcus Curtis, 7660 Spring Lake Road Concerning Spring Lake Road Reconstruction If you look to the city logo behind you, you will see a tree, an oak tree as representing this city. It would be a shame to see such trees vanish from the cityscape. Lastly, while curb and gutter is mostly accepted by the community it has been shared with us that many cities have begun working on new initiatives to go curb - less on their roadways where it makes sense. Often referred to as "green streets". Curb and gutter seem to be a pointless expense for the city considering how well - draining our native soils are. This all said, we do not oppose the proper replacement of Spring Lake Road. We understand that it is the city's goal to increase connectivity. This should be supported by the community as a whole where it makes sense such as those arterial roadways that exist today. Spring Lake Road is not an arterial road nor should it be made into one. This is a tranquil neighborhood street. Understandably, there are design guidelines as mandated by the state aid road program that traditionally would dictate the final design of this project. I ask for the city to consider the feedback of the project stakeholders prior to approving the project design. We do hope all Council Members will be present at the August 25t" meeting on this subject. Provided to city administration this evening is a copy of my prepared remarks along with a petition that at present time holds the signatures of 35 community members and growing. Thank you. To: City Council of Mounds View And To: Mayor Carol Mueller We, the undersigned taxpayers residing within the city of Mounds View and on or within proximity to Spring Lake Road, by signing this petition express our opposition to the proposed 2022-2023 street rehabilitation project and the related staff recommendations as described below: Mounds View Staff is recommending a 13' [drive] lane in either direction with added curb, gutter, and multi -use trail on the west side of the road. 01 g�. 1 r �_ I. � r► lI � A I ■ .�� f W 'WAN _ram WA WPM This page is one of a number of identical pages forming one petition opposing the proposed 2022-23 street rehabilitation project concerning Spring Lake Road. This petition may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures. To: City Council of Mounds View And To: Mayor Carol Mueller We, the undersigned taxpayers residing within the city of Mounds View and on or within proximity to Spring Lake Road, by signing this petition express our opposition to the proposed 2022-2023 street rehabilitation project and the related staff recommendations as described below: Mounds View Staff Is recommending a 13' [drive] lane in either direction with added curb, gutter, and multi -use trail on the west side of the road. ADDRESS SIGNATURE�. •won= 7 X© •1' l I `+W&IRAW rAj v M NEE R.T.Mm WAS W.- M &V IN "40 A� FqJ 1 �.a. UPWW s m m This page is one of a number of identical pages forming one petition opposing the proposed 2022-23 street rehabilitation project concerning Spring Lake Road. This petition may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures. woo�oaluolsmvM ZOYSS NN'sllodoauulN 'anuanV SIVAOV 3Gd V SNOWGN00 ONIlSIX9 w 0 o 0001 91InS allanbloN ££L �a4ue4S SNV1d %09 i3�ro Jd NOIlb11118W]d AI&S £Z0Z-ZZOZ o w O U ` IOSINNIW W11A SaNAOW �O )dO ;Q�� Z oo�< _ I 1 7489 li v 1 0 I I _ 1 N I I �I I N � II I v v i 1 N I 1 � N II I I II 1 - II v V V I I II 74 I I v 1 I J — — — v y I M II yI 7365 v 7350 v 1 `I 65 I tti T' I � v1 �! v - /L I� I 7462 ---+ - I II I I LIB ----- - - - - - - I II I I I I v I l I I C) 11 vl O LLJ - - - - - - - - -1 - - - - - - -JI 7340 I J `�'_ j v (7 I 7445 Q Q --- z O 7448 v U) II 1 \ l i I Q� I J 0 v l - — — — — — — MH v ` -- —-------- I � / - (D v j 1 vl J i _ 1 7337 >I - I - k vio I 1 - - - - ------------d R01 - vll I ,If I I I I I I I 1 7435 R0 v 1 v l 7430 i I 1 1 I I I elr R 1 v)ac >� K------------------ k1 1 v 17 R0 v 1 vl I cK c 3001 rvi \ -- I I I I �b I L 4v 1' 1 v /+c�� 7313 o , l 9— — — — — — — — — — - - - - �i I I R01V 7405 7406 ` I v �K J v v - - - y I \I I II �- vI \, -- - - - - - \� —«—«—cz--zz-- < < < c < < --< < v< < < «« \ <« 73RD AVE NE 11\ n ^1 ---- -- -� r------------- v 381 -COr 01 - - r--------- 1 IV , S. 1 7380 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I v I I I 1 1 I 11 1 I II I I I I 1 I I 11 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I M I I 'N3OOIAd'Od SI J31NV1S A9 03ZIaOHLOy 1VH1 NVH1 d'3H10 3SOdd'Od ANV aOd 3511 NOONSX £OMRE61 '11--d EOESOEE61 'Iaploq SO£SOM£61 '1XSX £OESOBE61 :q-X NOIlln002'd3N DMNV1S d0—NOMd 3H — SONIMVMO ONV SN01S3011V Ol UHOINAdOJ 3H1 BMP'IOOJ EO£SO££61\S9Rti 4spgndOV\dwal\oOol\D1DOddy\D10WD WWX\vaSN\:�:aWDU BUI,MO10 'AV1301nOH11M 031—S 01031 0— 39 TYHS SNOI—O NO SNONN9 ANY -ONIM— dSE:Z' LZOZ/ I£/80:a1D0 Mid 3H131-S — 00'SNONN3W10l1V NOd 3191SNOdAN 39 ONV —2A INNS M010VL1NOO 3H1 woJJaluolsmv\M ZOYSS NN'sgodoauu!N 'anuaAV SIVAOV 3Gd V SNOUIGN00 ONIlSIX9 w 0 o $ N 0001 a11nS allanbdoN ££L �a4ue4S SNV-ld %09 i3�ro Jd N011bllllgVH]d AI&S £Z0Z-ZZOZ o lz o p w O U "M1In `dlOS�NNIW SaNf10W �O JlllD ;Q�� oo�< I T ii II I I I � •I I N , N -- ------------- - M B N -------- N (t 7604 I i i I• I 7581 ' 7584 cool 01 ---------------- 1 II II -I ®---------- , o t M D 7564 L 7565 \ 7 - aI 7� 7675 7 �7�v i v I �_. I - ---------------� it .^ � 7555 I I I I \ I I I � I I 00 7660 <�« «««« 7646 ----------_ � I v - - }- - 7655 I it 1 I 1 0 M Q ---------------- - M� I 1I 7545 _ LU ' I_ `' III — + - I I I I .� - - - ------ 7538 I v I O 1, 7630 \o - 7633 1�{-W - 1 I U) 1 HRR > I i 11 (D _ ;al x l I --------------------� --A I /� ��� I ( \ / I r--- - - - - - - 7624 1+- J I 7629 I I - 1 I� 7501 I j 1 I I , I 1 I I I I I 1 , I I L• I� -- 11 JI ° i I ------------------- M v _ 7614 X ! X 0 A i yl 7627 � 1 j Iv 1 ---------� ------ ----------------- MG B I C-p 3Y D v s- _ � 7604 o< <<<< A II I �- I BRONSON DR - v i/I� � r • I I I - - ------------------- I 1 v I - _J 7581 'N3001ANOA SI J31NV1S A9 03ZINOHLOV 1VH1 NVH1 N3H10 3SOdN0d AN V NOA 3511 NO ONSX £OESOBE61 '11--d EOES0EE61 '�aploq S0£SOB£6l '1XSX £OESOBE61 ':9-X NOI1JlIOONd3N'DMNVIS AO —N ONd 3H13NV SONIMVNO ONV SNOIS3O — Ol UHOINAdOJ 3H1 BMP IOOJ EO£S09£61\898C 4awndOV\dwal\ oOol\D1D()ddV\D10 W D W WX\vaSN\:� :a, Du BUI,MO10 'AV1301nOH11M 331—S 01031NOd3N 39 TVHS SNOI—O NO SNONN3 ANV-ONIMVNO d6E:Z - LZOZ/ l£/80:a1D1) Mid 3H131-- 00'SNONN2— TV NOA 3191SNOdAN 39 ONV —2A INNS NOIJVNINOJ 3H1 w000aluolsmv\M ZOYSS NN'sgodoeuuiW 0001 94pS 'enuanV allenbioN COL SIVAOV 3Gd V SNOUIGN00 ONIlSIX9 w 0 o $ p M w O %09 i3�ro d N011bllllgVH]d iII&S £Z0Z-ZZOZ oSNV-ld lz o o o UdlOSINNIW"M�In SaN10W �OJll� 0U �W��a4ue4s a o o «--« 1765 1,86 ` Q A 1,860 w 11 1 Ai y (D z / \\ 7735 I v • I j i t 1 i v v /0 V Y oytiA I $ w f ; , — Gr ; — v -1 (D J� z 1 i , Lr) J I 1, v \ J V�1V 11 v J v<'/ J _ol1 I X - �,� I I• � << Y v A 2948 — / I oNSX ESO EOEE61 'll—Dd E0E908E6i v8P10gCOMM L'1XSX EOML wgaX 'N3aamod SI J31NV1S A9 03ZisoH nV IVHI NVH1 d3H10 3SOdNnd ANY NOd 3SO NO BMP' IOOJ EO£S08£61\898h 4spgndoV\dwa4\pool\oloOddV\wowouowx\vasn\:Z) :awou BulmwO NOIlln002'd3N DMNV1Sd0A1 AOMd3Hl3 VSONlM dM ONVSNOIS30IIVOlUH•JlN' dOJ3H1 Wtl6E:Z'LZOZ/lE,8 ubo0gold 'AM301no IIM 031—S 010310-39 TYHS SNOI—O NO SNONN9 ANY -ONIMYYO 3H131V3S — 00'SNOISN@— TY NOd 3191SNOdAN 39 ONY —2A IIYHS NOloYL1N00 3H1 woo�oaluolsmv\M ZOYSS NN'sgodoauu!N 0001 94pS 'anuanV allanbdoN ££L SIVAOV 3Gd V SNOUIGN00 ONIlSIX9 w 0 o $ p w O �a4ue4S SNV-ld %09 i3�ro Jd N011bllllgVH]d iII&S £Z0Z-ZZOZ o o o ° U ` "MIIA IOSINNIW SGNA0W �O )dO ;Q�� � 1. o Z oo�< N 5 0n n �F°o \ S 0 p \ \ n \ p o \ O \ \ C �C n v on= a \ o n I I n �o= I I Tn \ 00 \ I I I ° ? I I n o I I II °I L _ I I I I I I l i I n \ I I II I \ I I s0 I I I I \ \ \ I I I I I I \ I \ I I I II II oyp \ 1 I I } I I \ I I I I �ba I I I I \ I I I I I I o I n I I I I I I II I Dy ppy I I I I I I I _? n I \---------------------- I I I i p py�A i i I I I � I I T1— _= n m l o — — — — — — — — — — — -- \\O �/ N--- 7897 6 ED it HILLVIEW RD n I I I _ i —�0— I I I I 5 I I I I \ Fk II \ I fi I I I I 7890 7887 I I O ICI I I W I II I I I I q� II J V II (D J I I I I LJ� �a CK III V / I III — — — — — — — — — — — — — ---- 7880 — II - 7879 — — — — — — — I � v II v II III s i I v i t i I I J� �' ---------------------� . F 7865------- II II 'N3OOIAd'Od SI J31NV1S A9 C3ZIaOHLf1V 1VH1 NVH1 d'3H10 3SOdd'fId ANY dOd 3Sn d0 ONSX £OESOBE6 L '11--d EOESOEE61 '�ap1Oq SO£SOB£61 '1XSX COMM L wge X NOIlOnCO2'd3N DMNV1Sd0A1 AOMd3Hl3 VSONIMVMCONVSNOIOOIIVOl SIHOIL'AdOJ3H1 BMP'IOOJ EO£SO££61\S98ti 4spgndOV\dwal\oOol\D1DOddy\D10WD WWX\vaSN\:�:a, Ou BUI,M011) 'AVl3C 1no IIM 031—S01 C310-39 TYHS SNOI—ONO SNONN9 ANY -ONIMVYC dS£:Z-LZOZ/I£/80:a1O1)Mid 3H131V3S — OC'SNOISN@— TY NOd 3191SNOdAN 39 CNV —2A INNS NOlOVL1NO3 3H1 w000ayuoysmvM ZOYSS NN'sgodoeuuiW 0001 alinS 'enua^y allenbioN ££L SIVAOV 3Gd V SNOUIGN00 ONIlSIX9 w 0 o $ p �a�u��S SNV-ld %09 i3�ro Jd NOIlblll19W]d AI&S £Z0Z-ZZOZ o lz o w O U "M1In `dlOSINNIW SaNf10W �O JlllD ;Q�� oo�< o II I o III I I' ., $ I N I _ A�j N ---� II I I I II � II I I v II ,I INI. o O i I�--------- n----- -- II v �I I o s I I I i I I II I I —— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — o — — — — 8312 8493 I v - 8297 r II l o I � v I r n 1 a 8200 II I I I I I I •� II � � 1 T_ I v I I b 8289 n —— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — O— II II I I II II 18290 II I I v i t — I�TI//� 8180 i II �I o l I v 11 b 1 =II I v I I ----------------- — � II j I - •� II 11 I n l I v 8281 - n I ----------------------. � I it I v I I I 1 --— -------- ti• I^ I � o � I I I I I v I d I- ------------------ 11 8160 III I I 1 II II I � QI I I v I 1 I nl 8493 8270 ` I I LV I Q C) —— ——————— — — — — —— T 1411 el A I iII I Lu I I re,I II v I Q 8265 I J 8158 i I 1p z 9 I a j III n I I I v j C/) o--------------------- II -- I �I �I III II I 0 > OHP OHP > >> <�-_ ^ S ERWOOD'P�`—<_� 1 AVE---- tARDAN ---------- --- ------- � I II I _pC_ C-D C-D C_D --- I II II - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — In 8248 od II n I P 11 ®p A I 1 - II h 8493 0 2940 I o II I 1-6 III l 11 1 1 I 2975 or. 1 i ^ j ^ o I jII II A o I I A I 6 II A I j 0 1 ^ Hd n-------------------- II �1 .11 II ^ 8493 — D n I I OHP � --------------�-- >>>—>> I�i s, � ; ^ I I, 1--- o � I i I - l ^ I 8228 b . _ ^ II I \ � I I ^ A ^ A no �v \ 8493 Oi iII \ A O II I E I A---------------- 1 II n A i o I I II II A ---------------------- .n 11 qA — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — v II A I \\ ~I 1 1 ri Q Ov 8210 I I I A I cl MOUNDS VIEW BLV 0 0 8493 �ao o I I ONSX £o£SO8£61 '11--d £OMK61'J8POq So£908£61'ixsx £0£SO8£61 :9-x 'N30019MOd SI J31NV1S A9030soO HV IVH1 NVHl M3H103SONNnd ANY MOd 3Sn NO BMP1000-£0£S09£61\gg gspgndOV\dwal\10001\D1D0ddV\D1DwouDwx\vasn\:O:awou BulMwC NOI1JnOON—'0—V1S MO A1M3dOMd— MY SONIMYMC CNY SNO100 11V Ol SIHOIMAdOD— WtlS£Z'1ZOZ/IE/80.a1D1)yOld '-1nOH11M OR— Ol C-Od3M 39 TYHS SNOI—O NO SMOMM3 ANY -ONIMYMC 3H131VOS — 00'SNONN-10 TY MOd 3191SNOdAN 39 CNY A31M3A INNS MOlOYM1NO3 3H1 woo�oayuoysm,MM ZOYSS NN'sllodoauu!N 'anuany SIVAOV 3Gd V SNOWGN00 ONIISIX9 w 0 o $ 0001 94pS allanbdoN ££L �a4ue4S SNV_ld %09 i3�ro Jd N0IlblIll9VH]d AI&S £Z0Z-ZZ0Z o lz o p w O U "M�In `dlOS�NNIW SaNf10W �O Jlll� ;Q�� oo�< I I II I I IIn I --------------------- I P I I I 1 1 v I I T j I IN 8387 a � I �I 1 v r III i I INlip 1 ------ ---- — — N i 1 to � v I 8455 I ov o I }- -- --� I OtiA I In I I -- 84TH AVE NE I I I 111 I� / v III I I I marls---------------- It ------- v v 8383 8442 r--------------------- �110 I I I I I I v I I i 8449 I -- — — — — — � 1 r, l l �i _- I II I I Y II I I /01 Ib\ 01 8368 - or+P - I v pI 1 �� I I ---------------- Ilin/ 11 j• I I I I v � I I 8371 8436 I v I F — — — II v l l I v II -- �� :a �1 j/ aI v I n 8425 s r--------------------- vl 1 1 _ I Q 8359 8430 - - T� :I II v 8360 I 1 W I I I j11 II (D I I jlv I III I I v I I n I z I �. I I I I I I I � — � 1r. .I 1 1 I I� (1i ��ZJ 1 �Y v I Q 8421 v F--------------------- I I ICI I I I I 8347� \ 1 I I LU Q II I II I II I J --- --- I � I I /�1' � I 1 v II 1 (D 8340 I n 8418 I v a o�- II 11 II r--------------- -- I II IIv 8419 of loll �•• �� 11 8335 1 I i l ---- --- T J 1 v I I I I I I I I I I II I II �-7-------------------- I v �� 8406 11v II _� 8407 T` II 8336 �'� ¢, r l I"I v i t F--------- i I v I 11 v� n r I I 1 I I v i t j 8325 v 1 19 1 11 IIn II II r v I I i - 1 1 I 1 v —>�---»--» » L - ` 8403 I I 1 — 8394 � :a I I I I y 1 II II v I rl --+ K I 1 F I I 1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I I I—o��-------------------- I v I I 1 1 I I I I I �1 11 j II II 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 8315 II I I — — — I I I I I I I I I I �11 g I I I I I I ` 1 1 I 1 1 1 o✓��j T 8391 8316 1QLIIIv 1 23 8380 I I II I I 1 nl 8311 o III M I ONSX ESO £OBE61 '11-D d EOE90EE61'�8PJOq SO£SOB£6 1 '1XSX £OESOBE61 ^Ae1X 'N30019dOd SI DawiS A9 03ZisoH nV IVHI NVH1 d3H10 3SOdNnd ANY NOd 3SO NO 6Mp' IOOJ EOCS09£61\998h 4spgndoV\d W 21\IDOol\D1DOddV\Dl wouowx\vasN\:O :awou BulMwO NOIlln002'd3N DMNV1S d0 A NOMd 3H— SONIMYMO 0NY SNO10011V Ol UHOINAdOJ 3H1 WtlS£:Z'IZOZ/1£/80:a1D0 yOld 'AM301nOH11M 031—S 01031 0— 3911YHS SNOI—O NO SNONN9 ANY -ONIMYYO 3H131V0S-00'SNONN2— TY NOd 3191SNOdAN 39 ONY A 2A INNS M010YL1NOO 3H1 w000aluolsmvM ZOYSS NN'sgodoeuu!N 'enuanV SIVAOV 3Gd V SNOWGN00 ONIlSIX9 w 0 o $ 0001 911nS allenbioN ££L �a4ue4s SNV-ld %09 i3�ro Jd N011blllIgWId AI&S £Z0Z-ZZOZ o lz o o ° o p w O U "M1In `dlOSINNIW SaNf10W �O Jlll� z ;Q0� �W,a o oo6< N N I I I I I , , , , I I I I I I I I Z N co I I I I L--------1-------------t--1— 2 0 Ifl co , , , I I I I I I I - — — I a O — — — — I I C-D C-D C-D I C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D — — — — — — — — — — ` ----- ----J----,---- — — — ----f — — — — — — — --------------- ---------------------- \` --------- -- —— M- FO- FO- 7 I o \� II I I o I — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D I \II � I I I cN v I co I 8490 �e s 493 I� I� II I bl I I „I I In I I I ----------------II I I I6 I I � OHP — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — LJJ o 8485 i z 1 W 8482 (' Q 1p v 00 II I I I II I i I - I I II II II c c) v o I I 1 I i I 8477 I I - 6 I -------------------�� II Ili II lip ----------- - -------------------� I II III I II' I to i I I v to a - N I I �y v - 9 II---------------------1 �i to 8462 II II I �v — I I ilia I i Q I 4 I j j I b v I 8469 I LU o g I I I I I I n co d i v P �— al ul - v ---------------- II--------------------- v , v � I 8454 I 8461 �}------------- 1 I —>—> C-D D ow i i -------- PLEASANT VIEW DR. , I i OW ---------- �'; D----C-D-,==Z�— 8455 84TH AVE NE j v m oo I 8442 Iv r---------------------.41 — oNSX £s £008£61 '11--d £0£90K61'Iaploq SO£SOB£61'1XSX £0£SO8£61 '9a1X 'N30019MOd SI J31NV1S A9 03ZisoH nV lVHl NVHl M3H10 3SOdMnd ANY MOd 3sn MO BMP' IOOJ £0£S08£61\898ti gspgndoV\dwal\l000l\oloOddV\olowouowx\vasn\:Z) :awou BulMwO NOIllnCOMd3M'03WV1Sd0A1 AOMd3H13MVSONIMYMCCNVSNOIO011VOlUHO1MAdOD3H1 Wtl9£:Z-IZOZ/1£/80:a1o0gold '-1nOH11M 031—S Ol C31 0— 39 TYHS SNOI—O NO SMOMM3 ANY -ONIMYMC 3H131-S — 00'SNONN@— TY MOd 3191SNOdAN 39 0NY —2A INNS M010YM1N00 3H1 w000ayuoysmvM ZOYSS NN'sgodoeuuiW 0001 alinS 'enuanV allenbioN ££L SIVAOV 3Gd V SNOUIGN00 ONIlSIX3 w 0 o $ p w co %09 i3�ro d NOIlblll19W]d AI&S £Z0Z-ZZOZ oSNV-ld z lz o o o U0dlOSINNIWM�In SaN10W �OJll� Q�,�a4ue4s a o o2o6 \ 1 I n � o lQW \ N N x �T \ V \ 0 ( to v 1 \ A 2 LU ' - i IU) \ \ ° `\\ Q / W 8330 v n I J \\ 4a \ II 1 I v ^ 11 \ -- v I8125 J -I --- � J h — — — — — I I It \ /� tt ttt tttt •t ttt tt;`t*t' .thy I I Icil I— ' ; v 1 d � ; r 4 W , 8310 ; - Ln v ; < e W n — \ ' � I 8305 / / I u I \ / } I 10 8300 I v 0 1 I v \ / �/ \ / / o v I 5 �285 \ / ; 8284 / I o 5 SERVICE I ROAD I —»_ /"N _ 1 � o 8265 I 11 1 8270 b M 1 I I I ONSX £0£s08£61 '11--d £0£908£6112PlOq s0£s08£dl'ixSX £0£s08£61'AmX 'N300I9MOd SI DawiSA903ZIMOHL0V 1VH1 NVHl M3H103SOdMnd ANY MOd 3SH NO enep'IOOJ £0£SO££61\898h 4spgndOV\dwal\IDOOI\D1DOddV\DlnwouDwx\vasN\:�:awou BuIMD10 NOIlln00Md3M'03WV1Sd0A1 AOMd3H13MVSONIMYMOONVSNOIS30llVOl SIHOIMAdOD3H1 Wtl9£:Z'IZOZ/I£/80:a1D0 yOld 'AM301HOH1IM 031—S 01031MOd3M 39 TYHS SNOI—O MO SMOMM3 ANY -ONIMYMO 3H131-S — 00'SNONN@— TY MOd 319INNOdAN 39 ONY —2A INNS M010YM1NOO 3H1 w000aluolsmvM ZOYSS NN'sgodoeuu!N 0001 a11nS 'enuaAV allenbioN ££L :)04ue4S SNV-ld %09 SIVAOV 3Gd V SNOUIGN00 ONIISIX9 i3�ro Jd NOIlblll19W]d AI&S £Z0Z-ZZ0Z w 0 o ;Qw� o o $ - p w O U ` IOSINNIW W11A SGNA0W �O )dlD 8402 I I II I I�; I 9 A 8392 I �o A I I�n I Ij A r' 8390 8386 I n I � I I I I I° 0 I � 8380 I I r -rh 11° II III I to II I I I 'l 0 I V v Iv v v \I yi Ili 77 A (I° 8389 - - A r+ II II - I n A I I I 8387 II 11 1 f I A I I I I A I °I A A IrL II6385 I LU Fti z I Q I � I Q �i W �I I AA i II -L-I 8371 I I II I I I I I I I I P I 8163 I I I I l l � J I I� IM; A I I 8356 n I I I I I I b I , � I I N I I ------------ ---—_------__— _--------- N \ \ 8480 8461 ,\ it — > \\\ / tl \ u I ___--- �__--- II M I - I v 4 - I I / 8457 - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — cTV I I I 8454 , I --------------------�..1 8444 I I I lo— — IL� 8434 v /� I I — / v I / I / i i - I I v I I — v 84TH AVE NE / — — — — — — — — — — -o ---- o I 9 8441 I I I ! ;n V v Iv n v t v � — I L I — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I I 8422 0 I I _ I 1 II I 1 I I I In I I� 8412 I' I � I � I I I I I I II I I� I � ----------------------� I I I n 8402 I I I I nr o t I I 1 I I �I II �I I ONSX £0£s08£6l '11--d £OMK61 vaPloq90£S0££61'1XSX £0£908£6l ':Aa,x 'N3aamod SI J31NV1S A9 aazisoH nv 1VH1 NVHl d3H10 3SOdL'nd ANV SOd 3Sn NO BMP' 100� £0£SO££61\£98h gspgndoV\dwal\l000l\oloQddV\olowouowx\vasn\:Z) :awou BuIMwO NOIlln002'd3N DMNV1Sd0A1 AOMd3Hl3VSONIMVMOONVSNOIS30llVOl SIHOIL'AdOJ3H1 Wtl[£:Z'1ZOZ/1£/80 :a1D11 (i 'AV1301nOH1IM 031—S 01031YOAN 39 TVHS SNOI—O NO SNONN9 ANV -O 1—C 3H131-S-00'SNONN2— TV NOd 3191SNOdAN 39 ONV-2AINNS M010V 033H1 w000aluolsm,YM ZOYSS NN'sgodoeuuiW SIVAOV 3Gd V SNOUIGN00 ONIlSIX9 w 0 o $ O 0001 alinS 'enuanV allenb3oN ££L -)04ue4s SNV-ld %09 i3�ro Jd N011bllllgVH]d iII&S £Z0Z-ZZOZ o lz p _ 0 U "MIIn `dlOS�NNIW SaNf10W �O JlllD z ;Q0� �W�a o oo�< - ------------------------------ AV / V / so so xam x ** + ** %* *%*`x�`%y �\\ %y**Y *Yyx w so so so /-- 114 x*♦**"y,f f`y y %x* f xy* ` f so ;*% %. so so so x*"�� \ so �,x(*wso \\\ I ♦ *// y/ / o o so * * \ Q / %y*/y(Y %y Y/ o xx L0�8 •y+ �/f \ / o so ♦ x * + y / 4- oo ,so so so 9619 f .r w Is o // Z 91 -1% so **it WJ ��*%% ♦* %sj1 / / II!*%µye so so so so so. c � / t5l \ \ \ �v / 051>8 oNSX EOESO8E61 '11--d EOMK61'laplogSo£SOM 1'1XSX COMM wgBX 'N30019aOd S1031NV1S A9030soO OV IVHI NVH1 a3H103SOdand ANY SOd 3Sn NO BMp'IOOJ EO£S08£61\898ti gspgndoV\dwal\l000l\oloOddV\olowouowx\v'sn\:Z):awou BulMwO NOIL7n00ad3a'DMNV1S d0—NIOad 3H —SONIMYaO ONY SNO1S30 11V Ol UHOINAdOJ 3H1 Wtl[£Z'1ZOZ/1E/8 ubu1) (i 'AM301nOH11M 031—S 01031aOd3a 39 TYHS SNOI—O NO SNOaa3 ANY -O 1—C 3H131V3S — 00'SNOISN3W10l1Y NOd 3191SNOdAN 39 ONY A31a3A IIYHS a010Ya1NOO 3H1 APPEAL PETITION TO KEEP 8310 Pleasant View Drive, Mounds View DRIVEWAY SIZE ENTRANCE I, the undersigned, appeal/waiver to keep my driveway size at the entrance/approach of my driveway. Mounds View street rehabilitation project for Pleasant View Drive in Mounds View is changing the entrance size of my driveway. The original existing driveway was permitted by the City of Mounds View in 1977 when the home was built and has a three stall garage. The driveway is approximately 30+ feet wide from garage door to garage door. The cars on the driveway would have a difficult time to drive pass each other if the driveway is 24 feet since the cars would have to drive off the future curb if the driveway entrance was made smaller by the city of Mounds View. The existing driveway is short in length and the existing drive entrance is far from other existing driveways. The estimated lot size of 8310 Pleasant View Drive property is over 94 feet by over 245 feet so there is plenty of water absorption on the property. The existing driveway is in very good condition. The driveway does not unreasonably interfere with public travel nor impair the use and enjoyment of other properties. Thank you for your time and consideration, Rosemary Lensing email: lensing4693@gmail.com 8310 Pleasant View Drive Mounds View, MN 55112 —I =Ydr. s — •—� - -- sa3 d Petition to Keep Existing Single Mailboxes Page 1 of 3 We, the undersigned residents and neighbors of 82dto 8400s Pleasant View Drive in the City of Mounds View, Minnesota, voice our strong objection to attempts to eliminate curbside delivery of mail to our individual postal mailboxes in accordance to the plans from the Street Rehab Project meeting of August 25, 2021. We would like the complete 16 street of Pleasant View Drive with individual residential mailboxes instead of four cluster box units on one mailbox stand. We would like to maintain existing aesthetics for resale value and continuity. We feel mailboxes need to be put in front of the houses so that we can utilize them and not installed in front of one residence. Retrieving mail from a distance at night (early darkness in the winter months of 4:30pm to 5:00 pm) or inclement weather(WINTER) can be dangerous and difficult. Further, we feel that the safety and security of our families is compromised by requiring postal customers to leave their property to acquire a service that is the basic function of the United States Postal Service to provide. We strongly object to the requirement of any cluster box mail delivery. Cluster box delivery of mail is unsightly, unwanted, and unsafe. Help us save curbside delivery and save our mailbox. In closing, please help us keep Pleasant View Drive in Mounds View, Minnesota safe, functional, and beautiful by keeping individual mailboxes throughout the entire neighborhood. Thank you for your time and consideration. PRINTED NAME Sr f-�-v rw 2 1 ADDRESS �� a5 ql Ui 3 1 Lf art) Jr.? 3 3- , (%r DATE 6 f --/ 7 r Y-zAah-wnrI 8 QQ jCt J Page 2 of 3 A�m 14 DO21�S 931 f P,b,k s.,J U.,L, & lec a n a'3z r `j 2-1 jp, I I�q -d OrLu o 47 /e;) 21�- qi 0,to LA -- — 2 2J4 SWOOP'S U l k tuj tw 2r?� ����'��f 2 cw 21 ® 3 s ] L C�IL Page 3 of 3 31 33 sc i 2-6 3,4 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 Item No: 09B Meeting Date: Sep 13, 2021 Type of Business: Reports City Administrator Review: of Mounds View Staff R To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Jon Sevald, Community Development Director Item Title/Subject: Discussion; 5491 Adams Street (Fedor's Market) Introduction: Fedor's Market, 5491 Adams Street, operated between 1961 and 2016. In July 2021, the property was purchased by Andrei Bornov, BBAK Ventures, LLC. Mr. Bornov plans to renovate the building for multiple tenants. The current discussion is for; (1) an event center; (2) kennel boarding; and (3) grocery store. There are challenges regarding zoning and parking. In order for the proposed tenants to move forward, either the City Code must be amended or the property re -zoned, and Variance obtained to reduce required parking, and/or CUP for shared parking... It's complicated. The intent of this discussion is to make the Council aware of Mr. Bornov's intentions, and to request direction from the Council on which direction(s) to pursue, prior to investments being made in building renovations. On -site parking will be a challenge no matter the use(s). Thus, this issue should be addressed sooner rather than later. Alternatively, the Council may direct that all parking be on -site, limited to the existing 11 parking stalls (no on -street parking), thus, limiting practical uses to those which have little demand for parking, and high demand for storage (e.g. Tires N'More). Discussion: The property is zoned B-2 Neighborhood Business, is 0.43 acres in size, includes a 6,000 sq ft building, four -car detached garage, and 11 parking stalls in front of the building. On the side is angled parking, 12' in depth whereas 18' is required (Cars hang out into the street. This is not permitted). There is on -street parking on the east side of Adams Street (in front of Cross of Glory Lutheran Church), and no parking on Groberg Street (side street). The B-2 district is intended for retail or service businesses, providing goods and services on a community scale. Event Center (2,500 sq ft, 25-50 person capacity) 1. An Event Center (e.g. private rental space) is not specifically addressed in the Municipal Code, but is interpreted to be a "Public or semi-public recreational buildings and neighborhood or community centers....", which is a Permitted Use in the B-3 district. 2. Requires rezoning from B-2 to B-3; or an amendment to allow this use in the B-2 district. 3. Requires 13 parking stalls, one parking stall for every 4-person capacity.' Kennel Boarding (1,500 sq ft) 1. Animal Boarding Facilities are a Conditional Use2 (CUP) in the B-2 district, provided mitigation of noise and odors. Outdoor exercise areas must be supervised. 2. Requires 12 parking spaces.' 'Mounds View Municipal Code § 160.342 (Schedule of Off -Street Parking Requirements (Auditorium, Animal Hospital, Retail store and service establishment). Mounds View Municipal Code §160.183(C) (Veterinary clinics, animal clinics and animal boarding facilities) Item 09B Page 2 of 3 Grocery Store (1,000 sq ft) 1. Permitted use in the B-2 and B-3 districts. 2. Requires 7-10 parking stalls.' Summary If the three tenants are established, 35 parking stalls are required, whereas 11 are available. Along the east side of Adams Street, there is capacity for 10 or 11 vehicles adjacent to the church. The Municipal Code does not consider on -street parking toward meeting parking requirements. The Council may approve a CUP for joint off-street parking if within 300', if a parking easement or agreement is obtained from the church (has not been discussed with the church).' If comparing the proposed uses to similar businesses in Mounds View, the Mounds View Event Center will fill its parking lot on weekend nights (e.g. weddings), and is unused most weekdays. KinderCare has 15 parking stalls, and uses most during pick up & drop off (a kennel will not have the same concentrated busy times). Filipino Village has 18 stalls (1 per 277 sq ft), and uses 2-6 stalls. Using this ratio (1:277 sq ft), 4 stalls should be adequate for a 1,000 sq ft grocery store. In other words, the existing 11 parking stalls should be adequate for the proposed kennel and grocery store. The Event Center will be dependent upon on -street parking, and shared parking with the Church. None of this complies with the Municipal Code. A Variance and CUP will be needed. Strategic Plan Strategy/Goal: Continue BR&E program, maximize utilization of development space and current list of available sites, encourage land owners to maintain their properties, & consider residential redevelopment Financial Impact: N/A Recommendation: Staff requests direction from the Council if the owner should continue with the planned Event Center, Kennel, and Grocery Store, with the understanding that the Event Center is likely to demand on -street parking, and/or shared parking with Cross of Glory Lutheran Church across the street. Alternatively, the Council may provide an opinion that an Event Center is too intensive of a use, and that another use without parking demand be found. Respectfully, �ec:�,X Jon Sevald, AICP Community Development Director 3 Mounds View Municipal Code, 160.344(A)(2)(f) (Conditions required for joint use). The Mounds View Visior_ A Thriving Desirable Commit,«iy Item 09B Page 3 of 3 Site Photos 5491 Adams Street (at left), panoramic view looking north (Adams Street) (photo Sep 8, 2021). 5491 Adams Street (at left), panoramic view looking east (Groberb Street) (photo Sep 8, 2021). The Mounds View Vision A Thriving Desirable Community