Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-01-18 PC PacketMOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA January 18, 2023 — 6:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Special Order of Business A. Oath of Office Commissioner Rundle 4. Citizens Requests and Comments Relating to Planning and Zoning Issues Not Already on the Agenda. (Before speaking, please give your full name and address for the record.) 5. Planning Cases A. (none) 6. Other Planning Activity A. Long Lake Cove Concept Plan B. Review Bylaws 7. Approval of Minutes: A. November 2, 2022 B. December 7, 2022 8. Reports A. Upcoming Planning Cases & Activity B. Staff Updates C. Council Updates D. Planning Commissioner Reports 9. Next Planning Commission Meetings: AWedResda•February z/3B. Wednesday, February 15, 2023 10. Adjournment 1 01 Mounds View Planning Commission Oath of Office I, Gary Rundle, do solemnly swear, to support the Constitution of the United States, and of this state, and to discharge faithfully the duties, devolving upon me as a Planning Commission member of the City of Mounds View, to the best of my judgment and ability. Witness: Gary Rundle, Commissioner January 18, 2023 Date Jon Sevald, Community Development Director Item No: Meeting Date: M10"itsmrw Type of Business Planning Case City of Mounds 111ew Staff R, To: Planning Commission From: Jon Sevald, Community Development Director Item Title/Subject: Long Lake Cove Concept Plan 06A Jan 18, 2023 Planning Case M U 20022-002 Introduction: Schifsky Companies (Developer) is proposing to redevelop 7700 Long Lake Road' (NW corner of Long Lake Rd & Co Rd 1) into eight townhome units (three buildings). The project can be a Planned Unit Development (PUD), which allows for deviations from the City Code; OR it can be done without a PUD if Variances are approved (Variances require practical difficulties unique to the property). It had been Staff's opinion that this needed to be rezoned PUD due to the number of units, and deviations from Code requirements the Developer is requesting. But, after further review, it could be rezoned R-4, and apply for Variances (not all of the requested deviations have supporting practical difficulties). Which route to go (PUD vs. R-4), is up to the Developer. But, it would be tremendously helpful to receive direction from the Planning Commission. Discussion: PUD's allow for flexibility from the City Code if it is consistent with the intent of the Code, includes higher standards, preserves/enhances site characteristics, and is a more desirable project. The Developer presented a concept plan to the Planning Commission on August 3, 2022, specifically if they supported; (1) reducing the minimum Residential PUD project size from 3-acres to 1-acre (YES), and (2) increasing the density from a maximum of 5-units per acre, to 10-units (YES). Due to rising construction costs, the Developer is asking for additional deviations to the City Code (no curb & gutter, no fire truck turnaround). Although Commission members' opinions at the Concept Plan stage are "opinions", and not "approvals", Staff is requesting Commission members to provide clear direction regarding what on the plan is acceptable or not acceptable. If R-4 zoning, then the project requires; 1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Table 2-3; Density Within Redevelopment Areas); from 1 5 UROtS per aGFe, to 1-10 units per acre. 2. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, from Single Family DetaGhed to Single Family Attached. 3. Zoning Map amendment, from Q-1�-SiRgle-Famil , to R-4 High Density Residential. Lot 7, Bayport Acres (1980). Res 1131; Approving Subdivision of Lands to be Known as Bayport Acres. Res 1132; Approval of Development Agreement No. 80-36. The rviuunus view visiun A Thriving Desirable Community Item 05B Page 2 of 6 4. Preliminary/Final Platt, and Stormwater Management Permit. 5. Variance to reduce building setbacks. 6. Variance to curb & gutter requirements. 7. Development Review. If a PUD, then a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Residential PUD is required instead of Variances. If a PUD, then a Zoning Text Amendment is required to reduce the minimum project size from 3-acres' to 1-acre (Planning Commission was agreeable to this at the August 3, 2022 meeting). Analysis: 1. Comprehensive Plan amendment; (1) (Figure 2-2 Future Land Use), from Single -Family Detached, to Single -Family Attached; and, (2) amendment to change the density of Single Family Attached from 1-5 units per acre, to 1-10 units per acre. 4 5 6 The Planning Commission was agreeable to this at the August 3, 2022 meeting. 2. Proposed Use:' 3. Setbacks:$ 8 townhouse units Required R-4 Proposed North 20' 11' East 49'9 30' South 30' 34' West 50' 31' ---t - -NP - h Yellow area = building encroachments into setbacks. Z Mounds View City Code §158.020(B)2; "No subdivision shall be approved unless, and until the property has been rezoned in accordance with the proposed use thereof." ' Mounds View City Code §160.317(A)(2) (Minimum project size) a Mounds View City Code §160.004 (Relation to Comprehensive Municipal Plan) S Mounds View City Code §158.040 (Conformance with Comprehensive Plan). 6 Mounds View City Code §160.316(B) (General Requirements and Standards; Comprehensive Plan consistency) ' City Code 160.131(B) (R-4 High Density Residential District; Permitted Uses): Townhouses up to eight units as regulated herein. $ City Code 160.055(C) (Setbacks for Principal Buildings) 9 City Code 160.055(C)(1) "Where principal buildings in existence on lots within the some block on the same side of the street have front yard setbacks different from those required, the minimum front yard setback for any new principal buildings shall be the minimum front yard setback inexistence for anyone lot."..... 7750 Long Lake Road has a front yard setback of 49.3', according to a letter from the City to Timberlane Homes (May 26, 1981) regarding minimum setbacks for Bayport Acres. The rviounus view visiun A Thriving Desirable Community Item 05B Page 3 of 6 4. Landscaping10: Required Proposed Overstory deciduous shade tree 11+511 Coniferous tree 11 Understory shrub 76 Ornamental tree 11 If the site plan layout does not have adequate space, the number of plantings may be reduced, as long as the size and height is maintained.12 The Developer has completed a Tree Plan. There are 75 trees on the property, + 7 trees on the adjacent St Paul Water Authority land (along Co Rd 1), The 75 trees include 37 Specimen Trees. All are likely to be removed. 5. Usable Open Space.13 400 sq ft required per unit (3,200 sq ft total). Usable Open Space is to be for "active or passive recreation" (e.g. a "yard"). All yard space is stormwater infiltration basins. The Council could interpret the basins as "passive recreation" space, but it's a stretch. 6. Development Review: 14 A Development Review is a "catch-all" of everything not already required for review (e.g. architecture, landscaping, drainage, exterior lighting, etc). Development Reviews are not required for one and two-family units. It is Staff's interpretation of the project as a whole (8 units total, vs. excluding the two 2-unit buildings). During the August 3, 2022 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission opined: No yellow paint. Preserve as many trees as possible. Minimal usable yard space is ok. On the current plan, all yard space is consumed by stormwater infiltration basins. The basins are about 5' from the townhomes. By comparison, if the basins were within a Flood Fringe district, 10 City Code 160.419 (Landscaping); 1. One overstory deciduous shade tree for every 2,000 square feet of the total building footprint (e.g. 8 units X Z800 sf footprint = 23,040 sf footprint/2,000 sf = 11 trees. 2. One coniferous tree for every 2,000 square feet of building (e.g. 23,04012,000 =11 trees) or one coniferous tree for every 200 feet of site perimeter (e.g. 8481200 = 4 trees), whichever is greater (e.g. 11 trees). 3. One understory shrub for every 300 square feet of building (e.g. 23,0401300 = 76 shrubs) or one shrub for every 30 feet of site perimeter (e.g. 848130 = 28 shrubs, whichever is greater (76). 4. One ornamental tree for every 2,000 square feet of building (23,04012,000 = 11 trees) or one ornamental tree for every 200 feet of site perimeter (8481200 = 4), whichever is greater (11). 11 City Code 160.418(B)(2) (Tree Removal on Lots with Construction or Grading Activity): For every specimen tree removed, the permit holder or property owner shall plant a minimum of two new trees, up to a maximum of five new trees. 1z City Code 160.419(C)(6) 13 City Code 160.317(6)(f) (PUD; Special Requirements & Standards; Townhouses and condominiums) 14 City Code 150.054 (Development Controls); ..."All new construction and expansions of existing construction shall be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission and approved by the City Council as conforming to this section, except as follows...... Single- or two-family dwelling units"... The rviuunus view visiun A Thriving Desirable Community Item 05B Page 4 of 6 the building would require a 15' buffer, 1' above the flood elevation.15 Staff is concerned that there is not enough of a buffer, although the Code may not require any (unless within a Flood zone). 7. Curb & Gutter16 Curb & Gutter is required for residential (7+ units), and commercial/industrial. The Developer is requesting that it not be required, due to expense. The purpose of curb & gutter is to direct stormwater runoff. Without it, it is more likely that lawns will be driven over or damaged by snowplows, creating divots and collecting runoff, or damaging landscaping. Some townhome projects have it. Some do not (Mounds View streets did not have curb & gutter for 50+ years). 8. Truck Turnaround17 Fire Code requires a fire truck turnaround, unless the buildings are sprinkled. The turnaround is more likely to be used by garbage trucks and delivery vans. The Developer is requesting that one not be required, due to expense. Without a turnaround, trucks will have to back out onto Long Lake Road, which creates a hazard. Staff strongly opposes not requiring a turnaround. 9. Preliminary/Final Plat (revised plans have not been submitted) 10. Stormwater Management (will be reviewed with the revised Preliminary Plat) Strategic Plan Strategy/Goal: • Continue BR&E program. Maximize utilization of development space and current list of available sites. Consider residential redevelopment and thriving small businesses with neighborhood appeal. • Support the development of a variety of housing stocks that includes affordable and market rate, and the maintenance of properties. • Consider more townhomes and affordable apartments, and other housing options. Financial Impact: N/A Zs City Code 154.028(B)(1) (Flood Fringe District; Standards for Flood Fringe District permitted uses) ie City Code 152.004(D) (Curbing Standards) 17 MN 2015 Fire Code, Appendix D (Fire Apparatus Access Roads), Section D102. i ne rviounus view vision A Thriving Desirable Community Item 05B Page 5 of 6 Staff Recommendation: 1. Develop as R-4 zoning (with Variances to setbacks), not as a PUD. It is Staff's opinion that the City is loosely using PUD's as a means to avoid unjustified Variances, and is not getting any benefit (e.g. you get what you ask for). 2. Replace two 2-unit buildings with one 4-unit building, and shift both buildings south to the 30' setback. Variances would still be needed to reduce the east and west setbacks. Staff's opinion is that there are Practical Difficulties to support this. 3. Move the fire turnaround to the NW corner, instead of the south side. 4. Redesign the townhomes such that there is enough yard space to accommodate a patio (in front or back), and adequate buffer between home and stormwater basins. The garages should be sized to accommodate inside storage of garage/recycling bins (they are not). 5. Redesign the townhomes along Long Lake Road such that they look like they "front" the street, vs. back-up to the street. This corner is highly visible, and the architecture should stand out. Add some kind of element on the corner (e.g. pergola & landscaping). Respectfully, C�.6c Jon Sevald, AICP Community Development Director ATTACHED Aerial Photo Plan Set The Mounds View Vision A Thriving Desirable Community Tag Species Status Cond DBH Notes 9090 g0q.2 1 Oak, red High Value Fair 16 I / 6 2 Spruce, blue High Value Good 8 3 Oak, red Specimen Good 20 "d 4 Oak, red Specimen Fair 46 2x 23 23 Cr 5 Oak, red Specimen Fair 20 �oq3+ I 6 Oak, bur Specimen Fair 20 =` d • ,-g05.8 qoqqTW 7 Oak, red Poor 50 hazard I Xg05.1 r�-ROOF=g31.0 g089BW �� ' h ah g04.8 q0 EXISTING BUILDING ��� 9er� o A-�- 3-----f----- 33 -- -� 8 Oak, bur Specimen Fair 41 3x 20 0 °52 Xg06.4 �� xgo7.l 90 a a Mg 9 Oak, red Specimen Fair 17 10 Oak red Poor 27 h 5" DRAINAGE AND UTILITY \- LSO=gII.1 7° goa.7Bw 90d ; - q0 --EASEMENT PER PLAT x o7.g 2a� 9Os s / q/0.lk XgOq.6 Xg08.1'+ 11 Elm, Siberian Specimen Fair 38 9051 g05.5 1 Xg07.2 0,08' (232.26 PLAT) ('0. 1 \ XQ. 0.1 9/0 g10.4 / xgo8.8 12 Elm, Siberian Fair 12 0 ] i Xg06.3 / N88'13 5� - FE �gpq•Irw - �g.OTW Xgog.6 GM o0 Xg05. / #47- O �`q10 qTW gOg.SBW 13 Elm, siberian Fair 18 2x 9 9 q06 I Xg08.6 232.28 '05• 14 Ash, green Fair 10 leans toward house _ go6.a i ,.q0� --- - - I - - xgo8.2 - - - - - - - _ _ - - _ q°8�"- x 6.g gog3 #4q- - - -Xq°gam \\_qOq gw08.6- - - - g10 --I \190 U 15 Ash, green Fair 8 leans toward house i - - - I FOUND /2 I _ _ _ XgOg.2 g0 STW 1 9 - _-g0q.0 � Xg08.8 #46 J'55 16 Elm, Siberian Fair 8 [ � /_ #31 Xgoq. XgOq.7 90 ao INCH IRON 1 I qp0 q0 90q 9 a 17 Elm, siberian Poor 19 ostly dead, severe lea PIPE MARKED I #26 #48 #51 XCIOg.8 XgOq.3 RLS 474 << Q°� XgOq.2 ; - 18 Elm, siberian Poor 22 half dead I ,_ ; q �� 3� #33 #45 #44 q10 goq.gx d 19 Elm siberian Poor 20 half dead I e6 #25 Xgoq.3 d � "� Xq0 gog.0 � �,. 53 XgO20 Elm, Siberian Fair 20 Ioq.4 #320 #34 # 21 Elm, Siberian Fair 19 I #23 0 �g10.5 #61 x X - 22 Elm, siberian Fair 12 g08.2 I 1 ' xg06.8 #43 %J 24 #56 # XgOq.S # 23 Elm, Siberian Fair 8 �t -. � � I #22 J/ 60 �, I 24 Elm, siberian Fair 10 Y' I ao9.\x #21 911 xgI0.q d , 25 Elm, Siberian Fair 10 I �, g06.7 I #63 XgIL3 #5 SAN NH V 26 Elm, siberian Specimen Fair 36 I r-#Iq RIM -NH 27 Elm, siberian Fair 11 „ o I 9p96k #35 #59 <° INV=Bg0.q 28 Elm, Siberian Fair 13 ; 1,� I #20 #37 #42 • 0 W 0 29 Elm, Siberian Fair 10 -g0q.6 gll.7 g10.4 - 30 Elm, Siberian Fair 9 Y; I #38 #36 #41 GAZEBO gII.6x P\ Q 31 Elm, siberian Fair 10 I 32 Elm, Siberian Fair 10 +� /o° #40 a 9 xgl2.l #58 g08.0--� XgOq. CO. 33 Oak, red Specimen Poor 26 extensive root decay 908 I ou ou ou o qt0 ou oU W Z 34 Elm, siberian Fair 21 _ Xg08.3 ° p FOUND 1/2 O I o #65 35 Elm, Siberian Fair 18 INCH IRON xgo8.a - o ---- - \+55.1 - - a-tfIa2BW- 9p9 0° 0° gII.0 ° 36 Oak bur High Value Fair 14 c'J #17 a- a0 9 g11.3 c XgII.8 9 PIPE MARKED Xg12.5 gII.gX� RLS 4741 Q ^ a �I ° qo?�� 92iT °9ew 912 �m '_° o 37 Elm, siberian Fair 14 0 � o�I oA I � 1 o �w O - oq•q Ln 38 Oak, bur Specimen Fair 15 untagged Ixgo8.3 P a`� X C \ XgII.7 6 6q, ���w-- o �• x g12.6rw- 39 Oak, red Specimen Fair 20 o MI ° ° x �� o #39 \ o'\ b -g1o.o z 40 Elm, Siberian Fair 12 �oI o k 16 X o °` X 0 a``X X #67 41 Oak, red Specimen Fair 62 3x 26 20 16 x I x g12.1 G Xg12.4 g12.6T o x KENNEL X Oa �. L\ 9i(> gl2.l X912.1 g11.2BW 'e -g10.1 42 Oak, red Specimen Fair 26 o x a \� 912.6r 43 Oak, red Specimen Fair 21 I #13 9� `� ° BW 9 03 X Q'\ c gll.4 SHED 44 Oak, red Specimen Fair 17 90 xa I o I � x q1.4 XgII.R ° f g X 9s X a° \ #11 x gu.8 #3 GARAGE \ XISTING BUILDING 45 Oak bur High Value Fair 14 0 � � � � a. '� � 70" p FLOOR=gl3.l-� ' 4 o FLOOR=gl3.g'I �- a EM , • d ROOF=g27.2 71 •, 46 Oak, bur Specimen Fair 9 � Q I s 47 Oak, bur High Value Fair 8 o # 4-, sz I #10 I� FLooR=g12.0j------------- 62.2 ____________ �� -gI0.4 48 Oak, red Specimen Fair 20 % � I 1 ao� X o�' 1 9''s oG e° 9,,9 \\ V w a -- 15 ° o`' 9 p aJ1 12. 6 BUILDING g11.0 # 1 .Q .t 9!i� 8 o g12.4 ' 49 Oak, bur Specimen Fair 20 6, - I 76 \0 • z z 50 Oak, bur Specimen Fair 19 2x 127 Q I IT � # 51 Oak, red Specimen Fair 19 o Q I v, xgll.2 oG q°i d IA 72 52 Oak, bur High Value Fair 8 GM two �I 1 9 gn.7 xg11.g #74 # V gll.5-�/ ql .7X I XgOq.7 ^ 1 +9i, #78 53 Oak, red High Value Fair 16 I I XgOq.3 #GI x 1 Imo\ s 0#77 54 Oak red Specimen Fair 55 2x 29 26 _ 1\ I 2" Qq � xgll.3 � p ,�_-- -4 r 1 X \ ! � AN NH 55 Oak, bur Specimen Fair 22 ° X�-X 73" 9116x IN=g11.1 °I XgI0. i i #7q SET P.K. d =88g.8 56 Oak, bur Specimen Fair 19 I XgOq.6 I NAIL 57 Ash, green Fair 8 Xg1112 5 i xgIL4 I 58 Oak, red Specimen Fair 28 I i # 1 i xgll.l �\\� 9j> \p 59 Oak, red High Value Fair 15 9s+ I\ #7 I # - 9 a��� ,dL g 1.5 \ Xg10.1 XgII.I CB 911.SX d d• 60 Oak, red Specimen Fair 40 2x 20 20 _ Xg11.2 232.,46 - ; d gOq.B-�/I � + 880 9 _5611, #8 RIM=g 0.8--- Xgll.3 g11.8 ° 61 Oak red High Value Good 16 I gog.7 - INv=go7.I xgll.o d _ O g 1 s a gll'3 62 Oak, red High Value Fair 15 i xg1o.7 gll.a RIN=gl1.8 63 Elm, siberian Fair 12 1 FOUND /i X910.2 \ d Xq g11.0 d+ i) qII. tl 1 I xgll.2 INV-g0 I o�oo 0 60" WATEPMAIN d d #80 9// 9/p9 Xgl\.3 N.7 _glly d j' 66 64 Oak, bur Specimen Fair 19 2x 127 I PIPE XgIO.4 � #6 #4 9 ' ��.� a xqu.l x - p I Xg10.5 �8 8 ] qll. ® .>.� °> �� d 65 Oak, red Specimen Fair 19 i w 91'•2x #82 / Q ° q12 gl2o 66 Oak, red Specimen Good 22 1 of �9 d q II. p I X911.2 #8 � d; < . Xg10.8 p•\\6 g11.7 gll.7 q o-gll.8d d d a• d d 67 Oak, red Specimen Good 22 0 o i 9j, d a°. MB 68 Elm siberian Fair 8 1D dT�4 V . 1--g11.1 '. d11.4,-� gll5-� d. a , d d' d d d d d d Vd73 1 d gl�.a 4 d e- 6 WAT�PM6IN, d 69 Pine, white High Value Fair 9 1 \ .-alo °' d d-910°9 : , f d. d d d d �'d._dl �--d- 1 70 Pine, red High Value Fair 12 i ¢ i. d, ' dy Tp sd. I °- d. d. d d• 60" VATERrIAIN 'd - d-� T a y� d d d •q •d d. x d S S No 71 Pine red High Value Fair 13 �d Jy �'�-- -T d ■�VI �A d ° ' ` • d d M 1 ' -1-T• ,�� •����-�\d , • d . , •4 , d ' 'd • • • ' • • •` .d ° •• • :CO UY --� l e•1\��°•I'' • d. • d ° 'd >• °d, •, • . •'• 'd •v • ,. • ` d' • d, d .. . , , . . • < •RI-92.�7 72 Walnut, black Specimen Fair 23 d r •o ' z , ° _ d . d ' ,- glas . d ®1Nt9: gQ5.55, 15"RCP 73 Pine red High Value Fair 10 d , „ ,N88 19'S6"E g ° d ' ; !�e i < , d ' d a 15';RGP .26 .53 , d . d '}`ot�� 74 Crabapple High Value Fair 9 p.� d�1��a. ,d ' • • d • .. • ' • . b , . , .•b : . , • . . . d• , •d •a . , . d • a . d Q 1 •d . • ? d 75 Oak, red Specimen Good 24--- 1- 9T d P640. .. P . a „ a ' • , d d . d • d M. �, d '> .> d • • •O.5¢a'E .d• , •., , , • d• 'd ,•. .d „ • , •.d>.• ` ''(�j� >• .. A, ,,d •• /d d : �-d- >. •d ,>' •. • . d✓ ' .• , O° fSI'Il 1dH•� . d. Q.° Q . , 76 Oak red Specimen Fair 27 ' ° " , >.� >d • " d } 1 >•T~d> d• d . d•>' ' • • . d• d° ' ' " • • •d•, d d' • ° °,✓l'tN IIHi .' �d ° • • ,d• •d . •d, • . ' •d d°• •d• • ICI , � q I2.3 d,• • d.' d . • • • •d d 77 Oak, red Specimen Fair 35 2x 18 17 - »- d>° d a ' Q d . d ° • ti d „ 4 . d •RIB=�QILB =d d 'd 12"CIP PJ=8 fg.3 N, ' • ' ' ' • • ' ' ° ° ' '•' ' NVtV 7.7, ! • • , , . ' '• d • . d . • • ,INV-? E l"9 A •. -'- - 78 Oak, red Poor 48 2x 2820, half dead '• d , d ° ' a , ; b : d . ' d , (sLDGE)° . ' . ' d lam_ - ° i d la dl �, a d d rd ; . 79 Oak, red Specimen Fair 23 80 Oak, bur Specimen Fair 33 2x 2112 _ 1 � d oU oUd oU'�M- oU oud 81 Oak,bur Specimen Fair 62 6x1712118 86 i ou ou ou ou ou ou °u °u °U ou ou ou- -oU- ® Q y>a- ou d, 82 Oak, red Specimen Fair 21 -oU �- d d z a Moundsview Tree Preservation Ordinance I d § 160.416 DEFINITIONS. ' • d d, SIGNIFICANT TREE. Any live healthy high value tree EXISTING IMPROVEMENT AREAS: d measuring eight inches in diameter or greater, measured at four and ♦ d " one-half feet above the ground. HOUSE - 1 545 (IN SQUARE FEET) SPECIMEN TREE. Any high value tree over 16 inches in diameter, or any 0 20 40 other species over 30 inches in diameter. KENNEL 8 671 HIGH VALUE TREES. Any tree from the list below: Rehder Forestry Consulting SHED = 84 (1) Birches (River and Paper), Black Walnut, Catalpa, Cherry, All Firs, GAZEBO = 245 Flowering Crabapples and Hawthorns, Hackberry, Hybrid American CONCRETE = 500 Elm, Ironwood, Japanese Tree Lilac, All Lindens, All Maples, All Oaks, Ohio NORTH GRAVEL DRIVEWAY =1 002 Buckeye, Pines (except Jack), All Spruce. WALLS = 41 A 2X in the notes column denotes a tree with 2-stems with respective diameters TOTAL IMPROVEMENTS = 4088 SQ.FT. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: T e o owing legal description Is ass own on the Pillar Title Services as agent for Alliant National Title Services Company Title Commitment No. 100352.22 dated February 3rd, 2022) Lot 7, Block 1, BAYPORT ACRES, Ramsey County, Minnesota TORRENS PROPERTY EASEMENT NOTES: The following easements or encumbrances are as shown on the Fidelity National Title Insurance Company Report of Title Order No. 2657217 issued on January 24, 2018. 1 . Drainage and Utility Easement as shown on the Record Plat. 2. Easement for public use, such as setting of poles, stringing wires, trimming and removal of trees if necessary for line clearance and lying underground conduits. Covers the west 5 feet of the subject property. AREA: TOTAL AREA AS SHOWN = 44,513 SQ.FT. SURVEY NOTES: 1. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE RAMSEY COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM NAD 1983. BEARING ARE DIFFERENT THAN SHOWN ON THE RECORDED PLAT. 2. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN PER GOPHER ONE LOCATES AND AS-BUILTS PLANS PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. 3. THERE MAY SOME UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, GAS, ELECTRIC, ETC. NOT SHOWN OR LOCATED. 4. DATE OF FIELD SURVEY 3-31-22 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOTES: THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HAVE BEEN LOCATED FROM FIELD SURVEY INFORMATION AND EXISTING DRAWINGS. THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED ALTHOUGH HE DOES CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE. THIS SURVEY HAS NOT PHYSICALLY LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL LOCATE TICKET NUMBER(S) 220880919. SOME MAPS WERE RECEIVED, WHILE OTHER UTILITIES DID NOT RESPOND TO THE LOCATE REQUEST. ADDITIONAL UTILITIES OF WHICH WE ARE UNAWARE MAY EXIST. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! Gopher State One Call ly TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 BENCHMARKS ELEVATIONS BASED ON GPS DERIVED VALUES FOR NAVD 88. LEGEND: 0 FOUND MONUMENT FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION 0 SET 1 /2" IRON PIPE HYDRANT MARKED RLS NO. 25718 pp CURB STOP ry CABLE TV PEDESTAL WATER WELL AC AIR CONDITIONER O WATER MANHOLE OE ELECTRIC MANHOLE wM WATER METER ELECTRIC METER ® POST INDICATOR VALVE EP ELECTRIC PEDESTAL X WATER VALVE FT ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER O BOLLARD LIGHT POLE p� FLAG POLE GUY WIRE Mg MAIL BOX POWER POLE a TRAFFIC SIGN OG GAS MANHOLE O UNKNOWN MANHOLE cn GAS METER SOIL BORING O TELEPHONE MANHOLE TRAFFIC SIGNAL Ed TELEPHONE PEDESTAL co SANITARY CLEANOUT CONIFEROUS TREE �o SANITARY MANHOLE O CATCH BASIN or DECIDUOUS TREE ® or ® STORM DRAIN ® FLARED END SECTION O STORM MANHOLE uF UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC uiv UNDERGROUND CABLE TV uF UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC _UT UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE ou OVERHEAD UTILITY uc UNDERGROUND GAS > SANITARY SEWER >> STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FENCE CURB [TYPICAL] CONCRETE SURFACE BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONTACT: Carson Schifsky 651-260-3248 www.schifskycompanies.com COUNTY/CITY: RA M S EY CO LJ NTY CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW REVISIONS: dl- DATE REVISION 4-10-22 PRELIMINARY ISSUE CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Danciie::17 Thurmes Registration tuber: 25718 Date:--4-1 0_22 PROJECT LOCATION: A7 _A7 O O LONG LAKE ROAD PID#063023440059 Suite #200 1970 Northwestern Ave. Stillwater, MN 55082 Phone 651.275.8969 dan@cssurvey .net CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC. FILE NAME SURVSCH01 PROJECT NO. ZZSCH22001 #11 severe decay, leans towards home, wires = 9.2% (% OF PARCEL AREA) TREES SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY WERE LOCATED BY RHEDER FORESTRY CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY EXISTING BUILDING I EXISTING BUILDING / MB LMI w IO GM 449 ., �. LL— #46 s4 #27 #31 11 TYP 11 TYP Y 0 F#26 4116 g #33 #45 #55 (}' #25 • X I �#3 #34 #54 -' — 2 •!:•,. #23 9 #61 v 0 #43,`F #24 #56 ..• 7 #210 #62 #19 #63 #57 #20 #18 #35 � #42 #59 0 #37 — LLJ p #38 #36 CAZEBD O I X 8 4 #41 #64 O#40 r/ #58 OE OE OE OF 8 11 TYP X I #17 � gb 4 X 4 11 0 TYP X X—� 69" X w0 X X '`F #39 10 #16 F X O X 1 X O O #75 #67 #66 X NNEL X I �� rx X �O #13 X X ��S170" J#12 EXISTING BUILDING O )( #1 1 X •� #3 cnBncE0 O w01 m #10 I IT415 X X X ' )(—A '71'X' I I 11 TYP _I O —r—>>— LIJ 12"CIP #5 #7 #1 60" WATERMAIN #6 � #4 60" WATERMAIN 15"RCP P:\Projects\Projects - 2022\12226046 - Mounds View Residential\C. Design\Drawing Files\12226046 C100.dwg v %N M H 0 M=910.0 V=890.9 W i V Z O J rs rf ;y,•`�:i:�:.:�'�: ;. 11 TYP I ..#74.rl •. t. .M• ...... .... ..... ......... .. �• r '� l ^`i t 1 � • 4' L— .�.�A,r, •.•C,,�h � � � � � a !.� 't,•: •l jtpl •*w�. '� '�' j% •� ..it CB . i ! . t 12 ':' , '•'•' #81 RIM=910.8 •" , INV=907.1 .� : •• .NCB �; :t•%„' 1 ':', I I I g I 60" WATERMAIN IM=911.8 U INV=906.6 •t •7•�r , �•s;r ��� 15"RCP U � � 60" WATERMAIN STS MH COUNTY RD. I RIM=912.6 INV-905.55 S> >> >>— > ' SAN MH RIM=911.8 INV=887.7 SAN H RIM=912.3 INV=889.3 N INV=? E-N/ OE SYMBOL LEGEND ,, REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING •'. •'•'•'. •'•'•'. •'•'• BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION �' , ;,, :' •; REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION t., t • •'• REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING GRAVEL KEY NOTES O1 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING BUILDING AND ANY FOOTINGS ASSOCCIATED WITH BUILDING. O2 SAWCUT, REMOVE, AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. 0 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING GRAVEL. ® REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING FENCE FABRIC, POSTS, AND FOOTINGS. O5 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING ELECTRIC METER. COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL. © REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING POWER POLE, GUY WIRES AND FOOTINGS. COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL. l`7 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING LIGHT POLE AND FOOTING/BASE. COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL. z ® REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINES. O COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL. _ Og REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING GAS METER. COORDINATE U WITH GAS COMPANY. 10 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING GAS LINE. COORDINATE n/ WITH GAS COMPANY. 11 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING TREE, STUMP, AND ROOTS (74 TOTAL). z 12 PROTECT "RAW WATER CONDUIT". O U 0. O DEMOLITION NOTES LL 1. Verify all existing utility locations. O 2. It is the responsibility of the Contractor to perform or coordinate all necessary utility demolitions and relocations from existing utility locations z to all onsite amenities and buildings. These connections include, but are not limited to, water, sanitary sewer, cable tv, telephone, gas, electric, site lighting, etc. 0. 3. Prior to beginning work, contact Gopher State Onecall (651-454-0002) to Q locate utilities throughout the area under construction. The Contractor z shall retain the services of a private utility locator to locate the private — utilities. 5 GJ 4. Prior to beginning work, the contractor shall submit a Traffic Control Plan to the City according to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devises W (MUTCD). N 5. Sawcut along edges of pavements, sidewalks, and curbs to remain. 6. All construction shall be performed in accordance with state and local standard specifications for construction. 7. Prior to beginning work, contact St. Paul Regional Water Services: Mike Knutson at 651.775.6192 48 hours in advance. NORTH 0 10 20 40 o 0� r _ LID o LO ai z ,- E - (L.00 o Q OIL OY�L c J N of i 0M a) 0 U J 0p � W N o W -E LO N cy�co J N N O N O �W ZLU DN z w�, ;,- Q L0 LL O J W O CC — UWaw Y G Lu U) > (.0 Q W M W V ) Z W Q 00. U Z 2 W O i� W QUU) J z D V 0 Z O� J z F- O 0 U a I hereby certify that this plan, specifications or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Thomas J. Herkenhoff, P.E. Date: 11.14.22 Lic. No.: 25520 Rev. Date Description Project #: 12226046 Drawn By: KBK Checked By: TJH Issue Date: 11.14.22 Sheet Title: DEMOLITION PLAN Sheet: ------------- #4 » » » » > > w > > > I OE OE OE — OE 3' N v 2' W i J z 0 J _I #80 COUNTY RD. I >> O > > > > > > > > ® > > > — OE SYMBOL LEGEND NEW BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION SEE DETAIL 1/C500 NEW BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LONG LAKE ROAD (MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT) NEW LIGHT -DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT SEE DETAIL 2/C500 a: e A NEW HEAVY-DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT SEE DETAIL 3/C500 NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT ° ° a LONG LAKE ROAD ° (MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT) NOTE: THE CONCRETE JOINTS ARE SHOWN ONLY FOR GENERAL REFERENCE TO SIGNIFY LIGHT -DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT. ACTUAL JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. GENERAL PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE — — RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE KEY NOTES OCONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER WITH CONCRETE APRON, SEE DETAIL 4/C500 O2 B618 CURB AND GUTTER, SEE DETAIL 5/C500 OSURMOUNTABLE CURB AND GUTTER, SEE DETAIL 6/C500 4O NEW BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LONG LAKE ROAD (MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT) O5 NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT LONG LAKE ROAD (MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT) OB624 CURB AND GUTTER (MATCH EXISTING) O7 NEW RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET NORTH 0 10 20 40 z 0 U ND L.L U) z 0 U 0. 0 LL 0 z L.L Q z 2 LU L^.L L.L o — u7 0 u7.4 z E L o Q J N L rn o ' }•-��•�� V/ Mc6 W 00 J N � Co W w JwM3:23: J N N o N >LL1z� Z::)N QLO UW55 �=0 J0 W - UW J Y QW W co �e J W M W U) Z W Q > J 00. U Z2 W 0 w > o`� J D z D V 2i Z �-- OC/) J z F- 0 a� �o CU a I hereby certify that this plan, specifications or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. T omas J. Herkenhoff, P.E. Date: 11.14.22 Lic. No.: 25520 Rev. Date Description Project #: 12226046 Drawn By: KBK Checked By: TJH Issue Date: 11.14.22 Sheet Title: PAVING AND DIMENSION PLAN Sheet: P:\Projects\Projects - 2022\12226046 - Mounds View Residential\C. Design\Drawing Files\12226046 C200.dwg KEY NOTES GRADING NOTES 0 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, 05 INLET PROTECTION, 1. Tree protection consisting of snow fence or safety fence installed at the drip line shall be in place prior to beginning any SEE DETAIL 4/C501 SEE DETAIL 8/C501 grading or demolition work at the site. 0 SILT FENCE, O RAIN GUARDIAN W/ 7'x7' CL 3 RIP 2. All elevations with an asterisk (*) shall be field verified. If elevations vary significantly, notify the Engineer for further SEE DETAIL 5/C501 RAP & TYPE IV GEOTEXTILE instructions. 03 RIP RAP WIER OVERFLOW, SEE DETAIL 1/C502 3. Grades shown in paved areas represent finish elevation. SEE DETAIL 6/C501 0POND/BASIN PROTECTION SILT FENCE, SEE DETAIL 5/C501 4. Restore all disturbed areas with 5" of good quality topsoil and seed. 0 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, SEE DETAIL 7/C501 O8 CURB AND GUTTER PERIMETER 5. All construction shall be performed in accordance with state and local standard specifications for construction. PROTECTION TO BE INSTALLED AFTER CURB AND GUTTER 7. At the completion of the project and prior to turf establishment and seeding, the Contractor shall de -compact the soils in areas INSTALLATION that were disturbed as a result of construction activities. De -compaction shall consist of ripping, cultivating, or scarifying the SILT FENCE, SEE DETAIL 5/C501 top 12" in an attempt to improve the infiltration characteristics of the soils. The Contractor shall use low impact earth moving (BIO LOGS MAY BE USED IN THIS equipment to prevent compaction of the underlying soils, for both temporary and final grading and smoothing of the topsoil AREA AS AN APPROVED EQUAL) prior to seeding. 8. Infiltration areas to be marked off and protected from compaction. Only tracked and low impact equipment allowed in bottom Iof basin. If compaction does occur, soils shall be scarified to a depth of 18". 9. All sidewalks shall be constructed with a cross slope not to exceed 2%. Maximum 2% slope to be maintained through driveway. I9A� 2 909.00 L* - 1 - 5E0gie / 910.48 TC 000 0 00,�0�00°0°po0o y( 908.50 910. G 00000 0 0e-ooD")C' c�°I o 0 9I 0.15 GL °ob° 0 0 0 0 0� d 909.40 C PROPOSED BUILDI G / 8 2A 60 , - �1�1�TE - -, _ _ 000000° °°°°°°°000 Q. 'V 909.84 GL - \ 00000000 0000000 0 01 'o , 910.88 TC o o o o 0 0 0 909.71 C EOF 4 FFE = 911.7 / 910.67 TC 910.55 GL o o o o 0 0 0 0 �o 00000o 0o0°0o 909.25 L 2 GFE = 910.9 --_\ 2.98% / 910.34GL HP o 4 / I 910.02 TC 909.69 GL 609.9 C L 911.20 G 909.61 C >LJ MIN. LOWEST FLOOR = 905.00 //909.6 MIN. LOWEST OPENING = 909.93 10.48 T r 1 20 G 911.17 G PROPOSED BUILDING I 9�L PROPOSED BUILDING 2 SANMH I FFE J911.7 o- 3.54% FFE _ 912.00 RIM=910.0 INV=890.9 7 GFE = 910.9 o QnQ 86 T GFE = 911 20 100-YR HWL = 907.)3 BOT = bb5. X%I �I Ld X o. #14 1 I 1 I II I 909.53 6 /Z- 909.50 GL u a 908.50 G 910.9 G 5 PROPOSED BUILDINGI FFE = 911.7 GFE = 910.9 MIN. LOWEST FLOOR = 905.00 MIN. LOWEST OPENING = 909.93 PROPOSED BUILDING FFE 911.7 GFE = 910.9 7 4.10% i > 908.50 G k 91� Q M u 4.0 PROPOSED BUILDING FFE =912.00 I GFE = 911.20 MIN. LOWEST FLOOR = 907.00 MIN. LOWEST OPENING = 910.71 PROPOSED BUILDING / FFE = 912.00 GFE =911.20 8 - 910:55 TC I GL PROPOSED BUILDING 2.79% FFE = 912.00 - OFE = 911.20 - V 911.20 G/ 910.6 10.3 GL 911.20 G 911.17 G 910.04 G 910.44,GL / / /I I / 910.44 B / I > 909.44 GL LP 910.17 TC CB ' 909.84 GL RIM=910.8 • \ � 910.77 TC #81 INV=907.1 / 910.44 GL 0 1 1 1-/, 12"CIP W11WHIM �■_�um LLI I / � I / v Z� I / \ ll RATION BASIN ,I jl -Yj H = 908.37 XI IXI =907. v v v \\SAN MH I' f�IM=911 > O I \=889 1 � 60" WATERMAIN SYMBOL LEGEND - - - - - - - 950 ------ EXISTING CONTOURS SPOT ABBREVIATIONS: 950 PROPOSED CONTOURS - MAJOR INTERVAL 950.00 TC TC - TOP OF CURB 949 PROPOSED CONTOURS - MINOR INTERVAL 949.50 GL GL - GUTTER LINE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GRADE BREAK LINE B - BITUMINOUS GRADE SLOPE C - CONCRETE G - GROUND SILT FENCE EOF - EMERGENCY OVERFLOW 0000000 RIP -RAP / ROCK CONST. ENTRANCE LP - LOW POINT HP - HIGH POINT EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (*) -EXISTING TO BE VERIFIED INLET PROTECTION EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. Owner and Contractor shall obtain MPCA-NPDES permit. Contractor shall be responsible for all fees pertaining to this permit. The SWPPP Ishall be kept onsite at all times. 2. Install temporary erosion control measures (inlet protection, silt fence, and rock construction entrances) prior to beginning any excavation or Idemolition work at the site. 3. Erosion control measures shown on the erosion control plan are the absolute minimum. The contractor shall install temporary earth dikes, I sediment traps or basins, additional siltation fencing, and/or disk the soil parallel to the contours as deemed necessary to further control erosion. All changes shall be recorded in the SWPPP. 4. All construction site entrances shall be surfaced with crushed rock across the entire width of the entrance and from the entrance to a point 50' I into the construction zone. I5. The toe of the silt fence shall be trenched in a minimum of 6". The trench backfill shall be compacted with a vibratory plate compactor. 6. All grading operations shall be conducted in a manner to minimize the potential for site erosion. Sediment control practices must be Iestablished on all down gradient perimeters before any up gradient land disturbing activities begin. 7 Z 7. All exposed soil areas must be stabilized as soon as possible to limit soil erosion but in no case later than 14 days after the construction I activity in that portion of the site has temporarily or permanently ceased. Temporary stockpiles without significant silt, clay or organic O components (e.g., clean aggregate stockpiles, demolition concrete stockpiles, sand stockpiles) and the constructed base components of roads, parking lots and similar surfaces are exempt from this requirement. I8. U The normal wetted perimeter of any temporary or permanent drainage ditch or swale that drains water from any portion of the construction site, or diverts water around the site, must be stabilized within 200 lineal feet from the property edge, or from the point of discharge into any surface I water. Stabilization of the last 200 lineal feet must be completed within 24 hours after connecting to a surface water. Stabilization of the remaining portions of any temporary or permanent ditches or swales must be complete within 14 days after connecting to a surface water and I9. construction in that portion of the ditch has temporarily or permanently ceased. ^ Pipe outlets must be provided with energy dissipation within 24 hours of connection to surface water. Z 10. All be installed filter fabric Minnesota Department Transportation Standard O I riprap shall with a material or soil separation and comply with the of Specifications. U I 11. All storm sewers discharging into wetlands or water bodies shall outlet at or below the normal water level of the respective wetland or water body at an elevation where the downstream slope is 1 percent or flatter. The normal water level shall be the invert elevation of the outlet of the O wetland or water body. I12. LL All storm sewer catch basins not needed for site drainage during construction shall be covered to prevent runoff from entering the storm sewer Catch basins for drainage during be inlet system. necessary site construction shall provided with protection. 1 O 13. In areas where concentrated flows occur (such as swales and areas in front of storm catch basins and intakes) the erosion control facilities Z shall be backed by stabilization structure to protect those facilities from the concentrated flows. I14. Inspect the construction site once every seven days during active construction and within 24 hours after a rainfall event greater than 0.5 inches in 24 hours. All inspections shall be recorded in the SWPPP. I15. All silt fences must be repaired, replaced, or supplemented when they become nonfunctional or the sediment reaches 1/3 of the height of the Z fence. These repairs must be made within 24 hours of discovery, or as soon as field conditions allow access. All repairs shall be recorded in Ithe SWPPP. C- G 16. If sediment escapes the construction site, off -site accumulations of sediment must be removed in a manner and at a frequency sufficient to - Iminimize off -site impacts. J Wn/ 17. All soils tracked onto pavement shall be removed daily. L^L I18. All infiltration areas must be inspected to ensure that no sediment from ongoing construction activity is reaching the infiltration area and these areas are protected from compaction due to construction equipment driving across the infiltration area. I19. Temporary soil stockpiles must have silt fence or other effective sediment controls, and cannot be placed in surface waters, including stormwater conveyances such as curb and gutter systems, or conduits and ditches unless there is a bypass in place for the stormwater. 20. Collected sediment, asphalt and concrete millings, floating debris, paper, plastic, fabric, construction and demolition debris and other wastes must be disposed of properly and must comply with MPCA disposal requirements. CB I 21. Oil, gasoline, paint and any hazardous substances must be properly stored, including secondary containment, to prevent spills, leaks or other RIM=911 8 discharge. Restricted access to storage areas must be provided to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal of hazardous waste must be in 1 1 -- I I I - I INV=906.6 compliance with MPCA regulations. c [W 1 60" WATERMAIN a #80 #6 � #4 - > 1>>RCP >> 22. External washing of trucks and other construction vehicles must be limited to a defined area of the site. Runoff must be contained and waste - - - - - #82 ? - - �12- o properly disposed of. No engine degreasing is allowed onsite. #8 - / 5 - - 23 All li uid and solid wastes enerated b concrete washout o orations must be contained in a leak- roof containment facilit or im ermeable W 0 i /60" WATERMAIN \ W - \ > > OE 15"RCP OE OE OE > > OE - N COUTY RD. -> U >- SAN MH RIM=911.8 INV=887.7 (SLUDGE) - - - liner. A compacted clay liner that does not allow washout liquids to enter ground water is considered an impermeable liner. The liquid and solid wastes must not contact the ground, and there must not be runoff from the concrete washout operations or areas. Liquid and solid J 60" WATERMAIN 1 wastes must be disposed of properly and in compliance with MPCA regulations. A sign must be installed adjacent to each washout facility to 1 I inform concrete equipment operators to utilize the proper facilities. �1x STS MH IIV=912.6 24. Upon completion of the project and stabilization of all graded areas, all temporary erosion control facilities (silt fences, hay bales, etc.) shall be >> removed from the site. _ - 25. All permanent sedimentation basins must be restored to their design condition immediately following >> stabilization of the site. > > \ � � > - > © SAN tv1H > > '81zZ - RIM=912.3 26. Contractor shall submit Notice of Termination for MPCA-NPDES permit within 30 days after INV=889.3 N I I - Final Stabilization. OE OE OE \ 0 -OE OE ut >> I � / Y NORTH 0 10 20 40 tiCD O CNI i LO 0 L0 Z E � o Q O•i o��L J C) 04 L -0a�U w W _ N _E 0 C'M > CEO o N N o N 0 �Wwo ZLU DN > Q � Un LL Z O J W O 2 - UWaw J Y W U/ > (0 J W M v Z W Q J 00. c) Z Z2 Wo i� w > QUU) J Z D V 02 Z O W J Z O �o CU o_ I hereby certify that this plan, specifications or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Thomas J. Herkenhoff, P.E. Date: 11.14.22 Lic. No.: 25520 Rev. Date Description Project #: 12226046 Drawn By: KBK Checked By: TJH Issue Date: 11.14.22 Sheet Title: GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN Sheet: P:\Projects\Projects - 2022\12226046 - Mounds View Residential\C. Design\Drawing Files\12226046 C300.dwg EXISTING BUILDING / I I J 0 I GM 0 I I I I I I I I I PROPOSED BUILDING o--I MI-12 X SS INV=898.90 TC=909.88 2 O WM TP=901.69 INV=898.50 1 " PE WATER SERVIC w I w W/ TRACER WIRE CORPORATION - " CURB STOP & BOX (TYP 8 PLACES) PROPOSED BUILDING-1 PROPOSED BUILDING C.-1 Q SS INV=898.73 - WM TP=901.67 > z 4" PVC SAN SEW Ld _ SERVICE W/ RISER O 4x8 WYE W (TYP 8 PLACES) PROPOSED BUILDING -� o v co X I X LIJ 0' X I . I X o. #14 I - u- J CV � � I PROPOSED BUILDING 00 > LL J 0o v I I -E) 13 1 PROPOSED BUILDING _ I > , k- I MH 2 TC=910.26 N INV=897.7302 E INV=897.63 II > > > 141 LF 8" PVC @ 0.52% CB RIM=910.8HYDRANT - 6" GV & BOX O #81 INV=907.1 8x6 REDUCER- 60" WATERMAINI 10 LF 6" C900 33 LF 12" HDPE @ 2.7%- 0 #80 #6 HYDRANT LEAD W/ TRACER WIRE #82 #$ CORE DRILL INTO MB EXISTING CB INV = 907.1* 60" WATERMAIN I 15"RCP > > > 12"CIP I �- OE -r->>- IJ COUNTY RD. > ® >- SAN MH RIM=911.8 INV=887.7 /-FES INV = 908.00- > 11 om CONNECT TO EXIST 8" DIP WATERMAIN WET TAP 8" GATE VALVE & BOX M v SAN MH Q RIM=910.0 INV=890.9 O W i Q J Z O J > M v WA I I CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MH O EXIST INV = 889.80 3 W INV = 896.89 7.09 INSIDE DROP MH SAN MH RIM=911. I INV=889. .' WATERMAIN I CB RIM=911.8 INV=906.6 CP v >> U �v co I I 60" WATERMAIN SAN MH RIM=912.3 INV=889.3 N INV=? E-N/ OE STS MH RIM=912.6 INV=905.55 SYMBOL LEGEND O STORM MANHOLE O CATCH BASIN CURB INLET ® FLARED END O SANITARY MANHOLE Et HYDRANT H GATE VALVE & BOX ® WATER SHUTOFF LIGHT POLE CTV CABLE UNDERGROUND LINE OE of ELECTRIC OVERHEAD LINE UE LIE ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND LINE FO FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND LINE - GAS GAS GAS- NATURAL GAS UNDERGROUND LINE > > > SANITARY SEWER PIPE » » STORM SEWER PIPE T T T TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND LINE WATERMAIN PIPE » DT DRAINTILE PIPE UTILITY NOTES 1. It is the responsibility of the contractor to perform or coordinate all necessary utility connections and relocations from existing utility locations to the proposed building, as well as to all onsite amenities. These connections include but are not limited to water, sanitary sewer, cable TV, telephone, gas, electric, site lighting, etc. 2. All service connections shall be performed in accordance with state and local standard specifications for construction. Utility connections (sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer) may require a permit from the City. 3. The contractor shall verify the elevations at proposed connections to existing utilities prior to any demolition or excavation. 4. The contractor shall notify all appropriate engineering departments and utility companies 72 hours prior to construction. All necessary precautions shall be made to avoid damage to existing utilities. 7 z 5. Storm sewer requires testing in accordance with Minnesota plumbing code 4714.1109 where located within 10 feet of waterlines or the building. O 6. HDPE storm sewer piping shall meet ASTM F2306 and fittings shall meet ASTM D3212 joint pressure test. Installation shall meet ASTM C2321. U 7. All RCP pipe shown on the plans shall be MN/DOT class 3. N� L.L 8. Maintain a minimum of 7'/z' of cover over all water lines and sanitary sewer lines. Where 7'/z of cover is not provided, install 2" rigid polystyrene insulation (MN/DOT 3760) with a thermal �^ v ) resistance of at least 5 and a compressive strength of at least 25 psi. Insulation shall be 8' wide, centered over pipe with 6" sand cushion between pipe and insulation. Where depth is less than 5', z use 4" of insulation. O 9. Install water lines 18" above sewers. Where the sewer is less than 18" below the water line (or U above), install sewer piping of materials approved for inside building use for 10 feet on each side of the crossing. O 10. See Project Specifications for bedding requirements. LL 11. Pressure test and disinfect all new watermains in accordance with state and local requirements. 12. Sanitary sewer piping shall be PVC, SDR-35 for depths less than 12', PVC SDR-26 for depths O between 12' and 26', and class 52 D.I.P. for depths of 26' or more. z 13. A structure adjustment shall include removing and salvaging the existing casting assembly, ` removing existing concrete rings to the precast section. Install new rings and salvaged casting to r proposed grades, cleaning casting flange by mechanical means to insure a sound surface and install an external chimney seal from casting to precast section. Chimney seals shall be Infi-Shield Uni-Band or an approved equal. z G J NW L^^.L L.� KEY NOTES OSANITARY SEWER SERVICE, _ - SEE DETAIL 7/C500 O2 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE, SEE DETAIL 8/C500 V O CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE WITH INSIDE DROP, SEE DETAIL 9/C500 OHYDRANT AND GATE VALVE, SEE DETAIL 1/C501 OWATERMAIN SERVICE, SEE DETAIL 3/C501 NORTH 0 10 20 40 • o oC N r u7 oo u7 4 �, z LO 0 L (D o Q o4 C IY NL J C Lm i-°T°?° •- aim Mm� L- w Nam- N o W >� M ( L ICU > J LF) N N O N O ZLU W .:)N w� LO LL0JO W 2 - UWaw J Y LU J W M rm V Z W Q J 00. U Z2 W 0 w QUU) J 0 D V 2i Z 0(/) J z O �o U a I hereby certify that this plan, specifications or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Thomas J. Herkenhoff, P.E. Date: 11.14.22 Lic. No.: 25520 Rev. Date Description Project #: 12226046 Drawn By: KBK Checked By: TJH Issue Date: 11.14.22 Sheet Title: UTILITY PLAN Sheet: P:\Projects\Projects - 2022\12226046 - Mounds View Residential\C. Design\Drawing Files\12226046 C400.dwg M. I ,�..���.��.�.�.>.,-.�,�. �w,�-�..�.,�.aw,«�,�,»�,..n.,�«,.,�p,�. .,�.�:��:� �,-���.M .o- .�.:,� 7. �.��-..�»„ z... �...,��.�„�.,,.� .,��. � �._, x..� � , <,�.��.� �r e�srsc�s�s+�u�.ra�cr.;,�r�a�:�ee�:_ r ��s`'� "� 1 AWN MEN IA I I WN 0 11 MW71 MWA m IWO w I I I m I ..N _, _:. . , , _•m;: x . waJ. as .._.+e-,. a u..;a� ,. .K..i_ ,r n�. „, , ,.. . .,? ...�_ r, E....n„ sk,-fi . ,. _- a .�. as:.,N,^fi .,. �',l'd'w. .< . ,Sh¢�Jx ab ra.n ss, a."Y 4.?�..»xkY-rsA� �. ,,as`,,,�a.„F'�5.�;{a�'.o-. ueA'v,#i��s3a'�e ^�+:5.#;S..t.�1.... ,r e,�„r . °r t 7 xw. MOM .,<JV ,v a .M $ . 0 0 11 m wr r o t +�w ► „� � � . , , Item No: Meeting Date: Type of Business Planning Case City of Mounds 111ew Staff R, To: Planning Commission From: Jon Sevald, Community Development Director Item Title/Subject: Review of Bylaws 06B Jan 18, 2023 Other N/A Introduction: The Planning & Zoning Commission Bylaws establish the rules for the Planning Commission. Section II(B) requires that the Bylaws be reviewed annually at the Commission's first meeting in February. Discussion: The Bylaws were last amended on February 5, 2020. Staff is not proposing any changes. Analysis: N/A Strategic Plan Strategy/Goal: Increase community engagement while being sensitive to the changing demographics and their needs, and inclusive to all socioeconomic situations. Financial Impact: N/A Recommendation: The Planning Commission is requested to review the Bylaws. If changes are needed, Staff will prepare a report and resolution for a future Commission meeting. Respectfully, C�,in Jon Sevald, AICP Community Development Director The Mounds View Vision A Thriving Desirable Community CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BYLAWS (Revised February 5, 2020) AUTHORITY: The Bylaws of the Mounds View Planning and Zoning Commission (Bylaws) are established in accordance with the Mounds View Municipal Code Section 401.06. Subd. 7 "The Commission shall adopt bylaws for its governance and for the transaction of its business." Where there is a conflict between the provisions of the Bylaws and the provisions of the City Charter and the Municipal Code, the provisions of the City Charter and the Municipal Code shall govern. (For purposes of simplicity, the Planning and Zoning Commission may hereinafter be referred to as the Planning Commission or the Commission.) ADOPTION OF BYLAWS; REVIEW AND AMENDMENT: A. ADOPTION AND AMENDMENT: The Bylaws shall be adopted by Resolution by an affirmative vote of the majority of members of the Planning and Zoning Commission appointed as voting members, and shall be placed on file with the City Administrator and the Community Development Department. A copy of the bylaws shall be forwarded to the City Council for its information. Any amendments to the Bylaws shall be adopted by Resolution in the same manner as the original Bylaws. B. ANNUAL REVIEW: The Bylaws shall be reviewed on an annual basis at the first regular meeting of the Commission in February. III MEMBERSHIP AND VACANCIES. Vacancies on the Planning Commission shall be filled in accordance with the Municipal Code, Sections 401.02 and 401.03. IV. OFFICERS A. OFFICERS NAMED: The officers of the Planning Commission shall consist of a chairperson and vice -chairperson. The Commission may create and fill such other offices from its members, as it may determine, to transact Commission business. In addition, the City Administrator, or his or her designee, shall act as the recording secretary for the Commission for purpose of preparing meeting minutes. B. ELECTIONS, TERMS Chairperson: At the first meeting in January, the Commission shall conduct an election in order to make its recommendation for the chairperson, following the procedure in Section IV.B.3. The name of the person recommended for chairperson shall be forwarded to the City Council for action at its next meeting in January. Based upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission, the Mayor, with the approval of the City Council, shall appoint the chairperson of the Commission each year. 2. Vice -Chairperson: The Planning Commission shall elect a vice -chairperson each year at its first meeting in January, following the procedure in Section IV. B.3. 3. Election Procedure: For each office, the chairperson shall invite nominations from Planning Commission members. After nominations have been received, the chairperson shall entertain a motion to close nominations. If such motion is made and passed, and more than one nomination has been made, the chairperson shall distribute ballots to the Commission members and each member shall write his or her selection on the ballot. The recording secretary shall tally the ballots and announce the nominee receiving the most votes. In the event of a tie, the recording secretary shall announce the nominees tied in the voting and balloting shall be repeated until an election occurs. If only one nomination has been received, the chairperson may conduct the voting by voice vote. If a majority of the members present vote in the affirmative for the nominee, the nominee shall be elected. 4. Assumption of Duties: The Chairperson and Vice Chairperson shall assume office at the first meeting in February of each year. 5. Term of Office: The chairperson and vice chairperson shall serve one year terms, and may be re-elected to additional terms in accordance with this Section IV.B. C. DUTIES OF OFFICERS: The chairperson shall preside over the meetings of the Planning Commission, and shall have the authority to add or cancel regular meetings and to call special meetings as provided in Section VI. The Chair shall have the authority to redirect public comment unrelated to the Commission's business to the most appropriate City commission or to the City Council. The vice chairperson shall assume the duties of the chairperson, in the absence of the chairperson. In the event of the absence of both the chairperson and vice -chairperson, those members present shall elect a temporary chairperson to preside over the meeting. V. COUNCIL LIAISON: The City Council may appoint from among its members a Liaison to the Commission on an annual basis. It is expected that the Council Liaison will attend the Commission meetings on a regular basis. In the event of the absence of the Council Liaison at a Commission meeting, a Commission member may be appointed by the chairperson to represent the Planning Commission at the next regular City Council meeting or at the meeting where the City Council will be considering the planning cases acted upon by the Planning Commission in the absence of the Council Liaison. VI. MEETINGS A. TYPES OF MEETINGS; SCHEDULE: The annual meeting schedule of the Commission shall be adopted by Resolution at the first regular meeting in December for the following year. Regular Meetings: Subject to the adopted meeting schedule, the Commission's regular meetings will occur on the first and third Wednesdays of each month for the purpose of convening public hearings, making recommendations to the City Council, conducting business which requires a vote of the Commission, convening as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, conducting long-range planning functions and other official business. 2. Special Meetings: From time to time, special meetings may be called in order to process significant caseloads, to review works in progress such as comprehensive plan updates or municipal code revisions, or to undertake a retreat or strategic planning session, either amongst itself or in the company of the City Council or other commissions. Special meetings can be proposed by any Commission member or at the request of the City Administrator, or designated staff liaison, yet must be approved by a majority vote of the Commission. 3. Emergency Special Meetings. Emergency special meetings can be called via written notice to the City Administrator, or designated staff liaison, by the Chairperson or two Commission members, or by the City Administrator, or designated staff liaison. (Emergency special meetings are those in which the subject matter is of such an immediate concern that it cannot be delayed until the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission.) The City Administrator, or designated staff liaison, shall post and mail a notice of any special meeting in accordance with State Statutes. Planning Commission members shall be notified by telephone and in writing, if possible, at least seven days prior to a special meeting. 4. Cancellation of Meetings: Regular or special meetings may be canceled by the chairperson or City Administrator, or designated staff liaison, in the event that there are no items of business requiring the attention of the Commission, or for lack of a quorum, or in response to inclement weather or for any other good and sufficient reason. Members of the Commission shall be notified by telephone and/or other means of communications, of any meeting cancellation. A notice of the meeting cancellation shall be posted as required by State Statutes. B. QUORUM: A majority of the number of voting members appointed to the Commission shall constitute a quorum. C. CONDUCT OF MEETINGS; ADJOURNMENT Meeting Chairperson: If neither the chairperson nor the vice chairperson is present to conduct a meeting of the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission may elect a meeting chair from among those members present prior to the commencement of business. The election shall follow the procedures set forth in Section IV.B.3, except that the Community Development Director, or his or her designee, shall conduct the election. 2. Open Meeting Law: Meetings shall be conducted in accordance with the State of Minnesota Open Meeting Law (Minn. Statutes 471.705). 3. Adjournment: Meetings shall adjourn at or before 11:00 p.m. unless a two- thirds majority of the members present agree to extend the time of adjournment. If there is no objection, the Chairperson may declare the meeting adjourned without the necessity of a motion or vote by the Commission. D. MINUTES: Minutes shall be recorded for regular meetings and each commission member shall receive a copy of the unapproved minutes for review and approval at a succeeding meeting. Minutes shall be approved by motion. Approved minutes shall be the official record of the business conducted and actions taken by the Planning Commission. Commission members may request copies of approved minutes after they have been corrected, if necessary, and signed as approved. Copies of the approved minutes shall be filed with the Community Development Department. Unapproved minutes shall be clearly marked "DRAFT"; approved minutes shall be marked "APPROVED". A policy statement regarding the content and format of the minutes shall be on file with the Community Development Department which may be reviewed from time to time as needed. VII. INFORMATIONAL PACKETS: Each Commissioner shall receive a staff report, plans and additional information, as appropriate, for each item placed on the agenda for any regular or special meeting. The Commission packet should be delivered at least four days prior to the meeting. Each Commissioner is responsible for reviewing the material within the packet prior to the meeting. VII I. PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANTS: Advice from, consultation with, and/or requests for review by the City Attorney, City Engineer, City Planning Agency, or other paid consultants shall be in accordance with the Municipal Code, Section 401.07. IX. SUPPLEMENTARY PUBLICATIONS: All Commission members shall receive a copy of the Mounds View Municipal Code and a copy of the Municipal Comprehensive Plan as well as other materials provided by the City Council or City Staff. These materials shall be retained by each commission member and returned to the City Administrator, or designated staff liaison upon the member's resignation or termination of appointment. X. CONDUCT OF MEMBERS A. ATTENDANCE: Commission members shall advise the designated Staff member or the Commission chairperson of an anticipated absence from any regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting. Any member absent from three consecutive regularly scheduled meetings or more than six regularly scheduled meetings per year without the consent of the Commission shall be deemed to have vacated the office, and such vacancy shall be filled by the City Council pursuant to Section 401.03, Subd. 1. A leave of absence may be granted by the consent of the Commission. B. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. - General Standard: No Commissioner shall be appointed with private or personal interests likely to conflict with the general public interest. If any person appointed to the Commission shall find that their private or personal interests are involved in any matter coming before the Commission, they shall disqualify themselves from taking part in any discussion or action on the matter- alternatively, they may be disqualified by a two-thirds (2/3) majority vote of the Commissioners in attendance. 2. Conflict Due to Economic Interests: A Commissioner has a conflict of interest if, in his or her discharge of official duties, would be required to take an action or make a decision that would substantially affect the Commissioner's financial interests or those of an associated business, unless the effect on the Commissioner is no greater than on other members of the Commissioner's business classification, profession, or occupation. In the event a conflict of interest exists with respect to a particular matter before the Commission, the Commissioner shall disqualify himself or herself from taking part in any discussion or action on the matter. C- EX PARTE CONTACTS: Ex parte contacts are contacts between individuals seeking to influence the decisions of the Planning Commission and individual Commission members outside the meeting forum. Such contacts may include communications with project applicants, supporters and opponents. When the Planning Commission is involved in a matter which is to be heard and decided by the Commission (e.g. variances), Planning Commissioners shall indicate to the person contacting them that such communication and all testimony needs to be offered at the hearing to ensure a fair hearing for all parties. The intent is for Planning Commissioners to make their decisions based on the same information provided to all Planning Commissioners. Planning Commissioners should avoid expressing any opinion as to the merits of the case outside of Commission meetings. When ex parte contacts occur, the Planning Commissioner is responsible for notifying appropriate City staff and for conveying the substance of any ex parte communication to other Commission members at the next commission meeting at which the matter discussed is under consideration.. Gary' Steveiison, Chairperson ATTEST: N e i , ity Administrator Revision History: February 5, 2020 April 5, 2017 March 16, 2016 January 24, 2007 September 1, 2004 February 21, 2001 February 2, 2000 March 5, 1997 February 3, 1993 October 1990 DRAFT PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting November 2, 2022 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Mounds View Boulevard, Mounds View, MN 55112 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair Rundle at 6:30 p.m. for November 2, 2022. 2. Roll Call Members Present: Commissioners Curtis, Farmer, Munson, Nelson, Rundle, and Stevenson. Absent and Excused: Commissioner French. Also Present: Community Development Director Jon Sevald, City Administrator Nyle Zikmund, and Council Member Gary Meehlhause. Index to Minutes Page Resolution 1152-22, Approval of a Preliminary Plat and Final Plat 2 Of "Stellmaker Addition" Resolution 1153-22, Approval of a Conditional Use Permit for 2 Abiding Savior at 8211 Red Oak Drive Resolution 1154-22, Recommending Approval of Amending the 3 Zoning Map for 2310 Mounds View Boulevard; Preliminary Plat of Woodale Apartments; Planned Unit Development; and Development Review Resolution 1155-22, Appointments to the 2023 Planning Commission 6 Approval of Minutes 6 Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting 3. Special Order of Business None. November 2, 2022 Page 2 4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda None. 5. Planning Cases A. Resolution 1152-22, Recommending Approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat of "Stellmaker Addition" Community Development Director Sevald stated the applicants, Tanya and Ryan Stellmaker, live at 7280 Hidden Hollow Court, which backs up to 3024 County Road H2. The Stellmaker's purchased the home on County Road H2 with the intention of adjusting the property line to make their home's backyard larger. No new lots will be created. Staff commented further on the request and recommended the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat for the "Stellmaker Addition" as requested. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Stevenson/Commissioner Nelson. To approve Resolution 1152-22, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a Preliminary and Final Plat of "Stellmaker Addition" at 7280 Hidden Hollow Court. Ayes — 6 Nays — 0 Motion carried. B. Resolution 1153-22, Recommending Approval of a Conditional Use Permit for Abiding Savior at 8211 Red Oak Drive Community Development Director Sevald stated Abiding Savior, 8211 Red Oak Drive, has two ground signs, one on the northwest corner, and the other along Red Oak Drive. The second sign is proposed to be replaced. Multiple grounds signs are permitted on lots abutting multiple streets, although the cumulative sign area is limited to the combined allowable size (e.g. 100 sq ft divide between two ground signs). Dynamic Signs cannot flash, blink, or resemble traffic signs or create a traffic hazard. The sign must include an ambient light monitor able to adjust the brightness between daytime and nighttime. The sign shall display its message for a minimum of eight seconds. The sign shall only advertise information and activities that are located on the premises (e.g. cannot advertise community events not held on the property). Staff commented further on the request and recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit as requested. Commissioner Stevenson asked how this request differed from Messiah Lutheran Church request. Community Development Director Sevald explained Abiding Savior was requesting a Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting November 2, 2022 Page 3 larger sign and commented further on how sign technology has changed over the past several years. Chair Rundle stated he anticipated all churches and local businesses would be going to these signs. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Farmer/Commissioner Munson. To approve Resolution 1153-22, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a Ground Sign with a Dynamic Display at 8211 Red Oak Drive. Ayes — 6 Nays — 0 Motion carried. C. Resolution 1154-22, Recommending Approval of Amending the Zoning Map for 2310 Mounds View Boulevard; Preliminary Plat of Woodale Apartments; Planned Unit Development; and Development Review. Community Development Director Sevald stated Reuter Walton (developer) is proposing "Woodale Apartments", a 140-unit apartment building to be located at 2310 Mounds View Boulevard, east of Bel Rae Senior Living. The property is currently vacant. The project requires approvals for a Zoning Map Amendment; Preliminary/Final Plat; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Planned Unit Development (PUD); and Development Review. The City Council reviewed a concept plan at its August 1, 2022 Work Session, providing a consensus to the developer to proceed with an application. The project includes a "ghost plat" to include a Phase II 130-unit apartment east of Phase I. Phase II would require the acquisition of three homes to the east, none of which are for sale. The intent of the ghost plat is to demonstrate how a Phase II would be compatible with Phase I. There is no timetable as to when (if ever) Phase II will be developed. The proposed deviations for the PUD were further discussed with the Commission. Staff commented further on the proposed request and recommended the Planning Commission approve a Recommendation to Amend the Zoning Map; Preliminary Plat of Woodale Apartments; Planned Unit Development; and Development Review, conditioned upon being revised prior to the City Council's consideration. Jared Ackmann, Reuter Walton Development, discussed the proposed plans in further detail with the Commission. He reviewed other developments Reuter Walton had completed in the metro area. He stated he has had discussions with the City for the last year. He noted he was proposing a 140 unit apartment complex on the three acre site. He commented on how the units would be broken down for the proposed workforce housing. He indicated the site would have approximately 200 parking stalls and he would not be charging for parking. He discussed the outdoor amenities (tot lot and dog park) that would be included within the development. In addition, the property would have a community room, fitness area, bike racks and onsite office. He stated he appreciated how close this site was to the park and ride on County Road H and was also close to the Metro Transit Route #25 bus line. He finished his presentation by reviewing elevations of different Reuter Walton projects. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting November 2, 2022 Page 4 Commissioner Stevenson asked if the underground parking stalls would be assigned. Mr. Ackmann stated his developments have assigned stalls at some complexes and at others, they have not been assigned. Collin Kaas, Kaas Wilson Architects, commented further on how vehicles would circulate through the underground parking lot. Chair Rundle encouraged Reuter Walton to assign the parking stalls. Commissioner Nelson questioned where residents would park if there was not room in the underground parking lot. Community Development Director Sevald explained the City requires all projects to have adequate parking onsite. Mr. Kaas stated 35 to 40 additional parking stalls could be added on the corner lot as an interim solution, if parking concerns were to arise. Commissioner Nelson inquired if these units would be low income. Mr. Ackmann reported all units would be at 60% AMI or less. He explained he submitted a grant with Ramsey County to have 14 units at 30% AMI. Commissioner Nelson asked how long this project would take to construct. Mr. Ackmann commented on the proposed building timeline and anticipated the apartment complex would take 15 months to build noting the building would be ready to open in December of 2024. Further discussion ensued regarding the number of affordable housing units Mounds View was encouraged to construct per the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Nelson questioned if it was the developers long term goal to acquire the corner properties. Mr. Ackmann stated this was the case. Commissioner Stevenson discussed the history of this property noting the rezoning of this site was a long time coming. Commissioner Curtis recommended the plans continue to evolve to include a patio, tot lot, and dog area. Community Development Director Sevald commented further on the proposed landscaping plan and retaining wall location. Mr. Ackmann indicated he would be working on the landscaping plan further, prior to the City Council meeting. Mr. Kaas explained the units along the rear of the building would not have balconies and indicated this was done to protect the privacy of the adjacent homeowners. Commissioner Farmer supported the developer providing sidewalks that go all the way out to Mounds View Boulevard. Community Development Director Sevald reported it was staff s recommendation to have a sidewalk installed from Woodale Drive to Mounds View Boulevard. Mr. Ackmann explained he was looking into the options that would maximize access for future tenants. Commissioner Nelson indicated he was mostly supportive of the project, but he felt it was being rushed. While he understood the reasons for the project moving forward in a hurry in order to Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting November 2, 2022 Page 5 meet the grant timelines, he was concerned with the fact the developer was before the Commission requesting four things at one meeting. Chair Rundle inquired if the fire department had reviewed the plans. Community Development Director Sevald indicated the fire department had reviewed the plans and was looking into turning radius concerns they have, noting the layout of the parking lot could change. Commissioner Nelson questioned what the color scheme would be for the proposed building. Mr. Ackmann reviewed the building colors and materials. Commissioner Curtis stated his only concern with the project at this time was traffic and how traffic would flow in and out of the site. Commissioner Nelson asked what the park dedication fee would be for this project. Community Development Director Sevald discussed the park dedication fee that would be paid by the developer. Commissioner Curtis inquired who would manage this property. Mr. Ackmann stated this was yet to be determined, but noted it would be a local, experienced management company based out of the Twin Cities. Commissioner Farmer recommended staff address the lighting plan to ensure the apartment complex lighting does not bleed onto the neighboring properties. Community Development Director Sevald reported the City had standards in place that would address this concern. Commissioner Stevenson suggested the City Arborist review these plans prior to receiving Council approval. Commissioner Nelson requested the applicant provide the City with further information regarding the sites snow removal plan. Commissioner Stevenson questioned if a traffic study should be required. Community Development Director Sevald noted a traffic study could be completed after the project was approved. He suggested a traffic engineer be present when the Council reviews and considers this request. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Curtis/Commissioner Nelson. To approve Resolution 1154-22, a Resolution Recommending Approval of Amending the Zoning Map for 2310 Mounds View Boulevard; Preliminary Plat of Woodale Apartments; Planned Unit Development; and Development Review, directing staff and the applicant to provide further information regarding landscaping, proof of parking, snow removal, traffic and exterior lighting. Ayes — 6 Nays — 0 Motion carried. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting 6. Other Planning Activity November 2, 2022 Page 6 A. Resolution 1155-22, Recommending Appointments to the 2023 Planning Commission Community Development Director Sevald stated the Planning and Zoning Commission consists of seven Mounds View residents, appointed by the City Council to three-year terms, based upon the recommendation of the Commission. Terms expiring on December 31, 2022, include; Gary Rundle. The City advertised openings via the city website (deadline: October 20, 2022), receiving one application for the Planning Commission: Gary Rundle, 7445 Spring Lake Road Community Development Director Sevald recommended the Planning Commission approve the appointments. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Stevenson/Commissioner Munson. To approve Resolution 1155-22, a Resolution Recommending Gary Rundle be appointed to the Planning and Zoning Commission, for the term 2023-2025. Ayes — 6 Nays — 0 Motion carried. 7. Approval of Minutes September 7, 2022. Commissioner Farmer requested a correction to the minutes under Item 5A. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Curtis/Commissioner Farmer. To approve the Minutes of the September 7, 2022 regular Planning Commission meetings as amended. Ayes — 6 Nays — 0 Motion carried. 8. Reports A. Upcoming Planning Cases & Activity Community Development Director Sevald stated he had no upcoming planning cases. B. Staff Updates Community Development Director Sevald provided the Commission with an update from staff. He explained the Simon's property was on hold at this time. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting C. Council Updates November 2, 2022 Page 7 Council Member Meehlhause provided the Planning Commission with an update from the City Council. He stated the Council has been working on the 2023 budget and tax levy. He estimated the final tax levy would be around 5.5%. He commented on the benefits of having a home energy audit. He reported the Council was considering an expansion to the Community Center. City Administrator Zikmund explained staff was meeting bi-weekly with the architect working on the plans for the Community Center expansion. He reported the architect would have plans ready for the Council to review in February of 2023. He stated the City would be completing a community survey that was focused on parks and recreation, along with the proposed Community Center expansion. He anticipated the City would have to bond for this project at some point in the future. He commented on why the precautionary boil alert was in place, noting a variable frequency fan failed. He discussed how the City was responding to the notification/alert concerns. He noted the City would be issuing a report to the public once all of the facts were compiled. D. Planning Commissioner Reports Chair Rundle encouraged all residents to vote in the General Election on Tuesday, November 8. 9. Next Planning Commission Meeting: A. Wednesday, November 16, 2022 B. Wednesday, December 7, 2022 10. Adjournment There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Chair Rundle adjourned the meeting at 8:34 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jon Sevald Community Development Director Transcribed by: Heidi Guenther Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minute Maker Secretarial November 2, 2022 Page 8 PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting December 7, 2022 Moe's American Grill 2400 Mounds View Boulevard, Mounds View, MN 55112 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair Rundle at 6:39 p.m. for December 7, 2022. 2. Roll Call Members Present: Commissioners Curtis, Farmer, Munson, Nelson, and Rundle. Absent and Excused: Commissioner French, and Stevenson. Also Present: Community Development Director Jon Sevald, and Council Member Gary Meehlhause. Index to Minutes Page Resolution 1156-22, Adopting the 2023 Regular Meeting Schedule for The Mounds View Planning and Zoning Commission Recommend to the City Council that Gary Rundle be appointed as Chair of the Planning and Zoning Commission for 2023, and appoint Dennis Farmer as Vice -Chair for 2023. 2 3. Special Order of Business A. Resolution 1156-22, Adopting the 2023 Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting schedule. The Planning and Zoning Commission's Bylaws require that the Commission conduct meetings on the first and third Wednesdays of the month. The Bylaws also require the Commission to adopt a meeting schedule at its December meeting. Community Development Director Sevald stated that the only choice the Commissioners have is to move a date if a meeting falls on a Holiday, and meeting start time, which is currently 6:30 pm. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Nelson/Commissioner Curtis. To Approve Resolution 1156-22, Adopting the 2023 Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting schedule, and keep the 6:30 p.m. start time. Roll Call Vote: Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting Aye Nay Commissioner X Curtis X Farmer French X Munson X Nelson X Rundle Stevenson December 7, 2022 Page 2 Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. 4. Citizens Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda None. 5. Next Planning Commission Meeting: B. Wednesday, ianuar-y 4, 2023 Commissioner Nelson suggested that if the Chair/Vice-Chair was the only item on the January 4th Agenda, that the Commission vote on that now, and cancel the January 4th meeting. MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Nelson/Commissioner Curtis. Recommendation to the City Council that Gary Rundle be appointed as Chair of the Planning and Zoning Commission for 2023, and appoint Dennis Farmer as Vice -Chair for 2023. Roll Call Vote: Aye Nay Commissioner X Curtis X Farmer French X Munson X Nelson X Rundle Stevenson Ayes — 5 6. Adjournment Nays — 0 Motion carried. There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Chair Rundle adjourned the meeting at 6:45 p.m. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting Respectfully submitted, Jon Sevald Community Development Director December 7, 2022 Page 3