HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-25-2024 PRF Packet PARKS AND RECREATION AND FORESTRY COMMISSION
6:30 P.M. I APRIL 25 ,2024 I MOUNDS VIEW CITY HALL
MEETING AGENDA MOUNDtifIEW
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL: Commissioners: Anderson, Arel, Lillemo, Lundberg, Palm, Mills, Wake Wiesner
Staff: *Peterson I Thomas I Szurek *to be absent
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
March 28, 2024
5. PUBLIC INPUT
Citizens may speak to issues not on tonight's agenda. Before speaking, please give your full
name and address. Please limit your comments to three minutes.
6. STAFF REPORTS
A. Parks and Recreation -Andy
B. Public Works — Pete
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Ball Field Improvements — Shed location Concrete Slab
B. Greenfield Park— Pitching Mound — Update on Agreement
8. NEW BUSINESS
A. Ardan Park Storm Water Pond Update — Stantec
B. Literacy Trail — Partnership with Ramsey County Library
C. Joint City Council / Park, Recreation/Forestry Commission Meeting, June 3, 2024, City
Council Work Session —Topics to Cover
D. Park Tour— Select Park (s) for May Commission Meeting, to include tour of Public Works
Facility.
9. COMMISSIONER REPORTS
10. REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS / OTHER BUSINESS
11. Next Regular Commission Meeting: May 23, 2024
12. ADJOURNMENT
PARKS AND RECREATION AND FORESTRY COMMISSION
6:30 P.M. ' MARCH 28 ,2024 1 MOUNDS VIEW CITY HALL -
MEETING MINUTES MOUNDS VIEW
1. CALL TO ORDER at 6:31 PM
2. ROLL CALL: Commissioners: Anderson, Arel, Lillemo, Lundberg, Palm, Mills, Wake Wiesner
Staff: *Peterson I Thomas 1 Szurek *to be absent
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Motion to approve by Palm, 2nd by Lundberg. Motion passed
5-0
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES-February 22, 2024: Correction: Mills was present at the Feb.
meeting. (Lillemo present now) Motion to approve by Arel with correction. 2nd by Mills.
Motion Passed 6-0
5. PUBLIC INPUT
Citizens may speak to issues not on tonight's agenda. Before speaking, please give your full
name and address. Please limit your comments to three minutes. NO RESIDENTS PRESENT
6. STAFF REPORTS
A. Parks and Recreation -Andy: See attached report (Wake Wiesner present): 1st St.
Patrick's Day Bash was a success! No specific complaints at Hodges Park Building, but it
does need some updates in the bathrooms and new carpeting.
B. Public Works — Pete: See attached report.
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Ball Field Improvements- City Hall, Silver View Park — Shed location Concrete Slab: Direct
Staff to bring this size and location to IBL to see if this is acceptable.
B. Coach of the Year: We have 13 nominations. We can choose past winners. Discussed our
top 3 choices among each Commissioner. The Commission shared some of the comments
and agree that comments should be shared publicly on social media. Motion by Lillemo to
nominate Co-Coach of the Year to coaches #2 and #8 for MV Coach of the Year. 2nd
by Wake Wiesner. Motion Passed 7-0
C. Joint City Council / Parks, and Recreation and Forestry Commission Meeting — May 6,
2024, at 6:00 p.m.
8. COMMISSIONER REPORTS: Per email from Don Peterson: Staff has reached out to the
Ramsey County Library about a "Literacy Trail." Staff has not heard back, but the RCL did
provide a website for further information. Promoting an "off-leash" dog park area on social
media and the MV Newsletter would be how we would get the word out. This is at Hillview Park
and Lambert Park ice rink enclosed areas. Community Garden: We are still receiving
information from other communities on how they run their programs. Local Girl Scout Troop
sent to the Commission with ideas to improve Hillview Park to be inclusive and have an
accessible bathrooms during the day. Portable bathrooms will be delivered mid-April. Next
Tribute Park meeting will be April 9th. Positive survey results! Where are we with the Twins
Grant for the ballfield improvements? Unknown
9. REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS / OTHER BUSINESS: Park Tour for May, Public
Works Tour
10. Next Regular Commission Meeting: April 25, 2024
11. ADJOURNMENT: Motion to Adjourn at 7:28 PM by Palm, 2nd by Lillemo.
Item No. 6A
MouNDI EW
PARKS& RECREATION
MEMORANDUM
To: Parks & Recreation & Forestry Commissioners
From: Andy Thomas — Parks & Recreation Superintendent
Date: April 25m, 2024
RE: Parks & Recreation Staff Report
The following is a synopsis of recent activities and events of the Parks & Recreation Department.
Building & Operations
• Seasonal positions — Started interviews and Coordinator potion offered. Applications are
starting to come in.
• Front desk staff, Group fitness instructor
Programs
• Summer Explore More
o Registration o — 345 weeks registrations YTD
• Summer Youth Leagues registration closed — 155 registrations (150 in 2023)
o There are select openings for each age group. About 10.
• Youth Classes
o Rev Sports Summer Session one starts May 9th — Soccer and Tennis
• Senior programs
o Cinco de mayo lunch, MN Twins game 6/20
o 2300+ senior/pickleball check ins YTD
Event Center
• Strong start to the year for the event center.
• 11 open dates on F/S/SU till end of summer 2024.
• 7 out of 14 Saturdays booked for summer 2025.
Daily Admission/Members
YTD Check ins Last YTD Check ins %to last year
Youth Daily Admission 1608 2033 79.09%
Adult Daily Admission 1224 962 127.23%
Youth Membership 1616 1144 141.26%
Adult Membership 568 396 143.43%
Family Membership 600 521 115.16%
Senior Membership 1864 1501 124.18%
Total 7480 6557 114.08%
11Fage
Parks& Recreation Staff Report
Park Rentals
90
80
70
60
50
$ i
30
20
10
0
Number of Rentals
•City Hall Park ■Splash Pad 1 , Splash Pad 2 ■Splash Pad 3 ■Splash Pad 4
■Hodges •Lakeside •Lambert ■Silver View
City Hall Park Shelter 26
Splash Pad Pavilion (1) 17
Splash Pad Pavilion (2) 9
Splash Pad Pavilion (3) 20
Splash Pad Pavilion (4) 5
Hodges Park Building 90
Lakeside 18
Lambert Park Building 38
Silver View Park Shelter 31
Revenue
2024 YTD 2023 YTD
Park Rental $ 12,867.00 $ 11,070.00
Recreation Programs $ 52,815.00 $ 55,047.00
Event Center $ 58,087.00 $ 48,390.00
Gym & Meeting Rental $ 13,248.00 $ 9,651.00
Open Gym $ 24,265.00 $ 22,345.00
Total $ 161,282.00 $ 146,503.00
2IPage
Item No. 6B
MEMORANDUM MOUNDS VIEW
PUBLIC WORKS
To: Parks & Recreation & Forestry Commissioners
From: Pete Szurek — Public Works Superintendent
Date: April 24, 2024
RE: Public Works Staff Report
The following is a synopsis of recent activities and events of the Public Works Department.
Staff worked on the following items since April 1, 2024;
Parks Maintenance
• Land scape and bed weed treatments all parks
• Branch pick up all parks
• Ordering summer supplies
• Fertilizing at all parks (ongoing)
• Ball field leveling, base checks and base box checks
• Storing winter equipment
• Education and training, safety and loss control workshop
• Safety training
• Seasonal interviews
• Earth Day Park cleaning on 4-22-2024
• Irrigation system and drinking fountain startups (on going)
• Appointment of new (Parks Lead) Ben Geisbauer
• Snow removal
• Drop off of all portable bathrooms
Forestry
Staff worked on the following items this last month:
• Resident phone consults and site visits, daily
• Contractor meets and calls
• Tree and down tree removal in drainage area at Hillview and Jackson
• Marking boulevard Ash trees for removal
• Removal of Ash on trailways
• Education training
• Woodchip spreading Silverview disc golf course
• Planning and ordering for Arbor Day and 2024 new tree plantings
1iPage
Public Works Staff Report
The following is the List of Parks and projects / maintenance activities ongoing or planned this year.
Current updates are in black text, and updates from the previous two month period are in grey.
Ardan Park
• 2nd ditch clean out early winter/fall 2024
City Hall Campus:
• New grill installation on the West side of the West pavilion, summer 2024
• Repair the drinking fountain near the old playground site 2024
• Ball field checks and field leveling
• Splash Pad controller updates
Groveland Park:
• Tennis net installation
• Arbor Day planting Friday April 22nd at noon
• Ball field checks and leveling
• Girl Scout flower planting 4-28-2024
Greenfield Park:
• Tennis net installation
• Batting cage net installation
• New clay pitching mound installation
• Removal of turf mound ,currently stored at public works
• Ballfield checks and leveling
• Water turn on, irrigation turn on
• Merry go round install March 2024
• Benches and other play equipment installation May 2024
Hillview Park:
• Litter pick-up often
• Wood chipping and bush removal around building May 2024
• Girl Scout flower planting 4-28-2024
• Ball field checks and field leveling
21 Page
Public Works Staff Report
Lambert Park
• Rubber matting removal and storage
• Ballfield checks and leveling
Oakwood Park
• Trash and litter pickup
Random Park:
• Some additional landscaping to be done 2024
• Moving of the basketball hoop to the south side of the court, 2024
Silver View Park
• Trash pickup
• Buck thorn removal
• Diseased tree removals ongoing
• Disc golf trail wood chipping
• Easter egg hunt layout
Woodcrest Park
• Trash/ litter pickup
Community Center, Public Works Shop and City Hall Greenspaces
• Trash and litter pick up
• Planting snow ball hydrangeas Public works building
• Planting grass seed at the Community Center front entrance 4-24-2024
3IPage
Item No: 8A
Meeting Date: April 23, 2024
MOUNDS itIEW
City of Mounds View Staff Report
To: Parks & Recreation & Forestry Commission
From: Don Peterson, Director of Public Works/Parks and Recreation
Item Title/Subject: Storm Water Update; Silver View Park Storm Water
Background/Discussion:
The Public Works Department has many responsibilities and one is to efficiently operate
and manage the storm water system. The system was first constructed in the 1970's
and as with other similar core functions, research, innovation and best management
practices have changed over the years.
Below is an overview of the Ardan Park Storm Water Pond project- provided by Dan
Edgerton of Stantec Services:
Ardan Park Strom Water Pond:
Data collection
In-pond veg surveys are done
Sediment coring is done. Sediment needs to be hauled to landfill.
Water quality sampling is done
Upland vegetation summary memo was completed and reviewed with Don Peterson
Wetland delineation field work was completed. Report expected shortly so TEP can get out and
review.
Field survey is scheduled to be completed in the next couple of weeks, with a focus on potential
BMP locations
Public engagement
Mtg#1 was held on Thursday, 9/28, 5 pm. Meeting summary was submitted to Don
Mtg#2 to be held after preliminary plans and concepts complete
Take the recommendations to the Park Commission early 2022, before going to the City Council
Have the second public meeting at a City Council meeting, early 2024
Stantec has completed the field work and provided 60% plans for the Silver View Strom
Water Pond Project. Staff has been meeting with Stantec to review the plans and
working to prepare the plans for review by the Parks & Recreation & Forestry
Commission and City Council
After the Commission reviews the plans a Public Meeting will be held in early 2024 at
the City Council Meeting, part of the public outreach for this project.
Recommendation:
Staff is requesting the Commission review the information and provide Stantec and Staff
with feedback and further direction.
Respectfully submitted
7
Don Peterson
Director of Public Works / Parks and Recreation
Attachments:
Upland Vegetation Restoration Plan
44 4-1
boa C
PROJECT LOCATION
MOUNDS VIEW 4,
;20 ARDAN PONDSAA 1.PA AA A.PS
iiiir PUBLIC WORKS LOU
Ei.i.,fil
_ City of Blaine CITY HALL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
ARDAN POND IMPROVEMENTS
t
a v
w IY
a p
cn o; CITY OF11111 City of Blaine CITY PROJECT NO.)000(-YYY
`n a MOUNDS VIEW
t �Y,o PROJECT NO. 193806462
Sherwood Rd.
w
SHEET INDEX 0
J . ,
SHEET NUMBER 0.01 SHEET TITLE W
e HitlG0.0LEGEND
view Rd. !. ..LZ ,,
G
EC 00.033 GENERAL NOTES Z w
. ' C0.01 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DEMOLITION L'
43- C1.01 LOCATION PLAN • j
y • U to C2.01 TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL 3 0
(41 C3.01 SITE GRADING AND RESTORATION LL ri w
Ct/17
County Rd.I C8.01 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
S1? THIS PLAN CONTAINS SHEETS N a w•
Gi, Z 0~
aJ
• A.
z
c o
re
y w C O
U
a County Rd.H2 County Rd.H2 •
2024 City Officials and Staff Members
Is
ri
Mayor: Zach Lindstrom
6ION DATE
Councilmember: Theresa Cermak
Woodale Dr.
_
a Councilmember: Sherry Gunn - -
s
County Rd.H 0 Councilmember: Gary Meehlhause -. -
L._ - --- City of New Brighton
City Administrator: Nyle Zikmund —
Public Works Director: Don Peterson
G0.01
5 EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC SYMBOLS SURVEY SYMBOLS EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC LINES GRADING INFORMATION
u
STORM SEWER .,, PEDESTAL CAN `".•"`'`'' AERIAL CONTROL POINT
I Aye/`
'
€T�i i BASKETBALL POST - PEDESTAL COMMiCOMMUNICATIONSCOMMUNICATIONSs BAIXRETAINING WALL EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR SIGHT CONTROL POINT r x < . FENCE-BARBED WIRE .yam. EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR T
a€ LIBARRICADE PERMNENT POST INDICATOR VALVE GPS CONTROL POINT FENCE-CHAIN LING ---- ------ --� PROPOSED CONTOUR MINORC R
'BTA
o. BENCH POLE-COMMUNICATIONS LAND MONUMENT _iFENCE-DECORATIVE �SIA' � CONTOUR-- PROPOSED CONR MOOR
pq -gqyyY- - FENCE-STOCKADE • PROPOSED GRADING LIMITS/SLOPE LOST'v.. BOOSTER STATION - POLE-GUY • MONUMENT COMPUTED FENCE-WOOD '53.53 STR:5.67.I9 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
AA III FENCE-ELECRUC NOW
BUILDING LOWEST OPENING POLE-IICR • MONUMENT IRON FONDt
GUARD RAIL IW RISE:RUN(SLOPE) y
r BURIAL CONTROL MONUMENT r POLE-PO/IER MONUMENT IRON SET , TREE LINES6$E ER•
WERAMD ® 10 S
BUSH DECIOROUS POLE-UTILITY r RESECTED POINT }ABBREVIATIONS
CATCH BASIN BEEHIVE POLE-UTILITY SEAQ • ROCU MONUMENT SURVEY LINES
AD ALGEBRAIC DIREAENQ
• NRB BTX • POSTROW MARKER POST BV BUTTERFLY VALVE
CATCH BASIN - PROPANE TANG �• SECTION CORNER -. _. - - CENTERIIIENRY BVQ BEGIN VERTICAL CURVE ELEVATION
EXISTING EASEMENT IIIA SVCS BEGIN VERTICAL CURVE STATION
MN
COLU .. PICNIC TABLEBOUN
TRAVERSE CONTROL POINT PROPOSED EASEMENT LIE I CENTER LIN:
., CONTROL BOX SIGNAL • SAMPLING WELL er BENCH MARK LOCATION - - - ROOD PAIN BOUNDARY a- CLASS
EXISTING LOT LIRE CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIP: _
CLEAN OUT(SE RE) r,. ROCK PROPOSED LOT LIE CO. CHANGE ORDER
PROPOSED TOPOGRAPHIC SYMBOLS PROPOSEG R LOT LIE DIP DUCTILE IRON PSE
., CULVERT EN) I' RR SIGNAL CONTROL Bol(
• BOLLARDPROPOSED RIGIT-0FWAY EUEIEV ELEVATION
DRINKING FOUNTAIN RR CROSSING GATEEVCE END VERTICAL CURVE ELEVATION .�F 1 K
• SANITARY CLEANOUT SETBACK LIE EV6 END VERTICAL CURVE STATION . 4 gg
ENERGY DISSIPATER RR SIGNAL SECTION LINE Y E 4 S
• MANHOLE QUARTER SECTION UM EX EXISTING
e-• FLAG POLE •..e. REGULATION STATION GASSIXTEENTH SECTION LIE FES FLARED END SECTION
•
SANITARY OR STORM LIT STATION F/F FACE TO FAQ
FUEL RUMP SATELLITE DISH FM FORCE FINN
0 STORM SEWER BEEHIVE CATCH BASIN
GUY WIRE SEPTIC TAN( EXISTING UTILITY LINES F.O. FIELD ORDER
■ STORM SEWER CATCH BASIN GV GATE VALVE
GULL SEPTIC VER HF HI He FORCE MAIN HP HIGH POINT
IP- STORM SEWER FAMED ETD SECTION > SANITARY SEWER HAIL HIGH WATER LEVEL Q
HANDICAP SPACE " SEPTIC DRAIN FIELD
INVERTSANITARY SERVICE INV INVO
- IANDHOLE SIGN • STORM SEWER OUTLET STRUCTURE .. .. .. STORM SEWER K CURVE COEFFICIENT
W
FIRE HYDRANT SOIL BORING ® STORM SEWER OVERFLOW STRUCTURE N H ) I WATER SAM M MAN Z
WATER SERVICE MH MANHOLE
OLE(SPIETARY)
HYDRANT PAINT MARKER(REiECTOR)• „ STAND PIPE GAS • CURB BOX NTS NOT TO SCALE - LLAS
HYDRANT VALVEFIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED UTILITY UNES NIL NOWATER LLEVELSPIGOT WATER + S PC POINT OF CURVE 0
INLET(SMALL DOA-) .,'.•'.. SPRINKLER HEAD A WATER REDUCER —RI—RI—RI— FORCE MAIN PCC COMPOUND CURVE LLL d0
.. LIFT STATION CONTROL PNB VALVE —>—>—>—>— SANITARY SEV/ES P1 POINT OF INTERSECTION
SPRINKLER VALVE BOX M g$ >-a-•Ta-->->->.-» SANITARY SERVICE R PROPERTY TIN: > 1S
LIFT STATION DRY WELLd RIP RAP STORM SEW ER f 151110 PWC PERFORATED POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE Q Z 2
STUMP
PRC POINT OF REVERSE OIRVE
•••. DRAINAGE RQV
__I---1--1__-1— WA
— » »
- - - ESEVER Z
o. -
LIFT STATION WET WELL • ..= SERVICE-GAS POINT ON LINE
WATERR MAINPT POINT OF TANGENT CL
LIGHT YARD • T SERVICE-SANITARY SEWER POINT ON USE Q, PEDESTRIAN RAMP - ---I-.V-r. V-i WATER SERVICE PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE O Q
>.—"j Z,‘).-':->=. >— PIPE CASING PVI POINT OF VERTICAL INTERSECTION
LOOP DETECTORCK
•.,.: SERVICE-STORM SEWER POINT CN LIN: R RADIUS LL Q
MAIL BOX .>n., EIX REINFORCED CONC RETE PIPE 0
SERVICE-WATER POINT ON R/W RIGHT-0WNAY
FUTURE UTILITY LINES
MAIL RELAY BOX TELEPHONE BOOTH EXISTING PRIVATE UTILITY LINES SS STORM SEWER STRUCTURE I-
FORCE MAIN STA STATION
• MANHOLE-AIR PLEASEU
TRANSMISSION TOWER ELECTRIC MR c (TUE CARE TV QUALITY LEVEL D SANITARY SEWER TCE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASNIBRT
,r MANHOLE-lEAT _ - crv< CABLE TV QUALITY LEVEL SANITARY SERVICE TNH TOP NUT HYDRANT
TEST PIT LOC MA CIVA cm. CABLE IV QUALITY LEVELB STORM SEWER CRAIRBE TIP TYPICAL
MANIOLElAS v.r TRANSFORMER ROVER CARE N QUALITY LEVEL A STORM SEWER VC VERTICAL CURVE
MANHOLE-POWER E FIBER OPTIC QUALITY LEVEL WATER MAIN WM WATER MAIN
TREE DEAD ERA FOS TOS FIBER OPTIC QUALITY LEVELC WATER SERVICE
.. MANHOLE-SANITARY SEWER TREE-CONIFEROUSH. HATCH
H. FIBER OPTIC QUALITY IBM.B PPE CASING HATCH PATTERNS rxII Dore
MANHOLE-STORM SEWER HRA EO* FIBER OPTIC QUALITY LENS
TREE-DECIDUOUS F-00 POWER QUALITY LEVEL D
MANHOLECOMMUICATIORSTREE E-C F-C E-C POWERQUALITY LEVEL CONCRETE CURB AND GUI I tR
MANHOLE-UNKNOWN F-I F-B E-B POWER QUALITY LEVEL B HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS L I SAN) --
TRASH CAN EA -I POWER QUALITY LEVEL A FOISTING -- .�_-_.__.
A
MANHOLE-WATER u0 H-0 4-0 GAS QUALITY LEVEL D -- PROPOSE) -- l -
TAAFFIC9QNL PLC CC u GFS QUALITY IEVELC FUTURE BITUMINOUS I BEDROCK -•- -
C METER POWER •"' VALVE GAS KALA .-0 GAS QUALITY LEVEL B DEMOLITION
B
% .carr METER GAS VALVE GAS QUALITY LEVELA
6 .. COMMUNICATION LEVELO - CONCRETE I GROUND __
R urvm ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK ... VENN CAS CS < Co _:' -J <
9s COMMUNICATION QUALITY LEVEL[ •
°I A T WATER REDUCER FA CA NMHMNCATION QUALITY LEVEL B as/'�.,
FY Ramo OUTLET CONTROL SiRUCRIRE WETLAND-WATT.
um. OFF NOH[ OVERHEAD COMMUNICATION
ER DUCOMMUNICATION QUALITY IEVELA L ' .." ..: GgpVEL rw VO.ivoe:
aKR[[N POKING METEROVERHEAD
•
e p PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON
eT 02
� �I� > o*<oioi»„o>” fl oo �.`,i0n on:nays v5�"nnn�nn�n °n-i Fnv_nAsmngopn� „mpi>zngnx- C)
>njn QnO>T�>pT�mHl� ��mmm inRr �Oo >i0 m ganmpvOoi9FapQ°°op>°O�O EipAO g 0mFpiR,ag: F°oa �_
�gl?gbZZ 22nin rn g, nii> >0,t" 7ga> A:=01. 076.Spm"o2m2zoAv T,0.2UAn;gssrS"ofi°^o,-Am'n' mw,c �MAn,lm Z
o2 P2 k.�,g TI 2m?zxi3m?iv000 t>o-r pmF'ngg�non,m;pzna^'ng6158a „n'o^.w2,0ms;m,^no"'8>n.<A '"gio°„m T
,. amp -�� �S Am00a °0_ 0 0A-'. O000' m°Am�Az0,0 mA °°v 0 0 o 0^m>m> 0'Ax °
P 7,-� 9A 'noRgA%n oxo;i'o1°p0> A '==„ >„ >I ��„'<°�o°iooc2' ,T„sM„ m„°,1„m„�Qom> g„sno oFm„Mv-zc`ns r-
0 .--Y8AA9() ” ism E5mo '"n6zb>^z �wn>,.„s.sx.- ,�„>oi .2ni ni oPAsPTPPA >°0�0�30, ,33 W,:1 �-7
p esti ,ip
o °..z, Sow, ,._O 3.F,^ca>i`��Ogic�>�<a omRg2R°.->ommti,tg n o. -0 g2i.- 'g2A pi}gi{i`zv o18'��>°„oR z
1 o 28 R§..N $Z XiiM �o^oog'a„'41 oiii1 0`-i!' iog ;EOP,Rmp2 o`n1po< fliglg ;M: af>v Qo; v. r,t,
�ngiz
HPJr NIM z�Ni Ag >v'z mooQ. r10 ;14! . om 004 $� ; n' 7i” Ti 7p ''°„ �>"03 ���iDa;,m ov :-71-Pal
= A��='o '( k.,^ >�„'�� zso:iR� A�Ao �„�”^"2o Acni '�m��A^�
$ J0 <> °' I% OM �3� iz
-'8/-.6 Sm � <aN AmFpApA��`:Fam „Ay_i zAcz „po >pmn nm o� 7„ �on�N>Z zZ >c 'xpzo'>A oAm �..
i>m x pm -SAz a nm m O.; A O " „ OOpo y m m 3 0
b 1"=!-- 2::
i r _� „ > AFmx '�"'da o-"mQ�O zi 3 =0 iL > v> ps ng_- � >a
/-.6 -;'W g Z °44'1 jA9Oa°„FiO� U
Tg Oi c'5i
:s�� pmA m>2 �o a Fa i�0"""Q" p =a>gm ! �A 'n > F` 1 ga�£ �„� �z n �„��S nm ? i Fz 45$ p oo>�>mFg p' 70o '1P ' > n o�= o A” g `n$$ �� m< o Az � o ”>n Q£iQ :� s„ ��o� „pPp. �
9.-?U
"OM.' dp °0§70 52” '" g> v„g T3L9P ,Rt ° i a i3 g.„ s h Q'nmQ> 0P0
n+� FOQ � p �� a Arg ��. ozA � ° n aFP fA � n 9na
g R i ' °cio n ;S®g�'> na A mo o� zm��gS� o A z'£ o H °o li m". o0
aso; g 6 pm ;g�< 5 g,g; o vs � o
b >�- o z o °zip gx „i� a� NW,g; o my n FF^ p am o> � ^
$Z^ >�og f.o„ R^o"4 '> ZFm° o '8 h i rp p F xA o s di F pi- gy m i °
¢mS �3a�v N' �nZ �T"+a^ gA �� �A .7 x >i 2 mvzA>� � y
>g o ATiA g§n 0,r `ate Mi.5 n InA ?Ci § m F� a ° - �, 'mw �� 'f�P4 9Y
0�0 ®mo.®gig v DoT $ °z0 `iiFQ o gm ' m 3m °N gR
Ag
,g
°
0
0
„a
i
g
�- „ nNI
iii
-.(1,.-n®n„>Fn5. mni
q<>
Td P " ''''XI >FnmaF^$>° T n - °ioUT=o ii4, oooirSRR �nnf=ngg ''''XI gpigogAnrn $ gvJ=n < Sg52'"i ^mfnmon�> Owffx^ig'n2gm43 nRS sg N1.173,.10, 0,1-0 ® `agT ob9> oo„" o o <zi� iiaiglimoFgpa69>n�uQ_„Q og5Pt2B` „�70 WW1 73 ° ig ® Qg> gD£>"Nti>"c8:p,zE® 4oAAP> R$>AEP g"gg�wgg,i,,zrnx�-> . ig®-ams'po> ^ rRo , zxz'p5ggpg goo �o F„ � 2m, tn 70'62,-2 Z o�-O�O > o9ppZ2ii oAMRf0g ,^I m b9m;o"50,%; m ®2< 0A�nn164.9-.R0::%6 EdO1z 7$lI zoO Q „z,' < 9q99- ,,, aA„moz ,o� -ga4 ,A'gAg £,ng !; n1PE®gEp® g>2Pg3Z g g5av6qD N>-pyQ -0 „7-u >o60izorw, NOp Iam $N � oZnOqAa �9a^dn
j!:
30 IQ 20 4„ ipp6 0 QHz�mJ1 .Er iA n«s .=.;,1524-
. mQ ga> ay 8Q . Z � SsmZ 'i., 2g ; 3i ,pA Ra;a %` < Opgg ^ z' ; o�. i7-°iO E.AfgO 0D ' sm Q ,a i
z8
lrn Am os fign °1*
aig„ama iRig y to o,RoccO o - m� ;,,, Ah A? 2o m®. .> g . A VggmzNo o� .) 6 £ ng 'qgm> A nAnle,- ,Q„ a on 5iaRvz ihftgV Cpof °iA gl0 2A ,1° T - Q ;>81.6 202o° Pg=1,Up M $q i X42 ? � Ipz „ ifT
n P6503 r02 $A a D. >o m
T 0” 3m
Ta2
R g2
I.
op
r.
9 ” 0 n
N ER"'" rn
0 rn
O0� _� <
0
qO v®P T
O — ,l'n
;4 ). ywgg =I
r i=m>:0
a > P IZ
F
f,3 0 <S()D O
>a < ggm -1
T
4 %1 P„'??
! y ,
g O PNo
"'' ' I I ' ' . ' CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW,MINNESOTA
c� a ® , Stantec
0! a 2 ARDAN POND IMPROVEMENTS '"` - - --
Oy -
CJ GENERAL NOTES ..w..amc"Wmm
�� ��+' ��•�,�� EX.36"RCP eV
lt '`,A Ae ! INV=898.90 #„
oo — y1
-,�` l\
�\�' -d}- �' EX.16"RCP
83786gli
a (/�
INV=898.98 11.
G -1,
S' ' ' '.%
M
I It
y �Y
8370 b \ i F,,\ ;_`C ( R
yp 7 7
b ,
15'.; w
s,3sI3 1. -
�, �` a e 1
�" 4a
\'''f'7\'''''
'j }. + ° s' IX.36"RCP
r '''4i'
-} . '" C� R- x� INV=898.04
r. k ', n
EX.36"RCP3 i V AA-1,P,1 �. s.k " INV=898.1
9
aF-
'�
r fr_ �? ^s(,\ yr•.\.`_ ` r K yn'r nE(
/ AES
OS Y 1 '‘ - w� ,, a nb PROPERTY LINE8316 oZ �
w
/r
2n w0_€ .8 , 41 i\
APPROXIMATE a
5
8310 \ SEDIMENT PILREMOVAL REAN DEl
- Z oz❑- .`V. \ oz
Z r O a s 9330 ,,
, �c „,, CLEAR AND GRUB
T
;I`O 1) > RAMSEY COUNTY r-'5 )-2•,'_ 1�' ” C A a ) }
+ 1 MOUNDS VIEW YARD 4'},Y \, /
�' U
� WASTE SITE ("�
g .x; i�l^xl. AA-1.P.2 ) N o
d Oin Y II 1�,I ^ ,I
14
_ ..-- - ---_.. ._--- - --v� I', 1 jt ?, +. )ri� ii Y�t{ /'�' ,�a `..
-;-- �I4 III rJ � 4
g • ` 4.0 �5, r EX 36"RCP Rb
$ �i wa ! k t 7 1 INV=898,13 '82
-'-f l--AtutnN AVS IX 36 RCP1,0
r ,- .. '-_ F r { INV 898.29 9n p..
f( iii 1 zry - r.— N
bg #$ r ma — _tea. ase =+�s— s eb
i'l, 4 ''..
Eli
i . .. ol
Ig -_ --__. IIXrry 89zsz.., t ,..CO.
r�e'
1 '43t7A: .
> . ... .
... . .
e.-
*
,g
>P> ..„,, - .,.• . 41
, o
r .-1-,,mut .i LA 4^ .:. •
Jill o -
LI ,
,i.
•'••• ' '
"rI•-,-% ' ,,t..,1, , , •.' 4*.' '''''' ' '-n C''>r" ,Aticaw.r."4-'• ,.....ttte- - ' . • s' • ', ., .m..
...
grnono 1..... _,.., ...,•.;:e.,,,,,. ,
- ',':...• .-.'-i,,,,tiolik, ''''',,,,., , • _ • ..
.'4....:.\ ., , • .,..
"4- W
LONG LAKE RD
-,„ .,1#4 ,,,,,.„.a ,,......,•,,,,,. 41k ' *4
,,.
..,g- • '. -,itrAj.,---- -- . . -' ti' .7,-,. ,,. .. .;..A. ...t:' - 0,-.
'..5'irii,',. ,-..; --:',1.7.-;,,,..',. •::,„-.7,-1,-.., •I'',„','` . ., ,.....„...,V!, ,N,,,... „ ,.. t,„-, If. -,-•:,«- --Y, ...w-- , , ..-...,,,,,;,,,,,,,
4
,,,,,1 —1,,,.'ltli -',.'4-51,,vr tt‘''''.:,.,41'•".t-"'" ' '.'''' . "'''t-.."x,,•4:-:,..'.4`0,'wt: '
- '''•-rt..''.... Aik
-••-, "'t i Or.,;-, . :,- %,•- 8-•:-• .,z,„„ , • %,_ _ :.....", 4. ,... . .., . .4.
,:,,,-,..,,-..,.:::,4.,t..•,...,'•, #:;,,..:4 ;--- •'..•....•4'.,. ,•. '. ' . •-‘' -, ' ,`, ,.
;r!.
.u,
h, c -•"'''• 't4,,,
...... i.,:•-•.. '-`4....- .-
Noe . .?, • ›,...
. ,. .-. • -
2 if. r„, ,r,;,,,,,''''rA' . . •
•
, , , A, •
•'' 2 ' - -— ,,,.0..r. . • ..,,, . '-'. .,, „l
.. .-e-4-.'-'•-. ' -J5-
.. A „.
--A.746- ': I. -, - ,.. •-c•-
-..i. . ,.. „ .. - -- -.• ,s'• ..,".
I -.'.---•. -' ''' ,e,
.,- . ..- .
, :.p,,•,',
;,,,,-;,........,,„...„ ' •,, .,,...., , • - ...;., . '1
.. , .
.3.•' .'•
9'',al'. Vitt ' 0. •4. it$ " ' _:E 0
.,,,,,:xf-- - . • '
' :.
. .
.,-
. . . , _......,
ir
,, ,_., - - -.- . •,..,,---.
... _._•..,....10,0"..?-"F"-",- 7 ' "/ t t'
.. m. '' ... .4 , ,.:,?•,440-^,-*, 4'.*. * ,:
•". . .. :.• .• •", ..01"' ' - t!,-.1-,. ,ii -t;,-. ',:*4.,
' P 'Ir.:Att.,'''.7' "': .''. -'-s- ''',41./' ',''',,,..1 .:•7'..':. .,/ ,-• .;r1-•L•
w74-..-,:,, . .4'.- . - ,..•.--. ,--..r..:•-;:::•.,'''''' . ir 1:.
,T,3 .r . •....i..' , ...t.iii......'
•,,.,• ,,, ,--, " ,.. .'.. ..; ,di .....! ,.., _ _
,
i. , . ., „,,.•
' / c,> • . ,-,..,. c ..
I
/
6-,
.,
.s.En . • ,-,
rn
' ; ,•:.,,v.
...... • ' ..., . „
y
., ...,
,,,... ..,. : :,.. .. .. 4,,.7''' • ,,
.,..
: . , ,,---,. -,,,,, '•'' •••, ,, '' ''• ‘" 't••>.0'
- '•*.*4 ' -4,*.,'T.t."`*1/4', .,'" •''' , ''''`,'.,‘`' • '•,'' 1% • i;
..." ...." T• .,,k , .'•;,...\ . • ...,',.. i'• I ii ,' 4,
.4!.4' ',..0 ,. •
.4.
', . ''',.. ., / f",se',': '''x' '. •-• ir '4, • , - -,..., ;.. . 4,,, ‘i
. ,
/ '' ' ' '41,• A's 41, ' .',, ' 'N ' . ... ,
or, ,
•i'' ,r,,,. .• : _,„,..: „,,t , --4 ,,,,,,, ,.. - ---.1k, • .,, `,.- '‘, %,
, ,i,oilk ,V \,, •... •• -, '•' - • ..*'•'• • • '!' ''„ i '-
, ,. .. , .• ,,.. ,• , .
,,,,.,,,,,,:„.i.:,,,,,,..e..,,i'f:*,.‘t, '!,,1,--!''...;74:".'" "1.t,'''''.10.::411.;.'7,,;:•: '"' ''°1:' 1'' '1'..‘ . '. '''...';;;;;;:'N .' '
',.. ,...,
'' ..-4.8-'*.' '‘';:yk'...•' ' -i'''''Ilt'='--• '''''' '4,- lit* ,
/..4 ,..
...,._ ,4.1,.. k,:„s ,g`;‘' ...M.,.. 1,'4-‘s•,„••7 ''" '
‘ • - •• '. • •
. . .
,.
•-...,t t
•. ,.. '
.., ,, . •. . .-- , . ,. • ,
' -.. ''to,... .i•' r''4 vie : iti/41i* 'i. '. ' '' • ''.,Ar- '•"' •T•.
r, CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW,MINNESOTA 4 Stantec
ARDAN POND IMPROVEMENTS
ACCESS AND STAGING PLAN
..,
=,. r
i
1 .
LONG LAKE RD
YIY ` ::'::: : T
vr �
, , k . _ -
• --.
,- ,'..1.,5:-:-A1.4,;:11-:,,,,
rr
G
. A
vI •
,
,1
z c
•'('
Y _ •. ,c w
4 ll \ ` ,„ w 5 g Q 7
\ ' P
w -
i
,
®ji 1 T GI Y -31)
4 1 z~ g 8
? P
— r i.-.
•.
:•:•• z
4 is
4 0 7
, r
a•
aas ...
a. .•.•.
i aa'
i _iii
$1CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW,MINNESOTA
N s ARDAN POND IMPROVEMENTS ® Sta ntec
k a@ EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
P E OA,e . .ls_eem
o,
4
8384 \\\ A b. \ 10 NOi6: U
i.o e \ � b v\ A EX.36"RCP 1) Comluaon SHALL LIMIT EXCAVATION 040 DISTURBANCE TO A�
AREAS CITY PROPERTY W
c'llF 1,4 \ t � INV=898.90 a+° 2) CONTRACTOR N RESPONSIBLE FOR TESTING IXGVATED
aga. '\\, '$�' \' \�/ ,, INRTERIAL AW DISPOSING OF ANYCONTAMINATED MATERIAL
Y0 C
!'-61.1'
o1F A \ �I\_ AT AN MPG APPROVED CONSTRUCTION
FACNIT'.
c '$ '.n/ D 3) CONTRACTOR SHALL USE CONSTRUCTION MATTING AND
`kE 5i �\\ A 4 %+T 1 s\t,\ , SOIL DISTURBANCE
MEM WITH RUBBER TRAMS TO MINIMIZE N
ligBJ38 4) CONTRACTOR SMALL RESTORE ACCESS ROUTES AND OTHER A 4
t -- DISTURBED AREAS TO EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO r/ ;g
S= } ` 900 ,.O SEEDING.THIS INCLUDES SUBONDE REPAIR,FINE GRADING, u
81 b E I - EX.1S"RCP AND RE-SPREADING TOPSOIL ATA MINIMUM(INCIDENTAL).
SH .F' INV=898.98 5) ALL INDIVIDUAL TREES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE TO BE ,Ty,
i i l 'E 1 �' p, PROTECTED TNROUOgUT THE PROJECT.REMOVAL OF ANY e!)
i
[ t 4 b TREE SHOWN ON THE DRAWING MIST BE APPROVED BY THE
YEPs I'''-' pi ar Y)7 11�/ . OWER.
Tab
S:�
43
3#SL 0370 E & ;>C //1 \\ :.4C-e. , b n\
,
e ' ic \. I�iI A' ` 'ILS
, g
Bas9 `$ ! g 1 1 ,, ! X,-
Irt _? A, N
r
4 )' A, PROTECT EXISTING NOISE WALL 1)�.� '' yA, , 1-'( A n o
9 „
'�2M '>,�; f EX.36"RCP
4 � . . f �, d�, 't 1,6
INV=898.04
o ,�c AA-1.P.1 .<..' y L ..
NWL=898.18 ,. EX.36"RCPINV=898.19
905.65 ff
g g 9 O
EXCAVATE AND GRADE POND TO w
J \ CONTOURS SHOWN Z V'
Z w0
foo er) , : r n ti w_
. >
s; w 0�
0 4 ,off ro Q I3 kr_
E3,U ;g . 9-C Z Z
$ z os
n tb <
' 0 <w
ce
i t
lb
PROTECT EXISTING FENCE(TYP.) i; � - - � O
og r
b� % (3
",T NWL=898.69 ,
00 ..y HWL=905.40 t 4''' - 'QT 0 EX.36"RCP
j - i; ?r- ✓ INV=898.13
PROTECT EXISTING SEWER AI ' 'i t %
(INCIDENTAL) l b ' .is \ ..\
e, e Pa" DATE
fig N
�,
7 VS EX.36"RCP
ms, ��
. �
�
e;cc
EX.48"RCP AO
• -,g g, ARDAN AVE INV=897.52 \ \>
.) • —4464-- - - ° o
oeA wewe.
. N44,—, msA —.AA =—.1.64 -.44eA— eA weA sA-= sA- we -.1.6-k_0 { t! tEl
s€ sli GRADE 10'WIDE EOF OVER EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVE AT 906.20. \�
F ', a;g�._ g$ TIE INTO EXISTING EAST AND WEST OF EOF AT MAX.8%SLOPE _ tbN
C3.01
334 s ""'n
A
ljQ Ii�
tl rif. tt..
_ g ql iiiiij
gll i pip
r
!'ll g Aii,
4 -igg , 1114,1414 '*
mg sirq
i W 6
•,--- 1:400:'' I 5 # ,1 5==, iWi hil
' a 1P.1F �hi
ta
01
A? a b •
.: ..._,
., _
• IIN li' A
.-41u
O s mitl. E.iy. ;AA 4!� � !��!144,
!;I
O P!!1
41
$
/ssig ,-...„ q 1
eek 1 ,
\I
C _ 1Q19HMUMi —
4 11
' 41114
m
ail li ;Hf H�
1 wsrcnaeorneHr �}
= . ;
0 1! immir /
4
Z z , Ili _� age
, J.‘, i i
; § 141
, , § 1 s ,, A!f'_
Q
),. le4i40.141i A '41111211 il
i
x r
iP
n=_ a: o = , CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW,MINNESOTA
co ° 51 ARDAN POND IMPROVEMENTS ^'"•^" •I�
iI a STANDARD DETAILS
Stantec
MOUNDS VIEW ARDAN PARK PONDS
Upland Vegetation Restoration Plan
April 23, 2024
Prepared for:
City of Mounds View
Prepared by:
Stantec Consulting Services Inc
Project Number:
193806462
The conclusions in the Report titled Mounds View Ardan Park Ponds are Stantec's professional opinion,
as of the time of the Report, and concerning the scope described in the Report. The opinions in the
document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the scope of work was conducted
and do not take into account any subsequent changes. The Report relates solely to the specific project for
which Stantec was retained and the stated purpose for which the Report was prepared. The Report is not
to be used or relied on for any variation or extension of the project, or for any other project or purpose,
and any unauthorized use or reliance is at the recipient's own risk.
Stantec has assumed all information received from City of Mounds View(the "Client") and third parties in
the preparation of the Report to be correct. While Stantec has exercised a customary level of judgment or
due diligence in the use of such information, Stantec assumes no responsibility for the consequences of
any error or omission contained therein.
This Report is intended solely for use by the Client in accordance with Stantec's contract with the Client.
While the Report may be provided by the Client to applicable authorities having jurisdiction and to other
third parties in connection with the project, Stantec disclaims any legal duty based upon warranty,
reliance or any other theory to any third party, and will not be liable to such third party for any damages or
losses of any kind that may result.
Prepared by: ` ` __
Signature
Larissa Mottl, Senior Ecologist
Printed Name
Reviewed by: SatAisiziose:
Signator,
Sarah Harding, Senior Landscape Architect
Approved by:
Signature
Dan Edgerton, Project Manager
Printed Name
Table of Contents
1 INTRODUCTION 4
2 OVERVIEW OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 4
3 VEGETATION RESTORATION RECOMMENDATIONS 6
3.1 Lowland Hardwoods Existing Cover Type 8
3.2 Dry—Mesic Oak Woodland Existing Cover Type 9
3.3 Mowed Nonnative Grasses with Scattered Trees Existing Cover Type 11
4 VEGETATION RESTORATION ACTIVITIES & COST ESTIMATES 12
4.1 Activity Types 12
4.1.1 Tree Removal 12
4.1.2 Invasive Shrub Control 12
4.1.3 Herbaceous Weed Control 13
4.1.4 Native Seeding 13
4.1.5 Native Plug Planting 14
4.2 Cost Estimates 14
5 VEGETATION MAINTENANCE 15
6 POTENTIAL GRANT FUNDING 15
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Existing Vegetation Cover Types in the Ardan Park Ponds Restoration Planning Project Area 6
Table 2 Summary of Recommended Vegetation Cover Types 6
Table 3 Vegetation Restoration Cost Estimates 14
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 Ardan Park Ponds Existing Land Cover Map 5
Figure 2 Ardan Park Ponds Proposed Land Cover Map 7
Mounds View Ardan Park Ponds
1 Introduction
This plan provides upland vegetation ecological restoration and management recommendations for the
Ardan Park Ponds Restoration Planning project area in Mounds View. Stantec staff conducted field
surveys to assess existing vegetation cover on August 18 and September 8, 2023, around Pond AA-1.P1
and Pond AA-1.P2.Additional observations included erosion concerns and locations of park amenities
(benches, signage, and waste receptacles).
The following sections include summaries of existing conditions, followed by proposed vegetation
restoration and management goals, objectives, and cost estimates for initial restoration and future
maintenance.
• Restoration goals are provided to articulate desired future vegetation cover types and functional
values. The goals are designed to support water quality protection, high-quality wildlife habitat,
and native plant diversity, and enhance park visitor activities and amenities, using sustainable,
cost-effective, long-term vegetation management strategies.
• Restoration objectives provide the detailed desired future condition characteristics needed to
guide selection of vegetation management methods and materials. The objectives provide
measurable metrics that can be used to determine progress towards achieving restoration goals.
High-level cost estimates are provided to aid in understanding the overall scope of funding needed for
vegetation management and to help prioritize restoration activities given potential funding constraints or
opportunities. The estimates assume that Mounds View pursues the restoration goals and objectives as
described for each cover type. The estimates are based on outsourcing vegetation restoration and
management activities to ecological restoration contractors in current market conditions.
2 Overview of Existing Conditions
Vegetation cover types were identified based on vegetation structure, composition, and current
management(such as mowed versus unmowed). Two upland vegetation cover types were initially
mapped and described in the Vegetation Summary Memo(October 24, 2023). However, after additional
discussion with Mounds View staff about potential restoration opportunities in the park, Stantec mapped a
third upland vegetation cover type (dry-mesic oak woodland)that occurs by the compost facility. The
updated existing conditions cover map is provided in Figure 1. Emergent wetland vegetation was present
around each pond but was not mapped as part of the scope of this vegetation assessment. The upland
cover types are summarized in Table 1 along with acreages and key vegetation characteristics.
Project
® Number:
193806462 4
Mounds View Ardan Park Ponds
, 5-.
w"•
� \ 1Y V
./� ` '�p .� ' �� "• y .*"� ....... . �'.swu'.Y<r.+.a'vy. -+��`
' \\ t.\ ,1+r
.1�' ,'.'.4 �a�. . .,.� \\4 N� \ ''�
4. p /.,r '");:'• 441. \ ,'q�
�� 3 �F \ ^ fir. �`\ ,� �\, \ 'Sn Y,
y 1 \ � ��
q $C41.* *'''''1'0 &
, ' ',1,V.,
a ` ,/ ,..—,, Pond AA 1.P1 n
' '-.:(//,,,/;;\ -,,-;, \ \ *,\\\\ '''.', -
'' l'/,'1:s0-
i ;a') / 4'''..A
It. fff .�� \1 M,;¢'._ � i L
y Pond AA t/ -'
P2
a
( ' a �:° ApproxAreawith •
'' Sediment Stockpiles �A"
IT `� ,
/
j Compost
, Facility ''. ,
0.
t
��� .p'.
' /` ' Ir' Ardan Ave # 9 .
ti
Mounds= Vie
w Ardan Park: Existing Land Cover
Ardan Park Land Cover Types:
drymesic oak woodland
lowland hardwoods
�� mowed nonnative grasses
am
scattered trees
\A� 50 UO
®Stantec
Feei Doi()Sources:City of Mounds View.Slanted.NADS,MNGeo W MS 2020 Genal photo 1e360o462
Figure 1 Ardan Park Ponds Existing Land Cover Map
Project
(S' Number:
193806462 5
Mounds View Ardan Park Ponds
Table 1 Existing Vegetation Cover Types in the Ardan Park Ponds Restoration Planning Project
Area
Vegetation Cover Type Acres Key Characteristics
Lowland hardwoods 2.2 Boxelder, cottonwood, elm, willow, black walnut canopy;
native shrubs/vines present; dense buckthorn cover; native
ground cover present but patchy and low abundance
Dry-mesic oak woodland 0.5 Oak canopy; buckthorn understory; some native ground
cover present but patchy
Nonnative grasses—mowed 2.5 Mowed nonnative, cool season grasses with scattered
with scattered trees landscape trees
Invasive plant cover was common within the Lowland Hardwoods vegetation cover type, including white
mulberry and Amur maple trees in the canopy and common buckthorn, glossy buckthorn, and
honeysuckle in the shrub layers. Common buckthorn was also present in the oak woodland understory.
Invasive herbaceous plants observed were reed canary grass, smooth brome, hybrid cattails, purple
loosestrife, and garlic mustard. Other problematic herbaceous weeds present included bittersweet
nightshade and burdock. More information about each of the cover types is provided below in Section 3:
Vegetation Restoration Recommendations.
3 Vegetation Restoration Recommendations
Vegetation restoration recommendations are provided for each of the existing cover types in the following
sections. The recommendations consider existing conditions, Mounds View community member survey
responses, and the feasibility, sustainability, and costs associated with both short-term restoration efforts
and long-term maintenance. Vegetation restoration and management actions that will improve pond
buffer functionality, enhance wildlife habitat, increase native plant diversity, and enhance park visitor
nature experiences are prioritized in this plan. A summary table of recommended vegetation cover types
is provided in Table 2 and an overview map of recommended cover types is provided in Figure 2 .
Table 2 Summary of Recommended Vegetation Cover Types
Vegetation Cover Type Acres
Lowland Hardwoods 2.2
Pin Oak—Bur Oak Woodland 0.5
Native Ground Cover 1.0
Nonnative grasses—mowed 1.5
with scattered trees
Project
® Number:
193806462 6
Mounds View Ardan Park Ponds
A , , .-N,k90,\‘‘N, ;:\ \-:,,,-'\.\\,. \\\:\,, -....,-4777 !..,;;;;;c,„ 14 ' lir-Millir
\ mil
‘ / /:`,. ''''''• '\ \ ' \, \\
•,• # '` ,yam • '��'
1 , .,,,\-..\'‘',\ \ \ \ : \\,
1 $n
it. ! t ...,,..4)
" � PondAA-1.P1 �. v' ��; .iyc.
! ' ''
1 ,
N
4
\ ''\ .,.:
\
t •) PondAA-1.P2 A� �v
rat ! P' .f \\\ ,
y, "r � k \
'f/I/ Compost
i ,,,/
Facility .*
?"'y , y",• *. . ..,r
r
Mounds View Ardan Park: Proposed Land Cover
D Ardan Park Proposed Cover Types Native Ground Cover
, , Bur Oak-Pin Oak Maintain as mowed
"'-'i-'r"'-'i-'r` Woodland 1____ nonnative grasses&
Lowland Hardwoods scattered landscape trees
CEo so ®Stantec
J Feet Data Sources:City of Mounds view,Stantec NADS,MNGeo SMS 2020 aerial photo 193806462
Figure 2 Ardan Park Ponds Proposed Land Cover Map
Project
® Number:
193806462 7
Mounds View Ardan Park Ponds
3.1 Lowland Hardwoods Existing Cover Type
Lowland hardwoods occur around both stormwater ponds. Canopy cover was dominated by boxelder,
along with cottonwood, elm, willow, and black walnut trees. The understories were dense thickets of
common buckthorn, with occasional glossy buckthorn and honeysuckle. Native shrub cover included
sandbar willow, red-osier dogwood, black raspberry, gray dogwood, gooseberry, high-bush cranberry,
nannyberry, and red-berried elder. Native wild grape and Virginia creeper vines were common. Reed
canary grass was common in canopy openings and edges. A few native forbs were observed under the
buckthorn thickets. Erosion was noted at the north end of Pond AA-1.P1 and the southwest corner of
Pond AA-1.P2.
Lowland hardwoods also occur to the east of Pond AA-1.P2 and in the southeast corner of the park along
the slope to the stream. Canopy cover is open where the site was used for sediment stockpiling.
Maintaining lowland hardwood cover is recommended for about 2.2 acres, including around each pond
and for the southeast corner of the park, including the south-facing slope down to the stream. Vegetation
management objectives focus on removal of invasive, nonnative plants and increasing native herbaceous
cover and species diversity. Some pond slopes may require installation of erosion control materials along
with invasive plant removal and revegetation with native plant materials.
During 2023 observations, the area east of Pond AA-1.P2 was comprised of sediment stockpiles between
the lowland hardwoods area and the east park boundary. Once these temporary stockpiles are removed,
this portion of the park will be graded, stabilized, and restored with the lowland hardwoods cover type as
well.
Vegetation Management Goal
• Lowland hardwood plant communities with improved pond buffer qualities, wildlife habitat, native
plant diversity, and enhanced views of the ponds and associated wildlife.
Vegetation Management Objectives
• Canopy cover is 50-75% and composed of the native hardwoods currently present such as
boxelder, cottonwood, elm, willow, and black walnut. Other appropriate species include quaking
aspen, hackberry, silver maple, and black cherry.
• Diseased native trees, such as ash trees infested by Emerald Ash Borer and oak trees with oak
wilt, are removed to prevent spread of forest diseases and pests and excessive accumulation of
down dead wood.
• Invasive, nonnative trees (such as white mulberry, Amur maple, Siberian elm, black locust) are
eliminated.
• Native shrub cover is about 25-50% and composed of species such as black raspberry, red-
berried elder, common elderberry, gooseberry, chokecherry, gray dogwood, red-osier dogwood,
silky dogwood, and nannyberry.
Project
Number:
193806462 8
Mounds View Arden Park Ponds
• Invasive, nonnative shrub cover(common buckthorn, glossy buckthorn, Tartarian honeysuckle) is
reduced to less than 5%.
• Herbaceous ground layer vegetation cover is increased to over 75%and dominated by native
grasses, sedges, and forbs. Invasive herbaceous plant cover is less than 5%.
• Diverse ground layer vegetation is established using diverse native seed mixes and plugs that
include species that can provide floral resources for pollinators throughout the growing season.
LOWLAND HARDWOODS - Desired Future Conditions Overview
Vegetation
Cover(%) Representative Plant Species
Layer
Boxelder, cottonwood, black walnut, American elm, willow, quaking
Canopy 50-75 aspen, hackberry, silver maple, black cherry
Black raspberry, red raspberry, red-berried elder, common elderberry,
gooseberry, chokecherry, gray dogwood, silky dogwood, red-osier
Shrub/Sapling 25-50 dogwood, nannyberry, highbush cranberry, Virginia creeper, sandbar
willow, blackberry; tree saplings may include canopy species listed above
Silky wild rye, bottlebrush grass, Virginia wild rye, Sprengel's sedge,
common woodland sedge,jewelweed, white snakeroot, enchanter's
Herbaceous nightshade, violets, panicled aster, calico aster, arrowleaf aster, tall
(Ground) 75-100 bellflower, zig-zag goldenrod, wild geranium, black-eyed Susan, spotted
Joe pyeweed, sensitive fern, Canada goldenrod, wood nettle, stinging
nettle, boneset, willowherb
3.2 Dry - Mesic Oak Woodland Existing Cover Type
Although this cover type was not initially assessed in detail for restoration, cursory field observations
indicated potential for improving the quality of 0.5-acre of woodland cover using the same restoration
activities/methods used for the Lowland Hardwoods.
Due to the oak-dominated canopy cover, restoration towards a native plant community(NPC) resembling
Pin Oak—Bur Oak Woodland (FDs37b) is recommended. This woodland NPC has been mapped and
described based on vegetation plots sampled by the Minnesota Biological Survey. The following weblink
provides a MN DNR fact sheet describing the vegetation structure and composition, landscape setting
and soils, and natural history of Pin Oak—Bur Oak Woodlands.
https://files.dnr.state.mn.us/natural resources/npc/fire dependent forest/fds37.pdf
Vegetation Management Goal
Project
® Number:
193806462 9
Mounds View Ardan Park Ponds
• Plant community resembling Pin Oak—Bur Oak Woodland (FDs37b)with improved wildlife
habitat, native plant diversity, and water infiltration capacity.
Vegetation Management Objectives
• Canopy cover is over 50% and dominated by bur oak and pin oak, with a few canopy black
walnut and hackberry where present in 2023. Elm and boxelder are removed from the canopy.
Diseased/declining pin oaks and black cherry are removed. Standing dead trees are removed.
Any EAB-infested ash trees are removed.
• All invasive, nonnative trees (white mulberry) and saplings are removed.
• Native shrub cover is 25-50%and composed of species such as black raspberry, red-berried
elder, gooseberry, chokecherry, American hazelnut, prickly ash, and gray dogwood. Prickly ash
cover is reduced to maintain more diverse native shrub and ground layer cover.
• Invasive, nonnative shrub cover(common buckthorn, glossy buckthorn, Tartarian honeysuckle) is
reduced to less than 5%.
• Herbaceous ground layer vegetation cover is increased to over 75% and dominated by native
grasses, sedges, and forbs, such as those listed in the table below.
• Diverse ground layer vegetation is established using diverse native seed mixes that include
species that can provide high quality wildlife habitat and floral resources for pollinators throughout
the growing season.
Dry— Mesic Oak Woodland - Desired Future Conditions Overview
BUR OAK— PIN OAK WOODLAND
Vegetation
Layer Cover(%) Representative Plant Species
Canopy 50-100 Bur oak, pin oak, black cherry, existing canopy black walnut and
hackberry
Subcanopy 5-25 Bur oak, pin oak, black cherry
Black raspberry, red-berried elder, gooseberry, chokecherry, American
Shrub/Sapling 25-50 hazelnut, gray dogwood, Virginia creeper, prickly ash; seedlings and
saplings of canopy species(oak)
Bottlebrush grass, silky wild rye, Pennsylvania sedge, Sprengel's sedge,
Herbaceous common woodland sedge, white snakeroot, violets, enchanter's
(Ground) 75-100 nightshade, false Solomon's seal, Clayton's sweet cicely, wild geranium,
lopseed, large-leaved aster, wild columbine, calico aster, arrowleaf aster,
zig-zag goldenrod, tall bellflower, black-eyed Susan
Project
® Number:
193806462 10
Mounds View Ardan Park Ponds
3.3 Mowed Nonnative Grasses with Scattered Trees Existing Cover
Type
About 2.5 acres of upland vegetation were mapped as mowed, nonnative grasses with scattered
landscape trees. Based on field observations and the City's tree inventory for this park, most of the trees
in mowed areas are black walnut, white spruce, river birch, or crabapples. Additional observations within
this cover type included a memorial bench with plaque located on the east side and a park entry sign on
the west side of Pond AA-1.P1, as well as an unpaved maintenance access path and waste receptacle
between the ponds.
Converting mowed areas to native ground cover is recommended for about 1 acre on the west side of the
north pond (Pond AA-1.P1). The native ground cover will enhance buffering for the ponds with deep-
rooted native grass-dominated vegetation. Diverse native ground cover with short-statured grasses (such
as little bluestem, sideoats grama, prairie dropseed), sedges, and forbs will provide improved water
infiltration, year-round wildlife habitat, seasonal blooms, fall color, and winter beauty. After the initial 3-4-
year establishment phase, annual maintenance for native plantings should provide cost savings over
mowing maintenance. A mowed trail can be maintained through the planting to provide a walkable loop
around the pond and access to the memorial bench on the east side. The route currently used to access
the sand stockpile can also be kept mowed for maintenance vehicle access.
Vegetation Management Goal
• Native plant cover resembling short-statured prairie or savanna understory with improved water
infiltration capacity, wildlife habitat, and native plant diversity.
Vegetation Management Objectives
• Continuous ground cover by diverse native herbaceous species, represented by deep-rooted,
drought-tolerant grasses, sedges, and forbs.
• Herbaceous ground cover is designed to match light availability—open canopy versus partial
canopy/woodland edge.
• Flowering plants provide blooms throughout the growing season to enhance pollinator habitat.
Project
® Number:
193806462 11
Mounds View Ardan Park Ponds
Mowed Nonnative Grasses with Scattered Trees - Desired Future Conditions
Overview
NATIVE GROUND COVER
Vegetation o
Layer
Cover(/o) Representative Plant Species
Canopy variable Existing trees, such as black walnut, river birch, and crabapple
Prairie and savanna species such as little bluestem, sideoats grama,
Herbaceous prairie dropseed, plains oval sedge, gray-headed coneflower, Virginia
(Ground) 100 mountain mint, butterfly milkweed, prairie coreopsis, and many other
native grasses, sedges, and forbs
4 Vegetation Restoration Activities & Cost Estimates
4.1 Activity Types
The goals and objectives outlined above for each cover type can be accomplished by implementing best
management practices for ecological restoration and vegetation management. The activities described
below are most effective when integrated. For example, invasive plant control should be combined with
seeding/planting to replace the invasive plant cover with desirable vegetation. The following sections
describe activities anticipated for vegetation restoration and maintenance around the ponds.
4.1.1 TREE REMOVAL
Tree removal is recommended for invasive, nonnative trees and for select native trees in the areas
recommended for Lowland Hardwoods and Pin Oak—Bur Oak Woodland restoration. Tree removals
should be planned for dormant seasons with frozen ground conditions to minimize ground disturbance
and impacts to understory vegetation. Stumps should be treated with herbicide specifically proven to kill
the root systems and prevent re-sprouts of target trees.
Tree removal bids can be solicited on a cost per acre or on a per-tree basis, depending upon the scale of
a restoration project. For the relatively small scale of work at Ardan Park Ponds, conducting an inventory
of trees slated for removal and field marking each tree will enable development of more detailed bid
specifications for more accurate contractor pricing.
4.1.2 INVASIVE SHRUB CONTROL
Invasive shrub control will primarily involve common buckthorn, but glossy buckthorn, Tartarian
honeysuckle, and shrub/sapling-sized invasive trees should be included in this activity as well. Buckthorn
ranges in size from seedlings to trees that are over 3-4 inches in diameter at the park.
Project
® Number:
193806462 12
Mounds View Ardan Park Ponds
As with the tree removal, invasive shrubs and saplings should be removed during dormant conditions. All
of the invasive shrubs and saplings should be cut as close to the ground as possible and promptly treated
with herbicide. Cut material can be chipped and hauled off for composting or chipped and blown back into
the woodland areas. Removing the chipped material will enable better seed bed conditions for
subsequent seeding of native ground layer vegetation. Forestry mowing to shred cut material is another
alternative to chipping and hauling for areas accessible by a skidsteer. This may be a good option for the
woodland areas by the compost facility.
Follow-up foliar treatments should be anticipated for any stump re-sprouts and seedlings. If there is
desirable native broadleaf ground cover in areas with re-sprouts and seedlings, foliar treatment should
occur after the native broadleaf plants have gone dormant in the fall. Areas with sparse or no desirable
broadleaf plants can be foliar treated during the growing season. A minimum of 3 to 5 years of follow-up
foliar treatments should be anticipated to significantly reduce invasive shrub cover and control recruitment
from the soil seedbank.
Prior to invasive shrub control, a seeding/planting plan should be in place for revegetation. A seed mix of
native grasses and sedges is typically sown in areas where invasive shrubs will require follow-up foliar
treatments with a broadleaf-selective herbicide. After the invasive shrub cover has significantly
diminished, a seed mix with native grasses, sedges, and broadleaf flowers can be sown to add diversity,
functionality, and resilience.
4.1.3 HERBACEOUS WEED CONTROL
Herbaceous weed spot treatments are recommended for reducing cover by invasive plants and
problematic weeds such as Canada thistle, purple loosestrife, creeping Charlie, garlic mustard, burdock,
motherwort, nonnative cattail, reed canary grass, and smooth brome. Treatment for some of these
species may be combined with broadcast spraying as part of site preparation for native seeding/planting.
As with invasive shrub control, multiple treatments should be anticipated. For the herbaceous weeds,
successful control may require multiple treatments within one growing season and for at least 2-3 growing
seasons.
The specific control methods used, including herbicide selection and timing, will be species-dependent.
Treatments should involve the most selective herbicides applied at the lowest effective rates for control
based on herbicide label recommendations. Herbicide applications to flowering target species should be
avoided when pollinators are highly active.
4.1.4 NATIVE SEEDING
Native seeding is recommended to enhance ground layer vegetation cover throughout the project area.
No site preparation, other than weed spot treatments, may be needed in areas with some existing native
vegetation or canopy cover. Spring seeding native woodland grasses and sedges will be an effective
approach for increasing ground cover in woodland areas. The seeds will germinate during the growing
season and provide erosion control and cover. For broadleaf seed mixes, fall seeding is recommended to
Project
® Number:
193806462 13
Mounds View Ardan Park Ponds
enhance germination for many native broadleaf wildflowers. Other than monitoring establishment, no
other grow-in maintenance activities are needed other than weed spot treatments while the herbaceous
plants establish in woodland and lowland hardwood areas.
Lawn areas planned for conversion to native plantings will require site preparation prior to seeding. Site
preparation may involve a combination of broadcast spraying with a non-selective herbicide such as
glyphosate to kill the existing sod, and light soil scarification. Mowing will be required during the first
growing season after seeding to aid establishment of the native seedlings. Establishment monitoring will
determine whether mowing of the entire planting is needed during the second growing season. At a
minimum, spot weed mowing and spot herbaceous weed treatments should be anticipated for grow-in
maintenance for native ground cover establishment during the second and third growing seasons.
4.1.5 NATIVE PLUG PLANTING
Native plug planting can supplement seeding in select areas. Plugs are sometimes the best option for
species that are not otherwise available as seed. Pond shoreline areas that need quicker vegetation
cover should be considered for plugs. Watering should be planned as a contingency if sufficient rainfall is
lacking during the first growing season. Plug planting should be done in late spring or in the fall.
4.2 Cost Estimates
The following cost estimates are based on typical best management practices for conducting the activities
described above, including site preparation (if needed), follow-up treatments and grow-in maintenance.
For activities that should be implemented for at least 3 years as part of the initial restoration process, the
costs are inclusive for that timespan. Additional costs related to potential erosion control materials and
installation, tree inventory/marking, and native plug, shrub, or tree plantings are not included.
Table 3 Vegetation Restoration Cost Estimates
Activity Approximate Acres Subtotal
Cost($)/Acre Cost($)
Tree removal (lump sum) N/A 2.7 $10,000
Invasive shrub control (3 years) $5,500 2.7 $14,850
Herbaceous invasive spot treatments—woodland & $2,500 2.7 $6,750
lowland hardwoods (3 years)
Native seeding—woodland & lowland hardwoods; $1,800 2.7 $4,860
includes seed & seeding 2 times
Native seeding—lawn to natives (3 years); includes $4,500 1.0 $4,500
site preparation, native seed mix, seeding, grow-in
maintenance
Total 3.7 $40,960
Project
® Number:
193806462 14
Mounds View Arden Park Ponds
5 Vegetation Maintenance
Annual maintenance of vegetation in the project area should be anticipated to include monitoring 2-3
times per year for weed control needs, tree pruning or removal needs, and for pond buffer functionality.
Spot treatments should be planned for both woody invasive plants and herbaceous invasives. Spot
treatments may involve a combination of spot herbicide applications and spot mowing with weed whips,
brush saws, or walk-behind brush mowers.
Maintenance of native plantings in areas converted from turf may include a combination of spot weed
treatments, dormant season mowing, and periodic prescribed burns. Dormant mowing and prescribed fire
will help invigorate growth and flowering. Prescribed fire can aid in controlling some weed species as well,
depending on the timing. Dormant mowing in early spring will break down the previous year's growth.
Mowers used to mow the rest of the park could be used for dormant mowing. Prescribed burns should be
considered for implementation every 3-4 years. Trained personnel should plan and conduct the burns.
6 Potential Grant Funding
Potential state grant funding sources for ecological restoration include the Outdoor Heritage Fund (OHF),
as appropriated by the Lessard-Sams Outdoor Heritage Council, and the Environment and Natural
Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF), as appropriated by the Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota
Resources (LCCMR). Both of those funding sources require that funds for land ecological restoration and
enhancement are used on public lands or waters or on private lands encumbered by a perpetual
conservation easement.
The Outdoor Heritage Fund is just one of four funds established by the Clean Water, Land and Legacy
y
Amendment("Legacy Amendment")to the Minnesota Constitution that was passed by Minnesota voters
in 2008. The Legacy Amendment distributes revenue from three-eighths of one percent of state sales tax
to four funds: the OHF, Clean Water Fund, Parks and Trails Fund, and the Arts and Cultural Heritage
Fund. The MN DNR manages the Conservation Partners Legacy (CPL)Grant Program that awards
funding from the OHF. The CPL grant program specifically funds"conservation projects that restore,
enhance, or protect forests, wetlands, prairies, and habitat for fish, game, and wildlife in Minnesota."(MN
DNR 2024)
Under public ownership, Ardan Park should be eligible for CPL grants to aid in ecological restoration and
enhancement. Competitive matching grants range from $5,000 to$500,000 and government entities, as
well as local, regional, state, and national nonprofit organizations, are eligible to receive grants. More
information about the grant program is available at the following weblink:
https://www.dnrstate.mn.us/grants/habitat/cpl/index.html.
Project
® Number:
193806462 15
Mounds View Ardan Park Ponds
An example grant funding application schedule for Fiscal Year 2024 is provided below.
fncll �n
DEPARTMENT OF
NATURAL RESOURCES
Conservation Partners Legacy Grant Program
FY2024 Application and Funding Schedule
Application system opens for all grant cycles on August 1,2023
Expedited Conservation Projects(ECP)' Traditional,Metro,and New Applicant
September 11,2023: ECP Round 1 Closes,3:00 PM September 19,2023: Applkatlon system closes,3:00 PM
October 20,2023: Announce funded ECP applications December 30,2023: Awards announced for Round 1
November 13,2023: ECP Round 2 Closes,3:00 PM January 3,2024: Round 2 appikation system opens(if funds remain)
December 15,2023: Announce funded ECP applications February 20,2024: Applkation system closes,3:00 PM
May 10,2024: Awards announced for Round 2
January 16,2024: ECP Round 3 Closes,3:00 PM
February 16,2024: Announce funded ECP applications
March 11,2024: ECP Round 4 Closes,3.:00 PM
April 19,2024: Announce funded ECP applications
May 13,2024 ECP Round 5 Closes,3:00 PM
June 21,2024: Announce funded ECP applications
.ECP funds are available on a first-come,first-serve basis for approved,eligible projects.Up to 5 Rounds will be held.
Conservation Partners legacy Grant Program Page 1 of 1
FY24 Application and Funding Schedule
Project
® Number:
193806462 16
Cost Estimate
Silver View Pond Improvements
193806465
4/23/2024
BASINS EW 04.10 AND EW 04.11,RAIN GUARDIAN
No. Item Units Quantity Unit Price Total Price
1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $9,000.00 $9,000.00
2 CLASS 3 RIPRAP CY 50 $150.00 $7,500.00
3 MACHINE SLICED SILT FENCE LF 850 $4.00 $3,400.00
4 COMMON EXCAVATION CY 2,700 $20.00 $54,000.00
5 4"PERF.PVC DRAIN TILE LF 600 $25.00 $15,000.00
6 RAIN GUARDIAN TURRET STRUCTURE EA 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
7 4"PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT EA 3 $1,000.00 $3,000.00
8 PLANTING SOIL MEDIA(70%SAND/30%COMPOST) CY 700 $60.00 $42,000.00
9 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET(NATURAL NET) SY 2,400 $4.00 $9,600.00
10 BASIN PLANTINGS(PLUGS)(Basins EW-04.10 and-04.11) LS 1 $16,500.00 $16,500.00
11 CULVERT INLET PROTECTION EA 3 $300.00 $900.00
Subtotal $170,900.00
' Contingencies(10%) $17,090.00
Total Estimated Construction Cost $187,990.00
SAFL BAFFLE SUMP STRUCTURES
No. Item Units Quantity Unit Price Total Price
12 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
13 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00
14 4'DIA CBMH WITH 4'SUMP SAFL BAFFLE(OR EQUAL) EA 2 $10,000.00 $20,000.00
15 REMOVE AND REPLACE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF 20 $100.00 $2,000.00
16 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PATCHING SY 25 $150.00 $3,750.00
17 RESTORATION LS 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00
Subtotal $36,250.00
Contingencies(10%) $3,625.00
Total Estimated Construction Cost $39,875.00
FOREBAY WITH FILTRATION BENCH
No. Item Units Quantity Unit Price Total Price
18 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
19 DEWATERING/BYPASS LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
20 COMMON EXCAVATION CY 200 $20.00 $4,000.00
21 REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE LF 20 $17.00 $340.00
22 REMOVE WEIR WALL LF 30 $100.00 $3,000.00
23 15"RCP STORM SEWER LF 10 $200.00 $2,000.00
24 15"FLARED END SECTION,INCL.TRASH GUARD EA 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00
25 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE EA 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00
26 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III CY 30 $130.00 $3,900.00
27 IRON-FILTER BENCH CY 60 $300.00 $18,000.00
28 4"PERF.PVC DRAIN TILE LF 105 $30.00 $3,144.00
29 4"PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT EA 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00
30 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET(NATURAL NET) SY 1,200 $4.00 $4,800.00
31 CULVERT INLET PROTECTION EA 5 $300.00 $1,500.00
Subtotal $79,184.00
Contingencies(10%) $7,918.40
Total Estimated Construction Cost $87,102.40
BASIN EW 04.P1 AND EW 04.P2(ALONG CR H2)
No. Item Units Quantity Unit Price Total Price
32 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00
33 MACHINE SLICED SILT FENCE LF 400 $4.00 $1,600.00
34 STORM INLET PROTECTION EA 4 $300.00 $1,200.00
35 STORM SEWER BYPASS LS 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00
36 COMMON EXCAVATION CY 150 $20.00 $3,000.00
37 PLANTING MEDIA(70%SAND/30%COMPOST) CY 180 $60.00 $10,800.00
38 4"PERF.PVC DRAIN TILE LF 150 $30.00 $4,500.00
39 INLET RISER STRUCTURE EA 2 $1,000.00 $2,000.00
40 CULVERT INLET PROTECTION EA 3 $300.00 $900.00
41 4"PVC PIPE DRAIN CLEANOUT EA 4 $1,000.00 $4,000.00
42 CONNECT TO EXISTING DRAINTILE/STRUCTURE EA 3 $1,500.00 $4,500.00
43 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET(NATURAL NET) SY 460 $4.00 $1,840.00
Subtotal $39,840.00
Contingencies(10%) $3,984.00
Total Estimated Construction Cost $43,824.00
WEIR REPLACEMENT AT EAST OUTLET
No. Item Units Quantity Unit Price Total Price
44 REMOVE EXISTING WOOD WEIR AND REPLACE WITH LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00
CONCRETE WEIR
Subtotal $20,000.00
Contingencies(10%) $2,000.00
Total Estimated Construction Cost $22,000.00
UPLAND VEGETATION MANAGEMENT-1 YEAR
No. Item Units Quantity Unit Price Total Price
45 TREE REMOVAL&TREATMENT AC 4.8 $5,000.00 $24,000.00
46 INVASIVE SHRUB CONTROL AC 10.3 $6,500.00 $66,950.00
47 INVASIVE HERBACEOUS SPOT TREATMENTS AC 10.3 $2,500.00 $25,750.00
48 NATIVE SEED MIXES for Turf Conversion/BMP Improvement Areas AC 2.4 $950.00 $2,280.00
SITE PREPARATION AND NATIVE SEEDING-TURF
49 CONVERSION AREAS(includes 2 weed spray treatment applications, AC 2.4 $1,800.00 $4,320.00
soil scarification for seed bed prep,seed mix,1 seeding application,
and straw mulch)
50 NATIVE SEEDING-WOODLAND AND WETLAND AREAS(includes AC 10.3 $1,400.00 $14,420.00
1 seeding application and seed mixes)
Subtotal $137,720.00
Contingencies(10%) $13,772.00
Total Estimated Construction Cost $151,492.00
SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS(INCLUDES 10%CONTINGENCY)
BASIN EW 04.10 AND EW 04.11,RAIN GUARDIAN $187,990.00
SAFL BAFFLE SUMP STRUCTURES $39,875.00
FOREBAY WITH FILTRATION BENCH $87,102.40
BASIN EW 04.P1 AND EW 04.P2(ALONG CR H2) $43,824.00
CONCRETE WEIR REPLACEMENT AT EAST OUTLET $22,000.00
UPLAND VEGETATION MANAGEMENT-1 YEAR $151,492.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $532,283.40