HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/26/2004 Agenda & Packet Park and Recreation Committee Meeting Agenda
August 26, 2004
6:30 P.M.
1. Roll Call
2. Approval of minutes from the July 22, 2004 meeting.
3. Unfinished Business:
a) Greenfield Park Play Equipment - The motion to recommend dedication of$40,000 from the City
Park dedication Fund in 2005 for the Greenfield Park Playground Equipment Replacement Project
was presented to the City Council on Monday July 26, 2004. Attached is the Staff report. The City
Council approved the dedication of$48,000 to the Greenfield Park Playground Equipment Project.
However they did not approve expending City funds to print or mail donation request letters.
b) Groveland Park Building Replacement. —On May 10, 2004,the City Council approved Resolution
No. 6203 Authorizing the Preparation of a Site Plan, Construction Plans, Specifications, and
Consultant Selection for the Groveland Park Shelter Building Replacement Project. . TKDA has
submitted a Letter Agreement, which included a cost estimate of$19,600 for completing the plans
specifications. This Letter Agreement was presented to the City Council on June 28th for approval.
The City Council rejected it. On July 12, 2004, the City Council approved a resolution to rescind
Resolution No. 6203 and authorize the preparation of a Request For Proposal (RFP) for work
associated with the preparation of a site plan, construction plans, and specifications for the
Groveland Park Building Replacement Project. The RFP is scheduled to be approved by City
Council on August 23, 2004.
c) Facility Guide Update— Steve and Desaree are meeting on July 6th to develop the layout of the
Guide. A draft will be distributed at the August 26th meeting.
d) Park Usage Data Collection Sheets—August 26th has been set as the collection date for these sheets.
e) Community Survey—This was included in the May/June addition of the Mounds View Matters. As
of 6/23/2004 a total of 26 surveys were filled out and returned to the City. The deadline for
submittal is September 3, 2004. The Commission requested to review the surveys received so far at
the next meeting. These are attached. The City will be publishing a reminder in the newspaper
(Bulletin)to fill these out.
f) YMCA Committee Update—There was no meeting last month.
g) Lakeside Lions Park Parking Lot—This was included in the 2003 Street Improvement Project as a
bid alternate. Bids were received for this project. The low bid was $99,965.25. The engineer's
estimate was $104,750. This was awarded by City on June 14, 2004. The reconstructive work on
the parking lot is estimated to begin by mid August. Removal of the pavement occurred on the week
of August 16th
h) Lakeside Fishing Pier—The DNR is developing the necessary agreements to be signed by Spring
Lake Park and Mounds View. The installation of the pier may now be delayed until the spring of
2005 due to MinnCor's heavy workload. See email from Susann Willhite of the DNR dated August
20`h. The sign as suggested by the Commissioners will read"Cities" and not"City"
4. New Business:
a) 2004 Needs Analysis Item Update - Update on the items that were identified in the 2004 Needs
Analysis. What is the status of receiving and installing them?
b) Oakwood Park- Discuss the potential redevelopment
c) Other Items?
5. Commissioner/Staff Reports
a) Address Location of the blue port-o-potty in front of the Hillview Park Building. Can it be moved to the
backside of the building or moved closer to the baseball fields?
b) Address question regarding the volleyball courts at City Hall having railroad ties as a border. Can this
be replaced with something safer? Perhaps rope?
c) Silver View Sedimentation/Water Quality Pond Construction Update
6. Request for future agenda items/other business
Possible Items for September 23rd Agenda
Parks Needs Analysis Annual Review
Park and Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes
July 22, 2004
Meeting Called to order:
1. Roll Call:
Present: Kroeger, Kunz, Kunza, Edmond, Long, Silvis, Steeves, Lee
Absent: Aukee, Dazenski, McIntyre
2. Approval of May 27, 2004 Meeting Minutes:
Page 1, section 4,third item from the bottom—change "Ask"to "Ash"
Motion to approve: Kunz
2nd: Long
Motion passed unanimously
Commissioner Kunz noted that the agenda for July 22, 2004 should be revised.
Commissioner"Kunza"made a motion to recommend dedication of$40,000 for
the Greenfield Park Playground Equipment Replacement Project—Not
Commissioner"Kunz".
3. Unfinished Business:
a) Greenfield Park Play Equipment
• The motion to recommend dedication of$40,000 from the City
Park dedication Fund in 2005 for the Greenfield Park Playground
Equipment Replacement Project is being presented to the City
Council on Monday July 26, 2004.
• The Staff report is included in the packet
• There were questions as to the scope of the project. Did it include
swings? The"Donation Letter" states that swings and a hydraulic
speed control merry-go-round are included in the proposal. The
attached display picture did not show these items.
• There was a question as to what ages this playground equipment
would serve. This should be determined/and or noted in the
proposal.
• There are three main issues presented to the City Council in the
Staff report: Dedication of$40,000 for the play equipment,
Dedication of$8,000 for fiberfill and border, and expending
approximately$500 of City funds to finance the printing and
mailing of the donation letter to City businesses.
• The recommendation of dedicating $40,000 for the play equipment
was made by the Commissioners on July 8, 2004.
• The dedication of$8,000 for the addition of fiberfill and border
was discussed. There are two possible funding sources for this;
1
Park Dedication Fund, and the City General Fund. Staff was
recommending that it be derived from the Park Dedication Fund.
• A motion to recommend the dedication of an additional $8,000 for
the addition of fiberfill and a border around the playground was
made by Commissioner Kunz.
Motion to approve: Kunz
2nd: Long
Motion passed unanimously
• The Commissioners recommended that the dollar amounts in the
donation letter be revised- from $40,000 to $48,000.
• The Commission had some issues with the City financing and
being involved in the donation letter mailing. They thought that it
should not be on City letterhead. They also felt there are issues
with the financing of donation solicitations.
• A motion to provide a mailing list of Mounds View businesses was
made. The motion also recommended the denial of the use of City
envelopes and the denial to finance the printing and mailing of the
donation letter. This motion was made by Commissioner Kunz.
Motion to approve: Kunz
2nd: Edmond
Motion passed unanimously
• Should the City Council dedicate recommended funds to this
playground equipment replacement project, after which time, the
Parks and Recreation will review and perhaps vise their previous
recommendation to allocate $5,000 from Park Dedication Fund in
2005 for spring toys and other playground equipment for smaller
children. This was previously recommended as part of the Parks
Needs Analysis that was performed last years.
b) Groveland Park Building Replacement.
• On May 10, 2004,the City Council approved Resolution No. 6203
Authorizing the Preparation of a Site Plan, Construction Plans,
Specifications, and Consultant Selection for the Groveland Park
Shelter Building Replacement Project. .
• TKDA has submitted a Letter Agreement, which included a cost
estimate of$19,600 for completing the plans specifications.
• This Letter Agreement was presented to the City Council on June
28th for approval. The City Council rejected it.
• On July 12, 2004, the City Council approved a resolution to
rescind Resolution No. 6203 and authorize the preparation of a
Request For Proposal (RFP) for work associated with the
preparation of a site plan, construction plans, and specifications for
the Groveland Park Building Replacement Project.
• The RFP is scheduled to be presented and perhaps approved by
City Council on August 9, 2004.
• The RFP will be sent top the Commissioners for review.
2
c) Facility Guide Update
• A draft will absolutely be distributed at the August 26th meeting.
d) Park Usage Data Collection Sheets
• August 26, 2004 has been set as the collection date for these
sheets. Fill them out and bring them to the next meeting.
e) Community Survey
• This was included in the May/June addition of the Mounds View
Matters.
• As of 6/23/2004 a total of 26 surveys were filled out and returned
to the City.
• The deadline for submittal is September 3, 2004.
• The City will be publishing a reminder in the newspaper(Bulletin)
to fill these out.
f) YMCA Committee Update
• Jeanette handed out a summary of the last YMCA meeting and
went through it with the Commissioners.
g) Lakeside Lions Park Parking Lot
• This was awarded by City County on June 14, 2004.
• The reconstructive work on the parking lot is estimated to begin by
mid August.
h) Lakeside Fishing Pier
• The sign should read"Cities" and not"City"
• The installation of the pier is approximately scheduled for late
July.
4. New Business:
a.)NONE
5. Commissioner/Staff Reports
a) The blue port-o-potty is very unsightly in front of the Hillview Park Building.
Can it be moved to the backside of the building or moved closer to the
baseball fields?
b) The volleyball courts at City Hall have railroad ties as a border. Can this be
replaced with something safer? Perhaps rope?
c) An update to the Purple Loostrife Beetle Project was provided in the packet.
d) The playground equipment at Greenfield Park that was damaged by vandalism
has been corrected.
3
6. Request for future agenda items/other business
Possible Items for August 26th Agenda
• The Commissioners would like an update on the items that were
identified in the 2004 Needs Analysis. What is the status of
receiving and installing them?
• Discuss the potential redevelopment of Oakwood Park
Announced that the Next regular scheduled meeting will be August 26, 2004.
Motion to adjourn: Long
2nd: Silvis
Motion passed unanimously
Respectfully submitted by:
Greg Lee
4
Item No. 10B
Meeting Date: July 26, 2004
Type of Business: CB
WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing;
CA: Consent Agenda; CB: Council Business
City Administrator Review
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Greg Lee, Director of Public Works
Item Title/Subject: Resolution 6313 Dedicating Park Dedication Funds
in the 2005 Budget for the Greenfield Park
Playground Equipment Replacement Project
Background:
In the fall of 2003 the Parks and Recreation Commission preformed a "Needs
Analysis" for all City parks. Based on the analysis, the Commissioners developed
a list of desired changes and improvements to the City parks system. This list
was divided into three components; Short Term Items (items that could be done
without budgeting), Intermediate Items (items that needed to be budgeted for)
and Long Term Items (item that were capital expenditures and several years
out).
During this process a neighborhood group requested that something be done
with the Greenfield Park play equipment. They requested at minimum, new play
equipment for smaller children be added to Greenfield Park.
As part of the "Needs Analysis" the Commissioners recommended an
expenditure of $5,000 in 2005 to add new additional play equipment for smaller
children. The Commissioners also recommended that all of the playground
equipment at Greenfield Park be replaced in 2010 at an estimated cost of
$50,000 to $55,000, plus the cost of fiberfill, which was estimated to cost an
additional $8,000.
On April 22, 2004, the neighborhood group for Greenfield Park requested to
address the Parks and Recreation Commission. The neighborhood group
requested that the playground equipment be entirely replaced at this time. They
stated that the Greenfield Play equipment does not meet consumer product
safety and League of Minnesota Cities requirements. They also stated that
Greenfield Park play equipment is the oldest play equipment in the City and
should be replaced.
The Commissioners requested that equipment design be put together for
Greenfield Park. The Parks Supervisor, Steve Dazenski, worked with the
neighborhood group to create plans.
The plans were presented to the Commission on May 27, 2004. The proposed
playground would be 76' X 85'. It would have wood fiberfill base. The estimated
cost was $60,000 plus $8,000 for the wood fiberfill base. The Commissioners
requested additional proposals from other vendors.
The Park and Recreation Commission did not have a quorum on June 24, 2004;
this prompted the calling of a special meeting for July 8, 2004 to specifically
discuss the Greenfield Park Play Equipment Replacement.
On July 8, 2004, the Commissioners meet with the neighborhood group to
discuss the Greenfield Park Play Equipment. The Commissioners made a motion
to recommend that the City dedicate funds in the amount of $40,000 from the
City's Park Dedication Fund in the 2005 Budget for the Greenfield Park
Playground Equipment Replacement Project.
Discussion:
The total cost of the Greenfield Playground Equipment Replacement Project as
proposed is $60,000 for the equipment and $8,000 for the wood fiberfill and
playground border. The City routinely replaces wood fiberfill and budgets for it
annually. The current draft 2005 Budget has $1,500 for wood fiberfill. Should the
City Council wish to proceed with this project, Staff recommends that an
additional $8,000 be budgeted for in 2005 from the Park Dedication and not from
the Parks budget.
The difference in funds from what the Commissioners are recommending and the
estimated costs could be derived from donations. The neighborhood group has
submitted a donation request letter that they intend to send out to all of the
businesses in Mounds View (see attachment).
The neighborhood group has requested that the City print up these donation
request letters, provide envelopes with the City logo, and provide postage. The
estimated cost is summarized as follows:
Printing Costs $340.00
Envelopes (400) $ 8.00
Postages $148.00
TOTAL $496.00
*excludes Staff time.
Recommendation:
It has been recommended by the Parks and Recreation Commission that the City
Council approve a resolution to dedicate Park Dedication Funds in the 2005
Budget for the Greenfield Park Playground Equipment Replacement Project.
Respectfully Submitted,
Greg Lee, Director of Public Works
RESOLUTION NO. 6313
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEDICATING PARK DEDICATION FUNDS IN THE 2005 BUDGET FOR THE
GREENFIELD PARK PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
PROJECT
WHEREAS, on April 22, 2004, a neighborhood group requested that the
Parks and Recreation Commission recommend that the playground equipment at
Greenfield Park be entirely replaced at this time; and
WHEREAS, on July 8, 2004, the Commissioners made a motion to
recommend that the City dedicate funds in the amount of $40,000 from the City's
Park Dedication Fund in the 2005 Budget for the Greenfield Park Playground
Equipment Replacement Project; and
WHEREAS, should the City Council wish to proceed with this project, Staff
recommends that an additional $8,000 for filberfill and border be budgeted for in
2005 from the Park Dedication and not from the Parks budget; and
WHEREAS, the neighborhood group has requested that the City print up
donation request letters, provide envelopes with the City logo, and provide
postage.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Mounds View, Ramsey County, Minnesota as follows:
1. Dedicates Park Dedication Funds in the 2005 Budget for the
Greenfield Park Playground Equipment Replacement Project.
2. Said dedication will be in the amount of $48,000 which will include
fiberfill and border.
3. Donations raised by the neighborhood group will be applied entirely
to the Greenfield Park Playground Equipment Replacement Project.
Adopted this 26th day of July 2004.
(ATTEST)
Jerry Linke, Mayor
(SEAL)
Kurt Ulrich, City Administrator
July 30, 2004
Dear Mounds View area business or organization,
We are writing to you looking for financial support to replace the playground equipment at
Greenfield Park located on the north side of Mounds View at the corner of Hillview Road and
Knoll Drive. This equipment was installed in the early 1980s and is the oldest park in Mounds
View.
When this park was built, it met the guidelines for safety according to the United States
Consumer Product Safety Commission(CPSC)at that time. However the CPSC updated those
guidelines in the early 1990s and the playground at Greenfield Park has many areas that no longer
meet these safety recommendations. There are several areas on the equipment that are broken
and cannot be replaced because it is so old that parts are no longer available. It cannot be adjusted
for safety because that would void the company's liability/warranty if the equipment were altered.
On the reverse side you will find a photo of the tentative playground proposal. Swings, a
hydraulic speed control merry-go-round, and an age-appropriate area for toddlers are also
included in the proposal. This will provide the community with a playground of comparable size
to what is currently in place, and meet CPSC recommendations for safety.
The city of Mounds View has a Park Dedication Fund which is financed with monies collected
from development and redevelopment in the community. Mounds View is nearly fully
developed. Therefore the amount of money available in the Park Dedication Fund is limited. The
Mounds View City Council has agreed to budget$40,000 of the $70,000 cost for the project.
We are asking community businesses and organizations to contribute to the remaining cost of the
project so it can be installed in the spring of 2005. 100% of your donation will go directly to the
playground. Consult with your tax preparer for taxable deductions. Checks should be made to
the"City of Mounds View."Please specify your donation to go toward the"Greenfield
Playground." A receipt for your contribution can be returned upon request. In order for us to
achieve our goal,we will need your contribution by November 1, 2004 sent to:
Charles Hansen, Finance Director
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, MN 55112-1499
If you have any questions about this project,please contact any of the individuals below.
Thank you for keeping our children safe with your contribution.
Sincerely,
Greenfield Park area residents,
Cindy Palm Kendra Miller Colleen Johnson Shannon Mildenberger
763-783-5769 763-780-5467 763-780-4197 763-780-4449
.1k. r37 ,
41
,r, t
/ /
II
II S
{
0'v
M n tfiscon in :,}
? I f PLAYGR UND.,,i
v
11
WEFSCAPI
Item No. 9F
Meeting Date: August 23, 2004
Type of Business: CA
WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing;
CA: Consent Agenda; CB: Council Business
City Administrator Review
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Greg Lee, Director of Public Works
Item Title/Subject: Resolution 6333 Authorizing the Publication of a
Request For Proposal (RFP) for Work Associated
with the Preparation of a Site Plan, Construction
Plans, and Specifications for the Groveland Park
Building Replacement Project
Background:
On May 10, 2004 the City Council approved Resolution No. 6203 which
authorized the preparation of a site plan, construction plans, specifications, and
consultant selection for the Groveland Park Building Replacement Project.
In addition, the City Council authorized "the execution of a letter of agreement
with TKDA for the preparation of the site plans, construction plans, specifications,
and any other planning phase aspects of this project".
On June 21, 2004, the City's engineering firm of TKDA submitted a Letter of
Agreement with a list of the scope of work to be provided.
On June 28, 2004, Staff presented Resolution No. 6292 approving and
authorizing the execution of a Letter of Agreement with TKDA for the Groveland
Park Building Replacement Project. The estimated cost of the proposed work
was $19,600. At this meeting, the Council voiced an objection to the estimated
costs submitted by TKDA for the proposed work for the Groveland Park Building
replacement plans. The City Council did not approve Resolution No. 6292 and
gave Staff direction to develop a Request For Proposal (RFP) for other
engineering and architectural firms.
On July 12, 2004, the City Council approved Resolution No. 6300 rescinding
Resolution No. 6203 and authorizing the preparation of a Request For Proposal
(RFP) for work associated with the preparation of a site plan, construction plans,
and specifications for the Groveland Park Building Replacement Project.
Discussion:
Base on Council's direction, Staff has developed a Request For Proposal (RFP).
It is attached for Council's review. Staff is recommending that numerous qualified
Architectural and Engineering Consultant firms, including those within the City's
pool of consultants, be notified of the RFP either by publishing it or by directly
mailing it to them
Recommendation:
It is recommended the City Council approve a resolution to authorize the
publication of a Request For Proposal (RFP) for work associated with the
preparation of a site plan, construction plans, and specifications for the
Groveland Park Building Replacement Project
Respectfully Submitted,
Greg Lee, Director of Public Works
RESOLUTION NO. 6333
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AUTHORIZING THE PUBLICATION OF A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)
FOR WORK ASSOCIATED WITH THE PREPARATION OF A SITE PLAN,
CONSTRUCTION PLANS, AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE GROVELAND
PARK BUILDING REPLACEMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, on July 12, 2004, the City Council approved Resolution No.
6300 rescinding Resolution No. 6203 and authorizing the preparation of a
Request For Proposal (RFP) for work associated with the preparation of a site
plan, construction plans, and specifications for the Groveland Park Building
Replacement Project; and
WHEREAS, based on Council's direction, Staff has developed a Request
For Proposal (RFP); and
WHEREAS, Staff is recommending that numerous qualified Architectural
and Engineering Consultant firms, including those within the City's pool of
consultants, be notified of the RFP either by publishing it or by directly mailing it
to them.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Mounds View, Ramsey County, Minnesota as follows:
1. Accepts the Request For Proposal (RFP) for work associated with
the preparation of a site plan, construction plans, and specifications
for the Groveland Park Building Replacement.
2. Authorizes said Request For Proposal (RFP) to be published and
directly mailed to numerous qualified Architectural and Engineering
Consultant firms.
Adopted this 23rd day of August 2004.
(ATTEST)
Jerry Linke, Mayor
(SEAL)
Kurt Ulrich, City Administrator
City of Mounds View, Minnesota
Request for Proposals
For
Architectural / Engineering Consultant to Develop Plans and Specification
for the Groveland Park Building Replacement Project
RFP ISSUED: August 25, 2004
Proposals Due: September 24, 2004 at 4:30 p.m.
Submit Proposals to:
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
(763) 717-4066
Attn.: Steve Dazenski
Parks Supervisor
Overview
Background
The City of Mounds View, Minnesota, is requesting proposals from
qualified Architectural / Engineering firms to develop plans and
specifications for a new park building to replace the existing building at
Groveland Park in Mounds View.
There currently exists a prefabricated park building located at 2815 Arden
Avenue in Mounds View. This building was once a portable schoolroom.
The City purchased it nearly twenty years ago and moved it to this site.
The Mounds View Parks and Recreation Commission has reviewed the
condition of this existing building and determined that it has reached the
end of its useful life; the Commission then recommended that it be
replaced.
Mounds View's Capital Improvement Plan indicates the expenditure of
funds for the preparation of plans and specifications in 2004, and
construction in 2005.
Basic City Information
Mounds View has been a municipal corporation since 1958. The City
operates under a Home Rule Charter, which was adopted in 1979. The
City is governed by a Mayor and four City Council members, all of whom
are elected at large. The Council employs a City Administrator who is
responsible for administering Council policy and managing City business
on a daily basis.
Mounds View is located in northern Ramsey County, approximately eight
miles north of the City of St. Paul. The City encompasses an area of
approximately 4.25 square miles. Since 1970, the City's population
growth has been:
Year Population % Increase /
Decrease
1970 10,599 -
1980 12,593 +16.0%
1990 12,541 -0.4%
2000 12,950 + 0.3%
Available Resources — Plans and Specifications of a recent project
In 2001, the City of Mounds View performed a similar project in Hillview
Park (building address - 7901 Greenwood Drive). With this project, a
contractor, based on City specifications, removed the existing building.
The contractor then utilized plans and specifications to erect a new
replacement building.
The proposed Groveland Park Building replacement project will follow the
same set of plans and specification as the Hillview Park Building, with a
few minor modifications as indicated in the section, "Scope of Services".
The Hillview Park Building plans and specifications are available to
interested parties upon request. The plans are in an AutoCAD format.
II. Scope of Services
The City of Mounds View is requesting proposals from qualified
consultants to perform the following tasks related to the new park building
to replace the existing building at Groveland Park in Mounds View:
Task 1: Develop a Site Preparation Plan
A. Place City building removal specifications in project
specification book.
B. Indicate any or tree object removals
1
Task 2: Develop a Project Site Plan
A. Meet with Parks Supervisor to review project scope and
discuss proposed layout.
B. Conduct a topographic survey of building site
(approximately 200' X 300') using onsite hydrant as
benchmark and adjacent streets as horizontal control.
C. Plot survey data into a site base map to be used as a
background for the site plan.
D. Develop grading a plan with proposed building footprint
E. Develop a utility plan with proposed building footprint
Task 3: Develop Park Building Plans and Specifications
A. Utilize existing Hillview Park Building plans and
specifications.
B. Alter Hillview Plans as follows:
1. Create a straight wall on the porch side of the
building by eliminating jogs by the existing storage
area and women's bathroom.
2. Reduce the size of the bathrooms to create space
next to the women's bathroom for a new enclosed
storage space with lockable access door.
3. Add a wall separating the mechanical area from
the existing storage area. Change this storage to a
food serving area with a tub sink, microwave,
stainless steel countertop, and metal rollup
shutter.
4. Add air conditioning to the shelter with an air
conditioning unit to be located in the attic.
5. Provide an alternate bid for removable rubberized
flooring suitable for ice skates (does not currently
apply - possible future activity)
6. Provide some type of wood or other backing to
aluminum eves to deter damage from hockey
sticks.
7. Emphasize floor slopes toward floor drains to
provide positive drainage.
C. Meet with Parks Supervisor to review site and building
layouts.
D. Prepare final plan layouts incorporating review
comments.
E. Prepare construction drawings and specifications manual
(Contract Documents).
F. Provide City with one electronic copy and three hard
copy sets of the Contract Documents for use in obtaining
bids.
Ill. Additional Services
Although not part of the original proposal, the consultant firm must have
the ability to provide the City additional services which shall be billable on
an hourly basis, should the City choose to continue with this project and
retain the services of the consultant firm. Said services may include:
A. Further design effort or documentation beyond that described in
Section II, including additional meetings or evaluations requested by
the City.
B. Meetings with the Parks and Recreation Commission or the City
Council.
C. Bidding or construction phase services.
D. Permit application fees.
E. Subsurface exploration testing.
F. Additional field survey may be required.
G. Construction inspection.
IV. Desired Qualifications of Consultant
The consultant firm selected will have a broad base of experience dealing
with architectural and civil engineering projects. The consultant firm
selected shall have the ability to complete the work in a timely manner.
V. Organization of the Proposal
Proposals should include responses to each of the following items.
Include sample work products as appropriate to address the services
expected from the consultant, as outlined in Section II, "Scope of
Services." Please construct your responses in the same order as listed
below to facilitate review and comparison by the review committee.
1. Provide a general profile of the firm and identify the primary office
serving the City of Mounds View.
2. Identify the professional staff assigned to work on this project.
Indicate who is to be the lead representative and the role to be
played by other team members. Include relevant experience vitae
for each team member. If there is an intent to "partner" with
another firm on any part of this project, provide specific detail on
the firm, their role and function, team members, and responsibility
assigned.
3. Summarize the firm's support service capability; i.e., technology
and research capabilities. Indicate whether the support service will
be provided by the firm or outsourced.
4. Provide in detail an overview of the firm's approach and work plan,
including an outline of project tasks as they are to occur, expected
information requirements, City effort and resources required.
5. Provide a time schedule for all phases of the study from initiation to
completion. Indicate how the firm intends to report progress being
made on different phases of the project.
6. Provide a list of at least three (3) recent public sector references
including agency name, address, and name of a specific contact
person.
7. Provide a fee structure and task-by-task budget of professional
effort and charges consistent with understanding of the project.
VI. Terms and Conditions
1. The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals or to award
the contract to another consultant if the successful applicant does
not execute a contract within seven (7) days after the award of the
proposal.
2. The consultant must deliver ten (10) copies of its proposals to the
City Hall no later than 4:30 p.m., September 24, 2004. The
address and telephone number is:
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
(763) 717-4066
3. The City reserves the right to request clarification of the information
submitted and to request additional information of one or more
applicants.
4. Any proposal may be withdrawn up until the date and time set
above for the deadline for submitting proposals. Any proposals not
withdrawn shall constitute an irrevocable offer, for a period of thirty
(30) days, to provide to the City the services set forth in the
attached specifications, or until one or more of the proposals has
been approved by the City.
5. If, through any cause, the consultant shall fail to fulfill in a timely
and proper manner the obligations agreed to, the City shall have
the right to terminate its contract by specifying the date of
termination in a written notice to the consultant at least fifteen (15)
working days before the termination date. In this event, the
consultant shall be entitled to just and equitable compensation for
any satisfactory work completed.
6. Any agreement or contract resulting from the acceptance of a
proposal shall be on forms either supplied by or approved by the
City, and shall contain, as a minimum, applicable provisions of the
Request for Proposal. The city reserves the right to reject any
agreement that does not conform to the Request for Proposal and
any City requirements for agreements and contracts.
7. The selected consultant shall not subcontract or assign any interest
in the contract and shall not transfer any interest in the same
without prior written consent of the City.
8. No reports, information, or data given to or prepared by the
consultant under contract shall be made available to any individual
or organization by the firm without the prior written approval of the
City.
9. All data, documents and other information provided to the City by
the consultant as a result of this Request for Proposal shall become
the property of the City and subject to its disposal.
10. All costs associated with the preparation of a proposal in response
to the Request for Proposal shall be the responsibility of the
consultant submitting the proposal.
11. The consultant will be expected to meet with city officials at City
Hall as needed during the course of the project.
12. The City expects the consultant to respond to routine questions on
the phone which do not require considerable research on a
complimentary basis.
13. Should the consultant merge or be purchased by another individual
or firm, contract continuation would be at the City's option.
14. As this is a request for proposal and not a bid, the City reserves the
right to negotiate with any party and on any matter.
VI. Interviews
The City may select two or more consultants for oral presentations. Each
firm will give a presentation summarizing their qualifications and their
approach to the project. The presentation will be followed by a question-
and-answer period. The individuals who will be assigned to the project will
be expected to make the oral presentation.
VII. Evaluation of Proposals
Proposals will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
1. Responsiveness of the proposal in clearly stating an understanding
of the work to be performed for the City.
2. Competence of team, including technical education and training,
experience in hydrology issues and engineering work, availability of
adequate personnel, and firm's support service capability.
3. Relevant experience in similar projects.
4. Demonstrated capacity to successfully design an approach and
work plan to meet project requirements and then fulfill the
requirements of the plan.
5. Fee schedule
6. References
VIII. Schedule of Events
The following schedule of events for selection of a consultant and
completion of the project has been established:
Requests for Proposals available August 25, 2004
Deadline for submission of proposals September 24, 2004
Interview of Final Candidates (if necessary) September 27-30, 2004
Council appoints Consultant October 11, 2004
Project Starting Date October 18, 2004
All questions regarding this request for proposal are to be directed to:
Steve Dazenski
Parks Supervisor
763-717-4066
Lee, Greg
From: Kent Skaar[Kent.Skaar@dnr.state.mn.us]
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 7:29 AM
To: Suzann Willhite
Cc: greg.lee@ci.mounds-view.mn.us; mrygwall@ci.spring-lake-park.mn.us
Subject: Re: Request for Status of Spring Lake Fishing Pier?
Suzann,
As we had discussed, this pier had been scheduled for FY05. Although
MinnCor was able to complete the Pier Programs FY04 order in a very
timely fashion, given the number of large orders they have received over
the last several months (two of which are apparently each utilizing up
to 700 linear feet of 20 foot pier sections) they have indicated that
any additional orders/requests will not likely be ready for shipment
until the spring of 2005. So presently the Spring Lake installation
looks like 2005. I'll keep you posted if things change.
Kent Skaar
Water Recreation Program Coordinator
Trails and Waterways Division
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
651-297-2798
>>> Suzann Willhite 8/20/2004 1:18:20 PM >>>
Kent,
Checking back with you on the status of the Spring Lake fishing pier.
I know you mentioned that MinnCor may not be able to deliver this pier
this season due to their heavy workload. Do you have an update? Please
copy all on your response.
Thank you.
Suzann Willhite
DNR-Trails & Waterways
1200 Warner Road
St. Paul, MN 55106
651-772-7937
651-772-7977 FAX
1