HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/16/2004 Agenda & Packet Park and Recreation Committee Meeting Agenda
December 16, 2004
6:30 P.M.
1. Roll Call
2. No minutes from the November 18, 2004 meeting are available.
3. Unfinished Business:
a) Greenfield Park Play Equipment -
On Monday, December 13, 2004 the City Council ordered the Greenfield Playground Equipment
Replacement Project and awarded the contract to Minnesota/Wisconsin Playground in the amount
of$60,000.00. The City Council also approved revising the contract to include a climbing wall at an
estimated cost of $4,000, with the total project cost not to exceed the budgeted amount of
$64,541.05. The inclusion of said climbing wall is contingentonreceiving majority approval from
the Parks and Recreation Commission. The details to finalize the project, including the possible
inclusion of a climbing wall and the color scheme, will need to be discussed.
b) Groveland Park Building Replacement. —
Staff met with representatives of TKDA on December 1, 2004 to discuss this project. TKDA has
submitted a draft concept plan for the Commissioner's review. TKDA has indicated that based on
ENR(Engineering News Record) data the building construction cost for the Groveland building
may be 26% more than the Hillview building. This increase is based solely on inflation. TKDA will
be collecting site data in January.
c) Facility Guide Update—This was review at the last meeting. Staff is still working or addressing all
of the comments. A revised draft will be submitted to the Commission in January.
d) YMCA Committee Update—A meeting was held on December 6, 2004. Items that were discussed
were Recreation Software Purchase, fitness center equipment upgrade- looking at replacing with
used YMCA equipment, adding two new security cameras, and revising the entrance sign to include
all current tenants.
e) 2004 Park Needs Analysis—This was completed at the October meeting.
•
4. New Business:
a) City Wide Survey develop questions
The City Council has approved a contract to conduct a citywide telephone survey. This will be a fifty-
question(50) survey posed to four hundred (400) random homes. Are there questions that the Parks and
Recreation Commission wish to include in the survey? The Administration Department requests that the
Commissioners develop a list of questions they would liked asked, in order of importance.
b) Approve meeting dates for 2005
c) Recommend a Chairperson for 2005 - to be approved by City Council
d) Select a Vice-Chairperson and Secretary for 2005
e) Any Other Items?
5. Commissioner/Staff Reports:
a) Announce that there is a vacant seat on the Commission and that application are available but must be
submitted by Monday, January 17th, at 4:30 p.m.
b) Ice Rink Update
c) Any Other Reports?
6. Request for future agenda items/other business
Possible Items for January 27th Agenda
Item No. 10E
Meeting Date: December 13, 2004
Type of Business: CB
WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing;
CA:Consent Agenda;CB: Council Business
City Administrator Review
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Greg Lee, Director of Public Works
Item Title/Subject: Resolution 6404 Awarding a Contract for the
Greenfield Park Playground Equipment
Replacement Project
Background:
In the fall of 2003, the Parks and Recreation Commission preformed a "Needs
Analysis" for all City parks. Based on the analysis, the Commissioners developed
a list of desired changes and improvements to the City parks system. This list
was divided into three components: Short Term Items (items that could be done
without budgeting), Intermediate Items (items that needed to be budgeted for)
and Long Term Items (item that were capital expenditures and several years
out).
During this process a neighborhood group requested that something be done
with the Greenfield Park play equipment. They requested, at minimum, new play
equipment for smaller children be added to Greenfield Park.
As part of the "Needs Analysis" the Commissioners recommended an
expenditure of $5,000 in 2005 to add new additional play equipment for smaller
children. The Commissioners also recommended that all of the playground
equipment at Greenfield Park be replaced in 2010 at an estimated cost of
$50,000 to $55,000, plus the cost of fiberfill, which was estimated at an additional
$8,000.
On April 22, 2004, the neighborhood group for Greenfield Park requested to
address the Parks and Recreation Commission. The neighborhood group
requested that the playground equipment be entirely replaced at this time. They
stated that the Greenfield Play equipment does not meet consumer product
safety and League of Minnesota Cities requirements. They also stated that
Greenfield Park play equipment is the oldest play equipment in the City and
should be replaced.
The Commissioners requested that an equipment design be put together for
Greenfield Park. The Parks Supervisor, Steve Dazenski, worked with the
neighborhood group to create plans.
The plans were presented to the Commission on May 27, 2004. The proposed
playground would be 76' X 85'. It would have wood fiberfill base. The estimated
cost was $60,000, plus $8,000 for the wood fiberfill base. The Commissioners
requested additional proposals from other vendors.
The Parks and Recreation Commission did not have a quorum on June 24, 2004;
this prompted the calling of a special meeting for July 8, 2004 to specifically
discuss the Greenfield Park Playground equipment replacement.
On July 8, 2004, the Commissioners met with the neighborhood group to discuss
the Greenfield Park playground equipment. The Commissioners made a motion
to recommend that the City dedicate funds in the amount of $40,000 from the
City's Park Dedication Fund in the 2005 Budget for the Greenfield Park
Playground Equipment Replacement Project.
On July 26, 2004, the City Council approved Resolution 6313, which dedicated
the expenditure of $48,000.00 from the Park Dedication Fund in the 2005 Budget
for the Greenfield Park Playground Equipment Replacement Project. This
amount included the original amount of $40,000 recommended by the Parks and
Recreation Commission, and $8,000 for the wood fiberfill and playground border.
As previously stated, the total cost of the Greenfield Playground Equipment
Replacement Project, as proposed, was $68,000. This included the equipment,
the wood fiberfill, and the playground border.
The20 000 difference in funds from what the Cityapproved Council and the
estimated costs was to be derived from donations. The neighborhood group had
submitted a donation request letter that they intended to send out to all of the
businesses in Mounds View.
Discussion:
As of December 8, 2004 the Greenfield Neighborhood Group has raised
$16,541.05. This amount has been deposited into the City's Greenfield
Playground Equipment Replacement Project account. The total budget for this
project is currently $64,541.05.
For approximately the last thirty (30) years the City has been purchasing its
playground equipment from Minnesota Playground Equipment, Incorporated of
Golden Valley, Minnesota. They are a large vendor that supplies several brands
of playground equipment.
Because of the City playground equipment specifications, the City has historically
purchased "Game Time" brand playground equipment. This brand has proven to
be durable, easy to erect, safe for all users, and an overall value for the City.
Specification used for the Greenfield Playground Equipment Replacement
Project are similar to past City projects. Advertisement for bids was published on
December 1, 2004.
Review Bids - Bids for the Greenfield Playground Equipment Replacement
Project were received at 4:00 p.m. on Monday, December 13, 2004 at City Hall.
A total of three (3) bids were received for this project. The low bid of$60,000.00
was submitted by Minnesota/Wisconsin Playground of Golden Valley Minnesota.
The bid has been reviewed and found to be in order.
A complete bid summary is as follows:
SUPPLIER NAME BID AMOUNT
Clarence Thornberry — Gametime $71,231.85
Flanagan Sales Inc. $60,843.89
Minnesota/Wisconsin Playground $60,000.00
It should be noted that the bid of Flanagan Sales Incorporate did not meet the
City's specifications.
Budget
As stated, the budget for this project is currently $64,541.05. Should the bids
come in higher than this budgeted amount, there are several alternatives that
could be utilized for the project. These include:
• Seek more donations
• City dedicate more funds to the project
• Reduce the scope of the project
However, since the bids were less than the budgeted amount, the Greenfield
Neighborhood Group has requested that a climbing wall be added to the project.
The estimated cost of a climbing wall is $4,000.
Funding for this project will be the two aforementioned sources; donations raised
by the Greenfield Neighborhood Group in the amount of $16,541.05, and as per
Resolution 6313, funding in the amount up to $48,000.00, derived from the Park
Dedication Funds in the 2005 Budget.
Recommendation:
It is recommended the Council adopt a resolution to award a contract for the
Greenfield Park Playground Equipment Replacement Project to
Minnesota/Wisconsin Playground in the amount of $60,000.00.
Respectfully Submitted,
Greg Lee, Director of Public Works
RESOLUTION NO. 6404
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE GREENFIELD PARK PLAYGROUND
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, on April 22, 2004, a neighborhood group requested that the
Parks and Recreation Commission recommend that the playground equipment at
Greenfield Park be entirely replaced at this time; and
WHEREAS, on July 8, 2004, the Commissioners made a motion to
recommend that the City dedicate funds in the amount of $40,000 from the City's
Park Dedication Fund in the 2005 Budget for the Greenfield Park Playground
Equipment Replacement Project; and
WHEREAS, on July 26, 2004, the City Council approved Resolution 6313,
which dedicated the expenditure of $48,000.00 from the Park Dedication Funds
in the 2005 Budget for the Greenfield Park Playground Equipment Replacement
Project; and
WHEREAS, as of December 8, 2004 the Greenfield Neighborhood Group
has raised $16,541.05; and
WHEREAS, Staff has prepared plans and specifications that meet the City
of Mounds View's standards and are consistent with specifications utilized for
other recent projects; and
WHEREAS, funding for this project will be derived from donations raised
for this project from the Park Dedication Fund in the 2005 Budget; and
WHEREAS, sealed bids were received and tabulated on December 13,
2004, at 4:00 p.m. for the Greenfield Playground Equipment Replacement
Project; and
WHEREAS, the low responsive and responsible bid was received from
Minnesota/Wisconsin Playground at their bid price of $60,000.00.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Mounds View, Ramsey County, Minnesota as follows:
1. Said improvements are hereby ordered and shall hereafter be
known and referred to as the Greenfield Playground Equipment
Replacement Project. Said ordering of the improvements shall be
valid for a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of adoption
of this resolution.
2. Funds for this project are to be derived from the donations raised
by the for the Greenfield Playground Equipment Replacement
Project with the remaining amount, up to $48,000.00, as per
Resolution 6313, from the Park Dedication Fund in the 2005
Budget.
3. That the bid of Minnesota/VVisconsin Playground in the amount of
$60,000.00 for the Greenfield Playground Equipment Replacement
Project is the lowest responsive bid.
4. That a contract to perform said work is awarded to
Minnesota/Wisconsin Playground and that the Mayor and City
Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a
contract with said bidder.
5. That the contract will also include a climbing wall at an estimated
cost of $4,000, with the total project cost not to exceed the
budgeted amount of $64,541.05. The inclusion of said climbing wall
is contingent on receiving majority approval from the Parks and
Recreation Commission.
6. The Public Works Department is authorized and directed to return
the deposit made for said bids, except the deposit of the successful
bidder, which shall be retained until a contract has been signed.
Adopted this 13th day of December 2004.
(ATTEST)
Jerry Linke, Mayor
(SEAL)
Kurt Ulrich, City Administrator
,
Pr' £ rte"
tel;
f
..T
ilfil
6.•';',.;::.;:.,i,.,.3.:4147,-.:,:...,„'";
w p, qy q� 'dry t..,;.
a a,.;;:,".,,,...7,'''',' n "&
w , 4" �P
\\,,,, �< .a
ez,,
xA �."u
W
Steve Dazenski
From: Greg Lee
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 12:24 PM
To: Desaree Crane
Cc: Steve Dazenski
Subject: Greenfild Park Playground Equipment Replacement Project-revised council letter
Attached is ther final revised copy of the Greenfield Park Playground Equipment Replacement Project. Last night the City
Council added in a revision which I have included as paragraph 5. of the resolutuion.
5. That the contract will also include a climbing wall at an estimated cost of $4,000, with
the total project cost not to exceed the budgeted amount of $64,541.05. The inclusion
of said climbing wall is contingent on receiving majority approval from the Parks and
Recreation Commission.
Greenfield Park
Playground Equ...
1
Steve Dazenski
From: Steve Dazenski
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 2:08 PM
To: Greg Lee
Subject: FW: Groveland Park Shelter- concept plan
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
base_concepts.pdf
Original Message
From: Kathryn E. Poore-Larson [mailto:poore-larson.ke@tkda.com]
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 10:44 AM
To: Steve Dazenski
Cc: Richard L. Gray
Subject: Groveland Park Shelter - concept plan
Hi Steve,
Please see the attached concept plan for the Groveland Park Shelter with
modifications as discussed at our meeting 12/1/04. Let me know if you
have any comments or revisions you'd like to see.
The building length grew by 4 '-0" and the overall square footage
increased by 12% from the original Park Shelter plan done in 2001, from
1, 092 SF to 1,218 SF. Also consider the additional cost for the Serving
Area stainless steel counters (approximately $700/LF) , sink, coiling
shutter (approximately $2, 000-3, 000) and additional electrical needs.
Based on ENR (Engineering News Record) data the building construction
cost, rate of inflation from 2001 to 2004 was 19. 6%, (averaging
6. 6%/year) , so to 2005 may be 26%.
I hope this information is helpful for your Monday meeting. Please feel
free to contact me if you have any questions.
Kathryn
The attached files are transmitted for your convenience and are the sole
property of TKDA. By accepting delivery the recipient agrees to
indemnify and hold TKDA harmless from any liability arising from the use
of this data. By acceptance of this data, the user agrees not to
transmit this data or provide access to it or any part of it to another
party. This electronic data is subject to change and updates are the
responsibility of the recipient. TKDA is not responsible for updating
the files or for compatibility with recipient's hardware and/or
software. Please check these files for virus contamination prior to use.
Kathryn Poore-Larson, AIA, CID
Architect
phone: 651/292-4532
fax: 651/292-0083
e-mail: poore.larson.ke@tkda.com
TKDA
1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza
1
444 Cedar Street
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101-2140
2
Steve Dazenski
From: Steve Dazenski
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 2:08 PM
To: Greg Lee
Subject: FW: Groveland Park Shelter- concept plan
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
baseconcepts.pdf
Original Message
From: Kathryn E. Poore-Larson [mailto:poore-larson. ke@tkda.com]
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 10:44 AM
To: Steve Dazenski
Cc: Richard L. Gray
Subject: Groveland Park Shelter - concept plan
Hi Steve,
Please see the attached concept plan for the Groveland Park Shelter with
modifications as discussed at our meeting 12/1/04. Let me know if you
have any comments or revisions you'd like to see.
The building length grew by 4 '-0" and the overall square footage
increased by 12% from the original Park Shelter plan done in 2001, from
1, 092 SF to 1,218 SF. Also consider the additional cost for the Serving
Area stainless steel counters (approximately $700/LF) , sink, coiling
shutter (approximately $2, 000-3, 000) and additional electrical needs.
Based on ENR (Engineering News Record) data the building construction
cost, rate of inflation from 2001 to 2004 was 19. 6%, (averaging
6. 6%/year) , so to 2005 may be 26%.
I hope this information is helpful for your Monday meeting. Please feel
free to contact me if you have any questions.
Kathryn
The attached files are transmitted for your convenience and are the sole
property of TKDA. By accepting delivery the recipient agrees to
indemnify and hold TKDA harmless from any liability arising from the use
of this data. By acceptance of this data, the user agrees not to
transmit this data or provide access to it or any part of it to another
party. This electronic data is subject to change and updates are the
responsibility of the recipient. TKDA is not responsible for updating
the files or for compatibility with recipient's hardware and/or
software. Please check these files for virus contamination prior to use.
Kathryn_Poore-Larson, AIA, CID
Architect
phone: 651/292-4532
fax: 651/292-0083
e-mail: poore.larson.ke@tkda.com
TKDA
1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza
1
444 Cedar Street
• Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101-2140
2
Item No: 10J
Meeting Date: 11/22/04
Type of Business: CB
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Honorable Mayor and City Coupc'
From: Kurt Ulrich, City Administrator
Item Title/Subject: Consider Purcha e of Recreation Software
Background:
Over the last several months, the YMCA Advisory Committee has been reviewing the
benefits of purchasing software for the administration of the City's recreation
programming and facility rental. The Advisory Committee has recommended purchase of
the software indicated in order to improve the operation of the City recreation program.
Discussion:
After checking with several cities it was determined that a product known as RecNet
would best suit the needs of the City of Mounds View recreation program. The major
benefits of purchasing the use of such software would be:
Customers could:
• View Recreation programs and availability online
• Sign up for programs from the convenience of their home or office
• Have an account that shows what classes they have signed up for, and all the
information regarding length of program, instructor information, etc.
• View availability of Community Center Rooms, Park Shelters, Ball Diamond,
Soccer Fields
• Ability to use credit cards to pay for program registrations online with fee
• Receive receipts for program registration as email attachments
• Receive team/class rosters as email attachments
City Recreation Staff could:
• Process transactions from any computer with an Internet connection
• Process Activity Registration, Facility Reservation, and Membership Sales
• Process multiple transactions on one receipt
• Ability to accept cash, check, or credit card payment
• Online registration would decrease staff time in processing registrations
• Have the ability to send rosters/receipts to participants and coaches via email
• Greatly reduce the time spent printing receipts, mailing letters to
coaches/participants/community center user groups
• Ability to print mailing labels or send broadcast email to participant database
• Ability to print class rosters and facility reservation schedules
• The increased efficiency in processing reservations and registrations would leave
more time for staff to concentrate on other tasks
Budget Impact:
The City will pay an initial $2,400, plus and estimated $3,000 per year (in individual
transaction costs) to provide the services listed.
• The initial Onsite training cost for five users is $2,400.
• A RecNet trainer will come to our facility and provide 2 full days of training
• On a yearly basis, transaction fees will be deducted from the bi-monthly checks
sent for online/offline credit card transactions
• In Office Transaction Fees-Mounds View will pay a transaction fee of 1.5% for
each monetary transaction entered into the system by a staff member. For each
transaction paid with a credit card, there will be an additional credit card
processing fee of 2.25% (3.75% total.) The minimum yearly fee is $3,000 that is
a combination of in office and online transaction fees. The higher number of
online registrations, the lower the cost will be for Mounds View. Please refer to
the pricing proposal for more specific information pertaining to this. Based on
current participation the City would be at or below the minimum $3,000 level.
• Online Transaction Fees-Participants registering for recreation programs online
will pay 6.5% plus $.50 convenience fee.
• Transactions fees cover unlimited technical support, new updates and releases,
hosting/maintenance of data, and backups every 30 minutes.
The proposed costs will directly increase the amount the City contributes towards its
recreation program; $5,500 in 2005 plus $3,000 in 2006. Other offsetting benefits may
result from the systems ability to provide better tracking and more utilization of facilities,
and additional targeted marketing efforts that could be made utilizing the new customer
data.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council consider this 2-year agreement to trial
recreation software for the City. The Council should discuss the merits of this proposal
and if acceptable, direct the City Attorney to review and approve the proposed contract
language for consideration at the next regular meeting.
RecNet...Fully-Hosted, Fee-Based Transaction Model Virtually Eliminates
Upfront Costs
As a fully-hosted, transaction-based technology tool, RecNet virtually eliminates the need for
costly software and IT infrastructure investments.
Safe, Secure and Fully-Hosted Immediate and
The Active Network owns and maintains the entire database and web server Significant Savings
infrastructure hosting your RecNet product, meaning low-cost automation for
you.We provide our own merchant account so you don't have to, securely • No software installation,
process all online and offline transactions and safely store your data. updates,and licensing or
maintenance fees
• No need to
How Does the Fee-Based Transaction Model Work? costly servers purchase
The Active Network classifies transactions as either"Online"or"Offline" and • No fees to connect multi-
then charges a fee based on the type of transaction. site organizations
• No need for your own
Online Transactions (Credit Card Only) merchant account
When a participant registers and pays for a class over the Internet, The Active
Network charges a transaction fee to the registrant. This fee is in addition to
your class/program fee.
Online Credit Card Transactions
Class/Program Fee: $40
Online Transaction Fee(6.5%+.50) $3.10
Participant Pays: $43.10
Organization Keeps: $40
The Active Network Keeps: $3.10
How Do I Collect My Credit Card Registration Fees?
The Active Network mails the Organization bimonthly payments of the class registration fees
collected through online (and offline) credit card transactions. The 6.5%
plus .50 transaction fee
paid for by the participant is retained by The Active Network.
Offline Transactions (Walk-in; Phone-in; Mail-in)
When a participant registers and pays for a class on site (or offline)with either cash, a check or
credit card, the Organization is charged the transaction fee, not the participant. Cash and check
payments are charged a 1.5%fee per transaction. Offline credit card payments are charged a
3.75% transaction fee.
Offline Cash/Check Transactions Offline Credit Card Transactions
Class Fee: $40 Class Fee: $40
Cash/Check Transaction $.60 Credit Card Transaction $1.50
Fee 1.5% Fee 3.75%
Participant Pays: $40 Participant Pays: $40
Organization Nets: $39.40 Organization Nets: $38.50
How are the Offline Fees Collected?
RecWare offers several convenient payment options to make the collection of offline transaction
fees optimal for everyone. Our quarterly minimum for all offline transaction fees is$750. We
encourage organizations to work with their RecWare representative to set up the most convenient
payment plan for you.
RecNet
T 1.888.543.7223,ext.209 recware
E recinfo@active.com part o1 619eactweNErwaRK
C- -'
re cnet6P,;47YaliliTi7P-74.74-gavEIWZ*77;;;Magiffei
ifrNRaioga� ,
How RecNet will Benefit Mounds View Park and Recreation
Create Efficiency and Save Time
• Automate process of activity registration and facility reservations
• Offer online registration to participants as a means of registration
• Create a database of all your participants
• Access your RecNet database from various sites with an Internet connection,
User ID, password and appropriate security profile.
• Accept payments and deposits for enrollments and reservations
• Generate permits with customizable waiver information
• Generate activity rosters
• Real time functionality allows your staff to know exactly how many seats remain
in a given activity so popular activities will not be overbooked
• Staff workload is greatly reduced allowing them to focus their time and energy on
other projects or providing greater customer service
• Quickly view a daily, weekly, and monthly facility scheduling calendar to get a
clear picture of availability
• RecNet reduces customer wait times by allowing your staff to process multiple
transactions for an entire family on a single receipt.
• Ability to generate mailing labels for easy communication with your participants
Provide Additional Services to the Community
• Improve communication with customers by allowing them to search for class
information online
• Communicate with your participants via broadcast emails
• Families in your community can access their account via the Internet to view a
calendar of their scheduled activities or review their account history and reprint
past receipts.
• Participants are able to register and pay online for your classes from the
convenience of their home or office.
• Participants will be able to view availability or place a temporary hold on a
specific facility.
•
Access Valuable Information
• Generate a variety of reports giving you up to date information regarding
enrollment, reservations, and finances
• All reports can be printed, saved or emailed coworkers
• Email activity rosters to your instructors
• RecNet makes regular customer communication easy by letting you quickly print
out mailing labels based on customer demographic information
• Instructors will appreciate the ability to remotely access activity roster information
to find out the latest enrollment information for their classes.
• Enter and track vital customer data including resident/non-resident, demographic,
emergency contacts, medical, family, and account history information
Provide Security
• All updates and enhancements will be seamless to you as RecNet is a fully
hosted solution.
• We've partnered with VeriSign to create a Secure Server that provides the
highest level of privacy and security on the Internet. Your customers can be
certain that the information they provide during the registration process stays
private.
Why Choose the Active Network?
The Active Network, Inc. is a data, transaction and marketing services company for the
participatory sports and recreation industry. Online and offline, the company delivers a
comprehensive suite of services to both professionals and participants. Based in La
Jolla, California, The Active Network and its properties include Active.com, Active
TeamSports, Eteamz, RecWare, Active sports marketing group, and Active Parks.
RecWare, part of The Active Network, has provided award-winning recreation
management software solutions to park and recreation agencies, colleges and
universities, and military installations for more than a decade. With products such as
Safari and RecNet, professionals can access the industry's best recreation management
technologies to automate activity registration, facility reservation, financial management,
as well as offer Internet registration.
We would like to welcome Mounds View Park and Recreation Department to our family
of clients. We are confident we can help you increase registration numbers and
profitability, create a more efficient registration process, and provide more convenience
and customer service to your community.
RecNet Fee-Based Transaction Pricing
Pricing has been based on the following numbers:
• Total revenue per year $90,000
• Estimated% of offline transactions process by Credit Card 60%
• Estimated% of transactions processed by Cash/Check 40%
• Estimated% of online registration 10%
Offline Transaction Fees
Cash/Check: $1,215.00
*This figure is based on 1.5% transaction fee.
Credit Card: $1,093.50
*This figure is based on 3.75%transaction fee.
Total Offline Transaction Fees $2,308.50
Online Transaction Fees
Participants will pay a convenience fee of 6.5% plus $.50 (you will not pay a transaction
fee.) I have provided you pricing above which shows the cost to you based on 10% of
your registration being done via the Internet. The higher the percentage of participants
registering online, the lower the costs will be to Mounds View Park and Recreation
Department.
**Please keep in mind the above prices are approximate prices. The transaction fees
may vary depending on your number of transactions, the % of people who register
online, and the number of people who pay by credit. This pricing is an estimate based on
the numbers you have provided for me. The minimum quarterly fee is $750 ($3,000
annually.) This is a combination of the transaction fees Mounds View Recreation
Department pays plus the convenience fees that the participants pay.
RecNet Onsite Training
Onsite Training for Up to 5 Core Users $2400
*This will include two full days of training for your core users. This price includes a 20%
discount given to RecWare Pro clients, and is valid through January 31, 2005.
Onsite RecNet training provides the users with the greatest overall advantages for
learning the system. Our instructor-led format provides hands-on training in an
interactive classroom environment. Training will focus on the system administration
functions specifically related to effectively managing systems with the RecNet.
You will be training on a realistic sample database that contains examples and
illustrations that promote practical usage in your daily transactions.
Benefits of On-Site Training
• Learning new skills as a group fosters collaboration and team building, ensures
consistency of the learning experience across team members, and enables the
team to support each other in the practice and application of their new skills.
• Each user will have individual time with the instructor in order to ask questions,
repeat testing scenarios, and discuss future system functionality.
• The instructor will provide assistance on the creation of master files, tables, and
customizing the system to your specific needs.
• The Instructor will be able to focus on the particular needs of the individuals with
extensive or specific responsibilities.
• Your staff will immediately develop software habits which will help to master the
system quickly and maximize the effectiveness of RecNet.
RecNet Global Services Agreement
This RecNet Global Services Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into between The Active Network, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, ("Active" or"we" or"us") and Mounds View Parks and Recreation ("you" or"your" or"Agency"). Active
agrees to provide you the Services(as defined below)subject to the following terms and conditions:
1. Services. We will provide you with access to a fully-hosted version of Active's RecNet product, "RecNet",
through our website located at http://www.active.com(the "Website"). To assist us in the successful implementation and
promotion of the Services,you agree to provide us with certain information requested by us relating to your organization.
2. License to Intellectual Property/Promotion.
a. Active shall retain all right,title and interest in and to RecNet and its software,trademarks,service marks,
logo and trade names worldwide ("Intellectual Property") subject to a limited license necessary to perform this Agreement.
You shall use the Intellectual Property only as provided, and shall not alter the Intellectual Property in any way, or act or
permit action in any way that would impair Active's rights in its Intellectual Property.You acknowledge that your use of the
Intellectual Property shall not create in you or any other person any right,title or interest in or to such Intellectual Property.
Any goodwill accruing from the use of the Intellectual Property shall inure solely to the benefit of Active.
b. Active hereby grants to you a limited, non-exclusive, non-transferable license (i) to use RecNet in
accordance with Active's specifications,and (ii) to display,reproduce,distribute and transmit in digital form Active's name
and logo in connection with promotion of the Services. You hereby grant to Active a limited non-transferable license to
use,display, reproduce,distribute,modify and transmit in digital or printed form information provided by you relating to
your organization, including your organization's name, trademarks, service marks and logo, in connection with the
implementation and promotion of the Services and the promotion of your organization. You will make reasonable efforts
to promote and encourage adoption of the Services,including displaying Active's name and logo in any newsletters,printed
registration forms or mailings provided by you to prospective participants.
3.Training. We will conduct two (2) full days of onsite training to provide a basic level of training for the above
designated RecNet product. We will provide you with additional two-hour sessions for$500 per session.
4.Information Security. We will collect certain personal identifying information from users of the Service. Such
information shall be stored on a secure remote server. You may access this information at any time by downloading it from
our servers using your private password and "login" identifier. You will be responsible for protecting the privacy and
security of any information that you retrieve from our servers and shall indemnify and hold harmless Active for any claims
arising from unauthorized or illegal use or dissemination of such information. All information collected by Active shall be
jointly owned by Active and you.
5.Privacy. Each party shall comply with all applicable laws,regulations and guidelines governing online privacy in
fulfilling its obligations hereunder and in collecting and using personal information about users of the Service. Active may
use contact information provided by users or by you to send information about our services or our partners to such users;
provided,however, that users may opt out of any such uses in accordance with our privacy policy. We may combine into
statistical format information collected from users and distribute such information to improve and promote our services or
attract promotional partners. You agree to such uses and further agree that we may disclose information if we believe,in
good faith,that it is necessary in order to: (a) comply with the law,(b)enforce the terms and conditions of this Agreement,
or(c)protect the rights of you or us,to the extent that such disclosure is not otherwise prohibited by any law or regulation.
6.E . Transactions entered directly by participants through the Website will be assessed the customary service
fee charged by Active to online registrants("Service Charge"),as described below. Transactions entered by a member of the
Agency on behalf of a participant will be assessed a Service Charge equal to 1.5%for cash or check,and 3.75% for credit
card transactions. Each online registrant will pay the event registration fee charged by Agency plus a service charge equal to
6.5%of the registration fee plus$.50,with a minimum fee of$2.00. If the registration fee is between$150-$500,the service
charge will be 3.5% plus $5.00, and for fees above $500, the fee will be 2.5% plus $10.00. We may change the Service
Charge at any time and you agree to such change unless you provide us with written objection to such change within 30 days
from the date such change is first implemented. We will be responsible for collecting all fees charged by you and all Service
Charges assessed by us. All registration fees,except Service Charges,are your exclusive property. Any fees collected by us
will be sent to you twice a month and Service Charges shall be retained by us. Any advertising revenue generated from web
pages used in connection with the Services will be the exclusive property of Active. You shall guarantee Active a minimum
transaction fee,whether through offline or online transactions,of$750 per quarter. You shall pay to Active the difference
between such minimum and actual service charges collected by us,which will be billed at the end of each quarter beginning
from the date set forth below. Active shall not be responsible for processing or making any refunds. All credit card
refunds processed will be accessed a $.10 fee charged by Active to you. Active may reimburse itself for any credit card
charge backs and associated fees out of registration fees collected by it. In the event such funds are not available,you agree
to reimburse Active for any charge backs.
7. Training Fees. Fees for the required two (2) full days of onsite training will be $2,400.00 and will be billed
directly to your organization. Additional training beyond the first two days will be billed at the rate of$500.00 per two-hour
session or$1,250 per each set of three (3) additional two-hour sessions. Such Fees will be due within 30 days of invoice
date. Each Fee is due on or prior to the 15th day of the first month of the billing period. Any Fees rendered later than this
deadline shall accrue interest at the annual rate of 10%. In the event of delay in paying a Fee,you shall reimburse Active for
any legal fees incurred by Active in its collection efforts.
8. Disclaimer of Warranty/Limitation of Liability. Active expressly disclaims any warranty that the use of its
Intellectual Property,RecNet, or the Services will be uninterrupted or error free or that the specifications will meet your
requirements. The Intellectual Property,RecNet,and Services are provided to you on an "AS-IS"basis without warranties
of any kind, either express or implied,including without limitation warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular
purpose.Active's total liability under this Agreement is limited to the amount of fees retained and not distributed to you and
Service Charges collected hereunder.
9.Term and Termination. The term of this Agreement shall be for two (2)years from the date set forth below,
with automatic renewals for one(1)year terms thereafter until either party gives written notice to terminate this Agreement
sixty(60) days prior to the end of a term. Either party may terminate this Agreement upon a material breach by the other
party if such breach is not cured within thirty(30)days following written notice to the breaching party.
10.Representations and Warranties. Each party represents and warrants that it has the necessary and full right,
power, authority and capability to enter into this agreement and to perform its obligations hereunder; that it owns or
controls the rights granted or licensed to the other party herein;that the execution and performance of its obligations under
this Agreement will not violate any known rights of any third party,any contractual commitments or any applicable federal,
state and local law or regulation;and that to its knowledge the marks,logos and intellectual property licensed to the other
party herein do not violate the proprietary rights of a third party.
11.Exclusivity. Active will be the sole and exclusive provider of the Services for your agency for the term of this
Agreement.
12. Indemnification. Each party shall indemnify and hold harmless the other party and its directors, officers,
employees,affiliates and agents,against any claim,demand,cause of action,debt or liability,including reasonable attorneys'
fees,to the extent that: (i)it is based upon the indemnitor's breach of a representation,warranty or obligation hereunder;(ii)
it arises out of the indemnitor's gross negligence or willful misconduct;or(iii)it is based upon the indemnitor's violation of
any applicable federal,state or local law or regulation.
13.Arbitration. Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this agreement shall be settled by binding
arbitration in accordance with the American Arbitration Association(AAA)rules then in force and effect. The arbitration,
including the rendering of an award,shall take place in San Diego,California. The arbitrator or arbitrators shall apply the
substantive law of the State of California. Judgment on the award rendered by the arbitrator or arbitrators may be entered in
any court of competent jurisdiction.
14. Miscellaneous. Any notices shall be in writing by fax or airmail. Neither party may assign its rights or
obligations arising out of this Agreement without the other party's prior written consent,except that Active may assign this
Agreement in connection with any sale of all or substantially all of its assets or any other transaction in which more than
fifty percent of its voting securities are transferred. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California.
This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties regarding the subject matter and can only be modified by a
subsequent written agreement executed by both parties. Sections 6, 10, and 12 of this Agreement shall survive any
termination or expiration of this Agreement.
If the foregoing correctly reflects your understanding of our agreement please indicate this by signing this agreement in the
space indicated below and returning it to Megan Linaugh at Active by fax(858-551-7619).
THE ACTIVE NETWORK,INC.
By:
Matthew G.Landa Date of Agreement
President
Company Name E-Mail
By:
Signature Address
Print Name and Title City,State and Zip
Checks Payable to:
2005 Meeting Dates for Parks and Recreation Commission
Meetings will be generally set for the forth Thursday of the month and will start at 6:30 PM
January 27, 2004
February 24, 2004
March 24, 2004
April 28, 2004
May 26, 2004
June 23, 2004
July 28, 2004
August 25, 2004
September 22, 2004
October 27, 2004
November 17, 2004 (Third Thursday in November)
December 15, 2004 (Third Thursday in December)
December 14,2004
Timeline / Procedure for Filling Vacant Parks and Recreation Commission Seat
A rough timeline is listed below:
Date Action:
December 16, 2004 Notify the Park and Recreation Commissioners
December 16, 2004 Park and Recreation Commissioners announce the vacant seat
and deadline to submit an application at a regularly scheduled
meeting.
December 16, 2004 Submit an advertisement to the City's official newspaper(New
Brighton / Mounds View Bulletin) advertising the vacant position
and info on obtaining an application
December 16, 2004 City contacts previous applicants to see if they are still interested
in the seat. Ask if their previously submitted application is OK or
if they would like to submit a new one.
December 16, 2004 Request to publish the ad on the City's web site.
Date XX Add vacant seat information to City message board?
December 22, 2004 Advertisement is published
January 10, 2005 The vacant seat is announced at the next City Council Meeting.
How to obtain an application, and the deadline for submittal are
also announced.
January 17, 2005 Deadline to receive applications
January 27, 2005 Park and Recreation Commissioners provide a recommended
candidate
February 9, 2005 Give applications to the Mayor for review along with the Park and
Recreation Commissioners recommendation. The mayor will
select a recommended candidate.
February 14, 2005 City Council approves a candidate to fill the seat.
February 15, 2005 Public Works Director or Parks Supervisor contacts the newly
selected Commissioner
February 15, 2005 The Park and Recreation Commissioners list is update and the
new Commissioner is added to the database and email list.
February 24, 2005 New Commissioner is sworn in
Parks and Recreation
Possible Parks Survey Questions
I et/If SURVEy
Currently, the City uses a system of ponds to control the run-off
from st rms.
69. Would ou favor or oppose the STRONGLY FAVOR 11%
constr tion of storm water FAVOR 24%
sewers i the city? (WAIT OPPOSE 27%
FOR RESPO E) And do you STRONGLY OPPOSE 19%
feel strong y that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED197.
Although no formal roposals have been made, if the city were to
construct storm sew rs, it would require the passage of a bond
referendum.
70. How much more woul you be willing NOTHING 37%
to pay in property xes to sup- $25 11%
port construction of `..torm sewers? $50 15%
(START WITH RANDOMLY `• LECTED $75 5%
CHOICE FROM #1 - #7) L- t 's say $100 6%
would you be willing to • ay $____ $125 2%
per year? (MOVE TO NEXT I DICE $150 2'/
UP OR DOWN/REPEAT) DON'T KNOW/REFUSED237.
71 . How would you rate park and rec- EXCELLENT 29%
reational facilities in Mounds GOOD 58%
View -- excellent, good , only ONLY FAIR 8%
fair , or poor? POOR 1%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 4%
72. In general , do you usually spend OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES. . . .70%
your leisure time in outdoor INDOOR ACTIVITIES 87
1 activities, weather permitting, BOTH 20%
or indoor activities? NO LEISURE TIME 0%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 1%
73. Are you more apt to participate UNORGANIZED 71%
in unorganized recreation, such ORGANIZED 127..
{ as bicycling, walking , picnics, BOTH EQUALLY 15%
11 or skating, or in organized NEITHER O'/
recreation, such as team sports? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 2%
74. In the past year, have you or any YES 277.
1 member of your household partici- NO 69%
pated in a city-sponsored recre- DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 3%
1 ational program?
IF "YES" IN QUESTION #74, ASK: 1
I75. Do you feel that the regis- EXCESSIVELY HIGH 0%
tration fees are excessively COMPARATIVELY HIGH 1%
high, comparatively high, ABOUT AVERAGE 29%
about average, comparatively COMPARATIVELY LOW 4%
/ low, or very low? VERY LOW 1%
I DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 1%
P IF "NO" IN QUESTION #74, ASK:
1 9
L'%"
IF "NO" IN QUESTION #74, ASK:
76. Could you tell me one or two reasons why you haven't?
NO REASON: 45% NO TIME: 18'/. NO INTEREST: 8%
I NO KIDS: 4% GO ELSEWHERE: 12'/. AGE-HEALTH: 8%
UNAWARE: 4%
77. Could you tell me about how often ALMOST DAILY 3'/
you and other members of your SEVERAL TIMES PER WEEK22%
household have used the park and ONCE PER WEEK 15%
recreational facilities in Mounds SEVERAL TIMES PER MONTHI6%
View during the past year, weather ONCE PER MONTH 5'/.
permitting? (READ CHOICES #1 - SEVERAL TIMES PER YEAR.25'/.
#7) NOT AT ALL 12%
1 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 2%
1 IF "ONCE PER WEEK" OR MORE IN QUESTION #77, ASK:
7B. What kinds of activities do you engage in?
WALKING: 8% PLAYGROUND: 8% SKATING: 2% BALL: 10'/.
TENNIS: 2'/. COMBO-4+: 5% OTHER: 3%.
IF "SEVERAL TIMES PER YEAR" OR "NOT AT ALL" IN QUESTION #77,
} ASK:
) 79. Is there some particular reason why your household does
not use the park and recreation system more frequently?
NO REASON: 68% NO TIME: 11% NO INTEREST: 4% NO KIDS: 2%
GO ELSEWHERE: 77. AGE-HEALTH: 57. NOT AWARE: 2%
} 80. Would you favor or oppose a bond FAVOR 41%
referendum to upgrade and com- OPPOSE 45%
plete the Mounds View Park UNDECIDED 11'/.
System? REFUSED 3'/.
I 81 . What is your principal source of information about City
recreational programs and opportunities?
NONE: 8% PEOPLE: 7% NEWSLETTER: 48%. BULLETIN: 11%.
FLYERS: 8% PAPERS: 18% OTHER: 1%
I 82. Would you favor or oppose the FAVOR 46'/.
City developing and operating OPPOSE 44%
a regulation nine-hole golf DON'T KNOW/REFUSED10%
course?
!t 83. Whether you favor the project YES 51%
or not , would you and/or members NO 47%
of this household be likely to DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 2'/
use the golf course?
1
10
Mit Supazy
StS SmS SmO StO DKR
29. Elimination of the subsidy of
community events, such as
"Festival in the Park, " "Spring
Clean-Up Day, " and "Fall Clean-
Up Day, " saving $21,000 annually. 18% 32% 27% 18% 5%
30. Elimination of the planting of
flowers on all city property
except City Hall, saving $3,000. 34% 40% 16% 6% 4%
Moving on. . .
The City has eleven parks.
31. Would you support the elimination STRONGLY SUPPORT 10%
of the park in your neighborhood SUPPORT 8%
if the property could be developed OPPOSE 14%
into homes, thereby returning pro- STRONGLY OPPOSE 64%
perty tax money to the City? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 3%
(WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do you feel
strongly that way?
Another possible savings that the City could undertake would be a
reduction in the frequency of the publication of its newsletter.
Currently, the City Charter requires that a newsletter must be
published and mailed to all residents six times per year.
32. Would you favor or oppose a City FAVOR 92%
Charter change reducing the number OPPOSE 8%
of publications to four times each DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 0%
year, saving $7, 000?
Cities are also looking for alternative means of raising more
revenue. For many communities, alternate sources must be located
to provide an acceptable standard of basic services. Otherwise,
services will be cut or property taxes will be increased. Many
proposals feature "user fees" -- charges made to the user of
specific city and public services. For each of the following
users fee programs, please tell me whether you would strongly
support it, somewhat support it, somewhat oppose it, or strongly
oppose it.
StS SmS Sm0 StO DKR
33 . A utilities franchise fee of
a maximum of four percent based
on energy usage and raising
electric/gas bills on average
by $5. 00 to $10. 00 per month,
raising approximately $250, 000
annually for General Fund use. 7% 26% 22% 41% 4%
34 . A street light usage fee costing
homeowners about $1.23 per month. 22% 33% 15% 27% 4%
5
ICI--- ..m..... 417..........111.M7r1.1111111.11.0arktY .
major disadvanta a
the golf course.dvang is the initial high cost of the development of
39. If the Cit
coursehCsity
were
be to decide a golf
his site, developed on PRIVATE
CITY DEVE DEVELOPER
„ •56%
which option do you NEITHER
(VOL) . . . . ,
prefer -- city developmentNEITHER V %
• 2I,
preferownership and ( ) • • . . . . , , , 14%
of the golf course OR DON'T KNOW/REUSED. , ,
development and ownership by a • ZO-,
private developer?
Changing topics. . . ,
Currently, Mounds View plows be
when two inches of snow has falgen,in snow removal on cit
As a cost savings measure. . .
40. Would you favor or o g measure. , ,
thatuynv to oppose relaxing STRONGLY FAVOR. . . . ,
four standardh ? a snow fall of FAVOR. . . . • ' • • 350
Do you feelhs strongly( AlT FOR RESPONSE) OPPOSE. . . . . . . . . "
. 250
that way? STRONGLY OPPOSE. . . . . . . 11'
DON'T KNOW
City Hall hours of operation are currently /FUSED„ • , ,3%
7 AM to 5:30 PM Monday
through Thursday and 8 AM to 4:30 PM Friday.
41- Were you aware of the AWARE
ogre yo y Hall s of
to this survey?
e Cit , prior UNAWARr^. . . . ' . . . . . . . . . .530
'T KNOW %
IF "AWARE, " ASK: DON KNOW/REFUSED
42. During the
past year, have
YES.
,
• • • " " - • • • • -18%yu a member of this NO, . •KNOW/REFUSED. - . . - 35%household d CitHDON'T , , , ,before g;00 AM or after 4:30 Monday through
or
Thursday?
IF "UNAWARE, " ASK:
43. How likely would o
member of this you or a VERY LIKELY• • - . -
tom Citythousehold be SOMEWHAT LIKELY 5%
visitAM or aHal4:30 efore , , ,5
PM on NOT TOO LIKELY, , , - , -
aMonday through Thursday DNOT'AT ALL LIKELY- , • . .2%
very likely, somewhat likely, DON'T KNOW/REgED, , ,
not too likely, or not at all , . 0%
likely?
44. Would you favor or o _
tion in the o maintenanceofacitreduc STRONGLY FAVOR. , , , ,
equipment as city FAVOR. , . . . . . . . . 12%
parka cost-saving OPPOSE. . . . . . . . . . . . . • 18%
measure? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do
you feel strongly STRONGLY•OPPOSE. . . . . . .
' •33%
g y that way?
DON'T MOW/REFTjSED. . . , 10
IF "FAVOR, " ASK:
7
119z. stoitwy45. Would you still favor a re- STILLVOR 12%
duction even if liability NO 16%
risks increased because of DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 3%
potential accidents?
46. Would you favor or oppose a re- STRONGLY FAVOR 11%
duction in the maintenance of the FAVOR 23%
physical appearance of the parks OPPOSE 31%
as a cost-savings measure, even if STRONGLY OPPOSE 27%
the appearance of the parks DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 8%
changed? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do
you feel strongly that way?
Moving on. . . .
The City of Mounds View presently operates Lakeside Park under a
joint powers agreement with the City of Spring Lake Park. This
body of water is the only natural water source in the community.
A beach has been developed there, but staffing of lifeguards may
not be possible in the future because of budget reductions.
Staffing by lifeguards would cost the City approximately
$3 , 000. 00.
47. Would you favor or oppose the con- STRONGLY FAVOR 42%
tinued staffing of lifeguards FAVOR 22%
during the summer months at the OPPOSE 17%
Lakeside Park Beach? (WAIT FOR STRONGLY OPPOSE 12%
RESPONSE) Do you feel strongly DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 7%
that way?
Changing topics. . . .
There has been much discussion about the re-development of the
Highway 10 corridor in Mounds View.
48. If you could choose the type of development there, what type
would you most favor?
NO ANSWER, 53%; OFFICE, 3%; SMALL BUSINESS, 14%; COMMER-
CIAL, 4%; GROCERY, 3%; RESIDENTIAL, 3%; RETAIL, 6%;
INDUSTRIAL, 2%; PARKS, 3%; WIDEN HIGHWAY, 3%; MORE
TRAFFIC LIGHTS, 3%; SCATTERED, 3%.
49. What type of development would you not want to see there?
NO ANSWER, 42%; BARS, "ADULT" ENTERTAINMENT, 19%; MULTIPLE
HOUSING, 5%; CAR LOTS, 4%; COMMERCIAL, 5%; SHOPPING
CENTER, 4%; FAST FOOD, 2%; GAS STATION, 1%; TRAFFIC
GENERATING, 3%; SCATTERED, 2%.
One proposal would convert Highway 10 into a pedestrian-oriented
boulevard. More service-oriented business establishments would
be sited there. The speed limit would be lowered, and bicycle
and pedestrian paths added.
8
FILE No.503 06/04 '02 08:46 ID:CITY OF WOODBURY FAX:16517143501 PAGE 11
®011/020
\A/coDauky
SRvey
Roving on. . . .
81. How would you rate the City of EXCELLENT 28%
Woodbury's park and recreational GO0D 54%
opportunities -- excellent, good, ONLY FAIR 7%
only fair, or poor? POOR 1%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . .11$
The Woodbury park System is composed of smaller neighborhood
parks designed to serve residents within a one-half mile radius,
larger community parks containing ballfields, picnic areas,
beaches, the Eagle Valley Golf Course and Clubhouse, the Bielen-
berg Sports Center Ice Arena and Fieldhouse, Carver Lake Beach
and picnic shelter, Ojibway athletic fields, and interconnecting
trails. For each one, please tell me if you or members of this
household have visited that facility during the past year. Then,
for each one you or member* of your household have visited,
please rate it as excellent, good, only. fair or poor. If you
have no opinion, just say so. . . .
NOT ECC GOO OFR Poo DKR
82. Smaller neighborhood parks? 14% 31% 47% 4% 1% 5%
83. Larger community parks? 20% 33% 42% 2% 0% 4%
84. Trails? 15% 35% 405 3% 1% 7%
85. Bielenberg Sports Center Ice
Arena and Fieldhouse? 37% 22% 24% 1% 0% 17%
86. Carver Lake Beach and picnic
shelter? 46% 13% 23% 1t 0% 171s
87. Ojibwey or Bielenberg Sports
Center athletic fields? 35% 22% 28% 1% 0% 15%
88. Eagle Valley Golf Course and
Clubhouse? 38i 20% 18% 2% 0% 23%
As you may know, several city parks contain natural areas where
vegetation is allowed to grow wild.
89. Would you favor or oppose expand- FAVOR 80%
ing the amount of existing park OPPOSE, . , , 15%
land area left as natural areas? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 6%
On another topic. . . .
90. ROW would you rate park and rec- EXCELLENT— ., , 30%
seation facilities in Woodbury GOOD 55%
-- excellent, good, only fair, or ONLY FAIR 6%
poor? POOR 09s
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . .10%
IF RATING IS GIVEN, ASK;
10
FILE No.503 06/04 '02 08:46 ID:CITY OF WOODBURY FAX:16517143501 PAGE 12
' •""+ rtrw swifts., rni olz azU 1t76s DECISION RESOURCES
•
2012/o20iYio2o
WOObbL4Ly
SURVEY
. 91. Why do you feel that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 1%
WELL MAINTAINED 55%
A LOT TO OFFER 21%
COULD BE BETTER 4%
NEED MORE PARKS 5%
OTHER 4%
92. Specifically, how would you rate EXCELLENT
the appearance of the cit 's59%
park and recreationfacilities? SOD" 9�r
ONLY FAIR. . . . . . . . . „4t
POOR 0%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 6%
93. And, how would you rate the safety EXCELLENT
of city park and recreational fez- GOOD 23%
ilities -- excellent, good, only ONLY FAIR 64
fair or poor? 4%
POOR, 0%
DON'T KNOW/RLrFUSED. _ . , 11%
94. How safe do you feel using city VERY SAFE
parks at night -- v 21%
onably safe, somewhat safeeorrvery SOMEWHAT SAFEREASONABLY . . . . . , , 14E %
unsafe? 14�
vERY UNSAFE 4*
DON'T KNOW/pEFUSED. . . .22%
95. How would you rate the ease in EXCELLENT
getting to Woodbury's park and 58%
56%
recreation facilities -- excel- ONLY FAIR
lent, good, only fair or poor? POOR 0%
0%
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 7%
96. In the past twelve months, hare YES, . . ,
you or any members of this house- NO 44%3
5
hold used any city-sponsored rec- DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 3%
reational programs or facilities?
IF "YES" IN QUESTION #96, ASK:
I would like to read _You a short list of the types of city-
sponsored programs currently available. For each one,
please tell me if you or members of this household have
visited that facility during the past year. Then, for each
one you or members of your household have participated in,
please rate it as excellent, good, only fair or poor. If
you have no opinion, just say so. . . . (ROTATE LIST)
NOT EXC GOO OFR FOO DKR
97. Family events, such as
"Performance in the
park? 20% 10% 13% 1% 0% l%
98 . Special events, such as
the Holiday Egg Hunt or
Fourth of July? 10% 17% 16% 1% 0% 1%
99 , Adult sports? 32% 4% 4% 0% 0% 5%
11
FILE No.503 46ipq '02 Og:46
FILE No.5 wap /04 Fax :45 ez ID ons Y OF WOODBURY
DECISION RES0t CES FA7C:165171g35g1
Wciob&*y PAGE 13
�Sty
100, Youth programs? NOT LXC coa OFR p0O D
lot. KR
Playground
102. Natue programs? 30* 11%18% 1%
103 . programs?
13
Pre-school 34$ 4$ 6$ 1% 0% 2%
Programs? z$ Q� °$ 4$
J04, 33� 3# $ 0$ 0$
f ed you generally setis SAT' 4 0$ 0% 5�
dissatisfied with SATISFIED . . .
the program(s) ?
di (s t DISSATISFIED . . . , . , . .43$
IF "NOS DON• ZED. . . . . . - ,
IN QUESTION #96 T K't10W/RIIS�, ' : .0*
, ASK: - .3%
which of the following reaso
s of partic pating iif n' would account for
household me
city-sponsored re-
creational program
105. No
106. No time?
est in that kind of activity? Y NO DKR
108. Don107. 't too much? 27% 25$ 2%
109. Care for 28% 24% I$
Offering Limes Structured activities? 2% 47%
110, Health orare inconvenient?
sties? 10$ 4%
111. Not skillful age re�son9? engent? $0* 3%
8$ 41$ 5*
Now, I would Stough?
13% 39$
could be like to read 2% 48% 2$
Please offered, although you a short 3$
tell gh they ate not currently.
of tly. ms which
interested sue if you or members of currcrttl
at all is it, somewhat four household y• For each one,
iaterm it, interested, not would be very'
(ROTATE LIST) If you have no opinion, too . .
Pinion, just interested, or not
say so, . . .
112. Senior programs?
CRY SN�iT NOTO
113 , Children's NALL DKR
zz�.
programs?s summer full-cry 8$ 13% 11%
More youth 63$ 5%
115• Nature classes? B$
22%
116, 10� 30� 8$ 58$ 4*
117. MOr�t program? 8$ 3 71 49%
218. Mote adult sports? 11� 35% 12% 39% 53.
z?0 ,9. More farailyZactivfties? 13% 39$ 16% 50W 4$
Trips?
13�. 30% 8$ 36$ 4$
121. When would 6$ 22% 15% 52t 4�
be the best day,
any, given Ve.� your hobs if 6%
for city-sponsored onsorh household schedule FRIDAY
RSDpY. . . . . . . .3%
programs is which recreational SAT
programs
might you or householdQDAY. . • " • ' . ' . , • • •3
memb
(READ #1-#4) be interested? SHAY. , . . . , , ' . . . .36.
DOES NOT.MATTEII. • . . 9$
NO ET. . • • .10$
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED• . • .16�
. .10%
22
•
Mounds View Parks &Recreation Survey
t
The Mounds View Parks and Recreation Commission is very interested in obtaining your opinion of the current Mounds View Parks
System and your vision for its future. Please complete this survey and return to City Hall or the Mounds View Community Center by
Friday, September 3. The results of this survey will be shared at the October meeting of Parks and Recreation Commission. Thank
you for taking your time to help us make better decision for the residents of Mounds View.
1. In general,do you usually spend your leisure time in outdoor activities or indoor activities?
Indoor Outdoor Equal Amounts of both
2. In which of the following leisure activities do you or members of your household participate?
(check as many as apply)
❑Golf ❑Ice Skating ❑Video/Computer Gaines
❑Basketball ['Card Games ['Shuffle Board
❑Volleyball ❑Frisbee ❑Board Games
❑Baseball ❑Martial Arts ['Weightlifting
❑Softball Gymnastics ['Traveling
❑Football ['Dance ❑Reading
EHockey ❑Musical Instruments ❑Bird Watching
['Soccer Sledding ❑Lacrosse
❑Tennis ❑Horseshoes ['Gardening
❑Fitness classes ❑Picnicking ['Home Improvement
❑Skateboarding ['Bocce Ball ❑Internet
['Swimming ❑Scrapbooking ['Sewing
['Biking ❑Stamping ❑In-line skating
❑Running/Jogging ❑Arts&Crafts ['Skiing(downhill or cross-country)
❑Walking ❑Quilting ❑Other(please list)
3. In the past year,have you or any members of your household participated in a Mounds View/YMCA sponsored recreation
program?
a. If yes,which ones?
b. If not,why not?
4. In the past year,how often have you or members of your household used any park facility in Mounds View?
Less than 5 6-10 11-15 more than 15
5. Which Park is closest to your home?
Silver View City Hall Groveland Hillview Lambert Not sure
Oakwood Lakeside Random Woodcrest Arden
a. Are you satisfied with the amenities at this park? YES NO
b. no,what amenities would you like added or changed?
6. In the past two years,have you used the Mounds View Community Center? YES NO
a. If yes,what have you used it for?
['Exercise Equipment ❑Banquet Center ❑Gym
❑Meetings ['Organized Recreational Activities ❑Other(please list)
b. If no,why not?
7. What additional features or recreational programs would you like to see at the Community Center?
•
8. Please rate the following Parks&Recreation features:
Feature
Identification/signage Poor
Community1 Fair Excellent
Center 2 3 4 Don't Know ,
Park Buildings 1 2 5 DK
Picnic areas/shelters 1 2 3 4 5 DK
Playground equipment 1 2 3 4 5 DK
Trees/landscape 4
1 2 3 5 DK
Rinks(hockey&pleasure) 1 2 4 5 DK
Open space 1 2 3 4 5 DK
Playing fields(football,soccer, baseball 1 2 3 4 5 DK
fields,basketball courts)
Lighting 1 2 4 5 DK
4 5 DK
Trails 1 2 3 4 5 DK
Cross Country1
Sledding 3 4 5 DK
Skiing 2 ; 4
1 2 5 DK
Golf Course 1 2 3 4 5 DK
Frisbee golf 1
2 3 4
Cleanliness of Parks 3 4 5 DK
1 2 5 DK
Safety of Parks 1 2 3 4 5 DK
Tennis Courts 1
2 1 2 3 4 5 DK
you satisfied with the 3 4
park facilities in Mounds View? YES NO
� DK
9. In general,are
10. Are there any amenities that you would like to see added to the Mounds
View Park System?
11. Would you support a bond referendum for the development of features ures within the Mounds View Park System?
NO Unsure
12. Please use this space to make any other comments/suggestions.
Thank you for completing this survey!
Fold this survey into thirds and mail by Friday, September 3. You may also fax your form to: 763-784-3462.
POmin
@lit j CV WOODDX13 W
AY
X10 0600A7Ew Jl0
gt4i. itccrwA-7-?0, zcoy
D
... �. /fit l Fn�21 �o1N� �C►"'/ �iol�j (,1CCt� S9G�L.� �n�
Aey i ton 7- .(p 067- tion,
..3, a.) C 6tpuil -- S-c,�,�.,,� , %1 cAll4 a, i, . ,Li„ �,n ✓,r�,r e
az-4 17, bin 4 1n4494 J ° hAei
. .
• C(74.;
00) .„? „. 44., 4
77V J7ID 1.44, .4))4(A1 3\144-4e.e4,i ,�` ,�,� gelag
Cow ole-(4-4 - zvwtti x/ma, 41:`
P,���,�R�,6441P°
cf
(i L fr?/4 +4
* 9/44-41.k .6 , : Sttpti
. ce47 : -4AA) c aw& , / s / .C, / 1 -A/X/43
41-te40:11/%, psza.„,
/4 "2401Tr 4lC 7.A
' ifil ,b C - c0-4ng /2- J-2$' O ie 2-A y 54
A 4,4,.?` ' i ,-e)-e
-5' ori
/� t)
-,e 4 ; ,i1a.el! - ,ar.�.4 j 41•
a-4 ..,00-7../ 74-4.0, 71
//47k } a /A- 44-e -7,0
4
G�✓.4 / 4,,,, '
6) - �� ;� fi
^ 7/ . ;
C;) Ga Ax �e-r4^a/4 , /-1- u ef(0- /)-7/; el-n/4/ ' 4"- 4
Ldp
awizi
�vinlaa.�e :ate of rt, 6>u //117 +efi11,1 „LAS /5416>t F"i-
Cwrt o 61,4,44 LA- ,2.
— //; 7)
560.„,„ /Lid:AV (3.77
e) —Ceivtd mg '°a'` A tJ
4-r0i / ,% Z�, : 3 —) -465,T
/ s, 1“,/ / y
141 G n Ay) JATI-5-�/ 6/ � �
q�-�
rIn �,,,12( 4 7,/, /47,, /??5 s
71--low 4,7 /41! A46,
/I/At .0)Ak ,44jk 7t, b„,--4 c471.)
_y?�,di � l'�'� Scrl 564 M
— U��� , .� � .� /44,4 �AA , ktv std //-6
(Cot,. e, ! -1/44q/z- / ,o,Ai yc, (c '1
it6 /17 U /hzr,„n ,e/J1. 'off
( Mu 1,1 ) — '�.e p�/rt c�tl )
eirfze7Y Otc_ tiv,4-0.0441-4-/4
G, tmn / ti u i YI , D,4-vt-
c542(.4 6_-cAto& CAA, t<4 7-442 arrxivj PO, LAA,..evyytatz
5 eypti
'j
554,0 dYtbitcp h L - Com^
C �t .u°s2
Sc;