HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 2023/05/22APPROVED
PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
May 22, 2023
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Mounds View Boulevard, Mounds View, MN 55112
6:01 P.M.
1. MEETING IS CALLED TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Acting Mayor Meehlhause reported on Saturday, May 20, 2023, Mayor Al Hull lost his battle to
leukemia. He stated his thoughts, prayers and sympathies were with Al’s wife, daughter and the
rest of his family. He then held a moment of silence for our friend, Mayor Al Hull.
3. ROLL CALL: Cermak, Gunn, Lindstrom, and Meehlhause
NOT PRESENT: Hull.
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A. Monday, May 22, 2023, City Council Agenda.
Council Member Gunn requested Special Order of Business be discussed after the Consent
Agenda.
MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Lindstrom. To Approve the Monday, May 22, 2023, agenda as
amended.
Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried.
5. CONSENT AGENDA
Council Member Lindstrom asked to remove Item 5C.
A. Approval of Minutes: May 8, 2023.
B. Just and Correct Claims.
C. Resolution 9754, Authorizing the City to enter into a Professional Services
contract with LOCi Consulting.
Mounds View City Council May 22, 2023
Regular Meeting Page 2
MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Cermak. To Approve the Consent Agenda as amended removing
Item 5C.
Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried.
C. Resolution 9754, Authorizing the City to enter into a Professional Services
contract with LOCi Consulting.
Council Member Lindstrom explained the City received a grant from Ramsey County. He reported
this grant would assist the City with hiring a consultant to come up with ideas for the potential
redevelopment of Mounds View Square. He stated the City was in no way interested in getting rid
of the existing tenants, but rather wanted to rethink the future of this space.
MOTION/SECOND: Lindstrom/Cermak. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 8771,
Approving an Off-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for AB Liquor, LLC (doing business as ABC
Liquor), located at 2840 Mounds View Boulevard.
Council Member Gunn indicated this grant would assist the property owner with coming up with
ideas on redeveloping the space.
Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried.
7. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS
A. MMKR Audit Presentation – Aaron Nielsen, Principal.
Aaron Nielsen, Principal with MMKR, provided the Council with a presentation on the 2022 audit.
He explained the City received a clean or unmodified opinion. He commented further on the
General Fund and reviewed the revenues and expenditures for the previous year. He discussed the
health of the City’s Enterprise Funds and commended the City on its strong financial position.
Acting Mayor Meehlhause thanked Mr. Nielsen for his thorough presentation on the 2022 audit.
B. Outstanding Citizen Award – Bob King.
Police Chief Zender presented Bob King with an Outstanding Citizen Award and thanked him for
his tremendous volunteerism in the community. A round of applause was offered by all in
attendance.
Bob King stated there was a lot going on in the City of Mounds View. He encouraged residents to
get involved, have ideas and be positive.
Acting Mayor Meehlhause reported Bob King is one of the most supportive members of the
community when it comes to the Mounds View Police Department and the Mounds View Police
Foundation. He thanked him for his many contributions to the community.
C. MVPD Life Saving Awards – Chief Zender.
Mounds View City Council May 22, 2023
Regular Meeting Page 3
Police Chief Zender commented on the positive impacts officers make on people’s lives on a daily
basis. He stated many of these efforts go unnoticed by his officers or the public. He stated on
March 30, 2023 his officers and local EMT’s saved a resident’s life after suffering a cardiac arrest.
Chief Zender explained Sergeant Schultes and Officer Katzenmaier did what they were trained to
do, along with the fire personnel and EMT’s when they arrived on scene. He recognized each of
the first responders who responded to this call and commended all for their life saving efforts.
Ben Hall, Allina Health, commended his EMT’s for their life-saving efforts.
Fire Chief Retka, SBM Fire Department, recognized his fire personnel for their life-saving efforts.
A round of applause was offered by all in attendance.
6. PUBLIC COMMENT
Heather Schuchard, 7984 Woodlawn Drive, reported she was in attendance to speak on the Arden
Park proposal. She explained she opposed this development because it does not match the
neighborhood. In addition, the loss of the green space was a concern to her. She discussed how the
children in the neighborhood use this green space and that it was filled with wildlife. She did not
believe the City should be giving a break to a multi-billion corporation to earn money on this
development. She did not agree with the cottages because they required too many variances. She
expressed concern with the fact the units would not have garages. She made it clear to the Council
that the community cares about what was occurring in Mounds View. She reported even if the
public does not attend every meeting, they were following along with the events that were
occurring. She stated the public puts its trust in the Council and right now there was a lack of trust
because the public does not feel heard or seen. She feared there was a conflict of interest with the
proposed development and this was very concerning to her.
Maria Slabiak, 8135 Long Lake Road, reported the majority of the property the Arden Park
development would be built on a floodplain in a wetland buffer zone. She explained a buffer zone
was defined as essential protection for species that use a wetland habitat. She questioned if it was
wise to destroy this buffer zone. She discussed how changing the zoning from R-1 to R-3 on this
floodplain would add crowding, noise and would reduce property values to the adjacent homes.
She feared adding a large number of units to the area would adversely impact the drainage for the
area. She noted her neighbor’s backyard floods in wet weather. She stated residents were
concerned about having wet basements and backyards. She reported she conducted a search on the
developer and noted there were lawsuits against them for quality complaints and poor foundations
in three different states. She stated the proposed yard homes do not meet minimum requirements
for residential construction in Mounds View, nor did the townhomes meet the minimum zoning
requirements for lot size or setback requirements. She questioned why the City would allow this
many structures in such a small area. She feared this would be a fire safety concern. She asked
how the community was benefiting from this development, when 98% of the residents did not
support the project. She encouraged the City Council to properly represent the residents of Mounds
View when it comes to this project. She did not believe it was right to put 87 units on seven
residential lots. She stated this was not the time or location to experiment with expensive
townhomes or yard homes. She noted the yard homes do not fit into the character of the
Mounds View City Council May 22, 2023
Regular Meeting Page 4
neighborhood and the neighbor’s fear how their property value would be impacted. She
commented further on all of the variances the developer would require and reported this project
would require too much take from the City.
Rene Johnson, 7385 Pleasant View Drive, requested the Council address a Charter issue. She
explained when she was notified about her street there was 100% participation in a petition and
according to the Charter a special meeting should be held, a ruling is given and the petitioners can
challenge this in court and the Council has to abide by the court ruling. She reported because the
City does not assess for streets, the residents were not allowed to go through this process. In
addition, she asked that staff post meeting meetings to the City website.
Kathy Lee, 7719 Woodlawn Drive, expressed concern regarding the value of keeping greenspaces
in cities. She reported greenspace was a valuable benefit to the community and helped protect air
quality. In addition, there were huge benefits to having greenspace for both mental and physical
health. She reported wildlife also needed a place to live and this wetland has been their home. She
discussed how the proposed development would add another 150 cars into a very small area. This
would create more pollution and noise pollution. She reported if there was very little buildable
area left in Mounds View, she questioned why the City wanted to over populate this one area. She
believed the City needed more retail space or shops along with invaluable greenspace. She stated
the movement to increase greener cities was increasing worldwide. She encouraged the City to
reconsider the Arden Park plans and to take into consideration the thoughts and concerns being
voiced by the Mounds View residents.
Irena Sablak, 8466 Long Lake Road, spoke to the Council regarding the Arden Park project stating
she would like this project stopped. She reported the Council was elected by the residents of
Mounds View to represent the public. She noted the majority of Mounds View residents were
against the proposal. She discussed how this project was creating great stress for many residents.
She stated she wanted her children and her grandchildren to enjoy Mounds View as it is now. She
did not want to the wellbeing of this peaceful town to be lost because of this development. She
urged the City Council to not compromise on this project, but rather to hear the voices of the
public.
Dennis From, 7840 Bona Road, stated he grew up in the inner city in Chicago and he has been in
Mounds View since 1996. He explained he loved this town and liked the amenities within the
community. He stated he was afraid the yard waste site would go away and the City would build
more housing on this location. He reported Mounds View had nice homes on larger lots and not
shoebox style homes on tiny lots. He feared who would be able to live in the yard homes when
they had no garages or yards. He encouraged the City to reconsider what the motive was behind
the Arden Park development. He stated the residents of Mounds View do not support it.
Lily ____________, resident of Mounds View, stated the City wants to not only build homes in
the back of her home, but all of her neighbor’s homes as well. She did not believe this was a fair
decision and encouraged the Council to listen to what people had to say. She did not agree with
getting rid of all of the forest and indicated her neighbors felt the same way. She understood the
City wanted to develop its own land to make money, but she reminded the Council that a decision
to remove the forest would be permanent. She stated the wildlife would be lost in the community
Mounds View City Council May 22, 2023
Regular Meeting Page 5
and she loved seeing deer, rabbits, birds and squirrels. While she was only a kid, she wanted to
have a life filled with happy experiences in her backyard. She discussed the memories she has
made on the land behind her home and encouraged the Council to protect this forest and wetland
area.
Julie Clark, 8005 Woodlawn Drive, spoke to the Council regarding the Arden Park proposal. She
explained she had many of the concerns that have already been raised by her neighbors. She stated
she has a close community of neighbors that have organized two in-person neighborhood meetings,
conducted an online survey and has spoken to over 200 people in the community in the last two
weeks. She reported 98% of the people that took the survey do not support the townhome/yard
home proposal. In addition, the neighbors do not support giving or selling the land at a reduced
price to a multi-billion dollar developer. She noted 67% of the residents that completed the survey
have lived in Mounds View for over 10 years and they were concerned with the fact the proposed
development does not match the neighborhood. She indicated the neighbors would support single
family homes or the preservation/expansion of the park area. She stated one popular idea was to
turn this area into a dog park. She provided the Council with a handout on the results of the survey
that was conducted. She encouraged the Council to consider the comments and questions that were
provided from the Mounds View residents. She asked that the Council to represent the residents
of Mounds View and to stop pursuing the Arden Park proposal.
Joel Copp, 8388 Long Lake Road, stated he and his wife have been dedicated residents of Mounds
View for the past 35 years. He explained Mounds View was a community of owner occupied single
family homes on individual lots that were 50 to 100 feet wide. He noted these homeowners have
elected this Council to support their values. He reported the 75 unit high density townhome project
was not in keeping with the character or values of this community. He stated this project will
negatively impact existing property values and would add 300+ vehicles to Long Lake Road per
day. He stated this development would put great demands onto the City’s infrastructure and would
put permanent negative quality of life impacts on the established residents of Mounds View.
Tony Preciado, 8217 Long Lake Road, stated he opposed the Arden Park project. He noted this
development would be located directly in his back yard. He reported he has tried to purchase the
land behind his house several times. He stated if this project goes through, he would do everything
in his power to make sure none of the Councilmembers are reelected. He questioned how the City
Council was benefiting from this proposed project and feared how the wildlife in the area would
be impacted.
Tom Carlson, 8051 Woodlawn Drive, encouraged the Council to review the surveys and
questionnaires that were brought to the Council from Ms. Clark. He urged the Council to hear the
voices of the surrounding residents. He reported the project area was platted for eight single family
homes and the developer was proposing to squeeze 87 homes onto this space. He asked that the
Council consider what this would do the neighborhood and to the surrounding area. He stated if
the area were to be developed, low-density housing should be considered.
Dale Federer, 2322 Laport Drive, reported he has lived on Laport Drive for the past 40 years and
noted he has lived through the Medtronic development. He explained he would be extremely
disappointed to see high density housing this close to the transfer station. He questioned if the
Mounds View City Council May 22, 2023
Regular Meeting Page 6
proposed land could even support this much housing. He encouraged the Council to protect the
wetland and wildlife on this property. He recommended the Council focus on properly developing
the Mounds View Boulevard corridor. He stated he did not see the need to complete a development
of this type in Mounds View.
Wendy Kiewel, 8454 Greenwood Drive, stated she has lived in Mounds View for the last 28 years.
She noted she has remained in the area because she liked the older developed neighborhoods. She
explained she hated to see this greenspace go. She commented on how loud the hum of traffic was
in her neighborhood and noted this was impacting her quality of life. She feared how her
neighborhood would be further impacted if the proposed development were to move forward. She
cautioned the Council from moving forward with this development and urged them to protect the
last bit of remaining greenspace in Mounds View.
Diana Rolland, 7768 Woodlawn Drive, explained she has many of the same concerns as her
neighbors. She noted her biggest concern was the fact that the greenspace and wildlife would be
lost. She indicated this action would be permanent, so she urged the Council to consider their
actions carefully. She stated Mounds View had a lot of new apartments available in the community
for residents. She discussed how the proposed development would impact traffic in her
neighborhood, while also putting a strain on the City’s electrical grid and infrastructure. She
suggested walking trails or a dog park be considered for this greenspace.
Dan Madsen, 8206 Long Lake Road, stated he has been a resident of Mounds View for 31 years.
He explained he has many of the same concerns of his neighbors regarding the wetland and the
wildlife habitat. He indicated he did not mind paying taxes when the taxes are used for worthwhile
projects.
Kayla Roste, 8400 Long Lake Road, commented on the proposed Arden Park development. She
stated she was very concerned about the loss of the wetlands. She reported the wetland delineation
was completed during a drought year. She noted she was concerned about how the groundwater
would be impacted by this project. She indicated the proposed development would be managed by
an HOA that would be dumping fertilizer on the yards, which would damage the wetlands and
groundwater. She reported it was already challenging to use Long Lake Road in the morning and
the additional housing would compound this issue. She asked that Council to consider another use
for this property. She suggested a dog park or walking trails be considered for this area. She noted
she voted for several of the City Councilmembers and she hoped that they would hear the concerns
being voiced by the Mounds View residents.
Carrie Nelson, 8453 Eastwood Road, stated there has been an increase in traffic in her
neighborhood and she was concerned how this would be impacted by the proposed development.
She reported she could Medtronic from her house and she could hear the traffic from the freeway.
She questioned why the City was considering rezoning this property. She urged the City Council
to protect the last remaining greenspace and the trees in this area. She recommended the greenspace
be turned into a park and that the wetland be protected.
Mounds View City Council May 22, 2023
Regular Meeting Page 7
Dan Mueller, 8343 Groveland Road, stated he agreed with the concerns being voiced by his
neighbors. He commented on how all of the recent high density projects were costing all of the
trees in the community.
Ali Carlson, 8051 Woodlawn Drive, noted she has lived in Mounds View her entire life. She stated
the wetland area has brought deer, turkeys, and geese to her yard. She feared how the wetlands
would be impacted by the proposed townhomes and yard homes. She reported taking away the
wetland would remove the wildlife and would remove the greenspace that the neighborhood
children enjoy.
Peter Lozowi, 7971 Woodlawn Drive, explained he was totally against the proposed project. He
noted has lived in Mounds View since 1984. He urged the City Council to let the public vote on
this development because it was not right for the community. He discussed how much he paid in
taxes for Mounds View and expressed concern with the fact his taxes continue to rise each and
every year.
Carol Mueller, 8343 Groveland Road, reported she had the pleasure in 2018 of serving on the
Comp Plan Committee. She noted Acting Mayor Meehlhause served on the Comp Plan Committee
in 2008. She explained nowhere in either of these plans does it show where the City would take a
small piece of property and break all of the zoning rules, and allow a company from New Brighton
that was not allowed to put cottages into their community into Mounds View. She reported this
was the last 2% or 3% of developable land in the City. She encouraged the Council to remember
who voted for them and to serve the residents of Mounds View. She commented on the countless
hours one resident has spent pulling together data for the Council to review showing the opinions,
concerns and comments of the neighbors. She believed Mayor Hull had a legacy in the community
and she believed the City should put its resources into the expansion of the Community Center.
She did not believe Mayor Hull would have liked to have seen something that required the
expenditure of resources that do not serve the needs of the community and its existing residents.
Sharon Kirscher, 8406 Red Oak Drive, stated she agreed with the comments of her neighbors. She
noted she has lived in Mounds View most of her 63 years. She discussed how the swamps along
Red Oak Drive were turned into housing and she understood these homes had problems with water
in their basements. She discussed how the proposed development would remove yet another
wetland. She urged the Council to preserve this wetland and forested area. She believed this natural
filtration system should remain in place. She recommended this area be turned into a park or
preservation area.
Gary Schallock, 2450 Sherwood Road, stated he has been a resident for the past 20 years. He noted
he objected to the proposed development and believed this was the wrong decision for Mounds
View. He reported he has a large lot and he enjoyed the wildlife in his neighborhood. He explained
this development was wrong for this community and the only people who supported the project
was the City Council. He urged the Council to hear the voices of the neighbors.
Jake Thies, 8300 Pleasant View Drive, explained he agreed with the comments of his neighbors.
He expressed concern with how all of this additional housing would impact the wetlands and
Mounds View City Council May 22, 2023
Regular Meeting Page 8
groundwater for the surrounding neighbors. He reported if any of the City Councilmembers were
to support this project, he would be running against them at the next election.
Tanya Battista, 5307 Quincy Street, stated she agreed with the comments of her neighbors. She
urged the Council to keep this area of Mounds View natural.
Ann Erion, 7800 Bona Road, expressed concern with how her neighborhood would flood if the
City were to do away with this large wetland.
Marcy Winkler, 2372 Laport Drive, reported this was the third time she has been in front of the
Council regarding this property. She explained in previous attempts to develop this land the Rice
Creek Watershed shot the request down. She did not understand why their view has changed. She
stated she was concerned with the wildlife, the wetland and the floodplain. She noted she was also
concerned with how the residents on Long Lake Road would be impacted by the increased traffic
levels. She urged the Council to allow this greenspace and natural wetland to remain as God
intended.
Rebecca Scholl, 2467 Hillview Road, explained she has been a Mounds View resident for the past
26 years. She reported she was not against development, but she was against the Arden Park
development. She stated she appreciated all of the development that was occurring along the
corridor and the fact that the City Council had a plan. She urged the Council not to allow Pulte
Homes to cram 75+ townhomes into a small area that was located on a wetland. She indicated this
project does not match the zoning and did not make sense for Mounds View. She urged the Council
to deny this project. She thanked all of her neighbors for coming forward, voicing their concerns
and for speaking out against this project.
Mike Winkel, 7701 Bona Road, stated he did not believe the City needed the density or additional
traffic on Long Lake Road. In addition, he did not believe the City needed to lose the greenspace.
John Stacy, 800 Woodlawn Drive, explained he pounded a sand point in his yard so he could use
this well to water his yard. He noted he hit water at 14 feet. He reported when they did the project
on Sherwood the project kept filling up with water and pumps had to be brought in. He stated this
area was a swamp. He indicated the proposed project area was also a swamp and should remain a
swamp.
Tony Sablak, 8466 Long Lake Drive, reported he has been a real estate agent for the past 20 years.
He commented on how the proposed townhome/yard home project would adversely impact the
property values of the surrounding homes. He urged the Council to reconsider this project and not
move it forward.
Heather Forest, 8260 Long Lake Road, reported she would be living directly across from the
proposed development. She noted she has an 18 year old driver and she was terrified every day
her daughter would be hit while leaving the driveway. She explained there used to be a police
presence on Long Lake Road in the evening hours, but she hasn’t seen a police presence in 2023.
She reported she was very concerned with how the additional traffic would impact her quality of
life. She commented further on how her property loses power quite often and she feared how this
Mounds View City Council May 22, 2023
Regular Meeting Page 9
would be compounded with an additional 85 homes on the power grid. She noted her 12 year old
daughter was quite upset about having more people in the neighborhood. She indicated her
daughter was also concerned with how this new development would increase the class sizes at the
local schools, which were already quite full. She stated she strongly opposed this project and she
encouraged the Council to not move it forward.
Bjorg Steinbach, 7861 Woodlawn Drive, noted he has lived in his home for the past 26 years. He
provided the Council with a visual and asked all of the residents in attendance to raise their hands
if they oppose the Arden Park project.
Mike Kemen, 5054 Silver Lake Road, explained he biked a lot throughout the community and
along Long Lake Road. He stated he would hate to see additional traffic along this roadway
because it was already dangerous for bikers and pedestrians.
City Administrator Zikmund stated the City has reviewed a concept plan from Pulte Homes. He
reported to date there is no development agreement, preliminary plat or final plat. He explained
the Council met in closed session and conveyed a proposal for the land to Pulte Homes and has
not heard back. He noted the City has no project until a development agreement was in place.
8. COUNCIL BUSINESS
A. Public Hearing: Resolution 9752, Considering a Residential Dog Kennel
License for Joe Lundy, 2801 County Road H.
City Administrator Zikmund requested the Council consider a residential dog kennel license for
Joe Lundy at 2801 County Road H. He reported kennel licenses were required for residents that
have three or more pets. He explained training, breeding and boarding would not be allowed per
City Ordinance. He stated a mailing was sent to all neighbors living within 500 feet and staff was
recommending approval of the request.
Acting Mayor Meehlhause opened the public hearing at 7:41 p.m.
Kristin Hable, 2529 County Road H, stated she was opposed to her neighboring running a kennel.
She explained she has worked long and hard to improve her home. She reported her neighborhood
was full of dog issues, which could be seen through the number of police calls. She stated her
neighborhood was not cohesive. She stated she has dogs barking in her neighborhood day and
night. She indicated she was against a kennel unless the City had some way to control the dog
issues that would come with this.
Daniel Marquardt, 2554 Eastwood Drive in New Brighton, spoke to the types of dogs the resident
would have. He stated it sounded like the applicant had smaller dogs and the kennel license was
simply required because he wanted a third dog and would not be operating a kennel from this
property.
Mike Kemen, 5054 Silver Lake Road, reported he makes great sacrifices living along Silver Lake
Road due to the noise and traffic. He noted he wears ear plugs so he can fall asleep at night. He
indicated his greatest concern was with the fact the applicant would be operating a business. He
Mounds View City Council May 22, 2023
Regular Meeting Page 10
noted he was not as vehemently opposed, if the applicant was simply requesting to have three dogs.
He commented further on how the neighborhood dogs set each other off and that there was a great
deal of dogs barking.
Hearing no further public input, Acting Mayor Meehlhause closed the public hearing at 7:46 p.m.
City Administrator Zikmund stated the City Attorney could provide the Council with language for
a condition to ensure the applicant does not board, train or breed dogs on the property.
City Attorney Riggs advised this could be done to make it clear that these activities would not be
allowed at the property.
Andrea Amelse, 2816 Woodcrest, asked if this was an exception because they currently own three
dogs. She noted she has already heard the dogs on this property.
City Administrator Zikmund explained the applicant would be allowed to have three dogs, with
no kenneling, no training or breeding.
Acting Mayor Meehlhause stated this request was following an established Ordinance for the City.
He apologized for the confusion this license brought about by being called a kennel license.
MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Cermak. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 9752,
Considering a Residential Dog Kennel License for Joe Lundy at 2801 County Road H adding a
condition that states there will be no breeding, kenneling or training.
Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried.
B. First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 1003, Amending Mounds View
City Code Chapter 160.198; B-3 Highway Business District, Conditional Uses.
Community Development Director Sevald requested the Council consider an Ordinance that would
amend City Code regarding the B-3 Highway Business District. He explained Big Dipper
Creamery proposes to relocate their ice cream production facility to 2222 Mounds View
Boulevard, requiring; (1) an amendment to the B-3 district to allow processing of food products
as a Conditional Use; and (2) a Conditional Use Permit. He reported Big Dipper Creamery
currently operates retail stores in Blaine and North Oaks, and an ice cream production facility at
their North Oaks store. They have outgrown the space and intend to lease 2222 Mounds View
Boulevard for production and retail sales (no dine-in). It was noted 2222 Mounds View Boulevard
is a multi-tenant building (Southpaw Crossfit, Scout Shop, Mounds View Chiropractic, Betterley
Tools), and is zoned B-3 Highway Business. Staff commented further on the request and reported
the Planning Commission recommended approval of Ordinance 1003.
Council Member Gunn asked if retail sales would be conducted at this location. Community
Development Director Sevald stated grab and go sales would be conducted by the pint or quart.
MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Lindstrom. To Waive the First Reading and Introduce Ordinance
Mounds View City Council May 22, 2023
Regular Meeting Page 11
1003, Amending Mounds View City Code Chapter 160.198; B-3 Highway Business District,
Conditional Uses.
Council Member Lindstrom stated he was happy to see the City was working to bring another new
business to Mounds View.
Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried.
C. First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 999, Amending Mounds View
City Code Chapter 161 Signs and Billboards.
Community Development Director Sevald requested the Council introduce an Ordinance that
would amend City Code Chapter 161 regarding signs and billboards. He explained this request
was previously discussed by the Council at the February and April work sessions. Staff reviewed
the minor amendments to the code amendment and recommended the Council introduce the
Ordinance.
Council Member Lindstrom asked if this Ordinance amendment would impact the Bear Lot.
Community Development Director Sevald reported the Bear Lot was currently limited to 100 feet
of wall signage including the bear. Under the proposed amendment, the Bear Lot would be allowed
to double the amount of signage they were allowed to have now. He noted the amendment does
not give them everything they wanted.
MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Meehlhause. To Waive the First Reading and Adopt Ordinance 999,
Amending Mounds View City Code Chapter 161 Signs and Billboards.
Council Member Lindstrom suggested action on this item be tabled. He supported the Bear Lot
being able to have the bear. He recommended this item be postponed until the City had a full
Council.
Acting Mayor Meehlhause asked if the Bear Lot could go before the Planning Commission for a
variance. Community Development Director Sevald stated this could be done. He noted if the
proposed code amendment were approved, the Bear Lot would have 200 square feet to work with.
MOTION/SECOND: Lindstrom/Cermak. To Table Action on Ordinance 999 until there was a
full City Council to discuss this matter.
Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried.
D. Resolution 9753, Accept the bid results for the 2023 Street Rehabilitation
Project – Pleasant View Drive/Stinson Boulevard and select bid alternate for
trail section.
Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson requested the Council accept the bid results
for the 2023 Street Rehabilitation Project for the Pleasant View Drive/Stinson Boulevard street
project and select the bid alternate for the trail section. He reported this project was being done
Mounds View City Council May 22, 2023
Regular Meeting Page 12
jointly with the City of Fridley. He explained a Joint Powers Agreement was in place for the
redevelopment of this road. He noted Fridley volunteered to complete the plans, specs and
engineering for this project at an 8% cost to the City of Mounds View. He reviewed the plans for
the proposed roadway improvements noting there would be a walking trail on the east side of the
road. Staff recommended the bid be awarded to the lowest bidder, T.A. Schifsky & Sons with the
bid alternate for the trail section.
Acting Mayor Meehlhause asked if the 8% engineering cost was just for the City’s portion of
engineering expenses. Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson reported this was the
case.
Acting Mayor Meehlhause opened the meeting for public comments.
Ann Tate, 3048 Bronson Drive, reported the neighbors do not want or need the trail. She
questioned why the City would want to spend a great deal of money on a four block trail. She
explained if a trail had to go forward, she recommended the trail without a boulevard be
considered.
Rene Johnson, 7385 Pleasant View Drive, stated the reason she brought up the Charter question
earlier was because she would like the Council to table action on the walking trail at this time. She
supported the Charter being amended before action in order to allow the neighbors to go through
their due process. She explained if the district court states the trail should move forward, then at
least she had a chance to fight. She believed this was the proper course of action for the City to
pursue. She indicated if the trail had to be installed, she would prefer that her mailbox remain
where it is.
City Attorney Riggs explained what is being asked is if the residents can use the petition situation
for this type of matter. He stated the assessment provision for the petition does not apply because
the City does not assess. He reported there was another vehicle in the Charter that allows for
petitions to be done. However, with the type of decision before the Council, courts in Minnesota
have said it’s not right for this type of petition.
Ms. Johnson commented she understood she was not being assessed for this project, but the Charter
allows for petitions regarding improvements that would impact 100% of the residents on her street.
City Attorney Riggs reported there was another avenue in the Charter that allows for this question
to stop the trail. However, in Minnesota the courts have stated that is not a petition for the Council
to utilize and it would not stop the trail.
Ms. Johnson asked what would stop the trail. City Attorney Riggs reported the residents would
have to elect different Councilmembers in order to make a different decision. He explained that
even if the Charter were amended, this type of petition would not work because it was not
something the Council could consider.
Ms. Johnson asked if the Council would consider tabling action on this item for 60 days to allow
the public to prove why the trail wasn’t needed.
Mounds View City Council May 22, 2023
Regular Meeting Page 13
Acting Mayor Meehlhause requested further information regarding the cost of the project. Public
Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson reviewed the cost for the project, along with bid
alternates 1 or 2. It was noted the bid pricing did include the rapid flashing beacon and ADA ramps.
Council Member Gunn asked which of the bids staff would recommend. Public Works/Parks and
Recreation Director Peterson stated the boulevard would be the safest for pedestrians and bicycles.
He reported no trees would have to be removed for this project and only minor landscaping would
be disturbed if the 10 foot trail were installed.
MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Cermak. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 9753, Accept
the bid results for the 2023 Street Rehabilitation Project – Pleasant View Drive/Stinson Boulevard
and selecting Bid Alternate 1 for trail section.
Council Member Lindstrom stated he drove around the City and measured several trails. He
reported the trail off of H2 was an eight foot trail and most of the boulevards in town were four
feet. He indicated Davenport Avenue has a six foot sidewalk. He explained he has driven Pleasant
View four times a week for the past six or seven months and he has seen a total of five cars and
no pedestrians. He did not believe this was a highly traveled area that required a trail. He reviewed
the 2019 Comp Plan and noted Pleasant View does not have a trail on it. He stated because the
City had 100% participation from the residents on this street, he would not be supporting the trail.
Acting Mayor Meehlhause commented he has continued to be amazed at the opposition to a
sidewalk or trail as part of a street project. He noted this was true for Arden Avenue, Groveland,
Spring Lake Road, and now Pleasant View Drive. He was perplexed by the fact there was no
compelling reason other than the fact the residents do not want it. He explained in making decisions
the Council receives input from a variety of sources, such as staff, residents, and the strategic plan.
He reviewed the goals within the City’s strategic plan, noting one of the goals was for the Council
to maintain and expand the City’s trails and sidewalks to provide further connections with existing
sidewalks and trails. He noted the City’s 2024 Comprehensive Plan also comes into consideration
for this project. He stated there was a variety of input and resources each Councilmember takes
into consideration before making a decision on matters like this. He indicated each Councilmember
will reach their own decision based on the input and resources they have considered. He discussed
long-time Shoreview Mayor Sandy Martin who will go down in history as one of the most effective
local elected officials in Minnesota history. He reported Ms. Martin said she spent her 20t years
disappointing Shoreview residents because if she had listened to what the residents didn’t want,
they wouldn’t have a community center or playground outside of city hall. He noted he too would
disappoint the residents on Pleasant View Drive as he would be supporting the construction of a
sidewalk trailway based on the master trail plan, comprehensive plan and the Council’s 2023-2024
strategic plan. He noted the cost of this trail was not coming from property tax funding.
Ayes – 3 Nays – 1 (Lindstrom) Motion carried.
9. REPORTS
A. Reports of Mayor and Council.
Mounds View City Council May 22, 2023
Regular Meeting Page 14
Council Member Cermak reported graduation at Irondale High School would be held on Monday,
June 5.
Council Member Cermak stated the Mounds View Police Foundation would be meeting next on
Tuesday, June 6. She encouraged residents to visit the Manitou Grill on Wednesday, June 7 as a
part of a fundraiser for the Mounds View Police Foundation.
Council Member Cermak explained the Fire Department would be holding a golf tournament on
Saturday, June 10.
Council Member Lindstrom stated the Festival in the Park Committee met on Tuesday, May 16.
He noted there would be a foam party and water balloon fight as part of this year’s events.
Council Member Lindstrom thanked his neighbors for attending this meeting and for voicing their
concerns to the City Council.
Council Member Gunn reported the Diversity Task Force met and had good discussions. She noted
the group would meet next on Tuesday, June 20 at City Hall.
Council Member Gunn explained the Tribute Committee would be meeting next on Tuesday, June
6 at 6:30 p.m. at City Hall.
Council Member Gunn encouraged residents to participate in the garbage input meetings on
Wednesday, May 31 at 10:00 a.m., 1:30 p.m. or 7:00 p.m. at the Mounds View Community Center.
Acting Mayor Meehlhause stated he would be attending a Twin Cities Gateway executive
committee meeting on Tuesday, May 23. He provided the Council with a financial update from
Twin Cities Gateway and noted they continue to lead the entire state in hotel occupancy.
Acting Mayor Meehlhause reported he would be attending an NYFS board meeting on Thursday,
May 25.
B. Reports of Staff.
Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson stated a neighborhood meeting would be
held for the Pleasant View Drive/Stinson project on Wednesday, May 24 at City Hall in the
Council Chambers.
Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson explained Public Works staff was busy
filling potholes.
Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson noted an RFP for the sewer lining went out
last Friday.
Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson reported Stantec has been authorized to look
at wetland banking at Arden.
Mounds View City Council May 22, 2023
Regular Meeting Page 15
Finance Director Beer stated a new accountant started in the Finance Department today.
City Administrator Zikmund asked if the Council wanted to reschedule or cancel their Monday,
July 3 work session meeting. He noted there was nothing on the agenda that would be discussed
on Monday, July 11. The Council supported holding the work session meeting on Wednesday,
July 5.
City Administrator Zikmund commented on the legislative session and noted the tax bill was on
its way to the governor. He noted the City could put the local sales tax on the ballot for residents
to consider in November. He indicated the definition of general elections was being considered.
He noted the bonding bill process opened up yesterday and documentation would have to be
submitted for consideration on June 15.
C. Reports of City Attorney.
City Attorney Riggs stated with Mayor Hull’s passing the Council has a vacancy. He reported he
would provide the Council with a memo tomorrow regarding the steps that must be followed by
the City Council. He noted the first action would be for the Council to adopt a Resolution declaring
the vacancy. Because there was over a year left on the term, a special election would be required
on August 8 or November 7. He stated the Council would continue to act with four members, with
the Acting Mayor in place, until a new member was elected. Further discussion ensued regarding
the process the Council would have to follow if a current City Councilmember were to run and
win the open seat, and it was noted the City would have to hold another special election.
10. Next Council Work Session: Monday, June 5, 2023, at 6:00 p.m.
Next Council Meeting: Monday, June 12, 2023, at 6:00 p.m.
11. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8:57 p.m.
Transcribed by:
Heidi Guenther
Minute Maker Secretarial